Expressions in the Heptateuch

Augustine of Hippo · Exegetical Works
Revisions II
C. 54Expressions, in Seven BooksLocutionum, libri septem
Septem libros de septem libris divinarum Scripturarum, id est Moysi quinque et uno Iesu Nave et altero Iudicum, feci notatis locutionibus singulorum quae minus usitatae sunt linguae nostrae,
I composed seven books on the seven books of the divine Scriptures—that is, the five of Moses, one on Joshua son of Nun, and another on Judges—noting in each the expressions that are less customary to our language,
ExpHept
quas parum advertendo sensum quaerunt qui legunt divinorum eloquiorum, cum sit locutionis genus, et nonnumquam exculpunt aliquid quod a veritate quidem non abhorreat, non tamen id sensisse auctor a quo id scriptum est invenitur, sed genere locutionis hoc dixisse credibilius apparet.
expressions in which those who read the divine words, paying too little attention, seek a meaning, when it is in fact a manner of speech; and sometimes they dig out some meaning that does not, indeed, depart from the truth, yet it does not turn out to be what the author who wrote it meant, but rather it appears more credible that he said this by a manner of speech.
ExpHept
Multa autem in Scripturis Sanctis obscura cognito locutionis genere dilucescunt. Propter quod cognoscenda sunt eadem genera locutionum ubi sententiae patent, ut etiam ubi latent cognitio ipsa succurrat easque intentioni legentis aperiat.
Now many obscure passages in the holy Scriptures become clear once the manner of speech is recognized. For this reason these same manners of speech ought to be learned where the meaning is plain, so that even where it is hidden, the very knowledge of them may come to one's aid and open them up to the reader's intention.
ExpHept
Huius operis titulus est; Locutiones de Genesi, atque ita de singulis libris.
The title of this work is Expressions on Genesis, and so on for each of the books.
ExpHept
Quod autem in primo libro posui (Locut. 1, 18) scriptum esse: et fecit Noe omnia verba quaecumque praecepit illi Dominus, sic fecit (Gen 6, 22; 7, 5), eamque locutionem dixi esse similem ei quod in conditione creaturae,
But as for what I set down in the first book (Locut. in Hept. 1.18) as being written—and Noah did all the words whatsoever the Lord commanded him, so he did (Gen 6:22; 7:5)—and which expression I said was similar to the one that occurs at the founding of creation,
ExpHept
posteaquam dicitur: et sic est factum, additur: et fecit Deus (Gen 1, 15. 24), non omni modo simile hoc eidem mihi videtur. Denique ibi etiam sensus latet, hic sola locutio est.
where, after it is said and so it was made, there is added and God made it (Gen 1:15, 24), this does not seem to me to be similar in every way. For there, even the sense lies hidden, whereas here there is only the expression.
ExpHept
Hoc opus sic incipit: locutiones Scripturarum.
This work begins thus: The expressions of the Scriptures.
ExpHept
Bk. 1Expressions on GenesisLocutiones de Genesi
Locutiones Scripturarum, quae videntur secundum proprietates, quae idiomata Graece vocantur, linguae Hebraicae vel Graecae.
The expressions of the Scriptures that appear to follow the peculiarities—what are called in Greek idiomata—of the Hebrew or Greek language.
ExpHept
1. (1, 14) Et dividant inter medium diei, et inter medium noctis.
1. (1:14) And let them divide between the midst of the day and the midst of the night.
ExpHept
2. (1, 20. 26) Volatilia volantia super terram secundum firmamentum caeli. Quaeritur quomodo accipiendum sit: secundum firmamentum. Sic etiam: faciamus hominem secundum imaginem et secundum similitudinem; quod multi Latini codices habent: ad imaginem et similitudinem.
2. (1:20. 26) The flying things that fly over the earth according to the firmament of heaven. It is asked how according to the firmament is to be taken. So too: let us make man according to the image and according to the likeness, which many Latin manuscripts have as: to the image and likeness.
ExpHept
3. (1, 28) Implete terram, et dominamini eius. Latina enim locutio est: dominamini ei.
3. (1:28) Fill the earth, and have dominion over it. For the Latin expression is: dominamini ei ("have dominion over it").
ExpHept
4. (2, 5) Et homo non erat operari terram; quod Latini codices habent: qui operaretur terram.
4. (2:5) And there was no man to work the earth; which the Latin manuscripts have as: who might work the earth.
ExpHept
5. (2, 8) Plantavit Deus Paradisum secundum Orientem; quod Latini habent: ad Orientem.
5. (2:8) God planted a Paradise according to the East; which the Latin have as: toward the East.
ExpHept
6. (2, 9) Quod habent multi Latini codices: et lignum sciendi bonum et malum, vel: lignum scientiae boni et mali, vel: lignum sciendi boni et mali; et si quae sunt aliae varietates de hac re interpretum, Graecus habet: et lignum ad sciendum cognoscibile boni et mali; quod nescio utrum locutionis sit, et non magis certum sensum aliquem insinuet.
6. (2:9) Whereas many Latin manuscripts have: and the tree of knowing good and evil, or: the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, or: the tree of knowing of good and evil—and whatever other variants of the translators there may be on this matter—the Greek has: and the tree for knowing the knowable of good and evil; and I do not know whether this is a matter of expression and does not rather suggest some definite meaning.
ExpHept
7. (2, 16) Quod habent Latini codices: ex omni ligno, quod est in Paradiso, escae edes; non: in Paradiso escae, distinguendum est, sed: escae edes; nam esca edes dici admittit Latina locutio, quoniam pro dativo casu Graeco, "ablativum" vel quem appellant "septimum," in huiusmodi locutionibus solent ponere. Aut certe ordo verborum est: ex omni ligno escae.
7. (2:16) As to what the Latin manuscripts have: of every tree that is in Paradise you shall eat for food—it is not to be punctuated for food in Paradise, but: you shall eat for food; for the Latin expression admits the saying esca edes ("you shall eat as food"), since in expressions of this kind they are accustomed to put, for the Greek dative case, the "ablative" or what they call the "seventh" case. Or else the order of the words is: of every tree for food.
ExpHept
8. (3, 1) Serpens erat prudentissimus omnium bestiarum, quod multi Latini habent; in Graeco enim scriptum est [MISSING GREEK TEXT], non [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
8. (3:1) The serpent was the most prudent of all the beasts, which many Latin have; for in the Greek it is written [MISSING GREEK TEXT], not [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
9. (3, 7) Quod scriptum est de Adam et Eva: aperti sunt oculi eorum; cum absurde credatur eos in Paradiso caecos, vel oculis clausis prius oberrasse, locutionis est, qua etiam de Agar scriptum est: aperuit oculos suos, et vidit puteum (Gen 21, 19); neque enim clausis prius oculis sedebat; et quod in fractione panis aperti sunt oculi eorum qui cognoverunt Dominum post resurrectionem (Cf. Lc 24, 31); neque enim per viam cum illo clausis oculis ambulabant.
9. (3:7) As to what is written of Adam and Eve: their eyes were opened—since it would be absurd to believe that they had previously wandered about in Paradise blind or with their eyes shut, this is a matter of expression, by which it is also written of Hagar: she opened her eyes, and saw a well (Gen 21:19); for she was not sitting with her eyes previously shut; and likewise that at the breaking of bread the eyes were opened of those who recognized the Lord after the resurrection (See Luke 24:31); for they were not walking along the road with him with their eyes shut.
ExpHept
10. (3, 15) Quod habent multi codices: et inimicitiam ponam inter te et mulierem; Graeci habent: in medio tui et in medio mulieris, quod locutionis est; nam tantumdem valet quantum cum dicitur: inter te et mulierem. Hoc et in eo quod sequitur: in medio seminis tui, et in medio seminis eius.
10. (3:15) Whereas many manuscripts have: and I will put enmity between you and the woman, the Greeks have: in the midst of you and in the midst of the woman, which is a matter of expression; for it amounts to just as much as when one says: between you and the woman. This holds also for what follows: in the midst of your seed, and in the midst of her seed.
ExpHept
11. (3, 17) Quod habent multi Latini codices: quia audisti vocem mulieris tuae, et edisti de ligno de quo praeceperam tibi, de eo solo non edere; Graeci habent: edisti de ligno de quo praeceperam tibi, eo solo non edere ex eo; alii autem interpretes Graeci habent: manducasti, vel: edisti; ut ita sit sensus secundum ipsos: "quia audisti vocem mulieris tuae, et edisti de ligno de quo praeceperam tibi eo solo non edere, ex eo edisti."
11. (3:17) Whereas many Latin manuscripts have: because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten of the tree of which I had commanded you, of that alone, not to eat, the Greeks have: you have eaten of the tree of which I had commanded you, of that alone, not to eat of it; but other Greek translators have manducasti or edisti ("you have eaten"), so that according to them the sense is this: "because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and as for the tree of which I had commanded you, of that alone, not to eat—you have eaten of it."
ExpHept
12. (4, 2) Et apposuit parere fratrem eius Abel; locutio est frequens in Scripturis: apposuit dicere.
12. (4:2) And she went on to bear his brother Abel; the expression "went on to say" is frequent in the Scriptures.
ExpHept
13. (4, 8) Et factum est, dum essent in campo, insurrexit Cain super Abel, et occidit eum, locutio est; nam etsi non haberet: et factum est, posset integer sensus esse: et cum essent in campo.
13. (4:8) And it came to pass, while they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel, and slew him—this is a matter of expression; for even if it did not have and it came to pass, the sense could be complete: and when they were in the field.
ExpHept
14. (6, 6) Quod scriptum est in quibusdam Latinis codicibus: et paenituit, et dixit Deus: " Deleam hominem, quem feci a facie terrae "; in Graeco invenitur: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod magis: recogitavit, quam: paenituit significare perhibetur; quod verbum etiam nonnulli Latini codices habent.
14. (6:6) As to what is written in certain Latin manuscripts: and God repented, and said, 'I will blot out the man whom I made from the face of the earth'—in the Greek is found [MISSING GREEK TEXT], which is said to signify rather he reconsidered than he repented; which word some Latin manuscripts also have.
ExpHept
15. (6, 14) Quod habent Latini codices plurimi: nidos facies in arcam; cum Latina locutio sit non: in arcam, sed: "in arca"; Graeci nec: in arcam nec in arca habent, sed: nidos facies arcam; quod intellegitur: ut ipsa arca nidi essent.
15. (6:14) Whereas very many Latin manuscripts have: you shall make nests into the ark—since the Latin expression is not into the ark but "in the ark"—the Greeks have neither into the ark nor "in the ark," but: you shall make nests the ark; which is understood to mean: so that the ark itself should be the nests.
ExpHept
16. (6, 16) Quod habent plerique codices: facies ostium arcae a latere; nonnulli habent: ex transverso; sic enim voluerunt interpretari quod Graece dicitur: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
16. (6:16) Whereas very many manuscripts have: you shall make the door of the ark in the side, some have: crosswise; for they wished thus to translate what is said in Greek: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
17. (7, 4) Quod scriptum est: adhuc enim septem dies, ego inducam diluvium aquae super terram, quod nonnulli Latini codices habent, in Graeco invenitur: ego inducam pluviam super terram; Graeca locutio genitivum casum habet, non accusativum, ut si hoc in Latinum exprimamus, ita dicatur: adhuc enim septem dierum inducam pluviam super terram.
17. (7:4) As to what is written: for in seven more days, I will bring a flood of water upon the earth, which some Latin manuscripts have, in the Greek is found: I will bring rain upon the earth; the Greek expression has the genitive case, not the accusative, so that if we express this in Latin it would be said thus: for in seven more days I will bring rain upon the earth.
ExpHept
18. (7, 5) Quod scriptum est: et fecit Noe omnia quaecumque praecepit illi Dominus Deus, sic fecit, locutio est similis ei quod in conditione creaturae posteaquam dicitur: et sic est factum, additur: et fecit Deus (Gen 1, 15-16. 24-25).
18. (7:5) As to what is written: and Noah did all things whatsoever the Lord God commanded him, so he did, this is an expression similar to the one that occurs at the founding of creation: after it is said and so it was made, there is added and God made it (Gen 1:15-16, 24-25).
ExpHept
19. (7, 4) Quod scriptum est: delebo omnem suscitationem, non "creationem" dictam notandum est: enim Graece scriptum est,
19. (7:4) As to what is written: I will blot out every uprising—it is to be noted that it does not say "creation": for in Greek it is written [MISSING GREEK TEXT],
ExpHept
quod nomen etiam "resurrectionis" assidue ponitur in Scripturis Graecis, cum [MISSING GREEK TEXT] posset dici, ut "suscitatio" sit [MISSING GREEK TEXT], "resurrectio" [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
a word which is also regularly used for "resurrection" in the Greek Scriptures, when [MISSING GREEK TEXT] could be said, so that "uprising" is [MISSING GREEK TEXT], "resurrection" [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
Quo verbo et Apostolus usus est: si quo modo occurram in resurrectione mortuorum (Phil 3, 11); ibi enim Graeci non: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], sed: [MISSING GREEK TEXT] habent.
The Apostle too used this word: if by any means I may attain to the resurrection of the dead (Phil 3:11); for there the Greeks do not have [MISSING GREEK TEXT], but [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
20. (7, 14) Quod scriptum est: et omnes bestiae secundum genus, et omnia pecora secundum genus, et omne repens quod movetur super terram secundum genus, et omne volatile secundum genus intrarunt ad Noe in Arcam, bina ab omni carne, in quo est spiritus vitae; non refertur: in quo, nisi: "genus" subaudias, id est, "in quo genere"; nam si: carne subaudiremus, in qua fuerat, dicendum; quod solus interpres Symmachus dixit.
20. (7:14) As to what is written: and all the beasts according to their kind, and all the cattle according to their kind, and everything creeping that moves upon the earth according to its kind, and every flying thing according to its kind went in to Noah into the ark, two of all flesh, in which is the spirit of life—the phrase in which does not refer to anything unless you supply "kind," that is, "in which kind"; for if we were to supply flesh, it would have to be said in which (feminine) it was; which only the translator Symmachus said.
ExpHept
21. (7, 23) Quod iterum dictum est: et deleta est omnis suscitatio, notandum locutionis esse pro eo, ac si diceret: "conditionem" vel "creaturam" carnis.
21. (7:23) As to what is again said: and every uprising was blotted out, it is to be noted to be a matter of expression, as if it said "the founding" or "the creation" of flesh.
ExpHept
22. (7, 23) Cum dixisset: et deleta est omnis suscitatio quae erat super faciem omnis terrae, ab homine usque ad pecudem et repentium et volatilium caeli, deinde addidit: et deleta sunt de terra; locutionem illam esse repetitionis, qua familiariter utatur Scriptura, notandum est.
22. (7:23) When he had said: and every uprising that was upon the face of all the earth was blotted out, from man even to cattle and to the creeping things and the flying things of heaven, he then added: and they were blotted out from the earth; it is to be noted that this is an expression of repetition, which Scripture commonly employs.
ExpHept
23. (8, 6-7) Quod scriptum est: dimisit corvum videre si cessavit aqua, et exiens reversus non est, donec siccavit aqua a terra, locutio est usitata in Scripturis, quae iam nunc incipiat adverti; non enim postea reversus est, quia dictum est non reversum donec siccavit aqua.
23. (8:6-7) As to what is written: he sent forth the raven to see whether the water had ceased, and going forth it did not return, until the water dried up from the earth—this is an expression customary in the Scriptures, which may by now begin to be noticed; for it did not return afterward either, because it was said not to have returned until the water dried up.
ExpHept
24. (8, 9. 11) Quod scriptum est: et extendit manum suam, accepit eam, et induxit eam ad semetipsum in arcam, locutio est, quam propterea Hebraeam puto, quia et Punicae linguae familiarissima est, in qua multa invenimus Hebraeis verbis consonantia; nam utique sufficeret: et extendit manum, etsi non adderet: suam. Tale est etiam quod paulo post dicit: habebat olivae folia, surculum in ore suo.
24. (8:9. 11) As to what is written: and he stretched out his hand, took it, and brought it to himself into the ark—this is an expression which I think to be Hebrew for the reason that it is also most familiar to the Punic language, in which we find many things consonant with Hebrew words; for it would certainly suffice to say and he stretched out the hand, even if it did not add his. Such too is what he says a little after: it had olive leaves, a twig in its mouth.
ExpHept
25. (8, 12) Et non apposuit reverti ad eum amplius, locutio est familiarissima in Scripturis.
25. (8:12) And it did not go on to return to him any more—this is a most familiar expression in the Scriptures.
ExpHept
26. (8, 21) Quod scriptum est: et non adiciam adhuc maledicere super terram, simile est superiori: et non apposuit reverti ad eum.
26. (8:21) As to what is written: and I will not add further to curse upon the earth, it is similar to the one above: and it did not go on to return to him.
ExpHept
27. (8, 21) Et non adiciam percutere omnem carnem vivam, ipsa locutio est.
27. (8:21) And I will not add to strike all living flesh—this is the same expression.
ExpHept
28. (9, 5) Etenim sanguinem vestrum animarum vestrarum; cum sufficeret aut: sanguinem vestrum, aut: sanguinem animarum vestrarum.
28. (9:5) For indeed the blood of your souls; when it would suffice to say either your blood or the blood of your souls.
ExpHept
29. (9, 12) Hoc signum testamenti quod ego ponam inter medium meum et vestrum; quod est: "inter me et vos."
29. (9:12) This is the sign of the covenant which I will set in the midst of myself and you; which is: "between me and you."
ExpHept
30. (10, 9) Hic erat gigans venator contra Dominum Deum, incertum est utrum possit accipi "coram Domino Deo"; quia sic solet intellegi quod Graece dicitur: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
30. (10:9) He was a giant hunter against the Lord God—it is uncertain whether it can be taken as "before the Lord God"; because that is how what is said in Greek is usually understood: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
31. (10, 14) Unde exiit inde Philisthiim, cum sufficeret: unde exiit Philisthiim.
31. (10:14) Whence came forth thence the Philistines, when it would suffice: whence came forth the Philistines.
ExpHept
32. (11, 1) Et erat omnis terra labium unum; quod usitate nos dicimus: "lingua una."
32. (11:1) And the whole earth was one lip; which we customarily say: "one language."
ExpHept
33.* (11, 1) Et erat omnis terra labium unum; notandum, omnem terram appellatam omnes homines, qui tunc erant, quamvis nondum in omni terra.
33.* (11:1) And the whole earth was one lip; it is to be noted that the whole earth means all the men who then existed, although not yet in all the earth.
ExpHept
34. (11, 3) Et facti sunt illis lateres pro lapide; Graecus habet: et facti sunt illis lateres in lapidem; quod si Latine diceretur, locutio minus intellegeretur.
34. (11:3) And they had bricks for stone; the Greek has: and they had bricks into stone; which, if it were said in Latin, the expression would be less understood.
ExpHept
35. (11, 4) Venite, aedificemus nobis civitatem et turrem, cuius caput erit usque ad caelum; secundum hyperbolen dictum est, si locutionis genus hic accipiendum est; si autem usque ad caelum, proprie dictum accipitur, inter Quaestiones consideretur.
35. (11:4) Come, let us build for ourselves a city and a tower whose top will reach unto heaven; this is said by hyperbole, if a manner of speech is to be taken here; but if unto heaven is taken as said literally, let it be considered among the Questions.
ExpHept
36. (11, 10) Quod quidam Latini codices habent: Sem filius Noe erat annorum centum cum genuit Arphaxad, Graeci habent: Sem filius centum annorum cum genuit Arphaxad, ubi ellipsis est, quia deest erat. Sed quod non habent: filius Noe, sed filius tantum, nova locutio est.
36. (11:10) Whereas certain Latin manuscripts have: Shem the son of Noah was a hundred years old when he begot Arphaxad, the Greeks have: Shem the son of a hundred years when he begot Arphaxad, where there is an ellipsis, because was is lacking. But the fact that they do not have son of Noah, but only son, is a novel expression.
ExpHept
37. (11, 30) Et erat Sara sterilis, et non generabat, cum posset sufficere: et erat Sara sterilis.
37. (11:30) And Sarah was barren, and she did not bear, when it could suffice: and Sarah was barren.
ExpHept
38. (12, 12) Erit ergo cum te viderint Aegyptii, dicent: quia uxor illius haec, genere locutionis adiunctum est: quia, nam sufficere potuit: uxor illius haec.
38. (12:12) Therefore it will be that when the Egyptians see you, they will say: that this is his wife—the word that is added by the manner of speech, for it could have sufficed: this is his wife.
ExpHept
39. (12, 14) Quod ait Scriptura: factum est autem statim ut intravit Abraham in Aegyptum, sufficeret: statim autem ut intravit Abraham in Aegyptum.
39. (12:14) As to what Scripture says: and it came to pass, as soon as Abraham entered into Egypt, it would suffice: as soon as Abraham entered into Egypt.
ExpHept
40. (12, 18) Quid hoc fecisti mihi, quia non annuntiasti mihi quia uxor tua est? Cum sufficeret: non annuntiasti. Et ipsum annuntiasti, more Scripturarum dictum est; nam Latini habent plerique: non dixisti.
40. (12:18) Why have you done this to me, that you did not tell me that she is your wife? When it would suffice: you did not tell me. And the very word told is said after the manner of the Scriptures; for most Latin have: you did not say.
ExpHept
41. (13, 1) Ascendit autem Abraham de Aegypto, ipse et uxor eius et omnia eius, et Loth cum eo in desertum; subauditur: "ascenderunt"; nec tamen proprie dicitur ascendisse cum eo, quod habebat exanime, sicut aurum et argentum et omnis supellex; ac per hoc intellegitur hic locutio, quae vocatur Graece: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
41. (13:1) And Abraham went up out of Egypt, he and his wife and all that he had, and Lot with him, into the desert; "they went up" is to be supplied; yet it is not properly said that what he had that was lifeless—such as gold and silver and all the household goods—went up with him; and through this an expression is here understood which is called in Greek [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
42. (13, 7) Et facta est rixa inter medium pastorum pecorum Abraham et pecorum Loth, unde Latini codices paene omnes non transtulerunt istam locutionem, sed ita loquuntur ut consuetudo nostra habet, et nobis deinceps eam notare non placuit; ipsa est enim per omnia in Graeca Scriptura, ubi tale aliquid dicitur.
42. (13:7) And there was strife in the midst of the herdsmen of Abraham's cattle and of Lot's cattle—on which account almost all the Latin manuscripts did not render that expression, but speak as our custom has it, and we have decided not to note it henceforth; for it occurs throughout the Greek Scripture wherever something of this kind is said.
ExpHept
43. (13, 8) Quoniam homines fratres nos sumus, Abraham dixit ad Loth; unde intellegitur morem esse Scripturae ita loqui, ut "fratres" appellentur unius cognationis, etiamsi gradu sanguinis differant, ut alter sit in superiore, alter in inferiore, sicut hoc loco; nam patruus eius erat Abraham.
43. (13:8) For we are men, brothers, Abraham said to Lot; whence it is understood to be Scripture's custom to speak thus, so that those of one kinship are called "brothers" even if they differ in degree of blood, so that one is in the higher and the other in the lower, as in this place; for Abraham was his uncle.
ExpHept
44. (14, 1) Factum est autem in regno Amarphal regis Sennaar; secundum nostrae locutionis consuetudinem sic incipere sufficeret: in regno autem Amarphal, ergo quod ait Scriptura: factum est autem, more suo locuta est.
44. (14:1) And it came to pass in the reign of Amraphel king of Shinar; according to the custom of our manner of speech it would suffice to begin thus: now in the reign of Amraphel; therefore in saying and it came to pass, Scripture spoke after its own manner.
ExpHept
45. (14, 5) Quarto decimo autem anno Chodollogomor et reges qui cum eo, subauditur: "erant"; unde a quibusdam Latinis etiam additum est.
45. (14:5) Now in the fourteenth year Chedorlaomer and the kings who with him—"were" is to be supplied; whence by some Latin it was indeed added.
ExpHept
46. (14, 6) Et Chorraeos qui in montibus Seir; subauditur: "erant."
46. (14:6) And the Horites who in the mountains of Seir; "were" is to be supplied.
ExpHept
47. (14, 13) Adveniens autem eorum qui evaserunt quidam, nuntiavit Abraham transfluviali, ipse autem habitabat ad quercum Mambre, Amorrhis fratris Eschol, et fratris Aunan; qui erant coniurati Abraham; obscurum hyperbaton.
47. (14:13) And there coming a certain one of those who had escaped, he announced to Abraham the man from across the river, and he was dwelling by the oak of Mamre, of the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and brother of Aner; who were in league with Abraham—an obscure hyperbaton.
ExpHept
Ordo est enim: adveniens eorum qui evaserunt quidam Amorrhis fratris Eschol et fratris Aunan, qui erant coniurati, nuntiavit Abraham transfluviali; ipse autem habitabat ad quercum. Hoc hyperbaton obscurius fit etiam per ellipsin;
For the order is: there coming a certain one of those who had escaped, of the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and brother of Aner, who were in league, he announced to Abraham the man from across the river; and he was dwelling by the oak. This hyperbaton becomes still more obscure through an ellipsis;
ExpHept
cum enim dictum esset: quidam Amorrhis fratris Eschol et fratris Aunan, non dictum est: quid fratris, sed intellegitur: "filius"; sicut cum dicitur: Iacobus Alphaei, quamvis non dicatur: "filius," nihil aliud intellegitur, et multae sunt tales locutiones Scripturarum ubi "filius" tacetur et intellegitur.
for when it had said a certain one of the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and brother of Aner, it did not say what of the brother, but "son" is understood; just as when it is said James of Alphaeus, although "son" is not said, nothing else is understood, and there are many such expressions in the Scriptures where "son" is left unsaid and understood.
ExpHept
48. (14, 22) Quod habent quidam Latini codices: et dixit Abraham ad regem Sodomorum: 'extendo manum meam ad Deum altissimum, qui creavit caelum et terram.' Si a sparto usque ad corrigiam calceamenti; fefellit interpretem, quod Graecus habet: , quod Latine "filum" intellegitur, et ista Scripturarum locutio est.
48. (14:22) As to what certain Latin manuscripts have: and Abraham said to the king of Sodom: 'I stretch out my hand to God the Most High, who created heaven and earth. If from a thread even to the strap of a sandal'—the translator was misled by what the Greek has, [MISSING GREEK TEXT], which is understood in Latin as "thread," and this is an expression of the Scriptures.
ExpHept
49. (14, 22-23) Extendo manum meam ad Deum altissimum, qui creavit caelum et terram, si accipiam de omnibus tuis; si enim pro eo dixit: extendo manum meam ad Deum altissimum, ac si diceret: "iuro," non est in Latino usitata locutio, nisi ita dicatur: "extendo manum meam ad Deum altissimum, me non accipere de omnibus tuis."
49. (14:22-23) I stretch out my hand to God the Most High, who created heaven and earth, if I take anything of all that is yours; for if he said I stretch out my hand to God the Most High in place of saying "I swear," it is not a customary expression in Latin, unless it be said thus: "I stretch out my hand to God the Most High, that I will not take anything of all that is yours."
ExpHept
50. (15, 13) Sciendo scies, quia peregrinum erit semen tuum in terra; locutio quidem Scripturarum est usitatissima, sed Graeci habent: sciens scies, quod pene tantumdem est.
50. (15:13) Knowing you shall know, that your seed will be a stranger in a land; this is indeed a most customary expression of the Scriptures, but the Greeks have: knowing you shall know, which is almost the same.
ExpHept
51. (16, 3) Et dedit eam Abraham viro suo ipsi uxorem, plus habet: ipsi.
51. (16:3) And Abraham gave her to her husband, to him as a wife—it has the extra word: to him.
ExpHept
52. (16, 5) Cum autem vidit se conceptum habere, spreta sum coram illa. Graeci habent hoc loco participium, quod Latina lingua non habet, hoc est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], sed tamquam si diceretur: "videns autem se conceptum habere, spreta sum coram illa"; quasi solecismus sonat; sic etiam per illud participium quod dictum est: , pro quo nos dicimus: "videns."
52. (16:5) But when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised before her. The Greeks have in this place a participle, which the Latin language does not have, that is, [MISSING GREEK TEXT], but as if it were said: "seeing that I had conceived, I was despised before her"; it sounds like a solecism; so too through that participle which was said, [MISSING GREEK TEXT], for which we say: "seeing."
ExpHept
53. (17, 6) Quod Latini habent: augeam te nimis valde, Graeci habent: valde, valde.
53. (17:6) Whereas the Latin have: I will increase you exceedingly greatly, the Greeks have: greatly, greatly.
ExpHept
54. (17, 8) Et dabo tibi et semini tuo post te terram in qua habitas, omnem terram Chanaan in possessionem aeternam, videndum utrum locutio sit quod dicit: aeternam, Graeci habent: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]; et quod ait: et semini tuo post te, ibi enim voluit intellegi quod dixerat: tibi.
54. (17:8) And I will give to you and to your seed after you the land in which you dwell, all the land of Canaan for an everlasting possession—it is to be considered whether in saying everlasting it is a matter of expression; the Greeks have [MISSING GREEK TEXT]; and as for its saying and to your seed after you, there it wished to be understood what it had said: to you.
ExpHept
55. (17, 9) Tu autem testamentum meum conservabis, et semen tuum post te in progenies suas; conservabis, pro "conserva"; promissivum pro imperativo modo posuit.
55. (17:9) But you shall keep my covenant, and your seed after you in their generations; you shall keep, in place of "keep"; he put the future indicative for the imperative mood.
ExpHept
56. (17, 12) Et puer octo dierum circumcidetur vestrum, omne masculinum; pro "omnis masculus," quasi posset circumcidi nisi masculus.
56. (17:12) And a child of eight days shall be circumcised among you, every male; in place of "every male," as if any but a male could be circumcised.
ExpHept
57. (17, 17) Et procidit Abraham in faciem, et dixit in animo suo dicens: 'si mihi centum annos habenti nascetur, et si Sara annorum nonaginta pariet!' Admirantis esse istam locutionem, non dubitantis, dubitandum non est.
57. (17:17) And Abraham fell upon his face, and said in his heart, saying: 'Shall a son be born to me who am a hundred years old, and shall Sarah at ninety years bear?' There is no doubt that this is the expression of one marveling, not of one doubting.
ExpHept
58. (17, 24) Abraham autem erat annorum nonaginta novem cum circumcisus est carnem praeputii sui; non dixit: "carne," aut: "in carne."
58. (17:24) Now Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised the flesh of his foreskin; he did not say "in flesh" or "in the flesh."
ExpHept
59. (18, 7) Et in boves accucurrit Abraham; non dixit: "ad boves."
59. (18:7) And Abraham ran into the cattle; he did not say "to the cattle."
ExpHept
60. (18, 11) Abraham autem et Sara seniores progressi in diebus, quod Graeci habent: progressi dierum.
60. (18:11) Now Abraham and Sarah, elders advanced in days, which the Greeks have as: advanced of days.
ExpHept
61. (18, 20) Dixit autem Dominus: 'clamor Sodomorum et Gomorrhae impletus est, et delicta eorum magna valde.' "Clamorem" Scriptura solet ponere pro tanta impudentia et libertate iniquitatis, ut nec verecundia, nec timore abscondatur.
61. (18:20) And the Lord said: 'the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is fulfilled, and their sins are very great.' Scripture is accustomed to use "cry" for such shamelessness and licentiousness of iniquity that it is concealed neither by modesty nor by fear.
ExpHept
62. (18, 28) Et dixit: 'quia non perdam si invenero ibi quadraginta quinque,' superfluum videtur: quia, et ideo in codicibus nonnullis Latinis non legitur.
62. (18:28) And he said: 'that I will not destroy if I find there forty-five,' the word that seems superfluous, and so in some Latin manuscripts it is not read.
ExpHept
63. (18, 30) Numquid, Domine, si loquar, subauditur: "irasceris," aut aliquid huiusmodi.
63. (18:30) Will you, O Lord, if I speak—"be angry" is supplied, or something of this kind.
ExpHept
64. (19, 29) Cum everteret Dominus civitates, in quibus habitabat in eis.
64. (19:29) When the Lord overthrew the cities, in which he dwelt in them.
ExpHept
65. (20, 13) In omni loco ubi intraverimus ibi.
65. (20:13) In every place where we enter there.
ExpHept
66. (21, 19) Et aperuit Deus oculos eius, et vidit puteum aquae vivae, locutio est, non enim clausis oculis erat. Unde iam in principio libri locuti sumus, ubi scriptum est: et aperti sunt oculi eorum.
66. (21:19) And God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of living water—this is a matter of expression, for she was not with her eyes shut. We have already spoken of this at the beginning of the book, where it is written: and their eyes were opened.
ExpHept
67. (21, 23) Et terra in qua inhabitasti in ea.
67. (21:23) And the land in which you have dwelt in it.
ExpHept
68. (21, 27) Et disposuerunt ambo testamentum, vel testati sunt ambo; amat Scriptura "testamenti" nomine "pactum" appellare.
68. (21:27) And they both arranged a covenant, or both made a covenant; Scripture loves to call a "pact" by the name of "covenant."
ExpHept
69. (22, 2) Accipe filium tuum dilectum, illa locutione dictum est: accipe, qua etiam ad Agar de filio eius.
69. (22:2) Take your beloved son—the word take is said by that expression by which it is also said to Hagar concerning her son.
ExpHept
70. (22, 4) Et respiciens Abraham oculis, cum sufficeret: respiciens.
70. (22:4) And Abraham looking up with his eyes, when it would suffice: looking up.
ExpHept
71. (22, 16) Per me ipsum iuravi, nisi benedicens benedicam te; ac si diceret: "per me ipsum iuravi quod benedicens benedicam te"; aut nullo verbo addito simpliciter: "per me ipsum iuravi, benedicens benedicam te."
71. (22:16) By myself I have sworn, unless blessing I will bless you; as if it said: "by myself I have sworn that blessing I will bless you"; or, with no word added, simply: "by myself I have sworn, blessing I will bless you."
ExpHept
72. (22, 17) Et multiplicans multiplicabo semen tuum, cum sufficere posset: multiplicabo.
72. (22:17) And multiplying I will multiply your seed, when it could suffice: I will multiply.
ExpHept
73. (22, 20) Et nuntiatum est Abrahae, dicentes, cum consuetudo loquendi habeat: "nuntiaverunt Abrahae dicentes," aut: "nuntiatum est a dicentibus."
73. (22:20) And it was announced to Abraham, saying (plural), whereas the custom of speaking has: "they announced to Abraham saying," or: "it was announced by those saying."
ExpHept
74. (23, 3-4) Et surrexit Abraham a mortuo suo, non dixit: "a mortua sua." Et iterum de eadem: et sepeliam, inquit, mortuum meum, quod non neutro quasi corpus mortuum, sed masculino genere dictum Graeca scriptura demonstrat.
74. (23:3-4) And Abraham rose up from his dead (masculine), he did not say "from his dead" (feminine). And again concerning the same woman: and I will bury, he says, my dead, which the Greek scripture shows to be said not in the neuter as though a dead body, but in the masculine gender.
ExpHept
75. (24, 3) Et adiurabo te per Dominum Deum caeli et Deum terrae; Graeci non habent: per, sed: adiuro te Dominum Deum caeli.
75. (24:3) And I will adjure you by the Lord God of heaven and the God of earth; the Greeks do not have by, but: I adjure you the Lord God of heaven.
ExpHept
76. (24, 3) Cum quibus ego habito in eis.
76. (24:3) Among whom I dwell in them.
ExpHept
77. (24, 5) Ne quando noluerit mulier ire mecum: mulierem feminam appellare proprium est illius linguae.
77. (24:5) Lest perhaps the woman be unwilling to go with me: to call a woman "female" is proper to that language.
ExpHept
78. (24, 5) In terram de qua existi inde.
78. (24:5) Into the land from which you went out thence.
ExpHept
79. (24, 6) Attende tibi, ne revoces filium meum illuc: his verbis solet comminatio declarari.
79. (24:6) Take heed to yourself, that you do not bring my son back there: by these words a warning is customarily expressed.
ExpHept
80. (24, 9. 8) Et posuit puer manum suam sub femore Abrahae, et iuravit ei de verbo hoc. Ergo locutio est qua dixerat Abraham: adiuro te, ac si dixisset: "iura mihi";
80. (24:9. 8) And the servant put his hand under Abraham's thigh, and swore to him concerning this matter. Therefore this is the expression by which Abraham had said I adjure you, as if he had said: "swear to me";
ExpHept
non autem solemus sic loqui, sed observandum est utrum sint in Scripturis aliae similes locutiones; nam et quod dixit Abraham: si noluerit mulier venire tecum, purus eris a iuramento hoc; manifestavit ita se dixisse: adiuro te, tamquam diceret: "iura mihi."
but we are not accustomed to speak thus, and it is to be observed whether there are in the Scriptures other similar expressions; for the fact that Abraham said if the woman be unwilling to come with you, you will be free from this oath made it clear that he had said I adjure you as though he were saying: "swear to me."
ExpHept
81. (24, 16) Quod scriptum est de Rebecca: virgo autem erat speciosa facie valde; virgo erat, vir non cognoverat eam, ista repetitio commendationem virginitatis insinuat. Sed cur additum sit: vir non cognoverat eam, nisi locutionis sit, mirum si possit ita accipi, ut virgo nomen sit aetatis, non integritatis. Graeci autem non habent: cognoverat, sed: cognovit; quod videtur inconsequens.
81. (24:16) As to what is written of Rebekah: now the virgin was very beautiful in countenance; she was a virgin, no man had known her, this repetition conveys a commendation of virginity. But why it is added no man had known her—unless it be a matter of expression—it would be remarkable if it could be taken so that "virgin" be a name of age, not of integrity. The Greeks, however, do not have had known, but: knew; which seems inconsistent.
ExpHept
82. (24, 26) Adoravit Domino: quod nobis usitatum est dicere: "adoravit Dominum."
82. (24:26) He worshiped to the Lord: which it is customary for us to say: "he worshiped the Lord."
ExpHept
83. (24, 27) Quoniam non dereliquit iustitiam et veritatem a Domino meo: id est iustitiam et veritatem quae est a Domino meo, ac si diceret: "quam fecit Dominus meus."
83. (24:27) Because he has not forsaken justice and truth from my lord: that is, the justice and truth that is from my lord, as if it said: "which my lord has done."
ExpHept
84. (24, 28) Et currens puella nuntiavit in domum matris suae: quasi non ipsa esset et patris domus.
84. (24:28) And the girl, running, announced it into her mother's house: as though it were not also her father's house.
ExpHept
85. (24, 32) Et aquam lavare pedibus ipsius, et pedibus virorum qui cum eo erant.
85. (24:32) And water to wash with his feet, and with the feet of the men who were with him.
ExpHept
86. (24, 40) Dominus cui placui ante ipsum, ipse mittet angelum suum tecum; quasi non sufficeret: cui placui; an poterat ei placere nisi ante ipsum?
86. (24:40) The Lord, whom I have pleased before him, he will send his angel with you; as though it would not suffice: whom I have pleased; or could he please him except before him?
ExpHept
87. (24, 42) Si tu prosperas viam meam, quam ego nunc ingredior in eam.
87. (24:42) If you prosper my way, which I now enter upon it.
ExpHept
88. (24, 43-44) Cum verba sua narraret servus Abrahae, quae dixit accessurus ad fontem, ita narravit: et erit virgo cui ego dixero: 'da mihi bibere pusillum aquae de hydria tua,' et dicet mihi: 'et tu bibe, et camelis tuis hauriam'; haec mulier est quam paravit Dominus famulo suo Isaac.
88. (24:43-44) When the servant of Abraham was recounting his own words, which he said as he was about to approach the spring, he recounted them thus: and the virgin to whom I shall say, "give me a little water to drink from your jar," and she will say to me, "drink, you too, and I will draw for your camels"; this is the woman whom the Lord has prepared for his servant Isaac.
ExpHept
Quibus verbis satis evidenter expressum est, etiam mulieres appellatas locutione Hebraica, quae virgines essent.
By these words it is expressed clearly enough that even those who were virgins were called "women" by the Hebrew manner of speech.
ExpHept
89. (24, 48) Et benedixi Dominum Deum domini mei Abraham; honorificentiae locutio est, et familiarissima Scripturis, sicut Deus Heliae.
89. (24:48) And I blessed the Lord God of my lord Abraham; this is an expression of honor, and most familiar to the Scriptures, like the God of Elijah.
ExpHept
90. (24, 49) Renuntiate mihi ut redeam in dextram aut sinistram. Per dextram prosperitatem, per sinistram adversitatem significavit; id est dextram, si concesserint; sinistram, si non concesserint; nam utique ea via rediturus fuerat qua venerat; quam locutionem Scripturarum etiam cetera earum loca indicabunt; quia dextra nominatur in omnibus bonis, sinistra in malis, sive felicitas et infelicitas, sive iustitia et iniustitia, et aliquando dextra in aeternis, sinistra in temporalibus.
90. (24:49) Report to me, that I may turn to the right or the left. By the right hand he signified prosperity, by the left adversity; that is, the right, if they consent; the left, if they do not consent; for he was in any case going to return by the way he had come; which expression of the Scriptures the rest of their passages will also indicate, since the right hand is named in all good things, the left in evil ones—whether happiness and unhappiness, or justice and injustice, and sometimes the right hand in eternal things, the left in temporal.
ExpHept
91. (25, 13) Haec sunt nomina filiorum Ismael secundum nomina generationum eorum; tamquam dixisset: "secundum quae nomina generationes eorum appellatae sunt."
91. (25:13) These are the names of the sons of Ishmael according to the names of their generations; as if it had said: "according to which names their generations were called."
ExpHept
92. (25, 20) Accepit Rebeccam filiam Bathuel Syri de Mesopotamia, sororem Laban Syri, sibi in uxorem; cum posset dici tantummodo: uxorem; aut: sibi uxorem.
92. (25:20) He took Rebekah the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Mesopotamia, the sister of Laban the Syrian, to himself as a wife; when it could be said merely: as a wife; or: to himself a wife.
ExpHept
93. (25, 24) Et ei erant gemini in utero eius; cum posset non addi, quod dictum est: eius.
93. (25:24) And there were twins in her womb; when what was said could be left unadded: her.
ExpHept
94. (25, 27) Creverunt autem iuvenes. Est talis locutio et apud auctores saeculares, sicuti est: et scuta latentia condunt (VIRGILIO, Aen. 3, 237); id est: condendo latentia faciunt. Sic et hic: creverunt iuvenes, cum infantes essent, intellegitur, crescendo facti sunt iuvenes.
94. (25:27) And the young men grew up. There is such an expression even among secular authors, as is: and they build hidden shields (Virgil, Aeneid 3.237); that is, by building they make them hidden. So too here: the young men grew up—since they were infants, it is understood that by growing up they became young men.
ExpHept
95. (25, 31) Iacob ad Esau: vende mihi hodie primogenita tua mihi; sic enim habent codices Graeci.
95. (25:31) Jacob to Esau: sell me today your birthright to me; for so the Greek manuscripts have it.
ExpHept
96. (26, 28) Videntes vidimus, quia est Dominus tecum.
96. (26:28) Seeing we have seen, that the Lord is with you.
ExpHept
97. (26, 28) Et disponemus tecum testamentum: amant Scripturae pro "pacto" ponere testamentum, id est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Quod Latini habent: et disponemus tecum testamentum ne facias nobiscum malum; tamquam diceretur: "ut paciscaris non facere nobiscum malum."
97. (26:28) And we will arrange a covenant with you: the Scriptures love to put covenant for "pact," that is, [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. As the Latin have: and we will arrange a covenant with you that you do us no harm; as if it were said: "that you make a pact not to do us harm."
ExpHept
98. (27, 1) Et vocavit filium suum seniorem Esau, et dixit; hoc loco senioris nomen non significat aetatem gravem, sed ex comparatione maiorem.
98. (27:1) And he called his elder son Esau, and said; in this place the word "elder" does not signify advanced age, but the greater by comparison.
ExpHept
99. (27, 3) Nunc ergo sume vas tuum pharetramque et arcum; non dixit: "vasa," sed: vas; quod autem intellegi voluit, non apparet, nisi forte locutio est, ut vas pharetram voluerit intellegi, et exponendo quid dixerat: vas, adiunxerit: pharetramque et arcum, tamquam dixerit: "sume vas tuum et pharetram"; veluti si diceret: "sume vas tuum, id est pharetram; deinde aliud, et arcum," quod non ad illud vas pertineret quod est pharetra. Aut certe pharetram et arcum vas voluit appellare, singularem ponens numerum pro plurali; tamquam si diceret: "accipe vestem tuam," quo nomine intellegeremus plures vestes, sicuti intellegimus "militem" pro "militibus," et multa sunt talia.
99. (27:3) Now therefore take your vessel, both quiver and bow; he did not say "vessels," but: vessel; what he wished to be understood is not clear, unless perhaps it is an expression, so that by "vessel" he wished the quiver to be understood, and in explaining what he had said by vessel he added both quiver and bow, as if he had said: "take your vessel and the quiver"; as if he were to say: "take your vessel, that is, the quiver; then another thing, and the bow," which would not belong to that vessel which is the quiver. Or else he wished to call the quiver and bow a "vessel," putting the singular number for the plural; as if he were to say: "take your garment," by which name we would understand several garments, just as we understand "soldier" for "soldiers," and there are many such cases.
ExpHept
100. (27, 3) Exi in campum, et venare mihi venationem.
100. (27:3) Go out into the field, and hunt me a hunt.
ExpHept
101. (27, 9) Et vade ad oves, et sume mihi duos haedos teneros et bonos; nomine ovium utriusque pecoris genus significavit, quod in eisdem pascuis simul erant.
101. (27:9) And go to the sheep, and take me two tender and good kids; by the name of sheep he signified both kinds of livestock, because they were together in the same pastures.
ExpHept
102. (28, 4) Et det tibi benedictionem patris tui Abraham; Isaac dicit filio suo de avo eius patre suo.
102. (28:4) And may he give you the blessing of your father Abraham; Isaac says this to his son concerning the boy's grandfather, his own father.
ExpHept
103. (28, 5) Et exiit in Mesopotamiam Syriae; quasi Mesopotamia dicatur nisi Syriae, quamvis hoc Septuaginta non habere perhibeantur: Syriae, sed cum asterisco scriptum est.
103. (28:5) And he went out into Mesopotamia of Syria; as though Mesopotamia were spoken of as anything but of Syria, although the Septuagint is said not to have this word of Syria, but it is written with an asterisk.
ExpHept
104. (28, 15) Deus ad Iacob: non derelinquam te, donec faciam omnia quae tecum locutus sum; quasi dimissurus eum, cum fecerit; non utique, sed locutio est.
104. (28:15) God to Jacob: I will not forsake you, until I do all the things I have spoken with you; as though he would let him go once he had done them; but not so—it is a matter of expression.
