Sermons V (148-183)

Augustine of Hippo · Sermons
SERMO 148
Sermon 148
Sermons5
1. Cum lectio legeretur de libro qui inscribitur Actus Apostolorum, animadvertistis quid contigerit eis, qui cum villam vendidissent, subtraxerunt de pretio villae, et ante pedes Apostolorum, quasi totum pretium, posuerunt. Continuo correpti exspiraverunt ambo, vir et uxor eius. Nonnullis videtur nimis severa ista fuisse correptio, ut propter pecuniam de re sua subtractam, homines morerentur. Non hoc Spiritus Sanctus avaritia fecit, sed Spiritus Sanctus mendacium sic punivit. Nam verba audistis beatissimi Petri, dicentis: Nonne manens tibi manebat, et venditum in tua erat potestate? Si nolles vendere, quis te cogeret? Si velles offerre dimidium, quis exigeret totum? Si enim dimidium offerendum erat, dimidium dicendum erat. Pro toto dimidium, hoc est puniendum mendacium. Non tamen videatur, fratres, severa correptio, mors temporalis. Atque utinam hucusque vindicta processerit. Quid enim magnum mortalibus contigit quandocumque morituris? Sed per illorum temporalem poenam Deus sciri voluit disciplinam. Credendum est autem quod post hanc vitam eis pepercerit Deus; magna est enim eius misericordia. De mortibus autem quae contingunt ex vindicta, ait quodam loco apostolus Paulus, corripiens eos qui male tractabant corpus et sanguinem Christi, et dicens: Propterea in vobis multi infirmi et aegri, et dormiunt sufficientes; id est, quantum sufficit ad disciplinam imponendam. Multi in vobis dormiunt, hoc est, moriuntur. Flagello enim Domini corripiebantur; aegrotabant, et moriebantur. Et subiecit post haec verba, et ait: Si enim nos ipsos iudicaremus, a Domino non iudicaremur. Cum iudicamur autem, a Domino corripimur, ne cum mundo damnemur . Quid si ergo huic viro et uxori eius tale aliquid contigit? Correpti sunt mortis flagello, ne supplicio punirentur aeterno.
1. When the reading was read from the book entitled The Acts of the Apostles (Acts 5:1-11), you noticed what happened to those who, having sold a piece of land, kept back part of the price of the land and laid it at the feet of the apostles as though it were the whole price. They were rebuked, and both at once breathed their last, the man and his wife. To some this rebuke seemed too severe, that people should die on account of money kept back from their own property. The Holy Spirit did not do this out of greed; rather, the Holy Spirit thus punished a lie. For you heard the words of the most blessed Peter, who said, While it remained, did it not remain your own, and after it was sold, was it not in your power (Acts 5:4)? If you did not wish to sell, who would have forced you? If you wished to offer half, who would have demanded the whole? For if half was to be offered, half ought to have been declared. Half for the whole—this is the lie that had to be punished. Yet do not regard this rebuke as severe, brothers, this temporal death. And would that the punishment had gone only this far! For what great thing happens to mortals who are going to die in any case? But through their temporal punishment God willed his discipline to be known. We must believe, however, that after this life God spared them, for great is his mercy. Now concerning the deaths that come as punishment, the apostle Paul says in a certain place, rebuking those who were mistreating the body and blood of Christ, For this reason many among you are weak and sick, and some have fallen asleep (1 Cor 11:30)—that is, as many as suffices to impose discipline. Many among you have fallen asleep, that is, have died. For they were being scourged by the Lord; they fell sick and died. And after these words he added, For if we judged ourselves, we would not be judged by the Lord. But when we are judged, we are rebuked by the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world (1 Cor 11:31-32). What, then, if something like this happened to this man and his wife? They were rebuked by the scourge of death, that they might not be punished with eternal torment.
Sermons5.1
2. Hoc tantum attendat Caritas vestra, quia si Deo displicuit detrahere de pecunia quam voverant Deo, et utique illa pecunia usibus hominum fuerat necessaria; quomodo irascitur Deus, quando vovetur castitas, et non exhibetur; quando vovetur virginitas, et non exhibetur? Vovetur enim ad usus Dei, et non ad usus hominum. Quid est quod dixi: Ad usus Dei? Quia de sanctis Deus facit sibi domum, facit sibi templum, in quo habitare dignetur; et utique sanctum vult permanere templum suum. Potest ergo virgini sanctimoniali nubenti dici, quod ait Petrus de pecunia: Virginitas tua numquid non manens tibi manebat, et antequam eam voveres, in tua fuerat potestate? Quaecumque autem hoc fecerint, voverint talia, et non reddiderint; non se putent temporalibus mortibus corripi, sed aeterno igne damnari.
2. Let your Charity attend only to this, that if it displeased God for them to withhold part of the money they had vowed to God—and that money, surely, was needed for human use—how angry is God when chastity is vowed and not rendered, when virginity is vowed and not rendered? For it is vowed for the use of God, not for the use of human beings. What do I mean when I say "for the use of God"? That out of holy persons God makes himself a house, makes himself a temple, in which he may deign to dwell; and surely he wills his temple to remain holy. So to a consecrated virgin about to marry one may say what Peter said about the money: Did not your virginity remain your own while it remained, and before you vowed it, was it not in your power? But whoever does this, vows such things and does not render them, let them not suppose that they are rebuked with temporal deaths, but condemned to eternal fire.
Sermons5.2
SERMO 149
Sermon 149
Sermons5.2
1. 1. Ante diem Dominicum superiorem, memini me propositarum de Scripturis quarumdam quaestionum factum esse debitorem Sanctitati vestrae . Est autem, quantum Dominus dare dignatur, solvendi tempus, ne diutius debeamus, nisi solam caritatem, quae semper redditur, et semper debetur. De visione Petri dixeramus quaerendum esse, quid sibi velit vas illud; tamquam linteum submissum da caelo quattuor lineis, in quo erant omnia quadrupedia terrae, et serpentia, et volatilia caeli; et quod dictum est Petro voce divina: Occide et manduca ; et quod ter factum est et assumptum.
1. 1. Before last Sunday, I recall that I became a debtor to your Holiness for certain questions proposed from the Scriptures. Now, as far as the Lord deigns to grant, it is time to pay, lest we remain longer in debt for anything except love alone, which is always paid and always owed. We had said that we must inquire about the vision of Peter, what that vessel means—like a sheet let down from heaven by four corners, in which were all the four-footed creatures of the earth, and creeping things, and birds of the air (Acts 10:11-12); and what was said to Peter by the divine voice, Kill and eat (Acts 10:13); and that this was done three times and taken up.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Adversus eos quidem qui voracitatem a Domino Deo imperatam Petro arbitrantur, facile est disputare. Primo, quia etiamsi ad litteram velimus accipere quod dictum est: Occide, et manduca; non occidere et manducare peccatum est, sed immoderate uti donis Dei, quae tribuit ad usus homini.
2. 2. Against those, indeed, who suppose that gluttony was commanded to Peter by the Lord God, it is easy to argue. First, because even if we wish to take literally what was said, Kill and eat, to kill and eat is not a sin; rather, the sin is to use immoderately the gifts of God, which he bestowed for human use.
Sermons5.2.2
2. 3. Iudaei enim acceperant certa animalia quae manducarent, et certa a quibus abstinerent; quod in significatione rerum futurarum eos accepisse, manifestat apostolus Paulus, dicens: Nemo ergo vos iudicet in cibo, aut in potu, aut in parte diei festi, aut neomeniae, aut sabbatorum, quod est umbra futurorum . Itaque iam temporibus Ecclesiae dicit alio loco: Omnia munda mundis, sed malum est homini qui per offensionem manducat . Erant enim qui tempore illo, quo ista scribebat Apostolus, carnibus vescebantur, in offensionem quorumdam infirmorum. Immolatitia enim caro eorum pecorum quae aruspices immolabant, tunc in macello vendebatur, et multi fratres abstinebant se ab edendis carnibus, ne vel ignari incurrerent in eas carnes de quibus sacrificium idolis factum erat. Unde alio loco idem Apostolus, ne timore conscientia trepidaret, ait: Omne quod in macello venit, manducate, nihil interrogantes propter conscientiam. Domini est enim terra et plenitudo eius. Et iterum: Si quis autem vos vocaverit ex infidelibus, et volueritis ire; omnia quae apponuntur vobis manducate, nihil diiudicantes propter conscientiam. Si quis autem vobis dixerit: quod immolatitium est; nolite manducare, propter illum qui indicavit, et propter conscientiam . Omne ergo in his rebus sive mundum sive immundum, non in contactu carnis, sed in conscientiae puritate, aut in macula constitutum est.
2. 3. For the Jews had received certain animals that they might eat, and certain ones from which they were to abstain; and the apostle Paul shows that they received this as a sign of things to come, saying, Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in matters of food and drink, or with regard to a feast day or a new moon or a sabbath, which is a shadow of things to come (Col 2:16-17). And so in the times of the Church he now says in another place, All things are clean to the clean, but it is evil for the man who eats with offense (Rom 14:20). For there were those, at the time the Apostle was writing this, who ate meats to the offense of certain weaker persons. For the sacrificial flesh of those beasts which the soothsayers offered was then sold in the market, and many of the brothers abstained from eating meats, lest even unknowingly they should run into that flesh of which a sacrifice had been made to idols. Hence in another place the same Apostle, that the conscience might not tremble with fear, says, Eat whatever is sold in the meat market, asking no question on the ground of conscience. For the earth is the Lord's, and the fullness thereof (1 Cor 10:25-26). And again, If one of the unbelievers invites you, and you wish to go, eat whatever is set before you, raising no question on the ground of conscience. But if anyone says to you, "This has been offered in sacrifice," then do not eat it, for the sake of the one who informed you, and for conscience' sake (1 Cor 10:27-28). Therefore, in these matters everything clean or unclean is established not in the contact of the flesh, but in the purity or the stain of the conscience.
Sermons5.2.3
3. 4. Unde data est licentia Christianis, quae Iudaeis non est data. Omnia enim animalia quae Iudaeis prohibita sunt manducare, signa sunt rerum, et sicut dictum est, umbrae futurorum. Sicut illa circumcisio significat circumcisionem cordis, quam illi in carne gestabant, et in corde repudiabant; sic et epulae illae praecepta mysteriorum sunt, et signa futurorum. Veluti quod scriptum est eis, ut quae sunt ruminantia et fissa ungula, ipsa manducent; quibus autem vel utrumque vel unum horum defuerit, non manducent ; homines quidam significantur, non pertinentes ad societatem sanctorum. Fissa enim ungula ad mores, ruminatio vero ad sapientiam pertinet. Quare ad mores fissa ungula? Quia difficile labitur. Lapsus enim peccati signum est. Ruminatio autem ad sapientiae doctrinam quomodo pertinet? Quia dixit Scriptura: Thesaurus desiderabilis requiescit in ore sapientis, vir autem stultus glutit illum . Qui ergo audit, et negligentia fit obliviosus, quasi glutit quod audivit; ut iam in ore non sapiat, auditionem ipsam oblivione sepeliens. Qui autem in lege Domini meditatur die et nocte, tamquam ruminat, et in quodam quasi palato cordis verbi sapore delectatur. Hoc ergo quod praeceptum est Iudaeis, significat quod ad Ecclesiam, id est, ad corpus Christi, ad gratiam societatemque sanctorum non pertinent illi, qui aut neglegentes auditores sunt, aut malos mores habent, aut in utroque vitio reprehenduntur.
3. 4. Hence a liberty was given to Christians that was not given to the Jews. For all the animals that the Jews were forbidden to eat are signs of things, and, as has been said, shadows of things to come. Just as that circumcision signifies the circumcision of the heart, which they bore in the flesh and rejected in the heart, so too those foods are precepts of mysteries and signs of things to come. For instance, it was written for them that they should eat those animals that chew the cud and have a divided hoof, but should not eat those that lack either both or one of these (Lev 11:3; Deut 14:6): by this are signified certain people who do not belong to the fellowship of the saints. For the divided hoof pertains to conduct, the chewing of the cud to wisdom. Why does the divided hoof pertain to conduct? Because it slips with difficulty. For a slip is a sign of sin. And how does chewing the cud pertain to the teaching of wisdom? Because Scripture says, A desirable treasure rests in the mouth of the wise, but a foolish man swallows it down (Prov 21:20). So whoever hears and through negligence becomes forgetful, as it were swallows down what he has heard, so that it no longer has any savor in his mouth, burying the very hearing of it in forgetfulness. But whoever meditates on the law of the Lord day and night (Ps 1:2) chews the cud, as it were, and on a kind of palate of the heart delights in the savor of the word. So this which was commanded to the Jews signifies that those who are either negligent hearers, or have evil conduct, or are blameworthy in both faults, do not belong to the Church, that is, to the body of Christ, to the grace and the fellowship of the saints.
Sermons5.3.4
4. 5. Sic cetera quae ad hunc modum praecepta sunt data Iudaeis, umbraticae sunt significationes futurorum. Posteaquam venit lux mundi Dominus noster Iesus Christus, tantummodo ut intellegantur, non etiam ut observentur, leguntur. Data est ergo licentia Christianis, ut secundum hanc vanam consuetudinem non faciant, sed manducent quod velint, cum moderatione, cum benedictione, cum gratiarum actione. Fortassis ergo et Petro ita dictum est: Occide, et manduca ; ut non iam teneret observationes Iudaeorum; non tamen ei quasi gurges ventris et foeda voracitas imperata est.
4. 5. So too the other precepts of this kind given to the Jews are shadowy significations of things to come. After our Lord Jesus Christ, the light of the world, came, they are read only so that they may be understood, not also so that they may be observed. A liberty was therefore given to Christians not to act according to this empty custom, but to eat what they will, with moderation, with blessing, with thanksgiving. So perhaps it was also said to Peter, Kill and eat, so that he might no longer hold to the observances of the Jews; yet it was not the gluttony of the belly and foul voracity that was commanded him.
Sermons5.4.5
5. 6. Sed tamen ut intellegatis hoc in figura esse monstratum, erant in illo vase serpentia. Numquidnam poterat manducare serpentes? Quid ergo sibi vult ista significatio? Vas illud Ecclesiam significat: quattuor lineae quibus dependebat, quattuor partes orbis terrarum, per quas tenditur Ecclesia catholica, quae ubique diffusa est. Quicumque ergo voluerit in partem ire, et ab universo conscindi, non pertinet ad quattuor linearum sacramentum. Si autem ad visionem Petri non pertinet, nec ad claves quae datae sunt Petro. A quattuor enim ventis dicit Deus congregari sanctos suos in fine ; quia nunc per omnes istos quattuor cardines fides evangelica dilatatur. Animalia ergo illa, Gentes sunt. Omnes enim Gentes quae immundae erant, in erroribus et superstitionibus et concupiscentiis suis, antequam veniret Christus, illo adveniente donatis sibi peccatis mundae sunt factae. Unde iam post remissionem peccatorum, quare non recipiantur in corpus Christi, quod est Ecclesia Dei, cuius personam Petrus gestabat?
5. 6. But that you may understand this to have been shown in a figure, there were creeping things in that vessel. Could Peter possibly eat serpents? What, then, does this signification mean? That vessel signifies the Church; the four corners by which it hung, the four parts of the world, throughout which the catholic Church is stretched, spread everywhere. Whoever, therefore, wishes to go off into a part and be cut off from the whole does not belong to the sacrament of the four corners. But if he does not belong to the vision of Peter, neither does he belong to the keys that were given to Peter. For from the four winds, God says, his saints will be gathered at the end (See Matt 24:31), because now the gospel faith is spread abroad through all those four quarters. Those animals, then, are the nations. For all the nations that were unclean, in their errors and superstitions and lusts, before Christ came, were made clean at his coming, their sins forgiven. Hence, after the forgiveness of sins, why should they not be received into the body of Christ, which is the Church of God, whose person Peter bore?
Sermons5.5.6
6. 7. Petrus enim in multis locis Scripturarum apparet quod personam gestet Ecclesiae; maxime illo in loco ubi dictum est: Tibi trado claves regni caelorum. Quaecumque ligaveris in terra, erunt ligata et in caelo; et quaecumque solveris in terra, erunt soluta et in caelo . Numquid istas claves Petrus accepit, et Paulus non accepit? Petrus accepit, et Ioannes et Iacobus non accepit, et ceteri Apostoli? Aut non sunt istae in Ecclesia claves, ubi peccata quotidie dimittuntur? Sed quoniam in significatione personam Petrus gestabat Ecclesiae, quod illi uni datum est, Ecclesiae datum est. Ergo Petrus figuram gestabat Ecclesiae; Ecclesia corpus est Christi. Recipiat igitur iam mundatas Gentes, quibus peccata donata sunt; unde miserat ad illum Cornelius gentilis homo, et qui cum illo gentiles erant. Huius eleemosynae acceptae mundaverant eum ad quemdam modum; restabat ut tamquam cibus mundus incorporaretur Ecclesiae, hoc est, corpori Domini. Petrus autem trepidabat tradere Gentibus Evangelium; quia illi qui crediderant ex circumcisione, prohibebant Apostolos tradere incircumcisis christianam fidem; et dicebant non eos debere accedere ad participationem Evangelii, nisi suscepissent circumcisionem, quae tradita erat patribus eorum.
6. 7. For Peter appears in many places in the Scriptures to bear the person of the Church, most of all in that place where it was said, To you I hand over the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven (Matt 16:19). Did Peter receive these keys, and Paul not receive them? Did Peter receive them, and John and James not receive them, and the rest of the apostles? Or are these keys not in the Church, where sins are forgiven every day? But because in this signification Peter bore the person of the Church, what was given to him alone was given to the Church. Therefore Peter bore the figure of the Church; the Church is the body of Christ. Let it therefore now receive the nations, already made clean, to whom sins have been forgiven; whence Cornelius, a gentile man, and those who were gentiles with him, sent to him. The almsgiving that was accepted had cleansed him in a certain measure; it remained that, like clean food, he should be incorporated into the Church, that is, into the body of the Lord. But Peter was hesitant to hand over the gospel to the gentiles, because those who had believed from the circumcision were forbidding the apostles to hand over the Christian faith to the uncircumcised, and were saying that they ought not to come to a share in the gospel unless they had received circumcision, which had been handed down to their fathers.
Sermons5.6.7
7. 8. Vas ergo illud dubitationem istam sustulit; et ideo post illam visionem admonitus est ab Spiritu Sancto, ut descenderet et iret cum eis qui venerant a Cornelio, et perrexit. Cornelius enim et qui cum illo erant, tamquam ex illis animalibus habebantur, quae in vase fuerant demonstrata; quos tamen iam mundaverat Deus, quia eleemosynas eorum inde acceptaverat. Occidendi ergo erant et manducandi, id est, ut interficeretur in eis vita praeterita, qua non noverant Christum; et transirent in corpus eius, tamquam in novam vitam societatis Ecclesiae. Nam et ipse Petrus cum ad eos venisset, commemoravit breviter quid sibi in illa visione monstratum sit. Ait enim: Et vos scitis quam illicitum sit viro Iudaeo coniungi, aut accedere ad alienigenam; sed mihi Deus ostendit, neminem communem aut immundum hominem dicere. Quod utique tunc ostendit Deus, cum vox illa sonuit: Quae Deus mundavit, tu ne immunda dixeris . Et postea veniens ad fratres in Ierosolymam, cum quidam tumultuarentur, quod Gentibus Evangelium traderetur, reprimens eorum commotionem, etiam ipsum visum commemoravit ; quod nisi ad eamdem intellegentiam pertineret, commemorandum non esset.
7. 8. That vessel, then, removed this hesitation; and so after that vision he was admonished by the Holy Spirit to go down and go with those who had come from Cornelius, and he went. For Cornelius and those who were with him were reckoned among those animals that had been shown in the vessel; yet God had already cleansed them, since he had accepted their alms. They were therefore to be killed and eaten, that is, the past life in which they had not known Christ was to be slain in them, and they were to pass over into his body, as into the new life of the fellowship of the Church. For Peter himself, when he had come to them, briefly recalled what had been shown him in that vision. For he said, You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a Jewish man to associate with or visit a foreigner; but God has shown me that I should call no man common or unclean (Acts 10:28). And this God indeed showed when that voice sounded, What God has cleansed, you must not call unclean (Acts 10:15). And afterward, coming to the brothers in Jerusalem, when some were in an uproar because the gospel was being handed over to the gentiles, to restrain their agitation he recalled this same vision (Acts 11:1-18); and unless it pertained to the same understanding, it would not have needed to be recalled.
Sermons5.7.8
8. 9. Fortassis quaeratur etiam illud, quare linteum erat, in quo erant illa animalia. Non utique sine causa. Novimus enim quod linteum tinea non consumit, quae vestes alias corrumpit. Excludat unusquisque de corde suo corruptiones malarum concupiscentiarum, atque ita incorruptibiliter firmetur in fide, ut pravis cogitationibus tamquam tineis non penetretur, si vult ad sacramentum illius lintei pertinere, quo figuratur Ecclesia.
8. 9. Perhaps it may also be asked why it was a linen sheet in which those animals were. Surely not without cause. For we know that the moth does not consume linen, which corrupts other garments. Let each one shut out from his heart the corruptions of evil desires, and so be established incorruptibly in faith, that he may not be penetrated by depraved thoughts as by moths, if he wishes to belong to the sacrament of that sheet, by which the Church is figured.
Sermons5.8.9
9. 10. Quare ter de caelo submissum est? Quia ipsae omnes Gentes, quae pertinent ad quattuor partes orbis terrae, qua disseminatur Ecclesia, quam significabant quattuor lineae, quibus vas illud connectebatur, in nomine Trinitatis baptizantur. In nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti credentes innovantur, ut pertineant ad societatem communionemque sanctorum. Quattuor ergo lineae et trina submissio, etiam duodenarium Apostolorum numerum ostendit; tamquam ternis per quattuor deputatis. Quater enim tria, duodecim fiunt. Satis, ut arbitror, de ista visione tractatum est.
9. 10. Why was it let down from heaven three times? Because all those very nations, which belong to the four parts of the world through which the Church is scattered—the Church that the four corners by which that vessel was bound together signified—are baptized in the name of the Trinity. Believing in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, they are made new, that they may belong to the society and communion of the saints. The four corners, then, and the threefold lowering also show the number twelve of the apostles, as if three were assigned to each of the four. For four times three makes twelve. Enough, I think, has been treated concerning this vision.
Sermons5.9.10
10. 11. Alia quaestio a nobis dilata erat, quare Dominus in ipso sermone quem in monte habuit, dixit discipulis suis: Luceant opera vestra coram hominibus, ut videant bona facta vestra, et glorificent Patrem vestrum, qui in caelis est . Et paulo post in eo ipso sermone ait: Cavete facere iustitiam vestram coram hominibus, ut videamini ab eis; et: Sit eleemosyna tua in abscondito, et Pater tuus qui videt in abscondito, reddet tibi . Fluctuat plerumque operator inter haec duo praecepta, et cui obtemperet nescit; quando utique Domino vult obtemperare, qui utrumque praecepit. Quomodo lucebunt opera nostra coram hominibus, ut videant bona facta nostra; et quomodo rursus erit eleemosyna nostra in abscondito? Si hoc observare voluero, in illud offendo; si illud observavero, hinc pecco. Ergo uterque Scripturae locus ita temperandus est, ut ostendantur divina praecepta adversa sibi esse non posse. Nam ista quae videtur pugna in verbis, pacem intellectoris inquirit. Habeat quisque cum Dei verbo in corde concordiam, et Scripturae nulla discordia est.
10. 11. Another question had been deferred by us: why the Lord, in that very sermon which he delivered on the mountain, said to his disciples, Let your works shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father who is in heaven (Matt 5:16). And a little later in that same sermon he says, Beware of practicing your righteousness before men, in order to be seen by them (Matt 6:1); and, Let your alms be in secret, and your Father who sees in secret will reward you (Matt 6:4). The doer often wavers between these two precepts and does not know which to obey, when surely he wishes to obey the Lord, who commanded both. How will our works shine before men, that they may see our good deeds, and how again will our almsgiving be in secret? If I wish to observe the one, I offend against the other; if I observe the other, I sin against this. So both passages of Scripture must be so harmonized that the divine precepts may be shown to be unable to be contrary to one another. For this conflict that seems to be in the words seeks the peace of the one who understands. Let each have concord with the word of God in his heart, and there is no discord in Scripture.
Sermons5.10.11
11. 12. Propone ergo hominem eleemosynam facientem, sic ut omnino nesciat aliquis, si fieri potest, nec ille cui datur; ut eius etiam oculos vitans ponat potius quod inveniat, quam porrigat quod accipiat. Quid potest facere amplius, ut abscondat eleemosynam suam? Iste utique incurrit in illam sententiam, et non facit quod Dominus ait: Luceant opera vestra coram hominibus, ut videant bona facta vestra . Nemo videt facta eius bona, non invitat ad imitandum. Erunt ceteri steriles, quantum in ipso est, dum putant a nemine fieri quod praecepit Deus, si hoc homines agant, ut non videantur bona opera eorum; cum maior misericordia in eum fiat, cui proponitur bonae imitationis exemplum, quam cui porrigitur reficiendi corporis alimentum. Propone alterum eleemosynas suas apud populum ventilantem atque iactantem, nihil aliud in eis quam velle laudari; luceant opera eius coram hominibus. Videtis quia non offendit in illud praeceptum; sed offendit in alterum dicentis Domini: Sit eleemosyna tua in abscondito . Talis qui fuerit, etiam pigrescit, si existant aliqui impii, qui forte reprehendant quod facit. Pendet ex lingua laudantium; similis est autem virginibus quae non portant oleum secum. Nostis enim quinque virgines stultas, quae oleum secum non portaverunt; alias autem sapientes, quae oleum secum portaverunt. Omnium lampades lucebant: sed aliae non habebant secum unde illam pascerent lucem, et ab eis quae habebant ita distinguebantur, ut illae stultae, illae sapientes dicerentur . Quid est ergo, ferre oleum secum, nisi habere conscientiam placendi Deo de bonis operibus, et non ibi finem gaudii sui ponere, si homines laudent, qui conscientiam videre non possunt? Quia facit enim, potest videre homo; quo autem animo faciat, Deus videt.
11. 12. Consider, then, a man giving alms in such a way that no one whatever knows of it, if it can be done—not even the one to whom it is given—so that, avoiding even his eyes, he rather puts down what the other may find than holds out what he may take. What more can he do to hide his almsgiving? Surely this man runs into that other saying and does not do what the Lord says, Let your works shine before men, that they may see your good deeds. No one sees his good deeds; he invites no one to imitate them. The rest will be barren, so far as it lies in him, while they suppose that what God commanded is done by no one, if people act in such a way that their good works are not seen—when there is greater mercy shown toward the one to whom an example of good imitation is set before him than toward the one to whom food for refreshing the body is held out. Consider another flaunting and parading his alms before the people, wanting nothing else in them than to be praised; let his works shine before men. You see that he does not offend against that precept, but he offends against the other, where the Lord says, Let your alms be in secret. Whoever is such a man even grows slack if some ungodly persons arise who perhaps reproach what he does. He hangs upon the tongue of those who praise; he is like the virgins who do not carry oil with them. For you know of the five foolish virgins who did not carry oil with them, and the others, the wise, who did carry oil with them. The lamps of all were burning, but some had not with them the means to feed that light, and were so distinguished from those who had it that the ones were called foolish, the others wise (Matt 25:1-13). What, then, is it to carry oil with oneself, but to have the conscience of pleasing God by good works, and not to place there the limit of one's joy, in the praise of people who cannot see the conscience? For a person can see what he does, but God sees with what intention he does it.
Sermons5.11.12
12. 13. Proponamus ergo aliquem praeceptum utrumque servantem, utrique oboedientem. Porrigit panem esurienti, et porrigit coram illis quos vult facere imitatores suos; imitatus etiam Apostolum dicentem: Imitatores mei estote, sicut et ego Christi . Porrigit ergo pauperi panem, manifestus in opere, devotus in corde. Utrum laudem suam ibi quaerat, an gloriam Dei nullus hominum videt, nullus hominum iudicat; sed tamen illi qui studio benevolo ad imitandum parati sunt, quod bonum fieri vident, etiam pio animo fieri credunt; et laudant Deum, cuius praecepto et dono talia fieri vident. Apparet ergo opus eius, ut videant homines, et glorificent Patrem qui in caelis est; ipse autem effectus eius in corde est, ut sit eleemosyna eius in abscondito, et Pater qui videt in abscondito, reddat ei. Servavit iste modum quem debuit, nullius praecepti contemptor, sed utriusque perfector. Cavit enim ne fieret iustitia eius coram hominibus, id est, ne ibi haberet finem, ut ab hominibus laudaretur, quando non se ipsum, sed Deum voluit in opere suo bono laudari. Ea vero voluntas quia intus est in ipsa conscientia, facta est eleemosyna illa in abscondito, ut ille retribuat, cui nihil absconditur. Quis enim potest cor suum hominibus demonstrare cum facit, ut ostendat qua intentione animi faciat?
12. 13. Let us therefore set before us someone keeping both precepts, obedient to both. He holds out bread to the hungry, and he holds it out before those whom he wishes to make his imitators, imitating also the Apostle who says, Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ (1 Cor 11:1). So he holds out bread to the poor man, manifest in the deed, devout in heart. Whether he seeks his own praise there, or the glory of God, no human being sees, no human being judges; yet those who with kindly zeal are ready to imitate believe that the good they see being done is also done with a devout spirit, and they praise God, by whose precept and gift they see such things being done. His work therefore appears, that people may see and glorify the Father who is in heaven; but its effect is in the heart, so that his almsgiving may be in secret, and the Father who sees in secret may reward him. This man kept the measure he owed, despising no precept, but fulfilling both. For he took care that his righteousness should not be done before men—that is, that it should not have its limit there, in being praised by men—since he wished not himself, but God, to be praised in his good work. And because that intention is within, in the conscience itself, his almsgiving was done in secret, that the One from whom nothing is hidden might repay him. For who can show his heart to people when he acts, so as to display with what intention of mind he acts?
Sermons5.12.13
13. 14. Nam et ipsa verba, fratres, satis perpense a Domino dicta sunt. Attendite quomodo dicat: Cavete facere iustitiam vestram coram hominibus, ut videamini, inquit, ab eis . Si ibi posuit finem, ubi dixit: ut videamini ab eis; iste finis est reprehensibilis atque culpabilis, usque ad hominum laudem velle benefacere, nihil amplius inde quaerere. Quisquis ergo ideo tantum facit, ut videatur ab hominibus, reprehenditur a Domino in ista sententia. Illic vero ubi iubet videri bona facta nostra, non ibi finem posuit, ut tantummodo homines hominem videant, et hominem laudent; sed transit ad gloriam Dei, ut usque ad illam perducatur operantis intentio. Luceant, inquit, opera vestra coram hominibus, ut videant bona facta vestra; sed non hoc debes quaerere. Quid ergo? Addit et dicit: et glorificent, inquit, Patrem vestrum qui in caelis est . Hoc si quaeris, ut glorificetur Deus, noli timere ne videaris ab hominibus. Etiam sic intus est eleemosyna tua in abscondito; ubi solus ille cuius gloriam quaeris, te videt hoc quaerere. Unde apostolus Paulus posteaquam Evangelii persecutor prostratus est, et erectus est praedicator, dicit: Eram autem ignotus facie Ecclesiis Iudaeae, quae erant in Christo. Tantum autem audientes erant, quia qui aliquando nos persequebatur, nunc evangelizat fidem quam aliquando vastabat; et in me, inquit, magnificabant Deum . Non gaudebat quia homo qui acceperat, cognoscebatur; sed quia Deus qui dederat, laudabatur. Ipse enim dixit: Si adhuc hominibus placerem, Christi servus non essem . Et tamen alio loco dicit: Sicut et ego omnibus per omnia placeo. Et ista similis quaestio est. Sed quid adiungit? Non quaerens, inquit, quod mihi prodest, sed quod multis, ut salvi fiant . Hoc est, quod illo loco ait: Et in me magnificabant Deum; quod etiam Dominus dicit: Ut glorificent Patrem vestrum qui in caelis est. Tunc enim salvi fiunt, cum in operibus quae fieri per homines vident, eum glorificant a quo haec homines acceperunt.
13. 14. For the very words too, brothers, were carefully chosen by the Lord. Notice how he speaks: Beware of practicing your righteousness before men, in order, he says, to be seen by them. If he placed the limit there, where he said, in order to be seen by them, that limit is blameworthy and culpable—to wish to do good only up to human praise, seeking nothing further from it. Whoever, therefore, acts only in order to be seen by people is rebuked by the Lord in this saying. But there, where he commands our good deeds to be seen, he did not place the limit so that people should merely see a person and praise a person; rather, he passes on to the glory of God, so that the doer's intention may be carried all the way to that. Let your works shine, he says, before men, that they may see your good deeds; but you must not seek this. What, then? He adds and says, and let them glorify, he says, your Father who is in heaven. If you seek this, that God may be glorified, do not fear to be seen by people. Even so your almsgiving is within, in secret, where he alone whose glory you seek sees that you seek this. Hence the apostle Paul, after he was thrown down as a persecutor of the gospel and raised up as a preacher, says, I was unknown by face to the churches of Judea that were in Christ. They only heard it said, "He who once persecuted us is now preaching the faith he once ravaged"; and in me, he says, they magnified God (Gal 1:22-24). He did not rejoice that the man who had received was recognized, but that God who had given was praised. For he himself said, If I were still pleasing men, I would not be a servant of Christ (Gal 1:10). And yet in another place he says, Just as I too please all men in all things. And this is a similar question. But what does he add? Not seeking, he says, what is profitable to me, but to many, that they may be saved (1 Cor 10:33). This is what he says in that other place, And in me they magnified God; what the Lord too says, That they may glorify your Father who is in heaven. For then they are saved, when in the works they see done through people they glorify the One from whom people received these things.
Sermons5.13.14
14. 15. Restant duae quaestiones; sed vereor ne oneri sim iam fastidientibus, item timeo ne fraudem adhuc esurientes. Memini tamen quid solverim, et quid debeam. Restat enim videre quid sit: Nesciat sinistra tua quid faciat dextera tua ; et de dilectione inimici, cur antiquis videbatur data licentia ut odissent inimicos, quorum nobis imperatur dilectio. Sed quid facio? Si breviter de his disseram, fortassis non ita ut oportet intellegar; si diutius, timeo ne plus gravem vos onere sermonis, quam fructu expositionis sublevem. Sed certe si minus quam satis est, intellexeritis; adhuc me tenere debitorem, ut alio tempore ista plenius disserantur. Tamen nunc non oportet ea sic relinqui, ut omnino nihil inde dicatur. Sinistra est animi cupiditas carnalis, dextera est animi caritas spiritalis. Si ergo cum quisque facit eleemosynam, miscet cupiditatem temporalium commodorum, ut in opere illo aliquid tale conquirat; miscet sinistrae conscientiam operibus dexterae. Si autem simplici caritate et pura coram Deo conscientia homini subvenit, nihil aliud intuens, nisi ut illi placeat qui haec iubet, nescit sinistra quid facit dextera.
14. 15. Two questions remain; but I fear that I am a burden to those already weary, and again I fear to defraud those still hungry. Yet I remember what I have paid and what I owe. For it remains to see what this means, Let not your left hand know what your right hand is doing (Matt 6:3); and concerning the love of an enemy, why it seemed to the ancients that license was given to hate their enemies, whose love is commanded to us. But what am I doing? If I treat these matters briefly, perhaps I shall not be understood as I ought; if at greater length, I fear that I may weigh you down more with the burden of the sermon than I relieve you with the fruit of the exposition. But surely, if you understand less than enough, I still hold myself a debtor, that at another time these things may be more fully treated. Yet now they ought not to be so left that nothing at all is said about them. The left hand is the carnal desire of the soul, the right hand the spiritual love of the soul. If, then, when anyone gives alms, he mingles in the desire for temporal advantages, so that he seeks something of that sort in the work, he mingles the conscience of the left hand with the works of the right. But if with simple love and a pure conscience before God he helps a person, looking to nothing else than to please the One who commands these things, his left hand does not know what his right hand does.
Sermons5.14.15
15. 16. De dilectione autem inimici difficilior est quaestio, nec ea brevitate solvi potest. Sed cum auditis, orate pro nobis; et forte Dominus Deus cito dabit quod putamus esse difficile. Ex uno enim horreo vivimus; quia in una familia sumus. Quod ergo nos putamus esse valde intus in abdito, forte ipse qui promittit ponit in limine, ut facillime dari possit petentibus. Dilexit inimicos ipse Dominus Christus; pendens enim in cruce ait: Pater, ignosce illis quia nesciunt quid faciunt . Secutus est eius exemplum Stephanus, cum lapides in eum iacerentur, et ait: Domine, ne statuas illis hoc delictum . Dominum imitatus est servus, ut nemo servorum sit piger, et putet hoc esse factum quod a solo Domino fieri poterat. Si ergo multum est ad nos imitari Dominum, imitemur conservum. Ad eamdem quippe gratiam vocati omnes sumus. Quare ergo antiquis dictum est: Diliges proximum tuum, et oderis inimicum tuum ? Quia fortassis et ipsis verum dictum est; sed nobis apertius pro temporum distributione, per eius praesentiam qui videbat quid quibus vel tegendum esset vel aperiendum. Si enim habemus inimicum, quem numquam diligere iubemur; est autem diabolus: Diliges proximum tuum, hominem; et oderis inimicum tuum, diabolum. Sed quia in ipsis hominibus saepe existunt inimicitiae, in animis eorum qui per infidelitatem dant locum diabolo, et eius vasa fiunt, ut operetur in filiis diffidentiae; potest autem fieri ut relinquat homo malitiam suam, et convertatur ad Dominum; et dum adhuc saevit, dum adhuc persequitur, diligendus est, et orandum pro illo, et bene illi faciendum; ita et primum praeceptum implebis, ut diligas proximum tuum hominem, et oderis inimicum tuum diabolum; et secundum, ut diligas inimicos tuos homines, et ores pro eis qui te persequuntur .
15. 16. But concerning the love of an enemy the question is harder, nor can it be settled with such brevity. But when you hear it, pray for us; and perhaps the Lord God will quickly grant what we think to be difficult. For we live from one storehouse, since we are in one family. So what we think to be deep within the hidden place, perhaps he who promises sets at the threshold, that it may most easily be given to those who ask. The Lord Christ himself loved his enemies; for hanging on the cross he said, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do (Luke 23:34). Stephen followed his example, when stones were being thrown at him, and said, Lord, do not hold this sin against them (Acts 7:60). The servant imitated the Lord, that no servant might be slothful and suppose this to be a deed that could be done by the Lord alone. If, then, it is too much for us to imitate the Lord, let us imitate the fellow servant. For we are all called to the same grace. Why, then, was it said to the ancients, You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy (See Matt 5:43)? Because perhaps even to them what was said was true; but to us it is said more plainly, according to the dispensation of the times, through the presence of him who saw what was to be hidden from some and revealed to others. For if we have an enemy whom we are never commanded to love—and that is the devil—then You shall love your neighbor, the man; and hate your enemy, the devil. But because among human beings themselves enmities often arise, in the souls of those who through unbelief give place to the devil and become his vessels, that he may work in the sons of distrust (See Eph 2:2)—and yet it can happen that a person leaves off his malice and turns to the Lord; and while he still rages, while he still persecutes, he is to be loved, and one must pray for him and do him good—thus you will both fulfill the first precept, to love your neighbor, the man, and hate your enemy, the devil; and the second, to love your enemies, the men, and pray for those who persecute you.
Sermons5.15.16
16. 17. Nisi forte putas non orasse Christianos illo tempore pro Saulo persecutore Christianorum. Fortassis ad eius conversionem vox illa Stephani martyris exaudita est. In illo enim persecutorum eius numero fuit, et lapidantium vestimenta servavit . Idem etiam ad Timotheum scribens ait: Obsecro primum omnium fieri deprecationes, adhorationes, interpellationes, gratiarum actiones, pro omnibus hominibus, pro regibus et omnibus qui in sublimitate sunt, ut quietam et tranquillam vitam agamus . Iubebat ergo orari pro regibus; et tunc reges persequebantur Ecclesias. Sed quas tunc pro se orantes persequebantur, nunc pro se exauditas defendunt.
16. 17. Unless perhaps you suppose that Christians at that time did not pray for Saul, the persecutor of Christians. Perhaps that voice of Stephen the martyr was heard for his conversion. For he was in that number of his persecutors, and guarded the garments of those who stoned him (See Acts 7:58; 8:1). The same Paul, writing to Timothy, also says, I urge first of all that supplications, exhortations, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men, for kings and all who are in high places, that we may lead a quiet and tranquil life (1 Tim 2:1-2). He commanded, then, that prayer be made for kings; and at that time kings were persecuting the churches. But those whom they persecuted as they prayed for them, they now defend, their prayers having been heard for them.
Sermons5.16.17
17. 18. Vis ergo et illud antiquorum custodire praeceptum? Dilige proximum tuum, hoc est omnem hominem. Ex duobus enim primis parentibus omnes nati, omnes utique proximi sumus. Certe enim ipse Dominus Iesus Christus qui diligi praecipit inimicos, in duobus illis praeceptis totam Legem et Prophetas pendere testatus est: Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota mente tua; et: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum . Nihil ibi praecepit de dilectione inimici. Non ergo totum haec duo praecepta continent? Absit. Quia cum dicit: Diliges proximum tuum, ibi sunt omnes homines, etiamsi fuerint inimici; quia etiam secundum spiritalem propinquitatem nescis quid tibi sit in praescientia Dei homo, qui tibi ad tempus videtur inimicus. Quia enim patientia Dei ad paenitentiam eum adducit, fortassis cognoscet et sequetur ducentem. Si enim Deus ipse qui novit qui sint in peccatis perseveraturi, qui relicturi iustitiam et irrevocabiliter ad iniquitatem lapsuri, tamen facit solem suum oriri super bonos et malos, et pluit super iustos et iniustos , invitans utique ad paenitentiam per patientiam, ut qui neglexerint eius bonitatem, experiantur in fine severitatem; quanta sollicitudine placabilem oportet esse hominem, ne forte nesciens qualis futurus sit, cum praesentes eius inimicitias attenderit, oderit eum cum quo in aeterna felicitate regnabit? Imple ergo praeceptum primum: Dilige proximum tuum, omnem hominem; et oderis inimicum tuum, diabolum. Imple et secundum. Dilige inimicos tuos, sed homines; ora pro eis qui te persequuntur , sed pro hominibus; bene fac eis qui te oderunt, sed hominibus.
17. 18. Do you wish, then, to keep that precept of the ancients as well? Love your neighbor, that is, every human being. For all of us, born of the first two parents, are surely neighbors. Indeed, the Lord Jesus Christ himself, who commands us to love our enemies, testified that on those two precepts the whole Law and the Prophets depend: You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart, and with your whole soul, and with your whole mind; and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself (Matt 22:37-40). He commanded nothing there about the love of an enemy. Do these two precepts, then, not contain the whole? Far from it. For when he says, You shall love your neighbor, there are all human beings, even if they are enemies; because, even according to spiritual kinship, you do not know what, in God's foreknowledge, a person is to you who seems for the time to be your enemy. For since the patience of God leads him to repentance, perhaps he will come to know and will follow the One who leads. For if God himself, who knows who are going to persevere in sins, who are going to abandon righteousness and slip irrevocably into iniquity, nevertheless makes his sun rise on the good and the evil, and rains upon the just and the unjust (Matt 5:45)—inviting them surely to repentance through his patience, so that those who neglect his goodness may experience his severity in the end—with how much solicitude ought a man to be ready to be reconciled, lest perchance, not knowing what someone will be, when he looks upon his present enmities, he hate the one with whom he will reign in eternal happiness? Fulfill, then, the first precept: love your neighbor, every human being; and hate your enemy, the devil. Fulfill the second too. Love your enemies, but the men; pray for those who persecute you, but for the men; do good to those who hate you, but to the men.
Sermons5.17.18
18. 19. Si esurierit inimicus tuus, ciba illum; si sitit, potum da illi; hoc enim faciens, carbones ignis congeres super caput eius . Et hic quaestio est. Quomodo enim quisque diligit, quem vult ardere carbonibus? Sed si intellegatur, nulla contentio est. De illis enim vastatoribus carbonibus dicitur, qui dantur homini adversus linguam subdolam . Cum enim quisque benefecerit inimico, et non victus malo eius, vicerit in bono malum ; plerumque illum inimicitiarum suarum paenitebit, et irascetur sibi, quod tam bonum hominem laeserit. Ipsa vero ustio, paenitentia est, quae tamquam carbones ignis inimicitias eius malitiasque consumit.
18. 19. If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he thirsts, give him drink; for in doing this you will heap coals of fire upon his head (Rom 12:20; Prov 25:21-22). Here too there is a question. For how does anyone love a person whom he wants to burn with coals? But if it is understood rightly, there is no contention. For it is said of those laying-waste coals that are given to a man against a deceitful tongue (See Ps 120 (119):3-4). For when anyone does good to an enemy, and, not overcome by his evil, overcomes evil with good (Rom 12:21), very often the other will repent of his enmities and be angry with himself for having injured so good a man. And that burning itself is repentance, which, like coals of fire, consumes his enmities and his malice.
Sermons5.18.19
SERMO 150
Sermon 150
Sermons5.18.19
1. 1. Advertit nobiscum Caritas vestra, cum legeretur liber Actuum Apostolorum, Paulum locutum esse Atheniensibus, et ab eis qui praedicationem veritatis irridebant, dictum fuisse verborum seminatorem. Dictum est quidem ab irridentibus, sed non respuendum est a credentibus. Erat enim revera ille seminator verborum, sed messor morum. Et nos licet tantilli et nequaquam illius excellentiae comparandi, in agro Dei, quod est cor vestrum, verba Dei seminamus, et uberem messem de vestris moribus exspectamus. Verumtamen unde admonemur loqui Caritati vestrae, quod ipsa lectione continetur, hortamur attentius advertatis, si quomodo adiuvante Domino Deo nostro dicimus aliquid, quod nec facile, nisi dicatur, ab omnibus possit intellegi; neque cum intellectum fuerit, debeat ab ullo contemni.
1. 1. Your Charity noticed, along with us, when the book of the Acts of the Apostles was read, that Paul spoke to the Athenians, and was called a sower of words by those who mocked the preaching of the truth (See Acts 17:18). It was said, indeed, by mockers, but it is not to be rejected by believers. For he was truly a sower of words, but a reaper of morals. And we too, though so small and by no means to be compared with that excellence, sow the words of God in the field of God, which is your heart, and look for a rich harvest from your morals. Yet as to the reason we are admonished to speak to your Charity, which is contained in this very reading, we urge you to attend more closely, in case, with the help of the Lord our God, we may say something which cannot easily be understood by all unless it be said, nor, once it has been understood, ought to be despised by anyone.
Sermons5.1.1
1. 2. Apud Athenas loquebatur. Athenienses in omni litteratura atque doctrina per alios populos magna fama pollebant. Ipsa erat patria magnorum philosophorum. Inde se per ceteras Graeciae atque alias orbis terras varia et multiplex doctrina diffuderat. Ibi Apostolus loquebatur, ibi annuntiabat Christum crucifixum; Iudaeis quidem scandalum, Gentibus autem stultitiam; ipsis vero vocatis Iudaeis et Graecis Christum Dei virtutem et Dei sapientiam . Hoc annuntiare inter superbos et doctos quanti periculi fuerit, vestrum est cogitare. Denique sermone finito, audita illi resurrectione mortuorum, quae praecipua fides est Christianorum, alii irridebant; dicebant autem alii: Audiemus te de hoc iterum. Nec defuerunt qui crediderunt, atque in eis nominatur quidam Dionysius Areopagites, id est Atheniensium principalis (Areopagos enim Atheniensium curia vocabatur); et mulier quaedam nobilis, et alii. Facta est ergo loquente Apostolo tripartita illa multitudo, per quosdam gradus mira distinctione disposita; irridentium, dubitantium, credentium. Quidam enim, ut scriptum esse audivimus: Irridebant, quidam dicebant: Audiemus te de hoc iterum ; isti dubitantes erant; aliqui crediderunt. Inter irridentes et credentes, medii sunt dubitantes. Qui irridet, cadit; qui credit, stat; qui dubitat, fluctuat. Audiemus te de hoc iterum, inquiunt; incertum an casuri essent cum irridentibus, an staturi cum credentibus.
1. 2. He was speaking at Athens. The Athenians were renowned with great fame above other peoples in all literature and learning. It was the very homeland of the great philosophers. From there a varied and manifold learning had spread itself through the rest of Greece and the other lands of the world. There the Apostle was speaking; there he was proclaiming Christ crucified, to the Jews indeed a stumbling block, but to the gentiles folly; yet to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God (1 Cor 1:23-24). How great a danger it was to proclaim this among the proud and the learned, it is for you to consider. And so, when his discourse was finished and the resurrection of the dead had been heard—which is the chief faith of Christians—some mocked, but others said, We will hear you again about this. Nor were there lacking those who believed, and among them is named a certain Dionysius the Areopagite, that is, a leading man of the Athenians (for the Areopagus was the name of the council of the Athenians); and a certain noble woman, and others (Acts 17:32-34). So as the Apostle spoke, that crowd became threefold, arranged by certain degrees in a remarkable distinction: of mockers, of doubters, of believers. Some, as we heard written, mocked, and some said, "We will hear you again about this"—these were the doubters; some believed. Between the mockers and the believers, the doubters are in the middle. He who mocks falls; he who believes stands; he who doubts wavers. We will hear you again about this, they say: it is uncertain whether they were going to fall with the mockers or stand with the believers.
Sermons5.1.2
2. 2. Numquid tamen inaniter laboravit seminator ille verborum? Ille vero si formidaret irridentes, non perveniret ad credentes; quomodo seminator ille evangelicus, quem commemorat Dominus (nam utique hoc erat Paulus), si trepidaret mittere semina, ne aliud caderet in via, aliud inter spinas, aliud in loca petrosa; numquam semen posset etiam ad terram optimam pervenire. Et nos seminemus, spargamus; corda praeparate, fructum date.
2. 2. Yet did that sower of words labor in vain? Truly, if he had feared the mockers, he would not have reached the believers; just as that gospel sower whom the Lord mentions (for surely Paul was that sower), if he were afraid to scatter seed, lest some fall on the path, some among the thorns, some on rocky ground (See Matt 13:3-8), could never have brought the seed even to the best soil. Let us too sow, let us scatter; prepare your hearts, give fruit.
Sermons5.2.2
2. 3. Hoc quoque, si meminit Caritas vestra, cum legeretur audivimus, quod quidam ex philosophis Epicureis et Stoicis conferebant cum Apostolo. Qui sint vel fuerint philosophi Epicurei et Stoici, id est, quid senserint, quid verum esse putaverint, quid philosophando sectati sint, procul dubio multi vestrum nesciunt; sed quoniam Carthagini loquimur, multi sciunt. Adiuvent ergo modo nos dicturos vobis. Ad rem quippe valde pertinet, quod puto esse dicendum. Audiant nos et nescientes et scientes; nescientes instruantur, scientes commoneantur; illi cognoscant, illi recognoscant.
2. 3. This too, if your Charity remembers, we heard when it was read, that some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were conferring with the Apostle (Acts 17:18). Who the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers are or were—that is, what they thought, what they held to be true, what they pursued in their philosophizing—many of you doubtless do not know; but since we are speaking at Carthage, many do know. Let them therefore now help us as we are about to speak to you. For it pertains very much to the matter, what I think must be said. Let both those who do not know and those who do know hear us; let those who do not know be instructed, those who do know be reminded; let the one learn, the other recognize anew.
Sermons5.2.3
3. 4. Primo generaliter audite omnium philosophorum commune studium, in quo studio communi habuerunt quinque divisiones et differentias sententiarum propriarum. Communiter omnes philosophi studendo, quaerendo, disputando, vivendo appetiverunt apprehendere vitam beatam. Haec una fuit causa philosophandi; sed puto quod etiam hoc philosophi nobiscum commune habent. Si enim a vobis quaeram quare in Christum credideritis, quare christiani facti fueritis; veraciter mihi omnis homo respondet: Propter vitam beatam. Appetitio igitur beatae vitae philosophis Christianisque communis est. Sed res tam consona ubi inveniri possit, inde quaestio est, deinde discretio. Nam vitam beatam appetere, vitam beatam velle, vitam beatam concupiscere, desiderare, sectari, omnium hominum esse arbitror. Unde me video parum dixisse hunc appetitum beatae vitae philosophis Christianisque communem; debui enim dicere, omnium hominum, prorsus omnium bonorum et malorum. Nam et qui bonus est, ideo bonus est ut beatus sit; et qui malus est, malus non esset, nisi inde se beatum esse posse speraret. De bonis facilis quaestio est, quod beatam vitam quaerant, inde boni sint. De malis forte aliqui dubitant, utrum et ipsi beatam vitam quaerant. Sed si separatos malos et a bonis discretos interrogare possem et dicere: Vultis beati esse? nemo diceret: Nolo. Verbi gratia, pone aliquem furem; quaero ab illo: Quare furtum facis? Ut habeam, inquit, quod non habebam. Quare vis habere quod non habebas? Quia miserum est non habere. Si ergo miserum est non habere, beatum putat habere. Sed in eo impudens est et errat, quia de malo vult beatus fieri. Bonum est enim omnibus beatum esse. Unde ergo ille perversus? Quia bonum quaerit et malum facit. Quid quaerit ergo? Quid aspirat cupiditas malorum ad mercedem bonorum? Beata vita merces bonorum est; bonitas opus est, beatitudo merces est. Deus opus iubet, mercedem proponit; dicit: Hoc fac, et hoc accipies. Ille autem malus respondet nobis: Nisi male fecero, beatus non ero. Tamquam dicat aliquis: Ad bonum non pervenio, nisi malus fuero. Non vides quia bonum et malum contraria sunt? Bonum quaeris, et malum facis? In contrarium curris; quando pervenis?
3. 4. First hear, in general, the common pursuit of all the philosophers, in which common pursuit they had five divisions and differences of their own opinions. In common, all the philosophers, by studying, inquiring, disputing, and living, sought to lay hold of the happy life. This was the one cause of philosophizing; but I think that even this the philosophers have in common with us. For if I should ask you why you have believed in Christ, why you have become Christians, every person truly answers me: For the sake of the happy life. The desire of the happy life, then, is common to philosophers and Christians. But where so harmonious a thing can be found—there is the question, and then the discernment. For to desire the happy life, to will the happy life, to covet, to long for, to pursue the happy life, I think belongs to all human beings. Hence I see that I have said too little in calling this desire of the happy life common to philosophers and Christians; for I ought to have said, common to all human beings, indeed to all, both good and evil. For the one who is good is good in order to be happy; and the one who is evil would not be evil unless he hoped that thereby he could be happy. About the good the question is easy, that they seek the happy life and are good for that reason. About the evil, perhaps some doubt whether they too seek the happy life. But if I could question the evil set apart and distinguished from the good, and say, Do you wish to be happy? no one would say, I do not wish it. Take, for example, a thief; I ask him, Why do you steal? "That I may have," he says, "what I did not have." Why do you wish to have what you did not have? "Because it is wretched not to have." If, then, it is wretched not to have, he reckons it happy to have. But in this he is shameless and errs, because he wishes to become happy by evil. For it is good for all to be happy. Whence, then, is that perverse man? Because he seeks good and does evil. What, then, does he seek? Why does the desire of the evil aspire to the reward of the good? The happy life is the reward of the good; goodness is the work, happiness is the reward. God commands the work, sets forth the reward; he says, Do this, and you shall receive this. But that evil man answers us, "Unless I do evil, I shall not be happy." As if someone should say, "I do not arrive at the good unless I am evil." Do you not see that good and evil are contraries? You seek good and do evil? You run in the contrary direction; when do you arrive?
Sermons5.3.4
4. 5. Relinquamus ergo istos; forte opportunum erit ut ad eos redeamus, cum de philosophis quod instituimus peregerimus. Non enim arbitror sine causa, per nescientes actum esse aliquid magnum dispensante divina ipsa providentia, ut cum essent plurimae philosophorum sectae in civitate Atheniensi, non contulerint cum apostolo Paulo nisi Stoici et Epicurei . Cum enim audieritis quid sentiant in sectis suis, videbitis quam non frustra factum sit, ut ex omnibus philosophis soli cum Paulo conferrent. Neque enim ille eligere sibi potuit quibus altercantibus responderet; sed divina sapientia omnia gubernans hos ei apposuit, in quibus dissensionis philosophorum tota prope causa consisteret. Breviter ergo dico: indocti credant nobis, docti iudicent de nobis. Puto quia mentiri non audeo indoctis, iudicibus doctis; maxime quia dico aliquid, ubi pariter et docti et indocti possint veraciter iudicare. Hoc ergo prius dico, hominem constare ex anima et corpore. Hic non peto ut credatis, sed et vos peto ut iudicetis. Non enim timeo, ne in hoc dicto male quisquam iudicet de me, qui agnoscit se. Homo ergo, quod nemo ambigit, constat ex anima et corpore. Substantia ista, res ista, persona ista quae homo dicitur, beatam vitam quaerit; et hoc nostis; nec insto ut credatis, sed admoneo ut agnoscatis. Homo, inquam, id est, res ista non parva, praecedens omnia pecora, omnia volatilia, omnia et natatilia, et quidquid carnem gerit et homo non est; homo ergo constans ex anima et corpore; sed non qualicumque anima, nam et pecus constat ex anima et corpore; homo ergo constans ex anima rationali et carne mortali, quaerit beatam vitam. Quae res faciat beatam vitam cum cognoverit homo, nisi hanc teneat, hanc sequatur, hanc sibi vindicet, assumat si potestas est, petat si difficultas est, beatus esse non potest. Tota igitur quaestio est, quid faciat beatam vitam. Constituite nunc ante oculos vestros Epicureos, Stoicos, et Apostolum; quod etiam sic dicere potui, Epicureos, Stoicos, Christianos. Interrogemus prius Epicureos, quae res faciat vitam beatam. Respondent: Voluptas corporis. Hic iam credatis peto, quia iudices habeo. Utrum enim hoc dicant, hoc sentiant Epicurei, nescitis, quia illas litteras non legistis; sed sunt hic qui legerunt. Redeamus ad interrogandos. Quid dicitis, Epicurei, quae res facit beatam vitam? Respondent: Voluptas corporis. Quid dicitis, Stoici, quae res facit vitam beatam? Respondent: Virtus animi. Intendat mecum Caritas vestra, Christiani sumus, inter philosophos disceptamus. Videte quare illae tantum duae sectae procuratae sunt cum Apostolo collaturae. Nihil est in homine, quod ad eius substantiam pertineat atque naturam, praeter corpus et animam. Horum duorum in uno, hoc est in corpore, Epicurei posuerunt beatam vitam; in alio, id est anima, Stoici posuerunt beatam vitam. Quantum ad hominem pertinet, si ab illo sibi est vita beata, nihil restat praeter corpus et animam. Aut corpus est causa beatae vitae, aut anima est causa beatae vitae; si plus quaeris, ab homine recedis. Hi ergo qui beatam vitam hominis in homine posuerunt, alibi ponere omnino non potuerunt, nisi aut in corpore, aut in anima. Horum qui in corpore posuerunt, principatum Epicurei tenuerunt; horum qui in anima posuerunt, principatum Stoici tenuerunt.
4. 5. Let us therefore leave these men; perhaps it will be opportune to return to them when we have finished what we have undertaken about the philosophers. For I do not think it was without cause, by the divine providence itself disposing, that through people who did not know it something great was done: that, although there were very many sects of philosophers in the city of Athens, none conferred with the apostle Paul except the Stoics and the Epicureans. For when you have heard what they hold in their sects, you will see how not in vain it came about that of all the philosophers these alone conferred with Paul. For he could not choose for himself those to whose disputing he should reply; but the divine wisdom that governs all things set these before him, in whom nearly the whole cause of the philosophers' dissension consisted. Briefly, then, I say: let the unlearned believe us, let the learned judge of us. I think that I dare not lie when the unlearned are my hearers and the learned my judges—most of all because I am saying something about which both the learned and the unlearned can judge truly alike. This, then, I say first: that a human being consists of soul and body. Here I do not ask that you believe, but I ask you too to judge. For I do not fear that in this saying anyone may judge ill of me who knows himself. A human being, then, as no one doubts, consists of soul and body. This substance, this thing, this person who is called a human being seeks the happy life; and this you know—I do not insist that you believe, but I admonish you to recognize. A human being, I say—that is, this thing which is not small, surpassing all cattle, all birds, all swimming creatures, and whatever bears flesh and is not a human being; a human being, then, consisting of soul and body—but not of just any soul, for cattle too consist of soul and body; a human being, then, consisting of a rational soul and mortal flesh, seeks the happy life. Unless, when a human being has come to know what makes the happy life, he holds to it, follows it, claims it for himself, takes it if it is in his power, asks for it if it is hard to obtain, he cannot be happy. The whole question, then, is what makes the happy life. Now set before your eyes the Epicureans, the Stoics, and the Apostle—which I could also put thus: the Epicureans, the Stoics, the Christians. Let us first question the Epicureans: what makes the happy life? They answer: The pleasure of the body. Here now I ask that you believe, because I have judges. For whether the Epicureans say this, hold this, you do not know, because you have not read those writings; but there are those here who have read them. Let us return to the questioning. What do you say, Epicureans—what makes the happy life? They answer: The pleasure of the body. What do you say, Stoics—what makes the happy life? They answer: The virtue of the soul. Let your Charity attend with me: we are Christians; we are disputing among philosophers. See why only those two sects were procured to confer with the Apostle. There is nothing in a human being that pertains to his substance and nature except body and soul. Of these two, in the one—that is, in the body—the Epicureans placed the happy life; in the other—that is, in the soul—the Stoics placed the happy life. So far as concerns the human being, if the happy life is to be his from himself, nothing remains but body and soul. Either the body is the cause of the happy life, or the soul is the cause of the happy life; if you seek more, you depart from the human being. These, then, who placed the happy life of the human being within the human being, could place it nowhere else but either in the body or in the soul. Of those who placed it in the body, the Epicureans held the chief place; of those who placed it in the soul, the Stoics held the chief place.
Sermons5.4.5
5. 6. Ecce sunt, conferunt cum Apostolo; aliquidne plus habeat Apostolus; an vero uni harum duarum sectae necessario consentire deberet, ut etiam ipse causam beatae vitae, aut in corpore, aut in anima poneret. Numquam poneret Paulus in corpore; hoc enim magnum non est; cum ipsi minime ponant causam beatitudinis in corpore, qui melius sentiunt de corpore. Nam Epicurei et de corpore et de anima hoc idem sentiunt, quod utrumque mortale est. Et quod est gravius et detestabilius, prius dicunt animam post mortem dissolvi quam corpus. Adhuc, inquiunt, post efflatum spiritum manente cadavere, et integris membrorum lineamentis aliquantum durantibus, anima mox ut exierit, veluti fumus vento diverberata dissolvitur. Non ergo miremur quod summum bonum, id est, beatitudinis causam in corpore posuerunt, quod se melius quam animam habere senserunt. Numquid hoc faceret Apostolus? Absit ut poneret in corpore summum bonum. Summum enim bonum est causa beatitudinis; immo vero doluit Apostolus, quosdam e numero Christianorum elegisse sententiam Epicureorum, non hominum, sed porcorum. Ex hoc enim numero erant illi corrumpentes mores bonos colloquiis malis, et dicentes: Manducemus et bibamus; cras enim moriemur . Epicurei contulerunt cum Paulo apostolo; sunt et Christiani Epicurei. Quid enim sunt aliud dicentes quotidie: Manducemus et bibamus; cras enim moriemur? Quo pertinet: Nihil erit post mortem, umbrae enim transitus est vita nostra. Dixerunt enim apud se cogitantes non recte inter cetera: Coronemus nos rosis, antequam marcescant; nullum pratum sit quod non pertranseat luxuria nostra, ubique relinquamus signa laetitiae, quoniam haec est pars nostra, et haec est sors .
5. 6. See, here they are, conferring with the Apostle; whether the Apostle has anything more, or whether he had necessarily to agree with one of these two sects, so that he too should place the cause of the happy life either in the body or in the soul. Paul would never place it in the body, for this is no great thing—since even they place the cause of happiness least of all in the body, who think better of the body. For the Epicureans think this same thing of both body and soul, that each is mortal. And what is graver and more detestable, they say that the soul is dissolved after death sooner than the body. For "still," they say, "after the spirit is breathed out, while the corpse remains and the lineaments of the limbs last for a while, the soul, as soon as it has gone out, like smoke scattered by the wind, is dissolved." Let us not wonder, then, that they placed the highest good—that is, the cause of happiness—in the body, which they felt themselves to possess better than the soul. Would the Apostle do this? Far be it that he should place the highest good in the body. For the highest good is the cause of happiness; rather, the Apostle grieved that some of the number of Christians had chosen the opinion of the Epicureans—not of men, but of pigs. For from this number were those who were corrupting good morals by evil conversations and saying, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die (1 Cor 15:32; Isa 22:13). The Epicureans conferred with the apostle Paul; there are Christian Epicureans too. For what else are they saying who say daily, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die? To which this belongs: "There will be nothing after death, for our life is the passing of a shadow." For they said within themselves, reasoning not rightly, among other things, Let us crown ourselves with roses before they wither; let there be no meadow that our luxury does not pass through; let us everywhere leave the signs of our merriment, for this is our portion, and this is our lot (Wis 2:8-9).
Sermons5.5.6
6. 7. Hoc si atrocius obiurgemus, si his cupiditatibus vehementius resistamus, dicent et quod sequitur: Opprimamus pauperem iustum . Et tamen dicere vel in hoc loco positi non timemus: Nolite esse Epicurei. Cogitate quidem illud, quod dictum est ab his non recte loquentibus: Cras enim moriemur; sed non omni modo moriemur; manet enim post mortem quod sequitur mortem. Comes morienti aut vita erit, aut poena. Nemo dicat: Quis huc inde reversus est? Dives ille purpuratus sero redire voluit, et permitti non potuit. Stillam sitiens inquisivit, qui esurientem pauperem fastidivit . Nemo ergo dicat: Manducemus et bibamus, cras enim moriemur . Si vultis dicere: Cras enim moriemur; non prohibeo; sed aliud ante dicite. Epicurei quippe velut non victuri post mortem, quasi aliud nihil habentes nisi quod delectat carnem, dicunt: Manducemus et bibamus; cras enim moriemur. Christiani vero post mortem victuri, et felices potius victuri post mortem, non dicant; Manducemus et bibamus; cras enim moriemur; sed tenete quod dicitur: Cras enim moriemur; et dicite: Ieiunemus et oremus; cras enim moriemur. Addo plane aliud, addo tertium, nec quod praecipue observandum est praetermitto, ut de ieiunio tuo fames pauperis satietur, aut si ieiunare non potes, magis pascas, cuius saturitate tibi venia concedatur. Dicant ergo Christiani: Ieiunemus et oremus et donemus; cras enim moriemur. Aut si duas res volunt dicere, ego eligo ut dicant: Donemus et oremus, quam: Ieiunemus et non donemus. Absit ergo ut Apostolus in corpore poneret summum bonum hominis, id est, beatitudinis causam.
6. 7. If we rebuke this more sternly, if we resist these desires more vehemently, they will say also what follows: Let us oppress the poor righteous man (Wis 2:10). And yet, even set in this place, we do not fear to say: Do not be Epicureans. Consider indeed that which was said by these who spoke not rightly, For tomorrow we shall die; but we shall not die in every way, for there remains after death what follows death. The companion of the dying will be either life or punishment. Let no one say, Who has returned here from there? That rich man in purple wished to return late, and could not be permitted. Thirsting, he sought a drop, who had despised the hungry poor man (See Luke 16:19-31). Let no one, then, say, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die. If you wish to say, For tomorrow we shall die, I do not forbid it; but say something else first. The Epicureans, indeed, as though they were not going to live after death, as though they had nothing else but what delights the flesh, say, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die. But Christians, who are going to live after death—and rather to live happily after death—let them not say, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die; but hold to what is said, For tomorrow we shall die, and say: Let us fast and pray, for tomorrow we shall die. I add plainly something else, I add a third thing, nor do I pass over what must especially be observed: that from your fasting the hunger of the poor man may be satisfied, or, if you cannot fast, rather feed the one by whose being filled pardon may be granted you. Let Christians, then, say: Let us fast and pray and give, for tomorrow we shall die. Or if they wish to say two things, I choose that they say, Let us give and pray, rather than, Let us fast and not give. Far be it, then, that the Apostle should place the highest good of the human being—that is, the cause of happiness—in the body.
Sermons5.6.7
7. 8. Sed cum Stoicis non indecens fortasse luctamen est. Ecce enim interroganti ubi ponant efficiens beatae vitae, id est, quod facit in homine beatam vitam; respondent, non corporis voluptatem, sed animi esse virtutem. Quid Apostolus? Annuit? Si annuit, annuamus. Sed non annuit; revocat enim Scriptura eos qui confidunt in virtute sua . Epicureus itaque in corpore ponens summum hominis bonum, in se spem ponit. Sed enim Stoicus in animo ponens summum hominis bonum, in re quidem meliori hominis posuit; sed etiam ipse in se spem posuit. Homo est autem et Epicureus et Stoicus. Maledictus igitur omnis qui spem suam ponit in homine . Quid ergo? Iam constitutis ante oculos nostros tribus, Epicureo, Stoico, Christiano, interrogemus singulos. Dic, Epicuree, quae res faciat beatum. Respondet: Voluptas corporis. Dic, Stoice. Virtus animi. Dic, Christiane. Donum Dei.
7. 8. But with the Stoics perhaps the struggle is not unbecoming. For see, when they are asked where they place that which effects the happy life—that is, what makes the happy life in a human being—they answer, not the pleasure of the body, but the virtue of the soul. What of the Apostle? Does he agree? If he agrees, let us agree. But he does not agree; for Scripture calls back those who trust in their own virtue (See Jer 17:5). The Epicurean, therefore, placing the highest good of the human being in the body, places his hope in himself. But the Stoic too, placing the highest good of the human being in the soul, placed it indeed in the better thing of the human being; yet he too placed his hope in himself. But both the Epicurean and the Stoic are human beings. Cursed, then, is everyone who places his hope in man (Jer 17:5). What, then? With the three now set before our eyes—the Epicurean, the Stoic, the Christian—let us question each one. Tell me, Epicurean, what makes a person happy. He answers: The pleasure of the body. Tell me, Stoic. The virtue of the soul. Tell me, Christian. The gift of God.
Sermons5.7.8
8. 9. Itaque, fratres, velut ante oculos nostros Epicurei et Stoici cum Apostolo contulerunt, et collatione sua nos quid reicere et quid deberemus eligere docuerunt. Est virtus animi res laudabilis, prudentia mala et bona discernens, iustitia sua cuique distribuens, temperantia libidines cohibens, fortitudo molestias aequanimiter sustinens. Magna res, laudabilis res; lauda, Stoice, quantum potes; sed dic: Unde habes? Non virtus animi tui te facit beatum, sed qui tibi virtutem dedit, qui tibi velle inspiravit, et posse donavit . Scio quia fortassis irrisurus es me, et eris in eis de quibus scriptum est quia Paulum irridebant . Si tu via es, ego semino, seminator enim verborum sum pro modulo meo. Quod fuit convicium tuum, officium est meum. Ego semino; cadit in te quod semino, tamquam in terram duram. Ego non sum piger; et invenio terram bonam. Quid tibi faciam? Reprehensus es, et oraculo divino reprehensus es. Inter illos es, qui confidunt in virtute sua; inter illos es, qui spem ponunt in homine. Virtus te delectat; bona res delectat; scio, sitis; sed virtutem tibi manare non potes. Siccus es; si tibi ostendero fontem vitae, forte deridebis. Dicis enim apud te: De ista rupe bibiturus sum? Accedit virga, et manavit aqua . Iudaei enim signa petunt; sed tu, Stoice, non es Iudaeus; scio, Graecus es; et Graeci sapientiam quaerunt. Nos autem praedicamus Christum crucifixum. Scandalizatur Iudaeus, subsannat Graecus. Iudaeis enim scandalum, Gentibus autem stultitiam; sed ipsis vocatis Iudaeis et Graecis, hoc est, ipsi Paulo ex Saulo, et Dionysio Areopagitae, et talibus his, talibus et illis, Christum Dei Virtutem et Dei Sapientiam . Iam non irrides rupem; agnosce virgam crucem, Christum fontem; et si sitis, bibe virtutem. Esto fonte saginatus, gratiarum actiones fortasse ructuabis; quod ab illo habes, iam non tibi dabis, sed in ructuatione exclamabis: Diligam te, Domine, virtus mea . Iam non dices: Virtus animi mei me facit beatum. Non eris inter illos qui cognoscentes Deum, non sicut Deum glorificaverunt, aut gratias egerunt; sed evanuerunt in cogitationibus suis, et obscuratum est insipiens cor ipsorum; dicentes enim se esse sapientes stulti facti sunt . Quid est enim: dicentes se esse sapientes, nisi a se habere, sibi sufficere? Stulti facti sunt; merito stulti. Stultitia vera, est falsa sapientia. Sed eris inter illos, de quibus dicitur: Domine, in lumine vultus tui ambulabunt, et in nomine tuo exsultabunt tota die, et in iustitia tua exaltabuntur; quoniam gloria virtutis eorum tu es . Virtutem quaerebas; dic: Domine, virtus mea . Beatam vitam quaerebas; dic: Beatus homo quem tu erudieris, Domine . Beatus enim populus, cuius non voluptas carnis, cuius non virtus propria; sed: Beatus populus cuius est Dominus Deus ipsius . Haec est patria beatitudinis, quam omnes volunt; sed non omnes recte quaerunt. Nos autem ad talem patriam non nobis viam quasi corde nostro machinemur, et erraticas semitas moliamur; venit inde et via.
8. 9. And so, brothers, as it were before our eyes the Epicureans and Stoics conferred with the Apostle, and by their conference taught us what we ought to reject and what we ought to choose. The virtue of the soul is a praiseworthy thing: prudence, discerning evil and good; justice, distributing to each his own; temperance, restraining the lusts; fortitude, bearing hardships with an even mind. A great thing, a praiseworthy thing; praise it, Stoic, as much as you can; but say: From where do you have it? It is not the virtue of your soul that makes you happy, but he who gave you virtue, who breathed into you the willing and bestowed the being able (See Phil 2:13). I know that perhaps you are going to mock me, and you will be among those of whom it is written that they mocked Paul (See Acts 17:32). If you are the path, I sow, for I am a sower of words according to my small measure. What was your reproach is my office. I sow; what I sow falls on you as on hard ground. I am not slothful; and I find good ground. What shall I do to you? You have been rebuked, and rebuked by a divine oracle. You are among those who trust in their own virtue; you are among those who place their hope in man. Virtue delights you; a good thing delights you; I know, you thirst; but you cannot make virtue flow for yourself. You are dry; if I show you the fountain of life, perhaps you will deride it. For you say within yourself, "Am I going to drink from that rock?" The rod approaches, and water flowed (See Exod 17:5-6; Num 20:11). For the Jews, indeed, ask for signs; but you, Stoic, are not a Jew; I know, you are a Greek; and the Greeks seek wisdom. But we preach Christ crucified (1 Cor 1:22-23). The Jew is scandalized, the Greek scoffs. For to the Jews a stumbling block, but to the gentiles folly; but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks—that is, to Paul himself from Saul, and to Dionysius the Areopagite, and to such as these and such as those—Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God (1 Cor 1:23-24). Now you do not mock the rock; recognize the rod, the cross; Christ, the fountain; and if you thirst, drink virtue. Be fed at the fountain; perhaps you will belch forth thanksgivings; what you have from him you will no longer give to yourself, but in your belching you will cry out, I will love you, O Lord, my strength (Ps 18:1 (17:2)). Now you will not say, The virtue of my soul makes me happy. You will not be among those who, knowing God, did not glorify him as God or give thanks, but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened; for claiming to be wise, they became fools (Rom 1:21-22). For what is it, claiming to be wise, but to have from oneself, to suffice for oneself? They became fools; deservedly fools. True folly is false wisdom. But you will be among those of whom it is said, O Lord, they will walk in the light of your countenance, and in your name they will rejoice all the day, and in your righteousness they will be exalted; for you are the glory of their strength (Ps 89:15-17 (88:16-18)). You were seeking virtue; say, O Lord, my strength. You were seeking the happy life; say, Blessed is the man whom you instruct, O Lord (Ps 94:12 (93:12)). For blessed is the people whose joy is not the pleasure of the flesh, whose strength is not its own; but blessed is the people whose God is the Lord himself (Ps 144:15 (143:15)). This is the homeland of happiness, which all desire; but not all rightly seek it. But let us not contrive for ourselves a way to such a homeland, as it were out of our own heart, and devise wandering paths; from there came also the Way.
Sermons5.8.9
8. 10. Quid vult enim beatus, quid vult, nisi non falli, non mori, non dolere? Et quid quaerit? Plus esurire, et plus manducare? Quid, si melius est non esurire? Nemo beatus est, nisi qui vivit in aeternum sine ullo timore, sine ulla fallacia. Nam falli odit anima. Quantum falli oderit anima naturaliter, hinc intellegi potest, quoniam qui mente alienata rident, plorantur a sanis; et eligit homo utique ridere, quam flere. Si duo ista proponantur: Ridere vis, an flere? quis est qui respondeat, nisi: Ridere? Iterum si proponantur ista duo: Falli vis, an verum tenere? omnis homo respondet: Verum tenere. Et ridere eligit, et verum tenere; de duobus illis, risu et fletu, Ridere; de duobus istis, fallacia et veritate, Verum tenere. Sed tantum praevalet invictissima veritas, ut eligat homo sana mente flere, quam mente alienata ridere. Ibi ergo in illa patria veritas erit, fallacia et error nusquam. Sed et veritas erit, et flere non erit. Erit enim et verum ridere, et de veritate gaudere, quia ibi vita erit. Nam si dolor erit, vita non erit; neque enim vita dicenda est sempiternus immortalisque cruciatus. Ideo Dominus non appellans vitam quam habituri sunt impii, quamvis in igne victuri sint; vitam non finiunt, ne poenam finiant: Vermis enim eorum non morietur, et ignis eorum non extinguetur ; tamen eam noluit appellare vitam, sed hanc appellavit vitam quae beata et aeterna est . Unde interrogante illo divite Dominum: Quid boni faciam, ut vitam aeternam consequar? et ipse quidem vitam aeternam non nominabat, nisi beatam. Nam habebunt impii aeternam, sed non beatam vitam, quia cruciatibus plenam. Ergo ille ait: Domine, quid boni faciam, ut vitam aeternam consequar? Respondit illi Dominus de mandatis. Ait ille: Haec omnia feci. Sed quando respondit de mandatis, quid ait? Si vis venire ad vitam . Non ei dixit: beatam; quia misera nec vita dicenda est. Non ei dixit: aeternam; quia ubi mortis timor est, nec vita dicenda est. Ergo vita, quae hoc nomine digna est, ut vita dicatur, non est nisi beata; et beata non est, nisi aeterna. Hanc volunt omnes, hanc volumus omnes, veritatem et vitam; sed ad tam magnam possessionem, ad tam grandem felicitatem qua itur? Instruxerunt sibi vias erroris philosophi; alii dixerunt: Hac; alii: Non hac, sed hac. Latuit eos via, quia Deus superbis resistit . Lateret et nos, nisi venisset ad nos. Ideo Dominus: Ego, inquit, sum via. Piger viator, venire nolebas ad viam; ad te venit via. Quaerebas qua ires: Ego sum via. Quaerebas quo ires: Ego sum veritas et vita . Non errabis quando is ad illum, per illum. Haec est doctrina Christianorum, non plane conferenda, sed incomparabiliter praeferenda doctrinis philosophorum, immunditiae Epicureorum, superbiae Stoicorum.
8. 10. For what does the happy man will—what does he will but not to be deceived, not to die, not to grieve? And what does he seek? To hunger more and to eat more? What if it is better not to hunger? No one is happy except the one who lives forever without any fear, without any deception. For the soul hates to be deceived. How much the soul naturally hates to be deceived can be understood from this: that those who laugh in a deranged mind are wept over by the sane; and a man surely chooses to laugh rather than to weep. If these two are set before him—Do you wish to laugh or to weep?—who is there who answers anything but: To laugh? Again, if these two are set before him—Do you wish to be deceived or to hold the truth?—every person answers: To hold the truth. And he chooses both to laugh and to hold the truth; of those two, laughter and weeping, To laugh; of these two, deception and truth, To hold the truth. But truth, most invincible, so prevails that a man chooses to weep in a sane mind rather than to laugh in a deranged one. There, then, in that homeland, truth will be, deception and error nowhere. But there will be truth, and there will be no weeping. For there will be a true laughing too, and a rejoicing in the truth, because there will be life. For if there is grief, there will not be life; nor is everlasting and immortal torment to be called life. Therefore the Lord, not calling the existence the ungodly are going to have life—although they are going to live in fire, and do not end their life, lest they end their punishment, for their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be quenched (Isa 66:24; Mark 9:48)—yet was unwilling to call it life, but called this life which is happy and eternal. Hence, when that rich man asked the Lord, What good thing shall I do that I may attain eternal life (Matt 19:16)? he himself indeed named eternal life as nothing but happy life. For the ungodly will have eternal life, but not happy, because it is full of torments. So that man said, Lord, what good thing shall I do that I may attain eternal life? The Lord answered him concerning the commandments. The man said, All these I have done. But when he answered concerning the commandments, what did he say? If you wish to come to life (Matt 19:17). He did not say to him: happy; because a wretched existence is not even to be called life. He did not say to him: eternal; because where there is fear of death, it is not even to be called life. Therefore that life which is worthy of this name, to be called life, is none but the happy; and it is not happy unless it is eternal. This all desire, this we all desire—truth and life; but to so great a possession, to so great a happiness, by what way does one go? The philosophers built for themselves ways of error; some said, This way; others, Not this, but this. The way lay hidden from them, because God resists the proud (Jas 4:6; 1 Pet 5:5). It would lie hidden from us too, had it not come to us. Therefore the Lord says, I am the way. Slothful traveler, you were unwilling to come to the way; the Way came to you. You were seeking by what way you might go: I am the way. You were seeking where you might go: I am the truth and the life (John 14:6). You will not go astray when you go to him, through him. This is the teaching of Christians, by no means to be compared with, but incomparably to be preferred to, the teachings of the philosophers—to the uncleanness of the Epicureans, the pride of the Stoics.
Sermons5.8.10
SERMO 151
Sermon 151
Sermons5.8.10
1. 1. Lectio divina quae de apostoli Pauli Epistola recitata est, quotiescumque legitur, timendum est ne male intellecta det hominibus occasionem quaerentibus occasionem. Proclives sunt quippe homines ad peccandum, et vix se tenent. Ubi ergo audierint Apostolum dicentem: Non enim quod volo, facio bonum; sed quod odi malum, hoc ago ; agunt malum, et quasi displicentes sibi quia agunt malum, putant se Apostolo esse similes, qui dixit: Non enim quod volo, facio bonum; sed quod nolo malum, hoc ago. Nonnumquam ergo legitur, et tunc nobis ingerit necessitatem disputandi, ne homines male sumentes salubrem cibum vertant in venenum. Sit ergo intenta Caritas vestra, donec quod Dominus donaverit, dicam vobis; ut ubi me forte laborare videritis in difficultate alicuius obscuritatis, adiuvetis me affectu pietatis.
1. 1. The divine reading that was recited from the Epistle of the apostle Paul, whenever it is read, makes us fear lest, being misunderstood, it give occasion to people who are looking for occasion. For people are prone to sin, and scarcely hold themselves back. So when they hear the Apostle saying, For I do not do the good that I will, but the evil that I hate, that I do (Rom 7:15.19), they do evil, and, as though displeased with themselves for doing evil, they suppose themselves to be like the Apostle, who said, For I do not do the good that I will, but the evil that I do not will, that I do. So sometimes it is read, and then it lays upon us the necessity of discoursing, lest people, taking the wholesome food amiss, turn it into poison. Let your Charity, then, be attentive, until I tell you what the Lord shall grant; so that where you perhaps see me laboring in the difficulty of some obscurity, you may help me by the affection of your devotion.
Sermons5.1.1
1. 2. Prius ergo recolite, quod Deo propitio soletis audire, vitam iusti in isto corpore adhuc bellum esse, nondum triumphum. Huius autem belli aliquando erit triumphus. Ideo Apostolus dixit, et voces belli, et voces triumphi. Voces belli modo audivimus: Non enim quod volo, ago; sed quod odi, illud facio. Si autem quod odi, illud facio; consentio legi, quoniam bona est. Velle adiacet mihi, perficere autem bonum non invenio. Video autem aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis . Quando audis repugnantem, quando audis captivantem, bellum non agnoscis?
1. 2. First, then, recall what by God's favor you are accustomed to hear: that the life of the righteous man in this body is still warfare, not yet triumph. But of this warfare there will one day be a triumph. So the Apostle uttered both the voices of warfare and the voices of triumph. The voices of warfare we have just heard: For I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do. But if I do what I hate, I agree with the law, that it is good. To will lies near at hand for me, but to accomplish the good I do not find. But I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:15-16.18.23). When you hear "fighting against," when you hear "taking captive," do you not recognize warfare?
Sermons5.1.2
2. 2. Vox ergo triumphi nondum est; sed quia futura est, docet te idem Apostolus, dicens: Oportet corruptibile hoc induere incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induere immortalitatem. Cum autem corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem; ibi est vox triumphi: tunc fiet sermo qui scriptus est: Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Dicant triumphantes: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Dicemus ergo; quandoque dicemus; et ipsum quandoque non erit longe. Non enim tantum remanet de saeculo, quantum iam exemptum est. Hoc igitur tunc dicemus. Modo autem in isto bello, ne male intellegentibus lectio ista tuba sit hostis, non nostra, unde ille incitetur, non unde vincatur; advertite, obsecro, fratres mei, et qui certatis certate. Qui enim nondum certatis, non estis intellecturi quod dico; qui iam certatis, intellecturi estis. Vox mea in aperto, vestra erit in silentio. Prius illud recolite quod scripsit ad Galatas, unde hoc bene possit exponi. Ait enim, fidelibus loquens, baptizatis loquens, quibus utique in sancto lavacro omnia fuerant dimissa peccata; his tamen loquens, sed pugnantibus loquens, ait: Dico autem: Spiritu ambulate, et concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis. Non dixit: ne feceritis; sed: ne perfeceritis. Quare hoc? Sequitur et dicit: Caro enim concupiscit adversus spiritum, spiritus autem adversus carnem. Haec enim invicem adversantur; ut non ea quae vultis faciatis. Quod si Spiritu ducimini, non adhuc estis sub lege ; utique, sed sub gratia. Si Spiritu ducimini; quid est: duci Spiritu? Spiritui Dei consentire iubenti, non carni concupiscenti. Tamen concupiscit et resistit ; et vult aliquid, et non vis tu; persevera, ut nolis tu.
2. 2. The voice of triumph, then, is not yet here; but because it is to come, the same Apostle teaches you, saying, This corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. But when this corruptible has put on incorruption, and this mortal has put on immortality—there is the voice of triumph—then shall come to pass the saying that is written: Death is swallowed up in victory. Let those who triumph say, Where, O death, is your struggle (1 Cor 15:53-55)? We shall say it, then; one day we shall say it; and that "one day" will not be far off. For there does not remain as much of this age as has already been taken away. This, then, we shall say one day. But now, in this warfare, lest this reading should be a trumpet of the enemy, not ours, by which he may be roused, not by which he may be conquered—attend, I beseech you, my brothers, and you who are fighting, fight. For those who are not yet fighting will not understand what I say; those who are already fighting will understand it. My voice is in the open, yours will be in silence. First recall what he wrote to the Galatians, by which this can well be expounded. For he says, speaking to the faithful, speaking to the baptized, to whom surely in the holy washing all sins had been forgiven—yet speaking to these, but speaking to those who are fighting, he says, But I say: Walk by the Spirit, and do not accomplish the desires of the flesh. He did not say, "do not have them," but, do not accomplish them. Why this? It follows, and he says, For the flesh desires against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh. For these are opposed to one another, that you may not do what you will. But if you are led by the Spirit, you are no longer under the law (Gal 5:16-18)—surely, but under grace. If you are led by the Spirit; what is it to be led by the Spirit? To consent to the Spirit of God commanding, not to the flesh desiring. Yet it desires and resists; and it wills something, and you do not will it; persevere, that you may not will it.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Desiderium tamen tuum tale esse debet ad Deum, ut nec sit ipsa concupiscentia cui resistas. Videte quid dixerim: Desiderium, inquam, tuum tale esse debet ad Deum, ut omnino non sit ipsa concupiscentia cui resistere oporteat. Resistis enim, et non consentiendo vincis; sed melius est hostem non habere, quam vincere. Hostis iste aliquando non erit. Refer animum ad vocem triumphi, et vide si erit. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Non erit. Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Quaeres locum eius, et non invenies. Non enim haec, quod maxime debetis audire; non enim haec quasi alia natura est, sicut insaniunt Manichaei. Languor noster est, vitium nostrum est. Non separatum alibi erit, sed sanatum nusquam erit. Ergo concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis . Melius quidem erat implere quod lex dixit: Ne concupiscas . Plenitudo est ista virtutis, perfectio iustitiae, palma victoriae: Ne concupiscas. Hoc quia modo impleri non potest, vel illud impleatur quod sancta Scriptura item dicit: Post concupiscentias tuas non eas . Melius est eas non habere; sed quia sunt, noli post eas ire. Nolunt post te ire; noli post eas ire. Si velint post te ire, non erunt; quia contra mentem tuam non rebellabunt. Rebellant, rebella; pugnant, pugna; expugnant, expugna; hoc solum vide: ne vincant.
3. 3. Yet your desire toward God ought to be such that there be not even that desire which you resist. See what I have said: your desire toward God, I say, ought to be such that there be no desire at all which you must resist. For you resist, and by not consenting you conquer; but it is better not to have an enemy than to conquer one. This enemy will one day not exist. Turn your mind to the voice of triumph, and see whether it will exist. Where, O death, is your struggle? It will not be. Where, O death, is your sting (1 Cor 15:55)? You will seek its place and not find it. For this is not—what you most ought to hear—this is not, as the Manicheans rave, as it were another nature. It is our weakness, it is our defect. It will not be elsewhere, set apart, but it will be nowhere, healed. Therefore, do not accomplish the desires of the flesh. It would indeed be better to fulfill what the law said, You shall not covet (Exod 20:17; Rom 7:7). This is the fullness of virtue, the perfection of righteousness, the palm of victory: You shall not covet. Since this cannot now be fulfilled, let at least that be fulfilled which holy Scripture likewise says, Do not go after your desires (Sir 18:30). It is better not to have them; but since they are there, do not go after them. They do not want to go after you; do not go after them. If they should want to go after you, they will not be; for they will not rebel against your mind. They rebel; rebel back. They fight; fight. They assail; assail back. Only see to this: that they do not conquer.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Ecce aliquid inde ponam, unde cetera intellegatis. Nostis esse homines sobrios; pauciores sunt, sed sunt. Nostis esse et ebriosos; abundant. Baptizatus est sobrius; quantum pertinet ad ebrietatem, non habet cum qua pugnet; habet alias concupiscentias, cum quibus pugnet. Sed ut de ceteris intellegatis, unius tantummodo hostis certamen in medio constituamus. Baptizatus est et ebriosus; audivit, et cum timore audivit, inter cetera mala, quibus hominibus male viventibus intercluditur regnum Dei, commemoratam esse et ebrietatem; quia ubi dictum est: Neque fornicatores, neque idolis servientes, neque adulteri, neque molles, neque masculorum concubitores, neque fures; ibi additum est: Neque ebriosi, etc., regnum Dei possidebunt . Audivit, et timuit. Baptizatus est, dimissa sunt illi omnia quibus inebriatus est; restat adversaria consuetudo. Ergo habet cum qua pugnet renatus. Praeterita eius vitia omnia dimissa sunt ei; observet, vigilet, pugnet, ne aliquando inebrietur. Surgit ergo illa concupiscentia potandi, titillat animum, ingerit faucibus siccitatem, insidiatur sensibus; vult etiam ipsum, si potest fieri, penetrare murum, adire inclusum, trahere captivum. Pugnat, repugna. O si et ipsa non esset! Si consuetudine mala accessit, bona consuetudine morietur; tu tantum noli ei satisfacere, noli eam cedendo satiare, sed resistendo necare. Tamen quamdiu est, hostis est. Si ei non consentias, et numquam inebrieris, minor et minor erit quotidie. Nam sunt vires illius subiectio tua. Si enim ei cesseris, et inebriatus fueris, das ei vires. Numquid contra me, et non contra te? Ego de loco superiore moneo, dico, praedico; quid mali futurum sit ebriosis, ante denuntio. Non est quod dicas: Non audivi; non est quod dicas: Exigit Deus animam meam de manu illius, qui mihi tacuit. Sed laboras, quia tibi validum adversarium mala consuetudine ipse fecisti. Non laborasti, ut nutrires eum; labora, ut vincas eum. Et si minus idoneus es adversus eum, roga Deum. Tamen si te non vicerit, quamvis ipsa tua mala consuetudo luctata sit tecum, si te non vicerit, fecisti quod ait apostolus Paulus: Concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis . Facta est concupiscentia titillando; sed non est perfecta potando.
4. 4. See, I will set forth something from this, from which you may understand the rest. You know that there are sober people; they are fewer, but they exist. You know too that there are drunkards; they abound. A sober man has been baptized; so far as concerns drunkenness, he has nothing to fight against; he has other desires to fight against. But that you may understand about the rest, let us set in the midst the contest of one enemy only. A drunkard has been baptized; he heard, and heard with fear, that among the other evils by which the kingdom of God is shut off from people living badly, drunkenness too was mentioned; for where it was said, Neither fornicators, nor those who serve idols, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor sodomites, nor thieves, there was added, nor drunkards, etc., shall possess the kingdom of God (1 Cor 6:9-10). He heard, and feared. He was baptized; all the things in which he was drunk are forgiven him; there remains the adversary, habit. So the reborn man has something to fight against. All his past vices are forgiven him; let him watch, be vigilant, fight, lest at some time he become drunk. So that desire for drinking rises up, tickles the mind, brings dryness into the throat, lies in wait for the senses; it even wants, if it can be done, to penetrate the wall itself, to reach the one shut within, to drag him captive. It fights; fight back. Oh, if only it did not exist! If it came in by an evil habit, it will die by a good habit; only do not satisfy it, do not glut it by yielding, but kill it by resisting. Yet as long as it exists, it is an enemy. If you do not consent to it, and are never drunk, it will be less and less every day. For your submission is its strength. For if you yield to it and become drunk, you give it strength. Is it against me, and not against you? I admonish from the higher place, I speak, I proclaim; what evil is going to befall drunkards, I announce beforehand. There is no reason for you to say, I did not hear; there is no reason for you to say, God requires my soul at the hand of the one who was silent to me. But you labor, because by an evil habit you yourself made for yourself a strong adversary. You did not labor to nourish it; labor to conquer it. And if you are less than fit against it, ask God. Yet if it has not conquered you—though your own evil habit has wrestled with you, if it has not conquered you—you have done what the apostle Paul says, Do not accomplish the desires of the flesh. The desire arose by its tickling, but it was not accomplished by drinking.
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Quod dixi de ebrietate, hoc de omnibus vitiis, hoc de omnibus cupiditatibus. Cum aliquibus enim nati sumus, aliquas consuetudine fecimus. Nam propter illas cum quibus nati sumus, baptizantur infantes, ut solvantur a reatu propaginis, non malae, quam non habuerunt, consuetudinis. Ergo semper pugnandum est, quia ipsa concupiscentia, cum qua nati sumus, finiri non potest quamdiu vivimus; quotidie minui potest, finiri non potest. Per illam dictum est hoc nostrum mortis corpus. De ipsa dicit Apostolus: Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem. Video autem aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis . Tunc nata est ista lex, quando transgressa est prima lex. Tunc nata est, inquam, ista lex, quando contempta et transgressa est prima lex. Quae est prima lex? Quam in paradiso accepit homo. Nonne nudi erant, et non confundebantur? Quare nudi erant, et non confundebantur, nisi quia nondum erat lex in membris repugnans legi mentis? Fecit homo factum puniendum, et invenit motum pudendum. Manducaverunt contra interdictum, et aperti sunt oculi eorum. Quid enim? prius in paradiso clausis vel caecis oculis oberrabant? Absit. Nam Adam unde nomina imposuit volatilibus et bestiis, quando ad eum cuncta animalia adducta sunt ? Quibus nomina imponebat, si non videbat? Deinde dictum est: Vidit mulier lignum, quia placeret oculis ad videndum. Ergo oculos apertos habebant; et nudi erant, et non confundebantur. Aperti sunt autem oculi eorum ad aliquid quod numquam senserant, quod in motu sui corporis numquam expaverant. Aperti sunt oculi ad intuendum, non ad videndum; et quia senserunt pudendum, curaverunt tegendum. Consuerunt, inquit, folia ficulnea, et fecerunt sibi succinctoria . Quod texerunt, ibi senserunt. Ecce unde trahitur originale peccatum, ecce unde nemo nascitur sine peccato. Ecce propter quod Dominus non sic concipi voluit, quem virgo concepit. Solvit illud, qui venit sine illo; solvit illud, qui non venit ex illo. Unde unus et unus: unus ad mortem, unus ad vitam. Homo primus ad mortem, homo secundus ad vitam. Sed quare ad mortem ille homo? Quia tantum homo. Quare ad vitam iste homo? Quia Deus et homo.
5. 5. What I have said of drunkenness, this I say of all vices, this of all desires. For with some we are born, others we have made by habit. Now on account of those with which we are born, infants are baptized, that they may be loosed from the guilt of their origin—not of an evil habit, which they did not have. Therefore we must always fight, because that very desire with which we are born cannot be ended as long as we live; it can be lessened daily, it cannot be ended. On account of it this body of ours is called the body of death. Of it the Apostle says, For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man. But I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:22-23). This law was born when the first law was transgressed. Then was this law born, I say, when the first law was despised and transgressed. What is the first law? The one the human being received in paradise. Were they not naked, and not ashamed (Gen 2:25)? Why were they naked and not ashamed, except because there was not yet a law in the members fighting against the law of the mind? The human being did a deed to be punished, and found a motion to be ashamed of. They ate against the prohibition, and their eyes were opened. What then? Did they before wander in paradise with closed or blind eyes? Far from it. For how did Adam impose names on the birds and beasts, when all the animals were brought to him (Gen 2:19-20)? On those on which he imposed names, if he did not see them? Then it is said, The woman saw that the tree was pleasing to the eyes to look upon (Gen 3:6). So they had open eyes; and they were naked, and were not ashamed. But their eyes were opened to something they had never felt, something they had never dreaded in the motion of their body. Their eyes were opened to gaze upon it, not to see; and because they felt something shameful, they took care to cover it. They sewed together, it says, fig leaves, and made themselves girdles (Gen 3:7). What they covered, there they felt it. See whence original sin is drawn; see whence no one is born without sin. See why the Lord did not wish to be conceived in this way, whom a virgin conceived. He loosed it who came without it; he loosed it who did not come from it. Hence one and one: one to death, one to life. The first man to death, the second man to life. But why was that man to death? Because he was only man. Why is this man to life? Because he is God and man.
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Non ergo quod vult agit Apostolus; quia vult non concupiscere, et tamen concupiscit; ideo non quod vult agit. Numquid illa concupiscentia mala trahebat Apostolum subiugatum ad fornicationem et adulteria? Absit. Non ascendant tales cogitationes in cor nostrum. Luctabatur, non subiugabatur. Sed quia nolebat nec hoc habere contra quod luctaretur, ideo dicebat: Non quod volo, ago . Concupiscere nolo, et concupisco. Non ergo quod volo, ago; sed tamen concupiscentiae non consentio. Non enim aliter diceret: Concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis , si eas ipse perficeret. Sed constituit tibi ante oculos pugnam suam, ne timeres tuam. Si enim hoc non dixisset beatus Apostolus, quando videres moveri concupiscentiam in membris tuis, cui tu non consentires; tamen cum eam moveri videres, forsitan de te desperares et diceres: Si ad Deum pertinerem, sic non moverer. Vide Apostolum pugnantem, et noli te facere desperantem. Video aliam legem, inquit, in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae. Et quia nolo ut repugnet; caro enim mea est, ego ipse sum, pars mea est: Non quod volo ago; sed quod odi malum, hoc ago ; quia concupisco.
6. 6. The Apostle, then, does not do what he wills; for he wills not to covet, and yet he covets; so he does not do what he wills. Did that evil desire drag the Apostle, subjugated, to fornication and adultery? Far from it. Let no such thoughts rise into our heart. He wrestled, he was not subjugated. But because he did not want even to have this against which he wrestled, he therefore said, I do not do what I will. I do not wish to covet, and I covet. So I do not do what I will; yet I do not consent to the desire. For otherwise he would not say, Do not accomplish the desires of the flesh, if he himself accomplished them. But he set before your eyes his own struggle, that you might not fear your own. For if the blessed Apostle had not said this, when you saw a desire stirred in your members, to which you did not consent—yet, when you saw it stirred, you would perhaps despair of yourself and say, If I belonged to God, I would not be moved thus. See the Apostle fighting, and do not make yourself despair. I see another law, he says, in my members, fighting against the law of my mind. And because I do not want it to fight—for it is my flesh, it is my very self, it is a part of me—I do not do what I will, but the evil that I hate, that I do; because I covet.
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. Quod ergo bonum ago? Quia concupiscentiae malae non consentio. Ago bonum, et non perficio bonum; et concupiscentia hostis mea agit malum, et non perficit malum. Quomodo ago bonum et non perficio bonum? Ago bonum, cum malae concupiscentiae non consentio; sed non perficio bonum, ut omnino non concupiscam. Rursus ergo et hostis mea quomodo agit malum, et non perficit malum? Agit malum, quia movet desiderium malum; non perficit malum, quia me non trahit ad malum. Et in isto bello est tota vita sanctorum. Iam quid dicam de immundis, qui nec pugnant? Subiugati pertrahuntur; nec pertrahuntur, quia libenter sequuntur. Haec, inquam, est pugna sanctorum; et in hoc bello semper homo periclitatur, quousque moriatur. Sed in fine, id est, in triumpho illius victoriae quid dicitur? immo quid dicit Apostolus iam praemeditans triumphum? Tunc fiet sermo qui scriptus est: Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Vox triumphantium. Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum; cuius punctione facta est mors. Peccatum quasi scorpius est: pupugit nos, et mortui sumus. Sed quando dicitur; Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? quo aculeo facta es, non quem fecisti; quando ergo dicitur; Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? utique non erit; quia peccatum non erit. Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum. Contra peccatum data est lex. Sed virtus peccati lex . Quomodo virtus peccati lex? Subintravit, ut abundaret delictum . Quomodo hoc? Quia fuit ante legem homo peccator; data lege atque transgressa, factus est et praevaricator. Peccato tenebantur homines rei; lege data, plus praevaricatione facti sunt rei.
7. 7. What good, then, do I do? Because I do not consent to the evil desire. I do good, and I do not accomplish the good; and the desire, my enemy, does evil, and does not accomplish evil. How do I do good and not accomplish good? I do good when I do not consent to the evil desire; but I do not accomplish good, so as not to covet at all. And again, how does my enemy do evil and not accomplish evil? It does evil, because it stirs an evil longing; it does not accomplish evil, because it does not drag me to evil. And in this warfare is the whole life of the saints. What now shall I say of the unclean, who do not even fight? Subjugated, they are dragged along; nor are they dragged, since they follow willingly. This, I say, is the battle of the saints; and in this warfare a person is always in peril, until he dies. But in the end—that is, in the triumph of that victory—what is said? Rather, what does the Apostle say, already foretasting the triumph? Then shall come to pass the saying that is written: Death is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your struggle? The voice of those who triumph. Where, O death, is your sting? But the sting of death is sin (1 Cor 15:54-56); by whose stinging death was wrought. Sin is like a scorpion: it stung us, and we died. But when it is said, Where, O death, is your sting?—by which sting you were made, not which you made; when, therefore, it is said, Where, O death, is your sting?—surely it will not be, because sin will not be. But the sting of death is sin. Against sin the law was given. But the power of sin is the law (1 Cor 15:56). How is the law the power of sin? It came in, that the offense might abound (Rom 5:20). How is this? Because before the law the human being was a sinner; the law being given and transgressed, he became also a transgressor. People were held guilty by sin; the law being given, they were made more guilty by transgression.
Sermons5.7.7
8. 8. Ubi spes, nisi quod sequitur: Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia ? Ideo iste miles et quodammodo in isto bello exercitatissimus, tam exercitatus, ut esset et dux, cum laboraret in hoc bello contra hostem, et diceret: Video aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis, legem foedam, legem miseram, vulnus, tabem, languorem; subiunxit: Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Et gementi subventum est. Quomodo subventum est? Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum liberabit te a lege mortis huius, id est, a corpore mortis huius, gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Quando corpus habebis, ubi nulla concupiscentia remanebit? Cum mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem, et corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, et dicetur morti: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? et non erit: Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? et nusquam erit. Modo quid? Audi: Igitur ego ipse mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati . Mente servio legi Dei, non consentiendo; carne autem legi peccati, concupiscendo. Et mente legi Dei, et carne legi peccati. Et hac delector, et ibi concupisco; sed non vincor; titillat, insidiatur, pulsat, trahere conatur: Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Nolo semper vincere; sed volo aliquando ad pacem venire. Nunc ergo, fratres, tenete istum modum; mente servite legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati; sed ex necessitate, quia concupiscitis, non quia consentitis. Aliquando ista concupiscentia sic insidiatur sanctis, ut faciat dormientibus quod non potest vigilantibus. Unde omnes acclamastis, nisi quia omnes agnovistis? Pudet hic immorari, sed non pigeat inde Deum precari. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
8. 8. Where is hope, but in what follows: Where sin abounded, grace abounded the more (Rom 5:20)? Therefore that soldier, in a way most practiced in this warfare—so practiced that he was even a leader—when he labored in this warfare against the enemy, and said, I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members, a foul law, a wretched law, a wound, a rottenness, a sickness—added, Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death (Rom 7:23-24)? And help came to him as he groaned. How did help come? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord will free you from the law of this death—that is, from the body of this death—the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:25). When will you have a body in which no desire will remain? When this mortal puts on immortality, and this corruptible puts on incorruption, and it will be said to death, Where, O death, is your struggle? and it will not be: Where, O death, is your sting? and it will be nowhere (1 Cor 15:53-55). What now? Hear: So then I myself serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh (Rom 7:25). I serve the law of God with the mind, by not consenting; but the law of sin with the flesh, by coveting. And with the mind the law of God, and with the flesh the law of sin. And I delight in this, and there I covet; but I am not conquered; it tickles, lies in wait, knocks, tries to drag: Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? I do not wish always to conquer; but I wish at some time to come to peace. Now then, brothers, keep this measure: serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh—but out of necessity, because you covet, not because you consent. Sometimes this desire so lies in wait for the saints that it works in those asleep what it cannot in those awake. Whence did you all cry out, but because you all recognized it? It is shameful to linger here, but let it not be irksome to pray to God about it. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.8.8
SERMO 152
Sermon 152
Sermons5.8.8
1. Meminisse debet Caritas vestra, disputasse me vobis de quaestione difficillima ex apostoli Pauli Epistola, ubi dicit: Non enim quod volo, ago; sed quod odi, illud facio . Qui ergo adfuistis, meministis; adestote nunc animo, ut astruatis ad id quod audistis. Sequitur enim lectio quae hodie recitata est, quam quidem lector inde coepit: Misit Deus Filium suum in similitudinem carnis peccati, et de peccato damnavit peccatum in carne; ut iustitia legis impleretur in nobis, qui non secundum carnem ambulamus, sed secundum spiritum . Illa vero quae tunc lecta sunt, nec tractata verba, ista sunt quae sequuntur: Igitur ego ipse mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati. Nulla ergo condemnatio est his nunc qui sunt in Christo Iesu. Lex enim spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis. Quod enim impossibile erat legis, in quo infirmabatur per carnem . Et sequitur quod hodie lectum est: Deus Filium suum misit in similitudinem carnis peccati. Difficultas non est in obscuris sensibus, quando adiuvat spiritus. Adiuvet ergo nos orantibus vobis; quia ipsum desiderium quod vultis intellegere, oratio est ad Deum. Ab ipso ergo oportet ut exspectetis auxilium. Nos enim, quomodo rustici in agro, forinsecus operamur. Si autem nullus esset qui intrinsecus operaretur, nec semen terrae figeretur, nec in agro cacumen exsurgeret, nec roboraretur virga et perveniret ad trabem; nec rami, nec fructus, nec folia nascerentur. Ideo dixit ipse Apostolus, discernens operationem operariorum et Creatoris: Ego plantavi, Apollo rigavit; sed Deus incrementum dedit. Et adiunxit: Neque qui plantat est aliquid, neque qui rigat; sed qui incrementum dat Deus . Si Deus intrinsecus incrementum non det, inanis est iste sonus ad aures vestras. Si autem det, valet aliquid quod plantamus et rigamus, et non est inanis labor noster.
1. Your Charity ought to remember that I discoursed to you on a most difficult question from the Epistle of the apostle Paul, where he says, For I do not do the good that I will, but the evil that I hate, that I do (Rom 7:15.19). Those of you, then, who were present, remember; be present now in mind, that you may build upon what you heard. For there follows the reading that has been recited today, which the reader began here: God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and from sin condemned sin in the flesh; that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the spirit (Rom 8:3-4). But the words that were read then, and not treated, are these that follow: So then I myself serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh. There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed you from the law of sin and death. For what was impossible for the law, in which it was weakened through the flesh (Rom 7:25-8:3). And there follows what was read today: God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh. The difficulty is not in obscure meanings, when the spirit helps. May he therefore help us, as you pray; for the very desire by which you wish to understand is a prayer to God. From him, then, you must look for help. For we, like peasants in a field, work on the outside. But if there were none who worked on the inside, neither would the seed be fixed in the earth, nor would the top spring up in the field, nor would the shoot be strengthened and reach the trunk; nor would branches, nor fruit, nor leaves be born. So the Apostle himself said, distinguishing the work of the workers and of the Creator, I planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. And he added, So neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase (1 Cor 3:6-7). If God does not give the increase within, this sound is empty to your ears. But if he does give it, what we plant and water has some value, and our labor is not empty.
Sermons5.1
2. Iam dixi vobis sic esse accipiendum quod ait Apostolus: Mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati ; ut carni nihil plus permittatis, nisi desideria, sine quibus non potest esse. Si autem desideriis malis consenseritis, et non contra illa luctati fueritis, victi plangetis; et optandum est ut plangatis, ne et sensum doloris perdatis. Quantum ergo est in votis nostris, in voluntate nostra, in oratione nostra, quando dicimus: Ne nos inferas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo ; hoc utique cupimus, ut nec ipsa mala desideria existant de carne nostra. Sed quamdiu hic vivimus, efficere non valemus. Propter hoc ait: Perficere autem bonum non invenio . Facere quid invenio? Non consentire malo desiderio. Perficere non invenio: non habere malum desiderium. Restat ergo in hac pugna, ut mente non consentiente malis concupiscentiis, servias legi Dei; carne autem concupiscente, sed te non consentiente, servias legi peccati. Agit caro desideria sua, age et tu tua. Non opprimuntur, non exstinguuntur a te desideria eius; non exstinguat tua; ut in certamine labores, non victus traharis.
2. I have already told you that what the Apostle says is to be taken thus: I serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh; so that you permit the flesh nothing more than the longings without which it cannot be. But if you consent to the evil longings, and do not wrestle against them, conquered you will lament; and it is to be wished that you lament, lest you also lose the very sense of grief. As much, then, as lies in our prayers, in our will, in our supplication, when we say, Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil (Matt 6:13), this surely we desire: that not even those evil longings themselves should arise from our flesh. But as long as we live here, we are not able to bring it about. On account of this he says, But to accomplish the good I do not find (Rom 7:18). What do I find to do? Not to consent to the evil longing. To accomplish I do not find: that is, not to have an evil longing. It remains, then, in this warfare, that with your mind not consenting to the evil desires you serve the law of God, but with your flesh coveting, yet you not consenting, you serve the law of sin. The flesh does its longings; do you also do yours. Its longings are not crushed, not extinguished by you; let it not extinguish yours; that in the struggle you may labor, not, conquered, be dragged along.
Sermons5.2
3. Sequitur ergo et dicit Apostolus: Nulla ergo condemnatio est nunc his qui sunt in Christo Iesu . Et si habent desideria carnis, quibus non consentiunt; et si lex in membris eorum repugnat legi mentis eorum, et captivare vult mentem; tamen quia per gratiam Baptismatis et lavacri regenerationis solutus est et ipse reatus, cum quo eras natus, et quidquid antea consensisti malae concupiscentiae, sive quolibet flagitio, sive quolibet facinore, sive qualibet mala cogitatione, sive qualibet mala locutione, omnia deleta sunt in illo fonte, quo servus intrasti, unde liber existi; quia ergo haec ita sunt: Nulla nunc condemnatio est his qui sunt in Christo Iesu. Nulla est nunc, antea fuit. Ex uno omnes in condemnationem . Hoc malum fecerat generatio, sed hoc bonum fecit regeneratio. Lex enim spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis . Inest in membris, sed reum te non facit. Liberatus es ab illa; liber pugna; sed vide ne vincaris, et iterum fias servus. Laboras pugnando, sed laetaberis triumphando.
3. There follows, then, and the Apostle says, There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus (Rom 8:1). Even if they have the desires of the flesh, to which they do not consent; even if the law in their members fights against the law of their mind, and wishes to take the mind captive; yet because through the grace of Baptism and the washing of regeneration the very guilt with which you were born has been loosed, and whatever you previously consented to of evil desire—whether by any shameful deed, or any crime, or any evil thought, or any evil speech—all has been blotted out in that fountain, into which you entered a slave, from which you came out free; because, then, these things are so: There is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. There is now none; before there was. By one, all into condemnation (See Rom 5:16.18). This evil generation had wrought, but this good regeneration wrought. For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:2). It is present in your members, but does not make you guilty. You have been freed from it; free, fight; but see that you are not conquered, and become a slave again. You labor by fighting, but you will rejoice by triumphing.
Sermons5.3
4. Dixi autem vobis, et maxime meminisse debetis, ne forte propter istam pugnam, sine qua homo esse non potest, etiam qui iuste vivit; immo ille in ea est, qui iuste vivit; nam nec pugnat, sed trahitur, qui iuste non vivit; ergo ne putetis propter hoc quasi duas ex diversis principiis esse naturas, sicut insaniunt Manichaei, quod quasi non sit caro ex Deo. Falsum est, utrumque ex Deo est. Sed natura humana istam in semetipsa meruit ex peccato. Ergo languor est; sanatur, et non est. Discordia modo quae est in spiritu et carne, pro concordia laborat; spiritus ideo laborat, ut caro cum illo concordet. Quemadmodum si in una domo litem inter se habeant vir et uxor; ad hoc debet laborare vir, ut domet uxorem. Domata uxor subiugetur viro; subiugata uxore viro, fiat pax in domo.
4. But I told you—and you ought especially to remember this—lest, perchance, on account of this struggle, without which a human being cannot exist (even one who lives righteously; rather, it is the one who lives righteously who is in it, for the one who does not live righteously does not fight, but is dragged along)—lest, then, you suppose on this account that there are, as it were, two natures from diverse principles, as the Manicheans rave, as though the flesh were not from God. That is false; both are from God. But human nature deserved this within itself as a result of sin. It is therefore a sickness; it is healed, and it ceases to be. The discord that now exists between spirit and flesh labors for the sake of concord; the spirit labors in order that the flesh may agree with it. Just as if in one house a man and his wife have a quarrel between them, the husband must labor to tame the wife. Let the wife, once tamed, be subject to the husband; the wife being made subject to the husband, let there be peace in the house.
Sermons5.4
5. Cum autem dixisset: Lex spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis; proposuit nobis intellegendas ipsas leges. Intuemini eas, et discernite; satis vobis necessaria est ista descretio. Lex, inquit, spiritus vitae, ecce una lex: liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis, ecce altera lex. Et sequitur: Quod enim impossibile erat legis, in quo infirmabatur per carnem , ecce tertia lex. Aut forte ista est ex duabus? Inquiramus et Domino adiuvante videamus. De lege illa bona quid dixit? Lex spiritus vitae liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis. Istam non dixit invalidam fuisse ad efficiendum: Liberavit, inquit, te lex spiritus vitae a lege peccati et mortis. Lex illa bona liberavit te ab ista lege mala. Lex enim mala quae est? Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis . Quare et ipsa lex dicta est? Recte omnino. Admodum enim legitime factum est ut homo qui noluit oboedire Domino suo, non ei serviret caro ipsius. Supra te Dominus tuus, infra te caro tua. Servi meliori, ut serviat tibi inferior. Contempsisti superiorem, torqueris ab inferiore. Ista est ergo lex peccati, ipsa est et mortis. Per peccatum enim mors. Qua die manducaveritis, morte moriemini . Ista ergo lex peccati trahit spiritum, et subiugare contendit. Sed condelector legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem . Ac per hoc fit illa pugna, et in ipso certamine dicitur: Mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati. Lex spiritus vitae liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis . Lex enim ipsa spiritus vitae quomodo te liberavit? Primo omnium indulgentiam peccatorum dedit. Ipsa est enim lex, de qua in Psalmo dicitur Deo: Et de lege tua miserere mei . Lex misericordiae, lex fidei, non factorum. Quae est ergo lex factorum? Iam audistis legem fidei bonam: Lex spiritus vitae liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis. Audistis et aliam legem peccati et mortis. Quod enim impossibile erat legis, in quo infirmabatur per carnem. Haec ergo lex tertio loco quae nominata est, nescio quid quasi non implet; lex autem illa spiritus vitae implevit; quia te de lege peccati et mortis liberavit. Lex itaque ista, quae loco tertio nominata est, ipsa Lex quae data est populo per Moysen in monte Sina, ipsa dicitur lex factorum. Ipsa minari novit, non subvenire; iubere novit, non iuvare. Ipsa est quae dixit: Non concupisces. Unde dicit Apostolus: Concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Et quid mihi profuit, quia lex dixit: Non concupisces? Occasione accepta peccatum per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit . Prohibitus sum concupiscere, nec implevi iussa, sed victus sum. Ante legem fui peccator; accepta lege factus sum praevaricator. Peccatum enim occasione accepta per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit.
5. But when he had said, The law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:2), he set before us these laws themselves to be understood. Look at them, and distinguish them; this distinction is necessary enough for you. The law, he says, of the spirit of life—behold, one law: has freed you from the law of sin and death—behold, another law. And there follows, For what was impossible for the law, in which it was weakened through the flesh (Rom 8:3)—behold, a third law. Or perhaps this is one of the two? Let us inquire and, with the Lord's help, see. What did he say about that good law? The law of the spirit of life has freed you from the law of sin and death. He did not say that this law was powerless to accomplish anything: The law of the spirit of life has freed you, he says, from the law of sin and death. That good law has freed you from this evil law. For what is the evil law? I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:23). Why is this too called a law? With perfect rightness. For it was done most justly that the man who was unwilling to obey his Lord should have his own flesh disobey him. Above you is your Lord, below you is your flesh. Serve the higher, that the lower may serve you. You despised the higher; you are tormented by the lower. This, then, is the law of sin, which is also the law of death. For through sin came death. On the day you eat, you shall die the death (Gen 2:17). This law of sin, then, drags the spirit and strives to subjugate it. But I delight in the law of God according to the inner man (Rom 7:22). And through this comes that struggle, and in that very contest it is said, I serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh. The law of the spirit of life has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 7:25-8:2). For how did the law of the spirit of life itself free you? First of all, it gave the forgiveness of sins. For this is the law of which it is said to God in the Psalm, And in your law have mercy on me (Ps 119 (118):29). The law of mercy, the law of faith, not of works. What, then, is the law of works? You have already heard the good law of faith: The law of the spirit of life has freed you from the law of sin and death. You have heard too the other law, of sin and death. For what was impossible for the law, in which it was weakened through the flesh. This law, then, named in the third place, somehow does not fulfill anything, as it were; but that law of the spirit of life fulfilled it, because it freed you from the law of sin and death. So this law, named in the third place, the very Law that was given to the people through Moses on Mount Sinai, is called the law of works. It knows how to threaten, not to help; to command, not to aid. It is the one that said, You shall not covet. Hence the Apostle says, I would not have known coveting, unless the law said, You shall not covet. And what did it profit me that the law said, You shall not covet? Sin, taking occasion through the commandment, deceived me, and through it killed me (Rom 7:7.11). I was forbidden to covet, and I did not fulfill the commands, but was conquered. Before the law I was a sinner; the law being received, I became a transgressor. For sin, taking occasion through the commandment, deceived me, and through it killed me.
Sermons5.5
6. Itaque, inquit, lex quidem sancta. Bona est ergo et ista lex (quia et ipsam reprehendunt Manichaei, quomodo carnem). De illa dicit Apostolus: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum. Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit! Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem. Apostoli verba sunt, videte et attendite. Itaque lex quidem sancta. Quid tam sanctum, quam: Non concupisces? Non esset mala legis praevaricatio, nisi ipsa esset bona. Si enim non esset bona, non esset malum praevaricari rem malam. Quia vero malum est eam praevaricari, ergo bona est. Quid tam bonum, quam: Non concupisces? Lex ergo sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum. Quomodo satiat? quomodo inculcat? Quasi contra calumniatores clamat. Quid dicis, Manichaee? Lex quae data est per Moysen mala est? Mala est, dicunt: O portenta! o frontem ! Tu dixisti semel: Mala; audi Apostolum dicentem: Lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum. Taces aliquando? Quod ergo bonum est, inquit, mihi factum est mors? Absit! Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem. Et hic: per bonum; sic reum accusat, ut a laude legis non recedat. Per bonum mihi, inquit, operatum est mortem. Per quod bonum? Mandatum. Per quod bonum? Legem. Quomodo operatum est mortem? Ut appareat peccatum; ut fiat supra modum peccatum, delinquens per mandatum . Ideo: supra modum. Quando delinquebat sine mandato, minus erat; quando delinquit per mandatum, excedit modum. Quando enim non prohibetur aliquis, putat quia bene facit. Prohibitus, incipit nolle facere; vincitur, trahitur, subiugatur; iam restat illi gratiam invocare; quia non potuit legem servare.
6. And so, he says, the law indeed is holy. This law too, then, is good (for the Manicheans reproach it as well, just as they do the flesh). Of it the Apostle says, And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Did that which is good, then, become death to me? Far from it! But sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good. These are the Apostle's words; see and attend. And so the law indeed is holy. What is so holy as You shall not covet? The transgression of the law would not be evil unless the law itself were good. For if it were not good, it would not be evil to transgress an evil thing. But because it is evil to transgress it, therefore it is good. What is so good as You shall not covet? The law, then, is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. How he satisfies, how he drives it home! He cries out, as it were, against the slanderers. What do you say, Manichean? Is the law that was given through Moses evil? "It is evil," they say. O monsters! O effrontery! You said once: It is evil. Hear the Apostle saying, The law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Will you be silent at last? Did that which is good, he says, then become death to me? Far from it! But sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good. And here too, through what is good; thus he accuses the guilty party in such a way that he does not depart from the praise of the law. Through what is good, he says, it worked death in me. Through what good? The commandment. Through what good? The law. How did it work death? That sin might appear; that sin, sinning through the commandment, might become beyond measure. Hence: beyond measure. When he sinned without the commandment, it was less; when he sins through the commandment, he exceeds the measure. For when someone is not forbidden, he thinks he does well. Forbidden, he begins to be unwilling to do it; he is conquered, dragged, subjugated; it now remains for him to call upon grace, because he could not keep the law.
Sermons5.6
7. Ac per hoc lex illa, de qua dictum est: Lex enim spiritus vitae liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis , lex est fidei, lex est Spiritus, lex est gratiae, lex est misericordiae. Illa vero lex peccati et mortis, non est lex Dei, sed peccati et mortis. Illa vero altera de qua dicit Apostolus: Lex sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum , lex est Dei, sed factorum, lex operum; operum lex, quae iubet non iuvat; lex quae tibi ostendit, non tollit peccatum. Ab alia tibi lege ostenditur peccatum, ab alia tollitur. Duo sunt Testamenta, Vetus et Novum. Audi Apostolum dicentem: Dicite mihi, sub lege volentes esse, legem non legistis? Scriptum est enim quod Abraham duos filios habuit, unum de ancilla, et unum de libera. Sed is quidem qui de ancilla, secundum carnem natus est; qui autem de libera, per promissionem; quae sunt in allegoria. Haec enim sunt duo Testamenta, unum quidem in monte Sina in servitutem generans, quae est Agar, ancilla Sarae, quae data est Abrahae, et peperit Ismaelem servum. Est ergo Testamentum Vetus pertinens ad Agar, in servitutem generans. Quae autem sursum est Ierusalem, libera est, quae est mater nostra . Ergo filii gratiae, filii sunt liberae; filii litterae, filii sunt ancillae. Quaere filios ancillae: Littera occidit. Quaere filios liberae: Spiritus autem vivificat . Lex Spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis, unde te non potuit liberare lex litterae. Quod enim impossibile erat legis, in quo infirmabatur per carnem . Rebellabat enim caro tua, subiugabat te caro tua; audiebat legem, et plus incitabat concupiscentiam tuam. Infirmabatur ergo lex litterae per carnem; ac per hoc impossibile erat legis litterae liberare a lege peccati et mortis.
7. And through this, that law of which it was said, For the law of the spirit of life has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:2), is the law of faith, the law of the Spirit, the law of grace, the law of mercy. But that law of sin and death is not the law of God, but of sin and death. But that other law, of which the Apostle says, The law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good (Rom 7:12), is the law of God, but of works, the law of works; the law of works, which commands but does not help; the law that shows you sin, but does not take it away. By one law sin is shown to you, by another it is taken away. There are two Testaments, the Old and the New. Hear the Apostle saying, Tell me, you who wish to be under the law, have you not read the law? For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and one by the free woman. But he who was by the slave woman was born according to the flesh, while he who was by the free woman was born through the promise; which things are an allegory. For these are the two Testaments: one indeed on Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery, which is Hagar (Gal 4:21-24)—the slave of Sarah, who was given to Abraham, and bore Ishmael the slave. The Old Testament, then, pertaining to Hagar, bears children for slavery. But the Jerusalem that is above is free, which is our mother (Gal 4:26). Therefore the children of grace are children of the free woman; the children of the letter are children of the slave woman. Seek the children of the slave woman: The letter kills. Seek the children of the free woman: But the Spirit gives life (2 Cor 3:6). The law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed you from the law of sin and death, from which the law of the letter could not free you. For what was impossible for the law, in which it was weakened through the flesh (Rom 8:2-3). For your flesh was rebelling, your flesh was subjugating you; it heard the law, and only stirred up your coveting the more. The law of the letter, then, was weakened through the flesh; and through this it was impossible for the law of the letter to free you from the law of sin and death.
Sermons5.7
8. Misit Deus Filium suum in similitudinem carnis peccati ; non in carne peccati. In carne quidem, sed non in carne peccati. Cetera ergo omnium hominum caro, caro peccati; sola illius, non caro peccati; quia non eum mater concupiscentia, sed gratia concepit; tamen habens similitudinem carnis peccati; unde et nutriri, et esurire, et sitire, et dormire, et fatigari, et mori potuit. In similitudinem carnis peccati misit Deus Filium suum.
8. God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh (Rom 8:3)—not in the flesh of sin. In flesh indeed, but not in the flesh of sin. All the rest of the flesh of all human beings, then, is the flesh of sin; his alone is not the flesh of sin, because concupiscence did not conceive him, but grace; yet it has the likeness of sinful flesh, whence it could also be nourished, and hunger, and thirst, and sleep, and grow weary, and die. In the likeness of sinful flesh God sent his Son.
Sermons5.8
9. Et de peccato damnavit peccatum in carne. De quo peccato? Quod peccatum? De peccato damnavit peccatum in carne; ut iustitia legis impleatur in nobis. Iam illa iustitia legis impleatur in nobis; iam illa iustitia quae iubetur, impleatur in nobis per Spiritum qui adiuvat; id est, lex litterae impleatur in nobis per spiritum vitae: Qui non secundum carnem ambulamus, sed secundum spiritum . De quo ergo peccato Dominus, quod peccatum damnavit? Video, video quidem quod peccatum damnavit, video prorsus: Ecce Agnus Dei, ecce qui tollit peccatum mundi . Quod peccatum? Omne peccatum, omne nostrum peccatum damnavit. Sed de quo peccato? Ipse non habebat peccatum; de illo dictum est: Qui peccatum non fecit, nec inventus est dolus in ore eius . Nullum prorsus, nec trahendo, nec addendo; nullum peccatum habuit, nec originis, nec propriae iniquitatis. Originem virgo demonstrat; conversatio vero eius sancta satis ostendit nihil eum fecisse unde dignus esset morte. Ideo ait: Ecce venit princeps huius mundi (diabolum significans), et in me nihil inveniet. Non inveniet quare me occidat princeps mortis. Et quare ergo moreris? Sed ut sciant omnes quia voluntatem Patris mei facio, eamus hinc . Et perrexit ad passionem mortis, mortem voluntariam, non necessitatis, sed arbitrii. Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam. Nemo tollit eam a me, sed ego pono eam, et iterum sumo eam . Si miraris potestatem, intellege maiestatem. Ut Deus loquitur, Christus loquitur.
9. And from sin he condemned sin in the flesh. From what sin? What sin? From sin he condemned sin in the flesh; that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us. Now let that righteousness of the law be fulfilled in us; now let that righteousness which is commanded be fulfilled in us through the Spirit who helps; that is, let the law of the letter be fulfilled in us through the spirit of life: who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the spirit (Rom 8:3-4). From what sin, then, did the Lord condemn what sin? I see, I do indeed see what sin he condemned, I see it plainly: Behold the Lamb of God, behold him who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). What sin? Every sin; he condemned all our sin. But from what sin? He himself had no sin; of him it is said, He committed no sin, nor was deceit found in his mouth (1 Pet 2:22; Isa 53:9). None at all, neither by inheriting nor by adding; he had no sin, neither of origin nor of his own iniquity. The virgin demonstrates his origin; and his holy manner of life sufficiently shows that he did nothing for which he was worthy of death. So he says, Behold, the prince of this world comes (signifying the devil), and in me he will find nothing. The prince of death will find no reason to kill me. And why, then, do you die? But that all may know that I do the will of my Father, let us go from here (John 14:30-31). And he went on to the suffering of death, a voluntary death, not of necessity but of choice. I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down and take it up again (John 10:18). If you marvel at the power, understand the majesty. As God speaks, so Christ speaks.
Sermons5.9
10. De quo ergo peccato damnavit peccatum? Intellexerunt quidam, et pervenerunt ad sensum non improbum. Sed tamen quid dixerit Apostolus, quantum mihi videtur, indagare minime potuerunt. Rem tamen non malam dixerunt; hanc vobis prius dico, et deinde quid mihi videatur, et quod ipsa Scriptura divina ostendat esse verissimum. Cum turbarentur : De quo peccato damnavit peccatum? Habebat peccatum? hoc dixerunt: De peccato damnavit peccatum, de peccato non suo; tamen de peccato damnavit peccatum. Si ergo non de suo, de cuius? De peccato Iudae, de peccato Iudaeorum. Unde enim fudit sanguinem in remissionem peccatorum? Quia crucifixus est a Iudaeis. Quo tradente? Iuda. Iudaei quando illum occiderunt, Iudas illum tradidit. Bene fecerunt, an peccaverunt? Peccaverunt. Ecce de quo peccato damnavit peccatum. Bene dictum est, et vere dictum est, quia et de peccato Iudaeorum Christus damnavit omne peccatum, quia illis persequentibus fudit sanguinem, quo delevit omne peccatum. Verumtamen alio loco vide quid dicat Apostolus: Pro Christo, inquit, legatione fungimur, tamquam Deo hortante per nos; obsecramus pro Christo, id est tamquam Christus vos obsecret, pro illo vos obsecramus, reconciliari Deo. Et sequitur: Eum qui non noverat peccatum. Deus cui vos obsecramus reconciliari, eum qui non noverat peccatum, id est Christum Deum, eum Christum, qui non noverat peccatum, peccatum pro nobis fecit, ut nos simus iustitia Dei in ipso . Numquid hic potest intellegi peccatum Iudae, peccatum Iudaeorum, peccatum cuiusque alterius hominis; cum audias: Eum qui non noverat peccatum, peccatum pro nobis fecit? Quis? Quem? Deus Christum, Deus Christum fecit pro nobis peccatum. Non dixit: Fecit pro nobis peccantem; sed, fecit eum peccatum. Si nefas est dicere peccasse Christum, quis ferat peccatum esse Christum? Et tamen non possumus Apostolo contradicere. Non ei possumus dicere: Quid est quod loqueris? Si enim hoc Apostolo dixerimus, ipsi Christo dicimus. Ait enim alio loco: An vultis experimentum eius accipere, qui in me loquitur Christus?
10. From what sin, then, did he condemn sin? Some have understood it and reached a sense not to be condemned. Yet what the Apostle meant, so far as it seems to me, they could not at all track down. They said something not bad, however; this I tell you first, and then what seems to me, and what divine Scripture itself shows to be most true. When they were troubled: From what sin did he condemn sin? Did he have sin? this they said: From sin he condemned sin, from a sin not his own; yet from sin he condemned sin. If, then, not from his own, from whose? From the sin of Judas, from the sin of the Jews. For whence did he shed his blood for the forgiveness of sins? Because he was crucified by the Jews. By whose betrayal? Judas's. When the Jews killed him, Judas betrayed him. Did they do well, or did they sin? They sinned. Behold from what sin he condemned sin. It was well said, and truly said, that even from the sin of the Jews Christ condemned all sin, because, as they persecuted him, he shed the blood by which he blotted out all sin. Yet see what the Apostle says in another place: For Christ, he says, we perform an embassy, as though God were exhorting through us; we beseech you for Christ—that is, as though Christ besought you, on his behalf we beseech you—be reconciled to God. And there follows, Him who knew no sin. God to whom we beseech you to be reconciled, him who knew no sin—that is, Christ God, that Christ who knew no sin—he made sin for us, that we might be the righteousness of God in him (2 Cor 5:20-21). Can the sin of Judas here be understood, the sin of the Jews, the sin of any other person, when you hear, Him who knew no sin he made sin for us? Who? Whom? God made Christ, God made Christ sin for us. He did not say: He made him a sinner for us; but, he made him sin. If it is wicked to say that Christ sinned, who could bear that Christ is sin? And yet we cannot contradict the Apostle. We cannot say to him: What is it you are saying? For if we say this to the Apostle, we say it to Christ himself. For he says in another place, Or do you wish to receive proof of him who speaks in me, Christ (2 Cor 13:3)?
Sermons5.10
11. Quid igitur est? Intendat Caritas vestra magnum altumque mysterium. Felices eritis, si intellectum dilexeritis, et ad dilectum perveneritis. Prorsus, prorsus Christus Dominus noster, Iesus Salvator noster, Redemptor noster peccatum factus est, ut nos essemus iustitia Dei in ipso. Quomodo? Audite legem. Qui noverunt, sciunt quod dico; et qui non noverunt, legant, vel audiant. In lege peccata vocabantur etiam sacrificia, quae pro peccatis offerebantur. Habes, cum victima pro peccato adduceretur, dicit lex: Ponant manus suas sacerdotes super peccatum ; id est, super victimam pro peccato. Et quod est aliud quam Christus sacrificium pro peccato? Sicut et Christus, inquit, dilexit vos, et tradidit semetipsum pro vobis oblationem et hostiam Deo in odorem suavitatis . Ecce de quo peccato damnavit peccatum; de sacrificio quod factus est pro peccatis, inde damnavit peccatum. Ipsa est Lex spiritus vitae, quae liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis . Quia lex illa altera, lex litterae, lex iubens, bona est quidem; Mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum ; sed infirmabatur per carnem ; et quod iubebat, in nobis impleri non poterat. Alia ergo lex, ut dicere coeperam, tibi ostendat peccatum, alia tollat; ostendat peccatum lex litterae, tollat peccatum lex gratiae.
11. What, then, is it? Let your Charity attend to a great and deep mystery. You will be blessed if you have loved the understanding of it and have reached the beloved object. Truly, truly our Lord Christ, Jesus our Savior, our Redeemer, was made sin, that we might be the righteousness of God in him. How? Hear the law. Those who know it know what I am saying; and those who do not know, let them read it, or hear it. In the law even the sacrifices that were offered for sins were called sins. You have it that, when a victim was brought for sin, the law says, Let the priests place their hands upon the sin—that is, upon the victim for sin. And what else is Christ but a sacrifice for sin? Just as Christ also, he says, loved you and handed himself over for you, an offering and sacrifice to God for an odor of sweetness (Eph 5:2). Behold from what sin he condemned sin: from the sacrifice that he became for sins, from that he condemned sin. This is the law of the spirit of life that has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:2). For that other law, the law of the letter, the law that commands, is indeed good—the commandment holy and just and good—but it was weakened through the flesh, and what it commanded could not be fulfilled in us. Let another law, then, as I had begun to say, show you sin, and another take it away; let the law of the letter show sin, let the law of grace take sin away.
Sermons5.11
SERMO 153
Sermon 153
Sermons5.11
1. 1. Audivimus, concorditerque respondimus, et Deo nostro consona voce cantavimus: Beatus vir quem tu erudieris, Domine, et ex lege tua docueris eum . Silentium si praebeatis, audietis. Non invenit locum sapientia, ubi non est patientia. Nos loquimur, sed erudit Deus; nos loquimur, sed Deus docet. Non enim beatus dictus est quem docet homo, sed quem tu erudieris, Domine. Nos plantare possumus et rigare: sed Dei est incrementum dare . Qui plantat et qui rigat, forinsecus operatur: qui dat incrementum, intrinsecus opitulatur. Quae nobis lectio de sancti Apostoli Epistola proposita sit ad loquendum, quam difficilis, quam latebrosa, quam (si non intellegatur aut male intellegatur) periculosa; puto, fratres, immo scio, quia nobiscum recitaretur, audistis; et fluctuastis, si advertistis; aut si aliqui et intellexistis, quam sit arduum sine dubitatione vidistis. Hanc itaque lectionem totumque ipsum molestum et obscurum, sed intellegentibus salubrem Epistolae Apostoli locum suscepimus, adiuvante misericordia Dei, exponere disserendo. Caritati vestrae debitores nos esse scio, exactores vos esse sentio. Quemadmodum nos, ut ista percipiatis, oramus; sic et vos orate, ut ea vobis explicare valeamus. Si enim oratio nostra concordet; et vos faciet Deus idoneos auditores, et nos debiti huius fidelissimos redditores.
1. 1. We have heard, and have answered in concord, and have sung to our God with harmonious voice, Blessed is the man whom you instruct, O Lord, and teach out of your law (Ps 94:12 (93:12)). If you grant silence, you will hear. Wisdom finds no place where there is no patience. We speak, but God instructs; we speak, but God teaches. For he is not called blessed whom a man teaches, but whom you instruct, O Lord. We can plant and water; but it is God's to give the increase (See 1 Cor 3:6-7). He who plants and he who waters works on the outside; he who gives the increase aids on the inside. What reading from the Epistle of the holy Apostle has been set before us to speak on—how difficult, how full of hidden places, how perilous (if it is not understood, or is misunderstood)—I think, brothers, indeed I know, that you heard, since it was recited along with us; and you wavered, if you noticed; or if some of you did understand, you saw without doubt how arduous it is. This reading, then, and that whole passage of the Apostle's Epistle, troublesome and obscure but wholesome to those who understand, we have undertaken, with the help of God's mercy, to expound by discoursing. I know that we are debtors to your Charity; I feel that you are the collectors. As we pray that you may grasp these things, so do you pray that we may be able to unfold them to you. For if our prayer agrees, God will both make you fit hearers and make us most faithful payers of this debt.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Cum enim essemus in carne, ait Apostolus, passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti . Hic videtur (quod non intellegentibus primum et grande periculum est) Apostolus reprehendere et culpare legem Dei. Dicit aliquis: Absit hoc ab animo qualiscumque Christiani; quis hoc vel insanus audeat de Apostolo suspicari? Et tamen, fratres mei, verba ista male intellecta, fomitem insaniae furori Manichaeorum subministrarunt. Manichaei enim legem Dei per Moysen datam, dicunt non a Deo datam, et eam Evangelio contrariam esse contendunt. Et quando cum eis agitur, his testimoniis apostoli Pauli quae non intellegunt, conantur convincere, quid dicam, Catholicos non intellegentes, et non potius neglegentes? Non enim multum est, si quis velit esse diligens, post calumnias ab haeretico auditas, saltem considerare in codice circumstantiam lectionis. Quod si fecerit, ibi mox inveniet unde adversarium loquacem redarguat, unde hostes legis rebellesque prosternat. Etsi enim tardus est ad intellegenda verba Apostoli, manifesta ibi laus est expressa legis Dei.
2. 2. For when we were in the flesh, says the Apostle, the passions of sins, which were through the law, were at work in our members, so as to bear fruit for death (Rom 7:5). Here the Apostle seems (which, for those who do not understand, is the first and great peril) to rebuke and blame the law of God. Someone says: Far be this from the mind of any Christian whatever; who, even though mad, would dare suspect this of the Apostle? And yet, my brothers, these words, misunderstood, have furnished tinder for the madness of the Manicheans' fury. For the Manicheans say that the law given through Moses was not given by God, and contend that it is contrary to the gospel. And when one deals with them, they try, by these testimonies of the apostle Paul which they do not understand, to convict—what shall I call them?—Catholics who do not understand, or rather who are negligent. For it is no great thing, if one wishes to be diligent, after the slanders heard from the heretic, at least to consider in the codex the context of the reading. And if he does this, he will at once find there the means to refute the talkative adversary, the means to lay low the enemies and rebels against the law. For even if he is slow to understand the words of the Apostle, the praise of the law of God is plainly expressed there.
Sermons5.2.2
2. 3. Videte enim prius et advertite. Cum enim essemus in carne, ait, passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt, operabantur. Hic iam Manichaeus erigit cervicem, exaltat cornua, impetit te, facit impetum: Ecce, inquit, passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt. Quomodo bona est lex, per quam in nobis sunt passiones peccatorum, et operantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferant morti? Lege, aliquantum progredere, totum audi patienter, et si non intellegenter. Hoc enim quod ait: Passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, multum est ut intellegas; sed prius esto mecum legis laudator, et tunc fieri mereberis intellector. Clausum cor habes, et clavem accusas? Ecce interim quod non intellegimus, paululum seponamus, ad laudem legis quae aperta est veniamus. Passiones, inquit, peccatorum, quae per legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti. Nunc ergo evacuati sumus a lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litterae . Adhuc videtur legem arguere, culpare, improbare, detestari; sed non intellegentibus. Cum enim dicit: Cum essemus in carne, passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti. Nunc ergo evacuati sumus a lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litterae, quasi utique videtur legem accusare atque culpare. Vidit hoc et ipse, vidit, sensit se non intellegi, et contra obscuritatem verborum suorum cogitationes hominum commoveri; sensit quid possis dicere, sensit quid possis contradicere; et prior hoc voluit dicere, ut tu non invenias quod diceres.
2. 3. See first, and notice. For when we were in the flesh, he says, the passions of sins, which were through the law, were at work. Here now the Manichean raises his neck, lifts up his horns, attacks you, makes his charge: Behold, he says, the passions of sins, which were through the law. How is the law good, through which the passions of sins are in us and are at work in our members, so as to bear fruit for death? Read, go a little further, hear it all patiently, even if not understandingly. For this which he says, The passions of sins, which were through the law, were at work in our members, is much for you to understand; but first be with me a praiser of the law, and then you will deserve to become one who understands. You have a closed heart, and you accuse the key? Behold, meanwhile, let us set aside a little what we do not understand, and come to the praise of the law which is plain. The passions, he says, of sins, which were through the law, were at work in our members, so as to bear fruit for death. Now therefore we have been freed from the law of death, in which we were held, so that we serve in newness of spirit, and not in oldness of the letter (Rom 7:5-6). Still he seems to charge, blame, condemn, detest the law; but only to those who do not understand. For when he says, When we were in the flesh, the passions of sins, which were through the law, were at work in our members, so as to bear fruit for death. Now therefore we have been freed from the law of death, in which we were held, so that we serve in newness of spirit, and not in oldness of the letter, he seems, as it were, to accuse and blame the law. He himself saw this; he saw, he felt that he was not understood, and that the thoughts of people were being stirred against the obscurity of his words; he felt what you might say, he felt what you might say in objection; and he wished to say this first, so that you might not find anything to say.
Sermons5.2.3
3. 4. Quid ergo dicemus? inquit. Hoc sequitur: Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Absit! Uno verbo legem absolvit, legis accusatorem damnavit. Auctoritatem Apostoli contra me proferebas, o Manichaee, et dicebas mihi, cum legem reprehenderes: Ecce, audi Apostolum, lege Apostolum: Passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti. Nunc ergo evacuati sumus a lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litterae . Iactabas te, clamabas, dicebas: Audi, lege, vide; ista dixeras, et iam verso tergo ire cupiebas. Exspecta, audivi te, audi me; immo nec ego te, nec tu me; sed ambo simul audiamus Apostolum, qui solvit se, et alligat te. Quid ergo dicemus? inquit. Lex peccatum est? Hoc dicebas: Lex peccatum est, hoc nempe dicebas. Ecce audisti quod dicebas, audi quod dicas. Legem Dei peccatum esse dicebas, quando eam caecus et improvidus reprehendebas. Errasti: vidit Paulus errorem tuum. Quod dicebas, ipse dixit. Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Quod dicebas, hoc dicimus? Lex peccatum est? Absit! Si Apostoli sequebaris auctoritatem, appende verbum, et cape inde consilium. Audi: Lex peccatum est? Absit! Audi: Absit! Si Apostolum sequeris, si eius auctoritatem plurimi pendis, audi: Absit! et quod sentiebas, a te absit. Quid ergo dicemus? Quid dicemus? Quia dixi: Passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti; quia dixi: Evacuati sumus a lege mortis, in qua detinebamur; quia dixi: Serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litterae: Lex peccatum est? Absit! Quare ergo, Apostole, tanta illa dixisti ?
3. 4. What, then, shall we say? he says. This follows: What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? Far from it (Rom 7:7)! With one word he absolved the law, condemned the accuser of the law. You were bringing forth the authority of the Apostle against me, O Manichean, and saying to me, as you reproached the law: Behold, hear the Apostle, read the Apostle: The passions of sins, which were through the law, were at work in our members, so as to bear fruit for death. Now therefore we have been freed from the law of death, in which we were held, so that we serve in newness of spirit, and not in oldness of the letter. You boasted, you cried out, you said: Hear, read, see; you had said these things, and now, turning your back, you wished to go. Wait, I have heard you, hear me; rather, neither I you nor you me, but let us both together hear the Apostle, who frees himself and binds you. What, then, shall we say? he says. Is the law sin? This you were saying: The law is sin, this indeed you were saying. Behold, you heard what you were saying; hear what you should say. You were saying that the law of God is sin, when, blind and improvident, you reproached it. You erred; Paul saw your error. What you were saying, he himself said. What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? Do we say what you were saying? Is the law sin? Far from it! If you followed the authority of the Apostle, weigh the word, and take counsel from it. Hear: Is the law sin? Far from it! Hear: Far from it! If you follow the Apostle, if you value his authority highly, hear: Far from it! and let what you thought be far from you. What, then, shall we say? What shall we say? That because I said, The passions of sins, which were through the law, were at work in our members, so as to bear fruit for death; because I said, We have been freed from the law of death, in which we were held; because I said, Let us serve in newness of spirit, and not in oldness of the letter: Is the law sin? Far from it! Why, then, Apostle, did you say all those things?
Sermons5.3.4
4. 5. Lex absit ut sit peccatum: Sed peccatum, inquit, non cognovi, nisi per legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces . Iam modo interrogo te, Manichaee, modo te interrogo, responde mihi. Mala est lex quae dicit: Non concupisces? Hoc nec luxuriosus mihi et nequam aliquis responderit. Etenim et ipsi homines flagitiosi quando reprehenduntur, erubescunt; et quando sunt inter castos, lascivire non audent. Si ergo malam dicis esse legem quae dicit: Non cuncupisces; impune vis concupiscere; accusas legem, quia percutit libidinem. Fratres mei, si non audiremus Apostolum dicentem: Lex peccatum est? Absit! sed tantummodo verba legis commemorantem, ubi dictum est: Non concupisces; etiam legem illo non laudante, nos tamen laudare deberemus; illam laudare, nos accusare. Ecce lex, ecce desuper tuba divina clamat homini: Non concupisces. Non concupisces, reprehende si potes; fac, si reprehendere non potes. Audisti: Non concupisces, reprehendere non audes. Quia bonum est quod dixit: Non concupisces; malum est concupiscere. Malum culpat lex, a tuo malo te prohibet lex. Ergo concupiscere malum culpat lex, a tuo malo te prohibet lex. Ergo fac quod iubet lex, noli facere quod vetat lex, noli concupiscere.
4. 5. Far be it that the law be sin: But, he says, I did not know sin except through the law. For I would not have known coveting, unless the law said, You shall not covet (Rom 7:7). Now then I ask you, Manichean, now I ask you, answer me. Is the law evil that says, You shall not covet? Not even some lustful and worthless person would answer me this. For even shameful people themselves blush when they are reproached; and when they are among the chaste, they do not dare to be wanton. If, then, you say that the law is evil which says, You shall not covet, you wish to covet with impunity; you accuse the law because it strikes at lust. My brothers, if we did not hear the Apostle saying, Is the law sin? Far from it! but only recalling the words of the law, where it was said, You shall not covet; even though he did not praise the law, yet we ought to praise it—to praise it, and to accuse ourselves. Behold the law, behold from above the divine trumpet cries out to man, You shall not covet. You shall not covet: reproach it if you can; do it, if you cannot reproach it. You have heard, You shall not covet; you do not dare to reproach it. Because what it said is good, You shall not covet; it is evil to covet. The law blames the evil, the law forbids you from your own evil. Therefore the law blames the evil of coveting, the law forbids you from your own evil. Therefore do what the law commands, do not do what the law forbids, do not covet.
Sermons5.4.5
5. 6. Sed quid ait Apostolus? Concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Ibam enim post concupiscentiam meam, et qua trahebat currebam, eiusque illecebras blandas, et ex carnali suavitate iucundas magnam felicitatem arbitrabar. Laudatur enim peccator, ait lex, in desideriis animae suae; et qui iniqua gerit, benedicitur . Invenis hominem concupiscentias suas carnales sectantem, totumque se illis servum donantem, aucupari undique voluptates, fornicari, inebriari; non dico amplius; fornicari, inquam, inebriari. Haec dixi quae licite committuntur, sed non Dei legibus. Quis enim aliquando ad iudicem ductus est, quia meretricis lupanar intravit? Quis aliquando in publicis tribunalibus accusatus est, quia per suas lyristrias lascivus immundusque defluxit? Quis aliquando habens uxorem, quia ancillam suam vitiavit, crimen invenit? Sed in foro, non in caelo; in lege mundi, non in lege Creatoris mundi. Luxuriosus autem, immundus atque lascivus felix dicitur abundare voluptatibus, frui deliciis. Iamvero si se etiam vino ingurgitet, si bibat mensuras sine mensura; parum est quia non invenit crimen, etiam viri fortis accipit nomen; tanto nequior, quanto sub poculo invictior. Cum laudantur ista, et dicitur: Felix est, magnus est, bene est illi; et non solum hoc non putatur esse peccatum, sed etiam putatur vel Dei donum, vel certe suave, blandum et licitum bonum: procedit lex Dei, et dicit: Non concupisces. Ille homo qui putabat magnum bonum esse, magnamque felicitatem existimabat, ea quae posset, suae concupiscentiae non negare, sequi qua trahit; audit: Non concupisces; et cognoscit esse peccatum. Deus dixit, homo audivit. Deo credidit, peccatum suum vidit; quod bonum putabat, malum esse cognovit; voluit frenare concupiscentiam, non ire post eam, strinxit se, conatus est, victus est. Qui fuit antea nescius malorum suorum, factus est doctus, et peius est victus; coepit esse non solum peccator, sed etiam praevaricator. Peccator enim et antea erat; sed antequam legem audiret, peccatorem se esse nesciebat. Legem audivit, peccatum vidit; conatus est vincere, superatus atque prostratus est; factus est et legis praevaricator, qui fuit antea nescius peccator. Hoc dicit Apostolus: Lex peccatum est? Absit! Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces .
5. 6. But what does the Apostle say? I would not have known coveting, unless the law said, You shall not covet. For I was going after my coveting, and I ran where it dragged, and reckoned its allurements—soft and pleasant with carnal sweetness—a great happiness. For the sinner is praised, says the law, in the desires of his soul; and he who does unjust deeds is blessed (Ps 10:3 (9:24)). You find a person pursuing his carnal cravings, giving himself wholly as a slave to them, snatching at pleasures on every side, fornicating, getting drunk; I say no more—fornicating, I say, getting drunk. I have named these things, which are committed lawfully, but not by the laws of God. For who was ever brought before a judge because he entered a harlot's brothel? Who was ever accused in the public tribunals because, wanton and unclean, he dissolved himself among his lyre-girls? Who, having a wife, ever found a charge brought against him because he debauched his maidservant? But in the forum, not in heaven; in the law of the world, not in the law of the Creator of the world. The lustful, unclean, and wanton man is called happy because he abounds in pleasures, enjoys delights. And if he even gluts himself with wine, if he drinks measures without measure, it is too little that he finds no charge—he even receives the name of a brave man, the more worthless the more unconquered under the cup. When these things are praised, and it is said, He is happy, he is great, all is well with him; and not only is this not thought to be a sin, but it is even thought to be either a gift of God, or at least a sweet, pleasant, and lawful good: the law of God comes forth and says, You shall not covet. That man who thought it a great good, and reckoned it great happiness, not to deny his coveting what he could, but to follow where it dragged—he hears, You shall not covet; and he recognizes that it is sin. God spoke, man heard. He believed God, he saw his sin; what he thought good, he came to know was evil; he wished to bridle his coveting, not to go after it, he restrained himself, he tried, he was conquered. He who was before ignorant of his own evils became learned, and he is the worse for being conquered; he began to be not only a sinner, but also a transgressor. For he was a sinner even before; but before he heard the law, he did not know that he was a sinner. He heard the law, he saw the sin; he tried to conquer, he was overcome and laid low; he became a transgressor of the law too, who was before an ignorant sinner. This is what the Apostle says: Is the law sin? Far from it! But I did not know sin except through the law. For I would not have known coveting, unless the law said, You shall not covet.
Sermons5.5.6
5. 7. Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam . Minor erat concupiscentia, quando ante legem securus peccabas, nunc autem oppositis tibi obicibus legis, fluvius concupiscentiae quasi frenatus est paululum, non siccatus; sed increscente impetu qui te ducebat obicibus nullis, obruit te obicibus ruptis. Concupiscentia tua minor erat, quando tuam movebat libidinem, omnis est autem quando transcendit et legem. Vis nosse quam magna sit? Vide quid ruperit: Non concupisces. Non homo dixit, Deus dixit, Creator dixit, Iudex aeternus dixit, non quicumque dixit. Fac ergo quod dixit. Non facis? Observa iudicantem qui dixit. Sed quid facias, o homo? Ideo non vicisti, quia de te praesumpsisti.
