Expositio quarumdam propositionum ex Epistola ad Romanos

Augustine of Hippo · Exegetical Works
Sensus hi sunt in Epistola ad Romanos Pauli apostoli. Primo omnium, ut quisque intellegat in hac epistola quaestionem versari operum legis et gratiae.
These are the meanings found in the apostle Paul's Letter to the Romans. First of all, let each reader understand that the question being turned over in this letter is that of the works of the law and grace.
1. 1. [1.] Quod autem ait: Secundum Spiritum sanctificationis ex resurrectione mortuorum, id est quia Spiritus donum acceperunt post eius resurrectionem; mortuorum vero resurrectionem memorat, quia in ipso omnes crucifixi sumus et resurreximus.
1. 1. [1.] As for what he says, according to the Spirit of sanctification by the resurrection of the dead (Rom 1:4), this means that they received the gift of the Spirit after his resurrection; and he mentions the resurrection of the dead because in him we have all been crucified and have risen again.
2. 2. [2.] Quod autem dicit: Ut gratiam vobis spiritalem impertiar, dilectionem scilicet Dei et proximi, ut per caritatem Christi gentibus in Evangelium vocatis minime inviderent.
2. 2. [2.] As for what he says, that I may impart to you some spiritual grace (Rom 1:11), namely the love of God and of neighbor, this is so that through the love of Christ they might not in the least begrudge the gentiles their being called into the Gospel.
3. 3. [3.] Quod autem dixit: Revelatur ira Dei de caelo super omnem impietatem et cetera, ait et Salomon de sapientibus mundi: Si enim tantum potuerunt scire, ut possent aestimare saeculum, quomodo ipsius mundi Dominum et Creatorem non facilius invenerunt? Sed quos arguit Salomon, non cognoverunt per creaturam Creatorem; quos autem arguit Apostolus, cognoverunt, sed gratias non egerunt et dicentes se esse sapientes stulti facti sunt et ad colenda simulacra deciderunt. Nam sapientes gentium quod invenirent Creatorem, manifeste idem Apostolus, cum Atheniensibus loqueretur, ostendit. Cum enim dixisset: Quia in ipso vivimus et movemur et sumus, addidit: Sicut et quidam secundum vos dixerunt. Hac autem intentione prius arguit impietatem gentium, ut ex hac probet etiam ad gratiam posse pertingere conversos. Iniustum est enim ut poenam subeant impietatis, et praemium fidei non accipiant.
3. 3. [3.] As for what he says, the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all impiety (Rom 1:18) and so on, Solomon too says of the wise of this world, If they had power to know so much that they could estimate the world, how did they not more readily find the Lord and Creator of the world itself? (Wis 13:9) But those whom Solomon reproves did not come to know the Creator through the creation; whereas those whom the Apostle reproves did know him, but did not give thanks, and claiming to be wise they became fools and fell away into the worship of idols. For that the wise of the gentiles could find the Creator the same Apostle shows plainly when he was speaking with the Athenians. For when he had said, For in him we live and move and have our being, he added, as even some of your own have said (Acts 17:28). Now his purpose in first reproving the impiety of the gentiles is to prove from it that, once converted, they too can attain to grace. For it would be unjust that they should undergo the penalty of impiety and not receive the reward of faith.
4. 4. [4.] Quod autem dicit: Cognoscentes Deum non ut Deum glorificaverunt aut gratias egerunt, hoc caput est peccati, de quo dictum est: Initium omnis peccati superbia. Qui si gratias egisset Deo, qui dederat hanc sapientiam, non sibi aliquid tribuissent cogitationibus suis. Quapropter in desideria cordis sui traditi sunt a Domino, ut facerent quae non convenirent.
4. 4. [4.] As for what he says, knowing God they did not glorify him as God or give thanks (Rom 1:21), this is the head of sin, of which it is said, The beginning of all sin is pride (Sir 10:13). Had they given thanks to God, who had given this wisdom, they would not have attributed anything to themselves in their thoughts. For this reason they were handed over by the Lord to the desires of their heart, so that they did what was not fitting.
5. 5. [5.] Quod autem dicit: Tradidit, intellegitur, dimisit in desideria cordis eorum. Mercedem autem mutuam dicit recepisse de Deo, ut traderetur in desideria cordis sui.
5. 5. [5.] As for what he says, he handed them over (Rom 1:24), it is to be understood as: he let them go into the desires of their heart. And he says that in return they received a recompense from God, namely that one was handed over to the desires of one's own heart.
6. 6. [6.] Quod autem demum dicit: Tradidit illos Deus in reprobam mentem, etc., repletos, ait, omni iniquitate, datur intellegi ad nocere pertinere ista, quae nunc dicit, id est facinora. Superius autem dicebat de corruptelis quae flagitia nominantur, ex quibus ad facinora pervenitur, quoniam quisque perniciosam dulcedinem flagitiorum sequens, dum impedientes personas removere conatur, pergit in facinus. Sic distinctus est etiam ille locus in Sapientia Salomonis, ubi cum enumerasset superiora flagitia, ait: Circumveniamus pauperem iustum, quoniam inutilis est nobis, etc.
6. 6. [6.] As for what he finally says, God handed them over to a base mind (Rom 1:28) and so on, filled, he says, with all iniquity (Rom 1:29), we are given to understand that these things which he now mentions, that is, the crimes, pertain to doing harm. Earlier he was speaking of the corruptions that are called shameful deeds, from which one comes to crimes, since whoever pursues the ruinous sweetness of shameful deeds, in trying to remove the persons who stand in his way, proceeds to crime. This is how that passage too is distinguished in the Wisdom of Solomon, where, after enumerating the shameful deeds above, he says, Let us lie in wait for the poor righteous man, for he is useless to us (Wis 2:12) and so on.
7. 7. [7.-8.] Quod autem dicit: Non solum qui ea faciunt, sed etiam qui consentiunt facientibus, significat quia quaecumque fecerunt, non inviti, sed, cum ad mala facta consentiunt, etiam illa quae non fecerunt approbant, et ideo de perfectis iam peccatis dicit: Propterea inexcusabilis es, o homo omnis qui iudicas. Omnis autem cum dicit, subintrat iam, ut monstret non solum gentilem, sed etiam iudaeum, qui secundum legem volebat iudicare de gentibus.
7. 7. [7.-8.] As for what he says, not only those who do these things but also those who consent to those who do them (Rom 1:32), this means that whatever they have done was not done unwillingly, but rather, when they consent to evil deeds, they also approve even those they have not themselves done; and so, speaking now of sins already brought to completion, he says, Therefore you are without excuse, O man, whoever you are who judge (Rom 2:1). And when he says whoever, he is now bringing in, so as to show, not only the gentile but also the Jew, who wanted to judge the gentiles according to the law.
8. 8. [9.] Quod autem dicit: Thesaurizas tibi iram in die irae, iram Dei ubique loquitur pro vindicta. Idcirco ait: Iusti iudicii Dei. Notandum autem quoniam et ira Dei ponitur in Novo Testamento, quod cum in Vetere legunt homines, qui legi veteri adversantur, culpandam eam putant; cum Deus utique sicuti nos perturbationibus non subiaceat, dicente Salomone: Tu autem Domine virtutum cum tranquillitate iudicas. Sed ira, ut dictum est, in vindictae significatione ponitur.
8. 8. [9.] As for what he says, you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath (Rom 2:5), everywhere he uses the wrath of God to mean punishment. That is why he says, of the righteous judgment of God (Rom 2:5). It should be noted that the wrath of God is mentioned in the New Testament too; for when people who oppose the old law read of it in the Old, they suppose it ought to be blamed, although God of course is not subject to disturbances as we are, since Solomon says, But you, Lord of hosts, judge with tranquillity (Wis 12:18). But wrath, as has been said, is used in the sense of punishment.
9. 9. [10.] Quod autem dicit: Contestante conscientia illorum, secundum illum locum loquitur Ioannis apostoli, quo ait: Dilectissimi, si cor nostrum nos reprehenderit, maior est Deus conscientiae nostrae, etc.
9. 9. [10.] As for what he says, their conscience also bearing witness (Rom 2:15), he speaks in line with that passage of the apostle John where he says, Beloved, if our heart blames us, God is greater than our conscience (See 1 John 3:20) and so on.
10. 10. [11.] Quod autem dicit: Spiritu, non littera, hoc est, ut secundum spiritum, non secundum quod habet littera, lex intellegatur, quod utique contigit illis, qui circumcisionem magis carnaliter quam spiritaliter acceperunt.
10. 10. [11.] As for what he says, in the spirit, not the letter (Rom 2:29), this means that the law is to be understood according to the spirit, not according to what the letter has—which is just what befell those who received circumcision in a carnal rather than a spiritual way.
11. 11. [12.] Quod autem dicit: Cuius laus non ex hominibus sed ex Deo, illi convenit quod ait: Qui in secreto Iudaeus est.
11. 11. [12.] As for what he says, whose praise is not from men but from God (Rom 2:29), this fits with what he says, he who is a Jew in secret (Rom 2:29).
12. 12. [13.-18.] Quod autem dicit: Quia non iustificabitur in lege omnis caro coram illo; per legem enim cognitio peccati et cetera similia, quae quidam putant in contumeliam legis obicienda, sollicite satis legenda sunt, ut neque lex improbata ab Apostolo videatur neque homini arbitrium liberum sit ablatum. Itaque quattuor istos gradus hominis distinguamus: ante legem, sub lege, sub gratia, in pace. Ante legem sequimur concupiscentiam carnis, sub lege trahimur ab ea, sub gratia nec sequimur eam nec trahimur ab ea, in pace nulla est concupiscentia carnis. Ante legem ergo non pugnamus, quia non solum concupiscimus et peccamus, sed etiam approbamus peccata. Sub lege pugnamus, sed vincimur; fatemur enim mala esse quae facimus, et fatendo mala esse, utique nolumus facere, sed quia nondum est gratia, superamur. In isto gradu ostenditur nobis, quomodo iaceamus, et dum surgere volumus et cadimus, gravius affligimur. Inde hic dicitur: Lex subintravit, ut abundaret delictum. Inde et quod nunc positum est: Per legem enim cognitio peccati, non enim ablatio peccati est, quia per solam gratiam aufertur peccatum. Bona est ergo lex, quia ea vetat, quae vetanda sunt, et ea iubet, quae iubenda sunt. Sed cum quisque illam viribus suis se putat implere, non per gratiam Liberatoris sui, nihil ei prodest ista praesumptio; immo etiam tantum nocet, ut et vehementiore peccati desiderio rapiatur et in peccatis etiam praevaricator inveniatur. Ubi enim non est lex, nec praevaricatio. Sic ergo iacens cum se quisque cognoverit per seipsum surgere non valere, imploret Liberatoris auxilium. Venit ergo gratia, quae donet peccata praeterita et conantem adiuvet et tribuat caritatem iustitiae et auferat metum. Quod cum fit, tametsi desideria quaedam carnis, dum in hac vita sumus, adversus spiritum nostrum pugnant, ut eum ducant in peccatum, non tamen his desideriis consentiens spiritus, quoniam est fixus in gratia et caritate Dei, desinit peccare. Non enim in ipso desiderio pravo, sed in nostra consensione peccamus. Ad hoc valet, quod dicit idem Apostolus: Non ergo regnet peccatum in vestro mortali corpore ad oboediendum desideriis eius. Hinc enim ostendit esse desideria, quibus non oboediendo, peccatum in nobis regnare non sinimus. Sed quoniam ista desideria de carnis mortalitate nascuntur, quae trahimus ex primo peccato primi hominis, unde carnaliter nascimur, non finientur haec, nisi resurrectione corporis immutationem illam, quae nobis promittitur, meruerimus, ubi perfecta pax erit, cum in quarto gradu constituemur. Ideo autem perfecta pax, quia nihil nobis resistet non resistentibus Deo. Hoc est quod dicit Apostolus: Corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem vita est propter iustitiam. Si ergo Spiritus eius, qui suscitavit Iesum a mortuis habitat in vobis; qui suscitavit Iesum Christum a mortuis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra per inhabitantem Spiritum eius in vobis. Liberum ergo arbitrium perfecte fuit in primo homine, in nobis autem ante gratiam non est liberum arbitrium, ut non peccemus, sed tantum ut peccare nolimus. Gratia vero efficit, ut non tantum velimus recte facere, sed etiam possimus, non viribus nostris, sed Liberatoris auxilio, qui nobis etiam perfectam pacem in resurrectione tribuet, quae pax perfecta bonam voluntatem consequitur. Gloria enim in excelsis Deo et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis.
12. 12. [13.-18.] As for what he says, For no flesh will be justified in the law before him; for through the law comes the knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20) and other things like it, which some think are to be cast up as a reproach against the law, these are to be read with sufficient care, so that neither does the law appear to be condemned by the Apostle nor is free choice taken away from man. Let us therefore distinguish these four stages of man: before the law, under the law, under grace, in peace. Before the law we follow the desire of the flesh; under the law we are dragged by it; under grace we neither follow it nor are dragged by it; in peace there is no desire of the flesh. Before the law, then, we do not fight, because we not only desire and sin but even approve of our sins. Under the law we fight, but we are defeated; for we acknowledge that what we do is evil, and by acknowledging it to be evil we of course do not want to do it, but because grace is not yet present, we are overcome. At this stage it is shown to us how prostrate we lie, and while we want to rise and yet fall, we are afflicted more grievously. Hence it is said here, The law slipped in, so that the offense might abound (Rom 5:20). Hence too what is now set down, for through the law comes the knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20)—for it is not the taking away of sin, since it is by grace alone that sin is taken away. The law is therefore good, because it forbids what ought to be forbidden and commands what ought to be commanded. But when anyone supposes that he fulfills it by his own strength and not through the grace of his Liberator, this presumption does him no good; indeed, it even does him so much harm that he is both carried off by a more vehement desire for sin and found to be a transgressor as well in his sins. For where there is no law, neither is there transgression (Rom 4:15). Thus, then, lying prostrate, when anyone comes to recognize that by himself he cannot rise, let him implore the help of his Liberator. Grace therefore comes, which forgives past sins, helps the one who strives, grants the love of righteousness, and takes away fear. When this happens, then, although certain desires of the flesh, while we are in this life, fight against our spirit so as to lead it into sin, nevertheless the spirit, not consenting to these desires, since it is fixed in the grace and love of God, ceases to sin. For we sin not in the evil desire itself, but in our consenting to it. To this purpose serves what the same Apostle says, Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, so that you obey its desires (Rom 6:12). For here he shows that there are desires which, by not obeying them, we do not allow sin to reign in us. But since these desires arise from the mortality of the flesh, which we draw from the first sin of the first man, from whom we are born in a carnal way, they will not come to an end until by the resurrection of the body we attain that transformation which is promised to us, where there will be perfect peace, when we are established in the fourth stage. And the reason the peace is perfect is that nothing will resist us when we do not resist God. This is what the Apostle says, The body indeed is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness. If then the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Jesus Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you (Rom 8:10-11). Free choice, then, was present in its perfection in the first man; but in us, before grace, there is no free choice such that we may not sin, but only such that we may not want to sin. Grace, however, brings it about that we not only want to do right but are also able to—not by our own strength, but by the help of our Liberator, who will also grant us perfect peace in the resurrection, which perfect peace follows upon a good will. For Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men of good will (Luke 2:14).
13. 13. [19.] Quod autem dicit: Legem ergo evacuamus per fidem? Absit! sed legem statuimus, id est, firmamus. Sed quemadmodum firmanda erat lex nisi per iustitiam? Iustitiam autem quae est per fidem, quia ea ipsa, quae non poterant impleri per legem, per fidem impleta sunt.
13. 13. [19.] As for what he says, Do we then nullify the law through faith? Far from it! Rather, we establish the law (Rom 3:31)—that is, we confirm it. But how was the law to be confirmed except through righteousness? And through the righteousness that comes by faith, because those very things that could not be fulfilled through the law have been fulfilled through faith.
14. 14. [20.] Quod autem ait: Si enim Abraham ex operibus iustificatus est, habet gloriam, sed non apud Deum, hoc est, quia Abraham sine lege dum non ex operibus legis gloriam conquirit, quasi suis viribus legem impleat, cum adhuc lex ista data non esset, Dei illa gloria, non sua est. Non enim merito sui tamquam ex operibus, sed Dei gratia fide iustificatus est.
