Grace and Free Choice
Against Pelagianism
j/k navigate paragraphs
· n/p next/prev article
· e expand all
· c collapse all
Letters
C
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
C. 214
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
C. 215
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
C. 216
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
C
Grace
Grace
C. 225
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
C. 226
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Grace
Revisions II
C. 66To Valentinus and, with him, the monks, on grace and free choice, one bookAd Valentinum et cum illo monachos, de gratia et libero arbitrio, liber unus
Propter eos qui, cum defenditur Dei gratia (Ep. 214, 1; 215; 1), putantes negari liberum arbitrium, sic ipsi defendunt liberum arbitrium, ut negent Dei gratiam (De grat. et lib. arb. 5, 10-11), asserentes eam secundum merita nostra dari, scripsi librum cuius est titulus: De gratia et libero arbitrio. Ad eos autem scripsi monachos Adrumetinos, in quorum monasterio de hac re coeperat esse contentio, ita ut me consulere eorum aliqui cogerentur.
On account of those who, when God's grace is defended (Letters 214.1; 215.1), suppose that free choice is being denied, and so themselves defend free choice in such a way as to deny God's grace Grace and Free Choice 5.10–11., asserting that it is given according to our merits, I wrote a book whose title is On Grace and Free Choice. I wrote it for those monks of Hadrumetum, in whose monastery a dispute over this matter had begun, so that some of them were compelled to consult me.
GraceHic liber sic incipit: Propter eos qui hominis liberum arbitrium.
This book begins thus: On account of those who so preach human free choice.
GraceBk. 1
AD VALENTINUM ET CUM ILLO MONACHOS
To Valentinus and, with him, the Monks
Grace1. 1. Propter eos qui hominis liberum arbitrium sic praedicant et defendunt, ut Dei gratiam qua vocamur ad eum et a nostris malis meritis liberamur, et per quam bona merita comparamus quibus ad vitam perveniamus aeternam, negare audeant et conentur auferre, multa iam disseruimus, litterisque mandavimus, quantum nobis Dominus donare dignatus est. Sed quoniam sunt quidam, qui sic gratiam Dei defendunt, ut negent hominis liberum arbitrium, aut quando gratia defenditur, negari existiment liberum arbitrium, hinc aliquid scribere ad vestram Caritatem, Valentine frater, et ceteri qui simul Deo servitis, compellente mutua caritate curavi. Nuntiatum est enim mihi de vobis, fratres, ab aliquibus qui in vestra congregatione sunt, et ad nos inde venerunt, per quos et ista direximus, quod de hac re dissensiones in vobis sint.
1. 1. On account of those who so proclaim and defend human free choice that they dare to deny and try to do away with the grace of God by which we are called to him and freed from our evil merits, and through which we acquire the good merits by which we attain to eternal life, we have already discussed much and committed it to writing, as far as the Lord has seen fit to grant us. But since there are some who defend the grace of God in such a way as to deny human free choice, or who suppose that when grace is defended free choice is being denied, I have taken care, prompted by mutual love, to write something on this subject to your Charity, brother Valentinus, and to the rest who serve God along with you. For it has been reported to me concerning you, brothers, by some who are in your congregation and who came from there to us—through whom we have also sent these things—that there are disagreements among you over this matter.
Grace.1.1.1Itaque, dilectissimi, ne vos perturbet huius quaestionis obscuritas, moneo vos primum, ut de iis quae intellegitis, agatis Deo gratias: quidquid est autem quo pervenire nondum potest vestrae mentis intentio, pacem inter vos et caritatem servantes, a Domino ut intellegatis orate; et donec vos ipse perducat ad ea quae nondum intellegitis, ibi ambulate quo pervenire potuistis.
And so, beloved, lest the obscurity of this question disturb you, I admonish you first to give thanks to God for the things you understand; but whatever it is that the attention of your mind cannot yet reach, keep peace and love among yourselves and pray to the Lord that you may understand it; and until he himself leads you to the things you do not yet understand, walk in that which you have been able to reach.
Grace.1.1.1Hoc admonet apostolus Paulus, qui cum dixisset nondum se esse perfectum, paulo post ait: Quotquot ergo perfecti hoc sapiamus; id est, ita nos esse perfectos, ut nondum ad perfectionem quae nobis sufficit venerimus: continuoque subiunxit: Et si quid aliter sapitis, hoc quoque vobis Deus revelabit; verumtamen in quod pervenimus, in eo ambulemus (Phil 3, 15-16). Ambulando quippe in quod pervenimus, et quo nondum pervenimus pervenire poterimus, Deo nobis revelante si quid aliter sapimus, si ea quae iam revelavit non relinquamus.
This is what the apostle Paul admonishes, who, when he had said that he was not yet perfect, a little later says: Let those of us, then, who are perfect be of this mind; that is, that we are perfect in such a way that we have not yet come to the perfection that is sufficient for us; and he immediately added: And if in anything you are otherwise minded, this also God will reveal to you; nevertheless, let us walk by that to which we have attained (Phil 3:15–16). For by walking in that to which we have attained, we shall also be able to reach that to which we have not yet attained, with God revealing it to us if in anything we are otherwise minded, provided we do not abandon the things he has already revealed.
Grace.1.1.12. 2. Revelavit autem nobis per Scripturas suas sanctas, esse in homine liberum voluntatis arbitrium. Quomodo autem revelaverit, commemoro vos, non humano eloquio, sed divino. Primum, quia ipsa divina praecepta homini non prodessent, nisi haberet liberum voluntatis arbitrium, quo ea faciens ad promissa praemia perveniret. Ideo enim data sunt, ut homo excusationem de ignorantia non haberet, sicut Dominus dicit in Evangelio de Iudaeis: Si non venissem et locutus eis fuissem, peccatum non haberent: nunc autem excusationem non habent de peccato suo (Io 15, 22). De quo peccato dicit, nisi de illo magno, quod praesciebat eorum futurum quando ista dicebat, id est, quo eum fuerant occisuri? Neque enim nullum habebant peccatum, antequam Christus venisset in carne ad eos.
2. 2. Now he has revealed to us through his holy Scriptures that there is in man the free choice of the will. But how he has revealed it, I remind you, is not by human eloquence but by divine. First, because the divine precepts themselves would not profit a man unless he had the free choice of the will, by which, in keeping them, he might attain to the promised rewards. For they were given so that man might have no excuse from ignorance, as the Lord says in the Gospel concerning the Jews: If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin (John 15:22). Of what sin does he speak, except that great one which he foreknew would be theirs when he said these things—that is, the sin by which they were going to kill him? For they were not without any sin before Christ had come to them in the flesh.
Grace.1.2.2Item dicit Apostolus: Revelatur ira Dei de caelo in omnem impietatem et iniustitiam hominum eorum, qui veritatem in iniquitate detinent: quia quod notum est Dei, manifestum est in illis: Deus enim illis manifestavit. Invisibilia enim eius, a creatura mundi, per ea quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur; sempiterna quoque virtus eius ac divinitas, ut sint inexcusabiles (Rom 1, 18-20). Quomodo dicit inexcusabiles, nisi de illa excusatione qua solet dicere humana superbia: Si scissem, fecissem; ideo non feci quia nescivi"? aut: "Si scirem, facerem; ideo non facio, quia nescio"? Haec eis excusatio tollitur, quando praeceptum datur, vel scientia non peccandi manifestatur.
Likewise the Apostle says: The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all the ungodliness and unrighteousness of those men who hold the truth in unrighteousness; for what is known of God is manifest in them, for God has manifested it to them. For the invisible things of him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made; his eternal power also and divinity, so that they are without excuse (Rom 1:18–20). How does he call them without excuse, except in regard to that excuse which human pride is wont to make: "If I had known, I would have done it; the reason I did not do it is that I did not know"? or "If I knew, I would do it; the reason I do not do it is that I do not know"? This excuse is taken away from them when a precept is given, or when knowledge of how not to sin is made manifest.
Grace.1.2.22. 3. Sed sunt homines qui etiam de ipso Deo se excusare conantur, quibus dicit apostolus Iacobus: Nemo cum tentatur dicat: Quoniam a Deo tentor. Deus enim intentator malorum est; ipse autem neminem tentat. Unusquisque vero tentatur a concupiscentia sua abstractus et illectus; deinde concupiscentia, cum conceperit, parit peccatum; peccatum vero, cum consummatum fuerit, generat mortem (Iac 1, 13-15). Item de ipso Deo se excusare volentibus, respondet liber Proverbiorum Salomonis: Insipientia viri violat vias eius; Deum autem causatur in corde suo (Prov 19, 3).
2. 3. But there are men who try to excuse themselves even by appealing to God himself, to whom the apostle James says: Let no one say when he is tempted: I am tempted by God. For God is not a tempter to evils; he himself tempts no one. But each one is tempted by his own desire, being drawn away and enticed; then desire, when it has conceived, gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is brought to completion, begets death (Jas 1:13–15). Likewise, to those who wish to excuse themselves by appealing to God himself, the book of the Proverbs of Solomon replies: A man's folly violates his ways; but in his heart he lays the blame on God (Prov 19:3).
Grace.1.2.3Et liber Ecclesiasticus dicit: Ne dixeris: Quia propter Dominum recessi: quae enim odit non facias. Ne dixeris: Quia ipse me induxit: non enim opus habet viro peccatore. Omne exsecramentum odit Dominus, et non est amabile timentibus illum. Ipse ab initio fecit hominem, et reliquit eum in manu consilii sui. Si volueris, conservabis mandata, et fidem bonam placiti. Apponit tibi ignem et aquam; ad quodcumque volueris extende manum tuam. In conspectu hominis vita et mors, et quodcumque placuerit dabitur ei (Eccli 15, 11-18). Ecce apertissime videmus expressum liberum humanae voluntatis arbitrium.
And the book of Ecclesiasticus says: Do not say: It is because of the Lord that I fell away; for you must not do the things that he hates. Do not say: It was he who led me astray; for he has no need of a sinful man. The Lord hates every abomination, and it is not lovable to those who fear him. He himself made man from the beginning, and left him in the hand of his own counsel. If you will, you shall keep the commandments and good faith in doing his good pleasure. He has set before you fire and water; stretch out your hand to whichever you will. Before man are life and death, and whichever pleases him shall be given to him (Sir 15:11–18). Behold, we see most plainly expressed the free choice of the human will.
Grace.1.2.32. 4. Quid illud, quod tam multis locis omnia mandata sua custodiri et fieri iubet Deus? quomodo iubet, si non est liberum arbitrium? Quid beatus ille, de quo Psalmus dicit, quod in lege Domini fuit voluntas eius (Ps 1, 2) ? nonne satis indicat voluntate sua hominem in lege Dei consistere?
2. 4. What of the fact that in so many places God commands that all his commandments be kept and carried out? How does he command, if there is no free choice? What of that blessed man of whom the Psalm says that his will was in the law of the Lord (Ps 1:2)? Does this not sufficiently indicate that it is by his own will that a man takes his stand in the law of God?
Grace.1.2.4Deinde tam multa mandata, quae ipsam quodammodo nominatim conveniunt voluntatem, sicut est: Noli vinci a malo (Rom 12, 21); et alia similia, sicut sunt: Nolite fieri sicut equus et mulus, quibus non est intellectus (Ps 31, 9); et: Noli repellere consilia matris tuae (Prov 1, 8); et: Noli esse sapiens apud te ipsum (Prov 3, 7); et: Noli deficere a disciplina Domini (Prov 3, 11); et: Noli negligere legem (Prov 3, 1; 4, 2); et: Noli abstinere bene facere egenti (Prov 3, 27); et: Noli fabricare in amicum tuum mala (Prov 3, 29); et: Noli intendere fallaci mulieri (Prov 5, 2); et: Noluit intellegere ut bene ageret (Ps 35, 4); et: Noluerunt accipere disciplinam (Prov 1, 29) : et innumerabilia talia in veteribus Libris divinorum eloquiorum quid ostendunt, nisi liberum arbitrium voluntatis humanae?
Then there are so many commandments that, in a certain way, address the will by name, such as: Do not be overcome by evil (Rom 12:21); and others like it, such as: Do not become like the horse and the mule, which have no understanding (Ps 32 (31):9); and: Do not reject the counsels of your mother (Prov 1:8); and: Do not be wise in your own eyes (Prov 3:7); and: Do not grow faint under the discipline of the Lord (Prov 3:11); and: Do not neglect the law (Prov 3:1; 4:2); and: Do not withhold doing good to the needy (Prov 3:27); and: Do not devise evil against your friend (Prov 3:29); and: Do not give heed to a deceitful woman (Prov 5:2); and: He refused to understand so as to do well (Ps 36 (35):4); and: They refused to receive discipline (Prov 1:29)—and countless such things in the old books of the divine writings: what do they show, if not the free choice of the human will?
Grace.1.2.4In Libris etiam novis evangelicis et apostolicis, quid aliud ostenditur, ubi dicitur: Nolite vobis condere thesauros in terra (Mt 6, 19); et: Nolite timere eos qui occidunt corpus (Mt 10, 28); et: Qui vult venire post me, abneget semetipsum (Mt 16, 24; Lc 9, 23); et: Pax in terra hominibus bonae voluntatis (Lc 2, 14); et quod dicit apostolus Paulus: Quod vult faciat, non peccat si nubat: qui autem statuit in corde suo, non habens necessitatem, potestatem autem habens suae voluntatis, et hoc statuit in corde suo, servare virginem suam, bene facit (1 Cor 7, 36-37). Item dicit: Si autem volens, hoc facio, mercedem habeo (1 Cor 9, 17); et alio loco: Sobrii estote iuste, et nolite peccare (1 Cor 15, 34); et iterum: Ut quemadmodum promptus est animus voluntatis, ita sit et perficiendi (2 Cor 8, 11). Et ad Timotheum dicit: Cum enim in deliciis egerint in Christo, nubere volunt (1 Tim 5, 11); et alibi: Sed et omnes qui pie volunt vivere in Christo Iesu, persecutionem patientur (2 Tim 3, 12); et ipsi Timotheo: Noli negligere gratiam quae in te est (1 Tim 4, 14). Et ad Philemonem: Ne bonum tuum velut ex necessitate esset, sed ex voluntate (Philem 14). Servos etiam ipsos monet, ut dominis suis ex animo serviant cum bona voluntate (Eph 6, 6-7).
In the new books also, the evangelical and the apostolic, what else is shown, where it is said: Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth (Matt 6:19); and: Do not fear those who kill the body (Matt 10:28); and: Whoever wishes to come after me, let him deny himself (Matt 16:24; Luke 9:23); and: Peace on earth to men of good will (Luke 2:14); and what the apostle Paul says: Let her do what she wills; she does not sin if she marries. But whoever has firmly resolved in his heart, being under no necessity but having power over his own will, and has determined this in his heart, to keep his virgin, he does well (1 Cor 7:36–37). Likewise he says: If I do this willingly, I have a reward (1 Cor 9:17); and in another place: Be soberly righteous, and do not sin (1 Cor 15:34); and again: That as the mind is ready in willing, so it may be also in carrying out (2 Cor 8:11). And to Timothy he says: For when they have grown wanton against Christ, they wish to marry (1 Tim 5:11); and elsewhere: But all who wish to live devoutly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution (2 Tim 3:12); and to Timothy himself: Do not neglect the grace that is in you (1 Tim 4:14). And to Philemon: That your good deed might not be as it were out of necessity, but of your own will (Phlm 14). He also admonishes slaves themselves to serve their masters from the heart with good will (Eph 6:6–7).
Grace.1.2.4Item Iacobus: Nolite itaque errare, fratres mei, et nolite in personarum acceptione habere fidem Domini nostri Iesu Christi (Iac 2, 1); et: Nolite detrahere de alterutro (Iac 4, 11). Item Ioannes in Epistola sua: Nolite diligere mundum (1 Io 2, 15); et cetera huiusmodi. Nempe ubi dicitur: Noli hoc, et noli illud, et ubi ad aliquid faciendum vel non faciendum in divinis monitis opus voluntatis exigitur, satis liberum demonstratur arbitrium. Nemo ergo Deum causetur in corde suo, sed sibi imputet quisque, cum peccat. Neque cum aliquid secundum Deum operatur, alienet hoc a propria voluntate. Quando enim volens facit, tunc dicendum est opus bonum, tunc speranda est boni operis merces ab eo, de quo dictum est: Qui reddet unicuique secundum opera sua (Mt 16, 27; Rom 2, 6; Apoc 22, 12).
Likewise James: Do not err, therefore, my brothers, and do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with partiality toward persons (Jas 2:1); and: Do not speak ill of one another (Jas 4:11). Likewise John in his Epistle: Do not love the world (1 John 2:15); and other things of this kind. Surely, where it is said, Do not do this, and do not do that, and where in the divine admonitions an act of the will is required for doing or not doing something, free choice is sufficiently demonstrated. Let no one, then, lay the blame on God in his heart, but let each impute it to himself when he sins. Nor, when he does anything in accordance with God, let him alienate this from his own will. For when he acts willingly, then the work is to be called good, then the reward of a good work is to be hoped for from him of whom it is said: He will render to each one according to his works (Matt 16:27; Rom 2:6; Rev 22:12).
Grace.1.2.43. 5. Qui ergo noverunt divina mandata, aufertur eis excusatio, quam solent homines habere de ignorantia. Sed nec ipsi sine poena erunt, qui legem Dei nesciunt. Qui enim sine lege peccaverunt, sine lege peribunt: qui autem in lege peccaverunt, per legem iudicabuntur (Rom 2, 12). Quod mihi non videtur Apostolus ita dixisse, tamquam peius aliquid significaverit esse passuros, qui legem nesciunt in peccatis suis, quam illos qui sciunt. Peius enim videtur esse perire, quam iudicari; sed cum hoc de Gentibus et de Iudaeis loqueretur, quia illi sine lege sunt, isti autem legem acceperunt, quis audeat dicere Iudaeos qui in lege peccant, non esse perituros, cum in Christum non crediderint, quandoquidem de illis dictum est, per legem iudicabuntur?
3. 5. Those, then, who know the divine commandments are deprived of the excuse that men are wont to make from ignorance. But neither will those be without punishment who do not know the law of God. For those who have sinned without the law will perish without the law; and those who have sinned in the law will be judged by the law (Rom 2:12). It does not seem to me that the Apostle said this as though to signify that those who do not know the law are going to suffer something worse in their sins than those who do. For to perish seems worse than to be judged; but since he was speaking here of the Gentiles and of the Jews—the former being without the law, the latter having received the law—who would dare to say that the Jews who sin in the law are not going to perish, since they have not believed in Christ, seeing that it was said of them, they will be judged by the law?
Grace.1.3.5Sine fide enim Christi nemo liberari potest; ac per hoc ita iudicabuntur ut pereant. Nam si peior est conditio nescientium quam scientium legem Dei, quomodo verum erit quod Dominus in Evangelio ait: Servus qui nescit voluntatem domini sui, et facit digna plagis, vapulabit pauca; servus autem qui scit voluntatem domini sui, et facit digna plagis, vapulabit multa (Lc 12, 48. 47) ? Ecce ubi ostendit gravius peccare hominem scientem quam nescientem.
For without faith in Christ no one can be freed; and by this they will be so judged as to perish. For if the condition of those who do not know the law of God is worse than that of those who do know it, how will what the Lord says in the Gospel be true: The servant who does not know his master's will, and does what deserves a beating, will be beaten with few stripes; but the servant who knows his master's will, and does what deserves a beating, will be beaten with many stripes (Luke 12:48. 47)? Here he shows that a man who knows sins more gravely than one who does not know.
Grace.1.3.5Nec tamen ideo confugiendum est ad ignorantiae tenebras, ut in eis quisque requirat excusationem. Aliud est enim nescisse, aliud scire noluisse. Voluntas quippe in eo arguitur, de quo dicitur: Noluit intellegere ut bene ageret (Ps 35, 4). Sed et illa ignorantia quae non est eorum qui scire nolunt, sed eorum qui tamquam simpliciter nesciunt, neminem sic excusat, ut sempiterno igne non ardeat, si propterea non credidit quia non audivit omnino quid crederet; sed fortasse ut mitius ardeat.
Yet one must not for that reason take refuge in the darkness of ignorance, so as to seek an excuse there. For it is one thing not to have known, another to have refused to know. The will, indeed, is what is reproached in him of whom it is said: He refused to understand so as to do well (Ps 36 (35):4). But even that ignorance which is not the ignorance of those who refuse to know, but of those who, as it were, simply do not know, excuses no one so as to keep him from burning in everlasting fire, if the reason he did not believe is that he did not at all hear what he was to believe—though perhaps it does so excuse him as to make him burn more lightly.
Grace.1.3.5Non enim sine causa dictum est: Effunde iram tuam in gentes quae te non noverunt (Ps 78, 6); et illud quod ait Apostolus: Cum venerit in flamma ignis dare vindictam in eos qui ignorant Deum (2 Thess 1, 8). Verumtamen ut habeamus et ipsam scientiam, ne dicat unusquisque: Nescivi, non audivi, non intellexi; voluntas convenitur humana, ubi dicitur: Nolite esse sicut equus et mulus, quibus non est intellectus (Ps 31, 9); quamvis peior appareat, de quo dictum est: Verbis non emendabitur servus durus; si enim intellexerit, non obaudiet (Prov 29, 19).
For it was not without reason that it was said: Pour out your wrath upon the nations that have not known you (Ps 79 (78):6); and that which the Apostle says: When he comes in flaming fire to inflict vengeance upon those who do not know God (2 Thess 1:8). Nevertheless, so that we may have knowledge itself, lest each one say, I did not know, I did not hear, I did not understand, the human will is addressed where it is said: Do not be like the horse and the mule, which have no understanding (Ps 32 (31):9); although he appears worse of whom it is said: A stubborn servant will not be corrected by words; for even if he understands, he will not obey (Prov 29:19).