5. 7. But sin, taking occasion, worked in me through the commandment every kind of coveting (Rom 7:8). The coveting was less when, before the law, you sinned without care; but now, with the barriers of the law set against you, the river of coveting was as it were checked a little, not dried up; but, the force that was leading you growing greater against no barriers, it overwhelmed you when the barriers were broken. Your coveting was less when it stirred your lust; but it is "every kind" when it transgresses even the law. Do you wish to know how great it is? See what it broke through: You shall not covet. No man said it; God said it; the Creator said it; the eternal Judge said it; it was no ordinary person who said it. Do, then, what he said. You do not do it? Beware of the one who said it as he judges. But what can you do, O man? You did not conquer for this reason: because you presumed upon yourself.
Sermons5.5.7
6. 8. Attende ergo nunc verba superiora, quae videbantur obscura: Cum enim essemus in carne. Verba quae superiora diximus, unde coepit lectio quae obscura videbatur, attendite: Cum enim essemus in carne, passiones peccatorum quae per legem sunt . Unde per legem sunt? Quia eramus in carne. Quid est: Quia eramus in carne? Praesumebamus de carne. Num enim qui loquebatur Apostolus, iam exierat de ista carne, aut eis loquebatur qui iam exierant morte de ista carne? Non utique; sed secundum huius vitae modum, et qui loquebatur, et quibus loquebatur, in carne erant. Quid ergo est: Cum essemus in carne; nisi: Cum de carne praesumeremus, hoc est, de nobis consideremus? Homini enim dictum est, et de hominibus dictum est: Videbit omnis caro salutare Dei . Quid est: Videbit omnis caro, nisi: Videbit omnis homo? Et quid est: Verbum caro factum est , nisi: Verbum homo factum est? Non enim Verbum et caro erat, et anima ibi non erat; sed carnis nomine homo significatus est, in eo quod legitur: Verbum caro factum est. Ergo cum essemus in carne, id est, in concupiscentiis carnis versaremur, ibique totam spem nostram tamquam in nobis poneremus: passiones peccatorum, quae per legem sunt, auctae sunt per legem. Prohibendo enim fecerunt legis praevaricatorem; quia ille qui praevaricator est factus, Deum non habuit adiutorem. Operabantur ergo in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent, cui, nisi morti? Si damnandus erat peccator, quam spem habet praevaricator?
6. 8. Attend, then, now to the earlier words, which seemed obscure: For when we were in the flesh. Attend to the words we called the earlier ones, where the reading began that seemed obscure: For when we were in the flesh, the passions of sins, which were through the law (Rom 7:5). Whence are they "through the law"? Because we were in the flesh. What is, "Because we were in the flesh"? We were presuming upon the flesh. For surely the Apostle who was speaking had not already gone out of this flesh, nor was he speaking to those who had already gone out of this flesh by death? Not at all; but according to the manner of this life, both he who was speaking and those to whom he was speaking were in the flesh. What, then, is, When we were in the flesh, but: When we presumed upon the flesh, that is, relied upon ourselves? For it was said to man, and said of men, All flesh shall see the salvation of God (Luke 3:6; Isa 40:5). What is, All flesh shall see, but: Every man shall see? And what is, The Word was made flesh (John 1:14), but: The Word was made man? For it was not that the Word was flesh, and there was no soul there; but by the name of flesh man was signified, in that which is read, The Word was made flesh. Therefore when we were in the flesh—that is, when we dwelt in the desires of the flesh, and placed all our hope there, as it were in ourselves—the passions of sins, which were through the law, were increased through the law. For by forbidding they made a transgressor of the law, because the one who was made a transgressor did not have God as helper. They were at work, then, in our members, so as to bear fruit—for whom, but for death? If the sinner was to be condemned, what hope has the transgressor?
Sermons5.6.8
7. 9. Ergo, o homo, vicit te concupiscentia tua; vicit, quia in malo loco te invenit; invenit te in carne, ideo te vicit. Migra inde: quid expavescis? Non tibi dixi ut moriaris. Noli expavescere, quia dixi: Migra de carne. Non tibi dixi ut moriaris, immo audeo dicere, dixi ut moriaris. Si mortui estis cum Christo, quae sursum sunt quaerite. In carne vivens, noli esse in carne. Omnis caro fenum, Verbum autem Domini manet in aeternum . Dominus fiat refugium tuum. Instat concupiscentia, urget te, magnas vires accepit adversum te, prohibitione legis grandior facta est, maiorem hostem pateris: sit Dominus refugium tuum, turris fortitudinis a facie inimici . Noli ergo esse in carne, in spiritu esto. Quid est: In spiritu esto? In Deo spem pone. Nam si posueris spem in ipso spiritu quo homo es, iterum spiritus tuus in carnem relabitur, quia non dedisti eum illi a quo suspendatur. Non se continet, si non continetur. Noli remanere in te, transcende et te: in illo te pone qui fecit te. Nam si spem in te habueris, accepta lege praevaricator eris. Invenit te hostis nudum refugio, invadit te; vide ne forte rapiat, velut leo, et non sit qui eruat . Attende verba Apostoli legem laudantis, se accusantis, reum se sub lege facientis, et personam forte tuam in se transfigurantis, et dicentis tibi: Peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam. Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum est. Quid est: mortuum est? Latet, non apparet omnino, tamquam sepultum ignoratur. Adveniente autem mandato, peccatum revixit . Quid est: revixit? Apparere coepit, sentiri coepit, rebellare adversum me coepit.
7. 9. Therefore, O man, your coveting conquered you; it conquered you because it found you in an evil place; it found you in the flesh, and so conquered you. Move away from there; why are you terrified? I did not tell you to die. Do not be terrified because I said: Move away from the flesh. I did not tell you to die; rather, I dare to say, I told you to die. If you have died with Christ, seek the things that are above (See Col 3:1-3). Living in the flesh, do not be in the flesh. All flesh is grass, but the Word of the Lord remains forever (Isa 40:6.8; 1 Pet 1:24-25). Let the Lord become your refuge. Coveting presses, urges you, has received great strength against you, has been made greater by the law's prohibition; you suffer a greater enemy: let the Lord be your refuge, a tower of strength against the face of the enemy (See Ps 61:3 (60:4)). Do not, then, be in the flesh; be in the spirit. What is it to be in the spirit? To place your hope in God. For if you place your hope in the very spirit by which you are a man, again your spirit slips back into the flesh, because you did not give it to the One from whom it might hang. It does not contain itself, if it is not contained. Do not remain in yourself; transcend even yourself; place yourself in the One who made you. For if you have hope in yourself, when the law is received you will be a transgressor. The enemy finds you stripped of refuge, attacks you; beware lest perchance he seize you, like a lion, and there be no one to deliver you (See Ps 7:2 (7:3)). Attend to the words of the Apostle praising the law, accusing himself, making himself guilty under the law, and perhaps transfiguring your person in himself, and saying to you: I did not know sin except through the law. For I would not have known coveting, unless the law said, You shall not covet. But sin, taking occasion, worked in me through the commandment every kind of coveting. For without the law sin was dead. What is, was dead? It lies hidden, does not appear at all; as though buried, it is not known. But when the commandment came, sin revived (Rom 7:7-9). What is, revived? It began to appear, began to be felt, began to rebel against me.
Sermons5.7.9
8. 10. Ego autem mortuus sum. Quid est: mortuus sum? Praevaricator factus sum, et inventum est mihi mandatum quod erat in vitam . Videte quia lex laudatur, mandatum quod erat in vitam. Qualis enim vita est, non concupiscere? O vita dulcis! Dulcis est quidem voluptas concupiscentiae: verum est, nec eam homines sequerentur, nisi dulcis esset. Theatrum, spectaculum, meretrix lasciva, turpissima cantilena, dulcia sunt ista concupiscentiae; dulcia plane, suavia, delectabilia: sed: Narraverunt mihi iniusti delectationes, sed non sicut lex tua, Domine . Suavia sunt, dulcia sunt, delectabilia sunt; sed audi meliora: Narraverunt mihi iniusti delectationes, sed non sicut lex tua, Domine. Felix anima quae huiusmodi delectationibus oblectatur, ubi turpitudine nulla inquinatur, et veritatis serenitate purgatur. Quem autem delectat lex Dei, et sic delectat, ut omnes delectationes lasciviae vincat, non sibi arroget istam delectationem: Dominus dabit suavitatem . Quam dicam? Domine, da mihi illam suavitatem, vel illam? Suavis es, Domine, et in tua suavitate doce me iustitias tuas . In tua suavitate doce me, et doces me. Tunc disco ut faciam, si in tua suavitate doceas me. Ceterum quamdiu blanditur iniquitas et dulcis est iniquitas, amara est veritas. In tua suavitate doce me: ut suavis sit veritas, dulcedine tua contemnatur iniquitas. Multo melior est et suavior veritas, sed sanis suavis est panis. Quid melius et praeclarius pane caelesti? Sed si non obstupefacit dentes iniquitas. Scriptura enim dicit: Sicut uva acerba dentibus noxia est, et fumus oculis; sic iniquitas utentibus ea . Quid prodest quia panem laudatis, si male vivitis? Quod laudatis non manducatis. Cum ergo audis verbum, cum audis verbum iustitiae et veritatis, et laudas; multo laudabilius est, si facias. Fac ergo quod laudas. An dicturus es: Volo, sed non valeo? Quare non vales? Quia sanitas non est. Unde sanitatem perdidisti, nisi quia peccando Creatorem offendisti? Ergo ut eius panem, quem laudas, cum suavitate, id est, cum sanitate manduces, dic illi: Ego dixi, Domine, miserere mei; sana animam meam, quoniam peccavi tibi . Ergo, inquit: Inventum est mihi mandatum quod erat in vitam, hoc esse in mortem . Erat enim sibi antea ignotus peccator, factus est manifestus praevaricator. Ecce inventum est illi in mortem, quod erat in vitam.
8. 10. But I died. What is, I died? I became a transgressor, and the commandment that was unto life was found by me. See that the law is praised, the commandment that was unto life. For what kind of life is it, not to covet? O sweet life! Sweet indeed is the pleasure of coveting—it is true, nor would people pursue it unless it were sweet. The theater, the spectacle, the wanton harlot, the most shameful little song—these are the sweet things of coveting; sweet indeed, pleasant, delightful: but the unjust have told me of delights, but not like your law, O Lord (Ps 119:85 (118:85)). They are pleasant, they are sweet, they are delightful; but hear better things: The unjust have told me of delights, but not like your law, O Lord. Happy the soul that is delighted with delights of this kind, where it is stained by no shamefulness, and is purified by the serenity of truth. But whoever is delighted by the law of God, and so delighted that it conquers all the delights of wantonness, let him not arrogate this delight to himself: The Lord will give sweetness (Ps 85:12 (84:13)). Which shall I name? Lord, give me that sweetness, or that other? You are sweet, O Lord, and in your sweetness teach me your righteous decrees (See Ps 119:68 (118:68)). In your sweetness teach me, and you do teach me. Then I learn so as to do, if in your sweetness you teach me. But as long as iniquity flatters and iniquity is sweet, truth is bitter. In your sweetness teach me: that truth may be sweet, that by your sweetness iniquity may be despised. Truth is far better and sweeter, but to the healthy bread is sweet. What is better and more excellent than the heavenly bread? But only if iniquity does not blunt the teeth. For Scripture says, As an unripe grape is harmful to the teeth, and smoke to the eyes, so is iniquity to those who use it (Prov 10:26). What does it profit that you praise the bread, if you live badly? What you praise, you do not eat. When, then, you hear the word, when you hear the word of righteousness and truth, and praise it; it is far more praiseworthy if you do it. Do, then, what you praise. Or will you say: I wish to, but I am not able? Why are you not able? Because there is no health. Whence did you lose your health, but because by sinning you offended the Creator? Therefore, that you may eat his bread, which you praise, with sweetness—that is, with health—say to him, I said, O Lord, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against you (Ps 41:4 (40:5)). Therefore, he says, the commandment that was unto life was found by me to be unto death (Rom 7:10). For before he was a sinner unknown to himself; he became a manifest transgressor. Behold, that which was unto life was found by him to be unto death.
Sermons5.8.10
9. 11. Occasione autem, inquit, accepta peccatum per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit . Sic factum est primo in paradiso: Fefellit, inquit, me occasione accepta per mandatum. Vide serpentem mulieri illi susurrantem. Quaesivit ab ea quid dixerit Deus: respondit illa: Dixit nobis Deus: Ex omni ligno quod est in paradiso, edetis; de ligno autem scientiae boni et mali non edetis. Ex eo si ederitis, morte moriemini. Hoc est Dei mandatum. Contra serpens: Non, inquit, morte moriemini. Sciebat enim Deus quia qua die ederitis, aperientur oculi vestri, et eritis tamquam dii . Occasione ergo accepta peccatum per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit . Gladio quem portabas, te inimicus occidit; armis tuis te vicit, armis tuis te interemit. Recipe mandatum: scito esse arma, non quibus occidat te, sed quibus a te occidatur inimicus. Sed noli praesumere de viribus tuis. Vide parvum David contra Goliath, vide parvum contra ingentem; sed in nomine Domini praesumentem. Tu venis ad me, inquit, cum clypeo et lancea; ego in nomine Domini omnipotentis . Sic, sic; aliter non: omnino aliter non prosternitur inimicus. Qui praesumit de viribus suis, antequam pugnet ipse prosternitur.
9. 11. But sin, he says, taking occasion, deceived me through the commandment, and through it killed me (Rom 7:11). So it happened first in paradise: It deceived me, he says, taking occasion through the commandment. See the serpent whispering to that woman. He asked her what God had said: she answered, God said to us, Of every tree that is in paradise you shall eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat. If you eat of it, you shall die the death. This is God's commandment. The serpent, on the contrary: You shall not, he says, die the death. For God knew that on the day you eat, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like gods (Gen 3:1-5). Taking occasion, then, sin deceived me through the commandment, and through it killed me. By the sword you were carrying, the enemy killed you; with your own arms he conquered you, with your own arms he slew you. Take up the commandment: know that it is arms, not by which it may kill you, but by which the enemy may be killed by you. But do not presume upon your own strength. See little David against Goliath, see the small one against the huge one; but presuming in the name of the Lord. You come to me, he says, with shield and spear; I, in the name of the almighty Lord (1 Sam 17:45). Thus, thus; not otherwise: by no means otherwise is the enemy laid low. He who presumes upon his own strength is laid low before he fights.
Sermons5.9.11
10. 12. Videte tamen, carissimi, videte etiam atque etiam Paulum apostolum contra furorem Manichaeorum esse legis divinae apertissimum laudatorem, videte quid adiungat: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum. Numquid uberius laudari potest? Paulo ante verbo illo quod dixit: Absit! defenderat a crimine, non laudaverat. Aliud est a crimine obiecto defendere, aliud debito praeconio praedicare. Crimen obiectum fuit: Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Defensio, Absit! Uno verbo defenditur veritas; quia magna est Apostoli defendentis auctoritas. Quid diu defendat? Sufficit. Absit! An vultis, inquit, experimentum accipere eius qui in me loquitur Christus? Modo autem: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum.
10. 12. See, however, dearly beloved, see again and again that the apostle Paul, against the fury of the Manicheans, is a most open praiser of the divine law; see what he adds: And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good (Rom 7:12). Can it be praised more richly? A little before, by that word which he said, Far from it! he had defended it from a charge, not praised it. It is one thing to defend from a charge brought, another to proclaim with due heralding. The charge brought was: What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? The defense: Far from it! With one word truth is defended, because great is the authority of the Apostle defending. Why should he defend at length? It suffices. Far from it! Or do you wish, he says, to receive proof of him who speaks in me, Christ (2 Cor 13:3)? But now: And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good.
Sermons5.10.12
10. 13. Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit! Quia bonum non est mors. Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum operatum est mihi mortem . Mors non est lex, sed peccatum est mors. Iamdudum autem dixerat: Sine lege peccatum mortuum est . Ubi vos admonueram, quia mortuum est, dixit, absconditum latet, non apparet. Modo videte quam vere ita dictum sit: Peccatum, inquit, ut appareat peccatum. Non dixit: Ut sit; quia erat et quando non apparebat. Peccatum ut appareat peccatum. Quid est: Ut appareat peccatum? Quia concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces . Non ait: Concupiscentiam non habebam; sed: Concupiscentiam nesciebam. Sic etiam hic non ait: Ut sit peccatum; sed: Ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem. Quam mortem? Ut fiat supra modum peccator aut peccatum per mandatum . Attende: supra modum peccator. Quare supra modum? Quia iam et praevaricatio. Ubi enim lex non est, nec praevaricatio .
10. 13. Did that which is good, then, become death to me? Far from it! Because death is not good. But sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good (Rom 7:13). The law is not death, but sin is death. But he had said a while before, Without the law sin was dead. Where I had admonished you that was dead, he said, means: it lies hidden, concealed, does not appear. Now see how truly it was thus said: Sin, he says, that it might appear as sin. He did not say, That it might be; because it was even when it did not appear. Sin, that it might appear as sin. What is, That sin might appear? Because I would not have known coveting, unless the law said, You shall not covet. He did not say, I did not have coveting; but, I did not know coveting. So here too he does not say, That sin might be; but, That sin might appear, it worked death in me through what is good. What death? That the sinner, or sin, might become beyond measure through the commandment. Note: the sinner beyond measure. Why beyond measure? Because now there is also transgression. For where there is no law, neither is there transgression (Rom 4:15).
Sermons5.10.13
11. 14. Videte ergo, fratres, videte genus humanum a prima illius primi hominis morte fluxisse. Etenim: Peccatum a primo homine intravit in hunc mundum, et per peccatum mors, et ita in omnes homines pertransiit . Pertransiit, verbum attendite, quod audistis; considerate, videte quid est pertransiit. Pertransiit: inde est et parvulus reus; peccatum nondum fecit, sed traxit. Etenim illud peccatum non in fonte mansit, sed: pertransiit; non in illum aut illum, sed: in omnes homines pertransiit. Genuit peccatores morti obnoxios primus peccator, primus praevaricator. Venit ad sanandos de Virgine Salvator. Quia ad te non qua venisti, venit; non enim ille de concupiscentia maris et feminae, non de illo vinculo concupiscentiae. Spiritus, inquit, Sanctus superveniet in te. Dictum est hoc Virgini, dictum est fide ferventi, non concupiscentia carnis aestuanti: Spiritus Sanctus superveniet in te, et virtus Altissimi obumbrabit tibi . Quae tale obumbraculum haberet, quando ardore libidinis aestuaret? Quia ergo non qua venisti ad te venit, liberat te. Ubi te invenit? Venumdatum sub peccato, iacentem in morte primi hominis, trahentem peccatum primi hominis, habentem reatum antequam habere posses arbitrium. Ecce ubi te invenit, quando parvulum invenit. Sed parvuli aetatem excessisti: ecce crevisti, primo peccato multa addidisti; legem accepisti, praevaricator exstitisti. Sed noli esse sollicitus: Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia . Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
11. 14. See, then, brothers, see that the human race flowed from that first death of that first man. For through one man sin entered into this world, and through sin death, and so it passed into all men (Rom 5:12). It passed—note the word that you heard; consider, see what is it passed. It passed: hence even the little child is guilty; he has not yet committed sin, but he has inherited it. For that sin did not remain in its source, but passed; not into this one or that one, but passed into all men. The first sinner, the first transgressor, begot sinners liable to death. The Savior came from the Virgin to heal them. Because he came to you, not by the way by which you came; for he was not from the concupiscence of male and female, not from that bond of concupiscence. The Holy Spirit, it says, will come upon you. This was said to the Virgin, said to one fervent with faith, not aflame with the concupiscence of the flesh: The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you (Luke 1:35). Who could have such an overshadowing while aflame with the ardor of lust? Because, then, he came to you not by the way by which you came, he frees you. Where did he find you? Sold under sin, lying in the death of the first man, inheriting the sin of the first man, having the guilt before you could have a will. Behold where he found you, when he found you a little child. But you have passed beyond the age of a little child: behold, you have grown, you have added many things to the first sin; you have received the law, you have stood forth a transgressor. But do not be anxious: Where sin abounded, grace abounded the more (Rom 5:20). Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.11.14
SERMO 154
Sermon 154
Sermons5.11.14
1. 1. Hesternam lectionem de sancti apostoli Pauli Epistola, qui sermoni adfuistis, audistis; illam lectio sequitur quae hodie recitata est. Adhuc versatur ille difficilis et periculosus locus, quem vobis in adiutorio Domini nostri, quantum me religioso apud eum adiuvatis affectu, pro viribus quas dare dignatur, exponere et enodare suscepimus. Patientiam mihi praebeat Caritas vestra, ut si habeo propter obscuritatem rerum difficilem disputationem, saltem habeam facilem vocem. Si enim utrumque sit difficile, multum laboratur: et utinam non sine causa laboretur. Ut autem prosit labor noster, sit patiens auditus vester. Quia Legem non culpat Apostolus, hesterno die audientibus, quantum existimo, satisfecimus. Ibi quippe ait: Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Absit! Sed peccatum non cognovi nisi per legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam. Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum est; id est latet, non apparet. Ego autem vivebam aliquando sine lege; adveniente autem mandato, peccatum revixit. Ego autem mortuus sum, et inventum est mihi mandatum quod erat in vitam (quid enim tam pertinens ad vitam, quam: Non concupisces?), hoc esse in mortem. Peccatum enim occasione accepta per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit; concupiscentiam terruit, non exstinxit; terruit, non oppressit; fecit timorem poenae, non amorem iustitiae. Itaque, inquit, lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum et iustum, et bonum. Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit! Non enim lex mors, sed peccatum mors. Quid ergo ex occasione mandati? Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum; latebat enim quando mortuum dicebatur: per bonum mihi operatum est mortem; ut, addita praevaricatione, fiat supra modum peccator aut peccatum per mandatum; quia praevaricatio peccato non adderetur, si non esset mandatum. Alio enim loco dicit aperte idem Apostolus: Ubi enim lex non est, nec praevaricatio . Quid ergo? Quid dubitamus ad hoc datam esse legem, ut inveniret se homo? Quando enim Deus non prohibebat a malo, latebat se homo; vires suas languidas non invenit, nisi quando legem prohibitionis accepit. Invenit ergo se, in malis invenit se. Quo fugit se? Quocumque enim fugerit se, sequitur se. Et quid ei prodest de se invento scientia, quam sauciat conscientia?
1. 1. Yesterday's reading from the Epistle of the holy apostle Paul, you who were present at the sermon, heard; today's recited reading follows it. That difficult and perilous passage is still under treatment, which, with the help of our Lord—so far as you help me with devout affection toward him—we have undertaken to expound and untangle according to the strength he deigns to give. Let your Charity grant me patience, so that if, on account of the obscurity of the matters, I have a difficult discourse, I may at least have an easy voice. For if both are difficult, there is much labor; and would that the labor be not in vain. But that our labor may profit, let your hearing be patient. That the Apostle does not blame the Law, we satisfied our hearers yesterday, as I think. For there he says, What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? Far from it! But I did not know sin except through the law. For I would not have known coveting, unless the law said, You shall not covet. But sin, taking occasion through the commandment, worked in me every kind of coveting. For without the law sin was dead—that is, it lies hidden, does not appear. But I was alive once without the law; but when the commandment came, sin revived. But I died, and the commandment that was unto life was found by me (for what is so pertinent to life as You shall not covet?) to be unto death. For sin, taking occasion through the commandment, deceived me, and through it killed me (Rom 7:7-11); it terrified coveting, did not extinguish it; terrified, did not suppress it; it made fear of punishment, not love of righteousness. And so, he says, the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Did that which is good, then, become death to me? Far from it (Rom 7:12-13)! For the law is not death, but sin is death. What, then, from the occasion of the commandment? But sin, that it might appear as sin (for it was hidden when it was said to be dead) worked death in me through what is good; that, transgression being added, the sinner, or sin, might become beyond measure through the commandment; because transgression would not be added to sin if there were no commandment. For in another place the same Apostle says openly, For where there is no law, neither is there transgression (Rom 4:15). What, then? Why do we doubt that the law was given for this purpose, that man might find himself out? For when God did not forbid evil, man lay hidden from himself; he did not find out his own feeble strength except when he received the law of prohibition. He found himself out, then; he found himself out among evils. Where does he flee from himself? For wherever he flees from himself, he follows himself. And what does it profit him to have knowledge of himself, once found out, when conscience wounds him?
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Loquitur ergo et in ista lectione, quae hodie recitata est, ille qui invenit se. Scimus, inquit, quia lex spiritalis est; ego autem carnalis sum, venumdatus sub peccato. Quod enim operor, ignoro. Non enim quod volo, hoc ago; sed quod odi, illud facio . Quaeritur hoc loco magna diligentia quis intellegatur, utrum ipse Apostolus qui loquebatur, an alium aliquem in se transfiguravit, quem tangeret in se, sicut dixit quodam loco: Haec autem omnia transfiguravi in me et Apollo propter vos, ut in nobis discatis . Si ergo Apostolus loquitur (quod nemo dubitat), et cum dicit: Non quod volo ago; sed quod odi, illud facio, non de altero, sed de se ipso dicit; quid sumus intellecturi, fratres mei? Itane apostolus Paulus nolebat, verbi gratia, facere adulterium, et faciebat adulterium? Nolebat esse avarus, et erat avarus? Quis autem nostrum audeat se induere tali blasphemia, ut de Apostolo hoc sentiat? Forte ergo alius est aliquis; forte tu es, aut tu es, aut ille est, aut ego sum. Si ergo aliquis nostrum est, ipsum quasi de ipso audiamus, et non irati nos corrigamus. Si autem ipse est, forte enim et ipse est; non sic intellegamus quod dixit: Non quod volo ago; sed quod odi, illud facio, tamquam vellet esse castus, et esset adulter; aut vellet esse misericors, et esset crudelis; aut vellet esse pius, et esset impius. Non ad hoc accipiamus: Non enim quod volo, hoc ago; sed quod odi, illud facio.
2. 2. He speaks, then, in this reading too, which has been recited today, the one who has found himself out. We know, he says, that the law is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold under sin. For what I do, I do not know. For I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do (Rom 7:14-15). Here it is asked with great care who is to be understood—whether the Apostle himself who was speaking, or whether he transfigured some other person in himself, whom he was touching in himself, as he said in a certain place, But all these things I transfigured in myself and Apollos for your sake, that in us you might learn (1 Cor 4:6). If, then, the Apostle is speaking (which no one doubts), and when he says, I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do, speaks not of another but of himself; what are we to understand, my brothers? Did the apostle Paul, for instance, not wish to commit adultery, and yet commit adultery? Did he not wish to be greedy, and yet was greedy? But who of us would dare clothe himself in such blasphemy as to think this of the Apostle? Perhaps, then, it is some other person; perhaps it is you, or you, or that man, or I. If, then, it is one of us, let us hear it as though about ourselves, and let us not be angry but correct ourselves. But if it is he himself—for perhaps it is he himself too—let us not so understand what he said, I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do, as though he wished to be chaste, and was an adulterer; or wished to be merciful, and was cruel; or wished to be devout, and was ungodly. Let us not take it in this sense: For I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Sed ad quid? Volo non concupiscere, et concupisco. Lex quid dixit? Non concupisces . Homo legem audivit, vitium agnovit: bellum indixit, captivitatem invenit. Sed forte aliquis homo, non Apostolus. Quid ergo dicimus, fratres mei? Non habebat ullam concupiscentiam Apostolus in carne sua, quam habere nollet, cui tamen existenti, titillanti, suggerenti, sollicitanti, aestuanti, tentanti non consentiret? Dico Caritati vestrae, si crediderimus Apostolum nullam prorsus habuisse infirmitatem concupiscentiae cui reluctaretur, multum credimus de illo; atque utinam ita sit. Non enim invidere nos oportet Apostolis, sed Apostolos imitari. Verumtamen, carissimi, audio ipsum Apostolum confitentem, nondum eum ad tantam perfectionem iustitiae pervenisse, quantam in Angelis esse credimus; quorum Angelorum aequalitatem speramus, si ad hoc quod volumus perveniamus. Quid enim aliud nobis Dominus promittit in resurrectione, ubi ait: In resurrectione mortuorum neque nubent, neque uxores ducent; non enim incipient mori, sed erunt aequales Angelis Dei ?
3. 3. But in what sense? I wish not to covet, and I covet. What did the law say? You shall not covet (Rom 7:7). The man heard the law, recognized the fault: he declared war, he found captivity. But perhaps some man, not the Apostle. What, then, do we say, my brothers? Did the Apostle have no coveting in his flesh which he would have wished not to have, to which, nevertheless, as it existed, tickled, suggested, solicited, blazed up, tempted, he did not consent? I tell your Charity: if we believe that the Apostle had no infirmity of coveting at all against which he struggled, we believe a great deal of him; and would that it were so. For we ought not to envy the apostles, but to imitate the apostles. Yet, dearly beloved, I hear the Apostle himself confessing that he had not yet reached such a perfection of righteousness as we believe to be in the angels; whose angelic equality we hope for, if we reach what we will. For what else does the Lord promise us in the resurrection, where he says, In the resurrection of the dead they will neither marry nor be given in marriage; for they will not begin to die, but will be equal to the angels of God (Matt 22:30; Luke 20:36)?
Sermons5.3.3
3. 4. Dicit ergo aliquis: Et tu unde scis quia Paulus apostolus angeli iustitiam et perfectionem nondum habebat? Non facio iniuriam Apostolo, non credo nisi Apostolo, alium testem non quaero; suspicantem non audio, nimium laudantem non curo. Dic mihi, sancte Apostole, de te ipso, ubi nemo dubitat quia de te ipso loqueris. Nam ubi dixisti: Non quod volo ago; sed quod odi, illud facio , existunt qui dicant, quod alium in te nescio quem transfiguraveris laborantem, deficientem, victum, captivum. Tu mihi dic de te, ubi nemo dubitat quia loqueris de te. Fratres, ait Apostolus, ego me ipsum non arbitror apprehendisse. Et quid facis? Unum autem, quae retro oblitus, in ea quae ante sunt extentus, secundum intentionem, ait, non secundum perfectionem; secundum intentionem sequor ad palmam supernae vocationis Dei in Christo Iesu. Supra iam dixerat: Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim . Adhuc contradicitur et dicitur: Dicebat ista Apostolus, quia nondum pervenerat ad immortalitatem; non quia nondum pervenerat ad iustitiae perfectionem. Iam ergo tam iustus erat quam sunt Angeli, sed nondum immortalis sicut sunt Angeli. Sic, inquiunt, sic est prorsus. Modo dixisti: Tam erat iustus quam sunt Angeli, sed nondum immortalis sicut sunt Angeli. Ergo perfectionem iustitiae iam tenebat, sed sequendo palmam supernam, immortalitatem quaerebat.
3. 4. So someone says: And how do you know that the apostle Paul did not yet have the righteousness and perfection of an angel? I do no injury to the Apostle, I believe none but the Apostle, I seek no other witness; I do not hear the one who suspects, I do not care for the one who praises too much. Tell me, holy Apostle, about yourself, where no one doubts that you are speaking of yourself. For where you said, I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do (Rom 7:15), there are those who say that you transfigured some other person in yourself—one laboring, failing, conquered, captive. Tell me about yourself, where no one doubts that you are speaking of yourself. Brothers, says the Apostle, I do not reckon that I have laid hold of it. And what do you do? But one thing: forgetting what is behind, stretching out to what is ahead, according to my intention, he says—not according to perfection; according to my intention I press on toward the palm of the heavenly calling of God in Christ Jesus. Above he had already said, Not that I have already received it, or am already perfect (Phil 3:13-14.12). Still it is objected and said: The Apostle said these things because he had not yet reached immortality, not because he had not yet reached the perfection of righteousness. So he was already as righteous as the angels are, but not yet immortal as the angels are. "Just so," they say, "just so it is exactly." You just now said: He was as righteous as the angels are, but not yet immortal as the angels are. So he already held the perfection of righteousness, but by pressing on toward the heavenly palm he was seeking immortality.
Sermons5.3.4
4. 5. Dic nobis, sancte Apostole, alium aliquem manifestiorem locum, non ubi quaeris immortalitatem, sed ubi confiteris infirmitatem. Et hic iam susurratur, iam contradicitur. Videor mihi audire quorumdam cogitationes, et hic dicitur mihi: Verum est, novi quid dicturus es: confitetur infirmitatem, sed carnis, non mentis; confitetur infirmitatem, sed corporis, non animi; in animo autem est perfecta iustitia, non in corpore. Nam quis ignorat utique Apostolum in corpore fuisse fragilem, corpore fuisse mortalem, sicut dicit: Habemus thesaurum istum in vasis fictilibus ? Quid tibi ergo cum vase fictili? De thesauro aliquid loquere. Si aliquid minus habuit, si erat quod ei ad aurum iustitiae posset addi, inveniamus. Ipsum audiamus, ne iniuriosi existimemur. Et ne magnitudine revelationum mearum, Apostolus dicit: in magnitudine revelationum mearum ne extollar . Nempe hic agnoscitis Apostolum habentem magnitudinem revelationum, et timentem elationis praecipitium. Ut ergo noveris quia et ipse Apostolus, qui volebat alios salvos facere, adhuc curabatur; ut noveris quia et ipse adhuc curabatur; si magnipendis ipsius honorem, audi quid medicus ei apposuerit ad tumorem; audi non me, ipsum audi. Audi confitentem, ut sentias docentem. Audi: Et ne magnitudine revelationum mearum extollar. Ecce iam possum dicere apostolo Paulo: Ne extollaris, sancte Apostole? Tu ne extollaris, adhuc cavendum est? Tu ne extollaris, adhuc timendum est? Tu ne extollaris, adhuc huic infirmitati medicina quaerenda est?
4. 5. Tell us, holy Apostle, some other, plainer passage—not where you seek immortality, but where you confess infirmity. And here it is now whispered, now objected. I seem to myself to hear the thoughts of certain people, and here it is said to me: It is true, I know what you are going to say: he confesses infirmity, but of the flesh, not of the mind; he confesses infirmity, but of the body, not of the soul; but in the soul there is perfect righteousness, not in the body. For who does not know that the Apostle was indeed frail in body, mortal in body, as he says, We have this treasure in earthen vessels (2 Cor 4:7)? What, then, have you to do with the earthen vessel? Say something about the treasure. If he had anything less, if there was something that could be added to his gold of righteousness, let us find it. Let us hear the man himself, lest we be thought injurious. And lest by the greatness of my revelations, the Apostle says, in the greatness of my revelations I be exalted. Surely here you recognize the Apostle as having a greatness of revelations, and fearing the precipice of pride. So that you may know that even the Apostle himself, who wished to save others, was still being cured; that you may know that he too was still being cured; if you value his honor highly, hear what the physician applied to him for his swelling; hear not me, hear him. Hear him confessing, that you may perceive him teaching. Hear: And lest by the greatness of my revelations I be exalted. Behold, can I now say to the apostle Paul: Lest you be exalted, holy Apostle? You—lest you be exalted, must it still be guarded against? You—lest you be exalted, must it still be feared? You—lest you be exalted, must medicine still be sought for this infirmity?
Sermons5.4.5
5. 6. Quid mihi, inquit, dicis tu? Et tu audi quid sim; et noli altum sapere, sed time. Audi quomodo brevis agnus ingrediatur, ubi aries sic periclitatur. Ne magnitudine, inquit, revelationum mearum extollar, datus est mihi stimulus carnis meae, angelus satanae, qui me colaphizet . Qualem tumorem timuit, qui mordacissimum epithema accepit? Iam ergo modo dic quia tanta in illo erat iustitia, quanta est in Angelis sanctis. An forte et angelus sanctus in caelo, ne extollatur, accipit stimulum angelum satanae, a quo colaphizetur? Absit hoc de sanctis Angelis suspicari. Homines sumus, Apostolos sanctos homines agnoscamus; vasa electa, sed adhuc fragilia; adhuc in hac carne peregrinantes, nondum in caelesti patria triumphantes. Ergo quoniam Dominum ter rogavit, ut ab illo iste stimulus auferretur; nec auditus est ad voluntatem, quia exauditus est ad sanitatem ; forte non indecenter ipse loquitur, ubi dicit: Scimus autem quia Lex spiritalis est; ego autem carnalis sum .
5. 6. "What do you say to me?" he says. And you—hear what I am; and do not be high-minded, but fear (See Rom 11:20). Hear how the little lamb enters where the ram is so endangered. Lest by the greatness, he says, of my revelations I be exalted, there was given to me a sting of my flesh, an angel of Satan, to buffet me (2 Cor 12:7). What swelling did he fear, who received so biting a poultice? Now then say that there was as much righteousness in him as there is in the holy angels. Or does perhaps even a holy angel in heaven, lest he be exalted, receive a sting, an angel of Satan, by whom he may be buffeted? Far be it to suspect this of the holy angels. We are human beings; let us recognize the holy apostles as human beings—chosen vessels, but still frail; still sojourning in this flesh, not yet triumphing in the heavenly homeland. Therefore, since he asked the Lord three times that this sting be taken from him, and was not heard according to his will, because he was heard for his health (See 2 Cor 12:8-9), perhaps he speaks not unfittingly where he says, But we know that the law is spiritual; but I am carnal (Rom 7:14).
Sermons5.5.6
5. 7. Ergo carnalis Apostolus, qui aliis dicebat: Vos qui spiritales estis, instruite huiusmodi in spiritu lenitatis, alios tamquam spiritales alloquitur, et ipse carnalis est? Sed quid dixit et ipsis spiritalibus, quia nondum erant in perfectione caelesti et angelica, nondum erant in illius patriae securitate, sed in huius peregrinationis sollicitudine versabantur? Quid eis dixit? Certe spiritales eos vocavit: Vos, inquit, qui spiritales estis, instruite huiusmodi in spiritu lenitatis, intendens te ipsum, ne et tu tenteris . Ecce, quem spiritalem iam appellavit, timuit illi tentationis fragilitatem, unde posset tentari spiritalis, etsi non ex mente, utique ex carne. Spiritalis enim, quia secundum spiritum vivit; adhuc autem ex parte mortali carnalis: idem spiritalis, idemque carnalis. Ecce spiritalis: Mente servio legi Dei. Ecce carnalis: Carne autem legi peccati . Idem ergo ipse et spiritalis et carnalis? Idem plane, quamdiu hic vivit, sic est.
5. 7. The Apostle, then, is carnal—he who said to others, You who are spiritual, instruct such a one in a spirit of gentleness—he addresses others as spiritual, and is himself carnal? But what did he say even to those spiritual ones, because they were not yet in heavenly and angelic perfection, were not yet in the security of that homeland, but dwelt in the anxiety of this pilgrimage? What did he say to them? Certainly he called them spiritual: You, he says, who are spiritual, instruct such a one in a spirit of gentleness, looking to yourself, lest you too be tempted (Gal 6:1). Behold, the one he has already called spiritual, he feared for him the frailty of temptation, by which the spiritual one could be tempted, if not from the mind, surely from the flesh. For he is spiritual, because he lives according to the spirit; but he is still in part carnal, in the mortal part: the same one is spiritual and the same one carnal. Behold the spiritual: I serve the law of God with the mind. Behold the carnal: But the law of sin with the flesh (Rom 7:25). The same one, then, is both spiritual and carnal? The very same, plainly; as long as he lives here, so it is.
Sermons5.5.7
6. 8. Noli mirari, quisquis es, quicumque carnalibus concupiscentiis cedis atque consentis, qui eas vel bonas putas ad explendam libidinis saturitatem, vel certe sic iam vides malas, ut eis tamen cedendo consentias, et quo ducunt sequaris, et ea quae mala suggerunt perpetres; totus carnalis es. Tu, tu quisquis talis es, totus carnalis es. Si autem concupiscis quidem, quod lex vetat, cum dicit: Non concupisces ; servas tamen aliud quod item lex iubet: Post concupiscentias tuas non eas ; mente spiritalis es, carne carnalis. Aliud est enim, non concupiscere; aliud, post concupiscentias suas non ire. Non concupiscere, omnino perfecti est; post concupiscentias suas non ire, pugnantis est, luctantis est, laborantis est. Ubi fervet pugna, quare desperatur victoria? Quando erit victoria? Quando absorbebitur mors in victoriam. Tunc enim vox erit triumphantis, non sudor pugnantis. Quae futura est vox illa triumphantis, cum corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem? Vides victorem, audi exsultantem, exspecta triumphantem. Tunc fiet sermo qui scriptus est: Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Ubi est? Ecce erat, et non est. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Ecce mortis contentio: Non quod volo ago. Ecce mortis contentio: Scimus quia lex spiritalis est, ego autem carnalis sum . Si ergo Apostolus de se ipso dicit; si dico, non confirmo; si Apostolus dicit: Scimus quia lex spiritalis est, ego autem carnalis sum; mente enim spiritalis, corpore carnalis: quando totus spiritalis? Cum: Seminatur corpus animale, resurget corpus spiritale . Modo ergo quando fervet mortis contentio, non quod volo ago: ex parte spiritalis, ex parte carnalis; ex parte meliore spiritalis, ex parte inferiore carnalis. Adhuc confligo, nondum vici; magnum mihi est non vinci. Non quod volo, hoc ago; quod odi, illud facio . Quid facis? Concupisco. Etsi concupiscentiae non consentio, etsi post concupiscentias meas non eo; tamen adhuc concupisco: et utique etiam in ipsa parte ego sum.
6. 8. Do not wonder, whoever you are, whoever yields and consents to carnal cravings—you who either think them good, for the satisfying of lust to the full, or at least already see them to be evil in such a way that you nevertheless consent by yielding to them, and follow where they lead, and perpetrate the evils they suggest: you are wholly carnal. You, you, whoever you are who are such, are wholly carnal. But if you indeed covet what the law forbids when it says, You shall not covet; yet keep another thing which the law likewise commands, Do not go after your desires (Sir 18:30); you are spiritual in mind, carnal in flesh. For it is one thing not to covet, another not to go after your desires. Not to covet belongs to the wholly perfect; not to go after your desires belongs to the one fighting, wrestling, laboring. Where the battle rages, why is victory despaired of? When will there be victory? When death will be swallowed up in victory. For then it will be the voice of one triumphing, not the sweat of one fighting. What will that voice of one triumphing be, when this corruptible will have put on incorruption, and this mortal will have put on immortality? You see the victor, hear the one exulting, await the one triumphing. Then shall come to pass the saying that is written: Death is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your struggle? Where, O death, is your sting (1 Cor 15:54-55)? Where is it? Behold, it was, and is not. Where, O death, is your struggle? Behold the struggle of death: I do not do what I will. Behold the struggle of death: We know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal. If, then, the Apostle speaks of himself; if I say it, I do not affirm it; if the Apostle says it: We know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal; for in mind spiritual, in body carnal: when wholly spiritual? When the animal body is sown, the spiritual body will rise (1 Cor 15:44). Now, then, while the struggle of death rages, I do not do what I will: in part spiritual, in part carnal; in the better part spiritual, in the lower part carnal. Still I contend, I have not yet conquered; it is a great thing for me not to be conquered. I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do. What do you do? I covet. Even though I do not consent to the coveting, even though I do not go after my desires; yet I still covet: and surely even in that part I am present.
Sermons5.6.8
7. 9. Non enim ego in mente, et alius in carne. Sed quid? Igitur ipse ego: quia ego in mente, ego in carne. Non enim duae naturae contrariae, sed ex utraque unus homo; quia unus Deus, a quo factus est homo. Igitur ipse ego, ego ipse, mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati . Mente non consentio legi peccati: sed tamen nollem esse in membris meis lex ulla peccati. Quia ergo nollem, et tamen est; non quod volo ago: quia concupisco, et nolo, non quod volo ago; sed quod odi, illud facio . Quid odi? Concupiscere. Odi concupiscere, et tamen ago illud carne, non mente: Quod odi, illud facio.
7. 9. For it is not that I am in the mind and another is in the flesh. But what? So then it is I myself: because I am in the mind, I am in the flesh. For there are not two contrary natures, but from both there is one man; because there is one God, by whom man was made. So then it is I myself, I myself, serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh (Rom 7:25). With the mind I do not consent to the law of sin; yet I would not wish there to be any law of sin in my members. Because, then, I would not wish it, and yet it is there, I do not do what I will: because I covet, and I do not will it, I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do. What do I hate? To covet. I hate to covet, and yet I do it with the flesh, not with the mind: What I hate, that I do.
Sermons5.7.9
7. 10. Si autem quod nolo, illud facio; consentio legi, quoniam bona est . Quid est hoc: Si quod nolo, illud facio; consentio legi, quoniam bona est? Consentires legi, si quod vellet faceres: facis quod lex odit, quomodo consentis legi? Prorsus: Si quod nolo, hoc facio; consentio legi, quoniam bona est. Quomodo? Quia iubet lex: Non concupisces . Quid volo ego? Non concupiscere? Volendo quod vult lex, consentio legi, quoniam bona est. Si diceret lex: Non concupisces, et ego vellem concupiscere; non consentirem legi, et omnino ab illa voluntatis perversitate diversus existerem. Dicente enim lege: Non concupisces, et ego vellem concupiscere; non consentio legi Dei. Quid modo? Quid dicis, o lex? Non concupisces. Et ego nolo concupiscere, et ego nolo; quod non vis, nolo; ideo consentio, quia quod non vis, nolo. Non implet legem infirmitas mea; sed legem laudat voluntas mea. Ergo si quod nolo, hoc ago; ideo consentio legi, quia nolo quod non vult, non quia ago quod nolo. Ipsum enim agere concupiscere est, non concupiscentiae consentire: ne aliquis iam in Apostolo peccandi sibi quaerat exemplum, et det malum exemplum. Non quod volo ago. Quid enim lex dicit? Non concupisces. Et ego nolo concupiscere, et tamen concupisco; quamvis concupiscentiae meae assensum non praebeam, quamvis post eam non eam. Resisto enim, averto mentem, nego arma, teneo membra; et tamen fit in me quod nolo. Quod non vult lex, nolo cum lege; quod non vult, nolo: ergo consentio legi.
7. 10. But if I do what I do not will, I agree with the law, that it is good (Rom 7:16). What is this: If I do what I do not will, I agree with the law, that it is good? You would agree with the law if you did what it willed: you do what the law hates; how do you agree with the law? Precisely: If I do what I do not will, I agree with the law, that it is good. How? Because the law commands, You shall not covet. What do I will? Not to covet? By willing what the law wills, I agree with the law, that it is good. If the law said, You shall not covet, and I willed to covet, I would not agree with the law, and would stand wholly apart from it by that perversity of will. For if, the law saying, You shall not covet, I willed to covet, I do not agree with the law of God. What now? What do you say, O law? You shall not covet. And I do not will to covet, I too do not will it; what you do not will, I do not will; therefore I agree, because what you do not will, I do not will. My infirmity does not fulfill the law; but my will praises the law. Therefore, if I do what I do not will, I agree with the law for this reason: because I do not will what it does not will, not because I do what I do not will. For the very doing is coveting, not consenting to the coveting: lest anyone now seek for himself in the Apostle an example of sinning, and give a bad example. I do not do what I will. For what does the law say? You shall not covet. And I do not will to covet, and yet I covet; although I do not give assent to my coveting, although I do not go after it. For I resist, I turn away my mind, I refuse it arms, I hold back my members; and yet what I do not will happens in me. What the law does not will, I do not will with the law; what it does not will, I do not will: therefore I agree with the law.
Sermons5.7.10
8. 11. Sed quia ego sum in carne, ego sum in mente; sed magis ego sum in mente, quam in carne. Quia enim ego sum in mente, ego sum in regente; mens enim regit, caro regitur; et magis sum ego in eo quo rego, quam in eo in quo regor. Quia ergo magis ego in mente: Nunc autem iam non ego operor illud. Nunc autem, quid est? Nunc autem, iam redemptus, qui fui antea sub peccato venumdatus, iam accepta gratia Salvatoris, ut mente condelecter legi Dei, non ego operor illud, sed quod habitat in me peccatum. Scio enim quia non habitat in me . Iterum ergo: in me; audi quod sequitur: Hoc est in carne mea bonum. Velle enim mihi adiacet. Scio. Quid scis? Quia non habitat in me, hoc est in carne mea, bonum. Iamdudum dixeras: Quod operor, ignoro . Si ignoras, quomodo scis? Modo dicis: Ignoro; modo dicis: Scio; ego quomodo intellegam, nescio. An hoc est quod intellego? Ubi enim ait: Quod operor, ignoro; dixit: ignoro, non approbo, non accepto, non mihi placet, non consentio, non laudo. Non enim et Christus eos ignorabit, quibus dicturus est: Non novi vos . Prorsus etiam hoc intellego: Quod enim operor, ignoro; quia quod non facio, ignoro. Non enim ego operor illud, sed id quod in me habitat peccatum. Ideo ignoro: quia non ego facio, sicut dictum est de Domino: Eum qui non noverat peccatum . Quid est: non noverat? Ergo non noverat quod arguebat? non noverat quod puniebat? Si ergo non noverat quod puniebat, iniuste puniebat. Quia vero iuste puniebat, noverat quod puniebat. Et tamen peccatum non noverat, quia peccatum non fecerat. Quod enim operor, ignoro: non enim quod volo ago; sed quod odi, illud facio. Si autem quod nolo, hoc facio; consentio legi, quoniam bona est . Nunc autem, accepta iam gratia, non ego operor illud; libera est mens, caro captiva. Non ego operor illud, sed id quod in me habitat peccatum. Scio enim quia non habitat in me, hoc est in carne mea, bonum.
8. 11. But because I am in the flesh, I am in the mind; but I am more in the mind than in the flesh. For because I am in the mind, I am in that which rules; for the mind rules, the flesh is ruled; and I am more in that by which I rule than in that in which I am ruled. Because, then, I am more in the mind: But now it is no longer I that work it. But now, what is it? But now, already redeemed, I who was before sold under sin, having now received the grace of the Savior, so that with the mind I delight in the law of God, it is not I that work it, but the sin that dwells in me. For I know that there does not dwell in me. Again, then, in me; hear what follows: that is, in my flesh, anything good. For to will lies near at hand for me. I know. What do you know? That there does not dwell in me, that is, in my flesh, anything good (Rom 7:17-18). A while before you had said, What I do, I do not know (Rom 7:15). If you do not know, how do you know? Now you say, I do not know; now you say, I know; how I am to understand this, I do not know. Or is this what I understand? For where he says, What I do, I do not know, he said, "I do not know" in the sense of: I do not approve, I do not accept, it does not please me, I do not consent, I do not praise. For Christ too will not be ignorant of those to whom he is going to say, I do not know you (Matt 7:23; 25:12). I understand this too, plainly: For what I do, I do not know; because what I do not do, I do not know. For it is not I that work it, but the sin that dwells in me. Therefore I do not know it: because it is not I that do it, just as it was said of the Lord, Him who knew no sin (2 Cor 5:21). What is, knew no sin? Did he then not know what he convicted? did he not know what he punished? If, then, he did not know what he punished, he punished unjustly. But because he punished justly, he knew what he punished. And yet he knew no sin, because he had committed no sin. For what I do, I do not know: for I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do. But if I do what I do not will, I agree with the law, that it is good. But now, grace having been received, it is no longer I that work it; the mind is free, the flesh captive. It is not I that work it, but the sin that dwells in me. For I know that there does not dwell in me, that is, in my flesh, anything good.
Sermons5.8.11
9. 12. Velle enim adiacet mihi, perficere autem bonum non adiacet . Adiacet velle, perficere non adiacet. Non dixit: facere; sed: perficere. Non enim nihil facis. Rebellat concupiscentia, et non consentis; delectat uxor aliena, et non annuis, mentem avertis, in secretarium mentis intras. Vides foris strepentem concupiscentiam, profers adversus eam sententiam, mundans conscientiam. Nolo, inquis, non facio. Puta quia delectat, non facio, habeo cui condelecter. Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem . Quid tu de carne tua tumultuaris? Quid delectationes stultas, temporales fluxas, vanas, noxias, tumultuose suggeris, et eas quasi garrula mihi narras? Narraverunt mihi iniusti delectationes. Inde est et ista concupiscentia. Narrat mihi delectationes, sed non sicut lex tua, Domine . Condelector enim legi Dei: non de me, sed de gratia Dei. Tu concupiscentia in carne tumultuaris, mentem tibi non subdis. In Deo sperabo; non timebo quid faciat mihi caro . Me, me, hoc est, mente non consentiente, tumultuatur caro. In Deo, inquit, sperabo; non timebo quid faciat mihi caro. Sicut nec aliena, ita nec mea. Qui ergo in se haec agit, nihil facit? Multum facit: magnum est quod facit, sed tamen non perficit. Quid est enim: perficere? Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Ergo, Velle adiacet mihi, perficere autem bonum non.
9. 12. For to will lies near at hand for me, but to accomplish the good does not (Rom 7:18). To will lies near at hand, to accomplish does not. He did not say, to do; but, to accomplish. For you do not do nothing. Coveting rebels, and you do not consent; another's wife delights you, and you do not assent, you turn away your mind, you enter into the inner chamber of the mind. You see coveting making a din outside, you pronounce sentence against it, cleansing your conscience. I do not will, you say, I do not do it. Suppose it delights me, I do not do it, I have something else in which to delight. For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man (Rom 7:22). Why do you, my flesh, make an uproar? Why do you tumultuously suggest foolish delights, temporal, fleeting, vain, harmful, and tell them to me as it were chattering? The unjust have told me of delights. From there comes this coveting too. It tells me of delights, but not like your law, O Lord (Ps 119:85 (118:85)). For I delight in the law of God: not from myself, but from the grace of God. You, coveting, make an uproar in the flesh, you do not subject the mind to yourself. In God I will hope; I will not fear what the flesh may do to me (See Ps 56:4 (55:5)). It is against me—that is, with the mind not consenting—that the flesh makes its uproar. In God, he says, I will hope; I will not fear what the flesh may do to me. As neither another's, so neither my own. Does he, then, who does these things within himself do nothing? He does much: it is a great thing that he does, but yet he does not accomplish it. For what is it to accomplish? Where, O death, is your struggle (1 Cor 15:55)? Therefore, to will lies near at hand for me, but to accomplish the good does not.
Sermons5.9.12
9. 13. Non enim quod volo, facio bonum; sed quod nolo malum, hoc ago. Et repetit: Si autem quod nolo ego, hoc facio, id est, concupisco; iam non ego operor illud, sed id quod in me habitat peccatum. Invenio ergo legem mihi volenti facere bonum. Bonum invenio legem; bonum est lex, bonum aliquid est lex. Unde probo? Quia implere volo. Invenio ergo legem mihi volenti facere bonum; quoniam mihi malum adiacet . Et hoc mihi. Non enim caro non mea, aut de alia substantia caro, aut de alio principio caro, aut anima ex Deo, et caro de gente tenebrarum. Absit! Languor repugnat sanitati. Semivivus iacet in via, curatur adhuc, sanantur omnes languores eius . Non quod volo ago; sed quod odi, illud facio. Si autem quod nolo ego, illud facio; invenio ergo legem volenti mihi facere bonum, quoniam mihi malum adiacet. Quod malum?
9. 13. For I do not do the good that I will, but the evil that I do not will, that I do. And he repeats: But if I do what I do not will—that is, I covet—it is no longer I that work it, but the sin that dwells in me. I find, then, a law for me wishing to do good (Rom 7:19-21). I find the law good; the law is good, the law is something good. How do I prove it? Because I wish to fulfill it. I find, then, a law for me wishing to do good; because evil lies near at hand for me. And this for me. For my flesh is not another's, nor is the flesh of another substance, nor is the flesh from another principle, nor is the soul from God and the flesh from the race of darkness. Far from it! Sickness fights against health. The half-alive man lies in the way, is still being cured, all his sicknesses are healed (See Luke 10:30-34; Ps 103:3 (102:3)). I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do. But if I do what I do not will, I find, then, a law for me wishing to do good, because evil lies near at hand for me. What evil?
Sermons5.9.13
10. 14. Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem. Video aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivum me ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis ; captivum, sed ex carne; captivum, sed ex parte. Nam mens repugnat, et condelectatur legi Dei. Sic enim intellegere debemus, si de se ipso Apostolus loquitur. Iam ergo si mens non consentit peccato titillanti, suggerenti, blandienti; si mens non consentit, quoniam habet alias interius delectationes suas, delectationibus carnis ex nulla parte conferendas: si ergo non consentit, et est in me quiddam mortuum, et quiddam vivum, mors adhuc contendit, sed mens viva non consentit. Numquid ipsa mors non est in te? Numquid illud quod mortuum est, non pertinet ad te? Adhuc tibi est contentio. Quid etiam inde sperandum est?
10. 14. For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man. I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and leading me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:22-23); captive, but from the flesh; captive, but in part. For the mind fights against, and delights in, the law of God. For so we ought to understand it, if the Apostle is speaking of himself. If, then, the mind does not consent to sin as it tickles, suggests, flatters; if the mind does not consent, since it has within other delights of its own, in no way to be compared with the delights of the flesh: if, then, it does not consent, and there is in me something dead and something alive, death still contends, but the living mind does not consent. Is that death not in you? Does that which is dead not pertain to you? Still there is for you a struggle. What, then, is to be hoped for from this?
Sermons5.10.14
10. 15. Miser ego homo: etsi non in mente, tamen in carne miser homo. Non enim in mente homo, et in carne non homo. Quis enim umquam carnem suam odio habuit ? Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Quid est hoc, fratres? Quasi carere vult corpore. Quid festinas? Si tantum ibi est intentio tua, ut corpore careas; mors quandoque ventura est, et te ab isto corpore mortis dies adveniens ultimus procul dubio liberabit. Quid est quod pro magno gemis? Quid est quod dicis: Quis me liberabit? Mortalis loqueris, moriturus loqueris. Separatio mentis a carne quandoque ventura est: propter brevitatem vitae numquam longe est; propter quotidianos casus quando sit, nescis. Ergo sive festines, sive tardes, omnis vita humana brevis est: quid pro magno gemis, et dicis: Quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius?
10. 15. Wretched man that I am: even if not in mind, yet in flesh a wretched man. For man is not in the mind, and not man in the flesh. For who ever hated his own flesh (Eph 5:29)? Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death (Rom 7:24)? What is this, brothers? It is as though he wishes to be without a body. Why do you hasten? If your intention is only this, to be without a body; death will come at some time, and the last day that arrives will, without doubt, free you from this body of death. Why do you groan as over a great matter? Why do you say, Who will free me? You speak as a mortal, you speak as one about to die. The separation of the mind from the flesh will come at some time: because of the brevity of life it is never far off; because of daily mischances, when it will be, you do not know. Whether, then, you hasten or delay, all human life is short: why do you groan as over a great matter, and say, Who will free me from the body of this death?
Sermons5.10.15
11. 16. Et adiungit: Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Pagani enim qui non habent gratiam Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum, non morientur? Non quandoque die ultimo a carne solventur? Non illo die a corpore mortis huius liberabuntur? Tu quid est quod pro magno gratiae Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum vis tribuere, quia de corpore mortis huius liberaberis? Respondet tibi Apostolus, si sensum eius cepimus, immo quia Domino adiuvante, sine dubio cepimus; respondet tibi Apostolus, et dicit: Scio quid loquar. Paganos dicis liberari a corpore mortis huius, quia veniet dies ultimus vitae huius, et solventur ad tempus a corpore mortis huius. Veniet et dies, quando omnes qui sunt in monumentis audient vocem eius; et procedent qui bona fecerunt, in resurrectionem vitae; ecce liberati a corpore mortis huius. Qui mala fecerunt, in resurrectionem iudicii : ecce redierunt ad corpus mortis huius. Corpus mortis huius redit ad impium, nec inde aliquando solvetur. Tunc non erit vita aeterna, sed mors aeterna, quia poena aeterna.
11. 16. And he adds, The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:25). Will pagans, then, who do not have the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, not die? Will they not at some time, on the last day, be loosed from the flesh? Will they not on that day be freed from this body of death? Why do you wish to ascribe it as a great thing to the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord, that you will be freed from this body of death? The Apostle answers you, if we have grasped his meaning—rather, since with the Lord's help we have without doubt grasped it; the Apostle answers you and says: I know what I am saying. You say that pagans are freed from this body of death, because the last day of this life will come, and they will be loosed for a time from this body of death. There will come a day too, when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice; and those who have done good will come forth to the resurrection of life; behold, freed from this body of death. Those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment (John 5:28-29): behold, they have returned to this body of death. This body of death returns to the ungodly man, nor will he ever be loosed from it. Then there will not be eternal life, but eternal death, because eternal punishment.
Sermons5.11.16
12. 17. Tu autem, o Christiane, roga quantum potes, exclama et dic: Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Respondetur tibi: Securus efficeris, non de te, sed de Domino tuo; securus efficeris de pignore tuo. Spera cum Christo regnum Christi, iam pignus tenes sanguinem Christi. Dic, dic: Quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Ut respondeatur tibi: Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Non enim sic liberaberis de corpore mortis huius, ut hoc corpus non habeas. Habebis, sed iam non mortis huius. Ipsum erit, sed non ipsum erit. Ipsum erit, quia ipsa caro erit; non ipsum erit, quia mortale non erit. Sic, sic liberaberis a corpore mortis huius, ut mortale hoc induat immortalitatem, et corruptibile hoc induat incorruptionem . A quo? Per quem? Gratia Dei, per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Quia per unum hominem mors, et per unum hominem resurrectio mortuorum. Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur; inde est quod gemis. In Adam omnes moriuntur: inde est quod gemis, inde est quod cum morte confligis, inde est corpus mortis huius. Sed sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificabuntur . Vivificatus accepto corpore immortali, ubi dicas: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? , liberatus eris a corpore mortis huius; non tamen virtute tua, sed gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
12. 17. But you, O Christian, pray as much as you can, cry out and say, Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? It is answered to you: You are made secure, not concerning yourself, but concerning your Lord; you are made secure concerning your pledge. Hope, with Christ, for the kingdom of Christ; you already hold the pledge, the blood of Christ. Say, say, Who will free me from the body of this death? that it may be answered to you, The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:24-25). For you will not be freed from this body of death in such a way that you do not have this body. You will have it, but no longer of this death. It will be the same, and it will not be the same. It will be the same, because it will be the same flesh; it will not be the same, because it will not be mortal. Thus, thus you will be freed from the body of this death, so that this mortal will put on immortality, and this corruptible will put on incorruption (See 1 Cor 15:53). By whom? Through whom? The grace of God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. For through one man came death, and through one man the resurrection of the dead. As in Adam all die; hence comes your groaning. In Adam all die: hence comes your groaning, hence your contending with death, hence this body of death. But as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive (1 Cor 15:21-22). Made alive, having received an immortal body, where you may say, Where, O death, is your struggle (1 Cor 15:55)?, you will be freed from this body of death; yet not by your own power, but by the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.12.17
SERMO 154/A
Sermon 154/A
Sermons5.12.17
1. Apostolus Paulus cum legeretur, audivimus quid agatur in homine; et unusquisque se considerans invenit quia verum dixit Apostolus. Dixit enim, quia non quod vult agit, sed quod odit hoc facit. Et dixit: Si quod nolo hoc facio, consentio legi quoniam bona est ; quia, quod nolo, non vult et lex; quod me prohibet lex ne faciam, hoc ego nolo facere: sed quod nolo, hoc... est in me aliud quod pugnat contra voluntatem meam. Et dixit: Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem: video autem aliam legem repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivum me ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. Ecce quid agatur in homine. Sed videte quid dixit in sequentibus: Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum .
1. When the apostle Paul was being read, we heard what goes on in a human being; and each one, considering himself, found that the Apostle spoke truly. For he said that he does not do what he wills, but what he hates, that he does. And he said, If I do what I do not will, I agree with the law, that it is good (Rom 7:16); because what I do not will, the law too does not will; what the law forbids me to do, this I do not will to do: but what I do not will, this . . . there is in me something else that fights against my will. And he said, For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man: but I see another law fighting against the law of my mind, and leading me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:22-23). Behold what goes on in a human being. But see what he said in what follows: Unhappy man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:24-25).
Sermons5.1
2. Attendat ergo unusquisque homo seipsum: quia in Epistola sua Paulus speculum posuit, ubi se videat omnis homo. Quod iubet lex, delectat mentem nostram; et quod prohibet lex, delectat carnem nostram; et contendunt mens nostra et caro nostra; mens contendit pro lege, caro contra legem; et ambulat unus homo cum rixa, quae in illo agitur. In uno homine rixa est: tacet lingua, et intus tumultus est. Propono vobis, ubi illud melius videatis. Videt homo alienam mulierem, et concupiscit illam. Attendit legem, quae dicit: Ne forniceris; et quid dicit mens hominis intus? Bene dixit lex, magnam rem dixit lex, amat castitatem; et caro delectatur iniquitate. Facta est rixa in homine. Duo vincant unum; carnem contradicentem vincant duo, lex et mens. Sed videte quid dixit ipsa mens: Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivum me ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. Ergo vincitur mens a carne. Invocet auxilium Salvatoris, et evadet laqueum deceptoris. Videte enim quid dixit Apostolus. Qualis erat Apostolus, quam magnus et fortis athleta Dei! Tamen conduceretur captivus, si non illi subveniret crucifixus. Ideo, cum periclitaretur, quid dixit? Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius, ut non faciam iniquitatem, quod delectat carnem meam? Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum .
2. Let each person, then, attend to himself; for in his Epistle Paul has set up a mirror in which every person may see himself. What the law commands delights our mind; and what the law forbids delights our flesh; and our mind and our flesh contend; the mind contends for the law, the flesh against the law; and one man walks about with the quarrel that goes on within him. In one man there is a quarrel: the tongue is silent, and within there is an uproar. I set before you something where you may see this better. A man sees another's wife, and covets her. He attends to the law, which says, You shall not commit fornication; and what does the man's mind say within? The law has spoken well, the law has said a great thing, it loves chastity; and the flesh is delighted by iniquity. A quarrel has arisen in the man. Let the two conquer the one; let the two—the law and the mind—conquer the contradicting flesh. But see what the mind itself said: I see another law in my members fighting against the law of my mind, and leading me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:23). So the mind is conquered by the flesh. Let it call on the help of the Savior, and it will escape the snare of the deceiver. For see what the Apostle said. What sort of man was the Apostle, how great and strong an athlete of God! Yet he would be led captive, if the Crucified did not come to his aid. So, when he was in peril, what did he say? Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death, that I may not do iniquity, which delights my flesh? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:24-25).
Sermons5.2
3. Spectat te ergo Christus pugnantem. Theatrum est conscientia tua, ubi duo contendunt, mens et caro. Mens consentit legi, caro contradicit legi; et vult refrenare carnem. Magna lucta: sed qui te spectat pugnantem, potest adiuvare periclitantem. Nam si pancratium faceres cum aliquo homine, feriret te, et ferires illum; et spectaret te homo, quis vestrum vinceret. Quicumque habebat vincere, praemium accipiebat. Hoc tibi habebat dicere homo: Qui vestrum vicerit, accipiet hoc. Paratus erat coronare vincentem; numquid poterat adiuvare laborantem? Modo autem qui te spectat, Christus est; clama ad illum, quando laboras, ut vincas; quia et caro tua malo suo contendit ut vincat. Nam duo homines si contenderitis, et pancratium feceritis, quicumque vestrum vinceret, coronaretur. In ista autem lucta si vicerit mens, animam et carnem liberat; si vicerit caro, ambo in gehennam mittuntur. Ergo malo suo contendit caro, et malo suo vult vincere. Praestatur carni, ut vincatur, ne in aeterno igne puniatur.
3. Christ, then, watches you as you fight. Your conscience is the theater, where two contend, the mind and the flesh. The mind consents to the law, the flesh contradicts the law; and it wishes to rein in the flesh. A great struggle: but the One who watches you fighting can help you in your peril. For if you were in a wrestling match with some man, you would strike him and he would strike you; and a man would watch you, to see which of you would win. Whoever was going to win would receive the prize. This is what the man would have to say to you: Whichever of you wins will receive this. He was ready to crown the winner; but could he help the one in difficulty? But now the One who watches you is Christ; cry out to him, when you labor, that you may conquer; for your flesh too contends, to its own harm, that it may conquer. For if two men contend and make a wrestling match, whichever of you wins would be crowned. But in this struggle, if the mind wins, it frees both soul and flesh; if the flesh wins, both are sent into hell. So the flesh contends to its own harm, and wishes to conquer to its own harm. It is granted to the flesh to be conquered, lest it be punished in eternal fire.
Sermons5.3
4. Consentit ergo et Psalmus quem cantavimus, ut diximus: De profundis clamavi ad te, Domine; Domine, exaudi vocem meam . Istud est profundum ubi caro contra mentem contendit. Si enim vicerit mens, ambo ab illa sursum levantur; levatur illuc et caro victa, quia bono suo est victa. Quomodo in domo quando contendit mala uxor cum bono viro, malo suo vincit, et bono suo vincitur. Si enim vicerit uxor mala, fit perversa domus, quando barbatus servit mulieri malae. Si autem victa fuerit mala uxor, incipit servire bono viro; mulier fit ipsa bona, quia servit bono viro. Sic est ergo et caro nostra, quomodo uxor mala victa, quia bono suo vincitur. Ut invocetur ille in auxilium, qui coniungat duos et coronet ambos, ideo de isto profundo clamamus ad Dominum nostrum, ut diximus in Psalmo. Si enim vicerimus, et desideriis carnis nostrae malis non consenserimus, postea resurget caro; et non ibi invenis mala desideria, cum quibus contendas. Modo enim invenis desideria mala, contra quae pugnes: et dicitur tibi: Vince, et coronaris. Et quid est tibi modo vincere? Desideriis malis non consentire. Nam numquid potes non illa habere desideria mala? Sed vincere est... consentire. Quando autem receperimus carnem in die resurrectionis, convertitur ipsa caro, fit immortalis; et iam non invenis desiderium cum quo lucteris... in qua coroneris. Et iam cum fueris sursum cum carne tua, numquid clamas de profundo, ubi litigabas contra carnem tuam?
4. The Psalm we sang agrees with this too, as we said: Out of the depths I have cried to you, O Lord; Lord, hear my voice (Ps 130:1-2 (129:1-2)). This is the depth where the flesh contends against the mind. For if the mind wins, both are lifted up from it on high; even the conquered flesh is lifted up there, because it is conquered to its own good. Just as in a house, when an evil wife contends with a good husband, she wins to her own harm and is conquered to her own good. For if the evil wife wins, the house becomes perverse, when a bearded man serves an evil woman. But if the evil wife is conquered, she begins to serve a good husband; the woman herself becomes good, because she serves a good husband. So it is too with our flesh, like an evil wife conquered, because it is conquered to its own good. That he may be called on for help who joins the two and crowns both, therefore out of this depth we cry to our Lord, as we said in the Psalm. For if we conquer, and do not consent to the evil desires of our flesh, afterward the flesh will rise again; and there you do not find evil desires with which to contend. For now you find evil desires against which to fight: and it is said to you: Conquer, and you are crowned. And what is it for you now to conquer? Not to consent to evil desires. For can you not have those evil desires? But to conquer is . . . not to consent. But when we have received back the flesh on the day of resurrection, the flesh itself is changed, becomes immortal; and you no longer find a desire with which to wrestle . . . in which you may be crowned. And when you are on high with your flesh, do you cry out of the depth, where you were quarreling against your flesh?
Sermons5.4
5. Et mulier illa, quae clamabat post Dominum, Chananaea quomodo clamavit! Filia eius daemonium patiebatur: quoniam caro non consentit menti, a diabolo possidebatur. Si illa tantum clamavit pro filia sua, nos quantum debemus clamare pro carne et anima nostra? Videtis enim quid clamando impetravit. Nam primo contempta est; erat enim Chananaea, de gente mala, ubi idola colebantur. Dominus autem Iesus Christus in Iudaea ambulabat, unde erant Patriarchae, unde erat Virgo Maria, quae peperit Christum; et ipsa sola gens Deum verum colebat, idola non colebat. Ergo cum interpellaret illum nescio qua Chananaea, noluit illam audire. Ideo contemnebat, quia sciebat quid servabat; non ut ipse beneficium negaret, sed ut ipsa perseverans impetraret. Dixerunt ergo illi discipuli ipsius: Domine, iam dimitte illam, da illi responsum: vides quia clamat post nos, et taedium nobis facit. Et dixit ille ad discipulos suos: Non sum missus nisi ad oves quae perierunt domus Israel . Ad gentem Iudaeam sum missus, ubi quaererem oves quae perierant. Erant aliae oves in aliis Gentibus, sed non ad illas venerat Christus; quia non crediderunt in praesentia Christi, sed crediderunt Evangelio Christi. Ideo dixit: Non sum missus nisi ad oves; ideo in praesentia sua elegit Apostolos. Et de ipsis ovibus erat Nathanael, de quo dixit: Ecce Israelita, in quo dolus non est . De ipsis ovibus erat turba illa tanta, quae ferebat ramos ante asinum Domini et dicebat: Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini . Oves illae de domo Israel perierant, et praesentem pastorem cognoverant, et in Christum praesentem crediderant. Ergo illa quando aporiabatur, cum ovibus gentilibus differebatur. Cum audisset hoc, quod dixit discipulis suis Dominus, perseveravit clamando, et non dimisit. Et Dominus ad illam: Non est bonum tollere panem filiorum, et mittere canibus. Canem illam fecit: quare? Quia de Gentibus erat, qui idola colebant: canes enim lapides lingunt. Non est bonum tollere panem filiorum, et dare canibus. Et illa non dixit: Domine, noli me facere canem, quia non sum canis; sed magis dixit: Verum dicis, Domine, canis sum. Unde agnovit convicium, inde meruit beneficium; ubi enim aporiata est iniquitas, ibi coronata est humilitas. Ita, Domine, verum dicis: Sed et canes comedunt de micis, quae cadunt de mensa dominorum suorum. Et tunc Dominus: O mulier, magna est fides tua; fiat tibi sicut vis . Iam dudum canis, modo mulier, latrando mutata. Micas de mensa cadentes desiderabat: subito se ad mensam invenit discumbentem. Quando enim illi dicit: Magna est fides tua, iam inter illos computavit, quorum panem nolebat mittere canibus.
5. And that woman who cried out after the Lord, the Canaanite—how she cried out! Her daughter was suffering from a demon: because the flesh does not consent to the mind, it was possessed by the devil. If she cried out so much for her daughter, how much ought we to cry out for our flesh and our soul? For you see what she obtained by crying out. For at first she was despised; for she was a Canaanite, of an evil race, where idols were worshiped. But the Lord Jesus Christ was walking in Judea, from where the patriarchs were, from where the Virgin Mary was, who bore Christ; and that nation alone worshiped the true God, did not worship idols. So when some Canaanite woman appealed to him, he was unwilling to hear her. He despised her for this reason, because he knew what he was keeping in store; not that he himself denied the benefit, but that she, by persevering, might obtain it. So his disciples said to him: Lord, now send her away, give her an answer: you see that she cries out after us, and is wearisome to us. And he said to his disciples, I was sent only to the sheep that were lost of the house of Israel (Matt 15:23-24). I was sent to the Jewish nation, where I was to seek the sheep that had been lost. There were other sheep among other nations, but Christ had not come to them; because they did not believe in the presence of Christ, but believed the gospel of Christ. So he said, I was sent only to the sheep; so in his presence he chose the apostles. And of these sheep was Nathanael, of whom he said, Behold an Israelite in whom there is no guile (John 1:47). Of these sheep was that great crowd which carried branches before the Lord's donkey and said, Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord (Matt 21:9). Those sheep of the house of Israel had been lost, and had recognized the shepherd present, and had believed in Christ present. So when she was in distress, she was being put off along with the gentile sheep. When she had heard this, which the Lord said to his disciples, she persevered in crying out, and did not give up. And the Lord to her: It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs. He made her a dog: why? Because she was of the gentiles, who worshiped idols: for dogs lick stones. It is not good to take the children's bread and give it to the dogs. And she did not say: Lord, do not make me a dog, for I am not a dog; but rather said: You speak truly, Lord, I am a dog. From where she recognized the reproach, from there she deserved the benefit; for where iniquity was put to distress, there humility was crowned. Yes, Lord, you speak truly: but even the dogs eat of the crumbs that fall from the table of their masters. And then the Lord: O woman, great is your faith; let it be done to you as you wish (Matt 15:26-28). A while ago a dog, now a woman, changed by her barking. She was longing for the crumbs falling from the table: suddenly she found herself reclining at the table. For when he says to her, Great is your faith, he now counted her among those whose bread he was unwilling to throw to the dogs.
Sermons5.5
6. Omnia ista quid nos docent, nisi, quando bonum est quod Deo petimus, orando perseveremus, donec desiderio suspirantis accipiamus? Ideo enim Deus differt petentes, ut exerceat desiderantes. Sed vitam aeternam debemus petere magnis gemitibus, hic vitam bonam, et postea vitam aeternam; quia et vitam bonam a Deo debes petere, qui adiuvet voluntatem tuam. Si non adiuvaverit, victus remanes; incipies captivus duci, si non tibi subveniat quod dictum est: Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Duas ergo res securi petamus: in isto saeculo vitam bonam, in futuro saeculo vitam aeternam. Alias res nescimus an utiles sint nobis. Petit homo a Deo, ut ducat uxorem; unde scit, si bono suo ducit? Petit homo a Deo, ut acquirat divitias; unde scit, si pauper securus dormiebat, dives factus latrones somniat? Non scit ergo, quid illi utile sit ab omnibus quae habet saeculum istud. Securus autem rogat bonam vitam, et vitam aeternam; hic ut Deum promereatur, ibi ut a Deo coronetur. Vita autem bona quae est? Amare Deum ex toto corde, ex tota anima, ex tota mente, et amare fratrem tamquam teipsum. Amemus ergo Deum nostrum, diligamus nos in unitate ipsius, habeamus in illo pacem, et inter nos caritatem; ut, quando venerit ipse Dominus noster Christus... possimus: Domine, te adiuvante fecimus quod iussisti, te propitio accipiamus quod promisisti.
6. What do all these things teach us, but that, when what we ask of God is good, we should persevere in praying until we receive it through the longing of one who sighs for it? For God puts off those who ask in order to exercise those who long. But we ought to ask for eternal life with great groanings—here a good life, and afterward eternal life; because you ought to ask of God even the good life, that he may help your will. If he does not help, you remain conquered; you will begin to be led captive, if that does not come to your aid which was said: Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:24-25). Two things, then, let us securely ask: in this age, a good life; in the age to come, eternal life. As for other things, we do not know whether they are useful to us. A man asks of God that he may take a wife; how does he know whether he takes her to his own good? A man asks of God that he may acquire riches; how does he know whether the poor man slept secure, and, made rich, dreams of robbers? He does not know, then, what among all the things this world has is useful to him. But he securely asks for a good life and for eternal life; here, that he may merit God; there, that he may be crowned by God. But what is a good life? To love God with the whole heart, with the whole soul, with the whole mind, and to love one's brother as oneself. Let us, then, love our God, let us love one another in his unity, let us have peace in him, and love among ourselves; so that, when our Lord Christ himself comes . . . we may be able to say: Lord, with your help we have done what you commanded; in your mercy may we receive what you promised.
Sermons5.6
SERMO 155
Sermon 155
Sermons5.6
1. 1. Hesterna lectio sancti Apostoli eo usque terminata est, ubi dictum est: Igitur ipse ego mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati. In qua conclusione demonstravit Apostolus, ad hoc se dixisse quae supra dixerat: Iam non ego operor illud, sed id quod in me habitat peccatum ; quia non mente operabatur consentiendo, sed carne concupiscendo. Hoc enim peccati nomine appellat, unde oriuntur cuncta peccata, id est, ex carnali concupiscentia. Quidquid enim est peccatorum in dictis, in factis, in cogitationibus, non exoriuntur nisi ex mala cupiditate, non exoriuntur nisi ex illicita delectatione. Huic ergo illicitae delectationi si resistamus, si non consentiamus, si membra velut arma non ministremus; non regnat peccatum in nostro mortali corpore. Peccatum enim ante regnum perdit, et sic perit. In hac ergo vita, quantum ad sanctos attinet, regnum perdit, in alia perit. Hic enim regnum perdit, quando post concupiscentias nostras non imus; ibi autem perit, quando dicetur: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua?
1. 1. Yesterday's reading of the holy Apostle was concluded at the point where it was said, So then it is I myself who serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh (Rom 7:25). In this conclusion the Apostle showed that he had said what he had said above—It is no longer I that work it, but the sin that dwells in me (Rom 7:17)—for this reason: because he was not working it with the mind, by consenting, but with the flesh, by coveting. For he calls this by the name of sin, whence all sins arise, that is, carnal coveting. For whatever there is of sins in words, in deeds, in thoughts, they arise only from evil craving, they arise only from unlawful delight. If, then, we resist this unlawful delight, if we do not consent to it, if we do not furnish our members as arms; sin does not reign in our mortal body. For sin first loses its reign, and so it perishes. In this life, then, as far as concerns the saints, it loses its reign; in the other, it perishes. For here it loses its reign, when we do not go after our cravings; but there it perishes, when it will be said, Where, O death, is your struggle (1 Cor 15:55)?
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Ergo cum dixisset Apostolus: Mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati; non dando membra committendis iniquitatibus, sed tantum concupiscendo, nec tamen illicitae concupiscentiae manus dando: ergo cum dixisset: Mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati; subiecit et ait: Nulla ergo condemnatio est nunc his qui sunt in Christo Iesu . His qui sunt in carne condemnatio est: his qui sunt in Christo Iesu nulla condemnatio est. Ne putares hoc postea futurum, ideo addidit: nunc. Postea illud exspecta, ut nec concupiscentia sit in te, contra quam contendas, cum qua confligas, cui non consentias, quam frenes et domes; post exspecta, quia nec ipsa erit. Si enim quod nobiscum contendit ex mortali corpore etiam postea erit, Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? falsum erit. Quid ergo postea futurum sit, sciamus. Tunc enim fiet qui scriptus est: Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Aculeus enim mortis est peccatum; virtus autem peccati, lex . Quia ex prohibitione auctum est desiderium, non exstinctum. Lex peccato dedit virtutem, tantummodo per litteram iubendo, non per spiritum subveniendo. Ergo tunc non erit hoc, sed quid nunc? Quid sit nunc, quaeris? Quod et paulo ante dixit: Nunc autem iam non ego operor illud : et ibi nunc. Quid est: non ego operor illud? Non consentio, non annuo, non decerno, semper mihi displicet: membra mea teneo. Et magnum est hoc: cum sit ex carne concupiscentia, et ad carnem pertineant corporis membra, quando non regnat peccatum, id est, carnis concupiscentia; plus habet iuris mens ad tenenda membra carnis, ne dentur in arma iniquitatis, quam ipsa concupiscentia carnis ad movenda membra carnis. Itaque concupiscentia est carnis, et membra carnis; mens tamen quia dominatum habet: si tamen desuper adiuvetur, ne cum ei multum contra Dei gratiam damus, non regem, sed tyrannum faciamus; tantum ergo valet mens, sic regit cum regitur, ut de membris ipsius carnis, contra concupiscentiam carnis ipsius, possit agere quod ait Apostolus: Non ergo regnet peccatum in vestro mortali corpore, ad oboediendum desideriis eius; nec exhibeatis membra vestra arma iniquitatis peccato .
2. 2. So when the Apostle had said, I serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh—not by giving his members for the committing of iniquities, but only by coveting, and yet not giving a hand to unlawful coveting: so when he had said, I serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh, he went on and said, There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus (Rom 7:25-8:1). For those who are in the flesh there is condemnation; for those who are in Christ Jesus there is no condemnation. Lest you should think this would be only afterward, he therefore added now. Wait for that afterward—that there may not even be in you a coveting against which you must contend, with which you must struggle, to which you must not consent, which you must bridle and tame; wait for that afterward, because it too will not exist. For if that which contends with us from the mortal body will exist even afterward, Where, O death, is your struggle? will be false. Let us know, then, what is to be afterward. For then shall come to pass what is written: Death is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your struggle? Where, O death, is your sting? For the sting of death is sin; but the power of sin is the law (1 Cor 15:54-56). Because by the prohibition the desire was increased, not extinguished. The law gave power to sin, only by commanding through the letter, not by aiding through the spirit. Therefore then this will not be; but what now? You ask what is now? What he said also a little before: But now it is no longer I that work it (Rom 7:17)—there too now. What is, it is not I that work it? I do not consent, I do not assent, I do not decide, it always displeases me; I hold back my members. And this is a great thing: since coveting is from the flesh, and the members of the body pertain to the flesh, when sin—that is, the coveting of the flesh—does not reign, the mind has more right to hold back the members of the flesh, lest they be given as arms of iniquity, than the coveting of the flesh itself has to stir the members of the flesh. So there is the coveting of the flesh, and the members of the flesh; yet the mind, because it has dominion—provided it be helped from above, lest, when we give it too much against the grace of God, we make it not a king but a tyrant—the mind, then, has such power, so rules when it is ruled, that of the members of the flesh itself, against the coveting of the flesh itself, it can do what the Apostle says, Let not sin, then, reign in your mortal body, to obey its desires; nor present your members as arms of iniquity to sin (Rom 6:12-13).
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Nulla ergo condemnatio est nunc his qui sunt in Christo Iesu . Non sint solliciti, si concupiscentiis illicitis titillantur; non sint solliciti, quod videtur adhuc esse lex in membris repugnans legi mentis. Nulla enim condemnatio est. Sed quibus? etiam nunc quibus? Qui sunt in Christo Iesu. Et ubi est illa sententia, de qua dicebat paulo ante: Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati quae est in membris meis ? Sed medicebat ex carne, non ex mente. Ubi ergo illa lex, si nulla condemnatio est his qui sunt in Christo Iesu? Lex enim spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu . Lex enim, non illa in monte Sina per litteram: Lex enim, non illa in vetustate litterae; sed: Lex spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu, liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis. Ut enim condelecteris legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem, unde haberes, nisi lex spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu liberaret te a lege peccati et mortis? Ideo, mens humana, ne tibi tribuas, ne multum superbias; immo ne omnino superbias, o mens humana, quod non consentis desideriis carnis, quod lex peccati non te de arce deponit: Lex spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis. Non te illa lex liberavit, de qua supra dictum est: Ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litterae . Quare illa non liberavit? Nonne et ipsa digito Dei scripta est? Nonne digitus Dei Spiritus Sanctus intellegitur? Lege Evangelium, et vide quia ubi dicit unus evangelista, Domino dicente: Si ego in Spiritu Dei eicio daemonia ; alius dicit: Si ego in digito Dei eicio daemonia . Si ergo et lex illa digito Dei scripta est, hoc est, Spiritu Dei; quo Spiritu victi magi Pharaonis dixerunt: Digitus Dei est hic ; si ergo et ipsa, immo cum et ipsa Spiritu Dei, hoc est, digito Dei conscripta sit, quare non de illa dicitur: Lex enim spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu?
3. 3. There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus (Rom 8:1). Let them not be anxious if they are tickled by unlawful covetings; let them not be anxious that there still seems to be a law in the members fighting against the law of the mind. For there is no condemnation. But for whom? Even now, for whom? For those who are in Christ Jesus. And where is that saying of which he spoke a little before, I see another law in my members fighting against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin which is in my members (Rom 7:23)? But he said me from the flesh, not from the mind. Where, then, is that law, if there is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus? For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus. For the law—not that one on Mount Sinai through the letter; for the law—not that one in the oldness of the letter; but, the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus, has freed you from the law of sin and death. For that you delight in the law of God according to the inner man, whence would you have it, unless the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus freed you from the law of sin and death? Therefore, human mind, do not ascribe it to yourself, do not be too proud—rather, do not be proud at all, O human mind, that you do not consent to the desires of the flesh, that the law of sin does not cast you down from the citadel: The law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:1-2). That law did not free you of which it was said above, That we serve in newness of spirit, and not in oldness of the letter (Rom 7:6). Why did that law not free you? Was it not itself written by the finger of God? Is not the finger of God understood to be the Holy Spirit? Read the Gospel, and see that where one evangelist says, the Lord saying, If I cast out demons by the Spirit of God (Matt 12:28), another says, If I cast out demons by the finger of God (Luke 11:20). If, then, that law too was written by the finger of God—that is, by the Spirit of God; by which Spirit the magicians of Pharaoh, defeated, said, This is the finger of God (Exod 8:19)—if, then, it too, indeed since it too was written by the Spirit of God, that is, the finger of God, why is it not said of it, For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus?
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Lex enim mortis non ipsa dicitur, lex peccati et mortis non illa lex dicitur quae data est in monte Sina. Lex peccati et mortis illa dicitur de qua gemens ait: Video aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae . Sed illa lex, ipsa est quae dicta est: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum. Et subiecit: Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit! Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem; ut fiat supra modum peccator, aut peccatum per mandatum . Quid est: supra modum? Ut addatur praevaricatio. Data est ergo lex illa, ut inveniretur infirmitas. Parum est hoc, non solum ut inveniretur, sed etiam ut augeretur, et vel sic medicus quaereretur. Si enim levis morbus esset, contemneretur; si morbus contemneretur, medicus non quaereretur; si medicus non quaereretur, morbus non finiretur. Ideo ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia ; quae delevit cuncta peccata quae invenit, et ad non peccandum voluntati nostrae conanti adiutorium subministravit; ut ipsa voluntas nostra non in se ipsa, sed in Deo laudaretur. In Deo enim laudabimur tota die : et, In Domino laudabitur anima mea; audiant mites, et iucundentur . Audiant mites: nam superbi et litigiosi non audiunt. Ergo quare non ipsa est lex digito Dei scripta, quae dat adiutorium hoc gratiae, de qua loquimur? Quare? Quia in tabulis lapideis scripta est, non in tabulis cordis carnalibus .
4. 4. The law that is called the law of death—the law of sin and death is not that law which was given on Mount Sinai. The law of sin and death is that of which he says, groaning, I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind (Rom 7:23). But that law is the very one that was called, And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. And he added, Did that which is good, then, become death to me? Far from it! But sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good; that the sinner, or sin, might become beyond measure through the commandment (Rom 7:12-13). What is, beyond measure? That transgression be added. That law was therefore given, that infirmity might be found out. It is too little, this—not only that it be found out, but also that it be increased, and that even so a physician might be sought. For if the disease were slight, it would be despised; if the disease were despised, the physician would not be sought; if the physician were not sought, the disease would not be ended. Therefore, where sin abounded, grace abounded the more (Rom 5:20); which blotted out all the sins it found, and supplied aid to our will as it strove not to sin; so that our will itself might be praised not in itself, but in God. For in God we will be praised all the day (Ps 44:8 (43:9)); and, In the Lord my soul will be praised; let the meek hear, and be glad (Ps 34:2 (33:3)). Let the meek hear: for the proud and the contentious do not hear. Why, then, is it not the law written by the finger of God which gives this help of grace of which we speak? Why? Because it was written on tablets of stone, not on the fleshly tablets of the heart (See 2 Cor 3:3).
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Denique, fratres mei, in magno mysterio videte concordiam, videte distantiam; concordiam legis, distantiam plebis. Celebratur Pascha in veteri populo, sicut nostis, occisione agni cum azymis; ubi occisio ovis Christum significat, azyma autem novam vitam, hoc est, sine vetustate fermenti. Unde nobis Apostolus dicit: Expurgate vetus fermentum, ut sitis nova conspersio, sicut estis azymi; Pascha enim nostrum immolatus est Christus . Celebratum est ergo Pascha in illo veteri populo, nondum in luce fulgente, sed in umbra significante celebratum est; et post quinquaginta dies a celebratione Paschae, sicut computans inveniet qui voluerit, datur lex in monte Sina, scripta digito Dei. Venit verum Pascha, immolatur Christus; transitum facit a morte ad vitam. Transitus enim interpretatur hebraice Pascha; quod expressit Evangelista dicens: Cum autem veniret hora ut transiret Iesus de hoc mundo ad Patrem . Celebratur ergo Pascha, resurgit Dominus, facit transitum a morte ad vitam, quod est Pascha; et numerantur quinquaginta dies, et venit Spiritus Sanctus, digitus Dei.
5. 5. In short, my brothers, in a great mystery see the concord, see the distance; the concord of the law, the distance of the people. The Passover is celebrated among the old people, as you know, by the slaying of a lamb with unleavened bread; where the slaying of the sheep signifies Christ, and the unleavened bread the new life, that is, without the oldness of leaven. Hence the Apostle says to us, Cleanse out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, as you are unleavened; for Christ our Passover has been sacrificed (1 Cor 5:7). The Passover, then, was celebrated among that old people, not yet celebrated in the shining light, but in the signifying shadow; and fifty days after the celebration of the Passover, as one who wishes will find by counting, the law is given on Mount Sinai, written by the finger of God. The true Passover came, Christ is sacrificed; he makes a passing over from death to life. For "Passover" is interpreted in Hebrew as "passing over"; which the Evangelist expressed, saying, But when the hour came for Jesus to pass over from this world to the Father (John 13:1). The Passover, then, is celebrated, the Lord rises again, makes a passing over from death to life, which is the Passover; and fifty days are counted, and the Holy Spirit comes, the finger of God.
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Sed videte ibi quomodo, et hic quomodo. Ibi plebs longe stabat, timor erat, amor non erat. Nam usque adeo timuerunt, ut dicerent ad Moysen: Loquere tu ad nos, et non nobis loquatur Dominus, ne moriamur . Descendit ergo, sicut scriptum est, Deus in Sina in igne; sed plebem longe stantem territans, et digito suo scribens in lapide , non in corde. Huc autem quando venit Spiritus Sanctus, congregati erant fideles in unum; nec in monte terruit, sed intravit in domum. De caelo quidem factus est subito sonus, quasi ferretur flatus vehemens; sonuit, sed nullus expavit. Audisti sonum, vide et ignem; quia et in monte utrumque erat, et ignis et sonitus; sed illic etiam fumus, hic vero ignis serenus. Visae sunt enim illis, inquit Scriptura, linguae divisae, velut ignis. Numquid de longinquo territans? Absit! Nam insedit super unumquemque eorum, et coeperunt linguis loqui, sicut Spiritus dabat eis pronuntiare . Audi linguam loquentem, et intellege Spiritum, non in lapide, sed in corde scribentem. Lex ergo spiritus vitae, scripta in corde, non in lapide; in Christo Iesu, in quo celebratum est verissimum Pascha: liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis . Nam ut noveris ipsam esse distantiam evidentissimam Veteris et Novi Testamenti; unde et dicit Apostolus: Non in tabulis lapideis, sed in tabulis cordis carnalibus . Dominus apud Prophetam dicit: Ecce dies veniunt, dicit Dominus, et consummabo super domum Iacob testamentum novum, non secundum testamentum quod constitui patribus eorum, in die qua apprehendi manum eorum, et duxi eos de terra Aegypti. Deinde ipsam differentiam evidenter ostendens: Dans, inquit, leges meas in cordibus eorum; in cordibus, inquit, eorum superscribam eas . Si ergo scribatur lex Dei in corde tuo, non foris terreat, sed intus mulceat; tunc Lex spiritus vitae in Christo Iesu liberavit te a lege peccati et mortis .
6. 6. But see how it was there, and how it was here. There the people stood far off, there was fear, there was no love. For they feared so much that they said to Moses, You speak to us, and let not the Lord speak to us, lest we die (Exod 20:19). So God came down, as it is written, on Sinai in fire; but terrifying the people who stood far off, and writing with his finger on stone (See Exod 19:18; 31:18), not on the heart. But here, when the Holy Spirit came, the faithful were gathered together in one place; nor did he terrify on a mountain, but entered into the house. From heaven, indeed, a sound was suddenly made, as of a violent blast being borne; it sounded, but no one was terrified. You have heard the sound, see also the fire; for on the mountain too there were both, both fire and sound; but there also smoke, here a serene fire. There appeared to them, says Scripture, divided tongues, as of fire. Surely not terrifying from afar? Far from it! For it sat upon each one of them, and they began to speak in tongues, as the Spirit gave them to utter (Acts 2:2-4). Hear the tongue speaking, and understand the Spirit writing, not on stone, but on the heart. The law, then, of the spirit of life, written on the heart, not on stone; in Christ Jesus, in whom the truest Passover was celebrated, has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:2). For that you may know that this is the most evident distance between the Old and New Testaments—whence the Apostle also says, Not on tablets of stone, but on the fleshly tablets of the heart (2 Cor 3:3)—the Lord says through the Prophet, Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, and I will complete over the house of Jacob a new testament, not according to the testament that I established with their fathers, on the day when I took their hand and led them out of the land of Egypt. Then, showing the very difference plainly: Giving, he says, my laws into their hearts; into their hearts, he says, I will inscribe them (Jer 31:31-33; Heb 8:8-10). If, then, the law of God be written in your heart, that it may not terrify from without, but soothe within; then the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed you from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:2).
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. Quod enim impossibile erat legis . Hoc enim sequitur in lectione Apostoli: Quod impossibile erat legis. Et ne ipsa culparetur, quid subiunxit? In quo infirmabatur per carnem. Lex enim iubebat, et non implebat; quia caro, ubi non erat gratia, invictissime resistebat. Et lex infirmabatur per carnem, quia lex spiritalis est; ego autem carnalis sum . Quomodo ergo lex mihi opitularetur iubens per litteram, et non dans gratiam? Infirmabatur per carnem. Quid fecit Deus, cum hoc impossibile esset legis, et infirmaretur per carnem? Deus Filium suum misit. Per quid infirmabatur lex, et propter quid erat hoc impossibile legis? Infirmabatur per carnem. Quid ergo Deus? Contra carnem misit carnem; immo etiam pro carne misit carnem. Peccatum enim carnis occidit, carnis substantiam liberavit. Misit Deus Filium suum in similitudinem carnis peccati . In carne quidem vera, sed non in carne peccati. Quid autem: in similitudinem carnis peccati? Id est, ut esset caro, vera caro. Et unde similitudo carnis peccati? Quia de peccato mors: mors est utique in omni carne peccati; de qua dicit Apostolus: Ut evacuaretur corpus peccati . Quia ergo mors est in omni carne peccati: sed utrumque ibi est, et mors et peccatum in carne cetera. In carne peccati et mors est, et peccatum; in similitudine carnis peccati mors erat, et peccatum non erat. Si enim caro peccati esset, et merito peccati poenam mortis lueret, non diceret ipse Dominus: Ecce venit princeps mundi, et in me nihil inveniet . Quare ergo me occidit? Quia quae non rapui, tunc exsolvebam . Prorsus quod fecit de tributo, hoc fecit de morte. Exigebatur tributum, didrachma: Quare, inquit, tu et discipuli tui non redditis tributum? Vocavit ad se Petrum, et ait ei: Reges mundi a quibus exigunt tributum? a filiis suis, an ab alienis? Responsum est: Ab alienis. Ergo, inquit, liberi sunt filii. Tamen ne scandalizemus eos, vade ad mare, mitte hamum, et qui primus surrexerit, id est, primogenitus a mortuis; aperi, inquit, os eius, et invenies ibi staterem, id est, duas didrachmas, quattuor drachmas; quia didrachma, id est, duae drachmae, in caput exigebatur. Invenies ibi staterem, hoc est, quattuor drachmas, da eis pro me et te . Quid est: Pro me et te? Ipse Christus, Petrus, Ecclesia Christi, Ecclesiae quattuor Evangelia. Mysterium latebat: Christus tamen tributum non debitum persolvebat. Sic persolvit et mortem: non debebat, et persolvebat. Ille nisi indebitum solveret, numquam nos a debito liberaret.
7. 7. For what was impossible for the law. For this follows in the reading of the Apostle: What was impossible for the law. And lest the law itself be blamed, what did he add? In which it was weakened through the flesh. For the law commanded, and did not fulfill; because the flesh, where there was no grace, resisted most unconquerably. And the law was weakened through the flesh, because the law is spiritual; but I am carnal (Rom 7:14). How, then, would the law aid me, commanding through the letter, and not giving grace? It was weakened through the flesh. What did God do, since this was impossible for the law, and it was weakened through the flesh? God sent his Son. Through what was the law weakened, and on account of what was this impossible for the law? It was weakened through the flesh. What, then, did God do? Against the flesh he sent flesh; rather, also for the flesh he sent flesh. For he slew the sin of the flesh, he freed the substance of the flesh. God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh (Rom 8:3). In true flesh indeed, but not in the flesh of sin. But what is, in the likeness of sinful flesh? That is, that it was flesh, true flesh. And whence the likeness of sinful flesh? Because from sin comes death: death is surely in all sinful flesh; of which the Apostle says, That the body of sin might be destroyed (Rom 6:6). Because, then, death is in all sinful flesh: but both are there, both death and sin, in the rest of flesh. In sinful flesh there are both death and sin; in the likeness of sinful flesh there was death, and there was not sin. For if it were sinful flesh, and were paying the penalty of death by the desert of sin, the Lord himself would not say, Behold, the prince of the world comes, and in me he will find nothing (John 14:30). Why, then, did he kill me? Because what I did not seize, I was then paying back (Ps 69:4 (68:5)). Plainly, what he did about the tribute, this he did about death. The tribute was demanded, the didrachma: Why, it was said, do you and your disciples not pay the tribute? He called Peter to him and said to him, The kings of the world, from whom do they demand tribute? From their sons, or from strangers? It was answered, From strangers. Therefore, he said, the sons are free. Yet, lest we give them offense, go to the sea, cast a hook, and the first that comes up—that is, the firstborn from the dead—open, he said, its mouth, and you will find there a stater—that is, two didrachmas, four drachmas; because a didrachma, that is, two drachmas, was demanded per head. You will find there a stater, that is, four drachmas; give it to them for me and you (Matt 17:24-27). What is, for me and you? Christ himself, Peter, the Church of Christ; the four Gospels of the Church. The mystery lay hidden: yet Christ paid a tribute not owed. So too he paid death: he did not owe it, and he paid it. Unless he had paid what was not owed, he would never have freed us from the debt.
Sermons5.7.7
8. 8. Quod ergo impossibile erat legis, quae faciebat praevaricatorem, quia nondum mens convicta quaesierat Salvatorem; in quo infirmabatur per carnem, misit Deus Filium suum in similitudinem carnis peccati, et de peccato damnavit peccatum in carne . Quomodo ergo non habebat peccatum, si de peccato damnavit peccatum? Iam aliquando exposuimus vobis hoc , sed qui meminerunt, recognoscant; qui non audierunt, audiant; qui obliti sunt, recolant. Peccatum vocabatur in lege sacrificium pro peccato. Assidue lex hoc commemorat; non semel, non iterum, sed saepissime peccata dicebantur sacrificia pro peccatis. Tale peccatum erat Christus. Quid enim dicamus? Peccatum habebat? Absit! Peccatum non habebat, et peccatum erat. Peccatum erat, dixi, secundum illam intellegentiam, quia sacrificium pro peccato. Audi quia hoc modo peccatum erat, ipsum Apostolum audi. De illo loquens ait: Eum qui non noverat peccatum. Ipsam sententiam vobis exponebam, quando ista dicebam: Eum, inquit, qui non noverat peccatum, id est, Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, Deus Pater eum qui non noverat peccatum, pro nobis peccatum fecit; eum ipsum Christum qui non noverat peccatum, Deus Pater pro nobis peccatum fecit, ut nos simus iustitia Dei in ipso . Videte duo, iustitia Dei, non nostra; in ipso, non in nobis. Inde illi magni sancti, de quibus dicit Psalmus: Iustitia tua sicut montes Dei. Et quasi diceretur in ipso Psalmo, ubi dictum est: Iustitia tua; non enim iustitia eorum, sed: Iustitia tua velut montes Dei. Levavi enim oculos meos in montes, unde veniet auxilium mihi; sed non a montibus: Auxilium enim meum a Domino; qui fecit caelum et terram ; ergo cum dixisset: Iustitia tua sicut montes Dei; quasi quaereretur: Utquid ergo alii nascuntur qui non pertinent ad iustitiam Dei? subiecit: Iudicia tua sicut multa abyssus . Quid est: sicut multa abyssus? Altum est, impenetrabile est, inaccessum est humanae intentioni. Divitiae enim Dei inscrutabiles; inscrutabilia iudicia eius, investigabiles viae eius . Ergo et hic: Misit Deus Filium suum, propter praescitos, et praedestinatos, vocandos, iustificandos, glorificandos: ut montes Dei dicant: Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? Misit Deus Filium suum in similitudinem carnis peccati, et de peccato damnavit peccatum in carne, ut iustitia legis impleretur in nobis . Non implebatur per se, impleta est per Christum. Non enim venit legem solvere, sed implere .
8. 8. What, then, was impossible for the law, which made a transgressor, because the mind, not yet convicted, had not sought the Savior; in which it was weakened through the flesh, God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and from sin condemned sin in the flesh (Rom 8:3). How, then, did he not have sin, if from sin he condemned sin? We have already expounded this to you at one time, but let those who remember recognize it; let those who did not hear, hear it; let those who have forgotten, recall it. In the law a sacrifice for sin was called sin. The law constantly mentions this; not once, not twice, but very often the sacrifices for sins were called sins. Such a sin was Christ. For what shall we say? Did he have sin? Far from it! He did not have sin, and he was sin. He was sin, I said, according to that understanding, because a sacrifice for sin. Hear that he was sin in this way—hear the Apostle himself. Speaking of him, he says, Him who knew no sin. I was expounding this very saying to you when I said these things: Him, he says, who knew no sin—that is, our Lord Jesus Christ—God the Father made him who knew no sin sin for us; him, this same Christ who knew no sin, God the Father made sin for us, that we might be the righteousness of God in him (2 Cor 5:21). See two things: the righteousness of God, not ours; in him, not in us. Hence those great saints, of whom the Psalm says, Your righteousness is like the mountains of God. And as though it were said in that very Psalm, where it was said, Your righteousness—for not their righteousness, but, Your righteousness is like the mountains of God. For I lifted up my eyes to the mountains, from where my help will come; but not from the mountains: For my help is from the Lord, who made heaven and earth (Ps 121:1-2 (120:1-2)); therefore when he had said, Your righteousness is like the mountains of God, as though it were asked, Why, then, are others born who do not belong to the righteousness of God? he added, Your judgments are like a great deep (Ps 36:6 (35:7)). What is, like a great deep? It is deep, impenetrable, inaccessible to human striving. For the riches of God are unsearchable; his judgments unsearchable, his ways untraceable (See Rom 11:33). Therefore here too: God sent his Son, on account of the foreknown, and the predestined, to be called, to be justified, to be glorified: that the mountains of God may say, If God is for us, who is against us (Rom 8:31)? God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and from sin condemned sin in the flesh, that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us (Rom 8:3-4). It was not fulfilled of itself; it was fulfilled through Christ. For he came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it (See Matt 5:17).
Sermons5.8.8
9. 9. Sed quomodo iustitia legis impleretur in nobis, vel quomodo impletur nobis, vel quibus nobis? Vis audire in quibus nobis? Qui non secundum carnem ambulamus, sed secundum spiritum . Quid est: secundum carnem ambulare? Carnalibus concupiscentiis consentire. Quid est: secundum spiritum ambulare? Adiuvari spiritu in mente, et concupiscentiis carnis non oboedire. Sic ergo impletur in nobis lex, impletur in nobis iustitia Dei. Modo interim impletur: Post concupiscentias tuas non eas . Post concupiscentias tuas, cum audis, illicitas accipe. Post concupiscentias tuas non eas, debet impleri ex voluntate nostra adiuta gratia Dei; debet impleri: Post concupiscentias tuas non eas. Quidquid enim illa concupiscentia carnis egit in nobis praeteritorum peccatorum, sive in factis, sive in dictis, sive in cogitationibus; totum deletum est sacro Baptismate; omnia debita delevit una indulgentia. Restat ergo cum carne conflictus: quia deleta est iniquitas, sed manet infirmitas. Inest, titillat delectatio illicitae concupiscentiae; pugna, resiste, noli consentire; et impletur hic: Post concupiscentias tuas non eas; quia et si quando subrepunt, et usurpant sibi oculum, aurem, linguam, volaticam cogitationem, nec sic desperemus de salute nostra. Ideo quotidie dicimus: Dimitte nobis debita nostra . Iustitia, inquit, legis impleretur in nobis.
9. 9. But how is the righteousness of the law fulfilled in us, or how is it fulfilled in us, or in which of us? Do you wish to hear in which of us? Who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the spirit (Rom 8:4). What is it to walk according to the flesh? To consent to carnal covetings. What is it to walk according to the spirit? To be aided by the spirit in the mind, and not to obey the covetings of the flesh. Thus, then, the law is fulfilled in us, the righteousness of God is fulfilled in us. For now, meanwhile, this is fulfilled: Do not go after your desires (Sir 18:30). After your desires—when you hear this, understand the unlawful ones. Do not go after your desires ought to be fulfilled out of our will, aided by the grace of God; it ought to be fulfilled, Do not go after your desires. For whatever that coveting of the flesh did in us of past sins, whether in deeds, or in words, or in thoughts, all was blotted out by holy Baptism; one act of forgiveness blotted out all the debts. There remains, then, the conflict with the flesh: because the iniquity has been blotted out, but the infirmity remains. The delight of unlawful coveting is within, it tickles; fight, resist, do not consent; and here is fulfilled, Do not go after your desires; because even if at some time they creep up and usurp for themselves the eye, the ear, the tongue, the flitting thought, even so let us not despair of our salvation. Therefore we say daily, Forgive us our debts (Matt 6:12). The righteousness, he says, of the law might be fulfilled in us.
Sermons5.9.9
10. 10. Sed in quibus nobis? Qui non secundum carnem ambulamus, sed secundum spiritum. Qui enim secundum carnem sunt, quae carnis sunt sapiunt; qui autem secundum spiritum, quae sunt spiritus. Prudentia enim carnis mors est; prudentia autem spiritus vita et pax. Prudentia enim carnis inimica in Deum. Legi enim Dei non est subiecta: neque enim potest . Quid est: neque enim potest? Non homo non potest, non anima non potest, non denique ipsa caro, quia Dei creatura, non potest; sed prudentia carnis non potest, vitium non potest, non natura. Quomodo si diceres: Claudicatio rectae ambulationi non est subiecta; neque enim potest. Pes potest, sed claudicatio non potest. Tolle claudicationem, et videbis rectam ambulationem. Sed quamdiu claudicatio est, non potest; sic quamdiu prudentia carnis est, non potest. Non sit prudentia carnis, et homo potest. Prudentia spiritus vita et pax. Quod ergo ait: Prudentia carnis inimica in Deum, noli sic accipere, quasi inimica ista possit laedere Deum. Resistendo inimica est, non occidendo. Illi autem nocet, in quo est prudentia carnis; quia vitium naturae nocet, in qua natura inest. Medicina autem ideo inventa est, ut pellatur vitium, et sanetur natura. Venit ergo Salvator ad genus humanum, nullum sanum invenit, ideo magnus medicus venit.
10. 10. But in which of us? Who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the spirit. For those who are according to the flesh savor the things of the flesh; but those who are according to the spirit, the things of the spirit. For the prudence of the flesh is death; but the prudence of the spirit is life and peace. For the prudence of the flesh is hostile to God. For it is not subject to the law of God: for neither can it be (Rom 8:4-7). What is, for neither can it be? It is not that man cannot, not that the soul cannot, not, finally, that the flesh itself—because it is a creation of God—cannot; but the prudence of the flesh cannot; the vice cannot, not the nature. Just as if you said: Limping is not subject to walking straight; for neither can it be. The foot can, but limping cannot. Take away the limping, and you will see walking straight. But as long as the limping is there, it cannot; so as long as the prudence of the flesh is there, it cannot. Let there be no prudence of the flesh, and man can. The prudence of the spirit is life and peace. So, then, that which he says, The prudence of the flesh is hostile to God, do not take as though this hostile thing could harm God. It is hostile by resisting, not by killing. But it harms the one in whom the prudence of the flesh is; because the vice harms the nature in which the nature is. But medicine was found for this reason, that the vice might be driven out, and the nature healed. So the Savior came to the human race, found no one healthy, and therefore the great physician came.
Sermons5.10.10
10. 11. Hoc propterea dixit, quia Manichaei volentes aliam contra Deum inducere naturam mali, aliquantum de hoc Apostoli testimonio errorem suum existimant adiuvari, et putant quasi naturaliter dictum, quia dictum est: Non potest, inimica est in Deum: Legi enim Dei non est subiecta, neque enim potest ; et non attenderunt non de carne dictum esse: non potest; non de homine dictum esse: non potest; non de anima dictum esse: non potest; sed de prudentia carnis. Prudentia ista vitium est.
10. 11. He said this for this reason: that the Manicheans, wishing to introduce another nature of evil against God, think their error somewhat aided by this testimony of the Apostle, and suppose it was said as it were of nature, because it was said, It cannot, it is hostile to God: for it is not subject to the law of God, for neither can it be (Rom 8:7); and they did not notice that it was not said of the flesh, it cannot; not said of man, it cannot; not said of the soul, it cannot; but of the prudence of the flesh. This prudence is a vice.
Sermons5.10.11
11. 11. Vis nosse quid est: Sapere secundum carnem? Mors est . Sed ille ipse unus homo, eademque natura a Domino Deo vero et bono condita, heri sapiebat secundum carnem, hodie sapit secundum spiritum; expulsum est vitium, sanata est natura. Nam quamdiu esset prudentia illa carnis, omnino legi Dei subiecta esse non posset. Quamdiu enim inest per vitium claudicatio, nullo modo potest esse recta ambulatio. Sanato autem vitio, reparata est natura. Fuistis aliquando tenebrae; nunc autem lux in Domino .
11. 11. Do you wish to know what is, To savor according to the flesh? It is death (Rom 8:6). But that one and the same man, the same nature established by the Lord, the true and good God, yesterday savored according to the flesh, today savors according to the spirit; the vice has been driven out, the nature healed. For as long as that prudence of the flesh existed, it could in no way be subject to the law of God. For as long as limping is present through the vice, there can in no way be walking straight. But the vice being healed, the nature is restored. You were once darkness; but now you are light in the Lord (Eph 5:8).
Sermons5.11.11
11. 12. Videte ergo quid sequitur: Qui autem in carne sunt; id est, qui in carne confidunt, qui concupiscentias suas sequuntur, qui in his habitant, qui earum voluptatibus oblectantur, qui in earum delectationibus beatam felicemque vitam constituunt, ipsi sunt in carne; Deo placere non possunt. Non enim sic dictum est: Qui autem in carne sunt, Deo placere non possunt ; quasi dictum esset: In hac vita cum sunt homines, Deo placere non possunt. Ergo non placuerunt sancti Patriarchae? Ergo non placuerunt sancti Prophetae? Ergo non placuerunt sancti Apostoli? Non placuerunt sancti martyres, qui antequam corpus deponerent patiendo, Christum confitendo, non solum voluptatem contemnebant, sed dolores quoque patientissime perferebant? Placuerunt, sed in carne non fuerunt. Portabant carnem, non portabantur a carne. Iam enim paralytico dictum erat: Tolle grabatum tuum . Qui ergo in carne sunt, quemadmodum dixi, quemadmodum iam exposui, non in hoc saeculo vivendo, sed carnis concupiscentiis consentiendo, Deo placere non possunt.
11. 12. See, then, what follows: But those who are in the flesh—that is, those who trust in the flesh, who follow their covetings, who dwell in them, who delight in their pleasures, who place the happy and blessed life in their delights, these are in the flesh—cannot please God. For it was not said, But those who are in the flesh cannot please God, as though it were said: While men are in this life, they cannot please God. Did the holy patriarchs, then, not please? Did the holy prophets, then, not please? Did the holy apostles, then, not please? Did the holy martyrs not please, who, before they laid down the body by suffering, by confessing Christ, not only despised pleasure, but also bore even pains most patiently? They pleased, but they were not in the flesh. They carried the flesh, they were not carried by the flesh. For already it had been said to the paralytic, Take up your bed (Matt 9:6). Those, then, who are in the flesh, as I have said, as I have already expounded—not by living in this age, but by consenting to the covetings of the flesh—cannot please God.
Sermons5.11.12
12. 13. Denique audite ipsum, quaestionem sine ulla dubitatione solventem. Vivens utique in hoc corpore loquebatur; et tamen adiunxit: Vos autem non estis in carne. Putas, est aliquis hic in nobis, cui dictum est? Ecce populo Dei dixit, Ecclesiae dixit; Romanis quidem scribebat, sed universae Christi Ecclesiae dixit; sed tritico dixit, non paleae; massae dixit latenti, non stipulae apparenti. Unusquisque in corde suo agnoscat. Nos auribus loquimur, conscientias non videmus; tamen secundum et quae superius locuti sumus, existimo in nomine Christi esse in plebe Christi quibus dictum est: Vos autem non estis in carne, sed in Spiritu: si tamen Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis . Non estis in carne, quia non facitis opera carnis consentiendo concupiscentiis carnis; sed estis in Spiritu, quia secundum interiorem hominem condelectamini legi Dei; et hoc est: si tamen Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis. Nam si de spiritu vestro praesumitis, adhuc in carne estis. Si ergo non estis in carne, ut in Spiritu Dei sitis; tunc enim in carne non estis. Nam si recedat Spiritus Dei, pondere suo spiritus hominis revolvitur in carnem, redit ad facta carnalia, redit ad concupiscentias saeculares; et erunt illius hominis peiora novissima quam erant prima . Sic ergo habete liberum arbitrium, ut imploretis auxilium. Non estis in carne, et hoc ex viribus vestris? Absit! Unde ergo?
12. 13. In short, hear him resolving the question without any doubt. He was surely speaking while living in this body; and yet he added, But you are not in the flesh. Do you suppose there is anyone here among us to whom it was said? Behold, he said it to the people of God, he said it to the Church; he was writing to the Romans, indeed, but he said it to the whole Church of Christ; but he said it to the wheat, not to the chaff; he said it to the hidden lump, not to the apparent stubble. Let each one recognize it in his own heart. We speak to the ears, we do not see consciences; yet, according to what we have said above, I reckon that in the name of Christ there are in the people of Christ those to whom it was said, But you are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit: if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you (Rom 8:9). You are not in the flesh, because you do not do the works of the flesh by consenting to the covetings of the flesh; but you are in the Spirit, because according to the inner man you delight in the law of God; and this is, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. For if you presume upon your own spirit, you are still in the flesh. If, then, you are not in the flesh, it is that you may be in the Spirit of God; for then you are not in the flesh. For if the Spirit of God withdraws, by its own weight the spirit of man rolls back into the flesh, returns to carnal deeds, returns to worldly covetings; and the last state of that man will be worse than the first (See Luke 11:26). So, then, have free choice in such a way that you implore help. You are not in the flesh—and this from your own strength? Far from it! Whence, then?
Sermons5.12.13
13. 13. Si tamen Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis. Si quis autem Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est eius . Non ergo se extendat, non se iactet, non sibi arroget virtutem propriam, egena et vitiata natura. O humana natura! O Adam, quando sanus eras, non stetisti, et tuis viribus surrexisti? Si quis Spiritum Christi non habet: ipse enim Spiritus Dei, qui Spiritus Christi; et Patris est enim et Filii: Si quis Spiritum Christi non habet, non se fallat, hic non est eius.
13. 13. If indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not his (Rom 8:9). Let not the needy and vitiated nature, then, stretch itself out, boast, arrogate to itself its own virtue. O human nature! O Adam, when you were healthy, did you not stand, and did you rise by your own strength? If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ: for it is the same Spirit of God that is the Spirit of Christ; for it is of both the Father and the Son: If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, let him not deceive himself, he is not his.
Sermons5.13.13
13. 14. Ecce, adiuvante ipsius misericordia, Spiritum Christi habemus; ex ipsa dilectione iustitiae, integra fide, catholica fide, Spiritum Dei nobis inesse cognoscimus. Sed quid de carne illa mortali? Quid de lege in membris nostris repugnante legi mentis? Quid de illo gemitu: Miser ego homo? Audi: Si autem Christus in vobis, corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem vita est propter iustitiam . Ergo de corpore mortuo propter peccatum, iam desperandum est? Nulla spes est? Sic dormit, ut non adiciat ut resurgat . Absit! Corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem vita est propter iustitiam. Remansit tristitia de nostro corpore. Nemo autem carnem suam odio habuit . Videmus quam sollicite curetur sepultura mortuorum. Corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem vita est propter iustitiam. Iam dicebas ad consolationem: Vellem quidem et corpus meum esse in vita; sed quia non potest, sit vel spiritus meus, sit vel anima mea. Exspecta, noli esse sollicitus.
13. 14. Behold, with the help of his own mercy, we have the Spirit of Christ; from the very love of righteousness, by whole faith, catholic faith, we recognize that the Spirit of God is within us. But what of that mortal flesh? What of the law in our members fighting against the law of the mind? What of that groan, Wretched man that I am? Hear: But if Christ is in you, the body indeed is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness (Rom 8:10). Must we then despair of the body, dead because of sin? Is there no hope? Does it so sleep that it does not rise again (See Ps 41:8 (40:9))? Far from it! The body indeed is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness. Sadness remains concerning our body. But no one ever hated his own flesh (Eph 5:29). We see how anxiously the burial of the dead is cared for. The body indeed is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness. Now you were saying, for consolation: I would indeed wish my body too to be in life; but since it cannot be, let at least my spirit be, let at least my soul be. Wait, do not be anxious.
Sermons5.13.14
14. 15. Si enim Spiritus eius qui suscitavit Iesum a mortuis, habitat in vobis; qui suscitavit Christum Iesum a mortuis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra . Quid timetis? Quid etiam pro ipsa carne solliciti estis? Capillus capitis vestri non peribit . Adam peccando damnavit in mortem corpora vestra; sed Iesus, si est Spiritus eius in vobis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra; quia suum sanguinem dedit pro salute vestra. Promissum reddi dubitas, qui tale pignus tenes? sic ergo, homo, non erit mortis illa contentio, sic implebitur quod dictum est: Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Quia Christus Iesus, si Spiritus eius habitat in vobis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra. Sic liberaberis de corpore mortis huius, non corpus non habendo, vel alterum habendo; sed non ulterius moriendo. Si enim non adderet: mortis huius, et diceret: Quis me liberabit de corpore? forte suggereretur error cogitationi humanae, et diceretur: Vides quia non vult Deus nos esse cum corpore? De corpore, inquit, mortis huius. Mortem tolle, et bonum est corpus. Detrahatur mors novissima inimica, et erit mihi in aeternum caro mea amica. Nemo enim umquam carnem suam odio habuit. Etsi spiritus concupiscit contra carnem, et caro concupiscit adversus spiritum ; etsi modo rixa est in ista domo, maritus litigans, non perniciem, sed concordiam quaerit uxoris. Absit! Fratres mei, absit ut spiritus concupiscendo contra carnem oderit carnem. Vitia carnis odit, prudentiam carnis odit, contentionem mortis odit. Corruptibile hoc induat incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induat immortalitatem; seminetur corpus animale, resurgat corpus spiritale ; et videbis plenam perfectamque concordiam, videbis creaturam laudare Creatorem. Si ergo Spiritus eius qui suscitavit Iesum a mortuis, habitat in vobis; qui suscitavit Christum a mortuis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra, propter inhabitantem Spiritum eius qui habitat in vobis ; non propter merita vestra, sed propter munera sua. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
14. 15. For if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you; he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies (Rom 8:11). What do you fear? Why are you anxious even for the flesh itself? A hair of your head will not perish (Luke 21:18). Adam by sinning condemned your bodies to death; but Jesus, if his Spirit is in you, will also give life to your mortal bodies; because he gave his own blood for your salvation. Do you doubt that the promise will be paid, you who hold such a pledge? Thus, then, O man, there will not be that struggle of death; thus will be fulfilled what was said, Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? Because Christ Jesus, if his Spirit dwells in you, will also give life to your mortal bodies. Thus you will be freed from the body of this death, not by not having a body, or by having another; but by no longer dying. For if he had not added, of this death, and had said, Who will free me from the body? perhaps error would be suggested to human thought, and it would be said: You see that God does not wish us to be with a body? From the body, he says, of this death. Take away death, and the body is good. Let death, the last enemy, be taken away, and my flesh will be my friend forever. For no one ever hated his own flesh. Even if the spirit covets against the flesh, and the flesh covets against the spirit (Gal 5:17); even if there is now a quarrel in this house, the quarreling husband seeks not the ruin, but the concord of his wife. Far from it! My brothers, far be it that the spirit, by coveting against the flesh, should hate the flesh. It hates the vices of the flesh, it hates the prudence of the flesh, it hates the struggle of death. Let this corruptible put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality; let the animal body be sown, let the spiritual body rise (See 1 Cor 15:53.44); and you will see full and perfect concord, you will see the creation praising the Creator. If, then, the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you; he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies, on account of his indwelling Spirit who dwells in you (Rom 8:11); not on account of your merits, but on account of his gifts. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.14.15
SERMO 156
Sermon 156
Sermons5.14.15
1. 1. Verbi Dei altitudo exercet studium, non denegat intellectum. Si enim omnia clausa essent, nihil esset unde revelarentur obscura. Rursus si omnia tecta essent, non esset unde alimentum perciperet anima, et haberet vires quibus posset ad clausa pulsare. In lectionibus apostolicis superioribus, quas Caritati vestrae, quantum Dominus adiuvare dignatus est, exposuimus, multum laborem et sollicitudinem passi sumus. Compatiebamur vobis, et solliciti eramus et pro nobis et pro vobis. Quantum autem existimo, adiuvit Dominus et nos et vos; et ea quae prorsus difficillima videbantur, sic per nos enodare dignatus est, ut nulla quaestio remaneret, quae conturbet mentem piam. Impia enim mens odit etiam ipsum intellectum; et homo aliquando nimium mente perversa timet intellegere, ne cogatur quod intellexerit facere. De talibus ait Psalmus: Noluerunt intellegere, ut bene agerent . Vos autem, carissimi, quia bonum est bene sentire de vobis, exigitis intellectum, exigit Deus fructum. Intellectus enim, sicut scriptum est, bonus omnibus facientibus eum . Hoc tamen quod restat et hodie recitatum est, quamvis non habeat tantam difficultatem, quantam habuerunt superiora, quae iam, ut potuimus, adiuvante Domino, transvecti sumus, desiderat tamen intentionem vestram; velut enim conclusio fit, propter illa quae dicta sunt in superioribus lectionibus, ubi laborabatur, ne forte reus constitueretur Apostolus omnium quodammodo peccatorum dicendo: Non enim quod volo ago . Deinde ne lex videretur aut sufficere posse homini habenti liberum arbitrium, etiamsi nullum ultra auxilium divinum porrigeretur, aut certe frustra data fuisse crederetur, dicta est et causa quare sit lex data, quia et ipsa in adiutorium data est, sed non sicut gratia.
1. 1. The loftiness of the word of God exercises study, it does not deny understanding. For if everything were closed, there would be nothing whereby obscure things might be revealed. Again, if everything were uncovered, there would be nothing from which the soul might receive nourishment and have the strength by which it could knock at the closed things. In the earlier apostolic readings, which we expounded to your Charity as far as the Lord deigned to help, we suffered much labor and anxiety. We had compassion on you, and were anxious both for ourselves and for you. But as far as I reckon, the Lord helped both us and you; and the things that seemed utterly most difficult he deigned to untangle through us in such a way that no question remained which might disturb a devout mind. For an ungodly mind hates even understanding itself; and a person, sometimes with a too perverse mind, fears to understand, lest he be compelled to do what he has understood. Of such the Psalm says, They would not understand, that they might do good (Ps 36:3 (35:4)). But you, dearly beloved, because it is good to think well of you, demand understanding; God demands fruit. For good understanding, as it is written, belongs to all who do it (Ps 111:10 (110:10)). Yet this which remains and was recited today, although it does not have such difficulty as the earlier passages had, which we have now, as we could, with the Lord's help, carried across, nevertheless requires your attention; for it is, as it were, a conclusion, on account of the things that were said in the earlier readings, where there was labor lest perchance the Apostle be made guilty, as it were, of all sins by saying, For I do not do what I will (Rom 7:15). Then, lest the law should seem either able to suffice for a man having free choice, even if no further divine help were extended, or be believed to have been given in vain, the reason too was stated why the law was given: because it too was given as a help, but not as grace is.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Data est enim, sicut iam exposuimus, et tenere debetis, et vobis vehementius et diligentius nos commendare debemus; data est ut inveniret se homo, non ut morbus sanaretur, sed ut praevaricatione morbo crescente medicus quaereretur . Et quis est iste medicus, nisi qui dixit: Non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus ? Qui ergo non confitetur Creatorem, negat superbus auctorem. Qui autem negat aegritudinem suam, superfluum iudicat Salvatorem. Ergo et in natura nostra Creatorem laudemus; et propter vitium quod nobis infliximus, Salvatorem quaeramus. Et quomodo quaerimus Salvatorem? Ut det legem? Parum est: Si enim data esset lex quae posset vivificare, omnino esset ex lege iustitia . Si ergo non est data lex quae posset vivificare, quare data est? Sequitur, et ostendit quare sit data: quia etiam sic in adiutorium data est, ne te sanum putares. Si ergo data esset lex, quae posset vivificare, omnino ex lege esset iustitia. Et quasi quaereremus: Quare ergo data est? Sed conclusit, inquit, Scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Iesu Christi daretur credentibus . Quando audis promissorem, exspecta factorem. Idonea fuit humana natura per liberum arbitrium vulnerare se: sed iam vulnerata et saucia, non est idonea per liberum arbitrium sanare se. Si enim volueris intemperanter vivere ut aegrotes, ad hoc medicum non requiris; ad labem sufficis tibi. Cum autem intemperanter agens coeperis esse aegrotus, non sic potes ab aegritudine liberare te, quomodo potuisti per intemperantiam te in aegritudinem praecipitare. Et tamen medicus etiam sano praecipit temperantiam. Bonus medicus hoc facit, non vult esse necessarius aegrotanti. Sic etiam Dominus Deus creato homini sine vitio temperantiam praecipere dignatus est; quam si ille servasset, medicum postea morbo suo non desideraret. Sed quia non servavit, languidus factus est, cecidit; infirmus creavit infirmos, id est: infirmus genuit infirmos. Et tamen in omnibus qui nascuntur infirmis Deus quod bonum est operatur, formando corpus, vivificando corpus, alimenta praebendo, pluviam suam et solem suum super bonos et malos dando; non est unde accusent bonum, nec mali. Insuper etiam genus humanum iusto suo iudicio condemnatum noluit in interitum sempiternum relinquere: sed misit et medicum, misit Salvatorem, misit eum qui gratis sanaret; parum est qui gratis sanaret, qui sanatis etiam mercedem daret. Nihil addi ad istam benevolentiam potest. Quis est qui dicat: Sanem te, et do tibi mercedem? Optime fecit. Sciebat enim se divitem venisse ad pauperem: et sanat aegrotos, et sanatis donat, et non aliud quam se ipsum donat. Salvator est adiutorium languidi, ipse Salvator est praemium sanati.
2. 2. For it was given, as we have already expounded—and you ought to hold it, and we ought to commend it to you more vehemently and diligently—it was given that man might find himself out, not that the disease might be healed, but that, the disease growing through transgression, a physician might be sought. And who is this physician, but the one who said, Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick (Matt 9:12)? Whoever, then, does not confess the Creator, denies in his pride the Author. But whoever denies his own sickness judges the Savior superfluous. Therefore, both in our nature let us praise the Creator, and on account of the vice which we inflicted on ourselves, let us seek the Savior. And how do we seek the Savior? That he may give a law? It is too little: For if a law had been given that could give life, righteousness would surely be from the law (Gal 3:21). If, then, a law was not given that could give life, why was it given? It follows, and he shows why it was given: because even so it was given as a help, lest you should think yourself healthy. If, then, a law had been given that could give life, righteousness would surely be from the law. And as though we asked, Why, then, was it given? But Scripture, he says, has shut up all things under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe (Gal 3:22). When you hear of the one who promises, wait for the one who fulfills. Human nature was fit, through free choice, to wound itself; but, now wounded and injured, it is not fit, through free choice, to heal itself. For if you wish to live intemperately so as to fall sick, you do not need a physician for this; you suffice for your own ruin. But when, acting intemperately, you have begun to be sick, you cannot free yourself from the sickness in the way you were able, through intemperance, to plunge yourself into the sickness. And yet the physician prescribes temperance even to the healthy. The good physician does this; he does not wish to be necessary to the sick. So too the Lord God deigned to prescribe temperance to man, created without vice; which if he had kept, he would not afterward have desired a physician for his disease. But because he did not keep it, he became feeble, he fell; being feeble, he created feeble ones—that is, being feeble, he begot feeble ones. And yet in all who are born feeble God works what is good, forming the body, giving life to the body, providing nourishment, giving his rain and his sun upon the good and the evil; there is no reason why either the good or the evil should accuse the good. Moreover, he was unwilling to leave the human race, condemned by his just judgment, in everlasting destruction: but he sent also a physician, sent a Savior, sent one who would heal freely; it is too little to say one who would heal freely—who would even give a reward to those healed. Nothing can be added to this benevolence. Who is there who says: Let me heal you, and I give you a reward? He did most excellently. For he knew that he, rich, had come to the poor: and he heals the sick, and gives to the healed, and gives nothing other than himself. The Savior is the help of the feeble, the same Savior is the prize of the healed.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Ergo, fratres, quod hodie admoniti estis, debitores sumus non carni, ut secundum carnem vivamus . Ad hoc enim adiuti sumus, ad hoc Spiritum Dei accepimus, ad hoc etiam in laboribus nostris quotidianum adiutorium postulamus. Lex cui minatur non implendo quod iubet, eum facit esse sub se; hi sunt sub lege, non sub gratia. Bona est lex, si quis ea legitime utatur . Quid est ergo: Legitime uti lege? Per legem agnoscere morbum suum, et quaerere ad sanitatem divinum adiutorium. Quia, sicut dixi, et saepe dicendum est: Si lex posset vivificare, omnino ex lege esset iustitia, nec quaereretur salvator, nec veniret Christus, nec sanguine suo ovem perditam quaereret. Sic enim dicit alio loco idem Apostolus: Nam si per legem iustitia, ergo Christus gratis mortuus est . Quae igitur utilitas legis, et quod adiutorium? Quia conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Iesu Christi daretur credentibus. Itaque lex, inquit, paedagogus noster erat in Christo Iesu . Ex ista similitudine rem de qua loquor, attendite. Paedagogus puerum non ducit ad se ipsum, sed ad magistrum; sed cum puer bene institutus iam creverit, sub paedagogo non erit.
3. 3. Therefore, brothers, of which you were admonished today, we are debtors not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh (Rom 8:12). For to this we have been helped, for this we have received the Spirit of God, for this also in our labors we ask daily help. The law, by threatening the one who does not fulfill what it commands, makes him be under itself; these are under the law, not under grace. The law is good, if one uses it lawfully (1 Tim 1:8). What, then, is it to use the law lawfully? Through the law to recognize one's own disease, and to seek divine help for health. Because, as I have said, and it must often be said: If the law could give life, righteousness would surely be from the law (Gal 3:21), and no Savior would be sought, nor would Christ come, nor would he seek with his blood the lost sheep. For so the same Apostle says in another place, For if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died in vain (Gal 2:21). What, then, is the usefulness of the law, and what its help? That Scripture has shut up all things under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. And so the law, he says, was our pedagogue in Christ Jesus (Gal 3:22.24). From this comparison, attend to the matter of which I speak. The pedagogue does not lead the boy to himself, but to the master; but when the boy, well instructed, has grown up, he will not be under the pedagogue.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Tractans de his Apostolus etiam alio loco: valde enim assidue hoc commendat; sed utinam non surdis. Commendat autem hoc assidue, commendans fidem Gentibus; quia fide impetrant adiutorium, ut impleant legem, non per legem, sed vires implendi impetrantes per fidem; ad hoc assidue dicit et commendat ista Apostolus, propter Iudaeos, qui de lege gloriabantur, et libero suo arbitrio legem sufficere arbitrabantur; ac per hoc quia libero suo arbitrio legem sufficere arbitrabantur, ignorantes Dei iustitiam, id est, ex fide iustitiam datam a Deo, et suam volentes statuere, quasi suis viribus impletam, non clamante fide impetratam, iustitiae Dei, sicut dicit, non sunt subiecti. Finis enim legis Christus, ait, ad iustitiam omni credenti . Ergo cum de hic tractat, opposuit sibi: Quid ergo lex? Quasi: Quae utilitas legis? Respondit: Praevaricationis gratia posita est. Hoc est quod dicit alibi: Lex subintravit, ut abundaret delictum. Et ibi quid addidit? Ubi autem abundavit delictum, superabundavit gratia . Quia in leviore aegritudine contemnebatur adiutorium medicinae: crevit morbus, et quaesitus est medicus. Quid ergo lex? Praevaricationis gratia posita est; unde humiliaretur cervix superborum multum sibi tribuentium, et voluntati suae tantum arrogantium, ut sibi liberum arbitrium posse putarent ad iustitiam sufficere: quae tunc quando erat integra libertate, id est, in paradiso, ostendit vires suas, ostendit quantum possent, sed ad ruendum, non ad surgendum. Lex ergo praevaricationis gratia posita est, donec veniret semen cui promissum est, dispositum per angelos in manu Mediatoris .
4. 4. Treating of these matters, the Apostle in another place too (for he commends this very constantly; but would that not to the deaf), he commends this constantly, commending faith to the gentiles, because by faith they obtain help to fulfill the law—not through the law, but obtaining through faith the strength to fulfill it; for this the Apostle constantly says and commends these things, on account of the Jews, who gloried in the law, and thought the law sufficient for their own free choice; and through this, because they thought the law sufficient for their own free choice, being ignorant of the righteousness of God—that is, the righteousness given by God from faith—and wishing to establish their own, as if fulfilled by their own strength, not obtained by crying faith, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God, as he says. For the end of the law is Christ, he says, unto righteousness for everyone who believes (Rom 10:3-4). So when he treats of this, he raised an objection to himself: What, then, of the law? As if: What is the usefulness of the law? He answered, It was placed for the sake of transgression. This is what he says elsewhere, The law crept in, that the offense might abound. And there what did he add? But where the offense abounded, grace abounded the more (Rom 5:20). Because in the lighter sickness the help of medicine was despised: the disease grew, and a physician was sought. What, then, of the law? It was placed for the sake of transgression; whereby the neck of the proud might be humbled—of those who ascribe much to themselves, and arrogate so much to their own will that they think their free choice able to suffice for righteousness: which free choice, when it was in entire liberty, that is, in paradise, showed its strength, showed how much it could do, but for falling, not for rising. The law, then, was placed for the sake of transgression, until the seed should come to whom it was promised, ordained through angels in the hand of a mediator (Gal 3:19).
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Mediator autem unius non est; Deus autem unus est . Quid est: Mediator unius non est? Quia inter duos utique mediator est. Si unus est Deus, et mediator non est unius; inter quid et Deum quaerimus mediatorem? Quia mediator unius non est, Deus autem unus est. Inter quid et quid sit mediator, invenimus ipso Apostolo dicente: Unus enim Deus, et unus mediator Dei et hominum, homo Christus Iesus . Si non iaceres, mediatorem necessarium non haberes: quia vero iaces, et surgere non potes, mediatorem quodammodo Deus tibi porrexit brachium suum. Et brachium Domini cui revelatum est ? Nemo ergo dicat: Quoniam non sumus sub lege, sed sub gratia; ergo peccemus, ergo quod volumus faciamus. Qui hoc dicit, aegritudinem amat, non sanitatem. Gratia medicina est. Qui vult semper aegrotare, ingratus est medicinae. Ergo, fratres, accepto adiutorio, porrecto nobis desuper divino auxilio, brachio Domini, et ipso brachio Domini porrecto nobis auxilio Spiritu Sancto, debitores sumus non carni, ut secundum carnem ambulemus. Quia fides bene operari non potest, nisi per dilectionem. Ipsa est enim fidelium fides, ne sit daemonum fides; quia et daemones credunt, et contremiscunt . Illa est ergo laudabilis fides, ipsa est vera gratiae fides, quae per dilectionem operatur . Ut autem habeamus dilectionem, et ex ea possimus habere bonam operationem, numquid eam nobis dare nos possumus, cum scriptum sit: Caritas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum Sanctum qui datus est nobis ? Caritas usque adeo est donum Dei, ut Deus vocetur, apostolo Ioanne dicente: Deus caritas est, et qui manet in caritate, in Deo manet, et Deus in eo .
5. 5. But a mediator is not of one; God, however, is one (Gal 3:20). What is, A mediator is not of one? Because a mediator is surely between two. If God is one, and a mediator is not of one; between what and God do we seek a mediator? Because a mediator is not of one, but God is one. Between what and what the mediator is, we find by the Apostle himself saying, For there is one God, and one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus (1 Tim 2:5). If you did not lie fallen, you would not have a mediator as necessary; but because you lie fallen and cannot rise, God as it were extended to you his arm as a mediator. And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed (Isa 53:1)? Let no one, then, say: Since we are not under the law, but under grace, therefore let us sin, therefore let us do what we wish. Whoever says this loves sickness, not health. Grace is medicine. Whoever wishes always to be sick is ungrateful to the medicine. Therefore, brothers, the help having been received, the divine aid extended to us from above, the arm of the Lord, and the help, the Holy Spirit, extended to us by that arm of the Lord, we are debtors not to the flesh, to walk according to the flesh (Rom 8:12). Because faith cannot work well except through love. For this is the faith of the faithful, lest it be the faith of demons; for the demons too believe, and tremble (Jas 2:19). That, then, is the praiseworthy faith, that is the true faith of grace, which works through love (Gal 5:6). But that we may have love, and from it may be able to have good action, can we give it to ourselves, when it is written, The love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us (Rom 5:5)? Love is so much the gift of God that God is called love, the apostle John saying, God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him (1 John 4:16).
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Ergo, fratres, debitores sumus non carni, ut secundum carnem vivamus. Si enim secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini . Non quia caro malum est: nam et ipsa Dei creatura est, et ab eo condita a quo et anima; nec illa, nec illa pars Dei, sed et illa et illa creatura Dei. Ergo caro non est malum: sed secundum carnem vivere malum est. Deus summe bonus est, quia summe est qui ait: Ego sum qui sum . Deus ergo summe bonus est: anima magnum bonum, sed non summum bonum. Cum autem audis, Deus summe bonus est, noli putare de Deo tantum Patre dictum, sed de Patre et Filio et Spiritu Sancto. Haec enim Trinitas unum sunt, et unus est Deus, et summe bonus est. Ita plane unus est Deus, ut quando de ipsa Trinitate interrogaris, hoc respondeas: ne forte cum audieris, Unus est Deus, putes ipsum esse Patrem, ipsum esse Filium, ipsum esse Spiritum Sanctum. Non ita est: sed qui Pater est in illa Trinitate, non est Filius; qui Filius est in illa Trinitate, non est Pater; qui Spiritus Sanctus est in illa Trinitate, nec Filius est, nec Pater; sed Spiritus Patris, idemque Spiritus Filii. Ipse est enim unus Spiritus Sanctus et Patris et Filii, coaeternus Patri et Filio, consubstantialis, aequalis. Haec tota Trinitas, unus Deus summe bonus. Anima vero, ut dixi, creata a summo bono, non tamen summum bonum, sed magnum bonum. Item caro nec summum bonum, nec magnum bonum; sed tamen parvum bonum. Anima ergo magnum bonum, sed non summum bonum; vivens inter summum bonum et parvum bonum, id est, inter Deum et carnem, inferior Deo, carne superior; quare non vivit secundum summum bonum, sed vivit secundum parvum bonum? Hoc planius dicitur: Quare non vivit secundum Deum, sed vivit secundum carnem? Debitrix enim est non carni, ut secundum carnem vivat. Caro debet secundum ipsam vivere, non ipsa secundum carnem. Ipsa vivat secundum ipsam, quae vivit de ipsa. Certe unaquaeque secundum hoc vivat, unde vivit. Unde vivit caro tua? De anima tua. Unde vivit anima tua? De Deo tuo. Unaquaeque harum secundum vitam suam vivat. Caro enim sibi non est vita; sed anima carnis est vita. Anima sibi non est vita: sed Deus est animae vita. Anima ergo quae debet secundum Deum vivere; non enim debitrix est carni, ut secundum carnem vivat: ergo quae secundum Deum debet vivere, si secundum se ipsam vivat, deficit; secundum carnem vivit et proficit? Tunc autem recte vivit caro secundum animam, si anima vivat secundum Deum. Nam si anima, non dico secundum carnem, sed secundum se ipsam, ut dixi, voluerit vivere; dicturus vobis sum quid sit secundum se ipsam vivere: bonum est enim, ut hoc noveritis, et valde salubre.
6. 6. Therefore, brothers, we are debtors not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. For if you live according to the flesh, you will die (Rom 8:12-13). Not because the flesh is evil: for it too is a creation of God, and created by the same one by whom the soul too was; neither this nor that is a part of God, but both this and that are a creation of God. The flesh, then, is not evil; but to live according to the flesh is evil. God is supremely good, because he supremely is, who says, I am who am (Exod 3:14). God, then, is supremely good; the soul is a great good, but not the supreme good. But when you hear, God is supremely good, do not suppose it said of God the Father only, but of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. For this Trinity is one, and is one God, and is supremely good. So plainly is God one that when you are asked about that Trinity, you answer this: lest perhaps, when you have heard, God is one, you suppose that the Father himself is the Son, that he himself is the Holy Spirit. It is not so: but he who is the Father in that Trinity is not the Son; he who is the Son in that Trinity is not the Father; he who is the Holy Spirit in that Trinity is neither the Son nor the Father, but the Spirit of the Father and likewise the Spirit of the Son. For he is the one Holy Spirit of both the Father and the Son, coeternal with the Father and the Son, consubstantial, equal. This whole Trinity is one God, supremely good. But the soul, as I said, is created by the supreme good, yet is not the supreme good, but a great good. Likewise the flesh is neither the supreme good nor a great good, but nevertheless a small good. The soul, then, is a great good, but not the supreme good; living between the supreme good and the small good—that is, between God and the flesh, lower than God, higher than the flesh—why does it not live according to the supreme good, but live according to the small good? This is said more plainly: Why does it not live according to God, but live according to the flesh? For it is a debtor not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. The flesh ought to live according to it, not it according to the flesh. Let it live according to that by which it lives. Surely let each thing live according to that whence it lives. Whence does your flesh live? From your soul. Whence does your soul live? From your God. Let each of these live according to its own life. For the flesh is not its own life; but the soul is the life of the flesh. The soul is not its own life; but God is the life of the soul. The soul, then, which ought to live according to God—for it is not a debtor to the flesh, to live according to the flesh: that, then, which ought to live according to God, if it lives according to itself, fails; does it live according to the flesh and prosper? But then the flesh lives rightly according to the soul, if the soul lives according to God. For if the soul, I do not say according to the flesh, but according to itself, as I said, should wish to live; I am going to tell you what it is to live according to itself: for it is good that you know this, and very wholesome.
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. Fuerunt philosophi saeculi huius, alii putaverunt non esse beatitudinem, nisi secundum carnem vivere, et bonum hominis in voluptate corporis posuerunt. Isti philosophi Epicurei dicti sunt, ab Epicuro quodam auctore, magistro suo, et qui alii similes eorum. Exstiterunt autem alii superbi, quasi a carne se removentes, et totam spem beatitudinis suae in anima sua constituentes, posuerunt summum bonum in virtute sua. Vocem Psalmi in vobis affectus pietatis agnovit: scitis, nostis, agnovistis quomodo irrisi sunt in sancto Psalmo: Qui confidunt in virtute sua . Tales fuerunt philosophi, qui Stoici nuncupati sunt. Illi secundum carnem viventes, isti secundum animam viventes, nec illi nec isti secundum Deum viventes. Ideo cum ad urbem Atheniensium, ubi istae philosophorum disciplinae studio et contentione fervebant, venisset apostolus Paulus, sicut in Actibus Apostolorum legitur; ubi vos gaudeo nostrum agnoscendo et recolendo praevenire sermonem, sicut ibi scriptum est: Contulerunt cum illo quidam philosophorum Epicureorum et Stoicorum ; contulerunt cum illo secundum carnem viventes, contulerunt cum illo secundum animam viventes, contulit cum illis secundum Deum vivens. Dicebat Epicureus: Mihi frui carne, bonum est. Dicebat Stoicus: Mihi frui mea mente, bonum est. Dicebat Apostolus: Mihi autem adhaerere Deo, bonum est. Dicebat Epicureus: Beatus cuius est in fructu voluptas carnis eius. Dicebat Stoicus: Immo beatus cuius est in fructu virtus animae eius. Dicebat Apostolus: Beatus cuius est nomen Domini spes eius . Errat Epicureus: falsum est enim, esse hominem beatum, cuius est in fructu voluptas carnis eius. Fallitur et Stoicus: falsum est enim, et omnino mendacissimum, beatum esse hominem, cuius est in fructu virtus animae eius. Beatus ergo cuius est nomen Domini spes eius. Et quia illi vani sunt et mentiuntur: Et non respexit, inquit, in vanitates et insanias mendaces .
7. 7. There were philosophers of this age, some of whom thought there was no happiness except to live according to the flesh, and placed the good of man in the pleasure of the body. These philosophers were called Epicureans, from a certain Epicurus, their author and master, and those others like them. But there were others, proud, as it were removing themselves from the flesh and placing all the hope of their happiness in their own soul, who placed the highest good in their own virtue. The affection of devotion in you has recognized the voice of the Psalm: you know, you are aware, you have recognized how they were mocked in the holy Psalm: Those who trust in their own virtue (Ps 49:6 (48:7)). Such were the philosophers who were called Stoics. Those living according to the flesh, these living according to the soul; neither those nor these living according to God. Therefore, when the apostle Paul had come to the city of the Athenians, where these disciplines of the philosophers were fervent with zeal and contention, as is read in the Acts of the Apostles—where I rejoice to anticipate our sermon by your recognizing and recalling, as it is written there, Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers conferred with him (Acts 17:18): those living according to the flesh conferred with him, those living according to the soul conferred with him; he, living according to God, conferred with them. The Epicurean said: To enjoy the flesh is good for me. The Stoic said: To enjoy my own mind is good for me. The Apostle said: But to cleave to God is good for me. The Epicurean said: Happy the man whose enjoyment is the pleasure of his flesh. The Stoic said: Rather, happy the man whose enjoyment is the virtue of his soul. The Apostle said: Happy the man whose hope is the name of the Lord (Ps 73:28 (72:28); Ps 40:4 (39:5)). The Epicurean errs: for it is false that the man is happy whose enjoyment is the pleasure of his flesh. The Stoic too is deceived: for it is false, and utterly most lying, that the man is happy whose enjoyment is the virtue of his soul. Happy, then, the man whose hope is the name of the Lord. And because those are vain and lie: And he has not looked, it says, upon vanities and lying follies (Ps 40:4 (39:5)).
Sermons5.7.7
8. 8. Ergo, fratres, debitores sumus non carni, ut secundum carnem vivamus, sicut Epicurei. Sed etiam si secundum se ipsam vivere voluerit anima, carnalis erit; carnem sapit, de carne non surgit. Non est enim quemadmodum inde surgat, qui brachium porrectum iacenti non tenet. Si enim secundum carnem vixeritis. Ubi enim dictum est: Quid faciat mihi homo? ibi dictum est: Quid faciat mihi caro ? Si enim secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini. Non ista morte, cum de corpore exitur; ista enim moriemini, etsi secundum spiritum vixeritis: sed illa morte, de qua Dominus in Evangelio terribiliter dicit: Eum timete, qui habet potestatem et animam et corpus perdere in gehennam ignis . Si ergo secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini.
8. 8. Therefore, brothers, we are debtors not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh, like the Epicureans. But even if the soul should wish to live according to itself, it will be carnal; it savors the flesh, it does not rise from the flesh. For there is no way for one to rise from there who does not take hold of the arm extended to him as he lies fallen. For if you live according to the flesh. For where it was said, What can man do to me? there it was said, What can the flesh do to me (See Ps 56:11 (55:12); 56:4 (55:5))? For if you live according to the flesh, you will die. Not by that death, when one goes out of the body; for by that death you will die even if you live according to the spirit: but by that death of which the Lord in the Gospel terribly says, Fear him who has power to destroy both soul and body in the hell of fire (Matt 10:28). If, then, you live according to the flesh, you will die.
Sermons5.8.8
9. 9. Si autem spiritu actiones carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis. Hoc est opus nostrum in hac vita, actiones carnis spiritu mortificare; quotidie affligere, minuere, frenare, interimere. Quam multa enim proficientes non iam delectant, quae antea delectabant? Quando ergo delectabat, et non ei consentiebatur, mortificabatur: quia iam non delectat, mortificatum est. Calca mortuum, transi ad vivum: calca iacentem, conflige cum resistente. Mortua est enim delectatio una, sed vivit altera: et illam, dum non consentis, mortificas; cum coeperit omnino non delectare, mortificasti. Haec est actio nostra, haec est militia nostra. In hoc agone cum confligimus, Deum habemus spectatorem; in hoc agone cum laboramus, Deum poscimus adiutorem. Si enim nos ipse non adiuvat, non dico vincere, sed nec pugnare poterimus.
9. 9. But if by the spirit you put to death the actions of the flesh, you will live (Rom 8:13). This is our work in this life, to put to death the actions of the flesh by the spirit; daily to afflict, lessen, bridle, slay them. For how many things, as we make progress, no longer delight us which delighted us before? When, then, it delighted and was not consented to, it was being put to death; because it now no longer delights, it has been put to death. Trample the dead, pass on to the living; trample the one lying fallen, struggle with the one resisting. For one delight is dead, but another lives: and that one, while you do not consent, you put to death; when it begins not to delight at all, you have put it to death. This is our action, this is our warfare. In this contest, when we struggle, we have God as spectator; in this contest, when we labor, we ask God as helper. For if he himself does not help us, we shall be able—I do not say to conquer—but not even to fight.
Sermons5.9.9
9. 10. Cum ergo dixisset Apostolus: Si autem spiritu actiones carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis; id est, illas concupiscentias carnis, quibus non consentire magna laus est, quas non habere perfectio est: si has actiones carnis morbidas, et de morte habentes contentionem, spiritu mortificaveritis, vivetis. Hic iam metuendum est, ne quisquam rursus ad mortificandas actiones carnis de spiritu suo praesumat. Non solum enim Deus spiritus est: sed et anima tua spiritus est, et mens tua spiritus est. Et cum dicis: Mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati ; quia spiritus concupiscit adversus carnem, et caro adversus spiritum . Ergo ne ad carnis actiones mortificandas de spiritu tuo praesumas, et superbia pereas, et tibi superbo resistatur, non humili gratia concedatur; Deus enim superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam .
9. 10. So when the Apostle had said, But if by the spirit you put to death the actions of the flesh, you will live—that is, those covetings of the flesh, not to consent to which is great praise, not to have which is perfection: if you put to death by the spirit these diseased actions of the flesh, which have the struggle of death—you will live. Here now it must be feared lest anyone again presume upon his own spirit to put to death the actions of the flesh. For not only is God spirit: but your soul too is spirit, and your mind is spirit. And when you say, I serve the law of God with the mind, but the law of sin with the flesh (Rom 7:25); because the spirit covets against the flesh, and the flesh against the spirit (Gal 5:17). Therefore, lest you presume upon your own spirit to put to death the actions of the flesh, and perish by pride, and resistance be made to you, proud, and grace not be granted to you, humble; for God resists the proud, but to the humble he gives grace (Jas 4:6; 1 Pet 5:5).
Sermons5.9.10
10. 10. Ne forte ergo suboriretur tibi ista superbia, vide quid sequatur. Cum enim dixisset: Si spiritu actiones carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis ; ne hic se extolleret humanus spiritus, et ad hoc opus se idoneum firmumque iactaret, subiecit, et ait: Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei . Quid te ergo iam volebas extollere, ubi audisti: Si spiritu actiones carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis? Dicturus enim eras: Hoc potest voluntas mea, hoc potest liberum arbitrium meum. Quae voluntas? Quod liberum arbitrium? Nisi ille regat, cadis: nisi ille erigat, iaces. Quomodo ergo spiritu tuo, cum audias Apostolum dicentem: Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei? Tu te vis agere, a te ipso vis agi ad actiones carnis mortificandas? Quid tibi prodest quia non eris Epicureus, et eris Stoicus? Sive Epicureus eris, sive Stoicus eris, inter filios Dei non eris. Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei. Non qui secundum carnem suam vivunt, non qui secundum spiritum suum vivunt; non qui carnis voluptate ducuntur, non qui spiritu suo aguntur; sed: Quotquot Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei.