ExpHept
105. (28, 16) Surrexit Iacob de somno suo, et dixit: 'quia est Dominus in loco hoc, ego autem ignorabam'; plenus sensus est, etsi non habeat: quia.
105. (28:16) Jacob rose up from his sleep, and said: 'that the Lord is in this place, and I did not know it'; the sense is complete, even if it does not have that.
ExpHept
106. (28, 16) Est Dominus in loco hoc; ac si diceret: "est hic demonstratio Domini"; non enim Dominus in loco est.
106. (28:16) The Lord is in this place; as if it said: "there is here a manifestation of the Lord"; for the Lord is not in a place.
ExpHept
107. (29, 5) Iacob interrogans quod ait: nostis Laban filium Nachor? Cum esset filius Bathuel; intellegendum est nobiliorem fuisse Nachor, et merito dignitatis eius factum esse ut de ipso interrogaret. Filium autem dici et avi et proavi et ultra maioris alicuius eum qui ex illo propagatur, usitatissimae locutionis est. Hinc est quod et Isaac patrem filii sui appellavit Abraham, sicut paulo ante commemoravi.
107. (29:5) Jacob asking, in that he says: do you know Laban the son of Nahor? When he was the son of Bethuel; it is to be understood that Nahor was the more noble, and that by the merit of his standing it came about that he asked about him. That the one who is descended from someone should be called the "son" of grandfather and great-grandfather and beyond, of some greater ancestor, is a most customary expression. Hence it is that Isaac also called his son's father Abraham, as I mentioned a little before.
ExpHept
108. (29, 7) Adhuc est dies multa, nondum est hora congregandi pecora.
108. (29:7) The day is still long, it is not yet the hour for gathering the flocks.
ExpHept
109. (30, 4) Et dedit illi Ballan ancillam suam ipsi uxorem; plenum esset, etsi ipsi non adderetur.
109. (30:4) And she gave him Bilhah her maidservant, to him as a wife; it would be complete even if to him were not added.
ExpHept
110. (30, 27) Si inveni gratiam ante te, auguratus essem; benedixit enim me Deus in introitu tuo; non videtur consequens, quia hic dicendum fuit: "si invenissem gratiam ante te, auguratus essem";
110. (30:27) If I have found favor before you, I would have taken an omen; for God has blessed me at your coming in; it does not seem consistent, because here it should have been said: "if I had found favor before you, I would have taken an omen";
ExpHept
nunc autem: si inveni, ordo est: "si inveni gratiam ante te, permitte me augurar"; ita enim dixit: auguratus essem, tamquam diceret: "O si auguratus essem!". Id est "ad bonum augurium te in domo mea haberem."
but as it is, if I have found, the order is: "if I have found favor before you, permit me to take an omen"; for he said I would have taken an omen as if to say: "Oh that I had taken an omen!" That is, "that I might hold you in my house for a good omen."
ExpHept
111. (30, 33) Et exaudiet me iustitia mea in die crastino; id est: exaudiri me faciet.
111. (30:33) And my justice will answer for me on the morrow; that is, it will cause me to be heard.
ExpHept
112. (31, 2) Et vidit Iacob faciem Laban, et ecce non erat ad eum sicut hesterna et nudustertiana die; familiarissima in Scripturis locutio, hesterna et nudustertiana die, pro tempore praeterito posuit.
112. (31:2) And Jacob saw Laban's face, and behold it was not toward him as yesterday and the day before; a most familiar expression in the Scriptures: yesterday and the day before, he put for past time.
ExpHept
113. (31, 10) Et vidi oculis meis in somno; cum clausi sint in somno oculi corporis.
113. (31:10) And I saw with my eyes in sleep; although the eyes of the body are shut in sleep.
ExpHept
114. (31, 13) Ego sum Deus, qui apparui tibi in loco Dei, locutio est. An Deus in loco Dei sic accipiendum est, quomodo: pluit Dominus a Domino (Gen 19, 24), Filius a Patre?
114. (31:13) I am the God who appeared to you in the place of God, this is an expression. Or is God in the place of God to be taken in the way that the Lord rained from the Lord (Gen 19:24)—the Son from the Father?
ExpHept
115. (31, 31) Respondens autem Iacob dixit ad Laban: 'dixi enim, ne forte auferas filias tuas a me, et omnia mea.'
115. (31:31) But Jacob answering said to Laban: 'for I said, lest perhaps you take your daughters from me, and all that is mine.'
ExpHept
116. (31, 33) Intravit autem Laban et inscrutatus est in domo Liae; advertendum est quomodo dicatur domus uxoris, cum in itinere comprehensi sint a Laban; nisi forte consuetudo Scripturarum dicit "domum" pro cubiculo vel tentorio, quomodo etiam ancillarum domos dicit.
116. (31:33) Now Laban entered and searched in the house of Leah; it is to be noted how a wife's house is spoken of, since they were overtaken by Laban on the journey; unless perhaps the custom of the Scriptures says "house" for a chamber or tent, just as it also speaks of the maidservants' houses.
ExpHept
117. (31, 37) Iacob dicit ad Laban: quia scrutatus es omnia vasa domus meae; nunc unam domum dicit, cuius membra erant domus uxorum eius et concubinarum; ut intellegatur domos appellatas, cum essent cubicula aut tentoria, quos etiam "papiliones" vocant.
117. (31:37) Jacob says to Laban: for you have searched all the vessels of my house; now he speaks of one house, whose parts were the houses of his wives and concubines; so that it may be understood that "houses" were so called when they were chambers or tents, which they also call "pavilions."
ExpHept
118. (31, 42) Nisi Deus patris mei Abraham et timor Isaac esset mihi; patrem suum appellat avum suum, sicut ei dixerat Isaac pater eius.
118. (31:42) Unless the God of my father Abraham and the fear of Isaac had been with me; he calls his grandfather his father, just as Isaac his father had said to him.
ExpHept
119. (32, 4-5) Misit autem Iacob nuntios ante se ad Esau fratrem suum in terram Seir in regionem Edom, et mandavit illis dicens: 'sic dicetis domino meo Esau: 'sic dicit puer tuus Iacob, cum Laban habitavi et demoratus sum usque modo, et facti sunt mihi boves et asini et oves et pueri et puellae, et misi nuntiare domino meo Esau'; non dixit: "misi nuntiare tibi."
119. (32:4-5) Now Jacob sent messengers before him to Esau his brother into the land of Seir in the region of Edom, and charged them, saying: "thus you shall say to my lord Esau: 'thus says your servant Jacob, I have dwelt with Laban and stayed until now, and I have come to have oxen and asses and sheep and menservants and maidservants, and I have sent to announce to my lord Esau'"; he did not say: "I have sent to announce to you."
ExpHept
120. (32, 18) Si interrogaverit te Esau dicens: 'cuius es? Et quo vadis? Et cuius haec quae antecedunt te?'. Et dices: 'pueri tui Iacob'; plenum esset et integrum, etiam si et non haberet.
120. (32:18) If Esau asks you, saying: "whose are you? And where are you going? And whose are these that go before you?" And you shall say: "your servant Jacob's"; it would be complete and entire even if it did not have and.
ExpHept
121. (32, 19) Munera misit domino meo Esau, et ecce ipse post nos; dicendum autem fuerat usitata locutione: "munera misi domino meo tibi," aut: "munera misit domino suo tibi."
121. (32:19) He sent gifts to my lord Esau, and behold he himself is behind us; but it should have been said in the customary manner of speech: "I have sent gifts to my lord, to you," or: "he has sent gifts to his lord, to you."
ExpHept
122. (32, 23) Surrexit autem eadem nocte, et accepit uxores duas et duas ancillas; hic distinguuntur ab uxoribus, quas prius uxores Scriptura dixerat.
122. (32:23) Now he rose up that same night, and took his two wives and his two maidservants; here they are distinguished from the wives, whom Scripture had earlier called wives.
ExpHept
123. (32, 23) Et accepit duas uxores et duas ancillas; notandum est quemadmodum dicatur consuetudine Scripturarum: accepit; non enim tunc eas duxit, aut tunc a socero accepit.
123. (32:23) And he took his two wives and two maidservants; it is to be noted how, by the custom of the Scriptures, it says: he took; for he did not then marry them, nor then receive them from his father-in-law.
ExpHept
124. (33, 13) Quod habent Latini codices: et oves et boves fetantur; Graeci habent: fetantur super me; quod ea significatione dictum est, ut intellegatur: "super sollicitudinem" vel "curam meam"; quomodo solemus loqui, cum dicimus "super caput nostrum" esse aliquid, cuius maximam curam gerimus.
124. (33:13) Whereas the Latin manuscripts have: and the sheep and oxen are giving birth, the Greeks have: are giving birth upon me; which is said with this meaning, so that it may be understood: "upon my concern" or "my care"; in the way we are accustomed to speak when we say that something is "upon our head" of which we bear the greatest care.
ExpHept
125. (34, 7) Et filii Iacob venerunt de campo, et cum audissent, compuncti sunt viri, et triste erat illis valde, quod turpe fecerat in Israel, quod dormisset cum filia Iacob, et non sic erit;
125. (34:7) And the sons of Jacob came from the field, and when they had heard it, the men were stung, and it was very grievous to them, that he had done a disgraceful thing in Israel, in that he had lain with Jacob's daughter, and it shall not be so;
ExpHept
difficile talis locutio reperitur in Scripturis, non inducta persona loquentium scriptorem verba eorum interposuisse; non enim ait: "et dixerunt," sed hoc tacito verba dixit eorum. Nam qui alii dicere potuerunt: et non sic erit, nisi qui graviter indignati vindictam moliebantur?
such an expression is rarely found in the Scriptures—that the writer should have inserted the words of speakers without introducing the persons speaking; for it does not say "and they said," but with this verb left unsaid it spoke their words. For who else could have said and it shall not be so except those who, gravely indignant, were plotting vengeance?
ExpHept
126. (34, 8) Notandum quod Emmor loquens de Dina ad Iacob et filios eius: filiam dicit vestram; non dicit: "filiam tuam, sororem istorum."
126. (34:8) It is to be noted that Hamor, speaking to Jacob and his sons about Dinah, says your daughter; he does not say: "your daughter, the sister of these men."
ExpHept
127. (34, 15) In hoc similes erimus vobis, et habitabimus in vobis; id est: "inter vos."
127. (34:15) In this we will be like you, and we will dwell among you; that is: "among you."
ExpHept
128. (34, 19) Appositus enim erat filiae Iacob; id est: "amabat eam."
128. (34:19) For he was attached to Jacob's daughter; that is: "he loved her."
ExpHept
129. (34, 26) Et filium eius Sychem interfecerunt in ore gladii; ac si diceret: "gladio."
129. (34:26) And they slew his son Shechem with the edge of the sword; as if it said: "with the sword."
ExpHept
130. (34, 28-29) Quae abstulerunt filii Iacob de civitate Sichimorum Salem, cum eam expugnavissent, sic enumerantur: oves eorum, et boves eorum, et asinos eorum, quaecumque erant in civitate, et quaecumque erant in campo tulerunt; et omnia corpora eorum et omnem supellectilem eorum et uxores eorum captivaverunt, et diripuerunt quaecumque erant in civitate, et quaecumque erant in domibus.
130. (34:28-29) The things that the sons of Jacob took from the city of the Shechemites, Salem, when they had stormed it, are enumerated thus: their sheep, and their oxen, and their asses, whatever was in the city, and whatever was in the field they took; and all their bodies and all their household goods and their wives they took captive, and they plundered whatever was in the city, and whatever was in the houses.
ExpHept
Inter haec omnia non satis intellegitur quid dixit: et corpora eorum; neque enim suspicandum est, quod corpora abstulerunt peremptorum; sed rerum intellegenda sunt, quae corporaliter possidentur;
Among all these things, what it said by and their bodies is not well enough understood; for it is not to be supposed that they carried off the bodies of the slain; but it is to be understood of things that are possessed bodily;
ExpHept
ut eorum sit executio quod sequitur: et supellectilem, et cetera, sicut in iure dicitur "traditio corporum"; quamquam Graeci "servos" appellant [MISSING GREEK TEXT] usitatissima locutione, sed quia non,
so that the execution of it would be what follows: and the household goods, and the rest, as in law "delivery of bodies" is spoken of; although the Greeks, by a most customary expression, call "slaves" [MISSING GREEK TEXT], yet since it does not,
ExpHept
sed: hic dictum est, non [MISSING GREEK TEXT] est temere confirmandum, servos significatos; fieri tamen potest, ut hoc magis sit.
but: it is here said, it is not [MISSING GREEK TEXT]—it is not to be rashly affirmed that slaves are meant; yet it can be that this is rather the case.
ExpHept
131. (36, 40) Cum gentem Edom, id est Idumaeorum, commemoraret Scriptura, et qui in ea regnassent, postea dicit: haec nomina principum Esau, secundum loca eorum in regionibus eorum, et in gentibus eorum; gentes appellans unius gentis, propter familiarum multiplicatas generationes, cum etiam ipse Edom vocaretur; unde et gens, quam propagavit, cognominata est, cuius utique pater fuit.
131. (36:40) When Scripture had mentioned the nation of Edom, that is, of the Idumeans, and those who had reigned in it, it afterward says: these are the names of the chiefs of Esau, according to their places in their regions, and in their nations; calling the families of one nation "nations," on account of the multiplied generations, since even he himself was called Edom; whence also the nation that he propagated was named, of which he was indeed the father.
ExpHept
132. (37, 21) Cum audisset autem Ruben, liberavit eum de manibus eorum, et dixit: 'non feriamus eum in anima.' Non ergo liberavit eum, et inde hoc dixit; sed hoc dicendo eum liberavit. Prius ergo dixit: liberavit eum, et deinde brevi recapitulatione quomodo eum liberaverit, insinuerat.
132. (37:21) But when Reuben heard it, he delivered him out of their hands, and said: 'let us not strike him in the soul.' He did not, then, deliver him and afterward say this; rather, by saying this he delivered him. He first said, then, he delivered him, and afterward, by a brief recapitulation, conveyed how he delivered him.
ExpHept
133. (37, 21) Non feriamus eum in animam; hoc loco nomine animae vitam corporis animati significat, per efficientem id quod efficitur. Secundum hoc videri potest etiam ad diabolum dictum esse de Iob: animam eius ne tangas (Iob 2, 6); id est: ne occidas eum. Nam secundum illam significationem qua natura animae commemoratur, illud a Domino dicitur: nolite timere eos qui corpus occidunt, animam autem non possunt occidere (Mt 10, 28).
133. (37:21) Let us not strike him in the soul; in this place by the name of soul it signifies the life of the animate body, by the cause for the effect. According to this it can be seen that it was also said to the devil concerning Job: do not touch his soul (Job 2:6); that is: do not kill him. For according to that signification by which the nature of the soul is meant, this is said by the Lord: do not fear those who kill the body, but cannot kill the soul (Matt 10:28).
ExpHept
134. (37, 27) Quod Iudas dicit: manus autem nostrae non sint super eum, hoc est quod dici a nobis solet: "manus ei non inferamus."
134. (37:27) As to what Judah says: but let not our hands be upon him, this is what we are accustomed to say: "let us not lay hands on him."
ExpHept
135. (37, 27) Quoniam frater noster et caro nostra est; non aliud, sed bis hoc idem dictum est, tamquam exponendo quid sit frater noster, id est caro nostra, quod ex eadem carne fuerant procreati.
135. (37:27) Because he is our brother and our flesh; not something else, but this same thing is said twice, as if explaining what our brother is, that is our flesh, namely that they had been begotten of the same flesh.
ExpHept
136. (37, 31) Occiderunt haedum caprarum; sic solet loqui Scriptura, quemadmodum in Psalmo: sicut agni ovium (Ps 113, 4), quasi possit esse aut haedus nisi caprarum, aut agni nisi ovium.
136. (37:31) They killed a kid of the goats; Scripture is accustomed to speak thus, as in the Psalm: like lambs of the sheep (Ps 114:4 (113:4)), as though there could be a kid except of goats, or lambs except of sheep.
ExpHept
137. (38, 13) Et nuntiatum est nurui eius Thamar dicentes; dicendum autem fuit: "nuntiaverunt dicentes."
137. (38:13) And it was announced to his daughter-in-law Tamar, saying (plural); but it should have been said: "they announced, saying."
ExpHept
138. (38, 14) Et depositis vestimentis viduitatis suae a se; quid minus esset, si non adderetur: a se?
138. (38:14) And having laid aside the garments of her widowhood from herself; what would be lacking if there were not added: from herself?
ExpHept
139. (38, 26) Et non apposuit amplius scire eam; pro eo quod est misceri ei.
139. (38:26) And he did not go on to know her any more; in place of being joined with her.
ExpHept
140. (39, 4) Et invenit Ioseph gratiam in conspectu domini sui; haec locutio nulli est ignota in Scripturis.
140. (39:4) And Joseph found favor in the sight of his lord; this expression is unknown to no one in the Scriptures.
ExpHept
141. (39, 6) Et nesciebat quae circa eum erant nihil; Graecis usitata est vulgo locutio, apud nos recta non est, sed: "nesciebat aliquid," dicimus.
141. (39:6) And he did not know anything of the things that were around him, nothing; this is an expression commonly used among the Greeks; among us it is not correct, but we say: "he did not know anything."
ExpHept
142. (39, 6) Praeter panem quem ipse edebat; per panem utique omnia intellegi voluit ad victum eius pertinentia; unde pro quotidiano victu, panis solus positus intellegitur in Oratione Dominica (Cf. Mt 6, 14).
142. (39:6) Except the bread that he himself ate; by "bread" he certainly wished to be understood all things pertaining to his food; whence in the Lord's Prayer bread alone is understood as put for daily food (See Matt 6:11).
ExpHept
143. (39, 7) Et misit uxor domini eius oculos suos in Ioseph; solet et apud nos vulgo esse usitata locutio, pro eo quod est: "amavit eum."
143. (39:7) And his lord's wife cast her eyes upon Joseph; this is an expression commonly used even among us, in place of: "she loved him."
ExpHept
144. (39, 7) Et ait: 'dormi mecum'; et ista usitata est locutio, pro eo quod est: "concumbe mecum."
144. (39:7) And she said: 'sleep with me'; this too is a customary expression, in place of: "lie with me."
ExpHept
145. (39, 22) Et dedit carceris custos carcerem per manum Ioseph; pro eo quod est: "in manus Ioseph"; per quod significat: "in potestatem."
145. (39:22) And the keeper of the prison gave the prison through the hand of Joseph; in place of: "into the hands of Joseph"; by which it signifies: "into his power."
ExpHept
146. (40, 8) Et dixerunt: 'somnium vidimus, et non est qui interpretetur illud'; cum somnium suum unusquisque vidisset, non dixerunt: "somnia vidimus," sed: somnium vidimus.
146. (40:8) And they said: 'we have seen a dream, and there is no one to interpret it'; although each of them had seen his own dream, they did not say: "we have seen dreams," but: we have seen a dream.
ExpHept
147. (40, 12) Tres fundi, tres dies sunt; non dixit: "tres dies significant." Et multum haec locutio notanda est, ubi aliqua significantia, earum rerum quas significant, nomine appellantur; inde est quod ait Apostolus: petra autem erat Christus (1 Cor 10, 4); non ait: "petra significabat Christum."
147. (40:12) The three baskets are three days; he did not say: "the three baskets signify three days." And this expression is much to be noted, where things that signify are called by the name of the things they signify; hence it is that the Apostle says: and the rock was Christ (1 Cor 10:4); he does not say: "the rock signified Christ."
ExpHept
148. (40, 13) Et dabis calicem Pharaoni in manu eius; cum plenum esset, etiamsi non adderetur: in manu eius.
148. (40:13) And you shall give the cup to Pharaoh into his hand; though it would be complete even if there were not added: into his hand.
ExpHept
149. (40, 19) Et auferet Pharao caput tuum abs te; plenum esset, etiam si non haberet: abs te.
149. (40:19) And Pharaoh will take away your head from you; it would be complete even if it did not have: from you.
ExpHept
150. (40, 19) Et manducabunt aves caeli carnes tuas abs te; similis superiori locutioni.
150. (40:19) And the birds of heaven will eat your flesh from you; similar to the expression above.
ExpHept
151. (41, 1) Et factum est post biennium dierum; quid minus esset si non haberet: dierum?
151. (41:1) And it came to pass after two years of days; what would be lacking if it did not have: of days?
ExpHept
152. (41, 7) Surrexit autem Pharao, et erat somnium; amant Scripturae sic loqui de somniis, cum fuerit evigilatum, tamquam reddita homini veritate vigilantium, tunc illud appareat somnium, quod cum videretur, quasi veritas fuit.
152. (41:7) Now Pharaoh rose up, and it was a dream; the Scriptures love to speak thus of dreams: when one has awakened, then, the truth of waking persons being restored to the man, that appears as a dream which, while it was being seen, was as if truth.
ExpHept
153. (41, 9-10) Peccatum meum recordor hodie. Pharao iratus fuit pueris suis, et posuit nos in carcere; illi loquebatur tamquam de altero.
153. (41:9-10) I remember my sin today. Pharaoh was angry with his servants, and put us in prison; he was speaking to him as though of another.
ExpHept
154. (41, 11) Et vidimus somnium ambo nocte una, ego et ille; quasi non sufficeret, quod ambo dixerat. Deinde et hic: vidimus somnium dicit, non: "vidimus somnia"; tamquam unum ambo vidissent.
154. (41:11) And we both saw a dream in one night, I and he; as though it would not suffice that he had said both. Then here too he says we saw a dream, not: "we saw dreams"; as though both had seen one.
ExpHept
155. (41, 13) Factum est autem sicut comparavit nobis, ita et contigit. Factum est autem; sic solet Scriptura ponere; nam plenum esset: "sicut autem comparavit nobis, ita et contigit."
155. (41:13) And it came to pass, as he interpreted to us, so it also happened. And it came to pass; thus Scripture is accustomed to put it; for it would be complete: "and as he interpreted to us, so it also happened."
ExpHept
156. (41, 19) Quales numquam vidi tales in tota terra Aegypti turpiores; dici autem posset more nostro, "quibus numquam vidi turpiores," aut "quales numquam vidi," aut "numquam vidi tales."
156. (41:19) Such as I never saw, more wretched ones in all the land of Egypt; but it could be said in our manner: "than which I never saw more wretched ones," or "such as I never saw," or "I never saw such ones."
ExpHept
157. (41, 21) Exsurgens autem dormivi; exsurgens ait, pro: "expergiscens."
157. (41:21) And rising up I slept; rising up he says, in place of: "awaking."
ExpHept
158. (41, 25) Quanta Deus facit, ostendit Pharaoni; cum illi loqueretur, tamquam de altero dicit.
158. (41:25) How great things God does, he has shown to Pharaoh; though he was speaking to him, he says it as though of another.
ExpHept
159. (41, 30) Et consumet fames terram; pro: "hominibus qui sunt in terra."
159. (41:30) And the famine will consume the land; in place of: "the men who are in the land."
ExpHept
160. (41, 33-34) Nunc ergo vide hominem prudentem et intellegentem, et constitue eum super terram Aegypti; et faciat Pharao et constituat locorum principes super terram; quasi alius sit cui dixit: provide hominem prudentem, et alius de quo dicit: constituat Pharao.
160. (41:33-34) Now therefore look for a prudent and understanding man, and set him over the land of Egypt; and let Pharaoh do this and appoint chiefs of the regions over the land; as though the one to whom he says provide a prudent man were one person, and the one of whom he says let Pharaoh appoint another.
ExpHept
161. (41, 35) Et congregetur triticum sub manu Pharaonis, id est: "sub potestate."
161. (41:35) And let the grain be gathered under Pharaoh's hand, that is: "under his power."
ExpHept
162. (41, 40) Tamen thronum praecedam tui ego; sic se habent verba in Graeco, quae dixit Pharao ad Ioseph. Sed: praecedam tui, usitata est apud Graecos locutio, apud nos autem dicitur: praecedam te;
162. (41:40) Yet I will go before the throne of you; thus the words stand in the Greek which Pharaoh said to Joseph. But I will go before of you is a customary expression among the Greeks, whereas among us it is said: I will go before you;
ExpHept
illud vero: praecedam te thronum, nec apud Graecos usitata perhibetur sed: praecedam te throno, id est honore sedis; quod intellegitur: "praecedam te regno," hoc enim illi et postea dicit.
but that phrase I will go before you the throne is reported not to be customary even among the Greeks, but rather: I will go before you in the throne, that is, in the honor of the seat; which is understood: "I will go before you in the kingdom," for this is also what he says to him afterward.
ExpHept
163. (41, 44) Ego Pharao; sine te nemo extollet manum suam super omnem terram Aegypti; tamquam diceret: "ego sum rex, tu autem princeps vel praepositus Aegypti." Pharao quippe non hominis nomen est, sed regiae potestatis.
163. (41:44) I am Pharaoh; without you no one will lift up his hand over all the land of Egypt; as if he said: "I am king, but you are the chief or overseer of Egypt." For Pharaoh is not the name of a man, but of the royal power.
ExpHept
164. (42, 1-2) Videns autem Iacob, quia est venditio in Aegypto, dixit filiis suis: 'quare segnes estis? Ecce audivi quod est venditio in Aegypto'; notandum quia id quod audisse se dicit, vidisse eum Scriptura dixerat.
164. (42:1-2) Now Jacob seeing that there was selling in Egypt, said to his sons: 'why are you slothful? Behold, I have heard that there is selling in Egypt'; it is to be noted that what he says he heard, Scripture had said he saw.
ExpHept
165. (42, 2) Emite nobis pusillas escas, ut vivamus, et non moriamur; unum horum sufficeret, aut: ut vivamus, aut: ut non moriamur.
165. (42:2) Buy us a little food, that we may live, and not die; one of these would suffice, either: that we may live, or: that we may not die.
ExpHept
166. (42, 11) Pacati sumus; non sunt pueri tui exploratores; quasi de aliis dixerint: non sunt pueri tui exploratores, cum possent dicere: "non sumus"; honorificentiae autem more maxime ita loquebantur.
166. (42:11) We are peaceable; your servants are not spies; as though they spoke of others: your servants are not spies, when they could say: "we are not"; but out of a manner of honor they especially spoke thus.
ExpHept
167. (42, 13) Duodecim sumus pueri tui fratres in terra Chanaan; cum posterius dicant, quod unus eorum non sit, ipsum scilicet Ioseph non esse existimantes, id est, perisse. Hac locutione dictum est etiam illud: hi filii Iacob qui facti sunt ei in Mesopotamia (Gen 35, 26); cum ibi non fuerit natus Beniamin. Quod autem dixerunt: sumus in terra Chanaan, cum eo tempore, quo loquebantur, in Aegypto essent, sumus, dictum est, pro "habitamus"; inde enim venerant illico redituri, ibi commorantes.
167. (42:13) We are twelve, your servants, brothers in the land of Canaan; whereas they say afterward that one of them is not—namely, supposing Joseph himself not to exist, that is, to have perished. By this expression that too was said: these are the sons of Jacob who were born to him in Mesopotamia (Gen 35:26); although Benjamin was not born there. And as for their saying we are in the land of Canaan, when at the time they were speaking they were in Egypt, we are was said for "we dwell"; for they had come thence and would return there at once, abiding there.
ExpHept
168. (42, 14) Hoc est quod dixi vobis, dicens, quod exploratores estis; quid deesset, etiam si non adderet: dicens?
168. (42:14) This is what I said to you, saying, that you are spies; what would be lacking even if it did not add: saying?
ExpHept
169. (42, 19) Ipsi vero ite et ducite emptionem tritici vestri: ducite, pro eo quod est: "ferte"; quia enim ducuntur iumenta, in quibus fertur, etiam hoc "duci" dictum est.
169. (42:19) But you, go and bring the purchase of your grain: bring, in place of: "carry"; for since the beasts on which it is carried are led, this too was called "leading."
ExpHept
170. (42, 22) Nonne locutus sum vobis, dicens: 'ne noceatis puero, et non exaudistis me?' Notandum exauditionem non eam solam dici quam exaudit Deus.
170. (42:22) Did I not speak to you, saying: 'do not harm the boy,' and you did not hear me? It is to be noted that "hearing" is not said only of that which God hears.
ExpHept
171. (42, 23) Ipsi autem ignorabant quia audit Ioseph. Audit, pro "intellegit"; nam voces audit utique aure etiam qui non intellegit linguam. Repetitur illa locutio quando narrant patri suo quid eis acciderit in Aegypto, et quid dixerint ad Ioseph.
171. (42:23) But they did not know that Joseph heard. He hears, in place of "he understands"; for one who does not understand the language certainly hears the words even with his ear. That expression is repeated when they recount to their father what had happened to them in Egypt, and what they had said to Joseph.
ExpHept
172. (42, 32) Duodecim sumus fratres, filii patris nostri; unus non est, pusillus autem cum patre nostro hodie in terra Chanaan. Multa in his paucis verbis genera locutionum sunt,
172. (42:32) We are twelve brothers, the sons of our father; one is not, and the little one is with our father today in the land of Canaan. There are many kinds of expression in these few words,
ExpHept
et illud quod paulo ante memoravi: duodecim sumus, cum ipsi dicant: unus non est; et: filii sumus patris nostri, quasi possent esse filii non patris sui. Pusillus autem cum patre nostro hodie in terra Chanaan, nec dixerunt: "est," aut aliquid huiusmodi.
and that which I mentioned a little before: we are twelve, when they themselves say one is not; and: we are sons of our father, as though they could be sons of someone not their father. And the little one is with our father today in the land of Canaan—nor did they say "is," or anything of this kind.
ExpHept
Deinde notandum est, quod maxime necessarium videtur propter evangelistarum narrationes, quomodo cum ea, quae dicta sunt, dicta esse narrantur, non omnino eodem modo repetuntur, cum tamen in diversitate verborum nihil sententiae depereat veritatis.
Then it is to be noted, which seems especially necessary on account of the narratives of the evangelists, how, when the things that were said are recounted as having been said, they are not repeated in altogether the same way, while yet in the diversity of words nothing of the truth of the meaning is lost.
ExpHept
Nam quod dixerunt dictum sibi esse a Ioseph: et in terra mercamini, non invenitur ab illo dictum. Sine mendacio autem dixerunt, quod ex verbis quae dixerat, in eius voluntate cognoverunt; neque enim verba sunt necessaria nisi ad expromendam, et in audientium notitiam perferendam, quantum possumus, voluntatem.
For as to their saying that it had been said to them by Joseph, and trade in the land, this is not found to have been said by him. Yet they said it without lying, because from the words he had said they recognized it in his will; for words are not necessary except to express the will and convey it, as far as we can, to the knowledge of the hearers.
ExpHept
173. (42, 35) Et erat uniuscuiusque alligatura argenti in sacco eorum; non dixit: "in sacco eius," aut: "in saccis eorum," sed quasi unus saccus omnium esset.
173. (42:35) And the bundle of each one's silver was in their sack; it did not say: "in his sack," or: "in their sacks," but as though all had one sack.
ExpHept
174. (42, 36) Super me facta sunt omnia haec; id est: me miseria onerant.
174. (42:36) All these things are come upon me; that is: they burden me with misery.
ExpHept
175. (43, 3) Ait autem illi Iudas, dicens; potuit plenum esse, etsi non haberet: dicens.
175. (43:3) But Judah said to him, saying; it could be complete even if it did not have: saying.
ExpHept
176. (43, 7) Interrogans interrogavit nos homo; assidua est talis locutio in Scripturis: interrogans interrogavit nos homo; aut: "interrogando, interrogavit," et si quae similia.
176. (43:7) Asking the man asked us; such an expression is constant in the Scriptures: asking the man asked us; or: "by asking, he asked," and any like it.
ExpHept
177. (43, 16) Mecum enim manducabunt homines panes meridie; numquid panes tantum? Sed ab eo quod excellit et cetera est complexa locutio. Mecum enim manducabunt homines panes meridie; quod dicit: meridie, prandium significat, quod fit in medio die, hoc est enim meridies.
177. (43:16) For the men will eat loaves with me at midday; was it only loaves? But the expression has embraced the rest from that which is preeminent. For the men will eat loaves with me at midday; in saying at midday it signifies the meal that is taken in the middle of the day, for this is midday.
ExpHept
178. (43, 18) Ut accipiat nos in servos et asinos nostros; non utique subauditur: "servos"; nam quod Latini codices servos habent, [MISSING GREEK TEXT] in Graecis legitur, quod nullo modo asini possunt esse. Ergo asinos nostros tantummodo accipiat subauditur.
178. (43:18) That he may take us as slaves and our asses; "slaves" is certainly not to be supplied; for where the Latin manuscripts have slaves, [MISSING GREEK TEXT] is read in the Greek, which can in no way be asses. Therefore only our asses is to be supplied with may take.
ExpHept
179. (43, 21) Aperuimus saccos nostros, et hoc argentum uniuscuiusque in sacco suo; non addidit: "inventum est," aut: "apparuit," aut: "erat," aut aliquid huiusmodi.
179. (43:21) We opened our sacks, and this silver of each one in his sack; it did not add: "was found," or: "appeared," or: "was," or anything of this kind.
ExpHept
180. (43, 23) Propitius vobis, nolite timere; in his verbis quibus dictum est: propitius vobis, duo verba sunt quae subaudiuntur, et: "sit," et: "Deus." Plenum est enim: "propitius sit vobis Deus," quod omnino in Graeco usitatissimum est.
180. (43:23) Gracious to you, do not fear; in these words, in which it is said gracious to you, there are two words that are to be supplied, both "be" and "God." For the full form is: "may God be gracious to you," which is entirely most customary in the Greek.
ExpHept
181. (43, 28) Salvus est puer tuus pater noster, adhuc vivit; hic expressius ostenditur "pueri" nomine servum solere significari; non enim in illo sene posset hoc esse nomen aetatis.
181. (43:28) Your servant our father is safe, he still lives; here it is shown more expressly that by the name "servant" (or "boy") a slave is customarily signified; for in that old man this could not be a name of age.
ExpHept
182. (43, 32) Non enim poterant Aegyptii manducare cum Hebraeis panes; abominatio est enim Aegyptiis. Illa locutio frequentatur, ut in panibus omnes escae intellegantur.
182. (43:32) For the Egyptians could not eat loaves with the Hebrews; for it is an abomination to the Egyptians. That expression is frequent, so that by loaves all foods are understood.
ExpHept
183. (43, 34) Magnificata facta est autem pars Beniamin prae partibus omnium quinquipliciter ad illorum; iam quia dictum erat: prae partibus omnium, potuit non dici: ad illorum.
183. (43:34) Now Benjamin's portion was made greater than the portions of them all, fivefold compared to theirs; since it had already said than the portions of them all, it could have left unsaid: compared to theirs.
ExpHept
184. (44, 6-7) Inveniens autem eos, dixit secundum verba haec; potuit dicere: "dixit eis verba haec." An forte non locutionis genus est, sed interest etiam sententiae?
184. (44:6-7) And finding them, he spoke according to these words; he could have said: "he spoke these words to them." Or is it perhaps not a manner of speech, but does it bear also on the meaning?
ExpHept
Aliud enim est ipsa verba dicere, aliud secundum ipsa, ut quaecumque alia dicta fuerint, eadem sententia teneatur quae illis verbis comprehensa est; hoc est, "secundum ipsa," etiamsi non ipsa.
For it is one thing to say the very words, another to speak according to them, so that whatever other words may be said, the same meaning is held that was contained in those words; this is "according to them," even if not the very words.
ExpHept
Sed quia sequitur illis respondentibus: utquid loquitur dominus secundum verba haec? Qui utique dicere debuerunt usitato more: "utquid loquitur dominus verba haec?" constat esse locutionis genus.
But because there follows, as they answered: why does my lord speak according to these words?—who certainly ought to have said in the customary manner: "why does my lord speak these words?"—it is established to be a manner of speech.
ExpHept
185. (44, 7) Absit a pueris tuis facere secundum verbum hoc; potuerunt dicere: "absit a nobis"; sed illa honorificentia est usitata in Scripturis sic dicere, tamquam de aliis: pueris autem pro "servis" dictum est.
185. (44:7) Far be it from your servants to do according to this word; they could have said: "far be it from us"; but it is a customary mark of honor in the Scriptures to speak thus, as though of others: servants is said for "slaves."
ExpHept
186. (44, 9) Et nos autem erimus servi domino nostro. Etiam hic Graeci habent, hoc est "pueri," quod tam assidue Scriptura pro "servis" ponit, ut difficile inveniatur non isto nomine appellare servos.
186. (44:9) And we too will be slaves to our lord. Here too the Greeks have the word, that is "boys," which Scripture so constantly puts for "slaves" that it is hard to find it not calling slaves by this name.
ExpHept
187. (44, 34) Quomodo autem ascendam ad patrem, cum puer non sit nobiscum? Ut non videam mala quae invenient patrem meum! Magis consuetudo loquendi exigebat dici: "ut videam mala quae invenient patrem meum"; hoc est: "quomodo ascendam ut videam?". Novo itaque loquendi more id quod dixit, quomodo pro eo dixit, ac si dixisset: "non." Sic enim usitatus ordo iste verborum est: "non ascendam ad patrem, cum puer non sit nobiscum, ut non videam mala quae invenient patrem meum."
187. (44:34) But how shall I go up to my father, when the boy is not with us? That I may not see the evils that will find my father! The custom of speaking rather required that it be said: "that I may see the evils that will find my father"; that is: "how shall I go up that I may see?" And so by a novel manner of speaking he said what he said, putting how as if he had said: "not." For this is the customary order of these words: "I will not go up to my father, when the boy is not with us, that I may not see the evils that will find my father."
ExpHept
188. (45, 2-3) Quando flevit Ioseph, cum recognosceretur a fratribus suis, ait Scriptura: audierunt autem omnes Aegyptii, et auditum est in domo Pharaonis. Deinde sequitur quod narrabat: dixit autem Ioseph ad fratres suos; prius itaque Scriptura dixit quod postea factum est; hoc enim famae celeritate accidit, ut omnibus Aegyptiis notum fieret; et postea reversa est narratio ad id quod dicebatur brevi recapitulatione.
188. (45:2-3) When Joseph wept, as he was being recognized by his brothers, Scripture says: and all the Egyptians heard, and it was heard in the house of Pharaoh. Then follows what it was recounting: and Joseph said to his brothers; thus Scripture first said what happened afterward; for this came about by the swiftness of report, so that it became known to all the Egyptians; and afterward the narrative returned by a brief recapitulation to what was being said.
ExpHept
189. (45, 16) Et divulgata est vox in domo Pharaonis, dicentes: 'venerunt fratres Ioseph'; dicentes, posuit pro "dicentium," "vox enim dicentium divulgata est: venerunt fratres Ioseph."
189. (45:16) And the report was spread abroad in the house of Pharaoh, saying: "Joseph's brothers have come"; saying, it put for "of those saying," "for the report of those saying was spread abroad: Joseph's brothers have come."
ExpHept
190. (46, 2) At ille respondit: 'quid est: dicens?'. Ordo est: "at ille respondit dicens: Quid est?".
190. (46:2) But he answered: 'what is it: saying?'. The order is: "but he answered, saying: what is it?".
ExpHept
191. (46, 4) Deus ad Iacob dicit: et ego descendam tecum in Aegyptum, et ego ascendere te faciam in finem; sic habent Graeci, quod Latini habent: et ego deducam te in finem.
191. (46:4) God says to Jacob: and I will go down with you into Egypt, and I will bring you up at the end; thus the Greeks have it, which the Latin have as: and I will bring you up at the end.
ExpHept
192. (46, 28) Iudam autem misit ante se ad Ioseph, ut veniret sibi obviam iuxta Heroum civitatem; nescio utrum Heroum nomen facile in Scripturis reperiatur.
192. (46:28) But he sent Judah before him to Joseph, to meet him near the city of Heroes; I do not know whether the name "of Heroes" is easily found in the Scriptures.
ExpHept
193. (46, 31-32) In verbis Ioseph, quibus ait ad fratres suos: ascendens nuntiabo Pharaoni et dicam ei: 'fratres mei et domus patris mei, qui erant in terra Chanaan, venerunt ad me; viri autem sunt pastores (viri enim pecorum nutritores erant), et iumenta et oves et omnia sua adduxerunt,'
193. (46:31-32) In the words of Joseph, in which he says to his brothers: going up I will announce to Pharaoh and say to him: "my brothers and my father's house, who were in the land of Canaan, have come to me; the men are shepherds (for the men were keepers of cattle), and they have brought their beasts and sheep and all that is theirs,"
ExpHept
quod interpositum est: viri enim pecorum nutritores erant, ex persona sua scriptor interposuit, et redit ad verba Ioseph, adiungendo: et iumenta et omnia sua adduxerunt, ut ordo sit in verbis Ioseph: "viri autem sunt pastores, et iumenta et oves et omnia sua adduxerunt."
what is interposed—for the men were keepers of cattle—the writer interposed in his own person, and returns to the words of Joseph by adding: and they have brought their beasts and all that is theirs, so that the order in Joseph's words is: "the men are shepherds, and they have brought their beasts and sheep and all that is theirs."
ExpHept
194. (47, 8) Dixit autem Pharao ad Iacob: 'quot anni dierum vitae tuae?', subauditur: "sunt."
194. (47:8) And Pharaoh said to Jacob: 'how many are the years of the days of your life?', "are" is supplied.
ExpHept
195. (47, 9) Pusilli et maligni fuerunt dies annorum vitae meae. Pusilli, pro: "paucis" positum est, neque enim vitae alicuius quam ceterorum dies possunt esse horarum spatio breviores. Hoc autem Iacob ex comparatione dixit vitae maiorum suorum; nam utique centum triginta annos, quos ille iam agebat, nemo nunc vivit.
195. (47:9) Few and evil have been the days of the years of my life. Few, is put for "few in number," for the days of one person's life cannot be shorter in the span of hours than those of others. But Jacob said this by comparison with the life of his forefathers; for no one now lives the hundred and thirty years that he was then living.
ExpHept
196. (47, 12) Triticum secundum corpus, id est: "secundum numerum corporum"; per corpus enim numerum corporum, per numerum corporum numerum hominum significat.
196. (47:12) Grain according to the body, that is: "according to the number of bodies"; for by body it signifies the number of bodies, and by the number of bodies the number of men.
ExpHept
197. (47, 13) Invaluerat autem fames valde, et defecit terra Aegypti; terram posuit pro hominibus qui erant in terra.
197. (47:13) But the famine had grown very severe, and the land of Egypt failed; it put land for the men who were in the land.
ExpHept
198. (47, 15) Venerunt autem omnes Aegyptii ad Ioseph dicentes: 'da nobis panes'; per panes triticum significat, locutione per id quod efficitur, id quod efficit.
198. (47:15) And all the Egyptians came to Joseph, saying: 'give us loaves'; by loaves it signifies grain, by an expression that puts the effect for the cause.
ExpHept
199. (47, 20) Et facta est terra Pharaoni; non ait: "Pharaonis." Amat sic loqui Scriptura; sicut in Psalmo dictum est: et custodivi Legem tuam; haec facta est mihi, quoniam iustificationes tuas exquisivi (Ps 118, 55-56); de Lege Dei dixit: haec facta est mihi, id est: "in meam utilitatem."
199. (47:20) And the land became Pharaoh's; it did not say: "of Pharaoh." Scripture loves to speak thus; as in the Psalm it is said: and I kept your law; this became mine, because I sought out your justifications (Ps 119:55-56 (118:55-56)); of the law of God it said: this became mine, that is: "for my benefit."
ExpHept
200. (47, 22) Praeter terram sacerdotum tantum non possedit Ioseph; quasi dixisset: "praeter terram sacerdotum tantum, omnem terram possedit Ioseph."
200. (47:22) Only the land of the priests Joseph did not possess; as if it had said: "except only the land of the priests, Joseph possessed all the land."
ExpHept
201. (47, 26) Et posuit illis Ioseph in praeceptum usque in hodiernum diem in terra Aegypti, ut praestent quintas Pharaoni; hinc intellegitur Pharaonis nomen potestatis fuisse regalis, quod dixit: usque in hodiernum diem. Non enim illi, qui tunc fuit, praestare poterant Aegyptii usque ad illum diem, quo ista scribebantur, quando ille iam non vivebat.
201. (47:26) And Joseph set it for them as an ordinance, even to this present day, in the land of Egypt, that they should render fifths to Pharaoh; from this it is understood that the name "Pharaoh" was one of royal power, in that it said: even to this present day. For the Egyptians could not render to him who then was, down to the day on which these things were being written, when he was no longer living.
ExpHept
202. (47, 28) Et fuerunt dies Iacob annorum vitae eius; dies annorum saepe dicit Scriptura, cum semel posset "annos" dicere.
202. (47:28) And the days of Jacob were of the years of his life; Scripture often says days of years, when it could say "years" in a single word.
ExpHept
203. (48, 1) Quod scriptum est: nuntiatum est Ioseph, quia pater tuus turbatur; aliqui codices habent vexatur, aliqui aestuatur, et aliud alii, sicut interpretari Latini potuerunt, quod Graece scriptum est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
203. (48:1) As to what is written: it was announced to Joseph, that your father is troubled; some manuscripts have vexed, some in turmoil, and one thing one and another another, as the Latin were able to translate what is written in Greek: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
Ideo autem turbatur, accomodatius dici videtur, quia hoc dici solet de iis qui afflictatione corporis morte propinquante iactantur. Et ex hoc etiam turba [MISSING GREEK TEXT] dicitur, est enim turba multitudo inordinata, non sicut populus, quod [MISSING GREEK TEXT] dicitur, nec sicut plebs, quod [MISSING GREEK TEXT] dicitur, sed sicut [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod turba dicitur.
And troubled seems to be said more fittingly, because this is customarily said of those who, with the affliction of the body and death drawing near, are tossed about. And from this too a crowd is called [MISSING GREEK TEXT], for a crowd is a disordered multitude—not like a people, which is called [MISSING GREEK TEXT], nor like the commons, which is called [MISSING GREEK TEXT], but like [MISSING GREEK TEXT], which is called a crowd.
ExpHept
204. (48, 16) Iacob benedicens nepotes suos filios Ioseph ait inter cetera: et invocabitur in his nomen meum, et nomen patrum meorum; unde notandum est, non solum "exauditionem," sed etiam "invocationem" dici aliquando quae non Dei, sed hominum sit.
204. (48:16) Jacob, blessing his grandsons the sons of Joseph, says among other things: and in these shall my name be invoked, and the name of my fathers; whence it is to be noted that not only "hearing" but also "invocation" is sometimes said of what is not God's but men's.
ExpHept
205. (48, 18) Hic enim primitivus; minus habet "est," secundum codices graecos.
205. (48:18) For this is the firstborn; it lacks "is," according to the Greek manuscripts.
ExpHept
206. (49, 24) In benedictione Ioseph ait inter cetera Iacob: inde qui confortavit Israel; mirum si non subauditur: "est," ut plenum sit. "Inde est qui confortavit Israel."