14. 14. [20.] As for what he says, For if Abraham was justified by works, he has glory, but not before God (Rom 4:2), this means that, since Abraham, apart from the law, does not win glory from the works of the law as though he fulfilled the law by his own strength—seeing that this law had not yet been given—the glory is God's, not his own. For he was justified not by his own merit, as it were from works, but by the grace of God through faith.
15. 15. [21.] Quod autem ait: Ei autem qui operatur, merces non imputatur secundum gratiam sed secundum debitum, dixit, quemadmodum homines hominibus reddant mercedem. Nam Deus per gratiam dedit, quia peccatoribus dedit, ut per fidem iuste viverent, id est, bene operarentur. Quod ergo bene operamur iam accepta gratia, non nobis sed illi tribuendum est, qui per gratiam nos iustificavit. Nam si debitam mercedem vellet reddere, poenam redderet debitam peccatoribus.
15. 15. [21.] As for what he says, But to him who works, the wages are not reckoned according to grace but according to debt (Rom 4:4), he said this with reference to the way men render wages to men. For God gave through grace, because he gave to sinners that they might live righteously through faith, that is, do good works. So what we do well, once grace has been received, is to be attributed not to us but to him who justified us through grace. For if he wanted to render the wages that were due, he would render to sinners the penalty that is due.
16. 16. [22.] Quod autem ait: Qui iustificat impium, hoc est ex impio pium facit, ut de cetero in ipsa pietate permaneat atque iustitia, quia ideo iustificatus est, ut iustus sit, non ut peccare sibi licere arbitretur.
16. 16. [22.] As for what he says, who justifies the impious (Rom 4:5), this means that he makes the pious out of the impious, so that from then on he may remain in that very piety and righteousness; for he was justified for this purpose, that he might be righteous, not that he might suppose he is permitted to sin.
17. 17. [23.] Quod autem ait: Lex enim iram operatur, vindictam significat et ad illum gradum pertinet, cum est quisque sub lege.
17. 17. [23.] As for what he says, For the law works wrath (Rom 4:15), this signifies punishment and pertains to that stage when anyone is under the law.
18. 18. [24.] Quod autem ait: Ante Deum cui credidit, significavit fidem in interiore homine esse in conspectu Dei, non in ostentatione hominum, sicuti est carnis circumcisio.
18. 18. [24.] As for what he says, before God, in whom he believed (Rom 4:17), he signified that faith is in the inner man, in the sight of God, not in display before men, as is the circumcision of the flesh.
19. 19. [25.] Quod autem ait de Abraham: Dans gloriam Deo, adversus illos positum est, qui gloriam suam de operibus legis coram hominibus quaerebant.
19. 19. [25.] As for what he says of Abraham, giving glory to God (Rom 4:20), this is set against those who sought their own glory from the works of the law before men.
20. 20. [26.] Quod autem ait: Non solum autem, sed et gloriamur in tribulationibus et cetera gradatim perducit usque ad caritatem Dei, quam caritatem dicit nos habere per donum Spiritus, monstrat illa omnia, quae possemus nobis tribuere, Deo esse tribuenda, qui per Spiritum Sanctum gratiam dare dignatus est.
20. 20. [26.] As for what he says, And not only that, but we also glory in tribulations (Rom 5:3) and so on, by stages he leads up to the love of God, which love he says we have through the gift of the Spirit, and he shows that all those things which we might attribute to ourselves are to be attributed to God, who has deigned to give grace through the Holy Spirit.
21. 21. [27.-28.] Quod autem ait: Usque ad legem enim peccatum in mundo fuit, intellegendum est, quousque veniret gratia.. Contra eos enim dictum est, qui arbitrantur per legem auferri potuisse peccata. Dicit enim Apostolus manifestata esse peccata per legem, non autem ablata, cum dicit: Peccatum autem non deputabatur cum lex non esset. Non enim ait: Non erat, sed: non deputabatur. Neque cum lex data est, ablatum est, sed deputari coepit, id est, apparere. Non ergo putemus usque ad legem ita dictum esse, quasi iam sub lege non esset peccatum, sed dictum est sic: usque ad legem, ut totum legis tempus annumeres usque ad finem legis, quod est Christus.
21. 21. [27.-28.] As for what he says, For until the law sin was in the world (Rom 5:13), it is to be understood as: until grace should come. For this is said against those who suppose that sins could have been taken away through the law. For the Apostle says that sins were made manifest through the law, but not taken away, when he says, But sin was not reckoned when there was no law (Rom 5:13). For he does not say: There was no sin, but: it was not reckoned. Nor was it taken away when the law was given, but it began to be reckoned, that is, to appear. Let us not, then, suppose that until the law is said as though under the law there were no longer sin, but it is said in this way—until the law—so that you reckon the whole time of the law, up to the end of the law, which is Christ.
22. 22. [29. 1.] Quod autem ait: Sed regnavit mors ab Adam usque ad Moysen et in his, qui non peccaverunt in similitudinem praevaricationis Adae, duobus modis distinguitur; aut: In similitudinem praevaricationis Adae regnavit mors, quia et qui non peccaverunt, ex origine mortalitatis Adam mortui sunt, aut certe: Regnavit mors et in his, qui non in similitudinem praevaricationis Adae peccaverunt, sed ante legem peccaverunt, ut illi peccasse intellegantur in similitudinem praevaricationis Adae, qui legem acceperunt, quia et Adam accepta praecepti lege peccavit. Sane etiam id quod dictum est: usque ad Moysen, totum tempus legis intellegendum est. Forma autem futuri dictus est Adam, sed a contrario; ut quomodo per illum mors, sic per Dominum nostrum vita.
22. 22. [29. 1.] As for what he says, But death reigned from Adam to Moses even over those who did not sin in the likeness of the transgression of Adam (Rom 5:14), this is distinguished in two ways: either, In the likeness of the transgression of Adam death reigned, because even those who did not sin died from the origin of mortality in Adam; or else, Death reigned even over those who did not sin in the likeness of the transgression of Adam, but who sinned before the law, so that those who received the law are understood to have sinned in the likeness of the transgression of Adam, since Adam too sinned once the law of the commandment had been received. And of course what was said, to Moses, is to be understood as the whole time of the law. Now Adam is called the type of the one to come (Rom 5:14), but by way of contrast: that as through him came death, so through our Lord came life.
23. 23. [29. 2.] Quod autem ait: Sed non sicut delictum, ita est et donatio, duobus modis donatio praecellit, vel quod multo magis abundat gratia, quia utique in aeternum per illam vivitur, temporaliter autem per mortem Adae mors regnavit; vel quod unius delicti condemnatione mors multorum facta est per Adam, per Dominum autem nostrum Iesum Christum multorum delictorum donatione data gratia in vitam aeternam. Aliam vero differentiam sic explicat dicens: Et non sicut per unum peccantem ita est et donum. Nam iudicium quidem ex uno in condemnationem, gratia autem ex multis delictis ad iustificationem. Ex uno ergo quod dictum est, subauditur delicto, quia sequitur: gratia autem ex multis delictis. Ergo haec differentia est, quod in Adam unum delictum damnatum est, a Domino autem multa donata sunt. Quod ergo sequitur, ambas istas differentias tenet, ut explicetur sic: Si enim ob unius delictum mors regnavit per unum, multo magis qui abundantiam gratiae et iustitiae accipiunt, in vita regnabunt per unum Iesum Christum. Quod ergo dixit: Multo magis regnabunt, ad vitam aeternam pertinet, quod autem dixit: Abundantiam gratiae accipiunt, ad donationem multorum delictorum pertinet. Post explicatas autem has differentias, redit ad formam unde coeperat, cuius ordinem suspenderat, cum diceret: Sicut enim per unum hominem peccatum intravit in hunc mundum, et per peccatum mors. Ad quod nunc redit, cum dicit: Itaque sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem, ita et per unius iustificationem in omnes homines ad iustificationem vitae. Sicut enim per inoboedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti sunt multi, ita et per unius oboedientiam iusti constituentur multi. Haec est forma futuri Adam, de qua superius loqui coeperat et eius aliquas differentias interponens distulerat ordinem, ad quem nunc redeundo conclusit dicens: Itaque sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines, etc.
23. 23. [29. 2.] As for what he says, But the gift is not like the offense (Rom 5:15), the gift surpasses it in two ways: either in that grace abounds much more, because through it one lives forever, whereas through Adam's death death reigned only for a time; or in that, by the condemnation of one offense, the death of many came about through Adam, whereas through our Lord Jesus Christ grace given by the forgiveness of many offenses came unto eternal life. He sets out the other difference thus, saying, And the gift is not like what came through the one who sinned. For the judgment indeed was from one unto condemnation, but the grace is from many offenses unto justification (Rom 5:16). So when he says from one, "offense" is understood, because there follows, but the grace is from many offenses. This therefore is the difference: that in Adam one offense was condemned, but by the Lord many were forgiven. What follows, then, holds both of these differences, so that it is set out thus: For if by one man's offense death reigned through one, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and of righteousness reign in life through one, Jesus Christ (Rom 5:17). So when he said, much more will they reign, this pertains to eternal life; and when he said, they receive the abundance of grace, this pertains to the forgiveness of many offenses. After setting out these differences, he returns to the figure from which he had begun, whose sequence he had held in suspense when he said, For as through one man sin entered into this world, and through sin death (Rom 5:12). To this he now returns when he says, Therefore as through the offense of one upon all men unto condemnation, so also through the righteousness of one upon all men unto justification of life. For as through the disobedience of one man many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of one many will be made righteous (Rom 5:18-19). This is the type of the Adam to come, of which he had begun to speak above and, inserting some of its differences, had deferred its sequence, to which now returning he concluded, saying, Therefore as through the offense of one upon all men (Rom 5:18) and so on.
24. 24. [30.] Quod autem ait: Lex subintravit, ut abundaret delictum, ipso verbo satis significavit nescisse Iudaeos, qua dispensatione lex data sit. Non enim data est, quae possit vivificare, quia gratia vivificat per fidem, sed data est lex ad ostendendum quantis quamque arctis vinculis peccatorum constringerentur, qui de suis viribus ad implendam iustitiam praesumebant. Sic abundavit peccatum, cum et concupiscentia ex prohibitione ardentior facta est et peccantibus contra legem praevaricationis crimen accessit. Quod intellegit, qui secundum gradum in illis quattuor gradibus considerat.
24. 24. [30.] As for what he says, The law slipped in, so that the offense might abound (Rom 5:20), by this very word he signified plainly enough that the Jews did not know by what dispensation the law was given. For it was not given as something able to give life, since grace gives life through faith; rather, the law was given to show by how many and how tight bonds of sins those were bound who presumed by their own strength to fulfill righteousness. Thus sin abounded, since both desire grew more ardent from the prohibition and the charge of transgression was added against those who sinned against the law. He who considers the second stage among those four stages understands this.
25. 25. [31.] Quod autem ait: Quid ergo dicemus? Permanebimus in peccato, ut gratia abundet? Absit! Qui mortui sumus peccato, quomodo vivemus in eo? Hinc ostendit de praeteritis peccatis factum esse, ut donarentur, et in eo superabundasse gratiam, ut praeterita peccata dimitterentur. Ergo quisquis adhuc quaerit augmenta peccati, ut augmentum gratiae sentiat, non intellegit secundum id agere, ut nihil in eo gratia operetur. Opus enim gratiae est, ut moriamur peccato.
25. 25. [31.] As for what he says, What then shall we say? Shall we remain in sin, that grace may abound? Far from it! We who have died to sin, how shall we live in it? (Rom 6:1-2) By this he shows that what came about with regard to past sins was that they were forgiven, and that grace superabounded in this, that past sins were remitted. So whoever still seeks an increase of sin in order to feel an increase of grace does not understand that he is acting in such a way that grace works nothing in him. For it is the work of grace that we should die to sin.
26. 26. [32.-34.] Quod autem ait: Hoc scientes, quia vetus homo noster simul crucifixus est, ut evacuaretur corpus peccati, refertur ad illud, quod per Moysen dictum est: Maledictus omnis, qui in ligno pependerit. Veteris enim hominis crucifixio significata est in cruce Domini, sicut novi hominis instauratio in resurrectione significata est. Manifestum est autem secundum eum nos agere veterem hominem, qui maledictus est, propter quem peccatum et de Domino dictum esse nemo ambigit, quod peccata nostra portavit, et peccatum pro nobis fecit, et de peccato condemnavit peccatum. Quid est autem "evacuare corpus peccati"? Ipse exposuit: Ut ultra non serviamus peccato; et illud quod ait: Si mortui sumus cum Christo, hoc est, si crucifixi sumus cum Christo. Dicit enim alio loco: Qui enim Christi Iesu sunt, carnem suam crucifixerunt cum vitiis et concupiscentiis. Non ergo Domino maledixit Moyses, sed quid ostenderet eius crucifixio prophetavit.
26. 26. [32.-34.] As for what he says, knowing this, that our old man was crucified together with him, so that the body of sin might be done away (Rom 6:6), this refers to what was said through Moses, Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree (Deut 21:23). For the crucifixion of the old man was signified in the cross of the Lord, just as the renewal of the new man was signified in the resurrection. And it is plain that we act as the old man, who is cursed, in the way described; on whose account no one doubts that it was said of the Lord too that he bore our sins, and was made sin for us, and from sin condemned sin. But what does it mean, "to do away the body of sin"? He himself explained it: that we may no longer be slaves to sin (Rom 6:6). And as for what he says, If we have died with Christ (Rom 6:8), this means: if we have been crucified with Christ. For he says in another place, Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified their flesh with its vices and desires (Gal 5:24). So Moses did not curse the Lord, but prophesied what his crucifixion would show.
27. 27. [35.] Quod autem ait: Peccatum enim in vobis non dominabitur, non enim estis sub lege, sed sub gratia, utique ad tertium illum gradum iam pertinet, ubi homo iam mente servit legi Dei, quamvis carne serviat legi peccati. Non enim obaudit desiderio peccati, quamvis adhuc sollicitent concupiscentiae et provocent ad consensionem, donec vivificetur etiam corpus et absorbeatur mors in victoriam. Quia ergo non consentimus desideriis pravis, in gratia sumus et non regnat peccatum in nostro mortali corpore et omnino ex illo loco, ubi ait: Qui mortui sumus peccato, quomodo vivemus in eo? eum describit, qui est sub gratia constitutus. Cui autem dominatur peccatum, quamvis velit peccato resistere, adhuc sub lege est, nondum sub gratia.
27. 27. [35.] As for what he says, For sin will not have dominion over you, for you are not under the law but under grace (Rom 6:14), this of course pertains already to that third stage, where a man now serves the law of God with his mind, although with the flesh he serves the law of sin. For he does not heed the desire of sin, although desires still solicit him and provoke him to consent, until the body too is given life and death is swallowed up in victory. Because, then, we do not consent to evil desires, we are in grace, and sin does not reign in our mortal body; and altogether, from that passage where he says, We who have died to sin, how shall we live in it? (Rom 6:2), he describes the one who is established under grace. But the one over whom sin has dominion, although he may wish to resist sin, is still under the law, not yet under grace.
28. 28. [36.] Quod autem dicit: Mulier enim sub viro, vivo marito, vincta est legi; si autem mortuus fuerit vir eius, evacuata est a lege viri, etc. animadvertendum est istam similitudinem in hoc differre ab ea re, propter quam adhibita est, quod hic virum dicit mori, ut mulier nubat cui volet liberata utique a lege viri; ibi autem cum constituat animam quasi mulierem, virum autem quasi passiones peccatorum, quae operantur in membris, ut fructum ferant morti, id est, ut tali coniugio proles digna nascatur, et lex quae data est non ad auferendum peccatum vel ad liberationem a peccato, sed ad ostendendum peccatum ante gratiam, per quod factum est, ut sub lege positi vehementiore desiderio peccandi raperentur et amplius etiam praevaricatione peccarent; cum ergo et ibi tria sint: anima tamquam mulier, passiones peccatorum tamquam vir et lex tamquam lex viri, non ibi tamen peccatis mortuis tamquam viro mortuo liberari animam dicit, sed ipsam animam mori peccato et liberari a lege, ut sit alterius viri, id est Christi, cum mortua fuerit peccato, quamvis adhuc quasi vivente ipso peccato; quod fit cum adhuc manentibus in nobis desideriis et incitamentis quibusdam ad peccandum non oboedimus tamen neque consentimus mente servientes legi Dei, quia mortui sumus peccato. Morietur autem et peccatum, cum reformatio corporis in resurrectione facta fuerit, de qua post dicit: Vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra propter Spiritum manentem in vobis.