10. 10. Lest, then, perchance this pride should arise in you, see what follows. For when he had said, If by the spirit you put to death the actions of the flesh, you will live, lest here the human spirit should exalt itself and boast itself fit and strong for this work, he added and said, For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God (Rom 8:14). Why, then, did you now wish to exalt yourself, where you heard, If by the spirit you put to death the actions of the flesh, you will live? For you were going to say: This my will can do, this my free choice can do. What will? What free choice? Unless he rules, you fall; unless he raises you up, you lie fallen. How, then, by your own spirit, when you hear the Apostle saying, For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God? Do you wish to lead yourself, to be led by yourself to putting to death the actions of the flesh? What does it profit you that you will not be an Epicurean, and will be a Stoic? Whether you are an Epicurean, or a Stoic, you will not be among the sons of God. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God. Not those who live according to their own flesh, not those who live according to their own spirit; not those who are led by the pleasure of the flesh, not those who are led by their own spirit; but, As many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.
Sermons5.10.10
11. 11. Dicit mihi aliquis: Ergo agimur, non agimus. Respondeo: Immo et agis, et ageris; et tunc bene agis, si a bono agaris. Spiritus enim Dei qui te agit, agenti adiutor est tibi. Ipsum nomen adiutoris praescribit tibi, quia et tu ipse aliquid agis. Agnosce quid poscas; agnosce quid confitearis, quando dicis: Adiutor meus esto, ne derelinquas me . Adiutorem utique invocas Deum. Nemo adiuvatur, si ab illo nihil agatur. Quotquot enim, inquit, Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei : non littera, sed Spiritu; non lege praecipiente, minante, promittente, sed Spiritu exhortante, illuminante, adiuvante. Scimus, inquit idem Apostolus, quia diligentibus Deum omnia cooperantur in bonum . Si non esses operator, ille non esset cooperator.
11. 11. Someone says to me: Then we are led, we do not lead. I answer: Rather, you both lead and are led; and then you lead well, if you are led by the good one. For the Spirit of God who leads you is a helper to you as you lead. The very name "helper" prescribes to you that you yourself too do something. Recognize what you ask; recognize what you confess, when you say, Be my helper, do not forsake me (Ps 27:9 (26:9)). Surely you call upon God as helper. No one is helped if nothing is done by him. For as many, he says, as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God: not by the letter, but by the Spirit; not by the law commanding, threatening, promising, but by the Spirit exhorting, enlightening, helping. We know, says the same Apostle, that for those who love God all things work together for good (Rom 8:28). If you were not a worker, he would not be a co-worker.
Sermons5.11.11
11. 12. Sed hic fortiter vigilate, ne forte dicat spiritus vester: Si subtraxerit se cooperatio Dei et adiutorium Dei, spiritus meus facit hoc; etsi cum labore, etsi cum aliqua difficultate potest, tamen implere potest. Quomodo si aliquis dicat: Remis quidem pervenimus, sed cum aliquo labore, o si ventum habeamus, facilius pervenimus. Non sic est adiutorium Dei, non sic est adiutorium Christi, non sic est adiutorium Spiritus Sancti. Prorsus si defuerit, nihil boni agere poteris. Agis quidem illo non adiuvante libera voluntate, sed male. Ad hoc idonea est voluntas tua, quae vocatur libera, et male agendo fit damnabilis ancilla. Cum dico tibi: Sine adiutorio Dei nihil agis, nihil boni dico. Nam ad male agendum habes sine adiutorio Dei liberam voluntatem: quamquam non est illa libera. A quo enim quis devictus est, huic et servus addictus est ; et: Omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati; et: Si vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis .
11. 12. But here keep watch strongly, lest perchance your spirit say: If the cooperation of God and the help of God withdraws, my spirit does this; even if with labor, even if with some difficulty it can, yet it can fulfill it. As if someone should say: We arrived indeed by oars, but with some labor; oh, if we have wind, we arrive more easily. Not so is the help of God, not so is the help of Christ, not so is the help of the Holy Spirit. Plainly, if it is lacking, you will be able to do nothing good. You do indeed act with him not helping, by free will, but badly. For this your will, which is called free, is fit, and by acting badly becomes a condemnable slave. When I say to you, Without the help of God you do nothing, I say nothing good. For toward acting badly you have free will without the help of God; although that is not free. For by whom anyone has been overcome, to him also has he been assigned as a slave (2 Pet 2:19); and, Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin; and, If the Son frees you, then you will be truly free (John 8:34.36).
Sermons5.11.12
12. 13. Prorsus hoc credite, sic vos agere bona voluntate. Quia vivitis, utique agitis. Non enim adiutor est ille, si nihil agatis: non enim cooperator est ille, si nihil operamini. Sic vos tamen scitote agere bona, ut sit rector Spiritus adiutor; qui si defuerit, nihil boni omnino agere valeatis. Non sicut quidam dicere coeperunt, qui coarctati sunt aliquando gratiam confiteri; et benedicimus Deum, quia vel hoc aliquando dixerunt; accedendo enim proficere poterunt, et ad id quod vere rectum est pervenire. Iam ergo dicunt adiutricem esse gratiam Dei, ad facilius facienda. Ista sunt enim verba eorum: " Ad hoc dedit ", inquiunt, " Deus gratiam suam hominibus, ut quod facere iubentur per liberum arbitrium, facilius possint implere per gratiam " . Velo facilius, remo difficilius: tamen et remo itur. Iumento facilius, pedibus difficilius: sed tamen et pedibus pervenitur. Non est sic. Magister enim verus qui neminem palpat, neminem fallit, verax doctor idemque Salvator, ad quem nos duxit molestissimus paedagogus; cum de bonis operibus, id est, de sarmentorum et palmitum fructibus loqueretur, non ait: Sine me quidem potestis facere aliquid, sed facilius per me; non ait: Fructum vestrum sine me potestis facere, sed uberiorem per me. Non hoc dixit. Legite quid dixerit: Evangelium sanctum est, omnium superba colla subduntur. Non haec dicit Augustinus, haec dicit Dominus. Quid dicit Dominus? Sine me nihil potestis facere . Iam nunc cum auditis : Quotquot Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei, nolite vos demittere. Neque enim templum suum sic de vobis aedificat Deus, quasi de lapidibus qui non habent motum suum: levantur, ab structore ponuntur. Non sic sunt lapides vivi: Et vos tamquam lapides vivi coaedificamini in templum Dei . Ducimini, sed currite et vos; ducimini, sed sequimini; quia cum secuti fueritis, verum erit illud, quia sine illo nihil facere potestis. Non enim volentis, neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei .
12. 13. Believe this plainly, that you so act with a good will. Because you live, surely you act. For he is not a helper if you do nothing: for he is not a co-worker if you work nothing. Yet know that you so do good that the ruling Spirit is the helper; who, if he is lacking, you can do nothing good at all. Not as certain people have begun to say, who were at one time constrained to confess grace; and we bless God, because at least at one time they said this; for by coming nearer they will be able to make progress, and to arrive at that which is truly right. Already, then, they say that the grace of God is a help, for doing things more easily. For these are their words: "For this," they say, "God gave his grace to people, that what they are commanded to do through free choice they might be able to fulfill more easily through grace." By sail more easily, by oar more laboriously: yet one goes by oar too. By beast more easily, on foot more laboriously: but yet one arrives on foot too. It is not so. For the true Master, who flatters no one, deceives no one, the truthful teacher and likewise Savior, to whom the most troublesome pedagogue led us; when he spoke of good works—that is, of the fruits of the branches and shoots—did not say: Without me you can indeed do something, but more easily through me; did not say: You can do your fruit without me, but more abundantly through me. He did not say this. Read what he said: the Gospel is holy, the proud necks of all are subdued. It is not Augustine who says these things, it is the Lord who says them. What does the Lord say? Without me you can do nothing (John 15:5). Now then, when you hear, As many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God, do not let yourselves down. For God does not so build his temple out of you as out of stones that have no motion of their own: they are lifted, they are placed by the builder. Living stones are not like this: And you, like living stones, are built up into a temple of God (1 Pet 2:5). You are led, but run also yourselves; you are led, but follow; because when you have followed, that will be true, that without him you can do nothing. For it is not, he says, of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy (Rom 9:16).
Sermons5.12.13
13. 14. Forte dicturi eratis: Et lex sufficit nobis. Lex timorem dedit: et videte quid hinc subiunxit Apostolus, cum diceret: Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei ; quia cum Spiritu Dei aguntur, caritate aguntur: Caritas enim Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum Sanctum qui datus est nobis; secutus adiunxit: Non enim accepistis spiritum servitutis iterum in timore . Quid est: iterum? Quomodo terrente molestissimo paedagogo. Quid est: iterum? Sicut in monte Sina accepistis spiritum servitutis. Dicit aliquis: Alius est spiritus servitutis, alius spiritus libertatis. Si alius esset, non diceret Apostolus: iterum. Idem ergo spiritus, sed in tabulis lapideis in timore, in tabulis cordis in dilectione. Iam nudiustertius qui adfuistis audistis, quomodo longe positam plebem, voces, ignis, fumus in monte terrebat ; quomodo autem veniens Spiritus Sanctus, idem ipse digitus Dei, quinquagesimo die post umbram Paschae quomodo venerit, et igneis linguis super unumquemque eorum insederit . Iam ergo non in timore, sed in dilectione; ut non servi, sed filii simus. Qui enim adhuc ideo bene agit, quia poenam timet, Deum non amat, nondum est inter filios; utinam tamen vel poenam timeat. Timor servus est, caritas libera est; et ut sic dicamus, timor est servus caritatis. Ne possideat diabolus cor tuum, praecedat servus in corde tuo, et servet dominae venturae locum. Fac, fac vel timore poenae, si nondum potes amore iustitiae. Veniet domina, et servus abscedet; quia: Consummata caritas foras mittit timorem . Non enim accepistis spiritum servitutis iterum in timore. Novum Testamentum est, non Vetus. Vetera transierunt, et ecce nova facta sunt omnia; omnia autem ex Deo .
13. 14. Perhaps you were going to say: The law too suffices for us. The law gave fear: and see what the Apostle added on this, when he said, For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God; because when they are led by the Spirit of God, they are led by love—for the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us (Rom 5:5)—he went on to add, For you have not received a spirit of slavery again unto fear (Rom 8:15). What is, again? As under the terrifying, most troublesome pedagogue. What is, again? As on Mount Sinai you received a spirit of slavery. Someone says: The spirit of slavery is one, the spirit of liberty another. If it were another, the Apostle would not say, again. The same Spirit, then, but on the tablets of stone in fear, on the tablets of the heart in love. Now, the day before yesterday, you who were present heard how the voices, the fire, the smoke on the mountain terrified the people set far off (See Exod 19:16-18); but how, when the Holy Spirit came—the same finger of God—on the fiftieth day after the shadow of the Passover, how it came and sat in fiery tongues upon each one of them (See Acts 2:1-4). Now, then, not in fear, but in love; that we may be not slaves, but sons. For whoever still acts well only because he fears punishment does not love God, is not yet among the sons; but would that he at least fear punishment. Fear is a slave, love is free; and, so to speak, fear is the slave of love. Lest the devil possess your heart, let the slave go before in your heart, and keep the place for the mistress who is to come. Do, do it even from fear of punishment, if you cannot yet from love of righteousness. The mistress will come, and the slave will depart; because perfect love casts out fear (1 John 4:18). For you have not received a spirit of slavery again unto fear. It is the New Testament, not the Old. The old things have passed away, and behold, all things have been made new; but all things are from God (2 Cor 5:17-18).
Sermons5.13.14
14. 15. Denique quid sequitur? Quid ergo accepimus, quasi diceres: Sed accepistis Spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba, Pater . Dominus timetur, pater amatur. Accepistis Spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba, Pater. Clamor iste cordis est, non faucium, non labiorum; intus sonat, auribus Dei sonat. Clauso ore, labiisque immotis, Susanna ista voce clamabat . Sed accepistis Spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba, Pater. Cor clamet : Pater noster qui es in caelis . Ergo quare non tantum Pater? Quid sibi vult: Abba, Pater? Si enim quaeras quid sit: Abba, respondetur tibi: Pater. Abba enim hebraice pater dicitur. Quare voluit utrumque Apostolus ponere? Quia videbat lapidem angularem, quem reprobaverunt aedificantes, et factus est in caput anguli , non sine causa angularem dictum, nisi quia in osculum recipit utrumque parietem de diverso venientem. Hinc circumcisio, inde praeputium, tantum a se et inter se longe, quantum ab angulo longe; quantum autem ad angulum prope, et inter se utique prope; in angulo autem inter se iuncti. Ipse est enim pax nostra, qui fecit utraque unum . Ergo inde circumcisio, inde praeputium, parietum concordia, anguli gloria. Accepistis Spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba, Pater.
14. 15. In short, what follows? What, then, have we received—as though you were saying that: But you have received the Spirit of the adoption of sons, in whom we cry: Abba, Father (Rom 8:15). A master is feared, a father is loved. You have received the Spirit of the adoption of sons, in whom we cry: Abba, Father. This cry is of the heart, not of the throat, not of the lips; it sounds within, it sounds to the ears of God. With closed mouth and unmoving lips, Susanna cried out with this voice (See Dan 13:35; 13:42-44). But you have received the Spirit of the adoption of sons, in whom we cry: Abba, Father. Let the heart cry, Our Father who are in heaven (Matt 6:9). Why, then, not only Father? What does Abba, Father mean? For if you ask what Abba is, it is answered to you: Father. For "Abba" in Hebrew is "father." Why did the Apostle wish to put both? Because he saw the cornerstone, which the builders rejected, and it has become the head of the corner (Ps 118:22 (117:22); Matt 21:42)—not called the cornerstone without cause, except because it receives in a kiss each wall coming from a different direction. On one side circumcision, on the other uncircumcision, as far from each other and between themselves as they are far from the corner; but as near to the corner, so surely near to each other; but in the corner joined together between themselves. For he himself is our peace, who made both one (Eph 2:14). Therefore, on one side circumcision, on the other uncircumcision, the concord of the walls, the glory of the corner. You have received the Spirit of the adoption of sons, in whom we cry: Abba, Father.
Sermons5.14.15
15. 16. Qualis res est, si pignus tale est? Nec pignus, sed arrha dicenda est. Pignus enim quando ponitur, cum fuerit res ipsa reddita pignus aufertur. Arrha autem de ipsa re datur, quae danda promittitur; ut res quando redditur, impleatur quod datum est, non mutetur. Unusquisque ergo attendat cor suum, utrum ex intimis cordis medullis et sincera caritate dicat: Pater. Non modo quaeritur quanta sit ipsa caritas, utrum magna, an parva, an mediocris; utrum vel sit, quaero. Si nata est, latendo crescit, crescendo perficietur, perfecta permanebit. Non enim perfecta vergit in senium, et a senectute veniet ad mortem; ad hoc perficietur, ut aeterna permaneat. Vide enim quid sequitur. Clamamus: Abba, Pater. Ipse Spiritus testimonium reddit spiritui nostro, quia sumus filii Dei . Non spiritus noster reddit testimonium spiritui nostro, quia sumus filii Dei; sed Spiritus Dei, arrha reddit testimonium pro ea re quae nobis promissa est. Ipse Spiritus testimonium reddit spiritui nostro, quia sumus filii Dei.
15. 16. What a thing it is, if the pledge is such! Indeed, it is to be called not a pledge, but an earnest. For a pledge, when it is put down, is taken back when the thing itself has been returned. But an earnest is given out of the very thing that is promised to be given; so that when the thing is returned, what was given is completed, not changed. Let each one, then, attend to his own heart, whether from the inmost marrow of the heart and with sincere love he says, Father. It is not now asked how great that love itself is, whether great, or small, or middling; whether it even exists at all, I ask. If it is born, by lying hidden it grows, by growing it will be perfected, perfected it will remain. For when perfected it does not sink into old age, and from old age come to death; it will be perfected for this: that it may remain eternal. For see what follows. We cry: Abba, Father. The Spirit himself gives testimony to our spirit that we are sons of God (Rom 8:15-16). Not our spirit gives testimony to our spirit that we are sons of God; but the Spirit of God, the earnest, gives testimony for that thing which has been promised to us. The Spirit himself gives testimony to our spirit that we are sons of God.
Sermons5.15.16
15. 17. Si autem filii, et heredes. Non enim inaniter filii. Haec est merces: Et heredes. Hoc est quod paulo ante dicebam, quia medicus noster et sanitatem nobis donat, et mercedem insuper largiri dignatur. Quae est illa merces? Hereditas. Sed non quomodo est hominis patris hereditas. Relinquit enim filiis suis, non possidet cum filiis suis; et tamen magnum se facit, et gratias sibi agi desiderat, quia voluit dare quod non possit auferre. Moriens enim tolleret secum? Puto quia si posset, nihil hic filiis suis dimisisset. Heredes Dei sic sunt, ut ipse Deus sit hereditas nostra, cui dicit Psalmus: Dominus pars hereditatis meae . Heredes quidem Dei; si parum vobis est, audite, quo amplius gaudeatis: Heredes quidem Dei, coheredes autem Christi . Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
15. 17. But if sons, then heirs also. For not as sons in vain. This is the reward: And heirs. This is what I was saying a little before, that our physician both gives us health, and deigns moreover to bestow a reward. What is that reward? An inheritance. But not as is the inheritance of a man, a father. For he leaves it to his sons, he does not possess it with his sons; and yet he makes much of himself, and desires that thanks be given to him, because he wished to give what he cannot take away. For would he take it with him as he died? I think that if he could, he would have left nothing here to his sons. The heirs of God are heirs in such a way that God himself is our inheritance, to whom the Psalm says, The Lord is the portion of my inheritance (Ps 16:5 (15:5)). Heirs indeed of God; if this is too little for you, hear, that you may rejoice the more: Heirs indeed of God, but co-heirs of Christ (Rom 8:17). Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.15.17
SERMO 157
Sermon 157
Sermons5.15.17
1. 1. Sicut Apostolum dixisse meminit Sanctitas vestra, fratres carissimi: Spe salvi facti sumus. Spes autem, inquit, quae videtur, non est spes; quod enim videt quis, quid sperat? Si autem quod non videmus, speramus, per patientiam exspectamus . Hinc vobis exhortatorium et consolatorium praebere sermonem admonet nos ipse Dominus Deus noster, cui dicitur in Psalmo: Spes mea es tu, portio mea in terra viventium . Ipse, inquam, qui spes nostra est in terra viventium, iubet ut vos alloquamur in hac terra morientium; ut non respiciatis quae videntur, sed quae non videntur. Quae enim videntur, temporalia sunt; quae autem non videntur, aeterna . Quia ergo quod non videmus speramus, et per patientiam exspectamus; merito nobis in Psalmo dicitur: Sustine Dominum, viriliter age, et confortetur cor tuum, et sustine Dominum . Mundi enim promissa semper fallunt; Dei autem promissa numquam fallunt. Sed quia mundus quod pollicetur, hic videtur daturus, id est, in hac terra morientium, in qua nunc sumus; Deus autem quod pollicetur, in terra viventium nobis daturus est; multi fatigantur exspectare veracem, et non erubescunt amare fallacem. De talibus dicit Scriptura: Vae his qui perdiderunt sustinentiam, et diverterunt in vias pravas . Cum etiam viriliter agentibus et corde confortato Deum sustinentibus, filii sempiternae mortis insultare non cessant iactantes suas delicias temporales, quae ad tempus obdulcant fauces eorum, postea vero amariores felle invenient eas. Dicunt enim nobis: Ubi est quod vobis promittitur post hanc vitam? Quis huc inde reversus est, et indicavit vera esse quae creditis? Ecce nos in nostrarum voluptatum satietate laetamur, quia quod videmus, speramus; vos autem in laboribus continentiae cruciamini, credendo quod non videtis. Deinde subiungunt quod commemoravit Apostolus: Manducemus et bibamus: cras enim moriemur. Sed videte quid ipse cavendum monuerit: Corrumpunt, inquit, mores bonos colloquia mala. Sobrii estote iuste, et nolite peccare .
1. 1. As your Holiness remembers that the Apostle said, dearly beloved brothers, In hope we have been saved. But hope, he says, that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience (Rom 8:24-25). Hence the Lord our God himself admonishes us to offer you an exhortatory and consolatory sermon—he to whom it is said in the Psalm, You are my hope, my portion in the land of the living (Ps 142:5 (141:6)). He himself, I say, who is our hope in the land of the living, bids that we address you in this land of the dying; that you may look not on the things that are seen, but on the things that are not seen. For the things that are seen are temporal, but the things that are not seen are eternal (2 Cor 4:18). Because, then, we hope for what we do not see, and wait for it with patience; rightly is it said to us in the Psalm, Wait for the Lord, act manfully, and let your heart be strengthened, and wait for the Lord (Ps 27:14 (26:14)). For the promises of the world always deceive; but the promises of God never deceive. But because the world seems about to give here what it promises—that is, in this land of the dying, in which we now are; while God is going to give us what he promises in the land of the living—many grow weary of waiting for the truthful one, and are not ashamed to love the deceiver. Of such Scripture says, Woe to those who have lost endurance, and have turned aside into crooked ways (Sir 2:14.16). For even to those who act manfully and, with strengthened heart, wait for God, the sons of everlasting death do not cease to make insults, flaunting their temporal delights, which for a time sweeten their throats, but afterward they will find them more bitter than gall. For they say to us: Where is what is promised to you after this life? Who has returned here from there and shown that the things you believe are true? Behold, we rejoice in the abundance of our pleasures, because what we see, we hope for; but you are tormented in the labors of continence, by believing what you do not see. Then they add what the Apostle mentioned, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die. But see what he himself warned must be guarded against: Evil conversations, he says, corrupt good morals. Be soberly righteous, and do not sin (1 Cor 15:32-34).
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Cavete ergo, fratres, ne talibus colloquiis mores vestri corrumpantur, evertatur spes, enervetur patientia, et divertatis in vias pravas. Immo vero mites atque mansueti tenete vias rectas, quas vos docet Dominus; de quibus Psalmus dicit: Diriget mites in iudicio, docebit mansuetos vias suas . Patientiam quippe in laboribus huius vitae, sine qua non potest custodiri spes futurae vitae, nemo potest perpetuo retinere, nisi mitis atque mansuetus; qui non resistit voluntati Dei, cuius iugum lene est et sarcina levis, sed credentibus Deo, et sperantibus in eum, et diligentibus eum. Ita quippe mites atque mansueti non solum consolationes eius amabitis, sed etiam flagella eius tamquam boni filii tolerabitis; ut quoniam quod non videtis speratis, per patientiam exspectetis. Sic agite, sic ambulate. In Christo enim ambulatis, qui dixit: Ego sum via . Quomodo in illo ambulandum sit, discite, non solum eius verbo, sed etiam eius exemplo. Huic enim proprio Filio non pepercit Pater, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit illum; non utique nolentem, neque recusantem, sed pariter volentem; quia una est voluntas Patris et Filii secundum aequalitatem formae Dei, in qua cum esset, non rapinam arbitratus est, esse aequalis Deo; et singulariter oboedientem, secundum quod semetipsum evacuavit formam servi accipiens . Nam ipse dilexit nos, et tradidit semetipsum pro nobis oblationem et hostiam Deo in odorem suavitatis . Sic ergo Pater proprio Filio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit eum, ut et ipse Filius traderet semetipsum pro nobis.
2. 2. Beware, then, brothers, lest by such conversations your morals be corrupted, your hope overthrown, your patience unnerved, and you turn aside into crooked ways. Rather, being gentle and meek, keep the right ways, which the Lord teaches you; of which the Psalm says, He will direct the gentle in judgment, he will teach the meek his ways (Ps 25:9 (24:9)). For patience in the labors of this life, without which the hope of the future life cannot be kept, no one can perpetually retain except the gentle and meek; who do not resist the will of God, whose yoke is easy and burden light (See Matt 11:30), but who believe God, and hope in him, and love him. For thus, being gentle and meek, you will not only love his consolations, but will also bear his scourges like good sons; so that, since you hope for what you do not see, you may wait for it with patience. So act, so walk. For you walk in Christ, who said, I am the way (John 14:6). Learn how to walk in him, not only by his word, but also by his example. For the Father did not spare his own Son, but handed him over for us all (Rom 8:32); surely not unwilling, nor refusing, but equally willing; because the will of the Father and of the Son is one according to the equality of the form of God, in which, since he was, he did not consider it robbery to be equal to God; and singularly obedient, according to which he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant (See Phil 2:6-7). For he himself loved us, and handed himself over for us, an offering and sacrifice to God for an odor of sweetness (Eph 5:2). So, then, the Father did not spare his own Son, but handed him over for us all, that the Son himself too might hand himself over for us.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Traditus ergo ille Excelsus, per quem facta sunt omnia, traditus propter formam servi in opprobrium hominum et abiectionem plebis, in contumeliam, in flagella, in mortem crucis docuit nos exemplo passionis, cum quanta patientia in illo ambulemus; et firmavit nos exemplo suae resurrectionis, quid ab illo patienter sperare debeamus. Si enim quod non videmus speramus, per patientiam exspectamus . Quod non videmus quidem, speramus; sed corpus sumus illius capitis, in quo iam perfectum est quod speramus. De illo enim dictum est quod ipse sit caput corporis Ecclesiae, primogenitus, ipse primatum tenens . Et de nobis scriptum est: Vos autem estis corpus Christi et membra . Si autem quod non videmus speramus, per patientiam exspectamus, securi; quoniam qui resurrexit caput nostrum est, servat spem nostram. Et quia priusquam resurgeret, flagellatum est caput nostrum, firmavit patientiam nostram. Scriptum est enim: Quem enim diligit Dominus, corripit; flagellat autem omnem filium, quem recipit . Non itaque in flagello deficiamus, ut in resurrectione gaudeamus. Ita enim verum est quod flagellat omnem filium quem recipit, ut nec Unico suo pepercerit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradiderit eum. Intuentes ergo eum, qui sine peccati merito flagellatus est, qui mortuus est propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter iustificationem nostram, non timeamus ne abiciamur flagellati; sed potius confidamus quia recipiemur iustificati.
3. 3. Handed over, then, was that Most High one, through whom all things were made; handed over, on account of the form of a servant, to the reproach of men and the abjection of the people, to insult, to scourges, to the death of the cross, he taught us by the example of his passion with how great patience we should walk in him; and he strengthened us by the example of his resurrection as to what we ought to hope patiently from him. For if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience (Rom 8:25). We hope indeed for what we do not see; but we are the body of that head, in whom what we hope for is already accomplished. For of him it was said that he is the head of the body, the Church, the firstborn, himself holding the primacy (Col 1:18). And of us it is written, But you are the body of Christ and members (1 Cor 12:27). But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience, secure; since he who rose again is our head, he keeps our hope. And because before he rose our head was scourged, he strengthened our patience. For it is written, For whom the Lord loves he rebukes; and he scourges every son whom he receives (Heb 12:6; Prov 3:12). Let us therefore not fail under the scourge, that we may rejoice in the resurrection. For so true is it that he scourges every son whom he receives, that he did not spare even his Only-begotten, but handed him over for us all. Looking, then, on him who was scourged without the desert of sin, who died for our offenses and rose again for our justification (See Rom 4:25), let us not fear to be cast away when scourged; but rather let us be confident that we will be received when justified.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Quamvis enim nondum venerit nostri gaudii plenitudo: nec modo tamen sine gaudio relicti sumus; quia spe salvi facti sumus. Ideo et ipse Apostolus, qui ait: Si quod non videmus speramus, per patientiam exspectamus ; dicit alio loco: Spe gaudentes, in tribulatione patientes . Habentes ergo talem spem, multa fiducia utamur ; et sermo noster in gratia conditus sit sale, ut sciamus quemadmodum oporteat unicuique respondere . Dicendum est enim eis qui cum perdidissent, vel numquam suscepissent sustinentiam, nobis sustinentibus Dominum (quia quod non videmus sperantes, per patientiam exspectamus) etiam insultare audent, cum imitari deberent: Ubi sunt deliciae vestrae, propter quas ambulatis per vias pravas? Non dicimus: Ubi erunt, cum haec vita transierit; sed modo: Ubi sunt? Cum hesternum diem hodiernus abstulerit, et hodiernum crastinus ablaturus sit, quid eorum quae diligitis, non transcurrit et transvolat? Quid non fugit pene antequam capitur, cum ex ipso hodierno die nulla possit vel hora retineri? Ita enim secunda excluditur a tertia, sicut prima exclusa est a secunda. Ipsius horae unius, quae praesens videtur, nihil est praesens: omnes enim partes eius, et omnia momenta fugitiva sunt.
4. 4. For although the fullness of our joy has not yet come, yet not even now are we left without joy; because in hope we have been saved. Therefore the Apostle himself, who says, If we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience (Rom 8:25), says in another place, Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation (Rom 12:12). Having, then, such a hope, let us use much boldness (2 Cor 3:12); and let our speech be seasoned with salt, that we may know how we ought to answer each one (See Col 4:6). For it must be said to those who, having lost—or never having taken up—endurance, dare even to insult us as we wait for the Lord (because, hoping for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience), when they ought rather to imitate us: Where are your delights, for which you walk in crooked ways? We do not say: Where will they be, when this life has passed away; but now: Where are they? Since today has taken away yesterday, and tomorrow will take away today, what of the things you love does not run by and fly away? What does not flee almost before it is grasped, since of this very day not even an hour can be retained? For the second is shut out by the third, just as the first was shut out by the second. Of that one hour itself, which seems present, nothing is present: for all its parts and all its moments are fleeting.
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Propter quid peccat homo, si non excaecatus est cum peccat, vel cum peccaret attendat. Poterat videre quia voluptas transitura sine prudentia desideratur; vel cum transierit, cum paenitentia cogitatur. Nos irridetis, quia speramus aeterna, quae non videmus; cum vos eis quae videntur temporalibus subditi, nesciatis qualis vobis dies crastinus illucescat; quem saepe bonum sperantes, malum invenitis; nec, si bonus fuerit, eum ne fugiat tenere poteritis. Nos irridetis, quia speramus aeterna; quae cum venerint, non transibunt; quia nec ipsa veniunt, sed semper manent; nos autem ad illa veniemus, cum per viam dominicam ista quae transeunt transierimus. A vobis vero temporalia nec sperari aliquando desinunt, et tamen crebro sperata vos fallunt; nec cessant vos inflammare ventura, corrumpere venientia, torquere transeuntia. Nonne ipsa sunt quae concupita inardescunt, adepta vilescunt, amissa vanescunt? Utimur eis et nos secundum peregrinationis nostrae necessitatem; sed non in eis gaudia nostra figimus, ne illis labentibus subruamur. Utimur enim hoc mundo tamquam non utentes , ut veniamus ad eum qui fecit hunc mundum, et in eo maneamus, eius aeternitate perfruentes.
5. 5. Why does a man sin, if he is not blinded when he sins—or if only he would take heed when he sins? He could see that pleasure, soon to pass away, is desired without prudence; or, when it has passed, is thought on with repentance. You mock us because we hope for eternal things which we do not see; while you, subject to the temporal things that are seen, do not know what kind of day will dawn for you tomorrow—which, often hoping it good, you find evil; nor, if it is good, will you be able to hold it lest it flee. You mock us because we hope for eternal things; which, when they have come, will not pass away; because they themselves do not come, but always remain; but we shall come to them, when, by the Lord's way, we have passed through these things that pass away. But from you temporal things never cease at some time to be hoped for, and yet, hoped for, they often deceive you; nor do they cease to inflame you as they come, to corrupt as they arrive, to torment as they pass away. Are they not the very things that, when coveted, burn; when obtained, become worthless; when lost, vanish away? We too use them according to the necessity of our pilgrimage; but we do not fix our joys in them, lest, as they slip away, we be undermined. For we use this world as though not using it (See 1 Cor 7:31), that we may come to the one who made this world, and remain in him, fully enjoying his eternity.
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Quid est autem quod dicitis: Quis huc inde venit, et quid apud inferos geratur, quis hominibus indicavit? Et hinc vobis os clausit, qui mortuum quarta die resuscitavit , et ultra non moriturus die tertio resurrexit, et antequam moreretur, qualis vita morientes excipiat, tamquam ille quem nihil lateret, et in paupere quiescente et in divite ardente narravit . Sed illi ista non credunt, qui dicunt: Quis huc inde reversus est? Credituros se volunt videri, si quis parentum suorum revivisceret. Sed maledictus omnis qui spem suam ponit in homine . Ideo ergo Deus homo factus, mori et resurgere voluit; ut et quod futurum esset homini, in hominis carne ostenderetur, et Deo tamen, non homini crederetur. Et certe Ecclesia fidelium toto orbe diffusa, iam ante oculos eorum est. Legant eam ante tot saecula uni homini promissam, qui contra spem in spem credidit, ut fieret pater multarum gentium . Quid ergo uni Abrahae credenti promissum est, iam videmus impletum; et quod universo orbi promittitur credenti, desperamus esse venturum? Eant nunc et dicant: Manducemus et bibamus; cras enim moriemur . Illi se adhuc cras dicunt morituros, veritas autem illos iam cum ista dicunt, invenit mortuos. Vos autem, fratres, filii resurrectionis, cives sanctorum angelorum, Dei heredes, et Christi coheredes, cavete imitari eos, qui cras exspirando moriuntur, et hodie bibendo sepeliuntur. Sed, sicut dicit idem Apostolus, ne corrumpant vestros mores bonos colloquia mala, sobrii estote iuste, et nolite peccare ; ambulantes angustam, sed certam viam ducentem ad latitudinem Ierusalem caelestis, quae mater nostra aeterna est; firmissime sperate quod non videtis, patienter exspectate quod nondum habetis; quia veracem promissorem Christum fidelissime retinetis.
6. 6. But what is it that you say: Who came here from there, and who has shown men what goes on in the underworld? And here too he closed your mouth who raised a dead man on the fourth day (See John 11:39-44), and, no longer to die, rose on the third day, and before he died told what kind of life receives the dying—as one from whom nothing was hidden—both in the poor man at rest and in the rich man burning (See Luke 16:19-31). But those do not believe these things who say: Who has returned here from there? They wish to seem about to believe, if one of their parents should come back to life. But cursed is everyone who places his hope in man (Jer 17:5). Therefore God, made man, willed to die and rise again; that both what was to come for man might be shown in man's flesh, and yet it might be believed of God, not of man. And surely the Church of the faithful, spread throughout the whole world, is now before their eyes. Let them read that it was promised, so many ages ago, to one man, who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations (See Rom 4:18; Gen 17:5). What, then, was promised to Abraham alone, believing, we now see fulfilled; and do we despair that what is promised to the whole believing world will come? Let them now go and say, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die (1 Cor 15:32). They say they will still die tomorrow, but truth, while they say these things, finds them already dead. But you, brothers, sons of the resurrection, citizens of the holy angels, heirs of God and co-heirs of Christ, beware of imitating those who tomorrow die by breathing their last, and today are buried by drinking. But, as the same Apostle says, lest evil conversations corrupt your good morals, be soberly righteous, and do not sin (1 Cor 15:33-34); walking the narrow but sure way that leads to the breadth of the heavenly Jerusalem, which is our eternal mother; most firmly hope for what you do not see, patiently wait for what you do not yet have; because you most faithfully hold Christ, the truthful one who promises.
Sermons5.6.6
SERMO 158
Sermon 158
Sermons5.6.6
1. 1. Apostolum beatum audivimus exhortantem et confirmantem nos, cum diceret nobis: Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? Pro quibus autem sit Deus, superius ostendit, ubi ait: Quos autem praedestinavit, illos et vocavit; quos autem vocavit, illos et iustificavit, quos autem iustificavit, illos et glorificavit. Quid ergo dicemus ad haec? Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos ? Deus pro nobis, ut praedestinaret nos; Deus pro nobis, ut vocaret nos; Deus pro nobis, ut iustificaret nos; Deus pro nobis, ut glorificaret nos. Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? Praedestinavit, antequam essemus; vocavit, cum aversi essemus; iustificavit, cum peccatores essemus; glorificavit, cum mortales essemus. Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? Praedestinatis a Deo, vocatis, iustificatis, glorificatis, qui vult adversari, paret se, si potest bellare adversus Deum. Ubi enim audivimus: Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? nisi qui Deum vincit, non laedit nos. Et quis est qui vincit Omnipotentem? Quicumque reluctari voluerit, sibi nocet. Hoc est, quod et Paulo adhuc Saulo de caelo Christus clamavit: Non tibi expedit contra stimulum calcitrare . Saeviat, saeviat quantum potest; qui calces adversus stimulum mittit, nonne in se ipsum saevit?
1. 1. We have heard the blessed Apostle exhorting and confirming us, when he said to us, If God is for us, who is against us (Rom 8:31)? But for whom God is, he showed above, where he says, But those whom he predestined, these he also called; and those whom he called, these he also justified; and those whom he justified, these he also glorified. What, then, shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us (Rom 8:30-31)? God for us, to predestine us; God for us, to call us; God for us, to justify us; God for us, to glorify us. If God is for us, who is against us? He predestined us before we were; he called us when we were turned away; he justified us when we were sinners; he glorified us when we were mortal. If God is for us, who is against us? Against those predestined by God, called, justified, glorified, whoever wishes to be an adversary, let him prepare himself, if he can wage war against God. For where we have heard, If God is for us, who is against us? none harms us but the one who conquers God. And who is there who conquers the Almighty? Whoever wishes to struggle against him harms himself. This is what Christ cried from heaven to Paul, still Saul: It does not profit you to kick against the goad (Acts 9:5). Let him rage, let him rage as much as he can; he who kicks against the goad—does he not rage against himself?
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. In his autem quattuor rebus, quas commendavit Apostolus insignes, quae pertinent ad eos pro quibus est Deus, id est, praedestinatione, vocatione, iustificatione, glorificatione; in his ergo quattuor rebus considerare debemus quid iam habeamus, et quid adhuc exspectemus. In his enim quae iam habemus, laudemus Deum largitorem; in his quae nondum habemus, teneamus debitorem. Debitor enim factus est, non aliquid a nobis accipiendo, sed quod ei placuit promittendo. Aliter enim dicimus homini: Debes mihi quia dedi tibi; et aliter dicimus: Debes mihi, quia promisisti mihi. Quando dicis: Debes mihi, quia dedi tibi, a te processit beneficium, sed mutuatum, non donatum. Quando autem dicis: Debes mihi, quia promisisti mihi, tu nihil dedisti, et tamen exigis. Bonitas enim eius qui promisit, dabit, ne in malitiam fides convertatur. Qui enim fallit, malus est, Deo autem numquid dicimus: Redde mihi, quia dedi tibi? Quid dedimus Deo, quando totum quod sumus, et quod habemus boni, ab illo habemus? Nihil ergo ei dedimus. Non est quemadmodum ista voce exigamus debitorem Deum, maxime dicente nobis Apostolo: Quis enim cognovit sensum Domini? Aut quis consiliarius eius fuit? Aut quis prior dedit illi, et retribuetur ei ? Illo ergo modo possumus exigere Dominum nostrum, ut dicamus: Redde quod promisisti, quia fecimus quod iussisti; et hoc tu fecisti, quia laborantes iuvisti.
2. 2. But in these four notable things which the Apostle commended, which pertain to those for whom God is—that is, predestination, calling, justification, glorification—in these four things, then, we ought to consider what we already have, and what we still await. For in those things we already have, let us praise God the giver; in those we do not yet have, let us hold him as debtor. For he became a debtor, not by receiving anything from us, but by promising what it pleased him. For in one way we say to a man, You owe me because I gave to you; and in another way we say, You owe me because you promised me. When you say, You owe me because I gave to you, a benefit proceeded from you, but lent, not given. But when you say, You owe me because you promised me, you gave nothing, and yet you demand. For the goodness of him who promised will give, lest faith be turned into malice. For he who deceives is evil; but do we say to God, Repay me, because I gave to you? What did we give to God, when all that we are, and what good we have, we have from him? We gave him nothing, then. There is no way for us to demand God as debtor by these words, especially as the Apostle says to us, For who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor? Or who has first given to him, and it shall be repaid to him (Rom 11:34-35)? In that other way, then, we can demand of our Lord, so as to say: Pay what you promised, because we have done what you commanded; and this you did, because you helped us as we labored.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Nemo ergo dicat: Ideo me vocavit Deus, quia colui Deum. Quomodo coluisses, si vocatus non fuisses? Si propterea te vocavit Deus, quia coluisti Deum: ergo prior dedisti, et retribuit tibi. Nonne istam tibi vocem Apostolus tollit, cum dicit: Aut quis prior dedit illi, et retribuetur ei? Sed ecce quando vocatus es, vel iam eras. Quomodo praedestinareris, nisi quando non eras? Quid Deo dedisti, quando qui aliquid dares, non eras? Quid ergo fecit Deus, quando praedestinavit qui non erat? Quod ait Apostolus: Qui vocat ea quae non sunt, tamquam ea quae sunt . Si iam esses, non praedestinareris; nisi aversus esses, non vocareris; nisi impius esses, non iustificareris, nisi terrenus et abiectus esses, non glorificareris. Quis ergo prior dedit illi, et retribuetur ei? Quoniam ex ipso, et per ipsum, et in ipso sunt omnia. Quid ergo reddimus? Ipsi gloria . Quia non eramus, quando sumus praedestinati; quia aversi eramus, quando sumus vocati; quia peccatores eramus, quando sumus iustificati; agamus Deo gratias, ne remaneamus ingrati.
3. 3. Let no one, then, say: God called me for this reason, because I worshiped God. How would you have worshiped, if you had not been called? If God called you for this reason, because you worshiped God, then you first gave, and he repaid you. Does not the Apostle take this saying from you, when he says, Or who has first given to him, and it shall be repaid to him? But behold, when you were called, you at least already existed. How would you be predestined, except when you did not exist? What did you give to God, when you, who might give something, did not exist? What, then, did God do, when he predestined one who did not exist? What the Apostle says: He who calls the things that are not as though they were (Rom 4:17). If you already existed, you would not be predestined; unless you were turned away, you would not be called; unless you were ungodly, you would not be justified; unless you were earthly and abject, you would not be glorified. Who, then, has first given to him, and it shall be repaid to him? For from him, and through him, and in him are all things. What, then, do we render? To him be glory (Rom 11:35-36). Because we did not exist when we were predestined; because we were turned away when we were called; because we were sinners when we were justified; let us give thanks to God, lest we remain ungrateful.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Proposueramus autem considerare de his quattuor rebus quid iam consecuti fuerimus, quid adhuc adipiscendum exspectemus. Praedestinati enim iam sumus et antequam essemus. Vocati sumus, quando Christiani facti sumus. Iam ergo et hoc habemus. Iustificati, quid? Quid est: iustificati? Audemus dicere, iam hoc tertium habere nos? Et erit quisquam nostrum qui audeat dicere: Iustus sum? Puto enim hoc esse: Iustus sum, quod est: Peccator non sum. Si audes hoc dicere, occurrit tibi Ioannes: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus, et veritas in nobis non est . Quid ergo? Nihil habemus de iustitia? An habemus, sed non totum habemus? Hoc ergo quaeramus. Si enim aliquid habemus, et aliquid non habemus; crescat quod habemus, et implebitur quod non habemus. Ecce enim baptizati sunt homines, omnia illis peccata dimissa sunt, iustificati sunt a peccatis; negare non possumus: restat tamen lucta cum carne, restat lucta cum mundo, restat lucta cum diabolo. Qui autem luctatur, aliquando ferit, aliquando percutitur; aliquando vincit, aliquando perimitur; quomodo de stadio exeat attenditur. Nam si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus, et veritas in nobis non est. Item, si dixerimus quia iustitiae nihil habemus, adversum Dei dona mentimur. Si enim iustitiae nihil habemus, nec fidem habemus; si fidem non habemus, christiani non sumus. Si autem fidem habemus, iam aliquid habemus iustitiae. Ipsum aliquid, vis nosse quantum sit? Iustus ex fide vivit ; iustus, inquam, ex fide vivit; quia credit quod non videt.
4. 4. But we had proposed to consider, of these four things, what we have already attained, what we still await as to be obtained. For we have already been predestined, even before we existed. We have been called, when we were made Christians. So this too we already have. Justified—what? What is, justified? Do we dare to say that we already have this third thing? And will there be any of us who dares to say: I am righteous? For I think this is what "I am righteous" means: "I am not a sinner." If you dare to say this, John meets you: If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us (1 John 1:8). What, then? Do we have nothing of righteousness? Or do we have it, but do not have all of it? Let us seek this, then. For if we have something, and do not have something; let what we have grow, and what we do not have will be fulfilled. For behold, people have been baptized, all their sins have been forgiven them, they have been justified from their sins; we cannot deny it: yet there remains the struggle with the flesh, there remains the struggle with the world, there remains the struggle with the devil. But whoever struggles sometimes strikes, sometimes is struck; sometimes conquers, sometimes is slain; how he comes out of the arena is watched. For if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. Likewise, if we say that we have nothing of righteousness, we lie against the gifts of God. For if we have nothing of righteousness, we do not even have faith; if we do not have faith, we are not Christians. But if we have faith, we already have something of righteousness. That something—do you wish to know how great it is? The righteous lives by faith; the righteous, I say, lives by faith (Rom 1:17; Hab 2:4); because he believes what he does not see.
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Patres, arietes sancti, duces Apostoli, quando annuntiaverunt, non solum viderunt oculis, sed etiam manibus tractaverunt; et tamen Dominus servans nobis donum fidei, cuidam discipulorum suorum tractanti, palpanti, veritatem digitis inquirenti et invenienti, exclamanti: Dominus meus et Deus meus; ait ipse Dominus et Deus: Quia vidisti, credidisti. Et nos futuros intuens: Beati, inquit, qui non viderunt et crediderunt . Non vidimus, audivimus, et credidimus. Beati praedicti sumus, et de iustitia nihil habemus? Venit Dominus carnaliter ad Iudaeos, et occisus est; non venit ad nos, et acceptus est. Populus quem non cognovi, servivit mihi, in obauditu auris oboedivit mihi . Nos sumus, et de iustitia nihil habemus? Omnino habemus. Grati simus ex eo quod habemus: ut addatur quod non habemus, et non perdamus quod habemus. Ergo et hoc tertium iam agitur in nobis. Iustificati sumus: sed ipsa iustitia, cum proficimus, crescit. Et quomodo crescit dicam, et vobiscum quodammodo conferam; ut unusquisque vestrum iam in ipsa iustificatione constitutus, accepta scilicet remissione peccatorum per lavacrum regenerationis, accepto Spiritu Sancto, proficiens de die in diem, videat ubi sit, accedat, proficiat et crescat, donec consummetur, non ut finiatur, sed ut perficiatur.
5. 5. The fathers, the holy rams, the leaders, the apostles, when they announced him, not only saw with their eyes, but even handled with their hands; and yet the Lord, keeping for us the gift of faith, to one of his disciples handling, feeling, seeking the truth with his fingers and finding it, crying out, My Lord and my God; the Lord and God himself said, Because you have seen, you have believed. And looking upon us who were to come, Blessed, he said, are those who have not seen and have believed (John 20:28-29). We have not seen, we have heard, and we have believed. We have been foretold blessed, and do we have nothing of righteousness? The Lord came in the flesh to the Jews, and was killed; he did not come to us, and was received. A people I did not know served me, at the hearing of the ear it obeyed me (Ps 18:43-44 (17:44-45)). We are that people, and do we have nothing of righteousness? We surely have it. Let us be grateful for what we have: that what we do not have may be added, and that we may not lose what we have. So this third thing too is already at work in us. We have been justified: but this very righteousness, as we make progress, grows. And how it grows I will say, and as it were confer with you; so that each one of you, now established in this very justification—having, namely, received the forgiveness of sins through the washing of regeneration, having received the Holy Spirit, making progress from day to day—may see where he is, may draw near, make progress, and grow, until he is consummated, not so as to be ended, but so as to be perfected.
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Incipit homo a fide; quid pertinet ad fidem? Credere. Sed adhuc ista fides discernatur ab immundis spiritibus. Ad fidem quid pertinet? Credere. Sed ait apostolus Iacobus: Et daemones credunt, et contremiscunt . Si tantum credis, et sine spe vivis, vel dilectionem non habes: Et daemones credunt, et contremiscunt. Quid magnum est, si dicis Christum Filium Dei? Hoc dixit Petrus, et audivit: Beatus es Simon Bar Iona; hoc dixerunt daemones, et audierunt: Obmutescite. Ille beatus, dicitur ei: Quia non revelavit tibi caro et sanguis, sed Pater meus qui in caelis est . Illi autem audiunt: Obmutescite; et hoc ipsum dicunt, et repelluntur. Una vox est: sed Dominus radicem interrogat, non florem. Unde dicitur ad Hebraeos: Ne qua radix amaritudinis sursum germinans molestet, et per illam contaminentur multi . Prius ergo discerne fidem tuam a fide daemonis. Unde eam discernis ? Daemones hoc dixerunt timendo, Petrus amando. Adde ergo fidei spem. Et quae spes est, nisi de aliqua conscientiae bonitate? Speique ipsi adde caritatem. Desuper eminentem viam habemus, dicente Apostolo: Supereminentem viam vobis demonstro: Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, caritatem autem non habeam, factus sum velut aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens ; et cetera enarrat bona, et sine caritate nihil prodesse confirmat. Maneant ergo haec, fides, spes, caritas: maior autem horum caritas. Sectamini caritatem. Discernite ergo fidem vestram. Iam estis de praedestinatis, vocatis, iustificatis. Paulus apostolus dicit: Neque circumcisio aliquid valet, neque praeputium; sed fides. Dic adhuc, Apostole, adde, discerne; quia: Et daemones credunt et contremiscunt ; ergo adde et discerne, daemones enim credunt, et contremiscunt quod oderunt. Distingue, Apostole, et circumcide fidem meam, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta . Plane distinguit, discernit, circumcidit. Et fides, inquit, quae per dilectionem operatur .
6. 6. A man begins from faith; what pertains to faith? To believe. But let this faith still be distinguished from the unclean spirits. What pertains to faith? To believe. But the apostle James says, The demons too believe, and tremble (Jas 2:19). If you only believe, and live without hope, or do not have love: The demons too believe, and tremble. What great thing is it, if you say that Christ is the Son of God? Peter said this, and heard, Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah; the demons said this, and heard, Be silent. To him, blessed, it is said, Because flesh and blood did not reveal it to you, but my Father who is in heaven (Matt 16:16-17). But they hear, Be silent (See Mark 1:24-25; Luke 4:34-35); and they say this same thing, and are driven off. It is one voice: but the Lord questions the root, not the flower. Hence it is said to the Hebrews, Lest any root of bitterness, springing up, cause trouble, and through it many be defiled (Heb 12:15). First, then, distinguish your faith from the faith of a demon. By what do you distinguish it? The demons said this fearing, Peter loving. Add, then, hope to faith. And what is hope, but from some goodness of conscience? And to hope itself add love. We have a way that surpasses all, the Apostle saying, I show you a way that surpasses all: If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become like sounding brass, or a clanging cymbal (1 Cor 12:31-13:1); and he enumerates the other good things, and confirms that without love they profit nothing. Let these, then, remain: faith, hope, love; but the greatest of these is love. Pursue love. Distinguish, then, your faith. You are already among the predestined, called, justified. The apostle Paul says, Neither circumcision avails anything, nor uncircumcision; but faith. Say still more, Apostle, add, distinguish; because the demons too believe, and tremble; so add and distinguish, for the demons believe, and tremble at what they hate. Distinguish, Apostle, and circumcise my faith, and distinguish my cause from an unholy nation (See Ps 43:1 (42:1)). He plainly distinguishes, he distinguishes, he circumcises. And, faith, he says, that works through love (Gal 5:6).
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. Unusquisque ergo, fratres mei, inspiciat se intus, appendat se, probet se in omnibus factis suis, bonis operibus suis, quae faciat cum caritate, non exspectans retributionem temporalem, sed promissum Dei, faciem Dei. Non enim quidquid tibi Deus promittit, valet aliquid praeter ipsum Deum. Omnino me non satiaret Deus, nisi promitteret mihi se ipsum Deum. Quid est tota terra? Quid est totum mare? Quid est totum caelum? Quid sunt omnia sidera? Quid sol? Quid luna? Quid exercitus angelorum? Omnium istorum Creatorem sitio : ipsum esurio, ipsum sitio, ipsi dico: Quoniam apud te est fons vitae . Qui mihi dicit: Ego sum panis qui de caelo descendi . Esuriat et sitiat peregrinatio mea, ut satietur praesentia mea. Arridet mundus multis rebus, pulchris, fortibus, variis: pulchrior est ille qui fecit, fortior et clarior ille qui fecit, suavior ille est qui fecit. Satiabor, cum manifestabitur gloria tua . Fides ergo quae per dilectionem operatur si est in vobis, iam pertinetis ad praedestinatos, vocatos, iustificatos: ergo crescat in vobis. Fides enim quae per dilectionem operatur, sine spe esse non potest. Cum autem venerimus, iam erit ibi fides? Dicetur nobis: Crede? Non utique. Videbimus eum, contemplabimur eum. Dilectissimi, filii Dei sumus, et nondum apparuit quod erimus. Quia nondum apparuit, ideo fides. Filii Dei sumus, praedestinati, vocati, iustificati; filii Dei sumus, et nondum apparuit quod erimus. Modo ergo fides, antequam appareat quod erimus. Scimus quod cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus. Numquid quia credimus? Non. Quare ergo? Quoniam videbimus eum sicuti est .
7. 7. Let each one, then, my brothers, look at himself within, weigh himself, test himself in all his deeds, his good works, which he does with love, not expecting a temporal reward, but the promise of God, the face of God. For whatever God promises you is worth nothing apart from God himself. God would not satisfy me at all, unless he promised me himself, God. What is the whole earth? What is the whole sea? What is the whole heaven? What are all the stars? What is the sun? What is the moon? What is the host of angels? I thirst for the Creator of all these: him I hunger for, him I thirst for, to him I say, For with you is the fountain of life (Ps 36:9 (35:10)). He says to me, I am the bread that came down from heaven (John 6:41). Let my pilgrimage hunger and thirst, that my presence may be satisfied. The world smiles with many things—beautiful, strong, varied: more beautiful is he who made them, stronger and more glorious he who made them, sweeter is he who made them. I shall be satisfied when your glory is made manifest (Ps 17:15 (16:15)). If, then, faith that works through love is in you, you already belong to the predestined, called, justified: let it grow, then, in you. For faith that works through love cannot be without hope. But when we have come, will faith still be there? Will it be said to us: Believe? Surely not. We shall see him, we shall contemplate him. Beloved, we are sons of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be. Because it has not yet appeared, therefore faith. We are sons of God, predestined, called, justified; we are sons of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be. Now, then, faith, before it appears what we shall be. We know that when it has appeared, we shall be like him. Is it because we believe? No. Why, then? Because we shall see him as he is (1 John 3:2).
Sermons5.7.7
8. 8. Quid spes? Erit ibi? Spes iam non erit, quando erit res. Etenim ipsa spes peregrinationi necessaria est, ipsa est quae consolatur in via. Viator enim quando laborat ambulando, ideo laborem tolerat, quia pervenire sperat. Tolle illi spem perveniendi, continuo franguntur vires ambulandi. Ergo et spes quae hic est, ad iustitiam pertinet peregrinationis nostrae. Ipsum Apostolum audi: Adoptionem, inquit, exspectantes, in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus adhuc . Ubi est gemitus, iam non potest dici illa felicitas, de qua Scriptura dicit: Transiit labor et gemitus . Ergo adhuc, inquit, in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus, adoptionem exspectantes redemptionem corporis nostri. Adhuc ingemiscimus. Quare? Spe enim salvi facti sumus. Spes autem quae videtur, non est spes. Si enim videt quis, quid sperat? Si autem quod non videmus speramus, per patientiam exspectamus . In hac ergo patientia martyres coronabantur; desiderabant quae non videbant, contemnebant quae ferebant. In hac spe dicebant: Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? Tribulatio? An angustia? An persecutio? An fames? An nuditas? An gladius? Quia propter te . Et ubi est propter quem? Quia propter te, inquit, mortificamur tota die . Propter te. Et ubi est: Beati qui non viderunt et crediderunt ? Ecce ubi est, in te est, quia et fides ipsa in te ipso est. An fallit nos Apostolus, qui dicit: habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus nostris ? Modo per fidem, tunc per speciem: modo per fidem, quamdiu in via, quamdiu in peregrinatione. Quamdiu enim sumus in corpore, peregrinamur a Domino; per fidem enim ambulamus, non per speciem .
8. 8. What of hope? Will it be there? Hope will no longer exist, when the reality is present. For hope itself is necessary for the pilgrimage; it is what consoles on the way. For the traveler, when he labors in walking, bears the labor for this reason: because he hopes to arrive. Take from him the hope of arriving, and at once the strength of walking is broken. Therefore the hope that is here too pertains to the righteousness of our pilgrimage. Hear the Apostle himself: Awaiting the adoption, he says, we ourselves groan within ourselves still (See Rom 8:23). Where there is groaning, that happiness cannot yet be spoken of, of which Scripture says, Toil and groaning have passed away (Isa 35:10). Therefore still, he says, we groan within ourselves, awaiting the adoption, the redemption of our body. Still we groan. Why? For in hope we have been saved. But hope that is seen is not hope. For if anyone sees it, why does he hope? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience (Rom 8:24-25). In this patience, then, the martyrs were crowned; they longed for what they did not see, they despised what they bore. In this hope they said, Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Tribulation? Or distress? Or persecution? Or famine? Or nakedness? Or the sword? For on account of you. And where is the one for whose sake? For on account of you, he says, we are put to death all the day (Rom 8:35-36). On account of you. And where is, Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed (John 20:29)? Behold where he is, he is in you, because faith itself too is in you yourself. Or does the Apostle deceive us, who says that Christ dwells through faith in our hearts (Eph 3:17)? Now through faith, then through sight: now through faith, as long as we are on the way, as long as on pilgrimage. For as long as we are in the body, we are on pilgrimage away from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not by sight (2 Cor 5:6-7).
Sermons5.8.8
9. 9. Si hoc est fides, quid erit species? Audi quid erit: Ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus . Quid est: Omnia? Quidquid hic quaerebas, quidquid hic pro magno habebas, ipse tibi erit. Quid hic volebas, quid amabas? Manducare et bibere? Ipse tibi erit cibus, ipse tibi erit potus. Quid hic volebas? Sanitatem corporis fragilem, transeuntem? Ipse tibi immortalitas erit. Quid hic quaerebas? Divitias? Avare, quid enim tibi sufficit, si Deus ipse non sufficit? Sed quid amabas? Gloriam, honores? Deus tibi erit gloria: cui et modo dicitur: Gloria mea, et exaltans caput meum . Iam enim exaltavit caput meum. Caput nostrum Christus est. Sed quid miraris? Quia caput et cetera membra exaltabuntur; tunc erit Deus omnia in omnibus. Hoc modo credimus, hoc modo speramus: cum venerimus, tenebimus; et iam visio erit, non fides: cum venerimus, tenebimus, et iam res erit, non spes. Caritas quid? numquid et ipsa modo est, et tunc non erit? Si amamus credendo et non videndo; quomodo amabimus videndo et tenendo? Ergo caritas erit, sed perfecta erit; sicut Apostolus ait: Fides, spes, caritas, tria haec; maior autem horum caritas . Hanc habentes, et in nobis nutrientes, securi illo adiuvante perseverantes in eo, dicamus: Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? donec ipse misereatur, ipse perficiat. Tribulatio? An angustia? An fames? An nuditas? An periculum? An gladius? Quoniam propter te mortificamur tota die, deputati sumus ut oves occisionis. Et quis supportat? quis omnia tolerat? Sed in his omnibus superamus. Unde? Per eum qui dilexit nos. Ergo, Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
9. 9. If this is faith, what will sight be? Hear what it will be: That God may be all in all (1 Cor 15:28). What is, all? Whatever you sought here, whatever you held for great here, he himself will be to you. What did you want here, what did you love? To eat and drink? He himself will be your food, he himself will be your drink. What did you want here? The frail, passing health of the body? He himself will be your immortality. What did you seek here? Riches? Greedy one, what suffices for you, if God himself does not suffice? But what did you love? Glory, honors? God will be your glory: to whom even now it is said, My glory, and the lifter up of my head (Ps 3:3 (3:4)). For he has already lifted up my head. Our head is Christ. But why do you marvel? Because the head and the other members will be lifted up; then God will be all in all. In this way we believe, in this way we hope: when we have come, we will hold; and there will then be sight, not faith: when we have come, we will hold, and there will then be the reality, not hope. What of love? Surely it too exists now, and then will not be? If we love by believing and not seeing, how shall we love by seeing and holding? Therefore love will be, but it will be perfect; as the Apostle says, Faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love (1 Cor 13:13). Having this, and nourishing it in us, secure, with his help persevering in him, let us say, Who will separate us from the love of Christ? until he himself shows mercy, he himself perfects. Tribulation? Or distress? Or famine? Or nakedness? Or peril? Or the sword? For on account of you we are put to death all the day, we are reckoned as sheep for the slaughter. And who endures it? Who bears all things? But in all these things we conquer. By what? Through him who loved us (Rom 8:35-37). Therefore, If God is for us, who is against us (Rom 8:31)?
Sermons5.9.9
SERMO 159
Sermon 159
Sermons5.9.9
1. 1. Hesterno die de iustificatione nostra, quae nobis est a Domino Deo nostro, sermo productus est, ministrantibus nobis, donante illo, audientibus vobis. Et cum simus in hac vita onerati sarcina corruptibilis carnis, non utique sine peccato; quia si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est ; iustificatos tamen nos esse secundum modum peregrinationis nostrae, viventes ex fide quousque fruamur specie, claruit, quantum arbitror, Caritati vestrae. Incipitur ergo a fide, ut perveniatur ad speciem: via curritur, patria quaeritur. In peregrinatione dicit anima nostra: Quoniam ante te est omne desiderium meum, et gemitus meus a te non est absconditus . In patria vero nullus orandi locus erit, sed tantum laudandi. Quare orandi locus nullus erit? Quia nihil deest. Quod hic creditur, ibi videtur; quod hic speratur, ibi tenetur; quod hic petitur, ibi accipitur. Perfectio tamen in hac vita nonnulla est, ad quam sancti martyres pervenerunt. Ideoque habet ecclesiastica disciplina, quod fideles noverunt, cum martyres eo loco recitantur ad altare Dei, ubi non pro ipsis oretur; pro ceteris autem commemoratis defunctis oratur. Iniuria est enim, pro martyre orare, cuius nos debemus orationibus commendari. Certavit enim contra peccatum usque ad sanguinem. Quibusdam vero adhuc imperfectis, et tamen ex parte iustificatis, ad Hebraeos dicit Apostolus: Nondum enim usque ad sanguinem pugnastis, adversus peccatum certantes . Si ergo illi nondum usque ad sanguinem, procul dubio aliqui usque ad sanguinem. Qui usque ad sanguinem? Utique sancti martyres; de quibus lectio sancti apostoli Iacobi modo audita est. Omne gaudium existimate, fratres mei, cum in tentationes varias incideritis . Perfectis iam dicitur, qui etiam possunt dicere: Proba me, Domine, et tenta me . Scientes, inquit, quia tribulatio patientiam operatur; patientia autem opus perfectum habet .
1. 1. Yesterday a sermon was prolonged about our justification, which is ours from the Lord our God, we ministering, he granting, you hearing. And although in this life we are laden with the burden of corruptible flesh, surely not without sin—for if we say that we have no sin, we lead ourselves astray, and the truth is not in us (1 John 1:8)—yet that we have been justified according to the manner of our pilgrimage, living from faith until we enjoy sight, was made clear, as I reckon, to your Charity. We begin, then, from faith, that we may come to sight; we run the way, we seek the homeland. On pilgrimage our soul says, For before you is all my desire, and my groaning is not hidden from you (Ps 38:9 (37:10)). But in the homeland there will be no place for praying, but only for praising. Why will there be no place for praying? Because nothing is lacking. What is here believed, there is seen; what is here hoped for, there is held; what is here asked for, there is received. Yet there is some perfection in this life, to which the holy martyrs attained. And therefore ecclesiastical discipline holds, as the faithful know, that when the martyrs are recited at the altar of God in that place, prayer is not made for them; but for the rest of the commemorated dead prayer is made. For it is an injury to pray for a martyr, to whose prayers we ourselves ought to be commended. For he contended against sin even to blood. But to certain ones, still imperfect, and yet justified in part, the Apostle says to the Hebrews, For you have not yet fought to blood, contending against sin (Heb 12:4). If, then, they had not yet fought to blood, without doubt some did fight to blood. Who fought to blood? The holy martyrs, surely; of whom the reading from the holy apostle James was just now heard. Consider it all joy, my brothers, when you fall into various temptations (Jas 1:2). It is said to those now perfect, who can even say, Test me, O Lord, and try me (Ps 26:2 (25:2)). Knowing, he says, that tribulation works patience; but patience has a perfect work (Jas 1:3-4; Rom 5:3).
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Amanda est enim iustitia; et in hac iustitia amanda gradus sunt proficientium. Prius est ut amori iustitiae non praeponantur omnia quae delectant. Ipse est primus gradus. Quid est quod dixi? Ut inter omnia quae delectant, plus te delectet ipsa iustitia; non ut alia non delectent, sed plus ipsa delectet. Delectant enim quaedam naturaliter infirmitatem nostram, ut cibus et potus delectant esurientes atque sitientes; ut nos delectat haec lux, quae de caelo funditur sole exorto, vel quae de sideribus et luna fulget, vel quae in terra accenditur luminibus consolantibus tenebras oculorum: delectat canora vox et suavissima cantilena, delectat odor bonus; delectant etiam tactum nostrum quaecumque pertinent ad carnis aliquam voluptatem. Et haec omnia, quae nos delectant in sensibus corporis, aliqua licita sunt. Delectant enim, ut dixi, oculos spectacula ista magna naturae; sed delectant oculos etiam spectacula theatrorum. Haec licita, illa illicita. Psalmus sacer suaviter cantatus delectat auditum: sed delectant auditum etiam cantica histrionum. Hoc licite, illud illicite. Delectant olfactum flores et aromata, et haec Dei creatura; delectant olfactum etiam thura in aris daemoniorum. Hoc licite, illud illicite. Delectat gustum cibus non prohibitus; delectant gustum etiam epulae sacrilegorum sacrificiorum. Hoc licite, illud illicite. Delectant coniugales amplexus: delectant etiam meretricum. Hoc licite, illud illicite. Videtis ergo, carissimi, esse in istis corporis sensibus licitas et illicitas delectationes. Iustitia sic delectet, ut vincat etiam licitas delectationes; et ei delectationi qua licite delectaris, praepone iustitiam.
2. 2. For righteousness is to be loved; and in this loving of righteousness there are degrees of those making progress. The first is that all the things that delight not be preferred to the love of righteousness. This is the first degree. What do I mean by what I said? That among all the things that delight you, righteousness itself should delight you more; not that other things do not delight, but that it should delight more. For some things naturally delight our infirmity, as food and drink delight the hungry and thirsty; as this light delights us, which is poured from heaven when the sun has risen, or which shines from the stars and the moon, or which on earth is kindled by lamps consoling the darkness of the eyes; a tuneful voice and a most sweet song delights, a good odor delights; whatever pertains to some pleasure of the flesh delights our touch too. And all these things, which delight us in the senses of the body, some are lawful. For these great spectacles of nature delight the eyes, as I said; but the spectacles of the theaters also delight the eyes. These are lawful, those unlawful. A sacred psalm sweetly sung delights the hearing: but the songs of actors also delight the hearing. This lawfully, that unlawfully. Flowers and spices delight the sense of smell, and these are a creation of God; but the incense on the altars of demons also delights the sense of smell. This lawfully, that unlawfully. Food not forbidden delights the taste; but the banquets of sacrilegious sacrifices also delight the taste. This lawfully, that unlawfully. Conjugal embraces delight; the embraces of harlots also delight. This lawfully, that unlawfully. You see, then, dearly beloved, that in these senses of the body there are lawful and unlawful delights. Let righteousness so delight that it conquers even the lawful delights; and to that delight by which you are lawfully delighted, prefer righteousness.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Constituamus ante oculos, propter hoc quod dixi, exemplum certaminis. Interrogo utrum ames iustitiam; respondebis: Amo. Quod non responderes veraciter, nisi te aliquatenus delectaret. Non enim amatur, nisi quod delectat. Delectare in Domino , Scriptura dicit. Dominus autem iustitia est. Non enim tibi fingere debes Deum quasi idolum. Invisibilibus similis est Deus; et ea in nobis sunt meliora, quae sunt invisibilia. Melior est fides quam caro, melior est fides quam aurum, et melior est fides quam argentum, quam pecunia, quam praedia, quam familia, quam divitiae; et ista omnia videntur, fides non videtur. Cui ergo similiorem putabimus Deum, visibilibus, an invisibilibus? Pretiosis, an vilibus? De vilioribus loquar. Habes duos servos, unum deformem corpore, alium pulcherrimum; sed illum deformem fidelem, alterum infidelem. Dic mihi quem plus diligas: et video te amare invisibilia. Quid ergo, quando plus amas servum fidelem, licet corpore deformem, quam pulchrum infidelem, errasti, et foeda pulchris praeposuisti? Utique non: sed pulchriora foedis praeposuisti. Contempsisti enim oculos carnis, et erexisti oculos cordis. Interrogasti oculos carnis, et quid tibi renuntiaverunt? Iste pulcher est, ille foedus. Repulisti eos, eorum testimonium reprobasti; erexisti oculos cordis in servum fidelem, et in servum infidelem; istum invenisti foedum carne, illum pulchrum; sed pronuntiasti et dixisti: Quid fide pulchrius? Quid infidelitate deformius?
3. 3. Let us set before our eyes, for the sake of what I said, an example of a contest. I ask whether you love righteousness; you will answer: I love it. Which you would not answer truly, unless it delighted you in some measure. For nothing is loved but what delights. Delight in the Lord, Scripture says (Ps 37:4 (36:4)). But the Lord is righteousness. For you ought not to fashion God for yourself as it were an idol. God is like things invisible; and those things in us are better which are invisible. Faith is better than the flesh, faith is better than gold, and faith is better than silver, than money, than estates, than household, than riches; and all these are seen, faith is not seen. To which, then, shall we suppose God more like, the visible, or the invisible? The precious, or the cheap? Let me speak of cheaper things. You have two servants, one deformed in body, another most beautiful; but the deformed one faithful, the other unfaithful. Tell me which you would love more: and I see that you love the invisible. What then, when you love more the faithful servant, though deformed in body, than the beautiful unfaithful one—have you erred, and preferred ugly things to beautiful? Surely not: but you have preferred more beautiful things to ugly. For you despised the eyes of the flesh, and raised up the eyes of the heart. You questioned the eyes of the flesh, and what did they report to you? This one is beautiful, that one ugly. You rejected them, you disapproved their testimony; you raised the eyes of the heart upon the faithful servant and the unfaithful servant; you found this one ugly in flesh, that one beautiful; but you pronounced and said: What is more beautiful than faith? What more deformed than unfaithfulness?
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Ergo prae omnibus voluptatibus, hoc est delectationibus etiam licitis, amanda est iustitia. Si enim habes sensus interiores, omnes illi interiores sensus delectantur delectatione iustitiae. Si habes oculos interiores, vide iustitiae lumen: Quoniam apud te est fons vitae, et in lumine tuo videbimus lumen . De illo lumine dicit Psalmus: Illumina oculos meos, ne umquam obdormiam in morte . Item si habes aures interiores, audi iustitiam. Tales aures quaerebat, qui dicebat: Qui habet aures audiendi, audiat . Si habes olfactum interius, audi Apostolum: Christi bonus odor sumus Deo in omni loco . Si habes gustatum interius, audi: Gustate et videte, quoniam suavis est Dominus . Si habes tactum interius, audi quid sponsa cantet de sponso: Sinistra eius sub capite meo, et dextera eius amplectetur me .
4. 4. Therefore, above all pleasures—that is, above even lawful delights—righteousness is to be loved. For if you have inner senses, all those inner senses are delighted with the delight of righteousness. If you have inner eyes, see the light of righteousness: For with you is the fountain of life, and in your light we shall see light (Ps 36:9 (35:10)). Of that light the Psalm says, Enlighten my eyes, lest I ever sleep in death (Ps 13:3 (12:4)). Likewise, if you have inner ears, hear righteousness. Such ears he sought who said, He who has ears to hear, let him hear (Matt 11:15). If you have an inner sense of smell, hear the Apostle: We are the good odor of Christ to God in every place (2 Cor 2:15). If you have an inner taste, hear: Taste and see that the Lord is sweet (Ps 34:8 (33:9)). If you have an inner touch, hear what the bride sings of the bridegroom: His left hand is under my head, and his right hand will embrace me (Song 2:6).
Sermons5.4.4
4. 5. Exemplum ergo, ut dicere coeperam, huius certaminis proponamus. Videamus, fratres mei, quis nam sit; interrogo, et respondeat, quod dicturus sum, utrum sic delectetur iustitia, ut eam ceteris ad hos sensus corporis pertinentibus delectationibus anteponat. Ecce delectat te aurum tuum, oculos tuos delectat: metallum est pulchrum, fulgentissimum, delectat. Pulchrum est, non nego; nam si pulchrum negavero, Creatori iniuriam facio. Venit ergo tentator, et dicit tibi: Tollo tibi aurum, nisi dixeris pro me falsum testimonium; si autem dixeris, addo tibi. Decertant in te duae delectationes: modo interrogo te quid praeponas, quid te plus delectet, aurum, an veritas; aurum, an verum testimonium. An hoc lucet, et illud non lucet? Fides quaeritur in vero testimonio. Aurum lucet, fides non lucet? Erubesce, habeto oculos; quod amabas in servo tuo, redde Domino tuo. Iamdudum enim cum interrogarem de duobus servis tuis, uno deformi fideli, alio pulchro infideli, quem magis diligeres; respondebas mihi iuste, et praeponebas quod praeponendum fuit. Redi in te, quia modo agitur de te ipso. Certe amasti servum fidelem. Dominus tuus indignus est, si te habeat servum fidelem? Et tu servo tuo fideli pro magno quid promittebas? Ut multum diligeres, summum praemium libertatis. Quid magnum promittebas fideli servo tuo? Libertatem temporalem. Nonne videmus multos servientes non egentes, et liberos mendicantes? Et exigebas ab eo fidem, cui promittebas libertatem: nec ei servas fidem, qui tibi promittit aeternitatem!
4. 5. Let us, then, as I had begun to say, set forth an example of this contest. Let us see, my brothers, who he is; I ask, and let him answer what I am about to say, whether righteousness so delights him that he prefers it to the other delights pertaining to these senses of the body. Behold, your gold delights you, it delights your eyes: it is a beautiful metal, most gleaming, it delights. It is beautiful, I do not deny; for if I denied it beautiful, I would do injury to the Creator. The tempter comes, then, and says to you: I take your gold away, unless you give false testimony for me; but if you give it, I add to your gold. Two delights contend in you: now I ask you which you prefer, which delights you more, gold or truth, gold or true testimony. Or does this one gleam, and that one not gleam? Faith is sought in true testimony. Gold gleams, faith does not gleam? Blush, have eyes; what you loved in your servant, render to your Lord. For a while ago, when I asked about your two servants—one deformed and faithful, the other beautiful and unfaithful—which you would love more, you answered me justly, and preferred what was to be preferred. Return into yourself, because now the matter concerns you yourself. Surely you loved the faithful servant. Is your Lord unworthy to have you as a faithful servant? And what great thing did you promise to your faithful servant? That you might love him much, the highest reward of liberty. What great thing did you promise to your faithful servant? Temporal liberty. Do we not see many in service not in want, and free men begging? And you demanded faith from the one to whom you promised liberty: and you do not keep faith with the One who promises you eternity!
Sermons5.4.5
5. 6. Longum est, per singulos corporis sensus excurrere: sed quod de oculis dixi, hoc de ceteris intellegite; et praeponite delectationi carnis, delectationem mentis. Carnem quippe vestram delectant illicitae voluptates; mentem vestram delectet invisibilis, pulchra, casta, sancta, canora, dulcis iustitia, ut non ad eam timore cogamini. Si enim ad eam timore cogimini, nondum delectat. Peccare non debes, non timore poenae, sed amore iustitiae. Hinc Apostolus dicit: Humanum dico propter infirmitatem carnis vestrae. Sicut enim exhibuistis membra vestra servire immunditiae et iniquitati ad iniquitatem; sic nunc exhibete membra vestra servire iustitiae in sanctificationem . Quid dixi? Humanum dico: quod potestis portare, dico. Quando exhibuistis membra vestra iniquitati ad flagitia perpetranda, timore adducti estis, an delectatione invitati? Quid dicitis? Respondete nobis, quia et qui bene vivitis, male aliquando fortasse vixistis. Quando peccabatis, delectabamini in peccatis vestris; timor vos adducebat ad peccandum, an suavitas peccati? Respondebitis: Suavitas. Ad peccatum suavitas adducit, et ad iustitiam timor impingit? Probate vos, inspicite vos. Tollat aurum qui minatur: suavior est iustitia, lucidior est iustitia. Non det aurum qui promittit: praeponenda est auro iustitia, delectando praeponenda est; fulgentior est, lucidior est, suavior est, dulcior est. Iam ergo si quis se probat, et in hoc certamine superavit, audivit Apostolum dicentem: Humanum dico propter infirmitatem carnis vestrae. Sine dubio pepercit infirmitati; et nescio quid gratius minus idoneis dicere tentavit.
5. 6. It would be long to run through each of the bodily senses; but what I have said of the eyes, understand of the rest; and prefer to the delight of the flesh the delight of the mind. For unlawful pleasures delight your flesh; let the invisible, beautiful, chaste, holy, tuneful, sweet righteousness delight your mind, so that you are not driven to it by fear. For if you are driven to it by fear, it does not yet delight you. You ought not to sin, not from fear of punishment, but from love of righteousness. Hence the Apostle says, I speak in human terms because of the infirmity of your flesh. For just as you presented your members to serve uncleanness and iniquity unto iniquity, so now present your members to serve righteousness unto sanctification (Rom 6:19). What did I say? I speak in human terms: I say what you can bear. When you presented your members to iniquity for perpetrating shameful deeds, were you led by fear, or invited by delight? What do you say? Answer us, for even you who now live well perhaps once lived badly. When you were sinning, you delighted in your sins; did fear lead you to sinning, or the sweetness of sin? You will answer: Sweetness. Does sweetness lead to sin, and fear thrust toward righteousness? Test yourselves, examine yourselves. Let him who threatens take the gold: righteousness is sweeter, righteousness is brighter. Let him who promises not give the gold: righteousness is to be preferred to gold, to be preferred by delighting; it is more gleaming, brighter, sweeter, more pleasant. Now then, if anyone tests himself, and has overcome in this contest, he has heard the Apostle saying, I speak in human terms because of the infirmity of your flesh. Without doubt he spared their infirmity; and he tried to say something more agreeable to the less fit.
Sermons5.5.6
6. 7. Ecce, inquit, hoc dico quod capere potestis; exhibuistis membra vestra deliciis illicitis, peccatorum suavitate ducti estis, ut illa faceretis; ducat vos ad recta facta suavitas et dulcedo iustitiae; amate iustitiam, quomodo amastis iniquitatem. Digna est iustitia, quae a vobis impetret ut exhibeatis illi, quod exhibuistis iniquitati; hoc est: Humanum dico , hoc est, quod infirmitas vestra tolerare adhuc potest. Quid ergo suspendit Apostolus? Quid distulit dicere? Quid distulit, dicam, si potero. Appende iustitiam et iniquitatem; tantumne digna est iustitia, quantum digna fuit iniquitas? Sic amanda est ista, quomodo amata est illa? Absit ut sic, sed et utinam vel sic. Ergo plus? Plus omnino. In iniquitate secutus es voluptatem, pro iustitia tolera dolorem. In iniustitia, inquam, secutus es delectationem, pro iustititia tolera dolorem; hoc est plus. Ecce nescio quis aetatis lubricae impudicus adolescens, suavitate illiciente iniecit oculos in coniugem alienam, amavit, cupit pervenire; quaerit tamen latere: sic enim amat voluptatem, ut plus timeat dolorem. Quare quaerit latere? Timet apprehendi, ligari, adduci, includi, produci, torqueri, occidi. Haec omnia timendo, in illa appetitione suavitatis suae latebra quaerit; aucupatur absentiam mariti, ipsum adiutorem flagitii sui timet invenire, quia conscio se formidat implicare. Et videmus eum suavitate duci: sed suavitas illa non est tanta, ut vincat etiam timorem et dolorem timoremque poenarum. Da mihi pulchram iustitiam, da mihi fidei pulchritudinem; procedat in medium, ostendat se oculis cordis, inspiret fervorem amatoribus suis. Iam tibi dicitur: Frui me vis? Contemne quidquid te aliud delectat, contemne pro me. Ecce contempsisti, parum est illi: Humanum est hoc, propter infirmitatem carnis vestrae. Parum est ut contemnas quidquid te delectabat: contemne quidquid te terrebat; contemne carceres, contemne vincula, contemne equuleum, contemne tormenta, contemne mortem. Haec vicisti, me invenisti. In utroque gradu amatores iustitiae vos probate.
6. 7. Behold, he says, I say this which you can grasp; you presented your members to unlawful delights, you were led by the sweetness of sins to do them; let the sweetness and the pleasantness of righteousness lead you to right deeds; love righteousness as you loved iniquity. Righteousness is worthy that it obtain from you that you present to it what you presented to iniquity; this is, I speak in human terms—that is, what your infirmity can still bear. What, then, did the Apostle hold back? What did he defer to say? What he deferred, I will say, if I can. Weigh righteousness and iniquity; is righteousness only as worthy as iniquity was worthy? Is this to be loved as that was loved? Far be it that it be so—and yet would that it were even so. Therefore more? More, entirely. In iniquity you followed pleasure; for righteousness bear pain. In injustice, I say, you followed delight; for righteousness bear pain; this is "more." Behold some shameless young man of slippery age, by enticing sweetness cast his eyes on another's wife, loved her, desires to attain her; yet he seeks to lie hidden: for he so loves the pleasure that he more fears the pain. Why does he seek to lie hidden? He fears to be caught, bound, brought in, shut up, led out, tortured, killed. Fearing all these things, in that craving of his sweetness he seeks a hiding place; he watches for the husband's absence, he fears to find the very helper of his shameful deed, because he dreads to involve himself with a witness. And we see that he is led by sweetness: but that sweetness is not so great that it conquers even the fear and pain and dread of punishments. Give me beautiful righteousness, give me the beauty of faith; let it come forth into the midst, let it show itself to the eyes of the heart, let it breathe fervor into its lovers. Now it is said to you: Do you wish to enjoy me? Despise whatever else delights you, despise it for me. Behold, you have despised it; that is too little for it: This is human, on account of the infirmity of your flesh. It is too little that you despise whatever delighted you: despise whatever terrified you; despise prisons, despise chains, despise the rack, despise torments, despise death. These you have conquered, me you have found. In both degrees prove yourselves lovers of righteousness.
Sermons5.6.7
7. 8. Invenimus forsitan aliquos qui praeponant iustitiae delectationem voluptatibus et delectationi corporis sui: qui autem pro illa poenas, dolores, mortemque contemnat, putas est aliquis in vobis? Saltem cogitemus, quod profiteri non audemus. Quid cogitamus? Ubi cogitamus? Millia martyrum adiacent oculis nostris, ipsi veri amatores perfectique iustitiae. De illis dictum est: Omne gaudium existimate, fratres mei, cum in tentationes varias incideritis; scientes quod probatio fidei vestrae patientiam operatur; patientia autem opus perfectum habet . Quid addi potest, ut opus perfectum habeat? Amat, ardet, fervet; calcat omnia quae delectant, et transit; venit ad aspera, horrenda, truculenta, minantia; calcat, frangit, et transit. O amare, o ire, o sibi perire, o ad Deum pervenire! Qui animam suam amat, perdet illam; et qui perdiderit animam suam propter me, in vitam aeternam inveniet illam . Sic armandus est amator iustitiae, sic armandus est amator invisibilis pulchritudinis. Quae dico vobis in tenebris, dicite in lumine; et quae in aure auditis, super tecta praedicate . Quid est: Quae dico vobis in tenebris, dicite in lumine? Quae dico et auditis mente, dicite praesumentes. Et quod in aure auditis, super tecta praedicate. Quid est: In aure auditis? In secreto auditis; quia profiteri et confiteri adhuc timetis. Quid est ergo: Super tecta praedicate? Domus vestrae, corpora vestra; domus vestrae, carnes vestrae. Ascende in tectum, calca carnem, et praedica verbum.
7. 8. We find, perhaps, some who prefer the delight of righteousness to the pleasures and delight of their own body: but one who, for its sake, would despise punishments, pains, and death—do you suppose there is anyone among you? Let us at least think on what we do not dare to profess. What do we think on? Where do we think on it? Thousands of martyrs lie before our eyes, themselves the true and perfect lovers of righteousness. Of them it was said, Consider it all joy, my brothers, when you fall into various temptations; knowing that the testing of your faith works patience; but patience has a perfect work (Jas 1:2-4). What can be added, that it may have a perfect work? He loves, he burns, he is fervent; he tramples all the things that delight, and passes on; he comes to the harsh, the dreadful, the savage, the threatening; he tramples, breaks through, and passes on. O to love, O to go, O to perish to oneself, O to attain to God! He who loves his soul will lose it; and he who loses his soul for my sake will find it unto eternal life (John 12:25). So the lover of righteousness must be armed, so the lover of invisible beauty must be armed. What I tell you in the darkness, speak in the light; and what you hear in the ear, preach upon the housetops (Matt 10:27). What is, What I tell you in the darkness, speak in the light? What I say and you hear in the mind, speak with boldness. And what you hear in the ear, preach upon the housetops. What is, you hear in the ear? You hear in secret; because you still fear to profess and confess. What, then, is, preach upon the housetops? Your houses are your bodies; your houses are your flesh. Climb upon the roof, trample the flesh, and preach the word.
Sermons5.7.8
8. 9. 9 Sed prius, fratres mei, plangite quod eratis, ut quod nondum estis, esse possitis. Hoc quod loquor magnum est. Et unde nobis magnum? Summum est, perfectum est, optimum est; unde nobis? Audite unde nobis: Omne datum optimum et omne donum perfectum desursum est, descendens a Patre luminum, apud quem non est transmutatio, nec momenti obumbratio . Inde est quod habemus bonum, inde est quod nondum habemus. Non habetis? Petite, et accipietis . Si vos, ait Salvator, si vos cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris; quanto magis Pater vester caelestis dabit bona petentibus se ? Examinet se ergo omnis homo, et quidquid in se boni invenerit, quod pertineat ad iustificationem nostram, agat gratias illi qui dedit; et agendo gratias illi qui dedit, ab illo petat et quod nondum dedit. Non enim tu in accipiendo proficis, et ille in dando deficit. Quantumlibet capaces fauces, capacem ventrem afferas; fons vincit sitientem.
8. 9. But first, my brothers, lament what you were, that you may be able to be what you are not yet. This of which I speak is great. And whence is it great to us? It is highest, perfect, best; whence is it to us? Hear whence it is to us: Every best gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no change, nor shadow of alteration (Jas 1:17). From there comes what good we have, from there what we do not yet have. You do not have it? Ask, and you will receive (John 16:24). If you, says the Savior, if you, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children; how much more will your heavenly Father give good things to those who ask him (Matt 7:11)? Let every person, then, examine himself, and whatever good he finds in himself that pertains to our justification, let him give thanks to the one who gave it; and by giving thanks to the one who gave, let him ask of him also what he has not yet given. For you do not advance in receiving while he fails in giving. However capacious the throat, however capacious the belly you bring, the fountain overcomes the thirsty.
Sermons5.8.9
SERMO 159/A
Sermon 159/A
Sermons5.8.9
1. Sollemnitates sanctorum martyrum exhortationes sunt martyriorum, ut imitari delectet quod celebrare delectat. Ad hoc nos et sancta Scriptura recens in auribus nostris exhortatur et quodammodo accendit, dicente apostolo: Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? Tribulatio, an angustia, an persecutio, an fames, an nuditas, an periculum, an gladius? Sicut scriptum est: Quoniam propter te mortificamur tota die, deputati sumus ut oves victimae.. Deinde sequuntur alia quae violenta videntur ad separationem, in quibus tamen dat victoriam, ne ab illo separemur, qui a nobis non separatur. Propter has enim angustias imminentesque pressuras, polliceri nobis dignatus est fidelis promissor et benignus dator, quod nobiscum futurus esset usque in consummationem saeculi . Certus sum enim, inquit, quia neque mors neque vita, neque angeli neque principatus, neque praesentia neque futura, neque virtus, neque altitudo neque profundum, neque alia creatura - non enim potuit omnia nominare - poterit nos separare a caritate Dei, quae est in Christo Iesu Domino nostro . Atque ut nos, ne separaremur a Christo, fortissimos redderet spe et fiducia adversus omnes huius saeculi temptationes, quia vires nostrae nullo modo sufficiunt si divino adiutorio deseramur, superius dixit: Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? Apostolus, quibusdam breviter commemoratis quae videntur fidem christianam oppugnare saeviendo, ne talia nos separarent a caritate Christi, armavit nos ad omnia toleranda pro Christo.
1. The solemnities of the holy martyrs are exhortations to martyrdoms, that it may be a delight to imitate what it is a delight to celebrate. To this the holy Scripture, fresh in our ears, exhorts and in a way kindles us, the Apostle saying, Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or the sword? As it is written: For on account of you we are put to death all the day, we are reckoned as sheep for the victim (Rom 8:35-36). Then follow other things that seem violent unto separation, in which, nevertheless, he gives victory, lest we be separated from the one who is not separated from us. For on account of these straits and impending pressures, the faithful promiser and benign giver deigned to promise us that he would be with us even to the consummation of the age (Matt 28:20). For I am certain, he says, that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities, nor things present nor things to come, nor power, nor height nor depth, nor any other creature—for he could not name everything—will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord (Rom 8:38-39). And so that he might render us most strong in hope and confidence against all the temptations of this age, lest we be separated from Christ—because our strength in no way suffices if we are forsaken by divine help—he said above, If God is for us, who is against us (Rom 8:31)? The Apostle, having briefly mentioned certain things that seem to assail the Christian faith by raging, lest such things separate us from the love of Christ, armed us to endure all things for Christ.
Sermons5.1
2. Sed quia non solum conantur ea separare quae saeviunt, verum etiam quae blandiuntur, sicut armati sumus apostolicis verbis adversus ea quae nos a Christo saeviendo separare conantur, sic armati sumus a Domino ipso Christo adversus ea quae nos blandiendo seducere moliuntur. Metuendum est enim ne forte quem non separat crudelis gladius separare possit carnalis affectus. Ergo et contra illa quae blandiendo impugnant fidem nostram, ne quod impugnant expugnent, Dominum audiamus dicentem: Si quis venit ad me et non odit patrem, matrem, uxorem, filios, fratres, insuper et animam suam, non potest meus esse discipulus. Et qui non baiulat crucem suam et sequitur me, non potest esse meus discipulus . Dominus utrumque commemoravit et quod illiciendo suave est ut decipiat, et quod minando grave est. Nam contra blandimenta deceptionis de affectu carnali ait: Si quis venit ad me et non odit patrem et matrem, uxorem, filios et cetera, adversus ea vero quae fremendo et terrendo avertunt a fide, uno crucis nomine structos nos armatosque munit. Qui non, inquit, baiulat crucem suam et sequitur me, id est qui non tolerat - hoc est enim baiulat - omnia quae amara et dura sunt in hoc saeculo tamquam crux, et sequitur me, non potest meus esse discipulus.
2. But because not only the things that rage try to separate, but also the things that flatter, just as we have been armed by the apostolic words against the things that try to separate us from Christ by raging, so we have been armed by the Lord Christ himself against the things that strive to seduce us by flattering. For it is to be feared lest perchance one whom the cruel sword does not separate, carnal affection may separate. Therefore, against those things too that assail our faith by flattering, lest they take by storm what they assail, let us hear the Lord saying, If anyone comes to me and does not hate father, mother, wife, children, brothers, and moreover his own soul, he cannot be my disciple. And he who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple (Luke 14:26-27). The Lord mentioned both: what is sweet by enticing, so as to deceive, and what is hard by threatening. For against the flatteries of deception, from carnal affection, he says, If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife, children, and the rest; but against those things that, by roaring and terrifying, turn one away from faith, by the one name of the cross he fortifies us, built up and armed. He who does not, he says, carry his cross and follow me—that is, who does not bear (for this is what "carry" is) all the bitter and hard things in this age, as it were a cross, and follow me, cannot be my disciple.
Sermons5.2
3. Iam ergo martyrem Christi constituamus in medio inter minantes et blandientes; utraque ianua pulsatur, qua intratur ad cor: cupiditas et timor. Cupiditatis ianuam pulsant pater, mater, uxor, filii, fratres: omnia blanda sunt, suavia sunt, dulcia sunt. Sed numquid suaviora quam Deus? numquid dulciora quam Christus? Si non creditis, gustate et videte quam suavis est Dominus . Timoris ianuam pulsant minae, furor, opprobria, ad extremum ipsi dolores corporis, quos nemo potest contemnendo non sentire. Nam si contempserit pecuniam, damna patitur, non dolores. Totum hoc est in animo contemnentis: non te cruciat qui tibi aufert quod non amas. Sed amas pecuniam: times eum qui damna comminatur, nec te ipse cruciat, sed tu te cruciasti, quia te doloribus inseruisti. Radix est enim malorum avaritia, quam quidam appetentes a fide pererraverunt et inseruerunt se doloribus multis . Damna comminatur: qui te non invenit cupidum, invenit liberum; inanem risisti, quia non te inseruisti. Sic etiam cetera quae per doctrinam salutarem contemnere discimus, non amare admonemur, ut in temptationibus liberi inveniamur. Ad quam libertatem nos hortatur illa apostolica lectio, ubi est: Et qui utuntur hoc mundo tamquam non utentes sint , ut habeant libertatis usum, non cupiditatis affectum. Praeterit enim figura huius mundi. Volo vos sine sollicitudine esse .
3. Now then, let us set the martyr of Christ in the midst, between those who threaten and those who flatter; both doors are knocked at, by which one enters to the heart: desire and fear. At the door of desire knock father, mother, wife, children, brothers: all are alluring, sweet, pleasant. But are they sweeter than God? are they more pleasant than Christ? If you do not believe, taste and see how sweet the Lord is (Ps 34:8 (33:9)). At the door of fear knock threats, fury, reproaches, and finally the very pains of the body, which no one can fail to feel by despising them. For if he despises money, he suffers losses, not pains. All this lies in the soul of the one despising: he does not torment you who takes from you what you do not love. But you love money: you fear the one who threatens losses, and he does not torment you, but you have tormented yourself, because you have engrafted yourself onto pains. For the root of evils is greed, which some craving have strayed from the faith and engrafted themselves onto many pains (1 Tim 6:10). He threatens losses: the one who finds you not greedy finds you free; you have laughed at him as empty-handed, because you did not engraft yourself. So too the other things which by wholesome teaching we learn to despise, we are admonished not to love, that in temptations we may be found free. To which liberty that apostolic reading exhorts us, where it says, And let those who use this world be as those who do not use it (1 Cor 7:31), that they may have the use of liberty, not the affection of desire. For the figure of this world passes away. I wish you to be without anxiety (1 Cor 7:31-32).
Sermons5.3
4. Sed restat carnis infirmitas, quam unusquisque nostrum, quamdiu in hoc saeculo vivit, a se non potest alienare. Quid facis? Cum pungitur caro, non doleat cor? Vulnus est infirmitatis, donec capiat vestimentum immortalitatis. Ibi magna lucta est. Voluntate aversa a pecunia, stat martyr Dei securus adversus eos qui damnis terrent. " Tollat, inquit, quod non amo, ubi sentio? ". Exilium minatur, sed ei minatur a quo sola superna patria desideratur. Hic Christianus, quocumque ierit, peregrinus est. Opprobria comminatur. Habet quid respondeat: Gloria nostra haec est testimonium conscientiae nostrae . Exhonorationem minatur. Quantus honor est transitorius! Homo exhonorationem minatur, sed Dominus hominum aeternum honorem pollicetur. His contemptis omnibus, libertas tuta est. Sed quid de carne? Restat anima cum veste sua, et ea veste quam non exuit nisi mors. Iam homo, id est anima, de vicino urgetur, de infirmitate carnis suae. Ideo in cruce pendentis videntur, immo intelleguntur, verba illa Domini in psalmo magnifico, ubi paene evangelium recitatur, ubi dictum est: Foderunt manus meas et pedes meos, dinumeraverunt omnia ossa mea. Ipsi vero consideraverunt me, diviserunt sibi vestimenta mea et super vestem meam miserunt sortem . Verba sunt iam patientis, iam in cruce pendentis, et tamen dicitur ibi: Ne discedas a me, quoniam tribulatio proxima est . Si proxima intellexeris " temporis propinquantis ", non erunt verba in cruce pendentis: iam tribulatio inerat, si pendebat. Sed quare dictum est: proxima est? Iam in carne est. Nihil est proximius animae et carni quam portat illa. Alia foris sunt, externa appellantur, quod extra sunt. Quando caro cruciatur, anima de proximo pulsatur.
4. But there remains the infirmity of the flesh, which each of us, as long as he lives in this age, cannot estrange from himself. What do you do? When the flesh is pricked, will the heart not grieve? It is a wound of infirmity, until it takes on the garment of immortality. There the great struggle is. With the will turned away from money, the martyr of God stands secure against those who terrify with losses. "Let him take," he says, "what I do not love—where do I feel it?" He threatens exile, but threatens one by whom only the heavenly homeland is longed for. This Christian, wherever he goes, is a pilgrim. He threatens reproaches. He has something to answer: This is our glory, the testimony of our conscience (2 Cor 1:12). He threatens dishonor. How great is honor that passes away! A man threatens dishonor, but the Lord of men promises eternal honor. All these things being despised, liberty is safe. But what of the flesh? The soul remains with its garment, and with that garment which nothing but death strips off. Now the man—that is, the soul—is pressed from close by, from the infirmity of his own flesh. Therefore the words of the Lord in the magnificent Psalm seem—rather, are understood—to be those of one hanging on the cross, where almost the gospel is recited, where it was said, They have pierced my hands and my feet, they have numbered all my bones. But they themselves looked upon me, they divided my garments among themselves, and over my garment they cast lots (Ps 22:16-18 (21:17-19)). They are the words of one already suffering, already hanging on the cross, and yet it is said there, Do not depart from me, for tribulation is near (Ps 22:11 (21:12)). If you understand near as "of an approaching time," they will not be the words of one hanging on the cross: tribulation was already present, if he was hanging. But why was it said, it is near? It is already in the flesh. Nothing is nearer to the soul than the flesh which it carries. Other things are outside, are called external, because they are outside. When the flesh is tormented, the soul is knocked at from close by.
Sermons5.4
5. Gravia sunt haec, sed in omnibus supervincimus propter eum qui dilexit nos . Quare autem et in his vincimus? Quia si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? Ideo Dominus nomine crucis omnia terribilia, dura, amara, intoleranda et saeva significare dignatus est. Nam et in ipsis generibus mortium nihil est cruce intolerabilius. Magno quippe pondere additum est ab eodem apostolo, cum nobis humilitatem Domini commendaret; ait enim: Non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo, sed semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens, in similitudinem hominum factus, et habitu inventus ut homo . Quanta humiliatio Domini, fieri hominem! Sed audi adhuc. Ecce humiliatus est, quia factus est homo. Quid ultra? Humiliavit, inquit, semetipsum, factus oboediens usque ad mortem, non solum usque ad humanam nativitatem, sed etiam usque ad mortem. Habes ad hoc quod addas? " Habeo, inquit: mortem autem crucis ". Istum finem intuens Domini omnium amarissimum, crucem appellavit omnia quae iure pro eius nomine, <etsi > fides perpessa fuerit, caro christiana patitur. Nam fides nihil patitur, immo et passiones tolerabiles praestat. Instructi igitur ex utroque latere et munitam habentes utramque ianuam cupiditatis et timoris, nihil cupientes amplius quam quod promittit Deus, nihil timentes amplius quam quod minatur Deus, blandientes minantesque repellimus.
5. These things are grave, but in all things we more than conquer through him who loved us (Rom 8:37). But why do we conquer even in these? Because if God is for us, who is against us (Rom 8:31)? Therefore the Lord deigned by the name of the cross to signify all things terrible, hard, bitter, intolerable, and savage. For even among the kinds of death there is nothing more intolerable than the cross. Indeed, it was added with great weight by the same Apostle, when he commended to us the humility of the Lord; for he says, He did not consider it robbery to be equal to God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men, and found in fashion as a man (Phil 2:6-7). How great the humiliation of the Lord, to become a man! But hear further. Behold, he was humbled, because he was made a man. What more? He humbled, he says, himself, made obedient unto death—not only unto a human birth, but even unto death. Have you anything to add to this? "I have," he says: but the death of the cross (Phil 2:8). Looking on this end of the Lord, the most bitter of all, he called by the name "cross" all the things that the Christian flesh suffers when rightfully, for his name, the faith has endured them. For faith suffers nothing; rather, it makes even the sufferings bearable. Instructed, then, on both sides, and having both doors of desire and fear fortified, desiring nothing more than what God promises, fearing nothing more than what God threatens, we repel both those who flatter and those who threaten.
Sermons5.5
6. Sed exsistit aliquis et facit nobis quaestionem et dicit: " Ferenda sunt quidem pro fide Christi quaecumque amara, quaecumque dura, quaecumque saeva et perpessu aspera, ferenda omnino, sed movet me quod ille [qui] praeceptis suis primum praeceptum posuit ad diligendum proximum: Honora patrem et matrem, quod est mandatum primum in promissione, ut bene sit tibi ; et cum hoc apostolus pro magno commemoraret, dicit mihi Dominus: Si quis venit ad me et non odit patrem et matrem . Ubi audiam? Quid horum accipiam? Quomodo obtemperabo iubenti ut honorem patrem et matrem, item iubenti ut oderim patrem et matrem? Nonne ipse unus est qui praecipit utrumque, an - sicut quidam vani putant - alius est qui legem dedit et alius est qui Evangelium propagavit, quoniam in lege scriptum est: Honora patrem et matrem , in Evangelio: Quisquis non oderit patrem et matrem "? Absit! Ipse est et legis lator et Evangelii propagator, ipse est omnino. Tu agnosce Dominum: ne contraria praeciperet, tempora praeceptis distribuit. Nam si putas praeceptum quod iubemur honorare patrem et matrem, quia in veteri testamento prius legitur, contrarium esse praecepto evangelico, in eodem veteri testamento scriptum est tale aliquid quale in evangelio modo cum legeretur audivimus. Qui dicit patri et matri: Non novi vos, et qui filios suos non agnoscit, ipse cogitavit testamentum meum . Quam simile est, quam geminum, quam aequale agnoscitur. Ergo unus Dominus utrumque praecipiens, sed nos tempora discernamus.
6. But someone stands up and raises a question for us and says: "All the bitter things, all the hard things, all the savage and harsh-to-endure things are indeed to be borne for the faith of Christ, to be borne entirely; but it troubles me that he who among his precepts placed the first precept for loving one's neighbor: Honor your father and mother, which is the first commandment with a promise, that it may be well with you (Eph 6:2; Exod 20:12); and when the Apostle mentioned this as a great thing, the Lord says to me, If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother (Luke 14:26). To which shall I listen? Which of these shall I accept? How shall I obey the one commanding me to honor father and mother, and likewise the one commanding me to hate father and mother? Is he not one and the same who commands both, or—as certain vain people suppose—is it one who gave the law and another who propagated the Gospel, since in the law it is written, Honor father and mother, in the Gospel, Whoever does not hate father and mother?" Far from it! He himself is both the giver of the law and the propagator of the Gospel; he himself, entirely. Recognize the Lord: lest he command contrary things, he distributed the precepts according to the times. For if you think that the precept commanding us to honor father and mother, because it is read earlier in the Old Testament, is contrary to the gospel precept, in that same Old Testament something is written like what we just now heard read in the gospel. He who says to father and mother, "I do not know you," and who does not acknowledge his own children, he has kept my testament (Deut 33:9). How similar, how twinned, how equal it is recognized to be. Therefore one Lord commands both, but let us distinguish the times.
Sermons5.6
7. Ad coronam martyr armatur, et venit blandiens pater et mater, ut impediant quod promittit Deus, pollicentes vanam hereditatem et auferentes lucis aeternitatem . Hic plane noli agnoscere retinentes, immo oderis hic patrem, pietate oderis talem, ne remaneat talis. Sic patrem, sic matrem, sic filios, sic fratres, sic uxorem in qua maior est quaestio, quando ad hunc articulum ventum fuerit, oderis et ipsam, si et ipsa impedire conatur. Evam cave: tunc non est membrum tuum, sed serpentis ministerium . Qui primam eius vocem insipienter audisti, nec experimento profecisti, sed ea ipsa uxor, ut impediat a corona martyrem virum, et femineis dolis viro quasi de lege praescribit et de ipso Evangelio. " Audi, inquit, praeceptum ". Quod praeceptum? " Quod Deus coniunxit, homo non separet . Plane audi, ne spernas. Quod Deus coniunxit, homo non separet ". Sed vide, ne uxor a Deo separet. " Sed quod coniunxit, homo non debet separare ". Humanus affectus debet ab ipso Deo hominem separare? Et ubi erit quod modo audistis: Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? Hic ergo timere noli: non homo separat quod Deus coniunxit, sed Deus separat separare conantem. Non audias ergo uxorem dicentem tibi: " Membrum tuum sum, ecce membrum es ". Responde: " Si membrum meum putresceret et putrescendo totum corpus tabescere conaretur, a medico nonne praecideretur? Nonne ipsum Dominum et medicum verum audio dicentem: Expedit enim tibi ut pereat unum membrorum tuorum, quam ut totum corpus tuum eat in gehennam ? ". Ergo responde, bene intellecta lege, contra male utentem legem. Nihil enim magnum facit serpens, nihil magnum conatur per Evam de lege te velle decipere, qui primum Adam sine lege decepit. Vidit enim te modo de lege pasci et in esca tua laqueum ponit. Sed dic: Oculi mei semper ad Dominum, quoniam ipse evellet de laqueo pedes meos . Ergo et in hoc periculo ubi de lege temptaris, oculi tui sint ad Dominum, quia et ipse ab eodem serpente de lege temptatus est.
7. The martyr is armed for the crown, and father and mother come flattering, to hinder what God promises, promising a vain inheritance and taking away the eternity of light. Here plainly do not acknowledge those who hold you back; rather, hate the father here, out of devotion hate such a one, that he may not remain such. So father, so mother, so children, so brothers, so the wife—in whom is the greater question, when it has come to this point—hate even her, if she too tries to hinder you. Beware of Eve: then she is not your member, but the ministry of the serpent. You who unwisely heard her first voice, and did not profit by experience, but the very wife, to hinder the martyr husband from the crown, by feminine wiles prescribes to the husband as it were from the law and from the very Gospel. "Hear," she says, "the precept." What precept? "What God has joined, let not man separate (Matt 19:6). Hear plainly, do not scorn it. What God has joined, let not man separate." But see that the wife does not separate you from God. "But what he has joined, man ought not to separate." Ought human affection to separate man from God himself? And where will be what you just now heard, Who will separate us from the love of Christ (Rom 8:35)? Here, then, do not fear: man does not separate what God has joined, but God separates the one trying to separate. Do not, then, listen to the wife saying to you, "I am your member, behold, you are a member." Answer: "If my member were rotting, and by rotting were trying to make the whole body waste away, would it not be cut off by the physician? Do I not hear the Lord and true physician himself saying, For it is profitable for you that one of your members perish, rather than that your whole body go into hell (Matt 5:29)?" Answer, then, with the law well understood, against the one who uses the law badly. For the serpent does nothing great, attempts nothing great in wishing to deceive you about the law through Eve—the serpent who deceived the first Adam without law. For he saw you now feeding on the law, and sets a snare in your food. But say, My eyes are always toward the Lord, for he will pluck my feet out of the snare (Ps 25:15 (24:15)). So in this peril too, where you are tempted about the law, let your eyes be toward the Lord, because he too was tempted by the same serpent about the law.
Sermons5.7
8. Cum enim Dominus ad exemplum ponendum nobis certaminis atque victoriae dignatus esset a diabolo temptari, sicut dignatus est ab impiis crucifigi, in prima temptatione - nam trinam fuisse legimus - diabolo de lege respondit dicenti: Si filius Dei es, dic lapidibus istis ut panes fiant , ille de lege: Non in pane solo vivit homo, sed in omni verbo Dei . Rursus in alia temptatione: Adora me prostratus, et dabo tibi haec , et ille de lege: Scriptum est: Dominum Deum tuum adorabis, et illi soli servies . At ubi vidit se ille callidus serpens bis numero ex lege repulsum, de lege tetendit laqueum tertium: " Mitte te, inquit, deorsum de pinna templi, si filius Dei es ". Et continuo ad instrumentum legis, ut inde pugnaret unde fuerat superatus: " Scriptum est enim, inquit: Angelis suis mandavit de te, in manibus tollant te, ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum . Quia ergo, inquit, si filius Dei es, suscipiunt te angeli ne vexeris, mitte te et quod es proba nobis ". Numquid hic quia diabolus ausus est manum mittere ad legem, Dominus manum tulit a lege? Et hic ex eadem lege vulneravit inimicum, prostravit, confusum abire fecit. Ait enim: Scriptum est: Non temptabis Dominum Deum tuum . Et hic ergo quando vides uxorem impedire conantem te a martyrio, recitare tibi legem et dicere: " Quod Deus coniunxit, homo non separet , recita ibi et tu legem [Evangelium]: Quisquis venit ad me et non odit patrem et matrem, uxorem et filios ... ".
8. For when the Lord, to set us an example of contest and victory, deigned to be tempted by the devil, just as he deigned to be crucified by the ungodly, in the first temptation—for we read that there were three—he answered from the law the devil who said, If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become loaves (Matt 4:3); he, from the law: Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word of God (Matt 4:4; Deut 8:3). Again, in another temptation: Worship me prostrate, and I will give you these things; and he, from the law: It is written: You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve (Matt 4:9-10; Deut 6:13). But when that cunning serpent saw himself twice repulsed from the law, he stretched a third snare from the law: "Throw yourself," he said, "down from the pinnacle of the temple, if you are the Son of God." And at once, to the instrument of the law, that he might fight from where he had been overcome: "For it is written," he said, "He has commanded his angels concerning you, that they bear you up in their hands, lest you dash your foot against a stone (Matt 4:6; Ps 91:11-12 (90:11-12)). Because, then," he said, "if you are the Son of God, the angels receive you lest you be harmed, throw yourself down and prove to us what you are." Surely here, because the devil dared to put his hand to the law, did the Lord take his hand from the law? Here too, from the same law, he wounded the enemy, laid him low, made him go off confounded. For he said, It is written: You shall not tempt the Lord your God (Matt 4:7; Deut 6:16). And here too, then, when you see the wife trying to hinder you from martyrdom, reciting the law to you and saying, "What God has joined, let not man separate," recite there too the law of the Gospel: Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children (Luke 14:26).
Sermons5.8
9. Noli ergo irasci, uxor. Cui tu hic in hac causa irasceris, quia te odit, odit et patrem in hac causa, odit et matrem. Sed parum est uxori, quia scriptum est: Dimittet homo patrem et matrem et adhaerebit uxori suae . Si parentes enim, id est pater et mater, dixerint filio: " Si non vult uxor tua manere nobiscum, tu nobiscum mane, et illam dimitte ", assumat hoc praeceptum uxor et pugnet, praescribat viro et dicat ex lege Dei: " Immo illos dimitte et me noli dimittere. Recito enim: Dimittet homo patrem et matrem et adhaerebit uxori suae ". Recitasti, intellexisti, vicisti; prorsus nemo ambigit patrem et matrem separare conantes filium ab uxore sua esse dimittendos, ut uxor non deseratur. Sed intende, mulier, si fidelis esse dignaris, et sermonem fidei audire non dedignaris, intende: <unde > superaveris, et inde patere te superari. Ecce compescimus socerum tuum et socrum tuam, patrem et matrem viri tui, qui genuerunt, qui nutrierunt, qui ad hanc aetatem qua tibi vir fieret perduxerunt, compescimus omnino et corripuimus auctoritate divina et diximus: " Nolite separare velle filium ab uxore propter vos, a vobis enim melius quam ab illa separatur. Si fieri potest, omnes simul estote. Si autem hoc fieri non potest, melius est ille cum illa quam vobiscum sine
illa ". Egimus causam tuam. Vicisti in hoc iudicio: patere ut vincaris in altero, quia et ibi causam tuam agimus. Deinde fideliter causam carnis tuae egimus: debemus relinquere causam sempiternae salutis tuae? Disce. Non te separaverunt pater et mater viri tui a marito tuo: non separabis virum tuum a Deo tuo.
9. Do not, then, be angry, wife. The one at whom you are angry here, in this cause, because he hates you, also hates the father in this cause, also hates the mother. But it is too little for the wife, because it is written, A man will leave father and mother and will cleave to his wife (Gen 2:24; Matt 19:5). For if the parents—that is, father and mother—say to the son, "If your wife does not wish to stay with us, you stay with us, and dismiss her," let the wife take up this precept and fight, prescribe to the husband and say from the law of God, "Rather, dismiss them and do not dismiss me. For I recite, A man will leave father and mother and will cleave to his wife." You have recited, you have understood, you have conquered; plainly no one doubts that father and mother trying to separate the son from his wife are to be dismissed, that the wife not be deserted. But attend, woman, if you deign to be faithful, and do not disdain to hear a word of faith, attend: from where you have conquered, allow yourself there to be conquered. Behold, we restrain your father-in-law and your mother-in-law, the father and mother of your husband, who begot him, who nourished him, who brought him to this age at which he might become your husband; we wholly restrain and rebuke them by divine authority, and we have said: "Do not wish to separate the son from his wife on your account, for he is better separated from you than from her. If it can be done, all be together. But if this cannot be done, it is better that he be with her than with you without her." We have pleaded your cause. You have conquered in this judgment: allow yourself to be conquered in another, because there too we plead your cause. We have faithfully pleaded the cause of your flesh: ought we to abandon the cause of your everlasting salvation? Learn. The father and mother of your husband did not separate you from your husband: do not separate your husband from your God.
Sermons5.9
10. Ibi plus timenda fornicatio est in ea castitate quam Deo anima debet, ibi plus timenda est fornicatio, cui timebat apostolus dicens: Desponsavi uni viro virginem castam exhibere Christo. Timeo autem ne, sicut serpens Evam seduxit in versutia sua, sic et vestrae mentes corrumpantur a castitate Dei quae est in Christo Iesu . Vides, quia et ibi exigitur castitas. Quare non vis tu separari a viro tuo? Ne habeas fornicationis necessitatem? Sed in martyrio viri tui timere nihil debes. Illo enim coronato et a rebus humanis ad divina translato, vidua eris; si nupseris, fornicaria non eris. Sed forte uxor martyris nubere ulterius erubescis. Ecce coronato viro tuo, in tuto sit et fides tua. Noli detrahere virum tuum a complexu coniugii spiritalis. Et ibi exigitur castitas, et plus ibi quia maior ibi, plus ibi quia aeterna ibi. Perdidisti omnem qui fornicatur abs te . Quid enim agis aliud, ut tuis blandimentis superetur vir tuus, quam non sit in eo virtus? In quo non erit virtus, quam male erit vir tuus! Superatur elisus, blanditiis tuis effeminatus: quomodo vir tuus erit, qui iam vir non erit? Quid enim agis, nisi ut tuis blandimentis cedat, Dei praecepta contemnat, Christum neget, idolis sacrificet? Ecce cuius carnem quaeris, anima fornicatur, ecce audit: Perdidisti omnem qui fornicatur abs te. Sed vis ut haereat tibi et separetur a Deo: audi quod sequitur: Perdidisti omnem qui fornicatur abs te; mihi autem adhaerere Deo bonum est . Audi virum tuum armatum fide, iaculantem contra iniquitatem tuam tela iustitiae: Certus sum, inquit, quia neque mors neque vita, neque angelus neque principatus, neque altitudo neque profundum, neque creatura alia poterit nos separare [nos] a caritate Dei, quae est in Christo Iesu . Forte hic dicis: " Sed in his omnibus non nominavit uxorem ". In his, inquis, omnibus non nominavit uxorem. Dolosa, apostolica virtus etiam contra te vigilavit addendo: nec alia creatura. An forte dicere audebis te non esse creaturam? Si creatura es, immo quia creatura es, nec tu separabis quem nulla creatura separabit.
10. There fornication is more to be feared, in that chastity which the soul owes to God; there fornication is more to be feared, which the Apostle feared when he said, I have betrothed you to one husband, to present a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear lest, as the serpent seduced Eve in his craftiness, so too your minds be corrupted from the chastity of God which is in Christ Jesus (2 Cor 11:2-3). You see that there too chastity is demanded. Why do you not wish to be separated from your husband? Lest you have the necessity of fornication? But in your husband's martyrdom you ought to fear nothing. For he being crowned and translated from human affairs to divine, you will be a widow; if you marry, you will not be a fornicatress. But perhaps as the wife of a martyr you blush to marry further. Behold, your husband being crowned, let your faith also be safe. Do not drag your husband from the embrace of the spiritual marriage. There too chastity is demanded, and more there because greater there, more there because eternal there. You have destroyed everyone who fornicates away from you (Ps 73:27 (72:27)). For what else do you do, that your husband may be overcome by your flatteries, but that there be no virtue in him? In whom there will be no virtue, how badly off will your husband be! He is overcome, crushed, made effeminate by your flatteries: how will he be your husband, who will no longer be a man? For what do you do, but that he yield to your flatteries, despise the precepts of God, deny Christ, sacrifice to idols? Behold, the one whose flesh you seek—his soul fornicates; behold, he hears, You have destroyed everyone who fornicates away from you. But you wish him to cleave to you and be separated from God: hear what follows: You have destroyed everyone who fornicates away from you; but for me to cleave to God is good (Ps 73:27-28 (72:27-28)). Hear your husband armed with faith, hurling against your iniquity the darts of righteousness: I am certain, he says, that neither death nor life, nor angel nor principality, nor height nor depth, nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus (Rom 8:38-39). Perhaps here you say: "But in all these he did not name the wife." In all these, you say, he did not name the wife. Deceitful one, the apostolic power kept watch even against you by adding, nor any other creature. Or will you perhaps dare to say that you are not a creature? If you are a creature—rather, because you are a creature—neither will you separate the one whom no creature will separate.
Sermons5.10
11. Ita locuti sumus quasi viri festinent ad martyria et ab uxoribus impediantur: consolemur etiam infirmum sexum. Quam multae coronatae sunt et a viris non viriliter blandientibus superatae non sunt! Perpetua unde facta est perpetua, <nisi quia... perpetua? > Unde tantae felicitatis capax Felicitas, nisi quia eam temporalis non terruit infelicitas? Ergo ne etiam feminae in hac causa virorum blandimentis seducantur, attendatur ab eis Perpetua, attendatur Felicitas, et teneatur perpetua felicitas.
11. Thus we have spoken as though men were hastening to martyrdoms and being hindered by their wives: let us console the weaker sex too. How many women have been crowned and were not overcome by men flattering unmanfully! Whence was Perpetua made perpetual, but because . . . perpetual? Whence was Felicity capable of so great felicity, but because temporal infelicity did not terrify her? Therefore, lest women too in this cause be seduced by the flatteries of men, let Perpetua be regarded by them, let Felicity be regarded, and let perpetual felicity be held.
Sermons5.11
12. Non ergo irascatur in tali causa pater et mater, non uxor, non filii, non fratres; et si irascentur, additum est: oderis insuper animam tuam . In hac ergo causa male diligis uxorem tuam, qui iuberis et odisse animam tuam. Quid prodest, inquit, homini, si totum mundum lucretur, animae autem suae detrimentum patiatur? Et tamen ipsam iuberis odisse, ne et ipsa seducat volens hic esse, volens huic carni semper adhaerere, nolens in meliora emigrare; oderis talem, ne habeas talem. Quid enim aliud in hominibus quos temptat periculum persecutionis susurrat intrinsecus, quam " Nega, vive: ages postea paenitentiam "? Anima est: perire vult. Oderis eam perire volentem. Ne perire permittas, castiges, obiurges, informes, in auxilium Deum invoces. Marcescit enim a te et deficit periculis huius vitae, fidei oculis non rectis contemplatur aeternam vitam: erige illam exhortatione et dic: Quare tristis es, anima mea, et ut quid conturbas me? Forte respondebit tibi: " Quia infirma sum ". Ergo habes quod sequitur: Spera in Dominum, ipse erit virtus tua, ipse erit firmitas tua. Spera in Dominum, quoniam confitebor illi, non negabo illum, quoniam confitebor illum. Tu autem, anima, murmurabas: " Nega illum ". Confitebor illi: salutare vultus mei et Deus meus . Ergo qui amat animam suam, perdat eam hic, ut in vitam aeternam inveniat illam . Ergo contraria susurrantes non audias, nec patrem nec matrem, nec uxorem, nec filios, nec ipsam animam tuam.
12. Therefore let father and mother not be angry in such a cause, nor wife, nor children, nor brothers; and if they will be angry, it is added: hate moreover your own soul (See Luke 14:26). In this cause, then, you love your wife badly, you who are commanded even to hate your own soul. For what does it profit, he says, a man, if he gain the whole world, but suffer the loss of his soul (Matt 16:26)? And yet you are commanded to hate it too, lest it too seduce you, wishing to be here, wishing always to cleave to this flesh, unwilling to migrate to better things; hate such a soul, that you may not have such a one. For what else does it whisper within, in the people whom the peril of persecution tempts, but "Deny, live: you will do penance afterward"? It is the soul: it wishes to perish. Hate it as it wishes to perish. Do not permit it to perish; chastise, rebuke, form it, call God to your aid. For it withers from you and fails amid the perils of this life, with the eyes of faith not straight it contemplates eternal life: lift it up by exhortation and say, Why are you sad, my soul, and why do you disturb me? Perhaps it will answer you: "Because I am weak." Then you have what follows: Hope in the Lord, he himself will be your virtue, he himself will be your firmness. Hope in the Lord, for I will confess to him—I will not deny him, for I will confess him. But you, soul, were murmuring, "Deny him." I will confess to him: the salvation of my countenance and my God (Ps 42:5 (41:6)). Therefore he who loves his soul, let him lose it here, that he may find it unto eternal life (See John 12:25). Therefore do not listen to those whispering contrary things, neither father nor mother, nor wife, nor children, nor your own soul.
Sermons5.12
13. Tamdiu audiatur uxor cum timore separationis coniugalis, quamdiu non aliquid suadet unde offendatur Deus. Ita tenebunt omnes gradus ordinem suum: excellens virginitas, subsequens viduitas, tertia coniugalitas, nulla sine mercede. Virgines cogitent Mariam, viduae Annam, coniugatae Susannam. Omnes habent praemia sua, et ex omnibus his gradibus martyres minime defuerunt. Timet vir in articulo martyrii ne sit illi uxor Eva, timet et uxor in articulo martyrii ne sit illi maritus serpens. Ne autem audiat aliquem aliquid contra Deum suadentem. Hucusque valeat carnalis affectus; spiritalem murum non transcendat carnis infirmitas: infra sit, quia infra est. Anima subdita Deo ducat carnem, non in carnis principatum anima seducatur a Deo: perversum est. Tu vis principatum habere in domo tua, multo magis Deus in sua. Haec retinete et meditamini, haec in omnibus martyrum sollemnitatibus imitamini, et Deus pacis erit vobiscum . Conversi ad Dominum...
13. Let the wife be heard, with fear of conjugal separation, only as long as she does not advise anything by which God is offended. Thus all the degrees will keep their order: excellent virginity, widowhood following, marriage third, none without reward. Let virgins think on Mary, widows on Anna, the married on Susanna. All have their rewards, and from all these degrees the martyrs have by no means been lacking. The husband fears, at the moment of martyrdom, lest his wife be an Eve to him; the wife too fears, at the moment of martyrdom, lest her husband be a serpent to her. But let no one listen to anyone advising anything against God. Let carnal affection be valid up to this point; let the infirmity of the flesh not transcend the spiritual wall: let it be below, because it is below. Let the soul, subject to God, lead the flesh; let the soul not be seduced away from God into the dominion of the flesh: that is perverse. You wish to have the chief place in your house, much more does God in his. Hold and meditate on these things, imitate them in all the solemnities of the martyrs, and the God of peace will be with you (Phil 4:9). Let us turn to the Lord . . .
Sermons5.13
SERMO 159/B
Sermon 159/B
Sermons5.13
1. Divinae lectiones, quae nos spiritaliter pascunt, admonent quod vobis exspectantibus intentisque praerogemus, et tamquam de dominico cellario, cuius dispensatores sumus, aliquid esurientibus apponamus. Apostolica lectio his verbis enuntiata nobis est, quam nobiscum recordatur sanctitas vestra: O altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei, quam incomprehensibilia sunt iudicia eius, et investigabiles viae eius. Quis enim cognovit sensum Domini, aut quis fuit consiliarius illius, aut quis prior dedit illi et retribuetur ei? Quoniam ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia, ipsi gloria in saecula saeculorum, amen . Ut autem exclamaret Apostolus et quadam tamquam profunditate iudiciorum Dei perterritus diceret: O altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei, superius dixerat: Conclusit Deus omnes in peccato, ut omnium misereretur . Post hanc ergo sententiam ubi ait: Conclusit Deus omnes sub peccato, ut omnium misereatur, quia revera nescio quid profundum est prius factos esse homines in manifesto reos conscientiae suae, ut eis posset confitentibus subveniri, exclamavit: O altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei . Ubi altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei? In eo quod conclusit Deus omnes in peccato, ut omnium misereatur . Quo peccato? Incredulitatis. Nam hoc verbo usus est: Conclusit, inquit, Deus omnes in incredulitate, ut omnium misereatur. Adsit itaque ipse Dominus Deus noster, cuius divitias laudans exclamat apostolus, et de ipsis occultis et profundis divitiis suis aliquid nobis impertiri dignetur, ut, quod sentimus esse inexplicabile, aliquo modo dicamus, non ut explicemus, sed ut inexplicabilia commendemus. Videtur enim humana quadam infirmitate velut defecisse apostolus in explicando quod laetatus est in intuendo. Vidit nescio quid quod explicare lingua non posset, corde conspexit cui verbis minus idoneus fuit, et non invenit quomodo nos intentos faceret ad illud quod vidit, nisi exclamaret et erigeret corda nostra dicens: O altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei , ut erecta corda nostra ad illum dirigantur cuius ille videns divitias exclamavit, non ad os infirmi dispensatoris qui illas divitias non poterat explicare. Hoc itaque pro nostro modulo fecerimus, et nos intenderimus corda vestra ad illum cuius omnes sumus et sub quo uno magistro omnes in hac schola condiscipuli sumus, ubi sunt Dei divitiae, ubi est altitudo divitiarum, et inscrutabilia iudicia eius et investigabiles viae eius ubi sunt, quia conclusit omnes in incredulitate, ut omnium misereatur .
1. The divine readings, which feed us spiritually, admonish what we should dispense to you as you wait and attend, and that, as it were from the Lord's storehouse, of which we are the dispensers, we should set something before the hungry. The apostolic reading has been declared to us in these words, which your Holiness recalls with us: O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God, how incomprehensible are his judgments, and untraceable his ways. For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor, or who has first given to him, and it shall be repaid to him? For from him and through him and in him are all things; to him be glory unto ages of ages, amen (Rom 11:33-36). But that the Apostle might exclaim, and as if terrified by a certain depth of the judgments of God might say, O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God, he had said above, God has shut up all in sin, that he might have mercy on all (See Rom 11:32). After this sentence, then, where he says, God has shut up all under sin, that he might have mercy on all—because truly there is something deep in this, that men were first made manifestly guilty in their own conscience, so that they could be helped, confessing—he exclaimed, O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God. Where is the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God? In this, that God has shut up all in sin, that he might have mercy on all. By what sin? Of unbelief. For he used this word: God has shut up, he says, all in unbelief, that he might have mercy on all. May the Lord our God himself be present, then, whose riches the Apostle, praising them, exclaims over, and deign to impart to us something of those hidden and deep riches of his, so that what we feel to be inexplicable we may in some way speak—not so as to explain it, but so as to commend the inexplicable things. For the Apostle seems, by a certain human infirmity, to have as it were failed in explaining what he rejoiced in beholding. He saw something that the tongue could not explain, he beheld in the heart that for which he was less fit in words, and he did not find how to make us attentive to what he saw, except by exclaiming and lifting up our hearts, saying, O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God; that our hearts, lifted up, might be directed to him whose riches, seeing, he exclaimed over, not to the mouth of the feeble dispenser who could not explain those riches. This, then, according to our small measure, may we have done, and may we have directed your hearts to him whose we all are, and under whom, one Master, we are all fellow-disciples in this school, where are the riches of God, where is the depth of the riches, and where are his unsearchable judgments and untraceable ways, because he has shut up all in unbelief, that he might have mercy on all.
Sermons5.1
2. Qui conclusit omnes in incredulitate videtur irasci, sed qui miseretur omnium placidus est. Ergo capitulum Apostoli consentit psalmo: Deus, reppulisti nos et destruxisti nos, iratus es et misertus es nobis . Audi iratum et misertum. Conclusit Deus omnes in incredulitate, ut omnium misereatur . Quid voluit facere Dominus Deus noster? Primo irasci, repellere, humiliare, et postea subvenire, aversum vocare, conversum exaudire, exauditum adiuvare, adiutum mutare, mutatum coronare. Coniunge alia testimonia Scripturarum. Ait ipsa vox unius cuiusdam hominis laborantis in hac terra, hoc est ipsius Adam, generis humani - quod tamen genus humanum non dimisit secundus homo de caelo, ut primo terreni, postea fierent caelestes . Quia enim humiliati, inde terreni; quia depositi, inde terreni; quia repulsi, inde terreni; sed quia ille qui reppulit et deposuit et humiliavit misertus est nostri, inde caelestes -. Audiamus ergo ipsius hominis vocem alibi dicentis: Priusquam humiliarer, ego deliqui . Gemens in sua humilitate, agnovit peccatum suum; sibi tribuit iniquitatem, iustitiam Deo. Quid enim ait? Priusquam humiliarer - quod est poena quam Deus inflixit -, ego, inquit, deliqui. Ne iniustus videatur Deus qui me humiliavit, praecessit delictum meum, secuta est humiliatio mea. Iustus ergo iudex Dominus Deus meus . Non enim ad hanc humiliationem venirem, nisi primo delinquerem. Et quoniam ipsa humiliatio eius iram quidem videtur sonare Dei iudicis, sed ad misericordiam pertinet, audi eiusdem vocem alibi: Bonum est, inquit, mihi quoniam humiliasti me, ut discam iustificationes tuas . Intendat caritas vestra quid dicat: Priusquam humiliarer, ego deliqui . In poena videtur gemere, in compedibus suspirare, in ista mortalitate et infirmitate terrena auxilium eius quaerere confitendo, quem offenderat delinquendo. Hoc enim sonant verba haec: Priusquam humiliarer, ego deliqui, hoc est: Non tibi humiliationem meam imputo, Deus meus: ego feci quod malignum est , tu fecisti quod iustum est.
2. He who has shut up all in unbelief seems to be angry, but he who has mercy on all is calm. Therefore the Apostle's passage agrees with the Psalm: God, you have repulsed us and destroyed us, you were angry and have had mercy on us (Ps 60:1 (59:3)). Hear the one who is angry and shows mercy. God has shut up all in unbelief, that he might have mercy on all. What did the Lord our God wish to do? First to be angry, to repulse, to humble, and afterward to help, to call back the one turned away, to hear the one turned back, to aid the one heard, to change the one aided, to crown the one changed. Join other testimonies of the Scriptures. The voice itself of a certain one man laboring on this earth—that is, of Adam himself, of the human race (which human race, nevertheless, the second man from heaven did not abandon, that, having first been earthly, afterward they might become heavenly (See 1 Cor 15:47-49); for because they were humbled, hence earthly; because cast down, hence earthly; because repulsed, hence earthly; but because he who repulsed and cast down and humbled had mercy on us, hence heavenly)—let us hear, then, the voice of that same man saying elsewhere, Before I was humbled, I offended (Ps 119:67 (118:67)). Groaning in his lowliness, he acknowledged his sin; he ascribed iniquity to himself, righteousness to God. For what does he say? Before I was humbled—which is the punishment that God inflicted—I, he says, offended. Lest God who humbled me seem unjust, my offense came first, my humiliation followed. The Lord my God is therefore a just judge (See Ps 7:11 (7:12)). For I would not come to this humiliation, unless I first offended. And because his very humiliation seems indeed to sound of the wrath of God the judge, but pertains to mercy, hear the voice of the same one elsewhere: It is good for me, he says, that you have humbled me, that I may learn your righteous decrees (Ps 119:71 (118:71)). Let your charity attend to what he says: Before I was humbled, I offended. In his punishment he seems to groan, in his fetters to sigh, in this mortality and earthly infirmity to seek the help, by confessing, of the one he had offended by sinning. For these words sound thus: Before I was humbled, I offended—that is: I do not impute my humiliation to you, my God: I did what is wicked, you did what is just.
Sermons5.2
3. His verbis congruunt illa verba quae cantavimus. Qui enim dicit: Deus, reppulisti nos et destruxisti nos , ipse dicit: Priusquam humiliarer, ego deliqui . Audisti enim quia reppulit Deus; audisti quia deposuit Deus, id est de altitudine deiecit ad terram. Audisti. Quaere causam, quare hoc fecerit Deus: Priusquam humiliarer, ego, inquit, deliqui. Audisti praecedens delictum tuum et consequentem iustitiam Dei; audi quia et ipsa iustitia Dei, quae te humiliavit, non tantum severitatem iusti iudicis indicat, sed etiam clementiam misericordis. Ait enim, quod paulo ante dixi: Bonum est mihi quod humiliasti me, ut discam iustificationes tuas . Quid ergo, fratres mei? Irascebatur Deus cum humiliaret, an miserebatur? Si nihil profuit nobis humiliatio, nimiae severitati Dei deputetur; quae quidem si esset, de iniustitia eius queri non possemus. Rependat enim meritum suum peccator; non sibi blandiatur superbus et iniquus; inveniat primo quid dignus sit, ut sic cognoscat quid ille praestiterit. Itane audet cuiusquam hominis peccatoris cor renuntiare sibi nisi supplicium, renuntiare sibi nisi iustissimam poenam? Aut si fuerit supplicium consecutum iniquitatem hominis, potest dici iusto iudici: "Male fecisti damnare peccantem "? Hoc ergo nobis peccantes renuntiemus, ita confiteamur in poenis et delicta nostra et iustitiam Dei nostri: ita enim merebimur in ipsa poena nostra invenire misericordiam Dei. Hoc, fratres carissimi, nemo invenit, nisi qui se prius humiliaverit. Et quia dicturus sum sicut possum, non arbitror quemquam vestrum intellecturum quod dicturus sum, nisi primo fumum superbiae compresserit, quo mentis oculi tenebrantur, ne misericordia Dei in ipsa poena possit intellegi.
3. With these words agree those words that we sang. For he who says, God, you have repulsed us and destroyed us, the same says, Before I was humbled, I offended. For you heard that God repulsed; you heard that God cast down—that is, threw down from the height to the earth. You heard it. Seek the cause why God did this: Before I was humbled, I, he says, offended. You have heard your preceding offense and the consequent righteousness of God; hear that even that very righteousness of God, which humbled you, indicates not only the severity of a just judge, but also the clemency of one who has mercy. For he says, as I said a little before, It is good for me that you have humbled me, that I may learn your righteous decrees. What then, my brothers? Was God angry when he humbled, or did he have mercy? If the humiliation profited us nothing, let it be attributed to excessive severity of God; which, if it were so, we could not complain of his injustice. For let the sinner pay back his desert; let the proud and unjust man not flatter himself; let him first find out what he deserves, that he may so come to know what God has bestowed. Does the heart of any sinful man, then, dare to announce to itself anything but punishment, anything but most just penalty? Or if punishment has followed a man's iniquity, can it be said to the just judge, "You did wrong to condemn the sinner"? Let us, then, sinners, announce this to ourselves, let us so confess in our punishments both our offenses and the righteousness of our God: for thus we shall deserve, in our very punishment, to find the mercy of God. This, dearly beloved brothers, no one finds, except the one who has first humbled himself. And because I am going to speak as I can, I do not think any of you will understand what I am going to say, unless he first suppresses the smoke of pride, by which the eyes of the mind are darkened, so that the mercy of God in the very punishment cannot be understood.
Sermons5.3
4. At primo videte hoc in ipsa vita cottidiana - inde enim potestis habere ad intellegendum viam, quia non deseruit hominum mortalitatem - quibusdam similitudinibus in ipsis factis eorum, ut ostendatur nobis posse infligi poenam misericorditer. Quid dicam? Tu das disciplinam servo tuo, et dans disciplinam utique in eo ipso quod punire videris misereris, sed non dico servo: forte sic irasceris servo, ut oderis eum. Non quidem ita debes, si christianus es; non ita debes, si hominem te esse consideras; non ita debes, si consideras diversa quidem esse nomina " servus " et " dominus ", sed non diversa " homo " et " homo ". Non ita debes odio persequi peccantem servum. Sed quia ita solent homines, respuamus istam similitudinem, filium ponamus. Nemo potest nisi amare filios: non enim laudandus est homo qui amat filium suum. Si enim dilexeritis eos qui vos diligunt, quam mercedem habebitis, ait Dominus, nonne publicani hoc faciunt? Quanto magis filios, quos generant homines successores sibi. Nemo omnino potest iure ipso naturae odisse quem genuit. Nec in eo laudandus est homo, quod invenitur in bestia. Nemo laudat hominem amantem filios suos. Non in pecoribus tantum mitibus hoc invenis: feritas leonum mitescit ad filios, tigres amant filios suos, serpentes fovent ova et catulos nutriunt. Ergo si ea quae videntur esse saeva et aspera in creatura non servant asperitatem et saevitiam erga quos gignunt, quid magnum facit homo amare filium suum? Sed propterea ista dixi, fratres, ut videatis posse esse poenam miserantis de exemplo filiorum, de illa re quam nemo potest odisse. Videt ergo aliquis filium suum in superbiam ire, extolli adversus patrem, usurpare sibi amplius quam oportet, velle diffluere in nugas deliciosas, velle dilapidare quod nondum possidet; et est ille, cum hoc facit, laetus, ridens, gaudens, exsultans; ille autem cohibet obiurgatione, poena, flagellis, aufert risum, ingerit fletum, bonum videtur abstulisse et intulisse malum - vide quid abstulit: laetitiam, vide quid intulit: gemitum -, et tamen, si dimisisset illam impunitam laetitiam, crudelis esset; quia coegit ad fletum, misericors invenitur. Si ergo pater qui cogit ad fletum misericors invenitur, quare non intellegimus etiam Creatorem nostrum potuisse facere quod cantavimus: Deus, reppulisti nos et deposuisti nos? Sed quare hoc? Numquid ad interitum, numquid ad perditionem? Audi quod sequitur: Iratus es et misertus es nobis . Quare tibi iuste irascitur? Coniunge, quoniam diximus: Priusquam humiliarer, ego deliqui . Quid tibi prodest quod repulsus es et depositus es? Bonum est mihi quoniam humiliasti me, ut discam iustificationes tuas .
4. But first see this in daily life itself—for from there you can have a way to understanding, because he did not forsake the mortality of men—by certain similitudes in their very deeds, that it may be shown to us that a punishment can be inflicted mercifully. What shall I say? You discipline your servant, and in giving discipline surely, in the very thing in which you seem to punish, you have mercy—but I do not say "to your servant": perhaps you are so angry with your servant that you hate him. You ought not to be so, if you are a Christian; you ought not to be so, if you consider that you are a man; you ought not to be so, if you consider that "servant" and "master" are indeed different names, but "man" and "man" are not different. You ought not so to persecute with hatred the sinning servant. But because men are accustomed to be so, let us reject this similitude, and let us set up a son. No one can do anything but love his sons: for a man is not to be praised who loves his son. For if you love those who love you, what reward will you have, says the Lord, do not the tax collectors do this (Matt 5:46)? How much more sons, whom men beget as successors to themselves. No one at all can, by the very right of nature, hate the one he has begotten. Nor is a man to be praised in that which is found in a beast. No one praises a man for loving his sons. You find this not only in gentle cattle: the ferocity of lions grows gentle toward their young, tigers love their young, serpents warm their eggs and nourish their cubs. If, then, the things that seem savage and harsh in creation do not keep their harshness and savagery toward those they beget, what great thing does a man do in loving his son? But I said these things, brothers, that you may see, from the example of sons, that there can be a punishment of one who has mercy, from that thing which no one can hate. Someone sees his son going into pride, exalting himself against his father, claiming for himself more than he ought, wishing to dissolve into delightful trifles, wishing to squander what he does not yet possess; and that one, while he does this, is glad, laughing, rejoicing, exulting; but the father restrains him by rebuke, punishment, scourges, takes away the laughter, brings on weeping, seems to have taken away a good and brought on an evil—see what he took away: gladness; see what he brought on: groaning—and yet, if he had let that gladness go unpunished, he would be cruel; because he forced him to weeping, he is found merciful. If, then, the father who forces to weeping is found merciful, why do we not understand that our Creator too could do what we sang: God, you have repulsed us and cast us down? But why this? Surely not unto destruction, not unto perdition? Hear what follows: You were angry and have had mercy on us (Ps 60:1 (59:3)). Why is he justly angry with you? Join it, since we said, Before I was humbled, I offended. What does it profit you that you were repulsed and cast down? It is good for me that you have humbled me, that I may learn your righteous decrees (Ps 119:71 (118:71)).
Sermons5.4
5. Referamus nunc animum ad illud apostolicum: Conclusit Deus omnes in incredulitate, ut omnium misereatur . Primum peccatum hominis superbia fuit: sic in Genesi legimus, sic in alia Scriptura invenimus . In Genesi quid legimus? Quia positus est creatus et formatus homo in paradiso, sub quadam lege, sub quodam mandato ; mandatum quod illi impositum est hoc illi ostendebat: sic eum esse factum magnum, ut super se haberet maiorem. Humilitatem ergo Deus subdito sibi homini semper retinendam esse imperavit, id est ut servaretur humilitas hominis constituti sub Deo. Factus quidem homo est ad imaginem Dei et, sicut alio loco scriptum est, dedit illi virtutem continendi <omnia> : omnia sub illo erant, sed supra illum erat qui fecit omnia. Sic ergo debuit homo attendere quae erant sub se, ut magis attenderet eum qui erat super se; haerens enim superiori, possideret securius inferiora; a superiore autem recedens, inferioribus subderetur. Quemadmodum si tres homines ponamus: unum hominem habentem servum, habentem et dominum, quomodo plerumque evenit ut servi peculiosi habeant servos. Intendite: habet servum, habet dominum; subest uni, praeest alteri; superior est servo, inferior domino suo. Tertium posuimus servum servi, primum autem dominum domini, medium vero et servum et dominum: dominum servi sui et servum domini sui. Tertius ille non est nisi servus, primus ille non est nisi dominus, medius ille et servus est et dominus. Securus autem possidet servum suum, si non offenderit dominum suum. Et tres quidem homines diximus: omnes eiusdem generis sunt, omnes ex eadem substantia atque natura subsistunt. Non sic illa tria: Deus et homo et creatura homini inferior. Alterius enim generis nec eiusdem substantiae conditor et conditum, factor et factum, artifex et opus, creator et creatura. At vero quae creata sunt, generaliter quidem creata vocantur omnia, sed naturis et ordinibus et meritis et locis differunt. Primo enim spiritalia sunt et postea carnalia, ipsa quae condidit Deus, quae fecit Deus. Primum locum habent spiritalia, ultimum habent corporalia. Spiritale autem quiddam mens humana, ubi imprimitur similitudo et imago Dei ; corporalia autem omnia quae sensibus corporis subiacere cernimus: nota sunt omnibus, videntur, audiuntur, olent, sapiunt, tanguntur; dura mollia, calida frigida, aspera lenia, omnia haec corporalia dicuntur, inferiora sunt. Supra haec omnia homo constitutus est , sed secundum animum, secundum mentem, secundum id quod in illo est factum ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei. Non enim Deus corporali forma circumscriptus atque conclusus est, ut ex alia parte habeat dorsum, ex alia parte habeat oculos, sed lux quaedam est, nec talis qualem videmus oculis, nec si hanc qualem videmus oculis augeas, dilatans eam per phantasiam cogitationum tuarum, et facias campos lucis et montes lucis et arbores lucis, per vanitates cogitationum tuarum volitans. Vis intellegere lucem spiritalem? Quaere unde intellegis.
5. Let us now turn our mind back to that apostolic saying: God has shut up all in unbelief, that he might have mercy on all (See Rom 11:32). The first sin of man was pride: so we read in Genesis, so we find in another Scripture. What do we read in Genesis? That man, created and formed, was placed in paradise under a certain law, under a certain commandment (See Gen 2:15-17); the commandment imposed on him showed him this: that he was made great in such a way that he had a greater above himself. God, therefore, commanded that humility always be retained by man subject to him—that is, that the humility of man, established under God, be kept. Man was indeed made in the image of God and, as is written in another place, he gave him the power of holding all things: all things were under him, but above him was the one who made all things. So, then, man ought to have attended to the things that were under him in such a way that he attended more to the one who was above him; for cleaving to the higher, he would possess the lower more securely; but departing from the higher, he would be made subject to the lower. Just as if we set up three men: one man having a servant, having also a master—as it often happens that servants with savings have servants. Attend: he has a servant, he has a master; he is under one, he is over another; he is higher than the servant, lower than his master. We set up a third, the servant of the servant; the first, the master of the master; the middle, both servant and master: the master of his servant and the servant of his master. That third is nothing but a servant, that first is nothing but a master, that middle is both servant and master. But he securely possesses his servant, if he has not offended his master. And we have indeed spoken of three men: all are of the same kind, all subsist from the same substance and nature. Not so those three: God, and man, and the creature lower than man. For of another kind, and not of the same substance, are the founder and the founded, the maker and the made, the craftsman and the work, the creator and the creation. But the things that have been created are indeed all called, in general, created; but they differ in natures and orders and merits and places. For first are spiritual things and afterward carnal—the very things that God founded, that God made. Spiritual things have the first place, corporeal the last. But the human mind is something spiritual, where the likeness and image of God is imprinted; but corporeal are all the things that we perceive to lie under the senses of the body: they are known to all, they are seen, heard, smelled, tasted, touched; hard, soft, hot, cold, rough, smooth—all these are called corporeal, they are lower. Above all these man is established, but according to the mind, according to the intellect, according to that which is made in him in the image and likeness of God. For God is not circumscribed and enclosed by a corporeal form, so as to have a back on one side and eyes on another; but he is a certain light—nor such as we see with the eyes, nor if you enlarge this which we see with the eyes, spreading it out through the fancy of your thoughts, and make fields of light and mountains of light and trees of light, flitting about through the vanities of your thoughts. Do you wish to understand spiritual light? Seek out whereby you understand.
Sermons5.5
6. Hanc ipsam, inquam, lucem intellege, qua intellegis. Quid dixi? Vides alba et nigra oculis corporeis, adiuvaris extrinsecus luce aut solis aut lunae aut lucernae aut alicuius igniculi. Porro si lux illa extrinsecus non adiuvaret oculos tuos, frustra paterent lumina tua et sine causa lumina vocarentur. Quid autem in te pateat et sanum sit, id est oculus, et quid ad adiutorium admoveatur extrinsecus, id est lumen, et quid sit ad quod videndum adiuveris, id est colores et formae, nosti et discernis. Hoc de oculis diximus. Audis voces, nosti unde audias. Oculi non audiunt, sed nec aures vident. Deest aliquid oculis ad sentiendas voces, et deest aliquid auribus ad sentiendos colores. Tibi autem nihil horum deest, quia per oculos vides, per aures audis. Cognoscis ergo et quae olent, et quod membrum admoveas unde odorem sentias, nosti. Non enim aurem admoves ut sentias suavitatem odoris, sed affers illud quod tibi ad olfaciendum Deus creavit. Nec cum vis aliquod pulmentum gustare, ad aures aut ad oculum ponis: nosti ibi non esse sensum diiudicantem sapores. Et vis aliquid sentire an durum an molle, an frigidum an calidum sit? Nosti quia universo corpore tuo potes sentire contactum. Haec nosti. Bene. Intendite ad illud interius: quis est hic intus cui renuntiant omnes isti sensus quod sentiunt homines? Ista enim tamquam instrumenta sunt, ista quasi in servitutem subiecta sunt. Sensus est nescio quis interior imperator cui nuntii isti renuntiant quidquid foris inveniunt. Ille autem interior, qui discernit haec omnia, profecto superior est quam sunt haec omnia. Ergo oculus habet quod videat, auris quod audiat, nares quod olfaciant, os quod gustet, manus quod tangat, et mens non habet quod per seipsam possit intueri? Ipsa quidem mens sentit album et nigrum, sed renuntiantibus oculis; ipsa sentit in vocibus canorum et asperum, sed renuntiantibus auribus; ipsa sentit in odoribus suaveolentia et graveolentia, sed renuntiantibus naribus; ipsa sentit dulce et amarum, sed ore nuntiante; ipsa sentit durum et molle, sed cum manus contrectans renuntiaverit. Potest ergo ista sentire, renuntiante corpore, tam multa et varia: numquid per seipsam non est idonea sentire aliquid, nullo sibi membro corporis renuntiante? Quaere ergo quid per seipsam sentit, et invenies ubi sit imago Dei. Alba et nigra per oculos sentiebat, canora et absurda aures renuntiabant. Et ne rursus curram per singula haec quae adiacent corpori, membra corporis renuntiabant. Iustum et iniustum, numquid oculi renuntiant? Iustum et iniustum discernit mens et dicit: " Hoc iustum est, hoc iniustum est ". Quaere quis renuntiaverit? Si color est iustitia, oculi renuntiaverunt; si sonus est iustitia, aures renuntiaverunt; si odor est, nares renuntiaverunt; si sapor, os renuntiavit; si duritia vel mollitudo est, manus renuntiavit. Si nihil horum est, quis renuntiavit, nisi lumen interius? Haec ergo natura, ista substantia quam videtis excellentem, de qua, si velim copiosius dicere, tempus non sufficit, quiddam interius, quiddam divinum in nobis factum est ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei , supra omnia corporea est, et sic erat factum ut omnis ei corporea creatura subdita deserviret, sed tamen ipsa mens non est Deus. Nam si Deus esset, numquid peccasset? Deus enim incommutabilis est. Mens autem nostra quia creata est, quia facta est, non est hoc quod Deus. Mutabilis est. Videmus et nunc mutationes ipsas. Sapit, desipit; meminit, obliviscitur; vult, non vult; delectatur, contristatur. Istae mutabilitates non cadunt in Deum, qui supra mentem est, et creator est mentis.
6. Understand, I say, that very light by which you understand. What did I say? You see white and black with the bodily eyes, you are helped from without by the light either of the sun, or the moon, or a lamp, or some little fire. Moreover, if that light from without did not help your eyes, your eyes would lie open in vain and be called eyes without cause. But what in you lies open and is sound—that is, the eye—and what is brought to its aid from without—that is, the light—and what it is for the seeing of which you are helped—that is, colors and shapes—you know and distinguish. This we have said of the eyes. You hear voices, you know whereby you hear. The eyes do not hear, but neither do the ears see. Something is lacking to the eyes for perceiving voices, and something is lacking to the ears for perceiving colors. But to you none of these is lacking, because through the eyes you see, through the ears you hear. You know, then, the things that smell, and you know what member to bring near whereby you may perceive an odor. For you do not bring the ear near to perceive the sweetness of an odor, but you bring near that which God created in you for smelling. Nor, when you wish to taste some dish, do you put it to the ears or the eye: you know there is no sense there distinguishing flavors. And do you wish to perceive whether something is hard or soft, cold or hot? You know that with your whole body you can perceive contact. These things you know. Good. Attend to that inner thing: who is this one within to whom all these senses report what men perceive? For these are as it were instruments, these are as it were subjected to servitude. The inner perceiver is a certain commander to whom these messengers report whatever they find outside. But that inner one, who distinguishes all these things, is surely higher than all these things. So the eye has what it may see, the ear what it may hear, the nostrils what they may smell, the mouth what it may taste, the hand what it may touch, and has the mind nothing that it can behold through itself? The mind indeed perceives white and black, but with the eyes reporting; it perceives in voices the tuneful and the harsh, but with the ears reporting; it perceives in odors the sweet-smelling and the foul-smelling, but with the nostrils reporting; it perceives sweet and bitter, but with the mouth reporting; it perceives hard and soft, but when the touching hand has reported. Can it, then, with the body reporting, perceive things so many and various, and is it through itself not fit to perceive anything, with no member of the body reporting to it? Seek, then, what it perceives through itself, and you will find where the image of God is. White and black it perceived through the eyes, tuneful and discordant the ears reported. And, not to run again through each of these things that lie near the body, the members of the body reported. The just and the unjust—do the eyes report it? The mind distinguishes the just and the unjust and says, "This is just, this is unjust." Seek who reported it. If righteousness is a color, the eyes reported it; if righteousness is a sound, the ears reported it; if it is an odor, the nostrils reported it; if a flavor, the mouth reported it; if it is hardness or softness, the hand reported it. If it is none of these, who reported it, but the inner light? This nature, then, this substance which you see to be excellent—of which, if I wished to speak more fully, time would not suffice—a certain inner thing, a certain divine thing, was made in us in the image and likeness of God, is above all corporeal things, and was so made that all corporeal creation, subject to it, should serve it; but yet the mind itself is not God. For if it were God, would it have sinned? For God is unchangeable. But our mind, because it was created, because it was made, is not what God is. It is changeable. We see even now its very changes. It is wise, it is foolish; it remembers, it forgets; it wills, it does not will; it is delighted, it is saddened. These changeabilities do not fall upon God, who is above the mind, and is the creator of the mind.
Sermons5.6
7. Sed tamen hoc totum quod dixi supra corpus est, infra Deum est, infra dominum et supra servum. Ista sunt tria, de quibus paulo ante dicebam. Si ergo tres homines, cum sint omnes homines, ordinantur per quandam conditionem vitae huius, ut unus eorum sit dominus tantum, alter eorum sit servus tantum, alter vero eorum et servus sit domini et dominus servi, quomodo putatis et quam facilius et quam distinctius ordinatam esse universam creaturam? Natura et substantia mentis posita sub Deo, natura universi corporis posita sub mente. Sed quomodo dicebam: tunc ille securus possidet servum suum, si <non > offenderit dominum suum, ita mens illa, si non per quandam superbiam, qua suae potestatis esse voluit, offenderet dominum suum, semper illi tamquam servus universa natura corporis subderetur. Quia vero per superbiam offendit Dominum, facta est illi creatura corporis, quae data erat in famulatum, ad tormentum poenae, ad tormentum vindictae. Per corporis enim difficultatem modo mens cruciatur, cum universae naturae corporis antea dominaretur. Quemadmodum si homo ille - hinc enim melius accipitis illustriorem similitudinem, quia et hoc ipsum, quod difficulter intellegimus, ad poenam pertinet, qua humiliati sumus: de consuetudine damus aliqua documenta. Tres servos illos rursus ante oculos pone, quia hoc vix intellegis, cum sit distinctius; distinctiora enim sunt ista, quo diversa sunt: longe enim aliud Deus quam mens, et longe aliud mens quam corpus. At vero in illis tribus homo est, et homo, et homo. Natura diversa non est, sed conditio ordinem facit; tamen quia illa in consuetudine nostra sunt, facilius ipsa intellegimus, quam illa quae distinctiora sunt. Modo ergo hoc intellege, quod dicimus. Fac illum medium - quia ita est servus, ut et dominus sit; ita est dominus, ut et servus sit: servus superioris, dominus inferioris - fac ergo eum offendisse dominum suum. Unde offendit? Per superbiam quandam. Consideravit enim quod et ipse servum haberet, et ausus est extolli adversus dominum suum, eo ipso quo videbatur habere in potestate servum suum. Erexit se adversus dominum suum, iussit dominus eius ut a servo suo caederetur. Etenim ille dominus domini dominus amborum erat. Non enim tantum habebat in potestate servum suum servus ille, quantum ambos dominus amborum. Quando enim posset contemnere dominum illum, nullius servum, ut non caederet dominum suum, iubente potiore domino amborum? Iussit ergo Deus noster, quia offendimus eum, ut de corpore nostro cruciaremur; et factum est mortale corpus nostrum, et coepimus inde poenas pati, unde superbire adversus Dominum ausi sumus. Caedimur modo ergo a servo nostro. Cruciamur in tormentis carnis nostrae; humiliavit nos Dominus, ut vapularemus a servo.