206. (49:24) In the blessing of Joseph, Jacob says among other things: thence who strengthened Israel; it would be remarkable if "is" is not to be supplied, so that it be complete: "thence is he who strengthened Israel."
ExpHept
207. (50, 2-3) Quod scriptum est: dixit Ioseph servis suis sepultoribus, ut sepelirent patrem eius; non invenit lingua Latina quemadmodum appellaret [MISSING GREEK TEXT]: non enim ipsi sepeliunt, id est terrae mandant corpora mortuorum, quod non [MISSING GREEK TEXT] est Graece, sed: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
207. (50:2-3) As to what is written: Joseph said to his servants the buriers, that they should bury his father; the Latin language did not find how to render [MISSING GREEK TEXT]: for they do not themselves bury, that is, commit to the earth the bodies of the dead, which in Greek is not [MISSING GREEK TEXT], but: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
Illi ergo id agunt, quod exhibetur corporibus humandis, vel condiendo vel siccando vel involvendo et alligando, in quo opere maxime Aegyptiorum cura praecellit. Quod ergo dicit: etiam sepelierunt; "curaverunt," intellegere debemus. Et quod dicit: quadraginta dies sepulturae, ipsius curationis accipiendi sunt. Sepultus enim ille non est, nisi ubi se mandaverat sepeliri.
They, therefore, do what is rendered to bodies to be interred, whether by embalming or drying or wrapping and binding, in which work the care of the Egyptians especially excels. So when it says they also buried, we ought to understand "they tended." And when it says forty days of burial, they are to be taken as days of the tending itself. For he was not buried except where he had charged himself to be buried.
ExpHept
208. (50, 4) Loquimini in aures Pharaonis: locutio est usitata in Scripturis.
208. (50:4) Speak in the ears of Pharaoh: this is an expression customary in the Scriptures.
ExpHept
209. (50, 6) Et dixit Pharao ad Ioseph: 'descende et sepeli patrem tuum'; etiam si per potentes illos per quos Ioseph mandaverat, Pharao dixit quod perferrent ad Ioseph, non utique dixit nisi ipsi Ioseph.
209. (50:6) And Pharaoh said to Joseph: 'go down and bury your father'; even if Pharaoh said through those powerful men through whom Joseph had sent word what they were to carry to Joseph, he certainly did not say it except to Joseph himself.
ExpHept
Unde illud est in Evangelio, quod unus evangelistarum dicit, centurionem venisse ad Dominum et dixisse illi: puer meus iacet in domo paralyticus (Mt 8, 6); alius autem totum diligentius narrans, amicos eum ad Dominum misisse commemorat (Cf. Lc 7, 3), qui hoc ei dicerent, in quibus amicis utique ipse venit, cuius in eis voluntas praesens fuit; unde est: qui vos recipit, me recipit; et qui me recipit, recipit eum qui me misit (Mt 10, 40).
Hence there is that passage in the Gospel, where one of the evangelists says that a centurion came to the Lord and said to him: my servant lies at home a paralytic (Matt 8:6); but another, recounting the whole more carefully, mentions that he sent friends to the Lord (See Luke 7:3) to say this to him, in which friends he himself certainly came, whose will was present in them; whence it is said: he who receives you receives me; and he who receives me receives him who sent me (Matt 10:40).
ExpHept
210. (50, 10) Planxerunt eum planctum magnum et validum: planxerunt planctum, non "planxerunt planctu"; locutio est in Latina lingua non ignota, sicut dicitur: "servitutem servivit," "militiam militavit," et similia.
210. (50:10) They mourned him with a great and strong mourning: they mourned a mourning, not "they mourned with a mourning"; this is an expression not unknown in the Latin language, as it is said: "he served a servitude," "he soldiered a soldiery," and the like.
ExpHept
211. (50, 15) Et redditione reddet nobis omnia mala, quae ostendimus ei. Ex hac locutione ait et Apostolus: Alexander aerarius multa mala mihi ostendit (2 Tim 4, 14): ostendimus enim dictum est, vel ostendit, pro eo quod est: "fecimus," vel "fecit."
211. (50:15) And by a requital he will requite us all the evils that we showed him. From this expression the Apostle too says: Alexander the coppersmith showed me many evils (2 Tim 4:14): for we showed, or he showed, is said in place of "we did," or "he did."
ExpHept
212. (50, 17) Accipe iniquitatem servorum Dei patris tui; nova locutio est: accipe iniquitatem, pro: "ignosce," aut: "remitte," aut: "obliviscere"; sed puto inde esse dictum: accipe, ac si diceretur: "aequo animo accipe," hoc est: "noli indigne ferre."
212. (50:17) Receive the iniquity of the servants of the God of your father; it is a novel expression: receive the iniquity, for: "forgive," or: "remit," or: "forget"; but I think receive is said in such a way as if it were said: "receive it with an even mind," that is: "do not take it amiss."
ExpHept
213. (50, 18) Et venientes ad eum dixerunt; non iterum venerunt, sed quod dictum fuit iterum dictum est; solet hoc facere Scriptura.
213. (50:18) And coming to him they said; they did not come again, but what had been said is said again; Scripture is accustomed to do this.
ExpHept
Bk. 2Expressions on ExodusLocutiones de Exodo
1. (1, 12) Et invalescebant valde valde.
1. (1:12) And they grew strong exceedingly, exceedingly.
ExpHept
2. (1, 21) Quid est quod dictum est de obstetricibus: et fecerunt sibi domos, quoniam timuerunt Deum? Praedictum est enim: benefaciebat Deus cum obstetricibus (Gen 30, 30). Et ad hoc videtur pertinere, quod fecerunt sibi domos timendo Deum, tamquam beneficia Dei ad hoc eis profuerunt ut facerent sibi domos.
2. (1:21) What is the meaning of what is said of the midwives: and they made themselves houses, because they feared God? For it was said before: God did good to the midwives (Gen 30:30). And to this it seems to belong that they made themselves houses by fearing God, as though the benefits of God profited them to this end, that they should make themselves houses.
ExpHept
Numquid antea non eas habuisse domos intellegendum est? An ad divitias hoc verbum pertinet, vel potius ad aliquas rei familiaris idoneas facultates? Huic enim simile videtur, quod ait etiam Iacob post quattuordecim annos servitutis suae socero suo volenti eum adhuc apud se tenere: nunc ergo quando faciam et ego mihi domum? (Gen 30, 27) Dixerat enim quod creverint pecora Laban sub illo; sicut et ipse Laban confessus fuerat dicens: benedixit me Deus in introitu tuo (Ps 39, 15); cum ergo dicit: quando faciam et ego mihi domum? Subintellegitur: "sicut et tu." Hoc videtur enim valere quod ait: et ego, ut ad ipsam domum faciendam videatur pertinere quod consequenter ad Laban merces ipsa statuenda proponitur.
Is it to be understood that they did not previously have houses? Or does this word pertain to riches, or rather to some suitable means of a household? For similar to this seems what Jacob too says, after the fourteen years of his servitude, to his father-in-law, who wished to keep him still with him: now therefore when shall I too make a house for myself? (Gen 30:27) For he had said that Laban's flocks had increased under him; as Laban himself too had confessed, saying: God blessed me at your coming in (Gen 30:27); when, therefore, he says when shall I too make a house for myself? it is implied: "as you too have." For this seems to be the force of his saying I too, so that to the very making of the house there seems to belong the wage that is consequently proposed to be set for Laban.
ExpHept
3. (1, 22) Et omne femininum vivificate illud, sic enim habent Graeci; Latini non habent: illud.
3. (1:22) And every female, keep it alive, for so the Greeks have it; the Latin do not have: it.
ExpHept
4. (2, 1-2) Erat autem quidam de tribu Levi, et sumpsit sibi de filiabus Levi; intellegitur uxorem, quod quidam Latini interpretes etiam addendum putaverunt; sequitur autem: et habuit eam, et concepit.
4. (2:1-2) Now there was a certain man of the tribe of Levi, and he took to himself of the daughters of Levi; a wife is understood, which some Latin translators thought should even be added; for there follows: and he had her, and she conceived.
ExpHept
5. (2, 3) Quid sit: thibin, ideo difficile est nosse, quia nec Graecus interpres ex Hebraeo, nec Latinus ex Graeco vertit hoc nomen, sed sic transtulit ut invenit.
5. (2:3) What thibin is, is difficult to know, for this reason: that neither did the Greek translator render this word from the Hebrew, nor the Latin from the Greek, but each rendered it as he found it.
ExpHept
6. (2, 14) Timuit autem Moyses et dixit: 'si sic divulgatum est verbum hoc.' Duo sunt in hac locutione attendenda; primo, quia pendet sententia, et sic dimissa est; deinde, quia verbum pro "facto" posuit.
6. (2:14) But Moses feared, and said: 'if this matter has been so divulged.' Two things are to be noted in this expression: first, that the sentence is left hanging, and so dismissed; then, that it put word for "deed."
ExpHept
7. (2, 25) Et respexit filios Israel, et innotuit illis; pro eo positum est: innotuit, quod egit in eis ea quibus Dei curam erga se intellegerent.
7. (2:25) And he looked upon the children of Israel, and was made known to them; was made known is put in place of this: that he did among them the things by which they would understand God's care for them.
ExpHept
8. (3, 7) Videns vidi vexationem populi mei, qui est in Aegypto.
8. (3:7) Seeing I have seen the affliction of my people, who are in Egypt.
ExpHept
9. (3, 11-12) Et dixit Moyses ad Deum: 'quis sum, quia ibo ad Pharaonem regem Aegypti, et quia educam filios Israel de terra Aegypti?' Dixit autem: 'quoniam ero tecum,' sic habet Graecus; Latinus autem: et quis ego, dixit, et non dixit: quia ibo, et quia educam, sed: ut eam, et educam. Et quod in Graeco habet: dixit autem, quia ero tecum, intellegitur utique quod dixerit ad Moysen; totum autem hoc Latinus addidit, et ait: dixit autem Deus ad Moysen.
9. (3:11-12) And Moses said to God: 'who am I, that I should go to Pharaoh king of Egypt, and that I should lead the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt?' And he said: 'for I will be with you,' so the Greek has it; but the Latin said: and who am I, and did not say that I should go, and that I should lead, but: that I may go, and lead. And as for what the Greek has, and he said, for I will be with you, it is certainly understood that he said it to Moses; but all this the Latin added, and said: and God said to Moses.
ExpHept
10. (3, 16) Deus dicit quod dicat Moyses filiis Israel: visitans visitavi vos, et quaecumque contigerunt vobis in Aegypto; Graecus habet: visitatione visitavi vos.
10. (3:16) God says what Moses is to say to the children of Israel: visiting I have visited you, and whatever has befallen you in Egypt; the Greek has: with a visitation I have visited you.
ExpHept
11. (3, 18) Deus dicit ad Moysen de filiis Israel: et audient vocem tuam; Graecus habet: et exaudient vocem tuam, quia et "exauditio" dicitur hominis.
11. (3:18) God says to Moses concerning the children of Israel: and they will hear your voice; the Greek has: and they will hearken to your voice, because "hearkening" is also said of a man.
ExpHept
12. (3, 22) Quod habet Latinus: poscet mulier a vicina, et ab inquilina sua vasa argentea et aurea et vestem; Graecus habet: a cohabitatrice sua, hoc est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod Latini aliqui interpretati sunt: a cancellaria sua.
12. (3:22) Whereas the Latin has: the woman will ask of her neighbor, and of her lodger, vessels of silver and gold and clothing, the Greek has: of her fellow dweller, that is: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], which some Latin translated: of her chamber companion.
ExpHept
13. (4, 1) Moyses dicit: 'quid si non crediderint mihi, neque exaudierint vocem meam'; quod Latinus: audierint interpretatus est.
13. (4:1) Moses says: 'what if they do not believe me, nor hearken to my voice'; which the Latin translated: hear.
ExpHept
14. (4, 4) Extende manum, et apprehende caudam, Graecus habet; Latinus autem: manum tuam et caudam eius, interpretatus est.
14. (4:4) Stretch out the hand, and take hold of the tail, the Greek has; but the Latin translated: your hand and its tail.
ExpHept
15. (4, 4) Et extendens manum apprehendit caudam, et facta est virga in manu eius.
15. (4:4) And stretching out his hand he took hold of the tail, and it became a rod in his hand.
ExpHept
16. (4, 5) Et dixit illi: 'ut credant tibi quoniam apparuit tibi Dominus Deus patrum ipsorum'; Graecus non habet: et dixit illi, sed continuo adiunxit: ut credant tibi;
16. (4:5) And he said to him: 'that they may believe you, because the Lord God of their fathers has appeared to you'; the Greek does not have: and he said to him, but continued at once: that they may believe you;
ExpHept
id est verba Dei, post illud factum miraculum; tamquam adhuc loqueretur, et modo sententiam verborum impleverit. Nam ordo est verborum: extende manum et apprehende caudam, ut credant tibi; sed interposita est facti narratio, et postea redditum: ut credant tibi.
that is, the words of God, after that miracle was performed; as though he were still speaking, and had only now completed the sense of his words. For the order of the words is: stretch out the hand and take hold of the tail, that they may believe you; but the narrative of the deed was interposed, and afterward there was returned: that they may believe you.
ExpHept
17. (4, 6) Quod Latinus habet: et facta est manus eius leprosa tamquam nix; Graecus non habet: leprosa, sed tantum: facta est tamquam nix.
17. (4:6) Whereas the Latin has: and his hand became leprous like snow, the Greek does not have leprous, but only: it became like snow.
ExpHept
18. (4, 8) Quod si non audierint vocem signi primi, Graecus sic habet; Latinus autem: vocem tuam signi primi; sic et sequitur: credent tibi in voce signi sequentis.
18. (4:8) But if they do not hear the voice of the first sign, so the Greek has it; but the Latin: your voice of the first sign; so too there follows: they will believe you at the voice of the following sign.
ExpHept
19. (4, 9) Et erit aqua, quam sumes de flumine, sanguis super aridam, vel potius super aridum, id est, super id quod aridum est; quod Latinus dixit: sanguis super terram.
19. (4:9) And the water that you take from the river will be blood upon the dry land, or rather upon the dry, that is, upon that which is dry; which the Latin said: blood upon the earth.
ExpHept
20. (4, 10) Moyses dicit: precor, Domine, non sum eloquens ante hesternam et nudustertianam diem.
20. (4:10) Moses says: I beg you, Lord, I am not eloquent, before yesterday and the day before.
ExpHept
21. (4, 17) Et virgam hanc sumes in manum tuam, in qua facies in ea signa; cum dici posset, "in qua facies signa"; aut certe: "virgam hanc sumes in manum tuam, et facies in ea signa"; nunc vero utrumque dictum est solita locutione Scripturarum.
21. (4:17) And this rod you shall take in your hand, with which you shall do signs with it; when it could be said, "with which you shall do signs"; or else: "this rod you shall take in your hand, and you shall do signs with it"; but as it is, both were said by the customary expression of the Scriptures.
ExpHept
22. (4, 18-19) Post dies autem illos multos, mortuus est rex Aegypti; dixit autem Dominus ad Moysen in Madian: 'vade, perge in Aegyptum, mortui sunt enim omnes qui quaerebant animam tuam.' Multa in his verbis genera locutionum notanda sunt; primo: vade, perge in Aegyptum, tamquam non sufficeret tantum: vade, vel tantum; perge; deinde: mortui sunt enim omnes qui quaerebant animam tuam, cum solum regem Aegypti Scriptura dixerit mortuum, et de solo antea dictum fuerit quod Moysen quaerebat occidere. An ipse post alios inimicos ultimus mortuus est? Quod si ita est, non locutio, sed sensus est. Item: qui quaerebant animam tuam, non in malo tantum, sed etiam in bono dici solet in Scripturis; nam sicut hic, in malo dictum est etiam in Psalmis: confundantur et revereantur qui quaerunt animam meam; in bono: periit fuga a me, et non est qui requirat animam meam (Ps 39, 15; 141, 5); nisi forte aliquid distare dicitur inter quaerentes et requirentes, ut illud in malo, hoc in bono intellegendum sit.
22. (4:18-19) Now after those many days, the king of Egypt died; and the Lord said to Moses in Midian: 'go, proceed into Egypt, for all who sought your soul are dead.' Many kinds of expression in these words are to be noted; first: go, proceed into Egypt, as though it would not suffice to say only go, or only proceed; then: for all who sought your soul are dead, when Scripture had said that only the king of Egypt died, and it had been said before of him alone that he sought to kill Moses. Or did he die last, after his other enemies? But if it is so, it is not a matter of expression, but of sense. Likewise who sought your soul is said in the Scriptures not only in a bad sense, but also in a good one; for, as here, it is said in a bad sense also in the Psalms: let them be confounded and ashamed who seek my soul; in a good sense: flight has perished from me, and there is no one who seeks after my soul (Ps 40:14 (39:15); 142:4 (141:5)); unless perhaps some difference is said to lie between "seeking" and "seeking after," so that the former is to be understood in a bad sense, the latter in a good one.
ExpHept
23. (5, 10) Et dicebant ad populum dicentes: 'haec dicit Pharao'; quam locutionem piguit Latinum interpretari.
23. (5:10) And they said to the people, saying: 'thus says Pharaoh'; which expression the Latin was loath to render.
ExpHept
24. (5, 21) Videat Deus vos et iudicet, quoniam execrabilem fecistis odorem nostrum palam Pharaone, et palam servis eius, dare gladium in manus eius, ut occidat nos; sic enim habet Graecus, Latinus autem ait, quem pro optimo legebamus: ut daretis gladium in manibus eius; qui soloecismus, nulla interpretationis necessitate factus est, quia in Graeco non est.
24. (5:21) May God see you and judge, because you have made our odor abominable openly before Pharaoh, and openly before his servants, to give a sword into his hands, that he may kill us; for so the Greek has it; but the Latin which we read as the best says: that you should give a sword into his hands; which solecism was made by no necessity of translation, since it is not in the Greek.
ExpHept
25. (6, 4) Statui testamentum meum ad illos, ita ut darem illis terram Chananaeorum, et terram quam incoluerunt, in qua et incoluerunt in ea; sic enim habet Graecus, quod utique et in Graeca lingua absurde videtur sonare;
25. (6:4) I established my covenant with them, so as to give them the land of the Canaanites, and the land which they dwelt in, in which also they dwelt in it; for so the Greek has it, which certainly seems to sound absurd even in the Greek language;
ExpHept
et tamen Septuaginta interpretum auctoritas tanta est, quos ita loqui non piguit. Quid enim? Et sensus hic latet? Quod si nullus est, ipsa locutio notanda est, ne alibi inventa sensum impediat, vel aliquid quaerere ubi quaerendum non est, compellat.
and yet the authority of the Septuagint translators is so great, who were not loath to speak thus. For what then? Does a sense lie hidden here too? But if there is none, the expression itself is to be noted, lest, found elsewhere, it impede the sense, or compel one to seek something where it is not to be sought.
ExpHept
26. (6, 5) Quod habet Latinus: exaudivi gemitum filiorum Israel, quemadmodum Aegyptii affligunt eos, Graecus habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod interpretari posset: in servitutem redigunt eos; nam uno verbo non potest.
26. (6:5) Whereas the Latin has: I have heard the groaning of the children of Israel, in the way that the Egyptians afflict them, the Greek has: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], which could be rendered: reduce them to servitude; for it cannot be done in a single word.
ExpHept
27. (6, 9) Et locutus est Moyses sic ad filios Israel, et non exaudierunt Moysen a defectione animi et ab operibus duris; exaudierunt ait, non: "audierunt."
27. (6:9) And Moses spoke thus to the children of Israel, and they did not hearken to Moses out of faintness of mind and out of hard labors; it says hearkened, not: "heard."
ExpHept
28. (6, 12) Ego enim ineloquens sum, quod ait Moyses ad Dominum, [MISSING GREEK TEXT] dixit Graecus, non: "imperitus," quasi [MISSING GREEK TEXT], vel [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
28. (6:12) For I am uneloquent, which Moses says to the Lord—the Greek said [MISSING GREEK TEXT], not: "unskilled," as if [MISSING GREEK TEXT], or [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
29. (6, 26) Hi sunt Aaron et Moyses, quibus dixit eis Deus ut educant filios Israel de terra Aegypti; sic enim habet Graecus.
29. (6:26) These are the Aaron and Moses, to whom God said to them that they should lead the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; for so the Greek has it.
ExpHept
30. (6, 30) Ecce ego gracili voce sum, et quomodo exaudiet me Pharao? Notandum quod exaudiet dixit, non: "audiet."
30. (6:30) Behold I am of a thin voice, and how will Pharaoh hearken to me? It is to be noted that he said will hearken, not: "will hear."
ExpHept
31. (7, 6) Fecit autem Moyses et Aaron, sicut praecepit illis Dominus, ita fecerunt; quid deesset, si non diceretur: ita fecerunt?
31. (7:6) And Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded them, so they did; what would be lacking if it were not said: so they did?
ExpHept
32. (7, 9) Si loquetur vobis Pharao dicens: 'date nobis signum aut portentum,' et dices Aaron fratri tuo: 'sume virgam,' nonne locutionis nostrae consuetudo poscebat et quaedam eius integritas, ut ita diceretur: "si loquetur vobis Pharao dicens: 'date nobis signum aut portentum,' dices Aaron fratri tuo: 'sume virgam'"? Quid ergo ibi additum est: et, nisi aliqua proprietate locutionis Hebraicae? Nam neque Graeca esse perhibetur.
32. (7:9) If Pharaoh speaks to you, saying: 'give us a sign or a wonder,' then you shall say to Aaron your brother: 'take the rod,' did not the custom of our manner of speech, and a certain completeness of it, require that it be said thus: "if Pharaoh speaks to you, saying: 'give us a sign or a wonder,' you shall say to Aaron your brother: 'take the rod'"? What, then, is added there—and—except by some peculiarity of the Hebrew manner of speech? For it is reported not to be Greek either.
ExpHept
33. (7, 11) Non mihi videntur satis commode interpretati Latini [MISSING GREEK TEXT] Pharaonis, ut dicerent: sapientes; enim sapientes [MISSING GREEK TEXT] dicuntur. Potuit autem Latinus interpres "sophistas" dicere, quoniam non est quemadmodum id Latine dicatur; et ideo isto verbo iam utimur pro Latino, sicut "philosophiam" dicimus non solum Graece, verum etiam Latine: "sophistas" appellarunt Latinarum litterarum eloquentissimi auctores.
33. (7:11) The Latin do not seem to me to have rendered conveniently enough the [MISSING GREEK TEXT] of Pharaoh, so as to say: wise men; for wise men are called [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. The Latin translator could have said "sophists," since there is no way to say it in Latin; and so we now use this word as Latin, just as we say "philosophy" not only in Greek but also in Latin: the most eloquent authors of Latin letters called them "sophists."
ExpHept
34. (7, 12) Et absorbuit virga Aaron virgas illorum; ac si diceret: "draco Aaron."
34. (7:12) And the rod of Aaron swallowed up their rods; as if it said: "the serpent of Aaron."
ExpHept
35. (7, 15) Quod dictum est de Pharaone: ecce, ipse exit ad aquam; Graecus habet: super aquam.
35. (7:15) As to what is said of Pharaoh: behold, he goes out to the water; the Greek has: upon the water.
ExpHept
36. (7, 16) Dimitte populum meum ut serviat mihi in deserto, et ecce non exaudisti usque adhuc; quoties dicitur: exaudisti, cum homini dicatur?
36. (7:16) Let my people go that they may serve me in the desert, and behold, you have not hearkened until now; how often is it said you have hearkened, when it is said of a man?
ExpHept
37. (7, 22) Fecerunt autem similiter et incantatores Aegyptiorum veneficiis suis. Et induratum est cor Pharaonis, et non exaudivit eos, sicut dixit Dominus; quia in usu Scripturae est: exaudivit, cum etiam de homine loquitur.
37. (7:22) And the enchanters of the Egyptians did likewise with their sorceries. And Pharaoh's heart was hardened, and he did not hearken to them, as the Lord had said; for it is Scripture's usage to say he hearkened, even when it speaks of a man.
ExpHept
38. (8, 1) Dimitte populum meum ut serviant mihi; non: "ut serviat," qui loquendi modus non fere invenitur nisi ubi res ipsa singularis pluribus constat. Populus enim singulari nomine dicitur, sed constat ex multis. Sic etiam est: omnis terra adorent te (Ps 65, 4); quia omnis terra dictum est, pro "hominibus qui sunt in terra."
38. (8:1) Let my people go that they may serve me; not: "that it may serve," a manner of speaking which is hardly found except where the singular thing itself consists of many. For people is said by a singular name, but consists of many. So too is: let all the earth worship you (Ps 66:4 (65:4)); because all the earth was said for "the men who are in the earth."
ExpHept
39. (8, 2) Ecce ego ferio omnes fines tuos ranis; sic enim habet Graecus elegantissima locutione, ut ranae ipsae, plaga intellegatur, qua feritur terra Aegypti.
39. (8:2) Behold I strike all your borders with frogs; for so the Greek has it, by a most elegant expression, so that the frogs themselves are understood to be the plague by which the land of Egypt is struck.
ExpHept
40. (8, 3-4) Et eructabit flumen ranas, et ascendentes intrabunt in domos tuas et in promptuaria cubiculorum tuorum super lectos tuos, et in domos servorum tuorum, et populi tui, et in conspersis tuis, et in clibanis tuis; et super te et super populum tuum et super servos tuos ascendent ranae.
40. (8:3-4) And the river will belch forth frogs, and going up they will enter into your houses and into the storerooms of your chambers, upon your beds, and into the houses of your servants, and of your people, and into your kneading bowls, and into your ovens; and upon you and upon your people and upon your servants the frogs will go up.
ExpHept
Notandum quod in domos etc. cum dixisset, accusativum casum tenuit; et super lectos etc., ubi dixit: super, accusativum similiter servavit; in conspersis autem et in clibanis ad ablativum se transtulit;
It is to be noted that when it had said into the houses etc., it kept the accusative case; and upon the beds etc., where it said upon, it likewise kept the accusative; but at into the kneading bowls and into the ovens it shifted to the ablative;
ExpHept
nam et Graecus mutavit praepositionem, quam non mutat Latinus. Ille enim habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT] in domos; in consparsis autem [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
for the Greek too changed the preposition, which the Latin does not change. For it has: [MISSING GREEK TEXT] into the houses; but into the kneading bowls [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
ubi mirum si non etiam sensus est, non locutio, ut in conspersionibus et in clibanis exortas ranas forsitan velit intellegi, non extrinsecus ascendisse vel irruisse, et quia eas fluvium eructaturum praedicit, inde implere omnia.
in which it would be remarkable if there were not also a sense, not merely an expression, so that perhaps it wishes the frogs to be understood as having arisen in the kneading bowls and in the ovens, not as having gone up or rushed in from outside; and because it foretells that the river will belch them forth, it wishes them thence to fill all things.
ExpHept
41. (8, 6) Et extendit Aaron manum super aquas Aegypti et eduxit ranas, et educta est rana et operuit terram; repetitio a plurali ad singularem numerum traiecta est; nam utique rana, pro multitudine ranarum positum est; nescio quo autem modo per loquendi consuetudinem imbutis sensibus hominum, saepe plus videtur quod singulariter, quam quod pluraliter dicitur; nam plus accipitur cum dicitur, verbi causa, est illic miles, quam sunt illic milites; est illic piscis, quam sunt illic pisces.
41. (8:6) And Aaron stretched out his hand over the waters of Egypt and brought forth frogs, and the frog was brought forth and covered the earth; the repetition was carried over from the plural to the singular number; for frog is certainly put for the multitude of frogs; but somehow, through the custom of speaking with which men's senses are imbued, what is said in the singular often seems more than what is said in the plural; for more is grasped when one says, for example, "there is a soldier there" than "there are soldiers there"; "there is a fish there" than "there are fish there."
ExpHept
42. (8, 14) Et colligebant eas acervos acervos; haec repetitio multitudinem acervorum significat, et Scripturis est familiaris.
42. (8:14) And they gathered them in heaps upon heaps; this repetition signifies the multitude of heaps, and is familiar to the Scriptures.
ExpHept
43. (8, 16) Quod habent Latini: extende manu virgam tuam, et percute terra; non: "percute terram"; Graecus habet: aggerem terrae, si tamen hoc verbo recte interpretatur quod dictum est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
43. (8:16) Whereas the Latin have: stretch out with the hand your rod, and strike with the earth; not: strike the earth; the Greek has: the mound of earth, if indeed it is rightly rendered by this word what is said: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
44. (8, 18) Fecerunt autem similiter et incantatores veneficiis suis, ut educerent cyniphes, et non poterant. Notandum est: fecerunt dictum pro eo quod est: "conati sunt facere." Nam utique si fecerunt similiter, procul dubio eduxerunt cyniphes; sed quia sequitur: ut educerent, et non poterant; non ergo similiter fecerunt, sed similiter facere conati sunt. Aut si forte et ipsi, quamvis veneficiis agerent, eadem tamen agendi specie virgam extendebant, quod Scriptura non expressit, ad hoc referendum est: fecerunt similiter.
44. (8:18) And the enchanters did likewise with their sorceries, to bring forth gnats, and they could not. It is to be noted: they did is said in place of this: "they tried to do." For certainly, if they did likewise, beyond doubt they brought forth gnats; but because there follows: to bring forth, and they could not; therefore they did not do likewise, but tried to do likewise. Or if perhaps they too, although they acted by sorceries, nevertheless stretched out a rod with the same manner of acting, which Scripture did not express, to this is to be referred: they did likewise.
ExpHept
45. (8, 21) Et in terram super quam sunt super eam.
45. (8:21) And upon the land upon which they are upon it.
ExpHept
46. (8, 22) Et gloriosam faciam in die illa terram Gessen, in qua populus meus inest super eam.
46. (8:22) And on that day I will make glorious the land of Goshen, in which my people are upon it.
ExpHept
47. (8, 29) Et dixit Moyses: 'ego exeam a te, et orabo ad Deum, et exibit cynomyia a Pharaone et a servis eius'; quasi alteri diceret: exeam a te, et de altero Pharaone subsequeretur, a quo esset exitura cynomyia.
47. (8:29) And Moses said: 'I will go out from you, and will pray to God, and the dog-fly will go out from Pharaoh and from his servants'; as though he said I will go out from you to one person, and there followed concerning another Pharaoh, from whom the dog-fly was to go out.
ExpHept
48. (9, 1) Dimitte populum meum, ut mihi serviant.
48. (9:1) Let my people go, that they may serve me.
ExpHept
49. (9, 18. 24) Ecce ego pluam hanc horam crastinam diem grandinem multam. Grando autem multa valde valde.
49. (9:18. 24) Behold, I will rain this hour tomorrow much hail. And the hail was very, very much.
ExpHept
50. (9, 29. 28) Et desinent voces et grando. Notandum est Scripturam, voces solere appellare tonitrua, quas voces Dei etiam Pharao superius appellavit dicens: orate pro me ad Dominum, ut desinant fieri voces Dei; ubi et illa locutio est quod dixit: desinant fieri voces.
50. (9:29. 28) And the voices and the hail will cease. It is to be noted that Scripture is accustomed to call thunders voices, which Pharaoh too above called voices of God, saying: pray for me to the Lord, that the voices of God may cease to be made; where there is also that expression in his saying: let the voices cease to be made.
ExpHept
51. (10, 2) Ut narretis in aures filiis vestris, et filiis filiorum vestrorum quaecumque illusi Aegyptiis;
51. (10:2) That you may recount in the ears of your sons, and of your sons' sons, whatever I have mocked the Egyptians;
ExpHept
notandum quemadmodum dicatur illusi, ne forte ita sit dictum: draco hic quem finxisti ad illudendum ei (Ps 103, 26), et illud in Iob: hoc est initium figmenti Domini quod fecit ad illudendum ab angelis eius (Iob 40, 14).
it is to be noted in what way I have mocked is said, lest perhaps it be said in the way of: this dragon which you formed to mock him (Ps 104:26 (103:26)), and that passage in Job: this is the beginning of the Lord's creation, which he made to be mocked by his angels (Job 40:14).
ExpHept
52. (10, 4) Ecce ego induco hanc horam crastino die locustam multam. Ecce quemadmodum superius dixit ranam, ubi diximus plerumque plus intellegi cum aliquid huiusmodi singulariter dicitur, quam si pluraliter diceretur. Manifestum est enim plus sonare: locustam multam, quam si diceret: "locustas multas."
52. (10:4) Behold, I bring this hour tomorrow much locust. See how above it said "frog," where we said that more is generally understood when something of this kind is said in the singular than if it were said in the plural. For it is plain that much locust sounds more than if it said: "many locusts."
ExpHept
53. (10, 8) Qui autem et qui sunt qui ibunt? Quotidie dicimus consuetudine familiariore: "quam qui et qui ibunt?"
53. (10:8) But who and who are they that will go? We say daily, by a more familiar usage: "which and which will go?"
ExpHept
54. (10, 15) Non est relictum viride nihil in lignis; dicendum fuit more locutionis nostrae: "non est relictum viride aliquid in lignis."
54. (10:15) There was not left anything green nothing on the trees; it should have been said in the manner of our expression: "there was not left anything green on the trees."
ExpHept
55. (10, 16-17) Pharao ad Moysen: peccavi ante Dominum Deum vestrum et in vobis; suscipite ergo delictum meum; hac locutione et ad Ioseph usi sunt fratres eius ubi dixerunt: accipe iniquitatem servorum Dei patris tui (Gen 50, 17).
55. (10:16-17) Pharaoh to Moses: I have sinned before the Lord your God and against you; take up therefore my offense; this expression his brothers used also to Joseph, where they said: receive the iniquity of the servants of the God of your father (Gen 50:17).
ExpHept
56. (10, 23) Quod Latini habent: et nemo vidit fratrem suum tribus diebus; Graecus habet: et non vidit nemo fratrem suum; notandum etiam fratrem hominis quemlibet hominem dici.
56. (10:23) Whereas the Latin have: and no one saw his brother for three days, the Greek has: and no one did not see his brother; it is also to be noted that any man whatever is called the brother of a man.
ExpHept
57. (10, 24) Pharao dicit ad Moysen et Aaron: Ite et servite Domino Deo vestro, praeter oves et boves, relinquite; sic enim habet graecus: valde inusitata locutio est, nisi post distinctionem inferatur: relinquite, et subaudiatur: "ista"; ut sit sensus: "ite praeter oves et boves, et relinquite ista"; solet enim talis ellipsis fieri crebro in locutionibus Scripturarum.
57. (10:24) Pharaoh says to Moses and Aaron: Go and serve the Lord your God, except the sheep and oxen, leave behind; for so the Greek has it: it is a very unusual expression, unless after a pause is added: leave behind, and "these" is supplied; so that the sense is: "go, except the sheep and oxen, and leave these behind"; for such an ellipsis is frequently made in the expressions of the Scriptures.
ExpHept
58. (10, 26) Et non relinquemus ungulam; quasi abductis pecoribus, posset ungula remanere: quid est enim aliud non relinquemus ungulam, nisi: "nec ungulam relinquemus"?
58. (10:26) And we will not leave a hoof; as though, the cattle having been led away, a hoof could remain: for what else is we will not leave a hoof but: "not even a hoof will we leave"?
ExpHept
59. (10, 28) Pharao ad Moysen: attende tibi ultra apponere videre faciem meam; pro eo quod est: "attende tibi ne ultra videas faciem meam."
59. (10:28) Pharaoh to Moses: take heed to yourself to go on further to see my face; in place of this: "take heed to yourself that you do not further see my face."
ExpHept
60. (11, 2) Et petat unusquisque a proximo suo, et mulier a proxima vasa argentea et aurea et vestem; notandum et Aegyptios Hebraeis proximos dictos.
60. (11:2) And let each one ask of his neighbor, and the woman of her neighbor, vessels of silver and gold and clothing; it is to be noted that the Egyptians too are called the neighbors of the Hebrews.
ExpHept
61. (11, 6-7) Et erit clamor magnus per omnem terram Aegypti, qualis non fuit, et talis non adhuc apponetur; in filiis autem Israel non mutiet canis lingua sua ab homine usque ad pecus. Elegantissima locutio est; per canem quippe extremum significavit vel hominum vel pecorum, ita commendans quanta in Hebraeis quies futura esset, Aegyptiis acerba orbitate clamantibus.
61. (11:6-7) And there will be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt, such as has not been, and the like will not again be added; but among the children of Israel not a dog will growl with its tongue, from man even to beast. It is a most elegant expression; for by dog it signified the lowest, whether of men or of beasts, thus conveying how great a quiet there would be among the Hebrews, while the Egyptians cried out in bitter bereavement.
ExpHept
62. (12, 3) Accipiant singuli ovem per domos patriarum. Quas dicat patrias, non facile est intellegere; utrum civitates in quibus commanebant, an potius numerosas familias a cuiusque velut paternitate propagatas; hoc enim magis in graeco significari perhibetur.
62. (12:3) Let each one take a sheep according to the houses of the fathers' families. What it means by fathers' families is not easy to understand; whether the cities in which they were dwelling, or rather the numerous families propagated from the so-called paternity of each; for this is reported to be the more likely meaning in the Greek.
ExpHept
63. (12, 4) Si autem pauci sint qui in domo, ita ut non sint idonei ad ovem, id est, ut ipsa paucitas non sit idonea ad ovem consumendam, assumet secum vicinum proximum suum, hoc est ipsa domus assumet vicinum; "hominem proximum" pro "homine" posuit, singularem autem pro plurali; non enim unum, sed quot sufficiunt; cum de ove consumenda Scriptura loqueretur: secundum numerum, inquit, animarum unusquisque quod sufficiat; animas pro "hominibus," a parte totum.
63. (12:4) But if those in the house be few, so that they are not enough for the sheep, that is, so that their fewness is not enough to consume the sheep, he shall take in with him his neighbor next to him, that is, the house itself shall take in a neighbor; he put "the nearest man" for "men," and the singular for the plural; for not one, but as many as suffice; since Scripture was speaking of consuming the sheep, it says according to the number of souls, each one what suffices; souls for "men," the whole from a part.
ExpHept
64. (12, 7-8) Sument a sanguine, et ponent super duos postes, et super limen in domibus in quibus manducabunt illas in eis. Cum dixerit: in quibus, dixit etiam: in eis, more usitatissimo; sed manducabunt illas, quaeritur quas, et intellegitur carnes; hoc enim sequitur: et manducabunt carnes hac nocte assatas igni; quod habent Latini codices: qui manducabunt carnem, graeci autem habent: , id est carnem, sed genere neutro; ideo in Graeco est: in domibus, in quibus manducabunt illa in eis. Est vero illa locutio, ut prius diceret illas, quam praediceret quid in consequentibus intellegeretur quas dixerit, similis ei locutioni quam de filio Moyse exposuimus (Cf. Quaest. 2, 11), cum eum vellet angelus occidere, et exemplum adhibuimus de Psalmo: fundamenta eius in montibus sanctis; diligit Dominus portas Sion (Ps 86, 1-2); cuius enim fundamenta non intellegimus, nisi ex consequentibus; sic et hic: in quibus manducabunt illas in eis, id est in quibus domibus manducabunt illas, intellegitur carnes, de quibus consequenter loquitur.
64. (12:7-8) They shall take of the blood, and put it upon the two doorposts, and upon the lintel in the houses in which they will eat them in them. When it said in which, it also said in them, by a most customary manner; but they will eat them, it is asked which, and "flesh" is understood; for this follows: and they will eat the flesh this night roasted with fire; which the Latin manuscripts have as: who will eat the flesh (feminine), but the Greeks have it (neuter), that is, flesh, but in the neuter gender; therefore in the Greek it is: in the houses, in which they will eat it (neuter) in them. And that expression—that it should say them before it stated what was to be understood in what follows as the thing it called them—is similar to the expression which we explained concerning the son of Moses (See QQ. in Hept. 2.11), when the angel wished to kill him, and we adduced an example from the Psalm: its foundations are in the holy mountains; the Lord loves the gates of Zion (Ps 87:1-2 (86:1-2)); for we do not understand whose foundations except from what follows; so too here: in which they will eat them in them, that is, in which houses they will eat them, is understood as the flesh, of which it speaks subsequently.
ExpHept
65. (12, 22) Sumetis autem vobis fasciculum hyssopi, et tingetis ex sanguine qui est iuxta ostium, et linietis super limen et super ambos postes de sanguine. Etiam hic fasciculus hyssopi plures utique fasciculos significat, sicut "rana" plures ranas, et "locusta" plures locustas; tropus autem iste quando fit in rebus quae a nobis non ita dici solent, obscuritatem facit.
65. (12:22) And you shall take for yourselves a little bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is by the door, and smear the lintel and both doorposts with the blood. Here too a little bunch of hyssop certainly signifies several bunches, just as "frog" several frogs, and "locust" several locusts; but when this trope occurs in things that are not customarily spoken of so by us, it makes obscurity.
ExpHept
66. (12, 26-27) Et erit cum dicent ad vos filii vestri: 'quae est servitus ista?' Et dicetis eis: 'immolatio pascha hoc Domino'; etiam si non haberet et, plenum esset: dicetis eis.
66. (12:26-27) And it will be, when your sons say to you: 'what is this service?' And you shall say to them: 'this is the sacrifice of the Passover to the Lord'; even if it did not have and, it would be complete: you shall say to them.
ExpHept
67. (12, 28) Et advenientes fecerunt filii Israel, sicut praecepit Dominus Moysi et Aaron, ita fecerunt; non adderet: ita fecerunt, nisi mos esset Scripturarum.
67. (12:28) And the children of Israel coming did as the Lord commanded Moses and Aaron, so they did; it would not add so they did, were it not the custom of the Scriptures.
ExpHept
68. (12, 51) Et factum est, in die illa eduxit Dominus filios Israel de terra Aegypti.
68. (12:51) And it came to pass, on that day the Lord led the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt.
ExpHept
69. (13, 1) Ait autem Dominus ad Moysen dicens.
69. (13:1) And the Lord said to Moses, saying.
ExpHept
70. (13, 12) Omne adaperiens vulvam, masculina; pluralem numerum intulit singulari, quia ipsum quod dictum est: omne adaperiens, non utique in uno, sed in multis accipitur. Similis est locutio: attendite, populus meus (Ps 77, 1). Tale est et quod paulo post sequitur: omne quod adaperit vulvam de armentis et de pecoribus, quaecumque tibi nata erunt; omne quaecumque tibi nata erunt, ipse modus est locutionis.
70. (13:12) Everything that opens the womb, the males; it brought a plural number to a singular, because the very thing that was said, everything that opens, is taken certainly not in one but in many. Similar is the expression: attend, my people (Ps 78:1 (77:1)). Such too is what follows a little after: everything that opens the womb of the herds and of the flocks, whatever will be born to you; everything whatever will be born to you, this is the manner of the expression.
ExpHept
71. (13, 13) Omne adaperiens vulvam asinae; Graecus habet: asini; modo illo locutionis + quem iam in Genesi notavimus + ubi masculinum pro feminino positum est, de morte Sarae, dicente Scriptura: surgens Abraham a mortuo, et: sepeliam mortuum meum (Gen 23, 3-4); et talia ibi saepe dicuntur de mortua.
71. (13:13) Everything that opens the womb of a she-ass; the Greek has: of an ass (masculine); by that manner of expression which we have already noted in Genesis, where the masculine was put for the feminine, concerning the death of Sarah, Scripture saying: Abraham rising up from his dead (masculine), and: I will bury my dead (masculine) (Gen 23:3-4); and such things are often said there concerning the dead woman.
ExpHept
72. (13, 15) Propter hoc ego immolo Domino omne quod aperit vulvam, masculina; similis locutio superiori.
72. (13:15) For this reason I sacrifice to the Lord everything that opens the womb, the males; an expression similar to the one above.
ExpHept
73. (13, 16) Et erit in signum super manum tuam; id est: super opera tua; ubi magis sensus est forsitan quam locutio.
73. (13:16) And it will be for a sign upon your hand; that is: upon your works; where there is perhaps a sense rather than an expression.
ExpHept
74. (14, 27) Et excussit Dominus Aegyptios in medium maris; Graecus habet: et excussit Dominus Aegyptios medium maris.
74. (14:27) And the Lord shook off the Egyptians into the midst of the sea; the Greek has: and the Lord shook off the Egyptians the midst of the sea.
ExpHept
75. (14, 31) Vidit autem Israel manum magnam, quae fecit Dominus Aegyptiis.
75. (14:31) And Israel saw the great hand which the Lord did to the Egyptians.
ExpHept
76. (15, 1) Tunc cantavit Moyses et filii Israel canticum hoc Domino, et dixerunt dicere; sic enim habet Graecus: .
76. (15:1) Then Moses and the children of Israel sang this song to the Lord, and they said to say; for so the Greek has it.
ExpHept
77. (15, 22) Et non inveniebant aquam, ut biberent; poterat non habere: ut biberent.
77. (15:22) And they did not find water, that they might drink; it could lack: that they might drink.
ExpHept
78. (15, 24) Et murmuravit populus adversus Moysen dicentes, non "dicens"; sed: dicentes; ex pluribus enim populus constat.
78. (15:24) And the people murmured against Moses, saying (plural), not "saying" (singular); but: saying (plural); for a people consists of many.
ExpHept
79. (16, 1) Et venerunt omnis synagoga filiorum Israel in eremo; non dixit: "venit," quia synagoga ex pluribus constat.
79. (16:1) And all the assembly of the children of Israel came into the wilderness (plural verb); it did not say "came" (singular), because an assembly consists of many.
ExpHept
80. (16, 2) Murmurabant omnis synagoga filiorum Israel adversus Moysen et Aaron; eadem est et ista locutio.
80. (16:2) All the assembly of the children of Israel was murmuring against Moses and Aaron; this expression too is the same.
ExpHept
81. (16, 4) Dixit autem Dominus ad Moysen: 'ecce ego pluam vobis panes de caelo'; manna pluiturus panes promisit. Locutio est, qua panis pro "alimento" ponitur; amat autem Scriptura pluraliter magis panes quam singulariter dicere.
81. (16:4) And the Lord said to Moses: 'behold, I will rain you loaves from heaven'; being about to rain manna, he promised loaves. It is an expression by which bread is put for "nourishment"; and Scripture loves to say loaves in the plural rather than in the singular.
ExpHept
82. (16, 7) Mane videbitis, inquit, gloriam [Domini], dum exaudiet murmurationem vestram super Deum, id est "quia murmuratis super Deum"; quod tantum valet, ac si diceret: "adversus Deum." Deinde notandum novo modo hic "exauditionem" dictam non precantium sed murmurantium, cum reprehendat utique Scriptura murmurationem. Tamquam hoc dixerit, quod cognoverit Deus murmurationem eorum, et ipsam Dei cognitionem dixit "exauditionem."