28. 28. [36.] As for what he says, For a woman, while her husband lives, is bound by law to her husband; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of her husband (Rom 7:2) and so on, it must be noted that this comparison differs from the matter for which it is brought in, in that here he says the husband dies, so that the woman may marry whom she will, being now released from the law of her husband; whereas there, when he sets up the soul as, so to speak, the woman, but the passions of sins—which work in our members so that they may bear fruit unto death—as, so to speak, the husband (that is, so that from such a marriage offspring worthy of it may be born), and the law as the law of the husband, which was given not to take away sin or to free from sin, but to show sin before grace, by which it came about that those set under the law were carried off by a more vehement desire to sin and sinned even more by transgression; since, then, there too there are three things—the soul as the woman, the passions of sins as the husband, and the law as the law of the husband—nevertheless he does not there say that the soul is freed by the death of the sins as by the death of the husband, but that the soul itself dies to sin and is freed from the law, so that it may belong to another husband, that is, Christ, when it has died to sin, although that very sin is still, as it were, alive; which happens when, with desires and certain incitements to sin still remaining in us, we nevertheless do not obey them nor consent, serving the law of God with our mind, because we have died to sin. But sin too will die when the reformation of the body has come about in the resurrection, of which he says afterward, He will also give life to your mortal bodies because of his Spirit who remains in you (Rom 8:11).
29. 29. [37. 1.] Quod autem dicit: Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam, intellegendum est, non omnem fuisse concupiscentiam, antequam prohibitione aucta esset. Augetur enim prohibitione concupiscentia, quando deest gratia liberantis, ideo nondum est omnis, antequam prohibeatur. Cum autem prohibita fuerit desistente, ut diximus, gratia, tantum crescit concupiscentia, ut ita in suo genere omnis, id est, consummata fiat, ut etiam contra legem fiat et praevaricatione crimen accumulet.
29. 29. [37. 1.] As for what he says, But sin, finding occasion, worked in me through the commandment every kind of desire (Rom 7:8), it is to be understood that not all desire was present before it was increased by the prohibition. For desire is increased by the prohibition when the grace of the one who frees is absent; therefore it is not yet "every kind" before it is prohibited. But when it has been prohibited, grace—as we said—being absent, desire grows so great that thus in its own kind it becomes every kind, that is, brought to completion, so that it acts even against the law and heaps up guilt by transgression.
30. 30. [37. 2.] Quod autem dicit: Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum est, non quia non est, dixit: mortuum est, sed quia latet, quod in consequentibus manifestat, cum dicit: Sed peccatum, ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem. Bona est enim lex, sed sine gratia tantummodo ostendit peccata, non tollit.
30. 30. [37. 2.] As for what he says, For apart from the law sin is dead (Rom 7:8), he did not say it is dead because it does not exist, but because it lies hidden, which he makes clear in what follows when he says, But sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good (Rom 7:13). For the law is good, but without grace it only shows sins; it does not take them away.
31. 31. [38.] Quod autem ait: Ego autem vivebam aliquando sine lege, intellegendum est, vivere mihi videbar, quia ante mandatum latebat peccatum. Et quod ait: Adveniente autem mandato peccatum revixit, ego autem mortuus sum, intellegendum est, peccatum apparere coepit, ego autem mortuum me esse cognovi.
31. 31. [38.] As for what he says, But I was once alive apart from the law (Rom 7:9), it is to be understood: it seemed to me that I was alive, because before the commandment sin lay hidden. And as for what he says, but when the commandment came, sin came back to life, and I died (Rom 7:9-10), it is to be understood: sin began to appear, and I came to know that I was dead.
32. 32. [39.] Quod autem ait: Peccatum enim, occasione accepta per mandatum, fefellit me et per illud occidit, ideo dictum est, quia desiderii prohibiti fructus dulcior est. Unde etiam quaecumque peccata occulte fiunt, dulciora sunt, quamvis mortifera ista dulcedo sit. Inde est, quod apud Salomonem fallacis doctrinae imagine sedens mulier et invitans, ut ad se veniant insipientes, scribitur dicere: Panes occultos libenter edite et aquam dulcem furtivam bibite. Ista dulcedo est occasio per mandatum inventa peccati, quae cum appetitur, utique fallit et in maiores amaritudines vertit.
32. 32. [39.] As for what he says, For sin, finding occasion through the commandment, deceived me, and through it killed me (Rom 7:11), this was said because the fruit of forbidden desire is the sweeter. Hence too whatever sins are committed in secret are the sweeter, although this sweetness is deadly. Hence in Solomon the woman sitting as an image of deceptive teaching and inviting the foolish to come to her is written to say, Eat hidden bread gladly and drink sweet stolen water (Prov 9:17). This sweetness is the occasion of sin found through the commandment, which, when it is sought after, of course deceives and turns into greater bitterness.
33. 33. [40.] Quod autem ait: Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit! sed peccatum, ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem, hic evidenter ostendit, quod superius dixerat: Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum est, ideo dixisse, quia latet, quandoquidem nunc dicit non illud bonum, id est, legem factam sibi esse mortem, sed peccatum operatum esse mortem per bonum legis, id est, ut appareret peccatum, quod latebat sine lege. Tunc enim se mortuum quisque cognoscit, cum illud, quod recte praeceptum esse confitetur, implere non potest, et praevaricationis crimine amplius peccat, quam si non prohiberetur. Hoc est, quod in consequentibus dicit: Ut fiat supra modum peccator aut peccatum per mandatum; quod ante mandatum minus erat, quia ubi non est lex nec praevaricatio.
33. 33. [40.] As for what he says, Did then what is good become death to me? Far from it! But sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good (Rom 7:13), here he plainly shows that what he had said above, For apart from the law sin is dead (Rom 7:8), he said for this reason, that it lies hidden, since he now says that it was not that good thing, that is, the law, that became death to him, but that sin worked death through the good of the law, that is, so that the sin which lay hidden apart from the law might appear. For then anyone comes to know that he is dead when he cannot fulfill what he confesses to have been rightly commanded, and he sins more by the charge of transgression than if he were not forbidden. This is what he says in what follows, that sin, or the sinner, might become sinful beyond measure through the commandment (Rom 7:13)—which before the commandment was less, because where there is no law, neither is there transgression.
34. 34. [41.] Quod autem ait: Scimus quia lex spiritalis est, ego autem carnalis sum, satis ostendit non posse impleri legem nisi a spiritalibus, quales facit gratia Dei. Similis enim quisque factus ipsi legi facile implet, quod praecipit; nec erit sub illa sed cum illa, is est autem, qui iam non capitur temporalibus bonis, nec terretur temporalibus malis.
34. 34. [41.] As for what he says, We know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal (Rom 7:14), he shows well enough that the law cannot be fulfilled except by the spiritual, such as the grace of God makes them. For anyone made like the law itself easily fulfills what it commands; nor will he be under it but with it. And this is the one who is no longer captivated by temporal goods nor terrified by temporal evils.
35. 35. [42.] Quod autem ait: Venumdatus sum sub peccato, intellegendum est, quod unusquisque peccando animam suam diabolo vendit, accepta tamquam pretio dulcedine temporalis voluptatis. Unde et Dominus noster Redemptor dictum est, quia hoc modo, quo dictum est, venditi eramus.
35. 35. [42.] As for what he says, I have been sold under sin (Rom 7:14), it is to be understood that everyone, by sinning, sells his soul to the devil, having received, as it were as a price, the sweetness of temporal pleasure. Hence our Lord too was called Redeemer, because we had been sold in the manner described.
36. 36. [43.] Quod autem ait: Quod enim operor, ignoro, potest videri minus intellegentibus contrarium esse illi sententiae, qua dixit: Peccatum, ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem. Quomodo enim apparet, si ignoratur? Sed ignoro, sic dictum est hoc loco, ut intellegatur: Non approbo. Quomodo enim tenebrae non videntur, sed lucis comparatione sentiuntur, hoc est autem sentire tenebras, quod est non videre. Sic et peccatum, quia non illustratur luce iustitiae, non intellegendo dignoscitur, sicuti tenebras dictum est non videndo sentiri. Et ad hoc pertinet, quod in Psalmodicitur: Delicta quis intelligit?
36. 36. [43.] As for what he says, For what I do, I do not know (Rom 7:15), this can seem to those of less understanding to be contrary to that statement in which he said, sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good (Rom 7:13). For how does it appear, if it is not known? But I do not know is said in this place so that it may be understood: I do not approve. For just as darkness is not seen but is perceived by comparison with light—and to perceive darkness is precisely not to see—so too sin, because it is not illumined by the light of righteousness, is recognized not by understanding it, just as darkness was said to be perceived by not seeing. And to this pertains what is said in a Psalm, Who understands his faults? (Ps 19:12 (18:13))
37. 37. [44.] Quod autem ait: Non enim quod volo, hoc ago, sed quod odi, illud facio. Si autem quod nolo, hoc facio, consentio legi, quoniam bona est. Satis quidem lex ab omni criminatione defenditur, sed cavendum, ne quis arbitretur his verbis auferri nobis liberum voluntatis arbitrium, quod non ita est. Nunc enim homo describitur sub lege positus ante gratiam; tunc enim peccatis vincitur, dum viribus suis iuste vivere conatur sine adiutorio liberantis gratiae Dei. Libero autem arbitrio habet, ut credat Liberatori et accipiat gratiam, ut iam illo, qui eam donat, liberante et adiuvante non peccet atque ita desinat esse sub lege, sed cum lege vel in lege, implens eam caritate Dei, quod timore non poterat.
37. 37. [44.] As for what he says, For I do not do what I want, but I do what I hate. But if I do what I do not want, I agree with the law, that it is good (Rom 7:15-16), the law is indeed sufficiently defended from every accusation; but care must be taken that no one suppose that by these words free choice of the will is taken away from us, which is not the case. For man is here described as set under the law before grace; for he is then overcome by sins, while he tries by his own strength to live righteously without the help of God's freeing grace. By free choice, however, he has it within him to believe the Liberator and receive grace, so that now, by the freeing and helping of him who gives it, he may not sin, and so may cease to be under the law, but with the law, or in the law, fulfilling it by the love of God, which he could not do by fear.
38. 38. [45.-46.] Quod autem ait: Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et captivantem me sub lege peccati, quae est in membris meis, legem peccati dicit, qua quisque carnali consuetudine implicatus astringitur. Hanc repugnare ait legi mentis suae et se captivare sub lege peccati, unde intellegitur ille homo describi, qui nondum est sub gratia. Si enim repugnaret tantum consuetudo carnalis et non captivaret, non esset damnatio. In eo enim est damnatio, quod obtemperamus et servimus desideriis pravis carnalibus. Si autem existant et non desint talia desideria, non tamen his oboediamus, non captivamur et sub gratia iam sumus, de qua loquetur, cum exclamaverit et imploraverit Liberatoris auxilium, ut possit per gratiam caritas, quod per legem timor non poterat. Dixit enim: Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Et subiecit: Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Deinde incipit describere hominem sub gratia constitutum, qui tertius gradus est illorum quattuor, quos superius distinximus. Ad hunc gradum iam pertinet, quod statim subiungit: Igitur ego ipse mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati, quia licet existentibus desideriis carnalibus iam non servit consentiendo, ad faciendum peccatum, qui sub gratia constitutus mente servit legi Dei, carnem autem legi peccati. Legem autem peccati dicit ex transgressione Adae conditionem mortalem, qua mortales facti sumus. Ex hac enim labe carnis concupiscentia carnalis sollicitat et secundum hanc dicit alio loco: Fuimus et nos natura filii irae sicut et ceteri.
38. 38. [45.-46.] As for what he says, I see another law in my members fighting against the law of my mind and taking me captive under the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:23), he calls "the law of sin" that by which everyone is bound, entangled by carnal habit. He says that this fights against the law of his mind and takes him captive under the law of sin, from which it is understood that the man being described is one who is not yet under grace. For if carnal habit only fought and did not take captive, there would be no condemnation. For the condemnation lies in this, that we comply with and serve evil carnal desires. But if such desires exist and are not absent, yet we do not obey them, we are not taken captive and are already under grace, of which he will speak when he has cried out and implored the help of the Liberator, so that through grace love may do what fear could not do through the law. For he said, Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? (Rom 7:24) And he added, The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:25). Then he begins to describe the man established under grace, which is the third of those four stages we distinguished above. To this stage already pertains what he immediately adds, So then I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh the law of sin (Rom 7:25), because, although carnal desires exist, he no longer serves them by consenting, so as to commit sin—he who, established under grace, serves the law of God with his mind, but with his flesh the law of sin. And he calls "the law of sin" the mortal condition arising from Adam's transgression, by which we were made mortal. For from this defect of the flesh carnal desire solicits us, and in keeping with this he says in another place, We too were by nature children of wrath, like the rest (Eph 2:3).
39. 39. [47.] Quod autem dicit: Nulla ergo condemnatio est nunc in his, qui sunt in Christo Iesu, satis ostendit condemnationem non esse, si existant desideria carnalia, sed si eis ad peccandum non oboediatur. Quod contingit his, qui sub lege constituti sunt, nondum sub gratia. Nam sub lege constituti non solum repugnantem habent concupiscentiam, sed etiam captivi ducuntur, cum obtemperant ei. Non autem contingit his, qui mente serviunt legi Dei.
39. 39. [47.] As for what he says, There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus (Rom 8:1), he shows well enough that there is no condemnation if carnal desires exist, but only if they are obeyed unto sinning. This is what befalls those who are established under the law, not yet under grace. For those established under the law not only have desire fighting against them, but are also led captive, when they comply with it. But this does not befall those who serve the law of God with their mind.
40. 40. [48.] Quod autem ait: Quod enim impossibile erat legi, in quo infirmabatur per carnem, Deus Filium suum misit in similitudine carnis peccati et de peccato damnavit peccatum in carne, ut iustitia legis impleretur in nobis, qui non secundum carnem ambulamus sed secundum spiritum, manifestissime docet eadem ipsa praecepta legis propterea non impleta, quamvis essent implenda, quoniam quibus data erat lex ante gratiam, dediti erant carnalibus bonis et ex his beatitudinem acquirere cupiebant neque metuebant, nisi cum talibus bonis imminebat adversitas; et ideo, cum illa bona temporalia turbarentur, facile recedebant a praeceptis legis. Infirmabatur ergo lex non implendo, quod praecipiebat, non sua culpa sed per carnem, id est, eos homines, qui carnalia bona appetendo non amabant legis iustitiam sed ei temporalia commoda praeponebant. Ideo Liberator noster Dominus Iesus Christus suscipiendo mortalem carnem venit in similitudine carnis peccati. Carni enim peccati mors debita est. At vero illa mors Domini dignationis fuit, non debiti, et tamen hoc quoque Apostolus peccatum vocat susceptionem mortalis carnis quamvis non peccatricis, ideo quia immortalis tamquam peccatum facit, cum moritur. Sed de peccato, inquit, damnavit peccatum in carne. Id enim egit mors Domini, ne mors timeretur et ex eo iam non appeterentur temporalia bona nec metuerentur temporalia mala, in quibus carnalis erat prudentia illa, in qua impleri legis praecepta non poterant. Hac autem prudentia in homine dominico destructa et ablata, iustitia legis impletur, cum secundum carnem non ambulatur, sed secundum /spiritum. Unde verissime dictum est: Non veni legem solvere sed adimplere. Plenitudo ergo legis caritas. Et caritas eorum est, qui secundum spiritum ambulant. Haec enim ad gratiam pertinet Spiritus Sancti. Quando enim non erat caritas iustitiae sed timor, lex non implebatur.