Grace.1.3.5Quando autem dicit homo: Non possum facere quod praecipitur, quoniam concupiscentia mea vincor (Cf. Rom 7, 18), iam quidem de ignorantia non habet excusationem, nec Deum causatur in corde suo, sed malum suum in se cognoscit et dolet; cui tamen dicit Apostolus: Noli vinci a malo, sed vince in bono malum (Rom 12, 21). Et utique cui dicitur: Noli vinci, arbitrium voluntatis eius sine dubio convenitur. Velle enim et nolle propriae voluntatis est.
But when a man says, I cannot do what is commanded, because I am overcome by my desire (See Rom 7:18), he indeed no longer has an excuse from ignorance, nor does he lay the blame on God in his heart, but he recognizes his own evil within himself and grieves over it; yet to him the Apostle says: Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good (Rom 12:21). And surely, to one to whom it is said, Do not be overcome, the choice of his will is without doubt being addressed. For to will and not to will belongs to one's own will.
Grace.1.3.54. 6. Sed metuendum est ne ista omnia divina testimonia, et quaecumque alia sunt, quae sine dubitatione sunt plurima, in defensione liberi arbitrii, sic intellegantur, ut ad vitam piam et bonam conversationem, cui merces aeterna debetur, adiutorio et gratiae Dei locus non relinquatur; et audeat miser homo, quando bene vivit et bene operatur, vel potius bene vivere et bene operari sibi videtur, in se ipso, non in Domino gloriari, et spem recte vivendi in se ipso ponere, ut sequatur eum maledictum Ieremiae prophetae dicentis: Maledictus homo qui spem habet in homine, et firmat carnem brachii sui, et a Domino discedit cor eius (Ier 17, 5).
4. 6. But it must be feared that all these divine testimonies, and whatever others there are—which without doubt are very many—in defense of free choice, may be so understood that no room is left for the help and grace of God in living a devout life and a good manner of conduct, to which an eternal reward is owed; and that wretched man, when he lives well and acts well—or rather, seems to himself to live well and act well—may dare to glory in himself, not in the Lord, and to place his hope of living rightly in himself, so that there follows him the curse of Jeremiah the prophet, who says: Cursed is the man who places his hope in man, and makes the flesh of his arm his strength, and whose heart departs from the Lord (Jer 17:5).
Grace.1.4.6Intellegite, fratres, hoc propheticum testimonium. Quia enim non dixit Propheta: Maledictus homo qui spem habet in se ipso, posset alicui videri ideo dictum esse: Maledictus homo qui spem habet in homine, ut nemo habeat spem in altero homine, sed in se. Ut ergo ostenderet sic se admonuisse hominem, ut nec in se ipso haberet spem, propterea cum dixisset: Maledictus homo qui spem habet in homine, mox addidit: et firmat carnem brachii sui. Brachium pro potentia posuit operandi. In nomine autem carnis intellegenda est humana fragilitas. Ac per hoc firmat carnem brachii sui, qui potentiam fragilem atque invalidam, id est humanam, sibi sufficere ad bene operandum putat, nec adiutorium sperat a Domino. Propterea subiecit: et a Domino discedit cor eius.
Understand, brothers, this prophetic testimony. For because the Prophet did not say, Cursed is the man who places his hope in himself, it might seem to someone that the reason he said, Cursed is the man who places his hope in man, was that no one should place his hope in another man, but in himself. So then, in order to show that he had admonished man in such a way that he should not place his hope even in himself, after he had said, Cursed is the man who places his hope in man, he at once added, and makes the flesh of his arm his strength. He put the arm for the power of acting. And under the name of flesh, human frailty is to be understood. And thus he makes the flesh of his arm his strength who thinks that a frail and feeble power—that is, a human one—is sufficient for him to act well, and does not hope for help from the Lord. For this reason he added: and whose heart departs from the Lord.
Grace.1.4.6Talis est haeresis pelagiana, non antiqua, sed ante non multum tempus exorta: contra quam haeresim cum fuisset diutius disputatum, etiam ad concilia episcopalia novissima necessitate perventum est; unde vobis, non quidem omnia, sed tamen aliqua legenda direxi. Nos ergo ad bene operandum spem non habeamus in homine, firmantes carnem brachii nostri: nec a Domino discedat cor nostrum; sed ei dicat: Adiutor meus esto, ne derelinquas me, neque despicias me, Deus salutaris meus (Ps 26, 9).
Such is the Pelagian heresy, not ancient, but arisen not long ago; and since there had been a rather lengthy dispute against this heresy, in the end it even came to councils of bishops, of necessity. From these I have sent you to read not indeed all the documents, but some. Let us, then, in order to act well, place no hope in man, making the flesh of our arm our strength; and let our heart not depart from the Lord, but let it say to him: Be my helper, do not forsake me, nor despise me, O God my Savior (Ps 27 (26):9).
Grace.1.4.64. 7. Proinde, carissimi, sicut superioribus testimoniis sanctarum Scripturarum probavimus, ad bene vivendum et recte agendum esse in homine liberum voluntatis arbitrium, sic etiam de gratia Dei, sine qua nihil boni agere possumus, quae sint divina testimonia videamus. Ac primum de ipsa vestra professione aliquid dicam. Neque enim congregaret vos ista societas, in qua continenter vivitis, nisi voluptatem coniugalem contemneretis. Hinc autem Domino loquenti cum dixissent discipuli: Si talis est causa hominis cum uxore, non expedit nubere, respondit eis: Non omnes capiunt verbum hoc, sed quibus datum est (Mt 19, 10-11). Numquid non liberum arbitrium Timothei est exhortatus Apostolus dicens: Contine te ipsum (1 Tim 5, 22) ? Et in hac re potestatem voluntatis ostendit, ubi ait: non habens necessitatem, potestatem autem habens suae voluntatis, ut servet virginem suam (1 Cor 7, 37). Et tamen: non omnes capiunt verbum hoc, sed quibus datum est. Quibus enim non est datum, aut nolunt, aut non implent quod volunt; quibus autem datum est, sic volunt ut impleant quod volunt. Itaque, ut hoc verbum, quod non ab omnibus capitur, ab aliquibus capiatur, et Dei donum est, et liberum arbitrium.
4. 7. Accordingly, dearly beloved, just as we have proved by the foregoing testimonies of the holy Scriptures that there is in man the free choice of the will for living well and acting rightly, so too let us see what the divine testimonies are concerning the grace of God, without which we can do nothing good. And first I shall say something about your own profession. For this fellowship in which you live continently would not have gathered you together unless you despised conjugal pleasure. Now on this matter, when the disciples had said to the Lord as he was speaking, If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is not expedient to marry, he answered them: Not all grasp this word, but only those to whom it is given (Matt 19:10–11). Did the Apostle not exhort the free choice of Timothy when he said: Keep yourself continent (1 Tim 5:22)? And in this matter he showed the power of the will, where he says: being under no necessity but having power over his own will, to keep his virgin (1 Cor 7:37). And yet, not all grasp this word, but only those to whom it is given. For those to whom it is not given either do not will it, or do not fulfill what they will; but those to whom it is given so will it that they fulfill what they will. And so, that this word, which is not grasped by all, may be grasped by some, is both a gift of God and free choice.
Grace.1.4.74. 8. De ipsa quoque pudicitia coniugali nempe Apostolus ait: Quod vult faciat, non peccat si nubat (1 Cor 7, 36); et tamen etiam hoc Dei donum est, dicente Scriptura: A Domino iungitur mulier viro (Prov 19, 14 (sec. LXX)). Ideo Doctor Gentium et pudicitiam coniugalem per quam non fiunt adulteria, et perfectiorem continentiam per quam nullus concubitus quaeritur, sermone suo commendans, et hoc et illud donum Dei esse monstravit, scribens ad Corinthios, et admonens coniuges ne se invicem fraudent; quos cum admonuisset, adiecit: Vellem autem omnes homines esse sicut et me ipsum: quia utique ipse ab omni concubitu continebat; et continuo subiunxit: Sed unusquisque proprium donum habet a Deo; alius sic, alius autem sic (1 Cor 7, 7). Numquid tam multa quae praecipiuntur in lege Dei, ne fornicationes et adulteria committantur, indicant aliud quam liberum arbitrium? Neque enim praeciperentur, nisi homo haberet propriam voluntatem, qua divinis praeceptis obediret. Et tamen Dei donum est, sine quo servari castitatis praecepta non possunt. Unde ait ille in libro Sapientiae: Cum scirem quia nemo esse potest continens nisi Deus det; et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae, scire cuius esset hoc donum (Sap 8, 21). Ut autem ista non serventur castitatis sancta mandata, unusquisque tentatur a concupiscentia sua abstractus et illectus (Iac 1, 14).
4. 8. Concerning conjugal chastity itself, too, the Apostle says: Let her do what she wills; she does not sin if she marries (1 Cor 7:36); and yet this also is a gift of God, since Scripture says: By the Lord a wife is joined to a husband (Prov 19:14 (according to the LXX)). Therefore the Teacher of the Gentiles, commending in his discourse both conjugal chastity, by which adulteries are not committed, and the more perfect continence, by which no sexual union is sought, showed that both the one and the other is a gift of God, writing to the Corinthians and admonishing married persons not to defraud one another; and when he had admonished them, he added: But I would that all men were even as I myself—for indeed he himself abstained from all sexual union; and he at once continued: But each one has his own gift from God; one in this way, another in that (1 Cor 7:7). Do not the many things commanded in the law of God, that fornications and adulteries not be committed, indicate anything other than free choice? For they would not be commanded unless man had his own will, by which he might obey the divine precepts. And yet it is a gift of God, without which the precepts of chastity cannot be kept. Hence that man says in the book of Wisdom: When I knew that no one can be continent unless God grants it, this itself was a part of wisdom, to know whose gift it was (Wis 8:21). But that these holy commandments of chastity are not kept comes about because each one is tempted by his own desire, being drawn away and enticed (Jas 1:14).
Grace.1.4.8Ubi si dixerit: Volo servare, sed vincor a concupiscentia mea, respondet Scriptura libero eius arbitrio, quod iam superius dixi: Noli vinci a malo, sed vince in bono malum (Rom 12, 21). Quod tamen ut fiat, adiuvat gratia: quae nisi adiuverit, nihil lex erit nisi virtus peccati. Augetur enim concupiscentia, et maiores vires accipit lege prohibente, nisi adiuvet spiritus gratiae. Hoc est quod dicit ille ipse Doctor Gentium: Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum; virtus vero peccati, lex (1 Cor 15, 56). Ecce unde dicit homo: Volo legis servare mandatum, sed virtute concupiscentiae meae vincor. Et cum voluntas eius convenitur, et dicitur: Noli vinci a malo, quid ei prodest, nisi gratia succurrente fiat? Quod ipse Apostolus secutus adiunxit: nam cum dixisset: virtus peccati lex, continuo subiecit: Gratias autem Deo, qui dat nobis victoriam per Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum (1 Cor 15, 57). Ergo et victoria qua peccatum vincitur, nihil aliud est quam donum Dei, in isto certamine adiuvantis liberum arbitrium.
Here, if he says, I wish to keep it, but I am overcome by my desire, Scripture answers his free choice, as I have already said above: Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good (Rom 12:21). Yet that this may come about, grace helps; and unless it helps, the law will be nothing but the power of sin. For desire is increased, and receives greater strength, when the law forbids, unless the spirit of grace helps. This is what that same Teacher of the Gentiles says: The sting of death is sin; and the power of sin is the law (1 Cor 15:56). See from this why a man says, I wish to keep the commandment of the law, but I am overcome by the power of my desire. And when his will is addressed, and it is said to him, Do not be overcome by evil, what does it profit him, unless it comes about by the aid of grace? This the Apostle himself went on to add; for when he had said, the power of sin is the law, he at once added: But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Cor 15:57). Therefore the victory by which sin is overcome is nothing other than the gift of God, helping free choice in this contest.
Grace.1.4.84. 9. Propter quod dicit et caelestis Magister: Vigilate et orate, ne intretis in tentationem (Mt 26, 41). Ergo unusquisque contra suam concupiscentiam dimicans oret, ne intret in tentationem, id est, ne sit ab illa abstractus et illectus. Non autem intrat in tentationem, si voluntate bona vincat concupiscentiam malam. Nec tamen sufficit arbitrium voluntatis humanae, nisi a Domino victoria concedatur oranti, ne intret in tentationem.
4. 9. On account of this the heavenly Teacher also says: Watch and pray, that you do not enter into temptation (Matt 26:41). Therefore let each one, in fighting against his own desire, pray that he may not enter into temptation—that is, that he may not be drawn away and enticed by it. Now he does not enter into temptation if by a good will he overcomes evil desire. And yet the choice of the human will does not suffice, unless the victory is granted by the Lord to him who prays that he may not enter into temptation.
Grace.1.4.9Quid vero evidentius quam Dei ostenditur gratia, ubi quod oratur accipitur? Si enim dixisset Salvator noster: Vigilate, ne intretis in tentationem, admonuisse tantummodo videretur hominis voluntatem; cum vero addidit: et orate, ostendit Deum adiuvare, ne intretur in tentationem. Dictum est libero arbitrio: Fili, noli deficere a disciplina Domini (Prov 3, 11); et Dominus dixit: Ego rogavi pro te, Petre, ne deficiat fides tua (Luc 22, 32). Homo ergo gratia iuvatur, ne sine causa voluntati eius iubeatur.
But what is shown more plainly to be the grace of God than this, that what is prayed for is received? For if our Savior had said, Watch, that you do not enter into temptation, he would have seemed only to admonish the will of man; but when he added, and pray, he showed that God helps, so that one does not enter into temptation. It was said to free choice: Son, do not grow faint under the discipline of the Lord (Prov 3:11); and the Lord said: I have prayed for you, Peter, that your faith may not fail (Luke 22:32). Man, then, is helped by grace, so that it is not without reason that a command is given to his will.
Grace.1.4.95. 10. Cum dicit Deus: Convertimini ad me, et convertar ad vos (Zach 1, 3), unum horum videtur esse nostrae voluntatis, id est, ut convertamur ad eum; alterum vero ipsius gratiae, id est, ut etiam ipse convertatur ad nos. Ubi possunt putare pelagiani suam obtinere sententiam, qua dicunt gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari. Quod quidem in Oriente, hoc est, in provincia Palaestina, in qua est civitas Ierusalem, cum ipse Pelagius ab episcopis audiretur, affirmare non ausus est. Nam inter caetera quae illi obiecta sunt, et hoc obiectum est quod diceret gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari: quod sic alienum est a catholica doctrina et inimicum gratiae Christi, ut nisi hoc obiectum sibi anathemasset, ipse inde anathematus exisset. Sed fallaciter eum anathemasse, posteriores eius indicant libri, in quibus omnino nihil aliud defendit, quam gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari.
5. 10. When God says, Turn to me, and I will turn to you (Zech 1:3), one of these seems to belong to our will—that is, that we turn to him; but the other to his grace—that is, that he himself also turns to us. Here the Pelagians may think that they hold their own position, by which they say that the grace of God is given according to our merits. Yet in the East—that is, in the province of Palestine, in which is the city of Jerusalem—when Pelagius himself was heard by the bishops, he did not dare to affirm this. For among the other charges brought against him, this too was charged: that he said the grace of God is given according to our merits—which is so foreign to Catholic teaching and so hostile to the grace of Christ that, unless he had anathematized this charge made against him, he would himself have departed from there anathematized. But that he anathematized it deceitfully, his later books make plain, in which he defends nothing whatever other than that the grace of God is given according to our merits.
Grace.1.5.10Talia ergo de Scripturis colligunt, quale est hoc unum quod paulo ante dixi: Convertimini ad me, et convertar ad vos, ut secundum meritum conversionis nostrae ad Deum, detur gratia eius, in qua ad nos et ipse convertitur. Nec attendunt qui hoc sentiunt, quia nisi donum Dei esset etiam ipsa ad Deum nostra conversio, non ei diceretur: Deus virtutum, converte nos (Ps 79, 8); et: Deus, tu convertens vivificabis nos; et: Converte nos, Deus sanitatum nostrarum (Ps 84, 7. 5); et huiusmodi alia, quae commemorare longum est. Nam et venire ad Christum, quid est aliud nisi ad eum credendo converti? Et tamen ait: Nemo potest venire ad me, nisi datum fuerit ei a Patre meo (Io 6, 66).
Such things, then, they gather from the Scriptures, like this one that I mentioned a little while ago: Turn to me, and I will turn to you—so that, according to the merit of our turning to God, his grace is given, by which he also turns to us. But those who hold this view do not consider that, unless our very turning to God were itself also a gift of God, it would not be said to him: O God of hosts, turn us (Ps 80 (79):8); and: O God, you will turn and give us life; and: Turn us, O God of our salvation (Ps 85 (84):5. 7); and other things of this kind, which it would take long to recall. For to come to Christ, too, what else is it but to be turned to him by believing? And yet he says: No one can come to me unless it has been given him by my Father (John 6:66).
Grace.1.5.10...contra Pelagianos dicentes gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari.
. . . against the Pelagians, who say that the grace of God is given according to our merits.
Grace.1.5.105. 11. Item quod scriptum est in libro secundo Paralipomenon: Dominus vobiscum, cum vos estis cum eo, et si quaesieritis eum, invenietis; si autem reliqueritis eum, derelinquet vos (2 Par 15, 2), manifestat quidem voluntatis arbitrium. Sed illi qui dicunt gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari, ista testimonia sic accipiunt, ut dicant meritum nostrum in eo esse, quod sumus cum Deo; eius autem gratiam secundum hoc meritum dari, ut sit et ipse nobiscum. Item meritum nostrum in eo esse, quod quaerimus eum; et secundum hoc meritum dari eius gratiam, ut inveniamus eum.
5. 11. Likewise, what is written in the second book of Chronicles: The Lord is with you, when you are with him; and if you seek him, you will find him; but if you forsake him, he will forsake you (2 Chr 15:2), manifests indeed the choice of the will. But those who say that the grace of God is given according to our merits take these testimonies in such a way as to say that our merit consists in this, that we are with God; and that his grace is given according to this merit, that he too may be with us. Likewise, that our merit consists in this, that we seek him; and that according to this merit his grace is given, that we may find him.
Grace.1.5.11Et in libro primo quod dictum est: Et tu, Salomon fili mi, cognosce Deum, et servi ei in corde perfecto et anima volente; quia omnia corda scrutatur Dominus, et omnem cogitationem mentium novit; si quaesieris eum, invenietur tibi; et si dimiseris eum, repellet te in perpetuum (1 Par 28, 9), declarat voluntatis arbitrium. Sed illi in eo ponunt meritum hominis, quod dictum est: si quaesieris eum; et secundum hoc meritum dari gratiam, in eo quod dictum est : invenietur tibi; et omnino laborant, quantum possunt, ostendere gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari: hoc est, gratiam non esse gratiam. Quibus enim secundum meritum redditur, non imputatur merces secundum gratiam, sed secundum debitum (Rom 4, 4), sicut apertissime dicit Apostolus.
And what was said in the first book: And you, Solomon my son, know God, and serve him with a perfect heart and a willing soul; for the Lord searches all hearts, and knows every thought of minds; if you seek him, he will be found by you; and if you forsake him, he will cast you off forever (1 Chr 28:9), declares the choice of the will. But they place the merit of man in what was said, if you seek him; and they hold that grace is given according to this merit, in what was said, he will be found by you; and they labor altogether, as much as they can, to show that the grace of God is given according to our merits—that is, that grace is not grace. For to those to whom recompense is given according to merit, the reward is not reckoned according to grace, but according to debt (Rom 4:4), as the Apostle says most plainly.
Grace.1.5.115. 12. Meritum enim fuit quidem in apostolo Paulo, sed malum, quando persequebatur Ecclesiam: unde dicit: Non sum idoneus vocari Apostolus, quia persecutus sum Ecclesiam Dei (1 Cor 15, 9). Cum ergo haberet hoc meritum malum, redditum est ei bonum pro malo: ideoque secutus adiunxit: Sed gratia Dei sum id quod sum. Atque ut ostenderet et liberum arbitrium, mox addidit: et gratia eius in me vacua non fuit, sed plus omnibus illis laboravi (1 Cor 15, 10). Hoc enim liberum arbitrium hominis exhortatur et in aliis, quibus dicit: Rogamus ne in vacuum gratiam Dei suscipiatis (2 Cor 6, 1). Utquid enim eos rogat, si gratiam sic susceperunt, ut propriam perderent voluntatem? Tamen ne ipsa voluntas sine gratia Dei putetur boni aliquid posse, continuo cum dixisset: Gratia eius in me vacua non fuit, sed plus omnibus illis laboravi, subiunxit atque ait: Non ego autem, sed gratia Dei mecum (1 Cor 15, 10) : id est, "non solus, sed gratia Dei mecum": ac per hoc nec gratia Dei sola, nec ipse solus, sed gratia Dei cum illo. Ut autem de caelo vocaretur, et tam magna efficacissima vocatione converteretur, gratia Dei erat sola; quia merita eius erant magna, sed mala.
5. 12. There was indeed a merit in the apostle Paul, but an evil one, when he was persecuting the Church; hence he says: I am not fit to be called an Apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God (1 Cor 15:9). Since, then, he had this evil merit, good was rendered to him for evil; and so he went on to add: But by the grace of God I am what I am. And to show free choice as well, he at once added: and his grace in me was not in vain, but I labored more than all of them (1 Cor 15:10). For he exhorts this free choice of man in others also, to whom he says: We beseech you not to receive the grace of God in vain (2 Cor 6:1). For why does he beseech them, if they received grace in such a way as to lose their own will? Yet, lest the will itself be thought able to do anything good without the grace of God, immediately after he had said, his grace in me was not in vain, but I labored more than all of them, he added and said: Yet not I, but the grace of God with me (1 Cor 15:10)—that is, "not I alone, but the grace of God with me"; and thus neither the grace of God alone, nor he alone, but the grace of God with him. But that he was called from heaven, and converted by so great and most efficacious a calling, was the grace of God alone; for his merits were great, but evil.
