On Genesis: A Refutation of the Manichees

Augustine of Hippo · Exegetical Works
Revisions I
C. 10On Genesis: A Refutation of the Manichees, Two BooksDe Genesi adversus Manichaeos, libri duo
1. Iam vero in Africa constitutus, scripsi duos libros De Genesi contra Manichaeos. Quamvis enim in superioribus libris quidquid disputavi, unde ostenderem Deum summe bonum et immutabilem creatorem esse omnium mutabilium naturarum nec ullam esse naturam malam sive substantiam, in quantum natura est atque substantia, adversus Manichaeos nostra invigilaret intentio, isti tamen duo libri apertissime adversus eos editi sunt in defensionem Veteris Legis, quam vehementi studio vesani erroris oppugnant: in primo ab eo quod scriptum est: in principio fecit Deus caelum et terram (Gen 1, 1), donec septem peragantur dies, ubi legitur Deus requievisse in die septimo. In secundo autem, ab eo quod scriptum est: hic liber creaturae caeli et terrae (Gen 2, 4), donec Adam et mulier eius dimissi sunt de paradiso, et custodia posita est ligno vitae. Deinde in fine libri errori Manichaeorum fidem Catholicae veritatis opposui, quid illi dicant et nos quid dicamus breviter aperteque complectens.
1. Now that I was settled in Africa, I wrote two books On Genesis: A Refutation of the Manichees. For although in my earlier books, in whatever I argued in order to show that God is the supremely good and unchangeable creator of all changeable natures and that there is no nature or substance that is evil insofar as it is a nature and a substance, my purpose was vigilant against the Manichees, these two books were nonetheless published most openly against them in defense of the Old Law, which they attack with the fierce zeal of their insane error: in the first book, from the point where it is written, in the beginning God made heaven and earth (Gen 1:1), down to the completion of the seven days, where we read that God rested on the seventh day. In the second book, from the point where it is written, this is the book of the creation of heaven and earth (Gen 2:4), down to where Adam and his wife were sent out of paradise and a guard was set over the tree of life. Then, at the end of the book, I set the faith of the Catholic truth against the error of the Manichees, briefly and clearly summing up what they say and what we say.
GenMani.1
2. Quod vero dixi: illud autem lumen non irrationalium avium oculos pascit, sed pura corda eorum qui Deo credunt et ab amore visibilium rerum et temporalium se ad eius praecepta implenda convertunt, quod omnes homines possunt si velint (De Gen c. Man. 1, 3, 6), non existiment novi haeretici Pelagiani secundum eos esse dictum. Verum est enim omnino, omnes homines hoc posse si velint; sed praeparatur voluntas a Domino, et tantum augetur munere caritatis ut possint, quod hic ideo dictum non est, quoniam praesenti necessarium non erat quaestioni.
2. As for what I said, that that light does not feed the eyes of irrational birds but the pure hearts of those who believe in God and turn from the love of visible and temporal things to the fulfilling of his commandments, which all men can do if they will (De Gen. contra Manich. 1, 3, 6), the new Pelagian heretics should not suppose that it was said in their sense. For it is altogether true that all men can do this if they will; but the will is prepared by the Lord, and it is increased by the gift of love to such a degree that they can—which was not said here because it was not necessary for the question then at hand.
GenMani.2
Quod vero ibi legitur benedictionem Dei, qua dictum est: crescite et multiplicamini (Gen 1, 28) in carnalem fecunditatem post peccatum conversam esse credendam (De Gen c. Man. 1, 19, 30); si non potest alio modo dictum videri, nisi ut putentur illi homines non habituri fuisse filios homines nisi peccassent, omnino non approbo.
As for what one reads there, that the blessing of God by which it was said, increase and multiply (Gen 1:28), should be believed to have been changed into carnal fruitfulness after sin (De Gen. contra Manich. 1, 19, 30)—if it cannot appear to have been said in any other way than that those human beings are thought not to have been going to have children unless they had sinned, I do not approve of it at all.
GenMani.2
Illud etiam non est consequens, ut ideo intellegatur in allegoria tantummodo esse accipiendum, quod herbae virides et ligna fructifera omni generi bestiarum et omnibus avibus et omnibus serpentibus in libro Geneseos dantur ad cibum, quia sunt et quadrupedia et volatilia quae solis carnibus vivere videantur (De Gen c. Man. 1, 20, 31). Fieri enim posset ut alerentur ab hominibus etiam de fructibus terrae, si propter oboedientiam, qua ipsi homines Deo sine ulla iniquitate servirent, mererentur omnes bestias et aves omni modo habere servientes.
Nor does this follow, that it should be understood as to be taken only allegorically that the green plants and the fruit-bearing trees are given as food to every kind of beast and to all the birds and all the serpents in the book of Genesis, on the ground that there are also four-footed animals and birds that seem to live on flesh alone (De Gen. contra Manich. 1, 20, 31). For it could happen that they too were nourished by human beings on the fruits of the earth, if, on account of the obedience by which the human beings themselves served God without any iniquity, they had deserved to have all the beasts and birds serving them in every way.
GenMani.2
Item movere potest quomodo dixerim de populo Israel: adhuc corporali circumcisione et sacrificiis, tamquam in mari gentium populus ille legi serviebat (De Gen c. Man. 1, 23, 40) quandoquidem apud gentes sacrificare non poterant, sicut eos et nunc videmus sine sacrificiis remansisse (C. litt. Petil. 2, 27, 87), nisi forte quod per Pascha immolant ovem, hoc in sacrificio deputetur.
Likewise, it may be troubling how I said of the people of Israel, that people still served the Law, as it were amid the sea of the nations, by bodily circumcision and sacrifices (De Gen. contra Manich. 1, 23, 40), seeing that among the nations they could not offer sacrifice, just as we now see them remaining without sacrifices (Contra litt. Petil. 2, 27, 87)—unless perhaps the fact that they sacrifice a lamb at the Passover should be reckoned as a sacrifice.
GenMani.2
3. In secundo etiam libro illud quod posui nomine pabuli significari posse vitam (De Gen c. Man. 2, 3, 4; Gen 2, 5), cum melioris interpretationis codices non habeant pabulum, sed faenum, non satis apte dictum videtur. Non enim congruit faeni nomen significationi vitae quomodo pabuli.
3. In the second book, too, what I set down—that by the word fodder life can be signified (De Gen. contra Manich. 2, 3, 4; Gen 2:5), when the better manuscripts do not have fodder but grass—does not seem aptly said. For the word "grass" does not fit the signification of life as well as "fodder" does.
GenMani.3
Item non videor (De Gen c. Man. 2, 5, 6) recte appellasse verba prophetica quibus scriptum est: quid superbit terra et cinis? (Eccli 10, 9), quia non in eius libro legitur, quem certi simus appellandum esse prophetam.
Likewise, I do not seem (De Gen. contra Manich. 2, 5, 6) to have rightly called prophetic the words in which it is written, why is earth and ashes proud? (Sir 10:9), because it is not read in the book of one whom we are certain ought to be called a prophet.
GenMani.3
Nec illud Apostoli ubi adhibet testimonium de Genesi dicens: factus est primus homo Adam in animam viventem (1 Cor 15, 45), sicut ille voluit intellexi, cum exponerem quod scriptum est. Insufflavit Deus in faciem eius flatum vitae, et factus est homo in animam vivam, vel in animam viventem (Gen 2, 7;). Apostolus enim ad hoc adhibuit illud testimonium, ut probaret esse corpus "animale"; ego autem hinc putavi esse monstrandum animalem factum prius hominem, non corpus hominis solum (De Gen c. Man. 2, 8, 10).
Nor did I understand, as he intended, that passage of the Apostle where he adduces the testimony from Genesis, saying, the first man Adam was made a living soul (1 Cor 15:45), when I was expounding what is written, God breathed into his face the breath of life, and the man was made into a living soul (Gen 2:7). For the Apostle adduced that testimony in order to prove that there is an "animal" body; but I thought it should be shown from this that the man was first made animal—not the body of the man alone (De Gen. contra Manich. 2, 8, 10).
GenMani.3
Quod autem dixi: nulli naturae nocere peccata nisi sua (De Gen c. Man. 2, 29, 43), ideo dixi, quoniam iusto qui nocet non ei vere nocet, quando quidem etiam mercedem eius auget in caelis (Matteo 5, 12; Luca 6, 23), sibi autem peccando vere nocet, quia propter ipsam voluntatem nocendi recipiet id, quod nocuit. Possunt sane Pelagiani ad suum dogma trahere istam sententiam, et ideo dicere parvulis aliena non nocuisse peccata, quia dixi: nulli naturae nocere peccata nisi sua, non intuentes ideo parvulos, qui utique pertinent ad humanam naturam, trahere originale peccatum, quia in primis hominibus natura humana peccavit, ac per hoc naturae humanae nulla nocuere peccata nisi sua. Per unum quippe hominem, in quo omnes peccaverunt, peccatum intravit in mundum (Rom 5, 12); non enim "nulli homini," sed nulli naturae dixi peccata nocere nisi sua.
As for what I said, that sins harm no nature except their own (De Gen. contra Manich. 2, 29, 43), I said it because one who harms a just man does not truly harm him, since he even increases his reward in heaven (Matt 5:12; Luke 6:23), but by sinning he truly harms himself, because on account of the very will to harm he will receive that which he did to harm. The Pelagians, to be sure, can drag this statement over to their own teaching, and so say that the sins of others did not harm little children, because I said, sins harm no nature except their own—not considering that little children, who certainly belong to human nature, contract original sin precisely because human nature sinned in the first human beings, and thus no sins have harmed human nature except its own. For through one man, in whom all sinned, sin entered into the world (Rom 5:12); for I did not say "sins harm no man" but sins harm no nature except their own.
GenMani.3
Item in eo quod paulo post dixi: nullum esse malum naturale (De Gen c. Man. 2, 29, 43), possunt quaerere similem latebram, nisi hoc dictum ad naturam talem referatur, qualis sine vitio primitus condita est; ipsa enim vere ac proprie natura hominis dicitur. Translato autem verbo utimur, ut "naturam" dicamus etiam qualis nascitur homo, secundum quam locutionem dixit Apostolus: fuimus enim et nos aliquando natura filii irae sicut et ceteri (Eph 2, 3).
Likewise, in what I said a little later, that there is no natural evil (De Gen. contra Manich. 2, 29, 43), they can look for a similar hiding place, unless this is taken to refer to a nature such as it was first created without fault; for that is what is truly and properly called the nature of man. But we use the word in a transferred sense when we also call "nature" the condition in which a man is born, according to which manner of speaking the Apostle said, for we too were once by nature children of wrath, like the rest (Eph 2:3).
GenMani.3
Hoc opus sic incipit: si eligerent Manichaei quos deciperent.
This work begins thus: If the Manichees chose those whom they deceive.
GenMani.3
Bk. 1About to write against the Manichees, Augustine will use a style lowered to the grasp of the less learned.Contra Manichaeos scripturus Aug. utetur stilo ad imperitiorum captum demisso.
1. 1. Si eligerent Manichaei quos deciperent, eligeremus et nos verba quibus eis responderemus: cum vero illi et doctos litteris, et indoctos errore suo persequantur, et cum promittunt veritatem, a veritate conentur avertere; non ornato politoque sermone, sed rebus manifestis convincenda est vanitas eorum.
1. 1. If the Manichees chose those whom they deceive, we too would choose the words with which to answer them; but since they attack with their error both those learned in letters and the unlearned, and since, while they promise truth, they try to turn people away from the truth, their emptiness must be refuted not by ornate and polished speech but by plain facts.
GenMani.1.1.1
Placuit enim mihi quorumdam vere Christianorum sententia, qui cum sint eruditi liberalibus litteris, tamen alios libros nostros, quos adversus Manichaeos edidimus, cum legissent, viderunt eos ab imperitioribus, aut non aut difficile intellegi, et me benevolentissime monuerunt ut communem loquendi consuetudinem non desererem, si errores illos tam perniciosos ab animis etiam imperitorum expellere cogitarem. Hunc enim sermonem usitatum et simplicem etiam docti intellegunt, illum autem indocti non intellegunt.
For I was pleased by the opinion of certain truly Christian men who, though they are educated in the liberal arts, nonetheless, when they had read other books of ours that we published against the Manichees, saw that those books were either not understood by the less learned or understood only with difficulty; and they very kindly advised me not to abandon the common manner of speaking, if I intended to drive those so pernicious errors out of the minds even of the unlearned. For this customary and simple style is understood even by the learned, whereas the other is not understood by the unlearned.
GenMani.1.1.1
Defendendi libri V. T. a manichaeorum censuris imperitorum fidei insidiantibus.
The books of the Old Testament are to be defended against the Manichees' censures, which lie in wait for the faith of the unlearned.
1. 2. Solent ergo Manichaei Scripturas Veteris Testamenti, quas non noverunt, vituperare, et ea vituperatione infirmos et parvulos nostros, non invenientes quomodo sibi respondeant, irridere atque decipere: quia nulla Scriptura est, quae non apud eos qui illam non intellegunt, facile possit reprehendi.
1. 2. The Manichees, then, are accustomed to disparage the Scriptures of the Old Testament, which they do not know, and by that disparagement to mock and deceive our weak and little ones, who do not find how to answer them; for there is no Scripture that cannot easily be faulted by those who do not understand it.
GenMani.1.1.2
Sed ideo divina providentia multos diversi erroris haereticos esse permittit, ut cum insultant nobis, et interrogant nos ea quae nescimus, vel sic excutiamus pigritiam, et Divinas Scripturas nosse cupiamus.
But for this reason divine providence permits there to be many heretics of various errors, so that, when they insult us and question us about things we do not know, we may at least in this way shake off our laziness and desire to know the divine Scriptures.
GenMani.1.1.2
Propterea et Apostolus dicit: oportet multas haereses esse, ut probati manifesti fiant inter vos (1 Cor 11, 9). Illi enim Deo probati sunt, qui bene possunt docere: sed manifesti hominibus esse non possunt, nisi cum docent; docere autem nolunt, nisi eos qui doceri quaerunt. Sed multi ad quaerendum pigri sunt, nisi per molestias et insultationes haereticorum quasi de somno excitentur, et de imperitia sua erubescant sibi, et de illa imperitia sua periclitari se sentiant.
For this reason the Apostle also says, there must be many heresies, so that those who are approved may become manifest among you (1 Cor 11:19). For those are approved by God who are able to teach well, but they cannot be made manifest to men except when they teach; and they are unwilling to teach except those who seek to be taught. But many are too lazy to seek, unless through the troubles and insults of heretics they are, as it were, roused from sleep, and grow ashamed of their ignorance, and feel themselves to be in peril because of that ignorance of theirs.
GenMani.1.1.2
Qui homines si bonae sunt fidei, non cedunt haereticis, sed quid eis respondeant diligenter inquirunt. Nec eos deserit Deus, ut petentes accipiant, et quaerentes inveniant, et pulsantibus aperiatur (Cf. Mt 7, 7). Qui autem desperant se posse in Catholica disciplina invenire quod quaerunt, atteruntur erroribus; et si perseveranter inquirunt, ad ipsos fontes a quibus aberraverunt, post magnos labores fatigati atque sitientes, et pene mortui revertuntur.
If such men are of good faith, they do not yield to the heretics but diligently inquire what to answer them. Nor does God abandon them, so that those who ask receive, and those who seek find, and to those who knock it is opened (See Matt 7:7). But those who despair of being able to find in Catholic teaching what they seek are worn down by errors; and if they inquire perseveringly, they return, after great labors, weary and thirsty and almost dead, to the very fountains from which they had strayed.
GenMani.1.1.2
CThe verse Genesis 1:1 is defended against those who carp at what God was doing before the creation of the world.Versus Gen 1, 1 vendicatur contra obtrectantes quid faceret Deus ante mundi creationem.
2. 3. Primum ergo librum Veteris Testamenti, qui inscribitur Genesis, sic solent Manichaei reprehendere. Quod scriptum est: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram (Gen 1, 1), quaerunt, "in quo principio"; et dicunt: "si in principio aliquo temporis fecit Deus coelum et terram, quid agebat antequam faceret coelum et terram? et quid ei subito placuit facere, quod nunquam antea fecerat per tempora aeterna? His respondemus, Deum in principio fecisse coelum et terram, non in principio temporis, sed in Christo, cum Verbum esset apud Patrem, per quod facta et in quo facta sunt omnia (Cf. Io 1, 1. 3)." Dominus enim noster Iesus Christus, cum eum Iudaei interrogassent quis esset, respondit: principium, quia et loquor vobis (Io 8, 25).
2. 3. The first book of the Old Testament, then, which is entitled Genesis, the Manichees are accustomed to fault in this way. As to what is written, in the beginning God made heaven and earth (Gen 1:1), they ask, "in what beginning?" and they say: "If God made heaven and earth in some beginning of time, what was he doing before he made heaven and earth? And why did it suddenly please him to make what he had never made before throughout the eternal ages?" To these we answer that God made heaven and earth in the beginning, not in the beginning of time but in Christ, when the Word was with the Father, through whom all things were made and in whom they were made (See John 1:1, 3). For our Lord Jesus Christ, when the Jews asked him who he was, answered, the beginning, that is why I am even speaking to you (John 8:25).
GenMani.1.2.3
Sed etsi in principio temporis Deum fecisse coelum et terram credamus, debemus utique intellegere quod ante principium temporis non erat tempus. Deus enim fecit et tempora: et ideo antequam faceret tempora, non erant tempora. Non ergo possumus dicere fuisse aliquod tempus quando Deus nondum aliquid fecerat. Quomodo enim erat tempus quod Deus non fecerat, cum omnium temporum ipse sit fabricator? Et si tempus cum coelo et terra esse coepit, non potest inveniri tempus quo Deus nondum fecerat coelum et terram.
But even if we believe that God made heaven and earth in the beginning of time, we must certainly understand that before the beginning of time there was no time. For God made the times as well; and therefore before he made the times, there were no times. We cannot, then, say that there was some time when God had not yet made anything. For how could there be a time that God had not made, when he himself is the maker of all times? And if time began to exist together with heaven and earth, no time can be found in which God had not yet made heaven and earth.
GenMani.1.2.3
Cum autem dicitur, Quid ei placuit subito, sic dicitur, quasi aliqua tempora transierint, quibus Deus nihil operatus est. Non enim transire poterat tempus, quod nondum fecerat Deus; quia non potest esse operator temporum, nisi qui est ante tempora. Certe et ipsi Manichaei legunt Apostolum Paulum, et laudant et honorant; et eius Epistolas male interpretando multos decipiunt. Dicant ergo nobis quid dixerit Apostolus Paulus: agnitionem veritatis quae est secundum pietatem Dei in spem vitae aeternae, quam promisit non mendax Deus ante tempora aeterna (Tit 1, 1-2): aeterna enim tempora quid ante se habere potuerunt? Hoc ergo cogantur exponere, ut intellegant se non intellegere, cum temere volunt reprehendere quod diligenter quaerere debuerunt.
But when it is asked, "Why did it suddenly please him?" it is said as though some times had passed in which God did nothing. For no time could pass that God had not yet made, since none can be the maker of times except him who is before the times. Surely the Manichees themselves read the Apostle Paul, and praise and honor him; and by interpreting his Epistles badly they deceive many. Let them tell us, then, what the Apostle Paul said: the acknowledgment of the truth which is according to godliness, in the hope of eternal life, which God who does not lie promised before the eternal ages (Titus 1:1–2). For what could the eternal ages have had before them? Let them be compelled, then, to expound this, so that they may understand that they do not understand, when they rashly wish to fault what they ought to have sought out diligently.
GenMani.1.2.3
Contra manichaeos vindicatur unde subito placuerit Deo mundum creare.
Against the Manichees it is shown why it suddenly pleased God to create the world.
2. 4. Si autem non dicunt: "quid placuit Deo subito facere coelum et terram," sed tollunt inde, "subito"; et hoc tantum dicunt: "quid placuit Deo facere coelum et terram?" Non enim coaevum Deo mundum istum dicimus, quia non eius aeternitatis est hic mundus, cuius aeternitatis est Deus: mundum quippe fecit Deus, et sic cum ipsa creatura quam Deus fecit, tempora esse coeperunt; et ideo dicuntur tempora aeterna.
2. 4. But suppose they do not say, "Why did it please God suddenly to make heaven and earth," but remove the word "suddenly" from it, and say only this: "Why did it please God to make heaven and earth?" For we do not say that this world is coeternal with God, since this world does not belong to that eternity to which God belongs; for God made the world, and so it was together with the very creation that God made that the times began to exist; and that is why they are called eternal times.
GenMani.1.2.4
Non tamen sic sunt aeterna tempora quomodo aeternus est Deus, quia Deus est ante tempora, qui fabricator est temporum: sicut omnia quae fecit Deus bona sunt valde, sed non sic bona sunt, quomodo bonus est Deus, quia ille fecit, haec autem facta sunt: nec ea genuit de seipso, ut hoc essent quod ipse est; sed ea fecit de nihilo, ut non essent aequalia, nec ei a quo facta sunt; nec Filio eius per quem facta sunt; iustum est enim.
Yet the times are not eternal in the way that God is eternal, because God, who is the maker of times, is before the times: just as all the things that God made are very good, but they are not good in the way that God is good, because he made them, whereas these things were made; nor did he beget them out of himself, so that they would be what he himself is, but he made them out of nothing, so that they would not be equal either to him by whom they were made or to his Son through whom they were made; for that is just.
GenMani.1.2.4
Si ergo isti dixerint, "quid placuit Deo facere coelum et terram?" respondendum est eis, ut prius discant vim voluntatis humanae, qui voluntatem Dei nosse desiderant. Causas enim voluntatis Dei scire quaerunt, cum voluntas Dei omnium quae sunt, ipsa sit causa. Si enim habet causam voluntas Dei, est aliquid quod antecedat voluntatem Dei, quod nefas est credere. Qui ergo dicit: "quare fecit Deus coelum et terram?" respondendum est ei, "quia voluit." Voluntas enim Dei causa est coeli et terrae, et ideo maior est voluntas Dei quam coelum et terra. Qui autem dicit: "quare voluit facere coelum et terram?" maius aliquid quaerit quam est voluntas Dei: nihil autem maius inveniri potest.
If, then, these men say, "Why did it please God to make heaven and earth?" they must be answered that those who desire to know the will of God should first learn the force of the human will. For they seek to know the causes of God's will, when God's will is itself the cause of all things that are. For if God's will has a cause, there is something that precedes God's will—which it is impious to believe. Whoever, then, says, "Why did God make heaven and earth?" must be answered, "Because he willed it." For God's will is the cause of heaven and earth, and therefore God's will is greater than heaven and earth. But whoever says, "Why did he will to make heaven and earth?" is seeking something greater than the will of God; yet nothing greater can be found.
GenMani.1.2.4
Compescat ergo se humana temeritas, et id quod non est non quaerat, ne id quod est non inveniat. Et si voluntatem Dei nosse quisquam desiderat, fiat amicus Deo: quia si voluntatem hominis nosse quisquam vellet, cuius amicus non esset, omnes eius impudentiam ac stultitiam deriderent. Non autem quisquam efficitur amicus Dei, nisi purgatissimis moribus, et illo fine praecepti de quo Apostolus dicit: finis autem praecepti est caritas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta (1 Tim 1, 5); quod isti si haberent, non essent haeretici.
Let human rashness, then, restrain itself, and not seek what does not exist, lest it fail to find what does exist. And if anyone desires to know the will of God, let him become a friend of God; for if anyone wished to know the will of a man whose friend he was not, everyone would laugh at his impudence and folly. But no one is made a friend of God except by the most purified character and by that end of the commandment of which the Apostle speaks: the end of the commandment is love from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned (1 Tim 1:5); and if these men had this, they would not be heretics.
GenMani.1.2.4
Defenditur Gen 1, 2: Terra invisibilis, etc.
Genesis 1:2 is defended: the earth invisible, etc.
3. 5. Quod autem sequitur in libro Geneseos: terra autem erat invisibilis et incomposita (Gen 1, 2), sic reprehendunt Manichaei, ut dicant: "quomodo fecit Deus in principio coelum et terram, si iam et terra erat invisibilis et incomposita?" Ita, cum volunt Scripturas Divinas prius vituperare quam nosse, etiam res apertissimas non intellegunt.
3. 5. As for what follows in the book of Genesis: but the earth was invisible and unformed (Gen 1:2), the Manichees fault it by saying: "How did God make heaven and earth in the beginning, if the earth was already invisible and unformed?" Thus, when they want to disparage the divine Scriptures before knowing them, they fail to understand even the most obvious things.
GenMani.1.3.5
Quid enim manifestius dici potuit, quam hoc dictum est: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram; terra autem erat invisibilis et incomposita; id est: "in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram; terra autem ipsa quam fecit Deus, invisibilis erat et incomposita, antequam Deus omnium rerum formas locis et sedibus suis ordinata distinctione disponeret": antequam diceret: fiat lux, et: fiat firmamentum, et congregentur aquae, et: appareat arida (Gen 1, 3. 6. 9), et caetera quae in eodem libro sic exponuntur per ordinem, quemadmodum possint ea parvuli capere? Quae omnia continent tam magna mysteria, ut quisquis ea didicerit, omnium haereticorum vanitatem vel doleat quia homines sunt, vel derideat quia superbi sunt.
For what could have been said more plainly than this was said: in the beginning God made heaven and earth; but the earth was invisible and unformed; that is: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth; but the earth itself, which God made, was invisible and unformed, before God arranged the forms of all things in their places and seats with an ordered distinction"—before he said, let there be light, and, let there be a firmament, and, let the waters be gathered together, and, let the dry land appear (Gen 1:3, 6, 9), and the rest, which are set forth in order in that same book in such a way that little ones can grasp them? All of which contain mysteries so great that whoever has learned them will either grieve over the emptiness of all the heretics because they are men, or laugh at it because they are proud.
GenMani.1.3.5
Dei lucem longe aliud esse quam huius solis lumen.
God's light is something far other than the light of this sun.
3. 6. Sequitur in eodem libro: et tenebrae erant super abyssum (Gen 1, 2). Quod Manichaei reprehendunt dicentes: "in tenebris ergo erat Deus, antequam faceret lucem?" Vere ipsi sunt in tenebris ignorantiae, et ideo non intellegunt lucem, in qua Deus erat antequam faceret istam lucem. Non enim norunt isti lucem, nisi quam carneis oculis vident. Et ideo istum solem, quem pariter non solum cum bestiis maioribus, sed etiam cum muscis et vermiculis cernimus, illi sic colunt ut particulam dicant esse lucis illius in qua habitat Deus.
3. 6. There follows in that same book: and there was darkness over the abyss (Gen 1:2). This the Manichees fault, saying: "Was God, then, in darkness before he made light?" Truly it is they who are in the darkness of ignorance, and therefore they do not understand the light in which God was before he made this light. For they know no light except the one they see with the eyes of the flesh. And so this sun, which we behold in common not only with the larger beasts but even with flies and little worms, they so worship as to say that it is a particle of that light in which God dwells.
GenMani.1.3.6
Sed nos intellegamus aliam lucem esse in qua Deus habitat, unde est illud lumen de quo in Evangelio legitur: erat lumen verum, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum (Io 1, 9). Nam solis istius lumen non illuminat omnem hominem, sed corpus hominis et mortales oculos, in quibus nos vincunt aquilarum oculi, qui solem istum multo melius quam nos dicuntur aspicere. Illud autem lumen non irrationabilium avium oculos pascit, sed pura corda eorum qui Deo credunt, et ab amore visibilium rerum et temporalium se ad eius praecepta implenda convertunt. Quod omnes homines possunt si velint, quia illud lumen omnem hominem illuminat venientem in hunc mundum. Ergo tenebrae erant super abyssum antequam lux ista fieret: de qua consequenter hoc loco dicitur.
But let us understand that there is another light in which God dwells, from which comes that light of which we read in the Gospel: it was the true light, which enlightens every man coming into this world (John 1:9). For the light of this sun does not enlighten every man, but the body of a man and his mortal eyes, in which the eyes of eagles surpass us, since they are said to gaze at this sun far better than we do. But that light does not feed the eyes of irrational birds, but the pure hearts of those who believe in God and turn from the love of visible and temporal things to the fulfilling of his commandments. This all men can do if they will, because that light enlightens every man coming into this world. So there was darkness over the abyss before this light was made, of which light it is consequently said in this place.
GenMani.1.3.6
In defensionem v. 3 ostenditur tenebras nihil esse.
In defense of verse 3 it is shown that darkness is nothing.
4. 7. Et dixit Deus, 'fiat lux (Gen 1, 3).' Quia ubi lux non est, tenebrae sunt, non quia aliquid sunt tenebrae, sed ipsa lucis absentia tenebrae dicuntur. Sicut silentium non aliqua res est, sed ubi sonus non est, silentium dicitur. Et nuditas aliqua res non est, sed in corpore ubi tegumentum non est, nuditas dicitur. Et inanitas non est aliquid, sed locus ubi corpus non est, inanis dicitur. Sic tenebrae non aliquid sunt, sed ubi lux non est, tenebrae dicuntur.
4. 7. And God said, 'let there be light (Gen 1:3).' For where there is no light, there is darkness—not because darkness is anything, but the very absence of light is called darkness. Just as silence is not some thing, but where there is no sound, it is called silence. And nakedness is not some thing, but on a body where there is no covering, it is called nakedness. And emptiness is not anything, but a place where there is no body is called empty. So darkness is not anything, but where there is no light, it is called darkness.
GenMani.1.3.6
Hoc ideo dicimus, quia solent dicere: "unde erant ipsae tenebrae super abyssum, antequam faceret Deus lucem? quis illas fecerat vel genuerat? aut si nemo fecerat vel genuerat eas, aeternae erant tenebrae." Quasi aliquid sint tenebrae: sed, ut dictum est, lucis absentia hoc nomen accepit.
We say this because they are accustomed to say: "Where did that darkness over the abyss come from, before God made light? Who had made or begotten it? Or if no one had made or begotten it, then darkness was eternal." As though darkness were something; but, as has been said, it received this name from the absence of light.
GenMani.1.3.6
Sed quia ipsi fabulis suis decepti crediderunt gentem esse tenebrarum, in qua et corpora et formas et animas in illis corporibus fuisse arbitrantur, ideo putant quod tenebrae aliquid sint: et non intellegunt non sentiri tenebras, nisi quando non videmus, sicut non sentitur silentium, nisi quando non audimus. Sicut autem silentium nihil est, sic et tenebrae nihil sunt. Sicut autem isti dicunt gentem tenebrarum contra lucem Dei pugnasse; sic potest et alius similiter vanus dicere, gentem silentiorum contra vocem Dei pugnasse.
But because they themselves, deceived by their fables, believed there to be a race of darkness, in which they suppose there were bodies and forms and souls within those bodies, they therefore think that darkness is something; and they do not understand that darkness is not perceived except when we do not see, just as silence is not perceived except when we do not hear. But just as silence is nothing, so too darkness is nothing. And just as these men say that the race of darkness fought against the light of God, so another, equally empty-headed, could likewise say that a race of silences fought against the voice of God.
GenMani.1.3.6
Sed illas vanitates modo non suscepimus refellere atque convincere. Nunc enim ea quae reprehendunt in Veteri Testamento, statuimus defendere quantum vires Dominus praestare dignatur, et in eis ostendere contra veritatem Dei nihil valere hominum caecitatem.
But we have not now undertaken to refute and convict those empty fancies. For now we have determined to defend the things they fault in the Old Testament, as far as the Lord deigns to grant us strength, and to show in them that the blindness of men can avail nothing against the truth of God.
GenMani.1.3.6
Quomodo intellegendum: Spiritus superferebatur, etc., iuxta Gen 1, 2.
How to understand "the Spirit was borne over," etc., according to Genesis 1:2.
4. 8. Quod autem scriptum est: et Spiritus Dei superferebatur super aquam (Gen 1, 2), sic solent Manichaei reprehendere, ut dicant: "aqua ergo erat habitaculum Spiritus Dei, et ipsa continebat Spiritum Dei?" Totum conantur perversa mente pervertere, et excaecantur malitia sua. Cum enim dicimus, "sol superfertur super terram," numquid hoc intellegi volumus, quod in terra habitet sol, et terra solem contineat?
4. 8. As for what is written, and the Spirit of God was borne over the water (Gen 1:2), the Manichees are accustomed to fault it by saying: "Was the water, then, the dwelling place of the Spirit of God, and did it contain the Spirit of God?" They try to pervert everything with a perverse mind, and they are blinded by their own malice. For when we say, "the sun is borne over the earth," do we mean it to be understood that the sun dwells in the earth and that the earth contains the sun?
GenMani.1.4.8
Et tamen non sic Spiritus Dei superferebatur super aquam, sicut superfertur sol super terram; sed alio modo quem pauci intellegunt. Non enim per spatia locorum superferebatur aquae ille Spiritus, sicut sol terrae superfertur; sed per potentiam invisibilis sublimitatis suae.
And yet the Spirit of God was not borne over the water in the way that the sun is borne over the earth, but in another way, which few understand. For that Spirit was not borne over the water through spatial distances, as the sun is borne over the earth, but through the power of his invisible sublimity.
GenMani.1.4.8
Dicant autem nobis isti, quomodo iis rebus quae fabricandae sunt, superferatur voluntas fabri. Quod si haec humana et quotidiana non comprehendunt, timeant Deum, et simplici corde quod non intellegunt quaerant, ne cum volunt verbis sacrilegis concidere veritatem quam videre non possunt, redeat illis securis in crura. Nam illa concidi non potest quae incommutabilis manet; sed quaecumque plagae in illam emissae fuerint repercutiuntur, et maiore ictu redeunt in eos qui caedere audent, quod credere deberent, ut intellegere mererentur.
But let these men tell us how the will of a craftsman is borne over the things that are to be fashioned. And if they do not comprehend these human and everyday things, let them fear God, and with a simple heart seek what they do not understand, lest, when they wish with sacrilegious words to cut down the truth they cannot see, the axe rebound upon their own legs. For that truth, which remains unchangeable, cannot be cut down; but whatever blows are aimed at it are struck back, and return with a greater stroke upon those who dare to fell what they ought to believe in order to deserve to understand.
GenMani.1.4.8
Quid nomine aquae significetur in Gen 1, 2.
What is signified by the word "water" in Genesis 1:2.
5. 9. Deinde quaerunt, et insultando interrogant: "unde erat ipsa aqua super quam ferebatur Spiritus Dei? numquid enim superius scriptum est quod Deus aquam fecerit?" Hoc si pie quaererent, invenirent quemadmodum intellegendum esset. Non enim aqua sic appellata est hoc loco, ut haec a nobis intellegatur quam videre iam possumus et tangere: quomodo nec terra quae incomposita et invisibilis dicta est, talis erat qualis ista quae iam videri et tractari potest. Sed illud quod dictum est: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram (Gen 1, 1), coeli et terrae nomine universa creatura significata est, quam fecit et condidit Deus.