40. 40. [48.] As for what he says, For what was impossible for the law, in that it was weakened through the flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and from sin, condemned sin in the flesh, so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the spirit (Rom 8:3-4), he teaches most plainly that the very precepts of the law were therefore not fulfilled, though they ought to have been, because those to whom the law was given before grace were given over to carnal goods and desired to acquire happiness from them, and feared nothing except when adversity threatened such goods; and therefore, when those temporal goods were disturbed, they easily withdrew from the precepts of the law. The law, then, was weakened—failing to fulfill what it commanded—not through its own fault but through the flesh, that is, through those men who, in desiring carnal goods, did not love the righteousness of the law but preferred temporal advantages to it. Therefore our Liberator the Lord Jesus Christ, by taking on mortal flesh, came in the likeness of sinful flesh. For death is owed to sinful flesh. But that death of the Lord was of his gracious condescension, not of debt; and yet the Apostle calls even this 'sin,' the taking on of mortal—though not sinful—flesh, for this reason: that the immortal one, in dying, does as it were what sin does. But from sin, he says, he condemned sin in the flesh (Rom 8:3). For this is what the death of the Lord accomplished: that death should not be feared, and that from then on temporal goods should not be desired nor temporal evils feared—in which lay that carnal prudence in which the precepts of the law could not be fulfilled. But once this prudence in the man of the Lord was destroyed and removed, the righteousness of the law is fulfilled, when one walks not according to the flesh but according to the spirit. Hence it was said most truly, I have not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it (Matt 5:17). The fullness of the law, therefore, is love (Rom 13:10). And love belongs to those who walk according to the spirit. For this pertains to the grace of the Holy Spirit. For when there was not the love of righteousness but fear, the law was not fulfilled.
41. 41. [49.] Quod autem ait: Quia prudentia carnis inimica in Deum; legi enim Dei non est subiecta; nec enim potest, ostendit, quid dixerit: inimica, ne quis putaret tamquam ex adverso principio aliquam naturam, quam non condidit Deus, inimicitias adversus Deum exercere. Inimicus ergo Dei dicitur, qui legi ipsius non obtemperat et hoc per carnis prudentiam, id est, cum appetit temporalia bona et timet temporalia mala. Definitio enim prudentiae in appetendis bonis et vitandis malis explicari solet. Quapropter recte appellat Apostolus carnis prudentiam, qua haec appetuntur pro magnis bonis, quae non perseverant cum homine, et ne haec amittantur timetur, quae quandoque amittenda sunt. Non potest autem talis prudentia legi Dei obtemperare, sed tunc obtemperatur legi, cum haec prudentia exstincta fuerit, ut ei succedat prudentia spiritus, qua nec in bonis temporalibus spes nostra est neque in malis timor. Eadem namque animae natura et prudentiam carnis habet, cum inferiora sectatur, et prudentiam spiritus, cum superiora eligit, quemadmodum eadem, aquae natura et frigore congelascit et calore resolvitur. Sic ergo dictum est: Legi Dei non est subiecta prudentia carnis, nec enim potest, quomodo recte diceretur nivem non posse calefieri, neque enim potest, sed cum adhibito calore solvitur et calescit aqua, iam nemo potest eam nivem dicere.
41. 41. [49.] As for what he says, For the prudence of the flesh is hostile to God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be (Rom 8:7), he shows what he meant by hostile, lest anyone suppose that, as from an opposing principle, some nature which God did not create wages enmity against God. He is therefore called an enemy of God who does not comply with his law, and this through the prudence of the flesh, that is, when he desires temporal goods and fears temporal evils. For the definition of prudence is usually set out in terms of desiring goods and avoiding evils. Therefore the Apostle rightly calls it the prudence of the flesh, by which these things are desired as great goods, which do not endure with man, and by which one fears to lose them, which must at some point be lost. But such prudence cannot comply with the law of God; rather, the law is complied with when this prudence has been extinguished, so that the prudence of the spirit may succeed it, by which our hope is neither in temporal goods nor our fear in temporal evils. For one and the same nature of the soul has both the prudence of the flesh, when it pursues lower things, and the prudence of the spirit, when it chooses higher things—just as one and the same nature of water both freezes by cold and melts by heat. So, then, it was said, The prudence of the flesh is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be (Rom 8:7), in the way one would rightly say that snow cannot be made warm, nor indeed can it be; but when, heat being applied, it dissolves and the water grows warm, no one can now call it snow.
42. 42. [50.] Quod autem ait: Corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem vita est propter iustitiam, corpus mortuum dicitur mortale. Ex ipsius enim mortalitate indigentia rerum terrenarum sollicitat animam et quaedam desideria excitat, quibus ad peccandum non obtemperat, qui iam mente servit legi Dei.
42. 42. [50.] As for what he says, The body indeed is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness (Rom 8:10), the body is called dead in the sense of mortal. For from its very mortality the need of earthly things solicits the soul and stirs up certain desires, which he who now serves the law of God with his mind does not comply with unto sinning.
43. 43. [51.] Quod autem ait: Si Spiritus eius, qui suscitavit Iesum Christum a mortuis, habitat in vobis; qui suscitavit Iesum Christum a mortuis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra per inhabitantem Spiritum eius in vobis, iam quartum gradum demonstrat ex illis quattuor, quos superior distinximus. Sed gradus iste in hac vita non invenitur. Pertinet enim ad spem, qua exspectamus redemptionem corporis nostri, quando corruptibile hoc induet incorruptionem et mortale hoc induet immortalitatem. Ibi pax perfecta est, quia nihil molestiarum anima de corpore patitur iam vivificato et in caelestem qualitatem immutato.
43. 43. [51.] As for what he says, If the Spirit of him who raised Jesus Christ from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Jesus Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you (Rom 8:11), he now points to the fourth stage among those four we distinguished above. But this stage is not found in this life. For it pertains to the hope by which we await the redemption of our body, when this corruptible will put on incorruption and this mortal will put on immortality. There peace is perfect, because the soul suffers no troubles from the body, which is now given life and changed into the heavenly quality.
44. 44. [52.] Quod autem ait: Non enim accepistis spiritum servitutis in timorem, sed accepistis Spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba, Pater! evidentissime duorum Testamentorum distincta sunt tempora: illud enim ad timorem pertinet, Novum autem ad caritatem. Sed quaeritur, quis sit spiritus servitutis? Nam spiritus adoptionis filiorum utique Spiritus Sanctus est; spiritus ergo servitutis in timore ille est, qui potestatem habet mortis, quia ipso timore per totam vitam rei erant servitutis, qui sub lege agebant, non sub gratia. Nec mirandum est, quod eum acceperunt per divinam providentiam qui bona temporalia sectabantur, non quia ipsius est lex et mandatum. Nam: Lex sancta et mandatum sanctum et iustum et bonum, ille autem spiritus servitutis non utique bonus, quem accipiunt qui praecepta datae legis implere non possunt, dum serviunt desideriis carnalibus, nondum gratia Liberatoris assumpti in filiorum adoptionem; quia et ipse spiritus servitutis non habet quemquam in potestate, nisi qui ei per ordinem divinae providentiae traditus fuerit, Dei iustitia sua cuique tribuente. Quam potestatem acceperat Apostolus, cum dicit de quibusdam: Quos tradidi satanae, ut discant non blasphemare, et iterum de alio: Iam iudicavi, inquit, tradere huiusmodi satanae in interitum carnis, ut anima salva sit. Qui ergo nondum sub gratia sunt et sub lege constituti vincuntur peccatis ad oboediendum desideriis carnalibus et praevaricatione augent reatum criminum suorum, spiritum acceperunt servitutis, id est spiritum eius, qui potestatem mortis habet. Nam si spiritum servitutis ipsum spiritum hominis intellexerimus, incipit et spiritus adoptionis ipse intellegi tamquam in melius commutatus. Sed quia spiritum adoptionis Spiritum Sanctum accipimus, quem manifeste ostendit, cum dicit: Ipse Spiritus testimonium reddit spiritui nostro, restat, ut spiritum servitutis illum intellegamus, cui serviunt peccatores, ut quemadmodum Spiritus Sanctus a timore mortis vindicat, sic spiritus servitutis, qui potestatem habet mortis, eiusdem mortis terrore reos teneat, ut se ad Liberatoris auxilium quisque convertat, etiam ipso diabolo invito, qui eum semper in potestate habere desiderat.
44. 44. [52.] As for what he says, For you did not receive a spirit of slavery unto fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption as sons, in whom we cry, Abba, Father! (Rom 8:15) the times of the two Testaments are most plainly distinguished: for the one pertains to fear, but the New to love. But it is asked, what is the spirit of slavery? For the Spirit of adoption as sons is of course the Holy Spirit; the spirit of slavery unto fear, then, is the one who has the power of death, since by that very fear those who lived under the law and not under grace were throughout their whole life liable to slavery. Nor is it to be wondered at that, by divine providence, those who pursued temporal goods received him—not because the law and the commandment are his. For the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good (Rom 7:12), whereas that spirit of slavery is by no means good, the one whom those receive who cannot fulfill the precepts of the law that was given, while they serve carnal desires, not yet being taken up by the grace of the Liberator into the adoption of sons; for that spirit of slavery itself has no one in its power except him who has been handed over to it by the order of divine providence, God's justice rendering to each his own. The Apostle had received this power when he says of certain men, Whom I have handed over to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme (1 Tim 1:20), and again of another, I have already judged, he says, to hand over such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that the soul may be saved (1 Cor 5:3-5). Those, then, who are not yet under grace and, being established under the law, are overcome by sins unto obeying carnal desires, and who by transgression increase the guilt of their crimes, have received the spirit of slavery, that is, the spirit of him who has the power of death. For if we understand by the spirit of slavery the spirit of the man himself, then the spirit of adoption too begins to be understood as that same spirit changed for the better. But because we take the spirit of adoption to be the Holy Spirit, which he plainly shows when he says, The Spirit himself bears witness to our spirit (Rom 8:16), it remains that we understand by the spirit of slavery the one whom sinners serve, so that, just as the Holy Spirit delivers from the fear of death, so the spirit of slavery, which has the power of death, holds the guilty bound by the terror of that same death, so that everyone may turn to the help of the Liberator—even against the will of the devil himself, who desires always to have him in his power.
45. 45. [53.] Quod autem ait: Nam exspectatio creaturae revelationem filiorum Dei exspectat. Vanitati enim creatura subiecta est non sponte, etc. usque ad id quod ait: Et ipsi in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus, adoptionem exspectantes, redemptionem corporis nostri, sic intellegendum est, ut neque sensum dolendi et gemendi opinemur esse in arboribus et oleribus et lapidibus et ceteris huiuscemodi creaturis -hic enim error Manichaeorum est - neque angelos sanctos vanitati subiectos esse arbitremur, et de his existimemus, quod liberabuntur a servitute interitus, cum interituri utique non sint, sed omnem creaturam in ipso homine sine ulla calumnia cogitemus. Non enim creatura ulla esse potest nisi aut spiritalis, quae excellit in angelis, aut animalis quae etiam in vita bestiarum satis apparet, aut corporalis, quae videri aut tangi potest; omnis autem est etiam in homine, quia homo constat spiritu et anima et corpore. Ergo creatura revelationem filiorum Dei exspectat, quidquid nunc in homine laborat et corruptioni subiacet, illam scilicet manifestationem, de qua idem dicit Apostolus: Mortui enim estis et vita vestra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo; cum Christus apparuerit vita vestra, tunc et vos apparebitis cum illo in gloria. Dicit et Ioannes: Dilectissimi, nunc filii Dei sumus et nondum apparuit, quid erimus; scimus autem, quia, cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam videbimus eum sicuti est. Hanc ergo revelationem filiorum Dei exspectat creatura, quae in homine nunc vanitati subiecta est, quamdiu dedita est temporalibus rebus, quae transeunt tamquam umbra. Unde et in Psalmo dicitur: Homo vanitati similis factus est, dies eius velut umbra praetereunt. De vanitate etiam Salomon loquitur, cum dicit: Vanitas vanitantium et omnia vanitas, quae abundantia homini in omni labore suo, quo ipse laborat sub sole? De qua item David dicit: Utquid diligitis vanitatem et quaeritis mendacium? Non sponte autem dicit esse subiectam vanitati creaturam, quoniam poenalis est ista subiectio. Non enim homo sicut sponte peccavit, sic etiam sponte damnatus est, quae tamen damnatio non sine spe reparationis irrogata est naturae nostrae. Et ideo: Propter eum, inquit, qui subiecit eam in spe, quia et ipsa creatura liberabitur a servitute interitus, in libertatem gloriae filiorum Dei, id est, etiam ipsa, quae tantummodo creatura est, nondum per fidem aggregata numero filiorum Dei, sed tamen in eis, qui credituri erant, videbat Apostolus, quod dicit, quia creatura liberabitur a servitute interitus, ut interitui non serviat, cui serviunt omnes peccatores. Peccatori enim dictum est: Morte morieris. Liberabitur autem in libertatem gloriae filiorum Dei, id est, ut et ipsa perveniat ad libertatem gloriae filiorum Dei per fidem, quae fides cum in ea non erat, tantummodo creatura dicebatur. Et ad ipsam refert, quod sequitur: Scimus enim, quia creatura congemiscit et dolet usque adhuc. Erant enim adhuc credituri, qui etiam spiritu subiacebant laboriosis erroribus. Sed ne quis putaret de ipsorum tantum labore dictum esse, subiungit etiam de his, qui iam crediderant. Quamquam enim spiritu, hoc est, mente servirent legi Dei, tamen quia carne servitur legi peccati, quamdiu molestias et sollicitationes mortalitatis nostrae patimur, ideo addidit dicens: Non solum autem sed et nos ipsi primitias spiritus habentes et ipsi in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus. Non solum ergo, inquit, ipsa quae tantummodo creatura dicitur in hominibus, qui nondum crediderunt et ideo nondum in filiorum Dei numero constituti sunt, congemiscit et dolet, sed etiam nosmetipsi, qui credimus et spiritus primitias habemus, quia iam spiritu adhaeremus Deo per fidem, et ideo non iam creatura, sed filii Dei appellamur, tamen et ipsi in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus, adoptionem exspectantes redemptionem corporis nostri. Haec enim adoptio, quae iam facta est in his qui crediderunt spiritu non corpore facta est. Nondum enim etiam corpus reformatum est in caelestem illam immutationem, sicut spiritus iam mutatus est reconciliatione fidei ab erroribus conversus ad Deum. Ergo etiam in his, qui crediderunt, exspectatur adhuc illa manifestatio, quae in corporis resurrectione proveniet, quae pertinet ad quartum illum gradum, ubi ex toto perfecta pax erit et quies aeterna nulla nobis ex aliqua parte corruptione resistente aut sollicitante molestia.