Grace.1.5.12Denique et alibi dicit ad Timotheum: Collabora Evangelio secundum virtutem Dei salvos nos facientis, et vocantis vocatione sua sancta; non secundum opera nostra, sed secundum suum propositum et gratiam, quae data est nobis in Christo Iesu (2 Tim 1, 8-9). Item merita sua, sed mala commemorans dicit: Fuimus enim stulti et nos aliquando et increduli, errantes, servientes desideriis et voluptatibus variis, in malitia et invidia agentes, abominabiles, invicem odio habentes (Tit 3, 3). Quid istis tam malis meritis nisi poena utique debebatur? Sed Deo reddente bona pro malis, per gratiam quae non secundum merita nostra datur, factum est quod deinde subiungit et dicit: Cum autem benignitas et humanitas illuxit Salvatoris nostri Dei, non ex operibus iustitiae quae fecimus nos, sed secundum suam misericordiam salvos nos fecit, per lavacrum regenerationis et renovationis Spiritus sancti, quem ditissime effudit super nos, per Iesum Christum Salvatorem nostrum, ut iustificati ipsius gratia, haeredes efficiamur secundum spem vitae aeternae (Tit 3, 4-7).
Finally, elsewhere too he says to Timothy: Labor together for the Gospel according to the power of God, who saves us and calls us with his holy calling; not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus (2 Tim 1:8–9). Likewise, recalling his own merits, but evil ones, he says: For we too were once foolish and unbelieving, going astray, slaves to various desires and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, hating one another (Titus 3:3). What was owed to such evil merits except, surely, punishment? But, since God rendered good for evil, through grace which is not given according to our merits, there came about what he next adds and says: But when the kindness and humanity of God our Savior appeared, not by works of righteousness which we did, but according to his mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out richly upon us, through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that, justified by his grace, we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life (Titus 3:4–7).
Grace.1.5.126. 13. His et talibus testimoniis divinis probatur, gratiam Dei non secundum merita nostra dari: quandoquidem non solum nullis bonis, verum etiam multis meritis malis praecedentibus videmus datam, et quotidie dari videmus. Sed plane cum data fuerint, incipiunt esse etiam merita nostra bona, per illam tamen: nam si se illa subtraxerit, cadit homo, non erectus, sed praecipitatus libero arbitrio. Quapropter nec quando coeperit homo habere merita bona, debet sibi tribuere illa, sed Deo, cui dicitur in Psalmo: Adiutor meus esto, ne derelinquas me (Ps 26, 9). Dicendo: ne derelinquas me, ostendit quia si derelictus fuerit, nihil boni valet ipse per se: unde et ille ait: Ego dixi in abundantia mea: Non movebor in aeternum (Ps 29, 7).
6. 13. By these and similar divine testimonies it is proved that the grace of God is not given according to our merits; since we see it given not only when no good merits, but even when many evil merits, have gone before, and we see it given daily. But plainly, once it has been given, our merits too begin to be good—yet through it; for if it withdraws itself, man falls, not raised up but cast headlong by free choice. Therefore, even when a man has begun to have good merits, he ought not to attribute them to himself, but to God, to whom it is said in the Psalm: Be my helper, do not forsake me (Ps 27 (26):9). By saying, do not forsake me, he shows that if he is forsaken, he himself can do nothing good by himself; hence that man also says: I said in my abundance: I shall not be moved forever (Ps 30 (29):7).
Grace.1.6.13Putaverat enim suum fuisse bonum, quod ei sic abundabat, ut non moveretur; sed ut ostenderetur illi, cuius esset illud, de quo tamquam suo coeperat gloriari, paululum gratia deserente admonitus dicit: Domine, in voluntate tua praestitisti decori meo virtutem; avertisti autem faciem tuam a me, et factus sum conturbatus (Ps 29, 8).
For he had thought that the good which so abounded to him, that he was not moved, had been his own; but, that it might be shown to him to whom that belonged in which he had begun to glory as if it were his own, when grace deserted him a little, being thus admonished he says: O Lord, in your will you supplied strength to my comeliness; but you turned your face away from me, and I became troubled (Ps 30 (29):8).
Grace.1.6.13Ideo necessarium est homini, ut gratia Dei non solum iustificetur impius, id est, ex impio fiat iustus, cum redduntur ei bona pro malis, sed etiam cum fuerit iam iustificatus ex fide, ambulet cum illo gratia, et incumbat super ipsam ne cadat. Propter hoc scriptum est in Cantico Canticorum de ipsa Ecclesia: Quae est ista quae ascendit dealbata, incumbens super fratruelem suum? (Cant 8, 5). Dealbata est enim quae per se ipsam alba esse non posset. Et a quo dealbata est, nisi ab illo, qui per Prophetam dicit: Si fuerint peccata vestra ut phoenicium, sicut nivem dealbabo (Is 1, 18) ? Quando ergo dealbata est, nihil boni merebatur; iam vero alba facta, bene ambulat; sed si super eum a quo dealbata est, perseveranter incumbat. Propter quod et ipse Iesus, super quem incumbit dealbata, dixit discipulis suis: Sine me nihil potestis facere (Io 15, 5).
Therefore it is necessary for man that, by the grace of God, not only the ungodly be justified—that is, that out of an ungodly man he be made righteous, when good is rendered to him for evil—but also that, once he has already been justified by faith, grace may walk with him, and that he may lean upon it lest he fall. On account of this it is written in the Song of Songs concerning the Church herself: Who is this who comes up made white, leaning upon her kinsman? (Song 8:5). For she is made white who could not be white by herself. And by whom was she made white, except by him who says through the Prophet: If your sins are like scarlet, I will make them white as snow (Isa 1:18)? When, therefore, she was made white, she merited nothing good; but now, made white, she walks well—but only if she leans perseveringly upon him by whom she was made white. On account of this Jesus himself, upon whom she who is made white leans, said to his disciples: Without me you can do nothing (John 15:5).
Grace.1.6.136. 14. Ergo redeamus ad apostolum Paulum, quem certo invenimus sine ullis meritis bonis, immo cum multis meritis malis, Dei gratiam consecutum reddentis bona pro malis: videamus quid dicat, sua iam propinquante passione, scribens ad Timotheum: Ego enim iam immolor, inquit, et tempus resolutionis meae instat. Bonum certamen certavi, cursum consummavi, fidem servavi (2 Tim 4, 6-7). Ista utique iam merita sua bona commemorat; ut post bona merita consequatur coronam, qui post merita mala consecutus est gratiam.
6. 14. Let us, then, return to the apostle Paul, whom we find for certain to have obtained, without any good merits—indeed, with many evil merits—the grace of God, who renders good for evil. Let us see what he says, his own passion now drawing near, as he writes to Timothy: For I am already being offered up, he says, and the time of my departure is at hand. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept the faith (2 Tim 4:6–7). These, surely, are now his own good merits that he recalls; so that after good merits he may obtain the crown, who after evil merits obtained grace.
Grace.1.6.14Denique attendite quid sequatur: Superest, inquit, mihi corona iustitiae, quam reddet mihi Dominus in illa die iustus iudex (2 Tim 4, 8). Cui redderet coronam iustus iudex, si non donasset gratiam misericors pater? Et quomodo esset ista corona iustitiae, nisi praecessisset gratia quae iustificat impium? Quomodo ista debita redderetur, nisi prius illa gratuita donaretur?
Finally, notice what follows: There remains, he says, for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the just judge, will render to me on that day (2 Tim 4:8). To whom would the just judge render the crown, if the merciful Father had not granted grace? And how would this be a crown of righteousness, unless the grace that justifies the ungodly had gone before? How would this be rendered as something owed, unless that other had first been freely given?
Grace.1.6.146. 15. Sed cum dicunt pelagiani hanc esse solam non secundum merita nostra gratiam, qua homini peccata dimittuntur, illam vero quae datur in fine, id est, aeternam vitam, meritis nostris praecedentibus reddi, respondendum est eis. Si enim merita nostra sic intellegerent, ut etiam ipsa dona Dei esse cognoscerent, non esset reprobanda ista sententia; quoniam vero merita humana sic praedicant, ut ea ex semetipso habere hominem dicant, prorsus rectissime respondet Apostolus: Quis enim te discernit? Quid autem habes quod non accepisti? Si autem et accepisti, quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis? (1 Cor 4, 7)
6. 15. But when the Pelagians say that the only grace that is not according to our merits is that by which a man's sins are forgiven, whereas the grace that is given at the end—that is, eternal life—is rendered in return for our preceding merits, they must be answered. For if they understood our merits in such a way as to recognize that these too are gifts of God, this view would not have to be rejected; but since they so proclaim human merits as to say that man has them from his very self, the Apostle answers most rightly indeed: For who sets you apart? What do you have that you did not receive? But if you also received it, why do you glory as though you had not received it? (1 Cor 4:7)
Grace.1.6.15Prorsus talia cogitanti verissime dicitur: Dona sua coronat Deus, non merita tua, si tibi a te ipso, non ab illo sunt merita tua. Haec enim si talia sunt, mala sunt; quae non coronat Deus: si autem bona sunt, Dei dona sunt: quia, sicut dicit apostolus Iacobus: Omne datum optimum, et omne donum perfectum desursum est, descendens a Patre luminum (Iac 1, 17). Unde dicit et Ioannes praecursor Domini: Non potest homo accipere quidquam, nisi fuerit ei datum de caelo (Io 3, 27) : utique de caelo, unde etiam venit Spiritus Sanctus, quando Iesus ascendit in altum, captivavit captivitatem, dedit dona hominibus (Ps 67, 19; Eph 4, 8). Si ergo Dei dona sunt bona merita tua, non Deus coronat merita tua tamquam merita tua, sed tamquam dona sua.
To one who thinks such things, it is said most truly: God crowns his own gifts, not your merits, if your merits are from your own self and not from him. For if your merits are such, they are evil; and these God does not crown. But if they are good, they are gifts of God; for, as the apostle James says, Every good endowment and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights (Jas 1:17). Hence John the forerunner of the Lord also says: A man cannot receive anything, unless it has been given him from heaven (John 3:27)—surely from heaven, whence the Holy Spirit also came, when Jesus ascended on high, led captivity captive, and gave gifts to men (Ps 68 (67):19; Eph 4:8). If, then, your good merits are gifts of God, God does not crown your merits as your merits, but as his own gifts.
Grace.1.6.157. 16. Proinde consideremus ipsa merita apostoli Pauli, quibus dixit coronam iustitiae redditurum Iudicem iustum, et videamus utrum merita ipsius tamquam ipsius, id est, ex ipso illi comparata, an dona sint Dei. Bonum, inquit, certamen certavi, cursum consummavi, fidem servavi (2 Tim 4, 7). Primo ista bona opera, si non ea praecessissent cogitationes bonae, nulla essent. Attendite itaque quid de ipsis cogitationibus dicat: ait enim scribens ad Corinthios: Non quia idonei sumus cogitare aliquid a nobis, tamquam ex nobismetipsis; sed sufficientia nostra ex Deo est (2 Cor 3, 5).
7. 16. Accordingly, let us consider the very merits of the apostle Paul, those for which he said the just Judge would render him the crown of righteousness, and let us see whether his merits were as it were his own—that is, acquired by him from himself—or whether they are gifts of God. I have fought, he says, the good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept the faith (2 Tim 4:7). First, these good works would be nothing, if good thoughts had not gone before them. Notice, then, what he says about thoughts themselves; for, writing to the Corinthians, he says: Not that we are sufficient to think anything of ourselves, as if from our own selves; but our sufficiency is from God (2 Cor 3:5).
Grace.1.7.16Deinde singula inspiciamus: Bonum, inquit, certamen certavi. Quaero qua virtute certaverit: utrum quae illi ex semetipso fuerit, an quae desuper data sit. Sed absit ut tantus doctor ignoraverit legem Dei, cuius vox est in Deuteronomio: Ne dicas in corde tuo: Fortitudo mea et potentia manus meae fecit mihi virtutem magnam hanc; sed memoraberis Domini Dei tui, quia ipse tibi dat fortitudinem facere virtutem (Deut 8, 17-18). Quid autem prodest bonum certamen, nisi sequatur victoria? Et quis dat victoriam, nisi ille de qua dicit ipse: Gratias Deo qui dat nobis victoriam per Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum (1 Cor 15, 57) ? et alio loco cum commemorasset testimonium de Psalmo: Quoniam propter te mortificamur tota die, deputati sumus velut oves occisionis (Ps 43, 22), subiecit atque ait: sed in his omnibus supervincimus per eum qui dilexit nos (Rom 8, 36-37) : non ergo per nos, sed per eum qui dilexit nos.
Next let us examine them one by one. I have fought, he says, the good fight. I ask by what strength he fought: whether by one that was his from his own self, or by one given from above. But God forbid that so great a teacher should have been ignorant of the law of God, whose voice is in Deuteronomy: Do not say in your heart: My strength and the power of my hand has won me this great might; but you shall remember the Lord your God, for it is he who gives you the strength to win might (Deut 8:17–18). And what does the good fight profit, unless victory follows? And who gives the victory, except he of whom he himself says: Thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Cor 15:57)? And in another place, when he had recalled the testimony from the Psalm, For your sake we are put to death all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter (Ps 44 (43):22), he added and said: but in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us (Rom 8:36–37)—therefore not through ourselves, but through him who loved us.
Grace.1.7.16Deinde dixit: Cursum consummavi; sed ille hoc dixit, qui alio loco dicit: Igitur non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei (Rom 9, 16). Quae sententia nullo modo potest etiam sic converti ut dicatur: Non miserentis Dei, sed volentis et currentis est hominis: quisquis enim hoc ausus fuerit dicere, aperte se ostendit Apostolo contradicere.
Then he said: I have finished the course; but he who said this is the one who in another place says: So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy (Rom 9:16). This sentence can in no way be reversed so as to say: It is not of God who shows mercy, but of man who wills and runs; for whoever dares to say this plainly shows that he contradicts the Apostle.
Grace.1.7.167. 17. Postremo dixit: Fidem servavi; sed ille hoc dixit, qui alibi ait: Misericordiam consecutus sum, ut fidelis essem (1 Cor 7, 25). Non enim dixit: Misericordiam consecutus sum, quia fidelis eram; sed: ut fidelis essem: hinc ostendens etiam ipsam fidem haberi nisi Deo miserante non posse, et esse donum Dei. Quod apertissime docet, dicens: Gratia salvi facti estis per fidem, et hoc non ex vobis, sed Dei donum est (Eph 2, 8). Possent enim dicere: Ideo accepimus gratiam, quia credidimus; tamquam sibi fidem tribuentes, gratiam Deo: propter hoc Apostolus cum dixisset: per fidem, et hoc, inquit, non ex vobis, sed Dei donum est.
7. 17. Lastly he said: I have kept the faith; but he who said this is the one who elsewhere says: I have obtained mercy, that I might be faithful (1 Cor 7:25). For he did not say, I obtained mercy because I was faithful, but, that I might be faithful—thereby showing that even faith itself cannot be had except by the mercy of God, and that it is a gift of God. This he teaches most plainly when he says: By grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from yourselves, but is the gift of God (Eph 2:8). For they might have said: We received grace because we believed—thereby attributing the faith to themselves, the grace to God; on account of this the Apostle, when he had said through faith, said: and this is not from yourselves, but is the gift of God.
Grace.1.7.17Rursus, ne dicerent suis operibus se donum tale meruisse, continuo subiecit: non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur (Eph 2, 9). Non quia negavit aut evacuavit opera bona, cum dicat Deum unicuique reddere secundum opera eius (Cf. Rom 2, 6), sed quia opera sunt ex fide, non ex operibus fides; ac per hoc ab illo sunt nobis opera iustitiae, a quo est ipsa fides, de qua dictum est: Iustus ex fide vivit (Habac 2, 4; Rom 1, 17; Hebr 10, 38).
Again, lest they should say that they had merited so great a gift by their own works, he at once added: not from works, lest perhaps anyone be lifted up (Eph 2:9). Not that he denied or did away with good works, since he says that God renders to each one according to his works (See Rom 2:6), but because works are from faith, not faith from works; and thus the works of righteousness are ours from him from whom faith itself is, concerning which it was said: The righteous man lives by faith (Hab 2:4; Rom 1:17; Heb 10:38).
Grace.1.7.177. 18. Homines autem non intellegentes, quod ait ipse Apostolus: Arbitramur iustificari hominem per fidem sine operibus legis (Rom 3, 28), putaverunt eum dicere sufficere homini fidem, etiamsi male vivat et bona opera non habeat. Quod absit ut sentiret Vas Electionis; qui cum dixisset quodam loco: In Christo enim Iesu neque circumcisio aliquid valet, neque praeputium, mox addidit: sed fides quae per dilectionem operatur (Gal 5, 6). Ipsa est fides quae fideles Dei separat ab immundis daemonibus: nam et ipsi, sicut dicit apostolus Iacobus, credunt et contremiscunt (Iac 2, 19); sed non bene operantur. Non ergo habent istam fidem ex qua iustus vivit, id est, quae per dilectionem operatur, ut reddat ei Deus vitam aeternam secundum opera eius. Sed quia et ipsa bona opera nobis ex Deo sunt, a quo nobis et fides est et dilectio, propterea idem ipse Doctor Gentium etiam ipsam vitam aeternam gratiam nuncupavit.
7. 18. But men, not understanding what the Apostle himself says, We hold that a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the law (Rom 3:28), have supposed that he means faith suffices for a man, even if he lives badly and has no good works. God forbid that the Vessel of Election should hold this; for when he had said in a certain place, For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision avails anything, nor uncircumcision, he at once added: but faith that works through love (Gal 5:6). It is this faith that separates God's faithful from the unclean demons; for they too, as the apostle James says, believe and tremble (Jas 2:19), but they do not act well. They do not, then, have that faith by which the righteous man lives—that is, the faith that works through love, so that God may render him eternal life according to his works. But because the good works themselves are ours from God, from whom both faith and love are ours, on account of this the same Teacher of the Gentiles called eternal life itself, too, grace.
Grace.1.7.188. 19. Et nascitur inde non parva quaestio, quae Domino donante solvenda est. Si enim vita aeterna bonis operibus redditur (Mt 16, 27), sicut apertissime dicit Scriptura: Quoniam Deus reddet unicuique secundum opera eius (Rom 2, 6), quomodo gratia est vita aeterna, cum gratia non operibus reddatur, sed gratis detur, ipso Apostolo dicente: Ei qui operatur, merces non imputatur secundum gratiam, sed secundum debitum (Rom 4, 4) ? et iterum: Reliquiae, inquit, per electionem gratiae salvae factae sunt; et mox addidit: Si autem gratia, iam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia iam non est gratia (Rom 11, 5-6). Quomodo est ergo gratia vita aeterna, quae ex operibus sumitur? An forte vitam aeternam non dixit Apostolus gratiam? Immo vero sic dixit, ut negari omnino non possit; nec intellectorem acutum, sed tantummodo intentum desideret auditorem. Cum enim dixisset: Stipendium peccati, mors, continuo subdidit: Gratia autem Dei, vita aeterna, in Christo Iesu Domino nostro (Rom 6, 23).
8. 19. And from this there arises no small question, which is to be resolved with the Lord's help. For if eternal life is rendered in return for good works (Matt 16:27), as Scripture says most plainly, For God will render to each one according to his works (Rom 2:6), how is eternal life grace, since grace is not rendered for works, but given freely, as the Apostle himself says: To him who works, the reward is not reckoned according to grace, but according to debt (Rom 4:4)? And again he says: A remnant has been saved by the election of grace; and he at once added: But if by grace, then no longer of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace (Rom 11:5–6). How, then, is eternal life grace, which is received from works? Or did the Apostle perhaps not call eternal life grace? On the contrary, he did so call it, in such a way that it cannot be denied at all; and it requires not a sharp interpreter, but only an attentive hearer. For when he had said, The wages of sin is death, he at once added: But the grace of God is eternal life, in Christ Jesus our Lord (Rom 6:23).
Grace.1.8.198. 20. Ista ergo quaestio nullo modo mihi videtur posse dissolvi, nisi intellegamus et ipsa bona opera nostra quibus aeterna redditur vita, ad Dei gratiam pertinere, propter illud quod ait Dominus Iesus: Sine me nihil potestis facere (Io 15, 5). Et ipse Apostolus cum dixisset: Gratia salvi facti estis per fidem, et hoc non ex vobis, sed Dei donum est; non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur (Eph 2, 8-9), vidit utique putare posse homines hoc ita dictum, quasi necessaria non sint opera bona credentibus, sed eis fides sola sufficiat, et rursus posse homines de bonis operibus extolli, velut ad ea facienda sibi ipsi sufficiant; mox itaque addidit: Ipsius enim sumus figmentum, creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis, quae praeparavit Deus, ut in illis ambulemus (Eph 2, 10). Quid est hoc, quod cum Dei gratiam commendans dixisset: non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur, cur hoc dixerit rationem reddens: Ipsius enim sumus, inquit, figmentum, creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis? Quomodo ergo, non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur?