5. 9. Then they ask, and in mockery they question: "Where did that water come from over which the Spirit of God was being borne? For was it written above that God made water?" If they asked this devoutly, they would find how it ought to be understood. For water was not named in this place in such a way that we should understand the water we can already see and touch; just as the earth that was called unformed and invisible was not such as the earth that can now be seen and handled. But when it was said, in the beginning God made heaven and earth (Gen 1:1), by the words heaven and earth the whole creation was signified, which God made and founded.
GenMani.1.5.9
Ideo autem nominibus visibilium rerum haec appellata sunt, propter parvulorum infirmitatem, qui minus idonei sunt invisibilia comprehendere. Primo ergo materia facta est confusa et informis, unde omnia fierent quae distincta atque formata sunt, quod credo a Graecis [MISSING WORD] appellari. Sic enim et alio loco legimus dictum in laudibus Dei: qui fecisti mundum de materia informi (Sap 11, 18): quod aliqui codices habent, de materia invisa.
These things were given the names of visible things on account of the weakness of the little ones, who are less able to comprehend invisible things. First, then, matter was made, confused and formless, from which all things that are distinct and formed would be made—which I believe is called by the Greeks hyle (matter). For so too in another place we read it said in the praises of God, you who made the world out of formless matter (Wis 11:18)—which some manuscripts have as out of unseen matter.
GenMani.1.5.9
Materies informis ex nihilo atque ex ea cetera.
Formless matter is from nothing, and the rest from it.
6. 10. Et ideo Deus rectissime creditur omnia de nihilo fecisse, quia etiamsi omnia formata de ista materia facta sunt, haec ipsa materia tamen de omnino nihilo facta est. Non enim debemus esse similes istis qui omnipotentem Deum non credunt aliquid de nihilo facere potuisse, cum considerant fabros et quoslibet opifices non posse aliquid fabricare, nisi habuerint unde fabricent. Et ligna enim adiuvant fabrum, et argentum adiuvat argentarium, et aurum aurificem, et terra figulum adiuvat ut possit perficere opera sua.
6. 10. And therefore God is most rightly believed to have made all things out of nothing, because, even if all formed things were made out of that matter, this matter itself was nonetheless made out of nothing at all. For we ought not to be like those who do not believe that almighty God could make anything out of nothing, when they observe that smiths and craftsmen of any kind cannot fashion anything unless they have something from which to fashion it. For wood helps the carpenter, and silver helps the silversmith, and gold helps the goldsmith, and earth helps the potter to be able to complete his works.
GenMani.1.6.10
Si enim non adiuventur ea materia unde aliquid faciunt, nihil possunt facere, cum materiam ipsam ipsi non faciant. Non enim faber lignum facit, sed de ligno facit aliquid: sic et caeteri omnes huiusmodi opifices. Omnipotens autem Deus nulla re adiuvandus erat, quam ipse non fecerat, ut quod volebat efficeret. Si enim ad eas res quas facere volebat, adiuvabat eum aliqua res quam ipse non fecerat, non erat omnipotens: quod sacrilegum est credere.
For if they are not helped by the matter from which they make something, they can make nothing, since they do not themselves make the matter. For the carpenter does not make the wood, but makes something out of wood; and so too all other craftsmen of this kind. But almighty God needed to be helped by no thing that he himself had not made, in order to accomplish what he willed. For if, for the things he willed to make, he was helped by some thing that he himself had not made, he was not almighty—which it is sacrilegious to believe.
GenMani.1.6.10
Cur materies informis terra invisibilis, aqua etc. vocata sit.
Why formless matter was called invisible earth, water, and so on.
7. 11. Informis ergo illa materia quam de nihilo Deus fecit, appellata est primo "coelum et terra," et dictum est: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram (Gen 1, 1); non quia iam hoc erat, sed quia hoc esse poterat: nam et coelum scribitur postea factum.
7. 11. That formless matter, then, which God made out of nothing, was first called "heaven and earth," and it was said, in the beginning God made heaven and earth (Gen 1:1)—not because it already was this, but because it could be this; for heaven too is written to have been made afterward.
GenMani.1.7.11
Quemadmodum si semen arboris considerantes, dicamus ibi esse radices, et robur, et ramos, et fructus, et folia; non quia iam sunt, sed quia inde futura sunt: sic dictum est: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram, quasi semen coeli et terrae, cum in confuso adhuc esset coeli et terrae materia; sed quia certum erat inde futurum esse coelum et terram, iam et ipsa materia coelum et terra appellata est.
Just as, considering the seed of a tree, we might say that the roots and trunk and branches and fruit and leaves are there—not because they already are, but because they are going to be from it—so it was said, in the beginning God made heaven and earth, as if it were the seed of heaven and earth, when the matter of heaven and earth was still in confusion; but because it was certain that heaven and earth would come from it, that matter too was already called heaven and earth.
GenMani.1.7.11
Isto genere locutionis etiam Dominus loquitur, cum dicit: iam non dicam vos servos, quia servus nescit quid faciat dominus eius. Vos autem dixi amicos, quia omnia quae audivi a Patre meo, nota feci vobis (Io 15, 15); non quia iam factum erat, sed quia certissime futurum erat. Nam post paululum dicit illis: adhuc multa habeo vobis dicere, sed non potestis portare modo (Io 16, 12). Utquid ergo dixerat: omnia quae audivi a Patre meo, nota feci vobis; nisi quia se sciebat hoc esse facturum?
In this manner of speaking the Lord also speaks when he says, now I will not call you servants, because the servant does not know what his master does. But I have called you friends, because all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you (John 15:15)—not because it had already been done, but because it most certainly was going to be done. For a little later he says to them, I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now (John 16:12). Why, then, had he said, all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you, except that he knew he was going to do this?
GenMani.1.7.11
Sic etiam coelum et terra potuit dici materia unde nondum erat factum coelum et terra, sed tamen non erat aliunde faciendum. Innumerabiles tales locutiones in Scripturis Divinis inveniuntur. Sicut in consuetudine sermonis nostri, cum id quod certissime speramus futurum dicimus, "iam factum puta."
So too matter could be called heaven and earth, the matter from which heaven and earth had not yet been made, but yet was not to be made from anything else. Countless such expressions are found in the divine Scriptures. As in the custom of our speech, when we say that what we most certainly hope is going to happen, "consider it already done."
GenMani.1.7.11
7. 12. Hanc autem adhuc informem materiam, etiam terram invisibilem atque incompositam voluit appellare, quia inter omnia elementa mundi terra videtur minus speciosa quam caetera. Invisibilem autem dixit, propter obscuritatem; et incompositam, propter informitatem. Eamdem ipsam materiam etiam "aquam" appellavit, super quam ferebatur Spiritus Dei, sicut superfertur rebus fabricandis voluntas artificis. Quod etsi paucorum intellegentia potest attingere, humanis tamen verbis, nescio utrum vel a paucis hominibus, possit exponi. Propterea vero non absurde etiam aqua dicta est ista materia, quia omnia quae in terra nascuntur, sive animalia, sive arbores vel herbae, et si qua similia, ab humore incipiunt formari atque nutriri.
7. 12. But this still formless matter he willed also to call invisible and unformed earth, because among all the elements of the world the earth seems less beautiful than the rest. He called it invisible on account of its obscurity, and unformed on account of its formlessness. That same matter he also called "water," over which the Spirit of God was being borne, just as the will of the artisan is borne over the things to be fashioned. And although this can be reached by the understanding of a few, yet I do not know whether it can be expounded in human words even by a few men. But it was not absurd that this matter was also called water, because all things that are born in the earth—whether animals, or trees, or plants, and any like them—begin to be formed and nourished by moisture.
GenMani.1.7.12
Haec ergo nomina omnia, sive coelum et terra, sive terra invisibilis et incomposita et abyssus cum tenebris, sive aqua super quam Spiritus ferebatur, nomina sunt informis materiae: ut res ignota notis vocabulis insinuaretur imperitioribus; et non uno vocabulo, sed multis, ne si unum esset, hoc putaretur esse quod consueverant homines in illo vocabulo intellegere.
All these names, then—whether heaven and earth, or invisible and unformed earth and the abyss with darkness, or the water over which the Spirit was borne—are names of formless matter: so that the unknown thing might be introduced to the less learned by known terms; and not by one term but by many, lest, if there were one, it should be thought to be what men were accustomed to understand by that term.
GenMani.1.7.12
Dictum est ergo coelum et terra, quia inde futurum erat coelum et terra. Dicta est terra invisibilis et incomposita et tenebrae super abyssum, quia informis erat, et nulla specie cerni aut tractari poterat, etiamsi esset homo qui videret atque tractaret. Dicta est aqua, quia facilis et ductilis subiacebat operanti, ut de illa omnia formarentur. Sed sub his omnibus nominibus materia erat invisa et informis, de qua Deus condidit mundum.
It was called heaven and earth, then, because from it heaven and earth would come. It was called invisible and unformed earth, and darkness over the abyss, because it was formless and could be seen or handled in no form, even if there were a man to see and handle it. It was called water, because, easy and pliant, it lay beneath the one working, so that all things might be formed from it. But under all these names there was unseen and formless matter, out of which God founded the world.
GenMani.1.7.12
Reprimitur manichaeorum calumnia de Gen. 1, 4.
The Manichees' calumny concerning Genesis 1:4 is restrained.
8. 13. Et dixit Deus, 'fiat lux.' Et facta est lux (Gen 1, 3). Hoc non solent reprehendere Manichaei, sed illud quod sequitur: et vidit Deus lucem quia bona est (Gen 1, 4). Dicunt enim: "ergo non noverat Deus lucem, aut non noverat bonum." Miseri homines, quibus displicet, quod Deo placuerunt opera sua, cum videant etiam hominem artificem, verbi gratia, lignarium fabrum, quamvis in comparatione sapientiae et potentiae Dei pene nullus sit, tamen tam diu lignum caedere atque tractare dolando, asciando, planando, vel tornando atque poliendo quousque ad artis regulas perducatur, quantum potest, et placeat artifici suo.
8. 13. And God said, 'let there be light.' And light was made (Gen 1:3). This the Manichees are not accustomed to fault, but rather what follows: and God saw the light, that it was good (Gen 1:4). For they say: "So God did not know the light, or did not know the good." Wretched men, who are displeased that his works pleased God, when they see that even a human craftsman—for example, a worker in wood—although in comparison with the wisdom and power of God he is almost nothing, yet cuts and works the wood by hewing, shaping with the axe, planing, or turning and polishing, until it is brought, as far as he can, to the rules of the art, and pleases its craftsman.
GenMani.1.7.12
Numquid ergo quia placet ei quod fecit, ideo non noverat bonum? Prorsus noverat intus in animo, ubi ars ipsa pulchrior est, quam illa quae arte fabricantur. Sed quod videt artifex intus in arte, hoc foris probat in opere, et hoc est perfectum quod artifici suo placet.
Did he, then, not know the good simply because what he made pleases him? Assuredly he knew it within, in his mind, where the art itself is more beautiful than the things that are fashioned by the art. But what the craftsman sees within in the art, this he approves outside in the work, and that is perfect which pleases its craftsman.
GenMani.1.7.12
Vidit ergo Deus lucem quia bona est: quibus verbis non ostenditur eluxisse Deo insolitum bonum, sed placuisse perfectum.
God saw, then, the light, that it was good: by which words it is not shown that an unexpected good shone forth to God, but that the perfect work pleased him.
GenMani.1.7.12
Quid admiratione aliisque effectibus docere nos voluerit Christus.
What Christ willed to teach us by his wonder and his other reactions.
8. 14. Quid si dictum esset, "miratus est Deus lucem quia bona est?" quantum clamarent? quantum litigarent? Admiratio enim revera de rebus insperatis nasci solet, et tamen legunt isti, et laudant Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum in Evangelio admiratum esse fidem credentium (Cf. Mt 8, 10).
8. 14. What if it had been said, "God wondered at the light, that it was good"? How much would they cry out? How much would they wrangle? For wonder is indeed accustomed to arise from unhoped-for things, and yet these men read, and praise, that in the Gospel our Lord Jesus Christ wondered at the faith of believers (See Matt 8:10).
GenMani.1.8.14
Quis autem in illis fecerat ipsam fidem, nisi ipse qui eam mirabatur? Quod si et alius eam fecisset, utquid miraretur, qui praescius erat? Si solvunt Manichaei quaestionem istam, videant quia et illa solvi potest. Si autem non solvunt, quid ista reprehendunt quae ad se nolunt pertinere, cum illa quae ad se pertinere dicunt, non noverint?
But who had made that faith in them, except he himself who wondered at it? And if another had made it, why would he wonder, who was foreknowing? If the Manichees solve this question, let them see that the other can be solved as well. But if they do not solve it, why do they fault these things which they refuse to let pertain to themselves, when they do not know the things they say pertain to themselves?
GenMani.1.8.14
Quod enim miratur Dominus noster, nobis mirandum esse significat, quibus adhuc est opus sic moveri. Omnes ergo tales motus eius non perturbati animi sunt signa, sed docentis magistri.
For what our Lord wonders at, he signifies to be a thing of wonder for us, who still need to be moved in this way. All such movements of his, then, are not signs of a disturbed mind, but of a teacher instructing.
GenMani.1.8.14
Sic sunt et verba Veteris Testamenti, quae non Deum infirmum docent, sed nostrae infirmitati blandiuntur. Nihil enim de Deo digne dici potest. Nobis tamen ut nutriamur, et ad ea perveniamus quae nullo humano sermone dici possunt, ea dicuntur quae capere possumus.
Such too are the words of the Old Testament, which do not teach that God is weak, but rather coax our weakness. For nothing can be said worthily of God. Yet, so that we may be nourished and may come to those things which can be expressed in no human speech, things are said to us which we are able to grasp.
GenMani.1.8.14
Quomodo accipiendum quod est in Gen 1, 4-5 de luce ac tenebris.
How to take what is said in Genesis 1:4-5 about light and darkness.
9. 15. Et divisit Deus inter lucem et tenebras, et vocavit Deus diem lucem, et tenebras vocavit noctem (Gen 1, 4-5). Hic non dictum est, "fecit Deus tenebras"; quia tenebrae, sicut superius dictum est, lucis absentia est: distinctio tamen facta est inter lucem et tenebras. Quemadmodum nos clamando vocem facimus; silentium autem non sonando facimus, quia cessatio vocis silentium est: distinguimus tamen sensu quodam inter vocem et silentium, et illud vocamus vocem, illud silentium; quemadmodum ergo recte dicimur facere silentium, sic recte multis Divinarum Scripturarum locis Deus dicitur facere tenebras, quia lucem quibus vult temporibus et locis vel non dat, vel detrahit.
9. 15. And God divided between the light and the darkness, and God called the light day, and the darkness he called night (Gen 1:4–5). Here it is not said, "God made the darkness," because darkness, as was said above, is the absence of light; yet a distinction was made between the light and the darkness. Just as we make a sound by crying out, but make silence by not sounding, since the cessation of sound is silence—yet by a certain perception we distinguish between sound and silence, and call the one sound, the other silence—so, just as we are rightly said to make silence, so in many places of the divine Scriptures God is rightly said to make darkness, because at whatever times and places he wills he either does not give light or withdraws it.
GenMani.1.8.14
Hoc autem totum ad intellectum nostrum dictum est. Qua enim lingua vocavit Deus diem lucem, et tenebras noctem? utrum hebraea, an graeca, an latina, an aliqua alia? et sic omnia quae vocavit, quaeri potest qua lingua vocaverit. Sed apud Deum purus intellectus est, sine strepitu et diversitate linguarum. Vocavit autem dictum est, "vocari fecit"; quia sic distinxit omnia, et ordinavit, ut et discerni possent, et nomina accipere.
But all this was said for the sake of our understanding. For in what language did God call the light day, and the darkness night? Was it Hebrew, or Greek, or Latin, or some other? And so of all the things he named, one can ask in what language he named them. But with God there is pure understanding, without the noise and diversity of languages. He called, then, means "he caused to be called"; because he so distinguished all things and ordered them that they could both be discerned and receive names.
GenMani.1.8.14
Sed postea suo loco requiremus, utrum vere sic est accipiendum, quia vocavit Deus; quoniam quantum accedimus in Scripturis et in eis assuescimus, tantum nobis locutiones earum innotescunt. Sic enim dicimus, "ille paterfamilias aedificavit domum istam," id est aedificari fecit, et multa talia per omnes libros Divinarum Scripturarum inveniuntur.
But afterward, in its place, we shall inquire whether it is truly to be taken in this way, that God called; for the more we advance in the Scriptures and grow accustomed to them, the more their expressions become known to us. For so we say, "that householder built this house," that is, caused it to be built; and many such things are found throughout all the books of the divine Scriptures.
GenMani.1.8.14
Ut recte intellegitur coepisse ac transisse dies unus iuxta Gen 1, 5.
How it is rightly understood that one day began and passed, according to Genesis 1:5.
10. 16. Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies unus (Gen 1, 5). Et hic calumniantur Manichaei, dum putant ita dictum esse, quasi a vespera dies coeperit. Non intellegunt operationem illam qua lux facta est, et divisum est inter lucem et tenebras, et vocata est lux dies, et tenebrae nox; hanc ergo totam operationem non intellegunt ad diem pertinere: post hanc autem operationem tamquam finito die facta est vespera.
10. 16. And evening was made, and morning was made, one day (Gen 1:5). Here too the Manichees raise a calumny, since they think it was said as though the day had begun from evening. They do not understand that that work by which light was made, and a division was made between light and darkness, and the light was called day and the darkness night—this whole work, then, they do not understand to pertain to the day; and that it was after this work, as if the day were finished, that evening was made.
GenMani.1.8.14
Sed quia etiam nox ad diem suum pertinet, non dicitur transisse dies unus, nisi etiam nocte transacta cum factum est mane: sic deinceps reliqui dies computantur a mane usque in mane. Nunc enim cum factum est mane, et transactus est unus dies, incipit operatio, quae sequitur ab ipso mane quod iam factum est, et post ipsam operationem fit vespera, deinde mane, et transit alter dies: atque ita deinceps caeteri dies transeunt.
But because the night too pertains to its own day, one day is not said to have passed until, the night having also passed, morning was made: thus the remaining days are reckoned in succession from morning to morning. For now, when morning was made and one day was finished, the work begins which follows from that very morning already made, and after that work evening comes, then morning, and another day passes; and so in succession the remaining days pass.
GenMani.1.8.14
CHow the waters were divided by the firmament, according to Genesis 1:6-8.Aquae quomodo a firmamento divisae iuxta Gen 1, 6-8.
11. 17. Et dixit Deus, 'fiat firmamentum in medio aquae, et sit divisio inter aquam et aquam'; et sic factum est. Et fecit Deus firmamentum, et divisit Deus inter aquam quae est super firmamentum, et inter aquam quae est sub firmamento, et vocavit Deus firmamentum coelum: et vidit Deus quia bonum est (Gen 1, 6). Haec non memini Manichaeos reprehendere solere: tamen quod divisae sunt aquae ut aliae essent super firmamentum, et aliae sub firmamento, quoniam materiam illam dicebamus nomine aquae appellatam, credo firmamento coeli materiam corporalem rerum visibilium ab illa incorporali rerum invisibilium fuisse discretam.
11. 17. And God said, 'let there be a firmament in the midst of the water, and let there be a division between water and water'; and so it was made. And God made the firmament, and God divided between the water that is above the firmament and the water that is below the firmament, and God called the firmament heaven; and God saw that it was good (Gen 1:6). I do not remember that the Manichees are accustomed to fault this; nevertheless, as to the fact that the waters were divided so that some were above the firmament and some below the firmament, since we were saying that that matter was called by the word water, I believe that by the firmament of heaven the corporeal matter of visible things was separated from the incorporeal matter of invisible things.
GenMani.1.8.14
Cum enim coelum sit corpus pulcherrimum, omnis invisibilis creatura excedit etiam pulchritudinem coeli; et ideo fortasse super coelum esse dicuntur aquae invisibiles, quae a paucis intelleguntur non locorum sedibus, sed dignitate naturae superare coelum: quamquam de hac re nihil temere affirmandum est; obscura est enim, et remota a sensibus hominum: sed quoquo modo se habeat, antequam intellegatur, credenda est.
For since heaven is a most beautiful body, every invisible creature surpasses even the beauty of heaven; and therefore perhaps the invisible waters are said to be above heaven, waters understood by a few to surpass heaven not by location of place but by the dignity of their nature—although on this matter nothing is to be rashly affirmed, for it is obscure and remote from the senses of men; but however it stands, before it is understood, it is to be believed.
GenMani.1.8.14
Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies secundus (Gen 1, 8). Iam omnia haec quae repetuntur, sicut superius intellegenda atque tractanda sunt.
And evening was made, and morning was made, a second day (Gen 1:8). Now all these things that are repeated are to be understood and treated as above.
GenMani.1.8.14
CThat the gathering of the waters, of which Genesis 1:9-10 speaks, is itself the forming of the waters.Aquarum congregationem, de qua Gen 1, 9-10 ipsam, aquarum formationem esse.
12. 18. Et dixit Deus, 'congregetur aqua, quae est sub coelo, in congregationem unam, et appareat arida'; et sic factum est. Et congregata est aqua, quae erat sub coelo, in congregationem unam, et apparuit arida. Et vocavit Deus aridam, terram; et congregationem aquae vocavit mare. Et vidit Deus quia bonum est (Gen 1, 9-10). In isto loco Manichaei dicunt: "si totum aquis plenum erat, quomodo poterant aquae congregari in unum?" Sed iam superius dictum est, nomine aquarum materiam illam appellatam super quam ferebatur Spiritus Dei, unde erat Deus omnia formaturus.
12. 18. And God said, 'let the water that is under heaven be gathered together into one gathering, and let the dry land appear'; and so it was made. And the water that was under heaven was gathered together into one gathering, and the dry land appeared. And God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the water he called sea. And God saw that it was good (Gen 1:9–10). In this place the Manichees say: "If the whole was full of waters, how could the waters be gathered into one?" But it was already said above that by the word waters that matter was called over which the Spirit of God was borne, from which God was going to form all things.
GenMani.1.8.14
Nunc vero cum dicitur: congregetur aqua, quae est sub coelo, in congregationem unam; hoc dicitur ut illa materia corporalis formetur in eam speciem quam habent aquae istae visibiles. Ipsa enim congregatio in unum, ipsa est aquarum istarum formatio, quas videmus et tangimus. Omnis enim forma ad unitatis regulam cogitur.
But now, when it is said, let the water that is under heaven be gathered together into one gathering, this is said so that that corporeal matter may be formed into the appearance that these visible waters have. For that gathering into one is itself the forming of these waters, which we see and touch. For every form is brought together to the rule of unity.
GenMani.1.8.14
Et quod dicitur: appareat arida, quid aliud dici intellegendum est, nisi ut illa materies accipiat visibilem formam, quam nunc habet terra ista quam videmus et tangimus? Superius ergo quod nominabatur terra invisibilis et incomposita, materiae confusio et obscuritas nominabatur; et quod nominabatur aqua super quam ferebatur Spiritus Dei, eadem rursus materia nominabatur. Nunc vero aqua ista et terra formantur ex illa materia, quae ipsis nominibus appellabatur, antequam formas istas, quas nunc videmus, acciperet. Sane dicitur, in hebraea locutione omnem aquarum congregationem, sive salsarum sive dulcium, mare appellari.
And as for what is said, let the dry land appear, what else is to be understood as meant, except that that matter receives the visible form that this earth now has, which we see and touch? Above, then, what was called invisible and unformed earth was the confusion and obscurity of matter being named; and what was called water over which the Spirit of God was borne was again the same matter being named. But now this water and this earth are formed out of that matter, which was called by these very names before it received these forms that we now see. It is indeed said that in the Hebrew idiom every gathering of waters, whether salt or fresh, is called sea.
GenMani.1.8.14
Exploditur conquaestio circa Gen 1, 11: Infrugifera noxiaquae cur gignit tellus?
The complaint about Genesis 1:11 is rejected: why does the earth bring forth unfruitful and harmful things?
13. 19. Et dixit Deus, 'germinet terra herbam pabuli ferentem semen secundum suum genus et similitudinem, et lignum fructiferum faciens fructum, cuius semen sit in se secundum suam similitudinem.' Et sic est factum. Et eiecit terra herbam pabuli, ferentem semen secundum suum genus, et lignum fructiferum faciens fructum, cuius semen est in se secundum suam similitudinem, secundum suum genus super terram. Et vidit Deus quia bonum est. Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies tertius (Gen 1, 11-13). Hic solent dicere: "si Deus iussit nasci de terra herbam pabuli, et lignum fructiferum, quis iussit nasci tantas herbas vel spinosas vel venenosas, quae ad pabulum non proficiunt, et tam multa ligna quae nullum fructum ferunt?"
13. 19. And God said, 'let the earth bring forth the plant of fodder bearing seed according to its kind and likeness, and the fruit-bearing tree making fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its likeness.' And so it was made. And the earth put forth the plant of fodder, bearing seed according to its kind, and the fruit-bearing tree making fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its likeness, according to its kind, upon the earth. And God saw that it was good. And evening was made, and morning was made, a third day (Gen 1:11–13). Here they are accustomed to say: "If God commanded the plant of fodder and the fruit-bearing tree to be born from the earth, who commanded so many plants—thorny or poisonous—to be born, which are of no use for fodder, and so many trees that bear no fruit?"
GenMani.1.8.14
Quibus sic respondendum est, ut nulla indignis aperiantur mysteria, neque ostendatur in qua figura futurorum ista sic dicta sint.
These must be answered in such a way that no mysteries are opened to the unworthy, nor is it shown in what figure of things to come these things were said in this way.
GenMani.1.8.14
Ergo dicendum est, quod per peccatum hominis terra maledicta sit, ut spinas pareret: non ut ipsa poenas sentiret, quae sine sensu est, sed ut peccati humani crimen semper hominibus ante oculos poneret, quo admonerentur aliquando averti a peccatis, et ad Dei praecepta converti.
So it must be said that through the sin of man the earth was cursed, so that it would bring forth thorns—not so that it might itself feel punishment, since it is without feeling, but so that it might always set before the eyes of men the guilt of human sin, by which they might be admonished at some time to turn away from sins and turn to the commandments of God.
GenMani.1.8.14
Herbae autem venenosae ad poenam, vel ad exercitationem mortalium creatae sunt; et hoc totum propter peccatum, quia mortales post peccatum facti sumus. Per infructuosas vero arbores insultatur hominibus, ut intellegant quam sit erubescendum sine fructu bonorum operum esse in agro Dei, hoc est in Ecclesia; et timeant ne deserat eos Deus, quia et ipsi in agris suis infructuosas arbores deserunt, nec aliquam culturam eis adhibent.
Poisonous plants were created for the punishment, or for the testing, of mortals; and all this on account of sin, since we were made mortal after sin. But by unfruitful trees men are reproached, so that they may understand how shameful it is to be without the fruit of good works in the field of God, that is, in the Church; and that they may fear lest God forsake them, since they too forsake the unfruitful trees in their fields and give them no cultivation.
GenMani.1.8.14
Ante peccatum ergo hominis non est scriptum, quod terra aliud protulerit nisi herbam pabuli et ligna fructuosa: post peccatum autem videmus multa horrida et infructuosa de terra nasci, credo propter eam causam quam diximus. Sic enim dicitur ad primum hominem posteaquam peccavit: maledicta erit terra tibi in omnibus operibus tuis; in tristitia et gemitu edes ex ea omnibus diebus vitae tuae: spinas et tribulos eiciet tibi, et edes pabulum agri tui: in sudore vultus tui edes panem tuum, donec revertaris in terram, de qua sumptus es; quia terra es, et in terram ibis (Gen 1, 17-19).
Before the sin of man, then, it is not written that the earth brought forth anything except the plant of fodder and the fruitful trees; but after sin we see many horrid and unfruitful things born from the earth, for the cause, I believe, that we have stated. For so it is said to the first man after he had sinned: the earth will be cursed for you in all your works; in sorrow and groaning you will eat of it all the days of your life: it will bring forth thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the fodder of your field: in the sweat of your face you will eat your bread, until you return to the earth from which you were taken; for earth you are, and to earth you will go (Gen 3:17–19).
GenMani.1.8.14
CDifficulties from Genesis 1:14-19 are resolved.Solvuntur difficultates ex Gen 1, 14-19.
14. 20. Et dixit Deus, 'fiant sidera in firmamento coeli, sic ut luceant super terram, et dividant inter diem et noctem, et sint in signa, et in tempora, et in dies, et in annos; et sint in splendorem in firmamento coeli, sic ut luceant super terram.' Et sic est factum. Et fecit Deus duo luminaria, maius et minus: luminare maius in inchoationem diei, et luminare minus in inchoationem noctis, et stellas. Et posuit illas Deus in firmamento coeli, sic ut luceant super terram, et praesint diei et nocti, et dividant inter diem et noctem. Et vidit Deus quia bonum est. Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies quartus (Gen 1, 14-19).
14. 20. And God said, 'let there be lights in the firmament of heaven, so that they may shine upon the earth, and may divide between day and night, and may be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and for years; and let them be for splendor in the firmament of heaven, so that they may shine upon the earth.' And so it was made. And God made two great lights, a greater and a lesser: the greater light for the beginning of the day, and the lesser light for the beginning of the night, and the stars. And God set them in the firmament of heaven, so that they may shine upon the earth, and may preside over the day and the night, and may divide between day and night. And God saw that it was good. And evening was made, and morning was made, a fourth day (Gen 1:14–19).
GenMani.1.8.14
Hic primo quaerunt quomodo quarto die facta sint sidera, id est sol, et luna, et stellae. Tres enim dies superiores quomodo esse sine sole potuerunt, cum videamus nunc solis ortu et occasu diem transigi, noctem vero nobis fieri solis absentia, cum ab alia parte mundi ad orientem redit? Quibus respondemus, potuisse fieri ut tres superiores dies singuli per tantam moram temporis computarentur, per quantam moram circumit sol, ex quo procedit ab oriente quousque rursus ad orientem revertitur. Hanc enim moram et longitudinem temporis possent sentire homines etiamsi in speluncis habitarent, ubi orientem et occidentem solem videre non possent. Atque ita sentitur potuisse istam moram fieri etiam sine sole antequam sol factus esset, atque ipsam moram in illo triduo per dies singulos computatam.
Here they ask, first, how the lights—that is, the sun, the moon, and the stars—were made on the fourth day. For how could the three earlier days exist without the sun, when we see that now the day is spent by the rising and setting of the sun, and night comes upon us by the sun's absence, when from another part of the world it returns to the east? To these we answer that it could have been that the three earlier days were each reckoned over as great a span of time as the span in which the sun goes around, from the time it proceeds from the east until it returns again to the east. For men could perceive this span and length of time even if they lived in caves, where they could not see the rising and setting sun. And so it is perceived that this span could have occurred even without the sun, before the sun was made, and that this same span was reckoned over the three days, one by one.
GenMani.1.8.14
Hoc ergo responderemus, nisi nos revocaret quod ibi dicitur: et facta est vespera, et factum est mane, quod nunc sine solis cursu videmus fieri non posse. Restat ergo ut intellegamus, in ipsa quidem mora temporis ipsas distinctiones operum sic appellatas, vesperam propter transactionem consummati operis, et mane propter inchoationem futuri operis; de similitudine scilicet humanorum operum, quia plerumque a mane incipiunt, et ad vesperam desinunt. Habent enim consuetudinem Divinae Scripturae de rebus humanis ad divinas res verba transferre.
This, then, is what we would answer, were we not called back by what is said there, and evening was made, and morning was made, which we now see cannot happen without the course of the sun. It remains, then, that we understand that within that very span of time the distinctions of the works themselves were so named—evening for the completion of a finished work, and morning for the beginning of a work to come—drawn, that is, from the likeness of human works, since for the most part they begin in the morning and end at evening. For the divine Scriptures have the custom of transferring words from human matters to divine matters.
GenMani.1.8.14
Quid sibi velit: et sint in signa et in tempora.
What is meant by "and let them be for signs and for seasons."
14. 21. Deinde quaerunt utquid dictum sit de sideribus: et sint in signa et in tempora (Gen 1, 14). "Numquid enim," aiunt, "tres illi dies sine temporibus esse potuerunt, aut ad temporis spatia non pertinent?"
14. 21. Then they ask why it was said of the lights, and let them be for signs and for seasons (Gen 1:14). "For," they say, "could those three days have been without seasons, or do they not pertain to spans of time?"
GenMani.1.14.21
Sed, in signa et tempora dictum est, ut per haec sidera tempora distinguantur, et ab hominibus dignoscantur: quia si currant tempora; et nullis distinguantur articulis, qui articuli per siderum cursus notantur, possunt quidem currere tempora atque praeterire; sed intellegi et discerni ab hominibus non possunt. Sicut horae quando nubilus dies est, transeunt quidem, et sua spatia peragunt; sed distingui a nobis et notari non possunt.
But for signs and seasons was said so that through these lights the seasons might be distinguished and recognized by men; because if the seasons run on and are marked off by no divisions—divisions that are noted by the courses of the lights—the seasons can indeed run on and pass by, but they cannot be understood and discerned by men. Just as the hours, when the day is cloudy, do indeed pass by and complete their spans, but cannot be distinguished and noted by us.
GenMani.1.14.21
Quid sibi velit: in inchoationem diei, etc.
What is meant by "for the beginning of the day," etc.
14. 22. Quod autem dictum est. Et fecit Deus duo luminaria; luminare maius in inchoationem diei, et luminare minus in inchoationem noctis (Gen 1, 16), pro eo dictum est ac si diceretur, "in principatum diei et in principatum noctis." Non enim sol tantummodo inchoat diem, et non etiam peragit et finit: luna vero aliquando media nocte vel in fine noctis ad nos procedit; si ergo illae noctes, quibus hoc facit, non ab ista inchoantur, quomodo in inchoationem noctis facta est? Si autem per inchoationem "principium" intellegas, et per "principium" "principatum," manifestum est, quia per diem sol principatum tenet; luna vero per noctem, quia etsi caetera sidera tunc apparent, illa tamen suo fulgore superat omnia, et ideo princeps eorum rectissime dicitur.