82. (16:7) In the morning you shall see, it says, the glory [of the Lord], while he hears your murmuring against God, that is "because you murmur against God"; which amounts to as much as if it said: "against God." Then it is to be noted that here in a novel manner "hearing" is said not of those praying but of those murmuring, since Scripture certainly rebukes the murmuring. As though it said this, that God took notice of their murmuring, and it called this very taking-notice of God "hearing."
ExpHept
83. (16, 9. 12) Accedite ante Deum; exaudivit enim murmur vestrum; iterum exauditionem non precum significat et petitionum sed etiam murmuris malorum; hoc et postea dicit Deus: exaudivi murmur filiorum Israel.
83. (16:9. 12) Approach before God; for he has heard your murmuring; again it signifies "hearing" not of prayers and petitions but even of the murmuring of the wicked; this too God says afterward: I have heard the murmuring of the children of Israel.
ExpHept
84. (16, 14) Et ecce in facie eremi minutum tamquam coriandrum. Cum totiens Deus dicat: faciem terrae sicut hic: faciem eremi, mirum est, unde homines ita errent, cum "faciem" audierint, ut aliquid tale opinentur, qualis hominis facies est vel alicuius animantis.
84. (16:14) And behold, on the face of the wilderness something fine like coriander. Since God so often says the face of the earth, as here the face of the wilderness, it is remarkable how men so err, when they hear "face," as to suppose something such as a man's face or that of some living creature.
ExpHept
85. (16, 16) Secundum numerum animarum vestrarum; unusquisque cum commanentibus vobiscum colligite. Quam saepe Scriptura "animas" homines appellat (a parte totum) non facile autem "carnes" pro hominibus, sed "carnem," sicuti est: non timebo, quid mihi faciat caro, quod apertius in eodem Psalmo ait: quid mihi faciet homo (Ps 55, 5. 12). Non tamen diceret: "secundum numerum carnium vestrarum," sicut dixit: secundum numerum animarum vestrarum.
85. (16:16) According to the number of your souls; let each one with those dwelling with you gather. How often Scripture calls men "souls" (the whole from a part); but not readily "fleshes" for men, but "flesh," as is: I will not fear what flesh may do to me, which it says more openly in the same Psalm: what shall man do to me (Ps 56:4, 11 (55:5, 12)). Yet it would not say: "according to the number of your fleshes," as it said: according to the number of your souls.
ExpHept
86. (16, 21) Et collegerunt illud mane mane; quomodo puteos puteos, acervos acervos, sic dictum est: mane mane.
86. (16:21) And they gathered it morning by morning; as wells by wells, heaps by heaps, so it is said: morning by morning.
ExpHept
87. (16, 29) Nullus vestrum egrediatur unusquisque de loco suo die septimo; quod interpositum est: unusquisque, potuit et non dici.
87. (16:29) Let none of you go out, each one from his place, on the seventh day; what is interposed, each one, could also be left unsaid.
ExpHept
88. (17, 1) Non erat autem populo aqua bibere, id est: "ad bibendum."
88. (17:1) But there was no water for the people to drink, that is: "for drinking."
ExpHept
89. (17, 2) Et maledicebat populus ad Moysen; id est maledictis agebat Moysen, hoc est maledicebant illi; nam hoc in consequentibus ipse dixit: quid maledicitis mihi?
89. (17:2) And the people cursed at Moses; that is, they assailed Moses with curses, that is, they cursed him; for this he himself said in what follows: why do you curse me?
ExpHept
90. (17, 3) Et murmurabat populus ad Moysen dicentes.
90. (17:3) And the people murmured at Moses, saying.
ExpHept
91. (17, 5) Et virgam, in qua percussisti flumen, accipe in manu tua. In qua percussisti dixit pro eo, quod dicimus: "de qua percussisti," et est ista locutio creberrima in Scripturis.
91. (17:5) And the rod with which you struck the river, take in your hand. With which you struck it said in place of what we say: "with which you struck"; and this expression is most frequent in the Scriptures.
ExpHept
92. (18, 12) Et sumpsit Iotor socer Moysi holocaustomata et sacrificia Deo; sumpsit pro eo, quod est: "obtulit." An forte sensus est, non locutio, ut ea sumpsisse intellegatur, quae Moyses obtulisset, quamquam Moyses non legatur superius sacrificasse nec Aaron nec quisquam Hebraeorum, qui educti sunt de terra Aegypti, sed tantum superius scriptum est, quod altare constituerit Moyses et appellaverit illud: Dominus meum refugium? Istum autem Iothor legimus sacerdotem fuisse Madiam, id est gentis Madiam. Mirum est autem, si eius adventu coepit sacrificare Moyses et non potius ipse Iothor, qui iam sacerdos erat.
92. (18:12) And Jethro the father-in-law of Moses took burnt offerings and sacrifices for God; took in place of this: "offered." Or is it perhaps a sense, not an expression, so that he is understood to have taken what Moses had offered—although Moses is not read above to have sacrificed, nor Aaron, nor any of the Hebrews who were led out of the land of Egypt, but only it is written above that Moses set up an altar and called it: The Lord my refuge? But this Jethro we read to have been a priest of Midian, that is, of the Midianite nation. It is remarkable, however, if at his coming Moses began to sacrifice and not rather Jethro himself, who was already a priest.
ExpHept
93. (18, 18) Grave tibi verbum hoc. Subauditur "est."
93. (18:18) This matter is grievous to you. "Is" is supplied.
ExpHept
94. (18, 20) Et demonstrabis illis vias, in quibus ambulabunt in eis.
94. (18:20) And you shall show them the ways in which they will walk in them.
ExpHept
95. (18, 26) Verbum autem grave referebant super Moysen; sic enim habet Graecus, quod Latini interpretati sunt: ad Moysen. Illa sane locutione ipsa etiam cura significatur, qua dictum est: super Moysen, velut onus ei significaretur impositum. Verbum autem grave dictum est pro quaestione gravi. Unde sequitur: omne autem verbum leve iudicabant ipsi.
95. (18:26) But the grievous matter they referred upon Moses; for so the Greek has it, which the Latin translated: to Moses. By that very expression the care itself is signified, by which it said upon Moses, as though a burden were signified to be laid upon him. The grievous matter is said for "a grievous question." Whence there follows: but every light matter they judged themselves.
ExpHept
96. (20, 24) Quod graecus habet [MISSING GREEK TEXT], supernominavero, aut: annominavero expressius dicitur; quod usitatius cognominavero nonnulli interpretati sunt. Sed non habet necessariam significationem cognominavero; propinquius autem dicitur cognominavero quam "nominavero." Nam et hoc aliqui interpretes dixerunt.
96. (20:24) What the Greek has, [MISSING GREEK TEXT], is said more expressly I shall name over or: I shall name upon; which some, more customarily, rendered I shall surname. But I shall surname does not have a necessary meaning; yet I shall surname is said more closely than "I shall name." For this too some translators said.
ExpHept
97. (20, 24) Et veniam ad te et benedicam te. Cum superius pluraliter loqueretur: facietis et immolabitis, dicit: veniam ad te, tamquam ipsi Israel, id est populo.
97. (20:24) And I will come to you and bless you. Although above it spoke in the plural: you (plural) shall make and sacrifice, it says: I will come to you (singular), as though to Israel itself, that is, to the people.
ExpHept
98. (21, 1-2) Et hae iustificationes, quas appones coram illis. Si emeris servum Hebraeum, et cetera. Notanda locutio, quemadmodum, cum illud dictum est ad Moysen, hoc est: hae sunt iustificationes, quas appones coram illis, tam ad ipsum populum cetera dicuntur quam ad Moysen: si emeris servum Hebraeum, non enim hoc Moysi dictum est, sed, quod populo diceret, tantum ipsi populo dicebat.
98. (21:1-2) And these are the ordinances which you shall set before them. If you buy a Hebrew slave, and the rest. The expression is to be noted, how, when this was said to Moses—that is: these are the ordinances which you shall set before them—the rest is said to the people themselves as much as to Moses: if you buy a Hebrew slave; for this was not said to Moses, but what he was to say to the people, he was saying to the people themselves.
ExpHept
99. (21, 6) Pertundet ei dominus auriculam de subula et serviet ei in sempiternum vel in aeternum, quod Graecus habet [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Ecce quemadmodum Scriptura multis locis dicit secundum hoc verbum Graecum: sempiternum, vel: aeternum, ubi non intellegitur illa aeternitas, secundum quam nobis aeterna promittitur vel secundum quam a contrario igne aeterno mali cremabuntur! Neque enim servus iste, qui vivere in aeternum non posset, posset servire in aeternum; sed intellegitur aeternum dictum, cuius temporis finis non est. Aut certe aliquid hoc sacramento significatur aeternum.
99. (21:6) His master shall bore his ear with an awl, and he shall serve him forever or to eternity, which the Greek has [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. See how Scripture in many places says, according to this Greek word, forever or eternal, where that eternity is not understood according to which eternal things are promised to us, or according to which, on the contrary, the wicked will be burned with eternal fire! For this slave, who could not live forever, could not serve forever; but forever is understood as said of a time of which there is no end. Or else something eternal is signified by this mystery.
ExpHept
100. (21, 13) Dabo tibi locum, in quem fugiat ibi, qui occiderit.
100. (21:13) I will give you a place, to which he may flee there, who has killed.
ExpHept
101. (21, 20) Si quis percusserit servum suum aut ancillam suam in virga; quod est: "de virga."
101. (21:20) If anyone strikes his slave or his maidservant with a rod; which is: "with a rod."
ExpHept
102. (21, 28) Lapidibus lapidabitur taurus; quasi possit lapidari nisi lapidibus. Differt aliquid ista locutio ab illa, qua diceret more Scripturarum: lapidatione lapidabitur, sed tamen similis est.
102. (21:28) The bull shall be stoned with stones; as though it could be stoned except with stones. This expression differs somewhat from the one in which it would say, in the manner of the Scriptures: with a stoning it shall be stoned, but yet it is similar.
ExpHept
103. (21, 29) Si autem taurus cornipeta erat ante hesternam et nudiustertianam; pro tempore praeterito posuit partem pro toto, quantumcumque illud fuisset, more Scripturarum.
103. (21:29) But if the bull was given to goring before yesterday and the day before; it put for past time a part for the whole, however long that may have been, in the manner of the Scriptures.
ExpHept
104. (21, 33-34) Si quis autem aperuerit lacum aut exciderit lacum et non operuerit eum et ceciderit illuc vitulus aut asinus, dominus laci reddet. Et haec locutio a parte totum intellegenda est; non enim, si equus ceciderit in lacum aut ovis, ideo non reddet, quia hoc scriptum non est.
104. (21:33-34) But if anyone opens a pit or digs out a pit and does not cover it, and a calf or an ass falls in there, the owner of the pit shall make restitution. This expression too is to be understood as the whole from a part; for it is not the case that, if a horse falls into the pit or a sheep, he will therefore not make restitution because this is not written.
ExpHept
105. (21, 34) Quod autem mortuum fuerit, ipsi erit, pro: "ipsius erit."
105. (21:34) But what has died shall be his, in place of: "shall be his (genitive)."
ExpHept
106. (22, 5) Si autem depaverit quis agrum aut vineam et admiserit pecus suum depascere agrum alium, id est: "alienum."
106. (22:5) But if anyone grazes off a field or vineyard and lets his cattle graze off another field, that is: "another's."
ExpHept
107. (22, 26) Si autem pignus acceperis vestem proximi, ante solis occasum reddes ei. Genus pro specie posuit; sic enim dictum est, ac si de omni veste pignus dederit, cum de illo specialiter se dicere ex consequentibus Scriptura testetur, qui non habet nisi eam vestem, unde se nocte cooperiat.
107. (22:26) But if you take in pledge the garment of your neighbor, before sunset you shall return it to him. It put the genus for the species; for it is said as if he had given a pledge of any garment, although Scripture testifies, from what follows, that it speaks specifically of the man who has only that garment with which to cover himself at night.
ExpHept
108. (23, 20-21) Ecce ego mitto angelum meum ante faciem tuam, ut servet te in via, ut inducat te in terram, quam paravi tibi. Attende tibi et exaudi eum, angelum suum iubet Deus exaudiri a populo non utique petentem, sed iubentem.
108. (23:20-21) Behold, I send my angel before your face, to keep you on the way, to bring you into the land which I have prepared for you. Take heed to yourself and hearken to him; God commands his angel to be hearkened to by the people—not, certainly, as one petitioning, but as one commanding.
ExpHept
109. (23, 28) Et mittam vespas ante te et eiciet Amorraeos; a plurali ad singularem numerum se convertit. Intellegitur autem: eiciet Amorraeos vespa, sicut rana, sicut locusta, non quod una sit, sed quod per singularem pluralis numerus intellegitur.
109. (23:28) And I will send hornets before you and it will cast out the Amorites; it turned from the plural to the singular number. It is understood: the hornet will cast out the Amorites, as the frog, as the locust, not that it is one, but that by the singular the plural number is understood.
ExpHept
110. (23, 30) Per partes eiciam illos a te.
110. (23:30) By parts I will cast them out from before you.
ExpHept
111. (23, 32-33) Non dispones illis et diis eorum pactum; et non consident in terra tua, ne peccare te faciant ad me; non dixit: "in me," idem tamen significat.
111. (23:32-33) You shall not make a pact with them and their gods; and they shall not settle in your land, lest they make you sin against me; it did not say: "in me," yet it means the same.
ExpHept
112. (24, 3) Respondit autem omnis populus voce una dicentes.
112. (24:3) And all the people answered with one voice, saying (plural).
ExpHept
113. (24, 10) Et viderunt locum ubi steterat ibi Deus Israel. Ubi steterat posset sufficere, sed Hebraicae dicuntur istae locutiones.
113. (24:10) And they saw the place where the God of Israel had stood there. Where he had stood could suffice, but these expressions are said to be Hebrew.
ExpHept
114. (25, 13) Et inaurabis illa auro. Similis est locutio: lapidibus lapidabitur.
114. (25:13) And you shall gild them with gold. Similar is the expression: it shall be stoned with stones.
ExpHept
115. (25, 20) Cyathos in quibus immolabunt in eis.
115. (25:20) Cups in which they will offer in them.
ExpHept
116. (26, 10) Duas bases columnae uni in ambas partes eius et duas bases columnae uni in ambas partes eius. Ne de omnibus diceret, de duabus dicit more suo geminando, sicut puteos puteos, acervos acervos, generationes et generationes, et similia.
116. (26:10) Two bases for one column on both its sides and two bases for one column on both its sides. So as not to speak of them all, it speaks of two, after its manner of doubling, as wells by wells, heaps by heaps, generations and generations, and the like.
ExpHept
117. (26, 29) Et columnas inaurabis auro et inaurabis seras auro.
117. (26:29) And the columns you shall gild with gold and you shall gild the bars with gold.
ExpHept
118. (27, 6) Et inaerabis ea aeramento, talis locutio est: inaurabis auro.
118. (27:6) And you shall bronze them with bronze; such is the expression: you shall gild with gold.
ExpHept
119. (27, 21) Extra velum quod est super testamentum. De lucerna accendenda cum diceret, hoc ait, id est quod foris accenderetur, ubi est sanctum, non intra velamen, quod est super testamentum, hoc est Sanctum sanctorum. Ergo super non sic ait, tamquam esset tectum vel camera vel firmamentum caeli vel arcae cooperculum, sed etiam quod vice parietis oppositum esset, super dixit; sicut dicimus superiorem discumbere aut stare non utique alterum portari ab altero.
119. (27:21) Outside the veil which is over the covenant. Speaking of the lamp to be lit, it says this, that is, that it should be lit outside, where the holy place is, not within the veil, which is over the covenant, that is, the Holy of Holies. Therefore it does not say over as though it were a roof or a vault or the firmament of heaven or the lid of the ark, but it called over even what was set up in place of a wall; just as we say that one reclines or stands "above" another, not at all that the one is carried by the other.
ExpHept
120. (27, 21) Legitimum sempiternum in progenies vestras; eo modo sempiternum, quo multa superius diximus.
120. (27:21) An everlasting ordinance throughout your generations; in that sense of everlasting of which we have said much above.
ExpHept
121. (28, 29) Et sumet Aaron nomina filiorum Israel super rationale iudicii super pectus introeunti in sanctum.
121. (28:29) And Aaron shall take the names of the children of Israel upon the breastpiece of judgment upon the breast, to one entering into the holy place.
ExpHept
Consequens erat, ut diceret: introiens in sanctum, hoc est: "sumet Aaron introiens," quod aliqui Latini soloecismum vitantes interpretati sunt. Sed quia et Graecus introeunti habet et Latini aliqui consonant, locutionem potius notandam credidi quam corrigendam.
It would have been consistent to say: entering into the holy place (nominative), that is: "Aaron entering shall take," which some Latin, avoiding the solecism, rendered. But because the Greek too has to one entering (dative) and some Latin agree, I thought the expression should rather be noted than corrected.
ExpHept
122. (28, 24) Et pones super rationale iudicii fimbrias catenata. Et hic Latini nonnulli soloecismum caventes fimbrias catenatas interpretati sunt; Graecus autem habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Hanc solemus dicere "absolutam locutionem" cum generi masculino vel feminino neutrum infertur, quemadmodum si dicamus: "iustitiae terrenae non sunt stabilia."
122. (28:24) And you shall put upon the breastpiece of judgment fringes, chained things. And here some Latin, guarding against the solecism, rendered chained fringes; but the Greek has: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. We are accustomed to call this an "absolute expression" when a neuter is applied to the masculine or feminine gender, as if we should say: "earthly justices are not stable things" (neuter).
ExpHept
123. (28, 35) Et Aaron cum coeperit fungi sacerdotio, audietur vox eius intranti in sanctum in conspectu Domini et exeunti.
123. (28:35) And when Aaron begins to exercise the priesthood, his voice shall be heard, to him entering into the holy place in the sight of the Lord and going out.
ExpHept
Vocem eius ex tintinnabulis dixit, qui magis sonus est eius. Intranti et exeunti pro: "intrantis et exeuntis" posuit dativum pro genitivo.
It said his voice of the little bells, which is rather their sound. To him entering and going out, in place of: "of him entering and going out," it put the dative for the genitive.
ExpHept
124. (29, 13) Et duos renes et adipem quae super eos, subauditur: "est," quod nonnulli interpretes addiderunt.
124. (29:13) And the two kidneys and the fat which is upon them, "is" is supplied, which some translators added.
ExpHept
125. (29, 26) Et separabis illud separatione.
125. (29:26) And you shall separate it with a separation.
ExpHept
126. (30, 8) Et cum accendet Aaron lucernas, sero incendet super illud. Sero dixit pro: "vespere" et ideo notanda locutio est: quippe Graecus [MISSING GREEK TEXT] habet. Sero autem proprie non solet dici, nisi cum tempus transierit, quo fieri debuit, quod sero dicitur factum.
126. (30:8) And when Aaron lights the lamps, late he shall kindle upon it. It said late for: "in the evening," and therefore the expression is to be noted: indeed the Greek has [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. But "late" is not properly said except when the time has passed in which the thing said to be done late ought to have been done.
ExpHept
127. (30, 12-13) Si acceperis computationem filiorum Israel in visitatione eorum et dabunt singuli redemptionem animae suae Domino et non erit in eis ruina in visitatione eorum et hoc est quod dabunt tibi.
127. (30:12-13) If you take the reckoning of the children of Israel in their visitation and each one shall give the redemption of his soul to the Lord and there shall be no ruin among them in their visitation and this is what they shall give you.
ExpHept
"Pendet" ista locutio, quia interposita est coniunctio copulativa; quae si non interponeretur, non penderet. Tribus autem locis est posita, quorum undelibet detracta plenam facit esse sententiam.
This expression "hangs," because a copulative conjunction is interposed; which, if it were not interposed, it would not hang. It is placed in three spots, from any one of which, if it is removed, it makes the sentence complete.
ExpHept
Rursus ubi dictum est: si acceperis computationem filiorum Israel in visitatione eorum, et dabunt singuli redemptionem animae suae Domino; si enim non dixisset: et dabunt, sed tantummodo dixisset: dabunt, finiretur sententia nec penderet; ita enim diceretur: si acceperis computationem filiorum Israel in visitatione eorum, dabunt singuli redemptionem animae suae Domino.
Again, where it is said: if you take the reckoning of the children of Israel in their visitation, and each one shall give the redemption of his soul to the Lord; for if it had not said and they shall give, but had only said: they shall give, the sentence would be finished and would not hang; for it would be said thus: if you take the reckoning of the children of Israel in their visitation, each one shall give the redemption of his soul to the Lord.
ExpHept
Si autem hic ponitur haec coniunctio, deorsum tollenda est, ut ita dicatur: si acceperis computationem filiorum Israel in visitatione eorum et dabunt singuli redemptionem animae suae Domino et non erit in eis ruina in visitatione eorum, hoc est quod dabunt.
But if this conjunction is placed here, it is to be removed below, so that it be said thus: if you take the reckoning of the children of Israel in their visitation and each one shall give the redemption of his soul to the Lord and there shall be no ruin among them in their visitation, this is what they shall give.
ExpHept
Aut certe in medio, ubi dictum est: et non erit in eis ruina, si detrahas coniunctionem, non pendebit sententia; erit enim sensus: si acceperis computationem filiorum Israel in visitatione eorum et dabunt singuli redemptionem animae suae Domino, non erit in eis ruina. Cum vero ubique posita est eadem coniunctio, pendere facit locutionem; ideo eam notandam putavimus.
Or else in the middle, where it is said: and there shall be no ruin among them, if you remove the conjunction, the sentence will not hang; for the sense will be: if you take the reckoning of the children of Israel in their visitation and each one shall give the redemption of his soul to the Lord, there shall be no ruin among them. But since the same conjunction is placed everywhere, it makes the expression hang; therefore we thought it should be noted.
ExpHept
128. (32, 1) Consurrexit populus in Aaron et dixerunt ei. Usitata locutio est, quia ex multis populus constat. Deinde notandum totum pro parte positum. Apostolus enim, sicut revera erat, quosdam eorum dixit hoc fecisse, non totum populum, ubi ait: neque idolis serviamus sicut quidam illorum (1 Cor 10, 7).
128. (32:1) The people rose up against Aaron and they said to him. It is a customary expression, because a people consists of many. Then it is to be noted that the whole is put for a part. For the Apostle, as was indeed the fact, said that certain of them did this, not the whole people, where he says: nor let us serve idols as did some of them (1 Cor 10:7).
ExpHept
129. (32, 1) Surge et fac nobis deos, qui nos praecedant. Sedenti loquebantur? An potius locutio est notanda, propter quod dicitur saepe: exsurge, Domine (Ps 43, 27), aut: surge, Deus, iudica terram (Ps 81, 8).
129. (32:1) Rise up and make us gods, who may go before us. Were they speaking to one seated? Or rather is the expression to be noted, on account of which it is often said: rise up, O Lord (Ps 44:26 (43:27)), or: arise, O God, judge the earth (Ps 82:8 (81:8)).
ExpHept
130. (32, 10) Et nunc sine me et iratus ira, quomodo: "morte morietur"; amat ita loqui Scriptura.
130. (32:10) And now let me be and being angry with anger, like: "by death he shall die"; Scripture loves to speak thus.
ExpHept
131. (32, 24) Cui sunt aurea, demite; non dixit: quid aurea. Unde Latini interpretes dixerunt: qui habet aurum, demat.
131. (32:24) Whoever has gold things, take them off; it did not say: what gold things. Whence the Latin translators said: whoever has gold, let him take it off.
ExpHept
132. (32, 26) Quis ad Dominum? Veniat ad me.
132. (32:26) Who is for the Lord? Let him come to me.
ExpHept
133. (32, 31) Fecerunt sibi deos aureos, de uno vitulo. Pluralem ergo numerum pro singulari posuit, inde est et illud: hi dii tui Israel, qui eduxerunt te de terra Aegypti. Non sane locutiones istae reperiuntur, ubi pluralis pro singulari ponitur, nisi in eo rerum genere, in quo etiam de pluribus fieri vel intellegi potest. Non enim quia unus ille vitulus erat, ideo non et plures fieri poterant aut ideo non multis idolis similis fuerat. Hac locutione dictum est latrones insultasse Domino (Cf. Mt 27, 44), cum hoc unum fecisse Scriptura testetur (Cf. Lc 23, 39), sed non solus fuerat latro. Quin etiam cum ista locutio fit per nomina propria, qualiter eam in Scripturis factam nondum comperimus, plures illic intelleguntur, sicut Phaedras et medeas quidam dixerunt, cum fuerit una Phaedra et una Medea; sed Phaedras et Medeas appellaverunt omnes similes "Phaedrae" et "Medeae." Ita non sine causa nec utcumque ac passim sicut ab imperitis vitiose fit, sed certo modo certisque regulis istae locutiones interponuntur.
133. (32:31) They made themselves gods of gold, of one calf. It put the plural number, then, for the singular; hence too is that: these are your gods, O Israel, who led you out of the land of Egypt. These expressions, where the plural is put for the singular, are certainly not found except in that kind of thing in which the thing can also be made or understood of many. For not because that calf was one was it therefore impossible that more should be made, or therefore unlike many idols. By this expression it is said that the robbers reviled the Lord (See Matt 27:44), when Scripture testifies that one did this (See Luke 23:39), but he was not the only robber. Indeed, even when this expression is made through proper names—in what manner it is made in the Scriptures we have not yet discovered—several are understood there, as some have said "Phaedras and Medeas," when there was one Phaedra and one Medea; but they called all those like "Phaedra" and "Medea" Phaedras and Medeas. Thus these expressions are inserted not without cause, nor anyhow and at random as is done faultily by the unskilled, but in a certain manner and by certain rules.
ExpHept
134. (33, 1) Vade, ascende hinc tu et populus tuus, quos eduxisti de terra Aegypti, non: "quem" eduxisti; quod ita usitatum est, ut rarius aliter dicatur.
134. (33:1) Go, go up from here, you and your people, whom you led out of the land of Egypt (plural), not: "whom (singular) you led out"; which is so customary that it is rather rarely said otherwise.
ExpHept
135. (33, 5) Et dixit Dominus: 'deponite stolas gloriarum vestrarum et cultum, et ostendam quae facturus sum tibi.' A plurali ad singularem numerum locutionem terminavit, quia multi erant et populus erat,
135. (33:5) And the Lord said: 'lay aside the robes of your glories and your ornament, and I will show you (singular) what I am going to do'. It ended the expression from the plural to the singular number, because they were many and were a people,
ExpHept
sicut eis dixerat: vos populus dura cervice; non dixit: "tu populus," sed: vos populus, cum vos numeri sit pluralis, populus autem numeri singularis.
just as it had said to them: you (plural) are a stiff-necked people; it did not say: "you (singular) are a people," but: you (plural) are a people, since you is of the plural number, but people of the singular number.
ExpHept
136. (34, 9) Si inveni gratiam in conspectu tuo, simul ambulet Dominus meus nobiscum; tamquam de alio dicat. Assiduae sunt hae locutiones, sed cum dicitur ad Deum, putatur Patri dici de Filio. Cum autem talia dicerentur ad Pharaonem et ad Ioseph et ad alios multis locis, genus locutionis intellegebatur.
136. (34:9) If I have found favor in your sight, let my Lord walk together with us; as though he speaks of another. These expressions are frequent, but when it is said to God, it is thought to be said by the Father concerning the Son. But since such things were said to Pharaoh and to Joseph and to others in many places, the manner of speech was understood.
ExpHept
137. (34, 15) Ne quando ponas testamentum his, qui sedent super terram; ac si diceret: "sedes habent," quod est: "habitant."
137. (34:15) Lest at any time you make a pact with those who sit upon the land; as if it said: "have their seats," which is: "dwell."
ExpHept
138. (34, 17) Et deos fusiles ne feceris tibi. Locutio est a parte totum significans; non enim quia fusiles tantummodo nominavit, fieri sculptiles, ductiles fictilesque permisit vel ullum genus simulacrorum aut qualiumcumque facticiorum deorum.
138. (34:17) And you shall not make for yourself cast gods. It is an expression signifying the whole from a part; for not because it named only cast ones did it permit carved, hammered, and molded ones to be made, or any kind of images or of manufactured gods whatever.
ExpHept
139. (34, 19) Omne adaperiens vulvam masculina. Id est: "omne adaperiens vulvam mihi erit ex his, quae sunt masculina."
139. (34:19) Everything that opens the womb, the males. That is: "everything that opens the womb shall be mine, of those that are males."
ExpHept
140. (34, 20) Primitivum subiugalis redimes ove. Et hoc a parte totum est; neque enim si subiugale non sit iumentum quodlibet, cuius caro tamquam immunda respuitur, ideo non est redimendum aut alio quam ove redimendum.
140. (34:20) The firstborn of the beast of burden you shall redeem with a sheep. This too is the whole from a part; for it is not the case that, if the beast of burden be not just any animal whose flesh is rejected as unclean, it is therefore not to be redeemed, or to be redeemed with something other than a sheep.
ExpHept
141. (34, 25) Non occides super fermentum sanguinem immolatorum meorum; locutio est utique: "occides sanguinem" pro eo, quod est: "occidendo effundes."
141. (34:25) You shall not slay the blood of my sacrificial victims upon leaven; it is certainly an expression: "you shall slay the blood" in place of this: "by slaying you shall pour it out."
ExpHept
142. (34, 25) Et non dormiet usque in mane immolatio sollemnitatis Paschae. Dormiet dixit: "manebit"; nam caro pecudis occisae et coctae quemadmodum dormiet? Quod ergo dicitur: quare dormis, Domine (Ps 43, 34), hoc genere locutionis dicitur et intellegitur: "quare cessas," id est non vindicas.
142. (34:25) And the sacrifice of the feast of Passover shall not sleep until morning. It said shall sleep: "shall remain"; for how shall the flesh of a slaughtered and cooked animal sleep? So when it is said: why do you sleep, O Lord (Ps 44:23 (43:23)), it is said and understood by this kind of expression: "why do you delay," that is, do not take vengeance.
ExpHept
143. (34, 28) De quadraginta dierum ieiunio Moysi Scriptura sic loquitur: panem non manducavit et aquam non bibit, a parte totum, id est a pane omnem cibum et aqua omnem potum significans.
143. (34:28) Of Moses' fast of forty days Scripture speaks thus: he did not eat bread and did not drink water, the whole from a part, that is, by bread signifying all food and by water all drink.
ExpHept
144. (34, 1) Excide tibi duas tabulas sicut et primae, subauditur: "fuerunt"; unde hoc verbum nostri interpretes etiam addendum putaverunt, quoniam inusitata est in lingua Latina talis ellipsis.
144. (34:1) Cut for yourself two tablets like also the first, "were" is supplied; whence our translators thought this word should be added, since such an ellipsis is unusual in the Latin language.
ExpHept
145. (35, 4) Et ait Moyses ad omnem synagogam filiorum Israel dicens; plenum esset, et si non haberet: dicens.
145. (35:4) And Moses said to all the assembly of the children of Israel, saying; it would be complete even if it did not have: saying.
ExpHept
146. (35, 21) Et attulerunt unusquisque quod afferebat cor eorum. Poterat usitatius dici: "et attulit unusquisque quod afferebat cor eius."
146. (35:21) And they brought, each one what their heart brought. It could be said more customarily: "and each one brought what his heart brought."
ExpHept
147. (35, 21) Et quibus visum est animae eorum attulerunt demptionem Domino, non dixit: "et sicut visum est animae eorum."
147. (35:21) And those to whom it seemed good to their soul brought an offering to the Lord, it did not say: "and as it seemed good to their soul."
ExpHept
148. (35, 23) Et omnis cui inventum est apud eum coria arietum rubricata, quod diceretur usitate: "et omnes apud quos inventa sunt coria arietum rubricata."
148. (35:23) And everyone with whom was found reddened rams' skins, which would be said customarily: "and all with whom were found reddened rams' skins."
ExpHept
149. (35, 24) Omnis afferens demptionem argentum et aes attulerunt demptiones Domino. Usitatius diceretur: "omnis attulit" quam "omnis attulerunt."
149. (35:24) Everyone bringing an offering, silver and bronze, brought offerings to the Lord. It would be said more customarily: "everyone brought" rather than "everyone brought" (plural).
ExpHept
150. (35, 24) Et apud quos inventa sunt apud eos ligna imputribilia; apud eos more Scripturarum additum est; nam sine hoc esset plena sententia.
150. (35:24) And those with whom was found among them incorruptible wood; among them was added in the manner of the Scriptures; for without it the sentence would be complete.
ExpHept
151. (35, 25) Et omnis mulier sapiens mente manibus nere, quasi nere posset non manibus; et: sapiens nere elegans atque inusitata locutio est. Deinde: omnis mulier attulerunt more superiorum plurali concluditur singularis. Quia: "omnis mulier attulit," usitatius diceretur.
151. (35:25) And every woman wise in mind to spin with the hands, as if she could spin not with the hands; and: wise to spin is an elegant and unusual expression. Then: every woman brought (plural) is concluded, in the manner of those above, with a plural for a singular. Because "every woman brought" (singular) would be said more customarily.
ExpHept
152. (35, 26) Et omnes mulieres quibus visum est sensu suo in sapientia nerunt pilos caprinos. Notandum sapientiam in his artibus saepe appellare Scripturam, id est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
152. (35:26) And all the women to whom it seemed good in their understanding in wisdom spun goats' hair. It is to be noted that Scripture often calls skill in these arts "wisdom," that is: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
153. (35, 28) Et compositiones et oleum unctionis et compositionem incensi; non compositiones aliquas extra debemus intellegere, sed, cum dictum esset: et compositiones, per coniunctionem copulativam non aliud adiunxit sed quod dixerat exposuit, ut sciremus, quas compositiones, et oleum, inquit, unctionis et compositionem incensi. Compositiones autem vocat, quia ex multis ista confecta sunt.
153. (35:28) And the compounds and the oil of anointing and the compound of incense; we ought not to understand some compounds separately, but, when it had said and the compounds, through the copulative conjunction it did not join something else but explained what it had said, so that we might know which compounds: and the oil, it says, of anointing and the compound of incense. It calls them compounds because these were made up of many things.
ExpHept
154. (35, 29) Et omnis vir et mulier quorum afferebat sensus eorum, ut intrarent et facerent omne opus quodcumque praecepit Dominus fieri illud per Moysen, attulerunt filii Israel demptionem Domino. Ergo omnis vir et mulier intelleguntur filii Israel. Ceterae locutiones similes superioribus.
154. (35:29) And every man and woman whose understanding brought them to enter and do every work whatsoever the Lord commanded to be done by the hand of Moses, the children of Israel brought an offering to the Lord. Therefore by every man and woman the children of Israel are understood. The other expressions are similar to those above.
ExpHept
155. (35, 32-33) Facere aurum et argentum et aes, pro eo, quod est: "facere ex auro et argento et aere"; non enim aurum faciebant sed ex auro. Tale est etiam quod paulo post dicit: et operari ligna, hoc est: "ex lignis."
155. (35:32-33) To make gold and silver and bronze, in place of this: "to make from gold and silver and bronze"; for they did not make gold but from gold. Such too is what it says a little after: and to work woods, that is: "from woods."
ExpHept
156. (35, 35) Facere omnia opera sancti, textilia et varia texere cocco et bysso, facere omne opus architectonicum varietatis. Ecce et in rebus textilibus architectonicum opus appellat;
156. (35:35) To do all the works of the sanctuary, to weave woven and varied work with scarlet and fine linen, to do every architectural work of variety. See, even in woven things it calls it architectural work;
ExpHept
mirum nisi propterea, quia tabernaculo fiebant, quod aedificii simile fuit et tamquam domus erigebatur. Quid autem dicat: opera sancti, non evidenter apparet, utrum sancti sacerdotis, quoniam et de stola vel de stolis eius haec dicuntur, an sancti Dei, in cuius cultum haec fiebant, an opera sancti, sicut dicebatur sanctum et Sanctum sanctorum.
it would be remarkable unless it were for this reason: that they were being made for the tabernacle, which was like a building and was set up as a house. But what it means by the works of the sanctuary does not clearly appear—whether of the holy priest, since these things are said of his robe or robes, or of the holy God, in whose worship these were made, or of the sanctuary, as the holy place and the Holy of Holies were so called.
ExpHept
157. (36, 8) Umeralia continentia ex utrisque partibus eius: non dixit ex "utrisque partibus eorum," quamvis illa umeralia, non "umerale" dixisset, sicut solet umerale dicere; ipsum enim appellavit pluraliter umeralia, sicut "stolam" et easdem "stolas."
157. (36:8) The shoulder-pieces joined together from both its sides: it did not say "from both their sides," although it had said those shoulder-pieces (plural), not "shoulder-piece," as it usually says shoulder-piece; for it called it in the plural shoulder-pieces, as it does "robe" and the same "robes."
ExpHept
158. (36, 37) Et Eliab filius Achisamach de tribu Dan, qui architectonatus est textilia et consutilia et diversicoloria texere de cocco et bysso.
158. (36:37) And Oholiab the son of Ahisamach of the tribe of Dan, who acted as architect of woven and sewn and many-colored things, to weave with scarlet and fine linen.
ExpHept
Novo more dicuntur architectonari textilia. Etiam illud a parte totum intellegendum est, quod ait: texere cocco et bysso; ex his enim et cetera intellegimus, id est purpuram et hyacinthum.
By a novel manner woven things are said to be made by an architect. That too is to be understood as the whole from a part, in that it says: to weave with scarlet and fine linen; for from these we understand the rest as well, that is, purple and hyacinth.
ExpHept
159. (39, 31) Et fecerunt filii Israel, sicut praecepit Dominus Moysi, ita fecerunt; plenum esset, etiam si non adderetur: ita fecerunt.
159. (39:31) And the children of Israel did, as the Lord commanded Moses, so they did; it would be complete even if there were not added: so they did.
ExpHept
160. (40, 14) Et fecit Moyses omnia, quae praecepit ei Dominus, ita fecit; similiter, ut dictum est de filiis Israel.
160. (40:14) And Moses did all things that the Lord commanded him, so he did; similarly, as was said of the children of Israel.
ExpHept
Bk. 3Expressions on LeviticusLocutiones de Levitico
1. (1, 2) Homo ex vobis si obtulerit dona Domino a pecoribus, a bobus et ab ovibus offeretis; hoc est, si a pecoribus offeretis, a bobus, ab ovibus offeretis. Ovium nomine etiam caprarum genus inclusit, sicut et in aliis locis solet.
1. (1:2) If a man of you offers gifts to the Lord from the cattle, from the oxen and from the sheep you shall offer; that is, if you offer from the cattle, you shall offer from the oxen, from the sheep. By the name of sheep it included also the kind of goats, as it does in other places too.
ExpHept
2. (2, 6) Et confringes ea fragmenta; id est, confringendo facies ea fragmenta.
2. (2:6) And you shall break them into fragments; that is, by breaking you shall make them fragments.
ExpHept
3. (4, 23) Et cognitum ei fuerit peccatum quod peccavit in eo. Duo modi locutionis hic notandi sunt: et peccatum peccavit, et quod addidit: in eo. In quo enim nisi in ipso, id est peccato?
3. (4:23) And the sin which he sinned in it become known to him. Two manners of expression are here to be noted: both he sinned a sin, and what it added: in it. For in what but in the very thing, that is, the sin?
ExpHept
4. (5, 1) Si autem anima peccaverit, et audierit vocem iurationis, et ipse testis fuerit, aut viderit, aut conscius fuerit, si non nuntiaverit, et accipiet peccatum; plus videtur habere: et; nam eo dempto integre sequitur: accipiet peccatum.
4. (5:1) But if a soul sins, and hears the voice of one swearing, and is himself a witness, or has seen, or has been aware, if he does not report it, and he shall take on sin; the word and seems superfluous; for with it removed there follows complete: he shall take on sin.
ExpHept
5. (5, 1) Si autem anima peccaverit, et audierit vocem iurationis, et ipse testis fuerit, aut viderit, aut conscius fuerit non nuntiaverit; et positum est pro "id est"; nam sic dici posset nostrae locutionis consuetudine: "si autem anima peccaverit, id est audierit vocem iurationis," et cetera.
5. (5:1) But if a soul sins, and hears the voice of one swearing, and is himself a witness, or has seen, or has been aware, does not report it; and is put for "that is"; for it could be said thus by the custom of our expression: "but if a soul sins, that is, hears the voice of one swearing," and the rest.
ExpHept
6. (5, 3) Aut tetigerit ab immunditia hominis, ab omni immunditia eius, quam si tetigerit inquinetur, et latuit eum, post hoc autem cognoverit et deliquerit; cum recto ordine dicendum esset: et deliquerit, post hoc autem cognoverit.
6. (5:3) Or touches anything from the uncleanness of a man, from all his uncleanness, by which if he touches it he is defiled, and it was hidden from him, but after this he comes to know it and has transgressed; whereas it should have been said in the right order: and has transgressed, but after this comes to know it.
ExpHept
7. (5, 15-16) Anima si latuerit eum oblivione et peccaverit nolens. Non ait: "si latuerit eam," quoniam animam pro "homine" ponit, sicut facit et in aliis, ubi animam prius dixit, quae generis feminini est, postea masculinum infert genus ad hominem referens.
7. (5:15-16) A soul, if it be hidden from him by forgetfulness and he sins unwillingly. It did not say: "if it be hidden from her," since it puts soul for "man," as it does in other places, where it first said soul, which is of feminine gender, and afterward brings in the masculine gender, referring to the man.
ExpHept
Sed hic multo est haec locutio pressior, quoniam continuatim utrumque genus positum est, ut diceretur: anima si latuerit eum. Haec locutio terruit interpretes Latinos et noluerunt eam transferre,
But here this expression is much more compressed, since the two genders are placed in immediate sequence, so that it is said: a soul if it be hidden from him. This expression frightened the Latin translators and they did not wish to render it,
ExpHept
sed ita posuerunt: anima si qua latuerit et peccaverit non volens, cum aliud sit utique, si anima lateat, aliud, si animam lateat; hoc autem Scriptura dicit: si lateat eam, non: "si ipsa lateat."
but they put it thus: a soul, if any be hidden and sin unwillingly, whereas it is certainly one thing if a soul be hidden, another if something be hidden from a soul; but this is what Scripture says: if it be hidden from her, not: "if she herself be hidden."
ExpHept
In graeco autem alio invenimus: anima si latuerit ea oblivione; sed etiam ipse in consequentibus masculinum intulit dicens: sacerdos exorabit pro eo, et dimittetur illi, quod ibi habet [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Unde apparet scriptorem timuisse soloecismum nec tamen perseverare potuisse in genere feminino victum evidentia Scripturae consequentis.
But in another Greek copy we found: a soul, if it be hidden from her by forgetfulness; but even it in what follows brought in the masculine, saying: the priest shall make entreaty for him, and it shall be forgiven him, which there has [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Whence it appears that the writer feared a solecism, yet could not persevere in the feminine gender, overcome by the evidence of the following Scripture.
ExpHept
8. (6, 9) Ista holocaustosis super incensionem eius super altare totam noctem usque in mane, et ignis altaris ardebit super illud; potuit non habere: et, atque ita dici: "totam noctem usque in mane ignis altaris ardebit." Sed addita ista coniunctio facit obscuritatem his, qui in talibus Scripturarum locutionibus non assuefacti sunt.
8. (6:9) This is the burnt offering upon its burning upon the altar all the night until morning, and the fire of the altar shall burn upon it; it could lack and, and so be said: "all the night until morning the fire of the altar shall burn." But this conjunction, when added, makes obscurity for those who are not accustomed to such expressions of the Scriptures.
ExpHept
9. (6, 14) Ista Lex sacrificii, quod offerent illud filii Aaron sacerdotes ante Dominum; nihil deesset, si non haberet: illud.
9. (6:14) This is the law of the sacrifice, which the sons of Aaron the priests shall offer it before the Lord; nothing would be lacking if it did not have: it.
ExpHept
10. (6, 17) Sancta sanctorum est. Sic habet et Graecus; sed Graeca locutio est, quam nostri quidam transferre nolentes dixerunt: sancta sanctorum sunt.
10. (6:17) It is the holy of holies (singular). So the Greek has it; but it is a Greek expression, which certain of ours, unwilling to render, said: they are the holy of holies (plural).
ExpHept
11. (6, 32) Occident arietem qui pro delicto ante Dominum. Latini interpretes addiderunt: est, et dixerunt: qui pro delicto est, quod Graecus non habet.
11. (6:32) They shall slay the ram which for the offense before the Lord. The Latin translators added: is, and said: which is for the offense, which the Greek does not have.
ExpHept
12. (7, 16) Et si votum aut voluntarium sacrificaverit donum suum, quacumque die obtulerit sacrificium, edetur crastina die. Pro eo, quod est: "postera die"; unde alii: altera die interpretati sunt.
12. (7:16) And if he sacrifices his gift as a vow or a freewill offering, on whatever day he offers the sacrifice, it shall be eaten on the morrow. In place of this: "on the next day"; whence others rendered: on the other day.
ExpHept
13. (8, 31) Coquite carnes in atrio tabernaculi testimonii in loco sancto, et ibi edetis eas, et panes qui sunt in canistro consummationis, quomodo praeceptum est mihi dicens: 'Aaron et filii eius edent eam.' Hanc locutionem quidam transferre nolentes dixerunt: quomodo praecepit mihi dicens; quia hoc videtur consequens, ille autem in nostrae locutionis consuetudine soloecismus est.
13. (8:31) Cook the flesh in the court of the tabernacle of testimony in the holy place, and there you shall eat it, and the loaves that are in the basket of consecration, as it was commanded me, saying: "Aaron and his sons shall eat it." This expression certain ones, unwilling to render, said: as he commanded me, saying; because this seems consistent, but the former is a solecism in the custom of our expression.
ExpHept
14. (8, 35) Et ad ostium tabernaculi testimonii sedebitis septem dies, die et nocte; pro eo quod est: "habitabitis."
14. (8:35) And at the door of the tabernacle of testimony you shall sit seven days, day and night; in place of this: "you shall dwell."
ExpHept
15. (9, 7) Et ait Moyses ad Aaron: 'accede ad altare, et fac quod pro peccato tuo, et holocaustum; et exora pro te et domo tua, et fac dona populi, et exora pro eis quomodo praecepit Dominus Moysi.' Non ait: quomodo praecepit Dominus mihi; sed ita locutus est, quasi fuisset alter Moyses cui Dominus praecepit, et alter iste qui hoc ad Aaron loquebatur.
15. (9:7) And Moses said to Aaron: "approach the altar, and do what is for your sin, and the burnt offering; and make entreaty for yourself and your house, and make the gifts of the people, and make entreaty for them as the Lord commanded Moses." It did not say: as the Lord commanded me; but it spoke as though there had been one Moses whom the Lord commanded, and this other one who was speaking this to Aaron.
ExpHept
16. (10, 8-9) Et locutus est Dominus ad Aaron dicens: 'vinum et siceram non bibetis,' et cetera. Quam locutionem Domini ita concludit: omnia legitima quae locutus est Dominus ad eos per manum Moysi; cum Dominus loqueretur, non ait: "quae locutus sum ad eos per manum Moysi," sed ea locutione usus est qua superius ipse Moyses.