8. 20. This question, then, can in no way, it seems to me, be resolved unless we understand that even our own good works, for which eternal life is rendered, pertain to the grace of God, on account of what the Lord Jesus says: Without me you can do nothing (John 15:5). And the Apostle himself, when he had said, By grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from yourselves, but is the gift of God; not from works, lest perhaps anyone be lifted up (Eph 2:8–9), surely saw that men might suppose this to mean that good works are not necessary for believers, but that faith alone suffices for them; and again, that men might be lifted up over their good works, as though they were sufficient of themselves to do them. So he at once added: For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared, that we should walk in them (Eph 2:10). What does this mean, that when he had said, commending the grace of God, not from works, lest perhaps anyone be lifted up, he gives the reason for having said it: For we are, he says, his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works? How, then, is it not from works, lest perhaps anyone be lifted up?
Grace.1.8.20Sed audi, et intellege, non ex operibus dictum, tamquam tuis ex te ipso tibi existentibus, sed tamquam his in quibus te Deus finxit, id est formavit et creavit. Hoc enim ait: Ipsius sumus figmentum, creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis: non illa creatione qua homines facti sumus, sed ea de qua ille dicebat, qui utique iam homo erat: Cor mundum crea in me, Deus (Ps 50, 12); et de qua dicit Apostolus: Si qua igitur in Christo nova creatura, vetera transierunt; ecce facta sunt nova: omnia autem ex Deo (2 Cor 5, 17-18). Fingimur ergo, id est formamur et creamur in operibus bonis, quae, non praeparavimus nos, sed praeparavit Deus, ut in illis ambulemus.
But hear, and understand. It is said, not from works, as though they were works that exist for you from your own self, but as though they were works in which God fashioned you—that is, formed and created you. For he says: We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works; not by that creation by which we were made men, but by the one of which he was speaking who was surely already a man: Create in me a clean heart, O God (Ps 51 (50):12); and of which the Apostle says: If, then, anyone is a new creature in Christ, the old things have passed away; behold, they have become new: but all things are from God (2 Cor 5:17–18). We are fashioned, then—that is, formed and created—for good works, which we did not prepare, but God prepared, that we should walk in them.
Grace.1.8.20Itaque, carissimi, si vita bona nostra nihil aliud est quam Dei gratia, sine dubio et vita aeterna, quae bonae vitae redditur, Dei gratia est: et ipsa enim gratis datur, quia gratis data est illa cui datur. Sed illa cui datur, tantummodo gratia est; haec autem quae illi datur, quoniam praemium eius est, gratia est pro gratia, tamquam merces pro iustitia; ut verum sit, quoniam verum est, quia reddet unicuique Deus secundum opera eius (Mt 16, 27; Rom 2, 6; Ps 61, 13).
And so, dearly beloved, if our good life is nothing other than the grace of God, then without doubt eternal life also, which is rendered in return for a good life, is the grace of God; for it too is given freely, because that to which it is given was given freely. But that to which it is given is only grace; whereas this which is given to it, since it is its reward, is grace in return for grace, as it were a wage in return for righteousness—so that what is true may be true, namely that God will render to each one according to his works (Matt 16:27; Rom 2:6; Ps 62 (61):13).
Grace.1.8.209. 21. Utrum autem legerimus in Libris sanctis: gratiam pro gratia, forsitan quaeritis. Sed habetis Evangelium secundum Ioannem tanta luce clarissimum, ubi Ioannes Baptista de Domino Christo dicit: Nos autem ex plenitudine eius accepimus, et gratiam pro gratia (Io 1, 16). Ex eius itaque plenitudine accepimus pro modulo nostro tamquam particulas nostras ut bene vivamus, sicut Deus partitus est mensuram fidei (Rom 12, 3); quia unusquisque proprium donum habet a Deo, alius sic, alius autem sic (1 Cor 7, 7), et ipsa est gratia; sed insuper accipiemus et gratiam pro gratia, quando nobis vita aeterna reddetur, de qua dixit Apostolus: Gratia autem Dei vita aeterna in Christo Iesu Domino nostro: cum prius dixisset: Stipendium peccati, mors (Rom 6, 23). Merito enim stipendium, quia militiae diabolicae mors aeterna tamquam debitum redditur.
9. 21. But whether we have read in the holy books the phrase grace in return for grace, you perhaps ask. Well, you have the Gospel according to John, most clear with so great a light, where John the Baptist says of the Lord Christ: And of his fullness we have all received, and grace in return for grace (John 1:16). Of his fullness, then, we have received, according to our measure, as it were our portions, that we may live well, as God has apportioned the measure of faith (Rom 12:3); for each one has his own gift from God, one in this way, another in that (1 Cor 7:7), and this is grace; but in addition we shall also receive grace in return for grace, when eternal life is rendered to us, of which the Apostle said: But the grace of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord—when he had first said: The wages of sin is death (Rom 6:23). For it is rightly called wages, because eternal death is rendered to the service of the devil as something owed.
Grace.1.9.21Ubi cum posset dicere, et recte dicere: Stipendium autem iustitiae vita aeterna, maluit dicere: Gratia autem Dei, vita aeterna: ut hinc intellegeremus, non pro meritis nostris Deum nos ad aeternam vitam, sed pro sua miseratione perducere. De quo in Psalmo dicit homo eius animae suae: Qui coronat te in miseratione et misericordia (Ps 102, 4). Numquid non corona bonis operibus redditur? Sed quia ipsa bona opera ille in bonis operatur, de quo dictum est: Deus est enim qui operatur in vobis et velle et operari, pro bona voluntate (Phil 2, 13), ideo dixit Psalmus: Coronat te in miseratione et misericordia: quia eius miseratione bona operamur, quibus corona redditur.
Here, although he could have said, and rightly said, "But the wages of righteousness is eternal life," he preferred to say: But the grace of God is eternal life—so that from this we might understand that God leads us to eternal life not in return for our merits, but out of his own compassion. Of this God's man says in the Psalm to his own soul: Who crowns you in compassion and mercy (Ps 103 (102):4). Is not the crown rendered in return for good works? But because he in whose good works the good works themselves are performed is the one of whom it was said, For it is God who works in you both to will and to work, according to his good will (Phil 2:13), therefore the Psalm said: He crowns you in compassion and mercy; for it is by his compassion that we do the good works for which the crown is rendered.
Grace.1.9.21Non enim, quia dixit: Deus est enim qui operatur in vobis et velle et operari, pro bona voluntate, ideo liberum arbitrium abstulisse putandus est. Quid si ita esset, non superius dixisset: Cum timore et tremore vestram ipsorum salutem operamini (Phil 2, 12). Quando enim iubetur ut operentur, liberum eorum convenitur arbitrium: sed ideo cum timore et tremore, ne sibi tribuendo quod bene operantur, de bonis tamquam suis extollantur operibus. Tamquam ergo interrogaretur Apostolus, et diceretur ei: Quare dixisti: Cum timore et tremore? horum verborum rationem reddidit dicens: Deus est enim qui operatur in vobis. Si enim timetis et tremitis, non extollimini tamquam de vestris operibus bonis, quia Deus est qui operatur in vobis.
For, because he said, For it is God who works in you both to will and to work, according to his good will, he is not therefore to be thought to have taken away free choice. If that were so, he would not have said earlier: Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling (Phil 2:12). For when they are commanded to work, their free choice is addressed; but the reason it is with fear and trembling is that they may not, by attributing to themselves that they act well, be lifted up over their works as though these were their own. As though, then, the Apostle were asked and it were said to him, Why did you say, with fear and trembling?, he gave the reason for these words, saying: For it is God who works in you. For if you fear and tremble, you are not lifted up as over your own good works, because it is God who works in you.
Grace.1.9.2110. 22. Itaque, fratres, debetis quidem per liberum arbitrium non facere mala, et facere bona: hoc enim nobis lex Dei praecipit in Libris sanctis, sive Veteribus, sive Novis; sed legamus et adiuvante Domino intellegamus Apostolum dicentem: Quia non iustificabitur ex lege omnis caro coram illo: per legem enim cognitio peccati (Rom 3, 20). Cognitio dixit, non: Consumptio. Quando autem cognoscit homo peccatum, si non adiuvat gratia ut cognitum caveatur, sine dubio lex iram operatur.
10. 22. And so, brothers, you ought indeed, through free choice, not to do evil and to do good; for this the law of God commands us in the holy books, both Old and New. But let us read, and with the Lord's help understand, the Apostle when he says: For no flesh will be justified by the law in his sight; for through the law comes the knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20). He said knowledge, not "consuming." But when a man knows sin, if grace does not help so that what is known is guarded against, then without doubt the law works wrath.
Grace.1.10.22Quod alio loco ipse Apostolus dicit, ipsius enim verba sunt: Lex iram operatur. Hoc autem dixit, quia ira Dei maior est in praevaricatore, qui per legem cognoscit peccatum, et tamen facit: talis quippe homo praevaricator est legis, sicut et in alio loco dicit: Ubi enim lex non est, nec praevaricatio est (Rom 4, 15). Propter hoc et alibi ait: Ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litterae (Rom 7, 6) : legem volens intellegi litterae vetustatem, novitatem vero spiritus quid, nisi gratiam?
This the Apostle himself says in another place—for the words are his own: The law works wrath. And he said this because the wrath of God is greater against the transgressor who, through the law, knows sin and yet commits it; for such a man is a transgressor of the law, as he also says in another place: For where there is no law, neither is there transgression (Rom 4:15). On account of this he also says elsewhere: That we may serve in newness of the spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter (Rom 7:6)—wishing the law to be understood as the oldness of the letter, but the newness of the spirit to be understood as what, if not grace?
Grace.1.10.22Et ne putaretur accusasse legem vel reprehendisse, continuo sibi opposuit quaestionem, et ait: Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Absit. Deinde subiunxit: Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem; hoc est quod dixerat: Per legem cognitio peccati. Nam concupiscentiam, inquit, nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam: sine lege enim peccatum mortuum est. Ego autem aliquando vivebam sine lege; adveniente autem mandato, peccatum revixit, ego autem mortuus sum, et inventum est mihi mandatum quod erat in vitam, hoc esse in mortem; peccatum enim occasione accepta per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit. Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum. Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit. Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem, ut fiat supra modum peccator aut peccatum per mandatum (Rom 7, 7-13).
And lest he be thought to have accused or found fault with the law, he at once raised a question against himself, and said: What then shall we say? Is the law sin? God forbid. Then he added: But I did not know sin except through the law—this is what he had said, Through the law comes the knowledge of sin. For I would not have known desire, he says, if the law had not said: You shall not covet. But sin, taking occasion through the commandment, worked in me all manner of desire; for apart from the law sin is dead. And I was once alive apart from the law; but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died; and the commandment which was unto life was found by me to be unto death; for sin, taking occasion through the commandment, deceived me, and through it slew me. And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Did that, then, which is good become death to me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, worked death in me through what is good, that sin, or the sinner, might become sinful beyond measure through the commandment (Rom 7:7–13).
Grace.1.10.22Et ad Galatas dicit: Scientes autem quoniam non iustificatur homo ex operibus legis nisi per fidem Iesu Christi, et nos in Christo Iesu credidimus, ut iustificemur ex fide Christi, et non ex operibus legis, quoniam ex operibus legis non iustificabitur omnis caro (Gal 2, 16).
And to the Galatians he says: Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but through faith in Jesus Christ, we too have believed in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the law; for by the works of the law no flesh will be justified (Gal 2:16).
Grace.1.10.2211. 23. Quid est ergo quod vanissimi homines et perversissimi pelagiani legem dicunt esse Dei gratiam, qua iuvamur ad non peccandum? Quid est miseri quod dicunt, qui sine ulla dubitatione tanto Apostolo contradicunt? Ille dicit peccatum vires adversus hominem accepisse per legem, et eum per mandatum, quamvis sanctum et iustum et bonum, tamen occidere, et per bonum operari ei mortem, de qua non liberaretur, nisi vivificaret spiritus eum, quem littera occiderat, sicut alio loco dicit: Littera occidit, spiritus autem vivificat (2 Cor 3, 6) : et isti indociles contra lucem Dei caeci, et contra vocem Dei surdi, occidentem litteram vivificare dicunt, et vivificanti spiritui contradicunt.
11. 23. What, then, does it mean that those most foolish and most perverse men, the Pelagians, say that the law is the grace of God by which we are helped not to sin? What is it that the wretches say, who without any hesitation contradict so great an Apostle? He says that sin received its force against man through the law, and that, through the commandment—though holy and just and good—it nevertheless slays him and works death in him through what is good, from which he would not be freed unless the spirit gave life to him whom the letter had slain, as he says in another place: The letter kills, but the spirit gives life (2 Cor 3:6). And these unteachable men, blind against the light of God and deaf against the voice of God, say that the letter that kills gives life, and contradict the spirit that gives life.
Grace.1.11.23Ergo, fratres, ut ipsius potius Apostoli verbis vos moneam, debitores sumus non carni, ut secundum carnem vivamus. Si enim secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini; si autem spiritu actiones carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis (Rom 8, 12-13). Haec dixi, ut apostolicis verbis liberum arbitrium vestrum a malo deterrerem, et exhortarer ad bonum; nec tamen ideo debetis in homine, hoc est, in vobis ipsis, non in Domino gloriari, quando non secundum carnem vivitis, sed spiritu actiones carnis mortificatis.
Therefore, brothers—to admonish you rather in the very words of the Apostle—we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh, you will live (Rom 8:12–13). I have said these things in order, by the words of the Apostle, to deter your free choice from evil and to exhort it to good; yet you ought not on that account to glory in man—that is, in yourselves—rather than in the Lord, when you do not live according to the flesh, but by the spirit put to death the deeds of the flesh.
Grace.1.11.23Ut enim non se extollerent quibus ista dicebat, existimantes se suo spiritu tanta haec bona opera facere posse, non Dei, propterea cum dixisset: Si autem spiritu actiones carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis, continuo subiecit: Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei (Rom 8, 14). Quando ergo spiritu actiones carnis mortificatis ut vivatis, illum glorificate, illum laudate, illi gratias agite, cuius Spiritu agimini ut ista valeatis, ut vos filios Dei esse monstretis. Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei.
For, lest those to whom he said these things be lifted up, supposing that they could do such great good works by their own spirit and not by God's, on account of this, when he had said, But if by the spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh, you will live, he at once added: For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God (Rom 8:14). When, therefore, by the spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh that you may live, glorify him, praise him, give thanks to him, by whose Spirit you are led so that you are able to do these things, that you may show yourselves to be sons of God. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.
Grace.1.11.2312. 24. Quotquot ergo adiuncto solo adiutorio legis, sine adiutorio gratiae, confidentes in virtute sua, suo spiritu aguntur, non sunt filii Dei. Tales sunt de quibus idem dicit Apostolus, quod ignorantes Dei iustitiam, et suam volentes constituere, iustitiae Dei non sunt subiecti (Rom 10, 3).
12. 24. As many, then, as are led by their own spirit, trusting in their own strength, with only the help of the law added and not the help of grace, are not sons of God. Such are those of whom the same Apostle says that, being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and wishing to establish their own, they did not submit to the righteousness of God (Rom 10:3).
Grace.1.12.24De Iudaeis hoc dixit, qui de se praesumentes gratiam repellebant, et in Christum propterea non credebant. Suam vero iustitiam dicit eos volentes constituere, quae iustitia est ex lege; non quia lex ab ipsis est constituta, sed in lege quae ex Deo est, suam iustitiam constituerant, quando eamdem legem suis viribus se implere posse credebant: ignorantes Dei iustitiam, non qua iustitia Deus iustus est, sed quae iustitia est homini ex Deo.
He said this of the Jews, who, presuming on themselves, rejected grace, and for that reason did not believe in Christ. He says they wished to establish their own righteousness, which is the righteousness that is from the law—not that the law was established by them, but that in the law which is from God they had established their own righteousness, when they believed that they could fulfill that same law by their own strength: being ignorant of the righteousness of God, not the righteousness by which God is righteous, but the righteousness that is for man from God.
Grace.1.12.24Et ut sciatis hanc illum eorum dixisse iustitiam, quae est ex lege, hanc autem Dei, quae homini est ex Deo, audite quid alio loco dicat, cum de Christo loqueretur: Propter quem omnia, inquit, non solum detrimenta esse credidi, verum et stercora existimavi esse, ut Christum lucrifaciam, et inveniar in illo non habens meam iustitiam quae ex lege est, sed eam quae est per fidem Christi, quae est ex Deo (Phil 3, 8-9).
And that you may know that he called their righteousness the one that is from the law, but God's the one that is for man from God, hear what he says in another place, when he was speaking of Christ: For whose sake, he says, I have counted all things not only to be losses, but I have even reckoned them to be dung, that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having my own righteousness which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, which is from God (Phil 3:8–9).
Grace.1.12.24Quid est autem: non habens meam iustitiam quae ex lege est, cum sua non esset lex ipsa, sed Dei: nisi quia suam dixit iustitiam, quamvis ex lege esset, quia sua voluntate legem se posse putabat implere sine adiutorio gratiae quae est per fidem Christi? Ideo cum dixisset: non habens meam iustitiam quae ex lege est, secutus adiunxit: sed eam quae est per fidem Christi, quae est ex Deo.
But what does it mean, not having my own righteousness which is from the law, since the law itself was not his own, but God's—except that he called the righteousness his own, although it was from the law, because he thought he could fulfill the law by his own will, without the help of the grace that is through faith in Christ? So when he had said, not having my own righteousness which is from the law, he went on to add: but that which is through faith in Christ, which is from God.
Grace.1.12.24Hanc ignorabant, de quibus ait: ignorantes Dei iustitiam, id est, quae est ex Deo (hanc enim dat non littera occidens, sed vivificans spiritus), et suam volentes constituere (quam dixit ipse ex lege iustitiam, cum diceret: non habens meam iustitiam quae ex lege est), iustitiae Dei non sunt subiecti, hoc est, gratiae Dei non sunt subiecti.
This those men were ignorant of, of whom he says: being ignorant of the righteousness of God—that is, the righteousness that is from God (for this is given not by the letter that kills, but by the spirit that gives life)—and wishing to establish their own (which he called the righteousness from the law, when he said, not having my own righteousness which is from the law), they did not submit to the righteousness of God—that is, they did not submit to the grace of God.
Grace.1.12.24Sub lege enim erant, non sub gratia; et ideo eis dominabatur peccatum, a quo non fit homo liber lege, sed gratia. Propter quod alibi dicit: Peccatum enim vobis non dominabitur; non enim estis sub lege, sed sub gratia (Rom 6, 14) : non quia lex mala est, sed quia sub illa sunt quos reos facit iubendo, non adiuvando. Gratia quippe adiuvat ut legis quisque sit factor, sine qua gratia sub lege positus tantummodo erit legis auditor. Talibus itaque dicit: Qui in lege iustificamini, a gratia excidistis (Gal 5, 4).
For they were under the law, not under grace; and therefore sin had dominion over them, from which a man is set free not by the law, but by grace. On account of this he says elsewhere: For sin will not have dominion over you; for you are not under the law, but under grace (Rom 6:14)—not because the law is evil, but because under it are those whom it makes guilty by commanding, not by helping. For grace helps a man to be a doer of the law; without this grace, a man placed under the law will be only a hearer of the law. And so to such men he says: You who are justified by the law have fallen away from grace (Gal 5:4).
Grace.1.12.2413. 25. Quis ita sit surdus adversus apostolicas voces, quis ita desipiat, immo insaniat nesciens quid loquatur, ut audeat dicere, legem esse gratiam, cum clamet qui sciebat quid loqueretur: Qui in lege iustificamini, a gratia excidistis? Si autem lex non est gratia, quia ut ipsa lex fiat, non potest lex adiuvare, sed gratia, numquid natura erit gratia? Nam et hoc pelagiani ausi sunt dicere, gratiam esse naturam, in qua sic creati sumus, ut habeamus mentem rationalem, qua intellegere valeamus, facti ad imaginem Dei, ut dominemur piscibus maris, et volucribus caeli, et omnibus pecoribus quae repunt super terram. Sed non haec est gratia, quam commendat Apostolus per fidem Iesu Christi. Hanc enim naturam etiam cum impiis et infidelibus certum est nobis esse communem; gratia vero per fidem Iesu Christi eorum tantummodo est, quorum est ipsa fides. Non enim omnium est fides (2 Thess 3, 2).
13. 25. Who could be so deaf against the apostolic words, who so foolish—indeed, so mad, not knowing what he says—as to dare to say that the law is grace, when one who knew what he was saying cries out: You who are justified by the law have fallen away from grace? But if the law is not grace, since the law cannot help a man to become a doer of the law, but grace can, then surely nature will not be grace? For the Pelagians have dared to say even this, that grace is the nature in which we were so created that we have a rational mind, by which we are able to understand, made in the image of God so that we have dominion over the fish of the sea, and the birds of the air, and all the cattle that creep upon the earth. But this is not the grace which the Apostle commends through faith in Jesus Christ. For it is certain that this nature is common to us even with the ungodly and unbelievers; whereas the grace that is through faith in Jesus Christ belongs only to those whose faith it is. For not all have faith (2 Thess 3:2).
Grace.1.13.25Denique sicut eis qui volentes in lege iustificari, a gratia exciderunt, verissime dicit: Si ex lege iustitia, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est (Gal 2, 21) : sic et his qui gratiam quam commendat et percipit fides Christi, putant esse naturam, verissime dicitur: Si ex natura iustitia, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est. Iam hic enim erat lex, et non iustificabat; iam hic erat et natura, et non iustificabat: ideo Christus non gratis mortuus est, ut et lex per illum impleretur, qui dixit: Non veni solvere legem, sed implere (Mt 5, 17), et natura per Adam perdita, per illum repararetur, qui dixit venisse se quaerere et salvare quod perierat (Lc 19, 10; Mt 18, 11) : in quem venturum antiqui etiam Patres crediderant, qui diligebant Deum.