7. But nevertheless all this which I have spoken of is above the body, is below God, below the master and above the servant. These are the three things of which I was speaking a little before. If, then, three men, though all are men, are ordered by a certain condition of this life, so that one of them is only a master, another of them is only a servant, and another of them is both servant of the master and master of the servant, how much, do you suppose, and how much more easily and more distinctly has the whole creation been ordered? The nature and substance of the mind placed under God, the nature of the whole body placed under the mind. But as I was saying: then he securely possesses his servant, if he has not offended his master; so that mind, if by a certain pride, by which it wished to be of its own power, it had not offended its master, the whole nature of the body would always be subject to it as a servant. But because by pride it offended the Lord, the creation of the body, which had been given into its service, became to it a torment of punishment, a torment of retribution. For now the mind is tortured by the difficulty of the body, when before it had dominion over the whole nature of the body. Just as if that man—for from here you better grasp the more illustrious similitude, because this very thing, that we understand with difficulty, pertains to the punishment by which we were humbled: from custom we give some illustrations. Set those three servants again before your eyes, because you understand this with difficulty, though it is more distinct; for those things are more distinct in proportion as they are more diverse: for God is far other than the mind, and the mind far other than the body. But in those three it is man, and man, and man. The nature is not diverse, but condition makes the order; yet because those are in our custom, we more easily understand them than the things that are more distinct. Now, then, understand this which we say. Make that middle one—because he is a servant in such a way that he is also a master; he is a master in such a way that he is also a servant: servant of the higher, master of the lower—make him, then, to have offended his master. By what did he offend? By a certain pride. For he considered that he too had a servant, and dared to exalt himself against his master, in the very thing by which he seemed to have his servant in his power. He raised himself against his master; his master commanded that he be beaten by his own servant. For that master of the master was the master of both. For that servant did not have his own servant in his power as much as the master of both had both. For when could he despise that master, no one's servant, so as not to beat his own master, when the more powerful master of both commanded it? Our God commanded, then, because we offended him, that we be tormented by our own body; and our body was made mortal, and we began to suffer punishments from there whence we dared to be proud against the Lord. So now we are beaten by our own servant. We are tortured in the torments of our flesh; the Lord humbled us, that we might be flogged by the servant.
Sermons5.7
8. Quare autem humiliavit, ut vapularemus a servo? Quia prius deliquimus: Priusquam humiliarer, ego deliqui . Positus ergo sub verbere servi tui, exclama ad Dominum Deum tuum, et dic ei: Bonum mihi est quoniam humiliasti me, ut discam iustificationes tuas . Quas iustificationes tuas? Quia, quomodo ego habeo servum corpus, habes et tu servum me. Et quomodo ego quaero ut obtemperet mihi corpus, sic debui obtemperare tibi. Ergo ex hoc didici iustificationes tuas, tamquam loquente desuper mihi Domino meo et dicente: " O serve nequam , saltem iam in ista humiliatione constitutus, agnosce quem offendisti, et cui subiectus fueris. Certe cruciaris a servo tuo: habes corpus et vis ut in omnibus obtemperet tibi, vis ut cum manum levas, sequatur manus; cum pedem levas, sequatur pes. Et quamquam caedi te voluerim a servo tuo, adhuc servit tibi servus tuus ". Etenim cum volumus ambulare et locum corpori mutare, iubemus pedibus, et obtemperant; iubemus oculo ut videat, quando aliquid volumus intueri: non nobis contradicit, convertitur, renuntiat nobis. Admovemus aurem sonis, statim renuntiat quid sonet; levamus manum ad aliquid tractandum, non resistit. In eo enim quod nobis servit corpus, indicat nos esse dominos suos; in eo vero quod nobis resistit, indicat habere nos Dominum. Sed videamus in quo tibi non obtemperat corpus tuum. Verbi gratia potes ambulare decem milia passuum, vis viginti: non obtemperat. Potes ambulare quinquaginta milia, vis sexaginta: non obtemperat. Vis duabus noctibus vigilare: obtemperat ad partem, ad aliam partem non obtemperat. Movere vis manum ad aliquid levandum: levas aliquid; ad aliud aliquid conaris: non obtemperat. Adde tot cruciantes difficultates infirmitatis et corruptionis eius quae numerari non possunt, et intende corpus quomodo quod corrumpitur aggravet animam . In eo ergo quod tibi servit, ostendit te esse dominum suum; in eo autem quod tibi resistit, admonet ut servias Domino tuo. Ergo dic Domino tuo: Bonum est mihi quoniam humiliasti me, ut discam iustificationes tuas . Quomodo discis iustificationes eius? Ut sic iam non dedigneris servire Domino tuo, quomodo tibi vis servire corpus tuum. Et incipis iam servire Domino tuo, et nondum tibi, sicut vis, servit corpus tuum. Credis enim qui infidelis eras, sequeris praecepta Domini tui, ambulas viam, sed nondum est perfecta in te iustitia: propterea nondum est perfecta oboedientia in servo tuo; adhuc manet aliquid amaritudinis, ne dulcescat tibi iste mundus, et non desideres Dominum tuum qui fecit mundum.
8. But why did he humble us, that we might be flogged by the servant? Because we first offended: Before I was humbled, I offended (Ps 119:67 (118:67)). Placed, then, under the lash of your servant, cry out to the Lord your God, and say to him, It is good for me that you have humbled me, that I may learn your righteous decrees (Ps 119:71 (118:71)). What righteous decrees of yours? That, just as I have the body as a servant, you too have me as a servant. And just as I demand that the body obey me, so I ought to have obeyed you. Therefore from this I have learned your righteous decrees, as though the Lord were speaking to me from above and saying: "O wicked servant, at least now, set in this humiliation, acknowledge whom you offended, and to whom you were subject. Surely you are tortured by your own servant: you have a body and you wish it to obey you in all things, you wish that when you raise your hand, the hand follow; when you raise your foot, the foot follow. And although I wished you to be beaten by your servant, your servant still serves you." For when we wish to walk and to move the body to another place, we command the feet, and they obey; we command the eye to see, when we wish to behold something: it does not contradict us, it turns, it reports to us. We bring the ear near to sounds, at once it reports what sounds; we lift the hand to handle something, it does not resist. For in that the body serves us, it indicates that we are its masters; but in that it resists us, it indicates that we have a Master. But let us see in what your body does not obey you. For example, you can walk ten miles, you wish twenty: it does not obey. You can walk fifty miles, you wish sixty: it does not obey. You wish to stay awake two nights: it obeys in part, in another part it does not obey. You wish to move the hand to lift something: you lift something; you try at something else: it does not obey. Add so many tormenting difficulties of its infirmity and corruption, which cannot be numbered, and consider how the body, in that which is corrupted, weighs down the soul (See Wis 9:15). In that, then, which serves you, it shows that you are its master; but in that which resists you, it admonishes you to serve your Lord. Therefore say to your Lord, It is good for me that you have humbled me, that I may learn your righteous decrees. How do you learn his righteous decrees? So that now you do not disdain to serve your Lord, just as you wish your body to serve you. And you now begin to serve your Lord, and your body does not yet serve you as you wish. For you believe, who were unbelieving, you follow the precepts of your Lord, you walk the way, but righteousness is not yet perfect in you: therefore obedience is not yet perfect in your servant; there still remains something of bitterness, lest this world grow sweet to you, and you not long for your Lord who made the world.
Sermons5.8
9. Exclama a finibus terrae ad illum, o Ecclesia diffusa per orbem terrae, dic in psalmo: A finibus terrae ad te clamavi, cum angeretur cor meum . In psalmo sunt ista scripta: In petra exaltasti me, deduxisti me, quia factus es spes mea . Exaltavit enim nos Deus in petra. In qua petra? Petra autem erat Christus , dicit Apostolus. Et quomodo ibi facta est spes nostra? Quia Dominus noster Iesus Christus, per quem facti sumus, ipse est Verbum Dei, per quod facta sunt omnia . Suscepit carnem de massa mortalitatis nostrae, et mortem quae pertinebat ad poenam peccati suscepit ille, non peccatum, sed misericordia liberandi a peccato ipsam carnem suam tradidit morti. Non enim invitus traditus est; non crucifigeretur, nisi seipsum tradidisset. Quia et quod eum tradidit Iudas, volentem tradidit. Non tamen imputatur Iudae meritum voluntatis Christi, sed meritum cupiditatis suae. Non enim cum traderet Dominum, salutem nostram consideravit, sed avaritiam suam et perfidiam suam. Nam tradidit Iudas, tradidit Christus, tradidit Pater Christi. Unam rem videntur omnes fecisse. Unam rem fecerunt, sed non una intentione fecerunt. Tradidit Pater Filium misericordia, tradidit se Filius ipsa misericordia, tradidit Iudas magistrum perfidia. Videtur nihil interesse inter traditionem et traditionem, sed inter misericordiam et perfidiam plurimum interest. Quomodo tradidit Pater? Audi Apostolum: Qui Filio proprio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit illum . Quomodo tradidit Filius? Idem Apostolus dicit de ipso Domino: Qui me dilexit et tradidit semetipsum pro me . Tradidit ergo carnem istam occidendam, ne tu carni tuae aliquid timeres. Ostendit in resurrectione sua post triduum, quod debeas tu sperare in fine saeculi. Deducit ergo te, quia factus est spes tua . Ambulas modo ad spem resurrectionis, sed nisi prius resurgeret caput nostrum, quid membra cetera sperarent, non invenirent.
9. Cry out from the ends of the earth to him, O Church spread throughout the world, say in the Psalm, From the ends of the earth I have cried to you, while my heart was in anguish (Ps 61:2 (60:3)). These things are written in the Psalm: On a rock you have exalted me, you have led me, for you have become my hope (Ps 61:2-3 (60:3-4)). For God exalted us on a rock. On what rock? But the rock was Christ (1 Cor 10:4), says the Apostle. And how was our hope made there? Because our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we were made, is himself the Word of God, through whom all things were made (See John 1:3). He took flesh from the lump of our mortality, and took on death, which pertained to the punishment of sin—not sin, but out of the mercy of freeing us from sin he handed over his own flesh to death. For he was not handed over unwilling; he would not have been crucified, unless he had handed himself over. For even that Judas handed him over, he handed over the willing one. Yet the merit of Christ's will is not imputed to Judas, but the merit of his own greed. For when he handed over the Lord, he did not consider our salvation, but his own avarice and his own perfidy. For Judas handed him over, Christ handed himself over, the Father of Christ handed him over. They all seem to have done one thing. They did one thing, but did not do it with one intention. The Father handed over the Son out of mercy, the Son handed over himself out of that very mercy, Judas handed over the master out of perfidy. There seems to be no difference between handing over and handing over, but between mercy and perfidy there is the greatest difference. How did the Father hand him over? Hear the Apostle: He who did not spare his own Son, but handed him over for us all (Rom 8:32). How did the Son hand himself over? The same Apostle says of the Lord himself, Who loved me and handed himself over for me (Gal 2:20). He handed over this flesh, then, to be killed, that you might not fear anything for your flesh. He showed in his resurrection after three days what you ought to hope for at the end of the age. He leads you, then, because he has become your hope. You walk now to the hope of resurrection; but unless our head had first risen, the other members would not find what they should hope for.
Sermons5.9
10. Quid ergo, fratres mei? Quamquam, et antequam Dominus pateretur, serviret illi corpus tamquam Domino, non enim sic erat illigatus corpori tamquam ob vindictam, tamquam ob poenam, ut caederetur a servo quemadmodum nos; sed si quid pati voluit in corpore suo, voluntate passus est et potestate, non necessitate et inopia, sicut ipse dixit: Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam: nemo tollit eam a me, sed ego ipse ponam eam a me . Magna ergo potestas in illo; tamen quod pati voluit in carne ibi demonstravit, quod merito pateris. Ille passus est immerito, tu pateris merito. Sed ut sufferas quod pateris merito, consolatur te qui passus est immerito. Suffer ergo quod pateris, donec transeat mortalitas tua. Venit ergo regnum tuum certis dimensionibus temporis; exhibet ille quod promisit, quia in se iam exhibuit quod resurrexit. Resurrexit enim post triduum; prior voluit resurgere et ostendere nobis quid in fine sperare debeamus. Putabamus esse perituram carnem; ideo noluit aliunde sumere carnem, quam unde habebamus et nos carnem. Nam si aliunde illam sumeret, diceremus: " Potuit resurgere caro, quae aliunde sumpta fuit ". Numquid inde sumpta fuit, unde sumpsimus nos? Non admisit quidem ad matrem virile consortium, quia unicus Filius Dei erat. Quia sursum Patrem habebat, in terra non quaesivit nisi matrem. Ostendit nobis quia quod creavit non est malum: creavit masculum et feminam, ambos ipse creavit . Sed quia per feminam seductus erat homo, possent de se feminae desperare, nisi per virginem Mariam ille sexus honoraretur. Elegit nasci de femina; suscipere virum decebat, virum nasci. Sed non solum virum creaverat Deus, et feminam ipse creaverat. Poterant de se, ut dixi, feminae desperare et dicere non se pertinere ad misericordiam Dei, quia per feminam vir deceptus est; nasci dignatus est ex femina, viro suscepto, honoravitque sexum; ostendit se utriusque sexus conditorem, et postea liberatorem. Nam quia per feminam viro praeparata est mors a serpente, ipsis viris vita per feminas nuntiata est . Nam resurgentem Dominum primo feminae viderunt et viris apostolis nuntiaverunt. Ostendit ergo nobis in carne sua Dominus noster Iesus Christus, quid in fine sperare debeamus. Humiliavit ergo nos, ut iustificationes eius disceremus .
10. What then, my brothers? Although, even before the Lord suffered, his body served him as a master—for he was not bound to the body as though for retribution, as though for punishment, so as to be beaten by the servant as we are; but if he wished to suffer anything in his body, he suffered it by will and power, not by necessity and want, as he himself said, I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it up again: no one takes it from me, but I myself lay it down (John 10:18). Great, then, is the power in him; yet what he wished to suffer in the flesh he showed there, that you suffer deservedly. He suffered undeservedly, you suffer deservedly. But that you may endure what you suffer deservedly, he who suffered undeservedly consoles you. Endure, then, what you suffer, until your mortality passes away. Therefore your kingdom comes by certain measures of time; he renders what he promised, because in himself he has already shown that he rose. For he rose after three days; he wished to rise first and to show us what we ought to hope for at the end. We thought the flesh was going to perish; therefore he wished to take flesh from no other source than that from which we too had flesh. For if he took it from elsewhere, we would say: "The flesh could rise, which was taken from elsewhere. Was it taken from where we were taken?" He indeed did not admit to the mother the company of a man, because he was the only Son of God. Because he had the Father above, on earth he sought nothing but a mother. He showed us that what he created is not evil: he created male and female, he created both (See Gen 1:27). But because man had been seduced through a woman, women could despair of themselves, unless that sex were honored through the Virgin Mary. He chose to be born of a woman; it was fitting to take on a man, to be born a man. But not only had God created the man, he had created the woman too. Women could, as I said, despair of themselves and say that they did not pertain to the mercy of God, because through a woman the man was deceived; he deigned to be born of a woman, taking on a man, and honored the sex; he showed himself the founder of both sexes, and afterward the liberator. For because through a woman death was prepared for the man by the serpent, life was announced to the men themselves through women. For the women first saw the rising Lord and announced it to the men, the apostles. Our Lord Jesus Christ, then, showed us in his flesh what we ought to hope for at the end. He humbled us, then, that we might learn his righteous decrees.
Sermons5.10
11. Iam modo redeamus humiliati, qui deiecti sumus superbi. Tota enim causa mortalitatis nostrae, tota causa infirmitatis nostrae, tota causa omnium cruciatuum nostrorum, omnium difficultatum, omnium aerumnarum in isto saeculo, quas patitur genus humanum, non est nisi superbia. Habes Scripturam dicentem: Initium omnis peccati superbia . Et quid item dicit? Initium superbiae hominis, apostatare a Deo . Si superbia parvum malum vobis videtur, vel apostatare a Deo contremiscite. Porro si contremiscitis apostatare a Deo, causam apostatandi deicite. Apostatare enim a Deo superbia fecit hominem. Quia ergo ipsa est caput omnium morborum nostrorum, aegrotamus enim in hac vita. Quomodo medicus peritus, quando viderit hominem diversis morbis languentem, non attendit proximas causas et relinquit originem causarum omnium - si enim curaverit proximas causas servato fonte morborum, redeunt derivationes calamitatis, et ad tempus videtur mederi, non autem penitus sanat; ille autem medicus peritissimus invenitur, qui colligit bene causas omnes omnium morborum, et quam primam invenerit causam, unde omnia illa quae diversa sunt videantur tamquam rami exstitisse, amputat radicem, et tota dolorum silva succiditur -, sic Dominus Iesus Christus - quare dictus est Salvator, et qui dixit: Non est sanis opus medicus, sed male habentibus , venit ad aegrotantes, quia aegroti ad illum venire non possent; quaesivit non se quaerentes, convertit se ad infirmos, passus est multa, occidi se a caecis toleravit, ut eorum oculos de ipsa sua morte sanaret - fecit haec omnia, et quia causam omnium morborum nostrorum superbiam videbat, humilitate sua nos sanavit.
11. Now then, let us return humbled, we who were cast down proud. For the whole cause of our mortality, the whole cause of our infirmity, the whole cause of all our torments, all difficulties, all hardships in this age which the human race suffers, is nothing but pride. You have Scripture saying, The beginning of all sin is pride (Sir 10:13). And what else does it say? The beginning of man's pride is to apostatize from God (Sir 10:12). If pride seems to you a small evil, at least tremble at apostatizing from God. Moreover, if you tremble at apostatizing from God, cast down the cause of apostatizing. For pride made man apostatize from God. Because, then, this is the head of all our diseases—for we are sick in this life. Just as a skilled physician, when he sees a man languishing with various diseases, does not attend to the proximate causes and leave the origin of all the causes—for if he treats the proximate causes while the source of the diseases is preserved, the derivations of calamity return, and he seems to heal for a time, but does not heal thoroughly; but that physician is found most skilled who gathers well all the causes of all the diseases, and whatever he finds to be the first cause, from which all those various things seem to have arisen like branches, he cuts the root, and the whole forest of pains is cut down—so the Lord Jesus Christ (why is he called Savior, and who said, Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick (Matt 9:12)) came to the sick, because the sick could not come to him; he sought those not seeking him, he turned himself to the infirm, he suffered many things, he endured to be killed by the blind, that he might heal their eyes by his very death—he did all these things, and because he saw pride to be the cause of all our diseases, by his humility he healed us.
Sermons5.11
12. Noli ergo irridere humilitatem Christi. Irrident enim multi pagani quia humilis venit Christus - et utinam pagani soli! -, et multi haeretici qui se christianos dicunt. Sordet illis quia natus est Christus de femina; sordet illis quia fixus est in cruce et vulneratus est, et vera erant illa vulnera quae accepit, et veri erant illi clavi qui infixi sunt; sordet et dicunt: " Illa omnia simulavit, finxit et non pertulit ". Ergo mendacio te veritas liberavit? Mendacio laborabas, et de mendacio sanatus es? Unde fieri potest? Sed quicumque ista dicunt, ostendunt quales ipsi magistri sint. Si enim resurrexit Dominus et dubitanti discipulo suo praebuit manus palpandas et contrectandas cicatrices, dicenti: " Non credam, nisi misero digitos meos in latus eius " , ostendit se non tantum videndum oculis sed et manibus contrectandum; ille autem cum contrectaret cicatrices, invenit expressam veritatem et exclamavit: Dominus meus et Deus meus . Si ergo Christus fefellit, tu verum dicturus es? Quomodo te audiam, dic mihi. Velut magistrum vis audiam? " Velut magistrum ", inquit mihi. Quid mihi dicis, quid me doces? " Doceo te, inquit, quia non est Christus natus de femina, et non habuit veram carnem, et non vera mors illa fuit, nec vera illa vulnera, et si non vera vulnera, nec verae cicatrices ". Et ego contra de evangelio didici Dominum Iesum Christum, qui, cum dubitaret discipulus, obtulit illi cicatrices suas. Utique potuit sine cicatricibus resurgere, qui potuit curare oculos caeci nati. Sed quare voluit afferre testimonium cicatricum? Quia testimonium cicatricum corporis medicina erat vulnerum mentis. Quid ergo me docturus es: quia ista falsa erant, et simulavit Christus haec omnia, et falsitate deceptus exclamavit discipulus: Dominus meus et Deus meus? Si ergo ille de falsitate voluit facere sanum, unde scio utrum tu verum dicas mihi an mentiaris? Non enim scelus putas mentiri, quando auctorem mendacii Christum mihi conaris opponere. Dicturus enim sum tibi: Mentiris, et tu mihi: " Absit, non mentior ". Mentiris prorsus. " Absit a me ut mentiar ". Hoc mihi dicturus es, ut credam tibi. Nam dic mihi: " Mentior ", volo scire utrum tibi aliquid credam. Ut autem tibi aliquid credam, dicturus es mihi: " Absit ut mentiar ". Quare dixisti: " Absit ut mentiar ", nisi scelus putas mentiri cum doces? Quod ergo tibi scelus putas, hoc Christo assignas? Ergo recedant fallaciae humanae: quomodo scriptum est in evangelio, sic venit Christus. Non tibi sordeat humilitas Christi, humilitas illa superbiae sordet. Noli esse superbus, et non sordebit humilis Christus.
12. Do not, then, deride the humility of Christ. For many pagans deride it because Christ came humble—and would that pagans alone!—and many heretics who call themselves Christians. It is foul to them that Christ was born of a woman; it is foul to them that he was fastened to the cross and wounded, and that those wounds were true that he received, and those nails were true that were driven in; it is foul to them and they say: "He simulated all those things, he feigned them and did not endure them." Did truth, then, free you by a lie? Were you laboring under a lie, and were you healed by a lie? How can it be? But whoever says these things show what kind of masters they themselves are. For if the Lord rose and offered to his doubting disciple his hands to be felt and the scars to be handled, the disciple saying, "I will not believe, unless I put my fingers into his side" (See John 20:25), he showed himself not only to be seen with the eyes but also handled with the hands; but he, when he handled the scars, found expressed the truth and exclaimed, My Lord and my God (John 20:28). If, then, Christ deceived, will you tell the truth? How shall I hear you, tell me. Do you wish me to hear you as a master? "As a master," he says to me. What do you say to me, what do you teach me? "I teach you," he says, "that Christ was not born of a woman, and did not have true flesh, and that death was not true, nor those wounds true, and if not true wounds, then not true scars." And I, on the contrary, have learned from the gospel about the Lord Jesus Christ, who, when the disciple doubted, offered him his scars. Surely he could have risen without scars, who could heal the eyes of one born blind. But why did he wish to bring the testimony of the scars? Because the testimony of the scars of the body was the medicine of the wounds of the mind. What, then, will you teach me: that those things were false, and Christ simulated all these things, and the disciple, deceived by falsity, exclaimed, My Lord and my God? If, then, he wished to make a man sound by falsity, how do I know whether you tell me the truth or lie? For you do not think it a crime to lie, when you try to set before me Christ as the author of a lie. For I will say to you: You lie, and you to me: "Far from it, I do not lie." You lie outright. "Far be it from me to lie." This you will say to me, that I may believe you. For tell me, "I lie," and I want to know whether I will believe you anything. But that I may believe you anything, you will say to me, "Far be it that I lie." Why did you say, "Far be it that I lie," unless you think it a crime to lie when you teach? What, then, you think a crime for yourself, this you assign to Christ? Therefore let human deceits depart: as it is written in the gospel, so Christ came. Let not the humility of Christ be foul to you; that humility is foul to pride. Do not be proud, and the humble Christ will not be foul to you.
Sermons5.12
13. Ait Apostolus: Omnia munda mundis. Immundis autem et infidelibus nihil est mundum, sed polluta sunt eorum et mens et conscientia . Casto corde dic: " Concepit femina, concepit virgo ". Fide concepit, virgo concepit, virgo peperit, virgo permansit. Crede ista omnia, nec tibi illa immunda viscera videantur. Quia etsi omnino fuisset caro illa immunda, veniens Christus ad carnem mundaret immundam, non ab immunda fieret immundus. Vide humilitatem Domini tui: si tibi horret, superbus es. Humilitas superbo horret. Sic quomodo superbus es, coge te, ut non tibi horreat poculum tumoris tui. Cum enim superbus es, tumes; non grandis es. Si tumes, bibe poculum, ut detumescant viscera tua, ut sanus esse possis. Hoc poculum tibi medicus temperavit, ut bibas. Ipse medicus calicem tibi temperavit: bibe calicem amarum, si vis esse sanus. Non vides quia tumes, non vides quia non sunt sana viscera tua? Magnum te putas, et tumes. Non est ista magnitudo, sed morbus. Vis carere morbo, vis carere tumore? Bibe calicem humilitatis. Temperavit tibi eum, qui ad te humilis venit. Et ne tu dubitares bibere, prior medicus bibit, non quia medico necessarium fuit, sed ut dubitationem auferret aegroto. Noli ergo contemnere humilitatem, qua sanaris. Caput omnium morborum superbia est. Ad caput omnium morborum sanandum venit, qui caput Ecclesiae fieri dignatus est . Ablato capite omnium morborum, sanus eris. Humiliare et sanus eris, et dices securius: Bonum mihi quoniam humiliasti me, ut discam iustificationes tuas . Erexisti enim te et humiliatus es. Humilia te et erigeris, quia Deus superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam . Ideo ergo conclusit Deus omnes in incredulitate, ut omnium misereatur .
13. The Apostle says, All things are clean to the clean. But to the unclean and unbelieving nothing is clean, but both their mind and conscience are polluted (Titus 1:15). With a chaste heart say: "A woman conceived, a virgin conceived." By faith she conceived, a virgin conceived, a virgin gave birth, a virgin remained. Believe all these things, and let those inner parts not seem unclean to you. For even if that flesh had been altogether unclean, Christ, coming to the flesh, would cleanse the unclean, and would not become unclean from the unclean. See the humility of your Lord: if it makes you shudder, you are proud. Humility makes the proud man shudder. As you are proud, so force yourself, that the cup of your swelling may not make you shudder. For when you are proud, you swell; you are not great. If you swell, drink the cup, that your inner parts may subside, that you may be able to be sound. This cup the physician has tempered for you, that you may drink. The physician himself has tempered the chalice for you: drink the bitter chalice, if you wish to be sound. Do you not see that you swell, do you not see that your inner parts are not sound? You think yourself great, and you swell. This is not greatness, but disease. Do you wish to be free of disease, do you wish to be free of swelling? Drink the chalice of humility. He tempered it for you who came to you humble. And lest you doubt to drink it, the physician drank first—not because it was necessary for the physician, but to take away the doubt from the sick. Do not, then, despise the humility by which you are healed. The head of all diseases is pride. To heal the head of all diseases came he who deigned to become the head of the Church. The head of all diseases being taken away, you will be sound. Humble yourself and you will be sound, and you will say more securely, It is good for me that you have humbled me, that I may learn your righteous decrees (Ps 119:71 (118:71)). For you raised yourself up and were humbled. Humble yourself and you will be raised up, because God resists the proud, but to the humble he gives grace (Jas 4:6; 1 Pet 5:5). Therefore, then, God has shut up all in unbelief, that he might have mercy on all (See Rom 11:32).
Sermons5.13
14. Recessit homo a Deo, secutus est concupiscentias suas , laxavit habenas: errando, vagando, usque ad idolorum cultum pervenit. Superbierat et ipsa gens Iudaeorum quae colebat unum Deum, superbierat et ierat in iniquitatem. Volens Deus ostendere eis quia infirmi sunt, volens illis ostendere quia sub fragilitate carnis suae iacent, quia cupiditas illa quae ducta est de propagine parentum adhuc in eis manebat, dedit eis legem et mandata iusta et bona et sancta, sicut dicit Apostolus: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum iustum et sanctum et bonum. Quod ergo bonum est, inquit, mihi factum est mors? Absit! Sed peccatum, ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem . Vide quomodo bonum dixit ipsam legem, quae data erat Iudaeis. Bonum dixit, quia Deus dederat. Et vere omnia bona in decalogo praeceperat. An forte aliquid mali erat: Ne fureris, ne occidas, ne moecheris, ne falsum testimonium dicas et cetera, non concupiscas rem proximi tui ? Etsi enim non abstuleris, sed tantummodo concupiveris, non te tenent leges in foro, sed tenet te Deus in iudicio. Attendite itaque, fratres: data est lex Iudaeis infirmis, sed superbis. Coeperunt conari facere iustitias legis et deici cupiditatibus suis, et facti sunt rei, qui antea iniqui erant, sed rei legis non erant, praevaricatores non erant. Unde dicit Apostolus: Ubi enim lex non est, nec praevaricatio . Quando datur lex, ille qui contra legem facit, quamvis hoc faciat quod faciebat, tamen quando hoc sine lege faciebat, peccator erat, praevaricator non erat; quando autem iam accepta lege facit, non solum peccator, sed etiam praevaricator est. Quia ergo non solum peccator, sed etiam praevaricator est, impletur quod ait Apostolus: Lex autem subintravit, ut abundaret delictum . Quare autem abundavit delictum? Hoc enim est: Deus, reppulisti nos et deposuisti nos . Sequitur autem et dicit: Ubi autem abundavit delictum, superabundavit gratia. Quia ergo abundavit delictum, recte dicimus: Deus, reppulisti nos et deposuisti nos, iratus es. Sed quia superabundavit gratia, recte subiungimus: Et misertus es nobis . Non ergo dicant Iudaei: " Nos sumus aliquid ". Conclusit enim Deus omnes in incredulitate, ut omnium misereatur .
14. Man withdrew from God, followed his own covetings, loosened the reins: by wandering, roaming, he reached even the worship of idols. The very nation of the Jews, which worshiped one God, had grown proud, had grown proud and gone into iniquity. God, wishing to show them that they are weak, wishing to show them that they lie under the frailty of their own flesh, because that craving which was drawn from the lineage of their parents still remained in them, gave them the law and commandments, just and good and holy, as the Apostle says, And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment just and holy and good. Did that which is good, he says, then become death to me? Far from it! But sin, that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good (Rom 7:12-13). See how he called good that very law which had been given to the Jews. He called it good, because God had given it. And truly he had commanded all good things in the decalogue. Or was there perhaps something evil in: You shall not steal, you shall not kill, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not bear false witness, and the rest, you shall not covet your neighbor's property (Exod 20:13-17)? For even if you have not stolen, but only coveted, the laws do not hold you in the forum, but God holds you in judgment. Attend, therefore, brothers: the law was given to the Jews, weak but proud. They began to try to do the righteous deeds of the law and to be cast down by their own covetings, and they were made guilty, who before were unjust, but were not guilty of the law, were not transgressors. Hence the Apostle says, For where there is no law, neither is there transgression (Rom 4:15). When the law is given, the one who acts against the law, although he does what he was doing, yet when he was doing this without the law, he was a sinner, he was not a transgressor; but when he now does it with the law received, he is not only a sinner, but also a transgressor. Because, then, he is not only a sinner, but also a transgressor, that is fulfilled which the Apostle says, But the law crept in, that the offense might abound (Rom 5:20). But why did the offense abound? For this is, God, you have repulsed us and cast us down. But it follows and he says, But where the offense abounded, grace abounded the more. Because, then, the offense abounded, we rightly say, God, you have repulsed us and cast us down, you were angry. But because grace abounded the more, we rightly add, And you have had mercy on us (Ps 60:1 (59:3)). Let not the Jews, then, say, "We are something." For God has shut up all in unbelief, that he might have mercy on all (See Rom 11:32).
Sermons5.14
15. Cognoscamus ergo, fratres carissimi, vitam nostram, Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum; medicinam superbiae nostrae humilitatem Domini nostri Iesu Christi teneamus. Credamus in eum, speremus totum de misericordia illius, qui Filio proprio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit illum ; et quando forte proficimus in iustificationibus ipsius, non superbiamus et ceteros contemnamus, sed attendamus in itinere iustitiae non quantum transierimus, sed quantum nobis restat peragendum; et ubique gemamus, et tamdiu gemamus quamdiu peregrini sumus, quia gaudium nostrum non erit nisi in patria, cum angelis aequati fuerimus . Quamdiu sumus in corpore, peregrinamur a Domino . Quare peregrinamur a Domino? Per fidem enim ambulamus, inquit, non per speciem . Fides est credere quod non vides, species est videre quod credideras. Cum ergo venerit species, erit flamma illa caritatis acrior, quia quod absens desiderabas, praesens amplecteris; quod absens credebas, praesens vides. Et si dulcis est Deus creditus, quid erit conspectus? Cum ergo omnia ista finita fuerint quae nos adhuc torquent propter reliquias peccatorum nostrorum, tunc erit plenitudo iustitiae, tunc copulati angelis hymnum sempiternum " alleluia " cantabimus: laus Dei sine defectu nobis erit, nec fames inde nos repellet, quia non esurit corpus, nisi quod corrumpitur et aggravat animam ; nec sitiemus nec infirmabimur nec senescemus nec in somnum vergemus nec aliqua lassitudine fatigabimur, sed qualia sunt corpora angelorum, tales erunt carnes nostrae in resurrectione mortuorum . Noli mirari quia carnes istae caelestia corpora erunt in resurrectione mortuorum. Cogitate quia, antequam essemus, nihil eramus, et inde credite quales erimus cum resurrexerimus. Unusquisque consideret se: antequam natus esset, quid erat, ubi erat, ubi latebat? Omnis ista corporis distinctio: aures, oculi, vultus, spiritus vegetans universam molem corporis, ubi erant ista omnia? Certe in secreto naturae, certe ubi non videbantur. Processerunt inde, formavit te Deus [eum] qui non eras. Quid magnum est Deo ex homine facere angelum, qui ex limo fecit hominem ? Quid eras? et homo es; homo es, et angelus non eris? Vicinius fit ex homine angelus, quam ex illo quod eras fit homo. Quod est mirabilius in te fecit, quod restat non est facturus?
15. Let us, then, dearly beloved brothers, know our life, our Lord Jesus Christ; let us hold the medicine of our pride, the humility of our Lord Jesus Christ. Let us believe in him, let us hope wholly from his mercy, who did not spare his own Son, but handed him over for us all (Rom 8:32); and when perhaps we make progress in his righteous decrees, let us not be proud and despise the rest, but let us attend, on the road of righteousness, not to how much we have traversed, but to how much remains for us to accomplish; and let us groan everywhere, and let us groan as long as we are pilgrims, because our joy will not be except in the homeland, when we have been made equal to the angels (See Luke 20:36). As long as we are in the body, we are on pilgrimage away from the Lord. Why are we on pilgrimage away from the Lord? For we walk by faith, he says, not by sight (2 Cor 5:6-7). Faith is to believe what you do not see; sight is to see what you had believed. When, then, sight comes, that flame of love will be keener, because what you longed for absent, you embrace present; what you believed absent, you see present. And if God believed is sweet, what will he be when beheld? When, then, all these things are ended which still torment us on account of the remnants of our sins, then there will be the fullness of righteousness, then, joined to the angels, we shall sing the everlasting hymn "alleluia": the praise of God without ceasing will be ours, nor will hunger drive us from it, for the body does not hunger except that which is corrupted and weighs down the soul (See Wis 9:15); nor will we thirst nor grow weak nor grow old nor sink into sleep nor be tired by any weariness, but such as the bodies of the angels are, such will our flesh be in the resurrection of the dead (See Luke 20:36). Do not wonder that this flesh will be heavenly bodies in the resurrection of the dead. Consider that, before we existed, we were nothing, and from that believe what we shall be when we have risen. Let each one consider himself: before he was born, what was he, where was he, where did he lie hidden? All this distinction of the body—ears, eyes, face, the spirit animating the whole mass of the body—where were all these things? Surely in the secret of nature, surely where they were not seen. They came forth from there, God formed you who did not exist. What great thing is it for God to make an angel from a man, who from mud made man (See Gen 2:7)? What were you? and you are a man; you are a man, and will you not be an angel? An angel is made from a man more closely than a man is made from what you were. What is more wonderful, he has done in you; what remains, will he not do?
Sermons5.15
16. Opus est ut credas, et fides tua non deserat Christum, non deserat evangelium, non deserat promissa eius. Intellegas quia omnia quae sunt scripta prope peracta sunt, pauca sunt quae restant. Ecclesia ista, quam videtis toto orbe diffusam, ante parvum tempus non erat. Vos ante paucos annos pagani eratis, modo christiani estis; parentes vestri daemoniis serviebant, antea plena erant templa turificantibus, modo plena est Ecclesia Deum laudantibus. Quomodo mutavit Deus subito res humanas? Antequam essent haec omnia, scripta legebantur, credebantur et non videbantur; modo videmus ea quae maiores nostri legebant. Si ergo haec tanta impleta sunt, pauca quae restant non sunt ventura? Credite fortiter quia ventura sunt, fratres, quia et omnia ista quae iam venerunt non aliter venerunt quam conscripta sunt et praenuntiata antequam venirent. Ante multa milia annorum, quando dictum est Abrahae: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes , dicebatur uni homini: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes; considerabat se unum et hoc semen, et uxorem iam anum et confectam ipsam senectute, et dicebatur ei non tantum: " Erit de te semen " - quod si solum diceretur, quid mirabilius? -, parum erat dicere iam senectute confecto: "Habebis filium ", In semine tuo, inquit, benedicentur omnes gentes. Mirabilia dicebat Deus, impossibilia dicebat, sed sibi facilia . Ille unus credidit quod non videbat, et nos videmus; quod ille credidit, nobis exhibitum est, immo ipsi redditum est, quod in nobis exhibitum est. De semine enim Abrahae Isaac, et de Isaac Iacob, et de Iacob populus Iudaeorum, et de populo Iudaeorum David, et de semine David virgo Maria, et de virgine Maria Dominus Iesus Christus. Ergo in semine Abrahae benedicentur omnes gentes , quia omnes gentes in Christo benedicuntur. Ecce modo exhibitum est nobis quod illi promissum est. Deus ergo omnipotens et fidelis, quod uni homini promisit, exhibuit: quod omnibus promisit, non exhibebit? Fratres mei, aedificetur fides vestra, roboretur spes vestra. Unum non fefellit, orbem terrarum poterit fallere? Exhibuit uni orbem terrarum plenum christianis, exhibebit orbem terrarum cum Christo filio suo vivere in aeternum.
16. It is needful that you believe, and that your faith not forsake Christ, not forsake the gospel, not forsake his promises. Understand that all the things that are written are nearly accomplished, few are those that remain. This Church, which you see spread throughout the whole world, a little while ago did not exist. A few years ago you were pagans, now you are Christians; your parents served demons, before the temples were full of those burning incense, now the Church is full of those praising God. How suddenly has God changed human affairs! Before all these things were, the writings were read, were believed and were not seen; now we see those things that our elders read. If, then, such great things have been fulfilled, will the few that remain not come? Believe strongly that they will come, brothers, because even all these things that have already come, came in no other way than as they were written and foretold before they came. Many thousands of years ago, when it was said to Abraham, In your seed all nations will be blessed (Gen 22:18), it was said to one man, In your seed all nations will be blessed; he considered himself one, and this seed, and his wife now an old woman and worn out with old age itself, and it was said to him not only, "There will be a seed from you"—which, if it alone were said, what more wonderful?—it was too little to say to one already worn out with old age, "You will have a son": In your seed, he says, all nations will be blessed. God said wonderful things, said impossible things, but easy for himself (See Luke 1:37). That one man believed what he did not see, and we see it; what he believed has been displayed to us—rather, has been rendered to us, what has been displayed in us. For from the seed of Abraham came Isaac, and from Isaac Jacob, and from Jacob the people of the Jews, and from the people of the Jews David, and from the seed of David the virgin Mary, and from the virgin Mary the Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore in the seed of Abraham all nations will be blessed, because all nations are blessed in Christ. Behold, now there has been displayed to us what was promised to him. God, then, almighty and faithful, displayed what he promised to one man: will he not display what he promised to all? My brothers, let your faith be built up, let your hope be strengthened. He did not deceive one man; can he deceive the world? He has displayed to one man the world full of Christians; he will display the world living forever with Christ his Son.
Sermons5.16
17. Haec tenentes, fratres, intellegite quia Ecclesia non est in parte, sed in toto est. Totum emit Christus, sanguinem suum pro toto dedit: universus orbis terrarum habet christianos, unitas Christi Ecclesia est. Sine causa litigant haeretici cum Ecclesia Christi: parum est quia exheredari voluerunt, et heredibus calumniantur. Vos eos in unitate ad totum, non ipsi vos seducant ad partem. Si vos eos secuti fueritis, ad partem ibitis; si vos ipsi audierint, ad totum venient: lucro suo ipsi vincuntur. Christus enim totum emit, quando pependit in cruce, fratres mei: commercia Christi, passio Christi; ibi nos emit ubi crucifixus est. Ibi enim fudit sanguinem suum, pretium nostrum, ibi ubi praedictum est in psalmis adhuc futurum. Videte ante quot annos praedictum est: Foderunt manus meas et pedes meos, dinumeraverunt omnia ossa mea; ipsi vero conspexerunt et consideraverunt me, diviserunt sibi vestimenta mea et super vestem meam miserunt sortem . Haec omnia vix possunt discerni utrum in psalmo audiantur, an ex evangelio recitentur. Nonne quomodo cantantur in psalmo, sic leguntur in evangelio: Foderunt manus meas et pedes meos, dinumeraverunt omnia ossa mea ? Ibi nos emit Christus, ubi dinumerata sunt omnia ossa eius; ubi manus eius et pedes eius fossi sunt clavis, ibi nos emit. Ibi enim fudit sanguinem suum, quod est pretium nostrum. In ipso psalmo intellegitur quid emerit. Vultis nosse? Ipsum psalmum interrogate. Quid emit Christus, pendens in ligno? Post paucos enim versus dicit: Commemorabuntur et convertentur ad Dominum universi fines terrae, et adorabunt in conspectu eius universae patriae gentium . Quare adorabunt? Quoniam ipsius est regnum, et ipse dominabitur gentium . Quasi responderetur quare, quis est iste ad quem convertentur universi fines terrae et in cuius conspectu adorabunt omnes patriae gentium ? Quia ipsius est, inquit, regnum, et ipse dominabitur gentium . Quare ipsius est? Quia ipse emit.
17. Holding these things, brothers, understand that the Church is not in a part, but is in the whole. Christ bought the whole, he gave his blood for the whole: the whole world has Christians, the unity of Christ is the Church. Without cause the heretics quarrel with the Church of Christ: it is too little that they wished to be disinherited; they also slander the heirs. Lead them in unity to the whole; let them not seduce you to a part. If you follow them, you will go to a part; if they hear you, they will come to the whole: they themselves are conquered to their own gain. For Christ bought the whole when he hung on the cross, my brothers: the commerce of Christ, the passion of Christ; there he bought us where he was crucified. For there he poured out his blood, our price, there where it was foretold in the Psalms as still to come. See how many years before it was foretold: They have pierced my hands and my feet, they have numbered all my bones; but they themselves looked and gazed upon me, they divided my garments among themselves and over my garment they cast lots (Ps 22:16-18 (21:17-19)). All these things can scarcely be distinguished, whether they are heard in the Psalm or recited from the gospel. Are they not, just as they are sung in the Psalm, so read in the gospel: They have pierced my hands and my feet, they have numbered all my bones? There Christ bought us, where all his bones were numbered; where his hands and his feet were pierced with nails, there he bought us. For there he poured out his blood, which is our price. In that very Psalm is understood what he bought. Do you wish to know? Ask the very Psalm. What did Christ buy, hanging on the tree? For after a few verses it says, All the ends of the earth will remember and be turned to the Lord, and all the families of the nations will worship in his sight (Ps 22:27 (21:28)). Why will they worship? Because the kingdom is his, and he will rule over the nations (Ps 22:28 (21:29)). As though it were answered why—who is this to whom all the ends of the earth will be turned and in whose sight all the families of the nations will worship? Because, it says, the kingdom is his, and he will rule over the nations. Why is it his? Because he himself bought it.
Sermons5.17
18. Modo irruit inimicus possessor, et hoc sub nomine Christi. Potest dividere aliquas vestes Christi; tunicam illam nemo dividet, quae desuper texta est . Diviserunt, inquit, sibi vestimenta mea et super vestimentum meum miserunt sortem . Et dicit evangelista: Erat ibi quaedam tunica desuper texta, et dixerunt inter se qui crucifixerunt Dominum: Non eam dividamus, sed sortem super eam mittamus . Non est posita in divisione, praeter divisionem fuit tunica illa. Quare praeter divisionem fuit tunica illa? Quia desuper erat texta. Significatum est quare non meruit dividi desuper texta. Quid est quod desuper texitur? Unde nobis dicitur " sursum cor ". Itaque qui sursum habet cor, dividi in partes non potest, quia ad illam tunicam quae non potest dividi pertinebit. Ergo, fratres mei, ista tunica sorte obvenit ipsi Domino nostro Iesu Christo, quia sors ipsius est hereditas ipsius. Et cum ipsius esset hereditas, emit eam. Illi autem qui divisi sunt ad alias vestes Christi possunt pertinere, quia omnibus indutus est ille. Omnes qui credunt in eum, quoquomodo induitur illis. Sed quicumque quaerunt honores terrenos, commoda temporalia, phantasias corporales, non sunt desuper texti, quia saecularia desiderant. Ipsi ergo possunt dividi. Tunica vero illa quae desuper texta est, in divisionem non potest venire. Gaudete vos ad eam pertinere, qui germina catholicae estis. Interrogate cor vestrum si a Christo non quaeritis nisi regnum caelorum: non vana, non temporalia, non imagines corporeas, non ea quae delectant in isto saeculo et in hac terra. Cum vos interrogaveritis, respondet vobis conscientia vestra " sursum cor " habere. Et si " sursum cor " habetis, desuper texti estis; si desuper texti estis, dividi non potestis.
18. Now the enemy possessor breaks in, and this under the name of Christ. He can divide some of the garments of Christ; that tunic no one will divide, which was woven from the top. They divided, it says, my garments among themselves, and over my garment they cast lots (Ps 22:18 (21:19)). And the evangelist says, There was there a certain tunic woven from the top, and those who crucified the Lord said among themselves, Let us not divide it, but cast lots over it (John 19:23-24). It was not placed in the division, that tunic was beyond division. Why was that tunic beyond division? Because it was woven from the top. It was signified why what was woven from the top did not deserve to be divided. What is it that is woven from the top? Whence it is said to us, "Lift up your hearts." And so the one who has his heart on high cannot be divided into parts, because he will belong to that tunic which cannot be divided. Therefore, my brothers, that tunic fell by lot to our Lord Jesus Christ himself, because his lot is his inheritance. And since it was his inheritance, he bought it. But those who were divided can belong to the other garments of Christ, because he is clothed with all. All who believe in him are in some way his clothing. But whoever seek earthly honors, temporal advantages, bodily fancies, are not woven from the top, because they desire worldly things. They, then, can be divided. But that tunic which is woven from the top cannot come into division. Rejoice that you belong to it, you who are shoots of the catholic Church. Ask your heart whether you seek from Christ nothing but the kingdom of heaven: not vain things, not temporal things, not bodily images, not the things that delight in this age and on this earth. When you have asked yourselves, your conscience answers you that you have your "heart on high." And if you have your "heart on high," you are woven from the top; if you are woven from the top, you cannot be divided.
Sermons5.18
SERMO 160
Sermon 160
Sermons5.18
1. Admoniti ab Apostolo sumus, ut: Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur ; eique Domino cantavimus: In tua iustitia erue me, et exime me . Hoc est ergo in Domino gloriari, non in sua, sed in eius iustitia gloriari. Haec autem iustitia latuit eos qui de sua iustitia gloriantur. Et hoc maxime vitium apparuit in Iudaeis Novum Testamentum recusantibus et in Vetere homine remanentibus. Frustra et infructuose in suis codicibus legerant atque cantaverant: In tua iustitia erue me. Ignorantes enim Dei iustitiam, et suam volentes constituere, iustitiae Dei non sunt subiecti . Nemo ergo tamquam de sua iustitia glorietur, etiamsi iustus est. De sua quippe iustitia glorianti dictum est: Quid enim habes quod non accepisti? Ergo qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur. Quid enim securius, quam in illo gloriari, de quo nemo potest omnino confundi? Nam si gloriatus fueris in homine, potest inveniri aliquid in homine, immo multa inveniri possunt in homine, de quibus confundatur qui in illo gloriatur. Cum autem audis non esse in homine gloriandum, utique nec in te: non enim tu non homo. Si ergo gloriaris in te, in homine gloriaris; et hoc est stultius et exsecrabilius. Quia si gloriatus fueris in homine iusto aliquo vel alio sapiente, ille non in se gloriatur in quo tu gloriaris; tu autem si in te gloriaris, non sapiens, non iustus es; si autem non oportet in homine sapiente gloriari, multo minus oportet in insipiente gloriari. Qui autem gloriatur in se, in insipiente gloriatur. Eo enim ipso insipiens convincitur, quia in se ipso gloriatur. Ergo: Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur. Nihil tutius, nihil securius. Si potes, habes quod apprehendas, in Domino gloriatus non confunderis. Non enim aliquid reprehensionis inveniri potest in illo, in quo gloriaris. Ac per hoc et ille qui non dicebat: In mea iustitia erue me; sed: In tua iustitia erue me; hoc prius dixit: In te speravi, Domine, non confundar in aeternum .
1. We have been admonished by the Apostle that he who glories, let him glory in the Lord (1 Cor 1:31; 2 Cor 10:17); and to that Lord we have sung, In your righteousness rescue me, and deliver me (Ps 31:1 (30:2)). This, then, is to glory in the Lord, to glory not in one's own, but in his righteousness. But this righteousness lay hidden from those who glory in their own righteousness. And this vice appeared most of all in the Jews, refusing the New Testament and remaining in the old man. In vain and unfruitfully had they read and sung in their codices, In your righteousness rescue me. For being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and wishing to establish their own, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God (Rom 10:3). Let no one, then, glory as if in his own righteousness, even if he is righteous. For to the one glorying in his own righteousness it is said, For what do you have that you have not received (1 Cor 4:7)? Therefore he who glories, let him glory in the Lord. For what is more secure than to glory in him of whom no one at all can be put to shame? For if you glory in a man, something can be found in a man—rather, many things can be found in a man—over which the one who glories in him may be put to shame. But when you hear that one must not glory in man, surely not in yourself either: for you are not a non-man. If, then, you glory in yourself, you glory in a man; and this is more foolish and more execrable. For if you glory in some righteous man or other wise man, that one in whom you glory does not glory in himself; but if you glory in yourself, you are not wise, not righteous; but if one ought not to glory in a wise man, much less ought one to glory in a foolish one. But he who glories in himself glories in a foolish man. For by this very thing he is convicted as foolish, because he glories in himself. Therefore, he who glories, let him glory in the Lord. Nothing is safer, nothing more secure. If you can, you have something to lay hold of; glorying in the Lord you will not be put to shame. For nothing of reproach can be found in him in whom you glory. And through this, he too who did not say, In my righteousness rescue me, but, In your righteousness rescue me, first said this: In you I have hoped, O Lord; let me not be put to shame forever (Ps 31:1 (30:2)).
Sermons5.1
2. Numquid enim aliud est, in quo erraverunt Iudaei, aut quo alio vitio ab evangelica gratia extorres facti sunt, nisi uno illo de quo Apostolus non tacuit, quod paulo ante commemoravi? Testimonium, inquit, eis perhibeo, quia zelum Dei habent, sed non secundum scientiam . Ubi laudavit, etiam reprehendit. Unde ergo illi vitiosi? Quia utique quamvis zelum Dei habeant, non secundum scientiam. Et quasi consuleremus Apostolum, et diceremus: Quid est quod dixisti: Non secundum scientiam? Quae est ista scientia, quam illi non habent, qui tamen zelum Dei habent? Quam scientiam non habent, vis audire? Attende quod sequitur: Ignorantes enim Dei iustitiam, et suam volentes constituere, iustitiae Dei non sunt subiecti . Si ergo zelum Dei habes, et vis habere secundum scientiam, et pertinere ad Testamentum Novum, ad quod Iudaei propterea pertinere non potuerunt, quia zelum Dei non secundum scientiam habuerunt; agnosce Dei iustitiam, et noli tuam velle constituere hanc ipsam, si quam habes; si bene vivis, si praecepta Dei facis, noli tuum putare; hoc est enim velle suam iustitiam constituere. Agnosce a quo acceperis et habes quod accepisti. Non enim habes, quod non accepisti. Si autem accepisti, quid gloriaris, quasi non acceperis? Cum enim gloriaris, quasi non acceperis, in te gloriaris; et ubi est: Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur ? Datum tene, sed datorem agnosce. Spiritum suum se daturum cum promitteret Dominus: Si quis sitit, inquit, veniat ad me, et bibat. Qui credit in me, flumina aquae vivae fluent de ventre eius . Unde in te hoc flumen? Recordare tuam pristinam siccitatem. Nisi enim siccus fuisses, non sitisses; si non sitisses, non bibisses. Quid est: Si non sitisses, non bibisses? Nisi tu te inanem invenisses, in Christum non credidisses. Antequam diceret: Flumina aquae vivae fluent de ventre eius; prius dixit: Si quis sitit, veniat et bibat. Ideo flumen habebis aquae vivae, quia bibis; non bibis, si non sitis; si autem sitiebas, quare tamquam de tuo flumine gloriari volebas? Ergo: Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur.
2. For is there anything else in which the Jews erred, or by what other vice were they made exiles from gospel grace, except that one of which the Apostle was not silent, which I mentioned a little before? I bear witness, he says, to them, that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge (Rom 10:2). Where he praised, he also reproached. Whence, then, are they faulty? Because, although they have a zeal for God, it is not according to knowledge. And as though we should consult the Apostle and say: What do you mean by what you said, Not according to knowledge? What is this knowledge which they do not have, who nevertheless have a zeal for God? What knowledge do they not have—do you wish to hear? Attend to what follows: For being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and wishing to establish their own, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God (Rom 10:3). If, then, you have a zeal for God, and wish to have it according to knowledge, and to belong to the New Testament, to which the Jews could not belong for this reason, because they had a zeal for God not according to knowledge; acknowledge the righteousness of God, and do not wish to establish this very righteousness as your own, if you have any; if you live well, if you do the precepts of God, do not think it your own; for this is to wish to establish one's own righteousness. Acknowledge from whom you received it, and you have what you received. For you do not have what you have not received. But if you have received it, why do you glory as if you had not received it (1 Cor 4:7)? For when you glory as if you had not received it, you glory in yourself; and where is, He who glories, let him glory in the Lord (1 Cor 1:31)? Hold the gift, but acknowledge the giver. When the Lord promised that he would give his Spirit, If anyone thirsts, he said, let him come to me, and drink. He who believes in me, rivers of living water will flow from his belly (John 7:37-38). Whence is this river in you? Recall your former dryness. For unless you had been dry, you would not have thirsted; if you had not thirsted, you would not have drunk. What is, If you had not thirsted, you would not have drunk? Unless you had found yourself empty, you would not have believed in Christ. Before he said, Rivers of living water will flow from his belly, he first said, If anyone thirsts, let him come and drink. Therefore you will have a river of living water, because you drink; you do not drink, if you do not thirst; but if you were thirsting, why did you wish to glory as if from your own river? Therefore, he who glories, let him glory in the Lord.
Sermons5.2
3. Et ego, inquit, fratres, veniens ad vos veni non in elatione verbi aut sapientiae, annuntians vobis mysterium Dei. Dicit etiam: Numquid dixi me scire aliquid in vobis, nisi Iesum Christum, et hunc crucifixum? Et si hoc solum sciebat, nihil est quod nesciebat. Magnum est scire Christum crucifixum; sed ante oculos parvulorum tamquam involutum posuit thesaurum. Christum, inquit, crucifixum. Quanta habet intus iste thesaurus? Deinde alio loco, cum metueret quibusdam, ne per philosophiam et inanem fallaciam seducerentur a Christo, thesaurum scientiae et sapientiae Dei promisit in Christo. Cavete, inquit, ne quis vos seducat per philosophiam et inanem seductionem, secundum elementa mundi, non secundum Christum, in quo sunt omnes thesauri sapientiae et scientiae absconditi . Christus crucifixus, thesauri sapientiae et scientiae absconditi. Nolite ergo, inquit, nomine sapientiae decipi. Ad hoc involucrum vos advocate, hoc vobis ut evolvatur, orate. Stulte huius mundi philosophe, quod quaeris nihil est; quem non quaeris. Quid prodest, quia multum sitis, et fontem calcando pertransis? Contemnis humilitatem, quia non intellegis maiestatem. Si enim cognovissent, numquam Dominum gloriae crucifixissent . Iesum Christum, inquit, crucifixum. Non dixi aliquid me in vobis scire, nisi Iesum Christum, et hunc crucifixum; humilitatem eius, quam irrident superbi, ut fiat in eis: Increpasti superbos; maledicti enim qui declinant a mandatis tuis . Et quod est mandatum eius, nisi ut credamus in eum, et diligamus invicem? In quem credamus? In Christum crucifixum. Quod non vult audire superbia, hoc audiat sapientia. Mandatum eius est, ut credamus in eum. In quem? In Christum crucifixum. Hoc est mandatum eius, ut credamus in Christum crucifixum. Hoc omnino; sed superbus iste, erecta cervice, tumenti gutture, elata lingua, inflatis buccis irridet Christum crucifixum. Maledicti ergo qui declinant a mandatis tuis. Quare irrident, nisi quia vilem vesticulam forinsecus circumdatam vident, latentem intus thesaurum non vident? Videt carnem, videt hominem, videt crucem, videt mortem, ista contemnit. Mane, noli transire, noli spernere, noli insultare. Exspecta, scrutare; forte est aliquid intus quod te multum delectet. Si invenias quod oculus non vidit, nec auris audivit, nec in cor hominis ascendit . Videt oculus carnem; est infra carnem quod oculus non videt. Audit auris tua vocem; est ibi quod auris non audivit. Ascendit in cor tuum, quasi de terrenis cogitationibus, homo crucifixus et mortuus; est illic quod in cor hominis non ascendit. Ascendunt enim in cor nostrum usitatae cogitationes: Ascendit, inquit, in cor Moysi visitare fratres suos ; humana est ista conditio. Et cum discipuli de ipso Domino dubitarent, et apud se ipsos dicerent, cum subito resurrexisse conspicerent: Ipse est, non est; caro est, spiritus est; hoc eis dicit: Quid cogitationes ascendunt in cor vestrum?
3. And I, he says, brothers, coming to you, came not in loftiness of word or wisdom, announcing to you the mystery of God. He also says, Did I say that I knew anything among you, except Jesus Christ, and him crucified (1 Cor 2:1-2)? And if he knew this alone, there is nothing he did not know. It is a great thing to know Christ crucified; but before the eyes of little ones he set as it were a wrapped-up treasure. Christ, he says, crucified. How much does this treasure have within? Then in another place, when he feared for certain people, lest by philosophy and empty deceit they be seduced from Christ, he promised the treasure of the knowledge and wisdom of God in Christ. Beware, he says, lest anyone seduce you by philosophy and empty seduction, according to the elements of the world, not according to Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge (Col 2:8.3). Christ crucified, the hidden treasures of wisdom and knowledge. Do not, then, he says, be deceived by the name of wisdom. To this wrapping call yourselves; pray that this may be unwrapped for you. Foolish philosopher of this world, what you seek is nothing; what you do not seek is something. What does it profit that you thirst much, and trampling pass by the fountain? You despise the humility, because you do not understand the majesty. For if they had known, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory (1 Cor 2:8). Jesus Christ, he says, crucified. I did not say that I knew anything among you, except Jesus Christ, and him crucified; his humility, which the proud deride, that there may be fulfilled in them, You have rebuked the proud; for cursed are those who turn aside from your commandments (Ps 119:21 (118:21)). And what is his commandment, but that we believe in him, and love one another? In whom should we believe? In Christ crucified. What pride does not wish to hear, let wisdom hear. His commandment is that we believe in him. In whom? In Christ crucified. This is his commandment, that we believe in Christ crucified. This entirely; but that proud one, with stiff neck, swollen throat, exalted tongue, puffed cheeks, derides Christ crucified. Cursed, then, are those who turn aside from your commandments. Why do they deride, but because they see a cheap little garment wrapped around the outside, and do not see the treasure lying hidden within? He sees the flesh, sees the man, sees the cross, sees the death, and despises these things. Wait, do not pass by, do not scorn, do not insult. Wait, search; perhaps there is something within that will greatly delight you. If you should find what eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has ascended into the heart of man (1 Cor 2:9; Isa 64:4). The eye sees the flesh; there is beneath the flesh what the eye does not see. Your ear hears the voice; there is there what the ear has not heard. There has ascended into your heart, as it were from earthly thoughts, a man crucified and dead; there is there what has not ascended into the heart of man. For accustomed thoughts ascend into our heart: It ascended, it says, into the heart of Moses to visit his brothers (Acts 7:23; Exod 2:11); this is the human condition. And when the disciples doubted about the Lord himself, and said among themselves, when they suddenly saw him risen: It is he, it is not; it is flesh, it is a spirit; he says this to them, Why do thoughts ascend into your heart (Luke 24:38)?
Sermons5.3
4. Quaeramus ergo, si possumus, non quod in cor nostrum possit ascendere, sed quo cor nostrum mereatur ascendere. Merebitur enim in regnante glorificari, qui didicerit in crucifixo gloriari. Unde videns ipse Apostolus, non solum quo ascendat, sed etiam qua ascendat; multi enim viderunt quo, nec viderunt qua; amaverunt celsitudinis patriam, sed ignoraverunt humilitatis viam; sciens ergo Apostolus, et cogitans et praemeditans, non solum quo, sed etiam qua: Mihi, inquit, absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini Iesu Christi . Poterat dicere: In sapientia Domini nostri Iesu Christi; et verum diceret; poterat: In maiestate; et verum diceret; poterat: In potestate; et verum diceret; sed dixit: in cruce. Ubi mundi philosophus erubuit, ibi thesaurum Apostolus reperit; non contemnendo vile involucrum, pervenit ad pretiosum involutum. Absit, inquit, mihi gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi. Bonam sarcinam sustulisti, ibi totum est quod quaesisti; et quid ibi magnum lateret, ostendisti. Quale adiutorium? Per quem mihi, inquit, mundus crucifixus est et ego mundo . Quando tibi crucifigeretur mundus, nisi pro te crucifigeretur per quem factus est mundus? Ergo: Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur . Quo Domino? Christo crucifixo. Ubi humilitas, ibi maiestas; ubi infirmitas, ibi potestas; ubi mors, ibi vita. Si vis ad illa pervenire, noli ista contemnere.
4. Let us seek, then, if we can, not what can ascend into our heart, but where our heart may deserve to ascend. For he will deserve to be glorified in the one who reigns, who has learned to glory in the one who was crucified. Hence the Apostle himself, seeing not only where to ascend, but also by what way to ascend—for many have seen where, and have not seen by what way; they have loved the homeland of the heights, but have been ignorant of the way of humility—the Apostle, then, knowing, and thinking, and premeditating, not only where, but also by what way: Far be it from me, he says, to glory, except in the cross of the Lord Jesus Christ (Gal 6:14). He could have said, In the wisdom of our Lord Jesus Christ; and he would say the truth; he could have said, In the majesty; and he would say the truth; he could have said, In the power; and he would say the truth; but he said, in the cross. Where the philosopher of the world blushed, there the Apostle found the treasure; not by despising the cheap wrapping, he came to the precious thing wrapped within. Far be it from me, he says, to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. You have taken up a good burden, there is the whole of what you sought; and you have shown what great thing lay hidden there. What kind of help? Through whom, he says, the world is crucified to me, and I to the world (Gal 6:14). When would the world be crucified to you, unless for you were crucified the one through whom the world was made? Therefore, he who glories, let him glory in the Lord (1 Cor 1:31). In what Lord? In Christ crucified. Where there is humility, there is majesty; where there is infirmity, there is power; where there is death, there is life. If you wish to attain to those things, do not despise these.
Sermons5.4
5. Audisti in Evangelio filios Zebedaei. Quaerebant altitudinem, dicentes ut unus eorum sederet ad dexteram tanti patrisfamilias, alter ad sinistram. Magnam plane illi celsitudinem requirebant, magnam; sed quoniam postponebant qua, vocat eos Christus ab eo quo ire volebant, ad illud qua ire debebant. Quaerentibus quippe tantam celsitudinem quid respondit? Potestis bibere calicem quem ego bibiturus sum? Quem calicem, nisi humilitatis, nisi passionis? Quem bibiturus et in se transformans infirmitatem nostram ait Patri: Pater, si fieri potest, transeat a me calix iste . Istos ipsos in se transformans, qui talem calicem bibere recusabant, et altitudinem quaerebant, humilitatis viam neglegebant: Potestis bibere, inquit, calicem quem ego bibiturus sum? Christum quaeritis excelsum; redite ad crucifixum. Vultis regnare et gloriari in sedibus Christi; prius discite dicere: Mihi absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi . Haec est doctrina christiana, humilitatis praeceptum, humilitatis commendatio, ut non gloriemur, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi. Nam non est magnum in Christi sapientia gloriari; magnum est in cruce Christi gloriari; unde tibi insultat impius, inde glorietur pius; unde insultat superbus, inde glorietur Christianus. Noli erubescere de cruce Christi; ideo in fronte tamquam in sede pudoris signum ipsum accepisti. Recole frontem tuam, ne linguam expavescas alienam.
5. You heard in the Gospel about the sons of Zebedee. They sought the heights, asking that one of them sit at the right hand of so great a head of the household, the other at the left. They were indeed seeking a great loftiness, great; but because they put after it the "by what way," Christ calls them back from where they wished to go to that by which they ought to go. For to those seeking so great a loftiness, what did he answer? Can you drink the chalice that I am going to drink (Matt 20:22)? What chalice, but of humility, but of suffering? Which he was going to drink, and, transforming our infirmity into himself, he says to the Father, Father, if it can be, let this chalice pass from me (Matt 26:39). Transforming into himself those very ones who refused to drink such a chalice, and sought the heights, neglecting the way of humility: Can you drink, he says, the chalice that I am going to drink? You seek Christ on high; return to the crucified. You wish to reign and to glory in the seats of Christ; first learn to say, Far be it from me to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ (Gal 6:14). This is the Christian teaching, the precept of humility, the commendation of humility, that we glory in nothing but the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. For it is no great thing to glory in the wisdom of Christ; it is a great thing to glory in the cross of Christ; whence the ungodly man insults you, thence let the devout man glory; whence the proud insults, thence let the Christian glory. Do not blush at the cross of Christ; therefore you have received that very sign on your forehead, as it were on the seat of shame. Recall your forehead, that you may not dread another's tongue.
Sermons5.5
6. Signum Veteris Testamenti circumcisio in latenti carne, signum Novi Testamenti crux in libera fronte. Ibi enim occultatio est, hic revelatio; illud est sub velamine, hoc in facie. Quamdiu enim legitur Moyses, velamen super cor eorum positum est . Quare? Quia non transierunt ad Christum. Cum enim transieris ad Christum, auferetur velamen ; ut qui habebas in occulto circumcisionem, in fronte portes crucem: Nos autem revelata facie gloriam Domini speculantes, in eamdem imaginem, inquit, transformamur, de gloria in gloriam, tamquam a Domini Spiritu . Ne hoc tibi tribuas, ne hoc tuum putes, ne ignorans Dei iustitiam et tuam volens constituere, iustitiae Dei non sis subiectus. Transi ergo ad Christum, o qui gloriaris de circumcisione. Inde enim vis gloriam habere, quod verecundaris ostendere. Signum est, verum est, a Deo praeceptum est; sed occultationis signum est. Novum enim Testamentum in Veteri velabatur; Vetus Testamentum in Novo revelatur. Ideo signum ab occulto transeat in manifestum, et incipiat esse in fronte quod latebat sub veste. Nam in eo signo Christum esse praenuntiatum quis ambigat? Inde cultellus petrinus: Petra autem erat Christus . Inde octavus dies circumcisionis, et dominicus resurrectionis. Ideo Apostolus inde transiens, inde veniens, transiens scilicet ad Christum, ut auferatur velamen, novit unde glorietur. Mihi autem absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi. Quid enim prius dixerat? Neque enim qui circumcisi sunt, ii legem custodiunt; sed volunt vos circumcidi, ut in vestra carne glorientur . Tu quid, Apostole? Transfer signum ad frontem. Mihi autem absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi. Hic habeo, inquit, quod ignorabam. Venit Testamentum Novum, revelatum est quod occultabatur. Qui sedebant in umbra mortis , lumen ortum est eis. Revelatum est eis quod occultabatur; quod latebat, in aperto est. Venit ipsa Petra, omnes nos spiritu circumcidit, et suae humilitatis signum in redemptorum fronte defixit.
6. The sign of the Old Testament is circumcision in the hidden flesh, the sign of the New Testament is the cross on the free forehead. For there is concealment, here revelation; that is under a veil, this in the face. For as long as Moses is read, a veil is placed over their heart. Why? Because they have not passed over to Christ. For when you have passed over to Christ, the veil will be taken away (2 Cor 3:15-16); so that you who had circumcision in the hidden place may carry the cross on the forehead: But we, with unveiled face beholding the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image, he says, from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord (2 Cor 3:18). Do not ascribe this to yourself, do not think it yours, lest, being ignorant of the righteousness of God and wishing to establish your own, you not be subject to the righteousness of God. Pass over, then, to Christ, O you who glory in circumcision. For you wish to have glory in what you are ashamed to show. It is a sign, it is true, it was commanded by God; but it is a sign of concealment. For the New Testament was veiled in the Old; the Old Testament is revealed in the New. Therefore let the sign pass from the hidden to the manifest, and let that begin to be on the forehead which lay hidden under the garment. For that Christ was foretold in that sign, who can doubt? Hence the knife of stone: but the rock was Christ (1 Cor 10:4). Hence the eighth day of circumcision, and the Lord's day of resurrection. Therefore the Apostle, passing over from there, coming from there—passing over, that is, to Christ, that the veil might be taken away—knew whence to glory. But far be it from me to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. For what had he said before? For neither do those who are circumcised keep the law; but they wish you to be circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh (Gal 6:13). What of you, Apostle? Transfer the sign to the forehead. But far be it from me to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. Here I have, he says, what I was ignorant of. The New Testament came, what was concealed was revealed. Those who sat in the shadow of death (See Isa 9:2; Matt 4:16), light has risen for them. What was concealed was revealed to them; what lay hidden is in the open. The Rock himself came, circumcised us all in spirit, and fixed the sign of his humility on the forehead of the redeemed.
Sermons5.6
7. Iam gloriatio in cruce sit Christi; non nos pudeat humilitatis Excelsi. Quamdiu discretio ciborum, et carnis circumcisio? Quorum deus venter, et gloria in pudendis eorum. Illis futura praenuntiabantur, iam facta credantur . Non simus ingrati ei qui venit, si exspectavimus ut veniret. Sed unde Iudaei ab hac gratia extorres, alieni, fugitivi? Quia zelum Dei habent, sed non secundum scientiam. Quam scientiam? Ignorantes, inquit, Dei iustitiam, et suam volentes constituere ; non tenentes Deum nisi in praeceptis, et suis viribus se arbitrantes implere posse praecepta, adiutorium devitarunt. Finis enim legis Christus, perfectio legis Christus, ad iustitiam omni credenti . Et quid facit Christus? Iustificat impium. Credendo quippe in eum qui iustificat impium, non pium, sed impium; faciens pium, quem reperit impium: credenti ergo in eum qui iustificat impium, deputatur fides eius ad iustitiam. Si enim Abraham ex operibus iustificatus est, tamquam ipse fecerit, tamquam sibi hoc ipse praestiterit; habet gloriam, sed non apud Deum . Qui autem gloriatur, in Domino glorietur; et securus dicat: In tua iustitia erue me, et exime me. Eruit enim et eximit in se sperantes; non suis viribus, quod acceperint, tribuentes. Et hoc ipsum enim est sapientiae, scire cuius est donum . Quis hoc dixit? Qui rogavit Deum, ut daret illi continentiam. Quae iustitia, quae particula iustitiae impleri potest, sine aliqua continentia? Delectat enim peccare; nam si non delectaret, non fieret. Minus autem delectat iustitia, aut non delectat, aut minus quam dignum est, delectat. Unde hoc, nisi de languoribus animae? Panis in fastidio est, et delectat venenum. Unde iste languor sanabitur, obsecro vos? Itane a nobismetipsis et per nosmetipsos? Qui omnes idonei fuimus vulnerare nos, quis nostrum est idoneus curare quod fecit? Sic et in ipsis delictis, quis non cum voluerit, vulnerat se? Sed non quis cum voluerit, sanat se. Sit ergo animus pius, sit fideliter Christianus, sit gratiae non ingratus. Agnoscatur medicus: numquam se sanat aegrotus.
7. Now let glorying be in the cross of Christ; let us not be ashamed of the humility of the Most High. How long the distinction of foods, and the circumcision of the flesh? Whose god is the belly, and whose glory is in their shame (See Phil 3:19). To them future things were foretold; now let them be believed as done. Let us not be ungrateful to him who came, if we waited for him to come. But whence are the Jews exiles, aliens, fugitives from this grace? Because they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. What knowledge? Being ignorant, he says, of the righteousness of God, and wishing to establish their own (Rom 10:2-3); not holding God except in precepts, and supposing that by their own strength they could fulfill the precepts, they avoided the help. For Christ is the end of the law—the perfection of the law is Christ—unto righteousness for everyone who believes (Rom 10:4). And what does Christ do? He justifies the ungodly. For by believing in him who justifies the ungodly—not the godly, but the ungodly; making godly the one he finds ungodly: to the one, then, who believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned unto righteousness. For if Abraham was justified by works, as though he himself did it, as though he himself bestowed this on himself, he has glory, but not before God (Rom 4:5.2). But he who glories, let him glory in the Lord; and let him say securely, In your righteousness rescue me, and deliver me. For he rescues and delivers those who hope in him; who do not ascribe to their own strength what they have received. For this very thing is of wisdom, to know whose gift it is (Wis 8:21). Who said this? He who asked God to give him continence. What righteousness, what particle of righteousness can be fulfilled without some continence? For it is a delight to sin; for if it were no delight, it would not be done. But righteousness delights less, or does not delight, or delights less than is fitting. Whence this, but from the sicknesses of the soul? Bread is loathed, and poison delights. Whence will this sickness be healed, I beseech you? Is it from ourselves and through ourselves? We who were all fit to wound ourselves, which of us is fit to cure what he did? So too in sins themselves, who does not wound himself when he wishes? But not everyone, when he wishes, heals himself. Let the soul, then, be devout, let it be faithfully Christian, let it not be ungrateful to grace. Let the physician be acknowledged: the sick man never heals himself.
Sermons5.7
SERMO 161
Sermon 161
Sermons5.7
1. 1. Apostolum audivimus, cum legeretur, corripientem et coercentem humanas libidines; et dicentem: Nescitis quia corpora vestra membra Christi sunt? Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? Absit! Corpora ergo nostra membra Christi esse dixit; quoniam Christus caput nostrum est, eo quod homo factus est propter nos, caput de quo dictum est: Ipse Salvator corporis nostri . Corpus autem eius Ecclesia est . Si ergo Dominus noster Iesus Christus tantummodo animam humanam susciperet, membra eius non essent nisi animae nostrae; quia vero et corpus suscepit, per quod etiam caput est nobis, qui ex anima et corpore constamus; profecto illius membra sunt et corpora nostra. Si ergo unusquisque cupiens fornicari, vilescebat sibi, et in se ipso contemnebat se ipsum; non in se contemnat Christum; non dicat: Faciam, nihil sum: Omnis caro fenum . Sed corpus tuum membrum est Christi. Quo ibas? Redi. Quo te tamquam praecipitare cupiebas? Parce in te Christo, agnosce in te Christum. Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? Meretrix est enim quae tibi ad adulterium consentit; et forte ipsa christiana tollit membra Christi, et facit membra adulteri. Invicem in vobis contemnitis Christum, nec agnoscitis Dominum vestrum, nec cogitatis pretium vestrum. Qualis autem ille Dominus, qui servos suos fecit fratres suos? Sed parum erat fratres suos, nisi faceret membra sua. Itane tanta dignitas viluit? Quia tam benigne praestita est, non honor ei retribuitur? Si non praestaretur, desideraretur; quia praestita est, contemnitur?
1. 1. When the Apostle was read, we heard him rebuking and restraining human lusts, and saying, Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I, then, take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? Far from it (1 Cor 6:15)! He said, then, that our bodies are members of Christ; since Christ is our head, in that he was made man for us, the head of whom it was said, He himself is the Savior of our body. But his body is the Church (See Eph 5:23). If, then, our Lord Jesus Christ took up only a human soul, his members would be only our souls; but because he took up a body too, through which he is also our head—we who consist of soul and body—surely our bodies too are his members. If, then, each one craving to fornicate became cheap to himself, and despised himself in himself; let him not despise Christ in himself; let him not say: I will do it, I am nothing: All flesh is grass (Isa 40:6). But your body is a member of Christ. Where were you going? Return. To where were you craving as it were to hurl yourself? Spare Christ in yourself, acknowledge Christ in yourself. Shall I, then, take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? For a harlot is one who consents with you to adultery; and perhaps she herself, a Christian woman, takes the members of Christ and makes them members of an adulterer. You despise Christ in one another, and do not acknowledge your Lord, nor consider your price. But what kind of Lord is he, who made his servants his brothers? But it was too little to make them his brothers, unless he made them his members. Has so great a dignity, then, become cheap? Because it was bestowed so kindly, is no honor rendered to it in return? If it were not bestowed, it would be longed for; because it is bestowed, is it despised?
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Haec autem corpora nostra, quae dicit Apostolus membra esse Christi, propter corpus Christi, quod ex genere corporis nostri suscepit; haec ergo corpora nostra dicit idem Apostolus templum esse in nobis Spiritus Sancti, quem habemus a Deo. Propter corpus Christi corpora nostra membra sunt Christi; propter inhabitantem Spiritum Christi, corpora nostra sunt templum Spiritus Sancti. Quid horum in te contemnis? Christum, cuius membrum es? An Spiritum Sanctum, cuius templum es? Ipsam meretricem, quae tibi consentit ad malum, non audes fortasse introducere in cubiculum tuum, ubi habes lectum tuum coniugalem; sed quaeris aliquem abiectum in domo tua et turpem locum, in quo turpiter voluteris. Defers ergo honorem cubiculo uxoris tuae, et non defers templo Dei tui? Non introducis impudicam, ubi dormis cum coniuge tua, et tu ipse is ad impudicam, cum sis templum Dei? Puto quia melius est templum Dei, quam cubiculum uxoris tuae. Quocumque enim ieris, Iesus videt te; qui fecit te, et perditum redemit te, et pro mortuo mortuus est pro te. Tu te non agnoscis; sed ille a te oculos non avertit, non ad adiuvandum, sed ad puniendum. Oculi enim Domini super iustos, et aures eius ad preces eorum . Continuo subiecit, et terruit eos qui sibi malam securitatem dabant, qui sibi dicebant: Faciam; non enim Deus me tam turpia facientem dignatur attendere. Audi quid sequitur, cuius sis attende; quoniam quocumque ieris, Iesus videt: Vultus autem Domini super facientes mala, ut perdat de terra memoriam eorum . Sed de qua terra? Ubi dicitur; Spes mea es tu, portio mea in terra viventium .
2. 2. But these our bodies, which the Apostle says are members of Christ, on account of the body of Christ which he took from the kind of our body; these our bodies, then, the same Apostle says are a temple in us of the Holy Spirit, whom we have from God. On account of the body of Christ, our bodies are members of Christ; on account of the indwelling Spirit of Christ, our bodies are a temple of the Holy Spirit. Which of these do you despise in yourself? Christ, of whom you are a member? Or the Holy Spirit, of whom you are a temple? The harlot herself, who consents with you to evil, you do not dare perhaps to bring into your bedroom, where you have your conjugal bed; but you seek some abject and foul place in your house, in which to wallow foully. You show honor, then, to the bedroom of your wife, and do not show honor to the temple of your God? You do not bring in the unchaste woman where you sleep with your spouse, and you yourself go to an unchaste woman, when you are the temple of God? I think the temple of God is better than the bedroom of your wife. For wherever you go, Jesus sees you; who made you, and redeemed you when lost, and for you, dead, died. You do not acknowledge yourself; but he does not turn his eyes from you—not to help, but to punish. For the eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous, and his ears to their prayers. At once he went on and terrified those who gave themselves an evil security, who said to themselves: I will do it; for God does not deign to attend to me doing such foul things. Hear what follows, attend to whose you are; since wherever you go, Jesus sees: But the face of the Lord is upon those who do evil, to destroy their memory from the earth (Ps 34:15-16 (33:16-17)). But from what earth? Where it is said, You are my hope, my portion in the land of the living (Ps 142:5 (141:6)).
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Forte enim malus, iniquus, adulter, impudicus, fornicarius gaudet quia facit, et senescit in quo libido non senescit, et dicit apud se: Certe verum est: Vultus autem Domini super facientes mala, ut perdat de terra memoriam eorum . Ecce ego iam senui, qui ab ineunte aetate usque in hodiernum diem tanta committo, multos castos ante me sepelivi, multorum castorum funera iuvenum ad sepulcrum ipse deduxi, et pudicis impudicus supervixi. Quid est quod dicitur, quia: Vultus Domini super facientes mala, ut perdat de terra memoriam eorum? Est alia terra ubi non est impudicus, est alia terra in regno Dei. Nolite errare; neque fornicatores, neque idolis servientes, neque adulteri, neque molles, neque masculorum concubitores, neque fures, neque avari, neque ebriosi, neque maledici regnum Dei possidebunt . Hoc est, perdet de terra memoriam eorum. Multi enim talia committentes, spem sibi ponunt; propter eos qui perdite viventes spem sibi ponunt in regno Dei, quo non accessuri sunt, dictum est: Perdet de terra memoriam eorum. Erit enim caelum novum, et terra nova, quam iusti inhabitabunt. Ibi impii, ibi mali, ibi nequissimi habitare non sinuntur. Eligat modo qui talis est, ubi desideret habitare, cum tempus est ut possit mutari.
3. 3. For perhaps the evil, the unjust, the adulterer, the unchaste, the fornicator rejoices that he does it, and grows old while in him lust does not grow old, and says within himself: Surely it is true, But the face of the Lord is upon those who do evil, to destroy their memory from the earth. Behold, I have now grown old, who from my earliest age until this present day commit such things, I have buried many chaste men before me, I myself led to the grave the funerals of many chaste young men, and, unchaste, I have outlived the chaste. What is it that is said, that the face of the Lord is upon those who do evil, to destroy their memory from the earth? There is another earth where there is no unchaste man, there is another earth in the kingdom of God. Do not err; neither fornicators, nor those who serve idols, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers will possess the kingdom of God (1 Cor 6:9-10). This is, he will destroy their memory from the earth. For many committing such things place hope for themselves; on account of those who, living in ruin, place hope for themselves in the kingdom of God, to which they will not come, it was said, He will destroy their memory from the earth. For there will be a new heaven and a new earth, which the righteous will inhabit. There the ungodly, there the evil, there the most worthless are not allowed to dwell. Let him who is such now choose where he longs to dwell, while there is time that he may be able to be changed.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Duae quippe habitationes sunt; una in igne aeterno, alia in regno aeterno. Puta quia in igne aeterno aliter ille, aliter ille torquebuntur; ibi erunt tamen, ibi omnes cruciabuntur; minus ille, plus ille. Quia tolerabilius erit Sodomae in die iudicii, quam alteri civitati ; et quidam circumeunt mare et terram, facere unum proselytum, quem cum fecerint, faciunt eum filium gehennae duplo quam sunt ipsi . Puta quia alii duplo, alii simplo; puta quia alii plus, alii minus; non est regio ubi tibi eligas locum. Quaecumque ibi mitiora tormenta sunt, peiora sunt, quam quae formidas in isto saeculo. Cogita quomodo tremas, si tibi aliquis calumniatur, ne mittaris in carcerem; et tu ipse contra te male vivis, ut mittaris in ignem? Contremiscis, conturbaris, pallescis, ad ecclesiam curris, episcopum videre desideras, ad pedes eius volutaris. Quaerit, quare? Libera me, inquis. Quid agitur? Ecce ille mihi calumniatur. Et quid tibi facturus est? Domine, concutior; Domine, in carcerem mittor; miserere mei, libera me. Ecce quomodo timetur carcer, quomodo timetur conclusio; et non timetur gehennae exustio! Postremo, quando augetur calamitas, et pressura saevit atrocior, et usque ad mortem saevit, quando bonum videtur homini ne moriatur, ne occidatur, debere succurri omnes clamant, adiutoria cuncta implorantur; subvenite, currite propter animam. Tota exaggeratio calamitatis est, quia dicitur, propter animam. Succurrendum est quidem, nec huic timori adiutorium denegandum; faciendum quod fieri potest, a quo potest.
4. 4. For there are two dwellings; one in eternal fire, the other in the eternal kingdom. Suppose that in the eternal fire this one will be tormented in one way, that one in another; yet they will be there, there all will be tortured; this one less, that one more. For it will be more tolerable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for another city (See Matt 11:24); and some go around sea and land to make one proselyte, and when they have made him, they make him a son of hell twice as much as they are themselves (See Matt 23:15). Suppose that some twofold, others single; suppose that some more, others less; there is no region there where you may choose a place for yourself. Whatever milder torments are there, they are worse than what you dread in this age. Consider how you tremble if someone slanders you, lest you be sent to prison; and do you yourself live badly against yourself, that you may be sent into fire? You tremble, you are troubled, you grow pale, you run to the church, you long to see the bishop, you roll at his feet. He asks why. Free me, you say. What is going on? Behold, this man slanders me. And what is he going to do to you? Lord, I am shaken; Lord, I am being sent to prison; have mercy on me, free me. Behold how prison is feared, how confinement is feared; and the burning of hell is not feared! Finally, when calamity increases, and pressure rages more fiercely, and rages even to death, when it seems good to a man that he not die, not be killed, all cry out that help must be given, all aids are implored: come to the aid, run, for the sake of the soul. The whole heightening of the calamity is that it is said, for the sake of the soul. Help must indeed be given, nor must aid be denied to this fear; what can be done must be done, by him who can.
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Verumtamen ego interrogare volo periclitantem, et isto nomine mea viscera commoventem; quoniam dicit: Curre propter animam. Facile huic ego respondeo: Ego quidem curro propter carnem tuam; utinam tu curreres propter animam tuam. Et tu noveris quia propter corpus tuum curro, non propter animam tuam. Melius audio Christum vera dicentem, quam te timore falso murmurantem. Ipse enim Dominus dicit: Nolite timere eos qui corpus occidunt, animam autem non possunt occidere . Certe propter animam tuam me vis currere; ecce quem times, et sub cuius comminationibus expallescis, non potest occidere animam tuam; usque ad corpus saevit, tu noli saevire in animam tuam. Ab illo occidi non potest, a te potest; non lancea, sed lingua. Inimicus qui te percutit, finit hanc vitam: Os autem quod mentitur, occidit animam . Ex his ergo quae in hoc tempore homines timent, coniciant quae timere debeant. Timet enim carcerem, et non timet gehennam? Timet quaestionarios tortores, et non timet infernales angelos? Timet cruciatum temporalem, et non timet poenas ignis aeterni? Postremo timet ad modicum mori, et non timet in aeternum mori?
5. 5. Yet I wish to question the one in peril, and moving my inmost feelings by this word; since he says, Run, for the sake of the soul. I easily answer him: I indeed run for the sake of your flesh; would that you would run for the sake of your soul. And know that I run for the sake of your body, not for the sake of your soul. I would rather hear Christ saying true things than you murmuring out of a false fear. For the Lord himself says, Do not fear those who kill the body, but cannot kill the soul (Matt 10:28). Surely you wish me to run for the sake of your soul; behold, the one you fear, and under whose threats you grow pale, cannot kill your soul; he rages as far as the body; do not you rage against your soul. By him it cannot be killed, by you it can; not by a lance, but by a tongue. The enemy who strikes you ends this life: but the mouth that lies kills the soul (Wis 1:11). From these things, then, which in this time men fear, let them gather what they ought to fear. For he fears prison, and does not fear hell? He fears the torturers of the questioning, and does not fear the infernal angels? He fears temporal torment, and does not fear the punishments of the eternal fire? Finally, he fears to die for a little, and does not fear to die forever?
Sermons5.5.5
5. 6. Ille qui te occisurus est, quem times, quem exhorrescis, quem fugis, a cuius timore non sineris dormire, et ipsum in somnis si vides, cum dormieris, expavescis, quid est facturus tibi? Exclusurus est de carne tua animam tuam; anima tua exclusa quo eat, vide. Neque enim potest ille aliter carnem tuam occidere, nisi inde excludat animam tuam, per quam vivit caro tua. Praesentia quippe animae tuae caro vivit, et quamdiu in carne tua praesens est anima tua, necesse est ut vivat caro tua. Ille autem qui tuam mortem quaerit, eicere vult de carne tua vitam tuam, qua vivit caro tua.
5. 6. That one who is going to kill you, whom you fear, whom you shudder at, whom you flee, from fear of whom you are not allowed to sleep, and if you see him in dreams when you sleep, you are terrified—what is he going to do to you? He is going to shut out your soul from your flesh; see where your soul, shut out, may go. For he cannot kill your flesh in any other way except by shutting out your soul from there, by which your flesh lives. For by the presence of your soul the flesh lives, and as long as your soul is present in your flesh, your flesh must necessarily live. But the one who seeks your death wishes to cast out from your flesh your life, by which your flesh lives.
Sermons5.5.6
6. 6. Putas, non est aliqua vita, qua vivit ipsa anima tua? Est enim anima vita quaedam, qua vivit caro tua. Putas, nulla alia vita est, qua vivit ipsa anima tua; aut quomodo habet caro tua vitam, animam qua vivit caro tua, fit et ipsa anima tua, ut habeat aliquam vitam suam? Et quomodo caro, cum moritur, exspirat animam vitam suam; sic et anima, quando moritur, exspirat aliquam vitam suam? Si invenerimus quae sit haec vita, non corporis tui, quod est anima tua; sed vita vitae corporis tui, hoc est, vita animae tuae; si invenerimus eam, ex hac morte, qua times ne de carne eiciatur anima tua, puto quia plus debes timere illam mortem, ne vita animae tuae proiciatur de anima tua. Breviter ergo dicam: et quid multis teneor? Vita corporis anima est, vita animae Deus est. Spiritus Dei habitat in anima, et per animam in corpore, ut et corpora nostra templum sint Spiritus Sancti, quem habemus a Deo. Venit enim Spiritus ad animam nostram; quia caritas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum Sanctum, qui datus est nobis ; et totum possidet qui principale tenet. In te quippe illud principatur, quod melius est. Tenens Deus quod melius est, id est, cor tuum, mentem tuam, animam tuam, profecto per meliorem possidet et inferiorem, quod est corpus tuum. Saeviat igitur inimicus, minetur mortem, faciat si permittitur, excludat de carne animam tuam; anima tua non excludat a se vitam suam. Si recte plangis, et putas te miserabiliter dicere potenti inimico tuo: Noli ferire, parce sanguini meo; non tibi dicit Deus: Miserere animae tuae placens Deo ? Anima tua forte dicit: Roga illum, ne feriat; nam dimitto te. Si enim percusserit, manere tecum non possum. Roga ne feriat, si vis ut non te dimittam. Quae tibi dicit, si vis ut non te dimittam? Tu ipse; tu enim qui loqueris, anima es. Si ergo percusserit carnem, tu fugis, tu exis, tu migras, iacet terra in terra. Ubi erit quod animavit terram? Quod flatu Dei tibi datum est, ubi erit? Si non efflavit vitam suam, id est, Deum suum, in illo erit quem non perdidit, in illo erit quem non a se exclusit. Si autem obtemperas infirmitati animae tuae, dicenti tibi: Ferit, et dimitto te; non times Deum dicentem tibi: Peccas, et dimitto te?
6. 6. Do you suppose there is not some life by which your soul itself lives? For the soul is a certain life, by which your flesh lives. Do you suppose there is no other life by which your soul itself lives? Or, just as your flesh has a life—the soul by which your flesh lives—does your soul itself too come to have some life of its own? And just as the flesh, when it dies, breathes out the soul, its life; so the soul too, when it dies, breathes out some life of its own? If we find what this life is—not of your body, which is your soul, but the life of the life of your body, that is, the life of your soul; if we find it, then concerning this death by which you fear that your soul may be cast out of the flesh, I think you ought rather to fear that death, lest the life of your soul be cast out from your soul. Briefly, then, I will say it—and why am I held by many words? The life of the body is the soul, the life of the soul is God. The Spirit of God dwells in the soul, and through the soul in the body, so that our bodies too are a temple of the Holy Spirit, whom we have from God. For the Spirit comes to our soul; because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us (Rom 5:5); and he possesses the whole who holds the principal part. For in you that has the rule which is better. God, holding what is better—that is, your heart, your mind, your soul—surely through the better possesses also the lower, which is your body. Let the enemy, then, rage, let him threaten death, let him do it if it is permitted, let him shut out the soul from your flesh; let your soul not shut out from itself its own life. If you rightly lament, and think you say pitiably to your powerful enemy: Do not strike, spare my blood; does God not say to you, Have mercy on your soul, pleasing God (Sir 30:24)? Your soul perhaps says: Ask him not to strike; for I dismiss you. For if he strikes, I cannot remain with you. Ask him not to strike, if you wish me not to dismiss you. Who says to you, if you wish me not to dismiss you? You yourself; for you who speak are a soul. If, then, he strikes the flesh, you flee, you go out, you migrate, earth lies in earth. Where will be what animated the earth? What was given to you by the breath of God, where will it be? If it did not breathe out its own life, that is, its God, it will be in the one it did not lose, it will be in the one it did not shut out from itself. But if you obey the infirmity of your soul, which says to you, He strikes, and I dismiss you; do you not fear God saying to you, You sin, and I dismiss you?
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. De timore vano timorem utilem capiamus. Timor vanus est omnium hominum timentium amittere temporalia, quandoque migraturorum, et migrare trepidantium, volentium semper differre quod non possunt auferre. Vanus est iste timor hominum; et tamen est, et vehemens est, et resisti ei non potest. Hinc increpandi, hinc obiurgandi, hinc plangendi, hinc lugendi homines, timentes mori, et nihil aliud agentes, nisi serius mori. Quare non agunt non mori? Quoniam quidquid agunt, non efficiunt ut non moriantur. Possunt autem aliquid agere, quo efficiant ut numquam moriantur? Nullo modo. Prorsus quidquid egeris, quantumcumque invigilaveris, quocumque fugeris, quaelibet munimenta quaesieris, quibuslibet divitiis te redemeris, quibuslibet calliditatibus hostem fefelleris; non fallis febrem. Nihil enim aliud agis, ut non cito ab hoste moriaris, nisi ut serius aliquando a febre moriaris. Habes quod agas, ut numquam moriaris. Si times mortem, ama vitam. Vita tua Deus est, vita tua Christus est, vita tua Spiritus Sanctus est. Non illi places male agendo. Templum ruinosum non inhabitat, templum sordidum non ingreditur. Sed geme ad illum, ut mundet sibi locum; geme ad illum, ut aedificet templum sibi; quod tu destruxisti, ipse construat; quod tu exterminasti, ipse reformet; quod tu deiecisti, ipse erigat. Clama ad Deum, clama interius, clama ubi audit; quia et ibi peccas, ubi videt; ibi clama, ubi audit.
7. 7. From a vain fear let us take a useful fear. The fear of all men fearing to lose temporal things—men who are going to migrate at some time, and who tremble to migrate, wishing always to put off what they cannot keep from being taken away—is vain. This fear of men is vain; and yet it exists, and is vehement, and cannot be resisted. Hence men are to be reproached, hence rebuked, hence lamented, hence mourned: fearing to die, and doing nothing else but to die later. Why do they not bring it about that they not die? Because whatever they do, they do not bring it about that they not die. But can they do anything by which they may bring it about that they never die? In no way. Plainly, whatever you do, however much you keep watch, wherever you flee, whatever fortifications you seek, with whatever riches you ransom yourself, with whatever cunning you deceive the enemy, you do not deceive the fever. For you do nothing else, that you may not die soon by the enemy, except that you may die later sometime by the fever. You have something to do, that you may never die. If you fear death, love life. Your life is God, your life is Christ, your life is the Holy Spirit. You do not please him by acting badly. He does not inhabit a ruinous temple, he does not enter a filthy temple. But groan to him, that he may cleanse the place for himself; groan to him, that he may build a temple for himself; what you destroyed, let him construct; what you laid waste, let him reform; what you cast down, let him raise up. Cry to God, cry within, cry where he hears; for there too you sin, where he sees; cry there, where he hears.
Sermons5.7.7
7. 8. Et cum timorem correxeris, et utiliter timere coeperis, non temporales cruciatus, sed aeterni ignis supplicia, et ideo adulter non fueris; hinc enim loquebamur, propter Apostolum, qui dixit: Corpora vestra membra Christi sunt ; cum ergo ideo adulter esse non coeperis, quia times ardere in igne sempiterno, nondum laudandus es; non quidem ita dolendus, ut ante, sed tamen nondum laudandus.
7. 8. And when you have corrected your fear, and begun to fear usefully—not temporal torments, but the punishments of the eternal fire—and therefore have not been an adulterer (for this is what we were speaking of, on account of the Apostle, who said, Your bodies are members of Christ); when, then, you have begun not to be an adulterer because you fear to burn in the everlasting fire, you are not yet to be praised; not indeed so to be grieved over as before, but yet not yet to be praised.
Sermons5.7.8
8. 8. Quid enim magnum est, timere poenam? Magnum est, sed amare iustitiam. Interrogo te, et invenio te. Tu inspice interrogationem meam sonantem, et fac de te ipso interrogationem silentem. Dico ergo tibi: Libidine cum victus habes consentientem, quare non committis adulterium? Et respondebis; Quia timeo gehennam, timeo supplicium ignis aeterni, timeo iudicium Christi, timeo societatem diaboli, ne puniar ab illo, et cum illo ardeam. Quid? Dicturus sum: Male times? Quomodo tibi dicebam de adversario, quia quaerebat corpus tuum occidere. Ibi enim recte dicebam: Male times, securum te fecit Dominus tuus, dicens: Nolite timere eos qui corpus occidunt. Modo cum dicis mihi: Gehennam timeo, ardere timeo, in aeternum puniri timeo; quid dicturus sum? Male times? Vane times? Non audeo, quandoquidem ipse Dominus ablato timore, subiecit timorem; et ait, ubi dixit: Nolite timere eos qui corpus occidunt, et postea non habent quid faciant; sed eum timete, qui habet potestatem et corpus et animam occidere in gehennam ignis; ita dico vobis, hunc timete . Cum ergo Dominus timorem incusserit, et vehementer incusserit, et repetendo verbum comminationem geminaverit, dicturus ego sum: Male times? Ista non dicam. Plane time, nihil melius times; nihil est quod magis timere debeas. Sed interrogo te: Si non te videret Deus, quando facis, nec quisquam te convinceret in iudicio illius, faceres? Tu te vide. Non enim potes ad verba omnia mea respondere, inspice te ipsum. Faceres? Si faceres, ergo poenam times, castitatem nondum amas, caritatem nondum habes; serviliter times; formido est mali, nondum dilectio boni. Sed time tamen, ut ista formido custodiat te, ut perducat ad dilectionem. Timor enim iste, quo gehennam times, et ideo mala non facis, continet te; et sic volentem peccare animum interiorem non sinit. Est enim quidam custos timor, quasi paedagogus legis; littera est minans, nondum gratia iuvans. Custodiat tamen te timor iste, dum non facis timendo, et veniet caritas; intrat in cor tuum, et quantum illa intrat, tantum timor exit. Timor enim id agebat, ne faceres; caritas id agit, ut nolis facere, etiam si impune possis admittere.
8. 8. For what great thing is it to fear punishment? It is a great thing—but to love righteousness. I question you, and I find you out. Look at my question that sounds aloud, and make about yourself the question that is silent. I say to you, then: When, overcome by lust, you have a consenting partner, why do you not commit adultery? And you will answer: Because I fear hell, I fear the punishment of the eternal fire, I fear the judgment of Christ, I fear the fellowship of the devil, lest I be punished by him and burn with him. What? Shall I say: You fear badly? Just as I said to you about the adversary, that he sought to kill your body. For there I rightly said: You fear badly, your Lord made you secure, saying, Do not fear those who kill the body. Now, when you say to me: I fear hell, I fear to burn, I fear to be punished forever; what shall I say? You fear badly? You fear in vain? I dare not, since the Lord himself, having taken away fear, added fear; and he said, where he said, Do not fear those who kill the body, and afterward have nothing they can do; but fear him who has power to kill both body and soul in the hell of fire; yes, I tell you, fear him (Luke 12:4-5). When, then, the Lord struck fear, and struck it vehemently, and by repeating the word doubled the threat, shall I say: You fear badly? I will not say these things. Fear plainly, you fear nothing better; there is nothing you ought more to fear. But I question you: If God did not see you when you do it, nor would anyone convict you in his judgment, would you do it? Look at yourself. For you cannot answer all my words; look into yourself. Would you do it? If you would do it, then you fear punishment, you do not yet love chastity, you do not yet have love; you fear in a servile way; it is dread of evil, not yet love of good. But fear nevertheless, that this dread may guard you, that it may lead you to love. For this fear, by which you fear hell, and therefore do not do evils, restrains you; and so it does not allow the inner soul, willing to sin, to do so. For fear is a kind of guard, like the pedagogue of the law; it is the letter that threatens, not yet the grace that helps. Yet let this fear guard you, while you do not act through fearing, and love will come; it enters into your heart, and as much as it enters, so much does fear go out. For fear was working that you not do it; love works that you not wish to do it, even if you could commit it with impunity.
Sermons5.8.8
9. 9. Dixi quid timeatis, dixi quid appetatis. Sectamini caritatem, intret caritas; admittite illam, timendo peccare, admittite amorem non peccantem, admittite amorem bene viventem. Illa, ut dicere coeperam, intrante, incipit timor exire. Quanto plus illa intraverit, tanto timor minor erit. Cum illa tota intraverit, nullus timor erit; quia perfecta caritas foras mittit timorem . Intrat ergo caritas, pellit timorem. Non autem intrat et ipsa incomitata. Habet secum suum timorem, quem introducit ipsa; sed illum castum, permanentem in saeculum saeculi . Servilis timor est, quo times cum diabolo ardere; timor castus est, quo times Deo displicere. Considerate, carissimi, et ipsos humanos interrogate affectus. Timet servus offendere dominum suum, ne iubeat eum verberari, iubeat in compedes mitti, iubeat carcere includi, iubeat eum pistrino conteri. Haec timens servus non peccat; sed quando senserit absentes oculos domini sui, nec habuerit testem a quo possit convinci, facit. Quare facit? Quia poenam timebat, non iustitiam diligebat. Vir autem bonus, vir iustus, homo liber (nam solus iustus est liber; omnis enim qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati ), delectatur ipsa iustitia; et si possit sine teste peccare, testem reformidat et Deum; et si possit audire Deum dicentem sibi: Video te cum peccas, non te damnabo, sed displices mihi; ille nolens displicere oculis patris, non formidolosi iudicis, timet, non ne damnetur, non ne puniatur, non ne crucietur; sed ne offendat gaudium paternum, ne displiceat oculis amantis. Si enim amat ipse, et amantem sui Dominum sentit, non facit quod displicet amanti se.
9. 9. I have said what you should fear, I have said what you should seek. Pursue love, let love enter; admit it, by fearing to sin, admit the love that does not sin, admit the love that lives well. As that one enters, as I had begun to say, fear begins to go out. The more that one enters, the less fear there will be. When that one has wholly entered, there will be no fear; because perfect love casts out fear (1 John 4:18). Love enters, then, it drives out fear. But it too does not enter unaccompanied. It has with it its own fear, which it itself introduces; but that chaste fear, remaining unto the age of the age (See Ps 19:9 (18:10)). Servile fear is that by which you fear to burn with the devil; chaste fear is that by which you fear to displease God. Consider, dearly beloved, and question human affections themselves. A servant fears to offend his master, lest he command him to be flogged, command him to be put in fetters, command him to be shut in prison, command him to be ground down in the mill. Fearing these things the servant does not sin; but when he perceives that the eyes of his master are absent, and has no witness by whom he can be convicted, he does it. Why does he do it? Because he feared punishment, he did not love righteousness. But a good man, a just man, a free man (for only the just man is free; for everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin (John 8:34)) is delighted by righteousness itself; and if he could sin without a witness, he fears a witness, even God; and if he could hear God saying to him: I see you when you sin, I will not condemn you, but you displease me; that one, unwilling to displease the eyes of the father, not of a fearsome judge, fears—not lest he be condemned, not lest he be punished, not lest he be tortured; but lest he offend the joy of the father, lest he displease the eyes of the one who loves. For if he himself loves, and perceives the Lord who loves him, he does not do what displeases the one who loves him.
Sermons5.9.9
10. 10. Lubricos et inhonestos amatores attendite; si quis amore feminae lascivus et nequam vestit se aliter quam illi placet, vestit se aliter quam amatae suae placet, aut ornat se aliter quam illi placet. Illa dixerit: Nolo habeas talem byrrhum; non habet; si per hiemem illi dicat: In lacerna te amo; eligit tremere, quam displicere. Numquid illa cui displicet, damnatura est? numquid in carcerem missura? numquid tortores adhibitura? Hoc solum ibi timetur: Non te videbo; hoc solum ibi contremiscitur: Faciem meam non videbis. Si hoc impudica dicit, et terret; Deus dicit, et non terret? Sane plurimum; sed si amamus. Si autem non amamus, non inde terremur; sed terremur ut servi, de igne, de gehenna, de atrocissimis tartareis minis, de exaggeratissimis diaboli angelis, eiusque suppliciis? Vel inde terreamur. Si illud minus amamus, vel illa timeamus.
10. 10. Attend to slippery and dishonorable lovers; if anyone, out of love for a woman, wanton and worthless, dresses himself otherwise than as she pleases, dresses himself otherwise than as it pleases his beloved, or adorns himself otherwise than as it pleases her. She has said: I do not want you to have such a cloak; he does not have it; if in winter she says to him: I love you in the mantle; he chooses to shiver rather than to displease. Surely she whom he displeases is not going to condemn him? surely not to send him to prison? surely not to bring in torturers? This alone is feared there: I will not see you; this alone is trembled at there: You will not see my face. If an unchaste woman says this, and terrifies; does God say it, and not terrify? Surely very much; but only if we love. But if we do not love, we are not terrified by that; but are we terrified as slaves, by fire, by hell, by the most atrocious threats of Tartarus, by the most heightened angels of the devil and their punishments? Let us at least be terrified by that. If we love that less, let us at least fear those things.
Sermons5.10.10
11. 11. Non ergo fiant fornicationes. Templum Dei estis, et Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis. Si quis templum Dei corruperit, corrumpet illum Deus . Licita sunt matrimonia, nihil amplius requiratis. Non enim grande onus impositum est. Virginibus maior amor imposuit maius onus. Virgines quod licebat noluerunt, ut plus placerent ei cui se devoverunt. Ambierunt illam maiorem pulchritudinem cordis sui. Quid iubes? Tamquam dicerent: Quid iubes? Ne adulterae simus, hoc praecipis? Amando te, plus facimus quam iubes. De virginibus, ait Apostolus, praeceptum Domini non habeo. Ergo quare hoc faciunt? Consilium autem do . Illae autem amantes, quibus terrenae nuptiae viluerunt, quae terrenos amplexus non desideraverunt, usque adeo acceptaverunt praeceptum, ut non recusarent consilium; ut plus placerent, plus se ornaverunt. Corporis enim huius, id est, exterioris hominis ornamenta quanto magis appetuntur, tanto sunt interioris maiora detrimenta; quanto autem minus appetuntur ornamenta exterioris hominis, tanto magis moribus pulchris homo interior adornatur. Unde dicit et Petrus: Ornantes se non in tortis crinibus . Cum enim dixisset: Ornantes se; quid aliud a carnalibus, quam visibilia ista ornamenta putarentur? Continuo tulit cogitationi quod cupiditas inquirebat. Non, inquit, in tortis crinibus, neque auro, vel margaritis, vel veste pretiosa; sed ille absconditus cordis homo, qui est ante Deum dives . Neque enim Deus divitias daret exteriori homini, et inopem relinqueret interiorem; dedit invisibili divitias invisibiles, et invisibilem ornavit invisibiliter.
11. 11. Therefore let there be no fornications. You are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you. If anyone corrupts the temple of God, God will corrupt him (1 Cor 3:16-17). Marriages are lawful; require nothing more. For no great burden has been imposed. On virgins a greater love has imposed a greater burden. The virgins were unwilling to do what was lawful, that they might please the more him to whom they devoted themselves. They aspired to that greater beauty of their heart. What do you command? As though they should say: What do you command? That we not be adulteresses, is this what you command? By loving you, we do more than you command. Concerning virgins, says the Apostle, I have no precept of the Lord. Why, then, do they do this? But I give counsel (1 Cor 7:25). But those loving women, to whom earthly marriages had become cheap, who did not long for earthly embraces, so accepted the precept that they did not refuse the counsel; that they might please more, they adorned themselves more. For the more the adornments of this body—that is, of the outer man—are sought, the greater are the losses of the inner; but the less the adornments of the outer man are sought, the more the inner man is adorned with beautiful morals. Hence Peter too says, Adorning themselves not in braided hair. For when he had said, Adorning themselves, what else but these visible adornments would be supposed by the carnal? At once he took away from thought what desire was seeking. Not, he says, in braided hair, nor gold, nor pearls, nor costly garment; but that hidden man of the heart, who is rich before God (1 Pet 3:3-4). For God would not give riches to the outer man and leave the inner needy; he gave invisible riches to the invisible, and adorned the invisible invisibly.
Sermons5.11.11
12. 12. His ornamentis studentes Dei puellae, sanctae virgines, nec quod licebat appetierunt, nec quod cogebantur consenserunt. Multae enim etiam parentum suorum contrarios conatus igne superni amoris superaverunt. Iratus est pater, ploravit mater; non curavit illa, cui ante oculos versabatur speciosus forma prae filiis hominum . Ei quippe se ornari desideravit, ut tota eius curam gereret. Quia quae nupta est, cogitat quae sunt mundi, quomodo viro placeat; quae autem innupta est, cogitat quae sunt Dei, quomodo placeat Deo . Videte quid sit amare. Non dixit: Cogitat ne damnetur a Deo. Adhuc enim iste timor ille servilis est, custos quidem malorum, ut abstineant se a malis, et abstinendo digni sint ad se admittere caritatem. Sed illae non cogitant quemadmodum non puniantur a Deo, sed quomodo placeant Deo, pulchritudine interiore, decore occulti hominis, decore cordis, ubi illius oculis nudae sunt; nudae intus, non foris; integrae et intus et foris. Vel virgines doceant coniugatos et coniugatas, non ire in adulterium. Illae faciunt plus quam licet; illi non faciant quod non licet.
12. 12. Eager for these adornments, the maidens of God, the holy virgins, neither sought what was lawful, nor consented to what they were forced to. For many overcame even the opposing attempts of their own parents by the fire of heavenly love. The father was angry, the mother wept; she did not care, before whose eyes was set the one beautiful in form above the sons of men (Ps 45:2 (44:3)). For she desired to be adorned for him, that she might take wholly his care. Because she who is married thinks of the things of the world, how to please her husband; but she who is unmarried thinks of the things of God, how to please God (1 Cor 7:34). See what it is to love. He did not say: She thinks how not to be condemned by God. For this fear is still that servile one, the guard indeed of the wicked, that they may abstain from evils, and by abstaining may be worthy to admit love into themselves. But those women think not how they may not be punished by God, but how they may please God, by inner beauty, by the comeliness of the hidden man, by the comeliness of the heart, where they are naked to his eyes; naked within, not without; whole both within and without. Let virgins at least teach the married men and women not to go into adultery. They do more than is lawful; let those not do what is not lawful.
Sermons5.12.12
SERMO 162
Sermon 162
Sermons5.12.12
1. Quaestio de Epistola Corinthiorum beati Pauli apostoli, ubi dicit: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat ; nescio si possit ad liquidum dissolvi, quamvis possit, donante Domino, aliquid inde probabiliter dici: ita enim profunda est. Nam cum superius in eadem Epistola Apostolus diceret: Nolite errare; neque fornicatores, neque idolis servientes, neque adulteri, neque molles, neque masculorum concubitores, neque fures, neque avari, neque ebriosi, neque maledici, neque rapaces regnum Dei possidebunt; et paulo post: Nescitis, ait, quoniam corpora vestra membra sunt Christi? Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? Absit. An nescitis quia qui adhaeret meretrici, unum corpus est? Erunt enim, inquit, duo in carne una. Qui autem adhaeret Domino, unus spiritus est. Fugite fornicationem; atque ibi subiunxit: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat. An nescitis quia corpus vestrum, templum in vobis Spiritus Sancti est, quem habetis a Deo, et non estis vestri? Empti enim estis pretio magno; glorificate et portate Deum in corpore vestro ; cum ergo multa et horrenda in hoc capitulo prius enumerasset hominum peccata, quibus non dabitur regnum Dei, quae tamen nonnisi per corpus perpetrari ab hominibus possunt; quod corpus utique iam fidelium, templum esse dicit Spiritus Sancti, quem habemus a Deo; ipsaque membra corporis nostri, membra esse asseverat Christi; de quibus arguendo et quodammodo interrogando, ait: Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? Responderitque sibi: Absit! Subiungat adhuc et dicat: Nescitis quoniam qui adhaeret meretrici, unum corpus est? Erunt enim, inquit, duo in carne una; qui autem adhaeret Domino, unus spiritus est; et concludat: Fugite fornicationem; sequitur tamen ipse, et dicit: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat; quasi vero illa quae dinumeravit peccata, dicens: Nolite errare; neque fornicatores, neque idolis servientes, neque adulteri, neque molles, neque masculorum concubitores, neque fures, neque avari, neque ebriosi, neque maledici, neque rapaces, regnum Dei possidebunt; ista omnia facinora et flagitia, numquid nonnisi per corpus fieri aut exerceri possunt? Quis hoc sani capitis homo negaverit? Totum quippe istum locum Apostolus, propter ipsum corpus iam emptum pretio magno, id est, Christi sanguine pretioso, templum Spiritus Sancti factum a Domino, ne talibus flagitiis pollueretur, sed potius inviolatum tamquam Dei habitaculum servaretur, agebat et defendebat. Quare ergo subiungere voluit hoc, unde difficilis quaestio nasceretur; id est, ut diceret: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus suum peccat; cum sive ipsa fornicatio, sive alia huiusmodi, quae nonnisi per corpus fiunt peccata turpitudini et fornicationi simillima, nonnisi per ipsum corpus gerantur atque exerceantur? Quid enim? poteritne esse quispiam (ut cetera superius memorata taceam) fur, vel ebriosus, vel maledicus, vel rapax, extra operationem corporis huius? Quamvis nec ipsa idololatria neque ipsa avaritia, praeter servitium corporis huius poterit ad usum fructumque suum pervenire. Quid est ergo: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat? Primum, quia in corpore isto homo constitutus, quidquid solo tantum animo poterit inique concupiscere, dici non potest extra corpus hoc hominem facere, cum constet eum carnali sensu et carnali prudentia hoc agere, isto adhuc circumseptum corpore. Nam et quod in Psalmo scriptum est: Dixit impius in corde suo: Non est Deus ; idem beatus Paulus apostolus non potuit utique separare a corporali opere, illo loco ubi ait: Omnes adstabimus ante tribunal Christi, ut recipiat unusquisque secundum ea quae per corpus gessit, sive bonum, sive malum . Quia videlicet nonnisi in corpore constitutus impius potuit dicere: Non est Deus. Ut taceam quod in alia Epistola ipse Doctor Gentium dicit: Manifesta autem sunt opera carnis; et exsequitur: Quae sunt fornicationes, immunditiae, luxuriae, veneficia, inimicitiae, contentiones, aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, haereses, invidiae, ebrietates, et his similia; quae praedico vobis, sicut praedixi, quia qui talia agunt, regnum Dei non possidebunt . Numquid enim non videtur nobis extra corpus fieri cetera illa quae ibi interposuit, aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, invidias, haereses? Et tamen operibus carnis ista tribuit Doctor Gentium in fide et veritate. Quid est ergo: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; et unum tantummodo fornicationis peccatum nominans, ait: Qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat?
1. The question from the Epistle of the blessed apostle Paul to the Corinthians, where he says, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body (1 Cor 6:18), I do not know whether it can be resolved with full clarity, although, by the Lord's gift, something can probably be said about it: so deep is it. For when, earlier in the same Epistle, the Apostle said, Do not err; neither fornicators, nor those who serve idols, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor the rapacious will possess the kingdom of God (1 Cor 6:9-10); and a little after, Do you not know, he says, that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I, then, take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? Far from it. Or do you not know that he who cleaves to a harlot is one body? For they will be, he says, two in one flesh. But he who cleaves to the Lord is one spirit. Flee fornication (1 Cor 6:15-18); and there he added, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body. Or do you not know that your body is a temple in you of the Holy Spirit, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? For you were bought with a great price; glorify and carry God in your body (1 Cor 6:18-20); when, then, he had first enumerated many and horrible sins of men in this passage, to whom the kingdom of God will not be given, which nevertheless can be perpetrated by men only through the body—which body, indeed, of the faithful now, he says is a temple of the Holy Spirit whom we have from God; and the very members of our body he affirms to be members of Christ; arguing about which and as it were questioning, he says, Shall I, then, take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? and he answers himself, Far from it! Let him still add and say, Do you not know that he who cleaves to a harlot is one body? For they will be, he says, two in one flesh; but he who cleaves to the Lord is one spirit; and let him conclude, Flee fornication; yet he himself goes on and says, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body; as though indeed those sins which he enumerated, saying, Do not err; neither fornicators, nor those who serve idols, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor the rapacious will possess the kingdom of God—all these crimes and shameful deeds, can they be done or carried out only through the body? What man of sound head would deny this? For this whole passage the Apostle was pleading and defending on account of the body itself, now bought with a great price—that is, the precious blood of Christ—made by the Lord a temple of the Holy Spirit, that it not be polluted by such shameful deeds, but rather be kept inviolate as a dwelling of God. Why, then, did he wish to add this, from which a difficult question would arise—that is, to say, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body; when both fornication itself, or other sins of this kind which are done only through the body, most like to baseness and fornication, are carried out and exercised only through the body itself? For what? Can anyone (to be silent about the others mentioned above) be a thief, or a drunkard, or a reviler, or rapacious, outside the operation of this body? Although neither idolatry itself nor greed itself could come to its own use and enjoyment apart from the service of this body. What is it, then: Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body? First, because a man established in this body, whatever he can iniquitously covet by the mind alone, cannot be said to do outside this body, since it is plain that he does this by carnal sense and carnal prudence, still encompassed by this body. For even what is written in the Psalm, The fool has said in his heart, There is no God (Ps 14:1 (13:1)), the same blessed apostle Paul could surely not separate from a corporeal work, in that place where he says, We will all stand before the tribunal of Christ, that each may receive according to the things he did through the body, whether good or evil (2 Cor 5:10). Because, namely, only when established in the body could the ungodly man say, There is no God. Not to mention that in another Epistle the same Teacher of the Gentiles says, But the works of the flesh are manifest; and he goes on: Which are fornications, uncleannesses, debaucheries, sorceries, enmities, contentions, jealousies, animosities, dissensions, heresies, envies, drunkennesses, and the like; of which I foretell you, as I have foretold, that those who do such things will not possess the kingdom of God (Gal 5:19-21). For do not those other things which he interposed there—jealousies, animosities, dissensions, envies, heresies—seem to us to be done outside the body? And yet the Teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth attributes these to the works of the flesh. What is it, then: Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; and naming only one sin, of fornication, he says, But he who fornicates sins against his own body?
Sermons5.1
2. Apparet igitur cuivis tardo et obtuso, quam sit ista quaestio difficilis; quam Dominus piae intentioni nostrae, si aliquantulum dignatus fuerit dilucescere atque revelare, poterimus aliquid rationabiliter dicere. Videtur enim beatus Apostolus, in quo loquebatur Christus, aut exaggerare voluisse fornicationis malum super cetera omnia peccata, quae etsi per corpus committantur; non tamen animum humanum concupiscentiae carnali ita efficiunt obstrictum et obnoxium, quemadmodum in solo opere fornicationis corporalis, commisceri facit animum vis ingens libidinis cum ipso corpore, et unum cum ipso quodammodo agglutinari et devinctum esse; in tantum ut nihil aliud ipso momento et experimento huius tam magni flagitii cogitare homini liceat, aut intendere, nisi quod sibimet addicit mentem, quam captivam subdit ipsa submersio, et quodammodo absorptio libidinis et concupiscentiae carnalis; ut hoc esse videatur quod dictum est: Qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat ; quia tunc fit proprie et familiariter servum corporis cor hominis fornicantis, in tempore maxime ipsius nequissimae operationis; in tantum ut ipse Apostolus inculcatius volens commendare cavendum hominibus hoc malum, dixerit: Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? et exsecrans atque detestans responderit: Absit! An nescitis, inquit, quoniam qui adhaeret meretrici unum corpus est? Erunt enim, inquit, duo in carne una . Numquid hoc posset dici de aliis atque aliis quibuscumque facinoribus hominum? Liberum est enim animo humano in aliis quibusque sceleribus, et unum aliquid eorum operari, et eo ipso tempore alibi cogitatione distendi; quod in fornicationis ipso opere atque tempore non licet animo, ad aliud aliquid cogitandum liberum esse. Sic enim totus homo absorbetur ab ipso et in ipso corpore, ut iam dici non possit ipse animus suus esse; sed simul totus homo dici possit quod caro sit, et spiritus vadens et non revertens . Sic ergo possumus intellegere, quia: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat; ut videatur, ut dixi, Apostolus in tantum exaggerare voluisse fornicationis malum, ut in comparatione huius fornicationis, cetera extra corpus habenda esse duxerit quaecumque peccata; solo hoc tantummodo fornicationis malo in corpus proprium peccari dixerit, quia maiore libidinis ardore, quo superior nullus est, voluptas ipsius corporis tenet servum, efficitque captivum.
2. It appears, therefore, to anyone, however slow and dull, how difficult this question is; on which, if the Lord deigns to shed a little light and reveal it to our devout intention, we shall be able to say something reasonably. For the blessed Apostle, in whom Christ was speaking, seems either to have wished to heighten the evil of fornication above all other sins, which, even if they are committed through the body, yet do not make the human soul so bound and liable to carnal concupiscence as, in the work of bodily fornication alone, the immense force of lust makes the soul mingle with the body itself, and as it were be glued and bound to it as one; so much so that at that very moment and experience of so great a shameful deed a man is permitted to think or attend to nothing else but what addicts the mind to itself, the mind which the very submersion, and as it were absorption, of lust and carnal concupiscence holds captive and subjects; so that this seems to be what was said, But he who fornicates sins against his own body; because then the heart of the fornicating man becomes properly and intimately a slave of the body, especially at the time of that most wicked operation itself; so much so that the Apostle himself, wishing more emphatically to commend that this evil must be guarded against by men, said, Shall I, then, take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? and, abhorring and detesting it, answered, Far from it! Or do you not know, he says, that he who cleaves to a harlot is one body? For they will be, he says, two in one flesh. Could this be said of any other crimes whatever of men? For in any other crimes the human soul is free both to do some one of them, and at that very time to be stretched out elsewhere in thought; which in the very work and time of fornication is not permitted to the soul, to be free to think of anything else. For the whole man is so absorbed by the body and in the body itself that he can no longer be said to be his own soul; but the whole man at once can be said to be flesh, and a spirit going and not returning (See Ps 78:39 (77:39)). So, then, we can understand that every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body; so that the Apostle seems, as I said, to have wished so to heighten the evil of fornication, that in comparison with this fornication he reckoned all other sins, whatever they be, to be held outside the body; and said that by this one evil of fornication alone one sins against one's own body, because by a greater ardor of lust, than which there is none higher, the pleasure of the body itself holds him a slave and makes him captive.
Sermons5.2
3. Haec dicta sint de speciali fornicatione huius corporis. Verum quia non solum fornicatio in sacris Litteris specialiter, sed etiam generaliter arguitur et nominatur; conemur, Deo adiuvante, et hinc aliquid probabiliter dicere. Generalia igitur fornicatio aperte manifestatur in Psalmo, ubi dicitur: Quoniam ecce qui longe se faciunt a te, peribunt; perdidisti omnem qui fornicatur abs te . Ubi subsequenter, qualiter ista generalis fornicatio evadi et effugi possit, adiunxit dicens: Mihi autem adhaerere Deo bonum est . Ut exinde facile advertamus, illam esse generalem fornicationem animae humanae, qua non adhaerens quisque Deo, adhaeret mundo. Unde beatus apostolus Ioannes dicit: Si quis dilexerit mundum, dilectio Patris non est in eo . Et apostolus Iacobus dicit: Adulteri, nescitis quia amicitia huius mundi inimica est Deo? Breviter ergo definitum est, non posse habere dilectionem Dei, qui habuerit dilectionem mundi; et inimicum esse Dei, qui amicus esse voluerit mundi. Ad hoc etiam pertinet quod Dominus in Evangelio dicit: Nemo potest duobus dominis servire; aut enim unum odio habebit, et alterum diliget; aut unum patietur, et alterum contemnet. Et concludit: Non potestis Deo servire et mammonae . Ista est ergo generalis, ut dictum est, animae fornicatio, omnia omnino in se continens, qua non adhaeretur Deo, dum adhaeretur mundo; ut sic etiam intellegere valeamus, secundum istam generalem fornicationem, quod ait Apostolus: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat . Quia si non fornicetur anima humana, adhaerendo Deo, nec adhaerendo mundo, quaecumque alia peccata, a concupiscentia carnali prorsus aliena potuerit pro ipsa fragilitate mortalitatis, vel ignorando, vel neglegendo, vel obliviscendo, vel non intellegendo homo incurrere, hoc sit quod dictum est: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; quia nullum hic corporalis vel temporalis concupiscentiae peccatum poterit reperiri; unde merito extra corpus esse quodlibet tale peccatum, dici videtur. Quod si adhaerens mundo mundanus homo, longe se facit a Deo, fornicando ab ipso Deo, in corpus proprium peccat; quia corporali concupiscentia in quaeque temporalia et carnalia, carnali sensu et prudentia humanus animus trahitur, atque distrahitur creaturae serviens potius quam Creatori, qui est benedictus in saecula.
3. Let these things be said of the special fornication of this body. But because in the sacred Letters fornication is censured and named not only specially, but also generally; let us try, with God's help, to say something probable about this too. The general fornication, then, is openly manifested in the Psalm, where it is said, For behold, those who make themselves far from you will perish; you have destroyed everyone who fornicates away from you (Ps 73:27 (72:27)). Where, subsequently, he added how this general fornication can be escaped and fled, saying, But for me to cleave to God is good (Ps 73:28 (72:28)). So that from there we may easily notice that this is the general fornication of the human soul, by which anyone, not cleaving to God, cleaves to the world. Hence the blessed apostle John says, If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him (1 John 2:15). And the apostle James says, Adulterers, do you not know that the friendship of this world is enmity with God (Jas 4:4)? Briefly, then, it has been defined that he cannot have the love of God who has the love of the world; and that he is an enemy of God who wishes to be a friend of the world. To this also pertains what the Lord says in the Gospel, No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will bear with the one and despise the other. And he concludes, You cannot serve God and mammon (Matt 6:24). This, then, is the general fornication of the soul, as has been said, containing in itself absolutely all things, by which one does not cleave to God while cleaving to the world; so that we may also be able to understand, according to this general fornication, what the Apostle says, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body. Because, if the human soul does not fornicate, by cleaving to God, and by not cleaving to the world, whatever other sins, utterly foreign to carnal concupiscence, a man may incur, on account of the very frailty of mortality, whether by ignorance, or negligence, or forgetfulness, or not understanding, this is what was said, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; because no sin of corporeal or temporal concupiscence can be found here; whence rightly any such sin seems to be said to be outside the body. But if the worldly man, cleaving to the world, makes himself far from God, by fornicating away from God himself, he sins against his own body; because by corporeal concupiscence the human soul is dragged into temporal and carnal things by carnal sense and prudence, and is distracted, serving the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed unto the ages.
Sermons5.3
4. Sic ergo, quantum mihi videtur, salva fide, intellegi potest utriusque fornicationis malum, tam specialis, quam universalis, in hoc uno capitulo tanti et tam magni Doctoris, ubi ait: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat ; ut aut exaggeratio facta sit ab Apostolo huius specialis fornicationis, qua in corpus proprium peccari recte intellegitur; quia nusquam sic totus homo corporis ipsius voluptati addicitur, et ineffabiliter vel inevitabiliter affigitur, ut in comparatione huius tanti mali, cetera peccata extra corpus esse videantur, etiamsi per corpus exerceantur. Quemadmodum solius fornicationis vis quaedam imperiosae libidinis, conditioni suae subdit, propriumque ipsius corporis mancipium pessimum facit, tempore maxime ipsius immundissimae operationis; ut aliud quid praeter quod agit in ipso corpore, non sit liberum humanae menti vel cogitare, vel intendere. Si autem etiam generalem significare voluit Apostolus fornicationem, propter quam dixisse videatur: Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat; sic accipiendum est et intellegendum, ut quisque dum non adhaeret Deo, qui adhaeret mundo, omnia temporalia diligens et concupiscens, merito in corpus proprium peccare dicatur, id est, universae concupiscentiae carnali deditus et subditus factus, tamquam totus creaturae servus ab ipso Creatore alienus, per illam initium omnis peccati superbiam, cuius superbiae initium est, ut scriptum est, apostatare a Deo . A quo generali fornicationis malo quisque alienus, quodcumque aliud peccatum potuerit ut homo corruptibilis adhuc et mortalis incurrere, hoc intellegatur extra corpus esse; id est, extra corporeae et temporalis omnis concupiscentiae malum, alienum esse, extra corpus, ut saepe dictum est, esse. Tantummodo enim carnalis et generalis concupiscentiae malo per omnia fornicatur anima a Deo, tamquam corporalibus et temporalibus desideriis et delectationibus illigata et devincta, in corpus proprium peccat, cuius universaliter concupiscentiae serviens, incurvatur mundo, et alienatur a Deo; quod est, ut dictum est: Initium superbiae hominis, apostatare a Deo. Propter quod generalis fornicationis cavendum malum, beatus Ioannes admonet, dicens: Nolite diligere mundum neque ea quae sunt in mundo; quoniam quae in mundo sunt, concupiscentia carnis est, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio saeculi, quae non est ex Patre, sed ex mundo. Et mundus transit, et concupiscentia eius. Qui autem fecerit voluntatem Dei, manet in aeternum, sicut ille manet in aeternum . Ista ergo dilectio mundi, quae universalem in se concupiscentiam continet mundi, generalis est fornicatio, qua peccatur in corpus proprium; eo quod omnibus corporalibus et visibilibus et temporalibus desideriis et voluptatibus humanus indesinenter servit animus, ab ipso Creatore universorum desolatus atque derelictus.
4. Thus, then, as far as it seems to me, with faith preserved, the evil of both fornications—both the special and the universal—can be understood in this one passage of so great and so mighty a Teacher, where he says, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body; so that either a heightening was made by the Apostle of this special fornication, by which one is rightly understood to sin against one's own body, because nowhere is the whole man so addicted to the pleasure of the body itself, and ineffably or inevitably fixed to it, that in comparison with this so great an evil, the other sins seem to be outside the body, even if they are exercised through the body. Just as a certain force of imperious lust, belonging to fornication alone, subjects the man to its own condition, and makes him the worst chattel of his own body, especially at the time of that most unclean operation itself; so that, beyond what he is doing in the body itself, the human mind is not free either to think or to attend to anything else. But if the Apostle also wished to signify the general fornication, on account of which he seems to have said, Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who fornicates sins against his own body; it is to be taken and understood thus: that anyone who, while not cleaving to God, cleaves to the world, loving and coveting all temporal things, is rightly said to sin against his own body—that is, given over and subjected to the whole carnal concupiscence, as it were a complete slave of the creature, estranged from the Creator himself, through that pride which is the beginning of all sin, of which the beginning of pride is, as it is written, to apostatize from God (Sir 10:12-13). From which evil of general fornication anyone who is free, whatever other sin he may incur as a man still corruptible and mortal, let this be understood to be outside the body—that is, foreign to the evil of all corporeal and temporal concupiscence, to be, as has often been said, outside the body. For only by the evil of carnal and general concupiscence does the soul in all things fornicate away from God, as though bound and fettered by corporeal and temporal desires and delights, and sin against its own body, serving whose universal concupiscence it is bent toward the world and estranged from God; which is, as has been said, The beginning of man's pride is to apostatize from God. On account of which evil of general fornication that must be guarded against, the blessed John admonishes, saying, Do not love the world, nor the things that are in the world; for the things that are in the world are the concupiscence of the flesh, and the concupiscence of the eyes, and the ambition of the age, which is not from the Father, but from the world. And the world passes away, and its concupiscence. But he who does the will of God remains forever, as he remains forever (1 John 2:15-17). This love of the world, then, which contains in itself the universal concupiscence of the world, is the general fornication, by which one sins against one's own body; in that the human soul unceasingly serves all corporeal and visible and temporal desires and pleasures, abandoned and forsaken by the very Creator of all things.
Sermons5.4
SERMO 162/A
Sermon 162/A
Sermons5.4
1. Bonum est loqui de caritate eis qui diligunt eam, qua bene diligitur quidquid diligitur. Est enim secundum Apostolum in caritate supereminentissima via. Modo legebatur, audivimus: Supereminentem, inquit, vobis viam demonstro . Deinde narravit multa dona, et ea quidem praeclara, nec parvi facienda; nihil tamen ea dixit prodesse hominibus, qui non habuerint caritatem. In quibus donis commemoravit; linguis loqui hominum et angelorum; habere omnem prophetiam, omnem scientiam, omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferat; distribuere omnia sua pauperibus, tradere corpus suum ut ardeat . Haec omnia magna atque divina sunt, sed si in fundamento caritatis collocentur, et de radice caritatis exurgant. Fuisse autem ex his donis multa in multis qui non habuerunt caritatem, non auderemus dicere, nisi doceremur exemplis, non quorumlibet hominum et undecumque petitorum, sed de ipsis Sanctis Scripturis, quibus quisquis non habuerit fidem, non potest habere caritatem. Sed inter praecipua quae dicta sunt, magnum ibi apparet vel prophetia, vel fides. Quid ergo de ceteris? Si prophetiam quisquis habens nihil ei prodest, si non habuerit caritatem, et fidem quisquis habens non potest pervenire ad regnum Dei, nisi habuerit caritatem, quid de ceteris loquamur? Vel linguis loqui, quid est ad prophetiam et fidem? Vel distribuere omnia sua pauperibus, quid est ad prophetiam? Et tradere corpus suum ut ardeat? Plerumque hoc faciunt temerarii praecipites. Ergo illa ibi duo magna sunt, de quibus vere mirandum est, si invenire potuerimus aliquem hominem habere prophetiam, et non habere caritatem, aut habere fidem, et non habere caritatem.
1. It is good to speak of love to those who love it, by which whatever is loved is loved well. For according to the Apostle there is in love a most surpassing way. It was just now read, we heard: I show you a surpassing way. Then he related many gifts, and indeed excellent ones, not to be lightly esteemed; yet he said that they profit men nothing, who do not have love. Among the gifts he mentioned: to speak with the tongues of men and of angels; to have all prophecy, all knowledge, all faith, so as to move mountains; to distribute all one's goods to the poor, to hand over one's body to be burned (See 1 Cor 12:31; 13:1-3). All these are great and divine things, but only if they are set in the foundation of love, and rise from the root of love. But that many of these gifts were in many who did not have love, we would not dare to say, unless we were taught by examples—not of any men whatever, sought from anywhere, but from the holy Scriptures themselves, in which whoever does not have faith cannot have love. But among the chief things that were named, either prophecy or faith appears there as great. What, then, of the rest? If anyone having prophecy profits nothing by it, if he does not have love, and anyone having faith cannot reach the kingdom of God unless he has love, what shall we say of the rest? To speak with tongues—what is that compared to prophecy and faith? To distribute all one's goods to the poor—what is that compared to prophecy? And to hand over one's body to be burned? Very often rash and headstrong people do this. Therefore those two are the great things there, about which it is truly to be wondered at, if we can find any man having prophecy and not having love, or having faith and not having love.
Sermons5.1
2. De prophetia exemplum nobis dat Regnorum liber . Saul persecutor erat sancti David. Cum eum persequeretur, et mitteret satellites qui eum arriperent ad poenas, illi qui missi erant, ut adducerent David occidendum, invenerunt eum inter Prophetas, ubi erat et Samuel sanctus, Annae sterilis filius, quem concipiendum a Domino petierat, a Domino acceperat, et natum Domino dederat. Eo ergo tempore erat Samuel, quo tempore erat David, praestantissimus ille Prophetarum; nam ab ipso unctus est David. Cum itaque persecutionem a Saule pateretur, confugit ad Samuelem, sicut modo, verbi gratia, qui forte foris aliquam persecutionem patitur, confugit ad Ecclesiam. Ergo eo confugerat, ubi erat non solus Samuel praestantissimus omnium prophetarum, sed etiam multi ceteri prophetae. Inter illos, cum essent prophetantes, venerunt missi a Saule, qui eum, sicut dixi, ad mortem arriperent. Insiluit in illos Spiritus Dei, et coeperunt prophetare, qui venerant hominem sanctum et iustum Dei ad gladium adducere, et eruere de medio Prophetarum; repente impleti Spiritu Dei prophetae facti sunt. Fuerit hoc fortasse istorum innocentia; non enim sponte ad illum arripiendum venerant, sed a rege suo missi erant. Et forte venerant quidem ad eum locum ubi erat David, sed non erant facturi quod iusserat Saul; forte et ipsi remansuri erant. Nam et hodie contingunt haec. Mittitur aliquando apparitor a magna potestate rapere aliquem de ecclesia; non audet facere contra Deum, et, ne et ipse incurrat gladium, remanet ibi, ubi missus erat ut raperet. Dixerit ergo aliquis admirans, quod Prophetae isti repente facti sunt quia innocentes fuerunt; testimonium illis innocentiae ipsa prophetia perhibuit. Venerunt missi, sed facturi non erant quod iusserat malus ille. Credamus hoc de istis. Missi sunt alii; et in ipsos insiluit Spiritus Dei, et ipsi prophetare coeperunt. Et hos cum illis innocentiae merito numeremus. Missi sunt tertii; hoc et ipsis factum est. Fuerint omnes innocentes. Cum tardarent, et non fieret quod Saul praeceperat, venit et ipse. Numquid et ipse innocens? Numquid et ipse missus ab aliqua potestate, et non perversus propria voluntate? Et in illum tamen insiluit Spiritus Dei, et prophetare coepit. Ecce Saul prophetat, habens prophetiam, sed non habens caritatem. Factum est vas quoddam, quod ab Spiritu tangeretur, non quod ab Spiritu mundaretur.
2. Of prophecy the book of Kingdoms gives us an example. Saul was a persecutor of holy David. When he was persecuting him, and sent satellites to seize him for punishment, those who were sent to lead David away to be killed found him among the prophets, where was also holy Samuel, the son of the barren Anna, whom she had asked from the Lord to conceive, had received from the Lord, and had given, once born, to the Lord. At that time, then, in which David was, there was Samuel, that most excellent of the prophets; for by him David was anointed. So when David was suffering persecution from Saul, he fled to Samuel, just as now, for example, one who perhaps suffers some persecution outside flees to the Church. So he had fled there, where there was not only Samuel, the most excellent of all the prophets, but also many other prophets. Among them, when they were prophesying, came those sent by Saul, who, as I said, were to seize him for death. The Spirit of God leaped upon them, and those who had come to lead a holy and just man of God to the sword, and to drag him from the midst of the prophets, began to prophesy; suddenly filled with the Spirit of God, they were made prophets. Perhaps this was due to the innocence of these men; for they had not come of their own will to seize him, but were sent by their king. And perhaps they had indeed come to that place where David was, but were not going to do what Saul commanded; perhaps they too were going to remain. For these things happen even today. Sometimes an officer is sent by a great power to seize someone from the church; he does not dare to act against God, and, lest he himself incur the sword, he remains there where he was sent to seize. So someone, wondering, might say that these became prophets suddenly because they were innocent; the prophecy itself bore witness to their innocence. Those sent came, but were not going to do what that evil man commanded. Let us believe this of these. Others were sent; and the Spirit of God leaped upon them too, and they too began to prophesy. Let us count these too with the former by the merit of innocence. A third group was sent; this happened to them too. Let them all have been innocent. When they delayed, and what Saul commanded was not done, he himself came too. Surely he too was not innocent? Surely he too was not sent by some power, and not perverse by his own will? And yet the Spirit of God leaped upon him too, and he began to prophesy (See 1 Sam 19:18-24). Behold, Saul prophesies, having prophecy, but not having love. He was made a kind of vessel, to be touched by the Spirit, not to be cleansed by the Spirit.
Sermons5.2
3. Tangit enim aliqua corda ad prophetandum Spiritus Dei, nec tamen mundat. Et si tangit, et non mundat, forte inquinatur ipse Spiritus? Divinae enim substantiae est, omnia contingere, nusquam inquinari. Nec miremini, si lux ista, quae de caelo funditur, omnia ubique sparsa immunda contingit, nusquam de immundo fuscatur. Nec ista sola quae de caelo, sed etiam illa quae de lucerna mittitur, contingit quacumque duxeris lumen; et forte quisquis per cloacam transeat, ipse si tetigerit polluitur; si autem fert lucernam, splendor lucernae supra omnia transit, nusquam maculam contrahit. Si hoc potuit Deus donare corporalibus luminibus, ipse lumen verum et aeternum et incommutabile potest alicubi coinquinari? Aut potest alicubi deesse lux Dei, de qua dictum est: Attingit a fine usque ad finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter ? Tangit ergo quod vult, et mundat quod vult; non quodcumque tetigerit mundat, sed quod mundaverit tangit. Saulem itaque persecutorem Dei Spiritus non mundavit, sed tamen ad prophetandum tetigit. Caiphas, princeps sacerdotum, Christi persecutor erat; et tamen prophetiam locutus est, quando ait: Expedit ut unus homo moriatur, et non tota gens pereat . Secutus Evangelista exposuit prophetiam, et ait: Hoc autem non a se dixit, sed, cum esset pontifex, prophetavit . Prophetavit Caiphas, prophetavit Saul; habebant prophetiam, sed caritatem non habebant. Numquid caritatem habuit Caiphas, qui persequebatur Filium Dei, quem ad nos caritas duxit? Numquid caritatem habebat Saul, qui persequebatur eum, per cuius manum fuerat ab hostibus liberatus, non solum invidus, sed et ingratus? Ergo probavimus, posse esse in aliquo prophetiam, et non esse caritatem. Istis autem prophetia prodesse non potest, secundum Apostolum: Si caritatem, inquit, non habeam, nihil sum . Non ait: Nihil est prophetia, aut nihil est fides; sed: Nihil sum ego, si non habuero caritatem. Habens magna nihil est; quamvis magna habeat, nihil est; ipsa enim magna, quae habet, non habet ad adiutorium, sed habet ad iudicium. Non magna habere magnum est, sed bene uti magnis magnum est; non autem utitur bene, qui non habet caritatem. Etenim non utitur bene aliqua re, nisi voluntas bona; voluntas bona esse non potest, ubi caritas non est.
3. For the Spirit of God touches some hearts unto prophesying, and yet does not cleanse them. And if it touches and does not cleanse, is the Spirit itself perhaps defiled? For it belongs to the divine substance to touch all things, to be nowhere defiled. Nor wonder, if this light which is poured from heaven, touching all unclean things scattered everywhere, is nowhere darkened by the unclean. Nor only this which comes from heaven, but even that which is sent from a lamp touches whatever you lead the light to; and perhaps whoever passes through a sewer, he himself, if he touches it, is polluted; but if he carries a lamp, the splendor of the lamp passes over all things, nowhere contracts a stain. If God could grant this to corporeal lights, can he himself, the true and eternal and unchangeable light, be anywhere defiled? Or can the light of God be lacking anywhere, of which it was said, It reaches mightily from end to end, and disposes all things sweetly (Wis 8:1)? It touches, then, what it wishes, and cleanses what it wishes; it does not cleanse whatever it touches, but touches what it cleanses. The Spirit, then, did not cleanse Saul, the persecutor of God, but yet touched him unto prophesying. Caiaphas, the chief priest, was a persecutor of Christ; and yet he spoke prophecy, when he said, It is expedient that one man die, and the whole nation not perish. The Evangelist, following, expounded the prophecy and said, But this he did not say of himself, but, since he was high priest, he prophesied (John 11:50-51). Caiaphas prophesied, Saul prophesied; they had prophecy, but did not have love. Did Caiaphas have love, who persecuted the Son of God, whom love led to us? Did Saul have love, who persecuted the one by whose hand he had been freed from his enemies, not only envious, but also ungrateful? Therefore we have proved that there can be in someone prophecy, and not love. But prophecy cannot profit such men, according to the Apostle: If I do not have love, he says, I am nothing (1 Cor 13:2). He did not say: Prophecy is nothing, or faith is nothing; but: I myself am nothing, if I do not have love. Having great things, he is nothing; though he have great things, he is nothing; for those great things which he has, he has not unto help, but unto judgment. It is not a great thing to have great things, but to use great things well is a great thing; but he does not use them well who does not have love. For one does not use anything well except a good will; the will cannot be good where love is not.
Sermons5.3
4. Quid de fide? Invenimus aliquem habere et fidem, et non habere caritatem? Multi sunt, qui credunt, et non amant. Nec enumerandi sunt homines; daemones invenimus credidisse quod credimus, et non amare quod amamus. Nam, cum argueret apostolus Iacobus eos, qui sibi putabant sufficere ut crederent, et nolebant bene vivere, quod non fit nisi de caritate - bona enim vita ad caritatem pertinet, nec potest habens caritatem male vivere; quia hoc ipsum bene vivere nihil est aliud, quam impleri caritate - cum ergo quidam iactarent se quod credidissent in Deum, et nollent bene vivere, atque congruenter tantae fidei quam perceperant, daemonibus eos comparavit dicens: Tu, inquit, dicis, quia unus est Deus. Bene credis; sed et daemones credunt et contremiscunt . Si ergo tantummodo credis, et non diligis, adhuc cum daemonibus tibi commune est. Petrus dixit: Tu es Filius Dei; et dictum est illi: Beatus es, Simon Bariona, quia non revelavit tibi caro et sanguis, sed Pater meus qui in caelis est . Invenimus et daemones dixisse: Quid nobis et tibi est, Fili Dei? Filium Dei confitentur Apostoli, Filium Dei confitentur et daemones; confessio videtur par, dilectio dispar. Illi credunt, et amant; illi credunt, et timent; amor exspectat praemium, timor poenam. Ergo invenimus posse quemquam habere etiam fidem, et non habere caritatem. Nemo ergo se iactet de quocumque Ecclesiae dono, si forte eminet in Ecclesia aliquo attributo sibi dono, sed videat utrum habeat caritatem. Nam locutus est idem apostolus Paulus, et enumeravit multa dona Dei in membris Christi, quae est Ecclesia; et ait, dona propria quibusque membris esse attributa, nec posse fieri ut omnes habeant unum donum. Nec quisquam tamen sine dono remanebit; Apostolos, ait, Prophetas, Doctores, interpretatores, linguis locutores, habentes virtutes sanitatum, habentes adiutoria, gubernationes, genera linguarum . Dicta sunt haec; et alia videmus in aliis, alia in aliis. Non ergo doleat aliquis, non sibi esse concessum, quod videt alii concessum; habeat caritatem, non invideat habenti, et cum illo habet quod non habet. Quidquid enim habuerit frater meus, si non invidero, et amavero, meum est. In me non habeo, sed in illo habeo; non esset meum, si in uno corpore et sub uno capite non essemus.
4. What of faith? Do we find someone having both faith and not having love? There are many who believe and do not love. Nor need men be enumerated; we find that the demons believed what we believe, and did not love what we love. For when the apostle James was arguing against those who thought it sufficed for them to believe, and were unwilling to live well—which is not done except from love (for the good life pertains to love, nor can one having love live badly; because this very living well is nothing else than to be filled with love)—when, then, certain people boasted that they had believed in God, and were unwilling to live well, and fittingly to so great a faith as they had received, he compared them to demons, saying, You, he says, say that God is one. You believe well; but the demons too believe, and tremble (Jas 2:19). If, then, you only believe, and do not love, you still have something in common with the demons. Peter said, You are the Son of God; and it was said to him, Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, because flesh and blood did not reveal it to you, but my Father who is in heaven (Matt 16:16-17). We find that the demons too said, What have we to do with you, Son of God (Matt 8:29)? The apostles confess the Son of God, the demons too confess the Son of God; the confession seems equal, the love unequal. They believe and love; those believe and fear; love awaits a reward, fear punishment. Therefore we find that anyone can have even faith, and not have love. Let no one, then, boast of any gift of the Church, if perhaps he is eminent in the Church by some gift attributed to him, but let him see whether he has love. For the same apostle Paul spoke, and enumerated many gifts of God in the members of Christ, which is the Church; and he said that proper gifts are attributed to each member, and that it cannot happen that all have one gift. Nor yet will anyone remain without a gift; Apostles, he says, Prophets, Teachers, interpreters, speakers in tongues, those having powers of healings, those having helps, governings, kinds of tongues (1 Cor 12:28). These things were said; and we see some things in some, other things in others. Let no one, then, grieve that what he sees granted to another is not granted to himself; let him have love, let him not envy the one who has it, and with that one he has what he does not have. For whatever my brother has, if I do not envy it, and have loved it, it is mine. In myself I do not have it, but in him I have it; it would not be mine, if we were not in one body and under one head.
Sermons5.4
5. Sinistra manus, verbi gratia, in corpore habet anulum, et dextra non habet; numquid illa sine ornamento remansit? Respice singulas manus, et videbis unam habere, aliam non habere; respice compagem corporis, cui haerent ambae manus, et vide eam, quae non habet, in illa habere, quae habet. Oculi vident qua eatur, pedes eunt quo oculi prospiciunt; nec pedes possunt videre, nec oculi ambulare. Sed respondet tibi pes: Habeo et ego lumen, sed non in me, sed in oculo; non enim oculus sibi videt, et mihi non videt. Dicunt et oculi: Et nos ambulamus, non in nobis, sed in pedibus; non enim pedes seipsos portant, et nos non portant. Singula ergo membra singulis et propriis officiis distributa peragunt quod imperat animus; omnia tamen in uno corpore constituta, et unitatem tenentia; nec arrogant sibi quod altera membra habent, si forte illa membra non habent; nec putant esse a se alienum, quod in uno corpore simul habent. Denique, fratres, si alicui membro corporis molestiarum aliquid accidat, quae membra suum auxilium denegabunt? Quid tam extremum videtur in homine, quam pes? Et in ipso pede quid tam extremum, quam planta? Et in ipsa planta quid tam extremum, quam ipsa cutis, unde terra calcatur? Ita tamen hoc extremum universi corporis compage detinetur, ut si in ipso loco spina calcetur, ad auxilium spinae eruendae omnia membra concurrant; continuo complicantur poplites, curvatur spina, non illa quae haesit, sed quae totum dorsum continet; sedetur, ut spina eruatur; iam sedere, ut hoc fiat, totius corporis est. Quam exiguus locus in molestia est! Tantilllus locus est, quantum spina pungere potuit; et tamen illius extremi et exigui loci molestia a toto corpore non relinquitur; cetera membra nihil dolent, et in illo uno loco omnia dolent. Ipse inde Apostolus dedit caritatis exemplum, exhortans nos, ut ita nos diligamus invicem, quemadmodum se in corpore diligunt membra: Si patiatur, inquit, unum membrum, compatiuntur et alia membra; et si glorificatur unum membrum, congaudent omnia membra. Vos estis Corpus Christi et membra . Si se diligunt membra quae habent caput in terra, quomodo se debent membra diligere, quorum caput in caelo est? Certe nec ipsa se diligunt, si a suo capite deseruntur; cum vero illud caput ita sit caput, et ita exaltatus sit, et ita in caelo ad dextram Patris collocatum, ut tamen laboret in terra, non in se, sed in membris suis, ita ut dicat in fine: Esurivi, sitivi, hospes fui, quando ei dicetur: Quando te vidimus esurientem et sitientem? et tamquam respondeat: Ego caput in caelo eram, sed in terra membra sitiebant - denique ait: Cum uni ex minimis meis fecistis, mihi fecistis , rursusque non facientibus: Cum uni ex minimis meis non fecistis, neque mihi fecistis - huic capiti nonnisi per caritatem connectimur.
5. The left hand, for example, has a ring in the body, and the right does not; has it then remained without adornment? Look at the individual hands, and you will see one has it, the other does not; look at the framework of the body, to which both hands cleave, and see that the one which does not have it, has it in the one which has it. The eyes see where one goes, the feet go where the eyes look ahead; nor can the feet see, nor the eyes walk. But the foot answers you: I too have light, but not in myself, but in the eye; for the eye does not see for itself, and not see for me. The eyes too say: We too walk, not in ourselves, but in the feet; for the feet do not carry themselves and not carry us. The individual members, then, distributed to their individual and proper offices, carry out what the soul commands; yet all, set in one body and holding unity; nor do they arrogate to themselves what the other members have, if perhaps they do not have those members; nor do they think foreign to themselves what they have together in one body. Finally, brothers, if some trouble befall any member of the body, what members will deny it their help? What seems so extreme in a man as the foot? And in the foot itself, what so extreme as the sole? And in the sole itself, what so extreme as the very skin, by which the earth is trodden? Yet this extreme thing is so held by the framework of the whole body, that if in that very place a thorn is trodden on, all the members run together to the aid of pulling out the thorn; at once the knees are bent, the spine is curved—not the one that was pricked, but the one that holds the whole back; one sits down, that the thorn may be pulled out; now sitting down, that this may be done, belongs to the whole body. How tiny is the place in trouble! So small a place is it, as much as a thorn could prick; and yet the trouble of that extreme and tiny place is not abandoned by the whole body; the other members feel no pain, and in that one place all feel pain. Hence the Apostle himself gave an example of love, exhorting us so to love one another as the members in the body love one another: If one member suffers, he says, the other members suffer with it; and if one member is glorified, all the members rejoice together. You are the Body of Christ and members (1 Cor 12:26-27). If the members love one another which have a head on earth, how ought the members to love one another whose head is in heaven? Surely they do not even love one another, if they are forsaken by their head; but since that head is so the head, and is so exalted, and so set in heaven at the right hand of the Father, that yet he labors on earth—not in himself, but in his members—so that he says at the end, I was hungry, I thirsted, I was a stranger, when it is said to him, When did we see you hungry and thirsty? and as though he answers: I, the head, was in heaven, but on earth my members thirsted—finally he says, When you did it to one of my least, you did it to me, and again, to those who did not do it, When you did not do it to one of my least, neither did you do it to me (Matt 25:40.45)—to this head we are joined only through love.