14. 22. As for what was said, and God made two lights; the greater light for the beginning of the day, and the lesser light for the beginning of the night (Gen 1:16), it was said in place of saying, "for the rule of the day and for the rule of the night." For the sun does not merely begin the day and not also carry it through and end it; and the moon sometimes comes forth to us in the middle of the night or at the end of the night. If, then, those nights in which it does this are not begun by it, how was it made for the beginning of the night? But if by beginning you understand "principal place," and by "principal place" "rule," it is clear that through the day the sun holds rule, and the moon through the night, because, although the other lights then appear, the moon nonetheless surpasses them all by its brightness, and so is most rightly called their chief.
GenMani.1.14.22
Explicantur verba: et dividant inter diem et noctem.
The words "and let them divide between day and night" are explained.
14. 23. Quod autem dictum est: et dividant inter diem et noctem (Gen 1, 18); potest hic fieri calumnia, ut dicatur: "quomodo iam Deus diviserat superius inter diem et noctem, si hoc, quarto die, sidera faciunt?" Sic igitur hic dictum est: dividant inter diem et noctem, tamquam si diceretur: "sic inter se diem dividant et noctem, ut soli dies detur, nox autem lunae et sideribus caeteris." Quae duo iam divisa erant, sed nondum inter sidera, ut iam certum esset de siderum numero, quid per diem, et quid per noctem appareret hominibus.
14. 23. As for what was said, and let them divide between day and night (Gen 1:18), a calumny can be made here, so that one says: "How had God already divided above between day and night, if the lights do this on the fourth day?" So, then, it was here said, let them divide between day and night, as if it were said: "Let them so divide day and night between themselves that the day is given to the sun, and the night to the moon and the other lights." These two had already been divided, but not yet among the lights, so that it might now be settled, in respect of the number of the lights, what should appear to men by day and what by night.
GenMani.1.14.23
CThat by the word water in Genesis 1:20-23 the misty air is designated.Aquae nomine designari in Gen 1, 20-23 aerem nebulosum.
15. 24. Et dixit Deus, 'eiciant aquae reptilia animarum vivarum, et volatilia volantia super terram sub firmamento coeli.' Et sic factum est. Et fecit Deus cetos magnos, et omnem animam animalium et repentium quae eiecerunt aquae secundum uniuscuiusque genus, et omne genus volatile pennatum secundum genus. Et vidit Deus quia bona sunt; et benedixit illa Deus dicens: 'crescite et multiplicamini, et replete aquas maris, et volatilia multiplicentur super terram.' Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies quintus (Gen 1, 20-23). Hic solent reprehendere, quaerentes vel potius calumniantes, quare animalia non solum ea quae in aquis vivunt, sed etiam ea quae in aere volitant, et omnia pennata de aquis nata scriptum sit.
15. 24. And God said, 'let the waters bring forth creeping things of living souls, and flying things flying over the earth under the firmament of heaven.' And so it was made. And God made the great sea creatures, and every soul of the animals and crawling things that the waters brought forth according to each kind, and every kind of winged flying thing according to its kind. And God saw that they were good; and God blessed them, saying: 'increase and multiply, and fill the waters of the sea, and let the flying things multiply over the earth.' And evening was made, and morning was made, a fifth day (Gen 1:20–23). Here they are accustomed to fault, asking—or rather raising a calumny—why it was written that the animals not only those that live in the waters, but also those that fly in the air, and all winged things, were born from the waters.
GenMani.1.14.23
Sed sciant omnes quos haec movent, istum aerem nebulosum et humidum, in quo aves volant, a doctissimis hominibus qui haec diligenter inquirunt, cum aquis solere deputari. Concrescit enim et crassus efficitur exhalationibus et quasi vaporibus maris et terrae, et de ipso humore pinguescit quodammodo ut volatus avium portare possit. Ideo per noctes serenas etiam rorat, cuius roris guttae mane in herbis inveniuntur.
But let all whom these things trouble know that this misty and moist air in which the birds fly is, by the most learned men who diligently inquire into these matters, accustomed to be reckoned with the waters. For it thickens and becomes dense by the exhalations and, as it were, vapors of the sea and the earth, and from that moisture it grows somehow rich, so that it can bear up the flight of birds. That is why on clear nights it even gives dew, the drops of which dew are found in the morning on the plants.
GenMani.1.14.23
Nam mons ille Macedoniae, qui Olympus vocatur, tantae altitudinis esse dicitur, ut in eius cacumine nec ventus sentiatur, nec nubes se colligant, quia excedit altitudine sua totum istum aerem humidum in quo aves volant, et ideo nec aves ibi volare asseverantur. Quod ab eis proditum dicitur, qui per singulos annos solebant, nescio quorum sacrificiorum causa, memorati montis cacumen ascendere, et aliquas notas in pulvere scribere, quas alio anno integras inveniebant: quod fieri non posset, si ventum aut pluviam locus ille pateretur. Deinde quia tenuitas aeris illius qui ibi est, non eos inspirabat, durare ibi non poterant, nisi spongias humectas naribus applicarent, unde crassiorem et consuetum spiritum ducerent: hi ergo indicaverunt se etiam nullam avem in eo loco aliquando vidisse.
For that mountain of Macedonia which is called Olympus is said to be of such height that on its summit neither is wind felt nor do clouds gather, because by its height it rises above all this moist air in which the birds fly; and therefore it is asserted that not even birds fly there. This is said to have been reported by those who, on account of certain sacrifices I know not which, were accustomed each year to climb the summit of the said mountain and to write certain marks in the dust, which they found intact in another year—which could not happen if that place were subject to wind or rain. Then, because the thinness of the air there did not give them breath, they could not last there unless they applied moist sponges to their nostrils, from which to draw a denser and accustomed breath; these men, then, reported that they had never at any time seen even a single bird in that place.
GenMani.1.14.23
Non itaque immerito non solum pisces et caetera quae in aquis sunt animalia, sed etiam aves de aquis natas esse, fidelissima Scriptura commemorat; quia per istum aerem volare possunt, qui de maris et terrae humoribus surgit.
Not without reason, therefore, does the most trustworthy Scripture record that not only the fish and the other animals that are in the waters, but also the birds, were born from the waters; because they can fly through this air, which rises from the moisture of the sea and the earth.
GenMani.1.14.23
CWhy harmful living creatures were created (Genesis 1:24f.).Perniciosa animantia cur creata (Gen 1, 24s.).
16. 25. Et dixit Deus, 'eiciat terra animam vivam secundum unumquodque genus quadrupedum et serpentium et bestiarum terrae.' Et sic est factum. Et fecit Deus bestias terrae secundum genus, et pecora secundum genus, et omnia repentia terrae secundum genus. Et vidit Deus quia bona sunt (Gen 1, 24-25). Solent etiam istam Manichaei movere quaestionem ut dicant: "quid opus erat ut tam multa animalia Deus faceret, sive in aquis, sive in terra, quae hominibus non sunt necessaria? multa etiam perniciosa sunt et timenda."
16. 25. And God said, 'let the earth bring forth the living soul according to each kind of four-footed animals and serpents and beasts of the earth.' And so it was made. And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kind, and the cattle according to their kind, and all the crawling things of the earth according to their kind. And God saw that they were good (Gen 1:24–25). The Manichees are accustomed to raise this question too, saying: "What need was there for God to make so many animals, whether in the waters or on the earth, that are not necessary to men? Many too are harmful and to be feared."
GenMani.1.14.23
Sed cum ista dicunt, non intellegunt quemadmodum omnia pulchra sunt conditori et artifici suo, qui omnibus utitur ad gubernationem universitatis, cui summa Lege dominatur. Si enim in alicuius opificis officinam imperitus intraverit, videt ibi multa instrumenta quorum causas ignorat, et si multum est insipiens, superflua putat. Iamvero si in fornacem incautus ceciderit, aut ferramento aliquo acuto, cum id male tractat, seipsum vulneraverit, etiam perniciosa et noxia existimat ibi esse multa. Quorum tamen usum quoniam novit artifex, insipientiam eius irridet, et verba inepta non curans, officinam suam instanter exercet.
But when they say these things, they do not understand how all things are beautiful to their founder and craftsman, who uses them all for the governance of the universe, over which he holds dominion by the highest Law. For if an unskilled man enters the workshop of some craftsman, he sees there many tools whose purposes he does not know, and if he is very foolish, he thinks them superfluous. And if, being incautious, he falls into the furnace, or wounds himself with some sharp iron tool when he handles it badly, he thinks too that there are many harmful and noxious things there. Yet because the craftsman knows their use, he laughs at the man's foolishness, and, paying no heed to his inept words, presses on with his work in the shop.
GenMani.1.14.23
Et tamen tam stulti sunt homines, ut apud artificem hominem non audeant vituperare quae ignorant, sed cum ea viderint credant esse necessaria, et propter usus aliquos instituta: in hoc autem mundo cuius conditor et administrator praedicatur Deus, audent multa reprehendere quorum causas non vident, et in operibus atque instrumentis omnipotentis artificis volunt se videri scire quod nesciunt.
And yet men are so foolish that, with a human craftsman, they dare not find fault with what they do not understand, but when they have seen these things they believe them to be necessary and established for some uses; whereas in this world, whose founder and administrator God is proclaimed to be, they dare to fault many things whose causes they do not see, and, in the works and instruments of the almighty craftsman, they want to seem to know what they do not know.
GenMani.1.14.23
Omnia in suo genere pulchra esse: animantia autem vel utilia vel perniciosa vel superflua.
That all things are beautiful in their kind: living creatures are either useful, or harmful, or superfluous.
16. 26. Ego vero fateor me nescire mures et ranae quare creatae sint, aut muscae aut vermiculi: video tamen omnia in suo genere pulchra esse, quamvis propter peccata nostra multa nobis videantur adversa. Non enim animalis alicuius corpus et membra considero, ubi non mensuras et numeros et ordinem inveniam ad unitatem concordiae pertinere. Quae omnia unde veniant non intellego, nisi a summa mensura et numero et ordine, quae in ipsa Dei sublimitate incommutabili atque aeterna consistunt.
16. 26. For my part, I confess that I do not know why mice and frogs were created, or flies or little worms; yet I see that all things are beautiful in their kind, although, on account of our sins, many seem to us hostile. For I consider the body and members of no animal in which I do not find measures and numbers and order pertaining to the unity of harmony. Whence all these come I do not understand, except from the highest measure and number and order, which consist in the very sublimity of God, unchangeable and eternal.
GenMani.1.16.26
Quod si cogitarent isti loquacissimi et ineptissimi, non nobis taedium facerent, sed ipsi considerando omnes pulchritudines et summas et infimas, Deum artificem ubique laudarent; et quoniam nusquam offenditur ratio, sicubi forte sensus carnalis offenditur, non rerum ipsarum vitio, sed nostrae mortalitatis meritis imputarent.
If these most talkative and most inept men would consider this, they would not weary us, but would themselves, by considering all beauties, both the highest and the lowest, praise God the craftsman everywhere; and since reason is nowhere offended, then, if perchance somewhere the bodily sense is offended, they would impute it not to a fault of the things themselves but to the deserts of our mortality.
GenMani.1.16.26
Et certe omnia animalia aut utilia nobis sunt, aut perniciosa, aut superflua. Adversus utilia non habent quid dicant. De perniciosis autem vel punimur, vel exercemur, vel terremur, ut non vitam istam multis periculis et laboribus subditam, sed aliam meliorem, ubi securitas summa est, diligamus et desideremus, et eam nobis pietatis meritis comparemus.
And surely all animals are either useful to us, or harmful, or superfluous. Against the useful they have nothing to say. But by the harmful we are either punished, or tested, or terrified, so that we may love and desire not this life, subject to many dangers and toils, but another, better life, where there is the highest security, and may obtain it for ourselves by the deserts of godliness.
GenMani.1.16.26
De superfluis vero quid nobis est quaerere? Si tibi displicet quod non prosunt, placeat quod non obsunt; quia etsi domui nostrae non sunt necessaria, eis tamen completur huius universitatis integritas, quae multo maior est quam domus nostra et multo melior. Hanc enim multo melius administrat Deus, quam unusquisque nostrum domum suam.
But as for the superfluous, what is it to us to inquire? If it displeases you that they are of no profit, let it please you that they do no harm; because, even if they are not necessary to our house, yet by them the wholeness of this universe is completed, which is much greater and much better than our house. For God administers this universe much better than each one of us administers his own house.
GenMani.1.16.26
Usurpa ergo utilia, cave perniciosa, relinque superflua. In omnibus tamen cum mensuras et numeros et ordinem vides, artificem quaere. Nec alium invenies, nisi ubi summa mensura, et summus numerus, et summus ordo est, id est Deum, de quo verissime dictum est, quod omnia in mensura, et numero, et pondere disposuerit (Cf. Sap 11, 21).
Make use, then, of the useful, beware of the harmful, leave aside the superfluous. In all things, however, when you see measures and numbers and order, seek the craftsman. And you will find no other than where the highest measure, and the highest number, and the highest order is, that is, God, of whom it was most truly said that he arranged all things in measure, and number, and weight (See Wis 11:21).
GenMani.1.16.26
Sic fortasse uberiorem capies fructum, cum Deum laudas in humilitate formicae, quam cum transis fluvium in alicuius iumenti altitudine.
So perhaps you will reap a richer fruit when you praise God in the lowliness of the ant than when you cross a river on the height of some beast of burden.
GenMani.1.16.26
Quomodo intellegatur ad imaginem Dei factus homo iuxta Gen 1, 26.
How man, made to the image of God, is to be understood according to Genesis 1:26.
17. 27. Et dixit Deus: 'faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram; et habeat potestatem piscium maris et volatilium coeli, et omnium pecorum et ferarum, et omnis terrae, et omnium reptilium, quae super terram repunt (Gen 1, 26),' et caetera usque ad vesperam et mane quo completur dies sextus (Cf. Gen 1, 27-30). Istam maxime quaestionem solent Manichaei loquaciter agitare, et insultare nobis quod hominem credamus factum ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei. Attendunt enim figuram corporis nostri, et infeliciter quaerunt utrum habeat Deus nares et dentes et barbam, et membra etiam interiora, et caetera quae in nobis sunt necessaria. In Deo autem talia ridiculum est, imo impium credere, et ideo negant hominem factum esse ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei.
17. 27. And God said: 'let us make man to our image and likeness; and let him have power over the fish of the sea and the flying things of heaven, and over all cattle and wild beasts, and over all the earth, and over all the crawling things that crawl upon the earth (Gen 1:26),' and the rest, down to the evening and morning by which the sixth day is completed (See Gen 1:27–30). This question above all the Manichees are accustomed to stir up loquaciously, and to insult us for believing that man was made to the image and likeness of God. For they attend to the figure of our body, and unhappily ask whether God has nostrils and teeth and a beard, and inner members too, and the rest that are necessary in us. But to believe such things of God is ridiculous, indeed impious, and so they deny that man was made to the image and likeness of God.
GenMani.1.16.26
Quibus respondemus, membra quidem ista in Scripturis plerumque nominari, cum Deus insinuatur audientibus parvulis; et hoc non solum in Veteris Testamenti libris, sed etiam in Novi. Nam et oculi Dei commemorantur, et aures, et labia, et pedes, et ad dexteram Dei Patris sedere evangelizatur Filius. Et ipse Dominus dicit: nolite per coelum iurare, quia sedes Dei est; neque per terram, quia scabellum pedum eius est (Mt 5, 34-35). Item ipse dicit quod in digito Dei eiciebat daemonia (Cf. Lc 11, 20).
To these we answer that these members are indeed often named in the Scriptures when God is being introduced to little ones who hear; and this not only in the books of the Old Testament but also in those of the New. For the eyes of God are mentioned, and the ears, and the lips, and the feet, and the Son is proclaimed to sit at the right hand of God the Father. And the Lord himself says, do not swear by heaven, because it is God's throne; nor by the earth, because it is the footstool of his feet (Matt 5:34–35). Likewise he himself says that by the finger of God he was casting out demons (See Luke 11:20).
GenMani.1.16.26
Sed omnes qui spiritaliter intellegunt Scripturas, non membra corporea per ista nomina, sed spiritales potentias accipere didicerunt, sicut galeas, et scutum, et gladium (Cf. Eph 6, 16-17), et alia multa. Primo ergo istis haereticis dicendum est, qua impudentia de talibus verbis Veteri Testamento calumnientur, cum etiam in Novo haec posita videant, aut fortasse non videant, sed cum litigant excaecentur.
But all who understand the Scriptures spiritually have learned to take by these names not bodily members but spiritual powers, like the helmet, and the shield, and the sword (See Eph 6:16–17), and many others. First, then, these heretics must be asked with what shamelessness they raise a calumny against the Old Testament from such words, when they see these very things placed in the New as well—or perhaps they do not see, but in their wrangling are blinded.
GenMani.1.16.26
Homo ad imaginem Dei factus propter animam, qua omnia pecora superat.
That man was made to the image of God on account of the soul, by which he surpasses all the cattle.
17. 28. Sed tamen noverint in Catholica disciplina spiritales fideles non credere Deum forma corporea definitum; et quod homo ad imaginem Dei factus dicitur, secundum interiorem hominem dici, ubi est ratio et intellectus: unde etiam habet "potestatem piscium maris, et volatilium coeli, et omnium pecorum et ferarum, et omnis terrae, et omnium repentium quae repunt super terram." Cum enim dixisset: faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram; addidit continuo: et habeat potestatem piscium maris et volatilium coeli (Gen 1, 26), et caetera: ut intellegeremus non propter corpus dici hominem factum ad imaginem Dei, sed propter eam potestatem qua omnia pecora superat.
17. 28. But let them nonetheless know that in Catholic teaching the spiritual faithful do not believe God to be bounded by a bodily form; and that man's being said to be made to the image of God is said with respect to the inner man, where reason and understanding are: from which he also has "power over the fish of the sea, and the flying things of heaven, and over all cattle and wild beasts, and over all the earth, and over all the crawling things that crawl upon the earth." For when he had said, let us make man to our image and likeness, he added at once, and let him have power over the fish of the sea and the flying things of heaven (Gen 1:26), and the rest: so that we might understand that man is said to be made to the image of God not on account of the body, but on account of that power by which he surpasses all the cattle.
GenMani.1.17.28
Omnia enim animalia caetera subiecta sunt homini, non propter corpus, sed propter intellectum, quem nos habemus, et illa non habent: quamvis etiam corpus nostrum sic fabricatum sit, ut indicet nos meliores esse quam bestias, et propterea Deo similes. Omnium enim animalium corpora, sive quae in aquis, sive quae in terra vivunt, sive quae in aere volitant, inclinata sunt ad terram, et non sunt erecta sicut hominis corpus. Quo significatur, etiam animum nostrum in superna sua, id est in aeterna spiritalia, erectum esse debere. Ita intellegitur per animum maxime, attestante etiam erecta corporis forma, homo factus ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei.
For all the other animals are subject to man, not on account of the body, but on account of the understanding, which we have and they do not have—although our body too is fashioned in such a way as to indicate that we are better than the beasts and therefore like God. For the bodies of all animals, whether those that live in the waters, or on the earth, or those that fly in the air, are bent toward the earth and are not erect like the body of man. By this it is signified that our mind too ought to be erect toward the things above it, that is, toward the eternal spiritual things. So it is understood that it is chiefly through the mind—the erect form of the body bearing witness as well—that man was made to the image and likeness of God.
GenMani.1.17.28
Hominis potestas in bestias etiam post peccatum.
Man's power over the beasts even after sin.
18. 29. Aliquando etiam solent dicere: "quomodo accepit homo potestatem piscium maris et volatilium coeli et omnium pecorum et ferarum, cum videamus a multis feris homines occidi, et a multis volatilibus nobis noceri, quae volumus vel vitare vel capere et plerumque non possumus? quomodo ergo in haec accepimus potestatem?"
18. 29. Sometimes too they are accustomed to say: "How did man receive power over the fish of the sea and the flying things of heaven and all cattle and wild beasts, when we see men killed by many wild beasts, and harmed by many flying things, which we wish either to avoid or to capture and for the most part cannot? How, then, have we received power over these things?"
GenMani.1.18.29
Hic illis primo dicendum est quod multum errent qui post peccatum considerant hominem, cum in huius vitae mortalitatem damnatus est, et amisit perfectionem illam qua factus est ad imaginem Dei. Sed si damnatio eius tantum valet, ut tam multis pecoribus imperet: quamvis enim a multis feris propter fragilitatem corporis possit occidi, a nullis tamen domari potest, cum ipse tam multas et prope omnes domet: si ergo haec hominis damnatio tantum valet, quid de regno eius cogitandum est, quod ei renovato et liberato divina voce promittitur?
Here it must first be said to them that they greatly err who consider man after sin, when he has been condemned to the mortality of this life and has lost that perfection by which he was made to the image of God. But if his condemnation has so much force that he commands so many of the cattle—for although on account of the frailty of his body he can be killed by many wild beasts, yet by none can he be tamed, while he himself tames so many, indeed nearly all—if, then, this condemnation of man has so much force, what is to be thought of his kingdom, which is promised to him by the divine voice when he is renewed and set free?
GenMani.1.18.29
Quomodo spiritaliter accipiendum versus Gen 1, 28.
How the verse Genesis 1:28 is to be taken spiritually.
19. 30. Quod autem scriptum est: masculum et feminam fecit illos; et benedixit eos Deus dicens, 'crescite et multiplicamini, et generate, et replete terram' (Gen 1, 27-28); rectissime quaeritur quemadmodum accipienda sit coniunctio masculi et feminae ante peccatum, et ista benedictio qua dictum est: crescite et multiplicamini, et generate, et replete terram: utrum carnaliter, an spiritaliter accipienda sit. Licet enim nobis eam etiam spiritaliter accipere, ut in carnalem fecunditatem post peccatum conversa esse credatur. Erat enim prius casta coniunctio masculi et feminae; huius ad regendum, illius ad obtemperandum accommodata: et spiritalis fetus intellegibilium et immortalium gaudiorum replens terram, id est, vivificans corpus, et dominans eius; id est, ita subiectum habens, ut nullam ex eo adversitatem, nullam molestiam pateretur.
19. 30. As for what is written, male and female he made them; and God blessed them, saying, 'increase and multiply, and beget, and fill the earth' (Gen 1:27–28), it is most rightly asked how the joining of male and female before sin is to be taken, and this blessing in which it was said, increase and multiply, and beget, and fill the earth: whether it is to be taken carnally or spiritually. For we are permitted to take it spiritually as well, so that it may be believed to have been changed into carnal fruitfulness after sin. For there was first a chaste joining of male and female, the one suited for ruling, the other for obeying; and a spiritual offspring of intelligible and immortal joys filling the earth, that is, giving life to the body and ruling it—that is, holding it so subject that it suffered from it no adversity, no trouble.
GenMani.1.19.30
Quod ideo sic credendum est, quia nondum erant filii saeculi huius antequam peccarent. Filii enim saeculi huius generant et generantur, sicut Dominus dicit, cum in comparatione futurae vitae quae nobis promittitur, carnalem istam generationem contemnendam esse demonstrat (Cf. Lc 20, 34-36).
This is to be believed in this way because there were not yet sons of this world before they sinned. For the sons of this world beget and are begotten, as the Lord says, when, in comparison with the future life that is promised to us, he shows that this carnal generation is to be despised (See Luke 20:34–36).
GenMani.1.19.30
Quid sit, allegorice, bestiis dominari (Gen 1, 28).
What it is, allegorically, to have dominion over the beasts (Genesis 1:28).
20. 31. Et quod eis dictum est: habete potestatem piscium maris, et volatilium coeli, et repentium omnium quae repunt super terram (Gen 1, 28); salvo quidem intellectu, quo manifestum est omnibus his animalibus hominem ratione dominari; recte tamen intellegitur etiam spiritaliter, ut omnes affectiones et motus animi, quos habemus istis animalibus similes, subditos haberemus, et eorum dominaremur per temperantiam et modestiam. Cum enim non reguntur isti motus, erumpunt et pergunt in foedissimas consuetudines, et per diversas perniciosasque delectationes nos rapiunt, et faciunt similes omni generi bestiarum. Cum autem reguntur et subiciuntur, omnino mansuescunt et nobiscum concorditer vivunt.
20. 31. And as for what was said to them, have power over the fish of the sea, and the flying things of heaven, and all the crawling things that crawl upon the earth (Gen 1:28)—with the meaning preserved by which it is clear that man has dominion over all these animals by reason—it is yet rightly understood spiritually too, so that we should hold subject all the affections and movements of the mind that we have, similar to these animals, and have dominion over them through temperance and moderation. For when these movements are not ruled, they break out and go on into the foulest habits, and through diverse and ruinous pleasures they carry us off and make us like every kind of beast. But when they are ruled and subjected, they grow altogether tame and live in harmony with us.
GenMani.1.20.31
Non enim a nobis alieni sunt motus animi nostri. Pascuntur etiam nobiscum cognitione rationum et morum optimorum, et vitae aeternae, tamquam herbis seminalibus et lignis fructiferis et herbis viridibus. Et haec est hominis vita beata atque tranquilla, cum omnes motus eius rationi veritatique consentiunt; et vocantur gaudia, et amores sancti, et casti et boni. Si autem non consentiunt, nihilominus dum neglegenter geruntur, conscindunt et dissipant animum, et faciunt vitam miserrimam; et vocantur perturbationes, et libidines, et concupiscentiae malae. De quibus iam nobis praecipitur, ut eas cum quanto possumus labore crucifigamus in nobis, donec absorbeatur mors in victoriam (Cf. 1 Cor 15, 54). Dicit enim Apostolus: qui autem Iesu Christi sunt, carnem suam crucifixerunt cum perturbationibus et concupiscentiis (Gal 5, 24).
For the movements of our mind are not foreign to us. They too are fed, along with us, by the knowledge of the best reasonings and ways of life, and of eternal life, as if by seed-bearing plants and fruit-bearing trees and green plants. And this is the happy and tranquil life of man, when all his movements consent to reason and truth; and they are called joys, and holy and chaste and good loves. But if they do not consent, then nonetheless, while they are managed negligently, they tear apart and scatter the mind and make life most wretched; and they are called disturbances, and lusts, and evil desires. Concerning these it is already commanded us that we crucify them in ourselves with as much effort as we can, until death is swallowed up in victory (See 1 Cor 15:54). For the Apostle says, those who belong to Jesus Christ have crucified their flesh with its disturbances and desires (Gal 5:24).
GenMani.1.20.31
Vel hinc enim quivis admoneri debet non carnaliter haec esse intellegenda, quia herbae virides et ligna fructifera omni generi bestiarum, et omnibus volatilibus et omnibus serpentibus in Genesi dantur ad cibum, cum videamus leones, et accipitres, et milvos, et aquilas non pasci nisi carnibus, et interfectione aliorum animalium. Quod etiam de nonnullis serpentibus credo, qui sunt in arenosis et desertis locis, ubi nec lignum nec herba nascitur.
For from this very thing anyone ought to be admonished that these things are not to be understood carnally, since the green plants and the fruit-bearing trees are given as food to every kind of beast, and to all the flying things and all the serpents, in Genesis, when we see that lions, and hawks, and kites, and eagles are not fed except on flesh and on the killing of other animals. This I believe also of some serpents, which are in sandy and desert places, where neither tree nor plant is born.
GenMani.1.20.31
Cur in Gen 1, 31 dicitur: bona valde.
Why in Genesis 1:31 it is said: very good.
21. 32. Sane non est neglegenter praetereundum quod dictum est: et vidit Deus omnia quaecumque fecit, esse bona valde (Gen 1, 31). Cum enim de singulis ageret, dicebat tantum: vidit Deus quia bonum est: cum autem de omnibus diceretur, parum fuit dicere bona, nisi adderetur et valde. Si enim singula opera Dei cum considerantur a prudentibus, inveniuntur habere laudabiles mensuras et numeros et ordines in suo quaeque genere constituta; quanto magis omnia simul, id est ipsa universitas, quae istis singulis in unum collectis impletur?
21. 32. Certainly it is not to be passed over negligently that it was said, and God saw all the things that he made, that they were very good (Gen 1:31). For when he was dealing with the individual things, he said only, God saw that it was good; but when it was said of all things, it was too little to say good, unless very were also added. For if the individual works of God, when they are considered by the prudent, are found to have praiseworthy measures and numbers and orders, each established in its own kind, how much more all things together, that is, the universe itself, which is filled up by these individual things gathered into one?
GenMani.1.21.32
Omnis enim pulchritudo quae partibus constat, multo est laudabilior in toto quam in parte: sicut in corpore humano, si laudamus oculos solos, si nasum solum, si solas genas, aut solum caput, aut solas manus, aut solos pedes, et caetera si pulchra singula et sola laudamus; quanto magis totum corpus, cui omnia membra, quae singula pulchra sunt, conferunt pulchritudinem suam: ita ut manus pulchra, quae etiam sola laudabatur in corpore, si separetur a corpore, et ipsa amittat gratiam suam, et caetera sine illa inhonesta sint? Tanta est vis et potentia integritatis et unitatis, ut etiam quae multa sunt bona tunc placeant, cum in universum aliquid conveniunt atque concurrunt. Universum autem ab unitate nomen accepit.
For every beauty that consists of parts is much more praiseworthy in the whole than in a part: as in the human body, if we praise the eyes alone, or the nose alone, or the cheeks alone, or the head alone, or the hands alone, or the feet alone, and the rest, if we praise the beautiful parts singly and alone; how much more the whole body, to which all the members, which are beautiful singly, contribute their beauty—so that a beautiful hand, which even alone was praised in the body, if it be separated from the body, both itself loses its grace, and the rest without it are unseemly? So great is the force and power of wholeness and unity that even those things that are many goods please then, when in the whole they come together and meet in some unity. And "universe" took its name from unity.
GenMani.1.21.32
Quod si Manichaei considerarent, laudarent universitatis auctorem et conditorem Deum; et quod eos propter conditionem nostrae mortalitatis in parte offendit, redigerent ad universi pulchritudinem, et viderent quemadmodum Deus fecerit omnia non solum bona, sed etiam bona valde. Quia etiam in sermone aliquo ornato atque composito si consideremus singulas syllabas, vel etiam singulas litteras, quae cum sonuerint statim transeunt, non in eis invenimus quid delectet atque laudandum sit. Totus enim ille sermo non de singulis syllabis aut litteris, sed de omnibus pulcher est.
And if the Manichees considered this, they would praise God, the author and founder of the universe; and what offends them in a part, on account of the condition of our mortality, they would refer back to the beauty of the whole, and would see how God made all things not only good but even very good. For in some adorned and well-composed discourse too, if we consider the individual syllables, or even the individual letters, which, as soon as they have sounded, pass away at once, we find in them nothing to delight us and to be praised. For that whole discourse is beautiful not from the individual syllables or letters, but from all of them.
GenMani.1.21.32
CThe rest of the seventh day (Genesis 2:2) by way of allegory.Requies diei septimi (Gen 2, 2) per allegoriam.
22. 33. Iam nunc videamus etiam illud, quod solent maiore impudentia, quam imperitia deridere, quod scriptum est, Deum consummato coelo et terra et omnibus quae fecit, requievisse die septimo ab omnibus operibus suis (Cf. Gen 2, 3), et benedixisse diem septimum, et sanctificasse eum, quia requievit ab operibus suis. Dicunt enim: "quid opus erat ut Deus requiesceret? an forte operibus sex dierum fatigatus et lassatus erat?" Addunt etiam Domini testimonium, ubi ait: Pater meus usque nunc operatur (Io 5, 17); et hinc multos imperitos decipiunt, quibus persuadere conantur Novum Testamentum Veteri Testamento adversari.
22. 33. Now let us look also at this, which they are accustomed to deride with more shamelessness than ignorance: that it is written that God, having completed heaven and earth and all that he made, rested on the seventh day from all his works (See Gen 2:3), and blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it, because he rested from his works. For they say: "What need was there for God to rest? Was he perhaps wearied and tired by the works of the six days?" They add too the testimony of the Lord, where he says, my Father works even until now (John 5:17); and from this they deceive many unskilled people, whom they try to persuade that the New Testament is opposed to the Old Testament.
GenMani.1.22.33
Sed sicut illi quibus Dominus dicit: Pater meus usque nunc operatur, carnaliter opinabantur requiem Dei, et carnaliter sabbatum observantes non videbant quid illius diei significatio figuraret; sic et isti diversa quidem voluntate, pariter tamen non intellegunt sabbati sacramentum.
But just as those to whom the Lord says, my Father works even until now, supposed God's rest carnally, and, observing the sabbath carnally, did not see what the meaning of that day prefigured, so these men too, with a different intention indeed, yet alike do not understand the mystery of the sabbath.
GenMani.1.22.33
Et illi enim carnaliter observando, et isti carnaliter exsecrando, sabbatum non noverunt.
For the one group, by observing it carnally, and the other, by execrating it carnally, have not known the sabbath.
GenMani.1.22.33
Transeat ergo unusquisque ad Christum ut auferatur velamen, sicut Apostolus dicit (Cf. 2 Cor 3, 16). Velamen enim aufertur, quando similitudinis et allegoriae cooperimento ablato, veritas nudatur, ut possit videri.
Let each one, then, pass over to Christ, so that the veil may be taken away, as the Apostle says (See 2 Cor 3:16). For the veil is taken away when, the covering of likeness and allegory being removed, the truth is laid bare, so that it can be seen.
GenMani.1.22.33
Quid significet quod dicitur Deus requievisse.
What it signifies that God is said to have rested.
22. 34. Primo ergo huius locutionis regula in multis divinarum Scripturarum locis animadvertenda atque discenda est. Quid enim aliud significat, quod dicitur Deus requievisse ab omnibus operibus suis, quae fecit bona valde, nisi requiem nostram, quam nobis daturus est ab omnibus operibus nostris, si et nos bona opera fecerimus? Secundum ipsam figuram locutionis dicit et Apostolus: quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus; sed ipse Spiritus postulat pro nobis gemitibus inenarrabilibus (Rom 8, 26). Non enim Spiritus sanctus gemit, quasi indigeat aut angustias patiatur, qui secundum Deum interpellat pro sanctis: sed quia ipse nos movet ad orandum cum gemimus, quod ipso movente nos facimus, ipse facere dictus est.
22. 34. First, then, the rule of this manner of speaking is to be observed and learned in many places of the divine Scriptures. For what else does it signify, that God is said to have rested from all his works which he made very good, except our rest, which he is going to give us from all our works, if we too have done good works? According to this same figure of speech the Apostle also says, for we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with unutterable groanings (Rom 8:26). For the Holy Spirit does not groan as though he were in need or suffered distress, who according to God intercedes for the saints; but because he himself moves us to pray when we groan, what we do at his moving he himself is said to do.