45. 45. [53.] As for what he says, For the expectation of the creature awaits the revelation of the sons of God. For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly (Rom 8:19-20), and so on up to where he says, And we ourselves groan within ourselves, awaiting adoption, the redemption of our body (Rom 8:23), it is to be understood in this way: that we neither suppose there to be any sense of pain and groaning in trees and vegetables and stones and other creatures of this kind—for this is the error of the Manichees—nor think that the holy angels are subjected to vanity, supposing of them that they will be freed from the slavery of corruption, since they are of course not going to perish; rather, let us think, without any cavil, of every creature as being in man himself. For no creature can exist except either spiritual, which excels in the angels, or animal, which appears clearly enough also in the life of the beasts, or corporeal, which can be seen or touched; and all of these are also in man, because man consists of spirit and soul and body. Therefore the creature awaits the revelation of the sons of God—whatever now labors in man and lies subject to corruption—that is, that manifestation of which the same Apostle says, For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God; when Christ your life appears, then you too will appear with him in glory (Col 3:3-4). John too says, Beloved, now we are sons of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is (1 John 3:2). This revelation of the sons of God, then, the creature awaits, which in man is now made subject to vanity, so long as it is given over to temporal things, which pass away like a shadow. Hence too it is said in a Psalm, Man has been made like to vanity; his days pass away like a shadow (Ps 144:4 (143:4)). Solomon too speaks of vanity when he says, Vanity of vanities, and all is vanity; what abundance has a man in all his labor with which he labors under the sun? (Eccl 1:2-3) Of which David likewise says, Why do you love vanity and seek a lie? (Ps 4:2 (4:3)) He says that the creature was made subject to vanity not willingly, since this subjection is penal. For man was not condemned willingly as he sinned willingly; yet this condemnation was not imposed on our nature without hope of repair. And therefore, because of him, he says, who subjected it in hope, since the creature itself also will be freed from the slavery of corruption into the freedom of the glory of the sons of God (Rom 8:20-21)—that is, even that which is only creature, not yet gathered by faith into the number of the sons of God, but which nevertheless the Apostle saw in those who were going to believe; this is what he says: that the creature will be freed from the slavery of corruption, so that it may not serve corruption, which all sinners serve. For to the sinner it was said, By death you shall die (Gen 2:17). And it will be freed into the freedom of the glory of the sons of God, that is, so that it too may come to the freedom of the glory of the sons of God through faith, which faith, when it was not in it, made it be called only creature. And to it he refers what follows, For we know that the creature groans together and suffers pain even until now (Rom 8:22). For there were still those going to believe who in their spirit too lay subject to toilsome errors. But lest anyone suppose this was said only of their toil, he adds also concerning those who had already believed. For although in spirit, that is, in mind, they served the law of God, nevertheless, because with the flesh the law of sin is served so long as we suffer the troubles and solicitations of our mortality, he therefore added, saying, And not only that, but we ourselves also, having the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves (Rom 8:23). So not only does that which in men who have not yet believed—and therefore are not yet established in the number of the sons of God—is called only creature groan and suffer pain, he says, but we ourselves too, who believe and have the firstfruits of the Spirit, because in spirit we now cleave to God through faith, and therefore are no longer called creature but sons of God; nevertheless we ourselves also groan within ourselves, awaiting adoption, the redemption of our body (Rom 8:23). For this adoption, which has already taken place in those who have believed, has been accomplished in spirit, not in body. For the body has not yet been reformed into that heavenly transformation, as the spirit has already been changed, converted from errors to God by the reconciliation of faith. Therefore even in those who have believed, that manifestation is still awaited which will come about in the resurrection of the body, which pertains to that fourth stage, where there will be wholly perfect peace and eternal rest, with no corruption resisting us in any part nor any trouble soliciting us.
46. 46. [54.] Quod autem ait: Similiter et Spiritus adiuvat infirmitatem nostram; quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus, manifestum est eum de Spiritu Sancto dicere, quod in consequentibus clarum est, ubi ait: Quia secundum Deum interpellat pro sanctis. Nos ergo quid oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus duas ob res, quod et illud, quod futurum speramus et quo tendimus, nondum apparet; et in hac ipsa vita multa possunt nobis prospera videri, quae adversa sunt, et adversa quae prospera. Nam et tribulatio quando accidit servo Dei ad probationem vel emendationem, videtur nonnumquam minus intellegentibus inutilis, sed si referatur ad illud quod dictum est: Da nobis auxilium de tribulatione, et vana salus hominis, intellegitur quia plerumque de tribulatione nos adiuvat Deus, et frustra salus optatur, quae aliquando adversa est, cum delectatione et amore huius vitae implicat animam. Inde est etiam illud: Tribulationem et dolorem inveni et nomen Domini invocavi. Cum enim dicit: inveni, significat utilem, non enim recte gratulamur nos invenisse, nisi quod quaerebamus. Ergo quid oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus. Deus enim novit et quid nobis in hac vita expediat et quid post hanc vitam daturus sit. Sed ipse Spiritus interpellat gemitibus inenarrabilibus. Gemere dicit Spiritum, quod nos gemere faciat caritate concitans desiderium futurae vitae, sicut dicit: Tentat vos Dominus Deus vester, ut sciat, si diligitis eum, id est, ut scire vos faciat. Non enim Deum aliquid latet.
46. 46. [54.] As for what he says, Likewise the Spirit too helps our weakness; for we do not know what we should pray for as we ought (Rom 8:26), it is plain that he is speaking of the Holy Spirit, which is clear from what follows, where he says, since he intercedes for the saints according to God (Rom 8:27). We, then, do not know what we should pray for as we ought for two reasons: both because what we hope will be, and toward which we tend, does not yet appear; and because in this very life many things can seem to us favorable which are adverse, and adverse which are favorable. For when tribulation befalls a servant of God for his testing or correction, it sometimes seems useless to those of less understanding; but if it is referred to what was said, Give us help from tribulation, for vain is the salvation of man (Ps 60:11 (59:13)), it is understood that God very often helps us by tribulation, and that salvation is desired in vain when it is sometimes adverse, since by the delight and love of this life it entangles the soul. Hence too there is this, I found tribulation and sorrow, and I called upon the name of the Lord (Ps 116:3-4 (114:3-4)). For when he says I found, he signifies it was useful; for we do not rightly rejoice at having found anything except what we were seeking. Therefore we do not know what we should pray for as we ought. For God knows both what is profitable for us in this life and what he is going to give after this life. But the Spirit himself intercedes with unutterable groanings (Rom 8:26). He says the Spirit groans because he makes us groan, stirring up by love a desire for the life to come, just as he says, The Lord your God tests you, that he may know whether you love him (Deut 13:3), that is, that he may make you know it. For nothing is hidden from God.
47. 47. [55.] Quod autem ait: Quos vocavit, ipsos et iustificavit, potest movere et quaeri, utrum omnes, qui vocati sunt, iustificentur. Sed alibi legimus: Multi vocati, pauci autem electi. Tamen quia ipsi quoque electi utique vocati sunt, manifestum est non iustificatos nisi vocatus, quamquam non omnes vocatos sed eos, qui secundum propositum vocati sunt, sicut superior dixit. Propositum autem Dei accipiendum est, non ipsorum. Ipse autem exponit, quid sit secundum propositum, cum dicit: Quoniam quos ante praescivit et praedestinavit conformes imaginis Filii eius. Non enim omnes, qui vocati sunt, secundum propositum vocati sunt; hoc enim propositum ad praescientiam et ad praedestinationem Dei pertinet. Nec praedestinavit aliquem, nisi quem praescivit crediturum et secuturum vocationem suam, quos et electos dicit. Multi enim non veniunt, cum vocati fuerint, nemo autem venit, qui vocatus non fuerit.
47. 47. [55.] As for what he says, those whom he called, them he also justified (Rom 8:30), one may be moved to ask whether all who are called are justified. But elsewhere we read, Many are called, but few are chosen (Matt 22:14). Yet because the chosen too are of course called, it is plain that none are justified except the called—although not all the called, but those who are called according to the purpose (Rom 8:28), as he said above. And the purpose is to be understood as God's, not their own. He himself explains what "according to the purpose" means when he says, For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son (Rom 8:29). For not all who are called are called according to the purpose; for this purpose pertains to the foreknowledge and predestination of God. Nor did he predestine anyone except him whom he foreknew would believe and would follow his calling—those whom he also calls the chosen. For many do not come, though they have been called; but no one comes who has not been called.
48. 48. [56.] Quod autem dicit: Ut sit primogenitus in multis fratribus, satis docet aliter intellegendum Dominum nostrum unigenitum, aliter primogenitum. Nam ubi Unigenitus dicitur, fratres non habet et naturaliter est Filius Dei, Verbum in principio, per quod facta sunt omnia. Secundum susceptionem autem hominis et incarnationis dispensationem, per quam nos etiam non naturaliter filios in adoptionem filiorum vocare dignatus est, primogenitus dicitur cum adiunctione fratrum. Ubi enim primus dicitur, non utique solus sed consecuturis fratribus in id quod ipse praecessit. Unde et alio loco primogenitum eum a mortuis dicit, ut sit ipse primatum tenens. Resurrectio enim mortuorum, ut iam non moriantur, ante illum nulla, post illum autem multorum sanctorum est, quos fratres non confunditur appellare propter ipsam communicationem humanitatis.
48. 48. [56.] As for what he says, so that he might be the firstborn among many brothers (Rom 8:29), he teaches well enough that our Lord is to be understood as only-begotten in one way, and as firstborn in another. For where he is called Only-Begotten, he has no brothers and is by nature the Son of God, the Word in the beginning, through whom all things were made. But according to the taking on of man and the dispensation of the incarnation—through which he deigned to call us, who are not sons by nature, into the adoption of sons—he is called firstborn, with the addition of brothers. For where he is called first, he is of course not alone, but with brothers who will follow into that which he himself went before. Hence in another place too he calls him the firstborn from the dead, so that he himself may hold the primacy. For there was no resurrection of the dead—such that they die no more—before him; but after him there is the resurrection of many saints, whom he is not ashamed to call brothers because of that very sharing of humanity.
49. 49. [57.] Quod autem dicit: Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? Tribulatio an angustia an persecutio? et cetera, ex superiore sententia pendet, ubi ait: Si tamen compatimur, ut et glorificemus, exsistimo enim, quod non sint condignae passiones huius temporis ad futuram gloriam, quae revelabitur in nobis. Ad ipsam enim hortationem omnis huius loci intentio directa est, ne illi, quibus loquitur, persecutionibus frangerentur, si viverent secundum prudentiam carnis, qua temporalia bona appetuntur et timentur temporalia mala.
49. 49. [57.] As for what he says, Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Tribulation, or distress, or persecution? (Rom 8:35) and so on, this depends on the earlier statement where he says, If indeed we suffer with him, that we may also be glorified; for I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory to come, which will be revealed in us (Rom 8:17-18). For the whole intent of this passage is directed to that exhortation, lest those to whom he speaks be broken by persecutions, were they to live according to the prudence of the flesh, by which temporal goods are desired and temporal evils feared.
50. 50. [58.] Quod autem ait: Certus sum enim, et non dixit: Opinor enim; plena fide tenuit, quod nec mors ulla, nec vita temporalis promissa nec cetera subsequentia possunt credentem a caritate Dei detorquere. Nemo ergo separat, nec qui minatur mortem, quia qui credit in Christo licet moriatur vivet, neque qui pollicetur vitam, quia ille dat vitam aeternam. Nam temporalis vitae pollicitatio aeternae comparatione contemnenda est. Neque angelus separat, quia licet angelus, inquit, de caelo descendat et annuntiet vobis, praeterquam quod accepistis, anathema sit. Neque principatus, id est contrarius, quia exuit se ipse hos principatus et potestates, triumphans eos in semetipso. Neque praesentia neque futura, id est temporalia, vel quae delectant vel quae premunt vel quae spem dant vel quae incutiunt timorem. Neque virtus (et hic virtutem contrariam oportet intellegi, secundum quam dicit: Nemo vasa fortis diripiet, nisi prius alligaverit fortem) neque altitudo neque profundum. Plerumque enim inanis curiositas earum rerum, quae inveniri non possunt aut frustra etiam inveniuntur sive in caelo sive in abysso, separat a Deo, nisi caritas vincat, quae ad certa spiritalia non vanitate rerum, quae foris sunt, sed interno homine invitat. Neque creatura alia. Quod duobus modis intellegi potest: aut visibilis creatura, quia et nos id est anima creatura sumus, sed invisibilis, ut hoc dixerit, quod nos non separat alia creatura, id est amor corporum; aut certe quia nos non separat alia creatura a caritate Dei, ex eo quod nulla creatura est alia inter nos et Deum, quae se opponat et a complexu eius excludat. Supra humanas enim mentes, quae rationales sunt, iam nulla creatura, sed Deus est.
50. 50. [58.] As for what he says, For I am certain (Rom 8:38)—and he did not say, For I think—he held with full faith that neither death of any kind, nor any promised temporal life, nor the rest that follow, can turn the believer away from the love of God. No one, then, separates us: neither he who threatens death, because he who believes in Christ, though he die, will live; nor he who promises life, because he gives eternal life. For the promise of temporal life is to be despised in comparison with the eternal. Nor does an angel separate us, because even if an angel, he says, should come down from heaven and announce to you anything other than what you received, let him be anathema (Gal 1:8). Nor do principalities, that is, the adverse ones, because he himself stripped off these principalities and powers, triumphing over them in himself. Nor things present nor things to come, that is, temporal things, whether they delight or oppress, whether they give hope or strike fear. Nor any power (and here too the adverse power must be understood, in keeping with which he says, No one will plunder the goods of the strong man unless he first binds the strong man (Matt 12:29)), nor height nor depth. For very often an empty curiosity about those things which cannot be found, or which are even found in vain, whether in heaven or in the abyss, separates us from God, unless love conquers, which invites us to the sure spiritual things not by the vanity of things that are without but by the inner man. Nor any other creature. This can be understood in two ways: either the visible creature, since we too, that is, the soul, are a creature, but an invisible one, so that he meant that no other creature separates us, that is, the love of bodies; or else, that no other creature separates us from the love of God, in that there is no other creature between us and God which sets itself in opposition and shuts us out from his embrace. For above human minds, which are rational, there is now no creature, but God.
51. 51. [59.] Quod autem dicit: Quorum patres, ex quibus Christus secundum carnem, et adiecit: Qui est super omnes Deus benedictus in saecula, plenissimam fidem commendat, quia Dominum nostrum et secundum susceptionem carnis Filium hominis confitemur, et secundum aeternitatem Verbum in principio Deum benedictum super omnes in saecula. Huius autem confessionis Iudaei quoniam partem tenuerunt, refelluntur a Domino. Nam cum eos interrogasset, cuius filium dicerent esse Christum, responderunt: David. Hoc autem secundum carnem est. De divinitate vero eius, quod Deus est, nihil responderunt. Ideo Dominus ait eis: Quomodo ergo David in spiritu vocat eum Dominum? Ut intellegerent hoc se confessos esse tantum, quod Christus filius est David, hoc autem tacuisse quod est Christus Dominus ipsius David. Illud enim est secundum susceptionem carnis, hoc secundum aeternitatem divinitatis.
51. 51. [59.] As for what he says, whose are the fathers, from whom is Christ according to the flesh (Rom 9:5), and added, who is over all things God blessed forever (Rom 9:5), he commends the fullest faith, because we confess our Lord both, according to the taking on of flesh, the Son of man, and, according to eternity, the Word in the beginning, God blessed over all forever. Now since the Jews held only part of this confession, they are refuted by the Lord. For when he had asked them whose son they said the Christ was, they answered, David's (Matt 22:42). But this is according to the flesh. Of his divinity, however, that he is God, they answered nothing. Therefore the Lord says to them, How then does David in the spirit call him Lord? (Matt 22:43) So that they might understand that they had confessed only this, that Christ is the son of David, but had been silent about this, that Christ is the Lord of David himself. For the former is according to the taking on of flesh, the latter according to the eternity of the divinity.
52. 52. [60.] Quod autem ait: Nondum enim nascentium neque agentium aliquid boni aut mali, ut secundum electionem propositum Dei maneret, non ex operibus sed ex vocante dictum est ei: Quia maior serviet minori; sicut scriptum est: Iacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui, nonnullos movet, ut putent apostolum Paulum asbstulisse liberum voluntatis arbitrium, quo promeremur Deum bono pietatis vel malo impietatis offendimus. Dicunt enim, quod ante opera aliqua, seu bona seu mala, duorum nondum nascentium Deus unum dilexerit, alterum odio habuerit. Sed respondemus praescientia Dei factum esse, qua novit etiam de nondum natis, qualis quisque futurus sit. Sed ne quis dicat: Opera ergo elegit Deus in eo, quem dilexit, quamquam nondum erant, quod ea futura praesciebat; quod si opera elegit, quomodo dicit Apostolus non ex operibus factam electionem? Propterea ergo intellegendum est, opera bona per dilectionem fieri, dilectionem autem esse in nobis per donum Spiritus Sancti, sicut idem dicit Apostolus: Caritas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum Sanctum, qui datus est nobis. Non ergo quisquam gloriari debet ex operibus tamquam suis, quae per donum Dei habet, cum ipsa dilectio in eo bonum operatur. Quid ergo elegit Deus? Si enim cui vult, donat Spiritum Sanctum, per quem dilectio bonum operatur, quomodo elegit, cui donet? Si enim nullo merito non est electio; aequales enim omnes sunt ante meritum nec potest in rebus omnino aequalibus electio nominari. Sed quoniam Spiritus Sanctus non datur nisi credentibus, non quidem Deus elegit opera, quae ipse largitur, cum dat Spiritum Sanctum, ut per caritatem bona operemur, sed tamen elegit fidem. Quia nisi quisque credat in eum et in accipiendi voluntate permaneat, non accipit donum Dei, id est Spiritum Sanctum, per quem diffusa caritate bonum possit operari. Non ergo elegit Deus opera cuiusquam in praescientia, quae ipse daturus est, sed fidem elegit in praescientia, ut quem sibi crediturum esse praescivit, ipsum elegerit, cui Spiritum Sanctum daret, ut bona operando etiam aeternam vitam consequeretur. Dicit enim idem Apostolus: Idem Deus, qui operatur omnia in omnibus, nusquam autem dictum est: Deus credit omnia in omnibus. Quod ergo credimus, nostrum est, quod autem bonum operamur, illius qui credentibus in se dat Spiritum Sanctum. Hoc autem exemplum quibusdam Iudaeis obiectum est, qui Christo crediderunt et de operibus ante gratiam gloriabantur et dicebant se ipsam Evangelii gratiam per sua bona opera praecedentia meruisse, cum bona opera in nullo esse possint, nisi qui acceperit gratiam. Est autem gratia, ut vocatio peccatori praerogetur, cum eius merita nulla, nisi ad damnationem praecesserint. Quod si vocatus vocantem secutus fuerit, quod est iam in libero arbitrio, merebitur et Spiritum Sanctum, per quem bona possit operari; in quo permanens (quod nihilominus est in libero arbitrio) merebitur etiam vitam aeternam, quae nulla possit labe corrumpi.