Sermons5.5
6. Sic enim, fratres, singula membra in officiis suis videmus agere opus proprium, ut oculus videat, non autem operetur; manus autem operetur, non tamen videat; auris audiat, nec videat, nec operetur; lingua loquatur, nec audiat, nec videat; et cum sint singula suis officiis distincta atque discreta, una tamen compage corporis colligata habent aliquid commune in omnibus. Officia diversa sunt, sanitas una est. Hoc est ergo in membris Christi caritas, quod est in membris corporis sanitas. Meliori loco positus est oculus, in eminenti, et tamquam ad consilium in arce constitutus, unde prospiciat, unde videat, unde ostendat; honor magnus in oculis, et loco, et sensu ardentiore, et agilitate, et vi quadam, quam cetera membra non habent. Proinde plerumque homines per oculos suos iurant, quam per quodlibet alterum membrum. Nemo alicui dixit: Sic te diligo quomodo aures meas; et est aurium sensus oculis suppar et proximus. Quid de ceteris dicam? Quotidie dicunt homines: Sic te diligo tamquam oculos meos. Et Apostolus significans maiorem in oculis haberi dilectionem, quam in ceteris membris, cum se dilectum ab Ecclesia Dei diceret, ait: Testimonium enim vobis perhibeo, quia, si fieri posset, oculos vestros eruissetis, et dedissetis mihi . Nihil ergo in corpore sublimius oculis et honoratius; et nihil in corpore extremius fortasse, quam digitus minimus pedis. Cum ita sint, expedit tamen in corpore digitum esse, et sanum esse, quam oculum esse, et in perturbatione lippire; sanitas enim, quae communis est omnibus membris, pretiosior est officiis singulorum. Ita vides in Ecclesia hominem parvum aliquod donum habentem, et tamen habentem caritatem; alterum eminentem forte in Ecclesia aliquo maiore dono, et tamen non habentem caritatem. Ille sit extremus digitus, ille sit oculus; ille magis pertinet ad corporis compaginem, qui potuit obtinere sanitatem. Denique molestum est corpori cetero, quidquid aegrotarit in corpore; et datur quidem ab omnibus membris opera, ut sanetur quod aegrotum est, et plerumque sanatur. Si autem sanatum non fuerit, et tantam putredinem conceperit quae sanari non possit, ita consulitur omnibus membris, ut de corporis compage praecidatur.
6. For thus, brothers, we see the individual members acting their own work in their offices, so that the eye sees but does not work; the hand works but does not see; the ear hears but does not see or work; the tongue speaks but does not hear or see; and although they are individually distinguished and separated in their offices, yet bound together by one framework of the body, they have something common in all. The offices are diverse, the health is one. This, then, is in the members of Christ what health is in the members of the body—love. The eye is placed in a better location, on high, and as it were set on a citadel for counsel, whence it may look out, whence see, whence point out; great honor in the eyes, both in location, and in a more ardent sense, and in agility, and in a certain power that the other members do not have. Accordingly men very often swear by their eyes rather than by any other member. No one has said to another: I love you as my ears; and the sense of the ears is next and nearest to the eyes. What shall I say of the rest? Daily men say: I love you as my eyes. And the Apostle, signifying that greater love is held in the eyes than in the other members, when he said that he was loved by the Church of God, said, For I bear you witness, that, if it could be done, you would have plucked out your eyes and given them to me (Gal 4:15). Nothing, then, in the body is loftier than the eyes and more honored; and nothing in the body perhaps more extreme than the smallest toe of the foot. Since these things are so, yet it is more profitable in the body to be a toe, and to be sound, than to be an eye, and in disturbance to be bleary; for health, which is common to all the members, is more precious than the offices of individuals. So you see in the Church a small man having some small gift, and yet having love; another perhaps eminent in the Church by some greater gift, and yet not having love. Let that one be the extreme toe, let that one be the eye; that one belongs more to the framework of the body, who could obtain health. Finally, it is troublesome to the rest of the body, whatever is sick in the body; and effort is indeed given by all the members, that what is sick may be healed, and very often it is healed. But if it is not healed, and conceives so great a rottenness that it cannot be healed, it is taken thought for all the members that it be cut off from the framework of the body.
Sermons5.6
7. Fuerit ergo nescio quis Donatus quasi oculus in corpore, fuerit ita; non scimus qualis fuerit, sed prorsus talis fuerit qualis dicitur; quid illi profuit excellentia honoris et gloriae? Tenere non potuit sanitatem, quia non habuit caritatem. Denique ita isti putrefacti sunt, ut necessario praeciderentur; et quod se habere aliquos dicunt, vermes putredinis sunt; praecisi vermes sunt, nec sanitatem possunt admittere. Etenim tamdiu membrum admittit sanitatem, quamdiu est de corpore non praecisum; de ceteris enim sanis manat sanitas ad vulneris locum; cum autem fuerit praecisum membrum ubi vulnus est, qua et unde ad illud sanitas veniat, non invenitur. Ideo et sarmentis praecisis comparantur, et concurrit cum apostolica lectione evangelica lectio. Et ibi enim Dominus, ut maneamus in illo, non nobis maxime commendavit nisi caritatem: Ego sum, inquit, vitis, vos estis sarmenta, Pater meus est agricola. Sarmentum omne, quod in me dat fructum, purgat illud, ut maius fructum afferat; quod autem in me non dat fructum, praecidet illud . Fructus de ipsa caritate, quia non venit fructus nisi de radice. Dicit autem Apostolus: Ut in caritate radicati et fundati . Ibi est ergo radix, unde omnis fructus exurgit. Qui coepit dissentire a radice, quamvis videatur aliquantum manere, aut praecisus est latenter, aut aperte etiam praecidendus; fructum enim afferre nullo pacto potest. Illi erant aliquando in unitate. Praecisi sunt. Unde praecisi sunt? Ab unitate. Sed vos estis, inquiunt, praecisi. Quid facimus? Ego dico: Vos estis praecisi; vos dicitis: Vos estis praecisi. Iudicet Deus. Distulimus itaque quaestionem, et ad iudicium Dei misimus? Non plane. In multis rebus facimus hoc, ubi nondum apparet sententia Dei; ubi autem apparet, utamur, non differamus. Scripturam profero, et video quis unde praecisus sit. Si enim Scriptura testimonium perhibuit parti Donati, alicui Ecclesiae in terrarum aliqua parte constitutae, sicut in parte Africae constituta est pars Donati, dicant nos praecisos, et dicant se esse radicatos. Si autem Scriptura testimonium non perhibet nisi Ecclesiae toto orbe diffusae, quid quaerimus litis nostrae iudicem hominem? Deum habemus; nondum praesidet in iudicio, iam praesidet in Evangelio.
7. Let some Donatus, then, have been as it were an eye in the body, let it have been so; we do not know what he was, but let him have been wholly such as he is said to be; what did the excellence of his honor and glory profit him? He could not keep health, because he did not have love. Finally, these men are so rotted that they had necessarily to be cut off; and those whom they say they have are worms of rottenness; cut off, they are worms, nor can they admit health. For a member admits health only as long as it is not cut off from the body; for from the other sound parts health flows to the place of the wound; but when the member where the wound is has been cut off, by what way and whence health may come to it is not found. Therefore they are compared to cut-off shoots, and the gospel reading runs together with the apostolic reading. For there too the Lord, that we might abide in him, commended to us most of all nothing but love: I am, he says, the vine, you are the shoots, my Father is the husbandman. Every shoot that bears fruit in me, he prunes it, that it may bear more fruit; but the one that bears no fruit in me, he will cut it off (John 15:1-2.5). Fruit comes from love itself, because fruit comes only from the root. But the Apostle says, That, rooted and grounded in love (Eph 3:17). There, then, is the root, whence all fruit rises. He who has begun to dissent from the root, although he seems to remain a while, has either been cut off secretly, or is even openly to be cut off; for in no way can he bear fruit. They were once in unity. They were cut off. Whence were they cut off? From unity. But you, they say, are cut off. What shall we do? I say: You are cut off; you say: You are cut off. Let God judge. Have we then deferred the question and sent it to the judgment of God? Plainly not. In many matters we do this, where the sentence of God does not yet appear; but where it does appear, let us use it, not defer it. I bring forth Scripture, and I see who is cut off from where. For if Scripture bore witness to the party of Donatus, to some Church established in some part of the world, as the party of Donatus is established in the part of Africa, let them say we are cut off, and let them say they are rooted. But if Scripture bears witness only to the Church spread throughout the whole world, why do we seek a man as judge of our suit? We have God; he does not yet preside in judgment, he already presides in the Gospel.
Sermons5.7
8. Iudicatus est modo Crispinus haereticus. Sed quid ait? Numquid evangelica sententia superatus sum? Inde se asserens victum non esse, quia proconsul contra illum iudicavit, non Christus. Si ergo iudicium hominis parvi pendit, quare a proconsule ad imperatorem appellavit? Ipsius proconsulis iudicium ipse flagitavit; ipse dixit: Audi me, non sum haereticus. Cuius iudicium flagitasti, eius iudicium displicet tibi? Quare? Quia contra te iudicavit. Si pro te iudicaret, bene iudicaret; quia contra te iudicavit, male iudicavit. Antequam iudicaret, bonus iudex erat, cui dixisti: Non sum haereticus, audi me. Sed iudicavit proconsul, inquit, secundum leges imperatorum, non secundum leges Evangelii. Ita fecerit, secundum leges imperatorum proconsul iudicaverit; si ergo male contra te iudicant imperatores, quare a proconsule ad eorum iudicium provocasti? Iam erant leges imperatorum contra te, an nondum erant? Si nondum erant, non secundum ipsas proconsul iudicavit; si iam erant, numquid pro te imperatores contra leges suas iudicaturi sunt? Deinde quaero abs te: Ipsae leges imperatorum quae sunt contra te? Quid factum est? doce me. Manifestum est enim, et non negatur, multas imperatorum leges esse adversus ipsos. Unde hoc contigit? Unde hoc factum est? Nos forte persecuti sumus, et multa mala imperatoribus de vobis diximus? Hoc quidem dicunt his, quos miseros decipiunt imperitos. Causam enim, quemadmodum illo tempore gesta est, penitus occultant eis quos decipere volunt. Sed, quantumlibet occultent, eruitur, patescit, publicatur, in notitiam profertur etiam invitorum et recusantium. Claudentes oculos, ac nolentes lucem videre, ipsa lux feriat. Non eis liceat dissimulare manifesta; non eis liceat averti a patentibus: non eis liceat aperta operire. Urgeamus eos manifesta veritate. Vos imperatoris iudicium flagitastis. Mentimini, inquit. Extant chartae publicae. Ipsi Donatistae de parte Maiorini, qui prior ordinatus est contra Caecilianum, adierunt proconsulem tunc Anulinum, et detulerunt libellos accusatorios de nomine Caeciliani, et in aluta signatos, dicentes se adversus Caecilianum crimina quae illo libello scripsissent, et rogantes ut ipsam accusationem eorum mitteret ad comitatum imperatori. Extat relatio Anulini proconsulis scribentis ad imperatorem Constantinum, quod homines de parte Maiorini venerint ad illum cum libellis de accusatione Caeciliani, rogantes ut eosdem libellos mitteret imperatori; et se dicit fecisse quod illi rogaverunt. Scripsit imperator ad Meltiadem episcopum et Marcum, transferens ad illos causam ecclesiasticam, et removens a se. In eisdem litteris scribit imperator, misisse se chartas missas ab Anulino; et in ipsis litteris ignoratur quae illae chartae sint, sed in relatione Anulini cognoscitur, quae hodie publicis codicibus continetur. Deinde scribit idem Constantinus ad Anulinum, ut partes Romam dirigat ad episcopale iudicium. Refert etiam Anulinus in extremo, misisse se partes. Vos ergo istis ad imperatorem; vos causam Ecclesiae ad humanam potestatem detulistis. Ille melior quam vos: vos enim ad imperatorem deferebatis, ille ad episcopos. Dicta est causa in episcopali iudicio, illis primo accusantibus. Prolata est sententia pro Caeciliano. Illi non contenti iudicio ecclesiastico murmurare coeperunt, rursus eumdem imperatorem adierunt, post episcopale iudicium quaerentes imperiale iudicium. Dedit alterum ecclesiasticum apud Arelatum; ab ipso etiam iudicio illi ad ipsum imperatorem appellaverunt. Victus importunitate eorum, voluit et ipse causam suscipere atque cognoscere. Suscepit, cognovit, Caecilianum innocentissimum iudicavit; et iam omnes iussiones imperatorum contra illos. Quid mirum? Cuius iudicium flagitasti, eius sententiam recusare audes? Quare ad illum voluisti deferre iudicium? Habebas Ecclesiam in Africa; non habebas in toto orbe terrarum? Sed quo ibant, unde se iam ipsi praeciderant? Illi iam in Ecclesia non haerebant; sed imperator ibi haerebat, ad quem iudicium referebatur. Proinde ille mansuetissime episcopos voluit iudicare; et illis postea cessit, ut etiam ipse iudicaret. Inde sunt leges adversus vos; videte si non contra vos. Primo vos ipsi fuistis; vos primi accusatores, vos extremi appellatores, vos novissimi murmuratores. Numquid tamen, inquit, ex Evangelio superatus sum? Ex eo iudicio superatus es, quod tu ipse delegisti.
8. Crispinus the heretic has just now been judged. But what does he say? Surely I was not overcome by a gospel sentence? Thus asserting that he was not conquered, because the proconsul judged against him, not Christ. If, then, he holds the judgment of a man of little account, why did he appeal from the proconsul to the emperor? He himself demanded the judgment of that very proconsul; he himself said: Hear me, I am not a heretic. The one whose judgment you demanded, does his judgment displease you? Why? Because he judged against you. If he judged for you, he would judge well; because he judged against you, he judged badly. Before he judged, he was a good judge, to whom you said: I am not a heretic, hear me. But the proconsul judged, he says, according to the laws of the emperors, not according to the laws of the Gospel. Granted he did so, granted the proconsul judged according to the laws of the emperors; if, then, the emperors judge badly against you, why did you appeal from the proconsul to their judgment? Were the laws of the emperors already against you, or not yet? If not yet, the proconsul did not judge according to them; if they already were, will the emperors judge for you against their own laws? Then I ask you: These laws of the emperors which are against you—what happened? Teach me. For it is manifest, and not denied, that there are many laws of the emperors against them. Whence did this happen? Whence was this done? Did we perhaps persecute, and say many evil things to the emperors about you? This indeed they say to those whom, wretched and unskilled, they deceive. For they utterly conceal the cause, as it was conducted at that time, from those they wish to deceive. But, however much they conceal it, it is dug out, laid open, made public, brought to the knowledge even of the unwilling and the refusing. Closing their eyes, and unwilling to see the light, let the light itself strike them. Let them not be permitted to dissemble manifest things; let them not be permitted to be turned from things open; let them not be permitted to cover the plain. Let us press them with manifest truth. You demanded the emperor's judgment. You lie, he says. The public records exist. The Donatists themselves of the party of Majorinus, who was first ordained against Caecilian, went to the proconsul Anulinus at that time, and delivered accusatory documents in the name of Caecilian, sealed in leather, saying that they had against Caecilian the crimes which they had written in that document, and asking that he send their very accusation to the imperial court, to the emperor. There exists the report of the proconsul Anulinus writing to the emperor Constantine, that men of the party of Majorinus came to him with documents about the accusation of Caecilian, asking that he send those same documents to the emperor; and he says he did what they asked. The emperor wrote to bishop Miltiades and Mark, transferring to them the ecclesiastical case, and removing it from himself. In the same letters the emperor writes that he had sent the documents sent by Anulinus; and in those very letters it is not known what those documents are, but in the report of Anulinus it is learned, which today is contained in the public codices. Then the same Constantine writes to Anulinus, that he direct the parties to Rome for the episcopal judgment. Anulinus too reports at the end that he had sent the parties. You, then, went to those before the emperor; you brought the cause of the Church to a human power. He was better than you: for you brought it to the emperor, he to the bishops. The cause was pleaded in the episcopal judgment, they accusing first. Sentence was given for Caecilian. They, not content with the ecclesiastical judgment, began to murmur, again went to the same emperor, after the episcopal judgment seeking an imperial judgment. He gave another ecclesiastical one at Arles; from that judgment too they appealed to the emperor himself. Overcome by their importunity, he himself too wished to take up the cause and examine it. He took it up, examined it, judged Caecilian most innocent; and now all the orders of the emperors are against them. What wonder? The one whose judgment you demanded, do you dare to refuse his sentence? Why did you wish to bring the judgment to him? Did you have a Church in Africa; did you not have one in the whole world? But where were they going, who had already cut themselves off from it? They no longer cleaved to the Church; but the emperor cleaved to it, to whom the judgment was brought. Accordingly he most gently wished the bishops to judge; and afterward he yielded to them, that he himself too should judge. Hence the laws are against you; see whether they are not against you. First you yourselves were there; you the first accusers, you the last appellants, you the final murmurers. Yet surely, he says, was I overcome from the Gospel? You were overcome by that judgment which you yourself chose.
Sermons5.8
9. Sed non recusamus Evangelii sententiam: plane, etsi non diceret, nos legeremus, nos erueremus, nos ostenderemus. Recitetur Evangelium; videamus ubi esse dicit Ecclesiam Dominus Iesus Christus. Illi certe et aures nostrae et corda patere debent; ipsum audiamus, dicat nobis, Ecclesia ubi sit. Si in Africa esse dixerit Ecclesiam suam, omnes confluamus in partem Donati; si in toto terrarum orbe dixerit Ecclesiam suam, redeant ad corpus membra praecisa; non enim sic fracti sunt rami, ut denuo inseri non possint. Habes apostolum Paulum dicentem: Sed dicis: Fracti sunt rami, ut ego inserar. Bene. Propter incredulitatem fracti sunt; tu autem fide stas. Noli altum sapere, sed time. Nam, si Deus naturalibus ramis non pepercit, neque tibi parcet . Fracti enim erant Iudaei, tamquam rami naturales, et insertae erant gentes, tamquam oleaster in olivam. Ex his insertis ramis, et ex hoc inserto oleastro omnes sumus participes olivae. Sed, sicut minatus erat Apostolus superbientibus ramis oleastri, tales isti facti sunt superbiendo, ut cum illis naturalibus ante amputatis et ipsi superbia praecidi mererentur. Sed quid ait Apostolus? Et illi, inquit, si non permanserint in infidelitate, inserentur ; et tu, si non permanseris in fide, excideris. Nemo ergo in vite superbiat, nemo praeter vitem desperet: si superbis in vite, observa ne praecidaris; si praeter vitem positi sunt, non desperent, audeant inseri. Non enim manu sua inserendi sunt. Ait enim: Potens est Deus iterum inserere illos . Non dicant: Et unde fieri potest, res praecisa, ramus fractus, ut denuo inseratur? Recte dicis fieri non posse, si interroges humanam facultatem, non si interroges divinam maiestatem. Quid enim? Quod iam factum est a Domino, facere potest aliquis agricolarum? Oleastrum tulit, et in olivam inseruit; et oleaster in olivam insertus, non baccas amaras, sed olivam dedit. Facit hoc modo aliquis, inserat oleastrum in olivam; videbit nihil procedere, nisi baccas oleastri. Potens ergo fuit Deus, non olivam in oleastro, sed oleastrum inserere in olivam, et oleastrum facere participem pinguedinis olivae, ut exuta amaritudine pinguedine indueretur; et non erit potens, te praecisum per superbiam inserere per humilitatem? Bene, inquit, hortaris me, sed prius me ostende praecisum; ne forte te ipsum hortari debeas ut ad me venias, non me ut in te inserar. Audeo dicere: Audi me; et tamen timeo dicere: Audi me; timeo enim ne contemnat hominem. Immo hortor ut contemnat hominem; si enim contemneret hominem, non esset de parte Donati; homo enim fuit Donatus. Ergo, si nostra verba dicimus, contemnamur; si Christi verba dicimus, ille audiatur, qui non gratis auditur, et non gratis contemnitur; auditur enim ad praemium, non auditur ad supplicium. Ipsum audiamus: ipse Dominus dicat nobis.
9. But we do not refuse the sentence of the Gospel: plainly, even if he did not say it, we would read it, we would dig it out, we would show it. Let the Gospel be recited; let us see where the Lord Jesus Christ says the Church is. Surely both our ears and our hearts ought to be open to him; let us hear him, let him tell us where the Church is. If he says his Church is in Africa, let us all flow together into the party of Donatus; if he says his Church is in the whole world, let the cut-off members return to the body; for the branches are not so broken that they cannot be grafted in again. You have the apostle Paul saying, But you say: The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in. Well. They were broken off because of unbelief; but you stand by faith. Do not be high-minded, but fear. For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you (Rom 11:19-21). For the Jews were broken off, as natural branches, and the gentiles were grafted in, as a wild olive into the olive. From these grafted branches, and from this grafted wild olive, we all are partakers of the olive. But, just as the Apostle had threatened the proud branches of the wild olive, such these men have become by being proud, that with those natural ones cut off before, they too by pride deserve to be cut off. But what does the Apostle say? And they, he says, if they do not remain in unbelief, will be grafted in (Rom 11:23); and you, if you do not remain in faith, will be cut off. Let no one, then, be proud in the vine, let no one despair apart from the vine: if you are proud in the vine, watch that you not be cut off; if any are placed apart from the vine, let them not despair, let them dare to be grafted in. For they are not to be grafted in by their own hand. For he says, God is able to graft them in again (Rom 11:23). Let them not say: And how can it be done, that a cut-off thing, a broken branch, be grafted in again? You rightly say it cannot be done, if you ask human ability, not if you ask the divine majesty. For what? What has already been done by the Lord, can any of the husbandmen do it? He took a wild olive and grafted it into an olive; and the wild olive grafted into the olive gave not bitter berries, but the olive. Let someone do this: let him graft a wild olive into an olive; he will see nothing come forth but the berries of the wild olive. God, then, was able—not to graft the olive into the wild olive, but to graft the wild olive into the olive, and to make the wild olive a partaker of the fatness of the olive, so that, stripped of its bitterness, it might be clothed with fatness; and will he not be able to graft you, cut off through pride, by humility? You exhort me well, he says, but first show me cut off; lest perhaps you ought to exhort yourself to come to me, not me to be grafted into you. I dare to say: Hear me; and yet I fear to say: Hear me; for I fear lest he despise a man. Rather, I exhort that he despise a man; for if he despised a man, he would not be of the party of Donatus; for Donatus was a man. Therefore, if we speak our own words, let us be despised; if we speak the words of Christ, let him be heard, who is not heard in vain, and not despised in vain; for he is heard unto reward, not heard unto punishment. Let us hear him: let the Lord himself tell us.
Sermons5.9
10. Ecclesiam innumerabilibus locis ostendit; sed tamen commemorem unum aliquod. Post resurrectionem, nostis, fratres, ostendit se discipulis suis, cicatrices demonstravit, palpandum praebuit, non solum videndum. Illi autem tenentes, et palpantes, et agnoscentes, adhuc tamen prae gaudio haesitabant, sicut Evangelium nos docet, cui oportet credere, cui nefas est non credere. Dominus autem adhuc haesitantibus prae gaudio et dubitantibus intulit firmitatem de Scripturis, et ait: Haec dicebam vobis, cum adhuc essem vobiscum, quia oportet impleri omnia quae scripta sunt in Lege et Prophetis et Psalmis de me. Tunc aperuit illis sensum, ut intellegerent Scripturas, et dixit eis: Quia sic oportebat Christum pati, et resurgere tertia die, et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes, incipientibus ab Ierusalem . Ibi tu non es, ibi ego sum. Quid exspectas hominem, qui de te iudicet de tribunali? Audi Christum de Evangelio. Per omnes gentes, inquit, incipientibus ab Ierusalem. Tu ibi es? Communicas omnibus gentibus? Communicas ei Ecclesiae, quae diffusa est per omnes gentes, incipiens ab Ierusalem? Si communicas, ibi es, in vite es, praecisus non es; ipsa est enim vitis, quae crevit et implevit totum orbem terrarum, corpus Christi, Ecclesia Christi, cuius caput in caelo. Si autem non communicas nisi Afris, et de Africa quo potueris clanculo mittis qui consolentur peregrinos, non te invenis in parte remansisse, a toto praecisum esse? Quid dixisti in iudicio proconsulis? Catholicus sum. Vox est ipsius; de Gestis recitatur. Catholicus totum tene; holon enim totum est, et inde appellata est Ecclesia catholica, quia per totum est. Numquid κατὰ μέρος dicta est, et non catholica? Μέρος enim pars est, ὅλον totum est; de graeco verbo dicta est "catholica", secundum totum. Ergo communicas universo? Non, inquit. Ergo in parte es; quomodo catholicus es? Multum interest inter totum et partem, unde accipit nomen catholica. Tu enim accepisti nomen de parte Donati; catholica nomen accepit ab universo orbe terrarum. Sed nos dicimus in universo esse, et Deus forte non dicit? Evangelium commemoravi, ex Evangelio recitavi. Per omnes gentes, inquit, incipientibus ab Ierusalem. Non inde venit ad Africam? Si enim coepit ab Ierusalem, implendo omnia venit ad te, non siccando. Quis est qui dicat: Ductus est rivus de fonte, ut veniret ad me; siccavit in via, et pervenit ad me? Si in via siccavit, ad te qua pervenit? Utique implendo omnia pervenit ad te. Ingrate rive, quare fontem blasphemas? Nisi manaret, non implereris. Sed timeo, ne tu siccaveris; etenim omnis rivus a fonte praecisus siccet necesse est. De siccitate aspera loquuntur adversus Ecclesiam; lenia loquerentur, si rigarentur. Catholicus sum. Quid est: Catholicus? Homo de Numidia? Interrogo saltem Graecos. Non est utique "catholicus" verbum punicum, sed verbum graecum; interpretem quaere. Merito erras in lingua, qui non consentis omnibus linguis.
10. He showed the Church in innumerable places; but yet let me mention some one. After the resurrection, you know, brothers, he showed himself to his disciples, demonstrated his scars, offered himself to be handled, not only to be seen. But they, holding and handling and recognizing, yet still hesitated for joy, as the Gospel teaches us, which it is fitting to believe, which it is wicked not to believe. But the Lord, to those still hesitating for joy and doubting, brought firmness from the Scriptures, and said, These things I said to you, while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which are written in the Law and the Prophets and the Psalms about me. Then he opened their understanding, that they might understand the Scriptures, and said to them: Because so it behooved Christ to suffer, and to rise on the third day, and that repentance and the forgiveness of sins be preached in his name through all nations, beginning from Jerusalem (Luke 24:44-47). There you are not, there I am. Why do you await a man to judge about you from a tribunal? Hear Christ from the Gospel. Through all nations, he says, beginning from Jerusalem. Are you there? Do you commune with all nations? Do you commune with that Church which is spread through all nations, beginning from Jerusalem? If you commune, you are there, you are in the vine, you are not cut off; for that is the vine which grew and filled the whole world, the body of Christ, the Church of Christ, whose head is in heaven. But if you commune only with Africans, and from Africa you secretly send, where you can, men to console pilgrims, do you not find that you have remained in a part, cut off from the whole? What did you say in the proconsul's judgment? I am a Catholic. It is his own voice; it is recited from the Acts. Catholic, hold the whole; for "holon" is "whole," and hence the Church was called Catholic, because it is throughout the whole. Surely it was not called "according to a part," and not Catholic? For "meros" is "part," "holon" is "whole"; from the Greek word it was called "Catholic," "according to the whole." Do you, then, commune with the universal? No, he says. Then you are in a part; how are you a Catholic? There is much difference between the whole and a part, whence "Catholic" takes its name. For you took your name from the party of Donatus; the Catholic took its name from the whole world. But we say it is in the universal, and does God perhaps not say so? I have mentioned the Gospel, I have recited from the Gospel. Through all nations, he says, beginning from Jerusalem. Did it not come from there to Africa? For if it began from Jerusalem, by filling all things it came to you, not by drying up. Who is there who says: A stream was led from a fountain, that it might come to me; it dried up on the way, and reached me? If it dried up on the way, by what way did it reach you? Surely by filling all things it reached you. Ungrateful stream, why do you blaspheme the fountain? Unless it flowed, you would not be filled. But I fear lest you have dried up; for every stream cut off from the fountain must necessarily dry up. From dryness they speak harsh things against the Church; they would speak gentle things, if they were watered. I am a Catholic. What is, "Catholic"? A man from Numidia? I ask at least the Greeks. "Catholic" is surely not a Punic word, but a Greek word; seek an interpreter. You err deservedly in language, you who do not agree with all languages.
Sermons5.10
11. Spiritus quando venit de caelo, et implevit eos qui in Christum crediderant, omnibus linguis locuti sunt; et hoc erat signum illo tempore accepisse Spiritum Sanctum, si quis linguis omnium loqueretur. Numquid modo fidelibus non datur Spiritus Sanctus? Absit ut hoc credamus, alioquin spem non habebimus. Et illi utique fatentur dari fidelibus Spiritum Sanctum; et nos hoc dicimus, hoc credimus, hoc maxime et in sola Ecclesia catholica fieri assentamur. Sed illi sint Catholici, illic datur Spiritus Sanctus; nos simus Catholici, hic datur Spiritus Sanctus; modo quid intersit non quaeramus, qui sint Catholici; manifestum est quia datur Spiritus Sanctus. Quare modo linguis omnium non loquuntur, qui Spiritum Sanctum accipiunt, nisi quia tunc in paucis figurabatur, quod postea in omnibus ostenderetur? Quid enim praenuntiavit Spiritus Sanctus, commovens corda eorum quos tunc impleverat, et docens eos linguas omnes? Vix discit homo duas aut tres, aut per magistros, aut per regiones in quibus versatur aliqua consuetudine; ut multum tres aut quattuor linguas. Omnibus linguis loquebantur, qui impleti a Sancto Spiritu erant; verum et locuti repente, non paulatim discentes. Quid ergo tunc ostendebat Spiritus? Dic mihi, quare modo hoc non facit, nisi quia aliquid significando faciebat? Quid significabat, nisi Evangelium per omnes linguas futurum? Audeo dicere, et modo loquitur Ecclesia omnibus linguis; in omnibus enim linguis clamat Evangelium; et quod modo dicebam de membris, hoc dico et de linguis. Et quomodo dicit oculus: Mihi ambulat pes, sic et pes dicit: Mihi videt oculus; sic et ego dico: Lingua mea est Graeca, lingua mea est Hebraea, lingua mea Syra; omnes enim una fides tenet, omnes enim una caritatis compago concludit. Quod per Dominum demonstratum est, hoc per Prophetas ante praedictum est: In omnem terram exivit sonus eorum, et in fines orbis terrae verba eorum . Ecce quousque crevit Ecclesia, quae appellatur a toto Catholica. Et vide quia omnes linguae ierunt per omnes terras: Non sunt loquelae neque sermones, quorum non audiantur voces eorum .
11. When the Spirit came from heaven and filled those who had believed in Christ, they spoke in all tongues; and this was the sign, at that time, of having received the Holy Spirit, if anyone spoke in the tongues of all. Is the Holy Spirit not now given to the faithful? Far be it that we believe this, otherwise we will have no hope. And they too surely confess that the Holy Spirit is given to the faithful; and we say this, we believe this, we assent that this happens most of all and only in the Catholic Church. But let them be Catholics, there the Holy Spirit is given; let us be Catholics, here the Holy Spirit is given; now let us not ask what difference there is, who are Catholics; it is manifest that the Holy Spirit is given. Why do those who receive the Holy Spirit not now speak in the tongues of all, except because then in a few was figured what would afterward be shown in all? For what did the Holy Spirit foretell, moving the hearts of those whom it then filled, and teaching them all tongues? Scarcely does a man learn two or three, either through teachers, or through the regions in which he dwells, by some habit; at most three or four tongues. They spoke in all tongues, who were filled with the Holy Spirit; and indeed they spoke suddenly, not learning them gradually. What, then, did the Spirit then show? Tell me, why does it not now do this, except because by signifying something it did it? What did it signify, but that the Gospel would be in all tongues? I dare to say, the Church too now speaks in all tongues; for in all tongues it cries out the Gospel; and what I was just now saying about the members, this I say of the tongues too. And just as the eye says: The foot walks for me, so the foot too says: The eye sees for me; so I too say: My tongue is Greek, my tongue is Hebrew, my tongue is Syriac; for one faith holds all, for one framework of love encloses all. What was demonstrated through the Lord, this was foretold before through the Prophets: Their sound went out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world (Ps 19:4 (18:5); Rom 10:18). Behold how far the Church has grown, which is called Catholic from the whole. And see that all tongues went through all lands: There are no speeches nor words whose voices are not heard (Ps 19:3 (18:4)).
Sermons5.11
12. Hanc ergo Ecclesiam teneo, tu illam non tenes; si ergo praecisus es, agnosce unde praecisus es. Redi, et inserere, ne arescas, et in ignem mittaris. Loquuntur Prophetae, loquuntur Apostoli, loquitur Dominus de Ecclesia toto orbe diffusa: contra te dicunt omnes isti sententiam. A proconsule ad imperiale iudicium: ab Evangelio, quo? An forte ad Donatum? Donatus iudicabit contra Christum, an Donatum iudicat Christus? Quid tibi dicturus est Donatus? Ego Christum meum praedicavi de Africa. Quid dicturus? An: Me pro Christo opposui, et ego Christo successi? Hoc restat ut dicat, quia a corpore praecidere ausus est homines, quia Christo successit. Ecce Christi sententia, ecce Evangelia. Per omnes gentes, inquit, incipiens ab Ierusalem . Coepit ab Ierusalem: ibi venit Spiritus Sanctus; ibi erant Apostoli, quando in illos supervenit; inde coepit Evangelium praedicari, inde diffundi per omnes gentes, inde postea venit in Africam. Quo postea venit, ipsos deseruit? Immo non deseruit, si nolint. Nam et nos Afri sumus; utique Evangelium, quod venit in Africam, manet hic in catholicis Afris, quomodo in omnibus gentibus manet. Nam et per omnes gentes sunt haeretici, alii ibi, alii hic; et non sunt noti Afri, qui sunt in illis gentibus. De vite praecisi sunt. Catholica enim novit omnes; ipsi se non noverunt. Etenim vitis, unde sarmenta praecisa sunt, novit omnia sarmenta, et quae in se manent, et quae de se praecisa sunt. Etenim ubique diffusa est Ecclesia catholica. Illa sarmenta, ubi praecisa sunt, ibi remanserunt; ad alias partes et alias partes pervenire non potuerunt. Illa autem ubique diffusa, ubique tenet suos, ubique plangit praecisos; clamat ad omnes, ut revertantur et inserantur. Clamor eius non auditur, sed tamen ubera caritatis manare exhortatione non quiescunt. Sollicita est pro praecisis; clamat in Africa ad Donatistas, clamat in Oriente adversus Arianos, adversus Fotinianos, adversus alios atque alios. Quia enim ubique diffusa est, ubique invenit, contra quos clamet; quia in illa erant, et de illa praecisa sunt. Sarmenta coeperunt infructuosa esse, et praecisa sunt; si non permaneant in infidelitate, rursus inserentur. Haec audite, fratres, cum timore, ne superbiatis; cum caritate, ut etiam pro illis oretis. Conversi ad Dominum.
12. This Church, then, I hold, you do not hold it; if, therefore, you are cut off, acknowledge whence you are cut off. Return, and be grafted in, lest you wither and be cast into the fire. The Prophets speak, the Apostles speak, the Lord speaks of the Church spread throughout the whole world: against you all these pronounce sentence. From the proconsul to the imperial judgment: from the Gospel, to where? Or perhaps to Donatus? Will Donatus judge against Christ, or does Christ judge Donatus? What will Donatus say to you? I preached my Christ from Africa. What will he say? Or: I set myself in Christ's place, and I succeeded Christ? It remains for him to say this, because he dared to cut men off from the body, because he succeeded Christ. Behold the sentence of Christ, behold the Gospels. Through all nations, he says, beginning from Jerusalem. It began from Jerusalem: there the Holy Spirit came; there the apostles were, when it came upon them; thence the Gospel began to be preached, thence to be spread through all nations, thence afterward it came to Africa. To where it came afterward, did it forsake them? Rather it did not forsake, if they are not unwilling. For we too are Africans; surely the Gospel which came to Africa remains here among Catholic Africans, just as it remains among all nations. For through all nations too there are heretics, some there, some here; and the Africans who are among those nations are not known. They were cut off from the vine. For the Catholic Church knows all; they themselves do not know themselves. For the vine, from which the shoots are cut off, knows all the shoots, both those that remain in it and those that are cut off from it. For the Catholic Church is spread everywhere. Those shoots, where they were cut off, there they remained; they could not reach other parts and still other parts. But that Church, spread everywhere, everywhere holds its own, everywhere laments the cut-off; it cries to all, that they return and be grafted in. Its cry is not heard, but yet the breasts of love do not cease to flow with exhortation. It is anxious for the cut-off; it cries in Africa to the Donatists, it cries in the East against the Arians, against the Photinians, against others and still others. For because it is spread everywhere, everywhere it finds those against whom to cry; because they were in it, and were cut off from it. The shoots began to be fruitless, and were cut off; if they do not remain in unbelief, they will again be grafted in. Hear these things, brothers, with fear, that you not be proud; with love, that you may even pray for them. Let us turn to the Lord.
Sermons5.12
SERMO 162/B
Sermon 162/B
Sermons5.12
1. Apostolum audivimus nobis dicentem: Legatione fungimur pro Christo, exhortantes reconciliari Deo . Non exhortaretur ut reconciliaremur, nisi inimici fuissemus. Ergo erat totus mundus inimicus Salvatori, amicus captivatori; hoc est, inimicus Deo et amicus diabolo. Et totum genus humanum, tamquam ista mulier, curvatum erat ad terram. Iam intellegens quidam inimicos istos, clamat adversus eos, et dicit Deo: Curvaverunt animam meam . Diabolus et angeli eius animas hominum ad terras curvaverunt, id est, ut pronae in ea quae temporalia et terrena sunt, superna non quaererent. Nam utique hoc dicit Dominus de muliere ista, quam alligaverat satanas ecce decem et octo annis; et iam oportebat eam solvi a vinculo suo die sabbati. Calumniabantur autem erigenti. Qui, nisi " curvi " ? Quandoquidem et ipsa quae Deus praeceperat non intellegentes, terreno corde intuebantur. Sacramentum enim Baptismi carnaliter celebrabant, spiritaliter non videbant.
1. We have heard the Apostle saying to us, We perform an embassy for Christ, exhorting you to be reconciled to God (2 Cor 5:20). He would not exhort us to be reconciled, unless we had been enemies. Therefore the whole world was an enemy to the Savior, a friend to the one who took it captive; that is, an enemy to God and a friend to the devil. And the whole human race, like that woman, was bent down to the earth. Now one who understands these enemies cries out against them and says to God, They have bent down my soul (Ps 57:6 (56:7)). The devil and his angels bent down the souls of men to the earth—that is, that, prone to the things that are temporal and earthly, they should not seek the things above. For surely the Lord says this of that woman, whom Satan had bound, behold, for eighteen years; and it was now fitting that she be loosed from her bond on the sabbath day. But they slandered him who raised her up. Who, but the "bent ones"? Since even the very things which God had commanded they regarded, not understanding, with an earthly heart. For they celebrated the sacrament of Baptism carnally, they did not see it spiritually.
Sermons5.1
SERMO 162/C
Sermon 162/C
Sermons5.1
1. Scimus, fratres, et certa caritate confidimus congratulari vos nobis, quando iustitiam videtis in nobis. Consequens est enim ut, quando sancti Dei iustos sacerdotes vident, gaudeant de pastoribus suis et vicissim eos laetificent moribus suis. Hoc et modo Domino Deo nostro, una voce et uno corde, cantavimus: Sacerdotes tui induantur iustitiam, et sancti tui exsultatione exsultabunt ; videntes eos indutos esse iustitiam, vero gaudio et omnino integra dilectione, nulla adulatione, gaudebunt. Ut ergo exsultatione exsultetis, sancti Dei, iustitiam oportet induamus vobisque ad omne opus bonum exemplum praebeamus. Sed qui gaudere vultis de nobis, orate pro nobis . Induenda est enim iustitia, sicut cantavimus. Et quis dat hanc vestem, nisi qui post errorem et perditionem minori filio protulit stolam primam ? Eo ipso quippe quod iustitia velut indumentum commendatur, hoc significavit quia non eam habemus ex nobis ...
1. We know, brothers, and with sure love we are confident that you congratulate us when you see righteousness in us. For it is consequent that, when the holy ones of God see just priests, they rejoice in their shepherds and in turn gladden them by their own morals. This too we have just now sung to the Lord our God, with one voice and one heart: Let your priests be clothed with righteousness, and let your holy ones exult with exultation (Ps 132:9 (131:9)); seeing them clothed with righteousness, with true joy and wholly entire love, with no flattery, they will rejoice. That you may exult with exultation, then, you holy ones of God, we must be clothed with righteousness and offer you an example unto every good work. But you who wish to rejoice in us, pray for us. For righteousness must be put on, as we sang. And who gives this garment, but he who, after error and ruin, brought forth the first robe for the younger son (See Luke 15:22)? For by the very fact that righteousness is commended as a kind of garment, he signified this: that we do not have it from ourselves . . .
Sermons5.1
2. (folio lacerato, textus deest, cuius fragmentum parvum a Beda servatum est) Oportet ergo episcopum irreprehensibilem esse . Quis hoc negat? Sed cum oporteat episcopum irreprehensibilem esse, numquid reprehensibilem decet esse christianum? " Episcopus " nomen graecum est, latine vero " superintentor " vel " visitator " dici potest. Nos episcopi sumus, sed vobiscum christiani sumus. Nos proprie vocamur a visitatione, communiter omnes ab unctione. Si unctio communis est, et lucta communis est. Quare autem nos visitamus, si nihil boni est quod in vobis videamus?
2. (the leaf being torn, the text is missing, of which a small fragment was preserved by Bede) A bishop, then, must be irreproachable (1 Tim 3:2). Who denies this? But since a bishop must be irreproachable, does it become a Christian to be reproachable? "Bishop" is a Greek name, but in Latin it can be called "overseer" or "visitor." We are bishops, but with you we are Christians. We are properly called from the visitation, in common all from the anointing. If the anointing is common, the struggle too is common. But why do we visit, if there is nothing good that we may see in you?
Sermons5.2
3. ... inveniatur. Si hoc vellemus, si hoc praecipiti lapsu et temeritate auderemus, certe ab hodierna lectione terreremur. Omnes enim audivimus cum apostoli Pauli ad Galatas epistula legeretur: Cum venisset Petrus Antiochiam, in facie illi restiti, quia reprehensibilis erat . Petrus reprehensibilis erat, et ego me audebo sine ulla omnino reprehensione profiteri? Ego, infirma ovis, hunc gurgitem non pertimescam, cum siccantem vellera arietem videam ? Ipse se ex hoc gurgite fortiter erexit; ego si incidero, quis me invenit? Vitabo ergo tumorem huius undae, non me immittam, non me praecipitabo, etiam si omnino mihi essem conscius nihil in me inveniri ab hominibus posse, quo reprehendar. Aliud sunt oculi Dei, aliud sunt illius oculi, cui veraciter dictum est: Non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens . Et tamen Petrus, sicut modo cum legeretur audivimus, etiam ab hominibus reprehensus erat. Unde et ab hac temeritate omnino esse debet animus christianus alienus, ne audeat vitam huiusmodi profiteri, in qua nec homines inveniant quod possint reprehendere. Reprehendat et homo, si est quod reprehendat; prorsus reprehendat; si male accepero, bis reprehendat. Egit enim Petrus ut semel reprehenderetur, cum ab eo reprehensor aequo animo ferretur; exemplum non praebuit, sicut Christus, omnimodae perfectionis, sed totius praebuit exemplum humilitatis. Accepit aequo animo reprehendentem, in apostolatu non praecedentem, sed subsequentem. Det Paulus apostolus veniam: quod fecit, facile est; quod Petrus fecit, difficile est. In rebus humanis vivimus, cottidianis experimentis circumdamur: saepe vidi hominem reprehendentem, nescio utrum aliquando viderim reprehensorem aequo animo sustinentem. Paulus ergo sincerius, sed Petrus mirabilius. Nescio autem utrum etiam sincerius sit alienam culpam cognoscere, quam suam libenter agnoscere.
3. . . . be found. If we wished this, if by a headlong fall and rashness we dared this, surely we would be terrified by today's reading. For we all heard, when the epistle of the apostle Paul to the Galatians was read, When Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was reproachable (Gal 2:11). Peter was reproachable, and shall I dare to profess myself without any reproach at all? Shall I, a weak sheep, not be afraid of this whirlpool, when I see the ram that dries the fleeces in peril? He himself raised himself strongly from this whirlpool; if I fall in, who will find me? I will avoid, then, the swelling of this wave, I will not throw myself in, I will not hurl myself down, even if I were wholly conscious that nothing could be found in me by men for which I might be reproached. The eyes of God are one thing, the eyes of that one another, to whom it was truly said, No living thing will be justified in your sight (Ps 143:2 (142:2)). And yet Peter, as we just now heard when it was read, was reproached even by men. Hence the Christian mind ought to be wholly foreign to this rashness, lest it dare to profess a life of such a kind in which not even men may find what they can reproach. Let even a man reproach, if there is something to reproach; let him plainly reproach; if I take it badly, let him reproach twice. For Peter brought it about that he was reproached once, when the reproacher was borne by him with an even mind; he did not give an example, as Christ did, of every kind of perfection, but he gave an example of complete humility. He took with an even mind the one reproaching him—not preceding, but following him in the apostolate. Let the apostle Paul grant pardon: what he did is easy; what Peter did is difficult. We live among human affairs, we are surrounded by daily experiences: I have often seen a man reproaching, I do not know whether I have ever seen one bearing a reproacher with an even mind. Paul, then, more sincerely, but Peter more wonderfully. But I do not know whether it is even more sincere to know another's fault than gladly to acknowledge one's own.
Sermons5.3
4. Sed movet quosdam quod reprehensus dicitur Petrus, movet et disputant; sed contemnendi non sunt, si non eos movet sua praesumptio, sed Petri dilectio. Nolunt credere vere reprehensum; simulatum hoc putant, ad oculos hominum adumbratum. " Intus, inquiunt, aliud agebatur, aliud populo ostendebatur ". O homo, tu times unius culpam: non vis ut ego timeam amborum fallaciam? Amore Petri non credis reprehensum. Tu reprehensum non credis amore Petri, ego reprehensum credo amore Pauli et Petri. Nolo de apostolis credere quod aliud intus agebant, aliud populo praetendebant. Episcopi sumus, vestigia illorum pro viribus nostris sequimur: nolo nobis liceat fallere vos. Si aliud intus agitur, aliud populo praetenditur, quae sanctitas non timetur? Nec vos fallere volumus nec falli a vobis. Si enim putaveritis quod fallamus vos et nos putaverimus quod fallatis nos, ubi caritas quae omnia credit? Caritas, inquit, omnia credit . Ut habeatur, credit, non ut decipiatur.
4. But it troubles some that Peter is said to have been reproached; it troubles them and they dispute; but they are not to be despised, if it is not their own presumption that troubles them, but love of Peter. They are unwilling to believe that he was truly reproached; they think this was simulated, shadowed forth before the eyes of men. "Within," they say, "one thing was being done, another was being shown to the people." O man, you fear the fault of one: do you not wish me to fear the deceit of both? Out of love of Peter you do not believe him reproached. You do not believe him reproached out of love of Peter; I believe him reproached out of love of Paul and Peter. I do not wish to believe of the apostles that they did one thing within and held forth another to the people. We are bishops, we follow their footsteps as far as our strength allows: I do not wish it to be permitted us to deceive you. If one thing is done within, another is held forth to the people, what holiness is not to be feared? We neither wish to deceive you nor to be deceived by you. For if you think that we deceive you, and we think that you deceive us, where is the love that believes all things? Love, he says, believes all things (1 Cor 13:7). It believes that it may be kept, not that it may be deceived.
Sermons5.4
5. " Sed responde: Quid Paulus reprehendit in Petro? ". Quid nisi quod ipse dixit, ipse scripsit? Ipse epistulam ad memoriam condidit, ipse ad legendum in Ecclesiam posteris propagavit. Quid in libris divinis securius credo, si quod in illa epistula scriptum est non credo? Apostolica epistula est, canonica epistula est, Pauli epistula est, qui plus omnibus illis laboravit, non ipse autem, sed gratia Dei cum illo . Ergo gratiae Dei epistula est. Et si recolamus quis in illo loquebatur, Christi epistula est. An vultis, inquit, experimentum eius accipere, qui in me loquitur Christus? Audi et time. Experimentum ait, non figmentum. Si autem hoc parum putas, audi ipsum praedicatorem, etiam Dei obtestatorem. Illud quod insinuabat narrare sic coepit, quasi praevidens quosdam disputatores futuros: Quae autem scribo, inquit, vobis, ecce coram Deo quia non mentior . Ergone Deum sic attestans mentitur, cum [te] sine Dei testificatione: Os, inquit, quod mentitur, occidet non corpus, sed animam ? Rogo te: noli sic amare Petrum, ut occidas Paulum; rogo te: non occidatur in anima Paulus pro Petro, simul occisi sunt in carne pro Christo. Et iterum interrogas et dicis mihi: " Quid reprehendit Paulus in Petro? ". Iterum tibi respondeo: Hoc reprehendit Paulus in Petro quod dixit et scripsit. Sub attestatione Dei narravit se reprehendisse Paulus in Petro: quid a me quaeris? Epistula omnibus legitur: recole mecum. Cum venisset, inquit, Petrus Antiochiam, in facie illi restiti, quia reprehensibilis erat. Prius enim quam venissent fratres a Iacobo, cum gentibus convescebatur. Cum autem venissent, subtrahebat se, timens eos qui ex circumcisione erant, et simulate consenserunt illi etiam ceteri Iudaei, ita ut et Barnabas adduceretur in eorum simulatione . Ecce audisti, quid reprehendit Paulus in Petro. Exponamus, et hoc faciam adiuvante Domino, ut intellegas. Faciam enim non propter te, sed propter eos qui audiunt et me et te.
5. "But answer: What did Paul reproach in Peter?" What but what he himself said, he himself wrote? He himself committed the epistle to memory, he himself propagated it to posterity to be read in the Church. What do I believe more securely in the divine books, if I do not believe what is written in that epistle? It is an apostolic epistle, it is a canonical epistle, it is Paul's epistle, who labored more than all of them—yet not he, but the grace of God with him (See 1 Cor 15:10). Therefore it is an epistle of the grace of God. And if we recall who spoke in him, it is an epistle of Christ. Or do you wish, he says, to receive proof of him who speaks in me, Christ (2 Cor 13:3)? Hear and fear. Proof, he says, not a figment. But if you think this too little, hear the very preacher, even the witness-caller to God. What he was intimating he began thus to relate, as though foreseeing that there would be certain disputers: But what I write, he says, to you, behold, before God I do not lie (Gal 1:20). Does he, then, so calling God to witness, lie, when [you] without God's witnessing—the mouth, he says, that lies kills, not the body, but the soul (Wis 1:11)? I beg you: do not so love Peter that you kill Paul; I beg you: let not Paul be killed in soul for Peter's sake—they were together killed in the flesh for Christ's sake. And again you ask and say to me: "What did Paul reproach in Peter?" Again I answer you: This Paul reproached in Peter, what he said and wrote. Under the witness-calling of God Paul related that he had reproached Peter: what do you ask of me? The epistle is read to all: recall it with me. When Peter had come, he says, to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was reproachable. For before certain came from James, he ate with the gentiles. But when they had come, he withdrew himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision, and the rest of the Jews too feignedly consented to him, so that even Barnabas was led into their pretense (Gal 2:11-13). Behold, you have heard what Paul reproached in Peter. Let us expound it, and I will do this with the Lord's help, that you may understand. For I will do it not on your account, but on account of those who hear both me and you.
Sermons5.5
6. Sacramenta Iudaeorum: circumcisio scilicet, vacatio sabbati, devitatio quorundam ciborum et cetera huiusmodi, divinitus data sunt, in lege scripta sunt, a Deo praecepta sunt in figura temporum futurorum. Non erant ista sicut abominanda sacrilegia gentilium, non erant ista sicut sacrificia daemoniorum, non erat hoc quasi cultus idolorum. Deus hoc per Moysen praeceperat populo suo, Deus unus, Deus verus, Deus ille qui dixit: Ego sum qui sum . Sed posteaquam venit plenitudo temporis, misit Deus Filium suum, factum ex muliere, factum sub lege , nam et circumcisus est . Ex muliere autem virgine, consuetudine quippe locutionis hebraicae: nisi et virgo mulier vocaretur, non prius Eva in muliere formaretur . Postquam ergo in plenitudine temporis misit Deus Filium suum, factum ex muliere per quem fecit mulierem, factum sub lege per quem dedit legem, ut eos qui erant sub lege redimeret, ut adoptionem filiorum reciperemus , coeperunt umbrae non esse necessariae luce veniente; non tamen quia non erant necessariae, ideo iam erant, velut gentilium sacrilegia, sacra damnanda. Non sic dicendum erat Iudaeo: " Noli circumcidere, quia in Christum credidisti ", sicut dicendum erat pagano facto christiano: " Noli sacrificare idolis, quia in Christum credidisti ". Etenim si duo constituas: sacrificium paganorum et sacramentum Iudaeorum, horum unum numquam fuit necessarium, semper perniciosum; alterum vero aliquando necessarium, postea non necessarium, sed his qui tunc receperunt Evangelium ex Iudaeis nondum perniciosum. Cum ergo et illa Iudaeorum sacramenta iam post adventum Christi necessaria non essent, sed per haec praenuntiatus esset per quem necessaria non essent, cum honore fuerant finienda, non cum horrore respuenda. Quae cum ita essent, Paulus apostolus, qui praecipue fuerat ad praedicandum evangelium missus gentibus , praecipua voti cura gerere debuit, ne sacramentis Iudaeorum impediretur salus gentium. Hoc ergo Christo in se loquente , hoc Deo in se spirante et revelante, decrevit illo in tempore, in novitate Evangelii, ab his sacramentis nullum tunc prohibere Iudaeorum, ad haec sacramenta nullum cogere gentium. Sic [in] illa tamquam paterna funera cito abolenda, iam quasi corpora sine prophetiae anima tamquam ad sepulcrum cum obsequio deducenda, et ea tamen, quia insueta erant et mortua, nequaquam gentilibus umeris iudicavit imponenda.
6. The sacraments of the Jews—namely, circumcision, the resting on the sabbath, the avoidance of certain foods, and other such things—were given by God, written in the law, commanded by God as a figure of times to come. These were not like the abominable sacrileges of the gentiles, these were not like the sacrifices of demons, this was not as the worship of idols. God had commanded this through Moses to his people—the one God, the true God, that God who said, I am who am (Exod 3:14). But after the fullness of time came, God sent his Son, made of a woman, made under the law (Gal 4:4); for he too was circumcised (See Luke 2:21). But of a woman, a virgin—for by the custom of Hebrew speech, unless even a virgin were called a woman, Eve would not first be formed into a woman (See Gen 2:22-23). After, then, in the fullness of time God sent his Son, made of a woman—through whom he made the woman—made under the law—through whom he gave the law—that he might redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons (Gal 4:4-5)—the shadows began to be unnecessary, the light having come; yet not because they were unnecessary were they now sacred things to be condemned, like the sacrileges of the gentiles. It was not to be said to a Jew, "Do not circumcise, because you have believed in Christ," as it was to be said to a pagan made a Christian, "Do not sacrifice to idols, because you have believed in Christ." For if you set up two things—the sacrifice of the pagans and the sacrament of the Jews—of these one was never necessary, always pernicious; but the other was at one time necessary, afterward not necessary, but for those who then received the Gospel from the Jews not yet pernicious. Since, then, even those sacraments of the Jews were after the coming of Christ no longer necessary, but through them had been foretold the one through whom they would be unnecessary, they were to be ended with honor, not rejected with horror. Since these things were so, the apostle Paul, who had been especially sent to preach the gospel to the gentiles (See Gal 2:8-9), ought to take especial care, by his vow, that the salvation of the gentiles not be hindered by the sacraments of the Jews. Therefore, Christ speaking in him (See 2 Cor 13:3), God breathing and revealing in him, he decreed at that time, in the newness of the Gospel, to forbid no Jew then from these sacraments, to compel no gentile to these sacraments. Thus he judged those things—as it were paternal funerals soon to be abolished, now as it were bodies without the soul of prophecy, to be led with respect as it were to the tomb—and yet, because they were unaccustomed and dead, by no means to be imposed on gentile shoulders.
Sermons5.6
7. Quod ergo tunc in illis sacramentis peccatum fuit, unde Petrus reprehenderetur, intendite, et adiuvate vires nostras tantae moli quaestionis, quae tunc ipsos exagitavit apostolos, rumpendae atque solvendae fortasse minus idoneas, sed adiuvate nos: obsecro vos. Multa quidem iam audistis, sed tamquam novi audite quod plus vultis audire, et ego stans loquor vobis et infirmor. Certe cum vobis velut proposita sit de novo quaestio, ad hoc videtur pertinere nostra narratio. Nam modo iam qui paulo ante me interrogabat, antequam per narrationem exponerem quod volebam, quid Paulus in Petro reprehenderit, ex narratione mea cautior effectus, hoc dicit: " Si tempore illo et illis qui venerant <ex> Iudaeis non imponebatur abstinentia a talibus sacramentis et gentibus non imponebatur talium observatio sacramentorum, Petrus qui talia agebat ex Iudaeis veniebat, quomodo eum Paulus recte reprehendebat? ". Dico, fratres, quod ipsa verba indicant. Non hoc Paulus reprehendebat in Petro quia iudaica sacramenta observabat, sed quia ea gentibus imponebat. Iudaeus enim qui tunc credebat in Christum, si vellet illa observare, non prohibebatur; si nollet, non cogebatur. De gentibus autem quicumque crediderat, quando vellet circumcidi, cum audiret hoc non esse necessarium saluti? Forte vix ipsi Iudaei circumciderentur, nisi hoc parvuli paterentur. Quid autem erat gentes cogere ad observanda ista sacramenta , ubi diximus Petrum a Paulo esse reprehensum, forsitan si quis quaerat, quid erat ipsum cogere? Tenebantur inviti, ligabantur et circumcidebantur? Absit! Ergo quid erat cogere, quid putamus, nisi dicere illis: " Salvi esse non poteritis, nisi illa legitima praecepta, sicut Iudaei, observaveritis "? Hac enim proposita conditione, quia illi quaerebant salutem et dicebatur eis quod aliter ad salutem pervenire non possent, ad illa observanda sacramenta cogebantur inviti, non quia haec amabant, sed quia salutem desiderabant.
7. What sin, then, was there at that time in those sacraments, for which Peter was reproached, attend, and help our strength to break and resolve so great a mass of a question, which then agitated the apostles themselves—for which we are perhaps less fit—but help us: I beseech you. You have indeed heard many things, but as though new hear what you more wish to hear, and I, standing, speak to you and grow weak. Surely, since the question is as it were set before you anew, to this our narrative seems to pertain. For now the one who a little before was questioning me, before I expounded by narrative what I wished—what Paul reproached in Peter—made more cautious by my narrative, says this: "If at that time abstinence from such sacraments was not imposed on those who had come from among the Jews, and the observance of such sacraments was not imposed on the gentiles, Peter, who did such things, came from among the Jews; how did Paul rightly reproach him?" I say, brothers, what the very words indicate. Paul was not reproaching this in Peter, that he observed the Jewish sacraments, but that he imposed them on the gentiles. For a Jew who then believed in Christ, if he wished to observe them, was not forbidden; if he did not wish, he was not compelled. But of the gentiles, whoever had believed, when would he wish to be circumcised, when he heard that this was not necessary to salvation? Perhaps the Jews themselves would scarcely be circumcised, unless infants suffered this. But what was it to compel the gentiles to observe these sacraments, in which we said Peter was reproached by Paul—perhaps if anyone asks, what was the very compelling? Were they held unwilling, bound and circumcised? Far from it! What, then, was it to compel, what do we suppose, but to say to them: "You will not be able to be saved, unless you observe those legal precepts, as the Jews do"? For with this condition set forth, because they were seeking salvation and it was said to them that they could not otherwise reach salvation, they were compelled unwilling to observe those sacraments—not because they loved these, but because they desired salvation.
Sermons5.7
8. Moderatio ergo illa, ut neque Iudaei prohiberentur neque gentes cogerentur, servata est ab apostolis et decreta concilio. Cum enim haec quaestio multos exagitaret, multos perturbaret, conventum est ad Hierosolymam, congregatisque omnibus apostolis atque senioribus Ecclesiae, hoc est presbyteris et quibusque praedicatoribus Evangelii et praepositis Ecclesiarum, communi concilio, inspirante utique Domino, constitutum est ut neque Iudaei ab istis prohiberentur, neque ad ista gentes cogerentur . Hoc in Actibus apostolorum scriptum esse multi recolunt; legant qui non recolunt. Modus ergo iste erat temperatissimus, religiosissimus, cautissimus. Si illa iuberent continuo sic respui, quemadmodum idolorum sacrificia, non crederetur verus Deus esse qui illa praeceperat. Hoc ergo Paulus reprehendit in Petro, non quia haec ipse servaret, sed quod ad ea gentes compelleret. Quomodo compelleret? Consentiendo eis, quamvis simulate, qui dicebant aliter gentes salvas non esse, nisi iudaica sacramenta servarent. Etiam hoc scriptum est in Actibus apostolorum, in eodem libro narratur: Venerunt, inquit, Antiochiam quidam ab Iacobo, id est ab Hierosolymis, Iudaei scilicet, qui iam in Christum crediderant, et dicebant fratribus ex gentibus qui veniebant: " Non potestis aliter salvi fieri, nisi legitima praecepta servaveritis " . Hoc est cogere: dicere aliter eos salvos esse non posse.
8. That moderation, then—that neither the Jews be forbidden nor the gentiles compelled—was kept by the apostles and decreed by a council. For when this question agitated many, troubled many, they assembled at Jerusalem, and with all the apostles and elders of the Church gathered—that is, the presbyters and all the preachers of the Gospel and the heads of the churches—by common council, the Lord surely inspiring, it was established that neither the Jews be forbidden from these things, nor the gentiles compelled to these things (See Acts 15:1-29). That this is written in the Acts of the apostles, many recall; let those who do not recall it read it. That measure, then, was most temperate, most religious, most cautious. If they commanded those things to be at once rejected, just like the sacrifices of idols, the true God who had commanded them would not be believed to be God. This, then, Paul reproached in Peter, not because he himself observed these things, but because he was driving the gentiles to them. How was he driving them? By consenting, though feignedly, to those who said that the gentiles were not otherwise saved unless they observed the Jewish sacraments. This too is written in the Acts of the apostles, it is related in the same book: There came, it says, to Antioch certain from James—that is, from Jerusalem—Jews, namely, who had now believed in Christ, and they said to the brothers from the gentiles who came: "You cannot otherwise be saved, unless you observe the legal precepts" (See Acts 15:1). This is to compel: to say that they cannot otherwise be saved.
Sermons5.8
9. Contra hoc Paulus apostolus zelo ardentissimo militabat. Istud horrendae pressurae saxum, ut gentes miserae aliquando resurgerent tamquam de sepulcro Lazari , removebat. Nam si istam observationem reprehenderet, non coactionem, etiam seipsum reprehenderet. Nam et ipse suscepit ea et quaedam Hierosolymis sacramenta iudaica cum Iudaeis celebravit in templo; sed tamquam ex Iudaeis veniens haec observabat, non ad ea gentes cogebat. Ex Iudaeis veniens Paulus, evangelista gentium, consilii sancti apostolorum et decretor et impletor, quid sancto Spiritui in tali quaestione placuerit, quid decreverit atque statuerit, suo exemplo potius ostendebat. Nam Iacobus illi ait constituto iam Hierosolymis: " Multi, inquit, putant te adversari legitimis paternis et hostem atque inimicum esse legis. Quid ergo est? Audi me. Sunt hic quidam qui purificationem venerunt suscipere: purificare cum eis ut omnes sciant " -non dictum est " ut omnes putent ": devotio enim praecipiebatur, non simulatio suggerebatur -, " ut omnes, inquit, sciant te aemulatorem esse legis et paternarum observationum ". Hoc fecit Paulus tamquam Iudaeus ex Iudaeis, non tamen ut ex ipsis sacramentis iustificaretur, sed ne illa damnare putaretur.
9. Against this the apostle Paul warred with most ardent zeal. That stone of dreadful pressure he was removing, that the wretched gentiles might at some time rise again as if from the tomb of Lazarus (See John 11:38-44). For if he reproached this observance, not the compulsion, he would even reproach himself. For he himself too took these things up and celebrated certain Jewish sacraments with the Jews in the temple at Jerusalem; but, as one coming from among the Jews, he observed these things; he did not compel the gentiles to them. Paul, coming from among the Jews, the evangelist of the gentiles, both the decreer and the fulfiller of the holy counsel of the apostles, showed rather by his own example what had pleased the Holy Spirit in such a question, what it had decreed and established. For James said to him, now established at Jerusalem: "Many," he says, "think that you are opposed to the legal precepts of the fathers and are a foe and enemy of the law. What, then, is it? Hear me. There are here certain who have come to take up purification: be purified with them, that all may know"—it was not said, "that all may suppose": for devotion was commanded, not pretense suggested—"that all," he says, "may know that you are a zealot of the law and of the observances of the fathers" (See Acts 21:20-24). This Paul did as a Jew from among the Jews, yet not that he might be justified by those sacraments, but that he might not be thought to condemn them.
Sermons5.9
10. Ergo et fecit hoc. Nam et Timotheum circumcidit, natum de iudaea matre, propter scandalum Iudaeorum , volentem, non coactum, ut et per ipsum ostenderet non se illa damnare, sed gentibus tamquam saluti necessaria non imponere. Sed posteaquam circumcidit Timotheum hac indifferentia quam saepe commendavi et quam puto iam apte a vobis intellegi, quidam ex Iudaeis, qui non deponebant illam veterem pellem et propterea volebant circumcidi gentes, quod dicerent sine illis sacramentis salutem eis esse non posse. Unde et haeresis facta est: nam hodieque sunt quidam et in Christum credentes et filios suos circumcidentes, hoc est sine illis sacramentis salutem se habere non posse credentes. Cum ergo per hanc indifferentiam devotionis, non necessitate, circumcidisset Timotheum, quidam ex his, ut dixi, ibi statuentes salutem, quod Paulo displicebat, unde Petrum reprehendebat, iactare coeperunt ad alios decipiendos, quia et Paulus hoc tenet. Dicebant: " Quod et nos dicimus, hoc et ipse credit, quod sine his sacramentis salus esse non potest. Nam si hoc non credit, quare Timotheum circumcidit? ". Hoc ille cum audisset, Paulus, qui hoc fecerat libertate, non necessitate, propter scandalum Iudaeorum, non propter salutem Timothei, vidit illos accepisse occasionem alterius praedicationis et movendae in Paulum malae suspicionis, et noluit circumcidere Titum . Apparet autem quare illum voluerit, quare istum noluerit. Illum propter scandalum Iudaeorum voluit, istum propter occasiones male credentium noluit.
10. Therefore he did this too. For he also circumcised Timothy, born of a Jewish mother, on account of the scandal of the Jews (See Acts 16:1-3)—Timothy willing, not compelled—that through him too he might show that he did not condemn those things, but did not impose them on the gentiles as necessary to salvation. But after he circumcised Timothy with this indifference which I have often commended, and which I think is now aptly understood by you, certain ones from among the Jews, who did not put off that old skin and therefore wished the gentiles to be circumcised, because they said that without those sacraments there could be no salvation for them. Whence even a heresy was made: for even today there are certain who both believe in Christ and circumcise their sons—that is, believing that without those sacraments they cannot have salvation. When, then, by this indifference of devotion, not by necessity, he had circumcised Timothy, certain of these, as I said, placing salvation there—which displeased Paul, for which he reproached Peter—began to boast, to deceive others, that Paul too held this. They said: "What we too say, this he too believes, that without these sacraments there can be no salvation. For if he does not believe this, why did he circumcise Timothy?" When Paul, who had done this by liberty, not by necessity, on account of the scandal of the Jews, not on account of the salvation of Timothy, had heard this, he saw that they had taken occasion for another preaching and for stirring up an evil suspicion against Paul, and he was unwilling to circumcise Titus (See Gal 2:3). But it appears why he willed the one, why he was unwilling for the other. He willed the one on account of the scandal of the Jews, he was unwilling for the other on account of the occasions of those who believed badly.
Sermons5.10
11. Et hoc in epistula sua videte quemadmodum evidenter perspicueque commendet. Sed neque Titus, inquit, cum esset Graecus, sicut Timotheus, compulsus est circumcidi . Et quasi ei diceretur: " Quare non est compulsus Titus circumcidi, cum Timotheus, similiter Graecus cum esset, compulsus sit circumcidi? ". Quare? Vis audire? Propter subintroductos falsos fratres qui subintroierunt explorare libertatem nostram . In Timotheo ergo circumcidendo non fuit necessitas, sed libertas; in Petro autem reprehensa est necessitas, non libertas. Propter subintroductos, inquit, falsos fratres qui subintroierunt explorare libertatem nostram, ut nos in servitutem redigerent. Nos, inquit, redigerent in servitutem, faciendo de libertate necessitatem, quibus nec ad horam, inquit, cessimus subiectioni. Ut quid? Ut veritas Evangelii permaneat in vos . Quae est veritas Evangelii? Iudaeum tunc non prohibendum, gentilem non cogendum; sacramenta Iudaeorum non Iudaeis damnanda, non gentibus imponenda. Quae est veritas Evangelii? Posse sine illis sacramentis ad salutem perveniri per Christum. Hoc illi negabant, quibus Petrus simulate consentiebat. Ideoque adiungitur: Simulate illi alii consenserunt Iudaei, ita ut Barnabas etiam adduceretur in eorum simulationem. Sed cum viderem, inquit, quia non recte ingrediuntur ad veritatem Evangelii , sicut illic ait: Ut veritas Evangelii permaneat ad vos . Audis ubique commendari veritatem, et suspicaris ubique fallaciam, tam ubique: usque in apostolis. Vidit ergo quia non recte ingrediuntur ad veritatem . Vidit super hoc quoniam putabant gentes saluti suae illa esse necessaria sacramenta. Non est haec veritas Evangelii . Non iam haec necessaria saluti fuerunt: fortassis aliquando, cum praenuntiarent Christum venturum. Necessarius erat aliquando cultellus petrinus, antequam veniret ipsa petra .
11. And see in his epistle how evidently and clearly he commends this. But neither Titus, he says, though he was a Greek—as Timothy was—was compelled to be circumcised (Gal 2:3). And as though it were said to him: "Why was Titus not compelled to be circumcised, when Timothy, though similarly a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised?" Why? Do you wish to hear? On account of the false brothers smuggled in, who had crept in to spy out our liberty (Gal 2:4). In circumcising Timothy, then, there was not necessity, but liberty; but in Peter, necessity was reproached, not liberty. On account of, he says, the false brothers smuggled in, who had crept in to spy out our liberty, that they might bring us into slavery. That they might bring us, he says, into slavery, by making out of liberty a necessity, to whom we did not yield in subjection even for an hour, he says. For what reason? That the truth of the Gospel might remain among you (Gal 2:4-5). What is the truth of the Gospel? That the Jew was then not to be forbidden, the gentile not to be compelled; that the sacraments of the Jews were not to be condemned for the Jews, not to be imposed on the gentiles. What is the truth of the Gospel? That salvation can be reached through Christ without those sacraments. This those denied, to whom Peter feignedly consented. And therefore it is added, Those other Jews feignedly consented, so that even Barnabas was led into their pretense. But when I saw, he says, that they were not walking rightly toward the truth of the Gospel (Gal 2:13-14), as he says there, That the truth of the Gospel might remain among you. You hear the truth commended everywhere, and you suspect deceit everywhere—so everywhere, even among the apostles. He saw, then, that they were not walking rightly toward the truth. He saw, over this, that they thought those sacraments were necessary to the gentiles for their salvation. This is not the truth of the Gospel. These things were no longer necessary to salvation: perhaps at one time, when they foretold that Christ would come. The knife of stone was once necessary, before the Rock itself came (See 1 Cor 10:4).
Sermons5.11
12. Ego cum viderem, inquit, quia non recte ingrediuntur ad veritatem Evangelii, dixi Petro coram omnibus . Dixi Petro: Paulus Petro, minor maiori, sequens praecedenti; et dixi et Petro et coram omnibus: magna fiducia, sed magna illius patientia. Quoniam intentos fecisti, audiamus quid Petro, Paule, dixisti, et ubi. Intellegamus quid egisti, quid disposuisti, quia nusquam mendax esse voluisti. Dixi, inquit, Petro coram omnibus: " Si tu, cum sis Iudaeus " - quid est " cum tu sis Iudaeus "? Cui licebat ista indifferenter observare -, " gentiliter et non iudaice vivis " - quia priusquam venirent quidam a Iacobo, cum gentibus convescebatur -, " si tu, cum sis Iudaeus, gentiliter et non iudaice vivis ", debuit sequi et dicere: " Quomodo nunc iudaica sacramenta custodis? ". Non hoc dixit, sed ubi erat reprehensibilis, unde ista movebantur, unde zelabat Deo, quod impedimentum ab Evangelio removere moliebatur, hoc cum fiducia dixit, hoc coram omnibus dixit: " Si tu, cum sis Iudaeus, gentiliter vivis, quomodo cogis gentes iudaizare? " . " Cogis, inquit, iudaizare ". Iam dixi quemadmodum, consentiendo eis qui dicebant gentes aliter salutem habere non posse, " gentes cogis iudaizare ". Hoc Paulus non fecit, quando suscepit purificationes cum quibusdam ; non coegit gentes iudaizare, quando Timotheum circumcidit secundum illam indifferentiam, quia et circumcisio nihil est et praeputium nihil est ; non coegit gentes iudaizare. Et ne cogere crederetur, Titum non circumcidit ; non coegit Paulus gentes iudaizare. Hoc ipse non fecit, et ideo hoc in Petro recte reprehendit, quia ipse non fecit.
12. I, when I saw, he says, that they were not walking rightly toward the truth of the Gospel, said to Peter before all. I said to Peter: Paul to Peter, the lesser to the greater, the follower to the one preceding; and I said both to Peter and before all: great boldness, but great patience in that one. Since you have made us attentive, let us hear what you said to Peter, Paul, and where. Let us understand what you did, what you arranged, since you nowhere wished to be a liar. I said, he says, to Peter before all: "If you, being a Jew"—what is, "being a Jew"? to whom it was lawful to observe those things indifferently—"live in the manner of the gentiles and not in the manner of the Jews"—because before certain came from James, he ate with the gentiles"if you, being a Jew, live in the manner of the gentiles and not in the manner of the Jews," it ought to follow and to say: "How do you now keep the Jewish sacraments?" He did not say this, but where he was reproachable, whence these things were stirred up, for which he had zeal toward God, because he was striving to remove an impediment from the Gospel, this he said with boldness, this he said before all: "If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of the gentiles, how do you compel the gentiles to Judaize?" (Gal 2:14) "You compel", he says, "to Judaize". I have already said how: by consenting to those who said that the gentiles could not otherwise have salvation, "you compel the gentiles to Judaize." This Paul did not do, when he undertook purifications with certain ones; he did not compel the gentiles to Judaize when he circumcised Timothy according to that indifference, because both circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing (1 Cor 7:19); he did not compel the gentiles to Judaize. And lest he be thought to compel, he did not circumcise Titus; Paul did not compel the gentiles to Judaize. This he himself did not do, and therefore this he rightly reproached in Peter, because he himself did not do it.
Sermons5.12
13. Sed ponam et ipsum hoc fecisse, quamquam non inveniatur, non convincatur; non secundum me hoc dico, sed secundum quosdam, ut interim dicam, putemus hoc fecisse Paulum quod fecit Petrus, et hoc reprehendisse in Petro Paulum quod etiam ipse fecerat Paulus: facilius ambo fuerant corrigendi, quam nobis subintret detestabilis tinea, id est mendacium vel mendacii suspicio, tamquam vermiculus malignus ad omnem Scripturae rodendam litteram, metuendus ut nobis persuadeat aliquid Paulum in epistula sua canonica, quam Ecclesiae commendat a posteris propagatae, fuisse mentitum. Rogo vos: timete hoc malum; omnes timeamus, ne omnes postea frustra plangamus. Non est hoc leve malum: moneo vos, timens terreo. Date veniam sollicitudini meae: rarius ad vos loquimur quam vultis. Susurrant hi qui vestras aures, quando volunt, paratas inveniunt - nos nisi raro et ex hoc loco loqui vobis non permittimur -, non dico mente malignantes, non eis iniuriam facio, sed cavete errantes, et sic cum eis agite, ut ipsi potius corrigantur, non ut vos ab eis depravemini. Cum enim tibi ista dixerint: " Simulate hoc egit Petrus, simulate eum corripuit Paulus; non verum scripsit in epistula sua Paulus quia reprehensibilis erat Petrus ; non verum scripsit in epistula sua Paulus quia vidit eos non recte ingredientes ad veritatem Evangelii; non verum scripsit in epistula sua Paulus quia Petrus gentes cogebat iudaizare , sed omnia simulata sunt ", quid veri retinebimus, quam paginam suspectam de mendacio non habebimus?
13. But let me suppose that he himself did this, although it is not found, not proven; I say this not according to my own view, but according to certain people, that I may speak for the time being: let us suppose that Paul did this which Peter did, and that Paul reproached this in Peter which Paul himself had also done: both would more easily be corrected, than that the detestable moth—that is, a lie or the suspicion of a lie—should creep into us, like a malignant little worm to gnaw at every letter of Scripture, to be feared lest it persuade us that Paul lied in any way in his canonical epistle, which he commends to the Church spread by posterity. I beg you: fear this evil; let us all fear, lest afterward we all lament in vain. This is no light evil: I warn you, fearing I terrify. Pardon my anxiety: we speak to you more rarely than you wish. They whisper, those who find your ears ready when they wish—we are not permitted to speak to you except rarely and from this place—I do not say malignant in mind, I do not do them injury, but beware of those who err, and so deal with them that they themselves rather be corrected, not that you be depraved by them. For when they say these things to you: "Peter did this feignedly, Paul reproached him feignedly; Paul did not write truly in his epistle that Peter was reproachable; Paul did not write truly in his epistle that he saw them not walking rightly toward the truth of the Gospel; Paul did not write truly in his epistle that Peter compelled the gentiles to Judaize, but all was feigned"—what truth will we retain, what page will we not hold suspect of falsehood?
Sermons5.13
14. Ecce premimur, homines, evidentissima auctoritate, et vix cedunt tonanti et coruscanti veritati! Quo ibimus? Quid faciemus, quando forte dixero alicui: " Bonum est nubere, sed melius est non nubere , sicut scripsit apostolus Paulus ", si mihi dicat damnator nuptiarum: " Prorsus Paulus damnavit nuptias, sed hoc simulate scripsit, quoniam sustineri ab infirmis veritas ipsa non posset; quia imponitur laboriose continentia, ideo dixit: Bonum est nubere, nam sciebat malum esse nubere "? Unde hoc probas Paulum esse mentitum, ubi ait: Qui dat nuptum, bene facit ? " Unde probo? ", inquit: " quomodo mentitus sit, ubi ait: Cum viderem quia non recte ingrediebatur ad veritatem Evangelii - non enim Petrus non recte ingrediebatur ad veritatem Evangelii -; quomodo dixi Petro coram omnibus: Si tu, cum sis Iudaeus, gentiliter et non iudaice vivis, quomodo cogis gentes iudaizare? - non enim revera Petrus gentes cogebat iudaizare -. Sicut ergo ista simulate Paulus, sic etiam, cum videret ab hominibus carneis virginitatis excellentiam sustineri non posse, dixit: Qui dat nuptum, bene facit . Aliud agebat, aliud praetendebat ". Si haec ita sunt, quo ibimus? quae oracula sciscitabimur? Sic enim nobis debent esse eloquia divina in Scripturis canonicis mandata, sicut vere sunt oracula. Metuitur ibi fallacia, ubi veritas invenitur, ubi de veritate praesumitur? Obsecro vos: praevideatis vermiculum istum, ut caveatis; non admittatis ad armarium cordis vestri. Si admiseritis, nisi cito pannos excutitis, nihil integrum ibi invenietis.
14. Behold, we men are pressed by the most evident authority, and scarcely yield to truth thundering and flashing! Where shall we go? What shall we do, when perhaps I say to someone, "It is good to marry, but better not to marry, as the apostle Paul wrote," if the condemner of marriages says to me: "Plainly Paul condemned marriages, but he wrote this feignedly, since the truth itself could not be borne by the weak; because continence is laboriously imposed, therefore he said: It is good to marry, for he knew it was evil to marry"? Whence do you prove that Paul lied, where he says, He who gives in marriage does well (1 Cor 7:38)? "Whence do I prove it?" he says: "just as he lied where he says, When I saw that he was not walking rightly toward the truth of the Gospel—for Peter was not walking rightly toward the truth of the Gospel—; just as I said to Peter before all: If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of the gentiles and not in the manner of the Jews, how do you compel the gentiles to Judaize?—for Peter did not really compel the gentiles to Judaize. As, then, Paul said these things feignedly, so too, when he saw that the excellence of virginity could not be borne by carnal men, he said, He who gives in marriage does well. He was doing one thing, holding forth another." If these things are so, where shall we go? What oracles shall we consult? For the divine utterances committed to the canonical Scriptures ought to be to us truly as oracles. Is deceit to be feared there, where truth is found, where truth is presumed? I beseech you: foresee this little worm, that you may guard against it; do not admit it to the cabinet of your heart. If you admit it, unless you quickly shake out the cloths, you will find nothing whole there.
Sermons5.14
15. Dixi quod existimavi cum magna sollicitudine esse dicendum; diu tenui caritatem vestram, diu me tenuit sollicitudo vestra. Omnia quae scripta sunt in sanctis canonicis libris nos qui disputamus et libros scribimus, longe aliter scribimus, proficiendo scribimus, cottidie discimus, scrutando dictamus, pulsando loquimur. Certe non quiesco, quantum possum, ubi esse possum utilis fratribus, et loquendo et scribendo. Admoneo caritatem vestram, a me, usque ad me, ne cuiusquam disputationis librum aut disputationem pro canonica Scriptura habere velitis. In Scripturis sanctis iudicare discimus, in scripturis nostris iudicari non dedignamur. Illud quidem eligendum est et hoc potius de duobus optandum, ut scribendo vel loquendo vera dicamus, nusquam erremus. Sed quoniam hoc implere difficile est, ideo aliud est firmamentum canonis, tamquam caelum ubi sunt constituta luminaria Scripturarum, velut inter aquas et aquas , inter populos angelorum et populos hominum: illos supra, istos infra. Teneamus Scripturam tamquam Scripturam, tamquam Deum loquentem; non ibi quaeramus hominem errantem. Non enim frustra canon in Ecclesiam constitutus est: Spiritus sancti hoc officium est. Si quis ergo legit librum meum, iudicet me: si rationabile dixi, sequatur non me, sed rationem ipsam; si hoc probavi testimonio evidentissimo atque divino, sequatur non me, sed Scripturam divinam. Si autem aliquid quod ego recte dixi reprehendere voluerit, non recte facit, sed plus irascor tali laudatori meo qui librum meum tamquam canonicum accipit, quam ei qui in libro meo etiam non reprehendenda reprehendit. Rogo vos: quamvis intentos vos videam et paene recentissimos, velut modo audire coeperitis, tamen nolo aliquid amplius dicere, ut hoc quod ultimum dixi fortiter teneatis. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
15. I have said what I reckoned must be said with great anxiety; long I have held your Charity, long has anxiety for you held me. All the things written in the holy canonical books, we who dispute and write books write far otherwise—we write by making progress, we learn daily, we dictate by searching, we speak by knocking. Surely I do not rest, as much as I can, where I can be useful to the brothers, both by speaking and by writing. I admonish your Charity, from me, even concerning me: do not wish to hold the book or disputation of anyone's discussion as canonical Scripture. In the holy Scriptures we learn to judge; in our own writings we do not disdain to be judged. That indeed is to be chosen, and this rather to be wished of the two: that in writing or speaking we say true things, that we nowhere err. But because this is difficult to fulfill, therefore there is another, the firmament of the canon—as it were the heaven where the luminaries of the Scriptures are set, as it were between the waters and the waters, between the peoples of the angels and the peoples of men: those above, these below. Let us hold Scripture as Scripture, as God speaking; let us not seek there an erring man. For not in vain was the canon established in the Church: this is the office of the Holy Spirit. If anyone, then, reads my book, let him judge me: if I have said something reasonable, let him follow not me, but reason itself; if I have proved this by a most evident and divine testimony, let him follow not me, but the divine Scripture. But if he wishes to reproach something that I have said rightly, he does not act rightly; but I am more angry with such a praiser of mine, who takes my book as canonical, than with the one who reproaches in my book even what is not to be reproached. I beg you: although I see you attentive and almost most fresh, as though you had only just begun to listen, yet I do not wish to say anything more, that you may firmly hold this last thing I have said. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.15
SERMO 163
Sermon 163
Sermons5.15
1. 1. Si consideremus, fratres, ante gratiam Domini quid fuerimus, et per gratiam Domini quid esse coeperimus; profecto invenimus quia sicut homines in melius commutantur, ita etiam terrarum loca quae prius contra Dei gratiam fuerunt, nunc Dei gratiae dedicantur. Nos enim, sicut dicit Apostolus, templum Dei vivi sumus; propter quod dicit Deus: Inhabitabo in illis, et deambulabo . Quae autem hic simulacra fuerunt, figi noverant, ambulare non noverant. Deambulat autem in nobis praesentia maiestatis, si latitudinem invenerit caritatis. Ad hoc nos exhortans Apostolus ait: Dilatamini, ne sitis iugum ducentes cum infidelibus . Si dilatemur, deambulat in nobis Deus; sed ut dilatemur, operetur ipse Deus. Si enim latitudinem caritas facit, quae non novit angustias; videte quia Deus sibi in nobis latitudinem facit, ipso dicente Apostolo: Caritas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum Sanctum qui datus est nobis . Propter hanc latitudinem, inquam, in nobis deambulat Deus.
1. 1. If we consider, brothers, what we were before the grace of the Lord, and what we began to be through the grace of the Lord; surely we find that just as men are changed for the better, so too the places of the lands which before were against the grace of God are now dedicated to the grace of God. For we, as the Apostle says, are the temple of the living God; concerning which God says, I will dwell in them, and walk about (2 Cor 6:16). But the images that were here knew how to be fixed, they did not know how to walk. But the presence of the majesty walks about in us, if it finds the breadth of love. Exhorting us to this the Apostle says, Be enlarged, do not be drawing the yoke with unbelievers (2 Cor 6:13-14). If we are enlarged, God walks about in us; but that we may be enlarged, let God himself work it. For if love makes the breadth, which knows no straits; see that God makes for himself breadth in us, the Apostle himself saying, The love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us (Rom 5:5). On account of this breadth, I say, God walks about in us.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Modo Apostoli Epistola cum recitaretur, audivimus: Spiritu ambulate, et concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis. Caro enim concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem. Haec enim invicem adversantur; ut non ea quae vultis faciatis . Baptizatis dicebat: sed templum Dei adhuc aedificabat, nondum dedicabat. Videte, fratres mei, quemadmodum cum loca ipsa terrena in melius convertuntur, alia diruuntur atque franguntur, alia in meliores usus commutantur; sic et nos sumus. Opera carnis fuerunt in nobis. Audistis cum commemorarentur: Manifesta autem sunt, inquit, opera carnis, quae sunt fornicationes, immunditiae, idolorum servitus, veneficia, non beneficia, id est, non a bonis dicta, sed a venenis; contentiones, inimicitiae, haereses, invidiae, ebrietates, et his similia; deicienda sunt, non mutanda: quae praedico, inquit, vobis, sicut praedixi, quoniam qui talia agunt, regnum Dei non possidebunt . Ista in nobis, tamquam idola frangenda sunt. In usus autem meliores vertenda sunt ipsa corporis nostri membra, ut quae serviebant immunditiae cupiditatis, serviant gratiae caritatis.
2. 2. Just now, when the Apostle's Epistle was recited, we heard: Walk by the Spirit, and do not accomplish the desires of the flesh. For the flesh covets against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh. For these are opposed to one another, that you may not do what you wish (Gal 5:16-17). He was speaking to the baptized: but he was still building the temple of God, he was not yet dedicating it. See, my brothers, how, when those earthly places themselves are turned to the better, some are torn down and broken, others changed to better uses; so we too are. The works of the flesh were in us. You heard them when they were mentioned: But the works of the flesh are manifest, he says, which are fornications, uncleannesses, the service of idols, sorceries—not kindly deeds, that is, not so named from good things, but from poisons—contentions, enmities, heresies, envies, drunkennesses, and the like; these are to be cast down, not changed: which I foretell, he says, you, as I have foretold, that those who do such things will not possess the kingdom of God (Gal 5:19-21). These things in us are to be broken like idols. But the very members of our body are to be turned to better uses, so that what served the uncleanness of desire may serve the grace of love.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Sed videte quid dixerit, et diligenter advertite. Operarii Dei sumus, adhuc aedificatur templum Dei. In capite suo iam dedicatum est; quoniam Dominus resurrexit a mortuis, devicta morte, mortalitate consumpta ascendit in caelum; quia scriptus de illo erat Psalmus dedicationis domus. Ideo post passionem dicit: Convertisti luctum meum in gaudium mihi, conscidisti saccum meum, et accinxisti me iucunditate; ut psallat tibi gloria mea, et non compungar . Facta est ergo illa post passionem dedicatio in resurrectione. Ergo et nostra modo fit aedificatio per fidem, ut fiat et ipsa dedicatio per ultimam resurrectionem. Denique post istum Psalmum dedicationis domus, ubi ostenditur resuscitatio capitis nostri, alius est Psalmus post istum, non ante istum, cuius sic habet titulus: Quando domus aedificabatur post captivitatem . Recolite captivitatem, ubi antea fuerimus, quando totum mundum velut massam infidelium diabolus possidebat. Propter hanc captivitatem Redemptor advenit; pretium nostrum sanguinem suum fudit: fuso suo sanguine, captivitatis nostrae instrumenta delevit. Lex, inquit Apostolus, spiritalis est; ego autem carnalis sum, venumdatus sub peccato . Antea sub peccato venumdati, sed postea gratia liberati. Post illam captivitatem, domus modo aedificatur; et ut aedificetur, evangelizatur. Sic enim incipit Psalmus ipse: Cantate Domino canticum novum. Et ne putes domum istam in uno angulo aedificari, sicut aedificant schismatici vel haeretici; attende quod sequitur: Cantate Domino, omnis terra .
3. 3. But see what he said, and attend diligently. We are workers of God, the temple of God is still being built. In its head it is already dedicated; since the Lord rose from the dead, death conquered, mortality consumed, he ascended into heaven; because the Psalm of the dedication of the house was written about him. Therefore after the passion he says, You have turned my mourning into joy for me, you have torn my sackcloth, and girded me with gladness; that my glory may sing to you, and I be not pricked (Ps 30:11-12 (29:12-13)). That dedication, then, was made after the passion in the resurrection. So our building too is now being made through faith, that the dedication itself too may be made through the final resurrection. Finally, after that Psalm of the dedication of the house, where the raising up of our head is shown, there is another Psalm after it, not before it, whose title reads thus: When the house was being built after the captivity (Ps 96 (95) title). Recall the captivity, where we were before, when the devil possessed the whole world as a lump of unbelievers. On account of this captivity the Redeemer came; he poured out his blood, our price: his blood poured out, he blotted out the instruments of our captivity. The law, says the Apostle, is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold under sin (Rom 7:14). Before, sold under sin, but afterward freed by grace. After that captivity, the house is now being built; and that it may be built, the gospel is preached. For so the Psalm itself begins: Sing to the Lord a new song. And lest you think this house is built in one corner, as the schismatics or heretics build, attend to what follows: Sing to the Lord, all the earth (Ps 96:1 (95:1)).
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Cantate Domino canticum novum: contra canticum vetus, Testamentum Novum, quia prius Testamentum Vetus; novus homo, ut deponatur vetus homo. Exuite vos, inquit, veterem hominem cum actibus suis; et induite novum, qui secundum Deum creatus est in iustitia et sanctitate veritatis . Ergo: Cantate Domino canticum novum; cantate Domino, omnis terra. Cantate, et aedificate; cantate, et bene canite. Annuntiate diem ex die salutare eius ; annuntiate diem ex die Christum eius. Quid est enim: salutare eius, nisi: " Christum eius "? Pro isto salutari orabamus in Psalmo: Ostende nobis, Domine, misericordiam tuam, et salutare tuum da nobis . Desiderabant hoc salutare antiqui iusti, de quibus Dominus dicebat discipulis: Multi voluerunt videre quae vos videtis, et non potuerunt . Et salutare tuum da nobis. Dixerunt hoc antiqui iusti: Salutare tuum da nobis; Christum tuum cum in hac carne vivimus, videamus. Videamus in carne, qui nos liberet a carne; veniat caro mundans carnem; patiatur caro, et redimat animam et carnem. Et salutare tuum, Domine, da nobis. In hoc desiderio erat ille sanctus senex Simeon; in hoc, inquam, desiderio erat senex ille sanctus et de Deo bene meritus Simeon; sine dubio et ipse dicebat: Ostende nobis, Domine, misericordiam tuam, et salutare tuum da nobis. In hoc desiderio in talibus precibus responsum accepit, quia non gustaret mortem, nisi vidisset Christum Domino. Natus est Christus, veniebat ille, ille ibat; sed donec veniret ille, ille ire nolebat. Iam senectus matura excludebat, sed sincera pietas detinebat. At ubi venit, at ubi natus est, at ubi eum portari matris manibus vidit, et divinam infantiam pia senectus agnovit; accepit eum in manus suas, et dixit: Nunc dimittis, Domine, servum tuum in pace; quoniam viderunt oculi mei salutare tuum . Ecce unde dicebat: Ostende nobis, Domine, misericordiam tuam, et salutare tuum da nobis. Impletum est desiderium senis, mundi ipsius senectute vergente. Ipse ad senem hominem venit, qui mundum veterem invenit. Ergo si mundum veterem invenit, audiat mundus: Cantate Domino canticum novum; cantate Domino, omnis terra. Destruatur vetustas, novitas surgat.
4. 4. Sing to the Lord a new song: against the old song, the New Testament, because first the Old Testament; the new man, that the old man be put off. Put off, he says, the old man with his acts; and put on the new, who was created according to God in righteousness and the holiness of truth (Eph 4:22.24). Therefore: Sing to the Lord a new song; sing to the Lord, all the earth. Sing, and build; sing, and sing well. Announce day from day his salvation; announce day from day his Christ. For what is, his salvation, but "his Christ"? For this salvation we prayed in the Psalm: Show us, O Lord, your mercy, and give us your salvation (Ps 85:7 (84:8)). The ancient righteous longed for this salvation, of whom the Lord said to the disciples, Many wished to see what you see, and could not (See Luke 10:24; Matt 13:17). And give us your salvation. The ancient righteous said this: Give us your salvation; may we see your Christ while we live in this flesh. May we see in the flesh him who frees us from the flesh; may the flesh come that cleanses the flesh; may the flesh suffer, and redeem the soul and the flesh. And give us your salvation, O Lord. In this longing was that holy old man Simeon; in this longing, I say, was that holy old man, well-deserving of God, Simeon; without doubt he too said, Show us, O Lord, your mercy, and give us your salvation. In this longing, in such prayers, he received an answer that he would not taste death unless he had seen the Christ of the Lord. Christ was born, that one was coming, this one was going; but until that one came, this one was unwilling to go. Now mature old age was shutting him out, but sincere devotion was holding him back. But when he came, when he was born, when he saw him carried in his mother's hands, and his devout old age recognized the divine infancy; he took him in his hands and said, Now, Lord, you dismiss your servant in peace; for my eyes have seen your salvation (Luke 2:29-30). Behold whence he said, Show us, O Lord, your mercy, and give us your salvation. The longing of the old man was fulfilled, the old age of the world itself declining. He himself came to an old man, who found the world old. Therefore, if he found the world old, let the world hear: Sing to the Lord a new song; sing to the Lord, all the earth. Let the oldness be destroyed, let newness rise.
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Cantate Domino cantum novum, cantate Domino. Videte certamen aedificantium. Cantate Domino, benedicite nomen eius. Bene nuntiate, quod est graece " evangelizate ". Quid? Diem ex die. Quem diem ex die? Salutare eius. Quem diem ex die? Lumen ex lumine, Filium de Patre, salutare eius. Annuntiate in gentibus gloriam eius, in omnibus populis mirabilia eius. Ecce quomodo domus aedificatur post captivitatem. Terribilis est super omnes deos. Super quos deos? Quoniam omnes dii gentium daemonia; Dominus autem caelos fecit . Sanctos fecit, Apostolos fecit. Quoniam caeli enarrant gloriam Dei. Non sunt loquelae neque sermones, quorum non audiantur voces eorum. In omnem terram exivit sonus eorum : quia omnis terra cantat canticum novum.
5. 5. Sing to the Lord a new song, sing to the Lord. See the contest of the builders. Sing to the Lord, bless his name. Announce well—which in Greek is "evangelize." What? Day from day. What day from day? His salvation. What day from day? Light from light, the Son from the Father, his salvation. Announce among the nations his glory, among all peoples his wonders (Ps 96:2-3 (95:2-3)). Behold how the house is built after the captivity. He is terrible above all gods. Above what gods? For all the gods of the nations are demons; but the Lord made the heavens (Ps 96:5 (95:5)). He made the holy ones, he made the apostles. For the heavens declare the glory of God. There are no speeches nor words whose voices are not heard. Their sound went out into all the earth (Ps 19:1.3-4 (18:2.4-5)): because all the earth sings the new song.
Sermons5.5.5
5. 6. Audiamus ergo et Apostolum, architectum magistri: Ut sapiens, inquit, architectus fundamentum posui . Audiamus ergo istum architectum, quaedam nova construentem, quaedam vetera deicientem. Spiritu, inquit, ambulate, nova est ista constructio: et concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis, veterum est ista destructio. Caro enim, inquit, concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem. Haec enim invicem adversantur; ut non ea quae vultis faciatis . Adhuc enim aedificamini, nondum dedicamini. Ut non ea quae vultis faciatis.
5. 6. Let us hear, then, the Apostle too, the architect of the Master: As a wise architect, he says, I laid a foundation (1 Cor 3:10). Let us hear, then, this architect, constructing some new things, casting down some old. Walk by the Spirit, he says—this is the new construction; and do not accomplish the desires of the flesh—this is the destruction of the old. For the flesh, he says, covets against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh. For these are opposed to one another, that you may not do what you wish (Gal 5:16-17). For you are still being built, you are not yet being dedicated. That you may not do what you wish.
Sermons5.5.6
6. 6. Quae enim vultis? Ut omnino nullae sint concupiscentiae malarum et illicitarum delectationum. Quis sanctus non haec velit? Sed non efficit: quamdiu hic vivitur, hoc non impletur. Caro enim concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem. Haec enim invicem adversantur; ut ea quae vultis facere, ut nullae sint in vobis prorsus rerum illicitarum concupiscentiae, non possitis . Quid ergo restat? Spiritu ambulate; et, quia non potestis efficere ut concupiscentias carnis consumatis, concupiscentias carnis ne perficiatis. Consumere quidem illas atque finire, et penitus exstirpare omnimodo velle debetis, sed quamdiu sunt in vobis, et est alia lex in membris vestris repugnans legi mentis vestrae, concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis. Quid enim vultis? Ut omnino non sint concupiscentiae carnis. Non vos permittunt implere quod vultis; nolite eas permittere implere quod volunt. Quid vultis? Ut omnino non sint. Sed sunt. Caro concupiscit adversus spiritum: concupiscat spiritus adversus carnem. Ut non ea quae vultis faciatis, id est, ut non sint in vobis ipsae concupiscentiae carnis; nec ipsae faciant quod volunt, ut opus earum perficiatis. Si non tibi in totum ceditur, noli et tu cedere. Prius aequetur pugna, ut aliquando sit victoria.
6. 6. For what do you wish? That there be no desires at all of evil and unlawful delights. What holy person would not wish this? But he does not bring it about: as long as one lives here, this is not fulfilled. For the flesh covets against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh. For these are opposed to one another, that what you wish to do—that there be in you no desires at all of unlawful things—you cannot. What, then, remains? Walk by the Spirit; and, because you cannot bring it about that you consume the desires of the flesh, do not accomplish the desires of the flesh. You ought indeed to wish to consume them, to end them, and to extirpate them utterly in every way; but as long as they are in you, and there is another law in your members fighting against the law of your mind, do not accomplish the desires of the flesh. For what do you wish? That there be no desires of the flesh at all. They do not permit you to fulfill what you wish; do not you permit them to fulfill what they wish. What do you wish? That they not exist at all. But they exist. The flesh covets against the spirit: let the spirit covet against the flesh. That you may not do what you wish—that is, that there be not in you the very desires of the flesh; nor let them do what they wish, so that you accomplish their work. If it is not wholly yielded to you, do not you yield either. Let the battle first be equal, that at some time there may be victory.
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. Etenim procul dubio, fratres mei, erit; credamus, speremus, amemus, erit aliquando victoria, in dedicatione domus, quae modo aedificatur post captivitatem. Novissima enim inimica destruetur mors, cum corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem. Praemeditamini verba triumphantium: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Triumphantium ista vox est, non pugnantium. Pugnantium autem vox est: Miserere mei Domine, quoniam infirmus sum; sana me, Domine, quoniam conturbata sunt ossa mea, et anima mea turbata est valde; et tu, Domine, usquequo? Vide laborantem in certamine. Et tu, Domine, usquequo? Quid est: Usquequo? Quousque probes quia ego subvenio. Si enim cito subvenirem, luctamen non sentires; si luctamen non sentires, tamquam de tuis viribus superbires; et per istam superbiam numquam ad victoriam pervenires. Dictum est quidem: Adhuc te loquente dicam: Ecce adsum ; sed Deus et cum differt adest, et quod differt adest, et differendo adest; ne praeproperam cum implet voluntatem, perfectam non impleat sanitatem.
7. 7. For indeed, without doubt, my brothers, it will be; let us believe, let us hope, let us love—there will at some time be victory, in the dedication of the house which is now being built after the captivity. For the last enemy, death, will be destroyed, when this corruptible has put on incorruption, and this mortal has put on immortality. Premeditate the words of those who triumph: Where, O death, is your struggle (1 Cor 15:54-55)? This is the voice of those who triumph, not of those who fight. But the voice of those who fight is: Have mercy on me, O Lord, for I am weak; heal me, O Lord, for my bones are troubled, and my soul is troubled exceedingly; and you, O Lord, how long (Ps 6:2-3 (6:3-4))? See the one laboring in the contest. And you, O Lord, how long? What is, How long? Until you prove that I am helping. For if I helped quickly, you would not feel the struggle; if you did not feel the struggle, you would as it were be proud of your own strength; and through this pride you would never reach victory. It was indeed said, While you are still speaking I will say: Behold, here I am (Isa 58:9); but God both is present when he delays, and what he delays is present, and by delaying is present; lest, by fulfilling a too-hasty will, he not fulfill perfect health.
Sermons5.7.7
8. 8. Non enim, fratres mei, apostolo Paulo non aderat, qui cum certaret, ne extolleretur, timebat. In magnitudine, inquit, revelationum mearum ne extollar. Videte in conflictatione certantem, nondum in securitate triumphantem. In magnitudine revelationum mearum ne extollar. Quis dicit: Ne extollar? O terror, o tremor! Quis dicit: Ne extollar? Cum tanta eius verba sint retundentia elationem, compescentia tumorem, et dicit: Ne extollar? Parum est quia dicit: Ne extollar; videte medicamentum quod sibi dicit appositum. Ne extollar, inquit, datus est mihi stimulus carnis meae, angelus satanae. O venenum, quod non curatur nisi veneno! Datus est mihi stimulus carnis meae, angelus satanae, qui me colaphizet . Caput caedebatur, ne caput extolleretur. O antidotum, quod quasi de serpente conficitur, et propterea theriacum nuncupatur! Serpens enim ille superbiam persuasit. Gustate, et eritis sicut dii ; superbiae persuasio ista est. Unde cecidit, inde deiecit. Merito ergo venenum serpentis de serpente sanatur. Quid ait Apostolus? Propter quod ter Dominum rogavi, ut auferret eum a me. Ubi est: Adhuc te loquente dicam: Ecce adsum ? Propter quod, non semel, sed iterum et tertio Dominum rogavi. Nonne tunc et ipse dicebat: Et tu, Domine, usquequo? Sed numquid quia differebat, ideo non aderat, et falsum erat: Adhuc te loquente dicam: Ecce adsum? Quid enim? Medicus quando dat quod desideras, adest; quando secat, non adest? Nonne sub medici ferramento clamas ut parcat; et quia magis adest, magis secat? Denique ut scias quia aderat, videte quid ter roganti responderit. Dixit, inquit, mihi: Sufficit tibi gratia mea; nam virtus in infirmitate perficitur . Ego, inquit, novi; medicus optimus. Ego, inquit, novi in quem tumorem pergat quod volo sanare. Quiesce, adhibeam quod scio. Sufficit tibi gratia mea: non tibi sufficit voluntas tua. Haec erant utique verba certantis, et in certamine periclitantis, et divinum auxilium postulantis.
8. 8. For he was not absent, my brothers, from the apostle Paul, who, when he was contending, feared lest he be exalted. In the greatness, he says, of my revelations, lest I be exalted. See him contending in the conflict, not yet triumphing in security. In the greatness of my revelations, lest I be exalted. Who says, Lest I be exalted? O terror, O trembling! Who says, Lest I be exalted? When his words are so blunting of elation, so suppressing of swelling, and he says, Lest I be exalted? It is too little that he says, Lest I be exalted; see the medicine that he says was applied to him. Lest I be exalted, he says, there was given to me a sting of my flesh, an angel of Satan. O poison, which is not cured but by poison! There was given to me a sting of my flesh, an angel of Satan, to buffet me (2 Cor 12:7). The head was beaten, lest the head be exalted. O antidote, which is as it were made from the serpent, and therefore called "theriac"! For that serpent persuaded pride. Taste, and you will be like gods (See Gen 3:5); this is the persuasion of pride. Whence he fell, thence he cast down. Deservedly, then, the venom of the serpent is healed by the serpent. What does the Apostle say? For which I asked the Lord three times that he take it from me. Where is, While you are still speaking I will say: Behold, here I am? For which, not once, but again and a third time, I asked the Lord. Did he not then too say, And you, O Lord, how long? But surely, because he delayed, was he therefore not present, and was it false, While you are still speaking I will say: Behold, here I am? For what? When the physician gives what you desire, is he present; when he cuts, is he not present? Do you not under the physician's instrument cry out for him to spare; and because he is more present, he cuts more? Finally, that you may know he was present, see what he answered to the one asking three times. He said, he says, to me: My grace is sufficient for you; for power is perfected in infirmity (2 Cor 12:8-9). I, he says, know; the best physician. I, he says, know into what swelling that goes which I wish to heal. Be still, let me apply what I know. My grace is sufficient for you: your will is not sufficient for you. These were surely the words of one contending, and in the contest in peril, and asking for divine help.
Sermons5.8.8
9. 9. Triumphantis autem verba quae erunt? Verba certantis, dum domus aedificatur: verba triumphantis, cum domus in ultimo dedicatur. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum . Sic ista dicebat Apostolus, quasi ipse iam ibi esset. Denique post haec verba, quae constat esse de futura perceptione, non de praesenti conflictatione; quandoquidem dicit: Tunc fiet; non modo fit, sed tunc fiet. Quid tunc fiet? Sermo qui scriptus est: Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Tunc fiet ut nusquam sit aculeus mortis, nusquam possit inveniri peccatum. Quid festinas? Tunc fiet, tunc fiet. Mereatur in te humilitas, ut tunc in te fiat; ne superbia non permittat ut vel tunc in te fiat. Tunc fiet. Modo interim dum pugnas, dum laboras, dum periclitaris, dic, dic: Dimitte nobis debita nostra . Dic omnino dum pugnas, dic, verum dic, ex animo dic: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus. Tu tibi diabolus eris. Nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est . Non enim verum dicimus, dicendo nos non habere peccatum; cum hic non simus sine peccato. Dicamus ergo veritatem, ut aliquando inveniamus securitatem. Sit veritas in pugna, ut acquiratur securitas in victoria. Tunc fiet: Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Aculeus enim mortis est peccatum.
9. 9. But what will be the words of one triumphing? The words of one contending, while the house is being built: the words of one triumphing, when the house is at last dedicated. Where, O death, is your struggle? Where, O death, is your sting? But the sting of death is sin (1 Cor 15:55-56). Thus the Apostle said these things, as though he were already there. Finally, after these words, which it is agreed are about the future reception, not the present conflict; since he says, Then shall come to pass; it is not happening now, but then shall come to pass. What shall then come to pass? The saying that is written: Death is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your struggle? Where, O death, is your sting? Then it shall come to pass that the sting of death be nowhere, that sin can nowhere be found. Why do you hasten? Then it shall come to pass, then it shall come to pass. Let humility deserve it in you, that it may then come to pass in you; lest pride not permit that it even then come to pass in you. Then it shall come to pass. Now meanwhile, while you fight, while you labor, while you are in peril, say, say, Forgive us our debts (Matt 6:12). Say it utterly while you fight, say it, say it truly, say it from the soul: If we say that we have no sin, we lead ourselves astray. You will be your own devil. We lead ourselves astray, and the truth is not in us (1 John 1:8). For we do not say a true thing, by saying that we have no sin; since here we are not without sin. Let us, then, say the truth, that at some time we may find security. Let there be truth in the fight, that security may be gained in victory. Then it shall come to pass: Where, O death, is your sting? For the sting of death is sin.
Sermons5.9.9
10. 10. Sed de lege praesumis, quia data est tibi lex, et datum est tibi praeceptum. Bonum est tibi ut Spiritus te vivificet, ne littera occidat. Volo ut velis; sed non sufficit ut velis. Adiuvandus es ut plene velis, et impleas quod velis. Nam vis videre quid valeat sine Spiritu adiuvante littera iubens? Ibi dixit. Cum dictum est: Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum; continuo subiunxit: Virtus autem peccati lex . Quid est: Virtus peccati lex? Non mala iubendo, vel bona prohibendo: immo vero mala prohibendo, et bona iubendo. Virtus autem peccati lex: quia, subintravit, inquit, lex ut abundaret delictum. Quid est: ut abundaret delictum? Quia ubi gratia non erat, auxit prohibitio desiderium; et cum quasi de propria praesumitur virtute, factum est grande vitium. Sed quid fecit gratia? Ubi abundavit peccatum superabundavit gratia . Venit Dominus: totum quod de Adam traxisti, totum quod tuis pravis moribus addidisti, totum dimisit, totum delevit; orationem docuit, gratiam promisit; certamen indixit, laboranti subvenit, victorem coronavit. Itaque, inquit Apostolus, lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum. Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit! Sed peccatum, ut appareat peccatum . Nam quando non prohibebaris, erat; sed non apparebat. Nam concupiscentiam, inquit, nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Occasione igitur accepta, peccatum per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit . Ecce quid est: Lettera occidit .
10. 10. But you presume on the law, because the law was given to you, and a precept was given to you. It is good for you that the Spirit give you life, lest the letter kill. I wish that you may will; but it is not enough that you will. You must be helped, that you may will fully, and fulfill what you will. For do you wish to see what the commanding letter avails without the Spirit helping? There he said it. When it was said, Where, O death, is your sting? But the sting of death is sin; he at once added, But the power of sin is the law (1 Cor 15:55-56). What is, The power of sin is the law? Not by commanding evils, or by forbidding goods: rather indeed by forbidding evils and commanding goods. But the power of sin is the law: because, the law, he says, crept in, that the offense might abound. What is, that the offense might abound? Because where there was no grace, the prohibition increased the desire; and when one presumes as it were on one's own power, a great vice was made. But what did grace do? Where sin abounded, grace abounded the more (Rom 5:20). The Lord came: all that you drew from Adam, all that you added by your own depraved morals, he forgave all, blotted out all; he taught prayer, promised grace; he declared the contest, came to the aid of the laborer, crowned the victor. And so, says the Apostle, the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Did that which is good, then, become death to me? Far from it! But sin, that it might appear as sin (Rom 7:12-13). For when you were not forbidden, it was there; but it did not appear. For I would not have known coveting, he says, unless the law said, You shall not covet. Sin, then, taking occasion, deceived me through the commandment, and through it killed me (Rom 7:7.11). Behold what is, The letter kills (2 Cor 3:6).
Sermons5.10.10
11. 11. Si vis ergo evadere legem minantem, ad Spiritum fuge adiuvantem. Quod enim lex imperat, fides sperat. Clama ad Deum tuum, adiuvet te. Non remaneas sub littera reus, sed Spiritu suo te adiuvet Deus: ne tibi similis sit superbus Iudaeeus. Cum enim aculeus mortis esset peccatum, virtus autem peccati lex; quid ageret humana infirmitas, in qua fatigabatur voluntas? Velle, inquit, adiacet mihi; perficere autem bonum non invenio . Quid ergo ageret? Ecce aculeus mortis peccatum, ecce virtus peccati lex. Sed lex subintravit, ut abundaret delictum. Si enim lex posset vivificare, omnino ex lege esset iustitia. Sed conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato . Quomodo conclusit? Ne vagareris, ne praecipitareris, ne mergereris; cancellos tibi fecit lex, ut non inveniendo qua exires, ad gratiam convolares. Sed conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio. Qui promittit, quod facit promittit, non quod tu facis. Si tu facturus esses, praenuntiator esset Deus, non promissor. Sed conclusit, inquit, Scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Iesu Christi daretur credentibus . Audi: daretur. Quid superbis? Audi: daretur. Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? Ergo quia aculeus mortis est peccatum, virtus autem peccati lex; et hoc de bona providentia Dei, ut concluderentur homines sub peccato, et quaererent adiutorem, quaererent gratiam, quaererent Deum, non de sua virtute praesumerent; ideo et hic cum dixisset: Aculeus autem mortis peccatum, virtus autem peccati lex; quid times? Quid laboras? Quid sudas? Audi quod sequitur: Gratias autem Deo, qui dedit nobis victoriam per Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum . Certe tu tibi das victoriam? Gratias Deo, qui dedit nobis victoriam per Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum.
11. 11. If, then, you wish to escape the threatening law, flee to the helping Spirit. For what the law commands, faith hopes for. Cry to your God, that he help you. Do not remain guilty under the letter, but let God help you by his Spirit: lest the proud Jew be like you. For when the sting of death was sin, and the power of sin the law; what would human infirmity do, in which the will was wearied? To will, he says, lies near at hand for me; but to accomplish the good I do not find (Rom 7:18). What, then, would it do? Behold, the sting of death is sin, behold, the power of sin is the law. But the law crept in, that the offense might abound. For if the law could give life, righteousness would surely be from the law. But Scripture has shut up all things under sin (Rom 5:20; Gal 3:21-22). How did it shut up? Lest you wander, lest you be cast headlong, lest you be drowned; the law made bars for you, that, not finding by what way to go out, you might fly together to grace. But Scripture has shut up all things under sin, that the promise. He who promises, promises what he does, not what you do. If you were going to do it, God would be a foreteller, not a promiser. But Scripture, he says, has shut up all things under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe (Gal 3:22). Hear: might be given. Why are you proud? Hear: might be given. For what do you have that you have not received (1 Cor 4:7)? Therefore, because the sting of death is sin, but the power of sin the law; and this from the good providence of God, that men might be shut up under sin, and seek a helper, seek grace, seek God, not presume on their own power; therefore here too, when he had said, But the sting of death is sin, but the power of sin is the law; why do you fear? Why do you labor? Why do you sweat? Hear what follows: But thanks be to God, who gave us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Cor 15:57). Surely you do not give yourself the victory? Thanks be to God, who gave us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
Sermons5.11.11
12. 12. Ergo cum coeperis laborare pugnans contra concupiscentias carnis, spiritu ambula, spiritum invoca, donum Dei quaere. Et si lex membris repugnat legi mentis tuae ex parte inferiori, id est, a carne, captivum te tenet sub lege peccati; et hoc emendabitur, et hoc transiet in iura victoriae. Tu tantum clama, tu tantum invoca. Oportet semper orare, et non deficere . Invoca omnino, invoca adiutorium. Adhuc te loquente, dicit, ecce adsum . Post intellege, et audis dicentem animae tuae: Salus tua ego sum . Cum ergo lex carnis repugnare coeperit legi mentis, et captivum te ducere in lege peccati, quae est in membris tuis; orando dic, confitendo dic: Miser ego homo. Quid enim aliud est homo? Quid est homo, nisi quod memor es eius? Dic: Miser ego homo; quia nisi venisset Filius hominis, periisset homo. Exclama in angustiis: Quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Ubi lex in membris meis repugnat legi mentis meae. Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem . Quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Si hoc fideliter, si humiliter dicis; verissime respondetur: Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Conversi ad Dominum...
12. 12. Therefore, when you have begun to labor, fighting against the desires of the flesh, walk by the Spirit, call upon the Spirit, seek the gift of God. And if the law in the members fights against the law of your mind from the lower part—that is, from the flesh—and holds you captive under the law of sin; this too will be amended, this too will pass into the rights of victory. Only cry out, only call. One ought always to pray, and not to fail (Luke 18:1). Call utterly, call for help. While you are still speaking, he says, behold, here I am (Isa 58:9). Understand afterward, and you hear him saying to your soul, I am your salvation (Ps 35:3 (34:3)). When, then, the law of the flesh begins to fight against the law of the mind, and to lead you captive in the law of sin which is in your members; say in praying, say in confessing, Wretched man that I am. For what else is man? What is man, that you are mindful of him (Ps 8:4 (8:5))? Say, Wretched man that I am; because unless the Son of man had come, man would have perished. Cry out in your straits, Who will free me from the body of this death? where the law in my members fights against the law of my mind. For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man (Rom 7:24.22). Who will free me from the body of this death? If you say this faithfully, if humbly; most truly it is answered, The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:25). Let us turn to the Lord . . .
Sermons5.12.12
SERMO 163/A
Sermon 163/A
Sermons5.12.12
1. Ut audeamus loqui vobis, fides facit, qua credimus ut oretis pro nobis. Scio enim quod in cordibus vestris sumus ad commoriendum et ad convivendum ; ad hanc nos spem nutrit vestrae caritatis affectus. Itaque, quod Dominus donaverit, obsecro ut libenter audire dignemini.
1. That we dare to speak to you, faith brings about, by which we believe that you pray for us. For I know that we are in your hearts to die together and to live together (See 2 Cor 7:3); to this hope the affection of your love nourishes us. And so, what the Lord shall grant, I beseech you to deign to hear gladly.
Sermons5.1
2. Audivimus apostolum Paulum, cum eius epistola legeretur, apostolica auctoritate ammonentem atque dicentem: Spiritu, inquit, ambulate, et concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis; caro enim concupiscit adversus spiritum, spiritus autem concupiscit adversus carnem; haec enim invicem adversantur, ut non ea quae vultis faciatis . Proposuit ante oculos nostros quoddam bellum, in quo caro et spiritus ita confligunt, ut non quae volumus faciamus; et quoniam imperio Dei subicienda est carnis concupiscentia, contionatus est in certamine constitutos, et ait: Spiritu ambulate, et concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis. Pugnate, inquit, fortiter, et vincite, non rebellantem contra vos extraneam naturam, sed concupiscentiam quae regnat in membris vestris. Video, inquit Apostolus, aliam legem in membris meis . Oppugnat, expugna; rebellat, refrena; noli concedere membra tua, et non occidit animam tuam. Non regnet, inquit, peccatum in vestro mortali corpore, neque exhibeatis membra vestra arma iniquitatis peccato . Nega concupiscentiae arma sua, et praevalet victoria tua. Pugna, labora; nemo athleta sine sudore coronatur. In stadio et in agone, in certamine constitutus es; contra spiritum tuum carnis concupiscentia dimicat. Caro concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus concupiscit adversus carnem. Caro suggerit libidinem, spiritus imperet castitatem; caro incendit ad iracundiam, spiritus imperet misericordiam. In isto certamine constitutus, cum rebellanti concupiscentiae non dederis membra, quae fuerunt arma iniquitatis peccato, fiunt arma iustitiae Deo .
2. We heard the apostle Paul, when his epistle was read, admonishing by apostolic authority and saying, Walk by the Spirit, he says, and do not accomplish the desires of the flesh; for the flesh covets against the spirit, but the spirit covets against the flesh; for these are opposed to one another, that you may not do what you wish (Gal 5:16-17). He set before our eyes a certain warfare, in which the flesh and the spirit so contend that we do not do what we wish; and since the concupiscence of the flesh must be subjected to the command of God, he gave a discourse to those set in the contest, and said, Walk by the Spirit, and do not accomplish the desires of the flesh. Fight, he says, bravely, and conquer—not a foreign nature rebelling against you, but the concupiscence that reigns in your members. I see, says the Apostle, another law in my members (Rom 7:23). It assails, assail back; it rebels, restrain it; do not yield your members, and it does not kill your soul. Let not sin reign, he says, in your mortal body, nor present your members as arms of iniquity to sin (Rom 6:12-13). Deny concupiscence its arms, and your victory prevails. Fight, labor; no athlete is crowned without sweat. You are set in the stadium and in the contest, in the struggle; against your spirit the concupiscence of the flesh fights. The flesh covets against the spirit, and the spirit covets against the flesh. The flesh suggests lust, let the spirit command chastity; the flesh inflames to anger, let the spirit command mercy. Set in this contest, when you do not give to the rebelling concupiscence your members, which were arms of iniquity to sin, they become arms of righteousness to God (See Rom 6:13).
Sermons5.2
3. Ergo, carissimi, spiritu ambulate, et concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis . In hac pugna constitutus, noli praesumere de liberi arbitrii tui viribus; nam vincit te adversarius. Implora adiutorium gratiae Dei, et tunc vincis rebellantem contra te concupiscentiam carnis. Sed forte iam victus est, et inquies forte: Iam victus sum, iam contra me tenet arma concupiscentia, iam regnat peccatum in meo mortali corpore ad oboediendum desideriis eius. Exclama, et dic cum Paulo: Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Condelector legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem; video autem aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivum me ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis . Tantus campi doctor captivus ducitur; quid facio ego captivus et infirmus? Implora ergo adiutorium gratiae; respondebitur tibi, et dicetur: Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Quis me, inquit, liberabit de corpore mortis huius? O Manichaee, de corpore mortis huius dixit, non de captivitate gentis illius. Gratia, inquit, Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum. O Pelagiane, per Iesum Christum, inquit, Dominum nostrum, non per liberum arbitrium nostrum.
3. Therefore, dearly beloved, walk by the Spirit, and do not accomplish the desires of the flesh (Gal 5:16). Set in this fight, do not presume on the strength of your free choice; for the adversary conquers you. Implore the help of the grace of God, and then you conquer the concupiscence of the flesh rebelling against you. But perhaps you are already conquered, and you will say perhaps: I am already conquered, concupiscence already holds arms against me, sin already reigns in my mortal body to obey its desires. Cry out, and say with Paul, Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? I delight in the law of God according to the inner man; but I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and leading me captive in the law of sin which is in my members (Rom 7:24.22-23). So great a teacher of the field is led captive; what do I do, captive and weak? Implore, then, the help of grace; it will be answered to you, and it will be said, The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Who will free me, he says, from the body of this death? O Manichean, he said from the body of this death, not from the captivity of that nation. The grace, he says, of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. O Pelagian, through Jesus Christ, he says, our Lord, not through our free choice.
Sermons5.3
4. Itaque, carissimi, si spiritu vivimus, spiritu et sectemur. Non efficiamur inanis gloriae cupidi . Audistis apostolicam lectionem: Spiritu ambulate, et concupiscentias carnis ne perfeceritis; caro enim concupiscit adversus spiritum, spiritus autem adversus carnem: haec autem invicem adversantur, ut non ea quae vultis faciatis. Itaque, si spiritu ducimini, non adhuc estis sub lege. Manifesta, inquit, sunt opera carnis, quae sunt fornicationes, immunditia, luxuria, idolorum servitus, veneficia, inimicitiae, contentiones, aemulationes, animositates, dissensiones, haereses, invidiae, ebrietates, comessationes, et his, inquit, similia; quae praedico vobis, sicut praedixi, quoniam, qui talia agunt, regnum Dei non possidebunt . Occidite in vobis carnis concupiscentiam adiuvante Dei gratia: contemnite carnis opera, amate fructum spiritus. Fructus enim spiritus gaudium est, pax, longanimitas, benignitas, bonitas, fides, mansuetudo, continentia . Haec facite, et in his estote , et Deus pacis erit vobiscum .
4. And so, dearly beloved, if we live by the spirit, let us also follow the spirit. Let us not become desirous of vainglory (Gal 5:25-26). You heard the apostolic reading: Walk by the Spirit, and do not accomplish the desires of the flesh; for the flesh covets against the spirit, but the spirit against the flesh: but these are opposed to one another, that you may not do what you wish. And so, if you are led by the Spirit, you are no longer under the law. The works of the flesh, he says, are manifest, which are fornications, uncleanness, debauchery, the service of idols, sorceries, enmities, contentions, jealousies, animosities, dissensions, heresies, envies, drunkennesses, carousings, and the like, he says; of which I foretell you, as I have foretold, that those who do such things will not possess the kingdom of God (Gal 5:18-21). Kill in yourselves the concupiscence of the flesh with the help of God's grace: despise the works of the flesh, love the fruit of the spirit. For the fruit of the spirit is joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, gentleness, continence (Gal 5:22-23). Do these things, and be in these, and the God of peace will be with you (See Phil 4:9).
Sermons5.4
SERMO 163/B
Sermon 163/B
Sermons5.4
1. Recolite commemorantem epistolae apostolicae lectionem: Fratres, inquit, si praeoccupatus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto, vos, qui spiritales estis, instruite huiusmodi in spiritu lenitatis, intendens te ipsum, ne et tu tempteris. Alter alterius onera portate, et sic implebitis legem Christi. Qui enim putat se esse aliquid, cum nihil sit, se ipsum seducit. Opus autem suum probet unusquisque, et tunc in semetipso tantum habebit gloriam, et non in altero. Unusquisque enim proprium onus portabit. Communicet autem, qui catechizatur verbum, ei, qui se catechizat, in omnibus bonis. Nolite errare, Deus non subsannatur; quod enim seminaverit homo, hoc et metet; quia qui seminaverit in carne, ex carne metet corruptionem; qui autem seminaverit in spiritu, de spiritu metet et vitam aeternam. Bonum autem facientes non infirmemur: tempore enim suo metemus infatigabiles. Itaque, dum tempus habemus, operemur bonum ad omnes, maxime autem ad domesticos fidei .
1. Recall the reading of the apostolic epistle that mentions: Brothers, he says, if a man is overtaken in any offense, you who are spiritual, instruct such a one in a spirit of gentleness, looking to yourself, lest you too be tempted. Bear one another's burdens, and so you will fulfill the law of Christ. For he who thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, seduces himself. But let each one prove his own work, and then he will have glory in himself alone, and not in another. For each one will bear his own burden. But let the one who is catechized in the word share in all good things with the one who catechizes him. Do not err, God is not mocked; for what a man sows, that will he also reap; for he who sows in the flesh, from the flesh will reap corruption; but he who sows in the spirit, from the spirit will reap also eternal life. But in doing good let us not grow weary: for in its own time we shall reap untiringly. And so, while we have time, let us work good toward all, but most of all toward those of the household of faith (Gal 6:1-10).
Sermons5.1
2. Huc usque recitatum est de epistola Apostoli : huc usque vobis tamquam lector fui. Sed, fratres mei, si intellectus est lector, cui rei necessarius est disputator? Ecce audivimus, intelleximus: faciamus, et vivamus. Et quid opus est vestram onerare memoriam? tenete ista, et inde cogitate. An forte movet aliquem vestrum, quomodo intellegendum sit quod ait: Invicem onera vestra portate; et paulo post ait: Unusquisque proprium onus portabit ? Dicitis enim in cordibus vestris, qui tamen hoc advertistis: Quomodo invicem onera nostra portamus, si unusquisque proprium onus portabit? Quomodo unusquisque proprium onus portabit, si invicem onera nostra portamus? Fateor, quaestio est. Pulsate, et aperietur vobis ; pulsate intendendo, pulsate studendo, pulsate etiam pro nobis, ut aliquid dignum vobis dicamus, orando; ita pulsantes adiuvatis nos, et cito ista quaestio soluta erit. Utinam, quam cito solvetur, tam efficaciter quisque quod intellexerit operetur! In pondere infirmitatis invicem onera nostra portamus; in ratione pietatis unusquisque proprium onus portabit. Quid est quod dixi? Omnes homines quid sumus nisi homines, ac per hoc infirmi, et qui omnino sine peccato non sumus? In hoc enim invicem onera nostra portamus. Si enim taedium passus fueris ad peccatum fratris tui, et ille ad tuum, neglegitis invicem, et facitis vere grande peccatum. Si autem quod ille non potest toleras tu, et quod tu non potes tolerat ille, invicem onera vestra portatis; et quia invicem onera vestra portatis, impletis legem sacratissimam caritatis. Ipsa est enim lex Christi; lex caritatis est lex Christi. Ideo venit, quia nos amavit; et non erat quod amaret, sed amando amabiles fecit. Audistis quid sit: Invicem onera vestra portate, et sic implebitis legem Christi . Quid est ergo: Unusquisque proprium onus portabit? Unusquisque pro peccato suo rationem reddet; de peccato alieno nemo rationem redditurus est. Habet quisque causam suam; Deo redditurus est rationem suam. Sed et ipsi praepositi, qui rationem reddunt de gregibus Christi, de peccato suo rationem reddunt, si neglexerint de gregibus Christi.
2. Thus far it was recited from the Apostle's epistle: thus far I have been to you as a reader. But, my brothers, if the reader is understood, for what is a disputant necessary? Behold, we have heard, we have understood: let us do, and let us live. And what need is there to burden your memory? hold these things, and from there think on them. Or does it perhaps trouble any of you how that is to be understood which he says, Bear one another's burdens; and a little after he says, Each one will bear his own burden? For you say in your hearts—those of you, however, who noticed this: How do we bear one another's burdens, if each one will bear his own burden? How will each one bear his own burden, if we bear one another's burdens? I confess, it is a question. Knock, and it will be opened to you (Matt 7:7); knock by attending, knock by studying, knock also for us by praying, that we may say something worthy of you; thus by knocking you help us, and quickly this question will be resolved. Would that, as quickly as it is resolved, each one might as effectively do what he understood! In the weight of infirmity we bear one another's burdens; in the reckoning of devotion each one will bear his own burden. What is it I have said? All men—what are we but men, and through this weak, and not at all without sin? For in this we bear one another's burdens. For if you grow weary at your brother's sin, and he at yours, you neglect one another, and you truly commit a great sin. But if what he cannot bear, you bear, and what you cannot bear, he bears, you bear one another's burdens; and because you bear one another's burdens, you fulfill the most sacred law of love. For this is the law of Christ; the law of love is the law of Christ. He came for this reason, because he loved us; and there was nothing he might love, but by loving he made us lovable. You have heard what is, Bear one another's burdens, and so you will fulfill the law of Christ. What, then, is, Each one will bear his own burden? Each one will render an account for his own sin; no one will render an account for another's sin. Each one has his own case; he will render to God his own account. But even the very superiors, who render an account for the flocks of Christ, render an account for their own sin, if they neglect the flocks of Christ.
Sermons5.2
3. Ergo, fratres, si praeoccupatus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto, vos, qui spiritales estis, quicumque estis qui spiritales estis, instruite huiusmodi in spiritu lenitatis . Et si clamas, intus ama. Hortaris, blandiris, corripis, saevis; dilige, et quidquid vis fac. Non enim pater odit filium: et tamen pater, si opus est, verberat filium; incutit dolorem, ut tueatur salutem. Hoc est ergo: In spiritu lenitatis. Si enim praeoccupatus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto et dixeris: Non ad me pertinet; et dixero tibi: Quare ad te non pertinet? et responderis mihi: Quia unusquisque proprium onus portabit; respondebo tibi: Certe libenter audisti, et intellexisti : Invicem onera vestra portate. Ergo si praeoccupatus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto, tu [qui] spiritalis es, instrue huiusmodi in spiritu lenitatis. De peccato quidem suo ipse redditurus est rationem, quia unusquisque proprium onus portabit; sed tu vulnus illius si neglexeris, de peccato neglegentiae tuae malam redditurus es rationem; ac per hoc, si invicem onera vestra non portaveritis, malam rationem habebitis in eo quod unusquisque proprium onus portabit. Facite illud, ut invicem onera vestra portetis, et parcit vobis Deus, quod unusquisque proprium onus portabit. Si enim portabis onus alterius, quando praeoccupatur in aliquo delicto, ut in spiritu lenitatis instruas eum, venies ad eum locum ubi audisti: Unusquisque proprium onus portabit; et bona conscientia dicis Deo: Dimitte nobis debita nostra . Ergo, fratres, mementote: Si praeoccupatus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto... Non transeunter accipias: Homo. Potuit enim dicere: Si praeoccupatus fuerit quispiam, si praeoccupatus fuerit quicumque; non hoc dixit, sed dixit: Homo. Valde autem difficile est, ut non in aliquo delicto praeoccupetur homo: quia quid est homo?
3. Therefore, brothers, if a man is overtaken in any offense, you who are spiritual—whoever you are who are spiritual—instruct such a one in a spirit of gentleness. And if you cry out, within love. You exhort, you flatter, you rebuke, you rage; love, and do whatever you wish. For a father does not hate his son: and yet a father, if there is need, flogs his son; he inflicts pain, that he may guard his health. This, then, is, In a spirit of gentleness. For if a man is overtaken in any offense, and you say: It does not pertain to me; and I say to you: Why does it not pertain to you? and you answer me: Because each one will bear his own burden; I will answer you: Surely you gladly heard, and understood: Bear one another's burdens. Therefore, if a man is overtaken in any offense, you who are spiritual, instruct such a one in a spirit of gentleness. For his own sin he himself will render an account, because each one will bear his own burden; but if you neglect his wound, you will render a bad account for the sin of your negligence; and through this, if you do not bear one another's burdens, you will have a bad account in that each one will bear his own burden. Do this, that you bear one another's burdens, and God spares you in that each one will bear his own burden. For if you bear another's burden, when he is overtaken in any offense, so as to instruct him in a spirit of gentleness, you will come to that place where you heard, Each one will bear his own burden; and with a good conscience you say to God, Forgive us our debts (Matt 6:12). Therefore, brothers, remember: If a man is overtaken in any offense . . . Do not take it in passing: A man. For he could have said: If anyone is overtaken, if whoever is overtaken; he did not say this, but said, A man. But it is very difficult that a man not be overtaken in some offense: for what is man?
Sermons5.3
4. Sed spiritales isti, quos admonuit, ut in lenitate instruant eum hominem, qui delicto fuerit praeoccupatus, forte dicebant in cordibus suis: Portemus onera eorum, qui praeoccupantur delictis; quia nos non habemus, quid in nobis ipsi portare possint. Audi, quia non debes esse securus, sequentia verba; vide: Intendens te ipsum, ne et tu tenteris . Ne superbirent spiritales, ne se extollerent; quamquam, si sunt spiritales, non se extollent; timeo ne propterea se extollant, quia carnales sunt; tamen attendat et spiritalis, ne et ipse tentetur. Numquid enim quia spiritalis est, homo non est? Numquid quia spiritalis est, non portat corruptibile corpus quod aggravat animam ? Numquid quia spiritalis est, finivit hanc vitam, quae tota tentatio est super terram ? Ego bene illi dictum est, omnino bene: Intendens te ipsum, ne et tu tenteris. Et cum admonuisset illos, id est spiritales, intulit continuo generalem illam sententiam: Alter alterius onera portate, et sic implebitis legem Christi . Quid est: alter alterius? Carnalis portet onus alterius carnalis, spiritalis portet alterius spiritalis. Invicem onera vestra portate, peccata vestra invicem nolite neglegere. Apud quos fiducia est vobis, arguite; apud quos arguendi fiducia non fuerit, admonete; et si hoc necesse est, ne quisquam peccet, orate, rogate. An forte humiliavi vos, quia dixi, rogate? Apostolum audite: Praecipientes autem, inquit, et rogamus, ne in vacuum gratiam Dei suscipiatis . Medicus si vires invenerit in aegroto, corripit; si autem vires non invenerit, et timet ne sub amaritudine correptionis forte deficiat, supplicat, rogat, ut audiat, faciat et vivat. Constat ergo propter hoc dixisse Apostolum: Invicem onera vestra portate, quia spiritalem admonuerat, et dixerat: Intendens te ipsum, ne et tu tenteris; ne tantum sibi arrogaret iste spiritalis, ut putaret se non habere onus, quod debeat ab altero subportari.
4. But those spiritual ones, whom he admonished to instruct in gentleness the man who has been overtaken by an offense, perhaps said in their hearts: Let us bear the burdens of those who are overtaken by offenses; because we do not have anything in ourselves that they could bear. Hear, that you ought not to be secure, the following words; see: Looking to yourself, lest you too be tempted. Lest the spiritual be proud, lest they exalt themselves; although, if they are spiritual, they will not exalt themselves; I fear lest they exalt themselves for this reason, because they are carnal; yet let even the spiritual one attend, lest he too be tempted. For is he not a man because he is spiritual? Because he is spiritual, does he not carry a corruptible body that weighs down the soul (Wis 9:15)? Because he is spiritual, has he ended this life, which is wholly a temptation upon the earth (Job 7:1)? It is well said to him, wholly well: Looking to yourself, lest you too be tempted. And when he had admonished those—that is, the spiritual—he at once brought in that general sentence: Bear one another's burdens, and so you will fulfill the law of Christ (Gal 6:2). What is, one another's? Let the carnal bear the burden of another carnal one, let the spiritual bear that of another spiritual one. Bear one another's burdens, do not neglect one another's sins. Among those with whom you have confidence, reprove; among those with whom you have not confidence to reprove, admonish; and if this is necessary, that no one sin, pray, ask. Or have I perhaps humbled you, because I said, ask? Hear the Apostle: But commanding, he says, we also ask, that you not receive the grace of God in vain (See 2 Cor 6:1). The physician, if he finds strength in the sick man, rebukes; but if he does not find strength, and fears lest under the bitterness of the rebuke he perhaps fail, he supplicates, asks, that he may hear, do, and live. It is agreed, then, that the Apostle said this—Bear one another's burdens—because he had admonished the spiritual one, and had said, Looking to yourself, lest you too be tempted; lest this spiritual one arrogate so much to himself as to think that he has no burden which ought to be borne up by another.
Sermons5.4
5. Audi ipsum rursus, propter typhum, propter tumorem, propter inflationem, audi ipsum iterum: Qui etiam putat se esse aliquid, cum nihil sit, se ipsum seducit . Non potuit dici melius, se ipsum seducit. Non in omnibus diabolus est accusandus; aliquando enim ipse homo diabolus suus est. Cur enim cavendus est diabolus? Nempe ideo ne te seducat. Nonne ergo tu ipse es diabolus tuus, quando te ipsum seducis? Quid deinde? Opus autem suum probet unusquisque, et tunc in semetipso tantum habebit gloriam et non in altero . Quando facis aliquid boni, si propterea tibi placet, quia laudat te alter; si autem alter te hinc non laudaret, in faciendo opere bono deficeres, destitutus vocibus laudatoris, in altero habes gloriam, non in te ipso. Si laudat, facis; si forte bonum opus tuum displicuerit homini stulto, non facis. Nonne vides homines res suas effundentes histrionibus, et nihil pauperi porrigentes, quam multorum ore laudantur? Numquid ideo bonum est quod faciunt, quia laudantur? Expergiscere tandem: Laudatur peccator in desideriis animae suae. Omnes acclamastis, quia Scripturam sanctam, unde testimonium commemoravimus, nostis; audiant et qui nesciunt. Scriptura santa dixit, Scriptura sancta praedixit: Quoniam laudatur peccator in desideriis animae suae, et qui iniqua gerit benedicitur . Modo iam si laudatur peccator in desideriis animae suae, et qui iniqua gerit benedicitur, quaere laudatores. Dilaniant te desideria mala; fac iniquitates quotidie ad explenda desideria tua, et quaere laudatores. Mihi crede, non invenis nisi adulatores aut seductores. Quomodo adulatores, quomodo seductores? Debeo verborum meorum reddere rationem. Adulatores sunt, qui sciunt te mala facere, et tamen laudant; qui vero ideo te laudant male facientem, quia bonum putant esse quod facis, non sunt adulatores, quia ex animo laudant, sed sunt seductores, quia ad illa mala facienda te suarum laudum frequentatione seducunt, et respirare non sinunt. Is enim in auras inanes, putas bonum esse quod facis: praecipitas bona tua, exinanis domum tuam, nudos relinquis filios tuos. Laudes illae insanum fecerunt: curris, manus moves, favores accipis, ad os ponis; fundis domum, et colligis ventum. Quomodo, inquis, sunt isti seductores mei, qui me ex animo laudant? Ideo sunt seductores tui, quia prius errando fuerunt et sui. Itane vero scalas ad te ponere laborabit, ut non te seducat, qui seipsum seducit? Ergo laudatur peccator in desideriis animae suae, et qui iniqua gerit benedicitur. Cave tu talem laudatorem, vita huiusmodi benedictorem. Immo tu bonum fac. Sed, inquies, displicebo tali illi, si fecero. Et displice illi, et place Deo; si enim illi displicueris, et Deo placueris, in te ipso habebis gloriam, et non in altero. Sed detrahunt mali bonis, et amatores huius saeculi maledicunt contemptoribus saeculi, dicunt opprobria, quaerunt quid reprehendant; mox ut aliquid mali dictum fuerit, continuo credunt: si aliquid boni dictum fuerit, credere nolunt; et turbatur cor tuum, ut deficias in benefaciendo, quia non est inventus laudator vel adulator aut deceptor, et non tibi sufficit testimonium conscientiae tuae, in theatro pectoris tui, sub oculis Dei. Quare turbaris, obsecro te, quare turbaris? Quia multa dicuntur de me mala. Hoc dicis? Non turbareris in navi cordis tui, nisi Christus ibi dormiret.
5. Hear him again, on account of pomposity, on account of swelling, on account of puffing-up, hear him again: He who even thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, seduces himself (Gal 6:3). It could not be said better: he seduces himself. The devil is not to be accused in all things; for sometimes the man himself is his own devil. For why is the devil to be guarded against? Surely for this reason, lest he seduce you. Are you not, then, your own devil, when you seduce yourself? What then? But let each one prove his own work, and then he will have glory in himself alone, and not in another (Gal 6:4). When you do something good, if it pleases you for this reason, because another praises you; but if another did not praise you for it, you would fail in doing a good work, destitute of the voices of the praiser, you have glory in another, not in yourself. If he praises, you do it; if perhaps your good work displeases a foolish man, you do not do it. Do you not see men pouring out their goods to actors, and holding out nothing to the poor man, how they are praised by the mouths of many? Is what they do therefore good, because they are praised? Wake up at last: The sinner is praised in the desires of his soul. You all cried out, because you know the holy Scripture from which we mentioned the testimony; let those who do not know it hear too. The holy Scripture said, the holy Scripture foretold: For the sinner is praised in the desires of his soul, and he who does unjust deeds is blessed (Ps 10:3 (9:24)). Now then, if the sinner is praised in the desires of his soul, and he who does unjust deeds is blessed, seek praisers. Evil desires tear you apart; commit iniquities daily to fulfill your desires, and seek praisers. Believe me, you will find none but flatterers or seducers. How flatterers, how seducers? I must render an account of my words. Flatterers are those who know you do evil, and yet praise you; but those who praise you doing evil for this reason, because they think what you do is good, are not flatterers, because they praise from the soul, but are seducers, because by the frequency of their praises they seduce you to do those evils, and do not allow you to breathe. For going thus into the empty winds, you think what you do is good: you cast away your goods, you empty your house, you leave your children naked. Those praises made you mad: you run, you move your hands, you receive applause, you put it to your mouth; you pour out your house, and you gather wind. How, you say, are those my seducers, who praise me from the soul? They are your seducers for this reason, because by erring they were first their own. Will he then labor to put ladders up to you, so as not to seduce you, who seduces himself? Therefore the sinner is praised in the desires of his soul, and he who does unjust deeds is blessed. Beware of such a praiser, avoid a blesser of this kind. Rather, do good yourself. But, you will say, I will displease that man, if I do it. And displease him, and please God; for if you displease him, and please God, you will have glory in yourself, and not in another. But the evil detract from the good, and the lovers of this age curse the despisers of the age, speak reproaches, seek what to reproach; as soon as something evil is said, they at once believe it: if something good is said, they are unwilling to believe; and your heart is troubled, so that you fail in doing good, because no praiser or flatterer or deceiver has been found, and the testimony of your conscience does not suffice you, in the theater of your breast, under the eyes of God. Why are you troubled, I beseech you, why are you troubled? Because many evil things are said about me. Is this what you say? You would not be troubled in the ship of your heart, unless Christ slept there.
Sermons5.5
6. Audisti, cum Evangelium legeretur, irruit magna tempestas, et navis turbabatur, et operiebatur fluctibus . Quare? Quia Christus dormiebat. Quando dormit Christus in corde tuo, nisi quando oblivisceris fidem tuam? Fides Christi in corde tuo, tamquam in navi Christus est. Audis opprobria, fatigaris, turbaris: dormit Christus. Excita Christum, excita fidem tuam. Habes quid facias vel turbatus; excita fidem tuam. Evigilet Christus, et loquatur tibi: Turbant te opprobria? Quae non ego prior audivi pro te? Hoc tibi dicit Christus, sic te alloquitur fides tua; audi illam, et vide quia sic te alloquitur; nisi forte oblitus es, quia pro nobis passus est Christus , et ante quam pro nobis tanta mala pateretur, audivit opprobria. Daemonia eiciebat, et dicebatur ei: Daemonia habes . De illo per Prophetam dictum est: Opprobria exprobrantium tibi ceciderunt super me . Excita ergo Christum, et dicet tibi in corde tuo: Cum vobis detraxerint homines, et dixerint omne malum adversum vos propter me, gaudete et exsultate, quoniam merces vestra copiosa est in caelis . Crede quod dictum est, et fit in corde tuo tranquillitas magna. Si ergo putat se esse aliquid homo, cum sit nihil, se ipsum seducit; opus autem suum probet unusquisque, et tunc in semetipso gloriam habebit, et non in altero. Sive laudet, sive reprehendat, tu in temetipso habes gloriam, quia gloria tua Deus tuus est in conscientia tua; et eris similis virginibus sapientibus, quae tulerunt oleum secum in vasis, ut non in altero haberent gloriam, sed in se ipsis. Nam illae, quae non tulerunt oleum secum, mendicaverunt ab ipsis, et extinctae sunt lampades earum et dixerunt: Date nobis de oleo vestro . Quid est: Date nobis de oleo vestro, nisi: Laudate opera nostra, quia non nobis sufficit conscientia nostra? Quod obscurum videbatur in apostolica lectione, sicut Dominus donavit, exposui. Cetera plana sunt: non quaerunt expositorem, sed factorem. Ut autem quod audivimus faciamus, ipsum rogemus, sine cuius adiutorio facere nihil boni poterimus; quoniam ipse dixit suis discipulis: Sine me nihil potestis facere . Conversi ad Dominum...
Vere dico Caritati vestrae, quia nostrorum desiderium et querellas etiam per litteras ferre non possumus; sed quia hoc, quod petitis, iam iussit et sanctus senex, sic concludo sermonem. Natalis beati Cypriani certe iam propinquat; propter eam sollemnitatem in me retinendo violenti esse voluistis: ergo, qui verbo studemus, bonum est ut etiam corpore ieiunemus.
6. You heard, when the Gospel was read, a great storm broke out, and the ship was tossed, and was being covered by the waves (See Matt 8:24). Why? Because Christ was sleeping. When does Christ sleep in your heart, except when you forget your faith? The faith of Christ in your heart is as Christ in the ship. You hear reproaches, you are wearied, you are troubled: Christ sleeps. Awaken Christ, awaken your faith. You have something to do even when troubled; awaken your faith. Let Christ wake, and speak to you: Do reproaches trouble you? Which did I not first hear for you? This Christ says to you, thus your faith addresses you; hear it, and see that it thus addresses you; unless perhaps you have forgotten that Christ suffered for us (See 1 Pet 2:21), and before he suffered such great evils for us, he heard reproaches. He cast out demons, and it was said to him: You have a demon (See John 8:48). Of him it was said through the Prophet, The reproaches of those who reproach you fell upon me (Ps 69:9 (68:10)). Awaken Christ, then, and he will say to you in your heart, When men detract from you, and say all evil against you for my sake, rejoice and exult, for your reward is abundant in heaven (Matt 5:11-12). Believe what was said, and a great tranquillity comes to be in your heart. If, then, a man thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, he seduces himself; but let each one prove his own work, and then he will have glory in himself, and not in another. Whether he praise or reproach, you have glory in yourself, because your glory is your God in your conscience; and you will be like the wise virgins, who carried oil with them in vessels, so as to have glory not in another, but in themselves. For those who did not carry oil with them begged from them, and their lamps were going out, and they said, Give us of your oil (Matt 25:8). What is, Give us of your oil, but: Praise our works, because our conscience does not suffice us? What seemed obscure in the apostolic reading, as the Lord granted, I have expounded. The rest is plain: it does not seek an expositor, but a doer. But that we may do what we have heard, let us ask him without whose help we can do nothing good; since he himself said to his disciples, Without me you can do nothing (John 15:5). Let us turn to the Lord . . .
Truly I say to your Charity, that we cannot bear the longing for our own and their complaints even by letters; but because this which you ask the holy old man too has now commanded, I thus conclude the sermon. The birthday of blessed Cyprian is surely now drawing near; on account of that solemnity you wished to be violent in keeping me here: therefore, we who are eager for the word, it is good that we fast also in body.
Sermons5.6
SERMO 164
Sermon 164
Sermons5.6
1. 1. Omnes nos per Apostolum admonet veritas, ut invicem onera nostra portemus; et in eo ipso quo nos admonet, ut invicem onera nostra portemus, quo fructu id faciamus ostendit, adiungens et dicens: Et sic adimplebitis legem Christi ; quae non implebitur, nisi invicem onera nostra portemus. Quae sint onera ista, et quemadmodum portanda sint, quoniam quidem omnes pro nostris viribus conari debemus implere legem Christi, adiuvante Domino conabor ostendere. Quod me demonstraturum esse proposui, mementote ut exigatis; et cum reddidero, non petatis. Hoc me demonstraturum esse proposui, adiuvante Domino intentionem meam et pro me orationes vestras, quae sint onera quae invicem nos iubet ut portemus Apostolus, et quemadmodum portanda sint. Hoc si fecerimus, illud ubi fructum posuit, sua sponte consequetur, ut impleamus legem Christi.
1. 1. Truth, through the Apostle, admonishes us all to bear one another's burdens; and in the very thing in which he admonishes us to bear one another's burdens, he shows with what fruit we do it, adding and saying, And so you will fulfill the law of Christ (Gal 6:2); which will not be fulfilled, unless we bear one another's burdens. What these burdens are, and how they are to be borne—since indeed we all according to our strength ought to strive to fulfill the law of Christ—with the Lord's help I will try to show. What I have proposed to demonstrate, remember to demand; and when I have rendered it, do not ask for it. This I have proposed to demonstrate, the Lord helping my intention and your prayers for me: what the burdens are which the Apostle commands us to bear for one another, and how they are to be borne. If we do this, that wherein he placed the fruit will of its own accord follow—that we may fulfill the law of Christ.
Sermons5.1.1
1. 2. Dicit aliquis: Obscure enim Apostolus locutus est, ut tu coneris exponere quae sint ista onera, vel quemadmodum invicem sustinenda? Est illic quaestio, quae nos cogit onera distinguere. Et in ipso quippe capitulo lectionis habes ibi positum: Unusquisque autem proprium onus portabit . Iam ergo occurrit sensibus vestris: Si unusquisque onus proprium portabit, quomodo dicit: Invicem onera vestra portate ? Nisi quia onera distinguenda sunt, ne sibi contraria loqui putetur Apostolus. Non enim longe, non enim in alia Epistola, non enim in hac ipsa longe superius aut inferius; sed in eo ipso loco, ita ut sibi sint eadem verba contigua, utrumque posuit, et quia unusquisque proprium onus portabit, et quod admonuit et hortatus est, ut invicem onera nostra portemus.
1. 2. Someone says: Did the Apostle, then, speak obscurely, that you should try to expound what these burdens are, or how they are to be borne for one another? There is there a question which forces us to distinguish the burdens. For in the very passage of the reading you have it set down there: But each one will bear his own burden (Gal 6:5). Now then it occurs to your minds: If each one will bear his own burden, how does he say, Bear one another's burdens (Gal 6:2)? Unless the burdens are to be distinguished, lest the Apostle be thought to speak things contrary to himself. For not far off, not in another Epistle, not in this very one far above or below; but in that very place, so that the same words are contiguous to one another, he set down both: both that each one will bear his own burden, and what he admonished and exhorted, that we bear one another's burdens.
Sermons5.1.2
2. 3. Alia ergo sunt onera, in quibus unusquisque proprium portat, nec portat cum alio alter, nec proicit in alterum; et alia sunt onera, in quibus recte dicis fratri: Porto tecum, aut: Porto pro te. Si ergo distinctione opus est, non est facilis intellectus. Contra eos ergo qui putabant posse hominem contaminari peccatis alienis, respondit Apostolus: Unusquisque onus proprium portabit. Item, contra eos quibus per hoc possit neglegentia subintrare, ut quasi securi facti quod non contaminarentur peccatis alienis, neminem curarent corrigere: Invicem onera vestra portate . Breviter dictum, breviterque distinctum est; et quantum existimo, manifestationem veritatis non impedivit. Nam et breviter audistis, et cito intellexistis. Corda vestra non vidi; sed testes cordis voces audivi. Iam ergo tamquam de intellectis securi, aliquando latius disseramus; non ut intellegendum insinuetur, sed ut quod intellectum est, commendetur.
2. 3. There are, then, some burdens in which each one bears his own, nor does one bear it with another, nor cast it on another; and there are other burdens in which you rightly say to a brother: I bear it with you, or: I bear it for you. If, then, distinction is needed, the understanding is not easy. Against those, therefore, who thought that a man could be contaminated by another's sins, the Apostle answered, Each one will bear his own burden. Likewise, against those into whom negligence could creep through this, so that, made as it were secure that they would not be contaminated by another's sins, they would care to correct no one: Bear one another's burdens (Gal 6:5.2). It was briefly said, and briefly distinguished; and, as far as I reckon, it did not impede the manifestation of the truth. For you both heard briefly, and quickly understood. I did not see your hearts; but I heard the voices, witnesses of the heart. Now then, as it were secure about what has been understood, let us at last discourse more broadly; not that what is to be understood may be insinuated, but that what has been understood may be commended.