GenMani.1.22.34
Sic dicitur etiam illud: tentat vos Dominus Deus vester, ut sciat si diligitis eum (Deut 13, 3). Non enim ut sciat ipse quem nihil latet, sed ut scire nos faciat, quantum in eius dilectione profecerimus, tentari nos permittit. Secundum ipsam locutionem dicit et Dominus noster, nescire se diem et horam de fine saeculi (Cf. Mt 24, 36). Quid enim potest esse quod ille nesciat? Sed quia hoc utiliter occultabat discipulis, nescientem se esse dixit, quia illos nescientes occultando faciebat. Secundum hanc figuram etiam Patrem solum dixit scire diem ipsum, quia eumdem Filium scire faceret.
So too this is said: the Lord your God tests you, that he may know whether you love him (Deut 13:3). For it is not that he himself, from whom nothing is hidden, may know, but so that he may make us know how far we have advanced in his love, that he permits us to be tested. According to this same manner of speaking our Lord too says that he does not know the day and the hour of the end of the world (See Matt 24:36). For what can there be that he does not know? But because he was usefully hiding this from the disciples, he said that he did not know it, because by hiding it he was making them not know it. According to this figure he also said that the Father alone knows that day, because he would make the same Son know it.
GenMani.1.22.34
Ex hac figura multae quaestiones in Divinis Scripturis, eis qui iam genus locutionis huius noverunt, sine ulla difficultate solvuntur.
From this figure many questions in the divine Scriptures are solved without any difficulty for those who already know this kind of speech.
GenMani.1.22.34
Talibus locutionibus etiam abundat nostra consuetudo, cum dicimus laetum diem, quia nos laetos facit; et pigrum frigus, quia nos pigros facit (Cf. TIBULLO, Eleg. 1, 2, 28); et fossam caecam, quia nos eam non videmus; et linguam politam, quia verba polita facit: postremo etiam quietum ab omnibus molestiis tempus dicimus, in quo nos ab omnibus molestiis quieti sumus.
Our common usage too abounds in such expressions, as when we say a glad day, because it makes us glad; and a sluggish cold, because it makes us sluggish (See Tibullus, Eleg. 1, 2, 28); and a blind ditch, because we do not see it; and a polished tongue, because it makes polished words; and finally we even call a time quiet from all troubles, in which we are quiet from all troubles.
GenMani.1.22.34
Sed et Deus requievisse dictus est ab omnibus operibus suis, quae fecit bona valde, quia in illo requiescemus ab omnibus operibus nostris, si opera bona fecerimus: quia et ipsa bona opera nostra illi tribuenda sunt qui vocat, qui praecipit, qui viam veritatis ostendit, qui ut et velimus invitat, et vires implendi ea quae imperat, subministrat.
And so God too was said to have rested from all his works which he made very good, because in him we shall rest from all our works, if we have done good works: because our good works themselves are to be attributed to him who calls, who commands, who shows the way of truth, who invites us even to will, and supplies the strength to fulfill what he commands.
GenMani.1.22.34
The six days of creation are like the six ages of the world, the first of which is infancy: from Adam to Noah.Sex creationis diebus sex mundi aetatibus similes, quarum prima est infantia: ab Adam ad Noe.
23. 35. 1.a AETAS. Sed quare septimo die requies ista tribuatur, diligentius considerandum arbitror. Video enim per totum textum divinarum Scripturarum sex quasdam aetates operosas, certis quasi limitibus suis esse distinctas, ut in septima speretur requies; et easdem sex aetates habere similitudinem istorum sex dierum, in quibus ea facta sunt quae Deum fecisse Scriptura commemorat.
23. 35. FIRST AGE. But why this rest is assigned to the seventh day, I think is to be considered more diligently. For I see throughout the whole text of the divine Scriptures certain six laborious ages, distinguished as if by their own fixed boundaries, so that in the seventh rest may be hoped for; and that these same six ages have a likeness to those six days in which were made the things that Scripture records God to have made.
GenMani.1.23.35
Primordia enim generis humani, in quibus ista luce frui coepit, bene comparantur primo diei quo fecit Deus lucem. Haec aetas tamquam infantia deputanda est ipsius universi saeculi, quod tamquam unum hominem proportione magnitudinis suae cogitare debemus; quia unusquisque homo cum primo nascitur, et exit ad lucem, primam aetatem agit infantiam. Haec tenditur ab Adam usque ad Noe generationibus decem. Quasi vespera huius diei fit diluvium; quia et infantia nostra tamquam oblivionis diluvio deletur.
For the first beginnings of the human race, in which it began to enjoy this light, are well compared to the first day on which God made light. This age is to be reckoned as the infancy, as it were, of the whole age of the world, which we ought to think of as one man in proportion to its greatness; because each man, when he is first born and comes forth to the light, passes the first age, infancy. This stretches from Adam to Noah, through ten generations. As the evening of this day comes the flood; because our infancy too is wiped out, as it were, by a flood of forgetfulness.
GenMani.1.23.35
Secunda aetas, similis pueritiae: a Noe ad Abraham.
The second age, like boyhood: from Noah to Abraham.
23. 36. 2.a AETAS. Et incipit mane a temporibus Noe secunda aetas tamquam pueritia, et tenditur haec aetas usque ad Abraham aliis generationibus decem. Et bene comparatur secundo diei quo factum est firmamentum inter aquam et aquam; quia et arca in qua erat Noe cum suis, firmamentum erat inter aquas inferiores in quibus natabat, et superiores quibus compluebatur. Haec aetas non diluvio deletur, quia et pueritia nostra non oblivione tergitur de memoria. Meminimus enim nos fuisse pueros, infantes autem non meminimus. Huius vespera est confusio linguarum in eis qui turrem faciebant, et fit mane ab Abraham. Sed nec ista aetas secunda generavit populum Dei, quia nec pueritia apta est ad generandum.
23. 36. SECOND AGE. And the morning begins from the times of Noah—the second age, like boyhood—and this age stretches to Abraham through another ten generations. And it is well compared to the second day on which the firmament was made between water and water; because the ark too, in which Noah was with his own, was a firmament between the lower waters in which it floated and the upper waters by which it was rained upon. This age is not wiped out by a flood, because our boyhood too is not wiped from memory by forgetfulness. For we remember that we were boys, but we do not remember being infants. The evening of this age is the confusion of tongues among those who were building the tower, and the morning comes from Abraham. But this second age too did not beget the people of God, because boyhood is not fit for begetting either.
GenMani.1.23.36
23. 37. 3.a AETAS. Mane ergo fit ab Abraham et succedit aetas tertia similis adolescentiae. Et bene comparatur diei tertio, quo ab aquis terra separata est. Ab omnibus enim gentibus, quarum error instabilis et vanis simulacrorum doctrinis tamquam ventis omnibus mobilis, maris nomine bene significatur; ab hac ergo gentium vanitate et huius saeculi fluctibus separatus est populus Dei per Abraham, tamquam terra cum apparuit arida, id est, sitiens imbrem coelestem divinorum mandatorum: qui populus unum Deum colendo, tamquam irrigata terra, ut fructus utiles posset afferre, Sanctas Scripturas et Prophetias accepit. Haec enim aetas potuit iam generare populum Deo, quia et tertia aetas, id est adolescentia filios habere iam potest.
23. 37. THIRD AGE. The morning, then, comes from Abraham, and the third age succeeds, like adolescence. And it is well compared to the third day, on which the earth was separated from the waters. For from all the nations—whose unsteady error, mobile like all winds by the empty teachings of idols, is well signified by the word sea—from this emptiness of the nations, then, and the waves of this world, the people of God was separated through Abraham, like the earth when it appeared dry, that is, thirsting for the heavenly rain of the divine commandments: which people, by worshiping one God, like a watered earth so that it could bear useful fruit, received the Holy Scriptures and Prophecies. For this age could already beget a people for God, because the third age too, that is, adolescence, can already have children.
GenMani.1.23.37
Et ideo ad Abraham dictum est: patrem multarum gentium posui te, et augeam te nimis valde, et ponam te in gentes, et reges de te exient. Et ponam testamentum meum inter me et te, et inter semen tuum post te, in generationes eorum in testamentum aeternum; ut sim tibi Deus, et semini tuo post te: et dabo tibi et semini tuo post te terram in qua habitas, omnem terram Chanaan in possessionem aeternam, et ero illis Deus (Gen 17, 5-8). Haec aetas porrigitur ab Abraham usque ad David quatuordecim generationibus. Huius vespera est in populi peccatis, quibus divina mandata praeteribant, usque ad malitiam pessimi regis Saül.
And therefore it was said to Abraham: I have set you as a father of many nations, and I will increase you very greatly, and I will set you among the nations, and kings will come forth from you. And I will set my covenant between me and you, and between your seed after you, throughout their generations, as an everlasting covenant; that I may be your God, and your seed's after you: and I will give to you and to your seed after you the land in which you dwell, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession, and I will be their God (Gen 17:5–8). This age extends from Abraham to David, through fourteen generations. Its evening is in the sins of the people, by which they transgressed the divine commandments, down to the wickedness of that worst king, Saul.
GenMani.1.23.37
Quarta aetas, similis iuventuti: a Davidis regno ad Babylonicam transmigrationem.
The fourth age, like young manhood: from the reign of David to the migration to Babylon.
23. 38. 4.a AETAS. Et inde fit mane regnum David. Haec aetas similis iuventutis est. Et revera inter omnes aetates regnat iuventus, et ipsa est firmum ornamentum omnium aetatum: et ideo bene comparatur quarto diei, quo facta sunt sidera in firmamento coeli. Quid enim evidentius significat splendorem regni, quam solis excellentia? Et plebem obtemperantem regno splendor lunae ostendit, tamquam synagogam ipsam, et stellae principes eius, et omnia tamquam in firmamento in regni stabilitate fundata. Huius quasi vespera est in peccatis regum, quibus illa gens meruit captivari atque servire.
23. 38. FOURTH AGE. And from there the morning comes—the reign of David. This age is like young manhood. And indeed, among all the ages, young manhood reigns, and it is itself the firm adornment of all the ages; and therefore it is well compared to the fourth day, on which the lights were made in the firmament of heaven. For what more clearly signifies the splendor of the kingdom than the excellence of the sun? And the splendor of the moon shows the people obeying the kingdom, as if the synagogue itself, and the stars its princes, and all founded as if in a firmament, in the stability of the kingdom. Its evening, as it were, is in the sins of the kings, by which that nation deserved to be taken captive and to serve.
GenMani.1.23.38
Quinta aetas, similis aetati mediae: a babylonica captivitate ad Christum.
The fifth age, like middle age: from the Babylonian captivity to Christ.
23. 39. 5.a AETAS. Et fit mane transmigratio in Babyloniam, cum in ea captivitate populus leniter in peregrino otio collocatus est. Et porrigitur haec aetas usque ad adventum Domini nostri Iesu Christi, id est quinta aetas, scilicet declinatio a iuventute ad senectutem, nondum senectus, sed iam non iuventus: quae senioris aetas est, quem Graeci vocant. Nam senex apud eos non [MISSING WORD], sed [MISSING WORD] dicitur. Et revera sic ista aetas a regni robore inclinata et fracta est in populo Iudaeorum, quemadmodum homo a iuventute fit senior.
23. 39. FIFTH AGE. And the morning comes—the migration to Babylon, when in that captivity the people was gently settled in a foreign repose. And this age extends to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, that is, the fifth age—namely, the decline from young manhood to old age, not yet old age but no longer young manhood: which is the age of the older man, whom the Greeks call presbytes. For among them an old man is not called geron but presbytes. And indeed this age was so bent down and broken from the vigor of the kingdom among the people of the Jews, just as a man passes from young manhood to being older.
GenMani.1.23.39
Et bene comparatur illi diei quinto, quo facta sunt in aquis animalia, et volatilia coeli, posteaquam illi homines inter gentes, tamquam in mari, vivere coeperunt, et habere incertam sedem et instabilem, sicut volantes aves. Sed plane erant ibi etiam ceti magni, id est illi magni homines qui magis dominari fluctibus saeculi, quam servire in illa captivitate potuerunt. Non enim ad cultum idolorum aliquo terrore depravati sunt. Ubi sane animadvertendum est quod benedixit Deus illa animalia, dicens: crescite et multiplicamini, et implete aquas maris, et volatilia multiplicentur super terram (Gen 1, 22): quia revera gens Iudaeorum, ex quo dispersa est per gentes, valde multiplicata est. Huius diei, hoc est huius aetatis, quasi vespera est multiplicatio peccatorum in populo Iudaeorum, quia sic excaecati sunt, ut etiam Dominum Iesum Christum non possent agnoscere.
And it is well compared to that fifth day, on which the animals were made in the waters, and the flying things of heaven, after those men began to live among the nations, as if in the sea, and to have an uncertain and unstable seat, like flying birds. But there were plainly there also great sea creatures, that is, those great men who were able to master the waves of the world rather than to serve in that captivity. For they were not perverted by any terror to the worship of idols. Here indeed it is to be noted that God blessed those animals, saying, increase and multiply, and fill the waters of the sea, and let the flying things multiply over the earth (Gen 1:22): because indeed the nation of the Jews, from the time it was scattered among the nations, was greatly multiplied. The evening of this day, that is, of this age, as it were, is the multiplication of sins among the people of the Jews, because they were so blinded that they could not even recognize the Lord Jesus Christ.
GenMani.1.23.39
Sexta aetas, similis senectuti: in ea nascitur homo novus, spiritalis.
The sixth age, like old age: in it the new, spiritual man is born.
23. 40. 6.a AETAS. Mane autem fit ex praedicatione Evangelii per Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, et finitur dies quintus: incipit sextus, in quo senectus veteris hominis apparet. Hac enim aetate illud carnale regnum vehementer attritum est, quando et templum deiectum est, et sacrificia ipsa cessaverunt; et nunc ea gens quantum ad regni sui vires attinet, quasi extremam vitam trahit. In ista tamen aetate tamquam in senectute veteris hominis, homo novus nascitur, qui iam spiritaliter vivit.
23. 40. SIXTH AGE. But the morning comes from the preaching of the Gospel through our Lord Jesus Christ, and the fifth day ends; the sixth begins, in which the old age of the old man appears. For in this age that carnal kingdom was vehemently worn down, when both the temple was cast down and the sacrifices themselves ceased; and now that nation, as far as the strength of its kingdom is concerned, drags out, as it were, its last span of life. Yet in this age, as in the old age of the old man, the new man is born, who now lives spiritually.
GenMani.1.23.40
Sexta enim die dictum erat: producat terra animam vivam (Gen 1, 24). Nam quinto die dictum erat: producant aquae, non animam vivam, sed reptilia animarum vivarum (Gen 1, 20); quoniam corpora sunt reptilia, et adhuc corporali circumcisione et sacrificiis tamquam in mari Gentium populus ille serviebat Legi. Istam vero animam vivam dicit, qua vita iam incipiunt aeterna desiderari.
For on the sixth day it was said, let the earth bring forth the living soul (Gen 1:24). For on the fifth day it was said, let the waters bring forth, not the living soul, but creeping things of living souls (Gen 1:20); since creeping things are bodies, and that people still served the Law, as if in the sea of the nations, by bodily circumcision and sacrifices. But here he says the living soul, by which life eternal things now begin to be desired.
GenMani.1.23.40
Serpentes ergo et pecora quae terra producit, gentes significant iam stabiliter Evangelio credituras. De quibus dicitur in illo vase quod Petro demonstratum est in Actibus Apostolorum: macta, et manduca (Act 10, 13). Et cum ille immunda diceret, responsum est ei: quae Deus mundavit, tu ne immunda dixeris (Act 10, 15).
The serpents, then, and the cattle that the earth brings forth signify the nations that are now going to believe the Gospel firmly. Of these it is said, in that vessel which was shown to Peter in the Acts of the Apostles: kill, and eat (Acts 10:13). And when he said they were unclean, it was answered to him, what God has cleansed, do not you call unclean (Acts 10:15).
GenMani.1.23.40
Tunc fit homo ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei, sicut in ista sexta aetate nascitur in carne Dominus noster, de quo dictum est per prophetam: et homo est, et quis agnoscet eum? (Hebr 2, 6) Et quemadmodum in illo die masculus et femina, sic et in ista aetate Christus et Ecclesia. Et praeponitur homo in illo die pecoribus et serpentibus et volatilibus coeli, sicut in ista aetate Christus regit animas obtemperantes sibi, quae ad Ecclesiam eius, partim de gentibus, partim de populo Iudaeorum venerunt; ut ab eo domarentur atque mansuescerent homines, vel carnali concupiscentiae dediti sicut pecora, vel tenebrosa curiositate obscurati quasi serpentes, vel elati superbia quasi aves.
Then man is made to the image and likeness of God, just as in this sixth age our Lord is born in the flesh, of whom it was said through the prophet, he is also man, and who will know him? (Heb 2:6) And just as on that day there was male and female, so too in this age there is Christ and the Church. And on that day man is set over the cattle and the serpents and the flying things of heaven, just as in this age Christ rules the souls that obey him, which have come to his Church partly from the nations, partly from the people of the Jews; so that by him men might be tamed and made gentle—whether given over to carnal desire like cattle, or darkened by gloomy curiosity like serpents, or lifted up by pride like birds.
GenMani.1.23.40
Et sicut in illo die pascitur homo et animalia, quae cum ipso sunt, herbis seminalibus et lignis fructiferis et herbis viridibus; sic ista aetate spiritalis homo quicumque bonus minister est Christi, et eum bene quantum potest imitatur, cum ipso populo spiritaliter pascitur Sanctarum Scripturarum alimentis et Lege divina: partim ad concipiendam fecunditatem rationum atque sermonum, tamquam herbis seminalibus; partim ad utilitatem morum conversationis humanae, tamquam lignis fructiferis; partim ad vigorem fidei, spei et caritatis in vitam aeternam, tamquam herbis viridibus, id est vigentibus, quae nullo aestu tribulationum possint arescere.
And just as on that day man and the animals that are with him are fed with seed-bearing plants and fruit-bearing trees and green plants, so in this age the spiritual man—whoever is a good minister of Christ, and imitates him well as far as he can—is fed spiritually, together with the people itself, on the nourishment of the Holy Scriptures and the divine Law: partly to conceive the fruitfulness of reasonings and discourses, as if by seed-bearing plants; partly for the benefit of the ways of human conduct, as if by fruit-bearing trees; partly for the vigor of faith, hope, and charity unto eternal life, as if by green plants, that is, flourishing ones, which can be parched by no heat of tribulations.
GenMani.1.23.40
Sed spiritalis sic istis alimentis pascitur, ut multa intellegat; carnalis autem, id est parvulus in Christo, tamquam pecus Dei, ut multa credat quae intellegere nondum potest: tamen eosdem cibos omnes habent.
But the spiritual man is fed on these nourishments so as to understand many things; whereas the carnal man, that is, the little one in Christ, like a beast of God, so as to believe many things he cannot yet understand: yet they all have the same foods.
GenMani.1.23.40
Vespera sextae aetatis reditus est Filii hominis super terram.
The evening of the sixth age is the return of the Son of man over the earth.
23. 41. 7.a AETAS. Huius autem aetatis quasi vespera, quae utinam nos non inveniat, si tamen nondum coepit, illa est de qua Dominus dicit: putas cum veniet Filius hominis, inveniet fidem super terram? (Lc 18, 8) Post istam vesperam fiet mane, cum ipse Dominus in claritate venturus est: tunc requiescent cum Christo ab omnibus operibus suis ii quibus dictum est: estote perfecti, sicut Pater vester qui in coelis est (Mt 5, 48). Tales enim faciunt opera "bona valde." Post enim talia opera speranda est requies in die septimo, qui vesperam non habet.
23. 41. SEVENTH AGE. But the evening, as it were, of this age—which may it not find us, if it has not yet begun—is that of which the Lord says, do you think that when the Son of man comes, he will find faith on the earth? (Luke 18:8) After this evening the morning will come, when the Lord himself is going to come in glory: then those will rest with Christ from all their works to whom it was said, be perfect, as your Father who is in heaven is perfect (Matt 5:48). For such men do works "very good." For after such works rest is to be hoped for in the seventh day, which has no evening.
GenMani.1.23.41
Nullo ergo modo verbis dici potest quemadmodum Deus fecerit, et condiderit coelum et terram et omnem creaturam quam condidit: sed ista expositio per ordinem dierum sic indicat tamquam historiam rerum factarum, ut praedicationem futurorum maxime observet.
In no way, then, can it be told in words how God made and founded heaven and earth and every creature that he founded; but this exposition through the order of the days indicates it as if it were a history of things done, in such a way as chiefly to observe the foretelling of things to come.
GenMani.1.23.41
Mundi aetates quare inaequales.
Why the ages of the world are unequal.
24. 42. Si autem aliquem movet quod in istis aetatibus saeculi duas aetates primas denis generationibus advertimus explicari, tres autem consequentes singulae quatuordecim generationibus contexuntur, sexta vero ista nullo generationum numero definita est (Mt 1, 1); facile est videre, etiam in unoquoque homine duas primas aetates, infantiam et pueritiam, corporis sensibus inhaerere. Qui sensus corporis quinque sunt, visus, auditus, olfactus, gustus et tactus: quinarius autem numerus duplicatus, quoniam duplex est sexus humanus, unde generationes tales existunt, masculinus et femininus; quinarius ergo, ut dixi, duplicatus denarium numerum facit.
24. 42. But if anyone is troubled that in these ages of the world we observe the first two ages unfolded in ten generations each, while the three following are each woven of fourteen generations, and this sixth is defined by no number of generations (Matt 1:1), it is easy to see that in each individual man too the first two ages, infancy and boyhood, cling to the senses of the body. These bodily senses are five: sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch; and the number five doubled—since the human sex, from which such generations arise, is twofold, male and female—the number five, then, as I said, doubled makes the number ten.
GenMani.1.24.42
Iamvero ab adolescentia et deinceps, ubi ratio iam incipit in homine praevalere, accedit quinque sensibus cognitio et actio, quibus vita regitur et administratur, ut iam septenarius numerus incipiat esse: qui similiter duplicatus, propter duplicem sexum, in quatuordecim generationibus eminet et apparet, quas habent tres aetates consequentes, tamquam adolescentis, et iuvenis, et senioris. Senectutis vero aetas sicut in nobis nullo statuto annorum tempore definitur, sed post quinque illas aetates quantum quisque vixerit, senectuti deputatur: sic et in ista aetate saeculi non apparent generationes, ut etiam occultus sit ultimus dies, quem utiliter Dominus latere oportere demonstravit (Cf. Mt 24, 36).
But from adolescence onward, where reason now begins to prevail in man, there are added to the five senses knowledge and action, by which life is ruled and administered, so that now the number seven begins to be: which, likewise doubled, on account of the twofold sex, stands out and appears in the fourteen generations that the three following ages have, namely those of the adolescent, the young man, and the older man. But the age of old age, just as in us it is defined by no fixed term of years, but, after those five ages, however long each one lives is reckoned to old age, so too in this age of the world the generations do not appear, so that the last day is also hidden, which the Lord usefully showed ought to lie concealed (See Matt 24:36).
GenMani.1.24.42
Septem dierum altior allegoria.
A deeper allegory of the seven days.
25. 43. Habet etiam unusquisque nostrum in bonis operibus et recta vita tamquam distinctos istos sex dies, post quos debet quietem sperare.
25. 43. Each one of us also has, in good works and a right life, these six days as if distinct, after which he ought to hope for rest.
GenMani.1.25.43
Primo die lucem fidei, quando prius visibilibus credit, propter quam fidem Dominus visibiliter apparere dignatus est.
On the first day, the light of faith, when he first believes in visible things, for the sake of which faith the Lord deigned to appear visibly.
GenMani.1.25.43
Secundo die tamquam firmamentum disciplinae, quo discernit inter carnalia et spiritalia, sicut inter aquas inferiores et superiores.
On the second day, as it were the firmament of discipline, by which he discerns between carnal and spiritual things, as between the lower and the upper waters.
GenMani.1.25.43
Tertio die, quo mentem suam ad ferendos bonorum operum fructus, a labe et fluctibus tentationum carnalium, tamquam aridam terram a perturbationibus maris secernit, ut iam possit dicere: mente servio Legi Dei, carne autem Legi peccati (Rom 7, 25).
On the third day, by which he separates his mind, in order to bear the fruits of good works, from the corruption and waves of carnal temptations, as the dry land from the disturbances of the sea, so that he can now say, with my mind I serve the Law of God, but with my flesh the law of sin (Rom 7:25).
GenMani.1.25.43
Quarto die, quo iam in illo firmamento disciplinae spiritales intellegentias operatur atque distinguit, videt quae sit incommutabilis veritas, quae tamquam sol fulget in anima; et quemadmodum anima ipsius veritatis particeps fiat, et corpori ordinem et pulchritudinem praestet, tamquam luna illuminans noctem; et quemadmodum stellae omnes, scilicet intellegentiae spiritales, in huius vitae obscuritate tamquam in nocte micent et fulgeant.
On the fourth day, by which he now works and distinguishes spiritual understandings in that firmament of discipline, he sees what the unchangeable truth is, which shines like the sun in the soul; and how the soul becomes a partaker of that very truth, and furnishes order and beauty to the body, like the moon illuminating the night; and how all the stars—namely, the spiritual understandings—glitter and shine in the obscurity of this life, as in the night.
GenMani.1.25.43
Quarum rerum notitia fortior effectus incipiat quinto die in actionibus turbulentissimi saeculi, tamquam in aquis maris operari, propter utilitatem fraternae societatis; et de corporalibus actionibus, quae ad ipsum mare pertinent, id est ad hanc vitam, producere "animarum vivarum reptilia," id est opera quae prosint animis vivis; et "cetos magnos," id est fortissimas actiones, quibus fluctus saeculi dirumpuntur et contemnuntur, et "volatilia coeli," id est voces coelestia praedicantes.
Made stronger by the knowledge of these things, let him begin on the fifth day to work in the actions of this most turbulent world, as if in the waters of the sea, for the benefit of the brotherly fellowship; and from bodily actions, which pertain to the sea itself, that is, to this life, to bring forth "creeping things of living souls," that is, works that profit living souls; and "great sea creatures," that is, the strongest actions, by which the waves of the world are broken and despised; and "the flying things of heaven," that is, voices preaching heavenly things.
GenMani.1.25.43
Sexto autem die producat "de terra animam vivam," id est de ipsa stabilitate mentis suae ubi spiritales habet fructus, id est bonas cogitationes, motus omnes animi sui regat, ut sit in illo "anima viva," id est rationi et iustitiae serviens, non temeritati atque peccato. Ita fiat etiam homo ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei, masculus et femina, id est intellectus et actio, quorum copulatione spiritalis fetus terram impleat, id est carnem subiciat, et caetera quae iam in hominis perfectione superius dicta sunt. In istis autem tamquam diebus vespera est in ipsa perfectione singulorum operum, et mane in inchoatione consequentium.
But on the sixth day let him bring forth "the living soul from the earth," that is, from the very stability of his mind, where he has spiritual fruits, that is, good thoughts; let him rule all the movements of his soul, so that there may be in him "a living soul," that is, one serving reason and justice, not rashness and sin. So let man too be made to the image and likeness of God, male and female, that is, understanding and action, by whose union a spiritual offspring may fill the earth, that is, may subject the flesh, and the rest that was already said above concerning the perfection of man. But in these days, as it were, evening is in the very perfection of each work, and morning in the beginning of those that follow.
GenMani.1.25.43
Post istorum quasi sex dierum opera bona valde, speret homo quietem perpetuam, et intellegat quid sit: requievit Deus septimo die ab omnibus operibus suis (Gen 2, 2): quia et ipse in nobis haec bona operatur, qui ut operemur iubet; et ipse recte requiescere dicitur, quia post haec omnia opera requiem nobis ipse praestabit. Quomodo enim recte dicitur paterfamilias aedificare domum, cum hoc non opere suo faciat, sed eorum quibus servientibus imperat; sic recte dicitur et ab operibus requiescere, cum post perfectionem fabricae, illis quibus imperabat permittit ut vacent, et iucundo otio perfruantur.
After the works very good of these, as it were, six days, let man hope for perpetual rest, and understand what this is: God rested on the seventh day from all his works (Gen 2:2): because he himself works these good things in us, who commands us to work; and he himself is rightly said to rest, because after all these works he himself will grant us rest. For just as a householder is rightly said to build a house, when he does this not by his own work but by the work of those whom he commands as they serve him, so too he is rightly said to rest from his works, when, after the completion of the building, he permits those whom he commanded to be at leisure and to enjoy a pleasant repose.
GenMani.1.25.43
Bk. 2A recitation of the second chapter of Genesis.Recitatio secundi Geneseos capitis.
1. 1. Post enumerationem et expositionem dierum septem, interposita est quasi quaedam conclusio, et appellatus est liber creaturae coeli et terrae, quidquid superius dictum est, cum sit parva pars libri: sed ideo sic meruit vocari, quia universi saeculi a capite usque ad finem quasi brevis quaedam imago in his diebus septem figurata est. Deinde incipit de homine diligentius narrari. Quae omnis narratio non aperte, sed figurate explicatur, ut exerceat mentes quaerentium veritatem, et spiritali negotio a negotiis carnalibus avocet. Sic enim se continet:
1. 1. After the enumeration and exposition of the seven days, a kind of conclusion was interposed, and whatever was said above was called the book of the creation of heaven and earth, though it is a small part of the book; but it deserved to be so called because the whole age of the world, from beginning to end, was figured, as it were, in a brief image in these seven days. Then it begins to be narrated more diligently concerning man. This whole narration is set forth not openly but figuratively, so that it may exercise the minds of those who seek the truth and may call them away by spiritual business from carnal business. For it runs thus:
GenMani.2.1.1
hic est liber creaturae coeli et terrae, cum factus esset dies quo fecit Deus coelum et terram, et omnia viridia agri, antequam essent super terram, et omne pabulum agri, antequam germinaret. Nondum enim pluerat Deus super terram, nec erat homo qui operaretur in ea. Fons autem ascendebat de terra, et irrigabat omnem faciem terrae. Et tunc finxit Deus hominem de limo terrae, et insufflavit in faciem eius flatum vitae, et factus est homo in animam viventem. Et tunc plantavit Deus paradisum in Eden ad orientem, et posuit ibi hominem quem finxerat. Et produxit adhuc Deus de terra omne lignum formosum ad aspectum, et bonum ad escam: et lignum vitae plantavit in medio paradisi, et lignum scientiae boni et mali.
this is the book of the creation of heaven and earth, when the day was made on which God made heaven and earth, and all the green things of the field, before they were upon the earth, and all the fodder of the field, before it sprang up. For God had not yet rained upon the earth, nor was there a man to work in it. But a fountain went up from the earth and watered all the face of the earth. And then God formed man from the slime of the earth, and breathed into his face the breath of life, and the man was made into a living soul. And then God planted a paradise in Eden toward the east, and placed there the man whom he had formed. And God further brought forth from the earth every tree beautiful to look upon and good for food: and the tree of life he planted in the midst of paradise, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
GenMani.2.1.1
Flumen autem prodibat ex Eden, et irrigabat paradisum: quod inde dividitur in quatuor partes. Nomen uni Phison; hoc est quod circuit totam terram Evilath, ibi est aurum, aurum autem terrae illius optimum; ibi est carbunculus et lapis prasinus. Et nomen secundi fluminis Geon; hoc circuit totam terram Aethiopiae. Et flumen tertium Tigris; hoc est quod vadit contra Assyrios. Et flumen quartum dicitur Euphrates.
And a river went forth from Eden, and watered paradise: from there it is divided into four parts. The name of one is Pishon; this is the one that goes around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold, and the gold of that land is the best; there are the carbuncle and the green stone. And the name of the second river is Gihon; this goes around the whole land of Ethiopia. And the third river is the Tigris; this is the one that goes toward the Assyrians. And the fourth river is called the Euphrates.
GenMani.2.1.1
Et sumpsit Dominus Deus hominem quem fecerat, et posuit eum in Paradiso, ut operaretur ibi, et custodiret eum. Et praecepit Dominus Deus Adae, dicens: 'ex omni ligno quod est in paradiso, edes ad escam; de ligno autem scientiae boni et mali non edetis ab eo: qua die enim ederitis ab illo, morte moriemini.'
And the Lord God took the man whom he had made, and placed him in paradise, to work there and to keep it. And the Lord God commanded Adam, saying: 'of every tree that is in paradise, you will eat for food; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat from it: for on the day you eat from it, you will die the death.'
GenMani.2.1.1
Et dixit Dominus Deus: 'non est bonum esse hominem solum, faciamus ei adiutorium simile sibi.' Et quaecumque finxerat Deus ex omni genere pecorum, et ex omni genere bestiarum agri, et ex omni genere volatilium volantium sub coelo, perduxit ea ad Adam, ut videret quid ea vocaret: et quod vocavit ea omnia Adam animam vivam, hoc est nomen eius. Et post haec vocavit Adam nomina omnium pecorum, et omnium avium coeli, et omnium bestiarum agri; et secundum quod vocavit ea Adam, hoc est nomen eorum usque in hodiernum diem.
And the Lord God said: 'it is not good for the man to be alone; let us make for him a helper like himself.' And whatever God had formed of every kind of cattle, and of every kind of beast of the field, and of every kind of flying thing flying under heaven, he brought to Adam, to see what he would call them: and whatever Adam called every living soul, that is its name. And after these things Adam called the names of all the cattle, and of all the birds of heaven, and of all the beasts of the field; and according to what Adam called them, that is their name to this present day.
GenMani.2.1.1
Ipsi autem Adae nondum fuit adiutorium simile illi. Et immisit Deus soporem in Adam, et obdormivit: et sumpsit Deus unam de costis eius, et implevit locum eius carne, et formavit Deus costam quam accepit ab Adam in mulierem. Et adduxit illam ad Adam, ut videret quid eam vocaret. Et dixit Adam, Hoc nunc os ex ossibus meis, et caro de carne mea: 'haec vocabitur mulier, quoniam de viro suo sumpta est; et haec erit mihi adiutorium.' Propter hoc relinquet homo patrem et matrem, et adiungetur uxori suae; et erunt duo in carne una. Et erant ambo nudi, Adam et mulier eius, et non confundebantur (Gen 2, 4-25).
But for Adam himself there was not yet a helper like himself. And God sent a deep sleep upon Adam, and he fell asleep: and God took one of his ribs, and filled its place with flesh, and God formed the rib that he had taken from Adam into a woman. And he brought her to Adam, to see what he would call her. And Adam said, This now is bone from my bones, and flesh from my flesh: 'she will be called woman, because she was taken from her man; and she will be a helper to me.' For this reason a man will leave his father and mother, and will join himself to his wife; and the two will be in one flesh. And they were both naked, Adam and his wife, and were not ashamed (Gen 2:4–25).
GenMani.2.1.1
Recitatio tertii Geneseos capitis.
A recitation of the third chapter of Genesis.