52. 52. [60.] As for what he says, For when they were not yet born and had done nothing good or evil, in order that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not from works but from him who calls, it was said to her, The elder will serve the younger; as it is written, Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated (Rom 9:11-13), this moves some to suppose that the apostle Paul took away the free choice of the will by which we earn favor with God by the good of piety or offend him by the evil of impiety. For they say that, before any works, whether good or evil, of two not yet born, God loved the one and hated the other. But we answer that it came about by the foreknowledge of God, by which he knows even of the not-yet-born what each one will be. But lest anyone say: Then God chose works in the one whom he loved—although they did not yet exist, since he foreknew they would be; and if he chose works, how does the Apostle say the election was made not from works?—therefore it is to be understood that good works are done through love, and that love is in us through the gift of the Holy Spirit, as the same Apostle says, The love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us (Rom 5:5). No one, then, ought to glory in works as though they were his own, which he has through the gift of God, since that very love works the good in him. What, then, did God choose? For if he gives the Holy Spirit, through whom love works the good, to whom he wills, how did he choose to whom he should give it? For if it is by no merit, it is not an election; for all are equal before merit, and there can be no election at all among things wholly equal. But since the Holy Spirit is not given except to believers, God indeed did not choose the works which he himself bestows when he gives the Holy Spirit, that through love we may do good works; but nevertheless he chose faith. For unless a person believes in him and remains in the will to receive, he does not receive the gift of God, that is, the Holy Spirit, through whom, love being poured out, he may be able to work the good. God therefore did not choose anyone's works in his foreknowledge, which he himself was going to give, but he chose faith in his foreknowledge, so that the one whom he foreknew would believe in him, him he chose, to whom he would give the Holy Spirit, so that by doing good works he might also attain eternal life. For the same Apostle says, The same God who works all things in all (1 Cor 12:6); but nowhere is it said: God believes all things in all. What we believe, then, is ours; but the good we do is his who gives the Holy Spirit to those who believe in him. Now this example was set before certain Jews who had believed in Christ and gloried in works before grace, and said that they had merited the very grace of the Gospel by their preceding good works—although there can be no good works in anyone except in him who has received grace. And grace is precisely this: that the calling is held out beforehand to the sinner, when his merits have been nothing except such as precede unto condemnation. But if the one called follows the one who calls—which is now within free choice—he will merit the Holy Spirit too, through whom he may be able to do good works; and remaining in this (which is likewise within free choice) he will merit also eternal life, which can be corrupted by no defect.
53. 53. [61.] Quod autem ait: Miserebor, qui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo, cui misericors fuero, hinc ostenditur non esse iniquitatem apud Deum, quod possunt dicere quidam cum audiunt: Antequam nascerentur Iacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui. Miserebor enim, inquit, cui misertus ero. Primo enim misertus est nostri Deus, cum peccatores essemus, ut vocaret nos. Cui ergo misertus ero, inquit, ut eum vocem, miserebor adhuc eius, cum crediderit. Quomodo autem adhuc, nisi ut credenti et petenti det Spiritum Sanctum? Quo dato misericordiam praestabit, cui misericors fuerit, id est, ut faciat eum misericordem, quo bona possit per dilectionem operari. Nemo ergo sibi audeat tribuere, quod misericorditer operatur, quia Deus illi per Spiritum Sanctum dedit dilectionem, sine qua nemo potest esse misericors. Non ergo elegit Deus bene operantes sed credentes potius, ut ipse illos faciat bene operari. Nostrum enim est credere et velle, illius autem dare credentibus et volentibus facultatem bene operandi per Spiritum Sanctum, per quem caritas Dei diffunditur in cordibus nostris, ut nos misericordes efficiat.
53. 53. [61.] As for what he says, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I will be merciful (Rom 9:15), by this it is shown that there is no injustice with God, which some can say when they hear, Before they were born, Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated (Rom 9:11-13). For I will have mercy, he says, on whom I will have mercy. For God first had mercy on us when we were sinners, so as to call us. On whom, then, I will have mercy, he says, so as to call him, I will have mercy on him still further, when he has believed. And how "still further," except so as to give the Holy Spirit to the one who believes and asks? And when this is given, he will show mercy to the one to whom he is merciful, that is, so as to make him merciful, by which he may be able to do good works through love. Let no one, then, dare to attribute to himself the fact that he acts mercifully, because God gave him love through the Holy Spirit, without which no one can be merciful. God therefore did not choose those who do good but rather those who believe, so that he himself may make them do good. For it is ours to believe and to will, but his to give to those who believe and will the capacity to do good through the Holy Spirit, through whom the love of God is poured out in our hearts so as to make us merciful.
54. 54. [62.] Quod autem ait: Igitur non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei, non tollit liberum voluntatis arbitrium, sed non sufficere dicit velle nostrum, nisi adiuvet Deus misericordes nos efficiendo ad bene operandum per donum Spiritus Sancti ad hoc referens, quod superius dixit: Miserebor, cui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo, cui misericors fuero. Quia neque velle possumus, nisi vocemur, et cum post vocationem voluerimus, non sufficit voluntas nostra et cursus noster, nisi Deus et vires currentibus praebeat et perducat, quo vocat. Manifestum est ergo non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis Dei esse, quod bene operamur, quamquam ibi sit etiam voluntas nostra, quae sola nihil posset. Unde sequitur etiam de Pharaonis supplicio testimonium, cum ait Scriptura de Pharaone: Quia ad hoc te excitavi, ut ostendam in te potentiam meam, et ut annuntietur nomen meum in universa terra, sicut enim legimus in Exodo: obduratum est cor Pharaonis, ut tam evidentibus signis non moveretur. Quod ergo tunc Pharao non obtemperabat praeceptis Dei, iam de supplicio veniebat. Non autem quisquam potest dicere obdurationem illam cordis immerito accidisse Pharaoni, sed iudicio Dei retribuentis incredulitati eius debitam poenam. Non ergo hoc illi imputatur, quod tunc non obtemperaret, quandoquidem obdurato corde obtemperare non poterat, sed quia dignum se praebuit, cui cor obduraretur priore infidelitate. Sicut enim in his, quos elegit Deus, non opera sed fides inchoat meritum, ut per munus Dei bene operentur; sic in his, quos damnat, infidelitas et impietas inchoat poenae meritum, ut per ipsam poenam etiam male operentur, sicut et superius idem dicit Apostolus: Et quoniam non probaverunt Deum in notitia habere, tradidit illos Deus in reprobum sensum, ut faciant, quae non conveniunt. Quapropter ita concludit Apostolus: Ergo cui vult miseretur et quem vult obdurat. Cuius enim miseretur, facit eum bene operari et, quem obdurat, relinquit eum, ut male operetur. Sed et illa misericordia praecedenti merito fidei tribuitur et ista obduratio praecedenti impietati, ut et bona per donum Dei operemur et mala per supplicium; cum tamen homini non auferatur liberum voluntatis arbitrium, sive ad credendum Deo, ut consequatur nos misericordia, sive ad impietatem, ut consequatur supplicium. Qua conclusione illata, infert quaestionem tamquam a contradicente. Ait enim: Dicis itaque mihi: Quid adhuc conqueritur? Nam voluntati eius quis resistit? Cui sane inquisitioni sic respondet, ut intellegamus spiritalibus viris et iam non secundum terrenum hominem viventibus patere posse prima merita fidei et impietatis, quomodo Deus praescius eligat credituros et damnet incredulos, nec ex operibus illos eligens nec istos ex operibus damnans, sed illorum fidei praestans, ut bene operentur, et istorum impietatem obdurans deserendo, ut male operentur. Qui quoniam intellectus ut dixi spiritalibus patet, a carnali autem prudentia longe remotus est, sic refellit inquirentem, ut intellegat se deponere debere prius hominem luti, ut ista per spiritum investigare mereatur. Itaque inquit: O homo, tu quis es, qui respondeas Deo? Numquid dicit figmentum ei, qui se finxit: Quare sic me fecisti? Annon habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem conspersione vas facere, aliud quidem in honorem, aliud in contumeliam? Quamdiu figmentum es, inquit, et ad massam luti pertines nondum perductus ad spiritalia, ut sis spiritalis omnia iudicans et a nemine iudiceris, cohibeas te oportet ab huiusmodi inquisitione et non respondeas Deo. Cuius consilium quis scire cupiens oportet, ut prius in eius amicitiam recipiatur, quod contingere nisi spiritalibus non potest iam portantibus imaginem caelestis hominis. Iam enim inquit: Non vos dicam servos sed amicos, omnia enim, quae audivi a Patre meo, nota feci vobis. Quamdiu itaque vas fictile es, conterendum est hoc ipsum in te prius virga illa ferrea, de qua dictum est: Reges eos in virga ferrea et tamquam vas figuli conteres eos, ut corrupto exteriore homine et interiore renovato possis in caritate radicatus et fundatus comprehendere latitudinem, longitudinem, altitudinem et profundum, cognoscere etiam supereminentem scientiam caritatis Dei. Nunc itaque cum ex eadem conspersione Deus alia vasa in honorem facit, alia in contumeliam, non est tuum discutere, quisquis secundum hanc conspersionem adhuc vivis, id est, terreno sensu et carnaliter sapis.
54. 54. [62.] As for what he says, It is therefore not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy (Rom 9:16), he does not take away the free choice of the will, but says that our willing is not enough unless God helps by making us merciful unto doing good through the gift of the Holy Spirit, referring this to what he said above, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I will be merciful (Rom 9:15). For we cannot even will unless we are called; and when, after the call, we have willed, our will and our running are not enough unless God both gives strength to those who run and brings them to where he calls. It is plain, then, that the good we do is not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy—although our will too is there, which by itself could do nothing. Hence there follows also the testimony about Pharaoh's punishment, when Scripture says of Pharaoh, For this I raised you up, that I might show in you my power, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth (Rom 9:17); for, as we read in Exodus, Pharaoh's heart was hardened so that he was not moved even by such evident signs. The fact, then, that Pharaoh did not at that time comply with the precepts of God was itself coming from punishment. Nor can anyone say that that hardening of heart befell Pharaoh undeservedly, but rather by the judgment of God repaying to his unbelief its due penalty. It is therefore not imputed to him that he did not at that time comply, since with a hardened heart he could not comply, but that he showed himself worthy of having his heart hardened by his prior unfaithfulness. For just as in those whom God chose it is not works but faith that begins the merit, so that through the gift of God they may do good, so in those whom he condemns it is unfaithfulness and impiety that begin the merit of punishment, so that through punishment itself they may even do evil—just as the same Apostle says above, And since they did not see fit to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up to a reprobate sense, to do what is not fitting (Rom 1:28). For this reason the Apostle concludes thus, So then he has mercy on whom he wills and hardens whom he wills (Rom 9:18). For on whom he has mercy he makes him do good, and whom he hardens he abandons so that he does evil. But that mercy is granted to the preceding merit of faith, and this hardening to the preceding impiety, so that we both do good through the gift of God and evil through punishment—while yet free choice of the will is not taken away from man, either unto believing God, so that mercy may follow upon us, or unto impiety, so that punishment may follow. And having drawn this conclusion, he raises an objection as though from one contradicting him. For he says, You therefore say to me, Why then does he still find fault? For who resists his will? (Rom 9:19) To this inquiry he so responds that we may understand that to spiritual men, no longer living according to the earthly man, the first merits of faith and of impiety can lie open—how God in his foreknowledge chooses those who will believe and condemns the unbelieving, neither choosing the former from works nor condemning the latter from works, but granting to the faith of the former that they may do good and, by abandoning them, hardening the impiety of the latter so that they may do evil. And because this understanding, as I have said, lies open to the spiritual but is far removed from carnal prudence, he so refutes the inquirer as to make him understand that he ought first to lay aside the man of clay, so that he may be worthy to investigate these things through the spirit. And so he says, O man, who are you to answer back to God? Does the thing formed say to him who formed it, Why have you made me thus? Or has the potter no power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor? (Rom 9:20-21) So long as you are a thing formed, he says, and belong to the lump of clay, not yet brought through to spiritual things, so as to be spiritual, judging all things and judged by no one, you ought to restrain yourself from such inquiry and not answer back to God. He who desires to know God's counsel must first be received into his friendship, which cannot happen except to the spiritual who now bear the image of the heavenly man. For he says, I will not call you servants but friends, for all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you (John 15:15). So long, then, as you are an earthen vessel, this very thing must first be ground down in you by that rod of iron of which it was said, You will rule them with a rod of iron, and like a potter's vessel you will grind them (Ps 2:9), so that, the outer man being destroyed and the inner renewed, you may be able, rooted and grounded in love, to comprehend the breadth, length, height, and depth, and to know also the surpassing knowledge of the love of God. So now, when from the same lump God makes some vessels for honor and others for dishonor, it is not yours to examine this, whoever you are who still live according to this lump, that is, who are of earthly sense and are carnally wise.
55. 55. [63.] Quod autem ait: Attulit in multa patientia vasa irae, quae perfecta sunt in perditionem, hinc satis significavit obdurationem cordis, quae in Pharaone facta est, ex meritis venisse occultae superioris impietatis, quam tamen patienter sustinuit Deus, donec ad illum tempus perduceretur, quo opportune in eum vindicta procederet, ad correctionem eorum, quos ab errore instituerat liberare, et ad cultum suum pietatemque revocando perducere precibus eorum et gemitibus opem praebens.
55. 55. [63.] As for what he says, He bore with much patience the vessels of wrath, which have been made ready for destruction (Rom 9:22), by this he signified well enough that the hardening of heart which came about in Pharaoh came from the merits of a hidden prior impiety, which God nevertheless bore patiently until Pharaoh should be brought to that time at which punishment might fittingly proceed against him—for the correction of those whom he had purposed to free from error, and to bring them back to his worship and piety by lending aid to their prayers and groanings.
56. 56. [64.] Quod autem ait: Quos et vocavit nos non solum ex Iudaeis sed etiam ex gentibus, sicut et in Osee dicit: Vocabo non plebem meam, plebem meam et cetera, totius huius disputationis propositum ad hoc perducit, ut quoniam docuit misericordiae Dei esse, quod bene operamur, non tamquam ex operibus Iudaei glorientur, qui cum Evangelium percepissent tamquam meritis suis id tribuendum existimantes, nolebant gentibus dari; a qua superbia iam debent desistere intellegentes, quoniam si non ex operibus sed misericordia Dei vocamur, ut credamus, et credentibus praestatur, ut bene operemur, non est gentibus ista invidenda misericordia quasi praelato merito Iudaeorum quod nullum est.