Finally, just as he says most truly to those who, wishing to be justified by the law, have fallen away from grace, If righteousness is by the law, then Christ died in vain (Gal 2:21), so too it is said most truly to those who think that the grace which faith in Christ commends and receives is nature: If righteousness is by nature, then Christ died in vain. For here the law already existed, and it did not justify; here too nature already existed, and it did not justify. Therefore Christ did not die in vain, so that both the law might be fulfilled through him who said, I have not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it (Matt 5:17), and nature, lost through Adam, might be restored through him who said that he came to seek and to save what was lost (Luke 19:10; Matt 18:11)—in whom, as one who would come, even the ancient Fathers had believed, who loved God.
Grace.1.13.2513. 26. Dicunt etiam gratiam Dei, quae data est per fidem Iesu Christi, quae neque lex est neque natura, ad hoc tantum valere, ut peccata praeterita dimittantur, non ut futura vitentur, vel repugnantia superentur. Sed si hoc verum esset, utique in oratione dominica, cum dixissemus: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris, non adderemus: et ne nos inferas in tentationem (Mt 6, 12-13). Illud enim dicimus ut peccata dimittantur; hoc autem ut caveantur, sive vincantur: quod a Patre qui in caelis est, nulla ratione peteremus, si virtute voluntatis humanae hoc possemus efficere.
13. 26. They also say that the grace of God which is given through faith in Jesus Christ—which is neither the law nor nature—avails only for this, that past sins may be forgiven, not that future ones may be avoided or that opposing inclinations may be overcome. But if this were true, surely in the Lord's Prayer, when we had said, Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors, we would not add, and lead us not into temptation (Matt 6:12–13). For the one we say that sins may be forgiven; the other, that they may be guarded against or overcome—which we would by no means ask of the Father who is in heaven, if we could accomplish it by the power of the human will.
Grace.1.13.26Commoneo autem Caritatem vestram, et multum exhortor, ut beati Cypriani librum quem scripsit de oratione dominica, diligenter legatis; et quantum vos Dominus adiuverit, intellegatis, memoriaeque mandetis. Ibi videbitis quemadmodum sic alloquatur liberum arbitrium eorum, quos conscriptione sui sermonis aedificat, ut ostendat tamen ea quae implenda iubentur in lege, in oratione esse poscenda. Quod utique vanissime fieret, si ad illa agenda sine divino adiutorio voluntas humana sufficeret.
I urge your Charity, moreover, and earnestly exhort you, to read carefully the book that blessed Cyprian wrote On the Lord's Prayer; and, as much as the Lord helps you, to understand it and commit it to memory. There you will see how he so addresses the free choice of those whom he edifies by the composition of his discourse that he nonetheless shows that the things which are commanded to be fulfilled in the law are to be asked for in prayer. And this would surely be done most pointlessly, if the human will were sufficient to do those things without divine help.
Grace.1.13.2614. 27. Sed cum fuerint convicti, non defensores, sed inflatores et praecipitatores liberi arbitrii, quia neque scientia divinae legis, neque natura, neque sola remissio peccatorum est illa gratia, quae per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum datur, sed ipsa facit ut lex impleatur, ut natura liberetur, ne peccatum dominetur: cum ergo in his convicti fuerint, ad hoc se convertunt, ut quocumque modo conentur ostendere gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari. Dicunt enim: "Etsi non datur secundum merita bonorum operum, quia per ipsam bene operamur, tamen secundum merita bonae voluntatis datur: quia bona voluntas", inquiunt, "praecedit orantis, quam praecessit voluntas credentis, ut secundum haec merita gratia sequatur exaudientis Dei".
14. 27. But when they have been convicted of being not defenders, but inflaters and casters-down, of free choice—since that grace which is given through Jesus Christ our Lord is neither the knowledge of the divine law, nor nature, nor merely the remission of sins, but itself brings it about that the law is fulfilled, that nature is set free, and that sin does not have dominion—when, then, they have been convicted on these points, they turn to this, that by whatever means they may try to show that the grace of God is given according to our merits. For they say: "Even if it is not given according to the merits of good works, since it is through grace that we act well, yet it is given according to the merits of a good will; for a good will," they say, "precedes in the one who prays, and this was preceded by the will of the one who believes, so that, according to these merits, the grace of God who hears may follow."
Grace.1.14.2714. 28. Iam quidem de fide, hoc est, de voluntate credentis superius disputavi, usque adeo eam demonstrans ad gratiam pertinere, ut Apostolus non diceret: Misericordiam consecutus sum, quia fidelis eram, sed diceret: Misericordiam consecutus sum, ut fidelis essem (1 Cor 7, 25). Sunt et alia testimonia, in quibus est quod ait: Sapite ad temperantiam, sicut unicuique Deus partitus est mensuram fidei (Rom 12, 3). Et quod iam commemoravi: Gratia salvi facti estis per fidem, et hoc non ex vobis, sed Dei donum est (Eph 2, 8). Et illud quod scripsit ad Ephesios: Pax fratribus et caritas cum fide a Deo Patre et Domino Iesu Christo (Eph 6, 23). Et illud, ubi ait: Quia vobis donatum est pro Christo, non solum ut credatis in eum, verum etiam ut patiamini pro eo (Phil 1, 29). Utrumque ergo ad Dei gratiam pertinet, et fides credentium, et tolerantia patientium, quia utrumque dixit esse donatum. Et illud maxime, ubi dicit: Habentes autem eumdem spiritum fidei (2 Cor 4, 13).
14. 28. Now I have already discussed faith—that is, the will of the believer—above, showing it to pertain to grace to such a degree that the Apostle did not say, I obtained mercy because I was faithful, but said, I obtained mercy, that I might be faithful (1 Cor 7:25). There are also other testimonies, among which is what he says: Be wise unto soberness, as God has apportioned to each one the measure of faith (Rom 12:3). And what I have already mentioned: By grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from yourselves, but is the gift of God (Eph 2:8). And what he wrote to the Ephesians: Peace to the brothers, and love with faith, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ (Eph 6:23). And that where he says: For to you it has been granted for Christ's sake not only to believe in him, but also to suffer for him (Phil 1:29). Both, then, pertain to the grace of God, both the faith of believers and the endurance of sufferers, since he said that both were granted. And that especially, where he says: But having the same spirit of faith (2 Cor 4:13).
Grace.1.14.28Non enim ait: Scientiam fidei, sed: spiritum fidei: quod propterea dixit, ut intellegeremus, quia fides et non petita conceditur, ut ei petenti alia concedantur. Quomodo enim invocabunt, inquit, in quem non crediderunt? (Rom 10, 14). Ergo spiritus gratiae facit ut habeamus fidem, ut per fidem impetremus orando, ut possimus facere quae iubemur. Ideo ipse Apostolus assidue legi praeponit fidem: quoniam quod lex iubet, facere non valemus, nisi per fidem rogando impetremus, ut facere valeamus.
For he did not say, the knowledge of faith, but, the spirit of faith—which he said for this reason, that we might understand that faith too is granted without being asked, so that, when it asks, other things may be granted to it. For how, he says, shall they call upon him in whom they have not believed? (Rom 10:14). Therefore the spirit of grace brings it about that we have faith, so that through faith we may obtain by prayer the power to do the things we are commanded. For this reason the Apostle himself constantly sets faith before the law: since what the law commands we are not able to do, unless by faith we obtain through asking the power to do it.
Grace.1.14.2814. 29. Nam si fides liberi est tantummodo arbitrii, nec datur a Deo, propter quid pro eis qui nolunt credere, oramus ut credant? Quod prorsus faceremus inaniter, nisi rectissime crederemus, etiam perversas et fidei contrarias voluntates omnipotentem Deum ad credendum posse convertere. Liberum quidem hominis arbitrium pulsatur, ubi dicitur: Hodie si vocem eius audieritis, nolite obdurare corda vestra (Ps 94, 8). Sed nisi posset Deus etiam duritiam cordis auferre, non diceret per Prophetam: Auferam ab eis cor lapideum, et dabo eis cor carneum (Ez 11, 19). Quod de Novo Testamento fuisse praedictum, satis Apostolus ostendit, ubi ait: Epistola nostra vos estis, scripta non atramento, sed Spiritu Dei vivi; non in tabulis lapideis, sed in tabulis cordis carnalibus (2 Cor 3, 2-3). Quod non ideo dictum putemus, ut carnaliter vivant qui debent spiritaliter vivere: sed, quia lapis sine sensu est, cui comparatum est cor durum, cui nisi carni sentienti cor intellegens debuit comparari?
14. 29. For if faith belongs only to free choice and is not given by God, why do we pray for those who are unwilling to believe, that they may believe? This we would do altogether in vain, unless we most rightly believed that almighty God can turn to belief even wills that are perverse and contrary to faith. The free choice of man is indeed knocked at, where it is said: Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts (Ps 95 (94):8). But unless God could also take away hardness of heart, he would not say through the Prophet: I will take from them their heart of stone, and give them a heart of flesh (Ezek 11:19). That this was foretold concerning the New Testament, the Apostle sufficiently shows, where he says: You are our letter, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not on tablets of stone, but on the fleshly tablets of the heart (2 Cor 3:2–3). Let us not suppose this was said so that those who ought to live spiritually should live carnally; but, since stone is without feeling, to which a hard heart was compared, to what else but feeling flesh ought an understanding heart to be compared?
Grace.1.14.29Sic enim hoc dicitur per Ezechielem prophetam: Et dabo eis, inquit, cor aliud, et spiritum novum dabo eis; et evellam cor lapideum de carne eorum, et dabo eis cor carneum, ut in praeceptis meis ambulent, et iustificationes meas observent, et faciant eas: et erunt mihi in populum, et ego ero eis in Deum, dicit Dominus (Ez 11, 19-20). Numquid ergo possumus nisi absurdissime dicere, bonum meritum bonae voluntatis in homine praecessisse, ut evelleretur ab eo cor lapideum: quandoquidem ipsum cor lapideum non significat nisi durissimam voluntatem et adversus Deum omnino inflexibilem? Ubi enim praecedit bona voluntas, iam non est utique cor lapideum.
For this is how it is said through the prophet Ezekiel: And I will give them, he says, another heart, and I will give them a new spirit; and I will pluck out the heart of stone from their flesh, and give them a heart of flesh, that they may walk in my precepts and keep my ordinances and do them; and they shall be my people, and I will be their God, says the Lord (Ezek 11:19–20). Can we, then, say anything but the most absurd thing—that a good merit of a good will preceded in man, so that the heart of stone might be plucked out from him—seeing that the heart of stone itself signifies nothing but a most hardened will, altogether inflexible against God? For where a good will precedes, surely there is no longer a heart of stone.
Grace.1.14.2914. 30. Nam et alio loco per eumdem Prophetam Deus manifestissime ostendit, non propter eorum aliqua bona merita, sed propter nomen suum ista facere, ubi ait: Ego facio, domus Israel: sed propter nomen meum sanctum quod profanastis in gentibus, quo intrastis illuc: et sanctificabo nomen meum magnum quod profanatum est in gentibus, quod profanastis in medio eorum; et scient gentes quia ego sum Dominus, dicit Adonai Dominus, cum sanctificatus fuero in vobis ante oculos eorum. Et accipiam vos de gentibus, et congregabo vos ex omnibus terris, et inducam vos in terram vestram; et aspergam vos aqua munda, et mundabimini ab omnibus immunditiis vestris, et ab omnibus idolis vestris, et mundabo vos; et dabo vobis cor novum, et spiritum novum dabo in vobis; et auferetur cor lapideum de carne vestra, et dabo vobis cor carneum, et spiritum meum dabo in vobis: et faciam ut in iustificationibus meis ambuletis, et iudicia mea observetis et faciatis (Ez 36, 22-27).
14. 30. For in another place too, through the same Prophet, God shows most plainly that he does these things not for the sake of any good merits of theirs, but for the sake of his own name, where he says: I do this, O house of Israel, but for the sake of my holy name, which you profaned among the nations to which you went; and I will sanctify my great name which has been profaned among the nations, which you profaned in their midst; and the nations shall know that I am the Lord, says the Lord Adonai, when through you I am sanctified before their eyes. And I will take you from the nations, and gather you out of all the lands, and bring you into your own land; and I will sprinkle clean water upon you, and you shall be cleansed from all your uncleannesses and from all your idols, and I will cleanse you; and I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you; and the heart of stone shall be taken from your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh, and I will put my spirit within you; and I will cause you to walk in my ordinances, and to keep my judgments and do them (Ezek 36:22–27).
Grace.1.14.30Quis ita sit caecus, ut non videat, quis ita lapideus, ut non sentiat istam gratiam, non secundum merita bonae voluntatis dari, Domino dicente atque testante: Ego facio, domus Israel, sed propter nomen meum sanctum? Quare enim dixit: Ego facio, sed propter nomen meum sanctum, nisi ne illi putarent propter bona merita sua fieri, quod non erubescunt dicere pelagiani? Non solum autem bona merita eorum nulla, verum etiam mala merita praecessisse demonstrat, dicendo: sed propter nomen meum sanctum, quod profanastis in gentibus. Quis non videat horrendum malum esse, nomen sanctum Domini profanare? Et tamen propter ipsum nomen meum, inquit, quod profanastis vos, ego faciam vos bonos, non propter vos: et sanctificabo, inquit, nomen meum magnum, quod profanatum est in gentibus, quod profanastis in medio eorum. Sanctificare se dicit nomen suum, quod superius dixerat sanctum. Hoc est ergo quod oramus in oratione dominica, dicentes: Sanctificetur nomen tuum, ut sanctificetur in hominibus, quod per seipsum sine dubio semper est sanctum. Denique sequitur: Et scient omnes gentes quia ego sum Dominus, dicit Adonai Dominus, cum sanctificatus fuero in vobis. Cum ergo ipse semper sit sanctus, sanctificatur tamen in eis quibus largitur gratiam suam, auferendo ab eis cor lapideum, per quod nomen Domini profanaverunt.
Who could be so blind as not to see, who so stony as not to feel, that this grace is not given according to the merits of a good will, when the Lord says and testifies: I do this, O house of Israel, but for the sake of my holy name? For why did he say, I do this, but for the sake of my holy name, unless lest they should think it was done for the sake of their good merits—which the Pelagians are not ashamed to say? But he shows that not only were there no good merits of theirs, but even that evil merits had gone before, by saying: but for the sake of my holy name, which you profaned among the nations. Who does not see that it is a horrible evil to profane the holy name of the Lord? And yet, for the sake of that very name of mine, he says, which you profaned, I will make you good, not for your own sake: and I will sanctify, he says, my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, which you profaned in their midst. He says he will sanctify his name, which he had above called holy. This, then, is what we pray in the Lord's Prayer, saying, Hallowed be your name—that it may be hallowed among men, which in itself, without doubt, is always holy. Then it follows: And all the nations shall know that I am the Lord, says the Lord Adonai, when I am sanctified through you. Since, then, he himself is always holy, he is nonetheless sanctified in those to whom he grants his grace, by taking from them the heart of stone, through which they profaned the name of the Lord.
Grace.1.14.3015. 31. Ne autem putetur, nihil ibi facere ipsos homines per liberum arbitrium, ideo in Psalmo dicitur: Nolite obdurare corda vestra (Ps 94, 8). Et per ipsum Ezechielem: Proiicite a vobis omnes impietates vestras, quas impie egistis in me, et facite vobis cor novum et spiritum novum, et facite omnia mandata mea. Utquid moriemini, domus Israel, dicit Dominus? quia nolo mortem morientis, dicit Adonai Dominus, et convertimini et vivetis (Ez 18, 31-32). Meminerimus eum dicere: et convertimini et vivetis, cui dicitur: Converte nos, Deus (Ps 79, 4; 84, 5). Meminerimus eum dicere: Proiicite a vobis omnes impietates vestras: cum ipse iustificet impium (Rom 4, 5). Meminerimus ipsum dicere: Facite vobis cor novum et spiritum novum, qui dicit: Dabo vobis cor novum, et spiritum novum dabo in vobis (Ez 36, 26).
15. 31. But lest it be supposed that men themselves do nothing there through free choice, it is for this reason said in the Psalm: Do not harden your hearts (Ps 95 (94):8). And through Ezekiel himself: Cast away from you all your impieties, which you have impiously committed against me, and make for yourselves a new heart and a new spirit, and do all my commandments. Why will you die, O house of Israel, says the Lord? For I do not desire the death of him who dies, says the Lord Adonai; turn, then, and live (Ezek 18:31–32). Let us remember that he who says, turn, then, and live, is the one to whom it is said, Turn us, O God (Ps 80 (79):4; 85 (84):5). Let us remember that he who says, Cast away from you all your impieties, is the one who himself justifies the ungodly (Rom 4:5). Let us remember that he who says, Make for yourselves a new heart and a new spirit, is the one who says, I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you (Ezek 36:26).
Grace.1.15.31Quomodo ergo qui dicit: Facite vobis, hoc dicit: Dabo vobis? Quare iubet, si ipse daturus est? Quare dat, si homo facturus est, nisi quia dat quod iubet, cum adiuvat ut faciat cui iubet? Semper est autem in nobis voluntas libera, sed non semper est bona. Aut enim a iustitia libera est, quando servit peccato, et tunc est mala; aut a peccato libera est, quando servit iustitiae (Cf. Rom 6, 20-22), et tunc est bona. Gratia vero Dei semper est bona, et per hanc fit ut sit homo bonae voluntatis, qui prius fuit voluntatis malae.
How, then, does he who says, Make for yourselves, say this: I will give you? Why does he command, if he himself is going to give? Why does he give, if man is going to do it—unless because he gives what he commands, when he helps the one he commands to do it? But there is always a free will in us; yet it is not always good. For either it is free from righteousness, when it serves sin, and then it is evil; or it is free from sin, when it serves righteousness (See Rom 6:20–22), and then it is good. But the grace of God is always good, and through it the man who was before of an evil will becomes a man of good will.
Grace.1.15.31Per hanc etiam fit ut ipsa bona voluntas, quae iam esse coepit, augeatur, et tam magna fiat, ut possit implere divina mandata quae voluerit, cum valde perfecteque voluerit. Ad hoc enim valet quod scriptum est: Si volueris, servabis mandata (Eccli 15, 16 (sec. LXX)) : ut homo qui voluerit et non potuerit, nondum se plene velle cognoscat, et oret ut habeat tantam voluntatem, quanta sufficit ad implenda mandata.
Through this grace it also comes about that the good will itself, which has now begun to be, is increased, and made so great that it can fulfill the divine commandments which it wills, when it wills strongly and fully. For to this end avails what is written: If you will, you shall keep the commandments (Sir 15:16 (according to the LXX))—so that the man who has willed and yet has not been able may recognize that he does not yet fully will, and may pray that he may have a will as great as suffices to fulfill the commandments.
Grace.1.15.31Sic quippe adiuvatur, ut faciat quod iubetur. Tunc enim utile est velle, cum possumus; et tunc utile est posse, cum volumus: nam quid prodest, si quod non possumus volumus, aut quod possumus nolumus?
For he is helped in this way, that he may do what is commanded. For willing is useful then, when we are able; and being able is useful then, when we will: for what does it profit, if we will what we cannot, or do not will what we can?
Grace.1.15.3116. 32. Magnum aliquid pelagiani se scire putant, quando dicunt: "Non iuberet Deus, quod sciret non posse ab homine fieri". Quis hoc nesciat? Sed ideo iubet aliqua quae non possumus, ut noverimus quid ab illo petere debeamus. Ipsa est enim fides, quae orando impetrat quod lex imperat. Denique ipse qui dixit: Si volueris, conservabis mandata, in eodem libro Ecclesiastico aliquanto post dicit: Quis dabit in ore meo custodiam, et super labia mea signaculum astutum, ne forte cadam ab eo, et lingua mea perdat me? (Eccli 22, 33). Iam certe mandata acceperat: Cohibe linguam tuam a malo, et labia tua ne loquantur dolum (Ps 33, 14). Cum ergo verum sit quod dixit: Si volueris, conservabis mandata, quare quaerit in ore suo dari custodiam, similis ei qui dicit in Psalmo: Pone, Domine, custodiam ori meo (Ps 140, 3) ? Quare non ei sufficit mandatum Dei et voluntas sua, quandoquidem si voluerit, conservabit mandata?
16. 32. The Pelagians think they know something great when they say: "God would not command what he knew could not be done by man." Who does not know this? But he commands certain things that we cannot do, so that we may know what we ought to ask of him. For it is faith that obtains by prayer what the law commands. Indeed, the very one who said, If you will, you shall keep the commandments, in the same book of Ecclesiasticus says a little later: Who will set a guard over my mouth, and a shrewd seal upon my lips, lest I fall through them, and my tongue destroy me? (Sir 22:33). He had surely already received the commandments: Keep your tongue from evil, and let your lips not speak deceit (Ps 34 (33):14). Since, then, what he said is true—If you will, you shall keep the commandments—why does he ask that a guard be set over his mouth, like the one who says in the Psalm: Set a guard, O Lord, over my mouth (Ps 141 (140):3)? Why does the commandment of God and his own will not suffice for him, seeing that, if he wills, he will keep the commandments?
Grace.1.16.32Quam multa Dei mandata sunt contra superbiam, iam novit ea; si voluerit, conservabit ea. Quare ergo paulo post dicit: Domine Pater et Deus vitae meae, elationem oculorum ne dederis mihi (Eccli 23, 4) ? Iam dixerat ei lex: Non concupisces (Ex 20, 17) : velit ergo, et faciat quod iubetur; quoniam si voluerit, conservabit mandata. Quare sequitur et dicit: Concupiscentiam averte a me (Eccli 23, 5) ? Contra luxuriam Deus quam multa mandavit: faciat ea; quia si voluerit, conservabit mandata. Quid est quod clamat ad Deum: Ventris appetitio et concubitus ne apprehendat me (Eccli 23, 6) ?