1. 2. Serpens autem erat sapientior omnium bestiarum, quae erant super terram, quas fecerat Dominus Deus. Et dixit serpens ad mulierem: 'quare dixit Deus ne edatis ab omni ligno quod est in paradiso?' Et dixit mulier ad serpentem: 'ex omni ligno quod est in paradiso edemus; a fructu autem ligni quod est in medio paradisi, dixit Deus ne edamus, sed neque tangamus, ne moriamur.' Et dixit serpens mulieri: 'non morte moriemini; sciebat enim Deus quia qua die manducaveritis ex illo, aperientur oculi vestri, et eritis sicut dii, scientes bonum et malum.'
1. 2. Now the serpent was wiser than all the beasts that were upon the earth, which the Lord God had made. And the serpent said to the woman: 'why did God say you should not eat from every tree that is in paradise?' And the woman said to the serpent: 'of every tree that is in paradise we shall eat; but of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of paradise, God said we should not eat, nor even touch, lest we die.' And the serpent said to the woman: 'you will not die the death; for God knew that on the day you eat from it, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like gods, knowing good and evil.'
GenMani.2.1.1
Et vidit mulier quia bonum est lignum in escam, et quia bonum est oculis ad videndum et cognoscendum; et sumpsit fructum de ligno illo, et manducavit, et dedit viro suo; et accepit Adam, et manducavit: et aperti sunt oculi eorum, et tunc scierunt quia nudi erant; et sumpserunt sibi folia fici, et fecerunt sibi succinctoria. Et cum audissent vocem Domini deambulantis in Paradiso ad vesperam, absconderunt se Adam et mulier eius ab ante faciem Domini Dei, ad illam arborem quae erat in medio Paradiso.
And the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was good to the eyes for seeing and knowing; and she took the fruit from that tree, and ate, and gave to her husband; and Adam received it, and ate: and their eyes were opened, and then they knew that they were naked; and they took fig leaves for themselves, and made themselves girdles. And when they had heard the voice of the Lord walking in paradise toward evening, Adam and his wife hid themselves from before the face of the Lord God, by that tree which was in the midst of paradise.
GenMani.2.1.1
Et vocavit Dominus Deus Adam, et dixit illi: 'Adam, ubi es?' Et dixit ille: 'vocem tuam audivi, Domine, in Paradiso, et timui, et abscondi me, quia nudus sum.' Et dixit Dominus Deus: 'quis nuntiavit tibi, quia nudus es, nisi quia ab illa arbore de qua dixeram tibi ex illa sola non manducare, ex illa manducasti?' Et dixit Adam: 'mulier quam dedisti mihi, dedit ut ederem, et manducavi.' Et dixit Deus mulieri: 'quid hoc fecisti?' Et dixit mulier: 'Serpens seduxit me, et manducavi.'
And the Lord God called Adam, and said to him: 'Adam, where are you?' And he said: 'I heard your voice, Lord, in paradise, and I was afraid, and I hid myself, because I am naked.' And the Lord God said: 'who told you that you are naked, unless it is that you have eaten from that tree of which I had told you, of that one alone, not to eat?' And Adam said: 'the woman whom you gave me, gave it to me to eat, and I ate.' And God said to the woman: 'why have you done this?' And the woman said: 'the serpent seduced me, and I ate.'
GenMani.2.1.1
Et dixit Dominus Deus serpenti: 'quia hoc fecisti, maledictus tu ab omni pecore, et omni genere bestiarum. Pectore et ventre repes, et terram manducabis omnibus diebus vitae tuae. Et inimicitiam ponam inter te et mulierem, et inter semen tuum, et inter semen illius. Ipsa tuum observabit caput, et tu eius calcaneum.'
And the Lord God said to the serpent: 'because you have done this, you are cursed among all cattle, and among every kind of beast. Upon your breast and belly you will crawl, and you will eat earth all the days of your life. And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed. She will watch your head, and you her heel.'
GenMani.2.1.1
Et mulieri dixit: 'multiplicans multiplicabo dolores tuos, et suspiria tua, et in doloribus paries filios tuos; et ad virum tuum conversio tua, et ille tui dominabitur.'
And to the woman he said: 'multiplying I will multiply your sorrows and your sighs, and in sorrows you will bear your children; and your turning will be toward your husband, and he will have dominion over you.'
GenMani.2.1.1
Et tunc dixit Deus ad Adam: 'quia audisti vocem mulieris tuae, et manducasti de ligno de quo praeceperam tibi, ex illo solo ne ederes, maledicta terra erit tibi in omnibus operibus tuis, et in tristitia et gemitu tuo manducabis ex ea omnibus diebus vitae tuae. Spinas et tribulos germinabit tibi, et edes pabulum agri tui. In sudore vultus tui edes panem tuum, donec revertaris in terram, de qua sumptus es; quia terra es, et in terram ibis.'
And then God said to Adam: 'because you have heard the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree of which I had commanded you, of that one alone, not to eat, the earth will be cursed for you in all your works, and in your sorrow and groaning you will eat of it all the days of your life. It will bring forth thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the fodder of your field. In the sweat of your face you will eat your bread, until you return to the earth from which you were taken; for earth you are, and to earth you will go.'
GenMani.2.1.1
Et tunc Adam imposuit nomen uxori suae, Vita; quia mater est omnium vivorum. Et tunc fecit Dominus Deus Adae et mulieri eius tunicas pelliceas, et induit illos. Et dixit: 'ecce Adam factus est tamquam unus ex nobis, ad scientiam cognoscendi bonum et malum.' Et tunc ne porrigeret manum suam Adam ad arborem vitae et sumeret sibi inde, et ederet et viveret in aeternum, dimisit eum Dominus Deus de Paradiso suavitatis, ut operaretur terram de qua et sumptus fuerat. Et eiectus foras de Paradiso, moratus est contra paradisum voluptatis. Et Cherubim et illam flammeam frameam quae versatur, posuit Deus ad custodiendam viam arboris vitae (Gen 3, 1, 24).
And then Adam gave a name to his wife, Life; because she is the mother of all the living. And then the Lord God made for Adam and his wife garments of skins, and clothed them. And he said: 'behold, Adam has become like one of us, in the knowledge of recognizing good and evil.' And then, lest Adam stretch out his hand to the tree of life and take from it, and eat and live forever, the Lord God sent him out of the paradise of delight, to work the earth from which he had been taken. And cast out of paradise, he dwelt opposite the paradise of pleasure. And God set the Cherubim and that flaming sword which turns, to guard the way of the tree of life (Gen 3:1–24).
GenMani.2.1.1
Genesis ad litteram ubique nequit exponi.
Genesis cannot everywhere be expounded literally.
2. 3. Haec secreta verborum si non reprehendentes et accusantes, sed quaerentes et reverentes Manichaei mallent discutere, non essent utique Manichaei; sed daretur petentibus, et quaerentes invenirent, et pulsantibus aperiretur (Cf. Mt 7, 7). Plures enim quaestiones in hoc sermone proponunt, qui diligentia pia quaerunt, quam isti miseri atque impii: sed hoc interest, quod illi quaerunt ut inveniant, isti nihil laborant, nisi non invenire quod quaerunt.
2. 3. If the Manichees preferred to examine these hidden things of the words, not finding fault and accusing, but seeking and revering, they would surely not be Manichees; but it would be given to those who ask, and those who seek would find, and to those who knock it would be opened (See Matt 7:7). For those who seek with devout diligence propose more questions in this passage than these wretched and impious men do; but the difference is this, that they seek in order to find, while these labor at nothing except not to find what they seek.
GenMani.2.2.3
Hic ergo totus sermo primo secundum historiam discutiendus est, deinde secundum prophetiam. Secundum historiam facta narrantur, secundum prophetiam futura praenuntiantur. Sane quisquis voluerit omnia quae dicta sunt, secundum litteram accipere, id est non aliter intellegere quam littera sonat, et potuerit evitare blasphemias, et omnia congruentia fidei Catholicae praedicare, non solum ei non est invidendum, sed praecipuus multumque laudabilis intellector habendus est.
This whole passage, then, must first be examined according to history, then according to prophecy. According to history, deeds are narrated; according to prophecy, things to come are foretold. To be sure, whoever wishes to take everything that has been said according to the letter, that is, to understand it no otherwise than the letter sounds, and is able to avoid blasphemies and to proclaim everything in agreement with the Catholic faith, is not only not to be begrudged, but is to be held an outstanding and highly praiseworthy interpreter.
GenMani.2.2.3
Si autem nullus exitus datur, ut pie et digne Deo quae scripta sunt intellegantur, nisi figurate atque in aenigmatibus proposita ista credamus; habentes auctoritatem apostolicam, a quibus tam multa de libris Veteris Testamenti solvuntur aenigmata, modum quem intendimus teneamus, adiuvante illo qui nos petere, quaerere et pulsare adhortatur;
But if no way out is given by which the things written may be understood devoutly and worthily of God, unless we believe these things to have been set forth figuratively and in riddles—having apostolic authority, by whom so many riddles from the books of the Old Testament are solved—let us hold to the manner we intend, with the help of him who exhorts us to ask, to seek, and to knock;
GenMani.2.2.3
ut omnes istas figuras rerum secundum catholicam fidem, sive quae ad historiam, sive quae ad prophetiam pertinent, explicemus, non praeiudicantes meliori diligentiorique tractatui, sive per nos, sive per alios quibus Dominus revelare dignatur.
so that we may explain all these figures of things according to the Catholic faith, whether those pertaining to history or those pertaining to prophecy, without prejudging a better and more diligent treatment, whether by us or by others to whom the Lord deigns to reveal it.
GenMani.2.2.3
Quid viride agri (Gen 2, 5) designet.
What "the green of the field" (Genesis 2:5) designates.
3. 4. Factus est ergo dies, quo die fecit Deus coelum et terram, et omne viride agri, antequam essent super terram, et omne pabulum agri (Gen 2, 5). Superius septem dies numerantur, nunc unus dicitur dies, quo die fecit Deus coelum et terram, et omne viride agri, et omne pabulum, cuius diei nomine omne tempus significari bene intellegitur. Fecit enim Deus omne tempus simul cum omnibus creaturis temporalibus, quae creaturae visibiles coeli et terrae nomine significantur. Movere autem nos debet ad quaerendum, quod cum diem, qui factus est, et coelum, et terram nominasset adiecit etiam, viride agri, et omne pabulum.
3. 4. The day was made, then, on which day God made heaven and earth, and all the green of the field, before they were upon the earth, and all the fodder of the field (Gen 2:5). Above, seven days are numbered; now one day is spoken of, on which day God made heaven and earth, and all the green of the field, and all the fodder—by the name of which day all time is rightly understood to be signified. For God made all time together with all the temporal creatures, which visible creatures are signified by the name heaven and earth. But it ought to move us to inquire that, when he had named the day that was made, and heaven, and earth, he also added, the green of the field, and all the fodder.
GenMani.2.2.3
Non enim quando dictum est: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram, tunc dictum est, factum esse omne viride agri et pabulum: manifeste enim legitur, quod tertio die factum est omne viride et pabulum agri. Quod autem dictum est: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram, non pertinet ad aliquem dierum ex illis septem diebus. Adhuc enim vel materiam ipsam unde facta sunt omnia, coeli et terrae nomine nuncupabat: vel certe prius totam creaturam, coeli et terrae nomine proposuerat dicendo: in principio fecit Deus coelum et terram; et postea particulatim per ordinem dierum sicut oportebat, propter prophetiam, quam in primo libro commemoravimus (Cf. lib. 1, 23-42), Dei opera exsecutus exposuit.
For when it was said, in the beginning God made heaven and earth, it was not then said that all the green of the field and the fodder were made: for it is plainly read that on the third day all the green and fodder of the field was made. But what was said, in the beginning God made heaven and earth, does not pertain to any of those seven days. For he was still calling, by the name of heaven and earth, either the very matter from which all things were made, or else he had first set forth the whole creation by the name of heaven and earth, by saying, in the beginning God made heaven and earth; and afterward, piece by piece, through the order of the days as was fitting, on account of the prophecy which we mentioned in the first book (See bk. 1, 23–42), he set forth in order the works of God.
GenMani.2.2.3
Quid sibi ergo vult quod nunc nominato coelo et terra, addidit, viride agri et pabulum, et tacuit caetera tam multa, quae sunt in coelo et in terra, vel etiam in mari; nisi quia viride agri invisibilem creaturam vult intellegi, sicut est anima? Ager enim solet in Scripturis figurate mundus appellari. Nam et ipse Dominus: ager est hic, inquit, mundus (Mt 13, 38), cum illam parabolam exponeret, ubi bono semini sunt commixta zizania. Viride ergo agri spiritalem atque invisibilem creaturam dicit, propter vigorem vitae, et nomine pabuli utique propter vitam bene hoc ipsum interpretamur.
What does it mean, then, that, having now named heaven and earth, he added, the green of the field and the fodder, and was silent about the rest, so many things that are in heaven and on earth, or even in the sea—unless it is that by the green of the field he wants an invisible creature to be understood, such as the soul is? For the field is accustomed in the Scriptures to be called figuratively the world. For the Lord himself says, the field is the world (Matt 13:38), when he was expounding that parable in which the weeds were mingled with the good seed. By the green of the field, then, he means the spiritual and invisible creature, on account of the vigor of its life; and by the name fodder, likewise, on account of life, we rightly interpret this same thing.
GenMani.2.2.3
3. 5. Deinde quod addidit, antequam essent super terram, intellegitur antequam anima peccaret. Terrenis enim cupiditatibus sordidata, tamquam super terram nata, vel super terram esse, recte dicitur: ideoque addidit: nondum enim pluerat Deus super terra.
3. 5. Then, in that he added, before they were upon the earth, it is understood to mean before the soul sinned. For when it is soiled with earthly desires, the soul is rightly said to be, as it were, born upon the earth, or to be upon the earth; and so he added, for God had not yet rained upon the earth.
GenMani.2.3.5
Quid sibi velit illud Gen 2, 5: nondum pluerat super terram.
What is meant by Genesis 2:5: he had not yet rained upon the earth.
4. 5. Quia et nunc viride agri Deus facit, sed pluendo super terram, id est, facit animas revirescere per verbum suum; sed de nubibus eas irrigat, id est de Scripturis prophetarum et apostolorum. Recte autem appellantur nubes, quia verba ista quae sonant et percusso aere transeunt, addita etiam obscuritate allegoriarum quasi aliqua caligine obducta, velut nubes fiunt: quae dum tractando exprimuntur, bene intellegentibus tamquam imber veritatis infunditur.
4. 5. For even now God makes the green of the field, but by raining upon the earth, that is, he makes souls grow green again through his word; but he waters them from the clouds, that is, from the Scriptures of the prophets and apostles. And they are rightly called clouds, because these words, which sound and pass away when the air is struck, with the obscurity of allegories added as well, as if overlaid with a certain mist, become, as it were, clouds: which, when they are expressed by examination, are poured out, for those who understand well, like a shower of truth.
GenMani.2.4.5
Sed hoc nondum erat antequam anima peccaret; id est, antequam viride agri esset super terram. Nondum enim pluerat Deus super terram, nec erat homo qui operaretur in ea (Gen 2, 5). Laboranti enim homini in terra imber de nubibus est necessarius, de quibus nubibus iam dictum est. Post peccatum autem homo laborare coepit in terra, et necessarias habere illas nubes. Ante peccatum vero, cum viride agri et pabulum fecisset Deus, quo nomine invisibilem creaturam significari diximus, irrigabat eam fonte interiore, loquens in intellectum eius: ut non extrinsecus verba exciperet, tamquam ex supradictis nubibus pluviam; sed fonte suo, hoc est de intimis suis manante veritate, satiaretur.
But this was not yet so before the soul sinned; that is, before the green of the field was upon the earth. For God had not yet rained upon the earth, nor was there a man to work in it (Gen 2:5). For to a man laboring on the earth, a shower from the clouds is necessary, of which clouds it has already been said. But after sin, man began to labor on the earth and to have need of those clouds. Before sin, however, when God had made the green of the field and the fodder—by which name we said an invisible creature is signified—he watered it by an inner fountain, speaking into its understanding: so that it did not receive words from without, like rain from the aforesaid clouds, but was satisfied by its own fountain, that is, by truth flowing from its inmost parts.
GenMani.2.4.5
Fons irrigans terram (Gen 2, 6) allegorice.
The fountain watering the earth (Genesis 2:6) allegorically.
5. 6. Fons enim ascendebat, inquit, de terra, et irrigabat omnem faciem terrae (Gen 2, 6). De terra scilicet de qua dicitur: spes mea es tu, portio mea in terra viventium (Ps 141, 6). Quando autem anima tali fonte irrigabatur, nondum per superbiam "proiecerat intima sua." Initium enim superbiae hominis apostatare a Deo (Eccli 10, 14). Et quoniam in exteriora per superbiam tumescens coepit non irrigari fonte intimo, bene insultatur illi verbis propheticis, et dicitur: quid superbit terra et cinis? Quoniam in vita sua proiecit intima sua (Eccli 10, 9-10).
5. 6. For a fountain, he says, went up from the earth, and watered all the face of the earth (Gen 2:6). From the earth, namely, of which it is said, you are my hope, my portion in the land of the living (Ps 142:6 (141:6)). But when the soul was watered by such a fountain, it had not yet, through pride, "cast away its inmost parts." For the beginning of man's pride is to fall away from God (Sir 10:14). And since, swelling outward through pride, it began not to be watered by the inmost fountain, it is rightly mocked with the words of the prophet, and it is said, why is earth and ashes proud? Because in his life he has cast away his inmost parts (Sir 10:9–10).
GenMani.2.4.5
Quid est enim superbia aliud, nisi deserto secretario conscientiae foris videri velle quod non est? Et ideo laborans iam in terra necessariam habet pluviam de nubibus, id est doctrinam de humanis verbis, ut etiam hoc modo possit ab illa ariditate revirescere, et iterum fieri viride agri.
For what else is pride than, with the inner chamber of conscience abandoned, to wish to appear outwardly what one is not? And therefore, now laboring on the earth, it has need of rain from the clouds, that is, of teaching from human words, so that even in this way it may grow green again from that dryness, and may again become the green of the field.
GenMani.2.4.5
Sed utinam vel pluviam veritatis de ipsis nubibus libenter excipiat. Nam propter illam Dominus noster nubilum carnis nostrae dignatus assumere, imbrem sancti Evangelii largissimum infudit, promittens etiam quod si quis biberit de aqua eius, rediet ad illum intimum fontem, ut forinsecus non quaerat pluviam. Dicit enim: fiet in eo fons aquae salientis in vitam aeternam (Io 4, 14). Iste, credo, fons ante peccatum ascendebat de terra, et irrigabat omnem faciem terrae, quia interior erat, et nubium non desiderabat auxilium: nondum enim pluerat Deus super terram, nec erat homo qui operaretur in ea (Gen 2, 5). Cum enim dixisset: nondum enim pluerat Deus super terram, subiecit et causam quare nondum pluerat: quia non erat homo qui operaretur in ea.
But would that it might at least gladly receive the rain of truth from those very clouds. For on its account our Lord deigned to take on the cloud of our flesh, and poured out a most abundant shower of the holy Gospel, promising too that if anyone drinks of his water, he will return to that inmost fountain, so that he need not seek rain from without. For he says, it will become in him a fountain of water springing up unto eternal life (John 4:14). This fountain, I believe, before sin went up from the earth and watered all the face of the earth, because it was within and did not desire the help of clouds: for God had not yet rained upon the earth, nor was there a man to work in it (Gen 2:5). For when he had said, for God had not yet rained upon the earth, he subjoined also the cause why he had not yet rained: because there was no man to work in it.
GenMani.2.4.5
Tunc autem homo coepit operari in terra, cum post peccatum de beata vita dimissus est, qua in paradiso fruebatur. Sic enim scriptum est: et dimisit eum Dominus Deus de paradiso suavitatis, ut operaretur terram de qua et sumptus fuerat (Gen 2, 2): unde suo loco requiremus (Cf. cap. 22). Quod nunc ad hoc commemoravi, ut intellegeremus laboranti homini in terra, id est in peccatorum ariditate constituto, necessariam esse de humanis verbis divinam doctrinam, tamquam de nubibus pluviam. Talis autem scientia destruetur. Videmus enim nunc in aenigmate, tamquam in nubilo saginam quaerentes: tunc autem facie ad faciem (Cf. 1 Cor 13, 8-12), quando universa facies terrae nostrae interiore fonte aquae salientis irrigabitur. Nam si fontem aliquem huius visibilis aquae voluerimus intellegere, de quo dictum est: fons autem ascendebat de terra, et irrigabat omnem faciem terrae (Gen 2, 6); non est verisimile quod cum tam multi fontes perennes, sive rivorum, sive fluviorum per universam terram inveniantur, solus ille siccaverit, qui irrigabat omnem faciem terrae.
But man began to work on the earth when, after sin, he was sent away from the blessed life, which he enjoyed in paradise. For so it is written: and the Lord God sent him out of the paradise of delight, to work the earth from which he had been taken (Gen 3:23): which we will inquire into in its place (See ch. 22). I have now mentioned this for the purpose that we might understand that for a man laboring on the earth, that is, set in the dryness of sins, divine teaching from human words is necessary, like rain from the clouds. But such knowledge will be destroyed. For now we see in a riddle, as if seeking sustenance in a cloud; but then face to face (See 1 Cor 13:8–12), when the whole face of our earth will be watered by the inner fountain of water springing up. For if we should wish to understand some fountain of this visible water, of which it was said, but a fountain went up from the earth, and watered all the face of the earth (Gen 2:6), it is not probable that, when so many perennial fountains, whether of streams or of rivers, are found throughout the whole earth, that one alone should have dried up which watered all the face of the earth.
GenMani.2.4.5
Invisibilia quibus vocabulis signentur.
By what terms invisible things are signified.
6. 7. Sub his ergo paucis verbis universa creatura nobis insinuata est ante peccatum animae. Nomine enim coeli et terrae universa visibilis creatura significata est; et nomine diei, universum tempus; et nomine viridium et pabuli agri, creatura invisibilis; et nomine fontis ascendentis et irrigantis omnem faciem terrae, inundatio veritatis animam satians ante peccatum. Dies autem iste, cuius nomine universum tempus significari diximus, insinuat nobis non solum visibilem, sed etiam invisibilem creaturam tempus posse sentire: quod de anima nobis manifestatur, quae tanta varietate affectionum suarum, et ipso lapsu quo misera facta est, et reparatione qua rursus in beatitatem redit, tempore mutari posse convincitur.
6. 7. Under these few words, then, the whole creation was introduced to us before the sin of the soul. For by the name heaven and earth the whole visible creation was signified; and by the name day, all time; and by the name of the green and fodder of the field, the invisible creature; and by the name of the fountain going up and watering all the face of the earth, the flood of truth satisfying the soul before sin. But this day, by whose name we said all time is signified, introduces to us that not only the visible but also the invisible creature can experience time: which is made plain to us in the case of the soul, which, by such great variety of its affections, and by the very fall by which it was made wretched, and by the restoration by which it returns again to blessedness, is shown to be able to be changed in time.
GenMani.2.6.7
Et ideo non dictum est: cum factus esset dies, quo die fecit Deus coelum et terram (Gen 2, 4), tantum; quibus nominibus visibilis creatura intimatur: sed additum est etiam, viride, et pabulum agri (Gen 2, 5); quo nomine invisibilem creaturam, propter vigorem et vitam, significari diximus, sicuti est anima. Et ita dictum est: cum factus esset dies, quo die fecit Deus coelum et terram, et omne viride, et pabulum agri: ut sic intellegeremus non solum visibilem, sed etiam invisibilem creaturam pertinere ad tempus, propter mutabilitatem; quia solus Deus incommutabilis est, qui est ante tempora.
And therefore it was not said only, when the day was made, on which day God made heaven and earth (Gen 2:4), by which names the visible creation is intimated: but there was added also, the green, and fodder of the field (Gen 2:5); by which name we said the invisible creature is signified, on account of its vigor and life, such as the soul is. And so it was said, when the day was made, on which day God made heaven and earth, and all the green, and fodder of the field: so that we might thus understand that not only the visible but also the invisible creature pertains to time, on account of its changeableness; because God alone is unchangeable, who is before the times.
GenMani.2.6.7
Quid mysterii habeat limus terrae.
What mystery the slime of the earth holds.
7. 8. Nunc videamus post universae creaturae insinuationem tam visibilis quam invisibilis, et universale beneficium divini fontis erga invisibilem creaturam, quid de homine specialiter intimetur, quod ad nos maxime pertinet.
7. 8. Now let us see, after the introduction of the whole creation, both visible and invisible, and the universal benefit of the divine fountain toward the invisible creature, what is intimated specifically concerning man, which pertains to us most of all.
GenMani.2.7.8
Primo enim quod de limo terrae Deus hominem finxit (Cf. Gen 2, 7), solet habere quaestionem qualis ille limus fuerit, vel quae materia nomine limi significata sit. Illi autem inimici Veterum Librorum, omnia carnaliter intuentes, et propterea semper errantes, etiam hoc reprehendere mordaciter solent, quod de limo Deus hominem finxit.
First, the fact that God formed man from the slime of the earth (See Gen 2:7) is accustomed to raise the question what that slime was, or what matter is signified by the name slime. But those enemies of the Old Books, looking at everything carnally and therefore always erring, are accustomed to find biting fault even with this, that God formed man from slime.
GenMani.2.7.8
Dicunt enim: "quare de limo fecit Deus hominem? an defuerat ei melior et coelestis materia, unde hominem faceret, ut de labe terrena tam fragilem mortalemque formaret?" Non intellegentes primo quam multis significationibus vel terra vel aqua in Scripturis ponatur: limus enim aquae et terrae commixtio est.
For they say: "Why did God make man from slime? Had he run short of better and heavenly matter from which to make man, that he should form so fragile and mortal a thing from earthly filth?" Not understanding, first, in how many significations either earth or water is set in the Scriptures: for slime is a mixture of water and earth.
GenMani.2.7.8
Dicimus enim tabidum et fragile et morti destinatum corpus humanum post peccatum esse coepisse. Non enim in nostro corpore isti exhorrescunt nisi mortalitatem, quam damnatione meruimus. Quid autem mirum, aut difficile Deo, etiamsi de limo istius terrae hominem fecit, tale tamen corpus eius efficere, quod corruptioni non subiaceret, si homo praeceptum Dei custodiens peccare noluisset?
For we say that the human body began to be wasting and fragile and destined for death after sin. For it is nothing but mortality, which we deserved by condemnation, that these men shudder at in our body. But what is wonderful, or difficult, for God, even if he made man from the slime of this earth, to make his body nonetheless such that it would not be subject to corruption, if man, keeping the commandment of God, had been unwilling to sin?
GenMani.2.7.8
Si enim speciem coeli ipsius de nihilo, vel de informi materia dicimus factam, quia omnipotentem Artificem credimus; quid mirum si corpus, quod de limo qualicumque factum est, potuit ab Omnipotenti Artifice tale fieri, ut nulla molestia, nulla indigentia cruciaret hominem ante peccatum, et nulla corruptione tabesceret?
For if we say that the appearance of heaven itself was made from nothing, or from formless matter, because we believe in an almighty Craftsman, what is wonderful if the body, which was made from slime of whatever kind, could be made by the almighty Craftsman such that no trouble, no want, would torment man before sin, and it would waste away with no corruption?
GenMani.2.7.8
Finxitne limo Deus totum hominem an corpus tantum?
Did God form the whole man from slime, or only the body?
7. 9. Itaque superflue quaeritur unde hominis corpus Deus fecerit; si tamen nunc de corporis formatione dicitur. Sic enim nonnullos nostros intellegere accepi, qui dicunt, posteaquam dictum est: finxit Deus hominem de limo terrae (Gen 2, 7); propterea non additum, "ad imaginem et similitudinem suam," quoniam nunc de corporis formatione dicitur. Tunc autem homo interior significabatur, quando dictum est: fecit Deus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei (Gen 1, 27).
7. 9. And so it is asked needlessly from what God made the body of man—if indeed it is now the formation of the body that is being spoken of. For so I have learned that some of our people understand it, who say that, after it was said, God formed man from the slime of the earth (Gen 2:7), "to his own image and likeness" was for that reason not added, because it is now the formation of the body that is being spoken of. But the inner man was signified when it was said, God made man to the image and likeness of God (Gen 1:27).
GenMani.2.7.9
Sed etiamsi nunc quoque hominem ex corpore et anima factum intellegamus, ut non alicuius novi operis inchoatio, sed superius breviter insinuati diligentior retractatio isto sermone explicetur; si ergo, ut dixi, hominem hoc loco ex corpore et anima factum intellegamus, non absurde ipsa commixtio limi nomen accepit. Sicut enim aqua terram colligit, et conglutinat, et continet, quando eius commixtione limus eius efficitur; sic anima corporis materiam vivificando in unitatem concordem conformat, et non permittit labi et resolvi.
But even if here too we understand man to have been made of body and soul, so that what is set forth in this passage is not the beginning of some new work, but a more diligent reconsideration of what was briefly introduced above—if, then, as I said, we understand man in this place to have been made of body and soul, it is not absurd that the mixture itself received the name of slime. For just as water gathers and binds and holds together the earth, when by its mixture the slime of it is made, so the soul, by giving life to the matter of the body, forms it into a harmonious unity and does not permit it to slip apart and dissolve.
GenMani.2.7.9
Quid sit spiritus insufflatio.
What the breathing in of the spirit is.
8. 10. Quod autem scriptum est: et insufflavit in eum spiritum vitae, et factus est homo in animam viventem (Gen 2, 7): si adhuc corpus solum erat, animam adiunctam corpori hoc loco intellegere debemus; sive quae iam facta erat, sed tamquam in ore Dei erat, id est in eius Veritate vel Sapientia, unde tamen non recessit quasi locis separata, quando insufflata est - non enim Deus loco continetur, sed ubique praesens est - sive tunc anima facta est, quando in illud figmentum Deus insufflavit spiritum vitae, ut illa insufflatio ipsam operationem Dei significet, qua fecit animam in homine Spiritu potentiae suae. Si autem homo ille qui factus erat, iam corpus et anima erat; ipsi animae sensus est additus ista insufflatione, cum factus est homo in animam viventem: non quia illa insufflatio conversa est in animam viventem, sed operata est in animam viventem.
8. 10. As for what is written, and he breathed into him the spirit of life, and the man was made into a living soul (Gen 2:7): if there was as yet only the body, we ought to understand in this place the soul joined to the body—whether it had already been made, but was as it were in the mouth of God, that is, in his Truth or Wisdom, from which nevertheless it did not depart as though separated by place, when it was breathed in (for God is not contained by place, but is everywhere present), or whether the soul was then made, when God breathed the spirit of life into that figure, so that that breathing signifies the very working of God, by which he made the soul in man by the Spirit of his power. But if that man who had been made was already body and soul, then sense was added to the soul itself by this breathing, when the man was made into a living soul: not because that breathing was turned into a living soul, but it worked upon a living soul.
GenMani.2.8.10
Nondum tamen spiritalem hominem debemus intellegere, qui factus est in animam viventem, sed adhuc "animalem." Tunc enim "spiritalis" effectus est, cum in Paradiso, hoc est in beata vita constitutus, praeceptum etiam perfectionis accepit, ut verbo Dei consummaretur. Itaque postquam peccavit, recedens a praecepto Dei, et dimissus est de Paradiso, in hoc remansit ut "animalis" esset.
Yet we ought not yet to understand a spiritual man, who was made into a living soul, but still an "animal" one. For he was then made "spiritual" when, set in paradise, that is, in the blessed life, he also received the commandment of perfection, so that he might be brought to completion by the word of God. And so, after he sinned, withdrawing from the commandment of God, and was sent away from paradise, he remained in this state, that he was "animal."
GenMani.2.8.10
Et ideo "animalem" hominem prius agimus omnes, qui de illo post peccatum nati sumus, donec assequamur "spiritalem" Adam, id est Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui peccatum non fecit (Cf. 1 Pt 2, 22); et ab illo recreati et vivificati, restituamur in Paradisum, ubi latro ille cum ipso eo die meruit esse, quo vitam istam finivit (Cf. Lc 23, 43). Sic enim Apostolus dicit: sed non prius quod spiritale est, sed quod animale, sicut scriptum est: 'factus est primus Adam in animam viventem, novissimus Adam in spiritum vivificantem (1 Cor 15, 46).'
And therefore we all who were born of him after sin first lead the life of the "animal" man, until we attain the "spiritual" Adam, that is, our Lord Jesus Christ, who did no sin (See 1 Pet 2:22); and, recreated and given life by him, may be restored to paradise, where that thief deserved to be with him on the very day on which he ended this life (See Luke 23:43). For so the Apostle says: but not first what is spiritual, but what is animal, as it is written: 'the first Adam was made into a living soul, the last Adam into a life-giving spirit (1 Cor 15:45–46).'
GenMani.2.8.10
Quid in Scripturis vocetur spiritus hominis.
What is called the spirit of man in the Scriptures.
8. 11. Sic ergo debemus intellegere hunc locum, ut non quia dictum est: insufflavit in eum spiritum vitae, et factus est homo in animam viventem (Gen 2, 7), credamus illam veluti partem naturae Dei in animam hominis fuisse conversam, et cogamur dicere naturam Dei esse mutabilem: in quo errore maxime istos Manichaeos veritas premit. Sicut enim est mater omnium haereticorum superbia, ausi sunt dicere quod natura Dei sit anima. Et hinc urgentur a nobis, cum eis dicimus, "ergo natura Dei errat et misera est, et vitiorum labe corrumpitur et peccat; aut etiam, ut vos dicitis, naturae contrariae sordibus inquinatur: et caetera talia quae de natura Dei nefas est credere."
8. 11. So, then, we ought to understand this passage in such a way that we do not, because it was said, he breathed into him the spirit of life, and the man was made into a living soul (Gen 2:7), believe that something like a part of the nature of God was turned into the soul of man, and be compelled to say that the nature of God is changeable: an error in which the truth presses these Manichees most of all. For since pride is the mother of all heretics, they have dared to say that the nature of God is the soul. And from this they are hard-pressed by us, when we say to them: "Then the nature of God errs and is wretched, and is corrupted by the stain of vices and sins; or even, as you say, is befouled with the filth of a contrary nature: and other such things which it is impious to believe of the nature of God."
GenMani.2.8.11
Nam factam esse animam ab omnipotente Deo, et ideo non illam esse partem Dei vel naturam Dei, manifeste alio loco scriptum est, dicente propheta: et qui finxit spiritum omnibus, ipse fecit omnia (Ps 32, 15): et alio loco: qui finxit spiritum hominis in ipso est (Zach 12, 1). Ergo factum esse spiritum hominis, manifeste his testimoniis approbatur. Spiritus autem hominis in Scripturis dicitur ipsius animae potentia rationalis, qua distat a pecoribus, et eis naturae lege dominatur. De quo dicit Apostolus: nemo scit quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis qui in ipso est (1 Cor 2, 11).