56. 56. [64.] As for what he says, whom he also called, namely us, not only from the Jews but also from the gentiles, as he also says in Hosea: I will call the not-my-people my people (Rom 9:24-25) and so on, the aim of this whole argument he brings to this point: that, since he has taught that it is of the mercy of God that we do good, the Jews should not glory as if from works, who, when they had received the Gospel, supposing it was to be attributed to their own merits, were unwilling that it be given to the gentiles; from which pride they ought now to desist, understanding that, since we are called to believe not from works but by the mercy of God, and to those who believe it is granted that they do good, this mercy is not to be begrudged the gentiles as though the Jews had a merit set before them—which is nothing.
57. 57. [65.] Quod autem dicit: Isaias autem clamat pro Israel. Si fuerit numerus filiorum Israel quasi arena maris, reliquiae salvae fient, ostendit quemadmodum sit Deus lapis angularis utrumque parietem in se coniungens. Testimonium enim Osee prophetae dictum est pro gentibus: Vocabo non plebem meam, plebem meam et non dilectam, dilectam, et Isaiae testimonium dictum pro Israel, quoniam reliquiae salvae fient, ut ipse deputentur in semen Abrahae, quae crediderunt in Christum. Ita concordes ambos populos facit, secundum et Domini testimonium dicentis in Evangelio de gentibus: Habeo alias oves, quae non sunt de hoc ovili, quas oportet me adducere, et erit unus grex et unus pastor.
57. 57. [65.] As for what he says, But Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: If the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant will be saved (Rom 9:27), he shows how God is the cornerstone joining both walls together in himself. For the testimony of the prophet Hosea was spoken on behalf of the gentiles, I will call the not-my-people my people, and the not-beloved beloved (Rom 9:25), and the testimony of Isaiah was spoken on behalf of Israel, since a remnant will be saved, namely those who believed in Christ, so that they themselves may be reckoned in the seed of Abraham. Thus he makes both peoples to be in concord, in keeping with the Lord's testimony too, who says in the Gospel concerning the gentiles, I have other sheep that are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and there will be one flock and one shepherd (John 10:16).
58. 58. [66.] Quod autem ait: Fratres, bona voluntas cordis mei et deprecatio ad Deum fit pro illis in salutem, hinc iam incipit de spe Iudaeorum loqui, ne etiam Gentes superbire audeant adversus eos. Sicut enim Iudaeorum superbia refellenda erat tamquam ex operibus gloriantium, sic et gentibus occurrendum est, ne tamquam Iudaeis praelati superbiant.
58. 58. [66.] As for what he says, Brothers, the good will of my heart and my prayer to God on their behalf is for their salvation (Rom 10:1), here he now begins to speak of the hope of the Jews, lest the gentiles too dare to be proud against them. For just as the pride of the Jews, as of those glorying from works, had to be refuted, so the gentiles too must be met, lest they be proud as though set above the Jews.
59. 59. [67.] Quod autem dicit: Prope est verbum in ore tuo et in corde tuo; hoc est verbum fidei, quod praedicamus, quia si confitearis in ore tuo, quia Dominus est Iesus, et credideris in corde tuo, quia Deus illum suscitavit a mortuis, salvus eris. Corde enim creditur ad iustitiam, ore autem confessio fit in salutem; totus hic locus ad illud refertur, quod superius dixit: Verbum enim consummans et brevians faciet Dominus super terram. Remotis enim innumerabilibus et multiplicibus sacramentis, quibus iudaicus populus premebatur, per misericordiam Dei factum est, ut brevitate confessionis fidei ad salutem perveniremus.
59. 59. [67.] As for what he says, The word is near, in your mouth and in your heart; this is the word of faith which we preach: that if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation (Rom 10:8-10), this whole passage refers to what he said above, For the Lord will make a word that completes and shortens upon the earth (Rom 9:28). For when the innumerable and manifold sacraments by which the Jewish people was burdened had been removed, it came about, through the mercy of God, that by the brevity of the confession of faith we might attain to salvation.
60. 60. [68.] Quod autem dicit secundum testimonium Moysi: Ego ad aemulationem vos perducam in non gentem, in gentem insipientem irritabo vos; dicendo: gentem insipientem, exposuit quid dixerit: In non gentem, quasi quod nec gens dicenda sit, quae insipiens est. De cuius tamen fide irritandum dicit populum Iudaicum, quia illi apprehenderunt, quod isti respuerunt. Vel certe in non gentem, in gentem insipientem, quia cum esset gens insipiens, omnis populus idola colens tamen gentilitatem credendo deposuit. Unde etiam illud est: Si igitur praeputium iustitiae legis custodiat, nonne praeputium eius in circumcisione deputabitur? Ut sit hic sensus: Ego in aemulationem vos adducam in eam, quae non gens facta est, deponendo gentilitatem per fidem Christi, cum fuisset gens insipiens colendo idola.
60. 60. [68.] As for what he says, according to the testimony of Moses, I will lead you to rivalry by means of a non-nation; by a foolish nation I will provoke you (Rom 10:19), in saying a foolish nation he explained what he meant by a non-nation, namely that what is foolish is not even to be called a nation. Yet by the faith of this nation he says the Jewish people is to be provoked, because they laid hold of what the Jews rejected. Or else, by means of a non-nation, by a foolish nation, because, although it was a foolish nation—every people worshiping idols—it nevertheless laid aside its heathenism by believing. Hence too there is this, If, then, the uncircumcised man keeps the righteousness of the law, will not his uncircumcision be reckoned as circumcision? (Rom 2:26) So that the sense is this: I will lead you to rivalry by means of that which has been made a non-nation, by laying aside its heathenism through faith in Christ, though it had been a foolish nation by worshiping idols.
61. 61. [69.] Quod autem ait: Numquid reppulit Deus plebem suam? Absit! Nam et ego Israelita sum ex semine Abraham de tribu Beniamin, ad hoc refertur, quod superius dixit: Non potest autem excidere verbum Dei. Non enim omnes qui sunt ex Israel, hi sunt Israelitae, neque quia sunt semen Abraham omnes filii, sed in Isaac vocabitur tibi semen ut de ipso scilicet populo Iudaeorum illi deputentur in semen, qui Domino crediderunt. De hoc item dicit superius: Reliquiae salvae fient.
61. 61. [69.] As for what he says, Has God then rejected his people? Far from it! For I too am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin (Rom 11:1), this refers to what he said above, But the word of God cannot fail. For not all who are from Israel are Israelites, nor because they are the seed of Abraham are they all sons, but in Isaac shall your seed be called (Rom 9:6-7)—namely, that from the Jewish people itself those are to be reckoned in the seed who believed in the Lord. Of this too he says above, A remnant will be saved (Rom 9:27).
62. 62. [70.] Quod autem dicit: Dico ergo: Numquid sic deliquerunt, ut caderent? Absit! Sed illorum delicto salus gentibus, non ideo dicit, quia non ceciderunt, sed quia casus ipsorum non fuit inanis, quoniam ad salutem gentium profecit. Non ergo ita deliquerunt, ut caderent, id est, tantummodo ut caderent, quasi ad poenam suam solum, sed ut hoc ipsum, quod ceciderunt, prodesset gentibus ad salutem. Deinde incipit ex hoc loco Iudaeorum populum commendare, etiam de ipso casu infidelitatis, ut non superbiant Gentes, quia etiam casus Iudaeorum tam pretiosus extitit pro salute gentium, sed magis debent cavere Gentes ne, dum superbiunt, similiter cadant.
62. 62. [70.] As for what he says, I ask then: Did they so fail as to fall? Far from it! But by their failure salvation has come to the gentiles (Rom 11:11), he does not say this because they did not fall, but because their fall was not in vain, since it profited the salvation of the gentiles. They did not, then, so fail as to fall—that is, only to fall, as if for their own punishment alone—but so that this very fall of theirs might profit the gentiles unto salvation. Then from this point he begins to commend the Jewish people even on the ground of their fall into unfaithfulness, so that the gentiles may not be proud, since even the fall of the Jews proved so precious for the salvation of the gentiles; rather, the gentiles ought the more to take care lest, while they are proud, they fall in like manner.
63. 63. [71.] Quod autem ait: Si esurierit inimicus tuus, ciba illum; si sitit, potum da illi, hoc enim faciens carbones ignis congeres super caput eius, multis videri potest repugnare illi sententiae, qua Dominus praecepit, ut diligamus inimicos nostros et oremus pro his, qui nos persequuntur, vel huic etiam, quam idem Apostolus superius dixit: Benedicite persequentes vos, benedicite et nolite maledicere, et iterum: Nulli malum pro malo reddentes. Quomodo enim quisque diligit eum, cui propterea cibum et potum dat, ut carbones ignis congerat super caput eius, si carbones ignis hoc loco aliquam gravem poenam significant? Quapropter intellegendum est ad hoc dictum esse, ut eum, qui nos laeserit, provocemus ad paenitentiam facti sui, cum ei nos benefacimus. Isti enim carbones ignis ad exustionem, id est contribulationem spiritus valent, qui est quasi caput animae, in qua exuritur omnis malitia, cum homo in melius per poenitentiam commutatur, ut sunt illi carbones ignis, de quibus dicitur in Psalmis: Quid detur tibi aut quid apponatur tibi ad linguam subdulam? Sagittae potentis acutae cum carbonibus vastatoribus.
63. 63. [71.] As for what he says, If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him drink; for by doing this you will heap coals of fire on his head (Rom 12:20), it can seem to many to be opposed to that statement in which the Lord commanded that we love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us, or even to this, which the same Apostle said above, Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse (Rom 12:14), and again, Repaying no one evil for evil (Rom 12:17). For how does anyone love the one to whom he gives food and drink for the purpose of heaping coals of fire on his head, if coals of fire in this place signify some grievous punishment? Therefore it is to be understood that this was said for this purpose: that, by doing good to the one who has injured us, we may provoke him to repentance of his deed. For these coals of fire avail unto the burning, that is, the contrition, of the spirit, which is, as it were, the head of the soul, in which all malice is burned away when a man is changed for the better through repentance—such as those coals of fire of which it is said in the Psalms, What shall be given to you, or what added to you, against a deceitful tongue? The sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals that lay waste (Ps 120:3-4 (119:3-4)).
64. 64. [72.] Quod autem ait: Omnis anima potestatibus sublimioribus subdita sit; non est enim potestas nisi a Deo, rectissime admonet, ne quis ex eo, quod a Domino suo in libertatem vocatus est, factusque christianus, extollatur in superbiam et non arbitretur in huius vitae itinere servandum esse ordinem suum et potestatibus sublimioribus, quibus pro tempore rerum temporalium gubernatio tradita est, putet non se esse subdendum. Cum enim constemus ex anima et corpore et, quamdiu in hac vita temporali sumus, etiam rebus temporalibus ad subsidium degendae eius vitae utamur, oportet nos ex ea parte, quae ad hanc vitam pertinet, subditos esse potestatibus, id est, hominibus res humanas cum aliquo honore administrantibus. Ex illa vero parte, qua credimus Deo et in regnum eius vocamur, non nos oportet esse subditos cuiquam homini idipsum in nobis evertere cupienti, quod Deus ad vitam aeternam donare dignatus est. Si quis ergo putat, quoniam Christianus est, non sibi esse vectigal reddendum aut tributum aut non esse exhibendum honorem debitum eis, qui haec curant potestatibus, in magno errore versatur. Item si quis sic se putat esse subdendum, ut etiam in suam fidem habere potestatem arbitretur eum, qui temporalibus administrandis aliqua sublimitate praecellit, in maiorem errorem labitur. Sed modus iste servandus est, quem Dominus ipse praescribit, ut reddamus Caesari, quae sunt Caesari, et Deo, quae Dei sunt. Quamquam enim ad illud regnum vocemur, ubi nulla erit potestas huius mundi, in hoc tamen itinere dum agimus, donec perveniamus ad illud saeculum, ubi fit evacuatio omnis principatus et potestatis, conditionem nostram pro ipso rerum humanarum ordine toleremus, nihil simulate facientes, et in eo ipso non tam hominibus quam Deo, qui haec iubet, obtemperantes.
64. 64. [72.] As for what he says, Let every soul be subject to the higher powers; for there is no power except from God (Rom 13:1), he most rightly warns that no one, on the ground that he has been called by his Lord into freedom and made a Christian, should be lifted up into pride and suppose that on the journey of this life his proper order is not to be kept, and think that he is not to be subject to the higher powers, to whom for a time the governance of temporal affairs has been handed over. For since we consist of soul and body, and, so long as we are in this temporal life, make use of temporal things too as a support for living it, it is fitting that we, on the part that pertains to this life, be subject to the powers, that is, to the men who administer human affairs with some honor. But on that part by which we believe God and are called into his kingdom, we ought not to be subject to any man who desires to overthrow in us that very thing which God has deigned to grant unto eternal life. If anyone, then, supposes that, because he is a Christian, he need not pay a toll or tribute, or need not render the honor due to the powers who attend to these matters, he is in great error. Likewise, if anyone supposes that he is to be subject in such a way that he thinks the one who excels in some loftiness in administering temporal affairs has power even over his faith, he falls into a greater error. But this measure is to be kept, which the Lord himself prescribes: that we render to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. For although we are called to that kingdom where there will be no power of this world, nevertheless on this journey, while we are on the way, until we come to that age in which there is the doing-away of all rule and power, let us bear our condition for the sake of the very order of human affairs, doing nothing for show, and in this very thing complying not so much with men as with God, who commands these things.
65. 65. [73.] Quod autem ait: Vis autem non timere potestatem? Bonum fac et habebis laudem ex illa, potest movere aliquos, cum cogitaverint ab istis potestatibus persecutionem saepe passos fuisse Christianos. Numquid ergo non faciebant bonum, quia non solum non sunt laudati ab istis potestatibus, sed etiam poenis affecti et necati sunt? Consideranda ergo sunt verba Apostoli. Non enim ait: Bonum fac et laudabit te potestas; sed ait: Bonum fac et habebis laudem ex illa. Sive enim probet factum tuum bonum sive persequatur: laudem habebis ex illa, vel cum eam in obsequium Dei lucratus fueris vel cum eius persecutione coronam merueris. Hoc etiam in consequentibus intellegitur cum dicit: Dei enim minister est tibi in bonum, etiam si sibi in malum.
65. 65. [73.] As for what he says, Do you wish not to fear the power? Do good, and you will have praise from it (Rom 13:3), this can move some, when they reflect that Christians have often suffered persecution from these powers. Were they then not doing good, since not only were they not praised by these powers, but were even subjected to punishments and put to death? The words of the Apostle, therefore, are to be considered. For he does not say: Do good, and the power will praise you; but he says, Do good, and you will have praise from it. For whether it approve your good deed or persecute it, you will have praise from it—either when you have won it over into obedience to God, or when by its persecution you have merited a crown. This is understood also in what follows, when he says, For it is God's minister to you for good (Rom 13:4)—even if to itself for evil.
66. 66. [74.] Quod autem ait: Necessitate subditi estote, ad hoc valet, ut intellegamus, quia necesse est propter hanc vitam subditos nos esse oportere, non resistentes, si quid illi auferre voluerint, in quod sibi potestas data est, temporalibus rebus; quae quoniam transeunt ideo et ista subiectio non in bonis quasi permansuris sed in necessariis huic tempori constituenda est. Tamen quoniam dixit: Necessitate subdidi estote, ne quis non integro animo et pura dilectione subditus fieret huiusmodi potestatibus, addidit dicens: Non solum propter iram sed etiam propter conscientiam, id est, non solum ad iram evacuandam, quo potest etiam simulate fieri, sed ut in tua conscientia certus sis illius dilectione te facere, cui subditus fueris iussu Domini tui, qui omnes vult salvos fieri et in agnitionem veritatis venire. Et hoc enim cum diceret Apostolus, de ipsis potestatibus agebat. Hoc est, quod servis alio loco suadet: Non ad oculum servientes quasi hominibus placentes, ut idipsum, quod subduntur dominis suis, non eos oderint aut fallaciis promereri desiderent.