However many of God's commandments there are against pride, he already knows them; if he wills, he will keep them. Why, then, does he say a little after: O Lord, Father and God of my life, give me not haughtiness of eyes (Sir 23:4)? The law had already said to him: You shall not covet (Exod 20:17); let him, then, will, and do what is commanded; since, if he wills, he will keep the commandments. Why does he go on to say: Turn away desire from me (Sir 23:5)? How many things God has commanded against wantonness: let him do them; for, if he wills, he will keep the commandments. What is the meaning of his crying out to God: Let not the appetite of the belly and lust seize me (Sir 23:6)?
Grace.1.16.32Si haec ei praesenti diceremus, rectissime nobis responderet et diceret: Ex ista oratione mea, qua haec a Deo peto, intellegite quomodo dixerim: Si volueris, conservabis mandata. Certum est enim nos mandata servare, si volumus; sed quia praeparatur voluntas a Domino (Prov 8, 35 (sec. LXX)), ab illo petendum est ut tantum velimus, quantum sufficit ut volendo faciamus.
If we said these things to him face to face, he would answer us most rightly and say: From this prayer of mine, in which I ask these things of God, understand in what sense I said, If you will, you shall keep the commandments. For it is certain that we keep the commandments if we will; but because the will is prepared by the Lord (Prov 8:35 (according to the LXX)), we must ask of him that we may will as much as suffices for us to do by willing.
Grace.1.16.32Certum est nos velle, cum volumus; sed ille facit ut velimus bonum, de quo dictum est, quod paulo ante posui: Praeparatur voluntas a Domino; de quo dictum est: A Domino gressus hominis dirigentur, et viam eius volet (Ps 36, 23); de quo dictum est: Deus est qui operatur in vobis et velle (Phil 2, 13). Certum est nos facere, cum facimus; sed ille facit ut faciamus, praebendo vires efficacissimas voluntati, qui dixit: Faciam ut in iustificationibus meis ambuletis, et iudicia mea observetis et faciatis (Ez 36, 27).
It is certain that we will when we will; but he brings it about that we will the good, he of whom it was said, as I set down a little before, The will is prepared by the Lord; of whom it was said, By the Lord the steps of a man are directed, and he will desire his way (Ps 37 (36):23); of whom it was said, It is God who works in you the willing (Phil 2:13). It is certain that we do when we do; but he brings it about that we do, by supplying most efficacious strength to the will, he who said, I will cause you to walk in my ordinances, and to keep my judgments and do them (Ezek 36:27).
Grace.1.16.32Cum dicit: faciam ut faciatis, quid aliud dicit, nisi: auferam a vobis cor lapideum, unde non faciebatis, et dabo vobis cor carneum, unde faciatis? Et hoc quid est, nisi: Auferam cor durum, unde non faciebatis, et dabo cor oboediens, unde faciatis?
When he says, I will cause you to do them, what else does he say but: I will take from you the heart of stone, by which you did not do them, and I will give you a heart of flesh, by which you may do them? And what is this but: I will take away the hard heart, by which you did not do them, and I will give an obedient heart, by which you may do them?
Grace.1.16.32Ille facit ut faciamus, cui dicit homo: Pone, Domine, custodiam ori meo (Ps 140, 3). Hoc est enim dicere: Fac ut ponam custodiam ori meo: quod beneficium Dei iam fuerat consecutus, qui dixit: Posui ori meo custodiam (Ps 38, 2).
He brings it about that we do, to whom a man says: Set a guard, O Lord, over my mouth (Ps 141 (140):3). For this is to say: Bring it about that I set a guard over my mouth—a benefit of God which that man had already obtained who said: I have set a guard over my mouth (Ps 39 (38):2).
Grace.1.16.3217. 33. Qui ergo vult facere Dei mandatum et non potest, iam quidem habet voluntatem bonam, sed adhuc parvam et invalidam; poterit autem, cum magnam habuerit et robustam. Quando enim martyres magna illa mandata fecerunt, magna utique voluntate, hoc est, magna caritate fecerunt: de qua caritate ipse Dominus ait: Maiorem hac caritatem nemo habet, quam ut animam suam ponat pro amicis suis (Io 15, 13). Unde et Apostolus dicit: Qui enim diligit proximum, legem implevit; nam: Non adulterabis, Non homicidium facies, Non furaberis, Non concupisces, et si quod est aliud mandatum, in hoc sermone recapitulatur: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum. Dilectio proximi malum non operatur: plenitudo ergo legis, dilectio (Rom 13, 8-10).
17. 33. He, then, who wishes to do God's commandment and cannot, has indeed a good will, but as yet a small and feeble one; he will be able to, however, when he has a great and robust one. For when the martyrs did those great commandments, they did them surely by a great will—that is, by great love—of which the Lord himself says: Greater love than this no one has, than to lay down his life for his friends (John 15:13). Hence the Apostle too says: For whoever loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law; for: You shall not commit adultery, You shall not kill, You shall not steal, You shall not covet, and if there is any other commandment, it is summed up in this saying: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. Love of neighbor works no evil: love, therefore, is the fullness of the law (Rom 13:8–10).
Grace.1.17.33Ipsam caritatem apostolus Petrus nondum habuit, quando timore Dominum ter negavit. Timor enim non est in caritate, sicut ait Ioannes evangelista in epistola sua; sed perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem (1 Io 4, 18). Et tamen quamvis parva et imperfecta, non deerat, quando dicebat Domino: Animam meam pro te ponam (Io 13, 37) : putabat enim se posse, quod se velle sentiebat.
The apostle Peter did not yet have this love when, out of fear, he denied the Lord three times. For fear is not in love, as John the Evangelist says in his epistle; but perfect love casts out fear (1 John 4:18). And yet, though small and imperfect, it was not lacking when he said to the Lord: I will lay down my life for you (John 13:37); for he thought he was able to do what he felt himself to will.
Grace.1.17.33Et quis istam etsi parvam dare coeperat caritatem, nisi ille qui praeparat voluntatem, et cooperando perficit, quod operando incipit? Quoniam ipse ut velimus operatur incipiens, qui volentibus cooperatur perficiens. Propter quod ait Apostolus: Certus sum quoniam qui operatur in vobis opus bonum, perficiet usque in diem Christi Iesu (Phil 1, 6). Ut ergo velimus, sine nobis operatur; cum autem volumus, et sic volumus ut faciamus, nobiscum cooperatur: tamen sine illo vel operante ut velimus, vel cooperante cum volumus, ad bona pietatis opera nihil valemus.
And who had begun to give this love, small though it was, except he who prepares the will, and by cooperating brings to completion what by working he begins? For he who works that we may will, beginning the work, is the one who cooperates with those who will, bringing it to completion. On account of this the Apostle says: I am sure that he who works a good work in you will bring it to completion until the day of Christ Jesus (Phil 1:6). So that we may will, then, he works without us; but when we will, and so will that we act, he cooperates with us; yet without him, either working that we may will, or cooperating when we will, we can do nothing toward the good works of godliness.
Grace.1.17.33De operante illo ut velimus, dictum est: Deus est enim qui operatur in vobis et velle (Phil 2, 13). De cooperante autem cum iam volumus et volendo facimus: Scimus, inquit, quoniam diligentibus Deum omnia cooperatur in bonum (Rom 8, 28). Quid est: omnia, nisi et ipsas terribiles saevasque passiones? Sarcina quippe illa Christi, quae infirmitati gravis est, levis efficitur caritati. Talibus enim Dominus dixit esse suam sarcinam levem (Cf. Mt 11, 30), qualis Petrus fuit quando passus est pro Christo, non qualis fuit quando negavit Christum.
Of him who works that we may will, it was said: For it is God who works in you the willing (Phil 2:13). But of him who cooperates when we already will and by willing do: We know, he says, that for those who love God all things work together unto good (Rom 8:28). What is all things, if not even those terrible and savage sufferings? For that burden of Christ, which is heavy to weakness, is made light to love. For the Lord said his burden was light (See Matt 11:30) to such men as Peter was when he suffered for Christ, not such as he was when he denied Christ.
Grace.1.17.3317. 34. Istam caritatem, id est divino amore ardentissimam voluntatem commendans Apostolus, dicit: Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? tribulatio? an angustia? an persecutio? an fames? an nuditas? an periculum? an gladius? Sicut scriptum est: Quoniam propter te mortificamur tota die, deputati sumus velut oves occisionis. Sed in his omnibus supervincimus per eum qui dilexit nos. Certus sum enim quia neque mors, neque vita, neque angeli, neque principatus, neque praesentia, neque futura, neque altitudo, neque profundum, neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a caritate Dei, quae est in Christo Iesu Domino nostro (Rom 8, 35-39; Ps 43, 22).
17. 34. Commending this love—that is, the will most ardent with divine affection—the Apostle says: Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? tribulation? or distress? or persecution? or famine? or nakedness? or peril? or the sword? As it is written: For your sake we are put to death all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. But in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am sure that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord (Rom 8:35–39; Ps 44 (43):22).
Grace.1.17.34Et alio loco dicit: Adhuc supereminentiorem viam vobis demonstro. Si linguis hominum loquar et angelorum, caritatem autem non habeam, factus sum aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens. Et si habuero prophetiam, et si sciero omnia sacramenta, et si habuero omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferam, caritatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Et si distribuero omnia mea pauperibus, et si tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, caritatem autem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest. Caritas magnanima est, benigna est: caritas non aemulatur, non agit perperam, non inflatur, non dehonestatur, non quaerit quae sua sunt, non irritatur, non cogitat malum, non gaudet super iniquitate, congaudet autem veritati; omnia tolerat, omnia credit, omnia sperat, omnia suffert; caritas numquam cadit (1 Cor 12, 31 - 13, 8).
And in another place he says: I show you a still more excellent way. If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass, or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophecy, and know all mysteries, and have all faith, so as to move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. And if I distribute all my goods to the poor, and deliver my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing. Love is magnanimous, it is kind; love is not envious, does not act wrongly, is not puffed up, is not dishonorable, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil, does not rejoice over wickedness, but rejoices with the truth; it bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things; love never falls (1 Cor 12:31 – 13:8).
Grace.1.17.34Et paulo post: Manet, inquit, fides, spes, caritas, tria haec; maior autem horum caritas: sectamini caritatem (1 Cor 13, 13 - 14, 1). Item dicit ad Galatas: Vos enim in libertatem vocati estis, fratres; tantum ne libertatem in occasionem carnis detis, sed per caritatem servite invicem. Omnis enim lex in uno sermone impletur, in eo quod diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum (Gal 5, 13-14). Hoc est quod ad Romanos ait: Qui diligit alterum, legem implevit (Rom 13, 8). Item dicit ad Colossenses: Super omnia autem haec caritatem, quae est vinculum perfectionis (Col 3, 14). Et ad Timotheum: Finis, inquit, praecepti est caritas: et adiungens qualis caritas: de corde, inquit, puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta (1 Tim 1, 5). Ad Corinthios autem cum dicit: Omnia vestra cum caritate fiant (1 Cor 16, 14), satis ostendit, etiam ipsas correptiones, quas asperas et amaras sentiunt qui corripiuntur, cum caritate esse faciendas. Unde alibi cum dixisset: Corripite inquietos, consolamini pusillanimes, suscipite infirmos: patientes estote ad omnes, mox adiunxit: Videte ne quis malum pro malo alicui reddat (1 Thess 5, 14-15). Ergo et quando corripiuntur inquieti, non malum pro malo, sed potius bonum redditur. Haec autem omnia quae nisi caritas operatur?
And a little after he says: There remain faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity: pursue charity (1 Cor 13:13 – 14:1). Likewise he says to the Galatians: For you were called to freedom, brothers; only do not make freedom an occasion for the flesh, but through love serve one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one saying, in this: You shall love your neighbor as yourself (Gal 5:13–14). This is what he says to the Romans: Whoever loves another has fulfilled the law (Rom 13:8). Likewise he says to the Colossians: But above all these things, love, which is the bond of perfection (Col 3:14). And to Timothy: The end of the commandment, he says, is love; and, adding what kind of love: from a pure heart, he says, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned (1 Tim 1:5). But to the Corinthians, when he says, Let all your affairs be done with love (1 Cor 16:14), he sufficiently shows that even those rebukes, which those who are rebuked feel to be harsh and bitter, are to be administered with love. Hence, elsewhere, when he had said, Rebuke the unruly, comfort the fainthearted, support the weak, be patient toward all, he at once added: See that no one renders evil for evil to anyone (1 Thess 5:14–15). Therefore, even when the unruly are rebuked, not evil for evil, but rather good is rendered. And all these things—what but love performs them?
Grace.1.17.3417. 35. Et apostolus Petrus: Ante omnia, inquit, mutuam inter vos caritatem perpetuam habentes, quia caritas cooperit multitudinem peccatorum (1 Pt 4, 8; Prov 10, 12). Dicit etiam apostolus Iacobus: Si tamen legem perficitis regalem, secundum Scripturas: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum, bene facitis (Iac 2, 8; Lev 19, 18 (sec. LXX)). Item Ioannes apostolus: Qui diligit, inquit, fratrem suum, in lumine manet (1 Io 2, 10). Et alio loco: Qui non est iustus, non est ex Deo, et qui non diligit fratrem suum: quia haec est annuntiatio quam audivimus ab initio, ut diligamus invicem (1 Io 3, 10-11). Itemque alibi: Hoc est, inquit, mandatum illius, ut credamus nomini Filii eius Iesu Christi, et diligamus invicem (1 Io 3, 23). Et iterum: Hoc, inquit, mandatum habemus ab ipso, ut qui diligit Deum, diligat et fratrem suum (1 Io 4, 21). Et paulo post: In hoc, inquit, cognoscimus, quia diligimus filios Dei, cum Deum diligimus, et praecepta eius facimus. Haec est enim dilectio Dei, ut praecepta eius servemus, et praecepta eius gravia non sunt (1 Io 5, 2-3). Et in epistola secunda scriptum est: Non quasi praeceptum novum scribam tibi, sed quod habuimus ab initio, ut diligamus invicem (2 Io 5).
17. 35. And the apostle Peter says: Above all things, having unfailing mutual love among yourselves, because love covers a multitude of sins (1 Pet 4:8; Prov 10:12). The apostle James too says: If, however, you fulfill the royal law according to the Scriptures: You shall love your neighbor as yourself, you do well (Jas 2:8; Lev 19:18 (according to the LXX)). Likewise the apostle John: Whoever loves his brother, he says, abides in the light (1 John 2:10). And in another place: Whoever is not righteous is not of God, nor is he who does not love his brother: for this is the message that we have heard from the beginning, that we should love one another (1 John 3:10–11). And again elsewhere: This is his commandment, he says, that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another (1 John 3:23). And again: This commandment we have from him, he says, that whoever loves God should love his brother also (1 John 4:21). And a little after: In this, he says, we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and keep his precepts. For this is the love of God, that we keep his precepts; and his precepts are not burdensome (1 John 5:2–3). And in his second epistle it is written: Not as though I were writing you a new commandment, but the one we have had from the beginning, that we should love one another (2 John 5).
Grace.1.17.3517. 36. Dicit etiam ipse Dominus Iesus, in duobus praeceptis dilectionis Dei et dilectionis proximi totam Legem Prophetasque pendere (Mt 22, 40). De quibus duobus praeceptis in Evangelio secundum Marcum scriptum est: Et accessit unus de scribis qui audierat illos perquirentes, et videns quoniam illis bene responderit, interrogavit eum quod esset primum omnium mandatum. Iesus autem respondit ei: Primum omnium mandatum est: Audi, Israel, Dominus Deus tuus Deus unus est; et: Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota mente tua: hoc est primum mandatum. Secundum autem simile illi: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam teipsum. Maius horum aliud non est mandatum (Mc 12, 28-31; Deut 6, 4-5; Lev 19, 18). Dicit etiam in Evangelio secundum Ioannem: Mandatum novum do vobis, ut diligatis invicem, sicut dilexi vos, ut et vos diligatis invicem. In hoc cognoscent omnes quia discipuli mei estis, si dilectionem habueritis ad invicem (Io 13, 34-35).
17. 36. The Lord Jesus himself also says that on the two precepts of the love of God and the love of neighbor the whole Law and the Prophets depend (Matt 22:40). Concerning these two precepts it is written in the Gospel according to Mark: And one of the scribes, who had heard them disputing, came up; and, seeing that he had answered them well, asked him which was the first commandment of all. Jesus answered him: The first commandment of all is: Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one God; and: You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind: this is the first commandment. And the second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. There is no other commandment greater than these (Mark 12:28–31; Deut 6:4–5; Lev 19:18). He also says in the Gospel according to John: A new commandment I give you, that you love one another, as I have loved you, that you also love one another. By this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another (John 13:34–35).
Grace.1.17.3618. 37. Haec omnia praecepta dilectionis, id est caritatis, quae tanta et talia sunt, ut quidquid se putaverit homo facere bene, si fiat sine caritate, nullo modo fiat bene; haec ergo praecepta caritatis inaniter darentur hominibus, non habentibus liberum voluntatis arbitrium; sed quia per legem dantur et veterem et novam (quamvis in nova venerit gratia quae promittebatur in vetere), lex autem sine gratia littera est occidens, in gratia vero spiritus vivificans, unde est in hominibus caritas Dei et proximi, nisi ex ipso Deo? Nam si non ex Deo, sed ex hominibus, vicerunt Pelagiani; si autem ex Deo, vicimus pelagianos.
18. 37. All these precepts of love—that is, of charity—which are so great and such that whatever a man thinks he does well, if it is done without love, is in no way done well: these precepts of love, then, would be given to men in vain if they had no free choice of the will. But since they are given through the law, both old and new (although in the new there came the grace that was promised in the old), and since the law without grace is the letter that kills, but in grace is the spirit that gives life—whence, in men, is the love of God and of neighbor, if not from God himself? For if it is not from God, but from men, the Pelagians have won; but if it is from God, we have overcome the Pelagians.
Grace.1.18.37Sedeat ergo inter nos iudex apostolus Ioannes, et dicat nobis: Carissimi, diligamus invicem. In his verbis Ioannis cum se illi extollere coeperint et dicere: Utquid nobis hoc praecipitur, nisi quia ex nobis habemus ut invicem diligamus? sequitur continuo idem Ioannes, confundens eos et dicens: quia dilectio ex Deo est (1 Io 4, 7). Non itaque ex nobis, sed ex Deo est. Cur ergo dictum est: Diligamus invicem, quia dilectio ex Deo est, nisi quia praecepto admonitum est liberum arbitrium, ut quaereret Dei donum? Quod quidem sine suo fructu prorsus admoneretur, nisi prius acciperet aliquid dilectionis, ut addi sibi quaereret unde quod iubebatur impleret. Cum dicitur: Diligamus invicem, lex est; cum dicitur: quia dilectio ex Deo est, gratia est. Sapientia quippe Dei legem et misericordiam in lingua portat (Prov 3, 16 (sec. LXX)). Unde scriptum est in Psalmo: Etenim benedictionem dabit qui legem dedit (Ps 83, 8).
Let the apostle John, then, sit as judge between us, and say to us: Beloved, let us love one another. When, at these words of John, they begin to lift themselves up and say, Why is this commanded us, if not because we have it of ourselves to love one another?, the same John at once follows, confounding them and saying: because love is from God (1 John 4:7). It is therefore not from us, but from God. Why, then, was it said, Let us love one another, because love is from God, if not because by the precept free choice is admonished to seek the gift of God? And indeed it would be admonished altogether without fruit for itself, unless it first received some love, so that it might seek to have added to it that by which it might fulfill what was commanded. When it is said, Let us love one another, that is law; when it is said, because love is from God, that is grace. For the Wisdom of God carries law and mercy upon her tongue (Prov 3:16 (according to the LXX)). Hence it is written in the Psalm: For he who gave the law will also give a blessing (Ps 84 (83):8).
Grace.1.18.3718. 38. Nemo ergo vos fallat, fratres mei: quia nos non diligeremus Deum, nisi nos prior ipse diligeret. Idem Ioannes apertissime hoc ostendit, et dicit: Nos diligamus, quia ipse prior dilexit nos (1 Io 4, 19). Gratia nos facit legis dilectores, lex vero ipsa sine gratia nonnisi praevaricatores facit. Et quod discipulis suis dicit Dominus: Non vos me elegistis, sed ego elegi vos (Io 15, 16), nihil aliud indicat nobis. Si enim nos prius dileximus, ut hoc merito nos ipse diligeret, prius illum nos elegimus, ut ab illo eligi mereremur. Sed ipse qui veritas est, aliud dicit, et huic vanitati hominum apertissime contradicit: Non vos me elegistis, inquit. Si ergo non elegistis, sine dubio nec dilexistis: quomodo enim eum eligerent, quem non diligerent? Sed ego, inquit, vos elegi.
18. 38. Let no one, then, deceive you, my brothers: for we would not love God, unless he himself first loved us. The same John shows this most plainly, and says: Let us love, because he first loved us (1 John 4:19). Grace makes us lovers of the law, but the law itself without grace makes only transgressors. And what the Lord says to his disciples, You did not choose me, but I chose you (John 15:16), indicates nothing else to us. For if we first loved him, so that by this merit he himself might love us, then we first chose him, so that we might deserve to be chosen by him. But he who is the Truth says otherwise, and most plainly contradicts this vanity of men: You did not choose me, he says. If, then, you did not choose, without doubt you did not love either; for how would they choose him whom they did not love? But I, he says, chose you.