For that the soul was made by almighty God, and therefore is not a part of God or the nature of God, is plainly written in another place, the prophet saying: and he who formed the spirit for all, he himself made all things (Ps 33:15 (32:15)): and in another place: he who formed the spirit of man within him (Zech 12:1). That the spirit of man, then, was made, is plainly proved by these testimonies. But the spirit of man is called, in the Scriptures, the rational power of the soul itself, by which it differs from the cattle and, by the law of nature, has dominion over them. Of this the Apostle says: no one knows the things of a man, except the spirit of the man that is in him (1 Cor 2:11).
GenMani.2.8.11
Ne forte si probaretur his testimoniis animam factam esse, non deessent qui dicerent spiritum hominis non esse factum, et ipsum arbitrarentur esse naturam Dei, et in ipsum dicerent partem Dei esse conversam, cum illa insufflatio Dei facta est. Quod sana doctrina similiter respuit, quia et ipse spiritus hominis cum aliquando errat, et aliquando prudenter sapit, mutabilem se esse clamat: quod nullo modo de natura Dei fas est credere. Non autem potest maius signum esse superbiae, quam ut dicat se humana anima hoc esse quod Deus est, cum adhuc sub tantis vitiorum et miseriarum molibus gemat.
Lest perhaps, if it were proved by these testimonies that the soul was made, there should be no lack of those who would say that the spirit of man was not made, and would think it to be the nature of God, and would say that a part of God was turned into it, when that breathing in by God took place. This sound doctrine likewise rejects, because the spirit of man itself, since it sometimes errs and sometimes is prudently wise, cries out that it is changeable: which it is in no way right to believe of the nature of God. But there can be no greater sign of pride than that the human soul should say that it is what God is, while it still groans under such great masses of vices and miseries.
GenMani.2.8.11
Paradisi deliciae quid significent.
What the delights of paradise signify.
9. 12. Nunc iam videamus ipsam beatitudinem hominis, quae Paradisi nomine significatur: nam quoniam in nemoribus deliciosa quies hominum esse solet, et corporeis sensibus nostris de oriente lumen oritur, coelumque consurgit, quod superius corpus est nostro corpore atque excellentius; propterea his verbis etiam spiritales deliciae, quas habet beata vita, figurate explicantur, et ad orientem Paradisus plantatur. Intellegamus autem nostra gaudia spiritalia significare omne lignum formosum ad aspectum intellegentiae, et bonum ad escam quae non corrumpitur, qua beatae animae pascuntur: nam et Dominus dicit: operamini escam quae non corrumpitur (Io 6, 27); ut est omnis ratio, quae cibus est animae.
9. 12. Now let us look at the very blessedness of man, which is signified by the name of paradise: for since the delightful rest of men is accustomed to be in groves, and to our bodily senses the light rises from the east, and the heaven rises up, which is a body higher than our body and more excellent; therefore by these words the spiritual delights too, which the blessed life has, are explained figuratively, and paradise is planted toward the east. Let us understand, then, that our spiritual joys signify every tree beautiful to the sight of understanding, and good for the food that is not corrupted, on which blessed souls are fed: for the Lord too says, work for the food that is not corrupted (John 6:27); such as is every reasoning, which is the food of the soul.
GenMani.2.9.12
"Ad orientem," lucem sapientiae in Eden, id est in deliciis immortalibus et intellegibilibus. Nam deliciae, vel voluptas, vel epulum hoc verbo significari dicitur, si ex hebraeo in latinum interpretetur. Positum est autem sic sine interpretatione, ut aliquem locum significare videatur, magisque figuratam faciat locutionem. Productum autem ex terra omne illud lignum accipimus omne illud gaudium spiritale; id est, supereminere terrae, et non involvi atque obrui terrenarum cupiditatum implicamentis.
"Toward the east," the light of wisdom in Eden, that is, in immortal and intelligible delights. For "delight," or "pleasure," or "feast" is said to be signified by this word, if it is translated from Hebrew into Latin. But it was set down thus, without translation, so that it might seem to signify some place and might make the expression more figurative. And we take all that tree brought forth from the earth to be all that spiritual joy; that is, to rise above the earth and not to be wrapped up and overwhelmed in the entanglements of earthly desires.
GenMani.2.9.12
Lignum autem vitae plantatum in medio Paradisi, sapientiam illam significat, qua oportet ut intellegat anima, in meditullio quodam rerum se esse ordinatam, ut quamvis subiectam sibi habeat omnem naturam corpoream, supra se tamen esse intellegat naturam Dei: et neque in dexteram declinet, sibi arrogando quod non est; neque ad sinistram, per neglegentiam contemnendo quod est: et hoc est lignum vitae plantatum in medio Paradisi.
But the tree of life planted in the midst of paradise signifies that wisdom by which the soul ought to understand that it is ordered in a kind of middle position of things, so that, although it has every corporeal nature subject to it, it nevertheless understands that the nature of God is above it: and neither turns aside to the right, by arrogating to itself what it is not, nor to the left, by despising through negligence what it is: and this is the tree of life planted in the midst of paradise.
GenMani.2.9.12
Ligno autem scientiae boni et mali, ipsa item medietas animae et ordinata integritas significatur: nam et ipsum lignum in medio Paradisi plantatum est; et ideo lignum dignoscentiae boni et mali dicitur, quia si anima quae debet in ea quae anteriora sunt se extendere, id est in Deum, et ea quae posteriora sunt oblivisci (Cf. Phil 3, 13), id est corporeas voluptates, ad seipsam deserto Deo conversa fuerit, et sua potentia tamquam sine Deo frui voluerit, intumescit superbia, quod est initium omnis peccati. Et cum hoc eius peccatum poena fuerit consecuta, experiendo discit quid intersit inter bonum quod deseruit, et malum in quod cecidit. Et hoc ei erit gustasse de fructu arboris dignoscentiae boni et mali. Praecipitur ergo illi ut de omni ligno quod est in Paradiso edat, ex ligno autem in quo est dignoscentia boni et mali non edat; id est, non sic eo fruatur, ut ipsam ordinatam integritatem naturae suae, quasi manducando violet atque corrumpat.
But by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, this same middle position of the soul and its ordered integrity is likewise signified: for that tree too was planted in the midst of paradise; and it is for this reason called the tree of the discernment of good and evil, because, if the soul—which ought to stretch itself toward the things that are before it, that is, toward God, and to forget the things that are behind (See Phil 3:13), that is, bodily pleasures—turns, with God abandoned, toward itself, and wishes to enjoy its own power as if without God, it swells with pride, which is the beginning of all sin. And when punishment has followed upon this sin of its, it learns by experience what difference there is between the good it abandoned and the evil into which it fell. And this will be for it to have tasted of the fruit of the tree of the discernment of good and evil. It is commanded, then, to eat of every tree that is in paradise, but not to eat of the tree in which is the discernment of good and evil; that is, not to enjoy it in such a way that, as if by eating, it violates and corrupts the very ordered integrity of its nature.
GenMani.2.9.12
Flumina paradisi quid notent.
What the rivers of paradise denote.
10. 13. Flumen autem quod procedebat ex Eden, id est ex deliciis et voluptate et epulis, quod flumen a propheta significatur in Psalmis, cum dicit: torrente voluptatis tuae potabis eos (Ps 35, 9); hoc est enim Eden, quod latine "voluptas" dicitur: dividitur in quatuor partes, et quatuor virtutes significat, prudentiam, fortitudinem, temperantiam, iustitiam. Dicitur autem Phison ipse esse Ganges, Geon autem Nilus, quod etiam in Ieremia propheta animadverti potest: nunc aliis nominibus appellantur. Sicut nunc Tiberis dicitur fluvius, qui prius Albula dicebatur. Tigris vero et Euphrates etiam nunc eadem nomina tenent:
10. 13. And the river that went forth from Eden, that is, from delights and pleasure and feasting—which river is signified by the prophet in the Psalms when he says, you will give them to drink from the torrent of your pleasure (Ps 36:9 (35:9)); for this is Eden, which in Latin is called "pleasure"—is divided into four parts, and signifies four virtues: prudence, fortitude, temperance, justice. And the Pishon is said to be the Ganges, and the Gihon the Nile, which can also be observed in the prophet Jeremiah: now they are called by other names. Just as the river now called the Tiber was formerly called the Albula. But the Tigris and the Euphrates even now keep the same names:
GenMani.2.9.12
quibus tamen nominibus virtutes, ut dixi, spiritales significantur; quod etiam ipsorum nominum interpretatio docet, si quis hebraeam linguam vel syram consideret. Sicut Ierusalem quamvis sit visibilis et terrenus locus, significat tamen "Civitatem Pacis" spiritaliter: et Sion quamvis sit mons in terra, "Speculationem" tamen significat; et hoc nomen in Scripturarum allegoriis ad spiritalia intellegenda saepe transfertur: et ille qui descendebat ab Ierusalem in Iericho, sicut Dominus dicit, et in via vulneratus, saucius et semivivus relictus est a latronibus (Cf. Lc 10, 30), utique locos istos terrarum, quamvis secundum historiam in terra inveniantur, spiritaliter cogit intellegi.
by which names, nevertheless, spiritual virtues are signified, as I said; which the interpretation of the names themselves also teaches, if one considers the Hebrew or Syriac language. Just as Jerusalem, although it is a visible and earthly place, nevertheless signifies spiritually the "City of Peace"; and Zion, although it is a mountain on earth, nevertheless signifies "Watchtower"; and this name is often transferred in the allegories of the Scriptures to the understanding of spiritual things: and that man who was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, as the Lord says, and on the way was wounded, and left injured and half-dead by robbers (See Luke 10:30), certainly compels these earthly places, although according to history they are found on earth, to be understood spiritually.
GenMani.2.9.12
Quattuor flumina allegorice quattuor cardinales virtutes esse.
That the four rivers are allegorically the four cardinal virtues.
10. 14. Prudentia ergo, quae significat ipsam contemplationem Veritatis ab omni ore humano alienam, quia est ineffabilis, quam si eloqui velis, parturis eam potius quam paris, quia ibi audivit et Apostolus ineffabilia verba quae non licet homini loqui (Cf. 2 Cor 12, 4): haec ergo prudentia terram circumit, quae habet aurum, et carbunculum, et lapidem prasinum, id est disciplinam vivendi, quae ab omnibus terrenis sordibus, quasi decocta nitescit, sicut aurum optimum; et veritatem, quam nulla falsitas vincit, sicut carbunculi fulgor nocte non vincitur; et vitam aeternam, quae viriditate lapidis prasini significatur, propter vigorem qui non arescit.
10. 14. Prudence, then, which signifies the very contemplation of Truth, foreign to every human mouth because it is ineffable—which, if you should wish to express it, you are rather in labor with it than give it birth, since there the Apostle too heard ineffable words which it is not permitted to a man to speak (See 2 Cor 12:4)—this prudence, then, goes around the land that has gold, and the carbuncle, and the green stone, that is, the discipline of living, which, refined as it were from all earthly filth, shines like the best gold; and truth, which no falsehood overcomes, as the gleam of the carbuncle is not overcome by night; and eternal life, which is signified by the greenness of the green stone, on account of the vigor that does not wither.
GenMani.2.10.14
Fluvius autem ille qui circuit terram Aethiopiam multum calidam atque ferventem, significat fortitudinem calore actionis alacrem atque impigram. Tertius autem Tigris vadit contra Assyrios, et significat temperantiam, quae resistit libidini, multum adversanti consiliis prudentiae: unde plerumque in Scripturis Assyrii adversariorum loco ponuntur. Quartus fluvius non dictum est contra quid vadat, aut quam terram circumeat: iustitia enim ad omnes partes animae pertinet, quia ipsa ordo et aequitas animae est, qua sibi ista tria concorditer copulantur; prima, prudentia; secunda, fortitudo; tertia, temperantia; et in ista tota copulatione atque ordinatione iustitia.
But that river which goes around the land of Ethiopia, very hot and burning, signifies fortitude, lively and untiring with the heat of action. The third, the Tigris, goes toward the Assyrians, and signifies temperance, which resists lust, very much opposed to the counsels of prudence: whence for the most part in the Scriptures the Assyrians are set in the place of adversaries. Of the fourth river it is not said against what it goes, or what land it goes around: for justice pertains to all the parts of the soul, because it is itself the order and equity of the soul, by which these three are joined together harmoniously in it; first, prudence; second, fortitude; third, temperance; and in this whole joining together and ordering, justice.
GenMani.2.10.14
Opera hominis in paradiso; mulier in hominis adiutorium facta.
Man's work in paradise; the woman made as a helper for man.
11. 15. Quod autem ita constitutus est homo in Paradiso, ut operaretur et custodiret; operatio illa laudabilior laboriosa non erat. Alia est namque in Paradiso operatio, et alia in terra, quo post peccatum damnatus est. Ex eo autem quod additum est, et custodiret; significatum est qualis illa operatio erat. Namque in tranquillitate beatae vitae, ubi mors non est, omnis opera est custodire quod tenes.
11. 15. As for the fact that man was so set in paradise that he should work and keep it, that more praiseworthy work was not laborious. For there is one work in paradise, and another on the earth, to which he was condemned after sin. And from the fact that there was added, and keep it, it was signified what that work was. For in the tranquillity of the blessed life, where there is no death, all work is to keep what you hold.
GenMani.2.11.15
Accipit etiam praeceptum, de quo superius iam tractavimus (Cf. cap. 9). Quod praeceptum, quoniam sic concluditur, ut non ad unum loquatur; sic enim dicit: qua die autem manducaveritis, morte moriemini (Gen 3, 4);
He also receives a commandment, of which we have already treated above (See ch. 9). Which commandment, since it is concluded in such a way as not to speak to one person—for it says, but on the day you eat, you will die the death (Gen 2:17)
GenMani.2.11.15
incipit exponi quomodo sit facta femina: et facta dicitur in adiutorium viri, ut copulatione spiritali spiritales fetus ederet, id est bona opera divinae laudis; dum ille regit, haec obtemperat; ille a sapientia regitur, haec a viro. Caput enim viri Christus, et caput mulieris vir (1 Cor 11, 3).
it begins to be set forth how the woman was made: and she is said to have been made as a helper for the man, so that by a spiritual joining she might bring forth spiritual offspring, that is, good works of divine praise; while he rules, she obeys; he is ruled by wisdom, she by the man. For the head of the man is Christ, and the head of the woman is the man (1 Cor 11:3).
GenMani.2.11.15
Ideoque dicitur: non est bonum solum hominem esse (Gen 2, 18). Adhuc enim erat, quod fieret, ut non solum anima corpori dominaretur, quia corpus servilem locum obtinet, sed etiam virilis ratio subiugaret sibi "animalem" partem suam, per quod adiutorium imperaret corpori.
And so it is said, it is not good for the man to be alone (Gen 2:18). For there was still something that should come about, so that not only the soul should have dominion over the body, since the body holds the place of a servant, but also the manly reason should subject to itself its own "animal" part, through which helper it might command the body.
GenMani.2.11.15
Ad huius rei exemplum femina facta est, quam rerum ordo subiugat viro; ut quod in duobus hominibus evidentius apparet, id est in masculo et femina, etiam in uno homine considerari possit: ut appetitum animae, per quem de membris corporis operamur, habeat mens interior tamquam virilis ratio subiugatum, et iusta lege modum imponat adiutorio suo, sicut vir debet feminam regere, nec eam permittere dominari in virum; quod ubi contingit, perversa et misera domus est.
As an example of this matter the woman was made, whom the order of things subjects to the man; so that what appears more evidently in two human beings, that is, in male and female, may also be considered in one human being: so that the inner mind, like manly reason, may have subject to it the appetite of the soul, through which we work by the members of the body, and by a just law may impose measure on its helper, just as the man ought to rule the woman and not permit her to have dominion over the man; for where this happens, the household is perverse and wretched.
GenMani.2.11.15
11. 16. Primo ergo demonstravit Deus homini quanto melior esset pecoribus, et omnibus irrationabilibus animantibus: et hoc significat quod dictum est, adducta esse ad illum omnia animantia, ut videret quid ea vocaret, et eis nomina imponeret. Ex hoc enim apparet ipsa ratione hominem meliorem esse quam pecora, quod distinguere et nominatim ea discernere, nonnisi ratio potest, quae de ipsis iudicat.
11. 16. First, then, God showed man how much better he was than the cattle and all the irrational animals: and this is what is signified by what was said, that all the animals were brought to him, to see what he would call them, and to impose names on them. For from this it appears that man is better than the cattle by his very reason, because to distinguish and discern them by name nothing but reason can do, which judges concerning them.
GenMani.2.11.16
Sed haec facilis ratio est; cito enim homo intellegit se meliorem esse pecoribus: illa est difficilis ratio, qua intellegit in seipso aliud esse rationale quod regit, aliud "animale" quod regitur.
But this is an easy reasoning; for a man quickly understands that he is better than the cattle: that is the difficult reasoning, by which he understands that in himself there is one thing, the rational, that rules, and another, the "animal," that is ruled.
GenMani.2.11.16
Adae sopito Eva iuncta quid sibi velit.
What it means that Eve was joined to the sleeping Adam.
12. 16. Et quoniam haec secretiore sapientia videt, ipsam visionem secretam nomine soporis significari arbitror, quem immisit Deus in Adam, quando ei mulier facta est.
12. 16. And since the soul sees these things by a more hidden wisdom, I think that this hidden vision itself is signified by the name of the sleep that God sent upon Adam when the woman was made for him.
GenMani.2.12.16
Ut enim hoc videatur, non est opus oculis istis corporeis, sed quanto quisque ab istis visibilibus rebus in interiora intellegentiae secesserit (hoc est autem quasi obdormiscere), tanto melius et sincerius illud videt. Ipsa enim cognitio, qua intellegitur in nobis aliud esse quod ratione dominetur, aliud quod rationi obtemperet; ipsa ergo cognitio veluti effectio mulieris est de costa viri, propter coniunctionem significandam.
For in order to see this, there is no need of these bodily eyes; but the more each one withdraws from these visible things into the interior of understanding (and this is, as it were, to fall asleep), the better and more purely he sees that. For the very knowledge by which it is understood that in us there is one thing that rules by reason, another that obeys reason—this knowledge, then, is as it were the making of the woman from the rib of the man, in order to signify the conjunction.
GenMani.2.12.16
Deinde, ut quisque huic suae parti recte dominetur, et fiat quasi coniugalis in seipso, ut caro non concupiscat adversus spiritum, sed spiritui subiugetur, id est concupiscentia carnalis non adversetur rationi, sed potius obtemperando desinat esse carnalis, opus habet perfecta sapientia.
Then, so that each one may rightly have dominion over this part of himself, and may become as it were conjugal within himself, so that the flesh does not lust against the spirit but is subjected to the spirit, that is, so that carnal desire does not oppose reason but rather, by obeying, ceases to be carnal, he has need of perfect wisdom.
GenMani.2.12.16
Cuius contemplatio quia interior est et secretior, et ab omni sensu corporis remotissima, convenienter etiam ista "soporis" nomine intellegi potest. Tunc enim ordinatissime caput mulieris vir est, cum caput viri est Christus, qui Sapientia est Dei (Cf. 1 Cor 1, 24).
And since the contemplation of this is interior and more hidden, and most remote from every sense of the body, it too can fittingly be understood by the name of "sleep." For then the man is the head of the woman in the most orderly way, when the head of the man is Christ, who is the Wisdom of God (See 1 Cor 1:24).
GenMani.2.12.16
Mulier ex Adae costa mystice.
The woman from Adam's rib, mystically.
12. 17. Sane in locum illius costae carnem adimplevit, ut hoc nomine insinuaretur dilectionis affectus, quo diligit unusquisque animam suam, et non est durus ut eam contemnat; quod diligit quisque cui praeest. Non enim sic nominata est caro isto loco, ut carnalem concupiscentiam significet; sed isto modo potius quo propheta dicit auferri populo cor lapideum, et dari cor carneum (Cf. Ez 11, 19). Hoc modo enim dicit etiam Apostolus: non in tabulis lapideis, sed in tabulis cordis carnalibus (2 Cor 3, 3). Aliud est quippe propria locutio, aliud figurata, qualis ista est quam tractamus modo.
12. 17. Indeed, in the place of that rib he filled in flesh, so that by this name might be introduced the affection of love by which each one loves his own soul, and is not so hard as to despise it; for one loves that over which he presides. For flesh is not so named in this place as to signify carnal desire, but rather in that way in which the prophet says that a heart of stone is taken away from the people, and a heart of flesh is given (See Ezek 11:19). For in this way the Apostle too says, not on tablets of stone, but on the fleshly tablets of the heart (2 Cor 3:3). For one thing is proper speech, another figurative, such as this is which we are now treating.
GenMani.2.12.17
Quapropter etsi visibilis femina secundum historiam de corpore viri primo facta est a Domino Deo, non utique sine causa ita facta est, nisi ut aliquod secretum intimaret. Num enim aut limus defuit unde femina formaretur? aut, si vellet Dominus, homini vigilanti costam sine dolore detrahere non posset?
Wherefore, even if the visible woman was, according to history, first made from the body of the man by the Lord God, she was surely not made so without a cause, but only to introduce some hidden thing. For was there a lack of slime from which the woman might be formed? Or, if the Lord willed, could he not have drawn a rib from a waking man without pain?
GenMani.2.12.17
Sive ergo ista figurate dicta sint, sive etiam figurate facta sint, non frustra hoc modo dicta vel facta sunt; sed sunt plane mysteria et sacramenta, sive hoc modo quo tenuitas nostra conatur, sive aliquo alio meliore, secundum sanam tamen fidem sunt interpretanda et intellegenda.
Whether, then, these things were said figuratively, or were even done figuratively, they were not said or done in this way for nothing; but they are plainly mysteries and sacred signs, and are to be interpreted and understood according to sound faith—whether in the way that our slenderness attempts, or in some other better way.
GenMani.2.12.17
Spiritale coniugium in homine.
Spiritual marriage within man.
13. 18. Vocavit ergo mulierem suam vir, tamquam potior inferiorem, et dixit: hoc nunc os de ossibus meis, et caro de carne mea (Gen 2, 23). Os de ossibus, fortasse propter fortitudinem; et caro de carne, propter temperantiam. Hae namque duae virtutes ad inferiorem animi partem, quam prudentia rationalis regit, docentur pertinere. Quod autem dictum est: haec vocabitur mulier, quoniam de viro suo sumpta est (Gen 2, 22); ista origo nominis, et interpretatio in lingua latina non apparet. Quid enim simile habeat "mulieris" nomen ad "viri" nomen, non invenitur. Sed in hebraea locutione dicitur sic sonare, quasi dictum sit: "haec vocabitur virago, quoniam de viro suo sumpta est." Nam "virago" vel "virgo" potius habet aliquam similitudinem cum "viri" nomine; "mulier" autem non habet: sed hoc, ut dixi, linguae diversitas facit.
13. 18. The man, then, called her his woman, as the superior the inferior, and said, this now is bone from my bones, and flesh from my flesh (Gen 2:23). Bone from bones, perhaps on account of fortitude; and flesh from flesh, on account of temperance. For these two virtues are taught to pertain to the lower part of the mind, which the rational prudence rules. But as for what was said, she will be called woman, because she was taken from her man (Gen 2:23), this origin of the name, and its interpretation, does not appear in the Latin language. For what likeness the word "woman" has to the word "man" is not found. But in the Hebrew idiom it is said to sound as if it had been said: "she will be called she-man, because she was taken from her man." For "she-man," or rather "maiden," has some likeness to the word "man"; but "woman" does not: this, however, as I said, the diversity of language brings about.
GenMani.2.13.18
Verba Gen 2, 24 prophetiam significant.
The words of Genesis 2:24 signify a prophecy.
13. 19. Quod autem additum est: relinquet homo patrem et matrem, et adhaerebit uxori suae; et erunt duo in carne una (Eph 5, 31), quomodo referatur ad historiam non invenio, nisi quod plerumque in genere humano ista contingunt; sed tota prophetia est, cuius Apostolus meminit, dicens: propter hoc relinquet homo patrem et matrem, et adhaerebit uxori suae; et erunt duo in carne una. Sacramentum hoc magnum est: ego autem dico in Christo et in Ecclesia (Eph 5, 32). Quod Manichaei si non caeci legerent, qui per Epistolas Apostolicas multos decipiunt, intellegerent quomodo accipiendae sint Veteris Testamenti Scripturae, nec tam sacrilega voce auderent accusare quod nesciunt.
13. 19. But as for what was added, a man will leave his father and mother, and will cleave to his wife; and the two will be in one flesh (Eph 5:31), how it may be referred to history I do not find, except that for the most part these things happen in the human race; but it is wholly a prophecy, which the Apostle mentions, saying: for this reason a man will leave his father and mother, and will cleave to his wife; and the two will be in one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak in Christ and in the Church (Eph 5:31–32). If the Manichees, who deceive many through the Apostolic Epistles, read this not blind, they would understand how the Scriptures of the Old Testament are to be taken, and would not dare with so sacrilegious a voice to accuse what they do not know.
GenMani.2.13.19
Quod autem nudi erant Adam et mulier eius, et non confundebantur, simplicitatem animae castitatemque significat. Nam et Apostolus ita dicit: aptavi vos une viro virginem castam exhibere Christo: timeo autem ne sicut serpens Evam fefellit versutia sua, ita corrumpantur mentes vestrae a simplicitate et castitate, quae est in Christo (2 Cor 11, 2-3).
And that Adam and his wife were naked and were not ashamed signifies the simplicity and chastity of the soul. For the Apostle too says: I have prepared you to present you as a chaste virgin to one husband, Christ: but I fear lest, as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, so your minds be corrupted from the simplicity and chastity that is in Christ (2 Cor 11:2–3).
GenMani.2.13.19
Diabolus in serpente notatus.
The devil marked in the serpent.
14. 20. Serpens autem significat diabolum, qui sane non erat simplex. Quod enim dicitur sapientior omnibus bestiis, figurate insinuatur eius versutia. Non autem dictum est quod in paradiso erat serpens, sed erat serpens inter bestias quas fecit Deus. Paradisus namque beatam vitam, ut superius dixi, significat (Cf. cap. 9), in qua iam non erat serpens, quia iam diabolus erat; et de sua beatitudine ceciderat, quia in veritate non stetit. Nec mirandum est quomodo mulieri loqui potuerit, cum illa esset in Paradiso, et ille non esset; non enim aut illa secundum locum erat in Paradiso, sed potius secundum beatitudinis affectum: aut etiamsi locus est talis qui paradisus vocetur, in quo corporaliter Adam et mulier habitabant, etiam diaboli accessum corporaliter intellegere debemus? Non utique, sed spiritaliter, sicut Apostolus dicit: secundum principem potestatis aeris, spiritus qui nunc operatur in filiis diffidentiae (Eph 2, 2).
14. 20. But the serpent signifies the devil, who certainly was not simple. For in that it is said that he was wiser than all the beasts, his cunning is figuratively introduced. And it was not said that the serpent was in paradise, but that there was a serpent among the beasts that God made. For paradise, as I said above, signifies the blessed life (See ch. 9), in which the serpent now was not, because he was now the devil; and he had fallen from his blessedness, because he did not stand in the truth. Nor is it to be wondered how he could speak to the woman, since she was in paradise and he was not; for either she was not in paradise according to place, but rather according to the affection of blessedness; or, even if there is such a place as is called paradise, in which Adam and the woman dwelt bodily, must we then understand the devil's approach bodily too? Not at all, but spiritually, as the Apostle says: according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of unbelief (Eph 2:2).
GenMani.2.14.20
Numquid ergo visibiliter eis apparet, aut quasi corporeis locis accedit ad eos in quibus operatur? Non utique, sed miris modis per cogitationes suggerit quidquid potest. Quibus suggestionibus resistunt, qui vere dicunt, quod item dicit Apostolus: non enim ignoramus astutias eius (2 Cor 2, 11). Quomodo enim accessit ad Iudam, quando ei persuasit ut Dominum traderet? numquid in locis, aut per hos oculos ei visus est? Sed utique, ut dictum est, intravit in cor eius (Cf. Lc 22, 3).
Does he, then, appear to them visibly, or approach as if through bodily places those in whom he works? Not at all, but in wondrous ways he suggests through thoughts whatever he can. These suggestions are resisted by those who truly say what the Apostle likewise says: for we are not ignorant of his devices (2 Cor 2:11). For how did he approach Judas, when he persuaded him to betray the Lord? Was he seen by him in places, or through these eyes? But surely, as it was said, he entered into his heart (See Luke 22:3).
GenMani.2.14.20
Repellit autem illum homo, si Paradisum custodiat. Posuit enim Deus hominem in Paradiso, ut operaretur et custodiret: quia sic de Ecclesia dicitur in Canticis canticorum: hortus conclusus, fons signatus (Cant 4, 12); quo utique non admittitur perversitatis ille persuasor. Sed tamen per mulierem decipit: non enim etiam ratio nostra deduci ad consensionem peccati potest, nisi cum delectatio mota fuerit in illa parte animi, quae debet obtemperare rationi tamquam rectori viro.
But a man repels him if he keeps paradise. For God placed man in paradise to work and to keep it: because thus it is said of the Church in the Song of Songs: a garden enclosed, a fountain sealed (Song 4:12); into which surely that persuader to perversity is not admitted. But yet he deceives through the woman: for not even our reason can be led to consent to sin, except when delight has been stirred in that part of the mind which ought to obey reason as its governing husband.
GenMani.2.14.20
Peccatum et culpa.
Sin and guilt.
14. 21. Etiam nunc in unoquoque nostrum nihil aliud agitur, cum ad peccatum quisque delabitur, quam tunc actum est in illis tribus, serpente, muliere, et viro. Nam primo fit suggestio sive per cogitationem, sive per sensus corporis, vel videndo, vel tangendo, vel audiendo, vel gustando, vel olfaciendo: quae suggestio cum facta fuerit, si cupiditas nostra non movebitur ad peccandum, excludetur serpentis astutia; si autem mota fuerit, quasi mulieri iam persuasum erit. Sed aliquando ratio viriliter etiam commotam cupiditatem refrenat atque compescit. Quod cum fit, non labimur in peccatum, sed cum aliquanta luctatione coronamur. Si autem ratio consentiat, et quod libido commoverit, faciendum esse decernat, ab omni vita beata tamquam de Paradiso expellitur homo. Iam enim peccatum imputatur, etiamsi non subsequatur factum; quoniam rea tenetur in consensione conscientia.
14. 21. Even now in each one of us nothing else takes place, when anyone slips into sin, than what took place then in those three: the serpent, the woman, and the man. For first comes the suggestion, whether through thought or through the senses of the body—by seeing, or touching, or hearing, or tasting, or smelling: which suggestion, when it has been made, if our desire is not moved to sin, the serpent's cunning will be shut out; but if it has been moved, it will be as though the woman had already been persuaded. But sometimes reason manfully reins in and restrains even an aroused desire. When this happens, we do not slip into sin, but with some struggle we are crowned. But if reason consents, and decides that what desire has aroused must be done, then man is expelled from the whole blessed life, as from paradise. For now sin is imputed, even if the deed does not follow; since the conscience is held guilty in the consent.
GenMani.2.14.21
Peccatum ad nuditatem deicit.
Sin casts man down to nakedness.
15. 22. Quo autem modo serpens ille peccatum persuaserit, diligenter considerandum est; pertinet enim maxime ad nostram salutem: nam ideo haec scripta sunt ut iam talia caveamus. Nam cum interrogata mulier respondisset quid eis praeceptum esset; ait ille: non morte moriemini: sciebat enim Deus quoniam qua die manducaveritis ex illo, aperientur oculi vestri, et eritis sicut dii, scientes bonum et malum (Gen 3, 4-5).
15. 22. But in what way that serpent persuaded to sin must be considered diligently; for it pertains most of all to our salvation: for these things were written so that we might now beware of such things. For when the woman, on being questioned, had answered what had been commanded them, he said, you will not die the death: for God knew that on the day you eat from it, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like gods, knowing good and evil (Gen 3:4–5).
GenMani.2.15.22
Videmus his verbis per superbiam peccatum esse persuasum: ad hoc enim valet quod dictum est: eritis sicut dii. Sicut etiam hoc quod dictum est: sciebat enim Deus quoniam qua die manducaveritis ex eo, aperientur oculi vestri, quid hic intellegitur, nisi persuasum esse ut sub Deo esse nollent, sed in sua potestate potius sine Domino, ut legem eius non observarent, quasi invidentis sibi ne se ipsi regerent, non indigentes illius interno lumine, sed utentes propria providentia, quasi oculis suis, ad dignoscendum bonum et malum, quod ille prohibuisset?
We see by these words that sin was persuaded through pride: for to this tends what was said, you will be like gods. So too what was said, for God knew that on the day you eat from it, your eyes will be opened, what is here understood, except that they were persuaded to be unwilling to be under God, but rather to be in their own power without the Lord, so as not to observe his law, as though he begrudged them their ruling themselves, not needing his inner light, but using their own foresight, as if their own eyes, to discern good and evil, which he had forbidden?
GenMani.2.15.22
Hoc est ergo quod persuasum est, ut suam potestatem nimis amarent, et cum Deo esse pares vellent, illa medietate, per quam Deo subiecti erant, et corpora subiecta habebant, tamquam fructu arboris constitutae in medio Paradisi, male uterentur, id est contra Legem Dei; atque ita quod acceperant amitterent, dum id quod non acceperant, usurpare voluerunt. Non enim accepit hominis natura, ut per suam potestatem Deo non regente beata sit; quia nullo regente, per suam potestatem beatus esse solus Deus potest.
This, then, is what was persuaded: that they should love their own power too much, and, wishing to be equal with God, should make bad use of that middle position, through which they were subject to God and had their bodies subject to them—as if of the fruit of the tree set in the midst of paradise—that is, against the Law of God; and so should lose what they had received, while they wished to usurp what they had not received. For the nature of man did not receive the power to be blessed by its own power, with God not ruling; because, with no one ruling, God alone can be blessed by his own power.
GenMani.2.15.22
15. 23. Et vidit, inquit, mulier quia bonum est lignum ad escam; et quia bonum est oculis ad videndum, et cognoscendum (Gen 3, 6). Quomodo videbat, si clausi erant oculi? Sed hoc dictum est, ut intellegeremus eos oculos esse apertos, posteaquam de fructu illo acceperunt, quibus se nudos videbant, et displicebant sibi, id est oculos astutiae, quibus simplicitas displicet. Cum enim quisque ceciderit ab illa intima et secretissima luce veritatis, nihil est unde velit placere superbia, nisi fraudulentis simulationibus. Hinc enim et hypocrisis nascitur, in qua multum sibi videntur cordati, qui potuerint fallere et decipere quem voluerint.