16. (10:8-9) And the Lord spoke to Aaron, saying: "wine and strong drink you shall not drink," and the rest. Which words of the Lord it concludes thus: all the ordinances that the Lord spoke to them by the hand of Moses; whereas the Lord was speaking, it did not say: "which I spoke to them by the hand of Moses," but used that expression which Moses himself used above.
ExpHept
17. (10, 9) Legitimum aeternum in progenies vestras distinguere inter medium mundorum et contaminatorum, et cetera. Notandum quemadmodum dicat: aeternum, quod utique non erit sine fine.
17. (10:9) An eternal ordinance throughout your generations, to distinguish between the midst of the clean and of the defiled, and the rest. It is to be noted in what way it says eternal, which certainly will not be without end.
ExpHept
18. (10, 14) Moyses loquens ad Aaron, Eleazar et Ithamar filios eius, inter cetera etiam hoc ait: a sacrificiis salutarium filiorum Israel brachium ablationis et pectusculum segregationis super hostias adipum offerent, segregationem segregare ante Deum. Et erit tibi et filiis tuis et filiabus tuis tecum legitimum aeternum; cum hoc totum finem fuisset habiturum.
18. (10:14) Moses, speaking to Aaron, Eleazar, and Ithamar his sons, among other things says also this: from the sacrifices of the peace offerings of the children of Israel they shall offer the arm of the offering and the little breast of the setting-apart upon the offerings of the fat, to set apart a setting-apart before God. And it shall be for you and for your sons and for your daughters with you an eternal ordinance; though all this was to have an end.
ExpHept
19. (11, 9) Cum de animantibus quae in aquis sunt praeciperet, quae sint eorum munda vel immunda: in aquis, inquit, et in mari, et in torrentibus.
19. (11:9) When it was giving commands concerning the living creatures that are in the waters, which of them are clean or unclean: in the waters, it says, and in the sea, and in the streams.
ExpHept
Sed in mari Latini codices habent, quia nimis insolens fuit pluralem numerum transferre de Graeco, et non dicere in mari, sed in maribus, maxime propter ambiguitatem, ne non "maria," sed "mares" intellegerentur, id est masculi;
But the Latin manuscripts have in the sea (singular), because it was too unusual to render the plural number from the Greek and to say not in the sea but in the seas, especially on account of the ambiguity, lest not "seas" but "males" be understood, that is, the masculine sex;
ExpHept
nam nihilo minus insolens est, quod tamen interpretatum est de "sanguinibus," quia Latina lingua "sanguinis" numerum pluralem non recipit, vel in ipso nominativo casu. Nam etsi ab eo quod est mare nemo dicit maribus, dicuntur tamen maria, cum sanguines non dicantur, et tamen scriptum est: libera me a sanguinibus (Ps 50, 16); et: non congregabo conventicula eorum de sanguinibus (Ps 15, 4).
for it is no less unusual—what nevertheless was rendered—in the case of "bloods," because the Latin language does not admit a plural number of "blood," even in the nominative case itself. For although from the word "sea" (mare) no one says maribus, yet maria ("seas") are spoken of, whereas "bloods" are not spoken of, and yet it is written: deliver me from bloods (Ps 51:14 (50:16)); and: I will not gather their assemblies from bloods (Ps 16:4 (15:4)).
ExpHept
Ergo et maribus ita dici posset nisi, ut dixi, ambiguitas vitaretur. Torrentes vero isto loco pro "fluminibus" posuit Scriptura, cum torrentes proprie dicantur hiemales fluvii qui siccantur aestate, et ideo pisces habere non possunt. Unde nonnulli interpretes nostri non "torrentes" interpretari, sed "flumina" maluerunt. Poni autem in Scripturis "torrentes" pro "fluminibus" locus ille Psalmi satis ostendit ubi legitur: et torrente voluptatis tuae potabis eos. Non enim tale aliquid intellegi voluit nomine torrentis quod ad tempus flueret, ac deinde siccaretur, cum sequatur et dicat: quoniam apud te est fons vitae (Ps 35, 9-10); quae utique aeterna est et indeficiens.
Therefore maribus too could be said thus, were it not, as I said, that the ambiguity was avoided. But streams in this place Scripture put for "rivers," although streams are properly winter torrents that dry up in summer, and therefore cannot have fish. Whence some of our translators preferred to render not "streams" but "rivers." But that "streams" is put in the Scriptures for "rivers" that passage of the Psalm sufficiently shows where it is read: and you will give them to drink of the stream of your delight. For it did not wish anything to be understood by the name of stream that would flow for a time and then dry up, since there follows and it says: for with you is the fountain of life (Ps 36:8–9 (35:9–10)); which is certainly eternal and unfailing.
ExpHept
20. (11, 21) Sed haec edetis a repentibus volatilibus, quae ambulant super quattuor, quae habent crura superiora pedum eius; non dixit: "pedum suorum."
20. (11:21) But these you shall eat of the creeping flying things that walk upon four feet, which have upper legs of its feet; it did not say: "of its feet" (plural).
ExpHept
21. (11, 44) Et eritis sancti, quoniam sanctus ego; subauditur: "sum," unde plerique nostri interpretati sunt: quoniam sanctus sum ego.
21. (11:44) And you shall be holy, because holy I; "am" is supplied, whence most of ours rendered: because I am holy.
ExpHept
22. (12, 1) Et locutus est Dominus ad Moysen dicens. Haec usitatissima locutio est et creberrima in Scripturis: locutus est dicens. Sed ea quae sequitur, rarius reperitur, et Latini sermonis coarctat inopiam; Graecus enim habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod Latine exprimi posset, "et dices ad eos dicens";
22. (12:1) And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying. This is a most customary and most frequent expression in the Scriptures: he spoke, saying. But the one that follows is more rarely found, and it constrains the poverty of Latin speech; for the Greek has: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], which could be expressed in Latin, "and you shall say to them, saying";
ExpHept
minus autem offendit, si dicatur, "et inquies ad eos dicens"; et similius est Graeco, quia et ille non dixit: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], sed [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
but it offends less if it is said, "and you shall speak to them, saying"; and it is more like the Greek, because that too did not say [MISSING GREEK TEXT], but [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
ExpHept
23. (12, 2) Mulier quaecumque semen receperit et pepererit masculum, et immunda erit septem dies; nostri plerique noluerunt transferre, sed ita dixerunt: mulier quaecumque semen receperit et pepererit masculum, immunda erit septem dies. Illa ergo locutio quoniam et Graeco eloquio inusitata est, posset nec in graeco transferri; quia vero eam Graecos transferre non piguit, cur Latinos piguerit, ignoro.
23. (12:2) Whatever woman receives seed and bears a male, and she shall be unclean seven days; most of ours were unwilling to render it, but said thus: whatever woman receives seed and bears a male, she shall be unclean seven days. That expression, then, since it is unusual even in Greek speech, could also not be rendered in the Greek; but since it did not irk the Greeks to render it, why it should have irked the Latins, I do not know.
ExpHept
24. (12, 4) Triginta et tres dies sedebit in sanguine mundo suo. Similiter et de illa quae feminam peperit, dictum est: sedebit in sanguine mundo suo, sed duplicatis eisdem diebus, id est, sexaginta sex diebus. Sedebit ergo dictum est "manebit," non enim per tot dies de sella ei surgere non licebat.
24. (12:4) Thirty-three days she shall sit in her clean blood. Similarly of her who bore a female it is said: she shall sit in her clean blood, but with the same days doubled, that is, sixty-six days. She shall sit, then, is said for "she shall remain," for it was not the case that for so many days she was not allowed to rise from her seat.
ExpHept
25. (13, 2) Homini si cui facta fuerit in cute corporis eius cicatrix signi lucida. Notandum cicatricem dicere Scripturam non "vulneris," sed etiam solius coloris notam.
25. (13:2) If on any man there is made in the skin of his body a bright scar of a sign. It is to be noted that Scripture calls a "scar" not the mark of a "wound," but even the mark of color alone.
ExpHept
26. (13, 2) Et fuerit in cute coloris eius tactus leprae; tactum dicit ipsam maculam, quod ipse homo lepra sit tactus.
26. (13:2) And there is in the skin of his color a touch of leprosy; it calls the spot itself the touch, because the man himself is touched by leprosy.
ExpHept
27. (13, 3) Et videbit eum sacerdos, et inquinabit eum; pro eo quod est: "inquinatum pronuntiabit."
27. (13:3) And the priest shall see him, and shall defile him; in place of this: "shall pronounce him defiled."
ExpHept
28. (13, 3) Et pilus qui est in tactu convertatur albus; id est: "convertatur in album."
28. (13:3) And let the hair that is in the touch be turned white; that is: "be turned into white."
ExpHept
29. (13, 6) Et purgabit eum sacerdos; signum enim est; purgatum pronuntiabit, sicut: inquinabit, quod supra dixit, "inquinatum pronuntiabit."
29. (13:6) And the priest shall cleanse him; for it is a sign; he shall pronounce him cleansed, just as: he shall defile, which it said above, "he shall pronounce defiled."
ExpHept
30. (13, 7-8) Et viderit eum sacerdos, et ecce commutata est significatio in cute, et inquinabit illum sacerdos; plus habet: et; nam ea coniunctione detracta integer sensus est hoc modo: si autem conversa fuerit significatio in cute, posteaquam vidit eum sacerdos, ut purget illum, et visus fuerit denuo sacerdoti, et viderit eum sacerdos, et ecce commutata est significatio in cute, inquinabit illum sacerdos.
30. (13:7-8) And the priest shall see him, and behold the appearance is changed in the skin, and the priest shall defile him; it has the extra and; for with that conjunction removed the sense is complete in this way: but if the appearance is changed in the skin, after the priest saw him, in order to cleanse him, and he is seen again by the priest, and the priest sees him, and behold the appearance is changed in the skin, the priest shall defile him.
ExpHept
31. (13, 9-10) Et tactus leprae, si fuerit in homine, veniet ad sacerdotem, et videbit sacerdos, et ecce cicatrix alba in cute, et haec mutavit pilum album, et a sano carnis vivae in cicatrice; id est, mutavit pilum in album colorem in cicatricem, mutavit autem a sano carnis vivae, id est, quia non talem pilum habet, quod sanum est in carne viva.
31. (13:9-10) And if a touch of leprosy is on a man, he shall come to the priest, and the priest shall see, and behold a white scar in the skin, and this has changed the hair white, and from the sound of the living flesh in the scar; that is, it has changed the hair into a white color in the scar, but it has changed it from the sound of the living flesh, that is, because it does not have such hair as is sound in living flesh.
ExpHept
32. (13, 45-46) De leproso cum loqueretur, ait: et immundus immundus vocabitur, quasi non satis esset semel dicere: immundus vocabitur. Quamquam nonnulli codices ita habeant, in alio Graeco ita invenimus semel dictum: immundus vocabitur. Item paulo post dicit: cum sit immundus, immundus erit;
32. (13:45-46) Speaking of the leper, it says: and unclean unclean he shall be called, as though it were not enough to say once: he shall be called unclean. Although some manuscripts have it so, in another Greek copy we found it said once: he shall be called unclean. Likewise a little after it says: since he is unclean, he shall be unclean;
ExpHept
quod in Latinum de Graeco non sicut positum est exprimi potuit; ait enim Graecus: [MISSING GREEK TEXT] quasi diceret: "immundus existens, immundus erit"; sed non hoc est existens, quod Graecus dicit: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], sed si dici posset, "essens," ab eo quod est esse, non ab eo quod est "existere."
which could not be expressed into Latin from the Greek as it stands; for the Greek says [MISSING GREEK TEXT] as if it said: "being unclean, he shall be unclean"; but "being" (existens) is not what the Greek says, [MISSING GREEK TEXT], but, if it could be said, "essing" (essens), from the verb "to be" (esse), not from "to exist" (existere).
ExpHept
33. (13, 47) Et vestimento si fuerit in eo tactus leprae; potuit usitate ita dicere: "et in vestimento si fuerit tactus leprae."
33. (13:47) And a garment if there is in it a touch of leprosy; it could say customarily thus: "and in a garment if there is a touch of leprosy."
ExpHept
34. (13, 51) Aut in omni vase pelliceo, in quocumque fuerit in eo tactus; poterat satis esse: in quocumque fuerit tactus.
34. (13:51) Or in any vessel of leather, in whatever there is in it a touch; it could be enough: in whatever there is a touch.
ExpHept
35. (13, 55) Et ecce non commutavit tactus aspectum suum; id est colorem in quo aspicitur; non enim aspectum quo ipse aspicit, tactum quippe ipsam maculam dicit.
35. (13:55) And behold the touch has not changed its appearance; that is, the color in which it is seen; for not the sight by which it itself sees, since by touch it means the spot itself.
ExpHept
36. (14, 15) Et accipiens sacerdos in hemina olei, superfundet in manum sacerdotis sinistram; non dixit: "in manum suam sinistram," cum utique in suam faciat.
36. (14:15) And the priest taking of the pint of oil, shall pour it upon the left hand of the priest; it did not say: "upon his own left hand," although he certainly does it onto his own.
ExpHept
37. (15, 2) Viro, viro cuicumque fuerit fluor.
37. (15:2) To any man, any man who has a discharge.
ExpHept
38. (15, 16) Et homo cuicumque exierit ex eo concubitus seminis.
38. (15:16) And any man from whom goes out the lying-down of seed.
ExpHept
39. (15, 21) Et omne super quodcumque dormit super illud.
39. (15:21) And everything upon whatever he lies upon it.
ExpHept
40. (15, 21) Et omne super quod sederit super illud, immundum erit.
40. (15:21) And everything upon which he sits upon it, shall be unclean.
ExpHept
41. (16, 21) Et emittet in manu hominis parati in eremum, id est: "emittet in eremum in manu hominis ad hoc parati"; de hirco emissario loquebatur cum hoc diceret: notandum est autem quomodo dicat Scriptura: in manu.
41. (16:21) And he shall send it out by the hand of a man made ready into the wilderness, that is: "he shall send it out into the wilderness by the hand of a man made ready for this"; he was speaking of the scapegoat when he said this: but it is to be noted in what way Scripture says: by the hand.
ExpHept
42. (17, 3) Homo, homo filiorum Israel; id est: "ex filiis Israel"; ista autem repetitio quemlibet hominem videtur significare, id est, ille aut ille.
42. (17:3) A man, a man of the children of Israel; that is: "of the children of Israel"; but this repetition seems to signify any man whatever, that is, this one or that one.
ExpHept
43. (18, 7) Turpitudinem patris tui et turpitudinem matris tuae non revelabis; hac locutione concubitum vetuit cum his personis.
43. (18:7) The shame of your father and the shame of your mother you shall not uncover; by this expression it forbade intercourse with these persons.
ExpHept
44. (18, 14) Turpitudinem fratris patris tui non revelabis, et ad uxorem eius non introibis; propinqua enim tua est; et posuit, pro "id est"; hanc enim dicit turpitudinem fratris patris eius, id est, turpitudinem patrui, pudenda uxoris patrui.
44. (18:14) The shame of your father's brother you shall not uncover, and to his wife you shall not go in; for she is your kinswoman; it put and for "that is"; for it calls this the shame of his father's brother, that is, the shame of the paternal uncle, the private parts of the uncle's wife.
ExpHept
45. (18, 25) Et exhorruit terra eos qui insident super eam; id est: sedes habent, quod est: "habitant."
45. (18:25) And the land abhorred those who settle upon it; that is: have their seats, which is: "dwell."
ExpHept
46. (19, 9) Et permetentibus vobis messem terrae vestrae, non perficietis messem vestram agri tui permetere. Hoc quod a plurali coepit, et ad singularem numerum terminavit, plerique Latini interpretari noluerunt, sed dixerunt: agri vestri, ubi dictum est: agri tui, quasi Graecus hoc non posset dicere; magis ergo locutio notanda fuit quam emendanda.
46. (19:9) And when you (plural) reap the harvest of your land, you (singular) shall not finish reaping your field. This—that it began from the plural and ended with the singular number—most Latin were unwilling to render, but said: of your (plural) field, where it was said: of your (singular) field, as though the Greek could not say this; therefore the expression was to be noted rather than emended.
ExpHept
47. (20, 17) Quicumque acceperit sororem suam ex patre suo aut ex matre sua, et viderit turpitudinem eius, et ipsa viderit turpitudinem eius, turpitudinem sororis suae revelavit, peccatum suum accipient; peccatum posuit pro "poena peccati."
47. (20:17) Whoever takes his sister from his father or from his mother, and sees her shame, and she sees his shame, he has uncovered the shame of his sister, they shall take on their sin; it put sin for "the penalty of the sin."
ExpHept
48. (20, 25) Et segregabitis vosmetipsos inter medium pecorum mundorum, et inter medium pecorum immundorum, et inter medium volucrum mundarum et immundarum. Segregabitis vosmetipsos, dixit, inter medium mundorum et immundorum, quoniam segregantur munda ab immundis, vel a mundis immunda; nova est omnino locutio. Aliud est enim: "segregabis inter medium pecorum mundorum, et inter medium pecorum immundorum," sicut saepissime loqui solet; aliud est quod modo ait: segregabitis vosmetipsos, tamquam illa ab alterutris segregantes seipsos segregent ab utrisque, tamquam iudicando inter utraque.
48. (20:25) And you shall separate yourselves between the midst of clean animals and the midst of unclean animals, and the midst of clean and unclean birds. You shall separate yourselves, it said, between the midst of the clean and the unclean, since the clean are separated from the unclean, or the unclean from the clean; it is an altogether novel expression. For it is one thing: "you shall separate between the midst of clean animals and the midst of unclean animals," as it most often is accustomed to speak; another is what it now says: you shall separate yourselves, as though, by separating those things from one another, they separate themselves from both, as though judging between the two.
ExpHept
49. (21, 1) Dic sacerdotibus filiis Aaron, et dices ad eos: 'in animabus non inquinabuntur in gente eorum, nisi in propinquo qui proximus est eis'; in luctu dicit qui debetur animabus defunctorum; ideo enim lugetur, quia excesserunt.
49. (21:1) Speak to the priests, the sons of Aaron, and you shall say to them: "in souls they shall not be defiled among their people, except in a kinsman who is nearest to them"; it speaks of the mourning that is owed to the souls of the deceased; for one mourns because they have departed.
ExpHept
50. (21, 5) Et calvitium non rademini super mortuum, et super carnes suas non secabunt sectiones; usitata esset locutio: "carnes suas non secabunt sectionibus."
50. (21:5) And you shall not shave a baldness over the dead, and over their flesh they shall not cut cuttings; the customary expression would be: "they shall not cut their flesh with cuttings."
ExpHept
51. (21, 7-8) Mulierem fornicariam et profanam non accipient, et mulierem eiectam a viro suo; quoniam sanctus est Domino Deo suo; non dixit: "quoniam sancti sunt," sed tamquam de uno loqueretur, cum coeperit a plurali. Deinde sequitur singulariter: sanctificavit eum, dona Domini Dei vestri iste offeret; sanctus est, quoniam sanctus ego Dominus qui sanctifico eos; rursus ad pluralem conclusit.
51. (21:7-8) A harlot and profane woman they shall not take, nor a woman cast out by her husband; because he is holy to the Lord his God; it did not say: "because they are holy," but as though it spoke of one, though it began from the plural. Then it follows in the singular: he has sanctified him, the gifts of the Lord your God this one shall offer; he is holy, because holy am I the Lord who sanctify them; again it concluded with the plural.
ExpHept
52. (22, 11) Si autem sacerdos possederit animam emptam pecunia, hic edet de panibus eius; non dixit: haec edet, cum animam dixerit, quae generis est feminini; sed potius ad illud respexit quod per animam significare voluit, id est hominem.
52. (22:11) But if a priest possesses a soul bought with money, this one shall eat of his loaves; it did not say: this one (feminine) shall eat, although it said soul, which is of feminine gender; but it rather looked to that which it wished to signify by soul, that is, the man.
ExpHept
53. (22, 12) Et filia hominis sacerdotis si fuerit viro alienigenae; id est: "si nupserit viro alienigenae."
53. (22:12) And the daughter of a priest, a man, if she is to a foreign man; that is: "if she marries a foreign man."
ExpHept
54. (22, 26-27) Et locutus est Dominus ad Moysen dicens: 'vitulum aut ovem aut capram, cum natum fuerit, et erit septem dies sub matre sua'; plus videtur habere et, secundum usitatissimas locutiones in Scripturis, quas Latini plerique transferre noluerunt.
54. (22:26-27) And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: "a calf or a sheep or a goat, when it is born, and it shall be seven days under its mother"; it seems to have the extra and, according to the most customary expressions in the Scriptures, which most Latin were unwilling to render.
ExpHept
55. (22, 32) Et sanctificabor in medio filiorum Israel; quod est: "sanctus habebor"; neque enim Dominus etiam praeter filios Israel non est sanctus. Eo sensu dictum est et in oratione dominica: sanctificetur nomen tuum (Mt 6, 9), id est: "sanctum habeatur ab hominibus."
55. (22:32) And I will be sanctified in the midst of the children of Israel; which is: "I will be held holy"; for the Lord is not without holiness even apart from the children of Israel. In that sense it is said also in the Lord's Prayer: hallowed be your name (Matt 6:9), that is: "let it be held holy by men."
ExpHept
56. (23, 2) Loquere ad filios Israel, et dices ad eos: 'sollemnia Domini quae vocabitis vocata sancta, ista sunt sollemnia mea; sex diebus facies opera'; cum ad plures loquendum dixerit, tamquam ad unum postea loquitur.
56. (23:2) Speak to the children of Israel, and you shall say to them: "the feasts of the Lord which you shall call called holy, these are my feasts; six days you shall do works"; though it said it was to be spoken to many, it afterward speaks as though to one.
ExpHept
57. (23, 15-16) Et numerabitis vobis a die crastino Sabbati quo obtulerit gremium superpositionis, septem septimanas integras numerabis; non dixit: "numerabitis," cum ad plures superius loqueretur.
57. (23:15-16) And you (plural) shall count for yourselves from the day after the Sabbath on which he offered the sheaf of the laying-on, seven full weeks you (singular) shall count; it did not say: "you (plural) shall count," although it was speaking above to many.
ExpHept
58. (24, 11) Et cum nominasset filius mulieris Israelitidis, nomen maledixit; cum hic non addiderit: "Dei," manifestum est tamen nomen Dei esse intellegendum cui maledixit.
58. (24:11) And when the son of the Israelite woman had named, he cursed the name; although it did not add here "of God," it is nevertheless clear that the name of God is to be understood, which he cursed.
ExpHept
59. (24, 15) Homo, homo si maledixerit Deum, suum peccatum accipiet. Ecce ubi satis apparet locutionis esse, cum dicitur: homo, homo, tamquam dicat: "homo ille aut ille," hoc est quicumque homo; non sicut quidam putaverunt: homo, homo ita dici, tamquam laudabiliter nuncupetur, ac si diceretur: "homo, sed homo"; id est, non qualiscumque velut similis pecori, sed qui vere sit homo; quem sensum non esse verum, sed locutionis hoc esse Scripturarum, aperte hic ostenditur, cum in eo dicitur qui culpatur, non qui laudatur.
59. (24:15) A man, a man if he curses God, shall take on his own sin. See where it sufficiently appears to be a matter of expression, when it is said: a man, a man, as if it said: "this man or that one," that is, any man whatever; not as some have supposed, that a man, a man is said as though one were named praiseworthily, as if it were said: "a man, but a man"; that is, not just any sort like the beasts, but one who is truly a man. That this sense is not the true one, but that this is a matter of expression of the Scriptures, is here openly shown, since it is said of the one who is blamed, not of the one who is praised.
ExpHept
60. (25, 46) Cum de servis ageret, quos liceret habere Israelitis: et erunt vobis, inquit, in possessione in aeternum; cum utique aeterni moriendo esse non possent vel domini vel servi; aeternum ergo dixit, ubi non est temporis praestitutus modus quousque serviant sicut constitutus est eis, quos in remissione dimitti iubet libertati suae.
60. (25:46) When it was treating of the slaves whom it was permitted to the Israelites to have: and they shall be for you, it says, as a possession forever; although they certainly could not, being mortal, be either masters or slaves eternally; it said forever, then, where there is no fixed measure of time how long they should serve, as there is set for those whom in the year of remission it commands to be released into their freedom.
ExpHept
61. (26, 3) Si in praeceptis meis ambulaveritis, et mandata mea observaveritis, et feceritis ea, et dabo pluviam vobis in tempore suo; superfluum est: et, consuetudini locutionis nostrae, sed more Scripturarum additum; sequebatur enim: dabo vobis.
61. (26:3) If you walk in my precepts, and keep my commandments, and do them, and I will give you rain in its season; the and is superfluous to the custom of our expression, but added in the manner of the Scriptures; for there followed: I will give you.
ExpHept
62. (26, 18) Et si usque adhuc non oboedieritis mihi, et apponam castigare vos septies in peccatis vestris; etiam hic superfluum est: et, sequebatur enim: apponam castigare vos; quod autem ait: septies, pro omni numero accipiendum est.
62. (26:18) And if even still you do not obey me, and I will go on to chastise you seven times for your sins; here too the and is superfluous, for there followed: I will go on to chastise you; and what it says, seven times, is to be taken for any number whatever.
ExpHept
Bk. 4Expressions on NumbersLocutiones de Numeris
1. (1, 4) Et vobiscum erunt unusquisque secundum caput uniuscuiusque principum.
1. (1, 4) Et vobiscum erunt unusquisque secundum caput uniuscuiusque principum (and they shall be with you, each one according to the head of each one of the leaders).
ExpHept
2. (1, 22. 20) Filiis Symeon secundum propinquitates eorum, secundum populos eorum, secundum domos familiarum eorum, secundum numerum nominum eorum, secundum caput eorum, omnia masculina a viginti annis et supra, omnis, qui procedit in virtute, recognitio eorum. Haec locutio, quod non dicit: "filii Symeon" vel "ex filiis Symeon," sed: filiis Symeon dativo casu et hoc servat deinceps in ceteris tribubus, non est translata ab interpretibus Latinis, quos inspicere potuimus. In sola autem tribu Ruben quae prima numerata est, non est ista locutio; non enim ait: "filiis Ruben secundum propinquitates eorum," et cetera, sed ait: et fuerunt filii Ruben primogeniti Israelis secundum propinquitates eorum, et deinde similiter ut in ceteris.
2. (1, 22. 20) Filiis Symeon secundum propinquitates eorum, secundum populos eorum, secundum domos familiarum eorum, secundum numerum nominum eorum, secundum caput eorum, omnia masculina a viginti annis et supra, omnis, qui procedit in virtute, recognitio eorum (to the sons of Simeon, according to their kindreds, according to their peoples, according to the houses of their families, according to the number of their names, according to their head, all the males from twenty years old and upward, everyone who goes forth in the host, their census). This expression—that it does not say "the sons of Simeon" or "of the sons of Simeon," but to the sons of Simeon, in the dative case, and it keeps this thereafter in the remaining tribes—was not rendered this way by the Latin translators that we have been able to examine. In the tribe of Reuben alone, which is counted first, this expression does not occur; for it does not say "to the sons of Reuben, according to their kindreds," and so on, but says and the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel were, according to their kindreds, and then likewise as in the others.
ExpHept
3. (1, 22. 54) Et fecerunt filii Israel secundum omnia, quae mandavit Dominus Moysi et Aaron, ita fecerunt.
3. (1, 22. 54) Et fecerunt filii Israel secundum omnia, quae mandavit Dominus Moysi et Aaron, ita fecerunt (and the sons of Israel did according to all that the Lord commanded Moses and Aaron, so they did).
ExpHept
4. (3, 3) Sacerdotes qui uncti sunt quorum consummaverunt manus eorum sacerdotio fungi.
4. (3, 3) Sacerdotes qui uncti sunt quorum consummaverunt manus eorum sacerdotio fungi (the priests who were anointed, whose hands they consecrated to perform the priestly office).
ExpHept
5. (4, 14) Et imponent super illud omnia vasa eius, quibus ministrant in ipsis.
5. (4, 14) Et imponent super illud omnia vasa eius, quibus ministrant in ipsis (and they shall place upon it all its vessels, with which they minister therein).
ExpHept
6. (5, 7) Et reddet cui deliquit ei. Quidam locutionem istam transferre nolentes emendato ordine verba transtulerunt dicentes: et reddet ei cui deliquit.
6. (5, 7) Et reddet cui deliquit ei (and he shall restore to whom he wronged, to him). Some translators, unwilling to render this expression as it stands, corrected the order and translated et reddet ei cui deliquit (and he shall restore to him whom he wronged).
ExpHept
7. (5, 6) Vir aut mulier quicumque fecerit ab omnibus peccatis humanis. Non ait: "quaecumque fecerit"; sed locutio est, ubi sexus masculinus pronomen vindicavit, quamvis posterius femininus sit positus, quae locutio usitata non est.
7. (5, 6) Vir aut mulier quicumque fecerit ab omnibus peccatis humanis (a man or a woman, whoever [masculine] shall have committed any of human sins). It does not say "whoever [feminine] shall have committed"; rather it is an expression in which the masculine gender claims the pronoun, even though the feminine is placed afterward—an expression that is not customary.
ExpHept
8. (5, 12) Viri, viri si praevaricata fuerit uxor eius; non solum quia geminavit nomen, ut diceret: viri, viri, sed etiam quia addidit: eius, notanda locutio est.
8. (5, 12) Viri, viri si praevaricata fuerit uxor eius (of a man, of a man, if his wife shall have transgressed). The expression is to be noted not only because it doubled the noun, saying viri, viri (of a man, of a man), but also because it added eius (his).
ExpHept
9. (5, 14) Si superveniet illi spiritus zelandi. Illa autem non fuerit inquinata, et adducet homo uxorem suam ad sacerdotem; superfluum est: et, sed Scripturis usitata locutio.
9. (5, 14) Si superveniet illi spiritus zelandi. Illa autem non fuerit inquinata, et adducet homo uxorem suam ad sacerdotem (if a spirit of jealousy shall come upon him. But she shall not have been defiled, and the man shall bring his wife to the priest). The word et (and) is superfluous, but it is an expression customary to the Scriptures.
ExpHept
10. (5, 18) Erit aqua argutionis quae maledicitur haec. Hanc locutionem inusitatam fecit ordo verborum; posset enim usitate ita dici: "erit aqua argutionis haec quae maledicitur," aut: "erit haec aqua argutionis quae maledicitur," vel si quid aliud usitata verba ordinando dici potest.
10. (5, 18) Erit aqua argutionis quae maledicitur haec (it shall be the water of reproof which is accursed, this). This expression was made unusual by the order of the words; for it could be said in the customary way thus: "this shall be the water of reproof which is accursed," or "this water of reproof shall be that which is accursed," or in any other way that ordinary words can be arranged.
ExpHept
11. (5, 19) Innocens esto ab aqua argutionis quae maledicitur haec. In hac locutione non solus verborum ordo inusitate sonat, sed etiam casus mutatus est; esset enim integrum et usitatum: "innocens esto ab hac aqua argutionis quae maledicitur," aut: "ab aqua argutionis hac, quae maledicitur."
11. (5, 19) Innocens esto ab aqua argutionis quae maledicitur haec (be innocent of the water of reproof which is accursed, this). In this expression not only does the word order sound unusual, but the case is also changed; for it would be complete and customary to say "be innocent of this water of reproof which is accursed," or "of this water of reproof, which is accursed."
ExpHept
12. (5, 27) Et inflabitur ventrem, pro: "inflabitur ventre." Haec locutio et apud Latinos auctores frequentatur; sed interpretes nostri qui eam transferre noluerunt dixerunt: et inflabitur venter eius.
12. (5, 27) Et inflabitur ventrem (and she shall swell as to the belly), for "she shall swell in the belly." This expression is frequent even among Latin authors; but our translators, who were unwilling to render it, said et inflabitur venter eius (and her belly shall swell).
ExpHept
13. (6, 2) Vir vel mulier quicumque magne voverit votum, non dixit: "quaecumque."
13. (6, 2) Vir vel mulier quicumque magne voverit votum (a man or a woman, whoever [masculine] shall greatly vow a vow): it did not say "whoever [feminine]."
ExpHept
14. (6, 9) Et radetur caput suum, talis locutio est qualis superius: inflabitur ventrem.
14. (6, 9) Et radetur caput suum (and he shall shave his head [accusative]): such an expression as the one above, inflabitur ventrem (she shall swell as to the belly).
ExpHept
15. (7, 3) Sed vehicula tecta et duodecim boves, vehiculum a duobus principibus et vitulum a singulis. In hac locutione notandum putavi eosdem dictos "vitulos," quos boves dixerat; sed hoc etiam Graecum idioma esse perhibetur.
15. (7, 3) Sed vehicula tecta et duodecim boves, vehiculum a duobus principibus et vitulum a singulis (but covered wagons and twelve oxen, a wagon from two leaders and a calf from each one). In this expression I thought it worth noting that he calls "calves" the same ones he had called boves (oxen); but this too is reported to be a Greek idiom.
ExpHept
16. (7, 11) Princeps unus quotidie, princeps quotidie offerent dona sua, pro eo, ut diceret: "singulis diebus singuli principes."
16. (7, 11) Princeps unus quotidie, princeps quotidie offerent dona sua (one leader each day, a leader each day, they shall offer their gifts), instead of saying "the leaders one by one on single days."
ExpHept
17. (7, 15) Vitulum unum pro bobus et hircum ex capris unum.
17. (7, 15) Vitulum unum pro bobus et hircum ex capris unum (one calf for the oxen and one he-goat from the goats).
ExpHept
18. (8, 19) Et non erit in filiis Israel accedens filiorum Israel ad sancta. Videtur potuisse sufficere: "et non erit in filiis Israel accedens ad sancta," aut certe: "non erit filiorum Israel accedens ad sancta."
18. (8, 19) Et non erit in filiis Israel accedens filiorum Israel ad sancta (and there shall not be among the sons of Israel any of the sons of Israel approaching the holy things). It seems it could have sufficed to say "and there shall not be among the sons of Israel anyone approaching the holy things," or at least "there shall not be any of the sons of Israel approaching the holy things."
ExpHept
19. (8, 20) Et fecit Moyses et Aaron et omnis synagoga filiorum Israel Levitis; secundum quae praecepit Dominus Moysi de Levitis, ita fecerunt eis filii Israel.
19. (8, 20) Et fecit Moyses et Aaron et omnis synagoga filiorum Israel Levitis; secundum quae praecepit Dominus Moysi de Levitis, ita fecerunt eis filii Israel (and Moses and Aaron and the whole assembly of the sons of Israel did to the Levites; according to what the Lord commanded Moses concerning the Levites, so the sons of Israel did to them).
ExpHept
20. (9, 13) Et homo, homo quicumque mundus fuerit et in viam longinquam non est et defuerit facere Pascha. Exterminabitur anima illa de populo suo. Ergo homo, homo lucutio est, ac si diceret: "quicumque homo," ille vel ille.
20. (9, 13) Et homo, homo quicumque mundus fuerit et in viam longinquam non est et defuerit facere Pascha. Exterminabitur anima illa de populo suo. (and a man, a man, whoever shall be clean and is not on a far journey and shall have failed to keep the Passover, that soul shall be cut off from his people.) Therefore homo, homo (a man, a man) is an expression as if it said "whoever, a man," this one or that one.
ExpHept
21. (9, 17) Et cum ascendisset nubes a tabernaculo, et postea promovebant filii Israel. Poterat plenum esse: "et cum ascendisset nubes a tabernaculo, promovebant filii Israel."
21. (9, 17) Et cum ascendisset nubes a tabernaculo, et postea promovebant filii Israel (and when the cloud went up from the tabernacle, and afterward the sons of Israel would set out). It could have been complete: "and when the cloud went up from the tabernacle, the sons of Israel would set out."
ExpHept
22. (10, 14) Et promovebant ordo castrorum filiorum Iuda primi.
22. (10, 14) Et promovebant ordo castrorum filiorum Iuda primi (and the rank of the camp of the sons of Judah set out first).
ExpHept
23. (10, 17) Et promovebunt filii Gerson et filii Merari. Futuri temporis verbum posuit, cum rem gestam praeteritam narret sicut in superioribus cum de nube loqueretur (Cf. Ex 13, 21-22; Num 9, 17), ad cuius motum vel stationem castra promovebant vel consistebant, atque ita deinceps in plurium promotionibus hoc verbo utitur.
23. (10, 17) Et promovebunt filii Gerson et filii Merari (and the sons of Gershon and the sons of Merari shall set out). He used a verb in the future tense, though he is narrating a past event, as in the earlier passages when he was speaking of the cloud (See Exod 13:21–22; Num 9:17), at whose motion or halt the camp would set out or stay; and so thereafter, in the many instances of setting out, he uses this tense.
ExpHept
24. (10, 29) Et dixit Moyses Hobet filio Raguel Madianitae genero Moysi, non ait: "genero suo."
24. (10, 29) Et dixit Moyses Hobet filio Raguel Madianitae genero Moysi (and Moses said to Hobab the son of Raguel the Midianite, the kinsman of Moses): it did not say "his kinsman."
ExpHept
25. (10, 30) Et dixit ad eum: 'non ibo, sed ad terram meam et ad progeniem meam,' subauditur: "ibo."
25. (10, 30) Et dixit ad eum: 'non ibo, sed ad terram meam et ad progeniem meam' (and he said to him: "I will not go, but to my own land and to my own offspring"): "I will go" is understood.
ExpHept
26. (11, 4) Et promiscuus qui erat in eis concupiverunt concupiscentiam. Singularem posuit pro plurali, ut promiscuus diceret, non: "promiscui"; et tamen pluralem reddidit, cum ait: concupiverunt.
26. (11, 4) Et promiscuus qui erat in eis concupiverunt concupiscentiam (and the mixed multitude that was among them lusted a lust). He used the singular for the plural, saying promiscuus (the mixed multitude, singular), not "promiscui" (plural); and yet he rendered it as plural when he said concupiverunt (they lusted).
ExpHept
27. (11, 6) Nunc autem anima nostra arida, nihil praeter in manna oculi nostri. Desunt verba: "est," et: "sunt"; plenum quippe esset: "anima nostra arida est, nihil praeter in manna sunt oculi nostri." Nam quidam interpretes sic transtulerunt et addiderunt verba, quae non sunt in Graeco.
27. (11, 6) Nunc autem anima nostra arida, nihil praeter in manna oculi nostri (but now our soul is dry, our eyes are on nothing but the manna). The words "is" and "are" are missing; for it would be complete: "our soul is dry, our eyes are on nothing but the manna." For some translators rendered it thus and added words that are not in the Greek.
ExpHept
28. (11, 8) Et molebant illud in mola.
28. (11, 8) Et molebant illud in mola (and they would grind it in a mill).
ExpHept
29. (11, 21) Sescenta millia peditum in quibus sum in eis.
29. (11, 21) Sescenta millia peditum in quibus sum in eis (six hundred thousand footmen, among whom I am, among them).
ExpHept
30. (11, 25) Et abstulit de spiritu qui super ipsum. Subauditur aut: "erat," aut: "erit." Sed hanc locutionem, quae dicitur ellipsis, Graeco eloquio familiarissimam et, quantum puto, etiam Hebraeo Latinos interpretes transferre piguit, cum et in Latina lingua frequentetur quamvis minus quam in Graeca.
30. (11, 25) Et abstulit de spiritu qui super ipsum (and he took of the spirit that was upon him). Either "was" or "shall be" is understood. But the Latin translators were reluctant to render this expression, which is called ellipsis—most familiar to Greek diction and, as I think, to Hebrew as well—even though it is frequent in the Latin language too, though less than in Greek.
ExpHept
31. (11, 33) Et percussit Dominus populum plagam magnam valde; notanda fuit locutio: percussit plagam, non: "percussit plaga," quod est usitatum.
31. (11, 33) Et percussit Dominus populum plagam magnam valde (and the Lord struck the people a very great plague). The expression was to be noted: percussit plagam (struck a plague, accusative), not "percussit plaga" (struck with a plague, ablative), which is the customary form.
ExpHept
32. (12, 3) Et homo Moyses lenis valde, subauditur: "erat."
32. (12, 3) Et homo Moyses lenis valde (and the man Moses very meek): "was" is understood.
ExpHept
33. (12, 9) Et ira animationis Domini super eos. Subauditur: "facta est."
33. (12, 9) Et ira animationis Domini super eos (and the wrath of the Lord's anger upon them): "came to be" is understood.
ExpHept
34. (12, 10) Et ecce Maria leprosa sicut nix; et hic subauditur: "facta est."
34. (12, 10) Et ecce Maria leprosa sicut nix (and behold, Miriam leprous like snow); and here too "became" is understood.
ExpHept
35. (13, 20) Et quae terra in qua isti insident super eam; et quae civitates in quibus isti habitant in ipsis.
35. (13, 20) Et quae terra in qua isti insident super eam; et quae civitates in quibus isti habitant in ipsis (and what the land is in which these dwell upon it; and what the cities are in which these live in them).
ExpHept
36. (13, 25) Locum ipsum quem nominaverunt vallem Botrui, cum superius dixisset: venerunt in vallem Botrui. Dictum est ergo per anticipationem, non quia iam hoc vocabatur, quando venerunt, sed cum scriberetur hic liber, iam vocabatur.
36. (13, 25) Locum ipsum quem nominaverunt vallem Botrui (that very place which they named the Valley of the Cluster), although he had said above venerunt in vallem Botrui (they came into the Valley of the Cluster). It is said, then, by anticipation, not because it was already so called when they came, but because, when this book was being written, it was already so called.
ExpHept
37. (13, 32) Quoniam fortior nobis est magis. Usitata esset locutio si non haberet: magis.
37. (13, 32) Quoniam fortior nobis est magis (for it is stronger than we, more). The expression would be customary if it did not have magis (more).
ExpHept
38. (13, 33) Et protulerunt pavorem terrae quam exploraverunt eam.
38. (13, 33) Et protulerunt pavorem terrae quam exploraverunt eam (and they brought forth a dread of the land which they explored it).
ExpHept
39. (13, 33) Terram quam transivimus eam explorare, terra comedens qui habitant super eam est. Dicendum autem fuit usitate: "terram quam transivimus explorare."
39. (13, 33) Terram quam transivimus eam explorare, terra comedens qui habitant super eam est (the land which we passed through it to explore, a land devouring those who live upon it it is). But it should have been said in the customary way: "the land which we passed through to explore."
ExpHept
40. (14, 7) Terra quam exploravimus eam bona est valde valde.
40. (14, 7) Terra quam exploravimus eam bona est valde valde (the land which we explored it is very, very good).
ExpHept
41. (14, 10) Et ait omnis synagoga lapidare eos in lapidibus. Non dictum est: "lapidibus," cum ipsum lapidare posset usitata locutione sufficere.
41. (14, 10) Et ait omnis synagoga lapidare eos in lapidibus (and the whole assembly said to stone them with stones). It was not said "with stones [ablative without preposition]," since lapidare (to stone) by itself could have sufficed in the customary expression.
ExpHept
42. (14, 11) Et quousque non credunt mihi in omnibus signis quibus feci in ipsis? Non ait: "quae feci in ipsis."
42. (14, 11) Et quousque non credunt mihi in omnibus signis quibus feci in ipsis? (and how long do they not believe me in all the signs which I did among them?): it did not say "which I did among them [with the relative in another case]."
ExpHept
43. (14, 24) Puer autem meus Chaleb, quoniam spiritus alius in eo et assecutus est me, et inducam eum in terram. Usitatum esset, si non haberet: et.
43. (14, 24) Puer autem meus Chaleb, quoniam spiritus alius in eo et assecutus est me, et inducam eum in terram (but my servant Caleb, because another spirit is in him and he has followed me, and I will bring him into the land). It would be customary if it did not have et (and).
ExpHept
44. (14, 24) Et inducam eum in terram, in quam intravit illuc. Sufficeret usitata locutione: "in quam intravit."
44. (14, 24) Et inducam eum in terram, in quam intravit illuc (and I will bring him into the land, into which he entered thither). It would suffice in the customary expression: "into which he entered."
ExpHept
45. (14, 26) Et ait Dominus ad Moysen et Aaron dicens. Hoc illatum est, cum Dominus et superius loqueretur. Facit hoc saepe Scriptura; cum aliquid aliud vult dicere, iterum inducit loquentem, qui iam loquebatur.
45. (14, 26) Et ait Dominus ad Moysen et Aaron dicens (and the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, saying). This was introduced although the Lord was speaking in the passage above as well. Scripture often does this: when it wishes to say something further, it again introduces as speaking the one who was already speaking.
ExpHept
46. (14, 29) Quotquot murmuraverunt super me. Non ait: "de me," aut: "adversus me."
46. (14, 29) Quotquot murmuraverunt super me (as many as murmured upon me): it did not say "about me" or "against me."
ExpHept
47. (14, 31) Et hereditate possidebunt terram, quam vos abscessistis ab ea. Usitatum esset: "a qua vos abscessistis"; nunc vero et quam abscessistis dictum est non more et additum est: ab ea, sicut Scripturae loqui solent.
47. (14, 31) Et hereditate possidebunt terram, quam vos abscessistis ab ea (and by inheritance they shall possess the land, which you departed from it). The customary form would be "from which you departed"; but as it stands, both quam abscessistis (which you departed) is said in an uncustomary way, and ab ea (from it) is added, as the Scriptures are accustomed to speak.
ExpHept
Sicut est: penitusque sonantes accestis scopulos (VIRGILIO, Aen. 1, 200), id est: accessistis scopulos, non ait: ad scopulos; et: devenere locos (VIRGILIO, Aen. 6, 638), non ait: " ad locos ". Ita quam abscessistis, non ait: " a qua abscessistis ".
It is like the line penitusque sonantes accestis scopulos (and you drew near the deep-resounding crags) (Virgil, Aeneid 1.200), that is, "you approached the crags," he did not say "to the crags"; and devenere locos (they came down to the places) (Virgil, Aeneid 6.638), he did not say "to the places." So too quam abscessistis (which you departed), he did not say "from which you departed."
ExpHept
48. (14, 35) Ego Dominus locutus sum: 'nisi ita fecero synagogae malignae isti.' Quaerendum est sane quid sit quod Graece [MISSING GREEK TEXT] positum est nostri enim interpretes hoc paene ubique interpretati sunt: nisi.
48. (14, 35) Ego Dominus locutus sum: 'nisi ita fecero synagogae malignae isti.' (I the Lord have spoken: "unless I shall do thus to this wicked assembly.") It must indeed be asked what it is that in Greek is placed [Greek text]; for our translators have almost everywhere rendered this as nisi (unless).
ExpHept
49. (15, 18) In terram in quam ego induco vos illuc.