Grace.1.18.38Numquid non et ipsi postea elegerunt eum, et omnibus bonis huius saeculi praetulerunt? Sed quia electi sunt, elegerunt: non quia elegerunt, electi sunt. Eligentium hominum meritum nullum esset, nisi eos eligentis gratia Dei praeveniret. Unde et apostolus Paulus benedicens Thessalonicenses : Vos, inquit, Dominus multiplicet, et abundare faciat in caritate in invicem et in omnes (1 Thess 3, 12). Hanc benedictionem dedit ut nos invicem diligeremus, qui legem dederat ut invicem diligamus. Denique alio loco ad eosdem, quia sine dubio in quibusdam eorum iam erat, quod eis ut esset optaverat: Gratias, inquit, agere debemus Deo semper pro vobis, fratres, sicut dignum est, quoniam supercrescit fides vestra, et abundat caritas uniuscuiusque vestrum in invicem (2 Thess 1, 3). Hoc dixit, ne forte de tanto bono quod ex Deo habebant, tamquam ex se ipsis id habentes extollerentur. Quod ergo supercrescit fides vestra, inquit, et abundat caritas uniuscuiusque vestrum in invicem, gratias agere debemus Deo de vobis, non ita vos laudare, tamquam hoc habeatis ex vobis.
Did they not also choose him afterward, and prefer him to all the goods of this world? But because they were chosen, they chose: not because they chose, they were chosen. There would be no merit in the men who choose, unless the grace of God who chooses them went before. Hence the apostle Paul too, blessing the Thessalonians, says: May the Lord multiply you, and make you abound in love toward one another and toward all (1 Thess 3:12). He gave this blessing that we might love one another, who had given the law that we should love one another. Then, in another place, to the same people—because without doubt there was already in some of them what he had wished them to have—he says: We ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers, as is fitting, because your faith grows abundantly, and the love of each one of you for one another abounds (2 Thess 1:3). He said this lest perhaps, concerning so great a good which they had from God, they should be lifted up as though they had it of themselves. So then, because your faith grows abundantly, he says, and the love of each one of you for one another abounds, we ought to give thanks to God for you, not so to praise you as though you had this of yourselves.
Grace.1.18.3818. 39. Et ad Timotheum dicit: Non enim dedit nobis Deus spiritum timoris, sed virtutis et caritatis et continentiae (2 Tim 1, 7). In quo sane Apostoli testimonio cavere debemus, ne nos arbitremur non accepisse spiritum timoris Dei, quod sine dubio magnum est Dei donum, de quo dicit propheta Isaias: Requiescet super eum spiritus sapientiae et intellectus, spiritus consilii et fortitudinis, spiritus scientiae et pietatis, spiritus timoris Domini (Is 11, 2-3). Non quo timore Petrus Christum negavit, sed illius timoris spiritum accepimus, de quo dicit ipse Christus: Eum timete, qui habet potestatem et animam et corpus perdere in Gehennam: ita dico vobis, hunc timete (Lc 12, 5). Hoc autem dixit, ne illo timore negaremus eum, quo turbatus est Petrus. Hunc enim auferri voluit a nobis, cum prius dixit: Nolite timere eos qui corpus occidunt, et postea non habent quid faciant (Lc 12, 4). Huius timoris non accepimus spiritum, sed virtutis et caritatis et continentiae.
18. 39. And to Timothy he says: For God did not give us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of self-control (2 Tim 1:7). In this testimony of the Apostle we must indeed take care not to suppose that we have not received the spirit of the fear of God, which without doubt is a great gift of God, of which the prophet Isaiah says: There shall rest upon him the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and fortitude, the spirit of knowledge and godliness, the spirit of the fear of the Lord (Isa 11:2–3). It was not by that fear with which Peter denied Christ, but the spirit of that fear which we have received, of which Christ himself says: Fear him who has power to destroy both soul and body in Gehenna; yes, I tell you, fear him (Luke 12:5). But he said this lest we should deny him by that fear by which Peter was troubled. For he wished this to be taken away from us, when he first said: Do not fear those who kill the body, and after that have nothing more they can do (Luke 12:4). The spirit of this fear we have not received, but of power and of love and of self-control.
Grace.1.18.39De quo spiritu idem ipse ad Romanos ait: Gloriamur in tribulationibus, scientes quoniam tribulatio patientiam operatur, patientia probationem, probatio spem, spes autem non confundit: quia caritas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum Sanctum, qui datus est nobis (Rom 5, 3-5). Non itaque per nos, sed per Spiritum Sanctum qui datus est nobis, ipsa caritate fit, quam Dei donum esse manifestat, ut tribulatio non auferat, sed potius operetur patientiam. Ad Ephesios etiam: Pax, inquit, fratribus et caritas cum fide. Magna bona: sed dicat unde? a Deo, inquit, Patre et Domino Iesu Christo (Eph 6, 23). Ergo haec magna bona, non sunt nisi Dei dona.
Concerning this spirit the same Apostle says to the Romans: We glory in tribulations, knowing that tribulation works patience, patience proof, proof hope; and hope does not confound, because the love of God is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us (Rom 5:3–5). Therefore it is not through us, but through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us, that it comes about, by that very love—which he shows to be a gift of God—that tribulation does not take away patience, but rather works it. To the Ephesians also: Peace, he says, to the brothers, and love with faith. Great goods: but let him say from whom? from God, he says, the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ (Eph 6:23). Therefore these great goods are nothing other than gifts of God.
Grace.1.18.3919. 40. Sed non est mirum, si lux lucet in tenebris, et tenebrae eam non comprehendunt (Io 1, 5). In Ioanne lux dicit: Ecce qualem dilectionem dedit nobis Pater, ut filii Dei vocemur et simus (1 Io 3, 1). Et in pelagianis tenebrae dicunt: Dilectio nobis ex nobis est. Quam si veram, id est, christianam dilectionem haberent, scirent et unde haberent; sicut sciebat Apostolus, qui dicebat: Nos autem non spiritum mundi accepimus, sed spiritum qui ex Deo est, ut sciamus quae a Deo donata sunt nobis (1 Cor 2, 12). Ioannes dicit: Deus dilectio est (1 Io 4, 16). Et pelagiani etiam ipsum Deum non ex Deo, sed ex semetipsis habere se dicunt: et cum scientiam legis ex Deo nobis esse fateantur, caritatem ex nobis ipsis volunt. Nec audiunt Apostolum dicentem: Scientia inflat, caritas autem aedificat (1 Cor 8, 1).
19. 40. But it is no wonder if the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness does not comprehend it (John 1:5). In John the light says: Behold what manner of love the Father has given us, that we should be called, and be, children of God (1 John 3:1). And in the Pelagians the darkness says: Love is ours from ourselves. If they had true love—that is, Christian love—they would know also whence they had it; just as the Apostle knew, who said: But we have not received the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we may know the things that have been given us by God (1 Cor 2:12). John says: God is love (1 John 4:16). And the Pelagians say that they have even God himself not from God, but from their own selves; and although they confess that the knowledge of the law is ours from God, they want love to be from ourselves. Nor do they listen to the Apostle, who says: Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up (1 Cor 8:1).
Grace.1.19.40Quid est ineptius, immo vero quid est amentius, et ab ipsa sanctitate caritatis alienius, quam confiteri ex Deo esse scientiam, quae sine caritate inflat, et ex nobis esse caritatem, quae facit ut scientia inflare non possit? Item cum dicat Apostolus: supereminentem scientiae caritatem Christi (Eph 3, 19), quid est insanius, quam putare ex Deo esse scientiam, quae subdenda est caritati, et ex hominibus caritatem, quae supereminet scientiae? Fides autem vera et doctrina sana ambas esse dicit ex Deo, quia scriptum est: A facie eius scientia et intellectus procedit (Prov 2, 6); scriptum est: Caritas ex Deo est (1 Io 4, 7). Et legimus: Spiritum scientiae et pietatis (Is 11, 2); legimus: Spiritum virtutis et caritatis et continentiae (2 Tim 1, 7). Sed maius est donum caritas quam scientia: nam scientia quando est in homine, caritas est necessaria, ne infletur; caritas autem non aemulatur, non agit perperam, non inflatur (1 Cor 13, 4).
What is more foolish—indeed, what is more insane and more foreign to the very holiness of love—than to confess that knowledge, which without love puffs up, is from God, and that love, which keeps knowledge from being able to puff up, is from ourselves? Likewise, since the Apostle says the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge (Eph 3:19), what is more mad than to think that knowledge, which is to be made subject to love, is from God, and that love, which surpasses knowledge, is from men? But true faith and sound doctrine say that both are from God, for it is written: From his face knowledge and understanding proceed (Prov 2:6); it is written: Love is from God (1 John 4:7). And we read: The spirit of knowledge and godliness (Isa 11:2); we read: The spirit of power and of love and of self-control (2 Tim 1:7). But love is a greater gift than knowledge; for when knowledge is in a man, love is necessary, lest he be puffed up; but love is not envious, does not act wrongly, is not puffed up (1 Cor 13:4).
Grace.1.19.4020. 41. Satis me disputasse arbitror adversus eos qui gratiam Dei vehementer oppugnant, qua voluntas humana non tollitur, sed ex mala mutatur in bonam, et cum bona fuerit adiuvatur; et sic disputasse, ut non magis ego, quam divina ipsa Scriptura vobiscum locuta sit evidentissimis testimoniis veritatis: quae Scriptura divina si diligenter inspiciatur, ostendit non solum bonas hominum voluntates quas ipse facit ex malis, et a se factas bonas in actus bonos et in aeternam dirigit vitam, verum etiam illas quae conservant saeculi creaturam, ita esse in Dei potestate, ut eas quo voluerit, quando voluerit, faciat inclinari, vel ad beneficia quibusdam praestanda, vel ad poenas quibusdam ingerendas, sicut ipse iudicat, occultissimo quidem iudicio, sed sine ulla dubitatione iustissimo.
20. 41. I think I have disputed enough against those who vehemently assail the grace of God—the grace by which the human will is not taken away, but changed from evil to good, and, when it has become good, is helped; and I have disputed in such a way that not so much I, as the divine Scripture itself, has spoken with you by the most evident testimonies of the truth. And if this divine Scripture is carefully examined, it shows that God not only makes good the wills of men out of evil ones, and, once he has made them good, directs them to good acts and to eternal life, but also that those wills which preserve the creation of this world are so in the power of God that he makes them incline, wherever and whenever he wills, either to bestow benefits on some, or to inflict punishments on others, as he himself judges, by a judgment most hidden indeed, but without any doubt most just.
Grace.1.20.41Nam invenimus aliqua peccata etiam poenas esse aliorum peccatorum; sicut sunt vasa irae, quae perfecta dicit Apostolus in perditionem (Rom 9, 22); sicut est induratio Pharaonis, cuius et causa dicitur, ad ostendendam in illo virtutem Dei (Cf. Ex 9, 16); sicut est fuga Israelitarum a facie hostium de civitate Gai: in animo enim factus est timor ut fugerent, et hoc factum est ut vindicaretur peccatum eo modo, quo fuerat vindicandum: unde dicit Dominus ad Iesum Nave: Non poterunt filii Israel subsistere ante faciem inimicorum suorum (Ios 7, 4-5. 10-12). Quid est: Non poterunt subsistere? Quare non subsistebant per liberum arbitrium, sed per timorem turbata voluntate fugiebant, nisi quia Deus dominatur et voluntatibus hominum, et quos vult in formidinem convertit iratus?
For we find that some sins are even the punishments of other sins; such are the vessels of wrath, which the Apostle says are fitted for destruction (Rom 9:22); such is the hardening of Pharaoh, the cause of which is also stated, namely to show forth God's power in him (See Exod 9:16); such is the flight of the Israelites from the face of their enemies from the city of Ai: for fear was produced in their mind so that they fled, and this came about so that the sin might be punished in the manner in which it had to be punished. Hence the Lord says to Joshua son of Nun: The sons of Israel will not be able to stand before the face of their enemies (Josh 7:4–5. 10–12). What does it mean, they will not be able to stand? Why did they not stand through free choice, but, their will troubled through fear, did they flee, except because God has dominion even over the wills of men, and turns whom he wills to dread when he is angry?
Grace.1.20.41Numquid non hostes Israelitarum adversus populum Dei, quem ducebat Iesus Nave, sua voluntate pugnarunt? Et tamen dicit Scriptura, quia per Dominum factum est confortari cor eorum, ut obviam irent ad bellum ad Israel, ut exterminarentur (Ios 11, 20; cf. 7). Numquid non sua voluntate homo improbus filius Gemini maledicebat regi David? Et tamen quid ait David, plenus vera et alta et pia sapientia? quid ait illi qui maledicentem percutere voluit? Quid mihi, inquit, et vobis, filii Sarviae? Dimittite eum, et maledicat; quia Dominus dixit illi maledicere David. Et quis dicet ei: Quare fecisti sic? (2 Reg 16, 10).
Did not the enemies of the Israelites fight by their own will against the people of God, whom Joshua son of Nun was leading? And yet Scripture says that it was brought about by the Lord that their heart should be strengthened, that they should go out to meet Israel in battle, that they might be destroyed (Josh 11:20; see 7). Did not the wicked man, the son of Gera, by his own will curse King David? And yet what does David say, full of true and deep and devout wisdom? What does he say to the man who wished to strike the one cursing him? What have I to do with you, he says, O sons of Zeruiah? Let him alone, and let him curse; for the Lord has bidden him curse David. And who shall say to him: Why have you done so? (2 Sam 16:10).
Grace.1.20.41Deinde Scriptura divina plenam sententiam regis velut ab alio initio repetendo commendans: Et dixit, inquit, David ad Abessa et ad omnes pueros eius: Ecce filius meus qui exiit de utero meo; quaerit animam meam, et adhuc modo filius Gemini. Sinite illum, maledicat, quoniam dixit illi Dominus, ut videat Dominus humilitatem meam, et retribuat mihi bona pro maledicto eius in die isto (2 Reg 16, 11-12). Quomodo dixerit Dominus huic homini maledicere David, quis sapiens et intelleget? Non enim iubendo dixit, ubi obedientia laudaretur; sed quod eius voluntatem proprio vitio suo malam in hoc peccatum iudicio suo iusto et occulto inclinavit, ideo dictum est: dixit ei Dominus.
Then the divine Scripture, commending the king's full sentence by repeating it as if from a fresh start, says: And David said to Abishai and to all his servants: Behold, my son, who came forth from my womb, seeks my life; and how much more now this son of Gera. Let him alone, let him curse, for the Lord has bidden him; that the Lord may see my humiliation, and may render me good for his cursing this day (2 Sam 16:11–12). In what sense the Lord bade this man curse David—who that is wise will understand? For he did not bid it by commanding, where obedience would be praised; but because by his own just and hidden judgment he inclined to this sin the man's will, which was evil by its own fault, for that reason it was said, the Lord bade him.
Grace.1.20.41Nam si iubenti obtemperasset Deo, laudandus potius quam puniendus esset, sicut ex hoc peccato postea novimus esse punitum. Nec causa tacita est, cur ei Dominus isto modo dixerit maledicere David, hoc est, cor eius malum in hoc peccatum miserit vel dimiserit: ut videat, inquit, Dominus humilitatem meam, et retribuat mihi bona pro maledicto eius in die isto (Cf. 2 Reg 16, 12).
For if he had obeyed God commanding, he would be praised rather than punished, just as we know that he was afterward punished for this sin. Nor is the reason left unstated why the Lord bade him in this way curse David—that is, sent or let loose his evil heart into this sin: that the Lord may see my humiliation, he says, and may render me good for his cursing this day (See 2 Sam 16:12).
Grace.1.20.41Ecce quomodo probatur, Deum uti cordibus etiam malorum ad laudem atque adiumentum bonorum. Sic usus est Iuda tradente Christum, sic usus est et Iudaeis crucifigentibus Christum. Et quanta inde bona praestitit populis credituris! Qui et ipso diabolo utitur pessimo, sed optime, ad exercendam et probandam fidem et pietatem bonorum, non sibi, qui omnia scit antequam fiant, sed nobis, quibus erat necessarium, ut eo modo ageretur nobiscum. Numquid non sua voluntate Abessalon elegit consilium quod sibi oberat? Et tamen ideo fecit, quia exaudierat Dominus eius patrem orantem, ut hoc fieret. Propter quod Scriptura ait: Et Dominus mandavit dissipare consilium Achitophel bonum, ut inducat Dominus super Abessalon omnia mala (2 Reg 17, 14). Bonum consilium dixit, quod ad tempus proderat causae, quia pro ipso erat contra patrem eius, contra quem rebellaverat, ut posset eum opprimere, nisi Dominus consilium dissipasset quod dederat Achitophel, agendo in corde Abessalon, ut tale consilium repudiaret, et aliud quod ei non expediebat eligeret.
See, then, how it is proved that God uses the hearts even of the wicked for the praise and aid of the good. So he used Judas, who betrayed Christ; so he used the Jews, who crucified Christ. And what great goods he thereby bestowed on the peoples who were to believe! He who uses even the devil himself, most evil though he is, yet for the best ends, to exercise and prove the faith and godliness of the good—not for his own sake, who knows all things before they come to be, but for ours, for whom it was necessary that we be dealt with in this way. Did not Absalom by his own will choose the counsel that worked against him? And yet he did so because the Lord had heard his father praying that this might happen. On account of this Scripture says: And the Lord commanded that the good counsel of Ahithophel be brought to nothing, that the Lord might bring all evils upon Absalom (2 Sam 17:14). He called it good counsel because for the time it profited the cause, since it was for Absalom against his father, against whom he had rebelled, so that he might be able to crush him, had not the Lord brought to nothing the counsel that Ahithophel had given, by working in the heart of Absalom that he should reject such counsel and choose another that was not to his advantage.
Grace.1.20.4121. 42. Quis non ista iudicia divina contremiscat, quibus agit Deus in cordibus etiam malorum hominum quidquid vult, reddens eis tamen secundum merita eorum? Roboam filius Salomonis respuit consilium salubre seniorum, quod ei dederant, ne cum populo dure ageret, et verbis coaevorum suorum potius acquievit, respondendo minaciter quibus leniter debuit (Cf. 3 Reg 12, 1-11).
21. 42. Who would not tremble at these divine judgments, by which God works in the hearts even of evil men whatever he wills, yet rendering to them according to their merits? Rehoboam the son of Solomon spurned the wholesome counsel of the elders, which they had given him, that he should not deal harshly with the people, and rather yielded to the words of his contemporaries, answering threateningly those to whom he should have answered gently (See 1 Kgs 12:1–11).
Grace.1.21.42Unde hoc, nisi propria voluntate? Sed hinc ab eo recesserunt decem tribus Israel, et alium regem sibi constituerunt Ieroboam, ut irati Dei voluntas fieret, quod etiam futurum esse praedixerat. Quid enim Scriptura dicit? Et non audivit rex plebem, quoniam erat conversio a Domino, ut statueret verbum suum quod locutus est in manu Achiae Selonitae de Ieroboam filio Nabath (3 Reg 12, 15). Nempe sic factum est illud per hominis voluntatem, ut tamen conversio esset a Domino.
Whence this, if not by his own will? But hence the ten tribes of Israel withdrew from him and set up another king for themselves, Jeroboam, so that the will of an angry God might be done, which he had also foretold would come to be. For what does Scripture say? And the king did not listen to the people, for it was a turning from the Lord, that he might establish his word which he had spoken by the hand of Ahijah the Shilonite concerning Jeroboam the son of Nebat (1 Kgs 12:15). That, indeed, was so done through the will of man that it was nonetheless a turning from the Lord.
Grace.1.21.42Legite libros Paralipomenon, et invenietis in secundo libro scriptum: Et suscitavit Dominus super Ioram spiritum Philistiim et Arabum qui finitimi erant Aethiopibus; et ascenderunt in terram Iuda, et dissipaverunt eam, et ceperunt omnem substantiam, quae in domo regis inventa est (2 Par 21, 16-17). Hic ostenditur, Deum suscitare hostes eis terris vastandis, quas tali poena iudicat dignas. Numquid tamen Philistiim et Arabes in terram Iudaeam dissipandam sine sua voluntate venerunt, aut sic venerunt sua voluntate, ut mendaciter scriptum sit quod Dominus ad hoc faciendum eorum spiritum suscitavit? Immo utrumque verum est, quia et sua voluntate venerunt, et tamen spiritum eorum Dominus suscitavit. Quod etiam sic dici potest, et eorum spiritum Dominus suscitavit, et tamen sua voluntate venerunt. Agit enim Omnipotens in cordibus hominum etiam motum voluntatis eorum, ut per eos agat quod per eos agere ipse voluerit, qui omnino iniuste aliquid velle non novit.
Read the books of Chronicles, and you will find written in the second book: And the Lord stirred up against Jehoram the spirit of the Philistines and of the Arabs who were neighbors to the Ethiopians; and they came up into the land of Judah, and laid it waste, and carried off all the substance that was found in the king's house (2 Chr 21:16–17). Here it is shown that God stirs up enemies to lay waste those lands which he judges worthy of such punishment. But did the Philistines and the Arabs come into the land of Judah to lay it waste without their own will, or did they so come by their own will that what was written is false—that the Lord stirred up their spirit to do this? On the contrary, both are true, because they both came by their own will, and the Lord stirred up their spirit. This may also be put thus: the Lord both stirred up their spirit, and yet they came by their own will. For the Almighty works in the hearts of men even the movement of their will, that he may work through them what he himself willed to work through them, who knows not how to will anything at all unjustly.
Grace.1.21.42Quid est quod homo Dei dixit ad Amessiam regem: Non veniat tecum exercitus Israel, non est enim Dominus cum Israel, omnibus filiis Ephrem: quoniam si putaveris obtinere in illis, in fugam convertet te Deus ante inimicos, quoniam virtus est Deo vel adiuvare vel in fugam vertere (2 Par 25, 7-8) ? Quomodo virtus Dei alios adiuvat in bello dando eis fiduciam, alios immisso timore vertit in fugam, nisi quia ille qui in coelo et in terra omnia quaecumque voluit fecit (Cf. Ps 134, 6), etiam in cordibus hominum operatur?