Sermons5.2.3
2. 4. Onera quae unusquisque sua portat, peccata sunt. Has detestabilium onerum sarcinas portantibus hominibus, et sub eis frustra sudantibus, Dominus dicit: Venite ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego reficiam vos . Quomodo reficit peccatis oneratos, nisi indulgentia peccatorum? Concionator mundi, de quadam specula excelsae auctoritatis exclamat: Audi, genus humanum; audite, filii Adam; audi, genus laboriosum et infructuosum: video laborem vestrum, videte donum meum. Scio, laboratis et onerati estis; et quod est miserius, perniciosas sarcinas, vestris humeris alligatis; ad haec, quod peius est, onera addi vobis petitis, non deponi.
2. 4. The burdens which each one bears as his own are sins. To men carrying these packs of detestable burdens, and sweating in vain under them, the Lord says, Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you (Matt 11:28). How does he refresh those burdened with sins, but by the forgiveness of sins? The preacher of the world, from a certain watchtower of lofty authority, cries out: Hear, human race; hear, sons of Adam; hear, laborious and unfruitful race: I see your labor, see my gift. I know, you labor and are burdened; and, what is more wretched, you bind pernicious packs to your shoulders; in addition, what is worse, you ask that burdens be added to you, not laid down.
Sermons5.2.4
3. 5. Quis nostrum brevi tempore potest multiplicitatem et varietatem harum disserere sarcinarum? Tamen inde pauca commemoremus, et de his cetera coniectemus. Vide hominem oneratum sarcina avaritiae, vide illum sub hac sarcina sudantem, anhelantem, sitientem, et laborando sarcinam addentem. Quid exspectas, o avare, amplectens onus tuum, et catenis cupiditatis alligans malam sarcinam sub humeros tuos? Quid exspectas? Quid laboras? Quid inhias? Quid concupiscis? Nempe satiare avaritiam. O vota inania et facta nequissima! Exspectas ergo satiare avaritiam? Illa te potest premere, tu illam non potes satiare. An forte non est gravis? Usque adeo sub hac sarcina sensum etiam perdidisti? Non est gravis avaritia? Quare ergo te de somno excitat, quae te aliquando etiam dormire non sinit? Et fortasse habes cum illa alterum onus pigritiae, et ista duo nequissima onera secumque pugnantia premunt te, et dilaniant te. Non enim paria imperant, non enim similia iubent. Pigritia dicit: Dormi; avaritia dicit: Surge. Pigritia dicit: Noli pati frigidos dies; avaritia dicit: Tolera in mari etiam tempestates. Illa dicit: Quiesce; illa non sinit quiescere. Iubet, non solum: Procede; sed et: Naviga trans mare, quaere terras quas ignoras. Merces in Indiam deportandae sunt; non nosti linguam Indorum, sed intellegibilis videtur sermo avaritiae. Venies ignotus ad ignotum; das, accipis, emis, portas; periclitatus pervenisti, cum periculis redis, exclamas in mari exagitatus tempestate: Deus, libera me. Non audis respondentem: Quare? Misi te? Avaritia tibi iussit ut acquireres quod non habebas; ego tibi iussi ut sine labore ante ostium tuum pauperi dares quod habebas. Illa te ad Indos misit ad reportandum aurum; ego tibi ad ostium Christum posui, a quo emeres regnum caelorum. Laboras in iussione avaritiae, in iussione mea non laboras. Ambo iussimus; non audisti me: cui obaudisti liberet te.
3. 5. Which of us can in a short time discuss the multiplicity and variety of these packs? Yet let us mention a few of them, and from these conjecture the rest. See a man burdened with the pack of greed, see him sweating under this pack, panting, thirsting, and by laboring adding to the pack. What do you await, O greedy one, embracing your burden, and binding an evil pack under your shoulders with the chains of desire? What do you await? Why do you labor? Why do you gape? Why do you covet? Surely to satisfy greed. O empty vows and most worthless deeds! Do you await, then, to satisfy greed? It can press you, you cannot satisfy it. Or is it perhaps not heavy? Have you under this pack lost even your senses? Is greed not heavy? Why, then, does it rouse you from sleep, which sometimes does not even allow you to sleep? And perhaps you have with it another burden, of laziness, and these two most worthless burdens, fighting with one another, press you and tear you apart. For they do not command equal things, do not order similar things. Laziness says: Sleep; greed says: Get up. Laziness says: Do not endure cold days; greed says: Bear even storms at sea. The one says: Rest; the other does not allow you to rest. It commands not only: Go forth; but also: Sail across the sea, seek lands you do not know. Goods must be carried to India; you do not know the language of the Indians, but the speech of greed seems intelligible. You will come unknown to the unknown; you give, receive, buy, carry; having been in peril you arrived, with perils you return, you cry out, tossed at sea by a storm: God, free me. Do you not hear him answering: Why? Did I send you? Greed commanded you to acquire what you did not have; I commanded you, without labor, before your door, to give to the poor man what you had. It sent you to the Indians to bring back gold; I set Christ at your door, from whom you might buy the kingdom of heaven. You labor at the command of greed, at my command you do not labor. We both commanded; you did not hear me: let the one you obeyed free you.
Sermons5.3.5
4. 6. Quam multi has sarcinas portant? Quanti mihi modo contra ipsas sarcinas loquenti sub ipsis positi exclamant? Cum sarcinis intrarunt, cum sarcinis exeunt; avari ingressi sunt, avari discedunt. Ego loquendo contra istas sarcinas laboravi. Si clamatis, ponite quod portatis. Postremo me nolite audire; Imperatorem vestrum audite clamantem: Venite ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis. Non enim venitis, nisi laborare desinatis. Vultis ad me currere, sed cum gravibus sarcinis non potestis. Venite, inquit, ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego vos reficiam . Do veniam praeteritorum peccatorum, tollam quod premebat oculos vestros, sanabo quod nocuit humeris vestris. Tollam quidem sarcinas, sed inanes a sarcinis non dimittam: tollam sarcinas malas, et imponam bonas. Cum enim dixisset: Et ego vos reficiam; adiunxit: Tollite iugum meum super vos . Male te subiugaverat cupiditas, salubriter te subiuget caritas.
4. 6. How many carry these packs? How many, set under those very packs, cry out to me as I now speak against them? With their packs they entered, with their packs they go out; greedy they came in, greedy they depart. I labored by speaking against those packs. If you cry out, lay down what you carry. Finally, do not listen to me; listen to your Emperor crying out, Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened. For you do not come, unless you cease to labor. You wish to run to me, but with heavy packs you cannot. Come, he says, to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you (Matt 11:28). I give pardon of past sins, I will take away what pressed your eyes, I will heal what harmed your shoulders. I will indeed take away the packs, but I will not let you go empty of packs: I will take away the evil packs, and impose good ones. For when he had said, And I will refresh you; he added, Take my yoke upon you (Matt 11:29). Desire had subjugated you badly, let love subjugate you wholesomely.
Sermons5.4.6
4. 7. Tollite iugum meum super vos, et discite a me . Si vobis viluit humanum qualecumque magisterium, discite a me. Christus clamat magister, unicus Dei Filius, solus verax, verus, veritas clamat: Discite a me. Quid? Quia in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum, et omnia per ipsum facta sunt ? Numquid hoc ab eo discere poterimus, mundum fabricare, caelum luminibus implere, diei noctisque, vicissitudines ordinare, tempora et saecula iubere percurrere, seminibus vim tribuere, animalibus terram replere? Nihil horum nos iubet discere magister caelestis: illa facit ut Deus.
4. 7. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me (Matt 11:29). If any human teaching whatever has become cheap to you, learn from me. Christ the master cries out, the only Son of God, the only truthful one, the true one, the truth cries out: Learn from me. What? That in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and all things were made through him (John 1:1.3)? Can we learn this from him—to fashion the world, to fill the heaven with lights, to order the alternations of day and night, to bid the times and ages to run their course, to grant power to seeds, to fill the earth with animals? The heavenly master commands us to learn none of these things: those he does as God.
Sermons5.4.7
5. 7. Sed quia iste Deus et homo esse dignatus est, in eo quod Deus est, audi ut recreeris; in eo quod homo est, audi ut imiteris. Discite, inquit, a me; non mundum fabricare, et creare naturas; nec illa quidem alia quae hic latens Deus, homo manifestus effecit; nec ipsa dicit: Discite a me febres ab aegrotantibus pellere, fugare daemonia, mortuos suscitare, ventis et fluctibus imperare, super aquas ambulare; nec hoc dicit: Discite a me. Haec enim dedit quibusdam discipulis suis, quibusdam non dedit: hoc autem, Discite a me, omnibus dicit; ab hoc praecepto nemo se excuset: Discite a me quoniam mitis sum, et humilis corde . Quare dubitas hanc sarcinam ferre? Haec sarcina gravis est, humilitas et pietas? Haec sarcina gravis est, fides, spes, caritas? Istae enim humilem, istae mitem reddunt. Et vide quia oneratus non eris, si ipsum audieris. Iugum enim meum lene est, et sarcina mea levis est . Quid est: levis est? Quid si habet pondus, sed minus? Plus habet avaritia, minus iustitia? Nolo sic intellegas. Haec sarcina non est pondus onerati, sed alae sunt volaturi. Habent enim et aves pennarum suarum sarcinas. Et quid dicimus? Portant illas, et portantur. Portant illas in terra, portantur ab illis in caelo. Tu si misericordiam velis praebere avi, praesertim aestate, et dicas: Miseram istam aviculam onerant pennae, et detrahas onus hoc; in terra remanebit, cui subvenire voluisti. Porta ergo pennas pacis, alas accipe caritatis. Haec est sarcina, sic implebitur lex Christi.
5. 7. But because this one deigned to be both God and man, in that which is God, hear that you may be recreated; in that which is man, hear that you may imitate. Learn, he says, from me; not to fashion the world, and create natures; nor those other things which this hidden God, manifest as man, did; nor does he say: Learn from me to drive fevers from the sick, to put demons to flight, to raise the dead, to command the winds and the waves, to walk upon the waters; nor does he say this: Learn from me. For these things he gave to certain of his disciples, to certain he did not give them: but this, Learn from me, he says to all; from this precept let no one excuse himself: Learn from me, for I am gentle and humble of heart (Matt 11:29). Why do you hesitate to bear this pack? Is this pack heavy—humility and devotion? Is this pack heavy—faith, hope, love? For these make humble, these make gentle. And see that you will not be burdened, if you hear him. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light (Matt 11:30). What is, it is light? What if it has weight, but less? Has greed more, righteousness less? I do not wish you to understand it thus. This pack is not the weight of one burdened, but the wings of one about to fly. For the birds too have the packs of their feathers. And what do we say? They carry them, and are carried. They carry them on earth, they are carried by them in heaven. If you wish to show mercy to a bird, especially in summer, and say: This poor little bird is burdened by its feathers, and you take away this burden; it will remain on the earth, the one you wished to help. Carry, then, the feathers of peace, take the wings of love. This is the pack, thus the law of Christ will be fulfilled.
Sermons5.5.7
6. 8. Distincta sunt onera. Videte nunc, nescio quis avarus intrat; nosti illum avarum, stat tecum, et tu non es avarus; sed etiam misericors, das pauperi quod habes, non inhias in ea quae non habes; audis dicentem Apostolum: Praecipe divitibus huius mundi, non superbe sapere, neque sperare in incerto divitiarum, sed in Deo vivo, qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum; divites sint in operibus bonis, facile tribuant, communicent, thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut apprehendant veram vitam . Audisti, agnovisti, didicisti, tenuisti, fecisti. Fac quod facis, noli pigrescere, noli cessare. Qui perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit . Bene fecisti homini, ingratus est homo; non te paeniteat bene fecisse, ne fundas paenitendo quod implesti miserando; dic in corde tuo: Non videt iste in quem feci, videt ille propter quem feci; quia iste si videret, si ingratus non esset, sibi potius quam mihi prodesset. Ad Deum me teneam, quem non latet quod facio; non solum quod facio, sed etiam quod corde facio; Illum sperem retributorem, qui facti mei non quaerit testem. Talis es, et forte in populo Dei stat iuxta te avarus raptor, inhians rebus alienis. Quem nosti talem, et fidelis est, vel potius fidelis vocatus, non eum potes de Ecclesia pellere, non habes aliquem aditum castigando et corripiendo corrigere, accessurus est tecum ad altare; noli timere: Unusquisque proprium onus portabit . Memento Apostoli, ut securus accedas: Unusquisque proprium onus portabit. Tantummodo non tibi dicat: Porta mecum. Nam si cum illo communicare volueris avaritiam, onus non minuetur, sed duo gravabuntur. Portet ergo sarcinam suam, et tu tuam: quoniam quando ex humeris Dominus tuus talem sarcinam excussit, alteram imposuit; excussit cupiditatis, imposuit caritatis. Ergo secundum cupiditates suas unusquisque sarcinam suam portat, malus malam, bonus bonam.
6. 8. The burdens are distinguished. See now, some greedy man enters; you know him as greedy, he stands with you, and you are not greedy; but even merciful, you give to the poor man what you have, you do not gape after the things you do not have; you hear the Apostle saying, Command the rich of this world not to be proudly wise, nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches, but in the living God, who furnishes us all things abundantly to enjoy; let them be rich in good works, give easily, share, treasure up for themselves a good foundation for the future, that they may lay hold of the true life (1 Tim 6:17-19). You heard, you acknowledged, you learned, you held, you did it. Do what you do, do not grow slack, do not cease. He who perseveres to the end, this one will be saved (Matt 10:22). You did good to a man, the man is ungrateful; do not repent of having done good, lest by repenting you pour out what you fulfilled by showing mercy; say in your heart: This one does not see for whom I did it, but he sees on whose account I did it; because this one, if he saw, if he were not ungrateful, would profit himself rather than me. Let me hold to God, from whom what I do is not hidden; not only what I do, but even what I do in my heart; let me hope in him as the repayer, who does not seek a witness of my deed. You are such; and perhaps among the people of God there stands beside you a greedy plunderer, gaping after others' goods. Whom you know to be such, and he is faithful, or rather called faithful, you cannot drive him from the Church, you have no avenue to correct him by chastising and rebuking, he is going to approach the altar with you; do not fear: Each one will bear his own burden. Remember the Apostle, that you may approach secure: Each one will bear his own burden. Only let him not say to you: Bear it with me. For if you wish to share greed with him, the burden will not be lessened, but two will be weighed down. Let him carry his own pack, then, and you yours: since, when your Lord shook off such a pack from your shoulders, he imposed another; he shook off that of desire, imposed that of love. Therefore, according to his own desires each one bears his own pack, the evil man an evil one, the good man a good one.
Sermons5.6.8
7. 9. Converte te iam et ad illud praeceptum: Invicem onera vestra portate . Habes enim sarcinam Christi; unde portes cum altero onus proprium. Pauper est, dives es; onus illius paupertas est; tu tale onus non habes. Vide ne forte cum te interpellaverit pauper, tu dicas: Unusquisque onus proprium portabit . Hic alterum praeceptum audi: Invicem onera vestra portate. Paupertas non est onus meum, sed est onus fratris mei. Vide ne divitiae sint maius onus tuum. Nam non habes onus paupertatem, sed habes onus divitias. Si bene intendas, onus est. Ille alterum onus habet, tu alterum. Porta cum illo, et portet tecum, ut invicem onera vestra portetis. Quod est onus paupertatis? Non habere. Quod est divitiarum onus? Plus quam opus est habere. Et ille oneratus est, et tu oneratus es. Porta cum illo non habere, portet tecum plus habere; ut fiant aequales sarcinae vestrae. Si enim dederis indigenti, minuis illi non habenti onus ipsius, quod erat non habere; si ei dederis, incipit habere; minutum est illi onus, quod vocatur non habere; minuit et ipse onus tuum, quod vocatur plus habere. Duo ambulatis viam Dei in peregrinatione huius saeculi: tu portabas sumptus magnos superfluos, ille autem sumptus non habebat; adhaesit tibi, comes tuus esse desiderans; noli neglegere, noli spernere, noli relinquere. Non vides quantum portes? Nihil portanti et non habenti da inde aliquid, et comitem adiuvabis, et te relevabis. Apostolica sententia satis, quantum opinor, exposita est.
7. 9. Turn now to that precept too: Bear one another's burdens (Gal 6:2). For you have the pack of Christ; whence you may bear with another his own burden. He is poor, you are rich; his burden is poverty; you do not have such a burden. See lest perhaps, when the poor man appeals to you, you say: Each one will bear his own burden. Here hear the other precept: Bear one another's burdens. Poverty is not my burden, but is the burden of my brother. See lest riches be your greater burden. For you do not have the burden, poverty, but you have the burden, riches. If you attend well, it is a burden. He has one burden, you another. Carry with him, and let him carry with you, that you may bear one another's burdens. What is the burden of poverty? Not to have. What is the burden of riches? To have more than is needed. Both he is burdened, and you are burdened. Carry with him not-having, let him carry with you having-more; that your packs may be made equal. For if you give to the needy, you lessen for him, the not-having one, his burden, which was not-having; if you give to him, he begins to have; the burden which is called not-having is lessened for him; he too lessens your burden, which is called having-more. Two of you walk the way of God in the pilgrimage of this age: you carried great superfluous provisions, but he had no provisions; he cleaved to you, desiring to be your companion; do not neglect, do not despise, do not abandon. Do you not see how much you carry? Give some of it to the one carrying nothing and having nothing, and you will both help your companion and relieve yourself. The apostolic sentence has been sufficiently, as I reckon, expounded.
Sermons5.7.9
7. 10. Non vobis fumos vendant qui dicunt: Sancti sumus, non portamus sarcinas vestras, ideo vobis non communicamus. Maiores isti portant sarcinas divisionis, maiores portant sarcinas praecisionis, sarcinas schismatis, sarcinas haeresis, sarcinas dissensionis, sarcinas animositatis, sarcinas falsorum testimoniorum, sarcinas calumniosarum criminationum. Istas sarcinas conati sumus, et conamur deponere de humeris fratrum nostrorum. Illi amant illas tenentes ad se, minores esse nolunt, quia ipsis sarcinis tumuerunt. Nam et qui ponit sarcinam, quam gestabat collo, quasi minor fit; sed pondus posuit, non staturam.
7. 10. Let them not sell you smoke who say: We are holy, we do not carry your packs, therefore we do not commune with you. These greater men carry the packs of division, they carry the greater packs of cutting-off, the packs of schism, the packs of heresy, the packs of dissension, the packs of animosity, the packs of false testimonies, the packs of slanderous accusations. These packs we have tried, and we try, to lay down from the shoulders of our brothers. They love holding them to themselves, they are unwilling to be smaller, because they have swelled with those very packs. For even one who lays down a pack that he carried on his neck becomes as it were smaller; but he has laid down weight, not stature.
Sermons5.7.10
7. 11. Sed ego, inquis, non communico peccatis alienis. Quasi hoc tibi dicam: Veni, communica peccatis alienis. Non hoc dico, novi quid dicat Apostolus; sed illud dico. Propter peccata aliena, si vera essent, et non tua magis essent, gregem Dei mixtum ovibus et haedis non desereres; aream dominicam, quamdiu palea trituratur, non relinqueres; retia dominica quamdiu bonos et malos pisces ad littus trahunt, non disrumperes. Et quomodo, inquis, ferrem quem novi malum? Nonne melius ipsum ferres, quam te foras efferres? Ecce quomodo ferres: si attenderes Apostolum dicentem: Unusquisque proprium onus portabit ; liberaret te ista sententia. Non enim cum illo communicares avaritiam, sed communicares cum illo Christi mensam. Et quid tibi obesset, si cum illo communicares Christi mensam? Apostolus dicit: Qui enim manducat et bibit indigne, iudicium sibi manducat et bibit . Sibi, non tibi. Sane si iudex es, si iudicandi potestatem accepisti, ecclesiastica regula, si apud te accusatur, si veris documentis testibusque convincitur, coerce, corripe, excommunica, degrada. Sic vigilet tolerantia, ut non dormiat disciplina.
7. 11. But I, you say, do not commune in others' sins. As if I said this to you: Come, commune in others' sins. I do not say this, I know what the Apostle says; but I say this. On account of others' sins, if they were true, and were not rather yours, you would not desert the flock of God, mixed with sheep and goats; you would not abandon the Lord's threshing-floor as long as the chaff is being threshed; you would not break the Lord's nets as long as they draw good and bad fish to the shore. And how, you say, would I bear one whom I know to be evil? Would you not rather bear him, than bear yourself out? Behold how you would bear him: if you attended to the Apostle saying, Each one will bear his own burden; this sentence would free you. For you would not share greed with him, but you would share with him the table of Christ. And what would harm you, if you shared with him the table of Christ? The Apostle says, For he who eats and drinks unworthily, eats and drinks judgment to himself (1 Cor 11:29). To himself, not to you. Of course, if you are a judge, if you have received the power of judging by ecclesiastical rule, if he is accused before you, if he is convicted by true evidence and witnesses, restrain, rebuke, excommunicate, degrade. So let toleration keep watch, that discipline does not sleep.
Sermons5.7.11
8. 12. Sed damnatus est, inquiunt, Caecilianus. Damnatus? A quibus? Primo absens, deinde a traditoribus innocens. Allegata sunt ista, gestis inserta, probata sunt. Enervare quidem vires veritatis conati sunt, et inanium nebulis prosecutionum eius serenitatem nebulare, quantum potuerunt, enisi sunt. Adfuit Dominus, vicit serenitas eius nebulas eorum. Et videte quomodo nescientes absolverunt Ecclesiam orbis terrarum, cuius communione gaudemus, qualescumque in ea simus. Non ipsos nos, sed ipsam tuemur, defendimus, obtinemus, aream dominicam defendendo, pro area dominica clamo. Tu quis in ea sim, nolo cures; ventilabrum exspecto . Nolo, inquam, hoc cures; aut si curare vis, noli cum lite curare, ut possis fratres sanare. Cura paleam, si potes; sed triticum noli relinquere, si paleam curare non potes. Excutiuntur aliquando de area dominica et paleae; interdum et grana, sed non longe. Sunt autem operarii boni, circumeunt aream, et ea quae foris excussa sunt, quibusdam mundatoriis trahunt et revocant in aream, etsi trahendo, etsi cogendo. Mundatoria instrumenta sunt leges istae mundanae. Revoca, etiam cum terra trahe triticum, ne propter terram pereat triticum. Damnatus est, inquiunt, Caecilianus. Damnatus est semel absens, ter absolutus est praesens. Respondimus eis; et homines indociles, quantum potuimus, breviter de suis factis admonuimus, et diximus: Quid recitatis contra Caecilianum concilium septuaginta episcoporum, sententias in absentem proferentium? Plures prolatae sunt a Maximianistarum concilio contra absentem Primianum. Diximus: Absens ab illis damnatus est Caecilianus, absens ab istis damnatus est Primianus. Quomodo isti non praeiudicant absenti Primiano, sic et illi praeiudicare non potuerunt absenti Caeciliano.
8. 12. But Caecilian was condemned, they say. Condemned? By whom? First in his absence, then by traitors—innocent. These things were alleged, inserted into the records, proved. They tried indeed to weaken the strength of the truth, and strove, as much as they could, to becloud its serenity with the mists of empty prosecutions. The Lord was present, his serenity conquered their mists. And see how, not knowing it, they absolved the Church of the whole world, in whose communion we rejoice, whatever sort we are in it. We protect, defend, hold not ourselves, but that Church, defending the Lord's threshing-floor; for the Lord's threshing-floor I cry out. What sort I am in it, I do not wish you to care; I await the winnowing-fan (See Matt 3:12). I do not wish, I say, that you care for this; or if you wish to care, do not care with strife, that you may be able to heal the brothers. Care for the chaff, if you can; but do not abandon the wheat, if you cannot care for the chaff. Sometimes even grains are shaken from the Lord's threshing-floor along with the chaff; meanwhile even grains, but not far off. But there are good workers, they go around the threshing-floor, and the things shaken outside they draw with certain cleansing tools and recall onto the threshing-floor, even if by drawing, even if by forcing. The cleansing tools are these worldly laws. Recall, draw the wheat even with the earth, lest on account of the earth the wheat perish. Caecilian was condemned, they say. He was condemned once in absence, three times absolved present. We answered them; and we admonished men, untaught, as briefly as we could, about their own deeds, and said: Why do you recite against Caecilian the council of seventy bishops, pronouncing sentences against an absent man? More were pronounced by the council of the Maximianists against the absent Primian. We said: Caecilian was condemned absent by those, Primian was condemned absent by these. As these do not prejudge the absent Primian, so neither could those prejudge the absent Caecilian.
Sermons5.8.12
9. 13. Quid eos putatis in hac angustia respondisse? Quid enim dicerent? Qua evaderent inclusi retibus veritatis? Ut haec retia violenter rumperent, quid dixerunt breviter et absolute pro nobis? Et quidem multa, et pene omnia pro nobis, sicut gesta indicabunt, quae iam proponenda vestra Caritas lectura est. Sed hoc loco rogo vos, et obsecro per Christum, ut teneatis, dicatis, in ore semper habeatis. Non potuit enim pro nobis brevior, et certior, et liquidior ferri sententia. Quid ergo dixit, cum hoc obiceremus: Sic non praeiudicant isti Caeciliano, quomodo nec illi Primiano. Et ille defensor illorum: Nec causa causae praeiudicat, nec persona personae . O responsum breve, liquidum, verum! Non enim scivit quid dixit; sed Caiphae similis, cum esset pontifex prophetavit : Nec causa causae praeiudicat, nec persona personae. Si nec causa causae, nec persona personae praeiudicat, ergo unusquisque sarcinam suam portat. Eat nunc et obiciat tibi Caecilianum; non tibi cuicumque homini, sed ipsi orbi terrarum obiciat Caecilianum. Quod cum facit, innocentem, obicit innocentibus. Prorsus gesta indicabunt liquidissime. Purgatus est Caecilianus. Sed fac eum non purgatum, fac criminosum inventum; audi vocem tuam ab orbe terrarum: Nec causa causae, nec persona personae praeiudicat. Anima haeretica, insanabilis, animosa, cum tu in te sententiam dicas, iudicem quid accusas? Si illum ego corrupi, ut iudicaret pro me; te quis corrupit, ut damnares te?
9. 13. What do you think they answered in this strait? For what would they say? By what would they escape, enclosed in the nets of truth? That they might violently break these nets, what did they say briefly and absolutely for us? And indeed many things, and nearly all for us, as the records will indicate, which your Charity is now to read as they are set forth. But in this place I ask you, and beseech you through Christ, that you hold it, say it, always have it in your mouth. For no briefer, surer, clearer sentence could be brought forth for us. What, then, did he say, when we objected this: Thus these do not prejudge Caecilian, as neither those Primian? And that defender of theirs: Neither does a cause prejudge a cause, nor a person a person. O answer brief, clear, true! For he did not know what he said; but, like Caiaphas, since he was high priest he prophesied (See John 11:51): Neither does a cause prejudge a cause, nor a person a person. If neither a cause prejudges a cause, nor a person a person, then each one bears his own pack. Let him now go and object Caecilian to you; not to you, any man whatever, but let him object Caecilian to the whole world itself. When he does this, he objects an innocent man to innocent men. Plainly the records will indicate most clearly. Caecilian was cleared. But suppose him not cleared, suppose him found criminal; hear your own voice from the whole world: Neither does a cause prejudge a cause, nor a person a person. Heretical soul, incurable, animated, when you pronounce sentence against yourself, why do you accuse the judge? If I corrupted him, to judge for me; who corrupted you, to condemn yourself?
Sermons5.9.13
10. 14. Utinam haec aliquando cogitent, vel sero cogitent, vel detumescente animositate cogitent; ad se redeant, se interrogent, se discutiant, sibi respondeant, pro veritate non timeant eos quibus falsitatem diutissime vendiderunt. Ipsos enim timent offendere; erubescunt humanae infirmitati, et non erubescunt invictissimae veritati. Utique hoc timent, ne dicatur eis: Quare ergo nos decepistis? Quare nos seduxistis? Quare tanta mala et falsa dixistis? Respondere deberent, si Deum timerent. Humanum fuit errare, diabolicum est per animositatem in errore manere. Melius quidem erat si numquam erraremus; sed vel quod secundum est faciamus, ut errorem aliquando emendemus. Decepimus, quia decepti eramus; falsa praedicavimus, qui praedicantibus falsa credidimus. Dicant suis: Simul erravimus, simul ab errore recedamus. Duces vobis fuimus ad foveam, et secuti estis cum duceremus ad foveam; et nunc sequimini cum ducimus ad Ecclesiam. Possent ista dicere; indignantibus dicerent, iratis dicerent, aliquando et illi ponerent indignationem, amarent vel sero unitatem.
10. 14. Would that they think on these things at some time, even late, even with their animosity subsiding; that they return to themselves, question themselves, examine themselves, answer themselves, for the truth not fear those to whom they have sold falsehood for so very long. For they fear to offend those very people; they blush before human infirmity, and do not blush before the most invincible truth. Surely they fear this, lest it be said to them: Why, then, did you deceive us? Why did you seduce us? Why did you say so many evil and false things? They ought to answer, if they feared God. It was human to err, it is devilish to remain in error through animosity. It would indeed be better if we never erred; but let us at least do the second-best thing, to amend the error at some time. We deceived, because we were deceived; we preached false things, who believed those who preached false things. Let them say to their own: Together we erred, together let us withdraw from the error. We were leaders to you to the pit, and you followed when we led to the pit; and now follow when we lead to the Church. They could say these things; they would say them to the indignant, say them to the angry, and at some time even those would lay aside their indignation, would love unity at least late.
Sermons5.10.14
10. 15. Nos tamen, fratres, patientes circa illos simus. In fervore sunt et tumore oculi quos curamus. Non dico ut curare cessemus; sed ut non insultationibus ad maiores amaritudines provocemus; rationem leniter reddamus, non de victoria superbe exsultemus. Servum enim Domini litigare non oportet, Apostolus dicit, sed mitem esse ad omnes, docibilem, patientem, in modestia corripientem diversa sentientes; ne forte det illis Deus paenitentiam, et resipiscant a diaboli laqueis, a quo captivi tenentur secundum ipsius voluntatem . Patienter ergo ferte, si sani estis, patienter ferte, in quantum sani estis. Nam quis perfecte sanus? Cum Rex iustus sederit in throno, quis gloriabitur mundum se habere cor, aut quis gloriabitur mundum se esse a peccato ? Ergo quamdiu tales sumus, hoc nobis debemus, ut invicem onera nostra portemus. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
10. 15. Yet let us, brothers, be patient toward them. They are in fever and swelling, the eyes that we are treating. I do not say that we should cease to treat them; but that we should not provoke them by insults to greater bitternesses; let us render the reason gently, let us not exult proudly over victory. For the servant of the Lord ought not to quarrel, the Apostle says, but to be gentle to all, teachable, patient, with modesty rebuking those who think differently; lest perhaps God give them repentance, and they recover from the snares of the devil, by whom they are held captive according to his will (2 Tim 2:24-26). Bear patiently, then, if you are sound, bear patiently, in proportion as you are sound. For who is perfectly sound? When the just King sits on his throne, who will boast that he has a clean heart, or who will boast that he is clean from sin (See Prov 20:8-9)? Therefore, as long as we are such, we owe this to ourselves, that we bear one another's burdens. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.10.15
SERMO 164/A
Sermon 164/A
Sermons5.10.15
1. Sunt qui existimant eleemosinas iustis tantummodo esse praebendas, peccatoribus autem eiusmodi dari oportere. In hoc errore primum sacrilegi locum Manichaei tenent, qui credunt in quocumque cibo Dei membra permixta et colligata detineri, quibus censent esse parcendum, ne a peccatoribus polluantur, et nodibus miserioribus implicentur. Haec insania minus digne fortasse refellitur, quam sanorum omnium sensus offendit, si tantummodo proponatur. Nonnulli autem, nihil tale sentientes, ideo peccatores putant non esse pascendos, ne contra Deum conemur, cuius in eis indignatio declaratur, tamquam ex hoc etiam nobis possit irasci, quia eis volumus subvenire, quos vult ipse punire. Adhibent etiam testimonia Scripturarum sanctarum, ubi legimus: Da misericordiam, et ne suscipias peccatorem, et impiis et peccatoribus redde vindictam. Bene fac humilii, et ne dederis impio. Quoniam et altissimus odio habet peccatores, et impiis reddet vindictam . Haec verba quemadmodum accipienda sint non intellegentes, detestabili crudelitate induuntur. Unde nos oportet de hac re, fratres, vestram alloqui caritatem, ne cogitatione perversa cum divina voluntate non consentiatis.
1. There are those who think that alms are to be given only to the righteous, but that to sinners such things ought not to be given. In this error the sacrilegious Manicheans hold the first place, who believe that in any food whatever the members of God are held mingled and bound, which they reckon must be spared, lest they be polluted by sinners and entangled in more wretched knots. This madness is perhaps less worthily refuted than it offends the sense of all the sound, if it is merely set forth. But some, thinking nothing of the sort, suppose for this reason that sinners are not to be fed, lest we strive against God, whose indignation is declared in them, as though by this he could even be angry with us, because we wish to help those whom he wishes to punish. They even bring forward testimonies of the holy Scriptures, where we read, Give mercy, and do not receive a sinner, and to the ungodly and sinners render vengeance. Do good to the humble man, and do not give to the ungodly. For the Most High too hates sinners, and to the ungodly will render vengeance (Sir 12:4-6). Not understanding how these words are to be taken, they clothe themselves in a detestable cruelty. Hence we ought, on this matter, brothers, to address your Charity, lest by a perverse thought you not consent with the divine will.
Sermons5.1
2. Omnibus esse impertiendam misericordiam docet Paulus apostolus apertissime dicens: Infatigabiles, inquit, cum tempus habemus, operemur bonum ad omnes, maxime autem ad domesticos fidei . Unde revera satis apparet, in huiusmodi operibus iustos esse praeponendos. Quos enim alios intellegamus domesticos fidei, cum alibi aperte sit positum: Iustus ex fide vivit ? Non tamen aliis hominibus, etiam peccatoribus, misericordiae claudenda sunt viscera, nec si etiam adversum nos hostilem animum gerant, ipso nostro Salvatore dicente ac monente: Diligite inimicos vestros, bene facite his qui oderunt vos . Neque hoc in Libris Veteribus tacitum est. Ibi enim legitur: Si esurierit inimicus tuus, ciba illum; sitit, potum da illi , quo etiam in Novo et Apostolus usus est .
2. That mercy is to be imparted to all, Paul the apostle teaches most openly, saying, Untiringly, he says, while we have time, let us work good toward all, but most of all toward those of the household of faith (Gal 6:9-10). Whence indeed it appears clearly enough that in works of this kind the righteous are to be preferred. For whom else should we understand as those of the household of faith, when elsewhere it is openly set down, The righteous lives by faith (Rom 1:17; Hab 2:4)? Yet to other men too, even sinners, the bowels of mercy are not to be shut, not even if they bear a hostile mind against us, our Savior himself saying and admonishing, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you (Matt 5:44; Luke 6:27). Nor is this passed over in silence in the Old Books. For there it is read, If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he thirsts, give him drink (Prov 25:21), which the Apostle too used in the New (See Rom 12:20).
Sermons5.2
3. Nec ideo tamen falsa sunt quae supra posuimus, quia et ipsa divina praecepta sunt: Da misericordiam, et ne suscipias peccatorem . Illa enim ob hoc dicta sunt, ne cuiquam peccatori propterea bene facias, quia peccator est, ut bene autem facias ei qui te odit, non quia peccator, sed quia homo est. Ita utrumque praeceptum tenebis, nec ad vindicandum remissus, nec ad subveniendum inhumanus. Omnis enim qui recta arguit peccatorem, quid aliud quam non vult eum esse peccatorem? Odit ergo in illo quod et Deus odit, ut perimatur quod homo fecit, et liberetur quod Deus fecit. Peccatum quippe homo fecit, ipsum autem hominem Deus. Et duo ista nomina cum dicimus, homo peccator, non utique frustra dicuntur. Quia peccator est corripe, et quia homo est, miserere. Nec omnino liberabis hominem, nisi eum persecutus fueris peccatorem. Huic officio omnis invigilat disciplina, sicut cuique regenti apta et accomodata est, non solum episcopo regenti plebem suam, sed etiam pauperi regenti domum suam, diviti regenti familiam suam, marito regenti coniugem suam, patri regenti prolem suam, iudici regenti provinciam suam, regi regenti gentem suam. Omnes hi, cum boni sunt, eis quos regunt bene utique volunt, et secundum impertitam ab universorum Domino potestatem, qui etiam regentes regit, dant operam ut idem ipsi quos regunt, et conserventur homines, et pereant peccatores . Ita implent quod scriptum est: Da misericordiam et ne suscipias peccatorem, ne hoc in illo salvum, quod peccator est, velint; et impiis et peccatoribus redde vindictam: et in hoc, ipsum quod impii et peccatores sunt deleatur in eis; bene fac humili, propter hoc quod humilis est, et ne dederis impio, propter hoc quod impius est, quoniam et Altissimus odio habet peccatores et impiis reddet vindictam , qui tamen, quia non solum peccatores et impii, verum etiam et homines sunt, facit oriri solem suum super bonos et malos, et pluit super iustos et iniustos . Ita nulli hominum claudenda est misericordia, nulli peccato impunitas relaxanda.
3. Nor are the things we set down above for this reason false, because they too are divine precepts: Give mercy, and do not receive a sinner (Sir 12:4). For those things were said for this reason: that you should not do good to any sinner because he is a sinner, but that you should do good to the one who hates you, not because he is a sinner, but because he is a man. So you will keep both precepts, neither slack to take vengeance, nor inhuman to help. For everyone who rightly rebukes a sinner—what else does he wish, but that he not be a sinner? He hates, then, in him what God too hates, so that what man made may be destroyed, and what God made may be freed. For man made the sin, but God made the man himself. And when we say these two names, "sinful man," they are surely not said in vain. Because he is a sinner, rebuke him; and because he is a man, have mercy. Nor will you wholly free the man, unless you persecute the sinner. To this office all discipline keeps watch, as it is fitting and suited to each one who governs—not only to the bishop governing his people, but also to the poor man governing his house, the rich man governing his household, the husband governing his wife, the father governing his offspring, the judge governing his province, the king governing his nation. All these, when they are good, surely wish well to those they govern, and according to the power imparted by the Lord of all, who governs even those who govern, they give effort that those whom they govern may both be preserved as men, and perish as sinners. So they fulfill what is written, Give mercy and do not receive a sinner—lest they wish that to be saved in him which is that he is a sinner; and to the ungodly and sinners render vengeance—and in this, that the very thing by which they are ungodly and sinners be blotted out in them; do good to the humble man, on account of this, that he is humble, and do not give to the ungodly, on account of this, that he is ungodly, for the Most High too hates sinners, and to the ungodly will render vengeance (Sir 12:4-6)—who nevertheless, because they are not only sinners and ungodly, but also men, makes his sun rise upon the good and the evil, and rains upon the just and the unjust (Matt 5:45). Thus mercy is to be shut to no man, impunity for no sin is to be relaxed.
Sermons5.3
4. Hinc itaque maxime intellegendum est, quam non sit contemnenda eleemosina, quae quibusque pauperibus iure humanitatis impenditur, quando quidem Dominus sublevabat indigentiam pauperum, etiam ex his loculis quos ex opibus implebat aliorum . Quod si forte quis dixerit, nec illos debiles et mendicos, quos Dominus iussit potius invitari , nec illos quibus solebat de loculis erogare, peccatores fuisse; ideo non esse consequens, ut propter haec evangelica testimonia, etiam peccatores a misericordibus suscipi vel pasci iubeantur; illud attendat, quod iam superius memoravi, quia utique peccatores et maxime scelerati sunt, qui oderunt et persequuntur Ecclesiam, de quibus tamen dicitur: Bene facite his qui oderunt vos . Et hoc exemplo Dei patris astruitur, qui facit solem suum oriri super bonos et malos, et pluit super iustos et iniustos . Non ergo suscipiamus peccatores propter quod sunt peccatores, sed tamen eos ipsos, quia et homines sunt, humana consideratione tractemus. Persequamur in eis propriam iniquitatem, misereamur communem conditionem. Et sic infatigabiles, cum tempus habemus, operemur bonum ad omnes, maxime autem ad domesticos fidei .
4. Hence, then, it is especially to be understood how almsgiving is not to be despised which is bestowed on any poor by the right of humanity, since indeed the Lord relieved the want of the poor even from those purses which he filled from the wealth of others (See Luke 8:3; John 13:29). But if perhaps someone says that neither those weak and beggarly persons whom the Lord rather commanded to be invited (See Luke 14:13), nor those to whom he was accustomed to distribute from the purses, were sinners; and therefore it does not follow that, on account of these gospel testimonies, even sinners are commanded to be received or fed by the merciful; let him attend to what I have already mentioned above—that surely those are sinners and most of all wicked who hate and persecute the Church, of whom, nevertheless, it is said, Do good to those who hate you (Luke 6:27). And this is built up by the example of God the Father, who makes his sun rise upon the good and the evil, and rains upon the just and the unjust (Matt 5:45). Let us not, then, receive sinners because they are sinners, but yet let us treat those very ones, because they are also men, with human consideration. Let us persecute in them their own iniquity, let us have mercy on the common condition. And so, untiring, while we have time, let us work good toward all, but most of all toward those of the household of faith (Gal 6:9-10).
Sermons5.4
SERMO 165
Sermon 165
Sermons5.4
1. 1. Apostolum audivimus, Psalmum audivimus, Evangelium audivimus; consonant omnes divinae lectiones, ut spem non in nobis, sed in Domino collocemus. Peto, inquit Apostolus, non infirmari in tribulationibus meis pro vobis, quae est gloria vestra . Peto, inquit, non infirmari, id est, ut non infirmemini, quando auditis me pati pro vobis tribulationes; quia haec est gloria vestra. Petit ergo eos, ut non infirmentur; quod non faceret, nisi eorum vellet excitare voluntatem. Si enim responderent: Quid nos petis quod in potestate non habemus? Numquid non viderentur sibi iustum reddidisse responsum? Et tamen Apostolus, nisi sciret esse in eis voluntatis propriae consensionem, ubi et ipsi aliquid agerent, non diceret: Peto. Et si diceret: Iubeo, nisi eos nosset adhibere posse iussioni suae voluntatem, sine causa hoc verbum de eius ore procederet. Sed rursus sciens sine Dei adiutorio infirmam esse hominis voluntatem, non solum ne dicerent: Voluntatis arbitrium non habemus, dixit: Peto; verum etiam ne dicerent: Voluntatis arbitrium sufficit nobis, videte quid addidit: Huius rei gratia. Cuius rei gratia, nisi quam supra dixerat: Peto non infirmari in tribulationibus meis pro vobis, quae est gloria vestra? Quia ergo voluntatis habetis arbitrium: Peto. Quia vero voluntatis non sufficit arbitrium ad implendum quod peto: Huius rei gratia flecto genua mea ad Patrem Domini nostri Iesu Christi, ex quo omnis paternitas in caelo et in terra nominatur. Ut det vobis . Quid: det vobis? Quod peto a vobis, rogo det vobis. Peto enim a vobis, propter arbitrium voluntatis: rogo det vobis, propter auxilium maiestatis.
1. 1. We have heard the Apostle, we have heard the Psalm, we have heard the Gospel; all the divine readings agree, that we place our hope not in ourselves, but in the Lord. I ask, says the Apostle, that you not be weakened in my tribulations for you, which is your glory (Eph 3:13). I ask, he says, that you not be weakened—that is, that you be not weakened, when you hear that I suffer tribulations for you; for this is your glory. He asks them, then, not to be weakened; which he would not do, unless he wished to rouse their will. For if they answered: Why do you ask of us what we do not have in our power? would they not seem to themselves to have given a just answer? And yet the Apostle, unless he knew there was in them a consent of their own will, where they too did something, would not say, I ask. And if he said, I command, unless he knew that they could apply their will to his command, in vain would this word proceed from his mouth. But again, knowing that without God's help the will of man is weak, not only lest they say: We have no choice of will, did he say, I ask; but also lest they say: The choice of will is enough for us, see what he added: For this reason. For what reason, but that which he had said above, I ask that you not be weakened in my tribulations for you, which is your glory? Because, then, you have the choice of will: I ask. But because the choice of will is not enough to fulfill what I ask: For this reason I bend my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom all fatherhood in heaven and on earth is named. That he may give you (Eph 3:14-16). What: give you? What I ask of you, I ask that he give you. For I ask of you, on account of the choice of will: I ask that he give you, on account of the help of his majesty.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Sed Apostoli verba praevenimus. Adhuc fortasse exspectatis audire, qui textum eiusdem lectionis memoria non tenetis, utrum revera ideo Apostolus pro ipsis ad Patrem genua flectat, ut det illis quod dixerat eis: Peto. Mementote ergo quid petierit ab ipsis. Peto non infirmari in tribulationibus meis pro vobis : hoc ab ipsis petit. Modo videte quid illis petit: Flecto genua mea ad Patrem Domini nostri Iesu Christi, ut det vobis secundum divitias gloriae suae virtute corroborari. Quid est aliud, nisi non infirmari? Virtute corroborari, inquit, per Spiritum eius . Iste Spiritus gratiae. Videte quid petit. Hoc a Deo petit, quod ab hominibus exigit; quia ut Deus velit dare, debes et tu ad accipiendum accommodare voluntatem. Quomodo vis accipere gratiam divinae bonitatis, qui sinum non aperis voluntatis? Det, inquit, vobis. Non enim habetis, nisi det vobis. Det vobis virtute corroborari per Spiritum eius. Si enim dederit vobis virtute corroborari, ibi dabit vobis non infirmari. In interiore homine habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus vestris. Totum hoc det vobis. In caritate radicati et fundati, ut praevaleatis comprehendere cum omnibus sanctis . Quid comprehendere? Det vobis per Spiritum suum virtute corroborari, et habitare in interiore homine vestro Christum per fidem, atque ita in caritate radicati et fundati possitis comprehendere cum omnibus sanctis: quid? Quae sit latitudo, longitudo, altitudo et profundum . Altitudo quidem in latina lingua utrumque significat: et quod sursum versus est, altitudinis nomen habet; et quod in profondum altum est altitudinis nomen habet. Ideo bene respondit interpres ad id quod sursum altum est, altitudinem dicere; ad illud quod deorsum altum est, profundum dicere.
2. 2. But we have anticipated the Apostle's words. Perhaps you still await to hear—you who do not hold in memory the text of this reading—whether the Apostle really bends his knees to the Father for them, that he may give them what he said to them: I ask. Remember, then, what he asked of them. I ask that you not be weakened in my tribulations for you: this he asks of them. Now see what he asks for them: I bend my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, that he may give you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with power. What else is this, but not to be weakened? To be strengthened with power, he says, through his Spirit (Eph 3:14-16). This is the Spirit of grace. See what he asks. This he asks of God, which he demands of men; because, that God may be willing to give, you too ought to fit your will to receiving. How do you wish to receive the grace of the divine goodness, you who do not open the bosom of your will? May he give, he says, you. For you do not have it, unless he give it you. May he give you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit. For if he gives you to be strengthened with power, there he will give you not to be weakened. That Christ may dwell through faith in your hearts, in the inner man. May he give you all this. Rooted and grounded in love, that you may be able to comprehend with all the saints (Eph 3:16-18). To comprehend what? May he give you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit, and that Christ may dwell in your inner man through faith, and so, rooted and grounded in love, you may be able to comprehend with all the saints: what? What is the breadth, the length, the height, and the depth (Eph 3:18). "Height" indeed in the Latin language signifies both: both what is upward has the name of "height"; and what is deep downward has the name of "height." Therefore the translator rightly rendered: for what is high upward, to say "height"; for what is high downward, to say "depth."
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Quid est ergo, fratres mei, exponam hoc ego vobis. Facilius forte si cuiquam sit, quid ergo? quia latitudinem, longitudinem, altitudinem, et profundum, quattuor ista quae dicit Apostolus, minus idoneus sum vel comprehendere vel proferre, transibo ab hoc? An forte pulsabo, et ut vobis salubre aliquid proferam, vestris orationibus adiuvabor? Quid pergis corde, homo christiane, per latitudinem terrae, longitudinem temporum, altitudinem caeli, profunditatem abyssi? Quando ista comprehendis vel mente vel corpore? Hoc est, sive cogitando sive carnis oculis intuendo, quando ista comprehendis? Ipsum audi Apostolum dicentem tibi: Mihi autem absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi . Et nos in illa gloriemur, vel quia super illam incumbimus. In illa gloriemur omnes, o boni fratres, in illa gloriemur. Ibi forte inveniemus et latitudinem, et longitudinem, et altitudinem, et profundum. His enim Apostoli verbis crux quodammodo nobis ante oculos constituta est. Habet enim latitudinem, in qua manus figuntur; habet longitudinem, quod inde usque ad terram ducitur lignum; habet et altitudinem, quod ab ipso transverso, in quo figuntur manus, excedit aliquantum, ubi caput crucifixi ponitur; habet et profundum, hoc est quod in terra figitur, et non videtur. Videte magnum sacramentum. Ab illo profundo quod non vides, surgit totum quod vides.
3. 3. What is it, then, my brothers? I will expound this to you. Perhaps if it were easier for anyone—what then? Because the breadth, length, height, and depth, these four things which the Apostle names, I am less fit either to comprehend or to set forth, shall I pass over this? Or shall I perhaps knock, and, that I may set forth something wholesome for you, be helped by your prayers? Why do you range in heart, O Christian man, through the breadth of the earth, the length of times, the height of heaven, the depth of the abyss? When do you comprehend these things, either with the mind or with the body? That is, either by thinking or by gazing with the eyes of the flesh, when do you comprehend these things? Hear the Apostle himself saying to you, But far be it from me to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ (Gal 6:14). And let us too glory in it, or because we lean upon it. In it let us all glory, O good brothers, in it let us glory. There perhaps we shall find the breadth, the length, the height, and the depth. For by these words of the Apostle the cross is in a way set before our eyes. For it has breadth, in which the hands are fixed; it has length, in that the wood is led from there down to the earth; it has also height, in that, from the very crossbeam in which the hands are fixed, it rises somewhat, where the head of the crucified is placed; and it has depth, that is, what is fixed in the earth and is not seen. See the great sacrament. From that depth which you do not see rises all that you see.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Ubi ergo est latitudo? Confer te ad vitam moresque sanctorum, qui dicunt: Absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi . Invenimus in moribus eorum latitudinem caritatis; unde illos admonet ipse Apostolus, dicens: Dilatamini, ne sitis iugum ducentes cum infidelibus . Et quia ipse latus erat, qui eos ad latitudinem exhortabatur, audi quid dicat: Os nostrum patet ad vos, o Corinthii; cor nostrum dilatatum est . Latitudo ergo caritas est, quae sola bene operatur. Latitudo facit ut hilarem datorem diligat Deus . Si enim angustiam passus fuerit, tristis dabit: si tristis dabit, perit quod dabit. Opus est ergo latitudine caritatis, ne pereat quidquid boni facis. Sed quoniam ait Dominus: Ubi abundabit iniquitas, refrigescet caritas multorum ; da mihi et longitudinem. Quae est longitudo? Qui perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit . Haec est longitudo crucis, ubi totum corpus porrigitur; ubi quodammodo statur, quo stando perseveratur. Si ergo quaeris, qui in cruce gloriaris, habere crucis latitudinem, habeto bene operandi virtutem. Si vis habere crucis longitudinem, habeto perseverandi longanimitatem. Si autem vis habere crucis altitudinem, nosce quid audias, et ubi audias: Sursum cor. Quid est: Sursum cor? Ibi spera, ibi ama: inde pete virtutem, ibi exspecta mercedem. Nam si bene operaris, et hilariter tribuis, videris habere latitudinem. Si in iisdem bonis operibus usque in finem perseveraveris, videris habere longitudinem. Sed si omnia haec non propter supernam mercedem facis, altitudinem non habebis; et illa iam nec latitudo erit nec longitudo. Quid est enim habere altitudinem, nisi cogitare Deum, amare Deum; et gratis amare ipsum Deum adiutorem, ipsum spectatorem, ipsum coronatorem, ipsum praemii largitorem; postremo ipsum praemium deputare, non aliud ab ipso quam ipsum exspectare? Si amas, gratis ama: si vere amas, ipse sit merces quem amas. An vero tibi cara sunt omnia, et vilis est ille qui condidit omnia?
4. 4. Where, then, is the breadth? Turn yourself to the life and morals of the saints, who say, Far be it to glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. We find in their morals the breadth of love; whence the Apostle himself admonishes them, saying, Be enlarged, do not be drawing the yoke with unbelievers (2 Cor 6:13-14). And because he himself was broad, who exhorted them to breadth, hear what he says: Our mouth is open to you, O Corinthians; our heart is enlarged (2 Cor 6:11). Breadth, then, is love, which alone works well. Breadth makes God love a cheerful giver (See 2 Cor 9:7). For if one suffers straits, he will give sadly: if he gives sadly, what he gives perishes. There is need, then, of the breadth of love, lest whatever good you do perish. But since the Lord says, Where iniquity abounds, the love of many will grow cold (Matt 24:12); give me also the length. What is the length? He who perseveres to the end, this one will be saved (Matt 10:22). This is the length of the cross, where the whole body is stretched out; where, as it were, one stands, by which standing one perseveres. If, then, you seek—you who glory in the cross—to have the breadth of the cross, have the virtue of working well. If you wish to have the length of the cross, have the long-suffering of persevering. But if you wish to have the height of the cross, know what you hear, and where you hear: Lift up your heart. What is, Lift up your heart? There hope, there love: from there seek virtue, there await the reward. For if you work well, and give cheerfully, you seem to have breadth. If in those same good works you persevere to the end, you seem to have length. But if you do not do all these things on account of the heavenly reward, you will not have height; and that will then be neither breadth nor length. For what is it to have height, but to think of God, to love God; and to love freely God himself the helper, himself the spectator, himself the crowner, himself the bestower of the reward; finally, to reckon him himself the reward, to await nothing else from him but himself? If you love, love freely: if you truly love, let the one you love be himself the reward. Or are all things dear to you, and is he cheap who founded all things?
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Haec ut possimus, flexit genua sua pro nobis Apostolus, utique ideo ut detur nobis. Terret enim et Evangelium: Vobis datum est scire mysterium regni, illis autem non est datum. Qui enim habet, dabitur ei. Quis autem habet cui dabitur, nisi cui datum est? Qui autem non habet, et quod habet auferetur ab eo . Quis autem non habet, nisi cui non est datum? Quare ergo illi datum est, et illi non est datum? Non me piget dicere, hoc est profundum crucis. De profundo nescio quo iudiciorum Dei, quae perscrutari contemplarique non possumus, procedit omne quod possumus. De profunditate, inquam, nescio qua iudiciorum Dei, quae inscrutabilia contemplari non possumus, perscrutari non valemus, procedit omne quod possumus. Quod possum, video: unde possim, non video; nisi quia et hoc hactenus video, quod novi esse a Deo. Quare autem illum, et non illum; multum est ad me, abyssus est, profundum crucis est; admiratione exclamare possum, disputatione demonstrare non possum. Quid possum exclamare de ista profunditate? Quam magnificata sunt opera tua, Domine! Gentes illuminantur, Iudaei excaecantur. Quidam parvuli sacramento Baptismatis abluuntur, quidam vero parvuli in morte primi hominis relinquuntur. Quam magnificata sunt opera tua, Domine! Nimis profundae factae sunt cogitationes tuae! Et sequitur: Vir imprudens non cognoscit, et stultus non intellegit haec . Quid non intellegit stultus et imprudens? Quia vel profundum est. Nam si stultus non intellegit, et sapiens intellegit, non est nimis profundum. Sed si sapiens intellegit quia profundum est, stultus non intellegit quia vel profundum est.
5. 5. That we might be able to do these things, the Apostle bent his knees for us, surely for this reason, that it might be given to us. For the Gospel too terrifies: To you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom, but to them it is not given. For he who has, to him it will be given. But who has, to whom it will be given, but the one to whom it has been given? But he who has not, even what he has will be taken from him (Matt 13:11-12). But who has not, but the one to whom it has not been given? Why, then, was it given to that one, and not given to that one? It does not irk me to say it: this is the depth of the cross. From some depth of the judgments of God, which we cannot scrutinize and contemplate, comes all that we can. From some depth, I say, of the judgments of God, which, unsearchable, we cannot contemplate, we cannot scrutinize, comes all that we can. What I can, I see: whence I can, I do not see; except that even this I see thus far, that I know it is from God. But why this one, and not that one; it is too much for me, it is an abyss, it is the depth of the cross; I can cry out in wonder, I cannot demonstrate by disputation. What can I cry out about this depth? How magnified are your works, O Lord (Ps 92:5 (91:6))! The gentiles are enlightened, the Jews are blinded. Some little children are washed in the sacrament of Baptism, but some little children are left in the death of the first man. How magnified are your works, O Lord! Your thoughts are made exceedingly deep! And it follows, The imprudent man does not know, and the fool does not understand these things (Ps 92:5-6 (91:6-7)). What does the fool and imprudent man not understand? That it is even deep. For if the fool does not understand, and the wise man understands, it is not exceedingly deep. But if the wise man understands that it is deep, the fool does not understand that it is even deep.
Sermons5.5.5
5. 6. Ideo multi de isto profundo quaerentes reddere rationem, in fabulas vanitatis abierunt. Aliqui dixerunt quod animae sursum in caelo peccant, et secundum sua peccata ad corpora pro meritis diriguntur, et dignis ibi quasi carceribus includuntur. Ierunt post cogitationes suas; volentes disputare de Dei profundo, mersi sunt in profundum. Occurrit enim eis Apostolus, volens gratiam commendare, et elegit illos geminos in utero Rebeccae, et dicit: Nondum enim natis, nec qui aliquid egerint boni aut mali . Vide quemadmodum tulit vanis hominibus phantasias conversationis animarum ante corpus in caelo. Si enim ibi iam conversatae sunt, iam aliquid boni egerunt vel mali, et pro meritis suis ad corpora terrena detrusae sunt. Si placet, contradicamus Apostolo, qui dixit: Nondum natis, nec qui aliquid egerint boni aut mali. Hoc autem quia propter Apostoli evidentem sententiam respuit catholica fides, quod animae in caelis prius vivant et conversentur, et illic recipiendorum corporum merita assumant, modo isti novelli non audent dicere.
5. 6. Therefore many, seeking to render a reason for this depth, have gone off into fables of vanity. Some have said that souls sin above in heaven, and according to their sins are directed to bodies according to their deserts, and are shut up there as it were in fitting prisons. They went after their own thoughts; wishing to dispute about the depth of God, they were drowned in the depth. For the Apostle meets them, wishing to commend grace, and he chose those twins in the womb of Rebecca, and says, For when they were not yet born, nor had done anything good or evil (Rom 9:11). See how he took from vain men the fancies of a sojourn of souls before the body in heaven. For if they had already sojourned there, they had already done something good or evil, and were thrust down to earthly bodies according to their deserts. If it please, let us contradict the Apostle, who said, Not yet born, nor having done anything good or evil. But because, on account of the Apostle's evident sentence, the catholic faith rejects this—that souls live and sojourn first in the heavens, and there take on the deserts of the bodies they are to receive—these newcomers now do not dare to say it.
Sermons5.5.6
6. 7. Sed quid dicunt? Aliqui, sicut audivimus, ipsorum ita disputant: Prorsus, inquiunt, pro meritis suis omnes homines moriuntur, quia peccaverunt; non enim esset mors nisi veniens de peccato. Optime quidem et vere dictum est: Non esset mors, nisi veniens de peccato. Sed ego, cum hoc audio, ideo laudo, quia illam primam mortem intueor et illius primi hominis peccatum. Audio enim Apostolum: Sicut in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificabuntur . Per unum hominem peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors; et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccaverunt . Omnes enim unus fuerunt. Sic te audio dicentem mortem hominis de peccato esse? Non, inquit. Et quid dicis? Omnem hominem Deus immortalem creat modo. Mirabilis novitas. Quid dicis? Prorsus, inquit, omnem hominem Deus immortalem creat. Quare ergo moriuntur parvuli infantes? Nam si dicam: Quare moriuntur grandes homines? Dicturus es mihi: Peccaverunt. Ergo de maiorum aetate non disputabo: parvulorum infantiam contra te testem citabo. Non loquuntur, et convincunt; tacent, et quod dico probant. Ecce infantes in suis utique operibus innocentes sunt, nihil secum nisi quod de primo homine traxerunt habentes; quibus propterea est gratia Christi necessaria, ut in Christo vivificentur, qui in Adam mortui sunt; ut quia inquinati sunt generatione, purgentur regeneratione. Ipsos ergo testes citabo. Responde mihi: Quare moriuntur, si omnes homines immortales nascuntur, et quoniam peccant, ideo moriuntur? Quid putatis dici potuisse? Quae aures ferant? Peccaverunt et ipsi. Ubi peccaverunt? Rogo te, quando peccaverunt? quomodo peccaverunt? Bonum et malum quid sit nesciunt. Peccatum accipiunt, qui praeceptum non capiunt? Proba mihi peccatores infantes; quod dixisti, vere quia oblitus es quod fuisti, proba mihi peccata infantium. An quia plorant, peccant? Quia motibus quasi mutorum animalium, molestias repellunt, voluptates accipiunt, ideo peccant? Si motus isti peccata sunt, ampliores peccatores in Baptismo fiunt; quia cum baptizantur, vehementissime reluctantur. Quare illis in tanta reluctatione non imputatur peccatum, nisi quia nullum est adhuc voluntatis arbitrium?
6. 7. But what do they say? Some of them, as we have heard, dispute thus: Plainly, they say, all men die according to their own deserts, because they have sinned; for there would be no death but coming from sin. It is indeed most well and truly said: There would be no death but coming from sin. But I, when I hear this, praise it for this reason, because I look to that first death and the sin of that first man. For I hear the Apostle: As in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive (1 Cor 15:22). Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death; and so it passed into all men, in whom all sinned (Rom 5:12). For all were one. Do I hear you, then, saying that the death of man is from sin? No, he says. And what do you say? God now creates every man immortal. A wonderful novelty. What do you say? Plainly, he says, God creates every man immortal. Why, then, do little infants die? For if I say, Why do grown men die? you will say to me: They sinned. So I will not dispute about the age of the older: the infancy of little ones I will cite as a witness against you. They do not speak, and they convict; they are silent, and they prove what I say. Behold, infants are surely innocent in their own works, having with them nothing but what they drew from the first man; for whom therefore the grace of Christ is necessary, that they may be made alive in Christ, who died in Adam; that, because they were stained by generation, they may be cleansed by regeneration. These very ones, then, I will cite as witnesses. Answer me: Why do they die, if all men are born immortal, and because they sin, therefore they die? What do you suppose could be said? What ears could bear it? They too sinned. Where did they sin? I ask you, when did they sin? how did they sin? They do not know what good and evil is. Do they receive sin who do not grasp a precept? Prove to me that infants are sinners; what you said, truly because you forgot what you were, prove to me the sins of infants. Or do they sin because they weep? Because by movements as of dumb animals they repel discomforts, take pleasures, do they therefore sin? If those movements are sins, they become greater sinners in Baptism; because when they are baptized, they struggle most vehemently. Why is sin not imputed to them in so great a struggle, except because there is as yet no choice of will?
Sermons5.6.7
6. 8. Sed aliud dico: Isti quia nati sunt, ut arbitraris, peccarunt. Nam si non peccarent, inquis, non morerentur. Quid de illis dicis qui in utero moriuntur? O angustia! Et ipsi, inquit, peccarunt, ideo moriuntur. Mentiris, an falleris? Contradicit Apostolus: Nondum natis, nec aliquid agentibus boni aut mali . Magis Apostolum audio quam te: magis Apostolo credo quam tibi: Nondum natis, nec aliquid agentibus boni aut mali. Si autem hoc testimonium refellis, vade tibi potius ad illas vagationes, et dic: Quia in caelo peccaverunt, et inde in corpora praecipitantur. Non dico, inquit. Quare non dicis? Quia dicit Apostolus: Nondum natis, nec aliquid agentibus boni aut mali. Si ergo non eos accusas in caelo, quare accusas in utero? Ad utrumque respondet Apostolus, et eis respondet qui dicunt: In caelo peccaverunt; et eis respondet qui dicunt: In utero peccaverunt, quia ad utrumque valent illa verba quae dicunt, antequam nascerentur, nihil egisse vel boni vel mali. Quare ergo moriuntur? Et hic te auditurus sum, et non potius Magistrum Gentium?
6. 8. But I say something else: These, because they were born, as you reckon, sinned. For if they did not sin, you say, they would not die. What do you say of those who die in the womb? O strait! They too, he says, sinned, therefore they die. Do you lie, or are you deceived? The Apostle contradicts you: Not yet born, nor doing anything good or evil (Rom 9:11). I hear the Apostle rather than you: I believe the Apostle rather than you: Not yet born, nor doing anything good or evil. But if you refute this testimony, go rather to those wanderings, and say: Because they sinned in heaven, and from there are cast down into bodies. I do not say it, he says. Why do you not say it? Because the Apostle says, Not yet born, nor doing anything good or evil. If, then, you do not accuse them in heaven, why do you accuse them in the womb? To both the Apostle answers, and answers those who say, They sinned in heaven; and answers those who say, They sinned in the womb, because those words avail for both, which say that, before they were born, they did nothing either good or evil. Why, then, do they die? And here too am I to hear you, and not rather the Teacher of the Gentiles?
Sermons5.6.8
7. 9. Dic mihi, Paule apostole, quare moriuntur? Per unum hominem peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors; et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccaverunt . Ecce primus homo totam massam damnabilem fecit: veniat, veniat Dominus noster, secundus homo; veniat, veniat; ex alio tramite veniat, per virginem veniat; vivus veniat, mortuos inveniat: moriatur, ut morienti subveniat, mortuos ad vitam transferat, mortuos redimat a morte, servet vitam in morte, occidat mortem de morte. Sola est ista gratia parvulorum, sola maiorum: sola liberat pusillos cum magnis. Quare illum, et quare illum; quare non illum atque illum; nolo a me quaeras. Homo sum: profundum crucis adverto, non penetro; expavesco, non scrutor. Inscrutabilia sunt iudicia eius, investigabiles sunt viae eius . Homo sum, homo es; homo erat qui dicebat: O homo, tu quis es qui respondeas Deo? Homo dicebat, homini dicebat. Audiat homo, ne pereat homo, propter quem Deus factus est homo. In hac ergo crucis profunditate, in hac rerum tanta obscuritate teneamus quod cantavimus: non de nostra virtute praesumamus, non ingenioli nostri viribus in hac quaestione aliquid arrogemus: Psalmum dicamus, cum Psalmo dicamus: Miserere mei, Deus, miserere mei . Quare? Quia virtutem habeo qua te promerear? Non. Quare? Quia voluntatis arbitrium gero, unde gratiam tuam meritum meum praecedat? Non. Sed quare? Quoniam in te confidit anima mea . Magna scientia, ista confidentia. Conversi ad Dominum...
7. 9. Tell me, Paul the apostle, why do they die? Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death; and so it passed into all men, in whom all sinned (Rom 5:12). Behold, the first man made the whole lump damnable: let him come, let him come, our Lord, the second man; let him come, let him come; let him come by another path, let him come through a virgin; let him come living, let him find the dead: let him die, that he may help the dying, transfer the dead to life, redeem the dead from death, keep life in death, slay death from death. This grace alone is for the little ones, alone for the grown; alone it frees the small with the great. Why this one, and why that one; why not this one and that one; do not seek of me. I am a man: I notice the depth of the cross, I do not penetrate it; I am terrified, I do not scrutinize it. His judgments are unsearchable, his ways untraceable (Rom 11:33). I am a man, you are a man; a man was he who said, O man, who are you to answer back to God (Rom 9:20)? A man said it, said it to a man. Let man hear, lest man perish, on whose account God became man. In this depth of the cross, then, in this so great obscurity of things, let us hold to what we have sung: let us not presume on our own strength, let us not arrogate anything in this question to the powers of our little wit: let us say the Psalm, with the Psalm let us say, Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy on me (Ps 57:1 (56:2)). Why? Because I have virtue by which I may earn you? No. Why? Because I bear the choice of will, whence my merit may go before your grace? No. But why? Because in you my soul trusts (Ps 57:1 (56:2)). A great knowledge, this confidence. Let us turn to the Lord . . .
Sermons5.7.9
SERMO 166
Sermon 166
Sermons5.7.9
1. Hanc sententiam, quam dixit Apostolus: Deponentes mendacium, loquimini veritatem , non esse contrariam illi sententiae, quae dicta est in Psalmo: Omnis homo mendax , si Dominus dat intellectum, breviter exponemus. Quid ergo est: Deponentes mendacium, loquimini veritatem; et: Omnis homo mendax? An impossibilia per Apostolum Deus iubet? Non. Quid ergo iubet? Audeo dicere: sed sine contumelia dictum accipiatis, quia et in me ipsum dico; hoc iubet Deus, ut non simus homines. Si enim dicerem: Iubet Deus, ut non sitis homines, acerbe forsitan acciperetis; et me itaque coniunxi, ne quis irascatur.
1. That this sentence which the Apostle said, Putting away lying, speak the truth (Eph 4:25), is not contrary to that sentence which was said in the Psalm, Every man is a liar (Ps 116:11 (115:11)), if the Lord gives understanding, we will briefly expound. What, then, is, Putting away lying, speak the truth; and, Every man is a liar? Does God, through the Apostle, command impossible things? No. What, then, does he command? I dare to say it—but receive it as said without offense, because I say it about myself too: God commands this, that we be not men. For if I said, God commands you not to be men, you would perhaps take it harshly; and so I joined myself in, lest anyone be angry.
Sermons5.1
2. Plus enim dico Sanctitati vestrae: invenimus Apostolum tamquam crimen obiecisse hominibus, quia homines sunt; obiurgans enim illos hoc dixit. Quomodo nos irati dicimus alicui: Pecus es; sic ille corripiens in flagello dominicae disciplinae, obiecit hominibus quia homines erant? Quid illos fieri volebat, quibus crimen erat quia homines erant? Cum enim sit inter vos, inquit, aemulatio et contentio, nonne carnales estis, et secundum hominem ambulatis? Cum enim quis dicat: Ego quidem sum Pauli; alius autem, Ego Apollo; nonne homines estis ? Exprobrans et obiurgans ait: Nonne homines estis? Quid ergo eos fieri volebat, nisi quod in Psalmo dicitur: Ego dixi, dii estis et filii Altissimi ? Hoc quidem dixit Deus: ad hoc enim vocat. Sed quid subiungit? Vos autem sicut homines moriemini, et sicut unus ex principibus cadetis . Et ibi opprobrium obiectum est, cum dicitur: Vos autem sicut homines moriemini. Homo enim Adam, et non filius hominis; Christus autem Filius hominis, et Deus. Ad mendacium vetus homo pertinet, id est, Adam; ad veritatem novus homo Filius hominis, hoc est Christus Deus. Si deponis mendacium, exue Adam; si loqueris veritatem, indue Christum; et non tibi erunt contraria quae modo in Scripturis sunt posita. Quia et Apostolus exuendum hominem veterem et induendum novum monens, dicit: Deponentes mendacium, loquimini veritatem. Et Psalmus illos admonebat et plangebat, qui nolentes exuere Adam et induere Christum, non novi homines, sed tantum homines esse cupiebant, qualibus dicitur: Nonne homines estis? et in quos cadit quod dictum est: Omnis homo mendax.
2. For I say more to your Holiness: we find the Apostle as it were objecting it to men as a charge, that they are men; for rebuking them he said this. Just as we, angry, say to someone: You are a beast; so he, rebuking them under the lash of the Lord's discipline, objected to men that they were men. What did he wish them to become, to whom it was a charge that they were men? For since there is among you, he says, jealousy and contention, are you not carnal, and walk according to man? For when one says: I indeed am of Paul; but another, I of Apollos; are you not men (1 Cor 3:3-4)? Reproaching and rebuking, he says, Are you not men? What, then, did he wish them to become, but what is said in the Psalm, I said, you are gods, and sons of the Most High (Ps 82:6 (81:6))? This indeed God said: for to this he calls. But what does he add? But you will die like men, and fall like one of the princes (Ps 82:7 (81:7)). And there the reproach is objected, when it is said, But you will die like men. For Adam is a man, and not a son of man; but Christ is the Son of man, and God. To lying belongs the old man—that is, Adam; to truth the new man, the Son of man, that is, Christ God. If you put away lying, strip off Adam; if you speak the truth, put on Christ; and the things that are now set down in the Scriptures will not be contrary to you. Because the Apostle too, admonishing that the old man be stripped off and the new put on, says, Putting away lying, speak the truth. And the Psalm admonished and lamented those who, unwilling to strip off Adam and put on Christ, desired to be not new men, but only men, to whom it is said, Are you not men? and on whom falls what was said, Every man is a liar.
Sermons5.2
3. Si homo vis esse, mendax eris. Noli velle esse homo, et non eris mendax. Indue Christum, et eris verax; ut quae locutus fueris, non tua sint quasi propria, et abs te instituta, sed illustrantis te et illuminantis veritatis. Nam si spoliaberis lumine, remanebis in tenebris tuis, et non poteris nisi mendacia loqui. Ait enim ipse Dominus: Qui loquitur mendacium, de suo loquitur ; quia omnis homo mendax . Qui ergo loquitur veritatem, non de suo loquitur, sed de Dei. Non quidem ita, ut eum loqui dicamus aliena; fiunt enim sua, cum amat quod accipit, et gratias agit illi qui dedit. Nam si ablata fuerit homini illustratio veritatis, remanebit tamquam nudus indumento luminis, et non poterit nisi mendacia loqui. Hoc enim in illo remanebit, quod in Psalmo scriptum est: Omnis homo mendax.
3. If you wish to be a man, you will be a liar. Do not wish to be a man, and you will not be a liar. Put on Christ, and you will be truthful; so that the things you speak may be not your own as if your own, and established by you, but of the truth that illuminates and enlightens you. For if you are stripped of light, you will remain in your darkness, and you will be able only to speak lies. For the Lord himself says, He who speaks a lie speaks of his own (John 8:44); because every man is a liar. He who speaks the truth, then, speaks not of his own, but of God's. Not indeed in such a way that we say he speaks things foreign to himself; for they become his own, when he loves what he receives, and gives thanks to the one who gave. For if the illumination of truth be taken from a man, he will remain as it were naked of the garment of light, and will be able only to speak lies. For this will remain in him, what is written in the Psalm, Every man is a liar.
Sermons5.3
4. Non est ergo unde quisquam calumnietur, et dicat mihi: Mentiar, quia homo sum. Dicam enim et ego fidentissime: Noli esse homo, ut non mentiaris. Ergo, inquit, homo non ero? Non utique. Ut enim non sis homo, ad hoc vocatus es ab illo, qui propter te factus est homo. Noli suscensere. Non enim ita tibi dicitur ut homo non sis, ut pecus sis, sed ut sis inter eos, quibus dedit potestatem filios Dei fieri . Deus enim deum te vult facere; sed non natura, sicut est ille quem genuit; sed dono suo et adoptione. Sicut enim ille per humanitatem factus est particeps mortalitatis tuae; sic te per exaltationem facit participem immortalitatis suae. Age igitur gratias, et amplectere quod donatum est, ut merearis perfrui quo vocatus es. Noli esse Adam, et non eris homo. Si non homo, non utique mendax; quia: Omnis homo mendax . Et cum coeperis non mentiri, noli tibi tribuere et extolli, quasi tuo proprio; ne vento superbiae, tamquam lucerna quae aliunde accenditur, exstinguaris, et remaneas rursus in mendacio tuo. Nolite ergo mentiri, fratres. Iam enim veteres homines eratis; accessistis ad gratiam Dei, facti estis homines novi. Mendacium ad Adam pertinet, veritas ad Christum. Deponentes ergo mendacium, loquimini veritatem , ut et caro ista mortalis quam adhuc habetis de Adam, praecedente novitate spiritus, mereatur et ipsa innovationem et commutationem tempore resurrectionis suae; ac sic totus homo deificatus inhaereat perpetuae atque incommutabili veritati.
4. There is, then, no reason for anyone to slander, and say to me: I will lie, because I am a man. For I too will say most confidently: Do not be a man, that you may not lie. Then, he says, I will not be a man? Surely not. For that you may not be a man, you have been called to this by him who became a man for your sake. Do not be indignant. For it is not said to you that you may not be a man so as to be a beast, but that you may be among those to whom he gave the power to become sons of God (See John 1:12). For God wishes to make you a god; but not by nature, as is the one whom he begot; but by his gift and by adoption. For just as he, through humanity, was made a partaker of your mortality; so he, through exaltation, makes you a partaker of his immortality. Give thanks, then, and embrace what has been given, that you may deserve to enjoy fully that to which you have been called. Do not be Adam, and you will not be a man. If not a man, surely not a liar; because every man is a liar. And when you have begun not to lie, do not ascribe it to yourself and be exalted, as if it were your own; lest by the wind of pride, like a lamp kindled from elsewhere, you be extinguished, and remain again in your lie. Do not, then, lie, brothers. For you were once old men; you have come to the grace of God, you have been made new men. Lying belongs to Adam, truth to Christ. Putting away, then, lying, speak the truth (Eph 4:25), so that this mortal flesh too, which you still have from Adam, with the newness of the spirit going before, may itself deserve renewal and change at the time of its resurrection; and so the whole man, deified, may cleave to the perpetual and unchangeable truth.
Sermons5.4
SERMO 167
Sermon 167
Sermons5.4
1. 1. Apostolum, cum legeretur, audistis; immo omnes audivimus, dicentem nobis: Videte quomodo caute ambuletis; non ut insipientes, sed ut sapientes; redimentes tempus, quoniam dies mali sunt . Dies malos, fratres, duae res faciunt, malitia et miseria. Per malitiam hominum et miseriam hominum ducuntur dies mali. Ceterum dies isti, quantum pertinet ad spatia horarum, ordinati sunt; ducunt vices, agunt tempora; oritur sol, occidit sol, transeunt tempora. Cui molesta sunt tempora, si homines sibi non sunt molesti? Ergo dies malos, sicut dixi, duae res faciunt: miseria hominum et malitia hominum. Sed miseria hominum communis est; non debet malitia esse communis. Ex quo enim lapsus est Adam, et de paradiso expulsus, numquam fuerunt dies, nisi mali. Istos pueros qui nascuntur, interrogemus, quare a ploratu incipiunt, qui et ridere possunt. Nascitur, et statim plorat; post nescio quot dies ridet. Quando plorabat nascens, propheta suae calamitatis erat; lacrimae enim testes sunt miseriae. Nondum loquitur, et iam prophetat. Quid prophetat? In labore se futurum, vel in timore. Et si bene vixerit et iustus fuerit, certe in mediis positus tentationibus semper timebit.
1. 1. You heard the Apostle when he was read; rather, we all heard him saying to us, See how you walk cautiously; not as the unwise, but as the wise; redeeming the time, for the days are evil (Eph 5:15-16). Two things make the days evil, brothers: malice and misery. Through the malice of men and the misery of men the days are led as evil. Otherwise these days, so far as concerns the spaces of the hours, are ordered; they lead their turns, they conduct the seasons; the sun rises, the sun sets, the seasons pass. To whom are the seasons troublesome, if men are not troublesome to one another? Therefore two things make the days evil, as I said: the misery of men and the malice of men. But the misery of men is common; malice ought not to be common. For from the time Adam fell, and was expelled from paradise, there were never days but evil. Let us question these children who are born, why they begin from weeping, who could also laugh. He is born, and at once he weeps; after I know not how many days he laughs. When he wept being born, he was a prophet of his own calamity; for tears are witnesses of misery. He does not yet speak, and already he prophesies. What does he prophesy? That he will be in labor, or in fear. And if he lives well and is righteous, surely, set in the midst of temptations, he will always fear.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Quid ait Apostolus? Omnes qui volunt in Christo pie vivere, persecutionem patientur . Ecce quia dies mali sunt, sine persecutione vivere hic iusti non possunt. Qui inter malos vivunt, persecutionem patiuntur. Omnes mali persequuntur bonos, non ferro et lapidibus, sed vita et moribus. Numquid aliquis sanctum Lot persequebatur in Sodomis? Nemo illi molestus erat; et tamen inter impios vivebat, et inter immundos, superbos, blasphemos, persecutionem patiebatur, non vapulando, sed malos vivendo. Quisquis me audis, et nondum vivis in Christo pie, incipe in Christo pie vivere, et probas quod dico. Denique Apostolus cum commemoraret pericula sua: Periculis, inquit, in mari, periculis in fluminibus, periculis in deserto, periculis in latronibus, periculis in falsis fratribus . Cetera pericula quiescere possunt, pericula a falsis fratribus quiescere usque in finem saeculi non noverunt.
2. 2. What does the Apostle say? All who wish to live devoutly in Christ will suffer persecution (2 Tim 3:12). Behold, because the days are evil, the righteous cannot live here without persecution. Those who live among the evil suffer persecution. All the evil persecute the good—not with sword and stones, but by their life and morals. Did anyone persecute holy Lot in Sodom? No one was troublesome to him; and yet he lived among the ungodly, and among the unclean, proud, blasphemers, he suffered persecution, not by being beaten, but by their living evilly. Whoever you are who hear me, and do not yet live devoutly in Christ, begin to live devoutly in Christ, and you prove what I say. Finally, when the Apostle mentioned his perils: In perils, he says, at sea, in perils on rivers, in perils in the desert, in perils from robbers, in perils from false brothers (2 Cor 11:26). The other perils can be quiet, but perils from false brothers have not known how to be quiet until the end of the age.
Sermons5.2.2
2. 3. Redimamus tempus; quoniam dies mali sunt. Exspectatis a me forte scire, quid est tempus redimere. Dicturus sum quod pauci audiunt, pauci ferunt, pauci aggrediuntur, pauci agunt; tamen dicam, quoniam ipsi pauci qui me audituri sunt, inter malos vivunt. Redimere tempus, hoc est, quando aliquis tibi infert litem, perde aliquid, ut Deo vaces, non litibus. Perde ergo; ex eo quod perdis, pretium est temporis. Certe quando pro tuis necessitatibus procedis ad publicum, das nummos, et emis tibi panem, aut vinum, aut oleum, aut lignum, aut aliquam supellectilem; das et accipis, aliquid amittis, aliquid acquiris; hoc est emere. Nam si nihil amittas, et habeas quod non habebas; aut invenisti, aut donatum accepisti, aut hereditate acquisisti. Quando autem aliquid amittis ut aliquid habeas, tunc emis; quod habes, emptum est; quod amittis, pretium est. Quomodo ergo perdis nummos, ut emas tibi aliquid; sic perde nummos, ut emas tibi quietem. Ecce hoc est tempus redimere.
2. 3. Let us redeem the time; for the days are evil. Perhaps you await from me to know what it is to redeem the time. I am going to say what few hear, few bear, few approach, few do; yet I will say it, since the very few who are going to hear me live among the evil. To redeem the time is this: when someone brings a suit against you, lose something, that you may be free for God, not for suits. Lose, then; from what you lose is the price of the time. Surely when, for your necessities, you go forth to the marketplace, you give coins, and you buy yourself bread, or wine, or oil, or wood, or some furnishing; you give and you receive, you lose something, you gain something; this is to buy. For if you lose nothing, and have what you did not have, either you found it, or received it as a gift, or acquired it by inheritance. But when you lose something to have something, then you buy; what you have is bought; what you lose is the price. As, then, you lose coins to buy yourself something; so lose coins to buy yourself quiet. Behold, this is to redeem the time.
Sermons5.2.3
3. 4. Proverbium notum est punicum, quod quidem latine vobis dicam, quia punice non omnes nostis. Punicum enim proverbium est antiquum: Nummum quaerit pestilentia; duos illi da, et ducat se. Numquid non hoc proverbium de Evangelio videtur natum? Nam quid aliud dixit Dominus, quam: Redimentes tempus, quando ait: Si quis vult iudicio tecum contendere, et tunicam tuam tollere, dimitte ei et pallium ? Iudicio vult tecum contendere, et tunicam tuam tollere, vult avocare te litibus a Deo tuo; non habebis quietum cor, non habebis tranquillum animum, everteris cogitationibus tuis, irritaris adversus ipsum adversarium tuum. Ecce, tempus perdidisti. Quanto ergo melius est ut nummum amittas, et tempus redimas? Fratres mei, in causis vestris et in negotiis vestris, quando ad nos iudicanda veniunt, si homini christiano dico ut pro tempore redimendo perdat aliquid suum; quanto maiore cura et fiducia debeo dicere ut reddat alienum? Ambos enim Christianos audio. Iam ille calumniosus, qui vult alteri facere causam, et tollere ab illo vel pro compositione, gaudet ad ista verba. Apostolus dixit: Redimentes tempus, quoniam dies mali sunt . Facio ergo calumniam Christiano illi, velit nolit, dat mihi aliquid ut tempus redimat, quia episcopum audivit. Dic mihi, si illi dicturus sum: Perde aliquid, ut sis otiosus; tibi non sum dicturus: Calumniose, perdite fili diaboli, quare res alienas auferre moliris? Causam non habes, et calumnia plenus es. Si ergo illi dixero: Illi da aliquid, ut recedat a calumnia; tu ubi eris, qui habebis de calumnia pecuniam? Ille qui propter vitandam calumniam tempus a te redimit, hic tolerat dies malos; tu autem qui de calumniis pasceris, hic habebis dies malos, et post istos habiturus es in die iudicii peiores. Sed hoc forte rides, quia pecuniam rapis. Ride, ride, et contemne; ego erogem, veniet qui exigat.
3. 4. There is a well-known Punic proverb, which I will indeed say to you in Latin, because you do not all know Punic. For it is an old Punic proverb: The plague seeks a coin; give it two, and let it take itself off. Does this proverb not seem born of the Gospel? For what else did the Lord say than: Redeeming the time, when he said, If anyone wishes to contend with you in judgment, and to take away your tunic, let him have your cloak too (Matt 5:40)? He wishes to contend with you in judgment, and to take away your tunic, he wishes to call you away from your God by suits; you will not have a quiet heart, you will not have a tranquil mind, you will be overturned by your thoughts, you will be irritated against your very adversary. Behold, you have lost the time. How much better, then, that you lose a coin, and redeem the time? My brothers, in your cases and your business, when they come to us to be judged, if I say to a Christian man that, for redeeming the time, he should lose something of his own; with how much greater care and confidence ought I to say that he should give back what is another's? For I hear both as Christians. Now that slanderous man, who wishes to make a case against another, and to take from him either as a settlement, rejoices at these words. The Apostle said: Redeeming the time, for the days are evil. So I make a slander against that Christian: willy-nilly, he gives me something to redeem the time, because he has heard the bishop. Tell me, if I am going to say to him: Lose something, that you may be at peace; shall I not say to you: Slanderer, lost son of the devil, why do you strive to take away others' goods? You have no case, and you are full of slander. If, then, I say to him: Give him something, that he may withdraw from the slander; where will you be, who will have money from slander? That one, who redeems the time from you to avoid slander, here endures evil days; but you who feed on slanders, here will have evil days, and after these you are going to have worse ones on the day of judgment. But perhaps you laugh at this, because you seize money. Laugh, laugh, and despise; let me pay out, there will come one to exact.
Sermons5.3.4
SERMO 167/A
Sermon 167/A
Sermons5.3.4
1. Non est nobis colluctatio adversus carnem et sanguinem; quia non tantum te homo persequitur, sed diabolus per illum, et antequam te laedat in corpore, te occidit in mente. Non est nobis colluctatio adversus carnem et sanguinem, hominibus adversus homines, qui caro et sanguis sunt, sed adversus principes et potestates, rectores tenebrarum harum ; quia quomodo eos qui lux sunt Christus gubernat et regit, sic eos qui tenebrae sunt ad omne malum diabolus praecipitat et instigat. Hoc ergo nos hortatur Apostolus, ut non contra hominem malum, sed contra diabolum qui cum illo operatur oremus, et quidquid possumus faciamus, ut diabolus expellatur et homo liberetur. Quomodo enim si ad aliquem in proelio constitutum de parte adversaria armatus equo sedens veniat, non equo sed equiti irascitur, et quantum potest, hoc agere cupit ut equitem percutiat et equum possideat; sic circa homines malos agendum est, et non contra illos, sed contra eum qui illos instigat, totis viribus laborandum est, ut dum diabolus vincitur, infelix ille quem possidere coeperat liberetur.
1. Our struggle is not against flesh and blood; because not only does a man persecute you, but the devil through him, and before he harms you in the body, he kills you in the mind. Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, men against men, who are flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers, the rulers of these darknesses (Eph 6:12); because, as Christ governs and rules those who are light, so the devil casts down and instigates to every evil those who are darkness. This, then, the Apostle exhorts us: that we pray not against the evil man, but against the devil who works with him, and do whatever we can, that the devil be driven out and the man be freed. For just as, if against someone set in battle from the adversary's side an armed man comes sitting on a horse, he is angry not at the horse but at the rider, and as much as he can, he desires to do this—to strike the rider and possess the horse; so it must be done concerning evil men, and we must labor with all our strength not against them, but against the one who instigates them, so that, while the devil is conquered, that unhappy one whom he had begun to possess may be freed.
Sermons5.1
2. Qui dicit se in Christo manere, debet sicut ipse ambulavit et ille ambulare. Quae est ista via, in qua Christus ambulavit? Quae est alia nisi caritas, de qua dicit Apostolus: Adhuc supereminentiorem viam demonstro vobis ? Si ergo Christum volumus imitari, per ipsam viam debemus currere, qua Christus et in cruce pendens dignatus est ambulare. In cruce enim fixus erat, et caritatis viam currens, pro suis persecutoribus supplicabat. Denique sic dixit: Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt . Et nos ergo pro omnibus inimicis hoc iugiter supplicemus, ut illis Dominus emendationem morum et indulgentiam tribuat peccatorum.
2. He who says that he abides in Christ ought himself also to walk as he walked (1 John 2:6). What is this way in which Christ walked? What is it but love, of which the Apostle says, I show you a yet more surpassing way (1 Cor 12:31)? If, then, we wish to imitate Christ, we ought to run by that very way by which Christ, even hanging on the cross, deigned to walk. For he was fixed on the cross, and, running the way of love, he supplicated for his persecutors. Finally he said thus: Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do (Luke 23:34). And let us too, then, continually supplicate this for all our enemies, that the Lord grant them an amendment of morals and the forgiveness of sins.
Sermons5.2
SERMO 168
Sermon 168
Sermons5.2
1. 1. Lectionibus, canticis, sermonibusque divinis, et quod est praecipuum, gratia sua aedificet Dominus cor vestrum; ut quod verum auditis, non audiatis ad iudicium, sed ad praemium. Faciet hoc, quoniam qui promisit potens est et facere . Ita credidit Abraham, dans gloriam Deo, unde et plenissime credens quoniam quae promisit potens est et facere . Magnum nostrum gaudium; nos promisit Abrahae; nos promissionis filiis sumus. Quando enim dictum est Abrahae: In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes , nos promissi sumus. Ergo ipse nos fecit filios fidei Abrahae, qui potens est facere quod promisit. Nemo dicat: Ego feci. Non enim promittit Deus, et facis tu. Potest autem recte dici quia quae promittis tu, facit Deus. Tu enim infirmus es, tu omnipotens non es. Quando ergo promittis, nisi Deus faciat, inanis est promissio tua. Dei autem promissio non pendet ex te, sed ex illo. Sed ego, inquis, credidi. Concedo. Verum dicis: tu credidisti, sed non tibi tu fidem dedisti. Unde autem credidisti, nisi ex fide? Fides in te donum Dei est.
1. 1. By the readings, the songs, and the divine sermons, and—what is the chief thing—by his grace, may the Lord build up your heart; that what you hear as true, you may hear not unto judgment, but unto reward. He will do this, since he who promised is able also to do it. So Abraham believed, giving glory to God, whence also believing most fully that what he promised he is able also to do (See Rom 4:20-21). Great is our joy; he promised us to Abraham; we are the sons of the promise. For when it was said to Abraham, In your seed all nations will be blessed (Gen 22:18), we were promised. Therefore he himself made us sons of the faith of Abraham, who is able to do what he promised. Let no one say: I did it. For God does not promise, and you do it. But it can rightly be said that what you promise, God does. For you are weak, you are not almighty. When, then, you promise, unless God does it, your promise is empty. But the promise of God does not depend on you, but on him. But I, you say, believed. I grant it. You say true: you believed, but you did not give yourself faith. But whence did you believe, except from faith? Faith in you is the gift of God.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Audi Apostolum ipsum fidei disputatorem, et gratiae magnum defensorem; audi eum dicentem: Pax fratribus, et caritas cum fide . Magna tria dixit: Pax, caritas, fides. A fine coepit, ad initium terminavit. Initium est enim in fide, finis in pace. Qua enim credimus, ipsa est fides. Sed fides debet esse Christianorum, non daemoniorum. Nam, sicut dicit Iacobus apostolus: Et daemones credunt et contremiscunt . Et daemones dixerunt Christo: Tu es Filius Dei, scimus qui sis ; ideo regnaturi sunt cum Filio Dei? Absit! Discernenda est ergo fides daemonum a fide sanctorum. Plane discernenda vigilanter et diligenter. Nam et Petrus hoc dixit Domino dicenti: Quem me esse dicitis? Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi . Et Dominus: Beatus es, Simon Bar Iona . O Domine, hoc tibi dixerunt et daemones; quare ipsi non sunt beati? Quare? Quia daemones hoc dixerunt timore, Petrus amore. Ideo initium est a fide. Sed quali fide? Quam definivit Apostolus: Neque circumcisio aliquid valet, neque praeputium, sed fides. Dic quae fides? Quae per dilectionem operatur . Hanc daemones non habent fidem, quae per dilectionem operatur; sed soli servi Dei, soli sancti Dei, soli fide filii Abrahae, soli filii dilectionis, filii promissionis; ideo dicta est: et caritas. Tria illa dicta sunt ab Apostolo: Pax fratribus, et caritas cum fide. Pax fratribus. Unde pax? Et caritas. Unde caritas? Cum fide. Si enim non credis, non amas. Dixit ergo Apostolus, sic incipiens a fine, et veniens ad initium: Pax, caritas, cum fide. Nos dicamus: Fides, caritas, pax. Crede, ama, regna. Si enim credis et non amas, adhuc non discrevisti fidem tuam ab eis qui tremebant et dicebant: Scimus qui sis, Filius Dei. Ergo tu ama; quia caritas cum fide ipsa te perducit ad pacem. Quam pacem? Veram pacem, plenam pacem, solidam pacem, securam pacem; ubi nulla pestis, nullus hostis. Ipsa pax est finis omnium desideriorum bonorum. Caritas cum fide; et si sic dicas, bene dicis: Fides cum caritate.
2. 2. Hear the Apostle himself, the disputant of faith, and the great defender of grace; hear him saying, Peace to the brothers, and love with faith (Eph 6:23). He said three great things: Peace, love, faith. He began from the end, he ended at the beginning. For the beginning is in faith, the end in peace. For that by which we believe is faith itself. But the faith of Christians ought to be such, not of demons. For, as the apostle James says, The demons too believe, and tremble (Jas 2:19). And the demons said to Christ, You are the Son of God, we know who you are (See Mark 1:24; Luke 4:34); are they therefore going to reign with the Son of God? Far from it! The faith of demons, then, is to be distinguished from the faith of the saints. Plainly it is to be distinguished, vigilantly and diligently. For Peter too said this to the Lord asking, Who do you say that I am? You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. And the Lord: Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah (Matt 16:15-17). O Lord, the demons too said this to you; why are they not blessed? Why? Because the demons said it out of fear, Peter out of love. Therefore the beginning is from faith. But by what kind of faith? That which the Apostle defined: Neither circumcision avails anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith. Tell me, what faith? That which works through love (Gal 5:6). This faith the demons do not have, which works through love; but only the servants of God, only the holy ones of God, only by faith the sons of Abraham, only the sons of love, the sons of the promise; therefore it was said, and love. Those three things were said by the Apostle: Peace to the brothers, and love with faith. Peace to the brothers. Whence peace? And love. Whence love? With faith. For if you do not believe, you do not love. The Apostle said, then, thus beginning from the end and coming to the beginning: Peace, love, with faith. Let us say: Faith, love, peace. Believe, love, reign. For if you believe and do not love, you have not yet distinguished your faith from those who trembled and said, We know who you are, the Son of God. Therefore do you love; because love with faith itself leads you to peace. What peace? True peace, full peace, solid peace, secure peace; where there is no plague, no enemy. That peace is the end of all good desires. Love with faith; and if you say it thus, you say it well: Faith with love.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Magna ergo bona commemoravit Apostolus: Pax fratribus, et caritas cum fide; magna bona. Sed dicat unde bona ista; unde sunt, a nobis, an a Deo? Si dicis: A nobis, in te gloriaris, non in Deo. Si autem didicisti quod ait et ipse Apostolus: Ut qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur ; confitere pacem, caritatem cum fide, non tibi esse nisi a Deo. Sed respondes mihi: Tu hoc dicis, proba quod dicis. Probo; ipsum Apostolum testem vocabo. Ecce habetis; Apostolus dixit: Pax fratribus, et caritas cum fide. Ipse dixit. Quid ipse dixit? Vide, sequitur: Pax fratribus, et caritas cum fide, a Deo Patre nostro et Domino Iesu Christo . Quid ergo habes quod non accepisti? Si autem accepisti, quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis? Nam si gloriatus est Abraham, ex fide gloriatus est. Quae est fides plena et perfecta? Quae credit ex Deo esse omnia bona nostra, et ipsam fidem. Iterum dicit Apostolus: Misericordiam consecutus sum. O confessio! Non ait: Misericordiam consecutus sum, quia fidelis eram; sed, ut fidelis essem, misericordiam consecutus sum .
3. 3. The Apostle, then, mentioned great goods: Peace to the brothers, and love with faith; great goods. But let him say whence these goods are; whence they are, from us, or from God? If you say: From us, you glory in yourself, not in God. But if you have learned what the same Apostle says, That he who glories, let him glory in the Lord (1 Cor 1:31); confess that peace, love with faith, is yours only from God. But you answer me: You say this, prove what you say. I prove it; I will call the Apostle himself as witness. Behold, you have it; the Apostle said, Peace to the brothers, and love with faith. He himself said it. What did he himself say? See, it follows: Peace to the brothers, and love with faith, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ (Eph 6:23). What, then, do you have that you have not received? But if you have received it, why do you glory as if you had not received it (1 Cor 4:7)? For if Abraham gloried, he gloried from faith. What is full and perfect faith? That which believes all our goods to be from God, and faith itself. Again the Apostle says, I obtained mercy. O confession! He did not say: I obtained mercy, because I was faithful; but, that I might be faithful, I obtained mercy (1 Cor 7:25).
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Veniamus ad eius primordia, videamus Saulum saevientem, spectemus furentem, spectemus odia anhelantem, sanguinemque sitientem. Spectemus, fratres, eum; magnum spectaculum. Ecce post Stephani necem, post effusum testis Dei lapidibus sanguinem, ubi vestimenta servabat lapidantium, ut et in eorum etiam manibus lapidaret, tunc dispersi sunt fratres qui erant Ierosolymis congregati; et ille saeviens cui parum erat vidisse et fudisse sanguinem Stephani, accepit a principibus sacerdotum, ut iret Damascum, et quoscumque ibi inveniret Christianos, vinctos adduceret. Et ibat. Haec Pauli via erat, cuius via nondum erat Christus; adhuc Sauli, nondum Pauli. Ibat. Quid habebat in corde? Quid, nisi malum? Date mihi merita eius. Si merita quaeris, damnationis sunt, non liberationis. Ibat ergo saevire in membra Christi, ibat sanguinem fundere, ibat lupus pastor futurus; sic ibat. Non enim poterat aliter ire ad illa, propter quae ibat. Et cum sic ambulat, cogitat, anhelat caedes; cum ducit pedes eius ira, movet membra odium, dum pergit et ambulat, obtemperat mancipium crudelitati; et ecce vox de caelo: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? Ecce quare dixit: Misericordiam consecutus sum, ut fidelis essem . Erat infidelis; parum est, erat in ipsa infidelitate crudelis; sed misericordiam consecutus est, ut fidelis esset. Quid dicturus es Deo dicenti: Hoc volo? Ergo, Domine, ille qui tanta fecit, tanta mala in sanctos tuos facere cupiebat, tali eum misericordia dignum existimas? Hoc volo. An oculus tuus nequam est, quia ego bonus sum?
4. 4. Let us come to his beginnings, let us see Saul raging, let us watch him furious, let us watch him panting with hatreds, and thirsting for blood. Let us watch him, brothers; a great spectacle. Behold, after the killing of Stephen, after the blood of God's witness was poured out by stones, where he kept the garments of those who stoned him, so that even in their hands he might stone, then were dispersed the brothers who had been gathered at Jerusalem; and he, raging—for whom it was too little to have seen and shed the blood of Stephen—received from the chief priests authority to go to Damascus, and whatever Christians he found there, to lead them away bound. And he was going. This was the way of Paul, whose way was not yet Christ; still Saul's, not yet Paul's. He was going. What did he have in his heart? What, but evil? Give me his merits. If you seek merits, they are of condemnation, not of liberation. He was going, then, to rage against the members of Christ, going to shed blood, going to be a wolf about to be a shepherd; so he was going. For he could not go otherwise to the things for which he was going. And as he thus walks, thinks, pants for slaughter; while anger leads his feet, hatred moves his members, while he goes on and walks, the chattel obeys cruelty; and behold, a voice from heaven: Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me (Acts 9:4)? Behold why he said, I obtained mercy, that I might be faithful. He was unfaithful; it is too little—he was, in that very unfaithfulness, cruel; but he obtained mercy, that he might be faithful. What will you say to God saying: I wish this? Therefore, Lord, the one who did so great things, who desired to do so great evils against your saints, you reckon worthy of such mercy? I wish this. Or is your eye evil, because I am good (Matt 20:15)?
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Habete fidem; sed ut habeatis fidem, orate fide. Sed orare fide non possetis, nisi fidem haberetis. Non enim orat, nisi fides. Quomodo enim invocabunt, in quem non crediderunt? Aut quomodo credent ei quem non audierunt? Quomodo autem audient sine praedicante? Aut quomodo praedicabunt, si non mittantur? Ideo loquimur, quia missi sumus. Audite nos, audite illum per nos. Ergo, ait aliquis, invocamus Deum, ut det nobis perseverare in his bonis quae habemus, et addat bona quae non habemus. Praecessit ergo fides quae rogat. Certe totum dat Deus. Ut enim daret mihi, rogavi; ut rogarem, prius credidi. Ergo mihi dedi quod credidi, et Deus dedit quod credens oravi. Salvatur quaestio, non enim parva est. Hoc te video loqui, quia tu prior dedisti aliquid Deo, ut cetera daret tibi. Dedisti quippe illi fidem tuam et orationem tuam. Et ubi est quod ait Apostolus: Quis enim cognovit sensum Domini, aut quis consiliarius eius fuit? Aut quis prior dedit illi, et retribuetur ei? Ecce qualis vis esse. Ergo prior dedisti Deo, et hoc dedisti quod tibi non dedit Deus? Invenisti unde dares? Homo mendice, unde habuisti? Ergo unde dares? aliquid habuisti? Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? Ergo de Dei das Deo; ex eo quod tibi dedit, a te accipit. Nam mendicitas tua, nisi ipse prior dedisset, inanissima remaneret.
5. 5. Have faith; but that you may have faith, pray with faith. But you could not pray with faith, unless you had faith. For nothing prays but faith. For how will they call upon him in whom they have not believed? Or how will they believe him whom they have not heard? But how will they hear without a preacher? Or how will they preach, if they are not sent (Rom 10:14-15)? Therefore we speak, because we have been sent. Hear us, hear him through us. So, someone says, we call upon God, that he give us to persevere in these goods which we have, and add the goods we do not have. The faith that asks, then, went before. Surely God gives all. For that he might give to me, I asked; that I might ask, I first believed. Therefore I gave to myself what I believed, and God gave what, believing, I prayed for. The question is resolved—for it is no small one. I see you saying this: that you first gave something to God, that he might give the rest to you. For you gave him your faith and your prayer. And where is what the Apostle says, For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor? Or who has first given to him, and it shall be repaid to him (Rom 11:34-35)? Behold what kind you wish to be. Did you, then, first give to God, and give this which God did not give to you? Did you find from where you might give? O beggar man, whence did you have it? Whence, then, would you give? Did you have anything? For what do you have that you have not received (1 Cor 4:7)? Therefore you give to God from God's; from what he gave to you, he receives from you. For your beggary, unless he had first given, would remain most empty.
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Audite unde hoc evidentius probetis. Ecce vos quia credidistis, accepistis; quid dicimus de eis qui nondum crediderunt, qualis erat Saulus, qui nondum crediderat? Accepit autem ut crederet; posteaquam credidit Christo, tunc coepit invocare Christum. Ab illo accepit ut crederet, et credendo invocaret, invocando cetera acciperet. Quid putamus, fratres? Saulus antequam crederet, orabant pro illo qui crediderant, an non orabant? Dicatur mihi, si non pro illo orabant, quare dixit Stephanus: Domine, ne statuas illis hoc peccatum ? Orabatur et pro illo, et pro aliis infidelibus, ut crederent. Ecce nondum habebant fidem, et orationibus fidelium accipiebant fidem. Nondum habebant quod Deo offerrent; quia nondum erant misericordiam consecuti, ut fideles essent. Denique posteaquam Saulus iste conversus est, una voce elisus et levatus, elisus persecutor, levatus praedicator; posteaquam coepit evangelizare fidem quam aliquando vastabat, quid de se dixit? Eram autem ignotus facie Ecclesiis Iudaeae, quae sunt in Christo; tantum autem audiebant, quia is qui aliquando nos persequebatur, nunc evangelizat fidem quam aliquando vastabat; et in me magnificabant Deum . Numquid dixit: Et in me magnificabant me? Et in me, qui evangelizabam fidem quam aliquando vastabam, non me magnificabant, sed Deum. Ergo ipse fecit, ut Saulus deposita tunica veteri, peccatis pannosa, caedibus sanguinea, ut deposita ista tunica, acciperet tunicam humilitatis, et fieret de Saulo Paulus.
6. 6. Hear whence you may prove this more evidently. Behold, you, because you believed, received; what do we say of those who have not yet believed, as Saul was, who had not yet believed? But he received that he might believe; after he believed in Christ, then he began to call upon Christ. From him he received that he might believe, and by believing call upon him, and by calling upon him receive the rest. What do we suppose, brothers? Saul, before he believed, did those who had believed pray for him, or not? Let it be said to me, if they did not pray for him, why did Stephen say, Lord, do not lay this sin against them (Acts 7:60)? Prayer was made both for him and for other unbelievers, that they might believe. Behold, they did not yet have faith, and by the prayers of the faithful they received faith. They did not yet have what they might offer to God; because they had not yet obtained mercy, that they might be faithful. Finally, after this Saul was converted, struck down and raised up by one voice—struck down the persecutor, raised up the preacher; after he began to evangelize the faith which he once ravaged, what did he say of himself? But I was unknown by face to the churches of Judea that are in Christ; they only heard that he who once persecuted us now evangelizes the faith which he once ravaged; and in me they magnified God (Gal 1:22-24). Surely he did not say: And in me they magnified me? And in me, who evangelized the faith which I once ravaged, they did not magnify me, but God. Therefore he himself brought it about that Saul, his old tunic laid down—ragged with sins, bloody with slaughters—that, with this tunic laid down, he might receive the tunic of humility, and from Saul become Paul.
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. Quid est Paulus? " Minimus ". Ego enim sum minimus Apostolorum . Ecce quid est Paulus. Paulum enim latine " modicum " est. Sic loquimur quando dicimus: Post paulum video te; paulo post facio illud. Quid est: " paulo post "? Modico post; post paulum, post modicum. Quare ergo Paulus? Quia modicus. Modicus, quia novissimus. Ego enim sum, inquit, novissimus Apostolorum, qui non sum dignus vocari Apostolus, quia persecutus sum Ecclesiam Dei . Bene dicis; unde debuisti damnari, ab eo accepisti unde debeas coronari. A quo accepisti, unde debeas coronari? A quo accepit, vultis audire? Nolite me, ipsum audite: Non sum, inquit, dignus vocari Apostolus, quia persecutus sum Ecclesiam Dei; sed gratia Dei sum id quod sum. Ergo quod eras, iniquitate tua eras; quod es, gratia Dei es. Et gratia eius, inquit, vacua in me non fuit. Ecce evangelizat fidem quam aliquando vastabat; nec gratia ipsa vacat in illo, qui ait: In me vacua non fuit, sed plus omnibus illis laboravi . Observa, erigere te coepisti. Ubi es, Paule? Certe modicus eras. Plus omnibus illis laboravi. Dic unde? Quid enim habes quod non accepisti? Statim respexit; et cum dixisset: Plus omnibus illi laboravi; quasi expavit ad verba sua, et mox subiecit se humilem Paulum: Non autem ego, sed gratia Dei mecum .
7. 7. What is "Paul"? "Least." For I am the least of the apostles (1 Cor 15:9). Behold what "Paul" is. For "Paul" in Latin is "little." So we speak when we say: After a little ("paulum") I see you; a little after ("paulo post") I do that. What is "a little after"? A small while after; after a little, after a small while. Why, then, Paul? Because little. Little, because last. For I am, he says, the last of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God (1 Cor 15:9). You say well; whence you ought to have been condemned, from him you received whence you ought to be crowned. From whom did you receive, whence you ought to be crowned? From whom did he receive? Do you wish to hear? Do not hear me, hear him: I am not, he says, worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God; but by the grace of God I am what I am. Therefore what you were, you were by your own iniquity; what you are, you are by the grace of God. And his grace, he says, was not empty in me. Behold, he evangelizes the faith which he once ravaged; nor is that grace empty in him, who says, It was not empty in me, but I labored more than all of them (1 Cor 15:10). Watch out, you have begun to raise yourself up. Where are you, Paul? Surely you were little. I labored more than all of them. Tell me, whence? For what do you have that you have not received (1 Cor 4:7)? At once he looked back; and when he had said, I labored more than all of them; as though he were terrified at his own words, he at once subjected himself, humble Paul: Yet not I, but the grace of God with me (1 Cor 15:10).
Sermons5.7.7
7. 8. Ergo, fratres mei, ut noveritis etiam fidem a Domino Deo esse nobis, orate pro illis qui nondum crediderunt. Si quis habet amicum infidelem, moneo illum ut oret pro illo. Vere opus est ut ego illum moneam? Maritus Christianus est, uxor infidelis est; non orat pro uxore sua, ut credat? Uxor est Christiana, maritus infidelis est; non orat mulier religiosa pro marito suo, ut credat? Quando hoc orat qui orat; quid orat, nisi ut Deus det illi fidem? Ergo donum Dei est fides. Nemo se extollat, nemo sibi arroget, quasi sibi aliquid dederit. Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur .
7. 8. Therefore, my brothers, that you may know that faith too is ours from the Lord God, pray for those who have not yet believed. If anyone has an unbelieving friend, I advise him to pray for him. Is there really need for me to advise him? The husband is a Christian, the wife is an unbeliever; does he not pray for his wife, that she may believe? The wife is a Christian, the husband is an unbeliever; does the religious woman not pray for her husband, that he may believe? When he who prays prays this; what does he pray, but that God give him faith? Therefore faith is the gift of God. Let no one exalt himself, let no one arrogate to himself, as though he had given himself something. He who glories, let him glory in the Lord (1 Cor 1:31).
Sermons5.7.8
SERMO 169
Sermon 169
Sermons5.7.8
1. 1. Ad apostolicam lectionem aures et animum intendat Sanctitas vestra, adiuvando nos affectu vestro apud Dominum Deum nostrum, ut ea quae ille nobis revelare dignatur, ad vos apte atque salubriter proferre possimus. Ergo cum legeretur, audistis dicentem apostolum Paulum: Nos enim sumus circumcisio, qui spiritui Dei servimus . Scio plerosque codices habere: Qui spiritu Deo servimus. Quantum autem inspicere potuimus, plures Graeci hoc habent: Qui spiritui Dei servimus. Sed non ibi quaestio est. Manifestum est enim utrumque, et congruum regulae veritatis, quia et spiritui Dei servimus, et non carne, sed spiritu Deo servimus. Carne enim servit Deo, qui de rebus carnalibus sperat se placere Deo. Cum vero et ipsa caro ad bona opera spiritui subditur, spiritu servimus Deo; quia carnem domamus, ut spiritus obtemperet Deo. Spiritus enim regit, caro regitur; nec spiritus bene regit, si non regatur.
1. 1. Let your Holiness direct your ears and mind to the apostolic reading, helping us by your affection before the Lord our God, that the things he deigns to reveal to us we may be able to set forth to you fittingly and wholesomely. So when it was read, you heard the apostle Paul saying, For we are the circumcision, who serve the Spirit of God (Phil 3:3). I know that very many codices have: Who serve God in spirit. But as far as we could examine, more Greek copies have this: Who serve the Spirit of God. But the question is not there. For both are manifest, and agreeable to the rule of truth, since we both serve the Spirit of God, and serve God not in the flesh, but in the spirit. For he serves God in the flesh who hopes to please God by carnal things. But when even the flesh itself is subjected to the spirit for good works, we serve God in the spirit; because we tame the flesh, that the spirit may obey God. For the spirit rules, the flesh is ruled; nor does the spirit rule well, if it is not ruled.
Sermons5.1.1
1. 2. Cum ergo ait: Nos sumus circumcisio; videte quid voluerit intellegi in illa circumcisione, quae in umbra data est significante, quae remota est luce veniente. Cur autem non dixerit: Nos habemus circumcisionem; sed: Nos sumus circumcisio; sic accipite hoc voluisse Apostolum dicere: Nos sumus iustitia. Circumcisio enim iustitia est. Magis autem commendat quod dicit dicendo nos esse iustitiam, quam dicendo nos esse iustos; ita tamen ut cum iustitiam dicit esse, iustos intellegamus. Non enim sumus illa incommutabilis iustitia, cuius participes facti sumus; sed quemadmodum dicitur: Magna ibi iuventus est, pro multis iuvenibus; sic dicitur iustitia, ut intellegantur iusti. Audite hoc ipsum evidentius, eodem dicente Apostolo: Ut nos, inquit, simus iustitia Dei in ipso . Nos simus iustitia, non nostra, sed Dei; ab illo accepta, non a nobis assumpta; impertita, non usurpata; donata, non rapta. Cuidam enim rapina erat esse aequalis Deo; et quoniam quaesivit rapinam, invenit ruinam. Dominus autem noster Iesus Christus, cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo . Cui enim aequalitas Dei natura erat, rapina non erat. Sed tamen semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens, ut nos essemus iustitia Dei in ipso . Si enim ille paupertatem vitaret, nos paupertate non careremus. Pauper enim ille factus est, cum dives esset; ut illius paupertate, sicut scriptum est, nos ditaremur . Divitiae illius quid nos facturae sunt, cuius paupertas nos divites facit? Apostolus ergo non tibi negavit circumcisionem, sed exposuit; lucem praetendit, umbram removit.
1. 2. When, then, he says, We are the circumcision; see what he wished to be understood in that circumcision, which was given in the signifying shadow, which was removed when the light came. But why did he not say: We have circumcision; but: We are the circumcision? take it that the Apostle wished to say this: We are righteousness. For circumcision is righteousness. But he commends what he says more by saying that we are righteousness than by saying that we are righteous; yet so that when he says we are righteousness, we understand the righteous. For we are not that unchangeable righteousness of which we have been made partakers; but just as it is said: There is great youth there, for many young men; so righteousness is said, that the righteous may be understood. Hear this very thing more evidently, the same Apostle saying, That we, he says, may be the righteousness of God in him (2 Cor 5:21). That we may be righteousness—not our own, but God's; received from him, not assumed from ourselves; imparted, not usurped; given, not snatched. For to a certain one it was robbery to be equal to God; and because he sought robbery, he found ruin. But our Lord Jesus Christ, since he was in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal to God. For to one whose nature was equality with God, it was not robbery. But yet he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant (Phil 2:6-7), that we might be the righteousness of God in him. For if he avoided poverty, we would not be free of poverty. For he became poor, though he was rich; that by his poverty, as it is written, we might be enriched (2 Cor 8:9). What will his riches do for us, whose poverty makes us rich? The Apostle, then, did not deny you circumcision, but expounded it; he held forth the light, removed the shadow.
Sermons5.1.2
2. 3. Nos sumus, inquit, circumcisio, qui spiritu Deo servimus, et gloriamur in Christo Iesu, et non in carne fidentes . Respexit quosdam in carne fidentes; ipsi erant qui de carnis circumcisione gloriabantur. De quibus alio loco dicit: Quorum Deus venter est, et gloria in pudendis eorum . Intellege tu circumcisionem, et esto circumcisio; intellege, et esto: Intellectus enim bonus, sed omnibus qui faciunt eum . Non utique frustra octavo die iussus est infans circumcidi , nisi quia petra, qua circumcidimur, Christus erat. Cultellis enim petrinis circumcisus est populus : Petra autem erat Christus . Quare ergo octavo die? Quia in hebdomadibus idem primus qui octavus. Completis enim septem diebus, reditur ad primum. Finitur septimus, Dominus sepultus; reditur ad primum, Dominus resuscitatus. Domini enim resuscitatio promisit nobis aeternum diem et consecravit nobis Dominicum diem. Qui vocatur " Dominicus ", ipse videtur proprie ad Dominum pertinere; quia eo die Dominus resurrexit. Reddita est petra, circumcidantur qui volunt dicere: Nos enim sumus circumcisio . Traditus est enim propter peccata nostra, et resurrexit propter iustificationem nostram . Iustificatio tua, circumcisio tua, non est a te. Gratia salvi facti estis per fidem; et hoc non ex vobis, sed Dei donum est; non ex operibus . Ne forte dicas: Promerui, et ideo accepi. Non putes te promerendo accepisse, qui non promerereris, nisi accepisses. Gratia praecessit meritum tuum; non gratia ex merito, sed meritum ex gratia. Nam si gratia ex merito; emisti, non gratis accepisti. Pro nihilo, inquit, salvos facies eos . Quid est: Pro nihilo salvos facies eos? Nihil in eis invenis unde salves, et tamen salvas. Gratis das, gratis salvas. Omnia merita praecedis, ut dona tua consequantur merita mea. Prorsus gratis das, gratis salvas, qui nihil invenis unde salves, et multum invenis unde damnes.
2. 3. We are, he says, the circumcision, who serve God in spirit, and glory in Christ Jesus, and do not trust in the flesh (Phil 3:3). He looked at certain ones trusting in the flesh; they were the ones who gloried in the circumcision of the flesh. Of whom he says in another place, Whose God is the belly, and whose glory is in their shame (Phil 3:19). Understand the circumcision, and be the circumcision; understand, and be: For good understanding, but to all who do it (Ps 111:10 (110:10)). Surely not in vain was the infant commanded to be circumcised on the eighth day (See Gen 17:12), except because the rock by which we are circumcised was Christ. For the people was circumcised with knives of stone (See Josh 5:2): but the rock was Christ (1 Cor 10:4). Why, then, on the eighth day? Because in the weeks the same is both first and eighth. For when the seven days are completed, one returns to the first. The seventh is ended, the Lord buried; one returns to the first, the Lord raised up. For the Lord's resurrection promised us the eternal day and consecrated for us the Lord's day. That which is called "the Lord's" seems properly to pertain to the Lord; because on that day the Lord rose again. The rock has been restored, let them be circumcised who wish to say, For we are the circumcision. For he was handed over for our sins, and rose again for our justification (Rom 4:25). Your justification, your circumcision, is not from you. By grace you have been saved through faith; and this not from yourselves, but it is the gift of God; not from works (Eph 2:8-9). Lest perhaps you say: I earned it, and therefore I received it. Do not suppose that you received it by earning, you who would not earn it, unless you had received. Grace went before your merit; not grace from merit, but merit from grace. For if grace is from merit; you bought it, you did not receive it freely. For nothing, he says, you will save them (Ps 56:7 (55:8)). What is, For nothing you will save them? You find nothing in them whence to save, and yet you save. You give freely, you save freely. You go before all merits, that your gifts may follow my merits. Plainly you give freely, you save freely, you who find nothing whence to save, and find much whence to condemn.
Sermons5.2.3
3. 4. Nos ergo, inquit, sumus circumcisio, qui spiritui Dei servimus, et gloriamur in Christo Iesu . Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur . Et non in carne fidentes. Et quid est: Fidere in carne? Audite, inquit. Quamquam ego, inquit, habeam fiduciam, et in carne. Si quis alius in carne putat se habere fiduciam, magis ego . Ne arbitremini, inquit, me hoc contemnere quod non habeo. Quid magnum est, si homo abiectus, plebeius, ignobilis, contemnat nobilitatem, et tunc exhibeat veram humilitatem? Quamquam ego, inquit, habeam fiduciam et in carne. Ideo vos, inquit, doceo contemnere, quoniam videtis me habere quod contemnam. Si quis alius in carne putat se habere fiduciam, magis ego.
3. 4. We, then, he says, are the circumcision, who serve the Spirit of God, and glory in Christ Jesus (Phil 3:3). He who glories, let him glory in the Lord (1 Cor 1:31). And do not trust in the flesh. And what is it to trust in the flesh? Hear, he says. Although I, he says, have confidence even in the flesh. If anyone else thinks he has confidence in the flesh, I more (Phil 3:4). Do not suppose, he says, that I despise what I do not have. What great thing is it, if an abject, plebeian, ignoble man despises nobility, and then exhibits a true humility? Although I, he says, have confidence even in the flesh. Therefore I teach you to despise it, since you see that I have what I despise. If anyone else thinks he has confidence in the flesh, I more.
Sermons5.3.4
3. 5. Et audi in carne fiduciam: Circumcisione octavi diei ; id est, non proselytus, non advena ad populum Dei, non maior circumcisus, sed a parentibus natus Iudaeus, habeo circumcisionem octavi diei. Ex genere Israel, de tribu Beniamin, Hebraeus ex Hebraeis, secundum legem Pharisaeus . Primarii quidam erant, et quasi ad nobilitatem Iudaicam segregati, non contemptibili plebi commixti, qui dicebantur Pharisaei. Nam dicitur hoc verbum, quasi segregationem interpretari, quomodo in latina lingua dicitur " egregius ", quasi a grege separatus. Fuerunt autem Israelitae, id est, ex genere Israel, etiam illi qui separati fuerant a templo. Remansit autem ad templum tribus Iuda, et tribus Beniamin. Tribus Levi in sacerdotibus, tribus Iuda regia, et tribus Beniamin, hoc solum remansit ad Ierusalem et ad templum Dei, quando facta est separatio illa in servo Salomonis . Non ergo leviter accipiatis quod ait: de tribu Beniamin; inhaerens Iudae, non recedens a templo. Hebraeus ex Hebraeis, secundum legem Pharisaeus, secundum aemulationem persequens Ecclesiam . Inter merita sua commemorat quod fuerit persecutor: secundum aemulationem, inquit. Quam aemulationem? Non eram, inquit, piger Iudaeus; quidquid erat quod Legi meae adversarium videretur, impatienter ferebam, acriter insequebar. Haec apud Iudaeos nobilitas; sed apud Christum quaeritur humilitas. Ideo ibi iste Saulus, hic Paulus. Saulus a Saule nomen derivatur. Qui fuerit Saul, nostis; ipsius electa est statura proceris. Sic eum describit Scriptura, quod supereminens esset omnibus, quando electus est ut ungeretur in regem . Non fuit sic Paulus, sed factus Paulus. Paulus enim parvus, ideo Paulus modicus. Ergo: Secundum aemulationem, inquit, persequens Ecclesiam . Hinc intellegant homines, qualis apud Iudaeos fuerim, qui Christi Ecclesiam persequebar aemulatione traditionum paternarum.
3. 5. And hear the confidence in the flesh: In the circumcision of the eighth day; that is, not a proselyte, not a newcomer to the people of God, not circumcised as a grown man, but a Jew born of Jewish parents, I have the circumcision of the eighth day. Of the race of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews, according to the law a Pharisee (Phil 3:5). There were certain leading men, as it were set apart for Jewish nobility, not mingled with the contemptible commons, who were called Pharisees. For this word is said to be interpreted as a kind of separation, as in the Latin language one says "egregius" ("distinguished"), as it were separated from the flock ("grex"). But there were Israelites—that is, of the race of Israel—even those who had been separated from the temple. But there remained at the temple the tribe of Judah and the tribe of Benjamin. The tribe of Levi in the priests, the tribe of Judah the royal one, and the tribe of Benjamin—this alone remained at Jerusalem and at the temple of God, when that separation was made under the servant of Solomon (See 1 Kgs 11:26; 12:20-21). Do not, then, take lightly what he says, of the tribe of Benjamin; cleaving to Judah, not withdrawing from the temple. A Hebrew of Hebrews, according to the law a Pharisee, according to zeal persecuting the Church (Phil 3:5-6). Among his merits he mentions that he was a persecutor: according to zeal, he says. What zeal? I was not, he says, a lazy Jew; whatever there was that seemed adverse to my Law, I bore impatiently, I pursued sharply. This is nobility among the Jews; but with Christ humility is sought. Therefore there he is Saul, here Paul. "Saul" is a name derived from Saul. Who Saul was, you know; his stature was chosen, tall. So Scripture describes him, that he was taller than all, when he was chosen to be anointed as king (See 1 Sam 9:2; 10:23-24). Paul was not so, but became Paul. For "Paul" is little, therefore "Paul" is small. Therefore: According to zeal, he says, persecuting the Church. Hence let men understand what kind I was among the Jews, I who persecuted the Church of Christ out of zeal for ancestral traditions.
Sermons5.3.5
4. 6. Addit: Secundum iustitiam quae est in lege, qua fuerim sine querela . Novit Caritas vestra, dictos esse sine querela ambulasse in omnibus iustificationibus Domini Zachariam et Elizabeth. In omnibus, inquit Scriptura, iustificationibus Domini ambulantes sine querela . Ecce hoc erat et Paulus noster, quando Saulus erat. In lege sine querela ambulabat; et quod in eo fuit sine querela, hoc de illo faciebat magnam querelam. Quid ergo putamus, fratres, esse sine querela secundum iustitiam, quae in lege est, malum est? Si malum est, secundum iustitiam quae in lege est, esse sine querela; ergo aliquid mali est lex? Sed habemus eumdem Apostolum dicentem: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum . Si lex sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum; secundum iustitiam quae est ex lege sancta, conversari sine querela, quomodo potest non esse bonum? quomodo potest non esse sanctum? An forte sanctum est? Audiamus ipsum Apostolum; videte quid dicat: Quae mihi lucra fuerunt, haec propter Christum damna esse duxi . Damna sua dicit, et inter damna sua computat, quod in iustitia, quae est in lege, fuerit sine querela. Verumtamen, inquit, et arbitror omnia damna esse propter eminentem scientiam Christi Iesu Domini nostri . Attendo, inquit, laudes meas, comparo eminentiae Domini nostri Iesu Christi. Illud sitio, hoc contemno. Parum est hoc: Propter quem arbitror, inquit, omnia non solum detrimenta esse, verum et stercora existimavi esse, ut Christum lucrifacerem .
4. 6. He adds: According to the righteousness that is in the law, having been without complaint (Phil 3:6). Your Charity knows that Zechariah and Elizabeth were said to have walked without complaint in all the justifications of the Lord. Walking in all, says Scripture, the justifications of the Lord without complaint (Luke 1:6). Behold, this is what our Paul too was, when he was Saul. In the law he walked without complaint; and that which in him was without complaint, this made a great complaint about him. What, then, do we suppose, brothers—is it evil to be without complaint according to the righteousness that is in the law? If it is evil to be without complaint according to the righteousness that is in the law; then is the law something evil? But we have the same Apostle saying, And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good (Rom 7:12). If the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good; how can it not be good to conduct oneself without complaint according to the righteousness that is from the holy law? how can it not be holy? Or is it perhaps holy? Let us hear the Apostle himself; see what he says: The things that were gains to me, these I reckoned losses for the sake of Christ (Phil 3:7). He calls them his losses, and counts among his losses that he was without complaint in the righteousness that is in the law. But yet, he says, I also reckon all things to be losses on account of the surpassing knowledge of Christ Jesus our Lord. I attend, he says, to my praises, I compare them to the surpassing greatness of our Lord Jesus Christ. For that I thirst, this I despise. This is too little: On account of whom I reckon, he says, all things not only to be detriments, but I even considered them to be dung, that I might gain Christ (Phil 3:8).
Sermons5.4.6
5. 7. Quaestio maior exorta est, o Paule! Si secundum iustitiam, quae in lege est, versabaris sine querela, et hoc in detrimentis tuis, in damnis, in stercoribus computas, ut Christum lucrifacias, ergo iustitia illa a Christo prohibebat? Obsecro te, expone hoc paululum. Deo potius dicamus, ut illuminet et nos, a quo ipse illiminatus est, qui Epistolam istam scripsit nobis, non atramento, sed Spiritu Dei vivi. Videtis, carissimi, quam sit arduum, quam difficile intellegere hoc; cum constet legem sanctam esse, et mandatum sanctum, et iustum, et bonum; constetque omnino inter fideles catholicos; ita ut nemo dissentiat, nisi qui non vult esse catholicus, hanc legem non datam nisi a Domino Deo nostro; secundum istam iustitiam, quae in lege est, conversari sine querela, impedimentum fuisse Apostolo, ne veniret ad Christum; nec eum venisse ad Christum, nisi hoc quod fuit secundum iustitiam, quae in lege est, sine querela, inter damna et detrimenta et stercora computasset. Sequamur ergo, et accedamus aliquantum, ne forte in ipsis verbis Apostoli elucescat nobis aliquid, unde ista removeatur et solvatur obscuritas. Detrimenta, inquit, credidi haec omnia, et stercora existimavi, ut Christum lucrifaciam . Intendite, obsecro. Damna, detrimenta, stercora ista existimavi, in quibus etiam illud commemoro, quod fuerim sine querela secundum iustitiam, quae in lege est. Existimavi ergo haec omnia detrimenta et stercora, ut Christum lucrifaciam, et inveniar in illo, non habens meam iustitiam quae ex lege est. Qui praevenistis intellectu expositionem, arbitramini vos tamquam veloces in via cum tardioribus ambulare. Celeritas aliquantum reprimatur, ne comes tardior deseratur. Ut Christum, inquit, lucrifaciam, et inveniar in illo, non habens meam iustitiam, quae ex lege est. Si meam dixerat, quare addidit ex lege? Si enim ex lege est, quomodo tua est? Numquid tu tibi imposuisti legem? Deus legem dedit, Deus legem imposuit, Deus legi suae te obtemperare praecepit. Lex si non te doceret quemadmodum vivere deberes, quomodo posses habere iustitiam sine querela secundum legem? si secundum legem habes, quomodo dicis: Non habens meam iustitiam, quae ex lege est, sed eam quae est per fidem Christi, quae est a Deo ?
5. 7. A greater question has arisen, O Paul! If you conducted yourself without complaint according to the righteousness that is in the law, and you count this among your detriments, your losses, your dung, that you may gain Christ, did that righteousness, then, keep you from Christ? I beseech you, expound this a little. Let us rather say to God, that he may enlighten us too, by whom he himself was enlightened who wrote this Epistle to us, not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God (See 2 Cor 3:3). You see, dearly beloved, how arduous, how difficult it is to understand this; when it is agreed that the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good; and it is agreed entirely among the faithful catholics—so that no one dissents, except one who does not wish to be a catholic—that this law was given only by the Lord our God; that to conduct oneself without complaint according to that righteousness which is in the law was an impediment to the Apostle, that he should not come to Christ; and that he did not come to Christ, unless he had counted that which he was without complaint according to the righteousness that is in the law among his losses and detriments and dung. Let us follow, then, and approach a little, lest perhaps in the very words of the Apostle something may dawn on us, whence this obscurity may be removed and resolved. Detriments, he says, I believed all these things, and considered them dung, that I might gain Christ (Phil 3:8). Attend, I beseech you. I considered these losses, detriments, dung—among which I also mention that I was without complaint according to the righteousness that is in the law. I considered, then, all these things detriments and dung, that I might gain Christ, and be found in him, not having my own righteousness which is from the law (Phil 3:8-9). You who have anticipated the exposition with your understanding, suppose yourselves as it were swift on the road, walking with slower companions. Let speed be somewhat restrained, lest the slower companion be abandoned. That I may gain Christ, he says, and be found in him, not having my own righteousness which is from the law. If he had said my own, why did he add from the law? For if it is from the law, how is it yours? Did you impose the law on yourself? God gave the law, God imposed the law, God commanded you to obey his law. If the law did not teach you how you ought to live, how could you have righteousness without complaint according to the law? if you have it according to the law, how do you say, not having my own righteousness which is from the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, which is from God (Phil 3:9)?
Sermons5.5.7
6. 8. Iam ergo dicam ut potero; revelet melius qui vos possidet, donet et intellectum et affectum. Donabit enim effectum, si donabit affectum. Hoc est enim quod volo dicere; lege Dei proposita, ipsa enim dixit: Non concupisces ; lege ergo Dei proposita, exceptis illis carnalibus sacramentis, quae fuerunt umbrae futurorum; lege Dei proposita quisquis timuerit, et suis viribus eam implere se posse putaverit, et fecerit quod lex iubet, non amando iustitiam, sed timendo poenam; fuit quidem secundum iustitiam, quae ex lege est, homo sine querela; non furatur, non adulterat, non dicit falsum testimonium, non facit homicidium, non concupiscit rem proximi sui; potest hoc, potest fortassis; unde? Timore poenae. Quamquam qui timore poenae non concupiscit, puto quia concupiscit. Terrore ingenti armorum atque telorum, et circumdantis forsitan multitudinis vel obviam euntis, etiam leo revocatur a praeda; et tamen leo venit, leo redit; praedam non rapuit, non malitiam posuit. Si talis es, adhuc iustitia est, qua iustitia tibi consulis ne torquearis. Quid magnum est, poenam timere? Quis eam non timet? Quis latro, quis sceleratus, quis nefarius? Sed hoc interest inter timorem tuum timoremque latronis, quod latro timet leges hominum, et ideo facit latrocinium, quia sperat se fallere leges hominum; tu autem leges eius times, eius poenam times, quem fallere non potes. Nam si fallere posses, quid non fecisses? Ergo et concupiscentiam tuam malam non amor tollit, sed timor premit. Ad ovile lupus; latratu canum non amor tollit, sed timor premit. Ad ovile venit lupus; latratu canum et clamore pastorum ab ovili reversus est lupus; ipse tamen semper est lupus. In ovem vertatur. Facit enim et hoc Dominus; sed ipsa est iustitia eius, non tua. Nam quamdiu habes tuam, potes timere poenam, non amare iustitiam.
6. 8. Now then I will say it as I can; let him reveal it better who possesses you, let him grant both understanding and affection. For he will grant the effect, if he grants the affection. For this is what I wish to say: when the law of God is set forth—for it said, You shall not covet; when the law of God is set forth, then, apart from those carnal sacraments which were shadows of things to come; when the law of God is set forth, whoever fears it, and supposes that he can fulfill it by his own strength, and does what the law commands, not loving righteousness, but fearing punishment; that man is indeed without complaint according to the righteousness that is from the law; he does not steal, does not commit adultery, does not bear false witness, does not commit murder, does not covet his neighbor's property; he can do this, perhaps he can; whence? From fear of punishment. Although the one who does not covet from fear of punishment, I think still covets. By the immense terror of arms and weapons, and perhaps of a surrounding multitude or one coming to meet it, even a lion is called back from its prey; and yet the lion came, the lion returns; it did not seize the prey, it did not lay aside its malice. If you are such, it is still righteousness, the righteousness by which you take counsel for yourself not to be tortured. What great thing is it to fear punishment? Who does not fear it? What robber, what criminal, what wicked man? But this is the difference between your fear and the robber's fear: the robber fears the laws of men, and therefore commits robbery, because he hopes to deceive the laws of men; but you fear his laws, fear his punishment, whom you cannot deceive. For if you could deceive, what would you not do? Therefore your evil concupiscence too is not taken away by love, but pressed down by fear. The wolf comes to the sheepfold; by the barking of the dogs love does not take away, but fear presses down. The wolf comes to the sheepfold; by the barking of the dogs and the shout of the shepherds the wolf returns from the sheepfold; yet it is always a wolf. Let it be turned into a sheep. For the Lord does even this; but it is his righteousness, not yours. For as long as you have your own, you can fear punishment, not love righteousness.
Sermons5.6.8
7. 8. Ergo, fratres mei, habet delicias suas iniquitas, et iustitia non habet? Delectat malum, et non delectat bonum? Delectat omnino; sed: Dominus dabit suavitatem, et terra nostra dabit fructum suum . Ille nisi prior det suavitatem, terra nostra non habebit nisi sterilitatem. Hanc ergo iustitiam concupivit Apostolus, delectatus est; memor fuit Dei, et delectatus est ; concupivit anima eius, et aestuavit in atria Domini; et viluerunt omnia quae pro magno habebat, facta sunt damna, detrimenta, stercora.
7. 8. Therefore, my brothers, does iniquity have its delights, and righteousness not have them? Does evil delight, and good not delight? It delights entirely; but: The Lord will give sweetness, and our land will give its fruit (Ps 85:12 (84:13)). Unless he first give sweetness, our land will have nothing but sterility. This righteousness, then, the Apostle coveted, was delighted; he was mindful of God, and was delighted (See Ps 77:3 (76:4)); his soul coveted, and grew hot for the courts of the Lord (See Ps 84:2 (83:3)); and all the things he held for great became cheap, became losses, detriments, dung.
Sermons5.7.8
7. 9. Hinc enim erat et illud, quod Ecclesiam persequebatur, secundum aemulationem paternarum traditionum ; inde erat, quia suam iustitiam constituebat, non iustitiam Dei quaerebat. Videte enim, qua inde persequebatur Ecclesiam. Quid ergo dicemus? ait alio loco ipse Apostolus: Quia gentes quae non sectabantur iustitiam, apprehenderunt iustitiam . Sed quam? Iustitiam autem quae ex fide est. Gentes autem quae non sectabantur iustitiam, quae ex lege est, quasi propriam suam, quae fit de timore poenae, non de amore iustitiae; quia non sectabantur iustitiam, apprehenderunt iustitiam; iustitiam autem quae ex fide est. Israel autem, inquit, persequens legem iustitiae, in legem iustitiae non pervenit. Quare? Quia non ex fide . Quid est: Quia non ex fide? Non speravit in Deum, non illam petivit a Deo, non credidit in eum qui iustificat impium ; non fuit similis Publicano oculos in terram deicienti, pectus suum percutienti, et dicenti: Domine, propitius esto mihi peccatori . Ergo: Persequens legem iustitiae, in legem iustitiae non pervenit. Quare? Quia non ex fide, sed quasi ex operibus. Offenderunt enim in lapidem offensionis . Ecce unde Saulus persequebatur Ecclesiam. Quando enim persequebatur Ecclesiam, in lapidem offensionis offendebat. Christus humilis in terra iacebat; in caelis quidem et ipse erat, levata illa carne sua a mortuis resuscitata; sed nisi et in terra Christus iaceret, non ipse Saulo clamaret: Quid me persequeris? Ergo ille iacebat, quia humilitatem praeferebat; ille offendebat, quia non videbat. Et totum hoc non videre, unde erat? De tumore superbiae. Quid est: De tumore superbiae? Quasi de iustitia sua. Ex lege quidem, sed sua. Quid est: Ex lege? Quia in mandatis legis. Quid est: De sua? Tamquam de viribus suis. Amor deerat, amor iustitiae, amor caritatis Christi. Et unde illi amor? Solus illum possidebat timor, sed caritati venturae locum in corde servabat. Cum saeviret erectus, iactabundus, glorians apud ipsos Iudaeos quod secundum aemulationem paternarum traditionum persequebatur Ecclesiam; cum sibi videretur excelsus, audivit desuper vocem Domini nostri Iesu Christi, iam in caelo sedentis, et adhuc humilitatem commendantis: Saule, inquit, Saule, quid me persequeris? Durum est tibi adversus stimulum calces mittere . Possem te dimittere; tu enim vexareris punctionibus meis, non ego frangerer calcibus tuis; sed non te dimitto. Saevis, et misereor. Quid me persequeris? Non enim timeo te, ne iterum crucifigas me; sed volo agnoscas me, ne occidas non me, sed te.
7. 9. For hence too came that he persecuted the Church, according to zeal for ancestral traditions (See Gal 1:14); thence it came, because he was establishing his own righteousness, not seeking the righteousness of God. For see by what he was persecuting the Church. What, then, shall we say? the same Apostle says in another place: That the gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, laid hold of righteousness. But what? The righteousness that is from faith. But the gentiles who did not pursue righteousness—that which is from the law, as their own, which comes from fear of punishment, not from love of righteousness; because they did not pursue righteousness, laid hold of righteousness; but the righteousness that is from faith. But Israel, he says, pursuing the law of righteousness, did not arrive at the law of righteousness. Why? Because not from faith (Rom 9:30-32). What is, Because not from faith? He did not hope in God, did not ask it of God, did not believe in him who justifies the ungodly (See Rom 4:5); he was not like the tax collector casting his eyes to the ground, striking his breast, and saying, Lord, be merciful to me a sinner (Luke 18:13). Therefore: Pursuing the law of righteousness, he did not arrive at the law of righteousness. Why? Because not from faith, but as if from works. For they stumbled on the stone of stumbling (Rom 9:31-32). Behold whence Saul was persecuting the Church. For when he persecuted the Church, he stumbled on the stone of stumbling. The humble Christ lay on the earth; in heaven indeed he himself was too, that flesh of his lifted up, raised from the dead; but unless Christ also lay on the earth, he himself would not cry to Saul, Why do you persecute me (Acts 9:4)? Therefore that one lay, because he preferred humility; this one stumbled, because he did not see. And all this not-seeing, whence was it? From the swelling of pride. What is, From the swelling of pride? As it were from his own righteousness. From the law indeed, but his own. What is, From the law? Because in the precepts of the law. What is, His own? As it were from his own strength. Love was lacking, the love of righteousness, the love of the love of Christ. And whence love to him? Fear alone possessed him, but kept a place in the heart for the love to come. When he raged, raised up, boastful, glorying among the Jews themselves that according to zeal for ancestral traditions he persecuted the Church; when he seemed to himself lofty, he heard from above the voice of our Lord Jesus Christ, already sitting in heaven, and still commending humility: Saul, he said, Saul, why do you persecute me? It is hard for you to kick against the goad (Acts 9:4; 26:14). I could let you go; for you would be vexed by my prickings, I would not be broken by your kicks; but I do not let you go. You rage, and I have mercy. Why do you persecute me? For I do not fear you, lest you crucify me again; but I wish you to acknowledge me, lest you kill not me, but yourself.
Sermons5.7.9
8. 10. Horruit ergo Apostolus, percussus et prostratus, erectus et instructus. Factum enim est in illo: Ego percutiam, et ego sanabo . Non enim ait: Sanabo, et percutiam; sed: Percutiam, et sanabo. Percutiam te, et dabo tibi me. Sic prostratus horruit iustitiam suam, in qua erat certe sine querela, laudabilis, magnus, quasi gloriosus apud Iudaeos; detrimenta existimavit, damna credidit, stercora deputavit, ut inveniretur in illo non habens suam iustitiam, quae ex lege est; sed eam quae per fidem est Christi, quae est, inquit, ex Deo . Illi autem qui offenderunt in lapidem offensionis, quid de illis dicit ipse Apostolus? Quia non, inquit, ex fide, sed tamquam ex operibus. Quia ipsi quasi sua iustitia offenderunt in lapidem offensionis; sicut scriptum est: Ecce pono in Sion lapidem offensionis, et petram scandali; et qui crediderit in eum, non confundetur . Qui enim crediderit in eum, non habebit suam iustitiam, quae ex lege est, quamvis sit bona lex; sed implebit ipsam legem, non sua iustitia, sed data ex Deo. Ita enim non confundetur. Caritas enim est legis plenitudo . Et unde ista caritas diffusa est in cordibus nostris? Non utique a nobis, sed per Spiritum Sanctum qui datus est nobis . Offenderunt ergo illi in lapidem offensionis, et petram scandali. Et ait de illis: Fratres, bona voluntas quidem cordis mei, et deprecatio ad Deum pro illis in salutem . Deprecatur Apostolus pro non credentibus, ut credant; pro aversis, ut convertantur. Videtis quia nec ipsa conversio sine Dei adiutorio. Deprecatio, inquit, ad Deum pro illis ad salutem. Testimonium enim perhibeo, quia zelum Dei habent . Sic habebat et ipse; zelum Dei habebat. Sed quomodo ipse habebat? Quomodo illi habebant: Sed non secundum scientiam. Quid est hoc: Non secundum scientiam? Ignorantes enim Dei iustitiam, et suam volentes constituere . Unde iste correctus inquit: Non habens meam iustitiam. Illi volunt suam constituere, adhuc eos delectat in stercore iacere. Ego non habeo meam iustitiam, sed eam quae est per fidem Christi, iustitiam ex Deo; iustitiam, inquam, ex Deo, qui iustificat impium.
8. 10. The Apostle, then, shuddered, struck down and laid low, raised up and instructed. For there was fulfilled in him: I will strike, and I will heal. For he did not say: I will heal, and I will strike; but: I will strike, and I will heal (Deut 32:39). I will strike you, and I will give you myself. Thus, laid low, he shuddered at his own righteousness, in which he was surely without complaint, praiseworthy, great, as it were glorious among the Jews; he considered it detriments, believed it losses, reckoned it dung, that he might be found in him not having his own righteousness which is from the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, which is, he says, from God (Phil 3:9). But of those who stumbled on the stone of stumbling, what does the same Apostle say? Because not, he says, from faith, but as if from works. Because they, as if by their own righteousness, stumbled on the stone of stumbling; as it is written: Behold, I place in Zion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of scandal; and he who believes in him will not be put to shame (Rom 9:32-33). For he who believes in him will not have his own righteousness which is from the law, although the law is good; but he will fulfill the law itself, not by his own righteousness, but by that given from God. For so he will not be put to shame. For love is the fullness of the law (Rom 13:10). And whence is this love poured out in our hearts? Surely not from ourselves, but through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us (See Rom 5:5). Therefore they stumbled on the stone of stumbling, and the rock of scandal. And he says of them, Brothers, the good will indeed of my heart, and my supplication to God for them is unto salvation. The Apostle supplicates for unbelievers, that they may believe; for the turned-away, that they may be converted. You see that not even conversion itself is without the help of God. My supplication, he says, to God for them is unto salvation. For I bear witness that they have a zeal for God (Rom 10:1-2). So he too had it; he had a zeal for God. But how did he have it? How did they have it: But not according to knowledge. What is this: Not according to knowledge? For being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and wishing to establish their own (Rom 10:2-3). Whence this man, corrected, says, Not having my own righteousness. They wish to establish their own; it still delights them to lie in the dung. I do not have my own righteousness, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness from God; the righteousness, I say, from God, who justifies the ungodly.
Sermons5.8.10
9. 11. Tolle te, tolle, inquam, te a te, impedis te; si tu te aedificas, ruinam aedificas. Nisi Dominus aedificaverit domum, in vanum laboraverunt qui aedificant eam . Noli ergo velle habere iustitiam tuam. Certe ex lege est, nempe ex lege est; certe Deus dedit legem, et quia iustitia ex lege est, non sit tua. Apostolus Paulus loquitur; mihi amantes iustitiam suam non calumnientur. Ecce ubi illum habes: Aperi, lege, audi, vide. Tuam iustitiam noli habere; stercora illam deputat Apostolus, quamvis sit ex lege, tamen quia suam. Ignorantes enim Dei iustitiam, et suam volentes constituere, iustitiae Dei non sunt subiecti . Noli putare quia Christianus vocaris, ideo te non posse offendere in lapidem offensionis. Cuius gratiae derogas, in ipsum offendis. Minus est offendere Christum in cruce pendentem, quam in caelo sedentem. Iustitia sit, sed ex gratia sit, a Deo tibi sit; non tua sit. Sacerdotes tui, inquit, induantur iustitiam . Vestis accipitur, non cum capillis nascitur; pecora de suo vestiuntur. Hanc praedicat apostolus Paulus: A Deo tibi sit. Geme ut impetres, plora ut impetres, crede ut impetres. Qui, inquit, invocaverit nomen Domini, salvus erit . An putatis sic dictum esse: Qui invocaverit nomen Domini, salvus erit; quia a febre, aut a peste, aut a podagra, aut aliquo dolore corporis? Non sic, sed salvus erit, iustus erit. Quia: Non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus. Exposuit cum dixit: Non veni vocare iustos, sed peccatores .
9. 11. Take yourself away, take, I say, yourself from yourself, you impede yourself; if you build yourself, you build a ruin. Unless the Lord build the house, in vain have they labored who build it (Ps 127:1 (126:1)). Do not, then, wish to have your own righteousness. Surely it is from the law, surely it is from the law; surely God gave the law, and because the righteousness is from the law, let it not be yours. The apostle Paul speaks; let not those who love their own righteousness slander me. Behold where you have him: open, read, hear, see. Do not wish to have your own righteousness; the Apostle reckons it dung, although it is from the law, yet because it is one's own. For being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and wishing to establish their own, they have not submitted to the righteousness of God (Rom 10:3). Do not suppose that because you are called a Christian, you therefore cannot stumble on the stone of stumbling. Whose grace you disparage, on him you stumble. It is less to stumble on Christ hanging on the cross than on Christ sitting in heaven. Let there be righteousness, but let it be from grace, let it be to you from God; let it not be your own. Let your priests, he says, be clothed with righteousness (Ps 132:9 (131:9)). A garment is received, it is not born with the hair; cattle are clothed from their own. This the apostle Paul preaches: let it be to you from God. Groan, that you may obtain it; weep, that you may obtain it; believe, that you may obtain it. He who, he says, calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved (Rom 10:13; Joel 2:32). Or do you suppose it was said thus: He who calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved; because from a fever, or a plague, or gout, or some pain of the body? Not so, but will be saved, will be righteous. Because: Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. He expounded it when he said, I came not to call the righteous, but sinners (Matt 9:12-13).
Sermons5.9.11
10. 12. Videte ergo quid sequitur. Et inveniar, inquit, in illo, non habens meam iustitiam, quae ex lege est; quamvis ex lege, tamen meam: sed eam quae est per fidem Christi; quae impetratur a Deo, quae est ex Deo, iustitiam in fide, ad cognoscendum eum, et virtutem resurrectionis eius . Aliquid magnum est, agnoscere virtutem resurrectionis Christi. Hoc putatis esse magnum, quia carnem suam resuscitavit? Ipsam dixit virtutem resurrectionis eius? Nonne erit etiam nostra in fine saeculi resurrectio? Nonne et nostrum corruptibile hoc induet incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induet immortalitatem? Nonne quomodo ipse resurrexit a mortuis, et iam non moritur, et mors ei ultra non dominabitur ; sic et nos, mirabilius, ut ita dicam? Nam illius caro non vidit corruptionem, nostra de cinere reparatur. Magnum est quidem, quia praecessit in exemplo, et dedit nobis quid speraremus; sed non hoc est solum illi qui de iustitia loquebatur non sua, sed illa quae ex Deo est, et ibi nominavit virtutem resurrectionis Christi; agnosce ibi iustificationem tuam. Ex illius enim resurrectione iustificamur, tamquam a petra circumcidamur. Propterea inde coepit: Nos sumus circumcisio . Unde circumcisio? A petra. Qua petra? Christo. Quomodo? Octavo die. Quomodo resurrexit Dominus dominico die.
10. 12. See, then, what follows. And that I may be found, he says, in him, not having my own righteousness which is from the law; although from the law, yet my own: but that which is through the faith of Christ; which is obtained from God, which is from God, the righteousness in faith, to know him, and the power of his resurrection (Phil 3:9-10). It is something great, to know the power of Christ's resurrection. Do you suppose this is great, because he raised up his own flesh? Did he call this the power of his resurrection? Will there not also be our resurrection at the end of the age? Will not this our corruptible also put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality? Will it not be that, just as he rose from the dead, and now does not die, and death will no longer have dominion over him (See Rom 6:9); so we too—more wonderfully, so to speak? For his flesh did not see corruption, ours is restored from ashes. It is indeed great, because he went before in example, and gave us what we might hope for; but this is not the only thing for the one who was speaking of righteousness not his own, but that which is from God, and there named the power of Christ's resurrection; acknowledge there your justification. For from his resurrection we are justified, as though we were circumcised by the rock. Therefore he began from there: We are the circumcision. Whence the circumcision? From the rock. What rock? Christ. How? On the eighth day. As the Lord rose on the Lord's day.
Sermons5.10.12
11. 13. Hanc ergo, fratres mei, iustificationem et habeamus in quantum habemus, et augeamus in quantum minores sumus, et perficiamus cum illuc venerimus, ubi dicetur: Ubi est, mors, victoria tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Sed totum ex Deo; non tamen quasi dormientes, non quasi ut non conemur, non quasi ut non velimus. Sine voluntate tua non erit in te iustitia Dei. Voluntas quidem non est nisi tua, iustitia non est nisi Dei. Esse potest iustitia Dei sine voluntate tua, sed in te esse non potest praeter voluntatem tuam. Demonstratum est quid agere debeas; iussit lex: Non facias illud, non illud; fac hoc atque illud. Demonstratum est tibi, iussum est tibi, apertum est tibi, si tibi est cor, intellexisti quid facias; roga ut facias, si cognoscis virtutem resurrectionis Christi. Traditus est enim propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter iustificationem nostram . Quid est: propter iustificationem nostram? Ut iustificet nos, ut iustos faciat nos. Eris opus Dei, non solum quia homo es, sed etiam quia iustus es. Melius est enim iustum esse, quam te hominem esse. Si hominem te fecit Deus, et iustum tu te facis; melius aliquid facis quam fecit Deus. Sed sine te fecit te Deus. Non enim adhibuisti aliquem consensum, ut te faceret Deus. Quomodo consentiebas qui non eras? Qui ergo fecit te sine te, non te iustificat sine te. Ergo fecit nescientem, iustificat volentem. Tamen ipse iustificat, ne sit iustitia tua, ne redeas ad damna, ad detrimenta et stercora, invenire in illo non habens iustitiam tuam, quae ex lege est, sed iustitiam per fidem Christi, quae est ex Deo; iustitiam ex fide, ad cognoscendum eum, et virtutem resurrectionis eius, et communicationem passionum eius . Et ipsa virtus tua erit; communicatio passionum Christi, virtus tua erit.
11. 13. This justification, then, my brothers, let us both have insofar as we have it, and increase it insofar as we are deficient, and perfect it when we come there, where it will be said, Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting (1 Cor 15:55)? But all from God; yet not as though sleeping, not as though we should not strive, not as though we should not will. Without your will the righteousness of God will not be in you. The will indeed is none but yours, the righteousness none but God's. The righteousness of God can be without your will, but it cannot be in you apart from your will. It has been shown what you ought to do; the law commanded: Do not do this, not that; do this and that. It has been shown to you, commanded to you, opened to you; if you have a heart, you understood what you should do; ask that you may do it, if you know the power of Christ's resurrection. For he was handed over for our offenses, and rose again for our justification (Rom 4:25). What is, for our justification? That he may justify us, that he may make us righteous. You will be the work of God, not only because you are a man, but also because you are righteous. For it is better to be righteous than for you to be a man. If God made you a man, and you make yourself righteous; you do something better than God did. But God made you without you. For you did not bring any consent, that God might make you. How did you consent who did not exist? Therefore he who made you without you, does not justify you without you. He made you, then, not knowing it; he justifies you willing it. Yet he himself justifies, lest it be your own righteousness, lest you return to losses, to detriments and dung, to be found in him not having your own righteousness, which is from the law, but the righteousness through the faith of Christ, which is from God; the righteousness from faith, to know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings (Phil 3:9-10). And this itself will be your power; the fellowship of the sufferings of Christ will be your power.