49. (15, 18) In terram in quam ego induco vos illuc (into the land into which I am bringing you thither).
ExpHept
50. (15, 27-28) Si autem anima una peccaverit non sponte, offeret capram unam anniculam pro peccato. Et exorabit sacerdos pro anima invita et quae peccaverit nolenter ante Dominum exorare pro eo; et remittetur ei. In hac sententia et illa locutio notanda erat, quod ait: et exorabit sacerdos, et postea dixit: exorare (utrumque enim simul ita dici posset: "exorabit exorare"), et illa, quod a feminino genere incipiens ad masculinum clausit.
50. (15, 27-28) Si autem anima una peccaverit non sponte, offeret capram unam anniculam pro peccato. Et exorabit sacerdos pro anima invita et quae peccaverit nolenter ante Dominum exorare pro eo; et remittetur ei (but if one soul shall sin unwillingly, it shall offer one she-goat a year old for the sin. And the priest shall make atonement for the unwilling soul and the one who shall have sinned unwillingly before the Lord, to atone for him; and it shall be forgiven him). In this sentence both that expression was to be noted, that it says et exorabit sacerdos (and the priest shall make atonement) and afterward said exorare (to atone)—for both could be said together thus: "shall make atonement to atone"—and that other one, that, beginning from the feminine gender, it closed with the masculine.
ExpHept
Cum enim dixisset: si anima una peccaverit, conclusit dicens: exorare pro eo; ubi intellegitur: "pro eo homine." Nam et quod adiunxit: et dimittetur ei, in latino quidem non apparet, quia hoc pronomen generis omnis est; sed in Graeco masculinum elucet, ubi habet [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod hic positum est: ei.
For when it had said si anima una peccaverit (if one soul shall sin), it concluded by saying exorare pro eo (to atone for him); where "for that man" is understood. For also that which it added, et dimittetur ei (and it shall be forgiven him), in the Latin indeed does not show, because this pronoun is of every gender; but in the Greek the masculine shines out, where it has [Greek text], which is here placed ei (to him).
ExpHept
Quod vero hic dictum est: pro anima invita, intellegitur: "quae invita peccaverit," non quod nolit pro se offerri. Hoc enim etiam consequenter exposuit, cum ait: et quae peccaverit nolenter.
But what is here said, pro anima invita (for the unwilling soul), is understood as "which shall have sinned unwillingly," not that it is unwilling to have an offering made for it. For he explained this as a consequence too when he said et quae peccaverit nolenter (and the one who shall have sinned unwillingly).
ExpHept
Et ideo invita positum est, quia latine non potuit exprimi, quod Graece dictum est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]; non enim potuit dicere: "nolentata," vel quid aliud ab eo quod nolens fecerit.
And invita (unwilling) is set down for this reason, because what was said in Greek could not be expressed in Latin: [Greek text]; for one could not say "having been made unwilling," or anything else from the fact that one acted unwillingly.
ExpHept
51. (15, 30) Et anima quaecumque fecerit in manu superbiae, subauditur: "peccatum." Notandum etiam quod ait: manu superbiae, manum ponens pro "opere" sive "potestate."
51. (15, 30) Et anima quaecumque fecerit in manu superbiae (and whatever soul shall act in the hand of pride): "sin" is understood. It is also to be noted that it says manu superbiae (the hand of pride), putting "hand" for "deed" or "power."
ExpHept
52. (15, 35) Morte moriatur homo; lapidate eum lapidibus omnis synagoga. Et morte moriatur et lapidate lapidibus et lapidate omnis synagoga locutiones sunt inusitatae nobis.
52. (15, 35) Morte moriatur homo; lapidate eum lapidibus omnis synagoga. (let the man die the death; stone him with stones, the whole assembly.) Both morte moriatur (let him die the death) and lapidate lapidibus (stone with stones) and lapidate omnis synagoga (stone, the whole assembly) are expressions unusual to us.
ExpHept
53. (16, 17) Et accipite singuli turibulum suum.
53. (16, 17) Et accipite singuli turibulum suum (and take, each one, his own censer).
ExpHept
54. (16, 33) Et descenderunt ipsi et omnia quae sunt eis. Praesens posuit pro praeterito, sunt pro "erant" vel "fuerunt."
54. (16, 33) Et descenderunt ipsi et omnia quae sunt eis (and they went down, they themselves and all that are theirs). He put the present for the past, sunt (are) for "were" or "had been."
ExpHept
55. (16, 34) Et omnis Israel qui in circuitu eorum fugerunt a voce eorum. Subauditur: "erat"; id est: "omnis Israel qui erat in circuitu eorum."
55. (16, 34) Et omnis Israel qui in circuitu eorum fugerunt a voce eorum (and all Israel who round about them fled at their voice): "was" is understood; that is, "all Israel who was round about them."
ExpHept
56. (16, 37) Quoniam sanctificaverunt turibula peccatorum horum in animabus suis. Non dixit: "quia sanctificaverunt turibula peccatores hi in animabus suis"; sed quasi quaereretur, "quorum turibula," pro eo, ut diceret: "sua," dixit: peccatorum horum, qui autem sanctificaverint, intellegendum reliquit, id est quia ipsi.
56. (16, 37) Quoniam sanctificaverunt turibula peccatorum horum in animabus suis (because they sanctified the censers of these sinners at the cost of their souls). It did not say "because these sinners sanctified the censers at the cost of their souls"; but, as if it were being asked "whose censers," instead of saying "their own," it said peccatorum horum (of these sinners), and left it to be understood who had sanctified them, namely that they themselves had.
ExpHept
57. (17, 8) Et ecce germinavit virga in domum Levi; Latina consuetudo: "in domo Levi" exigeret dici.
57. (17, 8) Et ecce germinavit virga in domum Levi; (and behold, the rod budded into the house of Levi;) Latin usage would require it to be said "in the house of Levi [ablative]."
ExpHept
58. (18, 6) Et ego accepi fratres vestros Levitas de medio filiorum Israel dationem datam Domino. Haec locutio in Latinum necessitate ita translata est; nam Graecus habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Quod si quisquam latine velit exprimere, dicturus est: "datum datum," quia et datum est, secundum quod dicit Apostolus: non quia quaero datum, sed requiro fructum (Phil 4, 17), quod in Graeco [MISSING GREEK TEXT] scriptum est.
58. (18, 6) Et ego accepi fratres vestros Levitas de medio filiorum Israel dationem datam Domino (and I have taken your brothers the Levites from the midst of the sons of Israel, a giving given to the Lord). This expression has been rendered into Latin thus out of necessity; for the Greek has [Greek text]. And if anyone should wish to express it in Latin, he will say "a given thing given," because it both is a given thing, according to what the Apostle says: non quia quaero datum, sed requiro fructum (Phil 4:17) (not that I seek the gift, but I seek the fruit), which in the Greek is written [Greek text].
ExpHept
Et in Genesi: dedit Abraham data filiis suis (Gen 25, 6), Graecus habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], et in Evangelio: nostis bona data dare filiis vestris (Mt 7, 11), [MISSING GREEK TEXT] est in Graeco et [MISSING GREEK TEXT] "datum" est, non nomen sed participium. Ac per hoc "datum datum" dici posset, tamquam datum quod datur, nisi ambiguitas vitanda esset.
And in Genesis: dedit Abraham data filiis suis (Gen 25:6) (Abraham gave gifts to his sons), the Greek has [Greek text]; and in the Gospel: nostis bona data dare filiis vestris (Matt 7:11) (you know how to give good gifts to your children), in the Greek there is [Greek text], and [Greek text] is "a given thing," not a noun but a participle. And on this account "a given thing given" could be said, as a given thing that is given, were it not that the ambiguity must be avoided.
ExpHept
Hanc ambiguitatem quidam nostri interpretes vitare conantes, "donum datum" dixerunt; sed "donum" Graece [MISSING GREEK TEXT] dicitur, non [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Unde hoc loco non recte diceretur, quia non sibi hoc donatum a filiis Israel dicit Deus, sed pro primogenitis sibi debitis redditum; unde et quae redduntur et quae "donantur data" dici possunt. Et ideo omne donum etiam datum est, non omne datum etiam donum est, quia non omne quod datur continuo etiam donatur.
Some of our translators, trying to avoid this ambiguity, said "a gift given"; but "gift" in Greek is called [Greek text], not [Greek text]. Hence in this place it would not be said rightly, because God does not say that this has been given to him as a gift by the sons of Israel, but rendered to him in place of the firstborn owed to him; hence both what is rendered and what is "given as gifts" can be called given things. And therefore every gift is also a given thing, but not every given thing is also a gift, because not everything that is given is at once also given as a gift.
ExpHept
59. (18, 12) Omnis primitia olei et omnis primitia vini et tritici primitia eorum quaecumque dederint Domino tibi dedi ea. Non dixit: "omnem primitivum tibi dedi eum"; sed, cum dixisset: omnis primitia et enumeraret de quibus rebus esset, intulit: tibi dedi ea, nec saltem: "tibi dedi eam," aut: "tibi dedi eas," id est primitias,
59. (18, 12) Omnis primitia olei et omnis primitia vini et tritici primitia eorum quaecumque dederint Domino tibi dedi ea (every firstfruit of oil and every firstfruit of wine and the firstfruit of their wheat, whatever they shall give to the Lord, to you I have given them). It did not say "every firstfruit, to you I have given it"; but, when it had said omnis primitia (every firstfruit) and enumerated of what things it consisted, it added tibi dedi ea (to you I have given them [neuter plural]), not even "to you I have given it [feminine singular]" or "to you I have given them [feminine plural]," that is, the firstfruits,
ExpHept
sed neutrum genus intulit, quod quidem fieri absoluta locutione etiam in Latina lingua solet. Neque hoc quod dictum est: primitia, Latinum videtur; "primitiae" quippe numeri tantum pluralis dici solent. Sed si potuerunt interpretes nostri transferre quod in Graeco invenerunt: non congregabo conventicula eorum de sanguinibus (Ps 15, 4), et alio loco: virum sanguinum et dolosum abominabitur Dominus (Ps 5, 7), cum "sanguis" in Latina lingua numeri sit tantum singularis, cur etiam hic pigeret singularem numerum primitia, sicut habet Graecus, exprimere? Aliqui tamen interpretes primitias transtulerunt et per accusativum casum, ut dicerent: omnes primitias tibi dabo. Ita utramque locutionem nobis inusitatam, quomodo in graeco inventa est, transferre noluerunt.
but it introduced the neuter gender, which indeed is wont to be done by an absolute expression in the Latin language too. Nor does this which was said, primitia (firstfruit), seem Latin; for "firstfruits" is wont to be said only in the plural number. But if our translators could render what they found in the Greek, non congregabo conventicula eorum de sanguinibus (Ps 16:4 (15:4)) (I will not gather their assemblies out of bloods), and in another place virum sanguinum et dolosum abominabitur Dominus (Ps 5:6 (5:7)) (the man of bloods and deceitful the Lord will abhor), although "blood" in the Latin language is of the singular number only, why should it have irked them here too to express the singular number primitia (firstfruit), as the Greek has it? Yet some translators rendered primitias (firstfruits) and in the accusative case, so as to say omnes primitias tibi dabo (all the firstfruits I will give to you). Thus they were unwilling to render either expression, unusual to us, as it was found in the Greek.
ExpHept
60. (19, 2) Loquere filiis Israel, et accipiant ad te iuvencam rufam. Pro eo, ac si diceret: "adducant ad te," aut certe utrumque usitate diceretur: "accipiant et adducant ad te iuvencam rufam."
60. (19, 2) Loquere filiis Israel, et accipiant ad te iuvencam rufam (speak to the sons of Israel, and let them take to you a red heifer), instead of as if it said "let them bring to you," or at least both would be said in the customary way: "let them take and bring to you a red heifer."
ExpHept
61. (19, 7) Et lavabit corpus suum aqua. Hoc intellegeretur etiam si non haberet: aqua.
61. (19, 7) Et lavabit corpus suum aqua (and he shall wash his body with water). This would be understood even if it did not have aqua (with water).
ExpHept
62. (19, 9) Et ponet extra castra in locum mundum. Non: "in loco mundo" dixit, quod Latinae locutionis est.
62. (19, 9) Et ponet extra castra in locum mundum (and he shall put it outside the camp into a clean place). It did not say "in a clean place [ablative]," which belongs to the Latin expression.
ExpHept
63. (19, 15) Omne vas apertum quaecumque non habent alligaturam alligatam super ea.
63. (19, 15) Omne vas apertum quaecumque non habent alligaturam alligatam super ea (every open vessel which do not have a binding bound upon them).
ExpHept
64. (20, 9) Et accepit Moyses virgam quae ante Dominum, subauditur: "erat."
64. (20, 9) Et accepit Moyses virgam quae ante Dominum (and Moses took the rod which before the Lord): "was" is understood.
ExpHept
65. (20, 12) Quia non credidistis sanctificare me in conspectu filiorum Israel, id est: "sanctitatem meam declarare." Secundum istam locutionem dictum est: et pro eis sanctifico me ipsum (Io 17, 19). Et in oratione dominica: sanctificetur nomen tuum (Mt 6, 9).
65. (20, 12) Quia non credidistis sanctificare me in conspectu filiorum Israel (because you did not believe, to sanctify me in the sight of the sons of Israel), that is, "to declare my holiness." According to this expression it is said: et pro eis sanctifico me ipsum (John 17:19) (and for them I sanctify myself). And in the Lord's Prayer: sanctificetur nomen tuum (Matt 6:9) (hallowed be your name).
ExpHept
66. (20, 15) Et incolae fuimus in Aegypto dies plures, "pro annis multis."
66. (20, 15) Et incolae fuimus in Aegypto dies plures (and we were sojourners in Egypt many days), "for many years."
ExpHept
67. (20, 18) Et dixit ad eum Edom, hoc est: gens ipsa (non enim adhuc vivebat Edom, qui erat Esau) sicut isti, qui nuntios miserunt, "Israel" vocabantur, quod prius nomen unius hominis erat.
67. (20, 18) Et dixit ad eum Edom (and Edom said to him)—that is, the nation itself (for Edom, who was Esau, was no longer living)—just as those who sent messengers were called "Israel," which name had earlier been that of one man.
ExpHept
68. (20, 19) Et dicunt ei filii Israel: 'iuxta montem transibimus; si autem de aqua tua biberimus ego et pecora mea, dabo pretium tibi.' Satis eleganter a plurali transit ad singularem numerum, tamquam Israel diceret, cum dixisset: filii Israel, et a verbis coepisset numeri pluralis, quod est: transibimus et biberimus.
68. (20, 19) Et dicunt ei filii Israel: 'iuxta montem transibimus; si autem de aqua tua biberimus ego et pecora mea, dabo pretium tibi.' (and the sons of Israel say to him: "we will pass along by the mountain; but if we drink of your water, I and my cattle, I will give you a price.") Quite elegantly it passes from the plural to the singular number, as though Israel were speaking, when it had said filii Israel (the sons of Israel) and had begun with verbs of the plural number, which is transibimus et biberimus (we will pass and we will drink).
ExpHept
69. (20, 30) Et vidit omnis synagoga, quia dimissus est Aaron. Non facile hoc verbum reperitur in Scripturis dimissus pro eo, quod est "mortuus"; hoc et in Evangelio est, ubi ait Symeon: nunc dimittis servum tuum in pace (Lc 2, 29). Verum tamen habet [MISSING GREEK TEXT] in Graeco, quod magis a "resolutione" quam a "dimissione" dictum sonat; non enim dixit: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod sine dubio est: "dimittis."
69. (20, 30) Et vidit omnis synagoga, quia dimissus est Aaron (and the whole assembly saw that Aaron was released). This word dimissus (released) is not easily found in the Scriptures for what is "dead"; this occurs also in the Gospel, where Symeon says: nunc dimittis servum tuum in pace (Luke 2:29) (now you release your servant in peace). Yet it has [Greek text] in the Greek, which sounds more as derived from "loosing" than from "releasing"; for it did not say [Greek text], which without doubt is "you release."
ExpHept
70. (20, 30) Et fleverunt Aaron triginta dies omnis domus Israel. Non dixit: "flevit," nec dixit: "tota" vel "universa," sed: omnis, quasi plures essent; sicuti est: "omnis homo," quod de omnibus dicitur, longe utique aliud quam "totus homo," quod de uno dicitur. Sed assidue ponit Scriptura "omne" pro "toto."
70. (20, 30) Et fleverunt Aaron triginta dies omnis domus Israel (and the whole house of Israel wept for Aaron thirty days). It did not say "wept [singular]," nor did it say "the entire" or "the whole house," but omnis (all), as though they were many; just as "every man," which is said of all, is something far different from "the whole man," which is said of one. But Scripture constantly puts "every" for "whole."
ExpHept
71. (21, 5) Et detrahebat populus ad Deum et adversus Moysen. Non dixit: "de Deo," sed: ad Deum. Quamvis hanc locutionem quidam transferre nolentes: detrahebant de Deo transtulerunt.
71. (21, 5) Et detrahebat populus ad Deum et adversus Moysen (and the people spoke against God and against Moses). It did not say "of God," but ad Deum (to God). However, some translators, unwilling to render this expression, translated detrahebant de Deo (they spoke against God).
ExpHept
72. (21, 7) Ora ergo ad Dominum ut auferat a nobis serpentem. Sicut et in Exodo dictum est: ranam (Cf. Ex 8, 6; Loc. 2, 41) singularem pro plurali.
72. (21, 7) Ora ergo ad Dominum ut auferat a nobis serpentem (pray therefore to the Lord that he take away from us the serpent). Just as in Exodus it was said ranam (See Exod 8:6; Locutions 2.41) (the frog), the singular for the plural.
ExpHept
73. (21, 9) Et factum est quando momordit serpens hominem, et aspexit in aeneum serpentem, et vivebat. Non solum hoc habet ista locutio, quod vertit modum verbi et ab specie perfecta praeteriti temporis ad imperfectam clausit, sed etiam quod plus habet: et.
73. (21, 9) Et factum est quando momordit serpens hominem, et aspexit in aeneum serpentem, et vivebat (and it came to pass, when the serpent bit a man, and he looked upon the bronze serpent, and he was living). This expression not only has this, that it changes the mood of the verb and from the perfect form of the past tense closes with the imperfect, but also that it has an extra et (and).
ExpHept
74. (21, 11) Et elevantes ex Obot castra collocaverunt in Acalgai trans in eremo. Hoc est: "in ulteriore eremo."
74. (21, 11) Et elevantes ex Obot castra collocaverunt in Acalgai trans in eremo (and setting out from Oboth, they pitched camp in Acalgai across in the desert). This is "in the farther desert."
ExpHept
75. (22, 23) Et percussit asinam in virga. Non dixit: "virga," sed: in virga.
75. (22, 23) Et percussit asinam in virga (and he struck the donkey in the rod). It did not say "with the rod," but in virga (in the rod).
ExpHept
76. (23, 11) In maledictionem inimicorum meorum vocavi te, et ecce benedixisti benedictionem, non dixit: "benedictione," sed, tamquam diceret: "ecce dixisti benedictionem."
76. (23, 11) In maledictionem inimicorum meorum vocavi te, et ecce benedixisti benedictionem (for the cursing of my enemies I called you, and behold, you have blessed a blessing); it did not say "with a blessing," but, as though it said, "behold, you have spoken a blessing."
ExpHept
77. (23, 12) Quaecumque miserit Deus in os meum, hoc observabo loqui. Non dixit: "haec observabo."
77. (23, 12) Quaecumque miserit Deus in os meum, hoc observabo loqui (whatever God shall put into my mouth, this I will be careful to speak). It did not say "these things I will be careful."
ExpHept
78. (23, 13) Veni mecum adhuc in locum alium de quo non videbis eum inde.
78. (23, 13) Veni mecum adhuc in locum alium de quo non videbis eum inde (come with me still to another place from which you will not see it from there).
ExpHept
79. (25, 4) Et ait Dominus ad Moysen: 'accipe duces populi et ostenta eos Domino contra solem, et avertetur ira animationis Domini ab Israel.' Cum Dominus loqueretur, non dixit: "et ostenta eos mihi," et "avertetur ira "mea" ab Israel."
79. (25, 4) Et ait Dominus ad Moysen: 'accipe duces populi et ostenta eos Domino contra solem, et avertetur ira animationis Domini ab Israel.' (and the Lord said to Moses: "take the leaders of the people and display them to the Lord before the sun, and the wrath of the Lord's anger will be turned away from Israel.") Although the Lord was speaking, it did not say "and display them to me," and "the wrath 'of mine' will be turned away from Israel."
ExpHept
80. (25, 15) Domus familiae est Madian. De muliere hoc dixit, quae cum adultero Israelita percussa est. Quibus verbis, quantum puto, intellegi voluit nobilem fuisse, ut diceret eam: domus familiae. Sic iam vulgo ad insigne divitiarum et pater familias et mater familias dicitur.
80. (25, 15) Domus familiae est Madian (she is a house of a family of Midian). He said this of the woman who was slain together with the adulterous Israelite. By which words, as I think, he wished it to be understood that she was noble, so as to call her domus familiae (a house of a family). So now in common speech both "father of a family" and "mother of a family" are said as a mark of riches.
ExpHept
81. (26, 1) Et locutus est Dominus ad Moysen et Eleazar sacerdotem dicens: 'accipe principium totius synagogae filiorum Israel a viginti annis et supra.' Notandum quid appellaverit: principium, robur scilicet aetatis in populo.
81. (26, 1) Et locutus est Dominus ad Moysen et Eleazar sacerdotem dicens: 'accipe principium totius synagogae filiorum Israel a viginti annis et supra.' (and the Lord spoke to Moses and Eleazar the priest, saying: "take the beginning of the whole assembly of the sons of Israel from twenty years old and upward.") It is to be noted what he called principium (the beginning), namely the vigor of age among the people.
ExpHept
82. (27, 20-21) Ut exaudiant eum filii Israel, et: in ore eius exibunt, et: in ore eius introibunt, id est: "cum iusserit."
82. (27, 20-21) Ut exaudiant eum filii Israel (that the sons of Israel may obey him), and in ore eius exibunt (at his mouth they shall go out), and in ore eius introibunt (at his mouth they shall come in), that is, "when he shall have commanded."
ExpHept
83. (27, 22) Et fecit Moyses secundum quae praecepit illi Dominus; et assumens Iesum statuit eum ante Eleazarum sacerdotem et cetera, ubi hoc notandum fuit, quia, cum iam dixisset: et fecit Moyses secundum quae praecepit illi Dominus, eadem ipsa repetit.
83. (27, 22) Et fecit Moyses secundum quae praecepit illi Dominus; et assumens Iesum statuit eum ante Eleazarum sacerdotem et cetera (and Moses did according to what the Lord commanded him; and taking Joshua he set him before Eleazar the priest), where this was to be noted, that, when it had already said et fecit Moyses secundum quae praecepit illi Dominus (and Moses did according to what the Lord commanded him), it repeats the very same words.
ExpHept
84. (27, 23) Et commendavit eum secundum quae praecepit Dominus Moysi. Non ait: "secundum quae praecepit "illi" Dominus."
84. (27, 23) Et commendavit eum secundum quae praecepit Dominus Moysi (and he commended him according to what the Lord commanded Moses). It did not say "according to what the Lord commanded 'him.'"
ExpHept
85. (28, 13) Decimam decimam similaginis consparsam in oleo agno uni; id est: "singulas decimas singulis agnis." Quod enim ait: decimam decimam, significavit quod repetendae sint decimae per agnos singulos.
85. (28, 13) Decimam decimam similaginis consparsam in oleo agno uni (a tenth, a tenth of fine flour mingled with oil for one lamb); that is, "single tenths for single lambs." For when it says decimam decimam (a tenth, a tenth), it signified that the tenths are to be repeated for the individual lambs.
ExpHept
86. (28, 16-17) Et in mense primo quarta decima mensis huius dies festus, septem dies azyma edetis. Notandum diem festum per plures dies celebrari et tamen diem festum dici, non "dies festos" ipsius festivitatis celebrationem, quotquot dies tenuerit.
86. (28, 16-17) Et in mense primo quarta decima mensis huius dies festus, septem dies azyma edetis (and in the first month, on the fourteenth of this month, a feast day; seven days you shall eat unleavened bread). It is to be noted that the feast is celebrated over several days, and yet it is called diem festum (a feast day, singular)—it does not call the celebration of that festival "feast days," however many days it has lasted.
ExpHept
87. (29, 1) Et mense septimo una mensis. Secundum hanc locutionem dictum est in Genesi: et facta est vespera et factum est mane, dies unus (Gen 1, 5); nam et ibi sicut hic Graecus habet [MISSING GREEK TEXT], unde quidam hic interpretantes: "prima die mensis," necessariam locutionem praetermiserunt, quamvis a sententia verborum non recesserint.
87. (29, 1) Et mense septimo una mensis (and in the seventh month, on the one of the month). According to this expression it is said in Genesis: et facta est vespera et factum est mane, dies unus (Gen 1:5) (and there was evening and there was morning, one day); for there, as here, the Greek has [Greek text], whence some, here interpreting "on the first day of the month," passed over the necessary expression, although they did not depart from the sense of the words.
ExpHept
88. (29, 2) Vitulum unum ex bobus, arietem unum. Non ait: "ex ovibus," sicut illud: ex bobus, cum et illud, si deesset, plenum esset.
88. (29, 2) Vitulum unum ex bobus, arietem unum (one calf from the oxen, one ram). It did not say "from the sheep," as it did ex bobus (from the oxen), though that too, if it were absent, would be complete.
ExpHept
89. (29, 2) Agnos anniculos sine vitio septem. Hoc quod in agnis posuit: sine vitio, per omnia subauditur, et in vitulo scilicet et in ariete.
89. (29, 2) Agnos anniculos sine vitio septem (seven lambs a year old without blemish). This which it placed with the lambs, sine vitio (without blemish), is understood throughout—both, that is, with the calf and with the ram.
ExpHept
90. (29, 4) Decima decima agno uni septem agnis, id est: "singula singulis."
90. (29, 4) Decima decima agno uni septem agnis (a tenth, a tenth for one lamb, for seven lambs), that is, "single portions for single lambs."
ExpHept
91. (29, 39) Exceptis votis vestris et voluntaria vestra et holocaustomata vestra et sacrificia vestra et libamina vestra et salutaria vestra. Hanc locutionem, si vel Graeca esset, non notarem. Non enim ait: "exceptis votis vestris et voluntariis vestris et cetera," ut coeperat, sed neque: "excepta vota vestra," ut ab ipso velut soloecismo inciperet,
91. (29, 39) Exceptis votis vestris et voluntaria vestra et holocaustomata vestra et sacrificia vestra et libamina vestra et salutaria vestra (apart from your vows and your freewill offerings and your burnt offerings and your sacrifices and your drink offerings and your peace offerings). This expression, even if it were Greek, I would not note. For it does not say "apart from your vows and your freewill offerings," and so on, as it had begun; but neither "apart-from your vows" [in the nominative], so as to begin with a solecism, as it were,
ExpHept
sed, cum prius recte usitata locutione dixisset: exceptis votis vestris, ea deinde adiunxit per alium casum, ubi subaudiri non possit: "exceptis," sed: "excepta"; quod non admittit nec Graeca nec Latina locutio.
but, when it had first said in the correct and customary expression exceptis votis vestris (apart from your vows), it then added the rest in another case, where "apart from [agreeing with the ablative]" cannot be understood, but rather "excepted [agreeing with a nominative]"; which neither Greek nor Latin expression admits.
ExpHept
92. (30, 3) Homo, homo quicumque voverit votum Domino, pro eo, quod est: "omnis homo."
92. (30, 3) Homo, homo quicumque voverit votum Domino (a man, a man, whoever shall vow a vow to the Lord), instead of "every man."
ExpHept
93. (30, 4) Cum autem mulier voverit votum Domino aut definierit definitionem in domo patris sui in iuventute sua. Hic mulierem feminam dicit, etiamsi virgo sit, more Scripturarum; unde etiam de Christo est, quod ait Apostolus: factum ex muliere (Gal 4, 4).
93. (30, 4) Cum autem mulier voverit votum Domino aut definierit definitionem in domo patris sui in iuventute sua (but when a woman shall vow a vow to the Lord or shall determine a determination in the house of her father in her youth). Here it calls a female mulierem (a woman), even if she be a virgin, after the manner of the Scriptures; whence it is said also of Christ, what the Apostle says: factum ex muliere (Gal 4:4) (made of a woman).
ExpHept
94. (30, 5) Et audierit pater eius vota eius et definitiones eius, quas definivit. Definitiones definivit locutio est.
94. (30, 5) Et audierit pater eius vota eius et definitiones eius, quas definivit (and her father shall hear her vows and her determinations which she determined). Definitiones definivit (she determined determinations) is an expression.
ExpHept
95. (30, 5) Definivit adversus animam suam; id est: "adversus delectationes animae suae."
95. (30, 5) Definivit adversus animam suam (she determined against her soul); that is, "against the delights of her soul."
ExpHept
96. (30, 5) Et tacuerit pater eius, et stabunt omnia vota eius. Hic plus habet: et; nam integer sensus est: "si audierit et tacuerit pater eius, stabunt omnia vota eius."
96. (30, 5) Et tacuerit pater eius, et stabunt omnia vota eius (and her father shall be silent, and all her vows shall stand). Here it has an extra et (and); for the complete sense is "if her father shall hear and be silent, all her vows shall stand."
ExpHept
97. (30, 7) Si autem facta fuerit viro, intellegitur: "nupserit"; Scriptura sic loquitur.
97. (30, 7) Si autem facta fuerit viro (but if she shall have been made to a man), it is understood "shall have married"; Scripture speaks thus.
ExpHept
98. (30, 7) Et vota eius super eam, subauditur: "sunt," quod nonnulli etiam interpretes addiderunt.
98. (30, 7) Et vota eius super eam (and her vows upon her): "are" is understood, which some translators even added.
ExpHept
99. (30, 13) Omnia quaecumque exierint ex labiis eius secundum vota eius et secundum definitiones quae adversus animam eius, non manet ei, cum exspectaretur numerus pluralis, ut diceret: "non manent ei"; nam ita nonnulli interpretati sunt vitantes istum quasi soloecismum.
99. (30, 13) Omnia quaecumque exierint ex labiis eius secundum vota eius et secundum definitiones quae adversus animam eius, non manet ei (all whatever shall have gone forth from her lips according to her vows and according to the determinations which against her soul, does not remain for her), when one would expect the plural number, so as to say "do not remain for her"; for thus some translated, avoiding this seeming solecism.
ExpHept
100. (31, 4) Mille ex tribu et mille ex tribu, ex omnibus tribubus Israel. Numquid duodecies dixit mille? Et tamen repetitio ista "millenos" significat.
100. (31, 4) Mille ex tribu et mille ex tribu, ex omnibus tribubus Israel (a thousand from a tribe and a thousand from a tribe, from all the tribes of Israel). Did it really say mille (a thousand) twelve times? And yet this repetition signifies "a thousand from each."
ExpHept
101. (31, 8) Interfecerunt in gladio, quod usitate diceretur: "interfecerunt gladio."
101. (31, 8) Interfecerunt in gladio (they slew in the sword), which would customarily be said "they slew with the sword."
ExpHept
102. (31, 10) Et omnes civitates eorum quae in habitationibus eorum. Subauditur: "erant."
102. (31, 10) Et omnes civitates eorum quae in habitationibus eorum (and all their cities which in their dwellings): "were" is understood.
ExpHept
103. (31, 10) Et villas eorum succenderunt in igni, quod usitate diceretur: "succenderunt igni."
103. (31, 10) Et villas eorum succenderunt in igni (and their villages they burned in fire), which would customarily be said "they burned with fire."
ExpHept
104. (31, 18) Et omnem multitudinem mulierum, quae non novit concubitum masculi, vivificate. Nusquam certius apparet Hebraea locutione "mulieres" etiam virgines dici solere.
104. (31, 18) Et omnem multitudinem mulierum, quae non novit concubitum masculi, vivificate (and all the multitude of women who has not known the bed of a male, keep alive). Nowhere does it appear more certainly that by Hebrew expression even virgins are wont to be called "women."
ExpHept
105. (31, 28-29) Et a dimidia parte eorum accipietis, et dabis ea Eleazar sacerdoti primitias Domini. Non dixit: "dabitis."
105. (31, 28-29) Et a dimidia parte eorum accipietis, et dabis ea Eleazar sacerdoti primitias Domini (and from their half part you [plural] shall take, and you [singular] shall give them to Eleazar the priest as firstfruits of the Lord). It did not say "you [plural] shall give."
ExpHept
106. (31, 35) Et animae hominum a mulieribus, quae non cognoverunt concubitum viri, omnis anima duo et triginta milia. Et hic superior locutio confirmata est "mulieres" dici etiam quae non cognoverunt concubitum viri, id est virgines.
106. (31, 35) Et animae hominum a mulieribus, quae non cognoverunt concubitum viri, omnis anima duo et triginta milia (and the souls of persons from among the women who had not known the bed of a man, every soul thirty-two thousand). Here too the earlier expression is confirmed, that even those who had not known the bed of a man, that is, virgins, are called "women."
ExpHept
107. (31, 54) Et accepit Moyses et Eleazar sacerdos aurum a chiliarchis et a centurionibus et intulit ea in tabernaculum testimonii. Videtur dicere debuisse: "et intulit illud in tabernaculum testimonii," quoniam aurum acceptum esse praedixerat, et plerique Latini codices sic habent; sed ideo pluraliter videtur illatum ut diceret: intulit ea, quia multa vasa fuerant superius commemorata, in quibus erat hoc aurum.
107. (31, 54) Et accepit Moyses et Eleazar sacerdos aurum a chiliarchis et a centurionibus et intulit ea in tabernaculum testimonii (and Moses and Eleazar the priest took the gold from the captains of thousands and from the centurions and brought them into the tabernacle of testimony). It seems it ought to have said "and brought it into the tabernacle of testimony," since it had stated that gold had been taken, and most Latin manuscripts have it so; but it seems to have been brought in as a plural, so as to say intulit ea (brought them), because many vessels had been mentioned above, in which this gold was.
ExpHept
108. (32, 1) Et pecora multitudo erat filiis Ruben et filiis Gad, multitudo copiosa valde; non dixit: "et pecorum multitudo erat."
108. (32, 1) Et pecora multitudo erat filiis Ruben et filiis Gad, multitudo copiosa valde (and cattle, a multitude, there was to the sons of Reuben and to the sons of Gad, a very abundant multitude); it did not say "and there was a multitude of cattle."
ExpHept
109. (32, 1) Et viderunt regionem Iazer et regionem Galaad, et erat locus locus pecoribus. Non iungendum est in pronuntiatione quod bis dixit locus; sed subdistinguendum: et erat locus, et deinde inferendum: locus pecoribus. Quasi enim exspectaretur qualis locus, ita repetitio eleganter illata est.
109. (32, 1) Et viderunt regionem Iazer et regionem Galaad, et erat locus locus pecoribus (and they saw the region of Jazer and the region of Gilead, and there was a place, a place for cattle). What it said twice, locus (a place), is not to be joined in pronunciation; rather a slight pause is to be made: et erat locus (and there was a place), and then to be added locus pecoribus (a place for cattle). For, as though one waited to learn what sort of place, the repetition is elegantly introduced.
ExpHept
110. (32, 2) Et accedentes filii Ruben et filii Gad dixerunt ad Moysen et Eleazar sacerdotem et ad principes synagogae dicentes. Non est ista vel Graeca vel Latina locutio: dixerunt dicentes, sed Hebraea videtur.
110. (32, 2) Et accedentes filii Ruben et filii Gad dixerunt ad Moysen et Eleazar sacerdotem et ad principes synagogae dicentes (and the sons of Reuben and the sons of Gad, drawing near, said to Moses and Eleazar the priest and to the leaders of the assembly, saying). This is neither a Greek nor a Latin expression, dixerunt dicentes (they said, saying), but seems Hebrew.
ExpHept
111. (32, 5) Detur terra ista famulis tuis in possessionem; quasi de aliis dicerent, cum sibi peterent.
111. (32, 5) Detur terra ista famulis tuis in possessionem (let this land be given to your servants for a possession); as though they spoke of others, when they were asking for themselves.
ExpHept
112. (32, 12) Non enim secuti sunt post me praeter Chaleb filius Iephone. Videtur dicere debuisse: "praeter Chaleb filium Iephone"; sed nominative intulit, quia praecessit: secuti sunt. Est autem ista locutio etiam Latina, sed rara.
112. (32, 12) Non enim secuti sunt post me praeter Chaleb filius Iephone (for they did not follow after me, except Caleb the son of Jephone). It seems it ought to have said "except Caleb the son of Jephone [accusative]"; but it introduced it in the nominative, because secuti sunt (they followed) precedes. This expression is also Latin, but rare.
ExpHept
113. (32, 13) Donec consumeretur omnis generatio facientes maligna in conspectu Domini. Non dixit: "faciens maligna," neque: "facientium maligna."
113. (32, 13) Donec consumeretur omnis generatio facientes maligna in conspectu Domini (until the whole generation should be consumed, doing [nominative plural] wicked things in the sight of the Lord). It did not say "doing [nominative singular] wicked things," nor "of those doing [genitive plural] wicked things."
ExpHept
114. (32, 16) Et accesserunt ei et dicebant. Non ait quod usitatum est: "accesserunt ad eum."
114. (32, 16) Et accesserunt ei et dicebant (and they approached him and were saying). It did not say what is customary, "they approached to him."
ExpHept
115. (32, 24) Et aedificabitis vobis ipsis civitates impedimentis vestris. Ac si diceret: "aedificabitis vobis ipsis civitates propter impedimenta vestra."
115. (32, 24) Et aedificabitis vobis ipsis civitates impedimentis vestris (and you shall build for yourselves cities for your baggage). As though it said "you shall build for yourselves cities on account of your baggage."
ExpHept
116. (32, 26-27) Impedimenta nostra et uxores nostrae et omnia pecora nostra erunt in civitatibus Galaad; pueri autem tui transibunt omnes armati. Non dixerunt: "nos autem transibimus omnes armati," sed tamquam de aliis dicerent.
116. (32, 26-27) Impedimenta nostra et uxores nostrae et omnia pecora nostra erunt in civitatibus Galaad; pueri autem tui transibunt omnes armati (our baggage and our wives and all our cattle shall be in the cities of Gilead; but your servants will pass over, all armed). They did not say "but we will pass over, all armed," but as though they spoke of others.
ExpHept
117. (32, 28) Et commendavit eis Moyses Eleazar sacerdotem et Iesum filium Nave et principes familiarum tribuum Israel. Non ait: "commendavit eos Moyses Eleazar sacerdoti," quod utique ordo locutionis usitatae exigebat; per hos enim introducti sunt in terram, quam petebant; unde magis illi istis a quibus introducebantur in terram postulatam quam isti qui introducebant illis quos introducebant commendati videntur.
117. (32, 28) Et commendavit eis Moyses Eleazar sacerdotem et Iesum filium Nave et principes familiarum tribuum Israel (and Moses commended to them Eleazar the priest and Joshua the son of Nun and the leaders of the families of the tribes of Israel). It did not say "Moses commended them to Eleazar the priest," which the order of the customary expression certainly required; for through these men they were brought into the land they were seeking. Hence the latter rather seem commended to the former, by whom they were being brought into the land they had asked for, than the former, who were doing the bringing, commended to the latter, whom they were bringing in.
ExpHept
118. (32, 30) Si autem non transierint armati vobiscum in bellum in conspectu Domini, et transferte impedimenta eorum; plus habet: et.
118. (32, 30) Si autem non transierint armati vobiscum in bellum in conspectu Domini, et transferte impedimenta eorum (but if they shall not pass over armed with you into battle in the sight of the Lord, then transfer their baggage); it has an extra et (and).
ExpHept
119. (32, 33) Et dedit eis Moyses filiis Gad et filiis Ruben; plus habet: eis.
119. (32, 33) Et dedit eis Moyses filiis Gad et filiis Ruben (and Moses gave to them, to the sons of Gad and to the sons of Reuben); it has an extra eis (to them).
ExpHept
120. (33, 14) Et non ibi erat aqua populo bibere; pro eo, quod est: "ad bibendum."
120. (33, 14) Et non ibi erat aqua populo bibere (and there was no water there for the people to drink); instead of what is "for drinking."
ExpHept
121. (33, 51) Loquere filiis Israel et dices ad eos. Sufficere videtur: loquere filiis Israel.
121. (33, 51) Loquere filiis Israel et dices ad eos (speak to the sons of Israel and you shall say to them). It seems to suffice: loquere filiis Israel (speak to the sons of Israel).
ExpHept
122. (33, 52) Et omnia idola fusilia eorum perdetis ea. Plus habet: ea.
122. (33, 52) Et omnia idola fusilia eorum perdetis ea (and all their molten idols you shall destroy them). It has an extra ea (them).
ExpHept
123. (34, 6) Hoc erit vobis fines maris. Non dixit: "hi erunt vobis."
123. (34, 6) Hoc erit vobis fines maris (this shall be for you the borders of the sea). It did not say "these shall be for you."
ExpHept
124. (34, 7) Et hoc erit vobis fines ad aquilonem; eadem repetita locutio est.
124. (34, 7) Et hoc erit vobis fines ad aquilonem (and this shall be for you the borders toward the north); the same expression is repeated.
ExpHept
125. (35, 3) Et erunt civitates eis habitare, pro eo, quod dici solet: "ad habitandum."
125. (35, 3) Et erunt civitates eis habitare (and the cities shall be for them to dwell), instead of what is wont to be said, "for dwelling."
ExpHept
126. (35, 11) Refugia erunt vobis fugere illo homicidam; quod usitate dici potest: "ut fugiat illo homicida."
126. (35, 11) Refugia erunt vobis fugere illo homicidam (they shall be refuges for you, for the manslayer to flee thither); which can customarily be said "that the manslayer may flee thither."
ExpHept
127. (35, 15) Et incolae qui in vobis istae civitates in refugium. Singulari numero positum est: incolae, id est: "huic incolae qui in vobis," quoniam minus habet: "est." Non enim ait: "qui in vobis est," notissima locutione, sed rariore in lingua Latina quam in Graeca.
127. (35, 15) Et incolae qui in vobis istae civitates in refugium (and the sojourners who among you, these cities for a refuge). Incolae (sojourners) is set in the singular number, that is, "for this sojourner who is among you," since it lacks "is." For it did not say "who is among you," by a most familiar expression, but by one rarer in the Latin language than in Greek.
ExpHept
Bk. 5Expressions in DeuteronomyLocutiones de Deuteronomio
1. (1, 7) Usque ad flumen magnum, flumen Euphratem. Non dixit: "usque ad flumen magnum Euphratem."
1. (1, 7) Usque ad flumen magnum, flumen Euphratem (as far as the great river, the river Euphrates). It did not say "as far as the great river Euphrates."
ExpHept
2. (1, 17) Et iudicium quod durum fuerit a vobis, afferetis illud ad me. Non dixit: "quod durum fuerit vobis," sed: a vobis, id est ita durum ut a vobis iudicari non possit.
2. (1, 17) Et iudicium quod durum fuerit a vobis, afferetis illud ad me (and the judgment that shall be hard from you, you shall bring it to me). It did not say "that shall be hard for you," but a vobis (from you), that is, so hard that it cannot be judged by you.
ExpHept
3. (1, 35) Si videbit aliquis virorum istorum terram optimam hanc, quam iuravi patribus eorum praeter Chaleb filius Iephone; hic videbit eam. Et in libro Numerorum istam locutionem notavimus (Cf. Quaest. 4, 112), quia non dixit: "praeter Chaleb filium Iephone," sed: filius.
3. (1, 35) Si videbit aliquis virorum istorum terram optimam hanc, quam iuravi patribus eorum praeter Chaleb filius Iephone; hic videbit eam (if any of these men shall see this most excellent land which I swore to their fathers, except Caleb the son of Jephone; he shall see it). In the book of Numbers too we noted this expression (See Questions 4.112), that it did not say "except Caleb the son [accusative] of Jephone," but filius (the son [nominative]).
ExpHept
4. (2, 7) Dominus enim Deus vester benedixit te in omni opere manuum tuarum. Non ait: "benedixit vos in omni opere manuum vestrarum," cum praedixisset: vester, non: "tuus."
4. (2, 7) Dominus enim Deus vester benedixit te in omni opere manuum tuarum (for the Lord your [plural] God has blessed you [singular] in every work of your [singular] hands). It did not say "has blessed you [plural] in every work of your [plural] hands," although it had said beforehand vester (your [plural]), not "your [singular]."
ExpHept
5. (2, 24) Nunc ergo surgite et promovete et pertransite vos vallem Arnon; ecce tradidi in manus tuas Seon regem Esebon. Non dixit: "in manus vestras," sed a plurali ad singularem transiit.
5. (2, 24) Nunc ergo surgite et promovete et pertransite vos vallem Arnon; ecce tradidi in manus tuas Seon regem Esebon (now therefore rise and set out and pass over, you [plural], the valley of Arnon; behold, I have delivered into your [singular] hands Sihon king of Heshbon). It did not say "into your [plural] hands," but passed from the plural to the singular.
ExpHept
6. (4, 7) Quoniam quae est gens magna cui est ei Deus appropians illis? Duo sunt hic notanda: vel quod ait: cui est ei, vel quod non ait: "appropians illi," sed: appropians illis.
6. (4, 7) Quoniam quae est gens magna cui est ei Deus appropians illis? (for what is the great nation to which there is to it a God drawing near to them?) Two things are to be noted here: either that it says cui est ei (to which there is to it), or that it does not say "drawing near to it," but appropians illis (drawing near to them).
ExpHept
7. (4, 12) Et similitudinem non vidistis sed vocem, cum vox non possit videri; sed generaliter hoc verbum posuit, tamquam ad omnem corporis sensum videre pertineat.
7. (4, 12) Et similitudinem non vidistis sed vocem (and a likeness you did not see, but a voice), although a voice cannot be seen; but it used this word in a general way, as though "to see" pertained to every sense of the body.
ExpHept
8. (4, 5. 14) In quam vos ingredimini illo hereditare eam; plenum esset, etiamsi non additum esset illo.
8. (4, 5. 14) In quam vos ingredimini illo hereditare eam (into which you are entering thither to inherit it); it would be complete even if illo (thither) were not added.
ExpHept
9. (4, 20) Et eduxit vos de fornace ferrea ex Aegypto; fornacem ferream duram tribulationem intellegi voluit. Secundum hoc et de Ioseph dictum est in Psalmis: ferrum pertransit animam eius (Ps 104, 18).
9. (4, 20) Et eduxit vos de fornace ferrea ex Aegypto (and he brought you out of the iron furnace, out of Egypt); by the iron furnace he wished a hard tribulation to be understood. According to this it is also said of Joseph in the Psalms: ferrum pertransit animam eius (Ps 105:18 (104:18)) (the iron passed through his soul).