66. 66. [74.] As for what he says, Be subject of necessity (Rom 13:5), this avails so that we may understand that it is necessary, for the sake of this life, that we ought to be subject, not resisting if they should wish to take from us anything—in the matter of temporal things over which power has been given them—which, since they pass away, this subjection too is to be reckoned not among goods as though they were going to abide, but among the necessities for this time. Yet because he said, Be subject of necessity, lest anyone become subject to powers of this kind without a whole heart and pure love, he added, saying, not only because of wrath but also because of conscience (Rom 13:5), that is, not only to avert wrath, which can even be done for show, but so that in your conscience you may be certain that you do it out of love for him to whom you have become subject at the command of your Lord, who wills that all be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth (1 Tim 2:4). For when the Apostle said this too, he was dealing with these very powers. This is what he urges upon servants in another place, not serving to the eye as though pleasing men (Eph 6:6), so that in the very fact that they are subject to their masters they may not hate them or desire to win them over by deceits.
67. 67. [75.] Quod autem dicit: Qui enim diligit alterum, legem implevit, ostendit consummationem legis in dilectione positam, id est in caritate; unde et Dominus in illis duobus praeceptis totam Legem pendere dicit et omnes Prophetas, id est in dilectione Dei et proximi. Unde et ipse, qui legem venit implere, dilectionem donavit per Spiritum Sanctum, ut, quod antea timor implere non poterat, caritas postmodum impleret. Inde est et illud eiusdem Apostoli: Plenitudo autem legis caritas; et illud: Finis autem praecepti est caritas de corde puro et conscientia bona et fide non ficta.
67. 67. [75.] As for what he says, For he who loves another has fulfilled the law (Rom 13:8), he shows that the completion of the law lies in loving, that is, in love; hence the Lord too says that on those two precepts the whole Law and all the Prophets depend, that is, on the love of God and of neighbor. Hence too he himself, who came to fulfill the law, gave love through the Holy Spirit, so that what fear could not fulfill before, love might fulfill afterward. Hence too there is that saying of the same Apostle, But the fullness of the law is love (Rom 13:10); and that, But the end of the commandment is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned (1 Tim 1:5).
68. 68. [76.] Quod autem ait: Et hoc scientes tempus, quia hora est iam nos de somno surgere, illuc spectat, quod dictum est: Ecce nunc tempus acceptabile, ecce nunc dies salutis. Tempus enim Evangelii significatur, et illa opportunitas salvos faciendi credentes in Deum.
68. 68. [76.] As for what he says, And knowing this season, that it is now the hour for us to rise from sleep (Rom 13:11), this looks to what was said, Behold, now is the acceptable time; behold, now is the day of salvation (2 Cor 6:2). For the time of the Gospel is signified, and that opportune moment for saving those who believe in God.
69. 69. [77.] Quod autem ait: Et carnis providentiam ne perfeceritis in concupiscentiis, ostendit non esse culpandam carnis providentiam, quando ea providentur, quae ad necessitatem salutis corporalis valent. Si autem ad superfluas delectationes atque luxurias, ut quisque in his gaudeat, quae carne cupit, recte reprehenditur, quia providentiam carnis in concupiscentiis facit, quoniam qui seminat in carne sua, de carne metet corruptionem, id est, qui delectationibus carnalibus gaudet.
69. 69. [77.] As for what he says, And do not make provision for the flesh in its desires (Rom 13:14), he shows that provision for the flesh is not to be blamed when provision is made for those things which avail for the necessity of bodily health. But if it is for superfluous delights and excesses, so that one may take joy in those things which the flesh desires, he is rightly reproved, because he makes provision for the flesh in its desires, since he who sows in his flesh will from the flesh reap corruption (Gal 6:8)—that is, he who takes joy in carnal delights.
70. 70. [78.] Quod autem dicit: Infirmum autem in fide recipite, non in diiudicationibus cogitationum, hoc dicit ut eum, qui infirmus in fide est, recipiamus et nostra firmitate infirmitatem eius sustineamus neque diiudicemus cogitationes eius, id est, quasi ferre audeamus sententiam de alieno corde, quod non videmus. Ideo sequitur et dicit: Alius quidem credit manducare omnia; qui autem infirmus est, oleus manducet. Quia illo iam tempore multi iam firmi in fide et scientes secundum scientiam Domini non commaculare ea, quae in os intrant, sed quae exeunt, indifferenter sumebant cibos salva conscientia. Quidam vero infirmiores abstinebant a carnibus et a vino, ne vel nescientes inciderent in ea, quae idolis sacrificabantur. Omnis enim tunc immolaticia caro in macello vendebatur et de primitiis vini libabant Gentes simulacris suis et quaedam in ipsis torcularibus sacrificia faciebant. Iubet ergo Apostolus et his, qui salva conscientia talibus alimentis utebantur, non spernere infirmitatem illorum, qui se a talibus cibis et potu abstinebant, et illis infirmis, ne eos, qui carnibus non abstinebant et vinum bibebant, tamquam pollui iudicarent. Ad hoc valet, quod consequenter dicit: Qui manducat, non manducantem non iudicet, hoc est spernat, et qui non manducat manducantem non iudicet. Firmi enim infirmiores contumaciter contemnebant et infirmi firmos temere iudicabant.
70. 70. [78.] As for what he says, Receive the one weak in faith, but not in disputes over thoughts (Rom 14:1), he says this so that we may receive the one who is weak in faith and, by our firmness, bear with his weakness, and not pass judgment on his thoughts—that is, as if we should dare to pronounce sentence on another's heart, which we do not see. Therefore there follows, and he says, One indeed believes he may eat all things; but he who is weak, let him eat vegetables (Rom 14:2). For at that time many already firm in faith, knowing, according to the knowledge of the Lord, that it is not what enters the mouth that defiles but what comes out, were eating foods indifferently with a clear conscience. But certain of the weaker abstained from meats and from wine, lest even unknowingly they fall into what had been sacrificed to idols. For at that time all sacrificial meat was sold in the market, and the gentiles poured libations from the firstfruits of wine to their idols and made certain sacrifices at the very winepresses. The Apostle therefore commands both those who with a clear conscience used such foods not to despise the weakness of those who abstained from such foods and drink, and those weak ones not to judge those who did not abstain from meats and drank wine as though they were defiled. To this avails what he says next, Let him who eats not judge—that is, despise—him who does not eat, and let him who does not eat not judge him who eats (Rom 14:3). For the firm contemptuously despised the weaker, and the weak rashly judged the firm.
71. 71. [79.] Quod autem dicit: Tu quis es, qui iudices alienum servum? Ad hoc dicit, ut in his rebus, quae possunt et bono animo fieri et malo, iudicium Deo dimittamus nec audeamus de alterius corde, quod non videmus, ferre sententiam. In his vero rebus, quae ita comprehenduntur, ut eas bono et casto animo non posse fieri manifestum sit, non improbatur, si iudicemus. Itaque hoc, quod de cibis dicit, quia ignoratur, quo animo fiat, non vult nos esse iudices, sed Deum; de illo autem nefario stupro, ubi uxorem patris sui quidam habuerat, praeceptis debere iudicari. Non enim poterat ille dicere bono animo se tam immane flagitium commisisse. Ergo quaecumque facta ita manifestantur, ut non possit dici: Bono animo feci, iudicanda sunt a nobis, quaecumque autem ita fiunt, ut quo animo fiant, incertum sit, non sunt iudicanda sed reservanda iudicio Dei, sicut scriptum est: Quae occulta sunt Deo, quae autem palam sunt, vobis et filiis vestris.
71. 71. [79.] As for what he says, Who are you to judge another's servant? (Rom 14:4) he says this so that, in those matters which can be done with either a good or an evil mind, we may leave the judgment to God and not dare to pronounce sentence about another's heart, which we do not see. But in those matters which are so understood that it is plain they cannot be done with a good and chaste mind, it is not disapproved if we judge. And so, regarding what he says about foods, because it is not known with what mind it is done, he does not want us to be the judges but God; but concerning that wicked fornication, where someone had had his father's wife, he says one ought to judge by the precepts. For that man could not say that he had committed so monstrous a crime with a good mind. Therefore whatever deeds are so manifest that one cannot say, "I did it with a good mind," are to be judged by us; but whatever are done in such a way that it is uncertain with what mind they are done are not to be judged but reserved to the judgment of God, as it is written, The things that are hidden are for God; the things that are open are for you and your children (Deut 29:29).
72. 72. [80.] Quod autem ait: Alius quidem iudicat alternos dies, alius autem iudicat omnem diem, sequestrata interim meliore consideratione non de duobus hominibus mihi videtur dictum, sed de homine et Deo. Qui enim alternos dies iudicat, homo est, potest enim hodie aliud, cras aliud iudicare, id est, ut quemcumque hodie malum convictum confessumve damnaverit, cras bonum inveniat, cum se correxerit, vel contra, cum aliquem iustum hodie laudaverit, cras inveniat depravatum. Qui autem iudicat omnem diem, Deus est; quia non solum qualis quisque sit, sed etiam qualis omni die futurus sit novit. Ergo: Unusquisque in suo intellectu abundet, inquit, id est quantum humano intellectui vel unicuique homini concessum est, tantum audeat iudicare. Qui sapit, inquit, diem, Domino sapit, id est quia hoc ipsum, quod praesentem diem bene iudicat, Domino sapit. Hoc est autem bene iudicare ad diem, ut noveris de correctione eius non esse desperandum in futurum, de cuius culpa manifesta in praesentia iudicaveris.
72. 72. [80.] As for what he says, One indeed judges between day and day, but another judges every day (Rom 14:5), setting aside for the moment a better consideration, this seems to me to be said not of two men, but of man and God. For he who judges between day and day is man, for he can judge one thing today, another tomorrow—that is, so that whomever he has today condemned, convicted or confessed as evil, tomorrow he may find good, when he has corrected himself; or the reverse, when he has today praised someone as righteous, tomorrow he may find him depraved. But he who judges every day is God, because he knows not only what each one is, but also what he will be on every day. Therefore let each one abound in his own understanding (Rom 14:5), he says—that is, let him dare to judge as far as it is granted to human understanding or to each man. He who is wise about the day, he says, is wise unto the Lord (Rom 14:6)—that is, because this very thing, that he judges the present day well, is wise unto the Lord. And to judge well as to the day is this: that you know one is not to be despaired of for the future as to his correction, when you have in the present judged concerning his manifest fault.
73. 73. [81.] Quod autem ait: Beatus qui non iudicat semetipsum in quo probat, ad id potissimum referendum est, quod superius dixit: Non ergo blasphemetur bonum nostrum. Hoc est enim etiam, quod nunc ait ante istam sententiam: Tu fidem, quam habes penes temetipsum, habe coram Deo, ut quoniam bona est haec fides, qua credimus omnia munda mundis, et in ea fide nos probamus, bene utamur ipso bono nostro, ne forte, cum ad offendiculum infirmorum fratrum eo bono abusi fuerimus, peccemus in fratres et in eo ipso bono nos iudicemus, cum scandalizamus infirmos, in quo bono nos probamus, cum ipsa fides nobis placet.
73. 73. [81.] As for what he says, Blessed is he who does not judge himself in that which he approves (Rom 14:22), this is to be referred chiefly to what he said above, Let not our good be blasphemed (Rom 14:16). For this too is what he now says before this statement, Have the faith that you have to yourself before God (Rom 14:22), so that, since this faith is good, by which we believe that all things are clean to the clean (Titus 1:15), and in that faith we approve ourselves, we may use that good of ours well, lest perhaps, when we have abused that good unto the stumbling of weak brothers, we sin against the brothers and in that very good judge ourselves, when we scandalize the weak, in which good we approve ourselves, since that very faith pleases us.
74. 74. [82.] Quod autem ait: Dico enim Christum ministrum fuisse circumcisionis propter veritatem Dei ad confirmandas promissiones patrum, Gentes autem super misericordia glorificare Deum, ad hoc dicit, ut intellegant Gentes Dominum Christum ad Iudaeos esse missum et non superbiant. Iudaeis enim repellentibus, quod ad ipsos missum est, factum est, ut et gentibus Evangelium praedicaretur, quod et in Actibus Apostolorum manifestissime scribitur, cum dicunt Apostoli Iudaeis: Vobis primum oportuit praedicari verbum, sed quoniam indignos vos iudicastis, ecce convertimus nos ad Gentes. Secundum etiam ipsa Domini testimonia, cum dicit: Non sum missus nisi ad oves perditas domus Israel, et iterum: Non est bonum panem filiorum mittere canibus. Quod Gentes si bene considerent, intellegunt ista sua fide, qua iam credunt omnia munda mundis, non se debere insultare his, si qui forte infirmi ex circumcisione fuerint, qui propter communicationem idolorum nullas omnino carnes attingere audeant.
74. 74. [82.] As for what he says, For I say that Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the sake of the truth of God, to confirm the promises to the fathers, but the gentiles glorify God for his mercy (Rom 15:8-9), he says this so that the gentiles may understand that the Lord Christ was sent to the Jews, and may not be proud. For when the Jews rejected what was sent to them, it came about that the Gospel was preached also to the gentiles, which is also written most plainly in the Acts of the Apostles, when the apostles say to the Jews, It was necessary that the word be preached to you first; but since you have judged yourselves unworthy, behold, we turn to the gentiles (Acts 13:46). This is also according to the Lord's own testimonies, when he says, I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel (Matt 15:24), and again, It is not good to throw the children's bread to the dogs (Matt 15:26). If the gentiles consider this well, they understand that, by this faith of theirs by which they now believe that all things are clean to the clean (Titus 1:15), they ought not to insult those who, perhaps, are weak from the circumcision, who, on account of fellowship with idols, dare to touch no meats at all.
75. 75. [83.] Quod autem dicit: Ut minister sim Christi Iesu in gentibus consecrans Evangelium Dei, ut fiat oblatio gentium acceptabilis sanctificata in Spiritu Sancto, hoc intellegitur offerantur Gentes Deo, tamquam acceptabile sacrificium, cum in Christo credentes per Evangelium sanctificantur, sicut et superius dicit: Obsecro itaque vos, fratres, per misericordiam Dei, ut exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vivam, sanctam, Deo placentem.
75. 75. [83.] As for what he says, that I may be a minister of Christ Jesus among the gentiles, consecrating the Gospel of God, so that the offering of the gentiles may be acceptable, sanctified in the Holy Spirit (Rom 15:16), this is understood to mean that the gentiles are offered to God as an acceptable sacrifice, when, believing in Christ, they are sanctified through the Gospel, as he also says above, I beseech you therefore, brothers, by the mercy of God, that you present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy, pleasing to God (Rom 12:1).
76. 76. [84.] Quod autem ait: Obsecro vos, fratres, ut intendatis in eos, qui dissensiones et scandala praeter doctrinam, quam vos didicistis, faciunt, de his intellegitur dicere, de quibus et ad Timotheum scripsit dicens: Sicut rogavi te, ut sustineres Ephesi, cum irem in Macedoniam, ut denuntiares quibusdam, ne aliter docerent, neque intenderent fabulis et genealogiis interminatis, quae quaestiones praestant magis quam aedificationem Dei, quae est in fide, et ad Titum: Sunt enim multi non subditi, vaniloqui et mentis seductores, maxime qui ex circumcisione sunt, quos oportet refelli, qui universas domos subvertunt docentes, quae non oportet turpis lucri gratia; dixit quidam ex ipsis proprius eorum propheta: Cretenses semper mendaces, malae bestiae, ventres pigri. Ad hoc enim refertur, quod et hic ait: Hi enim Christo Domino non serviunt, sed suo ventri, de quibus alio loco dicit: Quorum Deus venter est.
76. 76. [84.] As for what he says, I beseech you, brothers, to take note of those who cause dissensions and scandals contrary to the teaching which you have learned (Rom 16:17), he is understood to be speaking of those concerning whom he also wrote to Timothy, saying, As I asked you to remain at Ephesus when I was going into Macedonia, so that you might charge certain ones not to teach otherwise, nor to occupy themselves with fables and endless genealogies, which furnish disputes rather than the edification of God which is in faith (1 Tim 1:3-4); and to Titus, For there are many insubordinate, idle talkers and deceivers of the mind, especially those of the circumcision, who must be refuted, who overturn whole households, teaching what they ought not for the sake of base gain; one of themselves, a prophet of their own, said: Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy bellies (Titus 1:10-12). For to this is referred what he says here too, For these do not serve Christ the Lord but their own belly (Rom 16:18), concerning whom he says in another place, whose God is the belly (Phil 3:19).

Notebook

Full View