15. 23. And the woman saw, he says, that the tree was good for food, and that it was good to the eyes for seeing and knowing (Gen 3:6). How did she see, if the eyes were closed? But this was said so that we might understand that their eyes were opened, after they had taken of that fruit—the eyes by which they saw themselves naked and were displeasing to themselves, that is, the eyes of cunning, to which simplicity is displeasing. For when anyone has fallen from that inmost and most hidden light of truth, there is nothing by which pride wishes to please except by fraudulent pretenses. For from this hypocrisy too is born, in which those seem very shrewd to themselves who have been able to deceive and beguile whomever they wished.
GenMani.2.15.22
Dedit enim mulier viro suo, et manducaverunt, et aperti sunt oculi eorum, de quibus iam dictum est; et tunc viderunt quod nudi essent, sed oculis perversis, quibus illa simplicitas quae nuditatis nomine significata est, erubescenda videbatur. Itaque ut iam non essent simplices, fecerunt de foliis fici sibi succinctoria, tamquam tegentes pudenda sua, id est occultantes simplicitatem, de qua iam erubescebat astuta superbia. Folia vero fici pruritum quemdam significant, si hoc bene in rebus incorporeis dicitur, quem miris modis animus patitur cupiditate, et delectatione mentiendi. Unde etiam latine salsi dicuntur, qui iocari amant. In iocis autem utique simulatio principatum tenet.
For the woman gave to her husband, and they ate, and their eyes were opened, of which it has already been said; and then they saw that they were naked, but with perverse eyes, to which that simplicity which was signified by the name of nakedness seemed something to be ashamed of. And so, that they might no longer be simple, they made themselves girdles from fig leaves, as if covering their shameful parts, that is, hiding the simplicity of which cunning pride was now ashamed. But the fig leaves signify a certain itch, if this is rightly said of incorporeal things, which the mind suffers in wondrous ways by the desire and delight of lying. Whence in Latin too those who love to jest are called "salty." But in jests surely pretense holds the chief place.
GenMani.2.15.22
Absconsio, ambulatio, percontatio quid signent (Gen 3, 8ss.).
What the hiding, the walking, the questioning signify (Genesis 3:8ff.).
16. 24. Itaque cum deambularet Deus in Paradiso ad vesperam (Cf. Gen 3, 8), id est cum ad eos iam iudicandos veniret, adhuc ante poenam eorum, deambulabat in Paradiso, id est, quasi movebatur in eis praesentia Dei, quando iam ipsi stabiles in eius praecepto non erant; et bene ad vesperam, id est cum iam ab eis sol occideret, id est auferretur ab eis lux illa interior veritatis: audierunt vocem eius, et absconderunt se a conspectu eius. Quis se abscondit a conspectu Dei, nisi qui deserto ipso incipit iam amare quod suum est? Iam enim habebant cooperimenta mendacii: qui autem loquitur mendacium, de suo loquitur (Cf. Io 8, 44). Et ideo ad arborem se dicuntur abscondere, quae erat in medio Paradisi, id est ad seipsos, qui in medio rerum infra Deum et supra corpora ordinati erant.
16. 24. And so, when God was walking in paradise toward evening (See Gen 3:8), that is, when he was now coming to judge them, still before their punishment, he was walking in paradise, that is, the presence of God was, as it were, moving in them, when they were no longer stable in his commandment; and well "toward evening," that is, when the sun was now setting for them, that is, when that inner light of truth was being taken from them: they heard his voice, and hid themselves from his sight. Who hides himself from the sight of God, except he who, having abandoned God himself, now begins to love what is his own? For now they had the coverings of lying: and he who speaks a lie speaks from his own (See John 8:44). And therefore they are said to hide themselves by the tree which was in the midst of paradise, that is, by themselves, who were ordered in the middle of things, below God and above bodies.
GenMani.2.16.24
Ergo ad seipsos absconderunt se, ut conturbarentur miseris erroribus, relicto lumine veritatis, quod ipsi non erant. Particeps enim veritatis potest esse anima humana: ipsa autem veritas Deus est incommutabilis supra illam. Ab ea ergo Veritate quisquis aversus est, et ad seipsum conversus, et non de rectore atque illustratore Deo, sed de suis motibus quasi liberis exsultat, tenebratur mendacio: quoniam qui loquitur mendacium, de suo loquitur; atque ita turbatur, et vocem illam prophetae manifestat, qua dictum est: ad meipsum anima mea turbata est (Ps 41, 7).
They hid themselves, then, by themselves, so that they were thrown into confusion by wretched errors, the light of truth, which they themselves were not, having been abandoned. For the human soul can be a partaker of truth: but the truth itself is the unchangeable God above it. From this Truth, then, whoever is turned away, and turned toward himself, and exults not in God his governor and illuminator but in his own movements as if they were free, is darkened by lying: since he who speaks a lie speaks from his own; and so is thrown into confusion, and makes plain that voice of the prophet by which it was said, my soul is troubled within me (Ps 42:7 (41:7)).
GenMani.2.16.24
Itaque iam interrogatur Adam, non Deo nesciente ubi esset, sed cogente ad confessionem peccati: non enim et Dominus Iesus Christus tam multa quae interrogabat, nesciebat. Respondit autem, voce eius audita, abscondisse se, quoniam nudus esset. Iam miserrimo errore respondit, quasi Deo posset displicere nudus, sicut eum ipse fecerat. Est autem hoc erroris proprium, ut quod cuique displicet, hoc etiam Deo displicere arbitretur. Illud autem sublimiter intellegendum est quod Dominus ait: quis nuntiavit tibi quod nudus esses, nisi quia ab illa arbore de qua dixeram tibi, ex illa sola ne manducares, ex illa manducasti? (Gen 3, 11) Nudus enim erat a simulatione, sed vestiebatur luce divina. Unde aversus et ad seipsum conversus, quod significat de illa arbore manducasse, nuditatem suam vidit, et displicuit sibi ex eo quod non habebat aliquid proprium.
And so now Adam is questioned, not because God did not know where he was, but because he was compelling him to confess his sin: for the Lord Jesus Christ too did not fail to know the many things about which he asked. But Adam answered that, having heard his voice, he had hidden himself, because he was naked. He answered already with a most wretched error, as if he could be displeasing to God naked, just as God himself had made him. But this is proper to error, that what is displeasing to each one he thinks is displeasing to God too. But that is to be understood loftily which the Lord says: who told you that you were naked, unless it is that you have eaten from that tree of which I had told you, of that one alone, not to eat? (Gen 3:11) For he was naked of pretense, but was clothed with the divine light. Whence, turned away and turned toward himself—which signifies that he ate of that tree—he saw his nakedness, and was displeasing to himself because he had nothing of his own.
GenMani.2.16.24
Culpae reiectio (Gen 3 ,12).
The casting off of guilt (Genesis 3:12).
17. 25. Deinde iam more superbiae in se non accusat quod consensit mulieri, sed in mulierem refundit culpam suam; et sic subtiliter quasi de astutia quam miser conceperat, voluit ad ipsum Deum pertinere quod peccavit. Non enim ait: "mulier dedit mihi"; sed addidit dicens: mulier quam dedisti mihi (Gen 3, 12).
17. 25. Then, now in the manner of pride, he does not accuse himself of having consented to the woman, but pours his guilt back onto the woman; and so subtly, as if from the cunning that the wretch had conceived, he wished what he had sinned to pertain to God himself. For he does not say, "the woman gave me"; but he added, saying, the woman whom you gave me (Gen 3:12).
GenMani.2.17.25
Nihil est autem tam familiare peccantibus, quam tribuere Deo velle undecumque accusantur: et hoc de illa vena superbiae, ut quoniam sic homo peccavit cum vult esse par Deo, id est liber esse ab eius dominio, sicut ille ab omni dominio liber est, quoniam ipse est Dominus omnium; quoniam in maiestate par illi esse non potuit, iam lapsus et iacens in peccato suo, parem sibi eum facere conetur. Vel potius illum vult ostendere peccasse, se autem esse innocentem.
But nothing is so familiar to sinners as to wish to attribute to God whatever they are accused of: and this from that vein of pride; so that, since man sinned in this way when he wants to be equal to God, that is, to be free from his dominion, just as God is free from all dominion, since he himself is the Lord of all—since man could not be equal to him in majesty, now fallen and lying in his sin, he tries to make him equal to himself. Or rather he wants to show that God sinned, but that he himself is innocent.
GenMani.2.17.25
Et mulier interrogata refert culpam in serpentem: quasi aut ille sic acceperat uxorem ut ei obtemperaret, et non potius ut ipsam sibi obtemperare faceret; aut illa non poterat Dei praeceptum potius custodire, quam verba serpentis admittere.
And the woman, when questioned, refers her guilt to the serpent: as though either he had so taken a wife that he should obey her, and not rather make her obey him; or she could not rather keep the commandment of God than admit the words of the serpent.
GenMani.2.17.25
Serpentis poena.
The serpent's punishment.
17. 26. Iam serpens non interrogatur, sed prior excepit poenam, quia nec confiteri peccatum potest, nec habet omnino unde se excuset. Non autem nunc ea damnatio diaboli dicitur, quae ultimo iudicio reservatur, de qua loquitur Dominus cum dicit: ite in ignem aeternum, qui praeparatus est diabolo et angelis eius (Mt 25, 42); sed ea poena eius dicitur, qua nobis cavendus est.
17. 26. Now the serpent is not questioned, but was the first to receive punishment, because he can neither confess his sin nor has anything at all by which to excuse himself. But that condemnation of the devil is not now spoken of which is reserved for the last judgment, of which the Lord speaks when he says, go into the eternal fire, which has been prepared for the devil and his angels (Matt 25:41); but that punishment of his is spoken of by which he is to be guarded against by us.
GenMani.2.17.26
Poena enim eius est, ut in potestate habeat eos qui Dei praecepta contemnunt. Hoc enim explicatur his verbis, quibus in eum profertur sententia: et inde maior poena est, quia de hac tam infelici potestate laetatur, qui solebat antequam caderet, de sublimi veritate gaudere in qua non stetit. Et ideo illi etiam pecora praeponuntur, non in potestate, sed in conservatione naturae suae: quia pecora non amiserunt beatitudinem aliquam coelestem, quam nunquam habuerunt, sed in sua natura quam acceperunt peragunt vitam.
For his punishment is that he should have in his power those who despise the commandments of God. For this is set forth in these words by which the sentence is pronounced against him: and from this his punishment is the greater, because he rejoices over this so unhappy power, who, before he fell, was accustomed to rejoice in the sublime truth in which he did not stand. And therefore even the cattle are preferred to him, not in power but in the preservation of their nature: because the cattle did not lose any heavenly blessedness, which they never had, but pass their life in the nature that they received.
GenMani.2.17.26
Dicitur ergo huic: pectore et ventre repes (Gen 3, 14). Quod quidem et in colubro animadvertitur, et ex illo animante visibili ad hunc invisibilem inimicum nostrum locutio figuratur. Nomine enim pectoris, significatur superbia, quia ibi dominatur impetus animi: nomine autem ventris, significatur carnale desiderium, quia haec pars mollior sentitur in corpore. Et quia his rebus ille serpit ad eos quos vult decipere; propterea dictum est: pectore et ventre repes.
It is said to him, then: upon your breast and belly you will crawl (Gen 3:14). Which is indeed observed also in the snake, and from that visible animal the manner of speaking is figured to this invisible enemy of ours. For by the name breast, pride is signified, because there the impulse of the mind has dominion; and by the name belly, carnal desire is signified, because this part is felt to be softer in the body. And because by these things he creeps toward those whom he wishes to deceive, therefore it was said, upon your breast and belly you will crawl.
GenMani.2.17.26
Quomodo intellegi possit: manducabis terram (Gen 3, 14).
How "you will eat earth" (Genesis 3:14) can be understood.
18. 27. Et terram, inquit, manducabis omnibus diebus vitae tuae (Gen 3, 15): id est omnibus diebus quibus agis hanc potestatem, ante illam ultimam poenam iudicii; haec enim vita eius videtur, de qua gaudet atque gloriatur. Terram ergo manducabis, duobus modis intellegi potest: vel ad te pertinebunt, quos terrena cupiditate deceperis, id est peccatores, qui terrae nomine significantur; vel certe genus tertium tentationis his verbis figuratur, quod est curiositas. Terram enim qui manducat, profunda et tenebrosa penetrat, et tamen temporalia atque terrena.
18. 27. And you will eat earth, he says, all the days of your life (Gen 3:14): that is, all the days in which you exercise this power, before that last punishment of the judgment; for this seems to be his life, in which he rejoices and glories. You will eat earth, then, can be understood in two ways: either those will pertain to you whom you have deceived by earthly desire, that is, sinners, who are signified by the name earth; or else a third kind of temptation is figured by these words, which is curiosity. For he who eats earth penetrates deep and dark things, and yet temporal and earthly ones.
GenMani.2.17.26
Serpentis cum Eva inimicitia.
The serpent's enmity with Eve.
18. 28. Non autem inimicitiae ponuntur inter ipsum et virum, sed inter ipsum et mulierem. Numquid quia viros non decipit et tentat? Sed manifestum est quod decipit. An quia ipsum Adam non decepit, sed mulierem eius? Sed numquid propterea non est inimicus eius, ad quem pervenit per mulierem suam illa deceptio, maxime quia de futuro iam dicitur: inimicitias ponam inter te et mulierem (Gen 3, 15)? Si autem quod non deinceps decepit Adam, nec ipsam Evam deinceps decepit.
18. 28. But enmity is not put between him and the man, but between him and the woman. Is it because he does not deceive and tempt men? But it is plain that he deceives them. Or is it because he did not deceive Adam himself, but his woman? But is he not therefore an enemy of him to whom that deception came through his woman, especially since it is now said of the future, I will put enmity between you and the woman (Gen 3:15)? But if it is because he did not afterward deceive Adam, neither did he afterward deceive Eve herself.
GenMani.2.18.28
Quare ergo ita dicitur, nisi quia hic manifeste ostenditur non posse nos a diabolo tentari, nisi per illam animalem partem, quae quasi mulieris imaginem vel exemplum in uno ipso homine ostendit, de qua superius iam multa diximus? Quod autem etiam inter semen diaboli, et semen mulieris ponuntur inimicitiae, significatur semine diaboli perversa suggestio; semine autem mulieris, fructus boni operis, quo perversae suggestioni resistit. Et ideo observat ipse plantam mulieris, ut si quando in illicita labitur delectatio, tunc illam capiat: et illa observat caput eius, ut eum in ipso initio malae suasionis excludat.
Why, then, is it said so, unless because here it is plainly shown that we cannot be tempted by the devil except through that animal part, which shows, as it were, the image or example of the woman in the one man himself, of which we have already said much above? And in that enmities are put also between the seed of the devil and the seed of the woman, by the seed of the devil is signified the perverse suggestion; and by the seed of the woman, the fruit of good work, by which it resists the perverse suggestion. And therefore he himself watches the sole of the woman's foot, so that, if at any time delight slips into unlawful things, he may then seize her: and she watches his head, so that she may shut him out at the very beginning of his evil persuasion.
GenMani.2.18.28
De poenis mulieri irrogatis.
On the punishments imposed on the woman.
19. 29. Iam de poena mulieris nulla quaestio est: manifeste enim multiplicatos dolores habet, atque suspiria in huius vitae calamitatibus; et quod in doloribus pariat filios, quamvis et in ista visibili muliere compleatur, tamen ad illam secretiorem consideratio revocanda est.
19. 29. Now about the punishment of the woman there is no question: for plainly she has multiplied sorrows, and sighs amid the calamities of this life; and as for the fact that she bears children in sorrows, although it is fulfilled also in this visible woman, nevertheless the consideration must be brought back to that more hidden woman.
GenMani.2.19.29
Nam et in pecoribus feminae cum dolore pariunt filios, et haec est in illis mortalitatis conditio potius quam poena peccati. Potest ergo fieri ut etiam in feminis hominibus mortalium corporum sit ista conditio. Sed hoc est magnum supplicium, quod ad istam corporum mortalitatem ex illa immortalitate venerunt.
For among the cattle too the females bear their young with pain, and this in them is a condition of mortality rather than a punishment of sin. It can be, then, that even in human females this is a condition of mortal bodies. But this is a great punishment, that they came to this mortality of bodies from that immortality.
GenMani.2.19.29
Verumtamen magnum sacramentum est huius sententiae, quod nulla abstinentia fit a voluntate carnali, quae non habeat in exordio dolorem, donec in meliorem partem consuetudo flectatur. Quod cum provenerit, quasi natus est filius, id est ad bonum opus paratus est affectus per consuetudinem bonam. Quae consuetudo ut nasceretur, cum dolore reluctatum est consuetudini malae. Nam et illud quod post partum dictum est: erit tibi conversio ad virum tuum, et ipse tui dominabitur (Gen 3, 16); nonne multae ac prope omnes mulieres absentibus viris suis pariunt, et post partum se ad illos non convertunt? Quae autem superbae sunt mulieres, et dominantur viris, numquid post partum carent hoc vitio, ut viri earum dominentur? Imo quasi dignitatem sibi additam credunt, quod matres fiunt, et plerumque superbiores existunt.
Nevertheless there is a great sacred meaning in this sentence, that no abstinence from carnal will is made which does not have sorrow at the outset, until habit is bent toward the better part. When this has come about, it is as though a son has been born, that is, the affection has been prepared for good work through good habit. And that this habit might be born, there was a struggle with sorrow against the bad habit. For as to what was said after the birth, your turning will be toward your husband, and he will have dominion over you (Gen 3:16)—do not many, and nearly all, women bear children in the absence of their husbands, and after the birth not turn toward them? And as for those women who are proud and have dominion over their husbands, are they free of this fault after the birth, so that their husbands have dominion over them? On the contrary, they believe, as it were, that a dignity has been added to them in becoming mothers, and for the most part they turn out prouder.
GenMani.2.19.29
Quid sibi ergo vult, quod posteaquam dictum est: in doloribus paries filios, additum est, et erit tibi conversio ad virum tuum, et ipse tui dominabitur (Gen 3, 16); nisi quia illa pars animae, quae carnalibus gaudiis tenetur, cum aliquam malam consuetudinem gaudiis tenetur, cum aliquam malam consuetudinem volens vincere, passa fuerit difficultatem ac dolorem, atque ita pepererit consuetudinem bonam, cautius iam et diligentius rationi obtemperat tamquam viro; et ipsis quasi erudita doloribus convertitur ad rationem, et libenter servit iubenti, ne iterum in aliquam perniciosam consuetudinem defluat? Ista ergo quae videntur maledicta, praecepta sunt, si non carnaliter spiritalia legamus. Lex enim spiritalis est (Rom 7, 14).
What does it mean, then, that after it was said, in sorrows you will bear children, there was added, and your turning will be toward your husband, and he will have dominion over you (Gen 3:16), unless it is that that part of the soul which is held by carnal joys, when, wishing to overcome some bad habit, it has suffered difficulty and sorrow, and so has given birth to a good habit, now more cautiously and diligently obeys reason as its husband; and, schooled as it were by those very sorrows, turns toward reason, and gladly serves it as it commands, lest it again flow down into some ruinous habit? These things, then, which seem curses, are commandments, if we read spiritual things not carnally. For the Law is spiritual (Rom 7:14).
GenMani.2.19.29
De viri poena.
On the man's punishment.
20. 30. Item de sententia ista quae prolata est in ipsum virum, quid dicemus? Numquid forte divites, quibus provenit facillimus victus, neque in terra operantur, evasisse istam poenam existimandi sunt, qua dicitur: maledicta terra erit tibi in omnibus operibus tuis; in tristitia et gemitu tuo manducabis ex ea omnibus diebus vitae tuae. Spinas et tribulos pariet tibi, et edes pabulum agri tui: in sudore vultus tui edes panem tuum, donec revertaris in terram, ex qua sumptus es; quia terra es, et in terram ibis (Gen 3, 17-19)?
20. 30. Likewise, what shall we say of this sentence which was pronounced against the man himself? Are the rich perhaps, to whom sustenance comes most easily and who do not work the earth, to be thought to have escaped this punishment, by which it is said, the earth will be cursed for you in all your works; in your sorrow and groaning you will eat of it all the days of your life. It will bring forth thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the fodder of your field: in the sweat of your face you will eat your bread, until you return to the earth from which you were taken; for earth you are, and to earth you will go (Gen 3:17–19)?
GenMani.2.20.30
Sed certe illud manifestum est, quod nemo evadat istam sententiam. Hoc ipsum enim quod in hac vita quisque natus, difficultatem inveniendae veritatis habet ex corruptibili corpore (sicut enim Salomon dicit: corpus quod corrumpitur aggravat animam, et deprimit terrena inhabitatio sensum multa cogitantem (Sap 9, 15)), ipsi sunt labores et tristitiae quas habet homo ex terra; et spinae ac tribuli sunt punctiones tortuosarum quaestionum, aut cogitationes de provisione huius vitae: quae plerumque, nisi exstirpentur et de agro Dei proiciantur, suffocant verbum, ne fructificet in homine, sicut Dominus in Evangelio dicit (Cf. Mc 4, 18-19).
But surely this is plain, that no one escapes this sentence. For this very thing, that each one born in this life has difficulty in finding the truth because of the corruptible body (for, as Solomon says, the body that is corrupted weighs down the soul, and the earthly dwelling presses down the mind that ponders many things (Wis 9:15))—these are themselves the labors and sorrows that man has from the earth; and the thorns and thistles are the prickings of tortuous questions, or the cares about the provision of this life: which for the most part, unless they are uprooted and cast out of the field of God, choke the word, so that it does not bear fruit in man, as the Lord says in the Gospel (See Mark 4:18–19).
GenMani.2.20.30
Et quoniam necessitate iam per hos oculos et per has aures de ipsa veritate admonemur, et difficile est resistere phantasmatibus quae per istos sensus intrant in animam, quamvis per illos intret etiam ipsa admonitio veritatis; in ista ergo perplexitate, cuius vultus non sudet ut manducet panem suum? quod omnibus diebus vitae nostrae passuri sumus, id est huius vitae quae transitura est. Et hoc illi dictum est, qui coluerit agrum suum, quia ista patitur donec revertatur in terram, ex qua sumptus est, id est, donec finiat vitam istam. Qui enim coluerit agrum istum interius, et ad panem suum quamvis cum labore pervenerit, potest usque ad finem vitae huius hunc laborem pati: post hanc autem vitam non est necesse ut patiatur. Sed qui forte agrum non coluerit, et spinis eum opprimi permiserit, habet in hac vita maledictionem terrae suae in omnibus operibus suis, et post hanc vitam habebit, vel ignem purgationis vel poenam aeternam. Ita nemo evadit istam sententiam: sed agendum est ut saltem in hac tantum vita sentiatur.
And since by necessity we are now admonished about the truth itself through these eyes and through these ears, and it is difficult to resist the phantasms that enter the soul through these senses, although through them the admonition of truth itself also enters; in this perplexity, then, whose face does not sweat that he may eat his bread? Which we are going to suffer all the days of our life, that is, of this life that will pass away. And this was said to him who has tilled his field, because he suffers these things until he returns to the earth from which he was taken, that is, until he ends this life. For he who has tilled this field within, and has come to his bread, though with labor, can suffer this labor up to the end of this life: but after this life it is not necessary that he suffer it. But he who perhaps has not tilled his field, and has allowed it to be overwhelmed with thorns, has in this life the curse of his earth in all his works, and after this life will have either the fire of purgation or eternal punishment. So no one escapes this sentence: but we must act so that it may be felt at least in this life only.
GenMani.2.20.30
Cur post transgressionem Adam vocaverit Vitam ipsam Evam.
Why after the transgression Adam called Eve herself Life.
21. 31. Quem autem non moveat, quod post peccatum et sententiam iudicis Dei vocat Adam mulierem suam, Vitam, quia vivorum ipsa sit mater, posteaquam meruit mortem, et mortales fetus parere destinata est; nisi quia illos fetus attendit Scriptura, quos cum in doloribus pepererit, fiet illi conversio ad virum suum, et eius ipse dominabitur? De quibus fetibus superius dictum est. Sic enim est illa vita materque vivorum. Nam vita quae in peccatis est, mors appellari in Scripturis solet, sicut Apostolus dicit mortuam esse viduam quae in deliciis vivit (1 Tim 5, 6): et mortui nomine peccatum ipsum significari legimus, ubi dictum est: qui baptizatur a mortuo, et iterum tangit illum, quid proficit in lavacro suo? Sic et qui ieiunat super peccata sua, et iterum ambulans haec eadem facit (Eccli 34, 30-31). Pro peccato enim mortuum posuit, abstinentiam vero ieiuniumque a peccato, tamquam Baptismum, hoc est mundationem a mortuo: iterum autem redire ad peccatum, tamquam iterum tangere mortuum.
21. 31. But whom would it not move that, after sin and the sentence of God the judge, Adam calls his woman Life, because she is the mother of the living, after she had deserved death and was destined to bear mortal offspring; unless it is that Scripture attends to those offspring which, when she has borne them in sorrows, her turning will be toward her husband, and he will have dominion over her? Of which offspring it was said above. For so is she Life and the mother of the living. For the life that is in sins is accustomed to be called death in the Scriptures, as the Apostle says that the widow who lives in pleasures is dead (1 Tim 5:6): and we read that sin itself is signified by the name of the dead, where it was said, he who is baptized from a dead body, and again touches it, what does he profit by his washing? So too he who fasts over his sins, and again, going about, does these same things (Sir 34:30–31). For he set down "a dead body" for sin, and abstinence and fasting from sin as a baptism, that is, a cleansing from a dead body: but to return again to sin as to touch again a dead body.
GenMani.2.21.31
Quare ergo non "animalis" illa pars nostra, quae tamquam viro debet obtemperare rationi, cum per ipsam rationem de verbo vitae recte vivendi sarcinam conceperit, appelletur vita; et cum parturitione abstinentiae, quamvis cum doloribus atque gemitibus, malae consuetudini resistens, bonam consuetudinem ad recte facta pepererit, mater vivorum vocetur, id est recte factorum; quibus contraria sunt peccata, quae nomine mortuorum significari posse docuimus?
Why, then, should not that "animal" part of ours, which ought to obey reason as a husband, when through reason itself it has conceived from the word of life the burden of living rightly, be called life; and when, by the labor of giving birth to abstinence—though with sorrows and groanings, resisting the bad habit—it has given birth to a good habit toward right deeds, be called the mother of the living, that is, of right deeds; to which sins are contrary, which we have taught can be signified by the name of the dead?
GenMani.2.21.31
De pelliceis tunicis allegorice.
On the garments of skins, allegorically.
21. 32. Nam illa mors, quam omnes qui ex Adam nati sumus, coepimus debere naturae, quam minatus est Deus, cum praeceptum daret ne arboris fructus ille ederetur; illa ergo mors in tunicis pelliceis figurata est. Ipsi enim sibi fecerunt praecinctoria de foliis fici, et Deus illis fecit tunicas pelliceas: id est, ipsi appetiverunt mentiendi libidinem relicta facie veritatis, et Deus corpora eorum in istam mortalitatem carnis mutavit, ubi latent corda mendacia.
21. 32. For that death which all of us who are born of Adam began to owe to nature—which God threatened when he gave the commandment that the fruit of the tree should not be eaten—that death, then, was figured in the garments of skins. For they themselves made themselves girdles from fig leaves, and God made them garments of skins: that is, they themselves sought the lust of lying, the face of truth having been abandoned, and God changed their bodies into this mortality of the flesh, where lying hearts lie hidden.
GenMani.2.21.32
Neque enim in illis corporibus coelestibus sic latere posse cogitationes credendum est, quemadmodum in his corporibus latent: sed sicut nonnulli motus animorum apparent in vultu, et maxime in oculis, sic in illa perspicuitate ac simplicitate coelestium corporum omnes omnino motus animi latere non arbitror.
For it is not to be believed that in those heavenly bodies thoughts can lie hidden in the way that they lie hidden in these bodies: but just as some movements of the mind appear in the face, and especially in the eyes, so in that clearness and simplicity of heavenly bodies I do not think that all the movements of the mind whatsoever can lie hidden.
GenMani.2.21.32
Itaque illi merebuntur habitationem illam et commutationem in angelicam formam, qui etiam in hac vita cum possint sub tunicis pelliceis occultare mendacia, oderunt tamen ea et cavent flagrantissimo amore veritatis, et hoc solum tegunt, quod ii qui audiunt, ferre non possunt; sed nulla mentiuntur. Veniet enim tempus ut nihil etiam contegatur: nihil est enim occultum quod non manifestabitur (Mt 10, 26).
And so those will deserve that dwelling and that change into the angelic form who, even in this life, although they can hide lies under the garments of skins, nevertheless hate them and guard against them with a most burning love of truth, and conceal this alone, which those who hear cannot bear; but they tell no lies. For a time will come when nothing at all will be covered up: for there is nothing hidden that will not be made manifest (Matt 10:26).
GenMani.2.21.32
Tamdiu autem in Paradiso fuerunt isti, quamvis iam sub sententia damnantis Dei, donec ventum esset ad pelliceas tunicas, id est ad huius vitae mortalitatem. Quo enim maiore indicio potuit significari mors quam sentimus in corpore, quam pellibus quae mortuis pecoribus detrahi solent? Itaque cum contra praeceptum, non imitatione legitima, sed illicita superbia, Deus esse appetit homo, usque ad belluarum mortalitatem deiectus est.
But these two were in paradise so long—although already under the sentence of the condemning God—until it had come to the garments of skins, that is, to the mortality of this life. For by what greater token could the death which we feel in the body be signified than by the skins which are accustomed to be stripped from dead cattle? And so, when, against the commandment, not by lawful imitation but by unlawful pride, man sought to be God, he was cast down even to the mortality of beasts.
GenMani.2.21.32
21. 33. Ideo sic illi Lex divina insultat ore Dei; qua insultatione nos admonemur quantum possumus cavere superbiam.
21. 33. Thus the divine Law mocks him by the mouth of God; by which mockery we are admonished to guard against pride as much as we can.
GenMani.2.21.33
Quid significet Gen 3, 22: Adam factus tamquam unus ex nobis.
What Genesis 3:22 signifies: Adam has become like one of us.
22. 33. Ecce Adam factus est tamquam unus ex nobis ad scientiam cognoscendi bonum et malum (Gen 3, 22). Quae ambigua locutio figuram facit: nam, factus est tamquam unus ex nobis, dupliciter intellegi potest: vel unus ex nobis quasi et ipse Deus, quod pertinet ad insultationem; sicut dicitur, "unus ex senatoribus," utique "senator": aut certe, quia et ipse deus esset, quamvis Creatoris sui beneficio, non natura, si sub eius potestate manere voluisset, sic dictum est, ex nobis; quomodo dicitur, ex consulibus; aut, pro consulibus, qui iam non est.
22. 33. Behold, Adam has become like one of us, in the knowledge of recognizing good and evil (Gen 3:22). This ambiguous expression makes a figure: for he has become like one of us can be understood in two ways: either one of us as if he too were God, which pertains to the mockery—as one says, "one of the senators," meaning of course "a senator"—or else, because he too would be a god, though by the benefit of his Creator, not by nature, if he had been willing to remain under his power, it was said, of us; as one says, "one of the former consuls," or "in place of a consul," who is no longer one.
GenMani.2.21.33
Sed ad quam rem factus est tamquam unus ex nobis? "Ad scientiam scilicet dignoscendi boni et mali," ut iste per experimentum disceret dum sentit malum, quod Deus per sapientiam novit; et potestatem illam Omnipotentis quam pati noluit beatus atque consentiens, poena sua discat esse inevitabilem.
But for what has he become like one of us? "In the knowledge, namely, of discerning good and evil," so that he might learn by experience, while he feels the evil, what God knows by wisdom; and might learn from his own punishment that that power of the Almighty, which he was unwilling to undergo while blessed and consenting, is unavoidable.
GenMani.2.21.33
Expulsio Adam de paradiso allegorice.
The expulsion of Adam from paradise, allegorically.
22. 34. Et tunc ne porrigeret Adam manum suam ad arborem vitae, et viveret in aeternum, dimisit illum Deus de Paradiso (Gen 3, 23). Bene dictum est, dimisit, non, "exclusit"; ut ipso peccatorum suorum pondere tamquam in locum sibi congruum videretur urgeri. Quod patitur plerumque malus homo cum inter bonos vivere coeperit, si se in melius commutare noluerit: ex illa bonorum congregatione, pondere malae suae consuetudinis pellitur; et illi eum non excludunt reluctantem, sed dimittunt cupientem.
22. 34. And then, lest Adam stretch out his hand to the tree of life and live forever, God sent him out of paradise (Gen 3:23). It was well said, he sent him out, not "he shut him out"; so that he might seem to be driven, by the very weight of his sins, as if into a place suited to him. This for the most part a bad man suffers when he has begun to live among the good, if he has been unwilling to change for the better: by the weight of his bad habit he is driven from that gathering of the good; and they do not shut him out as he struggles, but send him away as he desires.
GenMani.2.21.33
Quod autem dictum est: ne porrigeret Adam manum suam ad arborem vitae, etiam haec ambigua locutio est. Loquimur enim sic, cum dicimus, "ideo te moneo, ne iterum facias quod fecisti," volentes utique ut non faciat: et iterum sic, "ideo te moneo, ne forte sis bonus," volentes utique ut sit; id est, moneo te, non desperans quod bonus possis esse. Sicut loquitur Apostolus, cum dicit: ne forte det illis Deus poenitentiam ad cognoscendam veritatem (2 Tim 2, 25).
But as for what was said, lest Adam stretch out his hand to the tree of life, this too is an ambiguous expression. For we speak thus, when we say, "I warn you, lest you do again what you did," wishing of course that he not do it: and again thus, "I warn you, in case you may be good," wishing of course that he be so; that is, I warn you, not despairing that you may be able to be good. As the Apostle speaks, when he says, in case God may give them repentance to know the truth (2 Tim 2:25).
GenMani.2.21.33
Potest ergo videri propterea homo in labores huius vitae esse dimissus, ut aliquando manum porrigat ad arborem vitae, et vivat in aeternum. Manus autem porrectio bene significat crucem, per quam vita aeterna recuperatur. Quamvis etiam si illo modo intellegamus, ne manum porrigat, et vivat in aeternum, non iniusta poena est post peccatum interclusum esse aditum ad sapientiam, donec Dei misericordia mensuris temporum reviviscat qui mortuus est, et inveniatur qui perierat.