What of the fact that the man of God said to King Amaziah: Let not the army of Israel go with you, for the Lord is not with Israel, with all the sons of Ephraim; for if you think to prevail with them, God will turn you to flight before your enemies, since it is in God's power either to help or to put to flight (2 Chr 25:7–8)? How does the power of God help some in battle by giving them confidence, and turn others to flight by sending fear upon them, except because he who in heaven and on earth did whatever he willed (See Ps 135 (134):6) works also in the hearts of men?
Grace.1.21.42Legimus quid dixerit Ioas rex Israel, mittens nuntium ad Amessiam regem volentem pugnare cum illo. Nam post aliqua dixit: Nunc sede in domo tua. Quid provocas in malum, et cadis tu et Iuda tecum? (4 Reg 14, 9-10). Deinde Scriptura subiunxit: Et non audivit Amessias; quoniam a Deo erat ut traderetur in manus, quoniam quaesierunt deos Edom (2 Par 25, 20). Ecce Deus idololatriae peccatum volens vindicare, hoc operatus est in eius corde, cui utique iuste irascebatur, ut admonitionem salubrem non audiret, sed ea contempta iret in bellum, ubi cum suo exercitu caderet.
We read what Joash king of Israel said, sending a messenger to King Amaziah, who wished to fight with him. For after some other things he said: Now stay in your house. Why do you provoke evil, so that you fall, you and Judah with you? (2 Kgs 14:9–10). Then Scripture added: And Amaziah did not listen; for it was from God, that he might be delivered into their hands, because they had sought the gods of Edom (2 Chr 25:20). Behold, God, willing to punish the sin of idolatry, worked this in the heart of the one with whom he was surely justly angry, that he should not listen to the wholesome admonition, but, despising it, should go to war, where he would fall with his army.
Grace.1.21.42Per Ezechielem prophetam dicit Deus: Et propheta si erraverit et locutus fuerit, ego Dominus seduxi prophetam illum, et extendam manum meam super eum, et exterminabo eum de medio populi mei Israel (Ez 14, 9). In libro Esther scriptum est, quae mulier ex populo Israel in terra captivitatis facta erat uxor alienigenae regis Assueri: ergo in eius libro scriptum est, quod cum haberet necessitatem interveniendi pro populo suo, quem rex, ubicumque in regno eius esset, iusserat trucidari, oravit ad Dominum: cogebat enim eam magna necessitas, ut praeter iussum regis et praeter ordinem suum ad illum auderet intrare. Et videte quid Scriptura dicat: Et intuitus est eam tamquam taurus impetu indignationis suae, et timuit regina, et conversus est color eius per dissolutionem, et inclinavit se super caput delicatae suae, quae praecedebat eam; et convertit Deus, et transtulit indignationem eius in lenitatem (Esth 15, 4-19).
Through the prophet Ezekiel God says: And if the prophet goes astray and speaks, I the Lord have deceived that prophet, and I will stretch out my hand against him, and will destroy him from the midst of my people Israel (Ezek 14:9). In the book of Esther it is written—she was a woman of the people of Israel who in the land of captivity had been made the wife of the foreign king Ahasuerus—in her book, then, it is written that, when she was under the necessity of interceding for her people, whom the king had ordered to be slaughtered wherever they were in his kingdom, she prayed to the Lord; for great necessity compelled her to dare to go in to him contrary to the king's command and contrary to her own custom. And see what Scripture says: And he looked upon her like a bull in the onrush of his indignation, and the queen was afraid, and her color changed through faintness, and she leaned upon the head of her maid who went before her; and God turned, and changed his indignation into gentleness (Esth 15:4–19).
Grace.1.21.42Scriptum est et in Proverbis Salomonis: Sicut impetus aquae sic cor regis in manu Dei; quocumque voluerit, declinabit illud (Prov 21, 1). Et in Psalmo centesimo quarto legitur dictum de Aegyptiis, quid eis fecerit Deus: Et convertit cor eorum ut odissent populum eius, ut dolum facerent in servos eius (Ps 104, 25). In Litteris etiam apostolicis videte quae scripta sunt; in Epistola Pauli apostoli ad Romanos: Propterea tradidit illos Deus in desideria cordis eorum, in immunditiam. Item paulo post: Propter hoc tradidit illos Deus in passiones ignominiae. Item paulo post: Sicut non probaverunt Deum habere in notitiam, tradidit illos Deus in reprobam mentem, ut faciant quae non conveniunt (Rom 1, 24. 26. 28).
It is written also in the Proverbs of Solomon: As the rush of water, so is the heart of the king in the hand of God; wherever he wills, he will turn it (Prov 21:1). And in the one hundred and fifth Psalm it is read, said of the Egyptians, what God did to them: And he turned their heart to hate his people, to deal craftily with his servants (Ps 105 (104):25). In the apostolic writings also, see what is written; in the Epistle of the apostle Paul to the Romans: Therefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, to uncleanness. Likewise a little after: For this God gave them up to passions of shame. Likewise a little after: As they did not see fit to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up to a reprobate mind, to do the things that are not fitting (Rom 1:24. 26. 28).
Grace.1.21.42Et ad Thessalonicenses in Epistola secunda ait de quibusdam: Pro eo quod dilectionem veritatis non receperunt, ut salvi fierent, et ideo mittet illis Deus operationem erroris, ut credant mendacio, ut iudicentur omnes qui non crediderunt veritati, sed consenserunt iniquitati (2 Thess 2, 10-11).
And to the Thessalonians, in the second Epistle, he says of certain men: Because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved; and therefore God will send them a working of error, that they may believe a lie, so that all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but consented to iniquity (2 Thess 2:10–11).
Grace.1.21.4221. 43. His et talibus testimoniis divinorum eloquiorum, quae omnia commemorare nimis longum est, satis, quantum existimo, manifestatur, operari Deum in cordibus hominum ad inclinandas eorum voluntates quocumque voluerit, sive ad bona pro sua misericordia, sive ad mala pro meritis eorum, iudicio utique suo aliquando aperto, aliquando occulto, semper tamen iusto. Fixum enim debet esse et immobile in corde vestro, quia non est iniquitas apud Deum (Cf. Rom 9, 14). Ac per hoc quando legitis in Litteris veritatis, a Deo seduci homines, aut obtundi vel obdurari corda eorum, nolite dubitare praecessisse mala merita eorum, ut iuste ista paterentur; ne incurratis in illud proverbium Salomonis: Insipientia viri violat vias suas; Deum autem causatur in corde suo (Prov 19, 3).
21. 43. By these and similar testimonies of the divine writings—which it would be too long to recall in full—it is sufficiently made manifest, as I judge, that God works in the hearts of men to incline their wills wherever he wills, whether to good things out of his mercy, or to evil things according to their merits—by a judgment, indeed, sometimes open, sometimes hidden, but always just. For it ought to be fixed and immovable in your heart that there is no iniquity with God (See Rom 9:14). And thus, when you read in the writings of truth that men are deceived by God, or that their hearts are made dull or hardened, do not doubt that their evil merits went before, so that they justly suffered these things; lest you fall into that proverb of Solomon: A man's folly violates his own ways; but in his heart he lays the blame on God (Prov 19:3).
Grace.1.21.43Gratia vero non secundum merita hominum datur, alioquin gratia iam non est gratia: quia ideo gratia vocatur, quia gratis datur. Si autem potens est, sive per Angelos, vel bonos vel malos, sive quocumque alio modo operari etiam in cordibus malorum, pro meritis eorum, quorum malitiam non ipse fecit, sed aut originaliter tracta est ab Adam, aut crevit per propriam voluntatem, quid mirum est, si per Spiritum Sanctum operatur in cordibus electorum suorum bona, qui operatus est ut ipsa corda essent ex malis bona?
But grace is not given according to the merits of men, otherwise grace would no longer be grace; for it is called grace because it is given freely. But if he is able, whether through angels, good or evil, or in any other manner whatever, to work even in the hearts of the wicked according to their merits—whose wickedness he himself did not make, but which was either drawn from Adam by origin, or grew through their own will—what wonder is it if, through the Holy Spirit, he works good in the hearts of his elect, who worked that those hearts themselves should be good out of evil?
Grace.1.21.4322. 44. Sed suspicentur homines quaelibet merita bona, quae putant praecedere, ut iustificentur per Dei gratiam, non intellegentes, cum hoc dicunt, nihil aliud quam se negare gratiam: sed, ut dixi, quod volunt de maioribus suspicentur; de parvulis certe Pelagiani quid respondeant non inveniunt, quorum nec voluntas ulla est in accipienda gratia, cuius voluntatis meritum praecessisse dicant, et insuper eos etiam cum fletu reluctari videmus, quando baptizantur et divina Sacramenta percipiunt: quod eis ad magnum impietatis peccatum imputaretur, si iam libero uterentur arbitrio; et tamen haeret etiam in reluctantibus gratia, apertissime nullo bono merito praecedente, alioquin gratia iam non esset gratia.
22. 44. But let men suspect whatever good merits they think go before, so that they may be justified through the grace of God, not understanding that, in saying this, they do nothing other than deny grace. But, as I have said, let them suspect what they will about adults; concerning infants, certainly, the Pelagians find nothing to answer, infants who have no will at all in receiving grace whose merit they could say went before, and whom we even see, moreover, resisting with weeping when they are baptized and receive the divine sacraments—which would be imputed to them as a great sin of impiety, if they were already using free choice; and yet grace clings even to those who resist, with most plainly no good merit going before, otherwise grace would no longer be grace.
Grace.1.22.44Et aliquando filiis infidelium praestatur haec gratia, cum occulta Dei providentia in manus piorum quomodocumque perveniunt; aliquando autem filii fidelium non eam consequuntur, aliquo impedimento existente, ne possit periclitantibus subveniri. Fiunt vero ista per occultam Dei providentiam, cuius inscrutabilia sunt iudicia, et investigabiles viae (Cf. Rom 11, 33) : quod ut Apostolus diceret, quid praedixerit intuemini. Agebat enim de Iudaeis et Gentibus, cum scriberet ad Romanos, id est, ad Gentes, et ait: Sicut enim aliquando vos non credidistis Deo, nunc autem misericordiam consecuti estis in illorum incredulitate, ita et hi nunc non crediderunt in vestra misericordia, ut et ipsi misericordiam consequantur: conclusit enim Deus omnes in infidelitate, ut omnium misereatur (Rom 11, 30-32). Et cum attendisset quid dixerit, admirans sententiae suae certam quidem veritatem, sed magnam profunditatem, quomodo concluserit Deus omnes in infidelitate, ut omnium misereatur, quasi faciens mala ut venirent bona, mox exclamavit atque ait: O altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei! quam inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius, et investigabiles viae eius! (Rom 11, 33).
And sometimes this grace is bestowed on the children of unbelievers, when by the hidden providence of God they come, in one way or another, into the hands of the devout; but sometimes the children of believers do not obtain it, some impediment existing so that aid cannot be brought to those in peril. These things, indeed, come about by the hidden providence of God, whose judgments are unsearchable, and his ways past finding out (See Rom 11:33); and that the Apostle might say this, consider what he said before. For he was treating of the Jews and the Gentiles, when he wrote to the Romans—that is, to the Gentiles—and he says: For as you once did not believe God, but now have obtained mercy through their unbelief, so these too have now not believed, through the mercy shown to you, that they also may obtain mercy; for God has shut up all in unbelief, that he may have mercy on all (Rom 11:30–32). And when he had considered what he said, marveling at the certain truth, indeed, but the great profundity, of his statement—how God has shut up all in unbelief, that he may have mercy on all, as though doing evil things that good things might come—he at once cried out and said: O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! (Rom 11:33).
Grace.1.22.44Haec enim inscrutabilia iudicia et investigabiles vias perversi homines non cogitantes, et proclives ad reprehendendum, non idonei ad intellegendum, putabant et iactitabant Apostolum dicere: Faciamus mala, ut veniant bona (Rom 3, 8). Quod absit ut Apostolus diceret; sed homines non intellegentes hoc putabant dici, quando audiebant quod dixit Apostolus: Lex autem subintravit, ut abundaret delictum: ubi autem abundavit delictum, superabundavit gratia (Rom 5, 20). Sed utique gratia id agit, ut iam fiant bona ab eis qui fecerunt mala; non ut perseverent in malis, et reddi sibi existiment bona. Non itaque debent dicere: Faciamus mala, ut veniant bona; sed: Fecimus mala, et venerunt bona; iam faciamus bona, ut in futuro saeculo recipiamus pro bonis bona, qui in hoc saeculo recipimus pro malis bona.
For perverse men, not considering these unsearchable judgments and untraceable ways, and prone to find fault, not fit to understand, used to think and to boast that the Apostle said: Let us do evil, that good may come (Rom 3:8). God forbid that the Apostle should say this; but men, not understanding, thought it was said when they heard what the Apostle said: But the law entered in, that the offense might abound; but where the offense abounded, grace abounded all the more (Rom 5:20). But surely grace brings it about that good things are now done by those who did evil things; not that they should persevere in evils, and think that good things are rendered to them. And so they ought not to say: Let us do evil, that good may come; but: We did evil, and good came; now let us do good, that in the world to come we may receive good for good, who in this world receive good for evil.
Grace.1.22.44Propter quod scriptum est in Psalmo: Misericordiam et iudicium cantabo tibi, Domine (Ps 100, 1). Prius itaque non ideo venit Filius hominis in mundum, ut iudicet mundum, sed ut salvetur mundus per ipsum (Io 3, 17) : hoc propter misericordiam; postea vero propter iudicium venturus est iudicare vivos et mortuos, quamvis et in hoc tempore ipsa salvatio non fiat sine iudicio, sed occulto: ideo ait: In iudicium veni in hunc mundum, ut qui non vident, videant; et qui vident, caeci fiant (Io 9, 39).
On account of this it is written in the Psalm: Mercy and judgment I will sing to you, O Lord (Ps 101 (100):1). And so the Son of man first came into the world not to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him (John 3:17)—this on account of mercy; but afterward, on account of judgment, he is to come to judge the living and the dead; although even in this present time that salvation does not come about without judgment, but a hidden one; hence he says: For judgment I have come into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind (John 9:39).
Grace.1.22.4423. 45. Ad occulta ergo Dei iudicia revocate, quando videtis in una causa, quam certe habent omnes parvuli, haereditarium malum trahentes ex Adam, huic subveniri ut baptizetur, illi non subveniri ut in ipsa obligatione moriatur; illum baptizatum in hac vita relinqui, quem praescivit Deus impium futurum, istum vero baptizatum rapi ex hac vita, ne malitia mutet intellectum eius (Sap 4, 11); et nolite in istis dare iniustitiam vel insipientiam Deo, apud quem iustitiae fons est et sapientiae; sed sicut vos exhortatus sum ab initio sermonis huius (Cf. 1, 1), in quod pervenistis, in eo ambulate, et hoc quoque vobis Deus revelabit (Cf. Phil 3, 16. 15), et si non in hac vita, certe in altera: nihil est enim occultum quod non revelabitur (Mt 10, 26).
23. 45. Refer it, then, to the hidden judgments of God, when you see, in one and the same case—which certainly all infants have, drawing the hereditary evil from Adam—that aid is brought to this one that he may be baptized, and not brought to that one that he may die in that very bondage; that this one is left baptized in this life, whom God foreknew would be ungodly, but that one is, when baptized, snatched out of this life, lest wickedness alter his understanding (Wis 4:11); and do not, in these matters, ascribe injustice or folly to God, with whom is the fount of justice and of wisdom; but, as I exhorted you at the beginning of this discourse (See 1.1), walk in that to which you have attained, and this too God will reveal to you (See Phil 3:16. 15)—and if not in this life, certainly in the other: for there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed (Matt 10:26).
Grace.1.23.45Quando ergo auditis dicentem Dominum: Ego Dominus seduxi prophetam illum (Ez 14, 9), et quod ait Apostolus: Cuius vult miseretur, et quem vult obdurat (Rom 9, 18), in eo quem seduci permittit vel obdurari, mala eius merita credite; in eo vero cuius miseretur, gratiam Dei non reddentis mala pro malis, sed bona pro malis, fideliter et indubitanter agnoscite. Nec ideo auferatis a Pharaone liberum arbitrium, quia multis locis dicit Deus: Ego induravi Pharaonem; vel: induravi, aut: indurabo cor Pharaonis (Ex 4, 21; 7, 3; 9, 12; 10, 20. 27). Non enim propterea ipse Pharao non induravit cor suum. Nam et hoc de illo legitur, quando ablata est ab Aegyptiis cynomya, dicente Scriptura: Et ingravavit Pharao cor suum et in isto tempore, et noluit dimittere populum (Ex 8, 32). Ac per hoc et Deus induravit per iustum iudicium, et ipse Pharao per liberum arbitrium.
When, then, you hear the Lord saying, I the Lord have deceived that prophet (Ezek 14:9), and what the Apostle says, he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens (Rom 9:18), in the one whom he permits to be deceived or hardened, believe that his evil merits are the cause; but in the one on whom he has mercy, faithfully and without doubt acknowledge the grace of God, who renders not evil for evil, but good for evil. Nor on that account take away free choice from Pharaoh, because in many places God says: I hardened Pharaoh; or: I have hardened, or: I will harden the heart of Pharaoh (Exod 4:21; 7:3; 9:12; 10:20. 27). For Pharaoh himself did not on that account fail to harden his own heart. For this too is read of him, when the gadfly was taken away from the Egyptians, Scripture saying: And Pharaoh hardened his heart at this time also, and would not let the people go (Exod 8:32). And thus both God hardened him by a just judgment, and Pharaoh himself by free choice.
Grace.1.23.45Certi ergo estote quia non erit inanis labor vester, si in bono proposito proficientes perseveretis usque in finem. Deus enim qui modo illis quos liberat non reddit secundum opera eorum, tunc reddet unicuique secundum opera eius (Mt 16, 27). Reddet omnino Deus et mala pro malis, quoniam iustus est; et bona pro malis, quoniam bonus est; et bona pro bonis, quoniam bonus et iustus est; tantummodo mala pro bonis non reddet, quoniam iniustus non est. Reddet ergo mala pro malis, poenam pro iniustitia; et reddet bona pro malis, gratiam pro iniustitia; et reddet bona pro bonis, gratiam pro gratia (Cf. Io 1, 16).
Be certain, then, that your labor will not be in vain, if, advancing in your good resolve, you persevere to the end. For God, who now does not render to those whom he frees according to their works, will then render to each one according to his works (Matt 16:27). God will indeed render evil for evil, because he is just; and good for evil, because he is good; and good for good, because he is good and just; only he will not render evil for good, because he is not unjust. He will render, then, evil for evil, punishment for injustice; and he will render good for evil, grace for injustice; and he will render good for good, grace for grace (See John 1:16).
Grace.1.23.4524. 46. Repetite assidue librum istum, et si intellegitis, Deo gratias agite; ubi autem non intellegitis, orate ut intellegatis: dabit enim vobis Dominus intellectum. Mementote scriptum esse: Si quis vestrum indiget sapientia, postulet a Deo, qui dat omnibus affluenter et non improperat, et dabitur ei (Iac 1, 5). Ipsa est sapientia desursum descendens, sicut ipse apostolus Iacobus dicit. Illam vero sapientiam repellite a vobis, et orate ut non sit in vobis, quam detestatus est, ubi ait: Quod si zelum amarum habetis, et contentiones in vobis sunt, non est ista sapientia desursum descendens; sed terrena, animalis, diabolica. Ubi enim zelus et contentio est, ibi inconstantia et omne opus pravum. Quae autem desursum est sapientia, primum quidem pudica est, deinde pacifica, modesta, suadibilis, plena misericordia et fructibus bonis, inaestimabilis, sine simulatione (Iac 3, 14-17). Quid boni ergo non habebit, qui hanc sapientiam postularit et impetrarit a Domino? Et hinc intellegite gratiam; quia si ex nobis esset ista sapientia, desursum non esset, nec ab ipso qui nos creavit Deo postulanda esset. Fratres, orate et pro nobis, ut temperanter et pie et iuste vivamus in hoc saeculo, exspectantes illam beatam spem, et manifestationem Domini et Salvatoris nostri Iesu Christi (Tit 2, 12-13), cui est honor et gloria et regnum cum Patre et Spiritu Sancto in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
24. 46. Go over this book again and again; and if you understand, give thanks to God; but where you do not understand, pray that you may understand, for the Lord will give you understanding. Remember that it is written: If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all abundantly and does not reproach, and it will be given him (Jas 1:5). This is the wisdom that comes down from above, as the apostle James himself says. But that other wisdom drive away from yourselves, and pray that it may not be in you, which he detested, when he says: But if you have bitter zeal, and there are contentions among you, this is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but earthly, animal, devilish. For where there is zeal and contention, there is inconstancy and every depraved work. But the wisdom that is from above is first chaste, then peaceable, modest, open to persuasion, full of mercy and good fruits, beyond all judging, without dissimulation (Jas 3:14–17). What good, then, will he not have who asks for this wisdom and obtains it from the Lord? And from this understand grace; for if this wisdom were from ourselves, it would not be from above, nor would it have to be asked for from God himself, who created us. Brothers, pray also for us, that we may live with self-control and devoutly and justly in this world, awaiting that blessed hope, and the manifestation of the Lord and our Savior Jesus Christ (Titus 2:12–13), to whom is honor and glory and kingship with the Father and the Holy Spirit forever and ever. Amen.
Grace.1.24.46