Sermons5.11.13
11. 14. Quid autem erit: in communicationibus passionum Christi, si caritas non erit? Nonne inveniuntur torti latrones in tanta fortitudine corporum, ut quidam eorum non solum conscios prodere noluerint, sed nec nomina sua confiteri dignati sint; inter cruciatus, inter tormenta, effossis lateribus, et pene perditis membris, manserit animus in obstinatione nequissima? Vide ergo quid amabant. Facere tamen ista sine magno amore non poterant. Sed non sic amator Dei. Deus non amatur, nisi de Deo. Amavit ille nescio quid aliud de carne, sicut homo. Quodlibet amaverit, socios suos amaverit, conscientiam scelerum amaverit, gloriam in facinoribus amaverit; quodlibet amaverit, multum amavit, qui torqueri potuit, deficere non potuit. Si ergo ille non potuit, qui torqueri potuit, deficere non potuit; si ergo ille non potuit tanta perferre sine amore; nec tu poteris communicare Christi passionibus sine amore.
11. 14. But what will be: in the fellowships of the sufferings of Christ, if there is no love? Are not robbers found, tortured, with such fortitude of body that some of them not only refused to betray their accomplices, but did not even deign to confess their own names; amid the torments, amid the tortures, their sides dug out, and their limbs almost destroyed, their mind remained in a most wicked obstinacy? See, then, what they loved. Yet they could not do these things without great love. But the lover of God is not so. God is not loved except from God. That one loved I know not what else of the flesh, like a man. Whatever he loved—he loved his associates, he loved the consciousness of his crimes, he loved glory in misdeeds; whatever he loved, he loved much, who could be tortured and could not fail. If, then, that one could not—who could be tortured, could not fail; if, then, that one could not endure such things without love; neither will you be able to share in the sufferings of Christ without love.
Sermons5.11.14
12. 15. Sed quaero quo amore. Non sit cupiditas, sed sit caritas. Si enim, inquit, tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, et caritatem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest . Ut prosit tibi communicatio passionum Christi, caritas adsit. Unde tibi caritas? O mendicissima infirmitas, unde tibi caritas Dei? Vis ostendo tibi unde sit tibi? Ipsum interroga horrearium dominicum. Si enim in te fuerit caritas Dei, communicabis Christi passionibus et verus eris martyr. In quo caritas coronatur, ipse erit verus martyr. Unde ergo tibi? Habemus thesaurum istum in vasis fictilibus, ait ipse Apostolus, ut eminentia virtutis sit Dei, et non ex nobis . Ergo unde tibi caritas, nisi quia diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum Sanctum qui datus est nobis ? Ecce ad quod geme. Contemne spiritum tuum, accipe Spiritum Dei. Non timeat spiritus tuus, ne cum coeperit in te habitare Spiritus Dei, angustias patiatur in corpore tuo. Cum habitare in corpore tuo coeperit Spiritus Dei, non inde excludet spiritum tuum; noli timere. Si divitem aliquem hospitio suscipias, pateris angustias; ubi maneas tu non invenis, ubi illi lectus paretur, ubi coniux, ubi filii, ubi familia. Quid ago, inquis? Quo eo? Quo migrabo? Suscipe divitem Spiritum Dei; dilataberis, non angustaberis. Dilatasti gressus tuos subter me: dicis. Hospiti tuo dicturus es: Dilatasti gressus meos subter me . Hospiti tuo dicturus es: Dilatasti gressus meos subter me. Quando non hic eras, angustias patiebar; implesti cellam meam, et non me exclusisti, sed angustiam meam. Cum enim dicit: Caritas Dei diffusa est, ipsa diffusio latitudinem significat. Non ergo timeas angustias, recipe hospitem istum; et non sit hospes quasi de transeuntibus. Non enim habet dare discedendo: Veniens habitet in te, et dedit. Ipsius esto, non te deserat, non inde migret; tene illum omnino, et dic illi: Domine Deus noster, posside nos .
12. 15. But I ask, by what love? Let it not be cupidity, but let it be love. For if, he says, I hand over my body to be burned, and have not love, it profits me nothing (1 Cor 13:3). That the fellowship of the sufferings of Christ may profit you, let love be present. Whence have you love? O most beggarly weakness, whence have you the love of God? Do you wish me to show you whence it is to you? Question the Lord's storehouse itself. For if the love of God is in you, you will share in the sufferings of Christ and you will be a true martyr. In whom love is crowned, he will be a true martyr. Whence, then, is it to you? We have this treasure in earthen vessels, says the Apostle himself, that the eminence of the power may be God's, and not from us (2 Cor 4:7). Whence, then, have you love, except because it has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us (Rom 5:5)? Behold, for this groan. Despise your own spirit, receive the Spirit of God. Let not your spirit fear lest, when the Spirit of God begins to dwell in you, it suffer straits in your body. When the Spirit of God begins to dwell in your body, it will not for that reason shut out your spirit; do not fear. If you receive some rich man into your lodging, you suffer straits; you do not find where you may stay yourself, where a bed may be prepared for him, where the wife, where the children, where the household. What do I do, you say? Where do I go? Where shall I migrate? Receive the rich Spirit of God; you will be enlarged, not straitened. You enlarged my steps beneath me: you say. To your guest you will say, You enlarged my steps beneath me (Ps 18:36 (17:37)). When you were not here, I suffered straits; you filled my cell, and you did not shut me out, but my straits. For when he says, The love of God has been poured out, that very pouring out signifies breadth. Do not, then, fear straits, receive this guest; and let him not be a guest as of those passing by. For he does not give by departing: coming, let him dwell in you, and he has given. Be his, let him not forsake you, let him not migrate from there; hold him entirely, and say to him, O Lord our God, possess us (Isa 26:13).
Sermons5.12.15
13. 16. Ergo ad hoc, inquit, habeamus iustitiam, quae ex Deo est, ad cognoscendum eum, et virtutem resurrectionis eius, et communicationem passionum eius, conformati morti ipsius. Consepulti enim, inquit, sumus cum Christo per Baptismum in mortem; ut quemadmodum Christus surrexit a mortuis, sic et nos in novitate vitae ambulemus . Morere, ut vivas; sepelire, ut resurgas. Cum enim sepultus fueris, et resurrexeris; tunc verum erit: Sursum cor. Sapuit quod dixi. Numquid iste sermo saperet, nisi esset in vobis interna dulcedo? Conformatus, inquit, morti ipsius, si quo modo occurram in resurrectionem mortuorum. De iustitia loquebatur, iustitia quae est ex fide Christi, iustitia quae a Deo est, et sic cuncta exsecutus est. Et cum iustitiam quaereret dicens: Ut inveniar in illo non habens meam iustitiam, quae ex lege est, sed iustitiam quae est ex fide Christi, quae est ex Deo ; dicit modo: Si quomodo occurram in resurrectionem mortuorum. Quare dixisti: Si quomodo occurram? Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim; sequor autem, si quomodo apprehendam, in quo et apprehensus sum a Christo Iesu. Praevenit me iustitia ipsius, sequatur illum mea. Tunc autem sequetur mea, si non sit mea. Si quomodo occurram in resurrectionem mortuorum. Quare dixisti: Si quo modo occurram? Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim; sequor autem, si quo modo apprehendam, in quo et apprehensus sum in Christo Iesu . Praevenit me iustitia ipsius, sequatur illum mea. Tunc autem sequetur mea, si non sit mea. Si quo modo occurram. Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim. Coeperunt mirari, qui hoc audiebant dicentem Apostolum: Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim. Quid est quod nondum acceperat? Fidem habebat, virtutem habebat, spem habebat, caritate flagrabat, virtutes operabatur, invictissime praedicabat, omnes persecutiones tolerabat, in omnibus patiens, amans Ecclesiam, sollicitudinem omnium Ecclesiarum corde gestans; quid nondum acceperat? Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim. Quid est quod dicis? Dicis, et miramur; dicis, et stupemus. Novimus enim quid audiamus; quid dicis? Fratres, ait. Quid est quod dicis? Quid dicis? Ego me non arbitror apprehendisse . Nolite, inquit, in me falli; plus me ipse novi quam vos. Si nescio quid mihi desit; nescio quid adsit. Ego me ipsum non arbitror apprehendisse. Unum autem; hoc non me arbitror apprehendisse. Multa habeo, et unum nondum apprehendi. Unam petii a Domino, hanc requiram. Quid petisti, aut quid requiris? Ut inhabitem in domo Domini per omnes dies vitae meae. Ut quid? Ut contempler delectationem Domini . Ipsum est unum, quod se dicebat nondum apprehendisse Apostolus; et quantum illi deerat, in tantum nondum perfectus erat.
13. 16. Therefore for this, he says, let us have the righteousness which is from God, to know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, conformed to his death. For we have been buried, he says, with Christ through Baptism into death; that as Christ rose from the dead, so we too may walk in newness of life (Rom 6:4). Die, that you may live; be buried, that you may rise again. For when you have been buried and have risen again; then it will be true: Lift up your heart. What I have said has been savory. Surely this sermon would not be savory, unless there were in you an inner sweetness? Conformed, he says, to his death, if by any means I may attain to the resurrection of the dead (Phil 3:10-11). He was speaking of righteousness, the righteousness that is from the faith of Christ, the righteousness that is from God, and so he carried it all through. And when he sought righteousness, saying, That I may be found in him, not having my own righteousness which is from the law, but the righteousness which is from the faith of Christ, which is from God; he now says, If by any means I may attain to the resurrection of the dead. Why did you say, If by any means I may attain? Not that I have already received it, or am already perfect; but I follow, if by any means I may lay hold, in which I was also laid hold of by Christ Jesus. His righteousness has gone before me, let mine follow him. But then mine will follow, if it is not mine. If by any means I may attain to the resurrection of the dead. Not that I have already received it, or am already perfect. They began to wonder, who heard the Apostle saying this: Not that I have already received it, or am already perfect. What is it that he had not yet received? He had faith, he had virtue, he had hope, he burned with love, he worked virtues, he preached most unconquerably, he bore all persecutions, patient in all, loving the Church, bearing in his heart the care of all the churches; what had he not yet received? Not that I have already received it, or am already perfect. What is it that you say? You say it, and we wonder; you say it, and we are amazed. For we know what we hear; what do you say? Brothers, he says. What is it that you say? What do you say? I do not reckon that I have laid hold of it (Phil 3:13). Do not, he says, be deceived about me; I know myself more than you. If I know what is lacking to me, I know what is present. I do not reckon that I have laid hold of it myself. But one thing; this I do not reckon that I have laid hold of. I have many things, and one thing I have not yet laid hold of. One thing I have asked of the Lord, this I will seek. What did you ask, or what do you seek? That I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life. For what? That I may contemplate the delight of the Lord (Ps 27:4 (26:4)). This is the one thing which the Apostle said he had not yet laid hold of; and as much as was lacking to him, by so much he was not yet perfect.
Sermons5.13.16
14. 17. Meministis, fratres mei, evangelicae illius lectionis, ubi duae sorores Dominum susceperunt, Martha et Maria. Certe recolitis: Martha in multo ministerio conversabatur et occupata erat circa curam domus; quippe Dominum hospitio receperat et discipulos eius. Satagebat omni cura religiosissima, ne sancti apud eam ullam paterentur iniuriam. Cum ergo esset occupata circa multum ministerium, Maria soror eius sedebat ad pedes Domini, et verbum eius audiebat. Illa in labore stomachabunda, quod illam videret sedentem, et de suis laboribus nihil curantem, interpellavit Dominum: Placet, inquit, tibi, Domine, quod soror mea deseruit me, et ecce tantum in ministerio laboro? Et Dominus: Martha, Martha, circa multum es occupata. Porro unum est necessarium. Maria meliorem partem elegit, quae non auferetur ab ea . Tu bonam, sed ista meliorem. Tu bonam (bonum est enim conversari in obsequio sanctorum), sed ista meliorem. Denique quod tu elegisti, transit. Ministras esurientibus, ministras sitientibus, ministras lectulos dormituris, praebes domum habitare volentibus; omnia ista transeunt. Erit tempus ubi nemo esuriat, nemo sitiat, nemo dormiat. Ergo cura tua auferetur a te. Maria meliorem elegit partem, quae non auferetur ab ea. Non auferetur; contemplari elegit, verbo vivere elegit. Qualis erit vita de Verbo sine verbo? Modo ista vivebat de Verbo, sed sonante verbo. Erit vita de Verbo, nullo sonante verbo. Ipsum Verbum vita est. Similes ei erimus, quoniam videbimus eum sicuti est . Ipsa erat una, ut contemplaretur delectationem Domini. Hoc in saeculi huius nocte non possumus. Mane astabo tibi, et contemplabor . Ergo: Ego, inquit, me non arbitror apprehendisse. Unum autem .
14. 17. You remember, my brothers, that gospel reading where two sisters received the Lord, Martha and Mary. Surely you recall it: Martha was occupied in much ministry and busied about the care of the house; for she had received the Lord and his disciples into her lodging. She busied herself with every most devout care, lest the holy ones should suffer any wrong with her. So when she was occupied about much ministry, Mary her sister sat at the feet of the Lord, and heard his word. The other, indignant in her labor, because she saw her sister sitting and caring nothing for her labors, appealed to the Lord: Does it please you, Lord, she said, that my sister has left me, and behold I labor so much in ministry? And the Lord: Martha, Martha, you are occupied about much. But one thing is necessary. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken from her (Luke 10:38-42). You the good, but she the better. You the good (for it is good to be occupied in the service of the saints), but she the better. Finally, what you chose passes away. You minister to the hungry, you minister to the thirsty, you minister beds to those who will sleep, you offer a house to those who wish to dwell in it; all these things pass away. There will be a time when no one will hunger, no one thirst, no one sleep. Therefore your care will be taken from you. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken from her. It will not be taken; she chose to contemplate, she chose to live by the word. What will the life from the Word be, without word? Now she lived by the Word, but with the word sounding. There will be a life from the Word, with no word sounding. The Word itself is life. We shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is (1 John 3:2). This was the one thing, that she might contemplate the delight of the Lord. This we cannot do in the night of this age. In the morning I will stand before you, and contemplate (See Ps 5:3 (5:4)). Therefore: I, he says, do not reckon that I have laid hold of it. But one thing (Phil 3:13).
Sermons5.14.17
15. 18. Quid ergo facio? Quae retro oblitus, in ea quae ante sunt extentus, secundum intentionem sequor. Adhuc sequor: ad palmam supernae vocationis Dei in Christo Iesu . Adhuc sequor, adhuc proficio, adhuc ambulo, adhuc in via sum, adhuc me extendo, nondum perveni. Ergo si et tu ambulas, si te extendis, si ea quae ventura sunt cogitas; obliviscere praeterita, noli in ea respicere, ne ibi remaneas ubi respexeris. Mementote uxoris Lot . Quotquot ergo perfecti, hoc sapiamus. Dixerat: Non sum perfectus, et dicit: Quotquot perfecti, hoc sapiamus. Ego me non arbitror apprehendisse. Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim; et dicit: Quotquot perfecti, hoc sapiamus. Perfecti, et non perfecti; perfecti viatores, nondum perfecti possessores. Et ut noveritis quod perfectos viatores dicat; qui iam in via ambulant, perfecti viatores sunt; ut scias viatores eum dixisse, non habitatores, non possessores; audi quod sequitur: Quotquot ergo perfecti, hoc sapiamus. Et si quid aliter sapitis, ne forte subrepat vobis, quia vos aliquid estis. Qui autem se ipsum putat esse aliquid, cum nihil sit, se ipsum seducit . Et qui se putat aliquid scire, necdum scit quemadmodum oportet scire . Ergo: Et si quid aliter sapitis, quasi parvuli; id quoque vobis Deus revelabit. Verumtamen in quo pervenimus, in eo ambulemus . Ut revelet nobis Deus et quod aliter sapimus, in quo pervenimus, non in eo remaneamus, sed in eo ambulemus. Videtis quia viatores sumus. Dicitis: Quid est ambulare? Breviter dico: Proficere; ne forte non intellegatis, et pigrius ambuletis. Proficite, fratres mei, discutite vos semper sine dolo, sine adulatione, sine palpatione. Non enim aliquis est intus tecum, cui erubescas, et iactes te. Est ibi, sed cui placet humilitas, ipse te probet. Proba et te ipsum tu ipse. Semper tibi displiceat quod es, si vis pervenire ad id quod nondum es. Nam ubi tibi placuisti, ibi remansisti. Si autem dixeris: Sufficit; et peristi. Semper adde, semper ambula, semper profice; noli in via remanere, noli retro redire, noli deviare. Remanet, qui non proficit; retro redit, qui ad ea revolvitur unde iam abscesserat; deviat, qui apostatat. Melius it claudus in via, quam cursor praeter viam. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
15. 18. What, then, do I do? Forgetting what is behind, stretching out to what is ahead, according to my intention I follow. Still I follow: toward the palm of the heavenly calling of God in Christ Jesus (Phil 3:13-14). Still I follow, still I make progress, still I walk, still I am on the way, still I stretch myself out, I have not yet arrived. Therefore if you too walk, if you stretch yourself out, if you think on the things that are to come; forget the past, do not look back at it, lest you remain there where you have looked back. Remember Lot's wife (See Luke 17:32; Gen 19:26). As many of us, then, as are perfect, let us be of this mind. He had said: I am not perfect, and he says, As many as are perfect, let us be of this mind. I do not reckon that I have laid hold of it. Not that I have already received it, or am already perfect; and he says, As many as are perfect, let us be of this mind. Perfect, and not perfect; perfect travelers, not yet perfect possessors. And that you may know that he calls them perfect travelers; those who now walk on the way are perfect travelers; that you may know he said travelers, not dwellers, not possessors; hear what follows: As many of us, then, as are perfect, let us be of this mind. And if you are of any other mind, lest perhaps it creep upon you that you are something. But he who thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, seduces himself (See Gal 6:3). And he who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know (See 1 Cor 8:2). Therefore: And if you are of any other mind, as little ones; that too God will reveal to you. But in what we have arrived, in it let us walk (Phil 3:15-16). So that God may reveal to us even what we are of another mind about, and in what we have arrived, let us not remain in it, but in it let us walk. You see that we are travelers. You say: What is it to walk? I say briefly: To make progress; lest perhaps you not understand, and walk more lazily. Make progress, my brothers, examine yourselves always without deceit, without flattery, without indulgence. For there is not someone within with you before whom you may blush and boast of yourself. He is there, but one to whom humility is pleasing; let him prove you. Prove yourself too, you yourself. Let what you are always displease you, if you wish to arrive at what you are not yet. For where you have pleased yourself, there you have remained. But if you say: It is enough; you have perished too. Always add, always walk, always make progress; do not remain on the way, do not go back, do not turn aside. He remains, who does not make progress; he goes back, who returns to the things from which he had already withdrawn; he turns aside, who apostatizes. Better does the lame man go on the way than the runner off the way. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.15.18
SERMO 170
Sermon 170
Sermons5.15.18
1. Divinae lectiones omnes ita sibi connectuntur, tamquam una sit lectio; quia omnes ex uno ore procedunt. Multa sunt ora ministerium sermonis gerentium; sed unum est os ministros implentis. Audivimus apostolicam lectionem, et forte aliquem moveat quod ibi scriptum est: Secundum iustitiam quae ex lege est, qui fuerim sine querela. Quae mihi lucra fuerunt, haec propter Christum damna esse duxi . Deinde secutus ait: Non solum damna, sed etiam stercora existimavi esse, ut Christum lucrifaciam, et inveniar in illo non habens meam iustitiam quae ex lege est, sed iustitiam quae est ex fide Iesu Christi . Quomodo enim stercora existimavit et damna, secundum iustitiam quae ex lege est, conversari sine querela? Quis enim legem dedit? Nonne ipse legem praemisit, qui postea reis legis cum indulgentia venit? Sed his eum credimus venisse cum indulgentia, quos reos lex tenebat. Numquid autem lex reos tenebat eos qui secundum iustitiam quae ex lege est conversati sunt sine querela? Si ergo indulgentiam et veniam peccatorum reis legis attulit Dominus, non attulit Paulo apostolo, qui dicit sine querela se in lege conversatum? Sed ipsum audiamus alio loco: Non ex operibus, inquit, quae nos fecimus, sed secundum suam misericordiam salvos nos fecit, per lavacrum regenerationis . Et iterum: Qui prius fui blasphemus, et persecutor, et iniuriosus; sed misericordiam consecutus sum , et reliqua. Hac se constituit conversatum in lege sine querela, hac talem se confitetur fuisse peccatorem, ut omnis peccator propterea de se non desperet, quia Paulus meruit indulgentiam.
1. All the divine readings are so connected with one another, as though they were one reading; because they all proceed from one mouth. There are many mouths of those carrying out the ministry of the word; but there is one mouth of him who fills the ministers. We heard the apostolic reading, and perhaps something troubles someone in what is written there: According to the righteousness that is from the law, having been without complaint. The things that were gains to me, these I reckoned losses for the sake of Christ. Then he goes on and says, Not only losses, but I even considered them to be dung, that I might gain Christ, and be found in him not having my own righteousness which is from the law, but the righteousness which is from the faith of Jesus Christ (Phil 3:6-9). For how did he consider it dung and losses, to conduct himself without complaint according to the righteousness that is from the law? For who gave the law? Did not he himself send the law before, who afterward came with forgiveness to those guilty of the law? But we believe that he came with forgiveness to those whom the law held guilty. But did the law hold guilty those who conducted themselves without complaint according to the righteousness that is from the law? If, then, the Lord brought forgiveness and pardon of sins to those guilty of the law, did he not bring it to the apostle Paul, who says he conducted himself in the law without complaint? But let us hear him in another place: Not from the works, he says, which we did, but according to his mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration (Titus 3:5). And again: Who before was a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious; but I obtained mercy (1 Tim 1:13), and the rest. By the one he establishes that he conducted himself in the law without complaint; by the other he confesses that he was such a sinner, that every sinner may for this reason not despair of himself, because Paul deserved forgiveness.
Sermons5.1
2. Videte, fratres, et vim sermonis huius intuemini, quomodo Paulus apostolus damna existimat et stercora, ubi sine querela dicit se conversatum fuisse. Hac impletor legis, hac reus legis, uno eodemque tempore, ante Baptismum, ante gratiam. Sed non sine causa damna esse dicit; ne subintrent cogitationes noxiae, hoc ideo dixisse apostolum Paulum, quod alius dederit legem, alius Evangelium; sicut Manichaeus mente perversa sentit, et reliqui haeretici, qui dixerunt, alium fuisse datorem legis quae data est per Moysen, alium autem largitorem evangelicae gratiae; illum quidem Deum malum, illum vero Deum bonum. Quid miramur, fratres? In obscuritate legis, tamquam in clausis ostiis, caliginem passi sunt; quia non pietate pulsaverunt. Invenimus aliquando eumdem Paulum apertissime dicere, legem bonam esse ; quam tamen ideo datam dicit esse, ut abundaret peccatum; et ideo abundasse peccatum, ut superabundaret gratia . Praesumebant enim homines de viribus suis, et faciendo quidquid sibi licere arbitrabantur, peccabant in legem Dei occultam. Unde ista lex manifesta promulgata est eis, qui omnino sibi rei esse non videbantur. Data est illis lex, non quae sanaret, sed quae aegrotantes probaret. Lex praecucurrit ante medicum, ut se aegrotus, qui se sanum putabat, inveniret aegrotum; et dixit: Non concupisces . Et quia ante datam legem praevaricatio nondum erat: Ubi enim non est, inquit, lex, nec praevaricatio ; antea sine lege peccabatur; data vero lege posteaquam peccatum est, amplius peccatum est, quia cum praevaricatione peccatum est. Invenit se homo vinci a cupiditatibus suis, quas mala consuetudine adversum se nutriebat; qui etiam cum vinculo et obligatione peccati ex Adam fuerat propagatus. Unde dicit Apostolus: Fuimus et nos aliquando natura filii irae . Inde est, quod nec unius diei infantem mundum dicit a peccato ; non ex eo quod commisit, sed ex eo quod contraxit.
2. See, brothers, and consider the force of this saying, how the apostle Paul considers it losses and dung, where he says he conducted himself without complaint. By this a fulfiller of the law, by this guilty of the law, at one and the same time, before Baptism, before grace. But not without cause does he say it is losses; lest harmful thoughts creep in, that the apostle Paul said this because one gave the law, another the Gospel; as the Manichean with perverse mind thinks, and the other heretics, who said that the giver of the law which was given through Moses was one, but the bestower of gospel grace another; that one indeed an evil God, this one a good God. What wonder, brothers? In the obscurity of the law, as it were at closed doors, they suffered darkness; because they did not knock with devotion. We find the same Paul at one time saying most openly that the law is good (See Rom 7:12); which yet he says was given for this, that sin might abound; and that sin abounded for this, that grace might superabound (See Rom 5:20). For men presumed on their own strength, and by doing whatever they reckoned was lawful for them, they sinned against the hidden law of God. Hence this manifest law was promulgated to those who did not at all seem guilty to themselves. The law was given to them, not to heal, but to prove them sick. The law ran before the physician, that the sick man, who thought himself healthy, might find himself sick; and it said, You shall not covet (Exod 20:17). And because before the law was given there was not yet transgression: For where there is no law, he says, neither is there transgression (Rom 4:15); before, one sinned without the law; but the law being given, after one sinned, one sinned more, because one sinned with transgression. Man found himself conquered by his own desires, which by an evil habit he was nourishing against himself; who also had been propagated from Adam with the bond and obligation of sin. Hence the Apostle says, We too were once by nature children of wrath (Eph 2:3). Hence it is that he says not even a one-day-old infant is clean from sin (See Job 14:4-5 LXX); not from what he committed, but from what he contracted.
Sermons5.2
3. Audi Psalmum interiora dicentem, et peccatorum nostrorum secretiora canentem. Ex persona enim generis humani dicitur Christo: Tibi soli peccavi, et malignum coram te feci. Non ex persona unius David hoc dicit, sed ex Adam persona, de quo est genus humanum. Audi enim sequentia: Tibi, inquit, soli peccavi, et malignum coram te feci; ut iustificeris in sermonibus tuis. Christo dicitur; unde hoc intellegimus? Audi quod sequitur: Et vincas cum iudicaris . Non est iudicatus Deus Pater, non est iudicatus Deus Spiritus Sanctus; non invenimus nisi solum Filium in ista carne, quam de nostra massa suscipere dignatus est, iudicatum; non ex modo concupiscentiae hominis et feminae; virgo credidit, virgo concepit, virgo peperit, virgo permansit. Et ideo dicitur: Et vincas, cum iudicaris. Iudicatus est enim, et vicit; quia sine peccato iudicatus est. Patientiae fuit sustinere iudicium, non reatus. Multi innocentes iudicantur, sed in ipsis causis quas agunt. Nam de reliquo, peccato non carent; quia sicut ante homines facti, sic ante Deum cogitationis peccatum est. Factum tuum coram oculis Dei, cogitatio tua est. Testis facti est ipse iudex; accusatrix facti ipsa conscientia. Ergo ille vere innocens iudicatus est, et ideo vicit. Solus enim vicit, non de iudice Pontio Pilato, neque de Iudaeis saevientibus; sed de ipso diabolo, qui omnia nostra peccata rimatur diligentia invidentiae.
3. Hear the Psalm speaking inner things, and singing the more secret things of our sins. For in the person of the human race it is said to Christ, Against you only have I sinned, and done what is evil before you. He says this not in the person of David alone, but in the person of Adam, from whom is the human race. For hear what follows: Against you, he says, only have I sinned, and done what is evil before you; that you may be justified in your words. It is said to Christ; whence do we understand this? Hear what follows: And conquer when you are judged (Ps 51:4 (50:6)). God the Father was not judged, God the Holy Spirit was not judged; we find none but the Son alone judged, in that flesh which he deigned to take from our lump; not from the manner of the concupiscence of man and woman; a virgin believed, a virgin conceived, a virgin gave birth, a virgin remained. And therefore it is said, And conquer when you are judged. For he was judged, and conquered; because he was judged without sin. It was a matter of patience to undergo the judgment, not of guilt. Many innocent persons are judged, but in the very cases they plead. For as to the rest, they are not without sin; because, just as before men one is made a doer, so before God a thought is a sin. Your deed before the eyes of God is your thought. The witness of the deed is the judge himself; the accuser of the deed is conscience itself. Therefore that one was judged truly innocent, and therefore conquered. For he alone conquered, not over the judge Pontius Pilate, nor over the raging Jews; but over the devil himself, who scrutinizes all our sins with the diligence of envy.
Sermons5.3
4. Et quid ait Dominus Iesus de ipso diabolo? Ecce venit princeps mundi huius . Iam saepe dictum est Caritati vestrae, mundum istum appellari peccatores. Et quare peccatores nomine mundi appellantur? Quia dilectione mundi inhabitant mundum. Qui enim non diligunt mundum, non habitant in eo quod non diligunt. Nostra, inquit, conversatio in caelis est . Si ergo qui diligit Deum, in caelo habitat cum Deo; qui diligit mundum, in mundo cum principe habitat mundi. Omnes itaque dilectores mundi, ipsi sunt mundus; habitatores mundi, non carne, quod omnes iusti; sed animo, quod soli peccatores, quibus princeps est diabolus. Quomodo dicitur domus habitatores domus; secundum quam sententiam dicimus malam domum esse marmoratam, et bonam domum esse fumigatam. Invenis domum fumosam, quam boni habitant, et dicis: Bona domus. Invenis domum marmoratam et laqueatam, quam possident iniqui, et dicis: Mala domus, domum appellans non parietes et receptacula corporum, sed ipsos habitatores. Sic mundum appellavit Scriptura habitatores mundi per concupiscentiam dilectionis, non per conversationem corporis. Ergo: Ecce, inquit, venit princeps mundi, et in me nihil invenit. In solo ipso nihil invenit diabolus. Et tamquam diceretur ei: Quare ergo moreris? Ibi sequitur: Sed ut sciant omnes quia voluntatem Patris mei facio, surgite, eamus hinc . Surgit, et it ad passionem. Quare? Quia voluntatem Patris mei facio. Propter hanc ergo singularem innocentiam ait Psalmus: Tibi soli peccavi, et malignum coram te feci; ut iustificeris in sermonibus tuis, et vincas cum iudicaris ; quia nihil mali in te invenit. Quare autem in te invenit, o genus humanum? Quia sequitur et dicit: Ego enim in iniquitate conceptus sum, et in peccatis concepit me mater mea . Dicit hoc David. Quaere unde natus sit David; invenies de legitima uxore, de nullo adulterio. Secundum quam ergo propaginem dicit: In iniquitate conceptus sum; nisi quia ibi est quiddam de mortis propagine, quod secum trahit omnis qui ex coniunctione viri et feminae nascitur?
4. And what does the Lord Jesus say of the devil himself? Behold, the prince of this world comes. It has often been said to your Charity that this world is called the sinners. And why are sinners called by the name of the world? Because by love of the world they dwell in the world. For those who do not love the world do not dwell in what they do not love. Our, he says, way of life is in heaven (Phil 3:20). If, then, he who loves God dwells in heaven with God; he who loves the world dwells in the world with the prince of the world. And so all the lovers of the world, they themselves are the world; the dwellers in the world, not in the flesh, which all the just are, but in mind, which only sinners are, whose prince is the devil. Just as a house is called the dwellers in the house; according to which manner of speaking we say a marbled house is bad, and a smoky house is good. You find a smoky house, which good people dwell in, and you say: A good house. You find a marbled and paneled house, which the wicked possess, and you say: A bad house, calling "house" not the walls and the receptacles of bodies, but the dwellers themselves. So Scripture called the dwellers in the world "the world," by the concupiscence of love, not by the conduct of the body. Therefore: Behold, he says, the prince of the world comes, and in me finds nothing. In him alone the devil found nothing. And as though it were said to him: Why, then, do you die? There follows: But that all may know that I do the will of my Father, rise, let us go from here (John 14:30-31). He rises, and goes to the passion. Why? Because I do the will of my Father. On account of this unique innocence, then, the Psalm says, Against you only have I sinned, and done what is evil before you; that you may be justified in your words, and conquer when you are judged (Ps 51:4 (50:6)); because he found nothing evil in you. But why did he find it in you, O human race? Because it follows and says, For I was conceived in iniquity, and in sins did my mother conceive me (Ps 51:5 (50:7)). David says this. Seek whence David was born; you will find from a lawful wife, from no adultery. According to what propagation, then, does he say, I was conceived in iniquity; except because there is there something of the propagation of death, which everyone draws with himself who is born of the union of man and woman?
Sermons5.4
5. Habens ergo unusquisque concupiscentiam, attendat legem dicentem: Non concupisces ; invenit in se quod lex prohibet, et fit reus legis. Inveniens autem in se cui subditus est, incipiat iam dicere: Condelector legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem; video autem aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis . Cognovit se aegrotum, imploret medicum: Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Respondeat medicus: Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Gratia Dei, non merita tua. Quare ergo te dixisti in lege cum iustitia sine querela conversatum? Attendite: sine querela dixit hominum. Est enim quaedam iustitia, quam potest homo implere, ut nullus hominum queratur de homine. Dicit enim: Non concupiscas alienum . Tu si non rapueris alienum, nulla querela erit hominum. Ergo aliquando concupiscis, et non rapis. Sed sententia Dei supra te est, quia concupiscis; reus es legis, sed in oculis legislatoris. Sine querela vivis: quare ergo ista damna? quare ista stercora? Constrictior est aliquanto nodus iste; sed solvet qui solet. Hoc autem non ego solus pia subiectione, sed omnes pia intentione mereamur. Quidquid faciebant Iudaei, unde homines non quererentur, et esset ipsis conversatio in lege sine querela, sibi tribuebant, et ipsam iustitiam secundum legem viribus suis assignabant; implere non poterant, sed in tantum faciebant, in quantum poterant; sibi tribuendo, nec hoc pie implebant.
5. Each one, then, having concupiscence, let him attend to the law saying, You shall not covet; he finds in himself what the law forbids, and becomes guilty of the law. But finding in himself that to which he is subjected, let him now begin to say, I delight in the law of God according to the inner man; but I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members (Rom 7:22-23). He has come to know himself sick, let him implore the physician: Unhappy man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? Let the physician answer: The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:24-25). The grace of God, not your merits. Why, then, did you say that you conducted yourself in the law with righteousness without complaint? Attend: he said without complaint of men. For there is a certain righteousness which a man can fulfill, so that no man complains of a man. For it says, You shall not covet another's property. If you do not seize another's, there will be no complaint of men. So at some time you covet, and do not seize. But the sentence of God is over you, because you covet; you are guilty of the law, but in the eyes of the lawgiver. You live without complaint: why, then, these losses? why this dung? This knot is somewhat tighter; but he who is wont will untie it. But this, not I alone by devout submission, but all of us, let us deserve by devout intention. Whatever the Jews did, by which men would not complain, and their conduct in the law would be without complaint, they ascribed to themselves, and assigned that very righteousness according to the law to their own strength; they could not fulfill it, but they did it insofar as they could; by ascribing it to themselves, they did not even fulfill this devoutly.
Sermons5.5
6. Hoc ergo dicit legem implere, hoc est: " non concupiscere ". Quis hoc qui vivit, potest? Adiuvet nos Psalmus, qui modo cantatus est: Exaudi me in tua iustitia ; hoc est, non in mea. Si diceret: Exaudi me in iustitia mea; tamquam meritum vocaret. Vocat quidem in nonnullis locis et suam iustitiam; sed hic melius discernit, quia et suam quando dicit, datam dicit; quomodo dicimus: Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie . Quomodo, nostrum; quomodo: da? Ergo hic distinctius loquens ait: Exaudi me in tua iustitia. Et sequitur: Et non intres in iudicium cum servo tuo . Quid est: Non intres in iudicium cum servo tuo? Non stes mecum in iudicio, exigendo a me omnia quae praecepisti, exigendo omnia quae iussisti. Nam reum me invenies, si in iudicium intraveris mecum. Opus est ergo, inquit, mihi misericordia tua potius, quam liquidissimo iudicio tuo. Quare ergo: Ne intres in iudicium cum servo tuo? Sequitur, et dicit: Quia non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens . Servus enim sum: quare mecum stas in iudicio? Misericordia Domini utar. Quare? Quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens. Quid dixit? Quamdiu vivitur in hac vita, nemo iustificatus est, sed in conspectu Dei. Non frustra addidit: in conspectu tuo; nisi quia potest esse iustificatus aliquis in conspectu hominum, ut et illud impleatur: Secundum iustitiam quae ex lege est, qui fuerim sine querela , in conspectu hominum. Refer ad conspectum Dei: Non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens.
6. Therefore he says that this is to fulfill the law: that is, "not to covet." Who that lives can do this? Let the Psalm help us, which was just now sung: Hear me in your righteousness (Ps 143:1 (142:1)); that is, not in mine. If he said: Hear me in my righteousness; he would as it were call it a merit. He does indeed in some places call it his own righteousness too; but here he distinguishes better, because even when he calls it his own, he says it is given; as we say, Give us this day our daily bread (Matt 6:11). How, ours; how, give? Therefore here, speaking more distinctly, he says, Hear me in your righteousness. And it follows, And do not enter into judgment with your servant. What is, Do not enter into judgment with your servant? Do not stand with me in judgment, exacting from me all that you commanded, exacting all that you ordered. For you will find me guilty, if you enter into judgment with me. There is need, then, he says, for me of your mercy rather than of your most clear judgment. Why, then, Do not enter into judgment with your servant? It follows, and he says, Because no living thing will be justified in your sight (Ps 143:2 (142:2)). For I am a servant: why do you stand with me in judgment? I will use the mercy of the Lord. Why? Because no living thing will be justified in your sight. What did he say? As long as one lives in this life, no one has been justified—but in the sight of God. Not without cause did he add, in your sight; except because someone can be justified in the sight of men, so that this too is fulfilled, According to the righteousness that is from the law, having been without complaint (Phil 3:6), in the sight of men. Refer it to the sight of God: No living thing will be justified in your sight.
Sermons5.6
7. Quid ergo facturi sumus? Clamemus: Ne intres in iudicium cum servo tuo . Clamemus: Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Hoc ergo Psalmum audivimus, hoc Apostolum audivimus; quia cum fuerit illa iustitia secundum quam vivunt Angeli, cum fuerit illa iustitia ubi nulla erit concupiscentia, inde unusquisque metiatur se quid est modo, et quid erit tunc; et inveniet in comparatione illius iustitiae, istam damna esse et stercora. Quisquis autem putat se modo posse implere iustitiam, cum vixerit bene atque innocenter secundum probabilitatem existimationis humanae, in via remansit; non desiderat melius, quia implesse se putat; maximeque sibi tribuens, erit superbus. Et melior est peccator humilis, quam iustus superbus. Ideo ait: Et inveniar in illo non habens meam iustitiam, quae ex lege est, sicut Iudaei putabant; sed iustitiam quae ex fide est Christi Iesu. Deinde secutus ait: Si quomodo occurram in resurrectionem mortuorum . Ibi se credidit impleturum esse iustitiam, id est, plenam se habiturum iustitiam. In comparatione resurrectionis illius, stercus est tota vita quam gerimus. Adhuc Apostolum audi apertius dicente: Si quomodo occurram in resurrectionem iustorum; non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim. Et contexit deinde: Fratres, ego me non arbitror apprehendisse . Quomodo comparat iustitiam iustitiae, salutem saluti, fidem speciei, peregrinationem civitati?
7. What, then, shall we do? Let us cry out: Do not enter into judgment with your servant (Ps 143:2 (142:2)). Let us cry out: Unhappy man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:24-25). This Psalm, then, we have heard, this Apostle we have heard; because, when that righteousness comes according to which the angels live, when that righteousness comes where there will be no concupiscence, from there let each one measure himself, what he is now, and what he will be then; and he will find, in comparison with that righteousness, that this is losses and dung. But whoever thinks that he can now fulfill righteousness, when he has lived well and innocently according to the probability of human estimation, has remained on the way; he does not desire better, because he thinks he has fulfilled it; and ascribing it most of all to himself, he will be proud. And the humble sinner is better than the proud righteous man. Therefore he says, And that I may be found in him not having my own righteousness which is from the law, as the Jews thought; but the righteousness which is from the faith of Christ Jesus. Then he goes on and says, If by any means I may attain to the resurrection of the dead (Phil 3:9.11). There he believed he would fulfill righteousness—that is, that he would have full righteousness. In comparison with that resurrection, the whole life we lead is dung. Hear the Apostle still more openly saying, If by any means I may attain to the resurrection of the just; not that I have already received it, or am already perfect. And he goes on then: Brothers, I do not reckon that I have laid hold of it (Phil 3:11-13). How does he compare righteousness to righteousness, salvation to salvation, faith to sight, pilgrimage to the city?
Sermons5.7
8. Attendite quomodo hoc impleat: Fratres, ego me non arbitror apprehendisse. Unum autem . Quid: unum, nisi ex fide vivere, spe salutis aeternae, ubi erit plena et perfecta iustitia, in cuius comparatione damna sunt quae transitura sunt, et stercora quae reprobanda sunt? Quid ergo? Unum autem, quae retro oblitus, in ea quae ante sunt extentus, secundum intentionem sequor ad palmam supernae vocationis Dei in Christo Iesu . Et ad eos qui de sua perfectione possent praesumere: Quotquot autem perfecti sumus, hoc sapiamus. Iam dudum dixerat se imperfectum, nunc autem perfectum. Quare, nisi quia ipsa est perfectio hominis, invenisse se non esse perfectum? Quotquot autem perfecti sumus, hoc sapiamus. Et si quid forte aliter sapitis, id quoque vobis Deus revelabit ; id est, ut si vos in aliquo profectu animi iustificatos probatis, legendo Scripturas, et inveniendo quae sit vera et perfecta iustitia, inveniatis vos reos, et desiderio futurorum damnetis praesentia, vivatis ex fide et spe et caritate; et intellegatis quia quod adhuc creditis, nondum videtis; quod adhuc speratis, nondum tenetis; quod adhuc desideratis, nondum impletis. Ex si talis est caritas peregrinantium, qualis erit videntium? Ergo ille qui docebat iustitiam Dei, et non constituebat suam, clamabat de Psalmo: Exaudi me in tua iustitia. Et non intres in iudicium cum servo tuo; quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens .
8. See how he fulfills this: Brothers, I do not reckon that I have laid hold of it. But one thing. What is one thing, but to live by faith, in hope of eternal salvation, where there will be full and perfect righteousness, in comparison with which the things that are to pass away are losses, and the things that are to be rejected are dung? What, then? But one thing: forgetting what is behind, stretching out to what is ahead, according to my intention I follow toward the palm of the heavenly calling of God in Christ Jesus (Phil 3:13-14). And to those who could presume on their own perfection: As many of us as are perfect, let us be of this mind. A while ago he had said he was imperfect, but now perfect. Why, except because this is the perfection of man, to have found that he is not perfect? As many of us as are perfect, let us be of this mind. And if perhaps you are of any other mind, that too God will reveal to you (Phil 3:15); that is, so that, if you prove yourselves justified in some progress of the soul, by reading the Scriptures, and by finding what the true and perfect righteousness is, you may find yourselves guilty, and by the longing for things to come condemn the present, and live by faith and hope and love; and understand that what you still believe, you do not yet see; what you still hope for, you do not yet hold; what you still desire, you do not yet fulfill. But if the love of pilgrims is such, what will the love of those who see be? Therefore the one who taught the righteousness of God, and did not establish his own, cried out from the Psalm, Hear me in your righteousness. And do not enter into judgment with your servant; because no living thing will be justified in your sight (Ps 143:1-2 (142:1-2)).
Sermons5.8
9. Secundum hanc vitam dicitur Moysi: Nemo faciem Dei vidit, et vixit . Non enim vivendum est in hac vita, ut illam faciem videamus. Moriendum est mundo, ut Deo in sempiternum vivamus. Tunc non peccabimus, non solum factis, sed nec concupiscentiis, cum illam faciem videbimus, quae vincit omnes concupiscentias. Tam enim dulcis est, fratres mei, tam pulchra, ut illa visa nihil aliud possit delectare. Satietas erit insatiabilis, nullum fastidium; semper esuriemus, semper saturi erimus. Audi ipsas duas sententias de Scriptura: Qui bibunt me, dicit Sapientia, adhuc sitient; et qui edunt me, adhuc esurient . Sed ne putes quia ibi erit indigentia et fames, audi Dominum: Qui biberit ex aqua hac, non sitiet in aeternum . Sed dicis: Quando erit? Quandocumque erit, tamen exspecta Dominum, sustine Dominum, viriliter age, et confortetur cor tuum . Numquid tanta restant, quanta peracta sunt? Intende ab Adam usque ad hodiernum diem, quot saecula evoluta sunt, et ecce iam non sunt. Pauci dies remanent quodammodo; sic enim dicendum est quod remanet in comparatione transactorum saeculorum. Exhortemur invicem, exhortetur nos ille qui venit ad nos, qui cucurrit viam, et dixit: Sequimini; qui ascendit prior in caelum, ut caput de sublimioribus subveniat ceteris membris in terra laborantibus; qui dixit de caelo: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? Ergo nemo desperet; reddetur nobis in fine quod promissum est; ibi implebitur illa iustitia.
9. Concerning this life it is said to Moses, No one has seen the face of God, and lived (Exod 33:20). For one must not live in this life so as to see that face. One must die to the world, that we may live to God forever. Then we shall not sin, not only by deeds, but not even by concupiscences, when we shall see that face, which conquers all concupiscences. For it is so sweet, my brothers, so beautiful, that, it being seen, nothing else can delight. There will be an insatiable fullness, no loathing; we shall always hunger, we shall always be filled. Hear those two sentences from Scripture: Those who drink me, says Wisdom, will still thirst; and those who eat me will still hunger (Sir 24:21). But lest you suppose that there will be want and hunger there, hear the Lord: He who drinks of this water will not thirst forever (John 4:13-14). But you say: When will it be? Whenever it will be, yet wait for the Lord, await the Lord, act manfully, and let your heart be strengthened (See Ps 27:14 (26:14)). Surely there does not remain as much as has been accomplished? Look from Adam to the present day, how many ages have rolled by, and behold, now they are no more. A few days, in a way, remain; for so must one speak of what remains in comparison with the ages gone by. Let us exhort one another, let him exhort us who came to us, who ran the way, and said: Follow; who ascended first into heaven, that the head from the loftier places might come to the aid of the other members laboring on earth; who said from heaven, Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me (Acts 9:4)? Therefore let no one despair; what was promised will be rendered to us at the end; there that righteousness will be fulfilled.
Sermons5.9
10. Audistis et Evangelium his sermonibus concordare. Voluntas, inquit, Patris est, ut omnia quae dedit mihi non pereant, sed habeant vitam aeternam; et ego resuscitabo eos in novissimo die . Se ipsum primo die, nos novissimo die. Primus dies ad caput Ecclesiae. Dies enim noster Dominus Christus, non facit occasum. Novissimus dies, erit finis saeculi. Nolo dicas: Quando iste erit? Generi humano longe erit, unicuique hominum prope erit; quia novissimus dies est cuiusque dies mortis. Et enim cum hinc exieris, recipieris pro meritis, et resurges ad recipienda quae gessisti. Tunc Deus coronabit, non tam merita tua, quam dona sua. Quidquid tibi donavit, si servasti, cognoscet. Nunc ergo, fratres, desiderium nostrum non sit, nisi in caelum; non sit, nisi ad vitam aeternam. Nemo sibi placeat, quasi qui hic iuste vixerit, et comparet se illis qui male vivunt, secundum Pharisaeum qui se iustificabat , qui non audierat Apostolum: Non quia iam acceperim, aut iam perfectus sim . Ergo non acceperat adhuc hoc quod desiderabat. Pignus acceperat, sic dixit: Qui dedit nobis pignus Spiritum . Cuius rei pignus erat, ad hoc pervenire cupiebat; participatio quaedam, sed distat. Aliter modo participamus, aliter tunc participabimus. Modo per fidem, per spem, in eodem Spiritu; tunc autem species erit, res erit; idem autem Spiritus, idem Deus, eadem plenitudo. Qui clamat absentibus, exhibebit praesentibus; qui vocat peregrinos, nutriet et alet in patria.
10. You have heard the Gospel agree with these sayings. It is the will, he says, of the Father, that all that he has given me should not perish, but have eternal life; and I will raise them up on the last day (John 6:39-40). Himself on the first day, us on the last day. The first day belongs to the head of the Church. For our day, Christ the Lord, has no setting. The last day will be the end of the age. I do not wish you to say: When will this be? For the human race it will be far off, for each man it will be near; because the last day is each one's day of death. For when you have gone out from here, you will be received according to your merits, and you will rise to receive what you did. Then God will crown, not so much your merits as his own gifts. Whatever he gave you, if you have kept it, he will recognize it. Now, then, brothers, let our desire be only in heaven; let it be only for eternal life. Let no one please himself, as one who has lived justly here, and compare himself to those who live badly, like the Pharisee who justified himself (See Luke 18:11), who had not heard the Apostle: Not that I have already received it, or am already perfect (Phil 3:12). Therefore he had not yet received what he desired. He had received the pledge, so he said: Who gave us the pledge, the Spirit (2 Cor 5:5). The thing whose pledge it was, to this he desired to come; a certain participation, but it differs. Now we participate in one way, then we will participate in another. Now through faith, through hope, in the same Spirit; but then it will be sight, it will be the reality; but the same Spirit, the same God, the same fullness. He who cries to the absent will display himself to the present; he who calls the pilgrims will nourish and feed them in the homeland.
Sermons5.10
11. Via nobis factus est Christus, et desperamus nos perventuros? Via ista finiri non potest, praecidi non potest, corrumpi non potest, nec pluvia, nec diluviis, nec a latronibus obsideri. Ambula securus in Christo, ambula; ne offendas, ne cadas, ne retro respicias, ne in via remaneas, ne a via recedas. Ista omnia praecave tantum, et pervenisti. Cum perveneris, tunc iam gloriare ex hoc; noli in te. Nam qui se laudat, Deum non laudat, sed se a Deo avertit; quomodo qui vult recedere ab igne, ignis calidus remanet, sed ille frigescit; quomodo qui vult recedere a lumine, si recesserit, lumen in se lucidum remanet, sed ille tenebratur. Non recedamus a calore Spiritus, a lumine veritatis. Vocem modo audivimus, tunc autem facie ad faciem videbimus. Nemo sibi placeat, nemo alii insultet. Omnes sic velimus proficere, ut non invideamus proficientibus, non insultemus deficientibus; et erit in nobis cum gaudio impletum quod promissum est in Evangelio: Et ego resuscitabo eos in novissimo die .
11. Christ has been made the way for us, and do we despair of arriving? This way cannot be ended, cannot be cut off, cannot be corrupted, nor besieged by rain, nor by floods, nor by robbers. Walk secure in Christ, walk; do not stumble, do not fall, do not look back, do not remain on the way, do not withdraw from the way. Only guard against all these things, and you have arrived. When you have arrived, then now glory in this; not in yourself. For he who praises himself does not praise God, but turns himself away from God; just as one who wishes to withdraw from the fire—the fire remains hot, but he grows cold; just as one who wishes to withdraw from the light—if he withdraws, the light remains bright in itself, but he is darkened. Let us not withdraw from the warmth of the Spirit, from the light of the truth. We have now heard the voice, but then we shall see face to face. Let no one please himself, let no one insult another. Let us all so wish to make progress, that we do not envy those who make progress, do not insult those who fail; and there will be fulfilled in us with joy what was promised in the Gospel: And I will raise them up on the last day (John 6:40).
Sermons5.11
SERMO 171
Sermon 171
Sermons5.11
1. Gaudere nos Apostolus praecipit, sed in Domino, non in saeculo. Quicumque enim voluerit amicus esse huius mundi, sicut Scriptura dicit, inimicus Dei reputabitur . Sicut autem non potest homo duobus dominis servire , sic nemo potest gaudere et in saeculo, et in Domino. Multum inter se haec duo gaudia differunt, suntque omnino contraria. Quando gaudetur in saeculo, non gaudetur in Domino; quando gaudetur in Domino, non gaudetur in saeculo. Vincat gaudium in Domino, donec finiatur gaudium in saeculo. Gaudium in Domino semper augeatur: gaudium in saeculo semper minuatur, donec finiatur. Non ideo ista dicuntur, quoniam in hoc saeculo cum sumus, gaudere non debemus; sed ut etiam in hoc saeculo constituti, iam in Domino gaudeamus. Sed ait aliquis: In saeculo sum; utique si gaudeo, ibi gaudeo ubi sum. Quid enim? quia es in saeculo, in Domino non es? Audi eumdem Apostolum ad Athenienses loquentem, et in Actibus Apostolorum dicentem de Deo et de Domino Creatore nostro: In illo vivimus, et movemur, et sumus . Qui enim ubique est, ubi non est? Nonne ad hoc nos exhortabatur? Dominus in proximo est, nihil solliciti fueritis . Magnum est hoc, quod ascendit super omnes caelos, et proximus est eis qui versantur in terris. Quis est iste longinquus et proximus, nisi qui nobis misericordia factus est proximus?
1. The Apostle commands us to rejoice, but in the Lord, not in the world. For whoever wishes to be a friend of this world, as Scripture says, will be reckoned an enemy of God (Jas 4:4). But just as a man cannot serve two masters (See Matt 6:24), so no one can rejoice both in the world and in the Lord. These two joys differ much from one another, and are wholly contrary. When one rejoices in the world, one does not rejoice in the Lord; when one rejoices in the Lord, one does not rejoice in the world. Let joy in the Lord conquer, until joy in the world is ended. Let joy in the Lord always increase: let joy in the world always be lessened, until it is ended. These things are not said for this reason, that while we are in this world we ought not to rejoice; but that, even set in this world, we may now rejoice in the Lord. But someone says: I am in the world; surely if I rejoice, I rejoice there where I am. What then? because you are in the world, are you not in the Lord? Hear the same Apostle speaking to the Athenians, and in the Acts of the Apostles saying of God and of the Lord our Creator, In him we live, and move, and are (Acts 17:28). For he who is everywhere, where is he not? Did he not exhort us to this? The Lord is near, be anxious about nothing (Phil 4:5-6). It is a great thing that he who ascended above all the heavens is near to those who dwell on earth. Who is this one far off and near, but the one who by mercy was made near to us?
Sermons5.1
2. Totum enim genus humanum est homo ille qui iacebat in via semivivus a latronibus relictus, quem contempsit transiens sacerdos et levites, et accessit ad eum curandum eique opitulandum transiens Samaritanus. Ut autem narraret hoc, unde causa descendit? Quemdam quaerentem quae sint optima praecepta et summa in lege, admonuit duo esse: Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota mente tua; et diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum. Ille autem: Et quis est mihi proximus? Et narravit Dominus: Homo quidam descendebat ab Ierusalem in Iericho. Ostendit illum quodammodo Israelitam. Et incidit in latrones. Cum exspoliassent, et plagas ei graves irrogassent, dimiserunt eum in via semivivum. Transiit sacerdos, utique genere proximus, praeteriit iacentem. Transiit Levites, et hic genere proximus, iacentem etiam ipse contempsit. Transiit Samaritanus, genere longinquus, misericordia proximus, fecitque quod nostis . In quo Samaritano se voluit intellegi Dominus Iesus Christus. " Samaritanus " enim " Custos " interpretatur. Ideo surgens a mortuis, iam non moritur, et mors ei ultra non dominabitur ; quia: Non dormit, neque dormitat qui custodit Israel . Denique quando conviciis tantis blasphemabant Iudaei, dixerunt illi: Nonne verum dicimus, quia Samaritanus es, et daemonium habes? Cum ergo duo essent verba conviciosa obiecta Domino, dictumque illi esset: Nonne verum dicimus, quia Samaritanus es, et daemonium habes? poterat respondere: Nec Samaritanus sum, nec daemonium habeo; respondit autem: Ego daemonium non habeo . Quod respondit, refutavit; quod tacuit, confirmavit. Negavit se habere daemonium, qui se noverat daemoniorum exclusorem; non se negavit infirmi custodem. Ergo Dominus in proximo est ; quia Dominus nobis factus est in proximo.
2. For the whole human race is that man who lay on the road half-alive, left by robbers, whom the priest and the Levite passing by despised, and to whom the Samaritan, passing by, came near to cure and help. But to relate this, whence did the occasion arise? A certain man, asking what are the best and highest precepts in the law, he advised that there are two: You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart, and with your whole soul, and with your whole mind; and you shall love your neighbor as yourself. But the man: And who is my neighbor? And the Lord related: A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho. He showed him in a way to be an Israelite. And he fell among robbers. When they had stripped him and inflicted grievous blows on him, they left him on the road half-alive. The priest passed by, surely a neighbor by race, he passed by the one lying there. The Levite passed by, this one too a neighbor by race, he too despised the one lying there. The Samaritan passed by, far off by race, near by mercy, and did what you know (See Luke 10:25-37). In which Samaritan the Lord Jesus Christ wished himself to be understood. For "Samaritan" is interpreted "Guardian." Therefore rising from the dead, he dies no more, and death will no longer have dominion over him (Rom 6:9); because he who guards Israel does not sleep, nor slumber (Ps 121:4 (120:4)). Finally, when the Jews blasphemed with such great reproaches, they said to him, Do we not say truly that you are a Samaritan, and have a demon (John 8:48)? When, then, two reproachful words were objected to the Lord, and it was said to him, Do we not say truly that you are a Samaritan, and have a demon? he could answer: I am neither a Samaritan, nor do I have a demon; but he answered, I do not have a demon (John 8:49). What he answered, he refuted; what he kept silent about, he confirmed. He denied that he had a demon, who knew himself to be the expeller of demons; he did not deny himself to be the guardian of the weak. Therefore the Lord is near; because the Lord was made near to us.
Sermons5.2
3. Quid tam longinquum, quid tam remotum, quam Deus ab hominibus, immortalis a mortalibus, iustus a peccatoribus? Non loco longe, sed dissimilitudine. Nam solemus etiam ita loqui, cum de duobus hominibus dicimus, quando diversi sunt mores: Iste longe est ab illo. Etiamsi iuxta steterint, etiamsi vicinius inhabitent, etiamsi una catena colligentur; longe est pius ab impio, longe est innocens a reo, longe est iustus ab iniusto. Si hoc de duobus hominibus dicitur, quid de Deo et hominibus? Cum ergo longe a nobis esset immortalis et iustus, tamquam a mortalibus et peccatoribus, descendit ad nos, ut fieret nobis proximus ille longinquus. Et quid fecit? Cum haberet ipse duo bona, et nos duo mala; ille duo bona: iustitiam et immortalitatem; nos duo mala, iniquitatem et mortalitatem: si utrumque malum nostrum suscepisset, par noster factus esset, et liberatore nobiscum opus haberet. Quid ergo fecit, ut esset proximus nobis? Proximus non hoc quod nos, sed prope nos. Duo attende: Iustus est, immortalis est. In duobus tuis malis, una est culpa, altera est poena: culpa est quod iniustus es, poena est quia mortalis es. Ille ut esset proximus, suscepit poenam tuam, non suscepit culpam tuam: et si suscepit, delendam suscepit, non faciendam. Iustus et immortalis, longe ab iniustis et mortalibus. Peccator mortalis, longe eras a iusto immortali. Non est factus ille peccator, quod tu; sed factus est mortalis, quod tu. Manens iustus, factus est mortalis. Suscipiendo poenam et non suscipiendo culpam, et culpam delevit et poenam. Dominus ergo in proximo est, nihil solliciti fueritis . Etsi super omnes caelos ascendit corpore, non recessit maiestate. Ubique praesens est, qui fecit omnia.
3. What is so far off, what so remote, as God from men, the immortal from mortals, the just from sinners? Not far in place, but in unlikeness. For we are accustomed to speak thus too, when we say of two men, when their morals are diverse: That one is far from that one. Even if they stand side by side, even if they dwell more closely, even if they are bound by one chain; the devout is far from the ungodly, the innocent far from the guilty, the just far from the unjust. If this is said of two men, what of God and men? Since, then, the immortal and just one was far from us, as from mortals and sinners, he came down to us, that that far-off one might become near to us. And what did he do? Since he himself had two goods, and we two evils; he two goods: righteousness and immortality; we two evils, iniquity and mortality: if he had taken on both our evils, he would have been made our equal, and would need a liberator along with us. What, then, did he do, that he might be near to us? Near—not what we are, but near us. Attend to two things: he is just, he is immortal. In your two evils, one is fault, the other is punishment: the fault is that you are unjust, the punishment is that you are mortal. That he might be near, he took on your punishment, he did not take on your fault: and if he took it on, he took it on to blot it out, not to commit it. Just and immortal, far from the unjust and mortal. A mortal sinner, you were far from the just immortal one. He was not made a sinner, as you are; but he was made mortal, as you are. Remaining just, he was made mortal. By taking on the punishment and not taking on the fault, he blotted out both the fault and the punishment. Therefore the Lord is near, be anxious about nothing (Phil 4:5-6). Even though he ascended in body above all the heavens, he did not withdraw in majesty. He is everywhere present, who made all things.
Sermons5.3
4. In saeculo gaudium quod est? Gaudere de iniquitate, gaudere de turpitudine, gaudere de dedecore, de deformitate. De his omnibus gaudet saeculum. Quae omnia non essent, nisi homines voluissent. Alia sunt quae faciunt homines, alia quae patiuntur, etsi nolunt, ferunt. Quid ergo est hoc saeculum, et quod est gaudium saeculi? Dico, fratres, breviter quantum possum, quantum Deus adiuvat; festinanter, breviter dico. Saeculi laetitia est impunita nequitia. Luxurientur homines, fornicentur, in spectaculis nugentur, ebriositate ingurgitentur, turpitudine foedentur, nihil mali patiantur: et videte saeculi gaudium. Ista mala quae commemoravi, non castiget fames, non belli timor, non aliquis timor, non aliquis morbus, non aliquae adversitates; sed sint omnia in rerum abundantia, in pace carnis, in securitate malae mentis: ecce videte saeculi gaudium. Sed non cogitat Deus sicut homo: alia est Dei cogitatio, alia hominis. Magnae misericordiae est, nequitiam impunitam non relinquere; et ne cogatur in extremo gehennae damnare, modo flagello dignatur castigare.
4. What is the joy in the world? To rejoice over iniquity, to rejoice over baseness, to rejoice over disgrace, over deformity. Over all these the world rejoices. All of which would not exist, unless men had willed them. Some are things that men do, others things they suffer, and which, even unwilling, they bear. What, then, is this world, and what is the joy of the world? I say, brothers, briefly as I can, as far as God helps; hastily, briefly I say it. The gladness of the world is unpunished wickedness. Let men live luxuriously, fornicate, fool around at the spectacles, glut themselves with drunkenness, befoul themselves with baseness, suffer no evil: and behold the joy of the world. Let those evils which I have mentioned not be chastised by famine, nor by the fear of war, nor by any fear, nor by any disease, nor by any adversities; but let all be in abundance of goods, in peace of the flesh, in the security of an evil mind: behold, see the joy of the world. But God does not think as a man does: God's thought is one thing, man's another. It is of great mercy not to leave wickedness unpunished; and lest he be forced in the end to condemn to hell, now he deigns to chastise with the scourge.
Sermons5.4
5. Nam vis nosse, nulla poena quanta sit poena, non tamen iusto, sed peccatori, cui est temporalis poena, ne succedat aeterna? Vis ergo nosse, nulla poena quanta sit poena? Psalmum interroga: Irritavit Dominum peccator. Exclamavit vehementer, attendit, consideravit, exclamavit: Irritavit Dominum peccator. Quare, obsecro? quid vidisti? Qui autem hoc exclamavit, vidit peccatorem impune luxuriantem, male facientem, bonis abundantem, et exclamavit: Irritavit Dominum peccator. Quare hoc dixisti? Quid enim vidisti? Prae magnitudine irae suae non requirit . Intellegite, fratres christiani, misericordiam Dei. Quando castigat mundum, non vult damnare mundum. Prae magnitudine irae suae non exquirit. Ideo non exquirit, quia multum irascitur. Magna est ira eius. Parcendo saevit, sed iuste saevit. Est enim severitas, quasi saeva veritas. Si ergo aliquando saevit parcendo, bonum est nobis ut subveniat castigando. Et tamen si facta generis humani consideremus, quid patimur? Non secundum peccata nostra fecit nobis . Filii enim sumus. Unde hoc probamus? Mortuus est pro nobis Unicus, ne remaneret unus. Noluit esse unus, qui mortuus est unus. Multos enim filios Dei fecit unicus Filius Dei. Emit sibi fratres sanguine suo, probavit reprobatus, redemit venditus, honoravit iniuriatus, vivificavit occisus. Dubitas quod dabit tibi bona sua, qui non dedignatus est suscipere mala tua? Ergo, fratres, gaudete in Domino, non in saeculo: id est, gaudete in veritate, non in iniquitate; gaudete in spe aeternitatis, non in flore vanitatis. Ita gaudete: et ubicumque, et quamdiucumque hic fueritis: Dominus in proximo est, nihil solliciti fueritis .
5. For do you wish to know how great a punishment no punishment is—yet not to the just man, but to the sinner, for whom there is temporal punishment, lest eternal succeed? Do you wish, then, to know how great a punishment no punishment is? Question the Psalm: The sinner has provoked the Lord. He cried out vehemently, he attended, he considered, he cried out: The sinner has provoked the Lord. Why, I beseech? what did you see? But the one who cried out this saw the sinner living luxuriously with impunity, doing evil, abounding in goods, and cried out: The sinner has provoked the Lord. Why did you say this? For what did you see? On account of the greatness of his wrath he will not seek it out (Ps 10:4 (9:25)). Understand, Christian brothers, the mercy of God. When he chastises the world, he does not wish to condemn the world. On account of the greatness of his wrath he does not seek it out. For this reason he does not seek it out, because he is greatly angered. His wrath is great. By sparing he rages, but justly he rages. For there is severity, as it were a "savage truth." If, then, he sometimes rages by sparing, it is good for us that he come to our aid by chastising. And yet, if we consider the deeds of the human race, what do we suffer? He has not dealt with us according to our sins (Ps 103:10 (102:10)). For we are sons. Whence do we prove this? The Only-begotten died for us, lest he remain one. He who died one was unwilling to be one. For the only Son of God made many sons of God. He bought himself brothers by his blood, he proved himself by being rejected, redeemed by being sold, honored by being injured, gave life by being killed. Do you doubt that he will give you his goods, who did not disdain to take on your evils? Therefore, brothers, rejoice in the Lord, not in the world: that is, rejoice in truth, not in iniquity; rejoice in the hope of eternity, not in the flower of vanity. So rejoice: and wherever, and however long you are here: The Lord is near, be anxious about nothing (Phil 4:5-6).
Sermons5.5
SERMO 172
Sermon 172
Sermons5.5
1. 1. Admonet nos beatus Apostolus, ut de dormientibus, hoc est, mortuis carissimis nostris, non contristemur, sicut et ceteri qui spem non habent, spem scilicet resurrectionis et incorruptionis aeternae. Nam ideo et " dormientes " eos appellat Scripturae veracissima consuetudo, ut cum dormientes audimus, evigilaturos minime desperemus. Unde etiam cantatur in Psalmo: Numquid qui dormit, non adiciet ut resurgat? Est ergo de mortuis eis qui diligunt, quaedam tristitia quodammodo naturalis. Mortem quippe horret, non opinio, sed natura. Nec mors homini accideret, nisi ex poena quam praecesserat culpa. Quapropter si animalia quae ita creata sunt, ut suo quaeque tempore moriantur, mortem fugiunt, diligunt vitam; quanto magis homo, qui sic fuerat creatus, ut si vivere sine peccato voluisset, sine termino viveret? Hinc itaque necesse est ut tristes simus, quando nos moriendo deserunt quos amamus; quia etsi novimus eos non in aeternum relinquere nos mansuros, sed aliquantum praecedere secuturos; tamen mors ipsa quam natura refugit, cum occupat dilectum, contristat in nobis ipsius dilectionis affectum. Ideo non admonuit Apostolus, ut non contristemur; sed, non sicut ceteri qui spem non habent . Contristamur ergo nos in nostrorum mortibus necessitate amittendi, sed cum spe recipiendi. Inde angimur, hinc consolamur; inde infirmitas afficit, hinc fides reficit; inde dolet humana conditio, hinc sanat divina promissio.
1. 1. The blessed Apostle admonishes us that concerning those who sleep—that is, our dearest dead—we should not be saddened, like the rest who have no hope, namely the hope of resurrection and of eternal incorruption. For Scripture's most truthful custom calls them "those who sleep," so that, when we hear "those who sleep," we may by no means despair that they are going to wake. Hence too it is sung in the Psalm, Surely he who sleeps will not also rise again (Ps 41:8 (40:9))? There is, then, concerning the dead, in those who love, a certain sadness in a way natural. For nature, not opinion, shudders at death. Nor would death befall man, except from the punishment which a fault preceded. Wherefore, if the animals which were so created that each dies in its own time flee death, love life; how much more man, who had been so created that, if he had been willing to live without sin, he would live without end? Hence, then, it is necessary that we be sad when those whom we love forsake us by dying; because, even though we know that they do not leave us to remain forever, but go before us a little to be followed, yet death itself, which nature flees, when it seizes the beloved, saddens in us the very affection of that love. Therefore the Apostle did not admonish us not to be saddened; but, not like the rest who have no hope. We are saddened, then, in the deaths of our own by the necessity of losing them, but with the hope of receiving them again. Thence we are anguished, hence we are consoled; thence infirmity afflicts, hence faith refreshes; thence the human condition grieves, hence the divine promise heals.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Proinde pompae funeris, agmina exsequiarum, sumptuosa diligentia sepulturae, monumentorum opulenta constructio, vivorum sunt qualiacumque solatia, non adiutoria mortuorum. Orationibus vero sanctae Ecclesiae, et sacrificio salutari, et eleemosynis, quae pro eorum spiritibus erogantur, non est dubitandum mortuos adiuvari; ut cum eis misericordius agatur a Domino, quam eorum peccata meruerunt. Hoc enim a patribus traditum, universa observat Ecclesia, ut pro eis qui in corporis et sanguinis Christi communione defuncti sunt, cum ad ipsum sacrificium loco suo commemorantur, oretur, ac pro illis quoque id offerri commemoretur. Cum vero eorum commendandorum causa opera misericordiae celebrantur, quis eis dubitet suffragari, proquibus orationes Deo non inaniter allegantur? Non omnino ambigendum est, ista prodesse defunctis; sed talibus qui ita vixerint ante mortem, ut possint eis haec utilia esse post mortem. Nam qui sine fide quae per dilectionem operatur , eiusque Sacramentis, de corporibus exierunt, frustra illis a suis huiusmodi pietatis impenduntur officia, cuius, dum hic essent, pignore caruerunt, vel non suscipientes, vel in vacuum suscipientes Dei gratiam , et sibi non misericordiam thesaurizantes, sed iram . Non ergo mortuis nova merita comparantur, cum pro eis boni aliquid operantur sui, sed eorum praecedentibus consequentia ista redduntur. Non enim actum est, nisi cum hic viverent, ut eos haec aliquid adiuvarent, cum hic vivere destitissent. Et ideo istam finiens quisque vitam, nisi quod meruit in ipsa, non poterit habere post ipsam.
2. 2. Accordingly, the pomps of the funeral, the trains of the obsequies, the sumptuous diligence of burial, the opulent construction of monuments, are some sort of solaces of the living, not aids of the dead. But by the prayers of the holy Church, and the saving sacrifice, and the alms which are distributed for their spirits, there is no doubt that the dead are aided; so that the Lord deals with them more mercifully than their sins deserved. For this, handed down from the fathers, the whole Church observes: that for those who have died in the communion of the body and blood of Christ, when they are commemorated in their place at the very sacrifice, prayer is made, and it is mentioned that it is offered for them too. But when, for the sake of commending them, works of mercy are celebrated, who can doubt that they are supported—those for whom prayers are not vainly presented to God? It is by no means to be doubted that these things profit the dead; but only such as lived before death in such a way that these things could be useful to them after death. For those who went out of their bodies without the faith that works through love (See Gal 5:6), and without its sacraments, in vain are offices of this kind of devotion bestowed on them by their own; for, while they were here, they lacked its pledge, either not receiving the grace of God, or receiving it in vain (See 2 Cor 6:1), and treasuring up for themselves not mercy, but wrath (See Rom 2:5). Therefore no new merits are acquired for the dead when their own do something good for them, but these consequent things are rendered to their preceding merits. For it was brought about only while they lived here, that these things should aid them somewhat, when they had ceased to live here. And therefore each one, ending this life, can have after it nothing but what he deserved in it.
Sermons5.2.2
2. 3. Permittantur itaque pia corda carorum de suorum mortibus contristari dolore sanabili, et consolabiles lacrimas fundant conditione mortali; quas cito reprimat fidei gaudium, qua creduntur fideles, quando moriuntur, paululum a nobis abire, et ad meliora transire. Consolentur eos etiam fraterna obsequia, sive quae funeribus exhibentur, sive quae dolentibus adhibentur, ne sit iusta querela dicentium: Sustinui qui simul contristaretur, et non fuit; et consolantes, et non inveni . Sit pro viribus cura sepeliendi et sepulcra construendi: quia et haec in Scripturis sanctis inter bona opera deputata sunt; nec solum in corporibus Patriarcharum aliorumque sanctorum, et humanis cadaveribus quorumcumque iacentium; verum etiam in ipsius Domini corpore praedicati atque collaudati sunt, qui ista fecerunt. Impleant haec homines erga suos officia postremi muneris, et sui humani lenimenta maeroris. Verum illa quae adiuvant spiritus defunctorum, oblationes, orationes, erogationes, multo pro eis observantius, instantius, abundantius impendant, qui suos carne, non spiritu mortuos, non solum carnaliter, sed etiam spiritaliter amant.
2. 3. Let the devout hearts of the dear, then, be permitted to be saddened over the deaths of their own with a healable grief, and let them pour out consolable tears for the mortal condition; tears which the joy of faith should quickly check, by which the faithful are believed, when they die, to go away from us a little, and to pass over to better things. Let fraternal services console them too, whether those that are shown at funerals, or those that are applied to the grieving, lest there be the just complaint of those who say, I waited for one to grieve with me, and there was none; and for comforters, and I found none (Ps 69:20 (68:21)). Let there be, according to one's strength, care for burying and for constructing tombs: because these too are reckoned among good works in the holy Scriptures; nor only in the bodies of the patriarchs and other saints, and in the human corpses of any persons lying dead; but even in the body of the Lord himself, those who did these things were proclaimed and praised. Let men fulfill these offices of the last duty toward their own, and these soothings of their human mourning. But those things which aid the spirits of the dead—oblations, prayers, distributions—let them bestow much more observantly, urgently, abundantly for them, who love their own, dead in the flesh, not in the spirit, not only carnally, but also spiritually.
Sermons5.2.3
SERMO 173
Sermon 173
Sermons5.2.3
1. Quando celebramus dies fratrum defunctorum, in mente habere debemus, et quid sperandum, et quid timendum sit. Secundum hoc enim sperandum est, quoniam: Pretiosa in conspectu Domini mors sanctorum eius ; secundum hoc autem timendum est, quia: Mors peccatorum pessima . Ideoque propter spem: In memoria aeterna erit iustus; propter timorem: Ab auditu malo non timebit . Erit enim auditus quo nullus sit peior, quando dicetur sinistris: Ite in ignem aeternum . Ab hoc auditu malo iustus non timebit. Erit enim ad dexteram inter illos quibus dicetur: Venite, benedicti Patris mei, percipite regnum . In hac autem vita, quae media ante summa bona et ante summa mala ducitur, in medio bonorum malorumque mediorum, id est, in neutra parte summorum; quia et bona quaecumque hic fuerint homini, in comparatione bonorum aeternorum nulla sunt; et mala quaecumque in hac vita experitur homo, in comparatione ignis aeterni nec comparanda sunt; in hac ergo medietate vitae, illud quod audivimus nunc ex Evangelio, tenere debemus: Qui credit, inquit, in me, licet moriatur, vivit . Et vitam pronuntiat, et mortem non negat. Qui credit in me, licet moriatur, vivit. Quid est: licet moriatur, vivit? Licet moriatur corpore, vivit spiritu. Deinde adiungit: Et qui vivit et credit in me, non morietur in aeternum . Certe licet moriatur, quomodo, si non morietur? Sed licet moriatur ad tempus, non morietur in aeternum. Sic ista solvitur quaestio, ut non sint inter se contraria verba veritatis, et possint instruere affectum pietatis. Ergo licet corpore morituri simus, vivimus si credimus.
1. When we celebrate the days of our dead brothers, we ought to have in mind both what is to be hoped and what is to be feared. For according to this it is to be hoped, since precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his holy ones (Ps 116:15 (115:15)); but according to this it is to be feared, because the death of sinners is most evil (Ps 34:21 (33:22)). And therefore, on account of hope: The just will be in eternal memory; on account of fear: He will not fear an evil hearing (Ps 112:6-7 (111:6-7)). For there will be a hearing than which none is worse, when it will be said to those on the left, Go into the eternal fire (Matt 25:41). From this evil hearing the just man will not fear. For he will be at the right hand among those to whom it will be said, Come, blessed of my Father, take possession of the kingdom (Matt 25:34). But in this life, which is led in the middle, before the highest goods and before the highest evils, in the midst of middling goods and evils—that is, on neither side of the highest; because both whatever goods there are here for man are, in comparison with the eternal goods, nothing; and whatever evils a man experiences in this life are, in comparison with the eternal fire, not even to be compared—in this middle state of life, then, we ought to hold what we have now heard from the Gospel: He who believes, he says, in me, though he die, lives. He both proclaims life, and does not deny death. He who believes in me, though he die, lives. What is, though he die, lives? Though he die in body, he lives in spirit. Then he adds: And whoever lives and believes in me will not die forever (John 11:25-26). Surely though he die—how, if he will not die? But though he die for a time, he will not die forever. So this question is resolved, so that the words of truth are not contrary to one another, and can instruct the affection of devotion. Therefore, though we are going to die in body, we live if we believe.
Sermons5.1
2. Est autem fides nostra maxime discreta ab omni fide Gentilium in resurrectione mortuorum. Hanc enim illi omnino non recipiunt: quia ubi recipiant, non habent. A Domino enim praeparatur voluntas hominis, ut sit fidei receptaculum . Dicit Iudaeis Dominus: Sermo meus non capit in vobis . Ergo in his capit, in quibus invenit quod capiat. In his enim invenit quod capiat sermo qui capit, quos Deus pollicendo non decipit. Ille enim qui quaerit ovem perditam , et quam quaerit novit, et ubi quaerat, et quomodo eius membra dispersa colligat, et in unam salutem redigat, et ita restituat ut eam ulterius non perdat. Consolemur ergo nos invicem, et in his sermonibus nostris. Potest non dolere cor humanum defuncto carissimo: melius tamen cum dolet sanatur cor humanum quam non dolendo fit inhumanum. Maria Domino cohaerebat, et mortuum fratrem dolebat. Sed quid miraris quia Maria dolebat tunc, cum ipse Dominus flebat? Movere autem quemvis potest, quomodo flebat mortuum, se continuo iubente victurum ? Non mortuum flebat, quem ipse suscitavit; sed mortem, quam sibi homo peccando comparavit. Si enim peccatum non praecessisset, sine dubio mors secuta non fuisset. Secuta est ergo mors etiam corporis, quam praecessit mors animae. Mors animae praecessit deserendo Deum, et mors corporis secuta est deserente anima. Hac deseruit volens, hac coacta est deserere nolens. Tamquam illi diceretur: Recessisti ab eo quem diligere debuisti, recede ab eo quod dilexisti. Quis enim vult mori? Prorsus nemo: et ita nemo, ut beato Petro diceretur: Alter te cinget, et feret quo tu non vis . Si ergo nulla esset mortis amaritudo, non esset magna martyrum fortitudo.
2. But our faith is most especially distinguished from every faith of the gentiles in the resurrection of the dead. For this they wholly do not receive: because they have not wherein to receive it. For the will of man is prepared by the Lord, that it may be a receptacle of faith (See Prov 8:35 LXX). The Lord says to the Jews, My word does not find room in you (John 8:37). Therefore it finds room in those in whom it finds what to take in. For in those the word that takes in finds what to take in, whom God by promising does not deceive. For he who seeks the lost sheep (See Luke 15:4) both knows the one he seeks, and where to seek it, and how to gather its scattered members, and to restore it to one health, and so to restore it that he loses it no more. Let us console one another, then, in these our sayings too. The human heart can avoid grieving over a dear one who has died; yet the human heart is better healed when it grieves than made inhuman by not grieving. Mary cleaved to the Lord, and grieved over her dead brother. But why do you wonder that Mary grieved then, when the Lord himself wept? But it may move anyone, how he wept over the dead man whom he himself commanded immediately to live (See John 11:33-44). He did not weep over the dead man, whom he himself raised; but over the death which man procured for himself by sinning. For if sin had not gone before, without doubt death would not have followed. Therefore the death even of the body followed, which the death of the soul preceded. The death of the soul preceded by forsaking God, and the death of the body followed by the soul's forsaking. By the former it forsook willing, by the latter it was forced to forsake unwilling. As though it were said to it: You withdrew from him whom you ought to have loved, withdraw from what you loved. For who wishes to die? Surely no one: and so wholly no one that it was said to blessed Peter, Another will gird you, and carry you where you do not wish (John 21:18). If, then, there were no bitterness of death, there would not be the great fortitude of the martyrs.
Sermons5.2
3. Ideo et Apostolus: De dormientibus, inquit, nolo vos ignorare, fratres, ut non contristemini, sicut et Gentes, quae spem non habent . Non tantum ait: ut non contristemini; sed, ut non sic contristemini, quemadmodum Gentes, quae spem non habent. Necesse est enim ut contristemini: sed ubi contristaris, consoletur te spes. Quomodo enim non contristaris, ubi corpus quod vivit ex anima, fit exanime, discedente anima? Qui ambulabat iacet, qui loquebatur tacet, clausi oculi lucem non capiunt, aures nulli voci patescunt: omnia membrorum officia conquieverunt; non est qui moveat gressus ad ambulandum, manus ad operandum, sensus ad percipiendum. Nonne ista est domus, quam nescio quis invisibilis habitator ornabat? Discessit qui non videbatur, remansit quod cum dolore videatur. Ista est causa tristitiae. Si haec est causa tristitiae, sit huius tristitiae consolatio. Quae consolatio? Quia ipse Dominus in iussu et in voce archangeli, et in novissima tuba descendet de caelo, et mortui in Christo resurgent primi: deinde nos viventes, qui reliqui sumus, simul cum illis rapiemur in nubibus obviam Christo in aera. Numquid et hoc ad tempus? Non; sed quid est? Et ita semper cum Domino erimus . Pereat contristatio, ubi tanta est consolatio; detergatur luctus ex animo, fides expellat dolorem. In tanta spe non decet esse triste templum Dei. Ibi habitat bonus Consolator, ibi qui non fallit, Promissor. Quid mortuum diu plangamus? Quoniam mors amara est? Per illam transivit et Dominus. Sufficiant haec pauca Caritati vestrae: consoletur vos abundantius qui non migrat de corde vestro; sed ita dignetur habitare, ut nos dignetur etiam in fine mutare. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
3. Therefore the Apostle too says, Concerning those who sleep, I do not wish you to be ignorant, brothers, that you not be saddened, like the gentiles too, who have no hope. He did not only say, that you not be saddened; but, that you not be saddened thus, as the gentiles, who have no hope. For it is necessary that you be saddened: but where you are saddened, let hope console you. For how are you not saddened, where a body which lives from the soul becomes lifeless, the soul departing? He who walked lies still, he who spoke is silent, the closed eyes take in no light, the ears open to no voice: all the offices of the members have come to rest; there is no one to move the steps for walking, the hands for working, the senses for perceiving. Is this not the house which some invisible dweller was adorning? He who was not seen has departed, what is seen with grief has remained. This is the cause of sadness. If this is the cause of sadness, let there be the consolation of this sadness. What consolation? That the Lord himself, at a command and at the voice of an archangel, and at the last trumpet, will descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first: then we who are alive, who remain, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet Christ in the air. Is this too for a time? No; but what is it? And so we will always be with the Lord (1 Thess 4:13.16-17). Let sadness perish, where there is so great a consolation; let mourning be wiped from the mind, let faith drive out grief. In so great a hope it is not fitting that the temple of God be sad. There dwells the good Consoler, there the Promiser who does not deceive. Why should we lament a dead person long? Because death is bitter? Through it the Lord too passed. Let these few things suffice for your Charity: may he console you more abundantly who does not migrate from your heart; but may he so deign to dwell, that he may also deign to change us in the end. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.3
SERMO 174
Sermon 174
Sermons5.3
1. 1. Audivimus beatum apostolum Paulum dicentem: Humanus sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum peccatores salvos facere, quorum primus ego sum . Humanus ergo sermo et omni acceptione dignus. Quare humanus, et non divinus? Procul dubio nisi iste humanus sermo etiam divinus esset, dignus omni acceptione non esset. Sed sic est sermo iste humanus et divinus, quomodo est ipse Christus et homo et Deus. Si ergo recte intellegimus sermonem istum, non solum humanum esse, verum etiam divinum; quare Apostolus humanum maluit dicere, quam divinum? Procul dubio enim qui non mentiretur, si diceret divinum, non sine causa maluit dicere humanum. Hoc ergo elegit, per quod Christus in mundum venit. Venit enim per quod homo erat. Nam per quod Deus erat, semper hic erat. Ubi enim non est Deus, qui dixit: Caelum et terram ego impleo? Christus est certe virtus et sapientia Dei; de qua dicitur: Attingit a fine usque ad finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter . Ergo: In hoc mundo erat, et mundus per eum factus est, et mundus eum non cognovit . Et hic erat, et venit; hic erat per divinam maiestatem, venit per humanam infirmitatem. Quia ergo venit per infirmitatem humanam, ideo praedicans adventum eius dixit: Humanus sermo. Non liberaretur humanum genus, nisi sermo Dei dignaretur esse humanus. Nam et homo ille dicitur humanus, qui se exhibet hominem, et maxime qui hospitio suscipit hominem. Si ergo humanus dicitur qui in domo sua suscipit hominem, quam humanus est qui in se ipso suscepit hominem?
1. 1. We heard the blessed apostle Paul saying, A human saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the first (1 Tim 1:15). A human saying, then, and worthy of all acceptance. Why human, and not divine? Without doubt, unless this human saying were also divine, it would not be worthy of all acceptance. But this saying is human and divine in the way that Christ himself is both man and God. If, then, we rightly understand that this saying is not only human, but also divine; why did the Apostle prefer to say "human" rather than "divine"? Without doubt, since he would not lie if he said "divine," not without cause did he prefer to say "human." He chose this, then, by which Christ came into the world. For he came by that whereby he was man. For by that whereby he was God, he was always here. For where is God not, who said, I fill heaven and earth (Jer 23:24)? Christ surely is the power and wisdom of God; of whom it is said, It reaches mightily from end to end, and disposes all things sweetly (Wis 8:1). Therefore: He was in this world, and the world was made through him, and the world did not know him (John 1:10). He both was here, and came; he was here by his divine majesty, he came by human infirmity. Because, then, he came by human infirmity, therefore, proclaiming his coming, he said, A human saying. The human race would not be freed, unless the Word of God deigned to be human. For a man too is called "humane" who shows himself a man, and most of all who receives a man into his lodging. If, then, he is called humane who receives a man into his house, how humane is he who received a man into himself?
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Ergo: Humanus sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum peccatores salvos facere . Attende Evangelium. Venit enim Filius hominis quaerere et salvare quod perierat . Si homo non perisset, Filius hominis non venisset. Ergo perierat homo, venit Deus homo, et inventus est homo. Perierat homo per liberam voluntatem: venit Deus homo per gratiam liberatricem. Quaeris quid valeat ad malum liberum arbitrium? Recole hominem peccantem. Quaeris quid valeat ad auxilium Deus et homo? Attende in eo gratiam liberantem. Nusquam potuit sic ostendi, quantum valeat voluntas hominis usurpata per superbiam, ad vitandum sine adiutorio Dei malum; non potuit plus et manifestius exprimi, quam in homine primo. Et ecce periit primus homo, et ubi esset, nisi venisset secundus homo? Quia et ille homo, ideo et iste homo, et ideo humanus sermo. Prorsus nusquam sic apparet benignitas gratiae et liberalitas omnipotentiae Dei, quam in homine mediatore Dei et hominum, homine Christo Iesu. Quid enim dicimus, fratres mei? In fide catholica nutritis loquor, vel in pacem catholicam lucratis. Novimus et tenemus mediatorem Dei et hominum, hominem Christum Iesum, in quantum homo erat, eius esse naturae cuius et nos sumus. Non enim alterius naturae caro nostra et caro illius, nec alterius naturae anima nostra et anima illius. Hanc suscepit naturam, quam salvandam esse iudicavit. Nihil minus habebat in natura, sed nihil habebat in culpa. Natura pura, sed non sola humana. Ibi erat Deus, ibi erat Verbum Dei. Et sicut tu unus homo, anima es et caro; sic et ille unus Christus, Deus et homo. Audebit ergo aliquis dicere quia natura nostra in illo Mediatore primum per liberum arbitrium promeruit Deum, et sic suscipi meruit, ut esset homo et Deus unus Christus Iesus? Ecce nos possumus dicere virtutibus nostris, moribus nostris, conversatione vitae nostrae meruisse ut efficiamur filii Dei: possumus dicere: Accepimus praeceptum, si servaverimus et bene vixerimus, recipiemur in numerum filiorum Dei. Numquid et ille prius vixit filius hominis, et bene vivendo factus est Filius Dei? Inde coepit, et inde incoepit, et susceptione factus est. Verbum enim caro factum est, ut habitaret in nobis . Verbum Dei, unicus Dei Filius assumpsit animam et carnem hominis, non antea se promerentis, nec ad illam percipiendam sublimitatem virtute propria laborantis, sed omnino gratis. Nihil enim praecessit illam susceptionem: susceptione factus est. Virgo concepit: ante conceptum virginis homo mediator? Non utique prius iustus fuit. Quomodo enim iustus fuit, qui nec fuit? Virgo concepit, et susceptione hominis inde coepit. Merito dictum est: Vidimus gloriam eius, gloriam tamquam unigeniti a Patre, plenum gratia et veritate . Amas liberam voluntatem tuam, dicturus es patri tuo: Da mihi substantiam meam quae me contingit . Quid te tibi committis? Melius te potest servare, qui te potuit, antequam esses, creare. Agnosce ergo Christum, gratia plenus est. Hoc tibi vult fundere, quo plenus est; hoc tibi dicit: Quaere dona mea, obliviscere merita tua; quia si ego quaererem merita tua, non venires ad dona mea. Noli te extollere, pusillus esto, Zacchaeus esto.
2. 2. Therefore: A human saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners (1 Tim 1:15). Attend to the Gospel. For the Son of man came to seek and to save what was lost (Luke 19:10). If man had not perished, the Son of man would not have come. Therefore man had perished, God came as man, and man was found. Man had perished through free will: God came as man through liberating grace. Do you ask what free choice avails for evil? Recall the sinning man. Do you ask what God-and-man avails for help? Attend in him to liberating grace. Nowhere could it be so shown how much the will of man, usurped through pride, avails for avoiding evil without the help of God; it could not be expressed more and more manifestly than in the first man. And behold, the first man perished, and where would he be, unless the second man had come? Because that one too was man, therefore this one too is man, and therefore a human saying. Plainly nowhere does the kindness of grace and the liberality of the omnipotence of God so appear as in the man, the mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus. For what do we say, my brothers? I speak to those nourished in the catholic faith, or won to catholic peace. We know and hold that the mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus, insofar as he was man, is of that nature of which we too are. For our flesh and his flesh are not of another nature, nor our soul and his soul of another nature. He took on this nature, which he judged was to be saved. He had nothing less in nature, but he had nothing in fault. A pure nature, but not only human. There was God, there was the Word of God. And just as you, one man, are soul and flesh; so he, one Christ, is God and man. Will anyone, then, dare to say that our nature in that Mediator first earned God through free choice, and so deserved to be taken up, so as to be man and God, one Christ Jesus? Behold, we can say that by our virtues, by our morals, by the conduct of our life we earned to be made sons of God: we can say: We received a precept; if we keep it and live well, we will be received into the number of the sons of God. Did he too first live as a son of man, and by living well become the Son of God? From there he began, and there he started, and by being taken up he was made. For the Word was made flesh, that it might dwell among us (John 1:14). The Word of God, the only Son of God, assumed the soul and flesh of a man, not first earning it for himself, nor laboring by his own virtue to attain that sublimity, but wholly freely. For nothing went before that taking up: by being taken up he was made. A virgin conceived: before the conception of the virgin was there a man-mediator? Surely he was not first just. For how was he just, who did not even exist? A virgin conceived, and by the taking up of man it began there. Rightly it was said, We saw his glory, glory as of the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth (John 1:14). You love your free will, you are going to say to your father, Give me my substance which belongs to me (Luke 15:12). Why do you entrust yourself to yourself? He can better keep you, who could create you before you were. Acknowledge Christ, then; he is full of grace. This he wishes to pour into you, with which he is full; this he says to you: Seek my gifts, forget your merits; for if I sought your merits, you would not come to my gifts. Do not exalt yourself, be small, be Zacchaeus.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Sed dicturus es: Si Zacchaeus fuero, prae turba non potero videre Iesum. Noli esse tristis, ascende lignum, ubi pro te pependit Iesus, et videbis Iesum. Et quale genus ligni ascendit Zacchaeus? Sycomorum. In regionibus nostris aut omnino nusquam, aut raro forte alicubi nascitur; in illis autem partibus multum est huius generis ligni et pomi. Sycomora dicuntur poma quaedam ficis similia; sed tamen distant aliquid; quod possunt nosse qui viderunt vel gustaverunt. Quantum tamen indicant interpretatione nominis, sycomora "fici fatuae " latine interpretantur. Iam vide Zacchaeum meum, vide illum, obsecro te, volentem in turba videre Iesum, et non valentem. Humilis enim erat, turba superba erat; et ipsa turba ad videndum bene Dominum, sicut solet turba, se ipsam impediebat; ascendit a turba, et vidit Iesum non impediente turba. Turba enim dicit humilibus, humilitatis viam gradientibus, iniurias suas Deo dimittentibus, vindictam de inimicis non requirentibus, turba insultat, et dicit: Indefense, qui te non potes vindicare. Turba impedit ne videatur Iesus: turba glorians et exultans quando se potuerit vindicare, impedit ne videatur ille qui pendens ait: Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt . Hunc ergo volens videre Zacchaeus, in quo figurabatur persona humilium, non attendit turbam impedientem; sed ascendit sycomorum, quasi fatui pomi lignum. Nos enim, inquit Apostolus, praedicamus Christum crucifixum, Iudaeis quidem scandalum: attende sycomorum: Gentibus autem stultitiam . Denique de cruce Christi nobis insultant sapientes huius mundi, et dicunt: Quale cor habetis, qui Deum colitis crucifixum? Quale cor habemus? Non utique vestrum. Sapientia huius mundi stultitia est apud Deum . Non enim vestrum cor habemus. Sed dicitis cor nostrum stultum. Dicite quod vultis: nos ascendamus sycomorum, et videamus Iesum. Ideo enim vos Iesum videre non potestis, quia sycomorum ascendere erubescitis. Apprehendat Zacchaeus sycomorum, ascendat humilis crucem. Parum est si, ascendat; ne de cruce Christi erubescat, in fronte illam figat, ubi sedes pudoris est: ibi omnino, ibi in quo membro erubescitur, ibi figatur unde non erubescatur. Puto quia tu irrides sycomorum: et ipsa me fecit videre Iesum. Sed tu irrides sycomorum, quia homo es: stultum autem Dei sapientius est quam hominum .
3. 3. But you are going to say: If I am Zacchaeus, I will not be able to see Jesus because of the crowd. Do not be sad, climb the tree on which Jesus hung for you, and you will see Jesus. And what kind of tree did Zacchaeus climb? A sycamore. In our regions it is born either nowhere at all, or rarely perhaps somewhere; but in those parts there is much of this kind of tree and fruit. "Sycamores" are called certain fruits like figs; yet they differ somewhat, which those who have seen or tasted can know. Yet as far as the interpretation of the name indicates, "sycamore" is interpreted in Latin "foolish figs." Now see my Zacchaeus, see him, I beseech you, wishing to see Jesus in the crowd, and not able. For he was little, the crowd was proud; and the crowd itself, as a crowd is wont, was hindering itself from seeing the Lord well; he climbed up from the crowd, and saw Jesus with the crowd not hindering. For the crowd says to the humble, to those walking the way of humility, to those forgiving God their wrongs, to those not seeking vengeance on their enemies—the crowd insults, and says: Unavenged one, who cannot avenge yourself. The crowd hinders that Jesus be seen: the crowd, glorying and exulting when it can avenge itself, hinders that he be seen who hanging said, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do (Luke 23:34). Wishing to see him, then, Zacchaeus, in whom the person of the humble was figured, did not attend to the hindering crowd; but climbed the sycamore, as it were a tree of foolish fruit. For we, says the Apostle, preach Christ crucified, to the Jews indeed a stumbling block: attend to the sycamore: but to the gentiles folly (1 Cor 1:23). Finally the wise of this world insult us about the cross of Christ, and say: What kind of heart do you have, who worship a crucified God? What kind of heart do we have? Surely not yours. The wisdom of this world is folly with God (See 1 Cor 3:19). For we do not have your heart. But you say our heart is foolish. Say what you wish: let us climb the sycamore, and see Jesus. For you cannot see Jesus for this reason, because you blush to climb the sycamore. Let Zacchaeus lay hold of the sycamore, let the humble man climb the cross. It is too little if he climb; lest he blush at the cross of Christ, let him fix it on his forehead, where the seat of shame is: there entirely, there in the member where one blushes, let it be fixed whence one does not blush. I think that you laugh at the sycamore: and it made me see Jesus. But you laugh at the sycamore, because you are a man: but the foolishness of God is wiser than men (See 1 Cor 1:25).
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Et vidit Dominus ipsum Zacchaeum. Visus est, et vidit; sed nisi visus esset, non videret. Quos enim praedestinavit, illos et vocavit . Ipse est qui Nathanaeli dixit, iam quasi testimonio suo adiuvanti Evangelium, et dicenti: A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse? Dominus ad illum: Priusquam te Philippus vocaret, cum esses sub arbore fici, vidi te . Nostis unde sibi succinctoria fecerunt primi peccatores Adam et Eva. Quando peccaverunt, de foliis fici succinctoria sibi fecerunt et pudenda texerunt: quia quod eos puderet peccando fecerunt. Ergo si succinctoria sibi primi peccatores fecerunt, unde originem ducimus, in quibus perieramus, ut veniret ille quaerere et salvare quod perierat, de foliis fici ad pudenda tegenda fecerunt ; quid aliud dictum est: Cum esses sub arbore fici, vidi te; nisi, non venires ad purgatorem peccati, nisi prior te vidisset in umbra peccati? Ut videremus, visi sumus; ut diligeremus, dilecti sumus. Deus meus, misericordia eius praeveniet me .
4. 4. And the Lord saw Zacchaeus himself. He was seen, and saw; but unless he had been seen, he would not see. For whom he predestined, these he also called (See Rom 8:30). He himself it is who said to Nathanael, as it were already helping the Gospel by his testimony and saying, Can anything good be from Nazareth? the Lord to him: Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you (John 1:46.48). You know whence the first sinners, Adam and Eve, made themselves girdles. When they sinned, they made themselves girdles from fig leaves and covered their shameful parts: because what shamed them they did by sinning. Therefore, if the first sinners made themselves girdles, from whom we draw our origin, in whom we had perished, that he might come to seek and to save what had perished—they made them from fig leaves to cover their shameful parts; what else was said: When you were under the fig tree, I saw you; except, you would not come to the cleanser of sin, unless he had first seen you in the shadow of sin? That we might see, we were seen; that we might love, we were loved. My God, his mercy will go before me (See Ps 59:10 (58:11)).
Sermons5.4.4
4. 5. Iam ergo Dominus, qui Zacchaeum in corde susceperat, in domum eius dignatus est suscipi; et dixit: Zacchaee, festinans descende, quoniam in domo tua oportet me manere . Magnum beneficium ille arbitrabatur, Christum videre. Qui magnum et ineffabile beneficium putabat, transeuntem videre, subito meruit in domo habere. Infunditur gratia, operatur fides per dilectionem; suscipitur Christus in domum, qui iam habitabat in corde. Dicit Christo Zacchaeus: Domine, dimidium rerum mearum do pauperibus; et si quid aliquem fraudavi, quadruplum reddo . Quasi diceret: Ideo mihi dimidium teneo, non quod habeam, sed unde reddam. Vere ecce quod est suscipere Iesum, in cor suscipere. Ibi enim erat Christus, in Zacchaeo erat, et de illo sibi dicebat, quod ex ore eius audiebat. Sic enim Apostolus dicit: Habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus vestris .
4. 5. Now then the Lord, who had received Zacchaeus in his heart, deigned to be received into his house; and he said, Zacchaeus, hurry down, for in your house I must remain. He reckoned it a great benefit to see Christ. He who thought it a great and ineffable benefit to see him passing by, suddenly deserved to have him in his house. Grace is poured in, faith works through love; Christ is received into the house, who already dwelt in the heart. Zacchaeus says to Christ, Lord, half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I restore fourfold. As though he said: Therefore I keep half for myself, not that I may have it, but that I may have whence to restore. Truly behold what it is to receive Jesus, to receive him into the heart. For there Christ was, he was in Zacchaeus, and of him he was saying to himself what he heard from his mouth (See Luke 19:5-8). For so the Apostle says, That Christ may dwell through faith in your hearts (Eph 3:17).
Sermons5.4.5
5. 6. Iam ergo quia Zacchaeus erat, quia princeps publicanorum erat, quia valde peccator erat; quasi sana illa turba, quae impediebat videre Iesum, admirata est, et reprehendit quod in domum peccatoris intrasset Iesus. Hoc erat reprehendere quod in domum aegroti intravit medicus. Quia ergo velut peccator Zacchaeus irrisus est, irrisus est autem ab insanis sanatus, Dominus respondit irridentibus: Hodie salus huic domui facta est . Ecce quare intravi, salus hodie facta est. Utique si Salvator non intrasset, salus in illa domo facta non esset. Quid ergo miraris, aegrote? Voca et tu Iesum, noli tibi sanus videri. Cum spe aegrotat, qui medicum suscipit: desperate aegrotat, qui per insaniam medicum caedit. Qualis ergo eius insania, qui medicum occidit? Quanta vero bonitas et potentia medici, qui de sanguine suo, insano interfectori suo medicamentum fecit? Neque enim ille qui venerat quaerere et salvare quod perierat, pendens sine causa dicebat: Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt . Insani sunt, medicus sum: saeviant, patienter fero; cum occiderint, tunc sanabo. Simus ergo inter illos quos sanat. Humanus sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum peccatores salvos facere : magnos, pusillos, peccatores salvos facere. Venit Filius hominis quaerere et salvare quod perierat .
5. 6. Now then, because he was Zacchaeus, because he was a chief of the tax collectors, because he was a very great sinner; that crowd, as it were healthy, which was hindering the seeing of Jesus, wondered, and reproached that Jesus had entered the house of a sinner. This was to reproach that the physician entered the house of a sick man. Because, then, Zacchaeus was mocked as a sinner—but he was mocked, when healed, by the mad—the Lord answered those who mocked, Today salvation has been made for this house. Behold why I entered, salvation has been made today. Surely, if the Savior had not entered, salvation would not have been made in that house. Why, then, do you wonder, sick man? Call Jesus, you too, do not seem healthy to yourself. He is sick with hope who receives the physician: he is sick to despair who in madness strikes the physician. What madness, then, is his who kills the physician? But how great the goodness and power of the physician, who from his own blood made a medicine for his mad slayer? For he who had come to seek and to save what had perished did not without cause say, hanging, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do (Luke 23:34). They are mad, I am the physician: let them rage, I bear it patiently; when they have killed me, then I will heal. Let us, then, be among those whom he heals. A human saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners (1 Tim 1:15): the great, the small, to save sinners. The Son of man came to seek and to save what had perished (Luke 19:10).
Sermons5.5.6
6. 7. Qui dicit infantilem aetatem non habere quod salvet Iesus, omnibus fidelibus infantibus Christum negat esse Iesum. Qui dicit, inquam, infantilem aetatem non habere quod salvet Iesus in ea, nihil aliud dicit quam Christum Dominum fidelibus infantibus, id est, in Christo baptizatis infantibus non esse Iesum. Iesus enim quid est? Interpretatur Iesus, Salvator. Salvator est Iesus. Quos non salvat, non habendo quod in eis salvet, non est illis Iesus. Iam si corda vestra tolerant, aliquibus baptizatis Christum non esse Iesum, nescio utrum fides vestra in regula sana possit agnosci. Infantes sunt, sed membra eius fiunt. Infantes sunt, sed Sacramenta eius accipiunt. Infantes sunt, sed mensae eius participes fiunt, ut habeant in se vitam. Quid mihi dicis: Sanus est, non habet vitium? Quare cum illo curris ad medicum, si non habet vitium? Non times ne dicat tibi: Aufer hinc eum quem putas sanum? Filius hominis non venit, nisi quaerere et salvare quod perierat. Quare illum ad me affers, si non perierat?
6. 7. Whoever says that infancy has nothing for Jesus to save denies that Christ is Jesus to all the faithful infants. Whoever says, I say, that infancy has nothing in it for Jesus to save, says nothing else than that Christ the Lord is not Jesus to the faithful infants—that is, to infants baptized in Christ. For what is "Jesus"? "Jesus" is interpreted "Savior." Jesus is the Savior. To those he does not save—by their having nothing in them for him to save—he is not Jesus. Now if your hearts can bear that to some baptized persons Christ is not Jesus, I do not know whether your faith can be recognized as sound by the rule. They are infants, but they become his members. They are infants, but they receive his sacraments. They are infants, but they are made partakers of his table, that they may have life in themselves. What do you tell me: He is healthy, he has no defect? Why do you run with him to the physician, if he has no defect? Do you not fear lest he say to you: Take away from here the one you think healthy? The Son of man came only to seek and to save what had perished. Why do you bring him to me, if he had not perished?
Sermons5.6.7
7. 8. Humanus sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum . Quare venit in mundum? Peccatores salvos facere. Alia causa non fuit quare veniret in mundum. Non eum de caelo ad terram merita nostra bona, sed peccata duxerunt. Haec est causa cur veniret, peccatores salvos facere. Et vocabis, inquit, nomen eius Iesum. Quare vocabis nomen eius Iesum? Ipse enim salvum faciet populum suum a peccatis eorum . Vocabis nomen eius Iesum. Quare Iesum? quae ratio est huius nominis? Audi quare: Ipse enim salvum faciet populum suum. Unde? A peccatis eorum. Populum suum a peccatis eorum. Numquid ad istum populum non pertinent parvuli, quem salvum faciet Iesus a peccatis eorum? Pertinent plane, pertinent, fratres mei. Sic habete in corde, sic credite, cum ista fide parvulos ad gratiam Christi portate; ne si hanc fidem in corde non habueritis, pro quibus respondetis, lingua vestra occidatis. Prorsus, fratres, qui non cum ista fide cum parvulo cucurrerit, fingit. Sanus est, nihil mali habet, nihil vitii habet; sed tollam illum ad medicum. Quare? Quia sic solet fieri. Non times ne tibi dicat medicus: Tolle hinc tecum ipsum; non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus .
7. 8. A human saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world (1 Tim 1:15). Why did he come into the world? To save sinners. There was no other cause why he came into the world. Not our good merits, but our sins led him from heaven to earth. This is the cause why he came, to save sinners. And you will call, he says, his name Jesus. Why will you call his name Jesus? For he will save his people from their sins (Matt 1:21). You will call his name Jesus. Why Jesus? what is the reason for this name? Hear why: For he will save his people. Whence? From their sins. His people from their sins. Do little ones not belong to this people, whom Jesus will save from their sins? They belong plainly, they belong, my brothers. So have it in your heart, so believe, with this faith carry the little ones to the grace of Christ; lest, if you do not have this faith in your heart, you kill with your tongue those for whom you answer. Plainly, brothers, whoever does not run with the little one with this faith pretends. He is healthy, he has nothing evil, he has no defect; but I will take him to the physician. Why? Because it is the custom. Do you not fear lest the physician say to you: Take him away with you; those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick (Matt 9:12).
Sermons5.7.8
8. 9. Commendaverim Caritati vestrae causam eorum qui pro se loqui non possunt. Omnes parvuli tamquam pupilli considerentur, etiam qui nondum parentes proprios extulerunt. Omnis praedestinatorum numerus parvulorum populum Dei quaerit tutorem, qui exspectat Dominum salvatorem. Universam massam generis humani in homine primo venenator ille percussit; nemo ad secundum transit a primo, nisi per Baptismatis sacramentum. In parvulis natis et nondum baptizatis agnoscatur Adam: in parvulis natis et baptizatis et ob hoc renatis agnoscatur Christus. Qui Adam non agnoscit in parvulis natis, nec Christum agnoscere poterit in renatis. Sed quare, inquiunt, iam baptizatus homo fidelis, iam dimisso peccato, generat eum qui est cum primi hominis peccato? Quia carne illum generat, non spiritu. Quod natum est de carne, caro est . Et si exterior homo noster, ait Apostolus, corrumpitur, sed interior renovatur de die in diem . Ex eo quod in te renovatur, non generas parvulum: ex eo quod in te corrumpitur, generas parvulum. Tu ut non in aeternum moriaris natus es, et renatus es: ille adhuc natus, renatus nondum est. Si tu renascendo vivis, sine ut et ille renascatur et vivat; sine, inquam, renascatur, sine renascatur. Quare contradicis? quare novis disputationibus antiquam fidei regulam frangere conaris? Quid est enim quod dicis: Parvuli non habent omnino vel originale peccatum? Quid est quod dicis, nisi ut non accedant ad Iesum? Sed tibi clamat Iesus: Sine parvulos venire ad me . Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
8. 9. I would commend to your Charity the cause of those who cannot speak for themselves. Let all the little ones be considered as it were orphans, even those who have not yet buried their own parents. The whole number of the predestined—the people of God—seeks the little ones a guardian, which awaits the Lord the Savior. The whole lump of the human race that poisoner struck in the first man; no one passes from the first to the second except through the sacrament of Baptism. In little ones born and not yet baptized let Adam be recognized: in little ones born and baptized and through this reborn let Christ be recognized. He who does not recognize Adam in little ones born will not be able to recognize Christ in the reborn either. But why, they say, does a man now baptized, faithful, with sin now forgiven, beget one who is with the sin of the first man? Because he begets him by the flesh, not by the spirit. What is born of the flesh is flesh (John 3:6). And if our outer man, says the Apostle, is corrupted, yet the inner is renewed from day to day (2 Cor 4:16). By that which in you is renewed, you do not beget the little one: by that which in you is corrupted, you beget the little one. You have been born, and reborn, that you may not die forever: he as yet only born, not yet reborn. If you, by being reborn, live, allow him too to be reborn and live; allow, I say, that he be reborn, allow that he be reborn. Why do you contradict? why do you try by new disputations to break the ancient rule of faith? For what is it that you say: Little ones do not have any original sin at all? What is it that you say, but that they should not come to Jesus? But Jesus cries out to you, Let the little ones come to me (Matt 19:14; Luke 18:16). Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.8.9
SERMO 175
Sermon 175
Sermons5.8.9
1. 1. Quod lectum est modo de sancto Evangelio, hoc et Paulus apostolus dicit, cuius verba ista sunt: Fidelis sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum peccatores salvos facere, quorum primus ego sum . Nulla causa fuit veniendi Christo Domino, nisi peccatores salvos facere. Tolle morbos, tolle vulnera, et nulla causa est medicinae. Si venit de caelo magnus medicus, magnus per totum orbem terrae iacebat aegrotus. Ipse aegrotus genus humanum est. Sed non omnium est fides . Novit Dominus qui sunt eius . Superbiebant Iudaei, extollebant se, alta sapiebant, iustos se putabant, et Dominum colligentem peccatores insuper accusabant. Qui ergo superbiebant et alta sapiebant, relicti sunt in montibus, ad nonaginta novem pertinent. Quid est, relicti sunt in montibus? Relicti sunt in timore terreno. Quid est, ad nonaginta novem pertinent? In sinistra sunt, non in dextera. Nonaginta enim et novem in sinistra numerantur; unum adde, ad dexteram transitur. Venit ergo, ut ipse alio loco dicit, Venit Filius hominis quaerere et salvare quod perierat . Totum enim perierat: ex quo peccavit unus, ubi erat totum periit totum. Sed venit unus sine peccato, qui salvos faceret a peccato. Isti autem superbiendo, quod est peius, et aegrotabant, et sanos se esse credebant.
1. 1. What was just now read from the holy Gospel, this the apostle Paul too says, whose words are these: A faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the first (1 Tim 1:15). There was no cause for Christ the Lord to come, except to save sinners. Take away diseases, take away wounds, and there is no cause for medicine. If the great physician came from heaven, a great sick man was lying throughout the whole world. That sick man is the human race. But not all have faith (2 Thess 3:2). The Lord knows who are his (2 Tim 2:19). The Jews were proud, they exalted themselves, they were high-minded, they thought themselves righteous, and they moreover accused the Lord for gathering sinners. Those, then, who were proud and high-minded were left on the mountains, they belong to the ninety-nine. What is, they were left on the mountains? They were left in earthly fear. What is, they belong to the ninety-nine? They are on the left, not on the right. For ninety-nine are counted on the left; add one, and one passes to the right. For he came, as he himself says in another place, The Son of man came to seek and to save what had perished (Luke 19:10). For all had perished: from the time the one sinned, in whom was the whole, the whole perished. But one came without sin, who would save from sin. But those, by being proud—which is worse—were both sick and believed themselves healthy.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Periculosius aegrotant, qui mentem febribus perdiderunt. Illi rident, et sani plorant. Ridet enim phreneticus; sed non est sanus. Porro autem qui mentis est sanae, plorat phreneticum ridentem. Primum, si duo ista proponas: Quid est melius, ridere, an plorare? quis non sibi eligat ridere? Denique propter dolorem salubrem paenitentiae, in fletu Dominus posuit officium, in risu beneficium. Quomodo? Quando ait in Evangelio: Beati qui plorant, quoniam ridebunt . Ergo in ploratu officium est, in risu est praemium sapientiae. Risum enim pro gaudio posuit, non cachinnationem, sed exsultationem. Ergo si duo ista proponas, et quaeras quid horum sit melius, ridere, an plorare, omnis homo plorare non vult, et ridere vult. Porro si addas personas ad istos affectus, et ita proponas cum personis: Quid est melius, ridere phreneticum, an plorare sanum? eligit sibi homo fletum cum sanitate, quam risum cum amentia. Tantum valet mentis sanitas, ut etiam cum planctu eligatur. Isti ergo qui sanos se putabant, multo periculosius et desperatius aegrotabant; et ipsa aegritudine qua mentes perdiderant, etiam medicum caedebant. Parum est, caedebant: dicam totum; non solum caedebant, sed etiam occidebant. Ille autem etiam cum occideretur, medicus erat, vapulabat, et curabat; patiebatur phreneticum, nec deserebat aegrotum: tenebatur, alligabatur, colaphis percutiebatur, arundine plagas accipiebat, irridebatur, insultabatur ei, postremo audiebatur, damnabatur, ligno suspendebatur, undique circumfremebatur; et medicus erat.
2. 2. Those are more dangerously sick who have lost their mind to fevers. They laugh, and the healthy weep. For the frenzied man laughs; but he is not healthy. Moreover, one who is of sound mind weeps over the frenzied man laughing. First, if you set these two before someone: Which is better, to laugh or to weep? who would not choose for himself to laugh? Finally, on account of the wholesome grief of penitence, the Lord placed in weeping the duty, in laughter the benefit. How? When he says in the Gospel, Blessed are those who weep, for they will laugh. Therefore in weeping is the duty, in laughter is the reward of wisdom. For he placed laughter for joy, not cackling, but exultation. So if you set these two before someone, and ask which of them is better, to laugh or to weep, every man does not wish to weep, and wishes to laugh. Moreover, if you add persons to these affections, and so set it forth with persons: Which is better, for a frenzied man to laugh, or a healthy man to weep? a man chooses for himself weeping with health rather than laughter with madness. So much does the health of the mind avail, that it is chosen even with mourning. Those, then, who thought themselves healthy were much more dangerously and desperately sick; and by that very sickness by which they had lost their minds, they even struck the physician. It is too little to say they struck him: I will say it all; they not only struck him, but even killed him. But he, even while he was being killed, was a physician, he was being beaten, and he was healing; he bore with the frenzied man, nor did he forsake the sick man: he was held, he was bound, he was struck with blows, he received the blows of a reed, he was mocked, he was insulted, finally he was heard, condemned, hung on the wood, on every side raged at; and he was a physician.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Agnoscis phreneticos, agnosce et medicum. Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt . Illi perdita mente saeviebant, et medici sanguinem saeviendo fundebant; ille autem etiam de ipso sanguine suo aegrotis medicamenta faciebat. Non enim vere frustra dixit: Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt. Orat christianus, et exauditur; orat Christus, et non exauditur? Nam qui exaudit cum Patre, quia Deus est, quomodo non exauditur homo, quod pro nobis factus est? Prorsus exauditus est. Ibi erant, ibi saeviebant; de his erant qui reprehendebant eum, et dicebant: Ecce cum publicanis et peccatoribus convescitur . Erant in ipso populo, a quo ipse medicus occidebatur, et in eius sanguine etiam ipsis antidotum parabatur. Cum enim Dominus non solum sanguinem funderet, verum etiam ipsam suam mortem ad medicamenti confectionem impenderet; resurrexit ad demonstrandum resurrectionis exemplum. Patientia sua passus est, ut doceret patientiam nostram; et in resurrectione sua praemium patientiae demonstravit. Item, ut nostis, et omnes confitemur, ascendit in caelum, deinde ab eo Spiritus Sanctus est missus, ante promissus. Dixerat enim discipulis suis: Sedete in civitate, donec induamini virtute ex alto . Venit ergo et promissio ipsius, venit Spiritus Sanctus, implevit discipulos, coeperunt loqui linguis omnium gentium: signum in illis procedebat unitatis. Loquebatur enim tunc unus homo omnibus linguis; quia locutura erat unitas Ecclesiae in omnibus linguis. Expaverunt qui audiebant. Noverant enim homines idiotas fuisse, unius tantum linguae; et mirabantur ac stupebant, quod unius linguae homines, vel ut multum duarum, linguis omnium gentium loquerentur: suspensi sunt stupore, perdiderunt elationem, de monte facti sunt valles. Iam si humiles sunt, valles sunt; quod infuderis capiunt, non dimittunt. Si venerit aqua super altitudinem, decurrit et defluit: si venerit aqua ad concavum et humilem locum, et capitur et stat. Tales iam illi erant; stupebant, mirabantur, perdiderant saevitiam.
3. 3. You recognize the frenzied; recognize the physician too. Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do (Luke 23:34). They raged with lost minds, and by raging poured out the physician's blood; but he made from his very blood a medicine for the sick. For not truly in vain did he say, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do. A Christian prays, and is heard; does Christ pray, and is not heard? For he who hears with the Father, because he is God, how is he not heard as man, which he was made for us? Plainly he was heard. There they were, there they raged; of them were those who reproached him and said, Behold, he eats with tax collectors and sinners (Matt 9:11). They were in that very people, by whom the physician himself was being killed, and in whose blood an antidote was being prepared for them too. For since the Lord poured out not only blood, but even spent his very death for the confection of the medicine; he rose again to demonstrate the example of resurrection. By his patience he suffered, to teach our patience; and in his resurrection he demonstrated the reward of patience. Likewise, as you know, and we all confess, he ascended into heaven, then from him the Holy Spirit was sent, having been promised before. For he had said to his disciples, Sit in the city, until you are clothed with power from on high (Luke 24:49). So his promise came too, the Holy Spirit came, filled the disciples, they began to speak in the tongues of all nations: a sign of unity went forth in them. For then one man was speaking in all tongues; because the unity of the Church was going to speak in all tongues. Those who heard were astonished. For they knew that the men had been unlearned, of one tongue only; and they marveled and were amazed that men of one tongue, or at most two, were speaking in the tongues of all nations: they were suspended in amazement, they lost their elation, they were made from a mountain into valleys. Now if they are humble, they are valleys; what you pour into them they take in, they do not let go. If water comes upon a height, it runs down and flows off: if water comes to a hollow and low place, it is both taken in and stands. Such were those now; they were amazed, they marveled, they had lost their savagery.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Denique loquente sibi Petro, compuncti sunt, et factum est in illis quod Psalmus praedixerat: Conversus sum in aerumnam , cum configeretur spina . Quid est spina? Compunctio paenitentiae. Sic habes et verba ipsa Scripturae in Actibus Apostolorum: Compuncti sunt corde, et dixerunt ad Apostolos: Quid faciemus? Quare dixerunt: Quid faciemus? Novimus quid fecimus: quid faciemus? Quantum ad nostrum factum attinet, desperatio est salutis: sit ergo in vestro consilio, si fieri potest, spes aliqua sanitatis. Novimus quid fecerimus, dicite quid faciamus. Quid est quod fecimus? Non enim quemcumque hominem occidimus; et multum mali fecissemus, si quemcumque hominem innocentem occidissemus. Latronem elegimus, innocentem occidimus; mortuum elegimus, medicum occidimus; dicite: quid faciemus? Et Petrus: Agite paenitentiam, et baptizetur unusquisque vestrum in nomine Domini nostri Iesu Christi ; ut transeatis de nonaginta novem ad centum: quia cum nonaginta et novem essetis, paenitentiam vobis necessariam non putabatis, et Domino colligenti peccatores et volenti eos facere paenitentes, insuper insultabatis. Modo ergo compuncti, quia cognovistis peccatum vestrum, agite paenitentiam, et baptizetur unusquisque vestrum in nomine Domini nostri Iesu Christi; baptizetur in eius nomine quem occidistis sine crimine: et remittuntur vobis peccata vestra. Reducti sunt in spem: doluerunt, gemuerunt, conversi sunt, sanati sunt. Ipsi erant illi; Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt .
4. 4. Finally, as Peter spoke to them, they were pricked, and there was fulfilled in them what the Psalm had foretold: I was turned to misery, while a thorn was driven in (Ps 32:4 (31:4)). What is the thorn? The pricking of penitence. So you have the very words of Scripture in the Acts of the Apostles: They were pricked in heart, and said to the Apostles: What shall we do? Why did they say, What shall we do? We know what we have done: what shall we do? As far as concerns our deed, it is despair of salvation: let there be, then, in your counsel, if it can be, some hope of health. We know what we have done, tell us what we should do. What is it that we have done? For we did not kill just any man; and we would have done much evil if we had killed any innocent man. We chose a robber, we killed the innocent; we chose a dead man, we killed the physician; tell us: what shall we do? And Peter: Do penance, and let each of you be baptized in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 2:37-38); that you may pass over from the ninety-nine to the hundred: because, when you were ninety-nine, you did not think penance necessary for yourselves, and you moreover insulted the Lord gathering sinners and wishing to make them penitent. Now, then, pricked, because you have come to know your sin, do penance, and let each of you be baptized in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; let him be baptized in the name of him whom you killed without crime: and your sins are forgiven you. They were led back into hope: they grieved, they groaned, they were converted, they were healed. They were the very ones: Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do (Luke 23:34).
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Unusquisque ergo, carissimi, quando audit Dominum Iesum Christum non venisse propter iustos, sed propter peccatores, non amet esse peccator; ne forte dicat in corde suo: Si iustus fuero, non me amat Christus; si peccator fuero, amat me: quia propter peccatores descendit, non propter iustos. Respondet enim tibi: Si medicum agnovisti, febrem quare non timuisti? Utique medicus ad aegrotum venit, constat: sed ideo venit medicus ad aegrotum, ne ille sit semper aegrotus. Quid ergo dicimus? quid pronuntiamus? quid definimus? Aegrotum amat medicus, an sanum? Quod vult facere amat; non quod invenit. Ad aegrotum quidem venit, ad sanum non venit: noli attendere quia ad illum venit, ad illum non venit; plus enim amat sanum, quam aegrotum. Nam, ut noveritis quia plus amat sanum, quam aegrotum; numquid faceret quod odisset?
5. 5. Let each one, then, dearly beloved, when he hears that the Lord Jesus Christ came not for the sake of the righteous, but for the sake of sinners, not love to be a sinner; lest perhaps he say in his heart: If I am righteous, Christ does not love me; if I am a sinner, he loves me: because he came down for the sake of sinners, not for the sake of the righteous. For he answers you: If you have recognized the physician, why have you not feared the fever? Surely the physician comes to the sick man, it is agreed: but for this reason the physician comes to the sick man, that he may not be always sick. What, then, do we say? what do we pronounce? what do we define? Does the physician love the sick man, or the healthy? He loves what he wishes to make; not what he finds. To the sick man indeed he comes, to the healthy he does not come: do not attend to the fact that he comes to the one, and does not come to the other; for he loves the healthy more than the sick. For, that you may know that he loves the healthy more than the sick; would he do what he hated?
Sermons5.5.5
5. 6. Ergo Paulum apostolum attende: Fidelis sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum peccatores salvos facere, quorum primus ego sum . Dixit: quorum primus ego sum. Quomodo erat primus? Ante illum non fuerunt peccatores tot Iudaei? Ante illum non fuerunt peccatores in genere humano? Ante illum in omnibus hominibus nemo peccato tenebatur? Adam non ante illum fuit, qui primus peccavit, et nos omnes in mortem praecipitavit? Quid est: Quorum primus ego sum? Ad quod venit, primus ego sum? Sed nec hoc verum est. Primus electus est Petrus, primus Andreas, primi alii Apostoli ; tu Apostolus es novissimus; quomodo dicis: Quorum primus ego sum? Ergo Apostolus novissimus, primus peccator. Et hoc quomodo primus peccator? Ante te peccavit Petrus, quando ipsum Dominum ter negavit . Nolo dicere, quia et ipse nisi peccator inventus esset, de sinistra ad dexteram non transisset.
5. 6. Therefore attend to the apostle Paul: A faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the first (1 Tim 1:15). He said: of whom I am the first. How was he the first? Were there not so many Jewish sinners before him? Were there not sinners in the human race before him? Was no one before him, among all men, held by sin? Was Adam not before him, who first sinned, and cast us all headlong into death? What is, of whom I am the first? For that for which he came, I am the first? But this is not true either. Peter was chosen first, Andrew first, the other apostles first; you are the last apostle; how do you say, of whom I am the first? Therefore, the last apostle, the first sinner. And how the first sinner? Peter sinned before you, when he denied the Lord himself three times (See Matt 26:69-75). I do not wish to say that he too, unless he had been found a sinner, would not have passed from the left to the right.
Sermons5.5.6
6. 7. Quid est ergo: Quorum primus ego sum ? Quia omnibus peior sum. Ergo peiorem voluit intellegi primum. Quomodo in artificibus, quicumque vult aedificare, quid dicit? Quis est hic primus structor? quis est primus faber? Aut si curari vult: Quis est hic primus medicus? Non utique interrogat quis prior sit aetate, aut quis prior sit professione; sed quis prior sit arte. Quomodo illi in arte primi, sic iste in iniquitate primus. Quare Paulus in iniquitate primus? Recolite Saulum, et invenietis. Attenditis Paulum, obliti estis Saulum: attenditis ad pastorem, obliti estis lupum. Nonne ille est cui ad lapidandum Stephanum manus una non sufficiebat, et aliorum vestimenta servabat? Nonne ipse est qui Ecclesiam ubique persequebatur? Nonne ipse est qui litteras acceperat a principibus sacerdotum? Quia parum illi erat persequi Christianos, qui erant in Ierusalem; sed volebat ad alia loca venire, ubi eos inveniret, et ligaret, et puniendos adduceret. Nonne cum iter agens spirat et anhelat caedes, de caelo percussus est, et vocem Domini ad salutem fulminatus audivit? Dum ambulat, prosternitur; ut videat, excaecatur. Ipse est ergo qui primus erat persecutor, illo peior non fuit.
6. 7. What, then, is, of whom I am the first? Because I am worse than all. Therefore he wished "the first" to be understood as the worse. Just as among craftsmen, whoever wishes to build, what does he say? Who is the first builder here? who is the first workman? Or if he wishes to be cured: Who is the first physician here? He surely does not ask who is first in age, or who is first in profession; but who is first in skill. Just as those are first in skill, so this one is first in iniquity. Why is Paul first in iniquity? Recall Saul, and you will find out. You attend to Paul, you have forgotten Saul: you attend to the shepherd, you have forgotten the wolf. Is he not the one for whom, to stone Stephen, one hand was not enough, and he kept the garments of others? Is he not the one who persecuted the Church everywhere? Is he not the one who received letters from the chief priests? Because it was too little for him to persecute the Christians who were in Jerusalem; but he wished to come to other places, where he might find them, and bind them, and bring them to be punished. Was he not, while making the journey, breathing and panting for slaughter, struck from heaven, and, thunderstruck, did he not hear the voice of the Lord unto salvation? While he walks, he is laid low; that he may see, he is blinded. He himself, then, is the one who was first a persecutor, none was worse than he.
Sermons5.6.7
7. 8. Audite unde plus intellegatis. Ananiae loquebatur ipse Dominus Christus, iam illo prostrato, iam erecto; et dicebat ei: Vade ad vicum illum, ibi invenies Saulum a Tarsis Ciliciae, loquere ei . Quoniam vidit virum Ananiam intrantem ad se, et baptizantem se. Ille audivit nomen Sauli, et inter manus ipsius medici tremuit. Quod est autem dulcius, Saulus unde vocaretur, credo quia recolitis, et propter eos qui non recolunt, commemorem. Saul erat ille persecutor David. In David Christus erat, in David Christus praefigurabatur, in Saule Saulus praefigurabatur: tamquam David Sauli de caelo, Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? Ananias Ovis interpretatur: loquebatur ovi pastor, et timebat ovis lupum. Tanta huius lupi fama praecesserat, ut non se putaret tutam ovis, nec inter manus pastoris. Et Dominus ad illum, quasi ad ovem trementem. Ille enim cum audisset hoc, dixit: Domine, audivi de isto homine quanta mala fecit sanctis tuis in Ierusalem, et modo dicitur epistolas accepisse a principibus sacerdotum, ut quoscumque tenuerit, alligatos ducat . Quo me mittis? ovem ad lupum? Sed ille non audivit hanc excusationem. Iam enim dixerat paucis oviculis suis: Ecce ego mitto vos sicut oves in medio luporum . Si missae sunt oves in medio luporum, quare trepidas ire, Anania, ad eum qui iam non est lupus? Lupum timebas; sed respondet tibi Dominus Deus tuus: De lupo ovem feci; facio de ove pastorem.
7. 8. Hear something whence you may understand more. The Lord Christ himself was speaking to Ananias, when that one was already laid low, already raised up; and he said to him, Go to that street, there you will find Saul of Tarsus in Cilicia, speak to him. For he saw the man Ananias coming in to him, and baptizing him. He heard the name of Saul, and trembled between the hands of the physician himself. But what is sweeter—whence Saul was named, I believe you recall, and on account of those who do not recall, let me mention it. Saul was that persecutor of David. In David Christ was, in David Christ was prefigured, in Saul Saul was prefigured: as it were David to Saul from heaven, Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me (Acts 9:4)? "Ananias" is interpreted "Sheep": the shepherd was speaking to the sheep, and the sheep feared the wolf. So great a fame of this wolf had gone before, that the sheep did not think itself safe, not even between the hands of the shepherd. And the Lord to him, as to a trembling sheep. For when he had heard this, he said, Lord, I have heard about this man how great evils he did to your holy ones in Jerusalem, and now it is said that he received letters from the chief priests, that whomever he found he might lead bound (Acts 9:13-14). Where do you send me? a sheep to a wolf? But he did not hear this excuse. For he had already said to his few little sheep, Behold, I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves (Matt 10:16). If the sheep have been sent into the midst of wolves, why do you tremble to go, Ananias, to one who is no longer a wolf? You feared the wolf; but the Lord your God answers you: From a wolf I have made a sheep; I make from a sheep a shepherd.
Sermons5.7.8
8. 9. Quomodo ergo ipse Saulus postea Paulus gratulatur se ad Dei pervenisse misericordiam, quia primus, hoc est excellens in peccatis inventus est: Et tamen misericordiam consecutus sum, ut in me ostenderet Christus Iesus omnem longanimitatem, propter eos qui credituri sunt illi in vitam aeternam ; ut dicant sibi omnes: Si Paulus sanatus est, ego quare despero? Si a tanto medico tam desperatus aeger sanatus est, ego cur vulneribus meis illas manus non aptabo? ad illas manus non festinabo? Ut hoc dicerent homines, ideo Saulus factus est ex persecutore Apostolus. Quia quo venit medicus, quaerit aliquem ibi desperatum, et ipsum sanat: et si pauperrimum inveniat, tamen desperatum inveniat; non ibi quaerit mercedem, sed commendat artem. Dicam ergo quod coeperam. Quomodo ergo Saulus congratulatur se a Christo, quia peccator erat, assumptum atque sanatum, nec dixit: Maneam in peccato, quia propter me venit Christus, non propter iustum; ita etiam tu, qui audieras quia Christus propter peccatores venit , noli tibi dormire in dulci stratu; sed audi ipsum Paulum dicentem: Surge, qui dormis, et exsurge a mortuis, et illuminabit te Christus . Noli amare stratum peccati. Totum stratum eius vertisti in infirmitate eius , dictum est antea. Surge, sanus esto, sanitatem ama, et noli rursus per superbiam de dextera ire ad sinistram, de valle ad montem, de humilitate ad tumorem. Cum factus fueris sanus, id est, cum iuste coeperis vivere, Deo tribue, non tibi. Non enim laudando te, salvus factus es; sed contra te pronuntiando. Nam si te laudaveris per superbiam, gravius aegrotabis. Omnis enim qui se exaltat, humiliabitur; et qui se humiliat, exaltabitur . Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
8. 9. Therefore, just as Saul himself, afterward Paul, gives thanks that he came to the mercy of God, because he was found first—that is, eminent—in sins: And yet I obtained mercy, that in me Christ Jesus might show all his long-suffering, for the sake of those who would believe in him unto eternal life (1 Tim 1:16); so that all may say to themselves: If Paul was healed, why do I despair? If by so great a physician so desperate a sick man was healed, why will I not fit those hands to my wounds? why will I not hasten to those hands? That men might say this, for this reason Saul was made from a persecutor an apostle. For wherever the physician comes, he seeks someone there in despair, and heals him: and even if he finds a most poor man, yet let him find a desperate one; there he seeks not a fee, but commends his art. Let me say, then, what I had begun. Just as Saul gives thanks to Christ that he, a sinner, was taken up and healed, nor said: Let me remain in sin, because for my sake Christ came, not for the sake of the righteous; so too you, who had heard that Christ came for the sake of sinners (See 1 Tim 1:15), do not sleep for yourself in the sweet bed; but hear Paul himself saying, Rise, you who sleep, and arise from the dead, and Christ will enlighten you (Eph 5:14). Do not love the bed of sin. You have turned all his bed in his infirmity (Ps 41:3 (40:4)), it was said before. Rise, be healthy, love health, and do not again through pride go from the right to the left, from the valley to the mountain, from humility to swelling. When you have been made healthy—that is, when you have begun to live justly—ascribe it to God, not to yourself. For not by praising yourself were you made safe, but by pronouncing against yourself. For if you praise yourself through pride, you will be more gravely sick. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled; and he who humbles himself will be exalted (Luke 14:11; 18:14). Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.8.9
SERMO 176
Sermon 176
Sermons5.8.9
1. De divinis lectionibus quod Dominus admonere dignatur, intenti audite, fratres, illo dante, me ministrante. Primam lectionem audivimus Apostoli: Fidelis sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum peccatores salvos facere, quorum primus ego sum. Sed ideo misericordiam consecutus sum, ut in me ostenderet Christus Iesus omnem longanimitatem suam, ad informationem eorum qui credituri sunt illi in vitam aeternam . Hoc de apostolica lectione percepimus. Deinde cantavimus Psalmum, exhortantes nos invicem, una voce, uno corde dicentes: Venite adoremus, et prosternamur ei, et fleamus coram Domino qui fecit nos: et ibi praeveniamus faciem eius in confessione, et in psalmis iubilemus ei . Post haec, evangelica lectio decem leprosos mundatos nobis ostendit, et unum ex eis alienigenam gratias agentem mundatori suo. Has tres lectiones, quantum pro tempore possumus, pertractemus, dicentes pauca de singulis; et quantum conari possumus, adiuvante Domino, non in aliqua earum sic immorantes, ut aliis duabus impedimentum afferamus.
1. As to what the Lord deigns to admonish from the divine readings, hear attentively, brothers, he giving, I ministering. We heard the first reading, of the Apostle: A faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the first. But for this reason I obtained mercy, that in me Christ Jesus might show all his long-suffering, for the instruction of those who would believe in him unto eternal life (1 Tim 1:15-16). This we received from the apostolic reading. Then we sang the Psalm, exhorting one another, with one voice, one heart, saying, Come, let us adore and prostrate ourselves before him, and weep before the Lord who made us: and there, let us come before his face in confession, and in psalms let us shout for joy to him (Ps 95:6.2 (94:6.2)). After these, the gospel reading showed us ten lepers cleansed, and one of them, a foreigner, giving thanks to his cleanser. These three readings, as far as we can for the time, let us treat, saying a few things of each; and, as far as we can strive, with the Lord's help, not so lingering on any of them as to bring hindrance to the other two.
Sermons5.1
2. Proponit nobis Apostolus scientiam gratiarum actionis. Mementote quid ultima evangelica lectio resonet , quomodo Iesus Dominus laudat gratias agentem, ingratos improbat, mundatos in cute, leprosos in corde. Quid ergo Apostolus? Fidelis, inquit, sermo et omni acceptione dignus. Quis est iste sermo? Quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum. Utquid? Peccatores salvos facere. Quid tu? Quorum primus ego sum . Qui dicit, vel: Non sum peccator, vel: Non fui, ingratus est Salvatori. Nullus hominum in ista quae ex Adam defluit massa mortalium, nullus omnino hominum non aegrotus, nullus sine gratia Christi sanatus. Quid de parvulis pueris, si ex Adam aegroti? Nam et ipsi portantur ad Ecclesiam; et si pedibus illuc currere non possunt, alienis pedibus currunt, ut sanentur. Accommodat illis mater Ecclesia aliorum pedes ut veniant, aliorum cor ut credant, aliorum linguam ut fateantur: ut quoniam quod aegri sunt alio peccante praegravantur, sic cum hi sani sunt, alio pro eis confitente salventur. Nemo ergo vobis susurret doctrinas alienas. Hoc Ecclesia semper habuit, semper tenuit: hoc a maiorum fide percepit; hoc usque in finem perseveranter custodit. Quoniam non est opus sanis medicus, sed aegrotantibus . Quid necessarium ergo habuit infans Christum si non aegrotat? Si sanus est, quare per eos qui eum diligunt, medicum quaerit? Si quando portantur infantes, dicuntur omnino nullum propaginis habere peccatum, et venint ad Christum; quare non eis dicitur in Ecclesia qui eos apportant: Auferte hinc innocentes istos: non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus; non venit Christus vocare iustos, sed peccatores ? Numquam dictum est: sed nec aliquando dicetur. Quisque ergo quod potest, fratres, loquatur pro eo qui loqui pro se non potest. Pro magno commendantur episcopis patrimonia pupillorum, quanto magis gratia parvulorum? Pupillum tuetur episcopus, ne mortuis parentibus ab extraneis opprimatur. Clamet plus pro parvulo, cui timet ne a parentibus occidatur; clamet cum Apostolo: Fidelis sermo et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum, nullam aliam ob causam, nisi peccatores salvos facere . Qui venit ad Christum, habet quod in eo sanetur: qui non habet, non est causa quare medico offeratur. Eligant parentes unum de duobus: aut confiteantur in parvulis suis sanari peccatum, aut eos medico offerre desinant. Hoc nihil est aliud quam velle medico sanum offerre. Quid offers? Baptizandum. Quem? Infantem. Cui offers? Christo. Ei certe qui venit in mundum? Ita, inquit. Quare venit in mundum? Peccatores salvos facere. Ergo quem offers, habet quod in illo salvum fiat? Si dixeris: Habet, confitendo deles; si dixeris: Non habet, negando tenes.
2. The Apostle sets before us the knowledge of thanksgiving. Remember what the last gospel reading sounds, how the Lord Jesus praises the one giving thanks, reproves the ungrateful—cleansed in skin, lepers in heart. What, then, does the Apostle say? A faithful, he says, saying, and worthy of all acceptance. What is this saying? That Christ Jesus came into the world. For what? To save sinners. What of you? Of whom I am the first (1 Tim 1:15). He who says either: I am not a sinner, or: I was not, is ungrateful to the Savior. No one of men in that lump of mortals which flows from Adam, no one at all of men is not sick, none healed without the grace of Christ. What of little children, if they are sick from Adam? For they too are carried to the Church; and if they cannot run there on their own feet, they run on others' feet, that they may be healed. Mother Church lends them others' feet that they may come, others' heart that they may believe, others' tongue that they may confess: so that, since they are weighed down because they are sick by another's sinning, so, when these are healthy, by another confessing for them they may be saved. Let no one, then, whisper to you foreign doctrines. This the Church always had, always held: this it received from the faith of the elders; this it perseveringly guards to the end. Since those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick (See Matt 9:12). What, then, did the infant have need of Christ for, if he is not sick? If he is healthy, why does he seek the physician through those who love him? If, when infants are carried, they are said to have no sin of inheritance at all, and they come to Christ; why is it not said to those who bring them, in the Church: Take away from here these innocents: those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick; Christ came not to call the righteous, but sinners (See Matt 9:12-13)? It has never been said: but neither will it ever be said. Let each one, then, brothers, speak what he can for the one who cannot speak for himself. The patrimonies of orphans are commended to bishops as a great thing; how much more the grace of little ones? The bishop guards the orphan, lest, his parents being dead, he be oppressed by strangers. Let him cry out the more for the little one, for whom he fears lest he be killed by his parents; let him cry out with the Apostle: A faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world, for no other cause, but to save sinners (1 Tim 1:15). He who comes to Christ has something to be healed in him: he who does not have it, there is no cause why he should be offered to the physician. Let the parents choose one of two things: either let them confess that sin is healed in their little ones, or let them cease to offer them to the physician. This is nothing else than to wish to offer a healthy person to the physician. What do you offer? One to be baptized. Whom? An infant. To whom do you offer? To Christ. Surely to him who came into the world? Yes, he says. Why did he come into the world? To save sinners. Therefore the one you offer has something in him to be saved? If you say: He has, by confessing you blot it out; if you say: He does not have it, by denying you keep it.
Sermons5.2
3. Peccatores, inquit, salvos facere, quorum primus ego sum. Ante Paulum non erant peccatores? Certe vel ipse Adam ante omnes, et plena peccatoribus terra deleta diluvio, et deinceps quam multi. Unde verum est, ego primus sum? Primum se dixit, non peccatorum ordine, sed peccati magnitudine. Magnitudinem peccati sui adtendit, unde se primum dixit peccatorum; quomodo dicuntur inter advocatos, verbi gratia, primi: primus est iste, non quia plures annos habet, ex quo causas agit; sed quia ex quo coepit, ceteros superavit. Dicat ergo Apostolus alio loco unde primus sit peccatorum: Ego, inquit, sum novissimus Apostolorum, qui non sum dignus vocari Apostolus, quia persecutus sum Ecclesiam Dei . Nemo acrior inter persecutores: ergo nemo prior inter peccatores.
3. To save sinners, he says, of whom I am the first. Were there not sinners before Paul? Surely at least Adam himself before all, and the earth full of sinners destroyed by the flood, and afterward how many. Whence is it true, I am the first? He said himself first, not by the order of sinners, but by the greatness of his sin. He attended to the greatness of his sin, whence he called himself the first of sinners; just as among advocates, for example, the first are spoken of: this one is first, not because he has more years since he has been pleading cases; but because, from when he began, he surpassed the rest. Let the Apostle say in another place, then, whence he is the first of sinners: I am, he says, the last of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God (1 Cor 15:9). No one fiercer among the persecutors: therefore no one first among the sinners.
Sermons5.3
4. Sed misericordiam, inquit, consecutus sum. Et quare sit misericordiam consecutus, exponit causam: Ut in me, inquit, ostenderet Christus Iesus omnem longanimitatem, ad informationem eorum qui credituri sunt illi in vitam aeternam . Christus, inquit, daturus veniam conversis ad se peccatoribus usque ad inimicos suos, me primo elegit acriorem inimicum; quem cum sanaret, nemo in ceteris desperaret. Faciunt hoc medici: quando ad ea loca veniunt ubi ignoti sunt, quos curent primitus eligunt desperatos; ut in eis et benevolentiam exerceant, et commendent doctrinam; ut unusquisque in illo loco dicat proximo suo: Vade ad illum medicum, securus esto, sanat te. Et ille: Me sanat? Non vides quid patiar? Ego novi quid simile: tu quod pateris, et ego quidem passus sum. Sic dicit Paulus unicuique aegroto, et de se volenti desperare: Qui curavit me, misit me ad te, et dixit mihi: Illi desperanti vade, et dic quid habuisti, quid in te sanavi, quam cito sanavi. De caelo vocavi, una voce percussi et deieci, alia erexi et elegi, tertia implevi et misi, quarta liberavi et coronavi . Vade, dic aegrotis, clama desperatis: Fidelis sermo, et omni acceptione dignus, quia Christus Iesus venit in mundum peccatores salvos facere. Quid timetis? quid trepidatis? Quorum primus ego sum. Ego, inquit, vobis loquor, sanus aegrotantibus, stans iacentibus, securus desperantibus. Ideo enim misericordiam consecutus sum, ut in me ostenderet Christus Iesus omnem longanimitatem. Morbum meum diu pertulit, et sic abstulit; tamquam bonus medicus phreneticum patienter toleravit, sustinuit me ferientem se, donavit mihi feriri pro se. Omnem, inquit, longanimitatem ostendit in me, ad informationem eorum qui credituri sunt illi in vitam aeternam.
4. But I obtained, he says, mercy. And why he obtained mercy, he sets forth the cause: That in me, he says, Christ Jesus might show all his long-suffering, for the instruction of those who would believe in him unto eternal life (1 Tim 1:16). Christ, he says, going to give pardon to sinners converted to him, even to his enemies, chose me first, a fiercer enemy; that, when he healed me, no one among the rest might despair. Physicians do this: when they come to those places where they are unknown, they first choose the desperate cases to cure; that in them they may both exercise benevolence and commend their skill; so that each one in that place may say to his neighbor: Go to that physician, be secure, he heals you. And he: He heals me? Do you not see what I suffer? I know something similar: what you suffer, I too have suffered. So Paul says to each sick man, and to one wishing to despair of himself: He who cured me sent me to you, and said to me: Go to that desperate one, and tell him what you had, what I healed in you, how quickly I healed it. I called from heaven, with one voice I struck and cast down, with another I raised up and chose, with a third I filled and sent, with a fourth I freed and crowned (See Acts 9:3-19). Go, tell the sick, cry out to the desperate: A faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners. What do you fear? why do you tremble? Of whom I am the first. I, he says, speak to you, healthy to the sick, standing to those lying down, secure to the despairing. For this reason I obtained mercy, that in me Christ Jesus might show all his long-suffering. He long bore my disease, and so took it away; like a good physician he patiently tolerated the frenzied man, bore me striking him, granted me to strike for his sake. All his long-suffering, he says, he showed in me, for the instruction of those who would believe in him unto eternal life.
Sermons5.4
5. Nolite ergo desperare. Aegroti estis, accedite ad eum, et sanamini: caeci estis, accedite ad eum, et illuminamini. Et qui sani estis, ei gratias agite: et qui aegrotatis, ad eum sanandi currite; dicite omnes: Venite adoremus, et prosternamur ei, et ploremus coram Domino qui fecit nos , et homines, et salvos. Nam si ille nos fecit homines, nos autem ipsi nos fecimus salvos; aliquid illo melius fecimus. Melior est enim salvus homo, quam quilibet homo. Si ergo te Deus fecit hominem, et tu te fecisti bonum hominem; quod tu fecisti melius est. Noli te extollere super Deum: subde te Deo, adora, prosternere, confitere illi qui fecit te: quia nemo recreat, nisi qui creat, nemo reficit, nisi qui fecit. Hoc et in alio Psalmo: Ipse fecit nos, et non ipsi nos . Sane quando te fecit, quid tu faceres non habebas: quando autem iam es, habes et tu ipse quod facias; ad medicum curras, medicum implores, qui ubique est. Et ut implorares, excitavit cor tuum, et posse implorare donavit tibi; Deus est enim, inquit, qui operatur in vobis et velle, et operari, pro bona voluntate . Quia ut haberes bonam voluntatem, illius vocatio praecessit. Clama: Deus meus, misericordia eius praeveniet me . Ut esses, ut sentires, ut audires, ut consentires, praevenit te misericordia eius. Praevenit te in omnibus: praeveni et tu in aliquo iram eius. In quo, inquis, in quo? Confitere ista omnia a Deo te habere quidquid boni habes, a te quidquid mali. Ne in bonis tuis illum contemnas, te laudes; ne in malis tuis illum accuses, te excuses: ipsa est vera confessio. Ille qui in tantis bonis praevenit te, venturus est ad te, et inspecturus dona sua et mala tua; quomodo bono eius usus fueris, inspicit te. Ergo quia in omnibus istis donis praevenit te, vide in quo tu praevenias faciem venturi; audi Psalmum: Praeveniamus faciem eius in confessione. Praeveniamus faciem eius: antequam veniat, propitietur; antequam adsit, placetur. Habes enim sacerdotem per quem possis placare Deum tuum, et ipse cum Patre Deus est ad te, qui homo est propter te. Ita iubilabis in Psalmis, praeveniens faciem eius in confessione. Iubila in Psalmo: praeveniens faciem eius in confessione, accusa te; iubilans in Psalmo, lauda illum. Accusando te, et laudando eum qui fecit te; veniet qui mortuus est pro te, et vivificabit te.
5. Do not, then, despair. You are sick, come to him, and you are healed: you are blind, come to him, and you are enlightened. And you who are healthy, give him thanks: and you who are sick, run to him to be healed; all of you say, Come, let us adore and prostrate ourselves before him, and weep before the Lord who made us (Ps 95:6 (94:6))—both men, and saved. For if he made us men, but we ourselves made ourselves saved; we did something better than he. For a saved man is better than just any man. If, then, God made you a man, and you made yourself a good man; what you did is better. Do not exalt yourself above God: submit yourself to God, adore, prostrate yourself, confess to him who made you: because no one re-creates but the one who creates, no one remakes but the one who made. This too in another Psalm: He made us, and not we ourselves (Ps 100:3 (99:3)). Indeed, when he made you, you had nothing to do; but now that you are, you too have something to do; that you may run to the physician, implore the physician, who is everywhere. And that you might implore him, he roused your heart, and granted you to be able to implore; For it is God, he says, who works in you both to will and to work, for his good will (Phil 2:13). Because, that you might have a good will, his calling went before. Cry out, My God, his mercy will go before me (Ps 59:10 (58:11)). That you might exist, that you might perceive, that you might hear, that you might consent, his mercy went before you. It went before you in all things: do you too go before in something—his wrath. In what, you say, in what? Confess that you have all this from God—whatever good you have, from yourself whatever evil. Lest in your goods you despise him, praise yourself; lest in your evils you accuse him, excuse yourself: this is the true confession. He who in such great goods went before you is going to come to you, and to inspect his gifts and your evils; he inspects how you have used his good. Therefore, because in all these gifts he went before you, see in what you may go before the face of him who is to come; hear the Psalm: Let us come before his face in confession. Let us come before his face: before he comes, let him be appeased; before he is present, let him be reconciled. For you have a priest through whom you can appease your God, and he himself is, with the Father, God to you, who is man for your sake. So you will shout for joy in the Psalms, coming before his face in confession. Shout for joy in the Psalm: coming before his face in confession, accuse yourself; shouting for joy in the Psalm, praise him. By accusing yourself, and praising him who made you; he will come who died for you, and will give you life.
Sermons5.5
6. Hoc tenete, in hoc persistite. Nemo variet, nemo leprosus sit. Doctrina inconstans, non habens unum colorem, mentis lepram significat: et istam Christus mundat. Forte in aliquo variasti, et inspexisti, et in melius sententiam commutasti; et quod varium erat, unius coloris effectum est. Noli tibi tribuere, ne sis inter novem qui gratias non egerunt. Unus egit gratias, ceteri Iudaei erant; ille alienigena erat, gentes alienigenas significabat, numerus ille Christo decimas dedit. Illi ergo debemus quod sumus, quod vivimus, quod intellegimus: quod homines sumus, quod bene viximus, quod recte intelleximus, illi debemus. Nostrum nihil, nisi peccatum quod habemus. Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti? Vos ergo, maxime qui scitis quid audiatis, curandum ab aegritudine, mundatum a varietate sursum cor ponite, et Deo gratias agite.
6. Hold this, persist in this. Let no one be variegated, let no one be a leper. Inconstant doctrine, not having one color, signifies the leprosy of the mind: and this Christ cleanses. Perhaps you were variegated in something, and you looked, and changed your opinion for the better; and what was variegated was made of one color. Do not ascribe it to yourself, lest you be among the nine who did not give thanks. One gave thanks, the rest were Jews; that one was a foreigner, he signified the foreign nations, that number gave Christ his tithe. To him, then, we owe what we are, that we live, that we understand: that we are men, that we have lived well, that we have understood rightly, to him we owe. Nothing is ours but the sin we have. For what do you have that you have not received (1 Cor 4:7)? You, then, most of all who know what you hear—the heart to be cured of disease, cleansed of variegation—set it on high, and give thanks to God.
Sermons5.6
SERMO 176/A
Sermon 176/A
Sermons5.6
1. Oportet ergo episcopum irreprehensibilem esse . Quis hoc negat? Sed cum oporteat episcopum irreprehensibilem esse, numquid reprehensibilem decet esse christianum? Episcopus nomen graecum est, latine vero superintentor vel visitator dici potest. Nos episcopi sumus, sed vobiscum christiani sumus. Nos proprie vocamur a visitatione, communiter omnes ab unctione. Si unctio communis est, et lucta communis est. Quare autem nos visitamus, si nihil boni est quod in vobis videamus?
1. A bishop, then, must be irreproachable (1 Tim 3:2). Who denies this? But since a bishop must be irreproachable, does it become a Christian to be reproachable? "Bishop" is a Greek name, but in Latin it can be called "overseer" or "visitor." We are bishops, but with you we are Christians. We are properly called from the visitation, in common all from the anointing. If the anointing is common, the struggle too is common. But why do we visit, if there is nothing good that we may see in you?