It can seem, then, that for this reason man was sent into the labors of this life, that at some time he might stretch out his hand to the tree of life and live forever. And the stretching out of the hand well signifies the cross, through which eternal life is regained. Although, even if we understand it in that other way, lest he stretch out his hand and live forever, it is not an unjust punishment that after sin the way to wisdom was blocked off, until, by the mercy of God, in the measures of the times, he who is dead comes back to life, and he who had perished is found.
GenMani.2.21.33
Dimissus est ergo de paradiso suavitatis, ut operaretur terram de qua sumptus erat; id est, ut in corpore isto laboraret, et ibi si posset collocaret sibi meritum redeundi. Moratus est autem contra Paradisum in miseria: quae utique beatae vitae "contraria" est. Nam beatam vitam "Paradisi" nomine significatam existimo.
He was sent away, then, from the paradise of delight, to work the earth from which he had been taken; that is, to labor in this body, and there, if he could, to lay up for himself the merit of returning. But he dwelt opposite paradise in misery: which surely is "contrary" to the blessed life. For I think the blessed life is signified by the name "paradise."
GenMani.2.21.33
Cherubim et framea versatilis (Gen 3, 24) quid notent.
What the Cherubim and the turning sword (Genesis 3:24) denote.
23. 35. Posuit autem Deus Cherubim et flammeam frameam quae versatur, quae uno nomine "versatilis" dici potest, ad custodiendam viam arboris vitae (Gen 3, 24). Sicut illi volunt qui hebraea verba in Scripturis interpretati sunt, "cherubim" Latine "scientiae plenitudo" esse dicitur. Flammea vero framea versatilis, temporales poenae intelleguntur, quoniam tempora volubilitate versantur. Propterea et flammea dicitur, quia urit quodammodo omnis tribulatio. Sed aliud est uri ad consumptionem, et aliud est uri ad purgationem.
23. 35. And God set the Cherubim and the flaming sword which turns, which can be called by one word "turning," to guard the way of the tree of life (Gen 3:24). As those wish who have interpreted the Hebrew words in the Scriptures, "cherubim" is said to be in Latin "the fullness of knowledge." But by the flaming, turning sword temporal punishments are understood, since the times turn with revolving motion. It is also called flaming because every tribulation burns in a certain way. But it is one thing to burn unto consumption, and another to burn unto purgation.
GenMani.2.21.33
Nam et Apostolus dicit: quis scandalizatur, et ego non uror? (2 Cor 11, 29) Sed iste affectus purgabat eum magis, quia de caritate veniebat. Et illae tribulationes quas iusti patiuntur, ad istam pertinent flammeam frameam: quoniam in igne probatur aurum et argentum, et homines acceptabiles in camino humiliationis (Eccli 2, 5). Et iterum: vasa figuli probat fornax, et homines iustos tentatio tribulationis (Eccli 27, 6). Quoniam ergo quem diligit Deus, corripit; et flagellat omnem filium quem recipit (Hebr 12, 6); sicut dicit Apostolus: scientes quoniam tribulatio patientiam operatur, patientia autem probationem (Rom 5, 3-4), et legimus et audimus, et credendum est arborem vitae, plenitudinem scientiae et flammeam frameam custodire. Nemo ergo potest pervenire ad arborem vitae, nisi per has duas, id est per tolerantiam molestiarum, et scientiae plenitudinem.
For the Apostle too says, who is made to stumble, and I am not set on fire? (2 Cor 11:29) But this affection purified him the more, because it came from love. And those tribulations which the just suffer pertain to this flaming sword: since gold and silver are tested in fire, and acceptable men in the furnace of humiliation (Sir 2:5). And again: the furnace tests the potter's vessels, and the testing of tribulation just men (Sir 27:6). Since, then, whom God loves, he rebukes; and he scourges every son whom he receives (Heb 12:6); as the Apostle says, knowing that tribulation works patience, and patience testing (Rom 5:3–4), we both read and hear, and it is to be believed, that the fullness of knowledge and the flaming sword guard the tree of life. No one, then, can come to the tree of life except through these two, that is, through the endurance of troubles and the fullness of knowledge.
GenMani.2.21.33
Ad arborem vitae accedi potest per caritatem.
The tree of life can be approached through love.
23. 36. Sed tolerantia molestiarum omnibus fere in hac vita subeunda est, tendentibus ad arborem vitae: plenitudo autem scientiae videtur paucioribus provenire; ut quasi non omnes qui perveniunt ad arborem vitae, per scientiae plenitudinem veniant, quamvis omnes tolerantiam molestiarum, id est flammeam frameam versatilem, sentiant. Sed si attendatur quod Apostolus dicit: plenitudo autem Legis, caritas (Rom 13, 10); et videamus eamdem caritatem praecepto illo gemino contineri: 'diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota mente tua' (Mt 22, 37); et: 'diliges proximum tamquam teipsum; in quibus duobus praeceptis tota Lex pendet, et Prophetae' (Mt 22, 40): sine dubitatione intellegimus ad arborem vitae non solum per flammeam frameam versatilem, id est per tolerantiam temporalium molestiarum, sed etiam per plenitudinem scientiae, id est per caritatem veniri; quia si caritatem, inquit, non habeam, nihil sum (1 Cor 13, 2).
23. 36. But the endurance of troubles must be undergone by nearly all in this life who are striving toward the tree of life: while the fullness of knowledge seems to come to fewer; so that it is as though not all who come to the tree of life come through the fullness of knowledge, although all feel the endurance of troubles, that is, the flaming, turning sword. But if attention is paid to what the Apostle says, the fullness of the Law is love (Rom 13:10), and we see that this same love is contained in that twofold commandment: you shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart, and with your whole soul, and with your whole mind (Matt 22:37); and: you shall love your neighbor as yourself; on which two commandments hang the whole Law and the Prophets (Matt 22:40): without doubt we understand that one comes to the tree of life not only through the flaming, turning sword, that is, through the endurance of temporal troubles, but also through the fullness of knowledge, that is, through love; because if I have not love, he says, I am nothing (1 Cor 13:2).
GenMani.2.23.36
Adam Christus, Eva Ecclesiae.
Adam is Christ, Eve the Church.
24. 37. Sed in hoc sermone pollicitus sum considerationem rerum factarum, quam puto explicatam: et deinde considerationem prophetiae, quae remanet explicanda iam breviter. Posito enim tamquam signo quodam manifesto quo caetera dirigantur, non diu nos, quantum arbitror, ista consideratio detinebit. Dicit enim Apostolus sacramentum magnum esse, quod dictum est: propter hoc relinquet homo patrem et matrem, et adhaerebit uxori suae; et erunt duo in carne una (Eph 5, 31): quod ipse interpretatur subiciendo: ego autem dico in Christo et in Ecclesia (Eph 5, 32).
24. 37. But in this discourse I promised the consideration of the deeds done, which I think has been set forth; and then the consideration of the prophecy, which remains to be set forth, now briefly. For with a kind of clear sign laid down by which the rest may be directed, this consideration will not, I think, detain us long. For the Apostle says that it is a great mystery, what was said: for this reason a man will leave his father and mother, and will cleave to his wife; and the two will be in one flesh (Eph 5:31): which he himself interprets by subjoining, but I speak in Christ and in the Church (Eph 5:32).
GenMani.2.24.37
Ergo quod per historiam impletum est in Adam, per prophetiam significat Christum, qui reliquit patrem, cum dixit: ego a patre exivi, et veni in hunc mundum (Io 16, 28). Non loco reliquit, quia Deus loco non continetur, neque aversione peccati, sicut apostatae relinquunt Deum; sed apparendo hominibus in homine, cum Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Io 1, 14). Quod ipsum non commutationem naturae Dei significat, sed susceptionem naturae inferioris personae, id est humanae. Ad hoc valet etiam quod dicitur: semetipsum exinanivit (Phil 2, 7); quia non in ea dignitate apparuit hominibus in qua est apud Patrem, blandiens eorum infirmitati, qui cor mundum nondum habebant, unde videretur Verbum in principio Deus apud Deum (Cf. Io 1, 1). Quid est ergo quod diximus, reliquit Patrem, nisi, reliquit apparere hominibus sicut est apud Patrem?
Therefore what through history was fulfilled in Adam, through prophecy signifies Christ, who left his father, when he said, I came forth from the Father, and came into this world (John 16:28). He did not leave him by place, because God is not contained by place, nor by the turning away of sin, as apostates leave God; but by appearing to men in a man, when the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (John 1:14). This very thing signifies not a change of the nature of God, but the taking on of the nature of a lower person, that is, the human. To this tends also what is said, he emptied himself (Phil 2:7); because he did not appear to men in that dignity in which he is with the Father, coaxing the weakness of those who did not yet have a clean heart, by which the Word might be seen to be in the beginning God with God (See John 1:1). What is it, then, that we said, he left the Father, unless it is, he left off appearing to men as he is with the Father?
GenMani.2.24.37
Item reliquit et matrem, id est Synagogae veterem atque carnalem observationem, quae illi mater erat ex semine David secundum carnem, et adhaesit uxori suae, id est Ecclesiae, ut sint duo in carne una. Dicit enim Apostolus ipsum esse caput Ecclesiae, et Ecclesiam corpus eius (Cf. Col 1, 18). Ergo et ipse soporatus est dormitione passionis, ut ei coniux Ecclesia formaretur, quam dormitionem cantat per prophetam dicens: ego dormivi, et somnum cepi; et exsurrexi, quoniam Dominus suscepit me (Ps 3, 6). Formata est ergo ei coniux Ecclesia de latere eius, id est de fide passionis et Baptismi. Nam percussum latus eius lancea, sanguinem et aquam profudit (Cf. Io 19, 34).
Likewise he left his mother too, that is, the old and carnal observance of the Synagogue, which was his mother from the seed of David according to the flesh, and he cleaved to his wife, that is, the Church, so that they might be two in one flesh. For the Apostle says that he himself is the head of the Church, and the Church his body (See Col 1:18). So he too fell asleep in the sleep of his passion, that his spouse the Church might be formed for him—which sleep he sings of through the prophet, saying: I slept and took my rest; and I rose up, because the Lord sustained me (Ps 3:5 (3:6)). The Church, then, his spouse, was formed for him from his side, that is, from the faith of his passion and of baptism. For his side, struck with the lance, poured forth blood and water (See John 19:34).
GenMani.2.24.37
Factus autem, ut supra dixi, ex semine David secundum carnem (Rom 1, 3), sicut Apostolus dicit, id est tamquam de limo terrae, cum homo non esset qui operaretur in terra, quia nullus homo "operatus est" in Virgine, de qua natus est Christus. Fons autem ascendebat de terra, et irrigabat omnem faciem terrae (Gen 2, 6). Facies terrae, id est dignitas terrae, mater Domini virgo Maria rectissime accipitur, quam irrigavit Spiritus sanctus, qui fontis et aquae nomine in Evangelio significatur (Cf. Io 7, 37-38); ut quasi de limo tali homo ille fieret, qui constitutus est in paradiso, ut operaretur et custodiret, id est in voluntate Patris, ut eam impleret atque servaret.
And he was made, as I said above, from the seed of David according to the flesh (Rom 1:3), as the Apostle says, that is, as if from the slime of the earth, when there was no man to work in the earth, because no man "worked" in the Virgin from whom Christ was born. But a fountain went up from the earth, and watered all the face of the earth (Gen 2:6). By the face of the earth, that is, the dignity of the earth, the mother of the Lord, the Virgin Mary, is most rightly understood, whom the Holy Spirit watered, who is signified by the name of fountain and water in the Gospel (See John 7:37–38); so that from such slime, as it were, that man might be made who was set in paradise, to work and to keep it, that is, in the will of the Father, to fulfill it and to keep it.
GenMani.2.24.37
Haeretici ac manichaei maxime per serpentem designati.
Heretics and especially the Manichees designated by the serpent.
25. 38. Nam praeceptum quod accepit, nos accepimus in illo, quia unusquisque Christianus non incongrue sustinet personam Christi, dicente ipso Domino: quod fecistis uni ex minimis meis, mihi fecistis (Mt 25, 40). Atque utinam frueremur, sicut est praeceptum, omni ligno Paradisi, quod significat spiritales delicias;
25. 38. For the commandment that he received, we received in him, because each Christian not incongruously bears the person of Christ, the Lord himself saying, what you have done to one of the least of mine, you have done to me (Matt 25:40). And would that we enjoyed, as is commanded, every tree of paradise, which signifies spiritual delights;
GenMani.2.25.38
fructus autem Spiritus est, caritas, gaudium, pax, longanimitas, benignitas, bonitas, fides, mansuetudo, continentia (Gal 5, 22-23), sicut Apostolus dicit: et non tangeremus lignum in medio paradisi plantatum scientiae boni et mali, id est non vellemus superbire de natura nostra, quae, sicut iam diximus, media est, ut decepti experiremur quid intersit inter simplicem fidem catholicam, et fallacias haereticorum!
but the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, gentleness, self-control (Gal 5:22–23), as the Apostle says: and would that we did not touch the tree of the knowledge of good and evil planted in the midst of paradise, that is, that we did not wish to be proud of our nature, which, as we have already said, is in the middle, so that, deceived, we should learn by experience what difference there is between the simple Catholic faith and the deceptions of heretics!
GenMani.2.25.38
ita enim pervenimus ad dignoscentiam boni et mali. Nam oportet, inquit, etiam haereses esse, ut probati manifesti fiant inter vos (1 Cor 11, 19).
for so we come to the discernment of good and evil. For there must, he says, be even heresies, so that those who are approved may become manifest among you (1 Cor 11:19).
GenMani.2.25.38
Etenim serpens ille secundum prophetiam, haereticorum venena significat, et maxime istorum Manichaeorum, et quicumque Veteri Testamento adversantur. Non enim aliquid manifestius praenuntiatum arbitror, quam istos in illo serpente, vel potius illum in istis esse vitandum. Nulli enim loquacius atque iactantius promittunt scientiam boni et mali; et in ipso homine, tamquam in arbore quae plantata est in medio paradisi, eam dignoscentiam demonstraturos se esse praesumunt.
And indeed that serpent, according to the prophecy, signifies the poisons of heretics, and especially of these Manichees, and of whoever opposes the Old Testament. For I think nothing was more plainly foretold than that these men are to be avoided in that serpent, or rather that serpent in these men. For none more loquaciously and boastfully promise the knowledge of good and evil; and they presume that they will demonstrate that discernment in man himself, as if in the tree that is planted in the midst of paradise.
GenMani.2.25.38
Et etiam illud quod dictum est: eritis sicut dii (Gen 3, 5), qui alii magis dicunt quam isti, qui per suam superbam vanitatem, eamdem superbiam persuadere conantes, affirmant animam naturaliter hoc esse quod Deus est? Et ad quos magis pertinet apertio carnalium oculorum, quam ad istos qui relicta interiore sapientiae luce solem istum, qui pertinet ad oculos corporis, adorare compellunt? Et omnes quidem haeretici generaliter scientiae pollicitatione decipiunt, et reprehendunt eos quos simpliciter credentes invenerint; et quia omnino carnalia persuadent, quasi ad carnalium oculorum apertionem conantur adducere, ut interior oculus excaecetur.
And as for what was said, you will be like gods (Gen 3:5), who say this more than these men, who, through their proud emptiness, trying to persuade us of this same pride, affirm that the soul is naturally what God is? And to whom does the opening of the carnal eyes pertain more than to these men, who, having abandoned the inner light of wisdom, compel us to adore this sun, which pertains to the eyes of the body? And all heretics indeed deceive generally by the promise of knowledge, and find fault with those whom they find believing simply; and because they persuade us of wholly carnal things, they try, as it were, to lead us to the opening of the carnal eyes, so that the inner eye may be blinded.
GenMani.2.25.38
26. 38. Sed istis etiam corpora sua displicent, non propter poenalem mortalitatem, quam peccando meruimus; sed ita ut negent Deum esse corporum conditorem, tamquam apertis oculis carneis nuditas ista displiceat.
26. 38. But to these men even their own bodies are displeasing—not on account of the penal mortality which we deserved by sinning, but in such a way that they deny that God is the founder of bodies, as if, the eyes of the flesh being opened, this nakedness were displeasing to them.
GenMani.2.26.38
Manichaei de Christo mentiuntur ipsumque mentitum esse praedicant.
The Manichees lie about Christ and proclaim that he himself lied.
26. 39. Sed nihil vehementius istos designat et notat, quam quod dicit serpens: non morte moriemini: sciebat enim Deus quoniam qua die ederitis, aperientur oculi vestri (Gen 3, 4-5). Sic enim isti credunt, quod serpens ille Christus fuerit, et deum nescio quem gentis tenebrarum, sicuti affirmant, illud praeceptum dedisse confingunt, tamquam invideret hominibus scientiam boni et mali. Ex ista opinione etiam nescio quos serpentinos natos esse arbitror, qui serpentem pro Christo colere dicuntur, nec attendunt Apostolum qui ait: metuo ne sicut serpens Evam seduxit astutia sua, sic et sensus vestri corrumpantur (2 Cor 11, 3). Hos ergo per istam prophetiam praefiguratos esse existimo. Seducitur autem verbis huius serpentis carnalis nostra concupiscentia, et per illam decipitur Adam, non Christus, sed Christianus:
26. 39. But nothing more vehemently designates and marks these men than what the serpent says: you will not die the death: for God knew that on the day you eat, your eyes will be opened (Gen 3:4–5). For these men believe that that serpent was Christ, and they invent that some god of the race of darkness, as they affirm, gave that commandment, as though he begrudged men the knowledge of good and evil. From this opinion I think there were also born certain "serpent-people," who are said to worship a serpent in place of Christ, and do not heed the Apostle who says, I fear lest, as the serpent seduced Eve by his cunning, so your minds too be corrupted (2 Cor 11:3). These, then, I think were prefigured by this prophecy. But our carnal desire is seduced by the words of this serpent, and through it Adam is deceived—not Christ, but the Christian:
GenMani.2.26.39
qui si praeceptum Dei servare vellet, et ex fide perseveranter viveret, donec idoneus fieret intellegentiae veritatis, id est, si operaretur in paradiso, et custodiret quod accepit; non veniret in illam deformitatem, ut cum sibi displicet caro quasi nuditas sua, carnalia magis tegumenta mendaciorum, tamquam folia fici colligeret, quibus sibi faceret succinctorium. Hoc enim isti faciunt, cum de Christo mentiuntur, et ipsum mentitum esse praedicant; et tamquam abscondunt se a facie Dei, ad sua mendacia ab illius veritate conversi, sicut Apostolus dicit: et a veritate quidem auditum suum avertent, ad fabulas autem convertentur (2 Tim 4, 4).
who, if he were willing to keep the commandment of God, and to live perseveringly by faith, until he became fit for the understanding of truth—that is, if he worked in paradise and kept what he received—would not come into that deformity, that, when the flesh is displeasing to him as if it were his own nakedness, he should rather gather the carnal coverings of lies, like fig leaves, to make himself a girdle of them. For this is what these men do, when they lie about Christ and proclaim that he himself lied; and they hide themselves, as it were, from the face of God, turned from his truth to their own lies, as the Apostle says: and they will turn away their hearing from the truth, but will turn to fables (2 Tim 4:4).
GenMani.2.26.39
Quibus erroribus Ecclesiam fallat serpens, scl. haereticus quisque.
By what errors the serpent—namely, every heretic—deceives the Church.
26. 40. Et ille quidem serpens, id est ille error haereticorum, qui tentat Ecclesiam, contra quem incantat Apostolus, cum dicit: metuo ne sicut serpens Evam seduxit astutia sua, sic et sensus vestri corrumpantur (2 Cor 11, 3); ille ergo error pectore et ventre serpit, et terram manducat.
26. 40. And that serpent indeed, that is, that error of the heretics, which tempts the Church, against which the Apostle utters his charm, when he says, I fear lest, as the serpent seduced Eve by his cunning, so your minds too be corrupted (2 Cor 11:3); that error, then, creeps upon its breast and belly, and eats earth.
GenMani.2.26.40
Non enim decipit, nisi aut superbos, qui sibi arrogantes quod non sunt, cito credunt quod summi Dei et animae humanae una eademque natura sit;
For it deceives none but either the proud, who, arrogating to themselves what they are not, quickly believe that the highest God and the human soul are one and the same nature;
GenMani.2.26.40
aut desideriis carnalibus implicatos, qui libenter audiunt quod quidquid lascive faciunt, non ipsi faciunt, sed gens tenebrarum; aut curiosos, qui terrena sapiunt, et spiritalia terreno oculo inquirunt.
or those entangled in carnal desires, who gladly hear that whatever wanton things they do, they themselves do not do, but the race of darkness; or the curious, who relish earthly things, and seek out spiritual things with an earthly eye.
GenMani.2.26.40
Erunt autem inimicitiae inter istum et mulierem, et inter semen eius, et semen mulieris, si pariat ista filios quamvis cum doloribus, et se ad virum suum convertat, ut eius ipse dominetur. Tunc enim potest cognosci non aliam partem in nobis pertinere ad auctorem Deum, et aliam ad gentem tenebrarum, sicut isti dicunt; sed potius et illud quod regendi habet potestatem in homine, et illud inferius quod regendum est, ex Deo esse, sicut dicit Apostolus: vir quidem non debet velare caput, cum sit imago et gloria Dei; mulier autem gloria viri est. Non enim vir ex muliere, sed mulier ex viro: etenim non creatus est vir propter mulierem, sed mulier propter virum; propterea debet habere velamen mulier super caput, propter Angelos. Verumtamen neque mulier sine viro, neque vir sine muliere in Domino: sicut enim mulier ex viro, ita et vir per mulierem; omnia autem ex Deo (1 Cor 11, 7-12).
But there will be enmities between this one and the woman, and between his seed and the seed of the woman, if she bears children, though with sorrows, and turns toward her husband, so that he may have dominion over her. For then it can be known that there is not one part in us pertaining to God the author, and another to the race of darkness, as these men say; but rather that both that which has the power of ruling in man, and that lower thing which is to be ruled, are from God, as the Apostle says: a man indeed ought not to veil his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not from the woman, but the woman from the man: for the man was not created for the woman, but the woman for the man; therefore the woman ought to have a covering over her head, because of the angels. Nevertheless neither is the woman without the man, nor the man without the woman, in the Lord: for as the woman is from the man, so too the man is through the woman; but all things are from God (1 Cor 11:7–12).
GenMani.2.26.40
Adae lapsus et poena allegorice.
Adam's fall and punishment, allegorically.
27. 41. Laboret iam Adam in agro suo, et quod spinas et tribulos ei parit terra, intellegat non naturae esse, sed poenae; et hoc non nescio cui genti tenebrarum, sed divino iudicio tribuat: quia moderamen iustitiae est sua cuique tribuere. Ipse det mulieri escam coelestem, quam accepit a capite suo, qui est Christus: non ab illa accipiat vetitum cibum, id est haereticorum fallaciam cum magna pollicitatione scientiae, et quasi secretorum adapertionem, quo fiat ad decipiendum error ipse conditior.
27. 41. Let Adam now labor in his field, and, as for the earth's bringing forth thorns and thistles for him, let him understand that this is not a matter of nature but of punishment; and let him attribute this not to some race of darkness, but to the divine judgment: because it is the governance of justice to render to each his own. Let him himself give to the woman the heavenly food which he received from his head, who is Christ: let him not receive from her the forbidden food, that is, the deception of heretics with their great promise of knowledge and, as it were, the opening up of secrets, by which the error itself is made more seasoned for deceiving.
GenMani.2.27.41
Haereticorum quippe superba et curiosa cupiditas in libro Proverbiorum clamat sub mulieris imagine, et dicit: qui stultus est, divertat ad me (Prov 9, 16): et inopes sensu exhortatur, dicens: panes occultos edite libenter, et aquam dulcem furtivam bibite (Prov 9, 17).
For the proud and curious desire of heretics cries out in the book of Proverbs under the image of a woman, and says, let him who is foolish turn aside to me (Prov 9:16): and she exhorts those lacking sense, saying, gladly eat hidden bread, and drink stolen sweet water (Prov 9:17).
GenMani.2.27.41
Et necesse est tamen, cum et illa quisque crediderit, praecedente libidine mentiendi, qua Christum mentitum esse credit, accipiat etiam tunicam pelliceam divino iudicio. Quo nomine mihi videtur in prophetia significari non corporis mortalitas, quae significatur in historia, de qua iam tractatum est; sed de carnalibus sensibus attracta phantasmata, quae carnaliter mentientem divina Lege consequuntur et contegunt: atque ita de paradiso, id est de Catholica fide et veritate, dimittitur, habitaturus contra Paradisum, id est eidem fidei contradicturus.
And yet it is necessary that, when anyone has also believed those things, the lust of lying going before, by which he believes that Christ lied, he also receive a garment of skins by the divine judgment. By which name there seems to me to be signified in the prophecy not the mortality of the body, which is signified in the history, of which it has already been treated; but the phantasms drawn from the carnal senses, which follow and cover over the one lying carnally, by the divine Law: and so he is sent away from paradise, that is, from the Catholic faith and truth, to dwell opposite paradise, that is, to contradict that same faith.
GenMani.2.27.41
Qui si aliquando se ad Deum converterit per flammeam frameam, id est per temporales tribulationes, sua peccata cognoscendo et gemendo, et non iam extraneam naturam, quae nulla est, sed seipsum accusando, ut ipse veniam mereatur; et per plenitudinem scientiae, quae est caritas, diligendo Deum, qui supra omnia est incommutabilis, et diligendo ex toto corde, et ex tota anima, et ex tota mente; et diligendo proximum tamquam seipsum, perveniet ad arborem vitae, et vivet in aeternum.
And if at some time he turns himself to God through the flaming sword, that is, through temporal tribulations—by recognizing and groaning over his sins, and by accusing no longer a foreign nature, which is nothing, but himself, that he himself may deserve pardon; and through the fullness of knowledge, which is love, by loving God, who is unchangeable above all things, and loving him with his whole heart, and with his whole soul, and with his whole mind; and by loving his neighbor as himself—he will come to the tree of life, and will live forever.
GenMani.2.27.41
Per epilogum singulae refelluntur manichaeorum calumniae.
In an epilogue the individual calumnies of the Manichees are refuted.
28. 42. Quid habent ergo isti, quod in his litteris Veteris Testamenti reprehendant? Interrogent secundum morem suum, et respondeamus sicut Dominus donare dignatur.
28. 42. What, then, do these men have to find fault with in these writings of the Old Testament? Let them question after their manner, and let us answer as the Lord deigns to grant.
GenMani.2.28.42
"Quare fecit Deus hominem," inquiunt, "quem peccaturum sciebat?"
"Why did God make man," they say, "whom he knew would sin?"
GenMani.2.28.42
Quia et de peccante multa bona facere poterat, ordinans eum secundum moderamen iustitiae suae, et quia nihil oberat Deo peccatum eius: et sive non peccaret, mors nulla esset; sive quia peccavit, alii mortales de peccato eius corriguntur. Nihil enim sic revocat homines a peccato, quemadmodum imminentis mortis cogitatio.
Because even out of the sinner he could make many good things, ordering him according to the governance of his justice, and because his sin in no way harmed God: and whether he did not sin, there would be no death; or, because he did sin, others, being mortal, are corrected by his sin. For nothing so recalls men from sin as the thought of impending death.
GenMani.2.28.42
"Sic eum faceret," inquiunt, "ut non peccaret."
"He should have made him," they say, "so that he could not sin."
GenMani.2.28.42
Imo ipse hoc faceret; sic enim factus est, ut si noluisset, non peccaret.
On the contrary, he himself did this; for he was so made that, if he had been unwilling, he would not have sinned.
GenMani.2.28.42
"Non admitteretur," inquiunt, "Diabolus ad eius mulierem."
"The devil," they say, "should not have been admitted to his woman."
GenMani.2.28.42
Imo ipsa ad se diabolum non admitteret; sic enim facta est, ut si noluisset, non admitteret.
On the contrary, she herself should not have admitted the devil to herself; for she was so made that, if she had been unwilling, she would not have admitted him.
GenMani.2.28.42
"Non fieret," inquiunt, "mulier."
"The woman," they say, "should not have been made."
GenMani.2.28.42
Hoc est dicere, non fieret bonum: quia et ipsa utique aliquod bonum est, et tantum bonum, ut Apostolus eam gloriam viri esse dicat; et omnia ex Deo.
This is to say, a good thing should not have been made: because she too is surely some good, and so great a good that the Apostle says she is the glory of the man; and all things are from God.
GenMani.2.28.42
Iterum dicunt: "quis fecit diabolum?"
Again they say: "Who made the devil?"
GenMani.2.28.42
Se ipse; non enim natura, sed peccando diabolus factus est.
He himself; for he was made the devil not by nature, but by sinning.
GenMani.2.28.42
"Vel ipsum," aiunt, "non faceret Deus, si eum peccaturum esse sciebat."
"Or him too," they say, "God should not have made, if he knew that he would sin."
GenMani.2.28.42
Imo, quare non faceret, cum per suam iustitiam et providentiam multos de malitia diaboli corrigat? An forte non audistis Apostolum Paulum dicentem: quos tradidi Satanae, ut discant non blasphemare (1 Tim 1, 20)? et de seipso dicit: et ne magnitudine revelationum extollar, datus est mihi stimulus carnis, angelus Satanae qui me colaphizet (2 Cor 12, 7).
On the contrary, why should he not make him, when through his justice and providence he corrects many out of the devil's malice? Or have you perhaps not heard the Apostle Paul saying, whom I have handed over to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme (1 Tim 1:20)? And of himself he says, and lest I be exalted by the greatness of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn of the flesh, an angel of Satan to buffet me (2 Cor 12:7).
GenMani.2.28.42
"Ergo," inquiunt, "bonus est Diabolus, quia utilis est?"
"Then," they say, "the devil is good, because he is useful?"
GenMani.2.28.42
Imo malus in quantum Diabolus est; sed bonus et omnipotens Deus est, qui etiam de malitia eius multa iusta et bona operatur. Non enim Diabolo imputatur, nisi voluntas sua, qua conatur facere male, non Dei providentia, quae de illo bene facit.
On the contrary, he is evil insofar as he is the devil; but it is God who is good and almighty, who even out of his malice works many just and good things. For nothing is imputed to the devil except his own will, by which he tries to do evil, not the providence of God, which does good out of him.
GenMani.2.28.42
Ecclesiae dogmata de natura Dei hominisque cum Manichaeorum erroribus conferuntur.
The teachings of the Church about the nature of God and of man are compared with the errors of the Manichees.
29. 43. Postremo, quoniam cum Manichaeis nobis de religione quaestio est, quaestio autem religionis est, quid de Deo pie sentiatur, quoniam negare non possunt in miseria peccatorum esse genus humanum; illi dicunt naturam Dei esse in miseria: nos negamus, sed dicimus eam naturam esse in miseria, quam de nihilo fecit Deus, et ad hoc venisse non coactam, sed voluntate peccandi. Illi dicunt naturam Dei cogi ab ipso Deo ad poenitentiam peccatorum: nos negamus, sed dicimus eam naturam quam Deus fecit de nihilo, posteaquam peccavit cogi ad poenitentiam peccatorum. Illi dicunt naturam Dei ab ipso Deo accipere veniam: nos negamus, sed dicimus eam naturam quam fecit Deus de nihilo, si se a peccatis suis ad Deum suum converterit, accipere veniam peccatorum. Illi dicunt naturam Dei necessitate esse mutabilem: nos negamus, sed dicimus eam naturam quam Deus fecit de nihilo, voluntate esse mutatam. Illi dicunt naturae Dei nocere aliena peccata: nos negamus, sed dicimus nulli naturae nocere peccata, nisi sua; et Deum dicimus tantae bonitatis esse, tantae iustitiae, tantae incorruptionis, ut neque peccet, neque ipse alicui noceat, qui peccare noluerit, nec ipsi aliquis qui peccare voluerit.
29. 43. Finally, since our dispute with the Manichees is about religion, and the question of religion is what is devoutly thought concerning God, since they cannot deny that the human race is in the misery of sins: they say that the nature of God is in misery; we deny it, but say that the nature which God made from nothing is in misery, and that it came to this not by compulsion but by the will to sin. They say that the nature of God is compelled by God himself to repentance for sins; we deny it, but say that the nature which God made from nothing is, after it has sinned, compelled to repentance for sins. They say that the nature of God receives pardon from God himself; we deny it, but say that the nature which God made from nothing, if it turns itself from its sins to its God, receives pardon for its sins. They say that the nature of God is changeable by necessity; we deny it, but say that the nature which God made from nothing was changed by will. They say that the sins of others harm the nature of God; we deny it, but say that sins harm no nature except their own; and we say that God is of such goodness, such justice, such incorruption, that he neither sins, nor does he himself harm anyone who has been unwilling to sin, nor does anyone harm him who has been willing to sin.
GenMani.2.29.43
Illi dicunt esse naturam mali cui Deus coactus est naturae suae partem dare cruciandam: nos dicimus nullum malum esse naturale, sed omnes naturas bonas esse, et ipsum Deum summam esse naturam, caeteras ex ipso esse naturas: et omnes bonas in quantum sunt, quoniam fecit Deus omnia bona valde, sed distinctionis gradibus ordinata, ut sit aliud alio melius;
They say that there is a nature of evil, to which God was compelled to give a part of his own nature to be tormented; we say that there is no natural evil, but that all natures are good, and that God himself is the highest nature, and the other natures are from him: and all are good insofar as they are, since God made all things very good, but ordered in degrees of distinction, so that one is better than another;
GenMani.2.29.43
atque ita omni genere bonorum universitas ista compleatur, quae quibusdam perfectis, quibusdam imperfectis, tota perfecta est, quam Deus effector conditorque eius iusto moderamine administrare non cessat; qui omnia bona facit voluntate, nihil mali patitur necessitate. Cuius enim voluntas superat omnia, nulla ex parte quidquam sentit invitus.
and so this universe is filled up with every kind of goods, which—some perfect, some imperfect—is, as a whole, perfect; which universe God, its maker and founder, does not cease to administer by just governance; he who makes all good things by will, suffers nothing evil by necessity. For he whose will surpasses all things in no part experiences anything against his will.
GenMani.2.29.43
Cum ergo illa illi, et nos ista dicimus, unusquisque eligat quid sequatur. Ego enim, quod bona fide coram Deo dixerim, sine ullo studio contentionis, sine aliqua dubitatione veritatis, et sine aliquo praeiudicio diligentioris tractationis, quae mihi videbantur exposui.
Since, then, they say those things, and we say these, let each one choose what to follow. For I, speaking in good faith before God, without any zeal for contention, without any doubt of the truth, and without any prejudgment of a more diligent treatment, have set forth the things that seemed to me right.
GenMani.2.29.43

Notebook

Full View