ExpHept
10. (4, 22) Et non transeo Iordanem hunc, quasi et alius sit Iordanes. Ex hac locutione arbitror saepe dici etiam "hunc mundum," quasi alius sit.
10. (4, 22) Et non transeo Iordanem hunc (and I do not cross this Jordan), as though there were also another Jordan. From this expression I think that "this world" too is often said, as though there were another.
ExpHept
11. (4, 25) Si autem genueris filios et filios filiorum tuorum; notanda locutio est, ubi et avos nepotes dicit gignere.
11. (4, 25) Si autem genueris filios et filios filiorum tuorum (but if you shall beget sons and the sons of your sons); the expression is to be noted, where it says that grandfathers too beget grandsons.
ExpHept
12. (4, 29) Et quaeretis ibi Dominum Deum vestrum et invenietis eum, quando exquiretis eum ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua in tribulatione tua; non dixit: "in toto corde vestro et in tota anima vestra in tribulatione vestra."
12. (4, 29) Et quaeretis ibi Dominum Deum vestrum et invenietis eum, quando exquiretis eum ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua in tribulatione tua (and you [plural] shall seek there the Lord your [plural] God and shall find him, when you [singular] shall seek him out with your [singular] whole heart and with your [singular] whole soul in your [singular] tribulation); it did not say "with your [plural] whole heart and with your [plural] whole soul in your [plural] tribulation."
ExpHept
13. (4, 32) Interrogate dies priores, qui fuerunt priores te; non "homines" sed "dies" intellegendum est. Similiter et hoc notandum, quod etiam superius, cum dixerit: interrogate pluraliter, priores te intulit singulariter, non: "priores vobis."
13. (4, 32) Interrogate dies priores, qui fuerunt priores te (ask the former days, which were before you); not "men" but "days" is to be understood. Likewise this too is to be noted, that here as well, when it had said interrogate (ask) in the plural, it introduced priores te (before you) in the singular, not "before you [plural]."
ExpHept
14. (4, 34) Si et tentavit Deus ingressus accipere sibi gentem de media gente; tentavit pro eo, quod est "voluit," positum est. An quid aliud? Quod autem ait: de media gente, "de mediis gentibus" intellegendum est singulari posito pro plurali; sicut serpentem, ranam, et locustam pro "serpentibus" et "ranis" et "locustis" scriptum legimus.
14. (4, 34) Si et tentavit Deus ingressus accipere sibi gentem de media gente (whether God has even attempted, entering in, to take for himself a nation from the midst of a nation); tentavit (attempted) is set down for what is "willed." Or what else? But what it says, de media gente (from the midst of a nation), is to be understood as "from the midst of the nations," the singular being put for the plural; just as we read written serpentem, ranam, and locustam (the serpent, the frog, and the locust) for "serpents" and "frogs" and "locusts."
ExpHept
15. (4, 34) Secundum omnia, quae fecit Dominus Deus vester in Aegypto coram te vidente; nihil minus est, et si non addatur: vidente.
15. (4, 34) Secundum omnia, quae fecit Dominus Deus vester in Aegypto coram te vidente (according to all that the Lord your [plural] God did in Egypt before you [singular] looking on); nothing is lacking even if vidente (looking on) is not added.
ExpHept
16. (5, 5) Et ego stabam inter Dominum et vos in tempore illo annuntiare vobis verba Domini, quoniam timuistis a facie ignis et non ascendistis in montem, dicens: 'ego sum Dominus Deus tuus,' et cetera; dicens posuit pro: "cum diceret."
16. (5, 5) Et ego stabam inter Dominum et vos in tempore illo annuntiare vobis verba Domini, quoniam timuistis a facie ignis et non ascendistis in montem, dicens: 'ego sum Dominus Deus tuus,' et cetera (and I was standing between the Lord and you at that time to announce to you the words of the Lord, because you feared before the face of the fire and did not go up the mountain, saying: "I am the Lord your God," and so on); it put dicens (saying) for "when he said."
ExpHept
17. (5, 14) Et advena, qui incolit in te; populo dictum accipiendum est, non quasi uni homini, quia in populo incolit advena.
17. (5, 14) Et advena, qui incolit in te (and the stranger who dwells in you); it is to be taken as said to the people, not as though to one man, because a stranger dwells within a people.
ExpHept
18. (5, 15) Propter hoc constituit tibi Dominus Deus tuus ut observes diem Sabbati et sanctificare eum. Si: et non haberet, non videretur inusitata locutio: "ut observes diem Sabbati sanctificare eum"; aut certe si ita esset: "ut observes diem Sabbati et sanctifices eum";
18. (5, 15) Propter hoc constituit tibi Dominus Deus tuus ut observes diem Sabbati et sanctificare eum (on this account the Lord your God appointed for you that you should keep the Sabbath day and to sanctify it). If it did not have et (and), it would not seem an unusual expression: "that you should keep the Sabbath day, to sanctify it"; or at least if it were thus: "that you should keep the Sabbath day and may sanctify it";
ExpHept
aut ita: "propter hoc constituit tibi Dominus Deus tuus observare diem Sabbati et sanctificare eum." Nunc vero: ut observes diem Sabbati et sanctificare eum inusitata et notanda locutio est.
or thus: "on this account the Lord your God appointed for you to keep the Sabbath day and to sanctify it." But as it stands, ut observes diem Sabbati et sanctificare eum (that you should keep the Sabbath day and to sanctify it) is an unusual expression and to be noted.
ExpHept
19. (6, 13) Attende tibi, ne dilatetur cor tuum et obliviscaris Domini Dei tui; notandum etiam in malo dici posse dilatationem cordis; exsultatio quippe in dilatatione intellegitur, cui contrariae sunt angustiae, id est tristitia. Utrumque autem potest et in bono et in malo accipi.
19. (6, 13) Attende tibi, ne dilatetur cor tuum et obliviscaris Domini Dei tui (take heed to yourself, lest your heart be enlarged and you forget the Lord your God); it is to be noted that an enlarging of the heart can be spoken of in a bad sense as well; for exultation is understood in an enlarging, to which narrowness, that is, sadness, is contrary. But each can be taken both in a good and in a bad sense.
ExpHept
20. (6, 20) Et erit cum interrogaverit te filius tuus cras dicens; cras posuit pro futuro quocumque tempore.
20. (6, 20) Et erit cum interrogaverit te filius tuus cras dicens (and it shall be, when your son shall ask you tomorrow, saying); it put cras (tomorrow) for any future time whatever.
ExpHept
21. (7, 1) Septem gentes magnas et multas; quomodo ergo multas, si septem? Sed multas dixit "multitudinem habentes."
21. (7, 1) Septem gentes magnas et multas (seven nations great and many); how, then, "many," if seven? But it said multas (many) for "having a multitude."
ExpHept
22. (7, 2) Non dispones ad eos testamentum, cum de gentibus diceret: testamentum ergo pro "pacto" posuit.
22. (7, 2) Non dispones ad eos testamentum (you shall not arrange a covenant with them), although it was speaking of nations; therefore it put testamentum (covenant) for "pact."
ExpHept
23. (7, 3-4) Et filiam eius non sumes filio tuo; discedere enim faciet filium tuum a me et serviet diis aliis et irascetur indignatione Dominus in vos; non ait: "irascar," sed tamquam de alio diceret.
23. (7, 3-4) Et filiam eius non sumes filio tuo; discedere enim faciet filium tuum a me et serviet diis aliis et irascetur indignatione Dominus in vos (and you shall not take his daughter for your son; for he will make your son depart from me and he will serve other gods and the Lord will be angry with indignation against you); it did not say "I will be angry," but as though it spoke of another.
ExpHept
24. (9, 1) Civitates magnas et muratas usque in caelum; [MISSING GREEK TEXT] dictum.
24. (9, 1) Civitates magnas et muratas usque in caelum (cities great and walled up to heaven); said as a hyperbole.
ExpHept
25. (9, 4) Ne dicas in corde tuo: 'cum consumpserit Dominus Deus tuus gentes istas ante faciem tuam, dicens: 'propter iustitias meas induxit me Dominus hereditare terram bonam istam.' Ordo est: "ne dicas in corde tuo dicens."
25. (9, 4) Ne dicas in corde tuo: 'cum consumpserit Dominus Deus tuus gentes istas ante faciem tuam, dicens: 'propter iustitias meas induxit me Dominus hereditare terram bonam istam.' (do not say in your heart, "when the Lord your God shall have consumed these nations before your face," saying, "for my righteous deeds the Lord brought me in to inherit this good land.") The order is "do not say in your heart saying."
ExpHept
26. (9, 28) Ne quando dicant inhabitantes terram 'unde eduxisti nos inde'; more Scripturae additum est: inde.
26. (9, 28) Ne quando dicant inhabitantes terram 'unde eduxisti nos inde' (lest at any time the inhabitants of the land say, "from where you brought us out, from there"); after the manner of Scripture inde (from there) is added.
ExpHept
27. (11, 3) Quae fecit virtutem Aegyptiorum. Hoc interpretes quidam Latini minus intellegentes noluerunt dicere virtutem, sed virtuti, vel exercitui, quoniam id, quod ait Graecus [MISSING GREEK TEXT], nonnulli "exercitum" intellexerunt; sed elegans locutio est: quae fecit virtutem eorum intellegendum est, quid eam fecit, quoniam ad nihil eam redegit. Sed quia pluraliter dictum est, ideo suboscurum est.
27. (11, 3) Quae fecit virtutem Aegyptiorum (which he did to the power of the Egyptians). Some Latin translators, understanding this too little, were unwilling to say virtutem (the power [accusative]), but virtuti (to the power [dative]) or exercitui (to the army), since what the Greek says, [Greek text], some understood as "army"; but the expression is elegant: quae fecit virtutem eorum (which he did to their power) is to be understood as "what he did to it," since he reduced it to nothing. But because it was said in the plural, it is therefore somewhat obscure.
ExpHept
28. (11, 6) Quos aperiens terra os suum deglutivit eos et domos eorum et tabernacula eorum. Duae locutiones hic notandae sunt, quod et additum est: eos, cum sufficere potuisset, quod et ait superius: quos, et: domos eorum cum dixisset, addidit: et tabernacula eorum, quasi alias in eremo haberent domos nisi tabernacula. Sed nimirum domos intellegi voluit homines ad eos pertinentes, sicut ipsi populo dicitur: et nunc tu, domus Iacob (Isa 2, 5). Nec ista locutio aliena est a Latina lingua; nam et Romani dicti sunt domus Assaraci (Cf. VIRGILIO, Aen. 1, 284), quod ex Assaraco Troiano originem ducerent.
28. (11, 6) Quos aperiens terra os suum deglutivit eos et domos eorum et tabernacula eorum (whom the earth, opening its mouth, swallowed them up and their houses and their tents). Two expressions are to be noted here: that eos (them) was added, when what it also says above, quos (whom), could have sufficed; and that, when it had said domos eorum (their houses), it added et tabernacula eorum (and their tents), as though they had other houses in the desert besides tents. But doubtless it wished "houses" to be understood as the people belonging to them, just as it is said to the people itself: et nunc tu, domus Iacob (Isa 2:5) (and now you, house of Jacob). Nor is this expression foreign to the Latin language; for the Romans too were called the house of Assaracus (See Virgil, Aeneid 1.284), because they traced their origin from Assaracus the Trojan.
ExpHept
29. (11, 7) Quoniam oculi vestri videbant omnia opera Domini magna, quae fecit in vobis hodie. Cum de his operibus diceret, quae per eremum facta sunt eo tempore, quo ibi circumducebantur per quadraginta annos, tamen hodie dixit, quod intellegi voluit "hoc tempore," quotquot ibi annos idem tempus habere potuisset.
29. (11, 7) Quoniam oculi vestri videbant omnia opera Domini magna, quae fecit in vobis hodie (for your eyes were seeing all the great works of the Lord which he did among you today). Although it was speaking of those works that were done in the desert at the time when they were being led about there for forty years, yet it said hodie (today), by which it wished "this time" to be understood, however many years that same period could have had.
ExpHept
30. (11, 9) Terram, quam iuravit Dominus patribus vestris dare eis et semini eorum post eos. Tamquam diceret: "id est semini eorum post eos." Non enim et ipsis dedit, sed ita ipsis dedit, cum semini eorum dedit.
30. (11, 9) Terram, quam iuravit Dominus patribus vestris dare eis et semini eorum post eos (the land which the Lord swore to your fathers to give to them and to their seed after them). As though it said "that is, to their seed after them." For he did not give it to them as well, but he so gave it to them when he gave it to their seed.
ExpHept
31. (11, 13) Si autem auditu audieritis omnia mandata eius, quae ego mando tibi hodie. Auditu videtur superfluum, sed locutio est Scripturae Sanctae familiarissima.
31. (11, 13) Si autem auditu audieritis omnia mandata eius, quae ego mando tibi hodie (but if by hearing you shall hear all his commandments which I command you today). Auditu (by hearing) seems superfluous, but it is an expression most familiar to Holy Scripture.
ExpHept
32. (11, 14) Et dabit pluviam terrae tuae in tempore suo matutinam et serotinam. Cum "matutinum tempus" dies dicatur, numquid hinc intellegi voluit tempus anni primum? Serotinum vero minus Latinum est, sed non potuit magis proprie de Graeco exprimi, quod illi dicunt: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]; tamen etiam in Latina lingua vulgo usitatum est, ut dicatur "serotinum," sed quod tardius quam oporteat factum est. Hic vero tempus anni potius intellegi voluit.
32. (11, 14) Et dabit pluviam terrae tuae in tempore suo matutinam et serotinam (and he will give rain to your land in its season, the early and the late). Since the "morning time" is called day, did he perhaps wish the first season of the year to be understood from this? But serotinum (late) is less Latin, though it could not be more properly expressed from the Greek, which they call [Greek text]; yet it is in common use in the Latin language too that something be called "late," but as what was done later than it ought. Here, however, he rather wished a season of the year to be understood.
ExpHept
33. (11, 15-16) Et cum ederis et satiatus fueris, attende tibi ipsi, ne dilatetur cor tuum, et praevaricemini et serviatis diis aliis. Iam superius tales locutiones notavimus, sive quod a singulari ad pluralem transit sive quod in malo voluit intellegi: dilatetur, ubi noxiam prosperitatem significavit.
33. (11, 15-16) Et cum ederis et satiatus fueris, attende tibi ipsi, ne dilatetur cor tuum, et praevaricemini et serviatis diis aliis (and when you shall have eaten and been filled, take heed to yourself, lest your heart be enlarged, and you transgress and serve other gods). We have already noted such expressions above, both that it passes from the singular to the plural, and that it wished dilatetur (be enlarged) to be understood in a bad sense, where it signified harmful prosperity.
ExpHept
34. (11, 24) Et flumen magnum, flumen Euphratem; repetitiones istae usitatae sunt in Scripturis et rem decenter commendant.
34. (11, 24) Et flumen magnum, flumen Euphratem (and the great river, the river Euphrates); these repetitions are customary in the Scriptures and commend the matter fittingly.
ExpHept
35. (11, 25) Timorem vestrum et tremorem vestrum imponet Dominus Deus vester super faciem universae terrae; non timorem et tremorem, quo ipsi timent et tremunt, sed quo timentur et alios tremere faciunt.
35. (11, 25) Timorem vestrum et tremorem vestrum imponet Dominus Deus vester super faciem universae terrae (your fear and your trembling the Lord your God will lay upon the face of the whole earth); not the fear and trembling by which they themselves fear and tremble, but by which they are feared and make others tremble.
ExpHept
36. (12, 17) Non poteris manducare in civitatibus tuis decimationem frumenti tui. Pro eo, quod est: "non debebis."
36. (12, 17) Non poteris manducare in civitatibus tuis decimationem frumenti tui (you shall not be able to eat in your cities the tithe of your grain). Instead of what is "you shall not be permitted."
ExpHept
37. (13, 16) Et incendes civitatem in igni; nos usitatius diceremus: "igni."
37. (13, 16) Et incendes civitatem in igni (and you shall burn the city in fire); we would say more customarily "with fire."
ExpHept
38. (14, 24) Si autem longe fuerit via a te, ac si diceret: "longa via erit"; adverbium posuit pro nomine.
38. (14, 24) Si autem longe fuerit via a te (but if the way shall be far from you), as if it said "the way will be long"; it put an adverb for a noun.
ExpHept
39. (15, 6) Et fenerabis gentes multas. Fenerationem Scriptura dicit mutuo "datam" pecuniam, etiam si usurae non accipiantur; unde est et illud in Psalmo: beatus vir, qui miseretur et commodat (Ps 111, 5). Hoc enim maluerunt interpretari nostri, qui sententiam potius quam verba sequenda putaverunt; nam in Graeco habet [MISSING GREEK TEXT], quod est "feneratur."
39. (15, 6) Et fenerabis gentes multas (and you shall lend to many nations). Scripture calls "lending" money given on loan, even if interest is not received; whence there is also that saying in the Psalm: beatus vir, qui miseretur et commodat (Ps 112:5 (111:5)) (blessed is the man who has mercy and lends). For our translators preferred to render it thus, who thought the sense rather than the words should be followed; for in the Greek it has [Greek text], which is "he lends."
ExpHept
40. (15, 6) Et principaberis gentium multarum, tui autem non principabuntur. Tamquam diceret: "tibi non dominabuntur, hoc est gentes"; genitivus enim casus est singularis huius pronominis, quod ait tui (cuius dativus est "tibi") non pluralis nominativus, cuius genitivus est: "tuorum."
40. (15, 6) Et principaberis gentium multarum, tui autem non principabuntur (and you shall rule over many nations, but of you they shall not rule). As though it said "they shall not rule over you, that is, the nations"; for it is the genitive singular case of this pronoun that it says, tui (of you)—whose dative is "to you"—not the nominative plural, whose genitive is "of yours."
ExpHept
41. (15, 7) Si autem fuerit in te egenus in fratribus tuis. Non uni homini, sed populo dicitur: ideo in te.
41. (15, 7) Si autem fuerit in te egenus in fratribus tuis (but if there shall be in you a needy man among your brothers). It is said not to one man but to the people: therefore in te (in you).
ExpHept
42. (15, 7-8) Si autem fuerit in te egenus in fratribus tuis in una civitatum tuarum in terra, quam Dominus Deus tuus dat tibi, non avertes cor tuum neque constringes manum tuam a fratre tuo egente; aperiens aperies manus tuas ei, fenus fenerabis ei, quantumcumque postulat et quantum eget.
42. (15, 7-8) Si autem fuerit in te egenus in fratribus tuis in una civitatum tuarum in terra, quam Dominus Deus tuus dat tibi, non avertes cor tuum neque constringes manum tuam a fratre tuo egente; aperiens aperies manus tuas ei, fenus fenerabis ei, quantumcumque postulat et quantum eget (but if there shall be in you a needy man among your brothers in one of your cities in the land which the Lord your God gives you, you shall not turn away your heart nor close your hand from your needy brother; opening you shall open your hands to him, with a loan you shall lend to him, however much he asks and however much he needs).
ExpHept
Hic certe cum opera misericordiae praecipiat, non utique usurarum crudelitas suscipienda est; unde apparet, quod ait: fenus fenerabis ei, mutuo dandum, quod postularet, intellegi voluisse. Quod autem ait: aperiens aperies manus tuas, tale est et quod sequitur: fenus fenerabis, usitata locutio est in Scripturis Sanctis.
Here, certainly, since it enjoins works of mercy, the cruelty of usury is by no means to be undertaken; whence it appears that what it says, fenus fenerabis ei (with a loan you shall lend to him), it wished to be understood as giving on loan what he might ask. But what it says, aperiens aperies manus tuas (opening you shall open your hands), is of the same kind as what follows, fenus fenerabis (with a loan you shall lend): it is a customary expression in Holy Scripture.
ExpHept
43. (15, 17) Cum de aure pertundenda servi praecepisset: et ancillam, inquit, tuam facies similiter, accusativum pro dativo ponens. Non ait: "ancillae tuae facies," quod locutionis nostrae consuetudo poscebat.
43. (15, 17) When it had given the command about piercing the ear of a servant, et ancillam, it says, tuam facies similiter (and your maidservant you shall do likewise), putting the accusative for the dative. It did not say "to your maidservant you shall do," which the usage of our expression demanded.
ExpHept
44. (15, 21) Si autem fuerit in eo vitium, claudum aut caecum, vel omne vitium malum. Non ait: "claudicatio" aut "caecitas" (ipsa enim sunt vitia) sed: claudum et caecum, quod sunt non vitia, sed animalia, quae habent vitia, hoc quoque notandum est quod ait: vitium malum, quasi posset esse vitium bonum.
44. (15, 21) Si autem fuerit in eo vitium, claudum aut caecum, vel omne vitium malum (but if there shall be in it a blemish, lame or blind, or any evil blemish). It did not say "lameness" or "blindness" (for these are blemishes), but claudum et caecum (lame and blind), which are not blemishes but animals that have blemishes. This too is to be noted, that it says vitium malum (an evil blemish), as though there could be a good blemish.
ExpHept
45. (16, 4) Et non dormiet de carnibus, de quibus immolaveritis vespere die primo usque in mane. Pro eo, quod est: "non remanebit ea nocte," non dormiet dictum est.
45. (16, 4) Et non dormiet de carnibus, de quibus immolaveritis vespere die primo usque in mane (and there shall not sleep of the flesh which you shall have sacrificed in the evening on the first day until morning). Instead of what is "it shall not remain that night," it said non dormiet (shall not sleep).
ExpHept
46. (17, 1) Non offeres Domino Deo tuo vitulum vel ovem in quo est in ipso vitium. Usitata locutio esset: "in quo est vitium"; sed ista in Scripturis est usitatior.
46. (17, 1) Non offeres Domino Deo tuo vitulum vel ovem in quo est in ipso vitium (you shall not offer to the Lord your God a calf or a sheep in which there is in it a blemish). The customary expression would be "in which there is a blemish"; but this one is more customary in the Scriptures.
ExpHept
47. (17, 5) Et lapidabis eos in lapidibus, et morientur; quod ex nostra consuetudine diceretur: "lapidibus," non: in lapidibus.
47. (17, 5) Et lapidabis eos in lapidibus, et morientur (and you shall stone them with stones, and they shall die); which by our usage would be said "with stones," not in lapidibus (with stones [in the stones]).
ExpHept
48. (17, 16) Non multiplicabit sibi equum. Pro "equis" vel pro "equitatu" equum posuit; unde nonnulli: equitatum interpretati sunt.
48. (17, 16) Non multiplicabit sibi equum (he shall not multiply for himself a horse). It put equum (a horse) for "horses" or for "cavalry"; whence some translated equitatum (cavalry).
ExpHept
49. (17, 15) Non poteris constituere super te hominem alienum, quia non est frater tuus. Non poteris dictum est pro: "non debebis."
49. (17, 15) Non poteris constituere super te hominem alienum, quia non est frater tuus (you shall not be able to set over you a foreign man, because he is not your brother). Non poteris (you shall not be able) is said for "you shall not be permitted."
ExpHept
50. (18, 16) Secundum omnia quae petisti a Domino Deo tuo in Coreb in die convocationis dicentes. Cum dixerit superius: petisti, dicentes subiecit, non: "dicens."
50. (18, 16) Secundum omnia quae petisti a Domino Deo tuo in Coreb in die convocationis dicentes (according to all that you asked of the Lord your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly, saying). When it had said above petisti (you asked [singular]), it added dicentes (saying [plural]), not "saying [singular]."
ExpHept
51. (20, 4) Quoniam Dominus Deus vester, qui praecedit vobiscum; non dixit: "vos."
51. (20, 4) Quoniam Dominus Deus vester, qui praecedit vobiscum (for the Lord your God, who goes before with you); it did not say "before you."
ExpHept
52. (22, 6) Si occurreris nido avis ante faciem tuam in via, notandum, quod: occurreris dixit etiam non ambulanti.
52. (22, 6) Si occurreris nido avis ante faciem tuam in via (if you shall meet a bird's nest before your face on the way); it is to be noted that it said occurreris (you shall meet) even of one not walking.
ExpHept
53. (22, 8) Si autem aedificaveris domum novam, facies coronam solario tuo et non facies homicidium in domo tua, si cadat qui cecidit ab eo, id est: "a solario cadat qui cecidit." Nimis inusitata locutio est.
53. (22, 8) Si autem aedificaveris domum novam, facies coronam solario tuo et non facies homicidium in domo tua, si cadat qui cecidit ab eo (but if you shall build a new house, you shall make a parapet for your roof and you shall not commit homicide in your house, if there should fall the one who fell from it), that is, "the one who fell should fall from the roof." It is an exceedingly unusual expression.
ExpHept
54. (24, 2-3) Et abiens fuerit viro alteri, et oderit eam vir novissimus. Notandum ex duobus posteriorem novissimum dici. Talis locutio est et in Evangelio, quando quaeritur ex duobus fratribus, quis eorum fecerit voluntatem patris, et respondetur: novissimus, cum duo fuerint (Cf. Mt 21, 31).
54. (24, 2-3) Et abiens fuerit viro alteri, et oderit eam vir novissimus (and going away she shall be to another man, and the last man shall hate her). It is to be noted that, of two, the later one is called novissimum (the last). Such an expression is also in the Gospel, when it is asked which of two brothers did the will of the father, and the answer is novissimus (the last), although there were two (See Matt 21:31).
ExpHept
55. (24, 6) Non pignerabis molam neque superiorem lapidem molae, quia animam iste pignerat, pro eo, quod est: "quia animam pigneras, si feceris." Deinde notandum animam dixisse pro ea vita, quam habet anima in corpore; ex qua locutione et illud est in Evangelio: nonne anima plus est quam esca (Mt 6, 25).
55. (24, 6) Non pignerabis molam neque superiorem lapidem molae, quia animam iste pignerat (you shall not take in pledge a millstone nor the upper stone of a mill, because this one takes a soul in pledge), instead of what is "because you take a soul in pledge, if you should do it." Then it is to be noted that it said animam (a soul) for that life which the soul has in the body; from which expression there is also that saying in the Gospel: nonne anima plus est quam esca (Matt 6:25) (is not the soul more than food).
ExpHept
56. (24, 7) Si autem deprehendatur homo furans animam ex fratribus suis filiis Israel; animam pro "homine" posuit. Denique sequitur: et opprimens eum vendiderit; quae non minus notanda locutio est noluit enim dicere: "eam," quod esset magis consequens, quoniam animam dixerat, sed: eum, id est hominem, in cuius significatione dixerat animam.
56. (24, 7) Si autem deprehendatur homo furans animam ex fratribus suis filiis Israel (but if a man shall be caught stealing a soul from among his brothers, the sons of Israel); it put animam (a soul) for "a man." Then it follows: et opprimens eum vendiderit (and oppressing him he shall sell him); which is an expression no less to be noted, for it was unwilling to say "her," which would be more consistent, since it had said animam (a soul), but eum (him), that is, the man, in whose signification it had said animam (a soul).
ExpHept
57. (24, 10) Si debitum fuerit in proximo tuo debitum quodcumque; repetitio verbi locutionem notandam facit.
57. (24, 10) Si debitum fuerit in proximo tuo debitum quodcumque (if there shall be a debt owed by your neighbor, any debt whatever); the repetition of the word makes the expression worth noting.
ExpHept
58. (25, 7) Si autem noluerit homo accipere uxorem fratris sui, et ascendet mulier in porta ad senatum et dicet: 'non vult frater viri mei suscitare nomen fratris sui in Israel, noluit frater viri mei.' Quamvis verborum repetitiones amet Scriptura, inusitatior est tamen repetitio; sed elegantius querelae ostentat affectum.
58. (25, 7) Si autem noluerit homo accipere uxorem fratris sui, et ascendet mulier in porta ad senatum et dicet: 'non vult frater viri mei suscitare nomen fratris sui in Israel, noluit frater viri mei.' (but if the man shall not wish to take his brother's wife, then the woman shall go up at the gate to the council and shall say, "my husband's brother does not wish to raise up his brother's name in Israel, my husband's brother has refused.") Although Scripture loves repetitions of words, this repetition is yet more unusual; but it more elegantly displays the feeling of a complaint.
ExpHept
59. (27, 21) Maledictus omnis, qui dormierit cum omni pecore; pro eo, quod est: "concubuerit." Deinde cum omni pecore pro eo, quod est: "cum quolibet pecore."
59. (27, 21) Maledictus omnis, qui dormierit cum omni pecore (cursed is everyone who shall sleep with any beast); instead of what is "shall lie." Then cum omni pecore (with any beast) for what is "with whatever beast."
ExpHept
60. (28, 48) Et servies inimicis tuis, quos immittet Dominus Deus tuus super te. Graecus habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], ubi Latinus interpretatus est: servies. Solet autem hoc verbum in ea servitute Scriptura ponere, quae debetur Deo; unde idolatrae appellantur, qui ea servitute "idolis" serviunt;
60. (28, 48) Et servies inimicis tuis, quos immittet Dominus Deus tuus super te (and you shall serve your enemies, whom the Lord your God will send upon you). The Greek has [Greek text], where the Latin rendered servies (you shall serve). Now Scripture is wont to put this word for that servitude which is owed to God; whence those are called idolaters who serve "idols" with that servitude;
ExpHept
ergo hic inusitate positum est hoc verbum. Quamquam possit etiam hunc sensum habere, quod tam graviter multa dixerit, ut inimicis suis nimium superbientibus tamquam diis servisse cogantur.
therefore this word is here used unusually. Although it could also have this sense, that it threatened things so grievous that they would be compelled to serve their enemies, exceedingly proud, as though they were gods.
ExpHept
61. (28, 49) Gentem cuius non audies vocem eius. Et hoc notandum est, quod et cuius dixit et eius, sicut loqui Scripturae solent, et id, quod ait: cuius non audies vocem pro eo, quod est: "cuius linguam non intelleges."
61. (28, 49) Gentem cuius non audies vocem eius (a nation whose you shall not hear its voice). This too is to be noted, that it said both cuius (whose) and eius (its), as the Scriptures are wont to speak, and that what it says, cuius non audies vocem (whose voice you shall not hear), is for what is "whose tongue you shall not understand."
ExpHept
62. (28, 54-55) Mollis in te et tenera valde fascinabit oculo suo fratrem suum et uxorem quae est in sinu eius et qui sunt reliqui filii quicumque relicti fuerint illi, ita ut det uni ex eis a carnibus filiorum suorum de quibuscumque edet eo, quod non derelictum sit ei quidquam in angustia et tribulatione, qua tribulabunt te inimici tui in omnibus civitatibus tuis.
62. (28, 54-55) Mollis in te et tenera valde fascinabit oculo suo fratrem suum et uxorem quae est in sinu eius et qui sunt reliqui filii quicumque relicti fuerint illi, ita ut det uni ex eis a carnibus filiorum suorum de quibuscumque edet eo, quod non derelictum sit ei quidquam in angustia et tribulatione, qua tribulabunt te inimici tui in omnibus civitatibus tuis (the man soft among you and very delicate will look with grudging eye upon his brother and the wife who is in his bosom and the remaining children, whoever shall be left to him, so as to give to none of them of the flesh of his children, of which he will eat, because nothing has been left to him in the straits and tribulation with which your enemies will afflict you in all your cities).
ExpHept
Notandum est, quemadmodum hic dictum sit: fascinabit eum pro: "invidebit ei" tamquam ad hoc derelicto, ut necesse sit, ei dare de carnibus filiorum, quas cogit necessitas in cibum sumi a parentibus. Nam et in Proverbiis, quod Latini codices habent: non cenabis cum viro invido (Prov. 23, 6), Graecus habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]; autem "fascinus" dicitur.
It is to be noted how it is here said fascinabit eum (he will bewitch him) for "he will grudge him," as though one were left behind for this purpose, that it be necessary to give him of the flesh of the children, which necessity compels to be taken as food by the parents. For in Proverbs too, where the Latin manuscripts have non cenabis cum viro invido (Prov 23:6) (you shall not dine with an envious man), the Greek has [Greek text]; and an "evil eye" is called a bewitching.
ExpHept
63. (28, 63) Et erit sicut laetatus est Dominus in vobis bene facere vobis. Graecus habet: bene facere vos, nec videtur esse saltem Graeca locutio. Accusativus tamen pro dativo positus intellegitur; unde maluerunt Latini interpretes dicere: vobis quam: vos.
63. (28, 63) Et erit sicut laetatus est Dominus in vobis bene facere vobis (and it shall be, just as the Lord rejoiced over you to do good to you). The Greek has bene facere vos (to do good you [accusative]), and it does not even seem to be a Greek expression. Yet the accusative is understood as put for the dative; whence the Latin translators preferred to say vobis (to you) rather than vos (you).
ExpHept
64. (29, 2) Vos vidistis omnia, quae fecit Dominus Deus vester in terra Aegypti coram vobis Pharaoni et omnibus servis eius et omni terrae illius, tentationes magnas, quas viderunt oculi tui; notandum illas plagas etiam tentationes vocari.
64. (29, 2) Vos vidistis omnia, quae fecit Dominus Deus vester in terra Aegypti coram vobis Pharaoni et omnibus servis eius et omni terrae illius, tentationes magnas, quas viderunt oculi tui (you saw all that the Lord your God did in the land of Egypt before you, to Pharaoh and to all his servants and to all that land, the great trials which your eyes saw); it is to be noted that those plagues too are called tentationes (trials).
ExpHept
65. (30, 4) Si fuerit dispersio tua a summo caeli usque ad summum caeli, inde congregabit te Dominus Deus tuus. Mirum, si non hoc dicit: a summo caeli usque ad summum caeli, quod solet etiam dicere: a summo terrae usque ad summum terrae; fortasse propterea, quia secundum id, quod et iste aer "caelum" dicitur, coniungitur terrae.
65. (30, 4) Si fuerit dispersio tua a summo caeli usque ad summum caeli, inde congregabit te Dominus Deus tuus (if your dispersion shall be from the top of heaven to the top of heaven, from there the Lord your God will gather you). It is remarkable if it does not say a summo caeli usque ad summum caeli (from the top of heaven to the top of heaven) in the way it is wont also to say "from the end of the earth to the end of the earth"; perhaps for this reason, because, according to the fact that this air too is called "heaven," it is joined to the earth.
ExpHept
66. (30, 12-13) Non in caelo est, dicens: 'quis ascendet in caelum et accipiet nobis illud, et audientes illud faciemus?' Neque trans mare est, dicens: 'quis transfretabit nobis trans mare et accipiet nobis illud, et audientes illud faciemus?' Dicens pro eo posuit, quod est: "ut dicas," nova locutio.
66. (30, 12-13) Non in caelo est, dicens: 'quis ascendet in caelum et accipiet nobis illud, et audientes illud faciemus?' Neque trans mare est, dicens: 'quis transfretabit nobis trans mare et accipiet nobis illud, et audientes illud faciemus?' (it is not in heaven, saying, "who will go up into heaven and take it for us, and hearing it we will do it?" Nor is it across the sea, saying, "who will cross the sea for us and take it for us, and hearing it we will do it?") It put dicens (saying) for what is "so that you may say," a new expression.
ExpHept
67. (31, 8) Et Dominus qui comitatur tibi tecum.
67. (31, 8) Et Dominus qui comitatur tibi tecum (and the Lord who accompanies to you with you).
ExpHept
68. (31, 16) Et dixit Dominus ad Moysen: 'ecce tu dormies cum patribus tuis'; hoc verbo eius mortem significavit.
68. (31, 16) Et dixit Dominus ad Moysen: 'ecce tu dormies cum patribus tuis' (and the Lord said to Moses, "behold, you shall sleep with your fathers"); by this word it signified his death.
ExpHept
69. (31, 27) Amaricantes eratis quae ad Deum; id est "amaricabatis ea, quae Dei sunt."
69. (31, 27) Amaricantes eratis quae ad Deum (you were embittering the things that pertain to God); that is, "you were embittering the things that are God's."
ExpHept
70. (31, 29) Scio enim, quia post obitum meum iniquitate iniquitatem facietis; uno verbo autem Graece dicitur: iniquitatem facietis, quod est: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
70. (31, 29) Scio enim, quia post obitum meum iniquitate iniquitatem facietis (for I know that after my death you will do iniquity an iniquity); but it is said in Greek by one word, iniquitatem facietis (you will do iniquity), which is [Greek text].
ExpHept
71. (31, 29) Et occurrent vobis mala novissimum dierum; sic enim habet Graecus pro: "in novissimis diebus" aut: "in novissimo dierum."
71. (31, 29) Et occurrent vobis mala novissimum dierum (and evils will meet you, the last of days); for thus the Greek has it, instead of "in the last days" or "in the last of days."
ExpHept
72. (32, 6) Nonne hic ipse pater tuus possedit te et fecit te et creavit te? Ordo notandus est; prius enim videtur dicere debuisse: creavit te et fecit te, et deinde: possedit te, quomodo enim intellegitur posse possideri qui non est?
72. (32, 6) Nonne hic ipse pater tuus possedit te et fecit te et creavit te? (is not this same one your father, who possessed you and made you and created you?) The order is to be noted; for it seems it ought first to have said creavit te et fecit te (created you and made you), and then possedit te (possessed you); for how is one who does not exist understood to be able to be possessed?
ExpHept
73. (32, 14) Cum adipe renum tritici. Haec metaphora nimis inusitata est, ut renes tritici intellegantur velut interiora tritici, unde farina eicitur; enim et adipem dixit, nam hoc nomine etiam farinam solent Graeci dicere; hoc enim habet Graecus in Exodo, ubi scriptum est: elevantes farinam super humeros suos (Ex 12, 34), Graecus quippe interpres [MISSING GREEK TEXT] posuit, quod sunt "adipes."
73. (32, 14) Cum adipe renum tritici (with the fat of the kidneys of wheat). This metaphor is exceedingly unusual, that renes tritici (the kidneys of wheat) be understood as, so to speak, the inner parts of the wheat from which the flour is cast out; for it also said adipem (fat), for by this word the Greeks are wont to call flour as well; for the Greek has this in Exodus, where it is written elevantes farinam super humeros suos (Exod 12:34) (carrying the flour upon their shoulders), since the Greek translator put [Greek text], which is "fat."
ExpHept
74. (32, 20) Filii in quibus non est fides in eis; usitata Scripturis locutio.
74. (32, 20) Filii in quibus non est fides in eis (children in whom there is no faith in them); an expression customary to the Scriptures.
ExpHept
75. (32, 36) Quoniam iudicabit Dominus populum suum et in servis suis consolabitur; pro: "servos suos consolabitur," nisi forte ipsum consolari dicit translato verbo velut ab indignatione et offensione, qua eum offendunt mali. Sic autem eius consolatio accipienda est, non ex more hominum; sicut nec ira et zelus et cetera talia.
75. (32, 36) Quoniam iudicabit Dominus populum suum et in servis suis consolabitur (for the Lord will judge his people and will be comforted in his servants); for "he will comfort his servants," unless perhaps he says that he himself is comforted by a transferred word, as it were from the indignation and offense by which the wicked offend him. But his comfort is to be understood thus, not after the manner of men; just as neither is his anger nor zeal nor other such things.
ExpHept
76. (32, 37) Ubi sunt dii eorum in quibus fidebant in ipsis; plenum esset et sine: in ipsis.
76. (32, 37) Ubi sunt dii eorum in quibus fidebant in ipsis (where are their gods in whom they trusted in them); it would be complete even without in ipsis (in them).
ExpHept
77. (32, 40) Et iurabo dexteram meam; id est: "per dexteram meam."
77. (32, 40) Et iurabo dexteram meam (and I will swear my right hand); that is, "by my right hand."
ExpHept
78. (32, 42) Laetamini caeli simul cum eo, et adorent eum omnes angeli Dei. Alii codices habent: et adorent eum omnes filii Dei. Filios autem Dei dictos, qui angeli sunt in caelis, non facile in Scripturis Sanctis invenitur.
78. (32, 42) Laetamini caeli simul cum eo, et adorent eum omnes angeli Dei (rejoice, O heavens, together with him, and let all the angels of God worship him). Other manuscripts have et adorent eum omnes filii Dei (and let all the sons of God worship him). But that those who are angels in the heavens are called filios Dei (sons of God) is not easily found in Holy Scripture.
ExpHept
Bk. 6Expressions in JoshuaLocutiones de Iesu Nave
1. (1, 14) Vos autem transibitis expediti priores fratribus vestris, omnis fortis; id est omnis, quicumque in vobis fortis est.
1. (1, 14) Vos autem transibitis expediti priores fratribus vestris, omnis fortis (but you shall pass over unencumbered, ahead of your brothers, every strong man); that is, everyone who is strong among you.
ExpHept
2. (3, 4) Ut sciatis viam quam ibitis eam; plenum esset, etiam si non haberet: eam.
2. (3, 4) Ut sciatis viam quam ibitis eam (that you may know the way which you shall go it); it would be complete even if it did not have eam (it).
ExpHept
3. (5, 13) Et factum est cum esset Iesus in Iericho, notanda locutio est; nondum quippe erant in eadem civitate. Cuius portae contra illos clausae fuerant; unde factum est, ut in eam intrare non possent, nisi muri eius cecidissent circumacta arca Domini. Ergo in Iericho dictum est "in terra, quae pertineret ad Iericho."
3. (5, 13) Et factum est cum esset Iesus in Iericho (and it came to pass when Joshua was in Jericho), an expression to be noted; for they were not yet in that city, whose gates had been shut against them; whence it came about that they could not enter it unless its walls fell when the ark of the Lord was carried around. Therefore in Iericho (in Jericho) is said for "in the land that belonged to Jericho."
ExpHept
4. (6, 1) De Iericho dictum est, cum clausa esset: nec quisquam ex illa prodibat neque introibat; utique: "in illam" subauditur, non: "ex illa"; hoc appellatur Graece: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
4. (6, 1) Of Jericho it is said, when it was shut up, nec quisquam ex illa prodibat neque introibat (and no one went forth out of it nor came in); certainly "into it" is understood, not "out of it"; this is called in Greek [Greek text].
ExpHept
5. (6, 2) Dominus dicit ad Iesum: ecce ego trado tibi subiugatam Iericho et regem eius qui est in ea, potentes fortitudine. Mirandum, quod non hic posuit coniunctionem copulativam, ut diceret: "et potentes fortitudine," quam solet Scriptura tam assidue ponere, ut etiam ibi inveniatur, ubi sensum solitae locutionis impediat. An et Iericho et rex eius dicti sunt: potentes fortitudine?
5. (6, 2) The Lord says to Joshua: ecce ego trado tibi subiugatam Iericho et regem eius qui est in ea, potentes fortitudine (behold, I deliver to you Jericho subdued and its king who is in it, mighty in strength). It is to be wondered at that here it did not put the connective conjunction, so as to say "and mighty in strength," which Scripture is wont to put so constantly that it is found even where it impedes the sense of the customary expression. Or are both Jericho and its king called potentes fortitudine (mighty in strength)?
ExpHept
6. (6, 25; 4, 9) Et Raab meretricem et domum paternam eius vivificavit Iesus, et commorata est in Israel usque in hodiernum diem. Notandum est, quemadmodum dicat Scriptura: usque in hodiernum diem, quod assidue dicit. Nam et de lapidibus illis duodecim, qui positi sunt, ubi Iordanes ex ima parte defluxerat et ex parte superiore constiterat arca transeunte vel populo, ita dictum est, quod ibi essent: usque in hodiernum diem; quod videtur ita sonare, tamquam post plurimum temporis per hanc Scripturam ista narrentur nec eo tempore hi libri conscripti fuerint, quo erant haec recentissima. Quisquis autem putat hoc, quid de ista meretrice dicturus est, quae utique quantum est aetas unius hominis vixit et tamen dicitur: usque in hodiernum diem? De his itaque rebus hoc dicitur, quae non ita constitutae sunt, ut postea mutarentur ab eis, qui constituerunt; quomodo dicitur aliquis in exilium perpetuum missus, quia non ad tempus praedefinitum hoc supplicio plectitur, non quia quisquam potest esse perpetuus in exilio, cum homo ipse non possit esse perpetuus. Sic ergo et ista meretrix non est praecepta ad tempus habitare in Israel; ideo dictum est: usque in hodiernum diem.
6. (6, 25; 4, 9) Et Raab meretricem et domum paternam eius vivificavit Iesus, et commorata est in Israel usque in hodiernum diem (and Joshua kept alive Rahab the harlot and her father's house, and she has dwelt in Israel until the present day). It is to be noted how Scripture says usque in hodiernum diem (until the present day), which it constantly says. For of those twelve stones too, which were set up where the Jordan had flowed down on the lower side and on the upper side had stood still while the ark or the people crossed, it is said that they were there usque in hodiernum diem (until the present day); which seems to sound as though these things were narrated through this Scripture after a very long time, and these books were not written down at the time when these events were most recent. But whoever thinks this, what will he say of this harlot, who certainly lived as long as the lifespan of one human being, and yet it is said usque in hodiernum diem (until the present day)? Therefore this is said of those things which are so established that they were not afterward changed by those who established them; just as someone is said to be sent into perpetual exile because he is not punished with this penalty for a predefined time, not because anyone can be perpetual in exile, since the man himself cannot be perpetual. So therefore this harlot too was not commanded to dwell in Israel for a time; therefore it is said usque in hodiernum diem (until the present day).
ExpHept
7. (7, 11) Dominus dicit ad Iesum: Peccavit populus et transgressus est Testamentum meum, quod disposui ad eos. Notandum, quemadmodum testamentum appellet hoc, quod praeceperat, ut anathema esset Iericho et nemo sibi inde aliquid usurparet.
7. (7, 11) The Lord says to Joshua: Peccavit populus et transgressus est Testamentum meum, quod disposui ad eos (the people has sinned and has transgressed my covenant which I appointed to them). It is to be noted how it calls testamentum (covenant) this which it had commanded, that Jericho should be under the ban and that no one should appropriate anything from it for himself.
ExpHept
8. (8, 1-2) Dominus loquens ad Iesum ait inter cetera: ecce dedi in manus tuas regem Gai et terram ipsius, et facies Gai sicut fecisti Iericho et regi eius et praedam pecorum praedaberis tibi.
8. (8, 1-2) The Lord, speaking to Joshua, says among other things: ecce dedi in manus tuas regem Gai et terram ipsius, et facies Gai sicut fecisti Iericho et regi eius et praedam pecorum praedaberis tibi (behold, I have given into your hands the king of Ai and his land, and you shall do to Ai as you did to Jericho and its king, and the spoil of the cattle you shall plunder for yourself).
ExpHept
Praecipue notanda locutio est non solum, quia praedaberis tibi dixit, tamquam unius futura esset illa praeda, cum omnium esset futura; nam tales locutiones usitatissimae sunt, cum Deus tamquam ad unum loquitur, quae ad populum loquitur sed hoc novum est hic, quia praedixit Scriptura: et dixit Dominus ad Iesum, quem constat unum hominem fuisse. Quod tamen dixit: praedaberis tibi, non utique ita dictum est, ut praeda illa huius unius hominis esse praecepta sit, sed universi populi.
The expression is especially to be noted, not only because it said praedaberis tibi (you shall plunder for yourself), as though that spoil were to belong to one, when it was to belong to all—for such expressions are most customary when God speaks as though to one what he speaks to a people—but this is new here, because Scripture had said beforehand et dixit Dominus ad Iesum (and the Lord said to Joshua), who is established to have been one man. Yet what it said, praedaberis tibi (you shall plunder for yourself), was certainly not said in such a way that the spoil was commanded to belong to this one man, but to the whole people.
ExpHept
9. (8, 12) Et insidiae erant civitati a mari.Qui nescit, putat istam civitatem maritimam. Consuetudinis est autem Scripturarum, ut occidentalem partem "a mari" appellet vel "ad mare," quia ex ipsa parte terra, ubi haec agebantur, propius habet mare quam a ceteris partibus.
9. (8, 12) Et insidiae erant civitati a mari (and the ambush was for the city from the sea). One who does not know thinks this city was a seaside one. But it is the custom of the Scriptures to call the western side "from the sea" or "toward the sea," because, from that side, the land where these things were taking place has the sea nearer than from the other sides.
ExpHept
10. (8, 18) Extende manum tuam in gaeso quod est in manu tua contra civitatem. Ista locutio notanda non esset nisi propter nomen, quod obscurum est eis, in quorum consuetudine non est. Quid enim dicat gaeson, non facile intellegitur. Hoc interpres Symmachus scutum appellasse perhibetur; Septuaginta autem interpretes, secundum quos ista tractamus, qui posuerunt gaeson, miror si et in Graeca lingua "hastam" vel "lanceam gallicanam" intellegi voluerunt; ea quippe dicuntur gaesa, quorum et Vergilius meminit, ubi ait de Gallis in scuto Aeneae pictis: duo quisque Alpina coruscant gaesa manu (VIRGILIO, Aen. 8, 661-662).
10. (8, 18) Extende manum tuam in gaeso quod est in manu tua contra civitatem (stretch out your hand with the javelin that is in your hand toward the city). This expression would not be worth noting except on account of the noun, which is obscure to those in whose usage it is not. For what gaeson may mean is not easily understood. The translator Symmachus is reported to have called this a shield; but the Septuagint translators, according to whom we are treating these matters, who put gaeson, I wonder whether in the Greek language too they wished a "spear" or a "Gallic lance" to be understood; for those things are called gaesa which Virgil too mentions, where he says of the Gauls depicted on the shield of Aeneas: duo quisque Alpina coruscant gaesa manu (Virgil, Aeneid 8.661–62) (each brandishes two Alpine javelins in his hand).
ExpHept
11. (8, 22) Et facti sunt inter medium castrorum, hi hinc et hi hinc.
11. (8, 22) Et facti sunt inter medium castrorum, hi hinc et hi hinc (and they came to be in the midst of the camps, these on this side and these on that side).
ExpHept
Duo notanda sunt in hac locutione: unum, quod cum hostes qui vincebantur in medio essent, tamquam de his dictum est, quod hi essent hinc et hi hinc, cum potius ita Israelitae fuerint, qui eos in medio posuerant percutiendos;
Two things are to be noted in this expression: one, that, although the enemies who were being conquered were in the midst, it is said as though of these that these were on this side and these on that side, whereas it was rather the Israelites who had placed them in the midst to be struck down;
ExpHept
alterum, quod inter medium castrorum eos factos esse dicit Scriptura castra appellans etiam productas acies in proelio constitutas, cum castra non soleant appellari, nisi ubi exercitus ad manendum consistit; nisi forte ideo castra appellata sunt, quia cum omnibus suis ibant.
the other, that Scripture says they came to be in the midst of the camps, calling castra (camps) even the drawn-out battle lines set up in combat, although they are not usually called camps except where an army halts to remain; unless perhaps they were called camps for this reason, that they went with all their belongings.
ExpHept
12. (8, 27) Exceptis pecoribus et spoliis quae erant in civitate praedati sunt filii Israel secundum praeceptum Domini, quemadmodum constituit Dominus Iesu. Ita dictum est: exceptis pecoribus et spoliis praedati sunt, quasi ipsa non fuerint praedati, cum potius ipsa praedati sint, et ideo excepta dicta sint, quia haec illo proelio sola consumpta non sunt.
12. (8, 27) Exceptis pecoribus et spoliis quae erant in civitate praedati sunt filii Israel secundum praeceptum Domini, quemadmodum constituit Dominus Iesu (except the cattle and spoils which were in the city, the sons of Israel took as plunder according to the command of the Lord, as the Lord appointed for Joshua). It is said thus, exceptis pecoribus et spoliis praedati sunt (except the cattle and spoils they took as plunder), as though they did not plunder these, whereas they rather plundered these; and they were therefore said to be excepted because these alone were not destroyed in that battle.
ExpHept
13. (9, 7) Israelitae respondentes Gabaonitis dixerunt: Vide, ne in me habites, et quomodo disponam tibi Testamentum? Iam et superius tales locutiones notavimus. Hoc est enim: vide ne in me habites, quod est: "apud me," id est in terra, quam eis promiserat Deus. Et hic tamquam ad unum hominem videntur locuti, cum legatus ad eos non unus venerit; sed more suo genti et populo responsa reddentes singulari numero loquuntur, sicut plerumque et ad ipsos Deus vel ductor ipsorum. Notandum etiam quod pactum pacis Testamentum vocat Scriptura more quidem suo; nam saepe ita loquitur.
13. (9, 7) The Israelites, answering the Gibeonites, said: Vide, ne in me habites, et quomodo disponam tibi Testamentum? (see, lest you dwell in me, and how shall I arrange a covenant for you?) We have already noted such expressions above. For this, vide ne in me habites (see, lest you dwell in me), is what is "with me," that is, in the land which God had promised them. And here too they seem to have spoken as though to one man, although more than one envoy came to them; but in their manner, rendering answers to a nation and a people, they speak in the singular number, just as for the most part God or their own leader does to them as well. It is also to be noted that Scripture calls a pact of peace Testamentum (a covenant), in its own manner indeed; for it often speaks thus.
ExpHept
14. (10, 17) Et nuntiatum est Iesu dicentes: 'inventi sunt quinque reges absconditi in spelunca'; pro eo, quod est: "nuntiaverunt dicentes."
14. (10, 17) Et nuntiatum est Iesu dicentes: 'inventi sunt quinque reges absconditi in spelunca' (and it was announced to Joshua, saying, "the five kings have been found hidden in a cave"); instead of what is "they announced, saying."
ExpHept
15. (10, 25) Ita faciet Dominus omnibus inimicis vestris, quos vos debellabitis eos; nihil minus esset huic sententiae, etsi non haberet: eos.
15. (10, 25) Ita faciet Dominus omnibus inimicis vestris, quos vos debellabitis eos (so the Lord will do to all your enemies, whom you will war down them); nothing would be lacking to this sentence even if it did not have eos (them).
ExpHept
16. (11, 19-20) Et omnes cepit in bello, quia per Dominum factum est confortari cor eorum, ut obviam irent ad bellum ad Israel, ut exterminarentur; notandum est: confortari cor, non semper in bono accipiendum.
16. (11, 19-20) Et omnes cepit in bello, quia per Dominum factum est confortari cor eorum, ut obviam irent ad bellum ad Israel, ut exterminarentur (and he took them all in war, because it came about through the Lord that their heart was strengthened, so that they went out to battle against Israel, that they might be destroyed); it is to be noted that confortari cor (that the heart be strengthened) is not always to be taken in a good sense.
ExpHept
17. (14, 6) Tu scis verbum, quod locutus est Dominus ad Moysen hominem Dei de me et te; non dixit: "hominem suum."
17. (14, 6) Tu scis verbum, quod locutus est Dominus ad Moysen hominem Dei de me et te (you know the word which the Lord spoke to Moses the man of God concerning me and you); it did not say "his man."
ExpHept
18. (17, 16) Et dixerunt filii Ioseph: 'non sufficit nobis mons et equus electus et ferrum Chananaeo qui habitat in Baethsan.' Equum electum dixit pro "equis electis," quod usitatum in nostro sermone non est; unde nonnulli Latini interpretes noluerunt equum interpretari, sed: "equitatum." Sic autem dictum est: equus electus pro "equis," sicut in nostra consuetudine dicitur "miles" pro "militibus."
18. (17, 16) Et dixerunt filii Ioseph: 'non sufficit nobis mons et equus electus et ferrum Chananaeo qui habitat in Baethsan.' (and the sons of Joseph said, "the mountain is not enough for us, and there is choice horse and iron to the Canaanite who dwells in Beth-shan.") It said equum electum (choice horse) for "choice horses," which is not customary in our speech; whence some Latin translators were unwilling to render equum (horse), but "cavalry." But equus electus (choice horse) was said for "horses" just as in our usage "the soldier" is said for "soldiers."
ExpHept
19. (19, 33-34) Et facti sunt exitus illorum Iordanes. Et revertentur fines ad mare. Non dixit: "reversi sunt" aut "saltem revertuntur," sicut solet de finibus dici, sed: revertentur, tamquam adhuc futurum sit, cum praeteritorum sit ista narratio. Et in omnibus fere ipsis terrarum divisionibus per singulas quasque tribus ita loquitur Scriptura, ut futuri temporis verbis utatur.
19. (19, 33-34) Et facti sunt exitus illorum Iordanes. Et revertentur fines ad mare (and their goings out came to be the Jordan. And the borders will return toward the sea). It did not say "returned" or at least "return," as it is wont to say of borders, but revertentur (will return), as though it were still future, though this is a narration of past things. And in almost all the divisions of the lands themselves, tribe by tribe, Scripture speaks in such a way as to use verbs of the future tense.
ExpHept
20. (20, 9) Refugere illuc qui percusserit animam nolens. Hic animam vel "hominem" intellegere debemus vel "vitam carnis," quae fit per animam; qua locutione et illud dictum est a fratribus Ioseph: non percutiamus eius animam (Gen 37, 21), id est: "non eum occidamus," nam si anima posset ab interfectore percuti, non diceret Dominus: nolite timere eos, qui corpus occidunt, animam autem non possunt occidere (Mt 10, 28).
20. (20, 9) Refugere illuc qui percusserit animam nolens (that he may flee thither who shall have struck a soul unwillingly). Here we ought to understand animam (a soul) either as "a man" or as "the life of the flesh," which comes about through the soul; by which expression that too was said by the brothers of Joseph: non percutiamus eius animam (Gen 37:21) (let us not strike his soul), that is, "let us not kill him"; for if the soul could be struck by a slayer, the Lord would not say nolite timere eos, qui corpus occidunt, animam autem non possunt occidere (Matt 10:28) (do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul).
ExpHept
21. (21, 2) Mandavit Dominus in manu Moysi. Locutio familiarissima Scripturis; ita enim dicitur: "verbum, quod factum est in manu illius vel illius prophetae," hoc est in potestate dicendi datum.
21. (21, 2) Mandavit Dominus in manu Moysi (the Lord commanded in the hand of Moses). An expression most familiar to the Scriptures; for thus it is said "the word that came to be in the hand of this or that prophet," that is, given into his power of speaking.
ExpHept
22. (21, 40) Et accepit Iesus cultros petrinos, in quibus circumciderat filios Israel. Non dixit: "quibus circumciderat," sed: in quibus.
22. (21, 40) Et accepit Iesus cultros petrinos, in quibus circumciderat filios Israel (and Joshua took stone knives, in which he had circumcised the sons of Israel). It did not say "with which he had circumcised," but in quibus (in which).
ExpHept
23. (22, 7) Et ubi dimisit eos Iesus in domos suas, et benedixit eos dicens. Plus videtur hic copulativa coniunctio, id est: et; nam ita dici posset: "et ubi dimisit eos Iesus in domos suas, benedixit eos dicens."
23. (22, 7) Et ubi dimisit eos Iesus in domos suas, et benedixit eos dicens (and when Joshua sent them away to their homes, and he blessed them, saying). The connective conjunction, that is, et (and), seems superfluous here; for it could be said thus: "and when Joshua sent them away to their homes, he blessed them, saying."
ExpHept
24. (22, 8) Item alia locutio notanda est, quod cum dixisset Scriptura: et benedixit eos Iesus dicens atque his verbis intentos fecisset audire, quid benedicendo dixit Iesus, hoc solum subiecit: in divitiis multis abierunt in domos suas; et pecora multa valde et argentum et aurum et vestem multam valde diviserunt praedam inimicorum suorum cum fratribus suis; quod magis esse narrantis quam benedicentis apparet.
24. (22, 8) Likewise another expression is to be noted: that, when Scripture had said et benedixit eos Iesus dicens (and Joshua blessed them, saying) and by these words had made the hearers attentive as to what Joshua said in blessing, it added only this: in divitiis multis abierunt in domos suas; et pecora multa valde et argentum et aurum et vestem multam valde diviserunt praedam inimicorum suorum cum fratribus suis (in great riches they went away to their homes; and very many cattle and silver and gold and very much clothing—they divided the spoil of their enemies with their brothers); which appears to belong rather to one narrating than to one blessing.
ExpHept
25. (22, 10) Aedificaverunt ibi aram super Iordanem, aram magnam videre; ista locutio etiam in sermone Latino nota est.
25. (22, 10) Aedificaverunt ibi aram super Iordanem, aram magnam videre (they built there an altar by the Jordan, an altar great to look upon); this expression is known in Latin speech too.
ExpHept
26. (22, 11) Et audierunt filii Israel dicentium. Non ait: "dicentibus" vel: "dicentes."
26. (22, 11) Et audierunt filii Israel dicentium (and the sons of Israel heard of those saying). It did not say "saying [dative]" or "saying [accusative/nominative]."
ExpHept
27. (22, 27) Servire servitutem Domini. In qua locutione duo notanda sunt: et servire servitutem, quae etiam Latina locutio reperitur, et: servitutem Domini, id est, quae debetur vel exhibetur Domino.
27. (22, 27) Servire servitutem Domini (to serve the service of the Lord). In this expression two things are to be noted: servire servitutem (to serve a service), which is also found as a Latin expression, and servitutem Domini (the service of the Lord), that is, which is owed or rendered to the Lord.
ExpHept
28. (22, 30) Et audientes Phinees sacerdos et omnes principes synagogae, qui erant cum illo, verba, quae locuti sunt filii Ruben et filii Gad et dimidium tribus Manasses, et placuerunt illis. Audientes pro: "audierunt" positum est, aut plus est hic: et. Nec tamen sine inconsequentia, quia: "cum audissent" dicendum fuit.
28. (22, 30) Et audientes Phinees sacerdos et omnes principes synagogae, qui erant cum illo, verba, quae locuti sunt filii Ruben et filii Gad et dimidium tribus Manasses, et placuerunt illis (and Phinehas the priest and all the leaders of the assembly who were with him, hearing the words which the sons of Reuben and the sons of Gad and the half-tribe of Manasseh spoke, and they pleased them). Audientes (hearing) is put for "they heard," or else there is an extra et (and) here. And yet not without inconsistency, because "when they had heard" should have been said.
ExpHept
29. (23, 1) Et Iesus senior provectus diebus. Hoc de Abraham dictum notavimus seniorem in Scripturis non solum illum appellari, qui est infra aetatem senis, sed etiam valde senem (Cf. Quaest. 1, 35. 70), unde non omnis senior senex, omnis autem senex senior dici potest.
29. (23, 1) Et Iesus senior provectus diebus (and Joshua, an elder, advanced in days). We noted this said of Abraham, that in the Scriptures not only one who is below the age of senis (an old man) is called seniorem (an elder), but also one who is valde senem (very old) (See Questions 1.35; 1.70); whence not every elder can be called an old man, but every old man can be called an elder.
ExpHept
30. (24, 7) Et induxit super illos mare et operuit super illos; non ait: "operuit illos," quamvis nonnulli interpretes hoc maluerint dicere.
30. (24, 7) Et induxit super illos mare et operuit super illos (and he brought over them the sea and covered over them); it did not say "covered them," although some translators preferred to say this.
ExpHept
31. (24, 17) In omnibus gentibus quas transivimus per ipsas; usitatae in Scripturis sunt istae locutiones nec tam crebro notandae quam crebro intercurrunt.
31. (24, 17) In omnibus gentibus quas transivimus per ipsas (among all the nations which we passed through them); these expressions are customary in the Scriptures and not to be noted as often as they occur.
ExpHept
Bk. 7Expressions in JudgesLocutiones de Iudicibus
1. (1, 1) Et factum est postquam defunctus est Iesus, interrogabant filii Israel in Domino; non ait: "Dominum," quod sermonis nostri consuetudo poscebat.
1. (1, 1) Et factum est postquam defunctus est Iesus, interrogabant filii Israel in Domino (and it came to pass after Joshua died, the sons of Israel inquired in the Lord); it did not say "the Lord," which the usage of our speech demanded.
ExpHept
2. (1, 3) Et bellemus in Chananaeo. Non dixit: "adversus Chananaeum," aut: "contra Chananaeum," aut: saltem "in Chananaeum."
2. (1, 3) Et bellemus in Chananaeo (and let us make war in the Canaanite). It did not say "against the Canaanite," or "facing the Canaanite," or at least "into the Canaanite."
ExpHept
3. (2, 8) Et mortuus est Iesus filius Nave servus Domini, filius centum decem annorum. Ista repetitio, quod, cum dixisset filius Nave, repetivit filius et deinde addidit: centum decem annorum inusitata est ut potius filius centum decem annorum diceret, quam "homo centum decem annorum"; sed tamen et alibi reperitur.
3. (2, 8) Et mortuus est Iesus filius Nave servus Domini, filius centum decem annorum (and Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of the Lord, died, a son of one hundred ten years). This repetition—that, when it had said filius Nave (son of Nun), it repeated filius (son) and then added centum decem annorum (of one hundred ten years)—is unusual, in that it said filius centum decem annorum (a son of one hundred ten years) rather than "a man of one hundred ten years"; but yet it is found elsewhere too.
ExpHept
4. (2, 10) Et omnis generatio appositi sunt ad patres suos. Notanda locutio est, quod non ait: "apposita est," quia plures erant.
4. (2, 10) Et omnis generatio appositi sunt ad patres suos (and the whole generation, they were gathered to their fathers). The expression is to be noted, that it did not say "it was gathered," because they were many.
ExpHept
5. (2, 14) Tradidit eos in manu praedantium; non dixit: "in manum," quod videtur Latina locutio postulare.
5. (2, 14) Tradidit eos in manu praedantium (he delivered them in the hand of plunderers); it did not say "into the hand," which the Latin expression seems to require.
ExpHept
6. (2, 18) Et cum suscitavit Dominus eis iudices, et erat Dominus cum iudice; solita locutione plus est hic: et, nam plenum esset: "et cum suscitavit Dominus eis iudices, erat Dominus cum iudice,"
6. (2, 18) Et cum suscitavit Dominus eis iudices, et erat Dominus cum iudice (and when the Lord raised up judges for them, and the Lord was with the judge); by the customary expression there is an extra et (and) here, for it would be complete: "and when the Lord raised up judges for them, the Lord was with the judge,"
ExpHept
notandum est etiam hoc, quod a plurali ad singularem transiens non ait: "cum iudicibus," sed: cum iudice, id est cum unoquoque iudice.
this too is to be noted, that, passing from the plural to the singular, it did not say "with the judges," but cum iudice (with the judge), that is, with each judge.
ExpHept
7. (2, 19) Et factum est, cum moreretur iudex, et revertebantur et iterum corrumpebant super patres suos. Recta locutio ita esse poterat secundum consuetudinem sermonis nostri; et fiebat, cum moreretur iudex, et revertebantur et iterum corrumpebant super patres suos. Si: et non haberet, plenum esset: "cum moreretur iudex, revertebantur et iterum corrumpebant super patres suos," id est "plus quam patres eorum."
7. (2, 19) Et factum est, cum moreretur iudex, et revertebantur et iterum corrumpebant super patres suos (and it came to pass, when the judge died, and they would turn back and again would corrupt themselves beyond their fathers). The correct expression could be thus, according to the usage of our speech: "and it would come to pass, when the judge died, they would turn back and again would corrupt themselves beyond their fathers." If it did not have et (and), it would be complete: "when the judge died, they would turn back and again would corrupt themselves beyond their fathers," that is, "more than their fathers."
ExpHept
8. (2, 20) Propter quod tanta dereliquit gens haec Testamentum meum. Tanta dixit pro: "tantum," id est tam multum, nomen pro adverbio, quod etiam in Latinis locutionibus maxime poeticis invenitur.
8. (2, 20) Propter quod tanta dereliquit gens haec Testamentum meum (because this nation has so greatly forsaken my covenant). It said tanta (so great [a quantity]) for "so much," that is, so greatly—a noun for an adverb, which is found also in Latin expressions, especially poetic ones.
ExpHept
9. (2, 20) Et non obaudierunt vocis meae; Graeca magis locutio est.
9. (2, 20) Et non obaudierunt vocis meae (and they did not obey my voice [genitive]); it is rather a Greek expression.
ExpHept
10. (3, 10) Factus est super eum Spiritus Domini. Cum Spiritus Domini utique factus non sit, sed super eum factus est, ita dictum est, ac si diceretur: factum est, ut esset super eum. Ex qua locutione et in Evangelio legitur: ante me factus est (Io 1, 30), id est factum est, ut esset ante me; quod alio modo diceretur: "praelatus est mihi."
10. (3, 10) Factus est super eum Spiritus Domini (the Spirit of the Lord came to be upon him). Since the Spiritus Domini (Spirit of the Lord) certainly did not come to be, but came to be upon him, it is said as if it were said: it came about that he was upon him. From which expression there is also read in the Gospel: ante me factus est (John 1:30) (he came to be before me), that is, it came about that he was before me; which would be said another way: "he was set ahead of me."
ExpHept
11. (3, 21) Et sumpsit Aod gladium de super femore suo dextro. Sic interpretari potuit, quod Graecus habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT]; nam locutio minus Latina est.
11. (3, 21) Et sumpsit Aod gladium de super femore suo dextro (and Ehud took the sword from upon his right thigh). It could be rendered thus, what the Greek has, [Greek text]; for the expression is less Latin.
ExpHept
12. (3, 17) Erat autem Eglom vir exilis valde. Hoc dictum [MISSING GREEK TEXT], id est locutione contraria sequentia indicant; quando enim percussus est, dictum est, quod concluserint adipes vulnus, quia non eductus est gladius de ventre eius.
12. (3, 17) Erat autem Eglom vir exilis valde (now Eglon was a very slender man). This was said by irony, that is, the following words indicate it by a contrary expression; for when he was struck, it is said that the fat closed over the wound, because the sword was not drawn out of his belly.
ExpHept
13. (3, 31) Et percussit alienigenas in sescentos viros; non ait: "alienigenarum sescentos viros," aut certe: "alienigenas in sescentis viris."
13. (3, 31) Et percussit alienigenas in sescentos viros (and he struck the foreigners to six hundred men); it did not say "six hundred men of the foreigners," or at least "the foreigners in six hundred men."
ExpHept
14. (4, 6) Nonne praecepit Dominus Deus Israel tibi: 'et perges in montem Thabor?' Non ait: "ut pergas," quod videtur esse consequens, sed inusitata locutione: nonne praecepit tibi; 'et perges,' ut subaudiamus verbum, quod supra positum est, et sit: "nonne perges?"
14. (4, 6) Nonne praecepit Dominus Deus Israel tibi: 'et perges in montem Thabor?' (has not the Lord God of Israel commanded you: "and you shall go to Mount Tabor?") It did not say "that you should go," which seems to be the consequence, but by an unusual expression, nonne praecepit tibi; 'et perges' (has he not commanded you: "and you shall go"), so that we understand the word that was placed above, and it be "have you not gone?"
ExpHept
Aut solita locutione plus habet: et; nam ista coniunctione detracta sensus currit: "nonne mandavit Dominus Deus Israel tibi: Perges in montem Thabor" et accipies tecum decem millia virorum? et cetera.
Or by the customary expression it has an extra et (and); for when this conjunction is removed, the sense runs: "has not the Lord God of Israel commanded you: you shall go to Mount Tabor et accipies tecum decem millia virorum (and you shall take with you ten thousand men)?" and so on.
ExpHept
15. (4, 8) Quoniam nescio diem, in quo Dominus prosperat angelum mecum; utrum prosperat actus angeli eius. Qui mecum est, an prospera mihi facit per angelum?
15. (4, 8) Quoniam nescio diem, in quo Dominus prosperat angelum mecum (for I do not know the day on which the Lord prospers the angel with me); whether he prospers the acts of his angel who is with me, or makes things prosperous for me through the angel.
ExpHept
16. (4, 13) Omnes currus suos nongentos currus ferreos. Ubilibet distinguatur, elegans repetitio: utrum, omnes currus suos, et deinde sequatur: nongentos currus ferreos, an: omnes currus suos nongentos, et deinde inferatur: currus ferreos.
16. (4, 13) Omnes currus suos nongentos currus ferreos (all his chariots, nine hundred iron chariots). Wherever the pause is made, the repetition is elegant: whether omnes currus suos (all his chariots), and then there follow nongentos currus ferreos (nine hundred iron chariots); or omnes currus suos nongentos (all his nine hundred chariots), and then be introduced currus ferreos (iron chariots).
ExpHept
17. (4, 15) Et pavefecit Dominus Sisaram et omnes currus eius et omnia castra eius in ore gladii in conspectu Barach. Quomodo pavefecit currus, nisi eos intellegas, qui erant in curribus?
17. (4, 15) Et pavefecit Dominus Sisaram et omnes currus eius et omnia castra eius in ore gladii in conspectu Barach (and the Lord terrified Sisera and all his chariots and all his camp by the edge of the sword in the sight of Barak). How did he terrify the chariots, unless you understand those who were in the chariots?
ExpHept
18. (4, 15) Et pavefecit Dominus Sisaram et omnes currus eius et omnia castra eius in ore gladii in conspectu Barach. Pavefecit in ore gladii, ac si diceret: "interfecit in ore gladii"; pavefecit ergo, cum caederentur gladio.
18. (4, 15) Et pavefecit Dominus Sisaram et omnes currus eius et omnia castra eius in ore gladii in conspectu Barach (and the Lord terrified Sisera and all his chariots and all his camp by the edge of the sword in the sight of Barak). He terrified by the edge of the sword, as if he said "he slew by the edge of the sword"; pavefecit (he terrified), then, when they were being cut down by the sword.
ExpHept
19. (4, 16) Et descendit Sisara de super curru suo; ita dici Latine potuit, quod est Graece [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
19. (4, 16) Et descendit Sisara de super curru suo (and Sisera came down from upon his chariot); it could be said in Latin thus, what is in Greek [Greek text].
ExpHept
20. (4, 18) Et cooperuit eum in pelle sua, non dixit: "pelle," aut: "de pelle"; sic enim habet Graecus: [MISSING GREEK TEXT].
20. (4, 18) Et cooperuit eum in pelle sua (and she covered him in her skin); it did not say "with a skin" or "with a skin [de + ablative]"; for thus the Greek has it: [Greek text].
ExpHept
21. (4, 20) Et erit si quis venerit ad te et dixerit: 'est hic vir?' Et dices: 'non est.' Detracta coniunctione consequentem habet sensum: "si quis venerit ad te et dixerit: 'est hic vir?' Dices: 'non est.'"
21. (4, 20) Et erit si quis venerit ad te et dixerit: 'est hic vir?' Et dices: 'non est.' (and it shall be, if anyone comes to you and says, "is there a man here?" and you shall say, "there is not.") With the conjunction removed it has a consistent sense: "if anyone comes to you and says, 'is there a man here?' you shall say, 'there is not.'"
ExpHept
22. (4, 24) Et pergebat manus filiorum Israel pergens; solita et frequentata locutio est.
22. (4, 24) Et pergebat manus filiorum Israel pergens (and the hand of the sons of Israel went on, going); it is a customary and frequent expression.
ExpHept
23. (4, 24) Et indurabatur in Iabin regem Chanaan; novo modo positum est hoc verbum: indurabatur, pro eo, "quod est fortis efficiebatur et praevalidus."
23. (4, 24) Et indurabatur in Iabin regem Chanaan (and it was hardening against Jabin king of Canaan); this word indurabatur (was hardening) is used in a new way, for "it was becoming strong and exceedingly powerful."
ExpHept
24. (4, 26) Perforavit caput eius et percussit; id est percussit caput eius et perforavit.
24. (4, 26) Perforavit caput eius et percussit (she pierced his head and struck him); that is, she struck his head and pierced it.
ExpHept
25. (4, 31) Sic pereant omnes inimici tui, Domine; et diligentes eum sicut ortus solis in potentia eius; non dixit: "diligentes te," cum utique de Domino vellet intellegi.
25. (4, 31) Sic pereant omnes inimici tui, Domine; et diligentes eum sicut ortus solis in potentia eius (so let all your enemies perish, O Lord; and let those who love him be as the rising of the sun in its power); it did not say "those who love you," although it certainly wished it to be understood of the Lord.
ExpHept
26. (6, 3) Et factum est quando seminavit vir Israel; non unum hominem significat, sed ipsam gentem.
26. (6, 3) Et factum est quando seminavit vir Israel (and it came to pass when the man of Israel sowed); it does not signify one man, but the nation itself.
ExpHept
27. (6, 3) Ascendebat Madian et Amalech et filii orientis et ascendebant super eum; ista repetitio verbi non videtur habere solitam elegantiam vel affectum.
27. (6, 3) Ascendebat Madian et Amalech et filii orientis et ascendebant super eum (Midian and Amalek and the sons of the East would come up, and they would come up against him); this repetition of the word does not seem to have the customary elegance or feeling.
ExpHept
28. (6, 9) Et liberavi vos de manu Aegypti; per manum potestatem significat, per Aegyptum Aegyptios.
28. (6, 9) Et liberavi vos de manu Aegypti (and I delivered you from the hand of Egypt); by manum (hand) it signifies power, by Aegyptum (Egypt) the Egyptians.
ExpHept
29. (6, 13) Et dixit ad eum Gedeon: 'in me, Domine, mi'; subintellegitur: "intende," hoc est: "in me intende." Et est ista locutio Scripturis familiarissima.
29. (6, 13) Et dixit ad eum Gedeon: 'in me, Domine, mi' (and Gideon said to him, "on me, my Lord"); "attend" is understood, that is, "attend to me." And this expression is most familiar to the Scriptures.
ExpHept
30. (6, 13) Et si est Dominus nobiscum, et ut quid invenerunt nos omnia mala ista? Plus habet coniunctionem et, sicut solet loqui Scriptura; quae si detrahatur, plena sententia est: "et si est Dominus nobiscum, ut quid invenerunt nos omnia mala ista?" Quamvis et superior coniunctio possit salva sententia detrahi, ut, cum dixisset: in me, Domine mi, deinde subsequeretur: si est Dominus nobiscum, ut quid invenerunt nos omnia mala ista? Magis enim hoc exigit nostrae locutionis consuetudo.
30. (6, 13) Et si est Dominus nobiscum, et ut quid invenerunt nos omnia mala ista? (and if the Lord is with us, and why have all these evils found us?) It has an extra conjunction et (and), as Scripture is wont to speak; if it is removed, the sentence is complete: "and if the Lord is with us, why have all these evils found us?" Although the earlier conjunction too could be removed with the sentence kept intact, so that, when it had said in me, Domine mi (on me, my Lord), there would then follow si est Dominus nobiscum, ut quid invenerunt nos omnia mala ista? (if the Lord is with us, why have all these evils found us?); for the usage of our expression rather requires this.
ExpHept
31. (6, 25) Et vitulum annorum septem. Hic manifestum est quomodo vitulos appellet Scriptura; bos enim annorum septem secundum consuetudinem locutionis nostrae non est utique vitulus, secundum hanc ergo locutionem dictum est de Samegar, quod occiderit sescentos viros praeter vitulos boum (Iud 3, 31), hoc est: "praeter boves."
31. (6, 25) Et vitulum annorum septem (and a calf of seven years). Here it is manifest how Scripture calls calves; for an ox of seven years, according to the usage of our expression, is certainly not a calf. According to this expression, then, it was said of Shamgar that he slew sescentos viros praeter vitulos boum (Judg 3:31) (six hundred men besides the calves of the oxen), that is, "besides the oxen."
ExpHept
32. (6, 34) Et cecinit in cornea; subauditur: tuba; Graecus enim non habet tuba, sed tantum cornea.
32. (6, 34) Et cecinit in cornea (and he sounded on the horn); "trumpet" is understood; for the Greek does not have tuba (trumpet), but only cornea (horn).
ExpHept
33. (7, 12) Camelis eorum non erat numerus, et erant sicut arena quae est ad labium maris. In multitudinem constat dictum [MISSING GREEK TEXT]. Haec autem translatio, ubi labium maris posuit pro: "litore," assidua est in Scripturis, sed rara est in Latinis codicibus, quia plerique litus interpretati sunt magis quid significaret labium volentes ponere quam ipsum labium. Nam "litus" si vellent Septuaginta interpretes dicere, non deesset linguae Graecae quod diceret.
33. (7, 12) Camelis eorum non erat numerus, et erant sicut arena quae est ad labium maris (their camels had no number, and they were as the sand which is at the lip of the sea). It is agreed to be said as a hyperbole, with regard to multitude. But this rendering, where it put labium maris (the lip of the sea) for "the shore," is constant in the Scriptures, but rare in the Latin manuscripts, because most rendered litus (shore), wishing rather to put down what labium (lip) signified than labium (lip) itself. For if the Septuagint translators had wished to say "shore," the Greek language would not have lacked a word to say it.
ExpHept
34. (7, 16) Et divisit trecentos viros per tria principia; pro "partibus" principia posuit.
34. (7, 16) Et divisit trecentos viros per tria principia (and he divided the three hundred men into three beginnings); it put principia (beginnings) for "parts."
ExpHept
35. (8, 1) Et dixerunt ad Gedeon vir Ephraem; id est viri de tribu Ephraem.
35. (8, 1) Et dixerunt ad Gedeon vir Ephraem (and the man of Ephraim said to Gideon); that is, the men of the tribe of Ephraim.
ExpHept
36. (8, 1) Quid verbum hoc fecisti nobis, ut non vocares nos cum exires pugnare in Madian? Verbum pro "facto" posuit.
36. (8, 1) Quid verbum hoc fecisti nobis, ut non vocares nos cum exires pugnare in Madian? (what is this word you have done to us, that you did not call us when you went out to fight in Midian?) It put verbum (word) for "deed."
ExpHept
37. (9, 4) Et dederunt septuaginta argenti; subauditur: "pondo," vel tale aliquid; interpretatio ex Hebraeo: septuaginta pondo habet.
37. (9, 4) Et dederunt septuaginta argenti (and they gave seventy of silver); "by weight" is understood, or something of the kind; the rendering from the Hebrew has septuaginta pondo (seventy by weight).
ExpHept
38. (9, 4) Et conduxit in ipsis Abimelech viros; in ipsis dixit pro: "ex ipsis," id est ex argenti pondo septuaginta conduxit viros.
38. (9, 4) Et conduxit in ipsis Abimelech viros (and Abimelech hired men in them); it said in ipsis (in them) for "out of them," that is, out of the seventy by weight of silver he hired men.
ExpHept
39. (9, 4) Viros inanes et perturbatos. Inanes posuit pro "levibus," quibus sunt contrarii "graves," unde dicitur: in populo gravi laudabo te (Ps 34, 18).
39. (9, 4) Viros inanes et perturbatos (empty and disordered men). It put inanes (empty) for "light men," to whom "weighty men" are contrary, whence it is said: in populo gravi laudabo te (Ps 35:18 (34:18)) (in a weighty people I will praise you).
ExpHept
40. (9, 5) Et intravit in domum patris sui in Ephratha et interfecit fratres suos filios Ierobaal septuaginta viros super lapidem unum. Quia iam superius septuaginta dixerat filios Ierobaal, id est Gedeon, et nunc eos septuaginta dicit occisos, quamvis minus occisi fuerint duo; id est ipse qui occidit et Ioatham iunior qui latuit, de quo adiungens dicit: et remansit Ioatham filius Ierobaal iunior, quoniam abscondit se. Ac per hoc universum numerum posuit pro paene universo.
40. (9, 5) Et intravit in domum patris sui in Ephratha et interfecit fratres suos filios Ierobaal septuaginta viros super lapidem unum (and he entered the house of his father in Ophrah and killed his brothers, the sons of Jerubbaal, seventy men, upon one stone). Because it had already said above that the sons of Jerubbaal, that is, of Gideon, were seventy, and now says that these seventy were killed, although two fewer were killed—that is, the one who killed them and the younger Jotham who hid, of whom it says by way of addition et remansit Ioatham filius Ierobaal iunior, quoniam abscondit se (and Jotham the younger son of Jerubbaal remained, because he hid himself)—and on this account it put the whole number for nearly the whole.
ExpHept
41. (9, 23) Et spreverunt viri Sicimorum in domo Abimelech. Non dixit: "spreverunt domum Abimelech."
41. (9, 23) Et spreverunt viri Sicimorum in domo Abimelech (and the men of Shechem despised in the house of Abimelech); it did not say "they despised the house of Abimelech."
ExpHept
42. (9, 34) Et insidiati sunt super Sicimam quattuor principia; id est quattuor partes. Iam istam locutionem etiam superius notavimus (Loc. 7, 34).
42. (9, 34) Et insidiati sunt super Sicimam quattuor principia (and they lay in ambush against Shechem, four beginnings); that is, four parts. We have already noted this expression above too (Locutions 7.34).
ExpHept
43. (9, 43) Et accepit populum et divisit eum in tria principia: accepit dixit de illo populo, qui cum illo erat; et hic tria principia pro "tribus partibus" posuit.
43. (9, 43) Et accepit populum et divisit eum in tria principia (and he took the people and divided them into three beginnings); it said accepit (he took) of that people who were with him; and here it put tria principia (three beginnings) for "three parts."
ExpHept
44. (9, 55) Et abierunt vir in locum suum; id est: "unusquisque."
44. (9, 55) Et abierunt vir in locum suum (and the man went away to his place); that is, "each one."
ExpHept
45. (11, 8) Et eris nobis in caput omnibus habitantibus Galaad; non dixit: "eris nobis caput"; sic enim solet loqui Scriptura. Unde est: esto mihi in Deum protectorem et in domum refugii (Ps 30, 3), et multa huiusmodi.
45. (11, 8) Et eris nobis in caput omnibus habitantibus Galaad (and you shall be to us for a head to all the inhabitants of Gilead); it did not say "you shall be our head"; for thus Scripture is wont to speak. Whence there is: esto mihi in Deum protectorem et in domum refugii (Ps 31:3 (30:3)) (be to me for a protecting God and for a house of refuge), and many things of this kind.
ExpHept
46. (11, 34) Et haec unica ei, et non est ei praeter ipsam filius aut filia; hoc est, quod dictum est: unica ei, sed propter affectum repetita sententia est.
46. (11, 34) Et haec unica ei, et non est ei praeter ipsam filius aut filia (and this one was an only child to him, and there is not to him besides her a son or daughter); this is what was said, unica ei (an only child to him), but the statement is repeated for the sake of affection.
ExpHept
47. (13, 2) Et non est ei praeter ipsam filius aut filia; non est ei pro: "non erat ei" dictum est; praeterita quippe narrantur.
47. (13, 2) Et non est ei praeter ipsam filius aut filia (and there is not to him besides her a son or daughter); non est ei (there is not to him) is said for "there was not to him"; for past things are being narrated.
ExpHept
48. (13, 2) Et uxor eius sterilis et non pariebat; cum potuisset sufficere quod dictum est: sterilis.
48. (13, 2) Et uxor eius sterilis et non pariebat (and his wife was barren and did not bear), when what was said, sterilis (barren), could have sufficed.
ExpHept
49. (13, 8) Et precatus est Manue Dominum et dixit: 'in me, Domine, homo Dei, quem misisti, veniat nunc iterum ad nos'; in me ita dictum est, ut subaudiatur: "intende."
49. (13, 8) Et precatus est Manue Dominum et dixit: 'in me, Domine, homo Dei, quem misisti, veniat nunc iterum ad nos' (and Manoah prayed to the Lord and said, "on me, O Lord, the man of God whom you sent, let him now come again to us"); in me (on me) is said in such a way that "attend" is understood.
ExpHept
50. (15, 8) Et percussit eos tibiam super femur. Haec locutio inusitata est, tamen locutio est, non aliquis in corpore vulneris locus, sicut in Quaestionibus exposui (Cf. Quaest. 7, 55); hoc est: percussit eos ad admirationem, ad stuporem.
50. (15, 8) Et percussit eos tibiam super femur (and he struck them, shin upon thigh). This expression is unusual; yet it is an expression, not some place of a wound on the body, as I explained in the Questions (See Questions 7.55); this is: he struck them so as to cause amazement, to cause astonishment.
ExpHept
51. (15, 10) Et dixerunt vir Iuda: 'quare ascendistis super nos'; singularem posuit pro plurali; dixerunt enim viri Iuda, non unus vir.
51. (15, 10) Et dixerunt vir Iuda: 'quare ascendistis super nos' (and the man of Judah said, "why have you come up against us"); it put the singular for the plural; for the men of Judah said it, not one man.
ExpHept
52. (15, 12) Ne forte occurratis in me vos; pro eo, quod est: "occidatis me." Et haec locutio in Quaestionibus (Cf. Quaest. 7, 56) exposita est.
52. (15, 12) Ne forte occurratis in me vos (lest perhaps you fall upon me); instead of what is "lest you kill me." This expression too is explained in the Questions (See Questions 7.56).
ExpHept
53. (15, 13-14) Et reduxerunt eum de petra, et venit usque ad Maxillam; locus est sic appellatus postea ex eo facto, quod ibi gessit ipse Samson, quando maxilla asini pugnans mille prostravit. Hoc ergo per prolepsim dictum est, quia post illa omnia gesta haec historia conscripta est.
53. (15, 13-14) Et reduxerunt eum de petra, et venit usque ad Maxillam (and they brought him back from the rock, and he came as far as Jawbone); the place was so named afterward from that deed which Samson himself did there, when, fighting with the jawbone of a donkey, he laid low a thousand. This, then, is said by prolepsis, because this history was written down after all those deeds.
ExpHept
54. (15, 14) Sicut stuppa cum olefecerit ignem; metaphora ab animali ad inanimale; non enim stuppa sensum habet olfactus sed ita dictum est, ac si diceretur: "cum ignem senserit." Quamvis et hoc quod dixi: "senserit" ad eamdem metaphoram pertineat; sed ad celeritatem intellegendam pertinet quod dictum est: olefecerit.
54. (15, 14) Sicut stuppa cum olefecerit ignem (like tow when it has smelled fire); a metaphor from the animate to the inanimate; for tow does not have a sense of smell, but it is said as if it were said "when it has sensed the fire." Although this too which I said, "has sensed," pertains to the same metaphor; but what was said, olefecerit (has smelled), pertains to the swiftness to be understood.
ExpHept
55. (15, 15) Et extendit manum suam et accepit eam; et si non diceret: extendit manum suam, utique extenta manu acceptam intellegeremus.
55. (15, 15) Et extendit manum suam et accepit eam (and he stretched out his hand and took it); even if it did not say extendit manum suam (he stretched out his hand), we would certainly understand that it was taken with the hand stretched out.
ExpHept
56. (16, 2) Et nuntiatum est Gazaeis dicentes; non ait: "nuntiaverunt dicentes," aut: "nuntiatum est a dicentibus."
56. (16, 2) Et nuntiatum est Gazaeis dicentes (and it was announced to the men of Gaza, saying); it did not say "they announced, saying," or "it was announced by those saying."
ExpHept
57. (16, 7) Si ligaverint me in septem nervis humidis nondum siccatis; non ait: "septem nervis," sed in septem nervis.
57. (16, 7) Si ligaverint me in septem nervis humidis nondum siccatis (if they bind me with seven moist sinews not yet dried); it did not say "with seven sinews," but in septem nervis (with seven sinews [in + ablative]).
ExpHept
58. (16, 7) Si ligaverint me in septem nervis humidis nondum siccatis, et infirmabor; plenum esset et si non haberet: et.
58. (16, 7) Si ligaverint me in septem nervis humidis nondum siccatis, et infirmabor (if they bind me with seven moist sinews not yet dried, and I shall be weakened); it would be complete even if it did not have et (and).
ExpHept
59. (16, 9) Et insidiae ei sedebant in cubiculo; quod nonnulli interpretati sunt: obsidebant; sed Graecus habet: [MISSING GREEK TEXT], hoc est: sedebat, quia insidiae singulari numero Graece dicuntur nec potest Latine dici: "insidia." Locutio autem notanda erat, quia dictum est: insidiae sedebant, pro his, "qui insidiabantur"; ipsi enim sedebant.
59. (16, 9) Et insidiae ei sedebant in cubiculo (and the ambush was sitting for him in the chamber); which some rendered obsidebant (were besieging); but the Greek has [Greek text], that is, sedebat (it was sitting), because insidiae (ambush) is said in Greek in the singular number, and it cannot be said in Latin "an ambush [singular]." But the expression was to be noted, because it is said insidiae sedebant (the ambush were sitting), for those "who were lying in ambush"; for they themselves were sitting.
ExpHept
60. (16, 10) Nunc ergo indica mihi in quo ligaberis; non ait: "quo ligaberis", aut: "unde ligaberis."
60. (16, 10) Nunc ergo indica mihi in quo ligaberis (now therefore tell me by what you may be bound); it did not say "with what you may be bound," or "from what you may be bound."
ExpHept
61. (16, 11) Si ligaverint me in funibus novis; non dixit: "funibus."
61. (16, 11) Si ligaverint me in funibus novis (if they bind me with new ropes); it did not say "with ropes."
ExpHept
62. (16, 11) Item: si ligaverint me in funiculis novis in quibus non est factum opus, et infirmabor; plenum esset, et si non praeponeretur: et.
62. (16, 11) Likewise: si ligaverint me in funiculis novis in quibus non est factum opus, et infirmabor (if they bind me with new cords on which no work has been done, and I shall be weakened); it would be complete even if et (and) were not put before.
ExpHept
63. (16, 15) Hoc tertium fefellisti me; tertium posuit pro: "tertio," sive: "ter," nomen scilicet pro adverbio, quod et in Latinis locutionibus eleganter fieri solet.
63. (16, 15) Hoc tertium fefellisti me (this third you have deceived me); it put tertium (a third) for "a third time," or "thrice"—a noun, that is, for an adverb, which is also wont to be done elegantly in Latin expressions.
ExpHept
64. (16, 26) Dimitte me, et palpabo columnas, super quas domus confirmata est super eas.
64. (16, 26) Dimitte me, et palpabo columnas, super quas domus confirmata est super eas (let me go, and I will feel the columns upon which the house is established upon them).
ExpHept

Notebook

Full View