Sermons5.1
SERMO 177
Sermon 177
Sermons5.1
1. Sermonis nostri propositio, apostolica lectio. Nihil, inquit, intulimus in hunc mundum, sed nec auferre aliquid possumus: habentes autem victum et tegumentum, his contenti sumus . Nam qui volunt divites fieri, incidunt in temptationem et laqueum, et in desideria multa stulta et noxia, quae mergunt homines in interitum et perditionem. Radix enim est omnium malorum avaritia, quam quidam appetentes a fide pererraverunt, et inseruerunt se doloribus multis . Digna res quae intentos vos faciat ad audiendum, et nos promptos ad loquendum. His verbis constituitur ante oculos nostros avaritia: accusatur, non defendatur; immo accusata damnetur, ne defensor eius cum illa damnetur. Nescio quo autem modo id agit avaritia in cordibus hominum, ut omnes, vel ut verius et cautius dicam, pene omnes verbis eam dicant ream, et factis velint habere susceptam. Dixerunt in illam multi et multa et magna et gravia et vera, et poetae et historici et oratores et philosophi, et omne litterarum et professionum genus multa dixerunt in avaritiam. Magnum est autem non illam habere, et multo plus est non eam habere, quam de vitiis eius non tacere.
1. The theme of our sermon is the apostolic reading. We brought nothing, he says, into this world, but neither can we take anything away: but having food and covering, with these we are content. For those who wish to become rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge men into destruction and perdition. For the root of all evils is greed, which some craving have strayed from the faith, and engrafted themselves onto many pains (1 Tim 6:7-10). A worthy matter to make you attentive to hear, and us prompt to speak. By these words greed is set before our eyes: it is accused, let it not be defended; rather, accused, let it be condemned, lest its defender be condemned with it. But somehow greed so acts in the hearts of men that all—or, to speak more truly and cautiously, nearly all—say in words that it is guilty, and in deeds wish to have it received as a guest. Many said against it many and great and grave and true things—poets and historians and orators and philosophers, and every kind of letters and professions said many things against greed. But it is a great thing not to have it, and much more not to have it than not to be silent about its vices.
Sermons5.1
2. Quid autem interest inter philosophos, verbi gratia, accusantes avaritiam, et Apostolos eamdem ipsam accusantes? Quid interest? Si advertamus, discimus aliquid quod proprium non habet nisi schola Christi. Ecce quod modo commemoravi: Nihil intulimus in hunc mundum, sed nec auferre aliquid possumus, habentes victum et tegumentum his contenti sumus, multi dixerunt. Etiam hoc: Radix omnium malorum avaritia , fuerunt qui dicerent. Illud quod sequitur, nemo dixit illorum: Tu autem, homo Dei, haec fuge ; sectare vero iustitiam, fidem, caritatem, cum his qui invocant nomen Domini de corde puro . Talia nullus dixit illorum. Longe est a crepantibus buccis soliditas pietatis. Quapropter, carissimi, quoniam sunt extra societatem nostram qui et accusaverunt avaritiam et contempserunt; ne nobis magni videantur aut hominibus Dei, propterea: Tu autem, homo Dei. Ne ullo modo compararentur, hoc primitus discernere et tenere debemus propter Deum nos facere quod facimus. Nam si veri Dei cultus auferatur, quilibet amator avaritiae reprobatur. Verumtamen incutere nobis debet maiorem curam verior regula pietatis. Turpe est enim, et nimium pudendum et dolendum, si cultores idolorum inventi sunt avaritiae domitores, et cultor Dei unius ab avaritia subiugetur, et fiat avaritiae mancipium, cuius sanguis Christi fit pretium. Addidit Apostolus, et dixit Timotheo: Testificor coram Deo qui vivificat omnia, et Christo Iesu qui testimonium reddidit sub Pontio Pilato, bonam confessionem (hoc ab illis quantum longe est videtis ) ut serves mandatum irreprehensibile usque in adventum Domini nostri Iesu Christi, quem temporibus propriis ostendet beatus et solus potens, Rex regum et Dominus dominantium, qui solus habet immortalitatem et lucem habitat inaccessibilem, quem nemo hominum vidit, nec videre potest, cui est honor et gloria in saecula saeculorum . Huius familiae facti sumus, in huius familia adoptati sumus; huius filii non nostris meritis, sed ipsius gratia sumus. Nimis grave est, et nimis horribile, ut avaritia nos teneat in terris; cum illi dicamus: Pater noster, qui es in caelis . Huius desiderio vilescant omnia; nec nata nobis sint inter quae nati sumus, quia propter illum renati sumus. Sint haec ad necessitatis usum, non ad caritatis affectum: sint tamquam stabulum viatoris, non tamquam praedium possessoris. Refice te et transi. Iter agis, adtende ad quem venis, quia magnus est qui ad te venit. Discedendo de hac via, locum facis venienti; stabulis est ista conditio; cedis, ut alius succedat. Sed si vis ad locum tutissimum pervenire, Deus a te non recedat, cui dicimus: Deduxisti me per semitas iustitiae tuae, propter nomen tuum : non propter meritum meum.
2. But what is the difference between philosophers, for example, accusing greed, and the Apostles accusing the same thing? What is the difference? If we attend, we learn something that nothing has as its own but the school of Christ. Behold what I just mentioned: We brought nothing into this world, but neither can we take anything away, having food and covering with these we are content—many said this. This too: The root of all evils is greed—there were those who said it. But what follows, none of them said: But you, O man of God, flee these things; pursue rather righteousness, faith, love, with those who call upon the name of the Lord from a pure heart (1 Tim 6:11; 2 Tim 2:22). Such things none of them said. Far from the rattling cheeks is the solidity of devotion. Wherefore, dearly beloved, since there are outside our society those who both accused greed and despised it; lest they seem great to us or men of God, therefore: But you, O man of God. Lest they be in any way compared, we ought first to distinguish and hold this—that we do what we do on account of God. For if the worship of the true God be taken away, any lover of greed whatever is rejected. Yet the truer rule of devotion ought to strike upon us a greater care. For it is base, and exceedingly shameful and grievous, if worshipers of idols were found tamers of greed, and the worshiper of the one God be subjugated by greed, and become the chattel of greed, whose price is the blood of Christ. The Apostle added, and said to Timothy, I testify before God who gives life to all things, and Christ Jesus who gave testimony under Pontius Pilate, the good confession (you see how far this is from them) that you keep the commandment irreproachable until the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, which in his own times the blessed and only Powerful one will show, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone has immortality and dwells in inaccessible light, whom no man has seen, nor can see, to whom be honor and glory unto ages of ages (1 Tim 6:13-16). Of this household we have been made, into this household we have been adopted; his sons we are, not by our merits, but by his grace. It is too grave, and too horrible, that greed should hold us on earth; when we say to him, Our Father, who are in heaven (Matt 6:9). By the longing for him let all things become cheap; and let the things among which we were born not be born to us, because for his sake we were reborn. Let these be for the use of necessity, not for the affection of love: let them be like the lodging of a traveler, not like the estate of a possessor. Refresh yourself and pass on. You are making a journey, attend to the one to whom you come, because great is he who comes to you. By departing from this road, you make place for the one coming; this is the condition of lodgings; you yield, that another may succeed. But if you wish to come to the most secure place, let God not withdraw from you, to whom we say, You have led me through the paths of your righteousness, for the sake of your name (See Ps 23:3 (22:3)): not for the sake of my merit.
Sermons5.2
3. Aliud est ergo iter mortalitatis, aliud iter pietatis. Iter mortalitatis commune est universis nascentibus, iter pietatis non commune est omnibus; illud enim ambulant omnes nati; istum non nisi renati. Ad illud pertinet nasci, crescere, senescere, mori. Propter hoc necessarius est victus et tegumentum. Sufficientes sint huius itineris sumptus. Quare te gravas? Quare tantum portas in via brevi, non unde ad hanc viam finiendam iuveris, sed unde potius hac via finita gravius onereris? Nimium quippe miserabile est, quod tibi vis ut contingat: oneras te, multum portas, premit te in hac via pecunia, et post hanc viam premit te avaritia. Avaritia enim cordis est immunditia. Nihil tollis de hoc mundo, quod amasti: sed tollis vitium, quod amasti. Si perseveranter amas mundum, qui fecit mundum, non te invenit mundum. Sit ergo in usum temporalem moderata pecunia, sit viaticum eo fine constituto qui scriptus est: Sine amore, inquit, pecuniae modus sufficiens est praesentibus . Vide ante omnia quid praestruxit: Sine amore, inquit; ita manum mitte, ut cor inde solvas. Nam si pecuniae amore cor alligare volueris, inseris te doloribus multis; et ubi erit: Tu autem, homo Dei, haec fuge ? Non enim ait: Relinque, et desere; sed: Fuge, quasi hostem. Quaerebas fugere cum auro, fuge aurum: cor tuum fugiat, et securus est usus. Cupiditas non sit, pietas tamen non desit; est quod facias de auro, si dominus es auri, non servus. Si dominus auri es, facis de illo quod bonum est: si servus, facit de te quod malum est. Si dominus auri es, vestitus de te Dominum laudat: si servus auri es, spoliatus de te Deum blasphemat. Servum autem te facit cupiditas, liberum caritas. Inde servus, si non fugeris. Tu autem, homo Dei, haec fuge. In hac causa, si non vis esse servus, esto fugitivus.
3. The road of mortality, then, is one thing, the road of devotion another. The road of mortality is common to all who are born, the road of devotion is not common to all; for that one all the born walk; this one only the reborn. To that one belong to be born, to grow, to grow old, to die. On account of this food and covering are necessary. Let the provisions of this road be sufficient. Why do you burden yourself? Why do you carry so much on a short road—not what may help you to finish this road, but rather what may, when this road is finished, more grievously burden you? For it is too pitiable, what you wish to happen to you: you burden yourself, you carry much, money presses you on this road, and after this road greed presses you. For greed is an uncleanness of the heart. You take nothing out of this world that you loved: but you take the vice you loved. If you perseveringly love the world, he who made the world does not find you clean. Let there be, then, for temporal use a moderate amount of money, let there be a provision for the journey, with that limit established which is written: Without love, he says, of money a sufficient measure is enough for present needs (See Heb 13:5). See before all what he prefixed: Without love, he says; so put your hand to it that you loosen your heart from it. For if you wish to bind your heart with love of money, you engraft yourself onto many pains; and where will be, But you, O man of God, flee these things (1 Tim 6:11)? For he did not say: Leave them, and forsake them; but: Flee, as from an enemy. You were seeking to flee with the gold; flee the gold: let your heart flee, and the use is secure. Let there be no cupidity, yet let devotion not be lacking; there is something for you to do with gold, if you are the master of the gold, not the slave. If you are master of the gold, you do with it what is good: if you are a slave, it does with you what is evil. If you are master of the gold, the clothed one praises the Lord because of you: if you are a slave of the gold, the stripped one blasphemes God because of you. But cupidity makes you a slave, love makes you free. Hence a slave, if you do not flee. But you, O man of God, flee these things. In this matter, if you do not wish to be a slave, be a fugitive.
Sermons5.3
4. Audisti quid fugias, habes et quod secteris. Non enim inaniter fugis, aut sic relinquis ut non apprehendas. Sectare ergo iustitiam, fidem, pietatem, caritatem . Haec te divitem faciant. Hae divitiae intus sunt : fur ad eas non accedit, nisi mala voluntas ei dederit locum. Muni arcam interiorem, hoc est, conscientiam. Has divitias non tibi latro, non quilibet potentissimus inimicus, non irruens hostis aut barbarus, non denique naufragium poterit auferre, unde si nudus exeas, plenus exis. Neque enim vere inanis erat, quamvis forinsecus nihil habere videretur, qui dicebat: Dominus dedit, Dominus abstulit; sicut Domino placuit, ita factum est: sit nomen Domini benedictum . Laudabilis ista plenitudo, ingentes divitiae; inanis auro, plenus Deo; inanis omni transitoria facultate, plenus sui Domini voluntate. Quid quaeritis aurum tantis laboribus et peregrinationibus? Amate has divitias, et modo implemini; fons earum non latet, si cor patet; aperit cor clavis fidei, et aperit et mundat ubi ponas. Noli tibi angustus videri: divitiae tuae, Deus tuus, quando intrabit, ipse dilatabit.
4. You have heard what to flee, you have also what to pursue. For you do not flee in vain, or so leave that you lay hold of nothing. Pursue, then, righteousness, faith, devotion, love (1 Tim 6:11). Let these make you rich. These riches are within: the thief does not come to them, unless an evil will gives him place. Fortify the inner chest—that is, the conscience. These riches no robber, no most powerful enemy, no rushing enemy or barbarian, finally no shipwreck will be able to take from you; from which, if you come out naked, you come out full. For he was not truly empty, although he seemed to have nothing outside, who said, The Lord gave, the Lord has taken away; as it pleased the Lord, so it has been done: blessed be the name of the Lord (Job 1:21). Praiseworthy fullness, immense riches: empty of gold, full of God; empty of every transitory possession, full of his Lord's will. Why do you seek gold with such great labors and pilgrimages? Love these riches, and now be filled; their fountain is not hidden, if the heart lies open; the key of faith opens the heart, and both opens and cleanses where you may put it. Do not seem narrow to yourself: your riches, your God, when he enters, he himself will enlarge.
Sermons5.4
5. Ergo, sine amore pecuniae modus sufficiens est praesentibus. Quare praesentibus? Quia, nihil intulimus in hunc mundum, nec auferre aliquid possumus : ideo praesentibus, non futuris. Sed quae res decipit hominem ad avaritiae computum? Quid si diu vivo? Qui dat vitam, non dat unde transagas vitam? Postremo sunt reditus: quare quaeritur et thesaurus? Redit aliquid de negotio, redit aliquid de artificio, redit aliquid de pretio: sufficiat, non thesaurizetur; ne ubi ponis thesaurum tuum, ibi remaneat et cor tuum, et ut sursum sit , frustra audias, falsumque respondeas. Quando enim respondes ad illud sacratissimum verbum et voce subscribis, ab ipso corde intus non accusaris? Quamvis pressum et oppressum cor tuum, non tibi intus dicit: Sub terra me ponis, quare mentiris? Ergone tibi non dicit: Nonne ibi sum, ubi thesaurus tuus? Ergo mentiris. An vero ille mentitur, qui dixit: Ubi enim fuerit thesaurus tuus, illic erit et cor tuum ? Tu dicis: Non illic erit. Veritas dicit: Illic erit. Sed non illic erit, quia non amo. Factis proba. Non amas, sed dives es. Bene quidem adtendis, et discernis te; ab eo qui dives est, discernis eum, qui vult dives esse. Multum enim interest inter divitem esse, et divitem velle esse. Iusta discretio est, negari non potest. Ibi facultas est, hic cupiditas.
5. Therefore, without love of money a sufficient measure is enough for present needs. Why present needs? Because we brought nothing into this world, neither can we take anything away (1 Tim 6:7): therefore present needs, not future. But what is it that deceives a man toward the reckoning of greed? What if I live long? He who gives life, does he not give whence you may live out your life? Finally there are incomes: why is a treasure too sought? Something comes in from business, something from craft, something from a price: let it suffice, let it not be treasured up; lest, where you put your treasure, there your heart too remain, and, that it may be on high, you hear in vain, and answer falsely. For when you answer that most sacred word and subscribe with your voice, are you not within accused by your very heart? However pressed and oppressed, does your heart not say to you within: You put me under the earth, why do you lie? Does it not say to you: Am I not there, where your treasure is? Therefore you lie. Or does he lie who said, For where your treasure is, there will your heart be too (Matt 6:21)? You say: It will not be there. Truth says: It will be there. But it will not be there, because I do not love. Prove it by deeds. You do not love, but you are rich. You attend well indeed, and you distinguish yourself; from the one who is rich, you distinguish the one who wishes to be rich. For there is much difference between being rich and wishing to be rich. It is a just distinction, it cannot be denied. There it is means, here it is cupidity.
Sermons5.5
6. Nam et ipse Apostolus non ait: Qui divites sunt, sed: Qui volunt divites fieri, qui volunt fieri, incidunt in temptationem et laqueum, et desideria multa et noxia : volendo fieri, non exsistendo. Ideo ait, desideria. Desiderium est enim homini, qui vult pervenire ad quod non habet. Nam nemo desiderat quod habet. Insatiabilis est quidem avaritia; et tamen etiam in ipsis qui multum habent, desiderium est dicendum eius rei non quam habent, sed quam volunt habere. Habet istam villam, desiderat habere aliam quam non habet; sed cum et hanc habuerit, aliam desiderabit; non tamen desiderabit quod habuit, sed quod non habuit. Volendo ergo dives esse, desiderat, aestuat, sitit, et tamquam hydropisis morbo, plus bibendo plus sitit. Mira ista similitudo est in corporis morbo, omnino avarus in corde hydrops est. Nam hydrops in carne, humore plenus est, humore periclitatur, et humore non satiatur: sic hydrops in corde, quanto plus habet, tanto plus eget. Quando minus habebat, minora volebat, paucioribus gaudebat, exiguis locellis exhilarabatur: quia vero impletus est, distentus est, abundantissimus factus est (hereditates cotidie veniunt) bibit et sitit. Si hoc habeo, illud potero; parum possum, quia parum habeo. Cum et hoc habueris, plus habes velle: egestas aucta est, non potestas.
6. For the Apostle himself does not say: Those who are rich, but: Those who wish to become rich, who wish to become so, fall into temptation and a snare, and many harmful desires: by wishing to become so, not by being so. Therefore he says, desires. For there is desire in a man who wishes to attain what he does not have. For no one desires what he has. Greed is indeed insatiable; and yet even in those who have much, there is to be spoken of a desire, not of what they have, but of what they wish to have. He has this estate, he desires to have another which he does not have; but when he has had this too, he will desire another; yet he will not desire what he had, but what he did not have. By wishing, then, to be rich, he desires, burns, thirsts, and, as if by the disease of dropsy, by drinking more thirsts more. A wonderful similitude this is in the disease of the body: a greedy man is wholly a dropsy in the heart. For dropsy in the flesh is full of fluid, is endangered by fluid, and is not satisfied by fluid: so the dropsy in the heart, the more it has, the more it lacks. When it had less, it wished less, rejoiced in fewer things, was gladdened by tiny coffers: but because it has been filled, it has been distended, has been made most abundant (inheritances come daily); it drinks and thirsts. If I have this, I will be able to have that; I can little, because I have little. When you have this too, you have more to wish: want has been increased, not power.
Sermons5.6
7. Sed non amo, inquit, quod habeo, ut sursum cor habeam. Plane consentio; si non amas, potest esse sursum cor tuum. Quare enim non sit sursum cor liberum? Sed vide si non amas, ipse tibi fideliter renuntia, non a me accusatus, sed a te interrogatus. Plane, inquit, non amo: dives quidem sum, sed quia iam sum, non autem volo esse, ut incidam in temptationem et laqueum, et desideria multa stulta et noxia, quae mergunt hominem in interitum et perditionem : grave malum, horrendum, periculosum, exitiosum, iam sum, inquit, dives, non esse volo. Iam es dives? Iam, inquit. Non esse vis? Non, inquit. Si non esses, nolles? Nollem, inquit. Iam ergo quia es, et verbum Dei te foris divitem invenit, intus divitem fecit, accipe quae divitibus dicta sunt. Hoc enim quod his verbis dicebatur: Nihil intulimus in hunc mundum, sed nec auferre aliquid possumus: victum et tegumentum habentes, his contenti sumus. Nam qui volunt divites fieri incidunt in temptationem, et cetera; qui volunt, inquit, divites fieri, tamquam ad pauperes dicebantur. Haec verba Apostoli pauperem te invenerunt? Dic illa, et dives es; dic in corde ex corde: Nihil intuli in hunc mundum, sed nec auferre aliquid possum; victum et tegumentum habens, his contentus sum. Nam si voluero dives fieri, incidam in temptationem et laqueum. Dic, et consiste ubi inventus es. Noli te inserere doloribus multis; ne cum te volueris exuere, lanieris. Sed dives inventus es? Sunt et alia verba, quae recitemus: non existimet ad se nihil dictum qui dives inventus est. Eidem Timotheo Apostolus dicit, sed pauperi dicit. Timotheus enim pauper erat, sicut Paulus. Quid ergo Timotheo de hac re dicturus est, homini pauperi, quod pertineat ad eos qui inventi sunt divites? Audi quid: Praecipe, inquit, divitibus huius mundi : quia sunt et divites Dei; et veri divites non sunt nisi divites Dei, qualis erat ipse Paulus, qui ait: Ego enim didici in quibus sum sufficiens esse . Da mihi divitem mundi qui hoc dicat: Didici in quibus sum sufficiens esse : avaro autem non sufficit. Ergo: praecipe, inquit, divitibus huius mundi. Quid eis dicam? Nolite velle esse divites? Iam divites inventi sunt: audiant quod ad eos dictum est, ubi caput est, non superbe sapere . Ad hoc habentur divitiae multumque amantur. Nidus colligitur superbiae, ubi nutriatur et crescat; et quod peius est, non volet, sed maneat. Ergo ante omnia, non superbe sapere. Ut intellegat, sapiat, cogitet se mortalem, et mortalis pauperis parem. Ambos enim terra nudos excepit, ambos exspectat mors, ambos non timet febris. Habet eam pauper in strato terreno, sed nec dives eam venientem lecto terret argenteo. Ergo, Praecipe huius mundi divitibus, non superbe sapere. Agnoscant pares suos pauperes: pauperes homines sunt et homines; dissimilis vestis, sed similis cutis: et si dives mortuus conditur aromatibus, non erit nulla putredo, sed sera; serius putrescit, numquid non putrescit? Sed ponamus, non ambo putrescunt: tamen ambo non sentiunt. Praecipe divitibus huius mundi non superbe sapere. Non superbe sapiant: et vere tales erunt, quales se videri volunt: sine amore possidebunt, non possidebuntur.
7. But I do not love, he says, what I have, that I may have my heart on high. I plainly agree; if you do not love, your heart can be on high. For why should not a free heart be on high? But see whether you do not love: report it faithfully to yourself, not accused by me, but questioned by yourself. Plainly, he says, I do not love: I am indeed rich, but because I now am, and do not wish to be, lest I fall into temptation and a snare, and many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge a man into destruction and perdition: a grave evil, horrible, dangerous, deadly—I now am, he says, rich, I do not wish to be. You are now rich? Now, he says. You do not wish to be? No, he says. If you were not, would you be unwilling? I would be unwilling, he says. Now, then, because you are, and the word of God found you rich outside, made you rich within, receive what was said to the rich. For this which was said in these words—We brought nothing into this world, but neither can we take anything away: having food and covering, with these we are content. For those who wish to become rich fall into temptation, and the rest; those who wish, he says, to become rich—was said as it were to the poor. Did these words of the Apostle find you poor? Say them, and you are rich; say in your heart, from your heart: I brought nothing into this world, but neither can I take anything away; having food and covering, with these I am content. For if I wish to become rich, I will fall into temptation and a snare. Say it, and stand where you were found. Do not engraft yourself onto many pains; lest, when you wish to strip yourself, you be torn. But were you found rich? There are other words too, which let us recite: let not the one found rich think nothing was said to him. To the same Timothy the Apostle speaks, but speaks to a poor man. For Timothy was poor, as Paul was. What, then, is he going to say to Timothy on this matter, to a poor man, that may pertain to those who are found rich? Hear what: Command, he says, the rich of this world: for there are rich of God too; and the true rich are none but the rich of God, such as Paul himself was, who said, For I have learned, in whatever state I am, to be content (Phil 4:11). Give me a rich man of the world who says this: I have learned, in whatever state I am, to be content: but the greedy man is not content. Therefore: command, he says, the rich of this world. What shall I tell them? Do not wish to be rich? They are now found rich: let them hear what was said to them, where it is the chief point, not to be proudly wise. For this riches are had and much loved. A nest of pride is gathered, where it may be nourished and grow; and what is worse, it will not, but remain. Therefore before all, not to be proudly wise. That a man may understand, be wise, consider himself mortal, and the equal of a poor mortal. For the earth received both naked, death awaits both, the fever fears neither. The poor man has it on an earthen bed, but neither does the rich man frighten it away as it comes by a silver couch. Therefore: Command the rich of this world not to be proudly wise. Let them acknowledge the poor as their equals: the poor are men and men too; the garment is unlike, but the skin is alike: and if a rich dead man is embalmed with spices, there will not be no rottenness, but only later; it rots later—does it not rot? But let us suppose both do not rot: yet both do not feel it. Command the rich of this world not to be proudly wise. Let them not be proudly wise: and truly they will be such as they wish to seem: without love they will possess, they will not be possessed.
Sermons5.7
8. Sed quae sequantur vide: Non superbe sapere, neque sperare in incerto divitiarum. Amas aurum; fac, si potes, certum, ut non timeas amittere. Congregasti facultatem; da tibi, si potes, securitatem. Neque sperare in incerto divitiarum. Venit, abiit; modo erat, modo perit, modo timetur ne pereat. Non ergo sperent in incerto divitiarum. Tulit inde spem. Ubi fixit ? Sed in Deo vivo. Ibi fige spem, ibi anchoram cordis tui, ut tempestas saeculi non te inde abrumpat et perdat : in Deo vivo, qui praestat nobis omnia abunde ad fruendum . Si omnia, quanto magis se? Et vere ad fruendum ipse nobis erit omnia. Nam non mihi videtur dictum: Qui dedit nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum, nisi se ipsum. Videtur enim aliud esse uti, aliud frui. Utimur enim pro necessitate, fruimur pro iucunditate. Ergo ista temporalia dedit ad utendum, se ad fruendum. Si ergo se, quare dictum est omnia, nisi quia scriptum est: Ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus ? Ergo ibi cor ad fruendum, ut sit sursum cor . Solve te hinc, sed alliga ibi: periculosum est tibi in his tempestatibus sine vinculo remanere.
8. But see what follows: Not to be proudly wise, nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches (1 Tim 6:17). You love gold; make it, if you can, certain, that you may not fear to lose it. You have gathered means; give yourself, if you can, security. Nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches. It comes, it goes away; now it was, now it perishes, now it is feared lest it perish. Let them not, then, hope in the uncertainty of riches. He took away hope from there. Where did he fix it? But in the living God. There fix your hope, there the anchor of your heart, that the storm of this age may not tear you from there and destroy you: in the living God, who furnishes us all things abundantly to enjoy (1 Tim 6:17). If all things, how much more himself? And truly he himself will be to us all things to enjoy. For it does not seem to me said, Who gave us all things abundantly to enjoy, except himself. For it seems one thing to use, another to enjoy. For we use according to necessity, we enjoy according to pleasantness. Therefore he gave these temporal things to use, himself to enjoy. If, then, himself, why was it said all things, except because it is written, That God may be all in all (1 Cor 15:28)? Therefore there the heart for enjoying, that the heart may be on high. Loosen yourself from here, but bind yourself there: it is dangerous for you in these storms to remain without a bond.
Sermons5.8
9. Non sperare in incerto divitiarum: non tamen nusquam, sed in Deo vivo, qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum . Quid tam omnia, quam qui fecit omnia? Non enim ab illo fierent haec omnia, nisi ea nosset. Quis audeat dicere: Hoc fecit Deus, quod non noverat? Quod noverat fecit. Habebat ergo antequam fecit: sed habebat miris modis, non sicut fecit, temporalia et transeuntia, sed sicut facit artifex. Habet intus quod operatur foris. Ibi sunt ergo omnia praecipua, immortalia, indeficientia, permanentia, et ipse Deus omnia in omnibus: sed sanctis suis, sed iustis suis ipse erit omnia in omnibus . Ipse ergo sufficit, solus sufficit, de quo dictum est: Ostende nobis Patrem, et sufficit nobis ; sed, tanto, inquit, tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me? Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem . Omnia Deus Pater et Filius et Spiritus Sanctus. Merito solus sufficit. Si avari sumus, ipsum amemus. Si opes desideramus, ipsum desideremus. Solus nos satiare poterit, de quo dictum est: Qui satiat in bonis desiderium tuum . Hoc peccatori non sufficit? Hoc tantum, tam magnum bonum peccatori non sufficit? Volendo habere plus, perdidit omnia: quia radix omnium malorum avaritia est . Merito per Prophetam increpat animae peccatrici et a se fornicanti, et dicit: Existimasti, si a me discessisses , aliquid te amplius habituram . Sed quomodo ille filius minor, ecce porcos pavisti; ecce omnia perdidisti; ecce egens remansisti, et sero fessus redisti . Iam intellege quia id quod tibi Pater dabat, tutius ipse servabat: Existimasti, si a me recessisses, aliquid amplius te habituram. O anima peccatrix et impleta fornicationibus, facta turpis, facta decolor, facta immunda, et sic amata! Redi ergo ad pulchrum, ut ad pulchritudinem redeas: redi, et dic illi qui tibi solus sufficit: Perdidisti omnem qui fornicatur abs te . Quid ergo sufficit, nisi quod sequitur? Mihi autem adhaerere Deo bonum est . Ergo sursum cor , non in terra, non in mendicissimo thesauro, non in loco putredinis. Radix est enim omnium malorum avaritia. Et in ipso Adam radix omnium malorum avaritia fuit. Plus enim voluit, quam accepit, quia Deus illi non suffecit.
9. Not to hope in the uncertainty of riches: yet not nowhere, but in the living God, who furnishes us all things abundantly to enjoy (1 Tim 6:17). What is so "all things" as he who made all things? For these all things would not be made by him, unless he knew them. Who would dare say: God made this which he did not know? He made what he knew. He had it, then, before he made it: but he had it in wondrous ways, not as he made it, temporal and transitory, but as a craftsman makes. He has within what he works outside. There, then, are all things—chief, immortal, indefectible, permanent—and God himself all in all: but to his holy ones, to his just ones, he himself will be all in all. He himself, then, suffices, alone suffices, of whom it was said, Show us the Father, and it suffices us; but, so long a time, he says, I am with you, and you have not known me? He who has seen me has seen the Father too (John 14:8-9). God is all—Father and Son and Holy Spirit. Deservedly he alone suffices. If we are greedy, let us love him. If we desire wealth, let us desire him. He alone will be able to satisfy us, of whom it was said, Who satisfies your desire with good things (Ps 103:5 (102:5)). Does this not suffice the sinner? Does this so great, so great a good not suffice the sinner? By wishing to have more, he lost all: because the root of all evils is greed (1 Tim 6:10). And in Adam himself the root of all evils was greed. For he wished more than he received, because God did not suffice him. Deservedly through the Prophet he rebukes the sinful soul fornicating away from him, and says, You reckoned that, if you departed from me, you would have something more. But just as that younger son—behold, you have fed swine; behold, you have lost all; behold, you remained in want, and late, weary, you returned (See Luke 15:13-19). Now understand that what the Father was giving you, he himself kept more safely: You reckoned that, if you withdrew from me, you would have something more. O sinful soul, filled with fornications, made foul, made colorless, made unclean, and yet loved! Return, then, to the beautiful one, that you may return to beauty: return, and say to him who alone suffices you, You have destroyed everyone who fornicates away from you (Ps 73:27 (72:27)). What, then, suffices, but what follows? But for me to cleave to God is good (Ps 73:28 (72:28)). Therefore the heart on high, not on the earth, not in the most beggarly treasure, not in a place of rottenness. For the root of all evils is greed. And in Adam himself the root of all evils was greed. For he wished more than he received, because God did not suffice him.
Sermons5.9
10. Quid ergo sis facturus ex his quae habes, o dives, adtende. Iam non superbe sapis: recte. Non speras in incerto divitiarum: optime. Sed speras in Deo vivo, qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum : laudabiliter. Noli ergo piger esse in his quae sequentur: Divites sint in operibus bonis . Haec videamus, et quod non videmus, credamus. Dicebas: Aurum habeo, sed non amo; sed non amare, tuum intus est; si quid de te mereor, proba et mihi; quod non abscondis Deo tuo, proba et fratri tuo. Unde, inquit, probabo? Ex eo quod sequitur: Divites sint in operibus bonis, facile tribuant . Ad hoc dives esto, ut facile tribuas. Pauper enim vult tribuere, et non potest: apud illum difficultas, apud te facilitas. Hoc tibi prosit quod dives es, quia cum volueris facere, statim facis. Facile tribuant, communicent. Numquid perdunt? Thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum . Et ne ipsum aurum et argentum et praedia, et ea quae pulchra videntur in facultatibus hominum, etiam in illo saeculo amaremus, et talia ibi desideraremus, cum dicitur nobis: Illuc migrate, thesaurum vestrum ibi ponite: admonuit nos contra carnales cogitationes, et ait : Ut apprehendant veram vitam ; non aurum, quod in terra remanet, non facultates putribiles, non bona transeuntia, sed veram vitam. Quomodo ergo migramus, quando hoc illuc non transit, neque hoc ibi habebimus, quod hinc transferimus? Quodammodo Dominus Deus noster mercatores nos vult esse, mutationes nobiscum facit: quod hic abundat damus, quod ibi abundat accipimus; quemadmodum plerique traiectitias merces faciunt: aliud dant alibi, et quo veniunt aliud accipiunt. Verbi gratia, dicit amico suo: Accipe a me hic aurum, et da mihi in Africa oleum; et migrat et non migrat: iam quod dedit transtulit, sed non hoc accepit. Quod desiderat accipit. Talis est ista mutatio, qualis, fratres mei, nostra mercatio. Quid damus, et quid accipimus? Hoc damus quod nobiscum ferre non possumus, etsi vellemus, quare ergo perit. Hic quod minus est detur, ut quod est maius ibi inveniatur. Damus terram, et accipimus caelum; damus temporalia, et accipimus aeterna; damus putrescentia, et accipimus immortalia; postremo damus quod dedit Deus, et accipimus ipsum Deum. Non ergo pigri simus in ista mutatione rerum, in ista mercatura opima et ineffabili. Prosit quia hic sumus, prosit quia nati sumus, prosit quia peregrinamur. Non inopes redeamus.
10. Attend, then, O rich man, to what you are to do with what you have. You are no longer proudly wise: rightly. You do not hope in the uncertainty of riches: most excellently. But you hope in the living God, who furnishes us all things abundantly to enjoy: praiseworthily. Do not, then, be slothful in the things that follow: Let them be rich in good works. Let us see these, and what we do not see, let us believe. You said: I have gold, but I do not love it; but the not-loving is within you; if I deserve anything of you, prove it to me too; what you do not hide from your God, prove it to your brother too. Whence, he says, shall I prove it? From what follows: Let them be rich in good works, give easily. Be rich for this, that you may give easily. For the poor man wishes to give, and cannot: with him there is difficulty, with you facility. Let this profit you, that you are rich, because when you wish to do it, at once you do it. Give easily, share. Do they lose it? Treasure up for themselves a good foundation for the future. And lest we love that very gold and silver and estates, and the things that seem beautiful in the means of men, even in that age, and desire such things there, when it is said to us: Migrate there, put your treasure there: he admonished us against carnal thoughts, and said, That they may lay hold of the true life (1 Tim 6:18-19); not gold, which remains on earth, not perishable means, not transitory goods, but the true life. How, then, do we migrate, when this does not pass over there, nor will we have there what we transfer from here? In a way the Lord our God wishes us to be merchants, he makes exchanges with us: what abounds here we give, what abounds there we receive; just as very many make merchandise for shipment: they give one thing in one place, and where they come they receive another. For example, he says to his friend: Receive from me gold here, and give me oil in Africa; and he migrates and does not migrate: he has already transferred what he gave, but he did not receive this. He receives what he desires. Such is this exchange, my brothers, as our trade is. What do we give, and what do we receive? We give what we cannot carry with us, even if we wished, and which therefore perishes. Here let what is less be given, that what is greater may be found there. We give earth, and receive heaven; we give temporal things, and receive eternal; we give perishable things, and receive immortal; finally we give what God gave, and receive God himself. Let us not, then, be slothful in this exchange of things, in this rich and ineffable commerce. Let it profit us that we are here, let it profit us that we were born, let it profit us that we are on pilgrimage. Let us not return destitute.
Sermons5.10
11. Non intret arcam cordis tinea malae cogitationis. Non dicatur: Non dabo, ne cras non habeam. Noli multum cogitare de futuris: immo multum cogita de futuris, sed de longe futuris: Thesaurizent, inquit, sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut apprehendant veram vitam. Nec ita, quemadmodum dixit Apostolus: ut aliis refectio, vobis autem angustia, se ex eo quod quisque habet . Tantum nolite amare, servare, thesaurizare, incumbere conditis, hoc est de incertis sperare. Quam multi divites dormierunt, pauperes surrexerunt. Propter istas enim cogitationes, cum dixisset: Sine amore modus pecuniae sufficiens est praesentibus , propter malas cogitationes, quae dicunt: Si thesaurum non habuero, quis mihi dabit, cum egere coepero? Deinde: Abundat unde vivam, sufficit unde vivam; sed quid, si impingat mihi calumnia: unde me redimam? quid, si mihi necesse sit litigare: unde sumptus impendam? (quamdiu omnia mala quae possunt evenire generi humano narrare et computare poteris, plerumque una calamitas turbat computum numerantis, et totum quod numerabatur, non solum perit, sed nec in digitis remanebit) ideo contra istum cogitationis vermiculum, contra malignam tineam apposuit Deus in Scriptura sua, quomodo solent apponi vestibus odoramenta quaedam, ne tineent. Quid? Cogitabas ne tibi desit propter illud et illud, et numerabas multas calamitates. Non timebas unam grandem? Adtende quo sequitur: Sine amore modus pecuniae sufficiens est praesentibus, ipse enim dixit: Non te derelinquam, non te deseram ; timebas mala nescio quae, propterea pecuniam reservabas: me tene fideiussorem. Hoc tibi Deus dicit. Non homo, non par tuus aut ipse tu, sed Deus tibi dicit: Non te derelinquam, non te deseram. Homo si promitteret, crederes; Deus promittit, et dubitas? Promisit, scripsit, cautionem fecit: esto securus. Lege quod tenes, cautionem Dei tenes, ipsum debitorem tenuisti, a quo tua debita relaxari petisti. Amen.
11. Let not the moth of evil thought enter the chest of the heart. Let it not be said: I will not give, lest tomorrow I have nothing. Do not think much about future things: rather, think much about future things, but about the far-off future: Let them treasure up, he says, for themselves a good foundation for the future, that they may lay hold of the true life. Nor in such a way as the Apostle said: that there be refreshment for others, but for you distress, but from what each one has (See 2 Cor 8:13.12). Only do not love, keep, treasure up, lean upon what is stored; this is to hope in uncertain things. How many rich men slept rich, and rose up poor. For on account of these thoughts, when he had said, Without love a sufficient measure of money is enough for present needs, on account of the evil thoughts that say: If I do not have a treasure, who will give to me, when I begin to be in want? Then: There abounds whence I may live, there suffices whence I may live; but what, if a slander strikes me: whence shall I redeem myself? what, if it be necessary for me to litigate: whence shall I lay out expenses? (as long as you can narrate and reckon all the evils that can befall the human race, very often one calamity disturbs the reckoning of the one counting, and the whole that was being counted not only perishes, but will not even remain in the fingers)—therefore against that little worm of thought, against that malignant moth, God set in his Scripture, as certain perfumes are wont to be set on garments, lest they be moth-eaten. What? You were thinking lest you lack on account of this and that, and you were counting many calamities. Did you not fear one great one? Attend to what follows: Without love a sufficient measure of money is enough for present needs, for he himself said: I will not leave you, I will not forsake you (Heb 13:5); you feared I know not what evils, therefore you were reserving money: hold me as your surety. This God says to you. Not a man, not your equal or you yourself, but God says to you, I will not leave you, I will not forsake you. If a man promised, you would believe; God promises, and do you doubt? He promised, wrote it, made the bond: be secure. Read what you hold, you hold the bond of God, you have held the debtor himself, from whom you asked that your debts be released. Amen.
Sermons5.11
SERMO 178
Sermon 178
Sermons5.11
1. 1. Beati Apostoli Epistola cum legeretur de constituendis episcopis, commemoravit nos sine dubio respicere in nos; et vos commemoravit non iudicare nos; maxime quia omnes audivimus capituli Evangelii recentis lectionis novissimam sententiam: Nolite iudicare personaliter, sed iustum iudicium iudicate . Personam itaque iudicando nemo accipit alienam, si non accipit suam. Beatus Apostolus ait quodam loco: Non sic pugno, quasi aerem caedens; sed castigo corpus meum, et in servitutem redigo; ne forte aliis praedicans, ipse reprobus inveniar . Suo timore nos terruit. Quid enim faciet agnus ubi aries tremit? Inter multa ergo, quibus scripsit Apostolus, qualis esse episcopus debeat, etiam illud audivimus, unde modo forsitan loqui et disputare sufficiat. Si enim singula discutere, et de singulis, ut dignum est, disputare conemur; nec nostrae vires sufficiunt ad loquendum, nec vestrae ad audiendum. Quid ergo est quod volo dicere, si adiuvet me qui terruit me? Inter cetera ait episcopum potentem esse debere in doctrina sana, ut contradicentes redarguere possit. Magnum opus est, gravis sarcina, clivus arduus. Sed: Sperabo, inquit, in Deum, quoniam ipse liberabit me de laqueo venantium, et a verbo aspero . Nulla enim causa est, quae magis faciat hominem dispensatorem Dei pigriorem ad redarguendos contradicentes, quam timor verbi asperi.
1. 1. When the Epistle of the blessed Apostle was read about the appointing of bishops, it surely reminded us to look upon ourselves; and it reminded you not to judge us; most of all because we all heard the last sentence of the passage of the recent gospel reading: Do not judge according to persons, but judge a just judgment (John 7:24). So in judging, no one takes on another's person, if he does not take on his own. The blessed Apostle says in a certain place, I do not so fight as one beating the air; but I chastise my body and bring it into servitude; lest perhaps, preaching to others, I myself be found rejected (1 Cor 9:26-27). By his fear he terrified us. For what will the lamb do where the ram trembles? Among the many things, then, by which the Apostle wrote what kind a bishop ought to be, we heard this too, on which now perhaps it may suffice to speak and discourse. For if we try to examine each one, and discourse on each as is fitting, neither do our strengths suffice for speaking, nor yours for hearing. What, then, is it I wish to say, if he who terrified me help me? Among other things he says that a bishop ought to be powerful in sound doctrine, that he may be able to refute those who contradict. It is a great work, a grave burden, a steep slope. But: I will hope, he says, in God, for he will free me from the snare of the hunters, and from the harsh word (See Ps 91:3 (90:3)). For there is no cause that makes the dispenser of God more slothful to refute those who contradict than the fear of the harsh word.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Prius ergo quid sit, contradicentes redarguere, ut Dominus donaverit, exponam vobis. Contradicentes non uno modo intellegendi sunt. Paucissimi enim nobis contradicunt loquendo; sed multi male vivendo. Quando mihi audet dicere Christianus, bonum esse rapere res alienas; quandoquidem non audet dicere, bonum esse tenaciter servare res suas? Numquid enim dives ille, cui successerat regio, et non inveniebat ubi poneret fructus suos, et se consilium invenisse gaudebat destruendi veteres apothecas, et construendi novas ampliores, ut impleret eas, et diceret animae suae: Anima, habes multa bona in multum tempus, laetare, iucundare, satiare ; numquid ergo iste dives aliena quaerebat? Fructus suos colligere disponebat, ubi poneret consulebat, non de cuiusquam vicini agris, non limite perturbato, non spoliato paupere, non circumvento simplice, sed tantummodo de suis colligendis cogitabat. Audite quid audierit, qui tenaciter servabat sua; et hinc intellegite quid exspectent, qui rapiunt aliena. Cum ergo se prudentissimum consilium invenisse arbitraretur, de apothecis veteribus angustiis deiciendis, et amplioribus novis aedificandis, et omnibus suis fructibus colligendis et recondendis, non alienis concupiscendis atque rapiendis; ait illi Deus: Stulte; ubi tibi sapiens videris, ibi stulte. Stulte, inquit, hac nocte repetunt a te animam tuam; haec quae praeparasti cuius erunt? Si servaveris, tua non erunt; si erogaveris, tua erunt. Quid, inquit, reponis, quod relicturus es? Ecce increpatus est stultus male recondens. Si stultus est qui recondit sua, vos invenite nomen ei qui tollit aliena. Si sordidus est reconditor suorum, ulcerosus est raptor alienorum. Sed non qualis ille ulcerosus, qui iacebat ante ianuam divitis, et cuius canes linguebant ulcera. Ille enim ulcerosus erat in corpore; raptor, in corde.
2. 2. First, then, what it is to refute those who contradict, as the Lord grants, I will expound to you. Those who contradict are not to be understood in one way. For very few contradict us by speaking; but many by living badly. When does a Christian dare to say to me that it is good to seize others' goods; since he does not dare to say that it is good tenaciously to keep his own? For did that rich man, whose region had yielded a crop, and who did not find where to put his fruits, and rejoiced that he had found the plan of pulling down the old storehouses and building new and larger ones, that he might fill them, and say to his soul, Soul, you have many goods for much time, be glad, rejoice, be filled—did that rich man, then, seek others' goods? He was arranging to gather his own fruits, taking counsel where to put them, thinking not about anyone's neighboring fields, nor of a disturbed boundary, nor of a despoiled poor man, nor of a circumvented simple man, but only about gathering his own. Hear what he heard who tenaciously kept his own; and from this understand what awaits those who seize others'. So when he reckoned that he had found a most prudent plan—of casting down the old narrow storehouses, and building new and larger ones, and gathering and storing all his fruits, not coveting and seizing others'—God said to him, Fool; where you seem wise to yourself, there a fool. Fool, he says, this night they demand your soul from you; these things which you have prepared, whose will they be (Luke 12:18-20)? If you keep them, they will not be yours; if you distribute them, they will be yours. Why, he says, do you store up what you are going to leave behind? Behold, the fool was rebuked for storing up badly. If he is a fool who stores up his own, find a name for him who takes another's. If the storer of his own is sordid, the seizer of another's is ulcerous. But not such an ulcerous one as the one who lay before the rich man's gate, and whose ulcers the dogs licked. For that one was ulcerous in body; the seizer, in heart.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Fortassis aliquis respondeat, et dicat: Non valde magna poena erat illi homini, cui dixit Deus: Stulte. Non sic dicit Deus: Stulte, quomodo homo dicit. Tale in quemquam Dei verbum, iudicium est. Numquid enim Deus stultis daturus est regnum caelorum? Quibus autem non est daturus regnum caelorum, quid eis restat, nisi poena gehennarum? Conicere hoc videmur: aperte hoc manifesteque videamus. Nam et ille dives, ante cuius ianuam iacebat pauperrimus ulcerosus, non est dictus raptor rerum alienarum. Erat quidam dives, inquit, qui induebatur purpura et bysso, et epulabatur quotidie splendide . Dives, inquit, erat; non dixit: Calumniator; non dixit: Pauperum oppressor; non dixit: Rerum alienarum raptor, aut delator, aut receptor; non dixit: Pupillorum spoliator; non dixit: Viduarum persecutor; nihil horum, sed: Erat quidam dives. Quid magnum est? Dives erat, de suo dives erat. Cui aliquid tulerat? An forte ille auferret, et Dominus de illo reticeret, et personam eius acciperet, si crimina eius absconderet, qui nobis dicit: Nolite personaliter iudicare ? Si vis ergo audire crimen divitis illius, noli amplius quaerere, quam audis a Veritate. Dives erat; induebatur purpura et bysso, et epulabatur quotidie splendide. Quod ergo eius crimen? Iacens ante ianuam ulcerosus, et non adiutus. Hoc enim aperte de illo dictum est, quod immisericors erat. Numquid enim, carissimi, si pauper ille ante ianuam iacens sufficientem panem a divite acciperet, diceretur de illo quia cupiebat saturari de micis quae cadebant de mensa divitis ? Propter hanc solam inhumanitatem, qua contemnebat pauperem ante ianuam suam iacentem, nec congrue digneque pascebat, mortuus est et sepultus; et cum apud inferos in tormentis esset, levavit oculos suos, et vidit pauperem in sinu Abrahae. Et quid pluribus immorer? Desideravit guttam, qui non dedit micam; non accepit iusta sententia, qui non dedit crudeli avaritia ? Si haec ergo poena est avarorum, quae poena raptorum?
3. 3. Perhaps someone may answer and say: It was not a very great punishment for that man, to whom God said, Fool. God does not say Fool the way a man says it. Such a word of God against anyone is a judgment. For is God going to give the kingdom of heaven to fools? But to those to whom he is not going to give the kingdom of heaven, what remains for them but the punishment of hell? We seem to conjecture this: let us see it openly and manifestly. For that rich man too, before whose gate lay the most poor ulcerous man, was not called a seizer of others' goods. There was a certain rich man, it says, who clothed himself in purple and fine linen, and feasted splendidly every day. A rich man, it says, there was; it did not say: A slanderer; it did not say: An oppressor of the poor; it did not say: A seizer of others' goods, or an informer, or a receiver; it did not say: A despoiler of orphans; it did not say: A persecutor of widows; none of these, but: There was a certain rich man. What is great about that? He was rich, he was rich from his own. Whom had he robbed? Or would he perhaps rob, and the Lord be silent about him, and take on his person, if he hid his crimes—he who says to us, Do not judge according to persons? If, then, you wish to hear the crime of that rich man, do not seek more than you hear from the Truth. He was rich; he clothed himself in purple and fine linen, and feasted splendidly every day. What, then, was his crime? An ulcerous man lying before the gate, and not helped. For this was said openly of him, that he was unmerciful. For surely, dearly beloved, if that poor man lying before the gate had received sufficient bread from the rich man, would it be said of him that he desired to be filled with the crumbs that fell from the rich man's table? On account of this inhumanity alone, by which he despised the poor man lying before his gate, and did not fittingly and worthily feed him, he died and was buried; and when he was in torments in the underworld, he lifted up his eyes, and saw the poor man in the bosom of Abraham (See Luke 16:19-23). And why should I linger on more? He desired a drop, who did not give a crumb; he did not receive by a just sentence, who did not give out of cruel greed. If, then, this is the punishment of the greedy, what is the punishment of the seizers?
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Sed ait mihi raptor rerum alienarum: Ego similis illius divitis non sum. Agapes facio, vinctis in carcere victum mitto, nudos vestio, peregrinos suscipio. Dare te putas? Tollere noli, et dedisti. Cui dederis, gaudet; cui abstuleris, plorat; quem duorum istorum exauditurus est Dominus? Dicis ei cui dederis: Gratias age quia accepisti. Sed alter tibi ex alia parte dicit: Ego gemo cui abstulisti. Et pene totum tenuisti, et exiguum illi dedisti. Si ergo quod alteri abstulisti egentibus dedisses, nec talia opera diligit Deus. Dicit tibi Deus: Stulte, iussi ut dares, sed non de alieno. Si habes, da de tuo; si non habes quod des de tuo, melius nulli dabis, quam alteros spoliabis. Dicturus est Dominus Christus, cum in iudicio suo sederit, et alios ad dexteram et ad sinistram alios separaverit, bene operantibus: Venite, benedicti Patris mei, percipite regnum; sterilibus autem, qui nihil boni in pauperes operati sunt: Ite in ignem aeternum. Et quae dicturus est bonis? Esurivi enim, et dedistis mihi manducare, et cetera. Et respondebunt illi: Domine, quando te vidimus esurientem? Et ille ad eos: Cum uni ex minimis meis fecistis, mihi fecistis. Intellege ergo, stulte, qui vis eleemosynam facere de rapina, quoniam si quando pascis Christianum, pascis Christum; quando spolias Christianum, spolias Christum. Attendite quid sinistris dicturus est: Ite in ignem aeternum. Quare? Esurivi enim, et non dedistis mihi manducare; nudus fui, et non vestistis me . Ite. Quo? In ignem aeternum. Prorsus ite. Quare? Nudus fui, et non vestistis me. Si ergo in ignem aeternum ibit cui dicturus est Christus: Nudus fui, et non vestisti me; quem locum in igne aeterno habebit cui dicturus est: Vestitus fui, et spoliasti me?
4. 4. But the seizer of others' goods says to me: I am not like that rich man. I make love-feasts, I send food to those bound in prison, I clothe the naked, I receive strangers. Do you think you give? Do not take, and you have given. The one to whom you give rejoices; the one from whom you take weeps; which of these two will the Lord hear? You say to the one to whom you give: Give thanks because you have received. But the other on the other side says to you: I groan, from whom you took. And you have kept nearly the whole, and given him a little. If, then, you had given to the needy what you took from another—but God does not love such works. God says to you: Fool, I commanded you to give, but not of another's. If you have, give of your own; if you do not have what to give of your own, it is better to give to no one than to despoil others. The Lord Christ is going to say, when he sits in his judgment, and has separated some to the right and others to the left, to those who worked well, Come, blessed of my Father, take possession of the kingdom; but to the barren, who worked nothing good toward the poor: Go into the eternal fire. And what is he going to say to the good? For I was hungry, and you gave me to eat, and the rest. And they will answer him: Lord, when did we see you hungry? And he to them: When you did it to one of my least, you did it to me. Understand, then, fool, you who wish to give alms from plunder, that whenever you feed a Christian, you feed Christ; when you despoil a Christian, you despoil Christ. Attend to what he is going to say to those on the left: Go into the eternal fire. Why? For I was hungry, and you did not give me to eat; I was naked, and you did not clothe me (Matt 25:34-43). Go. Where? Into the eternal fire. Plainly, go. Why? I was naked, and you did not clothe me. If, then, into the eternal fire goes the one to whom Christ is going to say: I was naked, and you did not clothe me; what place in the eternal fire will he have to whom he is going to say: I was clothed, and you despoiled me?
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Hic fortasse ut evadas hanc vocem, ne dicat tibi Christus: Vestitus fui, et spoliasti me; mutata consuetudine, cogitas spoliare Paganum, et vestire Christianum. Et hic respondebit tibi Christus, immo nunc respondebit tibi per servum qualemcumque ministrum suum; respondebit tibi Christus, et dicet: Etiam hic parce damnis meis. Cum enim Christianus spolias Paganum, impedis fieri Christianum. Etiam et hic fortasse respondebis adhuc: Ego non odio poenam ingero, sed dilectione potius disciplinae; ideo spolio Paganum, ut per hanc asperam et salubrem disciplinam faciam Christianum. Audirem et crederem, si quod abstulisti Pagano, redderes Christiano.
5. 5. Here perhaps, to escape this voice, lest Christ say to you: I was clothed, and you despoiled me; with your habit changed, you think of despoiling a pagan, and clothing a Christian. And here too Christ will answer you—rather, now he will answer you through his servant, some minister of his; Christ will answer you and say: Even here spare my losses. For when, as a Christian, you despoil a pagan, you hinder him from becoming a Christian. Here too perhaps you will still answer: I do not inflict punishment out of hatred, but rather out of love of discipline; therefore I despoil the pagan, that by this harsh and wholesome discipline I may make him a Christian. I would hear and believe, if what you took from the pagan, you gave to a Christian.
Sermons5.5.5
5. 6. Diximus contra unum vitium rapinarum, quo res humanae usquequaque vastantur; diximus, et nemo nobis contradicit. Quis enim audet apertissimae loquendo contradicere veritati? Non ergo facimus quod Apostolus monuit, non contradicentes redarguimus; obedientes alloquimur, laudantes instruimus; non contradicentes redarguimus. Ita vero non contradicunt lingua, sed vita. Moneo, rapit; doceo, rapit; praecipio, rapit; arguo, rapit; quomodo non contradicit? Dicam ergo quod de hac re sufficere existimo. Abstinete vos, fratres, abstinete vos, filii, abstinete vos a consuetudine rapiendi; et vos qui sub manibus raptorum gemitis, abstinete vos a cupiditate rapiendi. Alius potens est, et rapit; tu in manu raptoris gemis; quia rapere non potes, ideo non facis. Habeto facultatem, et ibi laudabo domitam cupiditatem.
5. 6. We have spoken against the one vice of plundering, by which human affairs are everywhere laid waste; we have spoken, and no one contradicts us. For who dares contradict the most open truth by speaking? Therefore we do not do what the Apostle admonished, we do not refute those who contradict; we address the obedient, we instruct those who praise; we do not refute those who contradict. But they do not contradict by tongue, but by life. I admonish, he plunders; I teach, he plunders; I command, he plunders; I rebuke, he plunders; how does he not contradict? Let me say, then, what I think suffices on this matter. Abstain, brothers, abstain, sons, abstain from the habit of plundering; and you who groan under the hands of plunderers, abstain from the desire of plundering. Another is powerful, and plunders; you groan in the hand of the plunderer; because you cannot plunder, therefore you do not do it. Have the power, and there I will praise the desire subdued.
Sermons5.5.6
6. 7. Beatum sancta Scriptura dicit, qui post aurum non abiit; qui potuit transgredi, et non est transgressus; qui facere mala potuit, et non fecit . Tu autem dicis: Numquam negavi rem alienam. Quia forte nemo tibi commendavit; aut forte commendavit, sed sub testibus commendavit. Dic mihi, reddidisti, quando a solo solus, ubi Deus inter vos fuerat, accepisti? Si tunc reddidisti, si mortuo qui commendavit, nescienti filio reddidisti; tunc te laudabo, quia post aurum non isti; quia potuisti transgredi, et non es transgressus; quia potuisti mala facere, et non fecisti. Si forte alienum sacculum solidorum, ubi nemo te vidit, in via invenisti, et sine ulla mora cuius fuerat reddidisti. Eia, fratres, redite ad vos, inspicite vos, interrogate vos, vera respondete vobis, et iudicate vos non secundum personam, sed iustum iudicium iudicate. Ecce Christianus es, ecclesiam frequentas, verbum Dei audis, de lectione verbi Dei laetissime commoveris. Tu laudas tractantem, ego quaero facientem; tu, inquam, laudas dicentem, ego quaero facientem. Christianus es, frequentas ecclesiam, amas verbum Dei, et libenter audis. Ecce hoc quod propono, in eo te examina, in eo te appende, in eo ascende mentis tuae tribunal, et constitue te ante te, et iudica te; et si pravum inveneris, corrige te. Propono ergo. Deus dicit in lege sua, inventionem esse reddendam ; Deus in lege sua dicit, quam primo populo dedit, pro quibus Christus nondum erat mortuus, inventionem tamquam alienum esse reddendam; si quisquam, verbi gratia, in via inveniat alienum sacculum solidorum, debere reddere. Sed nescit cui? Non se excusat ignorantia, si non dominetur avaritia.
6. 7. Holy Scripture calls blessed the one who did not go after gold; who could transgress, and did not transgress; who could do evils, and did not do them (Sir 31:8.10). But you say: I never denied another's deposit. Because perhaps no one entrusted you anything; or perhaps he entrusted it, but entrusted it before witnesses. Tell me, did you return it, when from one man alone, you alone, where God had been between you, received it? If you returned it then, if to the dead man who entrusted it, to the ignorant son you returned it; then I will praise you, because you did not go after gold; because you could transgress, and did not transgress; because you could do evils, and did not do them. If perhaps you found in the road another's purse of gold pieces, where no one saw you, and without any delay you returned it to him whose it was. Come, brothers, return to yourselves, inspect yourselves, question yourselves, answer yourselves truly, and judge yourselves not according to persons, but judge a just judgment. Behold, you are a Christian, you frequent the church, you hear the word of God, you are most gladly moved by the reading of the word of God. You praise the one treating it, I seek the one doing it; you, I say, praise the one speaking, I seek the one doing. You are a Christian, you frequent the church, you love the word of God, and gladly hear it. Behold, in what I propose, examine yourself in it, weigh yourself in it, ascend in it the tribunal of your mind, and set yourself before yourself, and judge yourself; and if you find yourself depraved, correct yourself. I propose, then. God says in his law that a thing found must be returned (See Exod 23:4; Deut 22:1-3); God says in his law, which he gave to the first people, for whom Christ had not yet died, that a thing found, as another's, must be returned; if anyone, for example, finds in the road another's purse of gold pieces, he ought to return it. But he does not know to whom? Ignorance does not excuse him, if greed does not rule.
Sermons5.6.7
7. 8. Dicam vestrae Caritati, quoniam dona Dei sunt; et sunt in populo Dei qui non frustra audiunt verbum Dei; dicam quod fecerit pauperrimus homo, nobis apud Mediolanum constitutis; tam pauper, ut proscholus esset grammatici; sed plane Christianus, quamvis ille esset Paganus grammaticus; melior ad velum, quam in cathedra. Invenit sacculum, nisi forte me numerus fallit, cum solidis ferme ducentis; memor legis proposuit pittacium publice. Reddendum enim sciebat; sed cui redderet, ignorabat. Proposuit pittacium publice: Qui solidos perdidit, veniat ad locum illum, et quaerat hominem illum. Ille qui plangens circumquaque vagabatur, invento et lecto pittacio, venit ad hominem. Et ne forte quaereret alienum, quaesivit signa, interrogavit sacculi qualitatem, sigillum, solidorum etiam numerum. Et cum omnia ille fideliter respondisset, reddidit quod invenerat. Ille autem repletus gaudio, et quaerens vicem rependere, tamquam decimas obtulit illi solidos viginti; qui noluit accipere. Obtulit vel decem; noluit accipere. Saltem rogavit vel quinque acciperet; noluit ille. Stomachabundus homo proiecit sacculum: Nihil perdidi, ait; si non vis aliquid a me accipere, nec ego aliquid perdidi. Quale certamen, fratres mei, quale certamen? qualis pugna, qualis conflictus? Theatrum mundus, spectator Deus. Victus tandem ille quod offerebatur accepit; continuo totum pauperibus erogavit, unum solidum in domo sua non dimisit.
7. 8. I will tell your Charity—since the gifts of God exist, and there are in the people of God those who do not hear the word of God in vain—I will tell what a most poor man did, when we were at Milan; so poor that he was the usher of a grammarian; but plainly a Christian, although that grammarian was a pagan; better at the curtain than in the chair. He found a purse, unless perhaps the number deceives me, with nearly two hundred gold pieces; mindful of the law, he posted a notice publicly. For he knew it must be returned; but to whom to return it, he did not know. He posted a notice publicly: Let the one who lost gold pieces come to that place, and seek that man. He who, lamenting, was wandering everywhere, having found and read the notice, came to the man. And lest perhaps he seek another's, he asked for the signs, inquired the quality of the purse, the seal, even the number of the gold pieces. And when the other had faithfully answered all, he returned what he had found. But that man, filled with joy, and seeking to repay the kindness, offered him as it were a tithe, twenty gold pieces; who refused to take them. He offered at least ten; he refused to take them. He at least asked him to take five; he was unwilling. Indignant, the man threw down the purse: I have lost nothing, he said; if you do not wish to take anything from me, neither have I lost anything. What a contest, my brothers, what a contest? what a fight, what a conflict? The world the theater, God the spectator. At last, overcome, he took what was offered; at once he distributed it all to the poor, he did not leave one gold piece in his house.
Sermons5.7.8
8. 9. Quid est? Si aliquid egi in cordibus vestris, si verbum Dei insedit in vobis, si requiem invenit apud vos, facite hoc, fratres mei; nolite putare damnum vos pati, si feceritis; magnum lucrum est, si feceritis quod dico. Perdidi viginti solidos, perdidi ducentos, quingentos. Quid perdidisti? De domo tua perierant; alter perdiderat, non tu. Terra communis est, in una domo estis, in hoc mundo ambo viatores, huius vitae unum stabulum intrastis. Posuit ille, oblitus est ille; cecidit ab illo, tu invenisti alibi. Quis invenisti? Christianus. Quis invenisti? Qui legem audisti, Christianus qui legem audisti. Quis invenisti? Qui cum audires multa laudasti, tu invenisti. Si ergo veraciter laudasti, redde quod invenisti. Si ergo non reddidisti quod invenisti; quando laudasti, testimonium contra te dixisti. Estote fideles inventores, et tunc iniquos vituperate raptores. Nam quod invenisti et non reddidisti, rapuisti. Quantum potuisti, fecisti; quia plus non potuisti, ideo non plus fecisti. Qui alienum negat, si possit et tollit. Quod non tollis, timor prohibet; non bonum facis, sed malum metuis.
8. 9. What is this? If I have done anything in your hearts, if the word of God has settled in you, if it has found rest with you, do this, my brothers; do not think you suffer loss if you do it; it is a great gain, if you do what I say. I lost twenty gold pieces, I lost two hundred, five hundred. What did you lose? They had perished from your house; another had lost them, not you. The earth is common, you are in one house, in this world both travelers, you have entered one lodging of this life. The one put them down, the other forgot them; they fell from one, you found them elsewhere. Who found them? A Christian. Who found them? You who heard the law, a Christian who heard the law. Who found them? You who, when you heard, praised many things, you found them. If, then, you praised truly, return what you found. If, then, you did not return what you found; when you praised, you gave testimony against yourself. Be faithful finders, and then blame the unjust plunderers. For what you found and did not return, you plundered. As much as you could, you did; because you could not do more, therefore you did not do more. He who denies another's deposit, if he can, even takes it. What you do not take, fear forbids; you do not do a good, but you fear an evil.
Sermons5.8.9
9. 10. Quid est magnum, timere malum? Magnum est, non facere malum; magnum est, amare bonum. Nam et latro timet malum; et ubi non potest, non facit; et tamen latro est. Deus enim cor interrogat, non manum. Lupus venit ad ovile ovium, quaerit invadere, quaerit iugulare, quaerit devorare; vigilant pastores, latrant canes; nihil potest, non aufert, non occidit; sed tamen lupus venit, lupus redit. Numquid quia ovem non tulit, ideo lupus venit, et ovis redit? Lupus venit fremens, lupus redit tremens; lupus est tamen et fremens et tremens. Interroga ergo te, quisquis vis iudicare; et vide si tunc non facis male, quando potes facere et ab homine non puniri. Tunc times Deum. Nemo est ibi, nisi tu et ille cui facis malum, et Deus qui ambos videt; vide, ibi time. Parum est quod dico: Vide, ibi time malum. Ibi ama bonum. Nam etiamsi timore gehennae non facis malum, nondum es perfectus. Audeo dicere, si timore gehennae non facis malum, est quidem in te fides, quia credis futurum Dei esse iudicium; gaudeo fidei tuae, sed adhuc timeo malitiae tuae. Quid est quod dixi? Quia si timore gehennae non facis malum, non amore iustitiae facis bonum.
9. 10. What great thing is it, to fear evil? It is a great thing, not to do evil; it is a great thing, to love good. For even the robber fears evil; and where he cannot, he does not do it; and yet he is a robber. For God questions the heart, not the hand. The wolf comes to the sheepfold of the sheep, seeks to invade, seeks to slaughter, seeks to devour; the shepherds keep watch, the dogs bark; it can do nothing, it does not take, it does not kill; but yet the wolf came, the wolf returns. Surely it is not because it did not take a sheep that the wolf came, and the sheep returns? The wolf came raging, the wolf returns trembling; yet it is a wolf both raging and trembling. Question yourself, then, whoever you are who wish to judge; and see whether you do not then do evil, when you can do it and not be punished by man. Then you fear God. There is no one there, but you and the one to whom you do evil, and God who sees both; see, there fear. It is too little that I say: See, there fear evil. There love good. For even if from fear of hell you do not do evil, you are not yet perfect. I dare to say, if from fear of hell you do not do evil, there is indeed faith in you, because you believe there will be a judgment of God; I rejoice in your faith, but I still fear your malice. What is it that I have said? That if from fear of hell you do not do evil, you do not do good from love of righteousness.
Sermons5.9.10
10. 11. Aliud est, timere poenam; aliud est, amare iustitiam. Amor castus in te esse debet, quo amore desideres videre, non caelum et terram, non campos liquidos maris, non spectacula nugatoria, non fulgores nitoresque gemmarum; sed desidera videre Deum tuum, amare Deum tuum; quia dictum est: Dilectissimi, filii Dei sumus, et nondum apparuit quid erimus; scimus autem quia cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam videbimus eum sicuti est . Ecce propter quam visionem fac bonum, ecce propter quam noli facere malum. Si enim amas videre Deum tuum, si in hac peregrinatione illo amore suspiras; ecce probat te Dominus Deus tuus, quasi dicat tibi: Ecce fac quod vis, imple cupiditates tuas, extende nequitiam, dilata luxuriam, quidquid libuerit, licitum puta; non hinc te punio, non te in gehennas mitto, faciem meam tantum tibi negabo. Si expavisti, amasti; si hoc quod dictum est: Faciem suam tibi negabit Deus tuus, contremuit cor tuum, in non videndo Deum tuum magnam poenam putasti; gratis amasti. Si ergo sermo meus invenit in cordibus vestris aliquam scintillam gratuiti amoris Dei, ipsam nutrite; ad hanc augendam vos advocate prece, humilitate, dolore poenitentiae, dilectione iustitiae, operibus bonis, gemitibus sinceris, conversatione laudabili, amicitia fideli. Hanc scintillam boni amoris flate in vobis, nutrite in vobis; ipsa cum creverit, et flammam dignissimam et amplissimam fecerit, omnium cupiditatum carnalium fena consumit.
10. 11. It is one thing to fear punishment; another to love righteousness. There ought to be in you a chaste love, by which love you desire to see, not heaven and earth, not the liquid plains of the sea, not trifling spectacles, not the flashings and brilliances of gems; but desire to see your God, to love your God; because it is said, Beloved, we are sons of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be; but we know that when it has appeared, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is (1 John 3:2). Behold, for the sake of which vision do good, behold, for the sake of which do not do evil. For if you love to see your God, if in this pilgrimage you sigh with that love; behold, the Lord your God tests you, as if he said to you: Behold, do what you wish, fulfill your desires, extend your wickedness, broaden your luxury, whatever pleases, reckon it lawful; I do not punish you for this, I do not send you into hell, I will only deny you my face. If you were terrified, you loved; if at this which was said—Your God will deny you his face—your heart trembled, if in not seeing your God you reckoned it a great punishment; you loved freely. If, then, my sermon has found in your hearts some spark of the free love of God, nourish it; call yourselves to increase it by prayer, by humility, by the grief of penitence, by love of righteousness, by good works, by sincere groans, by praiseworthy conduct, by faithful friendship. Blow upon this spark of good love in yourselves, nourish it in yourselves; when it has grown, and made a most worthy and most ample flame, it consumes the straw of all carnal desires.
Sermons5.10.11
SERMO 179
Sermon 179
Sermons5.10.11
1. Verbi Dei assiduos auditores, beatus Iacobus apostolus convenit, dicens: Estote autem factores verbi, et non auditores tantum, fallentes vosmetipsos . Neque enim eum cuius verbum est, aut per quem dicitur verbum; sed vosmetipsos fallitis. Ex hac ergo sententia manante de fonte veritatis, per os apostolicum veracissimum, audemus et nos exhortari vos; et cum exhortamur vos, respicere nos. Verbi Dei enim inanis est forinsecus praedicator, qui non est intus auditor. Nec ita aversi ab humanitate et fideli consideratione sumus, ut pericula nostra non intellegamus, qui verbum Dei populis praedicamus. Consolatur autem nos, quia ubi periclitamur in ministeriis nostris, adiuvamur orationibus vestris. Nam ut noveritis, fratres, quam tutiore loco stetis quam nos, ipsius apostoli aliam sententiam profero dicentis: Sit autem unusquisque vestrum velox ad audiendum, tardus autem ad loquendum . Prius itaque de hoc officio nostro loquar, propter hanc sententiam, qua admonemur esse velociores ad audiendum, tardiores ad loquendum; ut cum officium nostrum qui saepe loquimur, excusavero, tunc veniam ad id quod primo proposui.
1. The blessed apostle James addresses the assiduous hearers of the word of God, saying, But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves (Jas 1:22). For not him whose word it is, or through whom the word is spoken; but you deceive yourselves. From this sentence, then, flowing from the fountain of truth, through the most truthful apostolic mouth, we too dare to exhort you; and while we exhort you, to look upon ourselves. For the preacher of the word of God is empty outside, who is not within a hearer. Nor are we so turned away from humanity and faithful consideration, that we do not understand our perils, we who preach the word of God to the peoples. But it consoles us that, where we are in peril in our ministries, we are helped by your prayers. For that you may know, brothers, in how much safer a place you stand than we, I bring forth another sentence of the same apostle, saying, But let each of you be swift to hear, but slow to speak (Jas 1:19). So first I will speak of this office of ours, on account of this sentence, by which we are admonished to be swifter to hear, slower to speak; that, when I have excused our office, who often speak, then I may come to what I first proposed.
Sermons5.1
2. Oportet nos exhortari vos, ut non sitis auditores tantum verbi, sed etiam factores. Quod ergo saepe vobis loquimur, quis non, parum advertens necessitatem nostram, iudicat nos, cum legit: Sit autem omnis homo velox ad audiendum, tardus autem ad loquendum ? Ecce studium vestrum nos non permittit istam servare sententiam. Debetis ergo orare, sublevare, quem cogitis periclitari. Verumtamen, fratres mei, dicam vobis, quod volo credatis; quia hoc in corde meo non videtis. Ego qui vobis assidue loquor, iubente domno et fratre meo episcopo vestro, et exigentibus vobis, tunc solidum gaudeo, dum audio. Gaudium, inquam, meum tunc solidum est, quando audio, non quando praedico. Tunc enim securus delector. Voluptas illa non habet inflationem. Non ibi formidatur praecipitium elationis, ubi est petra solidae veritatis. Et ut sciatis ita esse, audite ubi dictum est: Auditui meo dabis exsultationem et laetitiam. Ibi gaudeo, ubi audio. Deinde secutus adiunxit: Exsultabunt ossa humiliata . Ubi audimus ergo, humiles sumus; ubi autem praedicamus, et si non elatione periclitamur, certe vel frenamur. Et si non extollor, periclitor ne extollar. Ubi autem audio, sine fraudatore fruor, sine teste delector. Noverat hoc gaudium etiam amicus ille sponsi, qui dicebat: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est; amicus autem sponsi stat, et audit eum. Et ideo stat, quia audit eum. Quia et primus homo audiendo Deum stetit, audiendo serpentem cecidit. Ergo amicus sponsi stat, et audit eum; et gaudio, inquit, gaudet propter vocem sponsi . Non propter vocem suam, sed propter vocem sponsi. Vocem tamen sponsi quam intus audiebat, foras populis non claudebat.
2. It is fitting that we exhort you not to be hearers only of the word, but also doers. So, that we often speak to you, who does not judge us, little attending to our necessity, when he reads, But let every man be swift to hear, but slow to speak (Jas 1:19)? Behold, your zeal does not permit us to keep this sentence. You ought, then, to pray, to relieve, the one whom you compel to be in peril. Yet, my brothers, I will tell you—believe what I wish—because you do not see this in my heart. I who speak to you assiduously, by the command of my lord and brother your bishop, and at your demanding, then have solid joy, when I hear. My joy, I say, is then solid, when I hear, not when I preach. For then I am delighted in security. That pleasure has no puffing-up. There the precipice of elation is not feared, where there is the rock of solid truth. And that you may know it is so, hear where it was said, To my hearing you will give exultation and gladness. There I rejoice, where I hear. Then it follows and adds, The humbled bones will exult (Ps 51:8 (50:10)). Where we hear, then, we are humble; but where we preach, even if we are not endangered by elation, surely at least we are reined in. And if I am not exalted, I am in peril lest I be exalted. But where I hear, I enjoy without a defrauder, I am delighted without a witness. This joy that friend of the bridegroom too knew, who said, He who has the bride is the bridegroom; but the friend of the bridegroom stands, and hears him. And therefore he stands, because he hears him. Because the first man too by hearing God stood, by hearing the serpent fell. Therefore the friend of the bridegroom stands, and hears him; and with joy, he says, he rejoices on account of the voice of the bridegroom (John 3:29). Not on account of his own voice, but on account of the voice of the bridegroom. Yet the voice of the bridegroom which he heard within, he did not shut from the peoples outside.
Sermons5.2
3. Hanc partem sibi elegerat etiam illa Maria, quae ministrante et circa multum ministerium occupata sorore sua, sedebat ad pedes Domini, et otiosa verbum eius audiebat. Ioannes stabat, illa sedebat; sed illa corde stabat, et ille humilitate sedebat. Stato enim significat permansionem; sessio, humilitatem. Et ut sciatis quia statio permansionem significat, hanc permansionem dicitur diabolus non habuisse; de quo dictum est: Ille homicida erat ab initio, et in veritate non stetit . Item quia sessio significat humilitatem, ille Psalmus ostendit, ubi admonet de poenitentia, et dicit: Surgite postquam sedistis, qui manducatis panem doloris . Quid est: Surgite postquam sedistis? Qui se humiliat, exaltabitur . Quid autem boni habeat auditio, ipse Dominus testis est, loquens de Maria quae sedebat ad pedes eius, et verbum eius audiebat. Cum enim soror eius occupatissima circa ministerium, a germana sua desertam se esse quereretur, ab interpellato Domino audivit: Martha, Martha, circa multa es occupata; porro unum est necessarium. Maria meliorem partem elegit, quae non auferetur ab ea . Numquid malum erat quod Martha agebat? Quis nostrum satis explicet verbis, quantum sit bonum hospitalitatem ministrare sanctis? Si quibuslibet sanctis, quanto magis capiti et praecipuis membris, Christo et Apostolis? Nonne unusquisque vestrum habens hoc hospitalitatis bonum, quando audit quid Martha faciebat, dicit apud seipsum: O beata, o felix, quae suscipere Dominum meruit; cuius hospites Apostoli facti sunt ambulantes in carne! Nec tu deficias, quia non potes quod Martha, suscipere Christum in domum tuam cum Apostolis suis; facit te ipse securum: Quando uni ex minimis meis fecistis, mihi fecistis . Opus ergo magnum est, valde magnum, quod praecipit Apostolus dicens: Necessitatibus sanctorum communicantes, hospitalitatem sectantes . Quam laudans in Epistola ad Hebraeos dicit: Per hanc quidam nescientes, hospitio receperunt angelos . Magnum ergo ministerium, magnum donum. Et tamen Maria meliorem partem elegit; quia sorore sollicita, laborante, multa curante, illa vacabat, sedebat, audiebat.
3. This part Mary too had chosen for herself, who, while her sister ministered and was occupied about much ministry, sat at the feet of the Lord, and at leisure heard his word. John stood, she sat; but she stood in heart, and he sat in humility. For standing signifies permanence; sitting, humility. And that you may know that standing signifies permanence, the devil is said not to have had this permanence; of whom it was said, He was a murderer from the beginning, and did not stand in the truth (John 8:44). Likewise, that sitting signifies humility, that Psalm shows, where it admonishes about penitence and says, Rise after you have sat, you who eat the bread of sorrow. What is, Rise after you have sat? He who humbles himself will be exalted (Ps 127:2 (126:2); Luke 14:11). What good hearing has, the Lord himself is witness, speaking of Mary who sat at his feet, and heard his word. For when her sister, most occupied about ministry, complained that she was deserted by her own sister, she heard from the Lord, appealed to, Martha, Martha, you are occupied about many things; but one thing is necessary. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken from her (Luke 10:41-42). Was what Martha was doing evil? Who of us could sufficiently unfold in words how great a good it is to minister hospitality to the saints? If to any saints whatever, how much more to the head and the chief members, to Christ and the Apostles? Does not each one of you who has this good of hospitality, when he hears what Martha was doing, say within himself: O blessed, O happy woman, who deserved to receive the Lord; whose guests the Apostles were made, walking in the flesh! Nor do you fail, because you cannot do what Martha did, receive Christ into your house with his Apostles; he himself makes you secure: When you did it to one of my least, you did it to me (Matt 25:40). It is a great work, then, a very great work, that the Apostle commands, saying, Sharing in the necessities of the saints, pursuing hospitality (Rom 12:13). Praising which in the Epistle to the Hebrews he says, Through this some, unknowing, received angels in hospitality (Heb 13:2). A great ministry, then, a great gift. And yet Mary has chosen the better part; because, with her sister anxious, laboring, caring for many things, she was at leisure, she sat, she heard.
Sermons5.3
4. Ostendit tamen Dominus, unde fuerit illa pars melior. Continuo quippe cum dixisset: Maria meliorem partem elegit; quasi quaereremus, ut scire vellemus unde meliorem, subiunxit et ait: Quae non auferetur ab ea . Quid intellegimus, fratres mei? Si ideo meliorem partem elegit, quia non auferetur ab ea, sine dubio Martha eam partem elegerat, quae auferetur ab ea. Plane auferetur ab omni homine, qui ministrat sanctis ea quae sunt corpori necessaria, auferetur ab eo quod facit. Non enim semper ministraturus est sanctis. Cui enim ministrat, nisi infirmitati? cui ministrat, nisi mortalitati? cui ministrat, nisi esurienti ac sitienti? Haec omnia non erunt, cum corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem. Cum enim transierit ipsa necessitas, nullum erit ministerium necessitatis. Auferetur labor, sed reddetur merces. Cui tunc ministrabitur cibus, ubi esurit nemo? cui potus, ubi sitit nemo? cui hospitium, ubi peregrinus est nemo? Dominus ergo cum discipulis suis, ut posset mercedem huius operis reddere, dignatus est indigere. Esuriebat et ipse, et sitiebat; non quia cogebatur, sed quia dignabatur. Bonum enim erat, ut per quem facta sunt omnia, esuriret; sic enim felix esset qui pasceret. Et quando Dominum quisque pascebat, quid dabat? quis dabat? unde dabat? cui dabat? Quid dabat? Cibum pani dabat. Quis dabat? Ille utique dabat, qui plus accipere volebat. Unde dabat? numquid de suo? quid enim habebat, quod non acceperat? Cui dabat? Nonne illi qui creaverat et quod accipiebat, et a quo accipiebat? Magnum hoc ministerium, magnum hoc opus, magnum donum. Et tamen Maria meliorem partem elegit, quae non auferetur ab ea. Pars ergo Marthae transit; sed, ut dixi, merces pro illa data non transit.
4. Yet the Lord showed whence that part was better. For at once, when he had said, Mary has chosen the better part; as though we should ask, wishing to know whence the better, he added and said, which will not be taken from her. What do we understand, my brothers? If she chose the better part for this reason, because it will not be taken from her, without doubt Martha had chosen the part which will be taken from her. Plainly it will be taken from every man who ministers to the saints the things necessary to the body; it will be taken from him what he does. For he will not always minister to the saints. For to whom does he minister, but to infirmity? to whom does he minister, but to mortality? to whom does he minister, but to one hungering and thirsting? All these things will not be, when this corruptible has put on incorruption, and this mortal has put on immortality. For when that very necessity has passed away, there will be no ministry of necessity. Labor will be taken away, but the reward will be rendered. To whom then will food be ministered, where no one hungers? to whom drink, where no one thirsts? to whom hospitality, where no one is a pilgrim? The Lord, then, with his disciples, that he might render the reward of this work, deigned to be in need. He himself hungered and thirsted; not because he was forced, but because he deigned to. For it was good that the one through whom all things were made should hunger; for so the one who fed him would be happy. And when anyone fed the Lord, what did he give? who gave? whence did he give? to whom did he give? What did he give? He gave food to the Bread. Who gave? He surely gave who wished to receive more. Whence did he give? Surely not from his own? for what did he have, that he had not received? To whom did he give? Surely to the one who had created both what he received, and the one from whom he received? A great ministry this, a great work, a great gift. And yet Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken from her. Martha's part, then, passes; but, as I said, the reward given for it does not pass.
Sermons5.4
5. Pars vero Mariae non transit. Videte quomodo non transeat. Unde delectabatur Maria quando audiebat? Quid manducabat? quid bibebat? Scitis quid manducabat, quid bibebat? Ipsum Dominum interrogemus, qui talem suis praeparat mensam, ipsum interrogemus. Beati, inquit, qui esuriunt et sitiunt iustitiam, quoniam ipsi saturabuntur . De isto fonte, de isto horreo iustitiae sancta Maria sedens ad pedes Domini, quasdam esuriens micas accipiebat. Tantum enim Dominus tunc dabat, quantum illa capiebat. Totum autem tantum quantum in illa sua futura mensa daturus est, nec ipsi discipuli, nec ipsi Apostoli capere tunc poterant, quando illis dicebat: Adhuc habeo vobis multa dicere; sed non potestis illa audire modo . Unde ergo Maria, ut dixi, delectabatur? Quid manducabat, quid bibebat avidissimis cordis faucibus? Iustitiam, veritatem. Veritate delectabatur, veritatem audiebat; veritati inhiabat, veritati suspirabat. Veritatem esuriens manducabat, sitiens bibebat; et ipsa reficiebatur, et unde pascebatur non minuebatur. Unde Maria delectabatur? quid manducabat? Immoror, quia delector. Audeo dicere, ipsum manducabat quem audiebat. Si enim veritatem manducabat, nonne ipse dixit: Ego sum veritas ? Et quid amplius dicam? Manducabatur, quia panis erat: Ego sum, inquit, panis qui de caelo descendi . Iste panis est qui reficit, nec deficit.
5. But Mary's part does not pass. See how it does not pass. Whence was Mary delighted when she heard? What did she eat? what did she drink? Do you know what she ate, what she drank? Let us question the Lord himself, who prepares such a table for his own, let us question him. Blessed, he says, are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled (Matt 5:6). From that fountain, from that storehouse of righteousness, holy Mary, sitting at the feet of the Lord, received certain crumbs, hungering. For the Lord then gave as much as she could take in. But the whole, as much as he is going to give at that future table of his, neither the disciples themselves, nor the Apostles themselves could then take in, when he said to them, I still have many things to say to you; but you cannot bear them now (John 16:12). Whence, then, was Mary, as I said, delighted? What did she eat, what did she drink with the most eager throat of the heart? Righteousness, truth. By truth she was delighted, truth she heard; for truth she gaped, for truth she sighed. Hungering she ate truth, thirsting she drank it; and she herself was refreshed, and that whence she was fed was not lessened. Whence was Mary delighted? what did she eat? I linger, because I am delighted. I dare to say, she ate him whom she heard. For if she ate truth, did he not himself say, I am the truth (John 14:6)? And what more shall I say? He was eaten, because he was bread: I am, he says, the bread that came down from heaven (John 6:41). This is the bread that refreshes, and does not fail.
Sermons5.5
6. Intendat itaque Caritas vestra. Ecce dicimus ministrare sanctis, cibum parare, potum ministrare, mensam ponere, pedes lavare, lectum sternere, tecto suscipere; nonne omne hoc transiturum est? Quis autem audet dicere, modo nos pasci veritate, non pasci autem cum venerimus ad immortalitatem? Nonne si pascimur modo micis, tunc plenam habebimus mensam? De ipso enim cibo spiritali Dominus dicebat, quando laudavit fidem Centurionis, et dixit: Amen dico vobis, non inveni tantam fidem in Israel. Et ideo dico vobis, quia multi ab Oriente et Occidente venient, et recumbent cum Abraham et Isaac et Iacob in regno caelorum . Absit a cogitationibus nostris, ut illos cibos in mensa illius regni cogitemus, de qualibus dicit Apostolus: Esca ventri, et venter escis; Deus autem et hunc et has evacuabit . Quare evacuabit? Quia fames non erit ibi. Quod manducabitur, non finitur. Nam et hoc praemium sanctis suis promittens in illo regno, ait: Amen dico vobis, quia faciet eos recumbere; et transiet, et ministrabit eis . Quid est: faciet eos recumbere, nisi, faciet requiescere, faciet vacare? Quid est: transibit, vel: transiet, et ministrabit eis? Post hunc transitum ministrabit eis. Hic enim transitum fecit Christus; veniemus ad eum quo transivit, ibi iam non transit. Nam et Pascha in hebraea lingua Transitus interpretatur. Hoc Dominus ostendit, immo Evangelista, ubi de Domino dixit: Cum autem venisset hora ut transiret de hoc mundo ad Patrem . Si ergo hic nos pascit, et sic pascit; ibi quomodo pascet? Quod ergo elegit Maria, crescebat, non transibat. Delectatio enim cordis humani de lumine veritatis, de affluentia sapientiae, delectatio cordis humani, cordis fidelis, cordis sancti, non invenitur voluptas, cui possit aliqua ex parte comparari, ut vel minor dicatur. Quod enim dicis: Minus est, quasi crescendo par erit. Nolo dicere: Minor; non comparo, alterius generis est, longe aliud est. Quid est enim modo quod omnes attenditis, omnes auditis, omnes excitamini, et quando verum aliquid dicitur, delectamini? Quid vidistis? Quid tenuistis? Quis color apparuit oculis vestris? Quae forma, quae figura, quae statura, quae lineamenta membrorum, quae corporis pulchritudo? Nihil horum. Et tamen amatis. Quando enim sic laudaretis, si non amaretis? Quando amaretis, si nihil videretis? Me itaque non ostendente formam corporis, lineamenta, colorem, pulchros motus, me non ostendente, vos tamen videtis, amatis, laudatis. Si haec delectatio veritatis dulcis est nunc, multo dulcior erit tunc. Maria meliorem partem elegit, quae non auferetur ab ea .
6. Let your Charity attend, then. Behold, we say to minister to the saints, to prepare food, to minister drink, to set the table, to wash the feet, to spread the bed, to receive under one's roof; is not all this going to pass away? But who dares say that now we are fed by truth, but will not be fed when we come to immortality? If now we are fed with crumbs, will we not then have a full table? For of that very spiritual food the Lord spoke, when he praised the faith of the centurion, and said, Amen I say to you, I have not found such faith in Israel. And therefore I say to you, that many will come from East and West, and will recline with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven (Matt 8:10-11). Far be it from our thoughts, that we think of those foods at the table of that kingdom, of which kind the Apostle says, Food for the belly, and the belly for food; but God will destroy both this and these (1 Cor 6:13). Why will he destroy? Because there will be no hunger there. What is eaten there is not ended. For promising this very reward to his holy ones in that kingdom, he says, Amen I say to you, that he will make them recline; and he will pass over, and will minister to them (Luke 12:37). What is, he will make them recline, but, he will make them rest, will make them be at leisure? What is, he will pass over, or he will pass on, and will minister to them? After this passing over he will minister to them. For here Christ made a passing over; we shall come to him to where he passed over, there he no longer passes over. For "Passover" too in the Hebrew language is interpreted "Passing over." The Lord shows this—rather, the Evangelist, where he said of the Lord, But when the hour had come for him to pass over from this world to the Father (John 13:1). If, then, he feeds us here, and feeds us thus; how will he feed there? What Mary chose, then, was growing, not passing away. For the delight of the human heart from the light of truth, from the affluence of wisdom—the delight of the human heart, of a faithful heart, of a holy heart—there is found no pleasure to which it can in any part be compared, so as even to be called less. For what you say, It is less, as if by growing it would be equal. I do not wish to say: Less; I do not compare, it is of another kind, it is far other. For what is it now, that you all attend, you all hear, you are all roused, and when something true is said, you are delighted? What did you see? What did you hold? What color appeared to your eyes? What form, what figure, what stature, what lineaments of members, what beauty of body? None of these. And yet you love. For how would you so praise, if you did not love? How would you love, if you saw nothing? So, though I do not show the form of a body, the lineaments, the color, the beautiful movements, though I do not show it, yet you see, love, praise. If this delight of truth is sweet now, much sweeter will it be then. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken from her.
Sermons5.6
7. Ostendi, sicut potui, quantum me Dominus adiuvare dignatus est, dulcissimae Caritati vestrae, quam tutiore loco stetis audiendo, quam nos praedicando. Hoc enim modo vos facitis, quod tunc omnes facturi sumus. Non enim erit tunc aliquis magister verbi, se magistrum Verbum. Illud ergo sequitur, quod ad vos pertinet facere, ad nos monere. Vos enim estis auditores verbi, nos praedicatores. Intus autem ubi nemo videt, omnes auditores sumus; intus in corde, in mente, ubi vos docet ille, qui vos admonet laudare. Ego enim forinsecus loquor, ille intus excitat. Omnes ergo intus auditores sumus; et omnes et foris et intus in conspectu Dei factores esse debemus. Unde intus factores? Quia qui viderit mulierem ad concupiscendum eam, iam moechatus est eam in corde suo . Et potest esse moechus, nullo hominum vidente, sed Deo puniente. Quis est ergo intus factor? Qui non ad concupiscendum videt. Quis est foris factor? Frange panem tuum esurienti . Hoc enim cum fit, videt et proximus; sed quo animo fit, non videt nisi Deus. Estote ergo, fratres mei, factores verbi, et non auditores tantum, fallentes vosmetipsos ; non Deum, non eum qui praedicat. Ego enim, vel quisquis vobis praedicat verbum, cor vestrum non videt; quid agatis intus in cogitationibus vestris, iudicare non potest. Quia homo non potest, intuetur Deus, cui cor humanum non potest occultari. Ipse videt quo studio audias, quid cogites, quid teneas, quantum proficias de supplementis suis, quam instanter ores, quemadmodum depreceris Deum ex eo quod non habes, quomodo gratias agas ex eo quod habes; ille novit qui exacturus est. Nos pecuniam dominicam erogare possumus; veniet exactor qui dixit: Serve nequam, dares pecuniam meam nummulariis, et ego veniens cum usuris exigerem .
7. I have shown, as I could, as far as the Lord deigned to help me, to your most sweet Charity, in how much safer a place you stand by hearing than we by preaching. For in this way you do now what we all are going to do then. For then there will not be any master of the word, but the Word the master. There follows, then, what pertains to you to do, to us to admonish. For you are the hearers of the word, we the preachers. But within, where no one sees, we are all hearers; within, in the heart, in the mind, where he teaches you who admonishes you to praise. For I speak outside, he within rouses. Therefore within we are all hearers; and we all, both outside and within in the sight of God, ought to be doers. How doers within? Because whoever sees a woman to covet her has already committed adultery with her in his heart (Matt 5:28). And he can be an adulterer with no man seeing, but God punishing. Who, then, is a doer within? He who does not look to covet. Who is a doer outside? Break your bread to the hungry (Isa 58:7). For when this is done, the neighbor too sees; but with what spirit it is done, none but God sees. Be, then, my brothers, doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves; not God, not the one who preaches. For I, or whoever preaches the word to you, do not see your heart; what you do within in your thoughts, I cannot judge. Because man cannot, God beholds it, from whom the human heart cannot be hidden. He sees with what zeal you hear, what you think, what you hold, how much you profit from his supplements, how earnestly you pray, how you beseech God for what you do not have, how you give thanks for what you have; he knows, who is going to exact. We can pay out the Lord's money; the exactor will come who said, Wicked servant, you should have given my money to the bankers, and I coming would exact it with interest (Matt 25:26-27).
Sermons5.7
8. Nolite ergo, fratres mei, fallere vosmetipsos, quia venistis studiose ad audiendum verbum, si non facitis quod auditis deficiendo. Cogitate si pulchrum est audire, quanto magis facere. Si non audis, auditum negligis, nihil aedificas. Si audis et non facis, ruinam aedificas. Domini Christi est de hac re proposita congruentissima similitudo: Qui audit, inquit, verba mea haec, et facit ea, similabo eum viro prudenti qui aedificat domum suam super petram. Descendit pluvia, venerunt flumina, flaverunt venti, et impegerunt in domum illam, et non cecidit. Quare non cecidit? Fundata enim erat super petram . Ergo audire et facere, aedificare est super petram. Ipsum enim audire aedificare est. Qui autem, inquit, audit verba mea haec, et non facit ea, similabo eum viro stulto qui aedificat. Et ipse aedificat. Quid aedificat? Ecce aedificat domum suam; sed quia non facit quod audit, et audiendo aedificat super arenam . Ergo super arenam, qui audit et non facit, aedificat; super petram, qui audit et facit; nec super arenam, nec super petram aedificat, qui omnino non audit. Vide autem quid sequatur: Descendit pluvia, venerunt flumina, flaverunt venti, et impegerunt in domum illam et cecidit; et facta est ruina eius magna . Spectaculum miserabile!
8. Do not, then, my brothers, deceive yourselves, that you have come eagerly to hear the word, if you do not do what you hear, by failing. Consider, if it is beautiful to hear, how much more to do. If you do not hear, you neglect the hearing, you build nothing. If you hear and do not do, you build a ruin. The Lord Christ has on this matter a most fitting similitude set forth: He who hears, he says, these my words, and does them, I will liken him to a prudent man who builds his house on rock. The rain came down, the rivers came, the winds blew, and dashed against that house, and it did not fall. Why did it not fall? For it was founded on rock. Therefore to hear and to do is to build on rock. For the very hearing is to build. But he who, he says, hears these my words, and does not do them, I will liken him to a foolish man who builds. He too builds. What does he build? Behold, he builds his house; but because he does not do what he hears, by hearing too he builds on sand. Therefore on sand he builds who hears and does not do; on rock, who hears and does; neither on sand nor on rock builds he who does not hear at all. But see what follows: The rain came down, the rivers came, the winds blew, and dashed against that house, and it fell; and its ruin was great (Matt 7:24-27). A pitiable spectacle!
Sermons5.8
9. Ait ergo aliquis: Quod non sum facturus, quid mihi opus est audire? Audiendo enim, inquit, et non faciendo, ruinam aedificabo. Nonne tutius est nihil audire? Ipsam quippe partem Dominus in sua similitudine proposita attingere noluit, sed intellegendam dedit. In hoc enim saeculo, pluvia, venti, flumina non quiescunt. Non aedificas super petram, ut veniant, et non te deiciant? Non aedificas super arenam, ne cum venerint, domum deiciant? Ergo sine ullo tecto, quia nihil audis, sic remanebis. Venit pluvia, veniunt flumina; numquid ideo tutus, quia raperis nudus? Considera ergo, qualem tibi elegeris partem. Non eris, ut putas, non audiendo securus; necesse est te nudum sine ullo tecto obrui, tolli, submergi. Si ergo malum est super arenam aedificare, malum est nihil aedificare; restat ut non sit bonum nisi in petra aedificare. Malum est ergo non audire; malum est audire et non facere; restat audire et facere. Estote ergo factores verbi, et non auditores tantum, fallentes vosmetipsos .
9. So someone says: What I am not going to do, what need have I to hear it? For by hearing, he says, and not doing, I will build a ruin. Is it not safer to hear nothing? That very part the Lord did not wish to touch in his similitude set forth, but gave it to be understood. For in this age, rain, winds, rivers do not rest. Do you not build on rock, so that, when they come, they do not cast you down? Do you not build on sand, lest, when they come, they cast down the house? Therefore without any roof, because you hear nothing, so you will remain. The rain comes, the rivers come; are you therefore safe, because you are swept away naked? Consider, then, what kind of part you have chosen for yourself. You will not be, as you suppose, secure by not hearing; you must necessarily, naked without any roof, be overwhelmed, swept away, drowned. If, then, it is evil to build on sand, it is evil to build nothing; it remains that there is no good but to build on rock. It is evil, then, not to hear; it is evil to hear and not do; it remains to hear and to do. Be, then, doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves.
Sermons5.9
10. Post hanc exhortationem timeo ne non verbo erigam, sed desperatione confringam. Fortassis enim aliquis, vel unus, vel duo, vel certe plures, in ista vestra frequenti praesentia iudicat me, et dicit: Vellem scire, si iste qui mihi loquitur, omnia facit quae vel ipse audit, vel ceteris dicit. Huic respondeo: Mihi autem minimum est ut a vobis diiudicer, aut ab humano die . Quoniam et ego ipse ex aliqua parte, quid nunc sim, possum scire; quid cras futurus sim, nescio. Sed tibi de me, o quisquis ita moveris, Dominus securitatem dedit. Si enim facio quae dico vel quae audio, imitatores mei estote; sicut et ego Christi . Si autem dico, et non facio, Dominum audite: Quae dicunt, facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite . Ergo si bene de me sentis, laudas me; si male sentis, accusas me, sed non excusas te. Quomodo enim te excusabis, si in malum praedicatorem veritatis verbum Dei tibi dicentem, et sua mala opera facientem contorqueas accusationem; cum Dominus tuus, redemptor tuus, effusor pretii, aggregans te militiae suae, et faciens de servo suo fratrem suum, non te desinat commonere, et dicat: Quae dicunt, facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite? Dicunt enim, inquit, et non faciunt. Bona dicunt, mala faciunt; tu audi bona, et noli facere mala. Hic respondebis: Quomodo audio bona ab homine malo? Numquid colligunt de spinis uvas? .
10. After this exhortation I fear lest I not raise you up by word, but break you down by despair. For perhaps someone, either one, or two, or surely more, in this frequent presence of yours, judges me, and says: I would like to know whether this one who speaks to me does all the things that he either himself hears, or says to others. To him I answer: But it is a very small thing to me to be judged by you, or by a human day (1 Cor 4:3). Since even I myself, in some part, can know what I am now; what I will be tomorrow, I do not know. But the Lord has given you security about me, O whoever you are who are so moved. For if I do what I say or what I hear, be imitators of me, as I too am of Christ (1 Cor 4:16; 11:1). But if I say, and do not do, hear the Lord: What they say, do; but what they do, do not do. Therefore if you think well of me, you praise me; if you think badly, you accuse me, but you do not excuse yourself. For how will you excuse yourself, if you twist an accusation against an evil preacher of the truth speaking the word of God to you, and doing his own evil works; when your Lord, your redeemer, the one who poured out the price, gathering you into his army, and making his servant his brother, does not cease to admonish you, and says, What they say, do; but what they do, do not do? For they say, he says, and do not do (Matt 23:3). They say good things, they do evil things; do you hear the good, and do not do the evil. Here you will answer: How do I hear good things from an evil man? Surely they do not gather grapes from thorns (Matt 7:16)?
Sermons5.10
SERMO 179/A
Sermon 179/A
Sermons5.10
1. Terribilis lectio ante Psalmum sonuit in auribus nostris, quoniam: Quicumque totam legem servaverit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus . In tanto ergo periculo quis non clamet: Miserere nostri, Domine, miserere nostri ? Non enim subtracta eius misericordia nos ipsum periculum commemorare vehementius, et vehementius commendare poterimus. Ne intres in iudicio cum servo tuo, ait quidam, sanctus licet, sed tamen homo; Ne intres in iudicio cum servo tuo, quoniam non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens . Noluit ergo secum intrari in iudicium. Iudicium autem sine misericordia illi, qui non facit misericordiam . A contrario intellegamus aliam sententiam, et videamus ubi spem ponere debeamus. Si enim iudicium sine misericordia illi, qui non facit misericordiam, procul dubio iudicium cum misericordia illi qui facit misericordiam. Hanc sententiam Iacobus apostolus protulit, ex cuius Epistola eadem lectio terribilis recitata est, quia: Iudicium sine misericordia illi, qui non facit misericordiam. Hanc vero a contrario, quam nos diximus: Iudicium cum misericordia illi qui facit misericordiam, Dominus expressit, ubi ait: Beati misericordes, quoniam ipsi misericordiam consequentur . Spes est ergo in Dei misericordia, si ab opere misericordiae non sit arida nostra miseria. Quid quaeris a Domino? Misericordiam. Date, et dabitur vobis . Quid quaeris a Domino? Indulgentiam. Dimittite, et dimittetur vobis .
1. A terrible reading sounded in our ears before the Psalm, since: Whoever keeps the whole law, but offends in one point, has become guilty of all (Jas 2:10). In so great a peril, then, who would not cry out, Have mercy on us, Lord, have mercy on us (Ps 123:3 (122:3))? For without his mercy subtracted from us, we will be able to mention the peril itself more vehemently, and more vehemently to commend it. Do not enter into judgment with your servant, says a certain man, holy indeed, but yet a man; Do not enter into judgment with your servant, for no living thing will be justified in your sight (Ps 143:2 (142:2)). He did not wish, then, that one enter into judgment with him. But judgment without mercy to the one who does not do mercy. By the contrary let us understand the other sentence, and let us see where we ought to place hope. For if judgment without mercy to the one who does not do mercy, without doubt judgment with mercy to the one who does mercy. This sentence the apostle James brought forth, from whose Epistle the same terrible reading was recited, that judgment is without mercy to the one who does not do mercy (Jas 2:13). But the contrary one, which we have said—judgment with mercy to the one who does mercy—the Lord expressed, where he says, Blessed are the merciful, for they will obtain mercy (Matt 5:7). There is hope, then, in the mercy of God, if our misery is not dry of the work of mercy. What do you seek from the Lord? Mercy. Give, and it will be given to you. What do you seek from the Lord? Pardon. Forgive, and it will be forgiven you (Luke 6:38.37).
Sermons5.1
2. Verumtamen quaeri solet quomodo accipiendum sit: Quicumque totam legem servaverit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus . Metuendum est enim et cavendum, ne arbitremur furem homicidae aut adultero comparandum; error quippe iste periculosus est et molestus; multum interest inter furtum et homicidium. Sed opponitur nobis: Certe ergo: Qui totam legem servaverit, offendat autem in uno, factus est omnium reus. Servat se ab homicidio, servat ab adulterio, servat a falso testimonio, servat ab idolatria, servat a quolibet damnabili sacrilegio. Furatus est; iam tenebitur et homicida et adulter et falsus testis et idolatres et sacrilegus, quia furtum fecit? Non certe ergo, qui in uno offendit, factus est omnium reus. Exponens autem hoc ipsum idem apostolus, cuius epistola est, subiunxit atque ait: Qui enim dixit: Non moechaberis, dixit et: Non occides. Quod si non occidis, moecharis autem, factus es transgressor legis . Hoc periculum cum ante oculos posuisset, omnesque tremuissent, velut consolaturus adiunxit: Sic loquimini et sic facite, sicut per legem libertatis incipientes iudicari. Iudicium enim sine misericordia illi qui non facit misericordiam . Sive ergo nodum quaestionis huius explicare possimus, sive conatus noster difficultati eius fortasse subcumbat, et aut vel cogitare digne non possim quod dicam, aut forte dicere quod potuero cogitare, fervete in operibus misericordiae. Hoc planum est, hoc apertum est, hoc non expositore indiget, sed auditore atque factore. Tamen etiam illud aperire utcumque conabor; adiuvet nos apud Deum oratio vestra. Tempus quidem audiendi est, non orandi; sed si quod dicturus sum a Deo exspectatis, oratis.
2. Yet it is wont to be asked how this is to be taken: Whoever keeps the whole law, but offends in one point, has become guilty of all (Jas 2:10). For it must be feared and guarded against, lest we suppose a thief is to be compared with a murderer or an adulterer; for this error is dangerous and troublesome; there is much difference between theft and murder. But it is objected to us: Surely, then: He who keeps the whole law, but offends in one point, has become guilty of all. He keeps himself from murder, keeps from adultery, keeps from false testimony, keeps from idolatry, keeps from any condemnable sacrilege. He has stolen; will he now be held both murderer and adulterer and false witness and idolater and sacrilegious, because he committed theft? Surely not, then, the one who offends in one point has become guilty of all. But expounding this very thing, the same apostle whose epistle it is, added and said, For he who said: You shall not commit adultery, said also: You shall not kill. But if you do not kill, but you commit adultery, you have become a transgressor of the law (Jas 2:11). When he had set this peril before our eyes, and all had trembled, as if to console he added, So speak and so act, as those who are going to be judged by the law of liberty. For judgment is without mercy to the one who does not do mercy (Jas 2:12-13). Whether, then, we can unfold the knot of this question, or whether our effort perhaps succumbs to its difficulty, and either I cannot worthily think what I should say, or perhaps cannot say what I have been able to think—be fervent in works of mercy. This is plain, this is open, this does not need an expositor, but a hearer and a doer. Yet I will try somehow to open that too; let your prayer help us before God. It is indeed the time of hearing, not of praying; but if you await from God what I am going to say, you pray.
Sermons5.2
3. Lex multa praecepta continet; et quidem illa lex, quae Decalogus dicitur, decem praecepta habet. Decem vero praecepta quasi generalia sunt, quo cuncta cetera innumerabilia referantur. Verumtamen, quomodo praecepta cetera, quae videntur innumerabilia, ad istam paucitatem deceni numeri redigantur, infinitum est disputare. Hoc sane modo, quantum Dominus adiuvat, demonstrare poterimus, quia, quomodo cetera praecepta omnia ad ista referuntur, quod dixi disputare esse operosissimum, ita ista decem ad duo referuntur. Decem vero ista quippe sunt. De uno Deo colendo, alio non colendo, unum praeceptum ibi est: Non facies tibi idolum, nec cuiusquam similitudinem, neque quae in caelo sursum, neque quae in terra deorsum . Dominus Deus tuus Dominus unus est . Secundum praeceptum est: Non accipies in vanum nomen Domini Dei tui . Tertium praeceptum est: Observa diem sabbatorum . Ista praecepta ad Deum pertinent. De sabbati observatione quasi superfluum est aliquid docere christianum. Immo non solum superfluum non est, sed hoc solidum est; nam illa umbra est. A servilibus enim operibus populus sabbato prohibetur. Nos numquid non prohibemur a servilibus operibus? Audi Dominum: Omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati . Tamen idipsum, ut peccatum non faciamus, a Deo sperare, hoc est sabbatizare; ideo enim scriptum est: Deus requievit in die septimo ab omnibus operibus suis . Deus requievit: Deus te requiescere facit. Ut enim requiesceret Deus, ubi laboravit, qui cuncta verbo creavit? Ergo tria ista ad Deum pertinent. Septem cetera ad hominem pertinent: Honora patrem et matrem; non moechaberis; non occides; non falsum testimonium dices; non furaberis; non concupisces uxorem proximi tui; non concupisces rem proximi tui . Si diligis Deum, nec alterum colis, nec nomen eius in vanum accipis, et ei sabbatizas, ut in te requiescat, cum te requiescere facit. Si autem diligis proximum, et honoras parentes, et non moecharis, et non occidis, et neminem falso testimonio laedis, et nemini furtum facis, et nullius uxorem concupiscis, et nullius rem concupiscis. Ac per hoc: Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota mente tua ; et: Diliges proximum tuum tamquam teipsum . In his duobus praeceptis tota Lex impletur et Prophetae . Audi et Apostolum: Plenitudo, inquit, legis caritas . Non te misit in multa, nec in decem, nec in duo: una caritas totum implet. Sed ipsa caritas gemina est: in Deum et in proximum. In Deum, quantum? Ex toto. Quo toto? Non enim aure, et naso, et manu, et pede. Unde diligi potest ex toto? Ex toto corde, ex tota anima, ex tota mente; ex toto, quod in te vivit, diliges fontem vitae. Si ergo ex toto quod in me vivit diligere debeo Deum, quid mihi relinquam unde diligam proximum? De proximo enim diligendo cum tibi praeciperetur, non tibi dictum est: Ex toto corde, et ex tota anima, et ex tota mente; sed tamquam teipsum. Deum ex toto te, quia ille est melior te; proximum tamquam te, quia hoc est quod tu.
3. The law contains many precepts; and indeed that law which is called the Decalogue has ten precepts. But the ten precepts are as it were general, to which all the rest, innumerable, are referred. Yet how the other precepts, which seem innumerable, are reduced to this fewness of the number ten, it is endless to discuss. But in this way, as far as the Lord helps, we shall be able to show that, just as all the other precepts are referred to these—which I said is most laborious to discuss—so these ten are referred to two. The ten are these. About worshiping the one God, not worshiping another, there is one precept: You shall not make for yourself an idol, nor the likeness of anything, neither what is in heaven above, nor what is on earth below. The Lord your God is one Lord. The second precept is: You shall not take in vain the name of the Lord your God. The third precept is: Observe the day of the sabbaths. These precepts pertain to God. About the observance of the sabbath it is as it were superfluous to teach a Christian anything. Rather, not only is it not superfluous, but this is solid; for that is a shadow. For the people are forbidden from servile works on the sabbath. Are we not forbidden from servile works? Hear the Lord: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin (John 8:34). Yet this very thing—to hope from God that we not commit sin—this is to keep sabbath; for it is therefore written, God rested on the seventh day from all his works (Gen 2:2). God rested: God makes you rest. For how would God rest, where he labored, who created all things by a word? Therefore these three pertain to God. The other seven pertain to man: Honor father and mother; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not kill; you shall not bear false witness; you shall not steal; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife; you shall not covet your neighbor's property (Exod 20:4-17). If you love God, you neither worship another, nor take his name in vain, and you keep sabbath for him, that he may rest in you, when he makes you rest. But if you love your neighbor, and honor your parents, and do not commit adultery, and do not kill, and harm no one by false testimony, and steal from no one, and covet no one's wife, and covet no one's property. And through this: You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart, and with your whole soul, and with your whole mind; and: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two precepts the whole Law and the Prophets are fulfilled (Matt 22:37-40). Hear the Apostle too: The fullness, he says, of the law is love (Rom 13:10). He did not send you into many things, nor into ten, nor into two: one love fulfills all. But love itself is twofold: toward God and toward neighbor. Toward God, how much? Wholly. With what whole? For not with the ear, and the nose, and the hand, and the foot. Whence can he be loved wholly? With the whole heart, with the whole soul, with the whole mind; with the whole that lives in you, you shall love the fountain of life. If, then, with the whole that lives in me I ought to love God, what do I leave for myself with which to love my neighbor? For about loving the neighbor, when it was commanded you, it was not said to you: With the whole heart, and with the whole soul, and with the whole mind; but as yourself. God with the whole of you, because he is better than you; your neighbor as yourself, because this is what you are.
Sermons5.3
4. Duo sunt ergo praecepta; tamen tria sunt diligenda. Praecepta duo sunt data: dilige Deum et dilige proximum; tria tamen video diligenda. Non enim diceretur: et proximum tamquam teipsum, nisi diligeres et teipsum. Ergo si tria sunt diligenda, quare duo sunt praecepta? Quare? Accipite. Non iudicavit Deus monendum te, ut diligas te; nemo est enim, qui non diligat se. Sed quoniam multi male se diligendo perdunt se, dicendo tibi ut diligas Deum tuum ex toto te, ibi tibi data est regula quemadmodum diligas te. Vis diligere te? Dilige Deum ex toto te; ibi enim invenies te, ne in te perdas te. Si te in te diligis, casurus es et a te, et multa quaesiturus es praeter te. Unde ab illo capite omnia mala est Apostolus exorsus, ubi ait: Erunt enim homines seipsos amantes. Ecce elegisti amare te; videamus si remanes vel in te. Falsum est, non ibi remanes; a Deo lapsus, et abs te laberis. Ibi est enim firmamentum; ibi haerere debuisti, illum tibi facere locum munitum et domum refugii. Nunc vero vinculum amoris tui relaxasti, vel dirupisti ab illo ad te; non remanes nec in te. Audi denique ipsum Apostolum. Cum dixisset: Erunt enim homines seipsos amantes, continuo subiecit: amatores pecuniae . Nonne dixi quia non eras remansurus vel in te? Numquid pecunia tu es? Ecce et a teipso peristi, qui a Deo recessisti. Quid restat, nisi ut effundas totum patrimonium mentis tuae, cum meretricibus vivens prodige, id est, cum libidinibus et diversis cupiditatibus, et ab egestate porcos pascere compellaris, id est, quia te possedit immunda avaritia, pascantur de te immunda daemonia? Sed ille filius, perpessus inopiam, et fame contritus, reversus ad semetipsum dixit . Reversus ad se, quia perierat a se, et in se invenit se inopem; ubique felicitatem quaesivit, et nusquam invenit. Reversus ad semetipsum, quid dixit? Surgam, et ibo. Quo ibo? Ad patrem . Iam ad se reversus, sed adhuc iacens, surgam, et ibo; non iaceam, non remaneam. Ergo constituta est tibi regula, quemadmodum te diligas; dilige meliorem te, et dilexisti te. Sed meliorem dico natura, non voluntate. Multi enim homines inveniuntur meliores te voluntate, sed solus Deus natura; creator, institutor, factor a nullo factus. Ibi te fige. Intellege aliquando, et dic: Mihi autem. Quid, tibi autem? Adhaerere Deo bonum est . Quare hoc? Attende quid supra dixit: Perdidisti omnem qui fornicatur abs te . Quia ergo perdidit omnem qui fornicatur ab eo, invenisti te. Mihi autem adhaerere Deo bonum est, hoc est, non fornicari a Deo, non me tollere a Deo. Vis videre autem in hac re quid tibi promittatur? Qui autem adhaeret Domino unus spiritus est . Haec est ergo dilectio tua vel dilectio tui, id est, dilectio qua te diligis, ut Deum diligas. Iam committo tibi et proximum, quem diligas tamquam teipsum; video enim quia coepisti diligere teipsum. Quem diligis ergo tamquam teipsum, duc quo duxisti teipsum. Si enim aurum diligeres et aurum haberes, et proximum tuum diligeres tamquam teipsum, diligendo divideres quod habebas, et faceres eum auri tui participem. Sed dividendo minus haberetis ambo. Quare non ergo illum possides, ubi nullas cum coherede patieris angustias? Quantiscumque potueris persuadere, quotquot potueris invitare, vocare, cogere ad diligendum Deum, et omnibus totus est, et singulis totus est.
4. There are, then, two precepts; yet three are to be loved. Two precepts were given: love God and love your neighbor; yet three I see to be loved. For it would not be said, and your neighbor as yourself, unless you loved yourself too. Therefore if three are to be loved, why are there two precepts? Why? Hear. God did not judge that you must be admonished to love yourself; for there is no one who does not love himself. But because many, by loving themselves badly, lose themselves, by saying to you that you love your God with the whole of you, there was given you a rule how to love yourself. Do you wish to love yourself? Love God with the whole of you; for there you will find yourself, lest in yourself you lose yourself. If you love yourself in yourself, you are going to fall both away from yourself, and you will seek many things outside yourself. Whence the Apostle began from that head all evils, where he says, For men will be lovers of themselves. Behold, you have chosen to love yourself; let us see whether you remain even in yourself. It is false, you do not remain there; fallen from God, you fall away from yourself too. For there is the firmament; there you ought to have cleaved, to make that for yourself a fortified place and a house of refuge. But now you have loosed, or rather broken, the bond of your love from him to yourself; you do not remain even in yourself. Hear finally the Apostle himself. When he had said, For men will be lovers of themselves, he at once added: lovers of money (2 Tim 3:2). Did I not say that you would not remain even in yourself? Surely you are not money? Behold, you have perished even from yourself, you who withdrew from God. What remains, but that you pour out the whole patrimony of your mind, living prodigally with harlots—that is, with lusts and diverse cupidities—and from want be compelled to feed swine—that is, because unclean greed has possessed you, let unclean demons be fed from you? But that son, having suffered want, and worn down by hunger, returning to himself, said. Returning to himself, because he had perished from himself, and in himself found himself in want; everywhere he sought happiness, and nowhere found it. Returning to himself, what did he say? I will rise and go. Where shall I go? To the father (Luke 15:17-18). Now returned to himself, but still lying down, I will rise and go; I will not lie down, I will not remain. So a rule has been established for you, how to love yourself; love one better than you, and you have loved yourself. But I say better by nature, not by will. For many men are found better than you by will, but God alone by nature; creator, founder, maker, made by none. There fix yourself. Understand at last, and say: But for me. What, but for you? To cleave to God is good (Ps 73:28 (72:28)). Why this? Attend to what he said above: You have destroyed everyone who fornicates away from you. Because, then, he destroyed everyone who fornicates away from him, you found yourself. But for me to cleave to God is good—that is, not to fornicate away from God, not to take myself away from God. But do you wish to see in this matter what is promised you? But he who cleaves to the Lord is one spirit (1 Cor 6:17). This, then, is your love, or the love of yourself—that is, the love by which you love yourself, that you may love God. Now I commit to you the neighbor too, whom you should love as yourself; for I see that you have begun to love yourself. The one, then, whom you love as yourself, lead where you have led yourself. For if you loved gold and had gold, and loved your neighbor as yourself, by loving you would divide what you had, and make him a partaker of your gold. But by dividing you would both have less. Why, then, do you not possess that One, where you will suffer no straits with a co-heir? However many you can persuade, however many you can invite, call, compel to love God, he is both wholly for all, and wholly for each.
Sermons5.4
5. Dilige ergo Deum, et dilige proximum tamquam teipsum. Video enim quia diligis teipsum, quia diligis Deum. Caritas radix est omnium operum bonorum. Sicut enim: Radix omnium malorum cupiditas, sic radix omnium bonorum caritas. Plenitudo ergo legis est caritas . Cito ergo dico: qui offendit caritatem, factus est omnium reus. Qui enim radicem ipsam offendit, quid arboris inoffensum relinquit? Quid ergo facimus? Qui offendit caritatem factus est omnium reus; omnino verum est. Sed aliter offendit caritatem fur, aliter adulter, aliter homicida, aliter sacrilegus, aliter blasphemus. Eamdem caritatem omnes offendunt, quia, ubi est plena et perfecta caritas, nihil potest esse peccati. Sed ipsa est quae in nobis crescit, ut aliquando perficiatur; et ita perficiatur, ut non sit ulterius quod addatur. Quando ita perfecta fuerit, ut non sit ulterius quo crescat, non sit ulterius quo cumuletur, nulla erunt peccata. Sed ubi hoc erit, nisi quando absorbebitur mors in victoriam ? Ibi enim dicetur, quia nullum erit omnino peccatum: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Ubi est? Ecce non est; ecce iam non pungis, non sternis. Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Et quid est: Ubi est aculeus tuus? Audi exponentem: Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum . Ergo, fratres, qui committit minora peccata, omnium reus est; et qui committit maius aliquod et criminosum peccatum, omnium reus est. Sed ille magis reus est, ille minus reus est; tamen ambo omnium rei, ut in diversitate peccatorum non quaeratur nisi maius et minus. Fecit furtum: si haberet caritatem, non faceret furtum; nam, non adulterabis, ait Apostolus, non homicidium facies, non furaberis, non concupisces, et si quod aliud est mandatum, in hoc sermone recapitulatur; diliges proximum tuum tamquam teipsum. Dilectio proximi malum non operatur. Plenitudo autem legis est caritas . Ergo et qui facit furtum, omnium reus est, quia caritatem laesit; et qui facit adulterium, omnium reus, quia caritatem laesit. Quomodo enim non omnia violavit, qui radicem laesit? Sed ille minus laesit, ille magis laesit.
5. Love God, then, and love your neighbor as yourself. For I see that you love yourself, because you love God. Love is the root of all good works. For just as the root of all evils is cupidity, so the root of all goods is love. The fullness, then, of the law is love (1 Tim 6:10; Rom 13:10). So I quickly say: he who offends against love has become guilty of all. For he who offends against the root itself, what of the tree does he leave unoffended? What, then, do we do? He who offends against love has become guilty of all; it is wholly true. But the thief offends against love in one way, the adulterer in another, the murderer in another, the sacrilegious in another, the blasphemer in another. All offend against the same love, because, where there is full and perfect love, there can be no sin. But it is love that grows in us, that it may at some time be perfected; and so be perfected that there is nothing further to be added. When it has been so perfected that there is no further whither it may grow, no further whither it may be heaped up, there will be no sins. But where will this be, except when death is swallowed up in victory? For there it will be said, because there will be no sin at all: Where, O death, is your struggle? Where, O death, is your sting? Where is it? Behold, it is not; behold, now you do not prick, you do not lay low. Where, O death, is your sting? And what is: Where is your sting? Hear him expound: But the sting of death is sin (1 Cor 15:54-56). Therefore, brothers, he who commits lesser sins is guilty of all; and he who commits some greater and criminal sin is guilty of all. But the latter is more guilty, the former less guilty; yet both guilty of all, so that in the diversity of sins nothing is sought but the greater and the less. He committed theft: if he had love, he would not commit theft; for, you shall not commit adultery, says the Apostle, you shall not commit murder, you shall not steal, you shall not covet, and if there is any other commandment, it is summed up in this saying; you shall love your neighbor as yourself. The love of neighbor works no evil. But the fullness of the law is love (Rom 13:9-10). Therefore both he who commits theft is guilty of all, because he wounded love; and he who commits adultery is guilty of all, because he wounded love. For how did he not violate all things, who wounded the root? But the latter wounded less, the former wounded more.
Sermons5.5
6. Tamen et ille, qui minus laesit, non sit piger: Iudicium enim sine misericordia illi, qui non facit misericordiam . Dimissa sunt omnia peccata fidelibus baptizatis; nullum omnino relictum est, quod non illa sanctificatio prius ademerit et exstinxerit. Verum est: quis dubitat? Sed si tunc de corpore migraretur, continuo innocentia, ut coepta fuerat, permaneret; quia vero hic vivitur, deleta est iniquitas, sed manet infirmitas. Per cuius infirmitatis et quodammodo fragilitatis humanae quasdam tenuissimas rimulas intrat de pelago, quod confluat in sentinam. Non admisit homicidium: evasit naufragus fluctum. Sed nescis quia obruit sentina neglecta? Propter fluctus ergo maiores, et propter quoslibet irrepentes umores, baptismi sacramentum totum abluit; propter fragilitatem autem navis huius, quae longo pelago fertur, et temptationibus tamquam tempestatibus agitatur, quia necesse est quaedam quamvis minora peccata subrepant, datum est alterum remedium, quia non poterat dari alterum baptismi sacramentum. Illud est unum; hoc quotidianum, quod paulo ante dixi: Iudicium sine misericordia illi, qui non facit misericordiam. Date, et dabitur vobis; dimittite et dimittetur vobis . Et quodammodo in orationibus vestris a quotidianis levibus minoribusque peccatis quotidie purgamini, si ex animo dixeritis, si veraciter dixeritis, si fideliter dixeritis: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris .
6. Yet let even the one who wounded less not be slothful: For judgment is without mercy to the one who does not do mercy (Jas 2:13). All sins are forgiven to the baptized faithful; absolutely none is left which that sanctification has not first removed and extinguished. It is true: who doubts it? But if one then migrated from the body, at once innocence, as it had begun, would remain; but because one lives here, the iniquity is blotted out, but the infirmity remains. Through certain very thin little cracks of this infirmity and as it were of human frailty there enters from the sea what flows together into the bilge. He did not commit murder: as a shipwrecked man he escaped the wave. But do you not know that a neglected bilge drowns? On account of the greater waves, then, and on account of any creeping moisture, the sacrament of baptism washes all away; but on account of the frailty of this ship, which is borne over a long sea, and is tossed by temptations as by storms, because it is necessary that certain, though lesser, sins creep in, another remedy has been given, because another sacrament of baptism could not be given. That is one; this is daily, which I said a little before: Judgment without mercy to the one who does not do mercy. Give, and it will be given to you; forgive, and it will be forgiven you (Luke 6:38.37). And in a way in your prayers you are daily cleansed from daily, light, and lesser sins, if you say from the soul, if you say truly, if you say faithfully, Forgive us our debts, as we too forgive our debtors (Matt 6:12).
Sermons5.6
7. Si non dimittis adversario tuo, tu tibi es adversarius. Vis videre quantum intersit? Verbi gratia, ille te laesit auferendo pecuniam; tu te fraudas non merendo indulgentiam. Postremo dicturus es: Multum saevit, sanguinem meum quaerit. Ille, sanguinem carnis tuae; tu, mortem animae tuae. Non ignosco, inquit; multum me laesit, multum mihi adversarius fuit. Peior tibi es. Non ignosco. Rogo te, ignosce, dimitte. Sed non me rogat. Tu pro illo roga. Prorsus non ignosco. Litigare vis, et nescis cum quo debeas. Litigare amas; redi ad te, irascere, sed noli peccare . Tibi irascere, ut non pecces; in te saevi, te castiga. Habes intus quod domes, et dormis. Attendis, cum quo litiges, foris vicinum tuum, consortem tuum, socium tuum, compossessorem tuum. Illam non attendis, non vides, aliam legem in membris tuis, repugnantem legi mentis tuae, et captivantem te in lege peccati, quae est in membris tuis. Sed expoliavit me. Captivus traheris, et expoliatori irasceris! Agnovisti te, vidisti ubi sis. Cognovisti captivatorem, exhibe te pugnatorem, quaere redemptorem. Sicut et ille ipse, cum dixisset: Captivum me ducentem in lege peccati quae est in membris meis . Infelix ego homo, inquit, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? Gratia Dei per Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Sed quis invocat gratiam, qui suam non videt poenam? Intellege ergo, vide quo traheris. Sed delectat me iustitia. Scio quia delectat: condelectaris enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem , sed vides aliam legem in membris tuis; condelectaris legi Dei, alia est lex in membris tuis. Hac vivis, hac moreris. Semivivum te latrones in via dimiserunt, sed iam a transeunte et misericordi Samaritano iacens inventus es; infusum est tibi vinum et oleum, sacramentum Unigeniti percepisti; levatus es in iumentum eius, incarnatum Christum credidisti; ad stabulum perductus es, in Ecclesia curaris.
7. If you do not forgive your adversary, you are an adversary to yourself. Do you wish to see how much difference there is? For example, he wronged you by taking away money; you defraud yourself by not earning pardon. Finally you will say: He rages much, he seeks my blood. He, the blood of your flesh; you, the death of your soul. I do not forgive, he says; he wronged me much, he was much my adversary. You are worse to yourself. I do not forgive. I beg you, forgive, let it go. But he does not ask me. Do you ask for him. Plainly I do not forgive. You wish to litigate, and you do not know with whom you ought to. You love to litigate; return to yourself, be angry, but do not sin (Ps 4:4 (4:5)). Be angry with yourself, that you may not sin; rage against yourself, chastise yourself. You have within what to tame, and you sleep. You attend with whom you litigate outside—your neighbor, your consort, your companion, your fellow-possessor. You do not attend to her, you do not see, the other law in your members, fighting against the law of your mind, and taking you captive in the law of sin which is in your members. But he despoiled me. You are led captive, and you are angry with the despoiler! You have recognized yourself, you have seen where you are. You have known the captor, show yourself a fighter, seek the redeemer. Just as that very man, when he had said, Taking me captive in the law of sin which is in my members. Unhappy man that I am, he says, who will free me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 7:23-25). But who calls upon grace, who does not see his own punishment? Understand, then, see where you are dragged. But righteousness delights me. I know that it delights you: for you delight in the law of God according to the inner man, but you see another law in your members; you delight in the law of God, there is another law in your members. By this you live, by this you die. Half-alive the robbers left you on the road, but now, lying down, you have been found by the passing and merciful Samaritan; wine and oil have been poured on you, you have received the sacrament of the Only-begotten; you have been lifted onto his beast, you have believed in Christ incarnate; you have been brought to the inn, you are cared for in the Church (See Luke 10:30-34).
Sermons5.7
8. Inde est quod loquor: hoc etiam ego, hoc nos omnes agimus; stabularii fungimur munere. Illi dictum: Si quid amplius erogaveris, in redeundo reddam tibi . Utinam nos hoc saltem erogemus, quod accepimus! Sed quantumcumque erogemus, fratres, pecunia dominica est. Conservi vestri sumus: inde vivimus, unde pascimus. Nemo nobis imputet beneficium; mali servi erimus, si non fecerimus; si autem fecerimus, nulla sit nostra arrogantia, quia de nostro non facimus. Illum omnes amemus, illum diligamus, propter illum nos invicem diligamus. Unum regem omnes habemus; ad unum regnum omnes perveniamus.
8. Hence it is that I speak: this too I do, this we all do; we perform the office of innkeepers. To him it was said, If you spend anything more, on returning I will repay you (Luke 10:35). Would that we at least spend out what we have received! But however much we spend, brothers, it is the Lord's money. We are your fellow-servants: we live from where we feed you. Let no one impute the benefit to us; we will be bad servants if we do not do it; but if we do it, let there be no arrogance of ours, because we do it not from our own. Let us all love him, let us love him, on account of him let us love one another. We all have one king; let us all come to one kingdom.
Sermons5.8
SERMO 180
Sermon 180
Sermons5.8
1. 1. Prima lectio quae nobis hodie recitata est apostoli Iacobi, oblata nobis est ad disserendum, et quodammodo indicta. Intentos enim vos fecit, admonens ante omnia ne iuretis. Difficilis quaestio est. Hoc peccatum quem non reum teneat, si iurare peccatum est? Nam periurium peccatum esse, et grande peccatum, nemo dubitet. Sed non ait Apostolus de cuius lectione tractamus: Ante omnia, fratres mei, nolite periurare; sed: nolite iurare . Praecessit etiam ipsius Domini Iesu Christi in Evangelio similis admonitio: Audistis, inquit, quia dictum est antiquis: Non periurabis. Ego autem dico vobis: nolite iurare, neque per caelum, quia sedes Dei est; neque per terram, quia scabellum est pedum eius; neque per caput tuum iurabis, quia non tibi est potestas facere unum capillum album aut nigrum. Sit autem sermo vester: Est, est; Non, non. Si quid amplius est, a malo est . Huic dominicae admonitioni memorata Apostoli lectio omnino sic congruit, ut nihil aliud Deus iussisse videatur; quia nullus alius hoc dixit, quam ille qui per Apostolum dixit: Ante omnia, inquit, fratres mei, nolite iurare, neque per caelum, neque per terram, neque aliud quodcumque iuramentum. Sit autem sermo vester: Est, est; Non, non. Nisi quod iste addidit: Ante omnia; ex quo multum fecit intentos, auxitque difficultatem quaestioni.
1. 1. The first reading which was recited to us today, of the apostle James, has been offered to us for discussion, and in a way imposed. For it made you attentive, admonishing before all things that you not swear. It is a difficult question. Whom would this sin not hold guilty, if to swear is a sin? For that perjury is a sin, and a great sin, let no one doubt. But the Apostle, of whose reading we treat, does not say: Before all things, my brothers, do not perjure; but: do not swear (Jas 5:12). A similar admonition of the Lord Jesus Christ himself in the Gospel went before: You have heard, he says, that it was said to the ancients: You shall not perjure. But I say to you: do not swear, neither by heaven, for it is the throne of God; nor by earth, for it is the footstool of his feet; nor shall you swear by your head, for you have no power to make one hair white or black. But let your speech be: Yes, yes; No, no. If anything is more than this, it is from evil (Matt 5:33-37). To this dominical admonition the mentioned reading of the Apostle so wholly agrees that it seems God commanded nothing else; because no other said this than the one who said through the Apostle: Before all things, he says, my brothers, do not swear, neither by heaven, nor by earth, nor by any other oath. But let your speech be: Yes, yes; No, no. Except that this one added: Before all things; whence he made you very attentive, and increased the difficulty of the question.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Invenimus enim iurasse sanctos, iurasse primitus ipsum Dominum, in quo non est omnino peccatum. Iuravit Dominus, et non paenitebit eum: Tu es sacerdos in aeternum, secundum ordinem Melchisedech . Aeternitatem sacerdotii Filio cum iuratione promisit. Habes etiam: Per memetipsum iuro, dicit Dominus . Et illud iuratio est: Vivo ego, dicit Dominus . Quomodo homo per Deum, sic Deus per seipsum. Non est ergo peccatum iurare? Durum est hoc dicere; et quoniam diximus Deum iurasse, quam blasphemum est hoc dicere? Iurat Deus qui peccatum non habet; non ergo est peccatum iurare; sed magis peccatum est peierare. Fortasse quis dicat non esse proponendum de Domino Deo iurationis exemplum. Deus enim est, et forte illi soli competit iurare, qui non potest peierare. Homines enim falsum iurant, vel cum fallunt, vel cum falluntur. Aut enim putat homo verum esse quod falsum est, et temere iurat; aut scit vel putat falsum esse, et tamen pro vero iurat, et nihilominus cum scelere iurat. Distant autem ista periuria, quae duo commemoravi. Fac illum iurare, qui verum putat esse, pro quo iurat; verum putat esse, et tamen falsum est. Non ex animo iste periurat; fallitur, hoc pro vero habet quod falsum est; non pro re falsa sciens iurationem interponit. Da alium qui scit falsum esse, et dicit verum esse; et iurat tamquam verum sit, quod scit falsum esse. Videtis quam ista detestanda sit bellua, et de rebus humanis exterminanda? Quis enim hoc fieri velit? Omnes homines talia detestantur. Fac alium, putat falsum esse, et iurat tamquam verum sit, et forte verum est. Verbi gratia, ut intellegatis: Pluit in illo loco? interrogas hominem; et putat non pluisse, et ad negotium ipsius competit, ut dicat: Pluit. Sed putat non pluisse. Dicitur ei: Vere pluit? Vere, et iurat; et tamen pluit ibi, sed ille nescit, et putat non pluisse; periurus est. Interest quemadmodum verbum procedat ex animo. Ream linguam non facit, nisi mens rea. Quis est autem qui non fallatur, etsi noluit fallere? Quis est homo cui non subrepat fallacia? Et tamen iuratio ab ore non discedit, frequentatur; plura sunt plerumque iuramenta, quam verba. Si discutiat homo quoties iuret per totum diem, quoties se vulneret, quoties gladio linguae se feriat et transfigat, quis in illo locus invenitur sanus? Quia ergo grave peccatum est peierare, compendium tibi dedit Scriptura: Noli iurare.
2. 2. For we find that the saints swore, that first the Lord himself swore, in whom there is no sin at all. The Lord swore, and will not repent: You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek (Ps 110:4 (109:4)). He promised the Son the eternity of priesthood with an oath. You have too: By myself I swear, says the Lord (Gen 22:16). And that is an oath: As I live, says the Lord (Isa 49:18). As a man swears by God, so God by himself. Is it, then, not a sin to swear? It is hard to say this; and since we said that God swore, how blasphemous it is to say this! God swears, who has no sin; therefore it is not a sin to swear; but rather it is a sin to perjure. Perhaps someone says that the example of swearing should not be set forth concerning the Lord God. For he is God, and perhaps it befits him alone to swear, who cannot perjure. For men swear falsely either when they deceive, or when they are deceived. For either a man thinks true what is false, and swears rashly; or he knows or thinks it false, and yet swears it for true, and swears no less wickedly. But these perjuries, which I have mentioned as two, differ. Suppose one swears who thinks true that for which he swears; he thinks it true, and yet it is false. This man does not perjure from the soul; he is deceived, he holds for true what is false; he does not knowingly interpose the oath for a false thing. Take another who knows it is false, and says it is true; and swears as if it were true what he knows to be false. You see how detestable this beast is, and to be exterminated from human affairs? For who would wish this to be done? All men detest such things. Take another, he thinks it false, and swears as if it were true, and perhaps it is true. For example, that you may understand: Did it rain in that place? you question a man; and he thinks it did not rain, and it suits his business that he say: It rained. But he thinks it did not rain. It is said to him: Truly did it rain? Truly, and he swears; and yet it rained there, but he does not know it, and thinks it did not rain; he is a perjurer. It matters how the word proceeds from the soul. A guilty mind alone makes the tongue guilty. But who is there who is not deceived, even if he was unwilling to deceive? Who is the man upon whom deception does not creep? And yet the oath does not depart from the mouth, it is frequent; oaths are very often more than the words. If a man examines how often he swears throughout the whole day, how often he wounds himself, how often he strikes and transfixes himself with the sword of the tongue, what place is found in him sound? Because, then, it is a grave sin to perjure, Scripture gave you a shortcut: Do not swear.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Quid tibi dicturus sum homo! Verum iura? Ecce verum iura, non peccas; si verum iuras, non peccas. Sed homo inter tentationes positus, carne involutus, calcans terram sub terra, dum corpus quod corrumpitur aggravat animam, et deprimit terrena inhabitatio sensum multa cogitantem ; inter ista multa tua cogitata incerta, volatica, coniecturas humanas, fallacias humanas, quando non subrepit tibi quod falsum est, posito in regione falsitatis? Vis ergo longe esse a periurio? Iurare noli. Qui enim iurat, aliquando verum iurare potest; qui autem non iurat, mendacium iurare numquam potest. Iuret ergo Deus, qui iurat securus, quem nihil fallit, quem nihil latet, qui omnino fallere ignorat, quia nec falli potest. Cum enim iurat, se adhibet testem. Quomodo tu cum iuras, Deum adhibes testem; sic ipse cum iurat, se testem adhibet. Tu quando illum adhibes testem, forte supra mendacium tuum, accipis in vanum nomen Domini Dei tui . Ne ergo mendacium iures, noli iurare. Ipsa est angustia. Periurium praecipitium. Qui iurat, iuxta est; qui non iurat, longe est. Peccat et graviter qui falsum iurat; non peccat qui verum iurat; sed nec ille peccat, qui omnino non iurat. Sed qui non iurat, et non peccat, longe est a peccato; qui autem verum iurat, non peccat, sed prope est ad peccatum. Fac te ambulare in aliquo loco, ubi a parte dextera spatiosa sit terra, nec usquam angustias patiaris; a sinistra praeceps locus est. Ubi eligis ambulare? Super finem terrae in labio praecipiti, an inde longe? Puto quia inde longe. Sic et qui iurat, in fine ambulat; et ambulat pedibus infirmis, quia humanis. Si offenderis, deorsum is; si lapsus fueris, deorsum is. Et quid te excipit? Periurii poena. Ergo volebas verum iurare; audi consilium Dei: Noli iurare.
3. 3. What shall I tell you, O man? Swear truly? Behold, swear truly, you do not sin; if you swear truly, you do not sin. But a man set among temptations, wrapped in flesh, treading the earth under the earth, while the body which is corrupted weighs down the soul, and the earthly dwelling presses down the mind thinking many things (See Wis 9:15); amid these your many uncertain thoughts, flighty things, human conjectures, human deceptions, when does there not creep upon you what is false, set in the region of falsehood? Do you wish, then, to be far from perjury? Do not swear. For he who swears can sometimes swear truly; but he who does not swear can never swear a lie. Let God swear, then, who swears securely, whom nothing deceives, from whom nothing is hidden, who wholly knows not how to deceive, because he cannot be deceived. For when he swears, he produces himself as witness. As you, when you swear, produce God as witness; so he, when he swears, produces himself as witness. You, when you produce him as witness, perhaps over your lie, take in vain the name of the Lord your God (See Exod 20:7). Lest, then, you swear a lie, do not swear. This is the strait. Perjury is the precipice. He who swears is near it; he who does not swear is far from it. He sins, and gravely, who swears falsely; he does not sin who swears truly; but neither does he sin who does not swear at all. But he who does not swear, and does not sin, is far from sin; but he who swears truly does not sin, but is near sin. Suppose you to walk in some place where on the right hand the land is spacious, nor do you anywhere suffer straits; on the left there is a precipitous place. Where do you choose to walk? On the edge of the land at the precipitous brink, or far from it? I think far from it. So too he who swears walks on the edge; and walks with infirm feet, because human. If you stumble, you go down; if you slip, you go down. And what receives you? The punishment of perjury. Therefore you wished to swear truly; hear the counsel of God: Do not swear.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Si peccatum esset iuratio, nec in veteri lege diceretur: Non periurabis; reddes autem Domino iusiurandum tuum . Non enim peccatum praeciperetur nobis. Sed ait tibi Deus tuus: Si iuraveris, non damnabo; si verum iuraveris, non damnabo. Sed numquid si non iuraveris damnabo? Duo sunt, inquit, quae non damno umquam; veram iurationem et nullam iurationem; damno autem falsam iurationem. Falsa iuratio exitiosa est, vera iuratio periculosa est, nulla iuratio secura est. Scio esse difficilem quaestionem, et Caritati vestrae fateor, semper illam vitavi. Nunc autem cum die dominico debito reddendi sermonis recitaretur eadem lectio, divinitus mihi inspiratum esse credidi, ut inde tractarem. Hinc me dicere Deus voluit; hinc vos audire. Obsecro ne contemnatis, obsecro ut cor stabiliatis, linguae mobilitates mutetis. Non frustra est omnino, non vacat quod cum eam, ut dixi, quaestionem semper devitare voluerim, imposita est necessitati meae, ut imponatur et Caritati vestrae.
4. 4. If swearing were a sin, it would not be said even in the old law: You shall not perjure; but you shall render to the Lord your oath (Matt 5:33; Lev 19:12; Deut 23:21). For a sin would not be commanded to us. But your God says to you: If you swear, I will not condemn you; if you swear truly, I will not condemn you. But surely if you do not swear will I condemn you? There are two things, he says, that I never condemn: a true oath and no oath; but I condemn a false oath. A false oath is destructive, a true oath is dangerous, no oath is secure. I know it is a difficult question, and I confess to your Charity that I always avoided it. But now, when on the Lord's day of the sermon owed, the same reading was recited, I believed it was divinely inspired to me that I should treat of it. From here God wished me to speak; from here you to hear. I beseech you not to despise it, I beseech you to make your heart firm, to change the mobilities of your tongue. It is not wholly without cause, it is not idle, that, since I always wished, as I said, to avoid that question, it has been imposed on my necessity, that it may be imposed on your Charity too.
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Ut noveritis, verum iurare non esse peccatum, invenimus et apostolum Paulum iurasse; Quotidie morior per vestram gloriam, fratres, quam habeo in Christo Iesu Domino nostro . Per vestram gloriam, iuratio est. Non quasi sic ait: Per vestram gloriam morior, quasi vestra gloria me facit mori; quomodo si diceret: Per venenum mortuus est, per gladium mortuus est, per bestiam mortuus est, per inimicum mortuus est; id est, faciente inimico, faciente gladio, faciente veneno, et similia; non sic dixit: Per vestram gloriam. Ambiguitatem graecus sermo dissolvit. Inspicitur in Epistola graeca, et invenitur ibi iuratio quae non est ambigua: Νὴ τὴν ὑμετέραν καύχησιν, ubi dixerit graecus, iurat. Quotidie auditis Graecos, et qui graece nostis: Νὴ τὸν Θεόν; quando dicit: Νὴ τὸν Θεόν, iuratio est: Per Deum. Ergo nemo dubitet iurasse Apostolum, cum dixit: Per vestram gloriam, fratres (et ne putemus eum per humanam gloriam iurasse) quam habeo in Christo Iesu Domino nostro. Est alio loco iuratio prorsus certa et expressa: Testem Deum invoco super animam meam. Apostolus dicit: Testem Deum invoco super animam meam, quia parcens vobis nondum veni Corinthum . Et alio loco ad Galatas: Quae autem scribo vobis, ecce coram Deo, quia non mentior .
5. 5. That you may know that to swear truly is not a sin, we find that the apostle Paul too swore: I die daily, by your glory, brothers, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord. By your glory is an oath. He does not say it as though: By your glory I die, as though your glory makes me die; as if he said: He died by poison, he died by the sword, he died by a beast, he died by an enemy; that is, the enemy doing it, the sword doing it, the poison doing it, and the like; he did not say it so: By your glory. The Greek text resolves the ambiguity. It is examined in the Greek Epistle, and there is found an oath which is not ambiguous: Nē tēn hymeteran kauchēsin; where a Greek says this, he swears. You hear Greeks daily, and you who know Greek: Nē ton Theon; when one says Nē ton Theon, it is an oath: By God. Therefore let no one doubt that the Apostle swore, when he said: By your glory, brothers (and lest we suppose he swore by human glory) which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord (1 Cor 15:31). There is in another place an oath wholly certain and express: I call God as witness upon my soul. The Apostle says: I call God as witness upon my soul, that, sparing you, I have not yet come to Corinth (2 Cor 1:23). And in another place, to the Galatians: But what I write to you, behold, before God, that I do not lie (Gal 1:20).
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Intendite, quaeso, et advertite; et si non tam plausibilis sermo vobis sit, propter angustias quaestionis, utilis tamen est, si ad viscera vestra perveniat. Ecce iuravit Apostolus. Non vos fallant, qui nescio quomodo volentes ipsas iurationes discernere, vel potius non intellegere, dicunt non esse iurationem, quando dicit homo: Scit Deus, Testis est Deus, Invoco Deum super animam meam verum me dicere. Invocavit, inquit, Deum, testem fecit Deum; numquid iuravit? Qui haec dicunt, nihil aliud volunt, nisi invocato Deo teste mentiri. Itane vero, quisquis es pravi cordis, et perversi cordis, si dicas: Per Deum, iuras; si dicas: Testis est Deus, non iuras? Quid est enim: Per Deum, nisi: Testis est Deus? Aut quid est: Testis est Deus, nisi: Per Deum?
6. 6. Attend, I beg, and notice; and even if the sermon is not so pleasing to you, on account of the straits of the question, yet it is useful, if it reaches your inmost parts. Behold, the Apostle swore. Let those not deceive you who, I know not how, wishing to distinguish—or rather, not to understand—oaths, say it is not an oath, when a man says: God knows, God is witness, I call God upon my soul that I speak the truth. He called upon God, they say, made God a witness; did he swear? Those who say this wish nothing else but, with God called as witness, to lie. Is it really so, whoever you are of a depraved heart and a perverse heart, that if you say: By God, you swear; but if you say: God is witness, you do not swear? For what is, By God, but, God is witness? Or what is, God is witness, but, By God?
Sermons5.6.6
6. 7. Quid est autem iurare, nisi ius Deo reddere, quando per Deum iuras; ius saluti tuae reddere, quando per salutem tuam iuras; ius filiis tuis reddere, quando per filios tuos iuras? Quod autem ius debemus saluti nostrae, filiis nostris, Deo nostro, nisi caritatis, veritatis, et non falsitatis? Maxime autem per Deum cum fit, ipsa est vera iuratio; quia et cum dicit quisque: Per meam salutem, salutem suam Deo obligat; quando dicit: Per filios meos, oppignerat Deo filios suos, ut hoc veniat in caput eorum, quod exit de ore ipsius; si verum, verum; si falsum, falsum. Cum ergo filios suos, vel caput suum, vel salutem suam quisque in iuratione nominans, quidquid nominat obligat Deo; quanto magis quando peierat per ipsum Deum? Timet enim falsum iurare per filium suum, et non timet falsum iurare per Deum suum? Fortassis hoc dicens in animo suo: Timeo per filium meum falsum iurare, ne moriatur; Deo autem qui non moritur, etsi falsum per eum iuretur, quid mali contingit? Bene quidem dicis, nihil mali contingit Deo, quando falsum iuras per Deum; sed contingit mali multum tibi, qui fallis proximum, cui testem adhibes Deum. Si aliquid teste filio tuo faceres, et amico vel proximo tuo vel cuilibet homini diceres: Non feci, et tangeres filio tuo caput, quo teste fecisti, et diceres: Per huius salutem, quia non feci; exclamaret forte filius tuus sub paterna manu tremens, nec tamen paternam manum, sed divinam tremens: Noli, pater, non tibi vilis sit salus mea; Deum super me invocasti, ego te vidi, fecisti, noli peierare; te quidem habeo genitorem, sed plus et tuum et meum timeo Creatorem.
6. 7. But what is it to swear, but to render right ("ius") to God, when you swear by God; to render right to your salvation, when you swear by your salvation; to render right to your children, when you swear by your children? But what right do we owe to our salvation, to our children, to our God, but of love, of truth, and not of falsehood? But most of all when it is done by God, that is the true oath; because even when anyone says: By my salvation, he obligates his salvation to God; when he says: By my children, he pledges his children to God, that this come upon their head, which goes out of his mouth; if true, true; if false, false. When, therefore, anyone, naming his children, or his head, or his salvation in an oath, obligates to God whatever he names; how much more when he perjures by God himself? For he fears to swear falsely by his son, and does not fear to swear falsely by his God? Perhaps saying this in his mind: I fear to swear falsely by my son, lest he die; but to God, who does not die, even if a false oath be sworn by him, what evil happens? You say well indeed, no evil happens to God, when you swear falsely by God; but much evil happens to you, who deceive a neighbor to whom you produce God as witness. If you did something with your son as witness, and said to a friend or your neighbor or any man whatever: I did not do it, and you touched your son's head, by whose witness you did it, and said: By his salvation, I did not do it; your son, trembling under your paternal hand, yet trembling not at your paternal hand, but at the divine, would perhaps cry out: Do not, father, let my salvation not be cheap to you; you called God upon me, I saw you, you did it, do not perjure; I have you indeed as my begetter, but I fear more both your Creator and mine.
Sermons5.6.7
7. 8. Sed quia Deus, quando per eum iuras, non tibi dicit: Ego te vidi, noli iurare, fecisti; sed times ne te iste occidat, tu te ante occidis; quia ergo non dicit: Ego te vidi, putas quia non vidit? Et ubi est quod dicit: Tacui, tacui; numquid semper tacebo? Et tamen plerumque dicit: Ego te vidi; sed aliter quando vindicat in periurum. Sed non in omnes vindicat; ideo homines aedificantur ad exemplum. Ego scio, ille mihi falsum iuravit, et vivit. Ille tibi falsum iuravit, et vivit? Falsum iuravit, et vivit; ille falsum iuravit. Tu falleris. Si tu oculos haberes unde mortem huius videres, si et tu in eo quod est mori, et non mori, non fallereris, videres huius mortem. Et modo intende Scripturam; et ibi invenies iacentem, quem putas viventem. Quia pedibus ambulat, quia manibus contrectat, quia oculis videt, et audit auribus, officiis ceteris membrorum satis utitur, viventem putas. Vivit, sed corpus eius; mortua est autem anima eius, mortuum est quod melius est eius. Vivit habitaculum, mortuus est habitator. Quomodo, inquies, cum vivat corpus, mortua est anima; cum corpus non viveret, nisi vivificatum ab anima? Quomodo ergo mortua est anima, de qua vivit corpus? Audi ergo, et disce: corpus hominis creatura Dei est, et anima hominis creatura Dei est. De anima Deus vivificat carnem; ipsam item animam vivificat de se ipso, non de se ipsa. Vita ergo corporis anima est; vita ergo animae Deus est. Moritur corpus, cum recedit anima; moritur ergo anima, si recedit Deus. Recedit anima, cum corpus percutitur gladio; et putas quia non recedit Deus, cum ipsa anima feritur periurio? Vis videre quia mortuus est, de quo loqueris? Lege Scripturam: Os quod mentitur, occidit animam . Sed tu praesentem Deum ultorem putas, si ille qui te iuratione falsa deceperit, continuo exspiret. Si exspiret ante oculos tuos, exspiravit caro ipsius. Quid est, exspiravit caro ipsius? Spiritum quo vivificabatur, eiecit. Hoc est, exspiravit excluso spiritu, quo vivebat caro. Peieravit, exclusit spiritum quo vivebat anima. Exspiravit, sed nescis; exspiravit, sed non vides. Carnem enim iacentem sine anima vides, animam miseram sine Deo videre non potes. Crede ergo, adhibe oculos fidei. Nemo periurus impunitus; prorsus nemo, cum illo est poena sua. Si haberet in cubiculo suo tortorem carnis, punitus esset; habet in secreto cordis sui tortorem conscientiae suae, et impunitus vocatur? Et tamen quid dicis? Vivit, gaudet, luxuriatur qui mihi mendacium iuravit; quid est, quod me mittis ad invisibilia? Quia et ipse Deus, per quem iuravit, invisibilis est. Iuravit per invisibilem, feritur poena invisibili. Sed vivit, inquit, et quodammodo scatet et bullit luxuriis. Si hoc ita est, quod scatet luxuriis, quod bullit luxuriis, vermes sunt animae mortuae. Denique omnis homo prudens, qui tales luxuriantes periuros attendit, sano cordis olfactu, avertit se, non vult videre, non vult audire. Unde se ista sanitas avertit, nisi quia putet anima mortua?
7. 8. But because God, when you swear by him, does not say to you: I saw you, do not swear, you did it; but you fear lest that one kill you, you kill yourself first; because, then, he does not say: I saw you, do you suppose he did not see? And where is what he says: I was silent, I was silent; shall I always be silent (Isa 42:14)? And yet very often he does say: I saw you; but in another way, when he takes vengeance on the perjurer. But he does not take vengeance on all; therefore men are built up by the example. I know, that man swore falsely to me, and he lives. That man swore falsely to you, and he lives? He swore falsely, and he lives; that man swore falsely. You are deceived. If you had eyes whence you could see his death, if you too in that which is to die and not to die were not deceived, you would see his death. And now attend to Scripture; and there you will find him lying dead, whom you think living. Because he walks with his feet, because he handles with his hands, because he sees with his eyes, and hears with his ears, and uses well enough the other offices of the members, you think him living. He lives, but his body; but his soul is dead, what is better in him is dead. The dwelling lives, the dweller is dead. How, you will say, when the body lives, is the soul dead; when the body would not live, unless given life by the soul? How, then, is the soul dead, by which the body lives? Hear, then, and learn: the body of man is a creation of God, and the soul of man is a creation of God. From the soul God gives life to the flesh; that same soul he gives life to from himself, not from itself. The life, then, of the body is the soul; the life, then, of the soul is God. The body dies when the soul withdraws; the soul dies, then, if God withdraws. The soul withdraws when the body is struck with the sword; and do you suppose that God does not withdraw when the soul itself is struck with perjury? Do you wish to see that the one of whom you speak is dead? Read Scripture: The mouth that lies kills the soul (Wis 1:11). But you think God a present avenger, if the one who deceived you by a false oath at once breathes his last. If he breathes his last before your eyes, his flesh has breathed its last. What is, his flesh has breathed its last? It has cast out the spirit by which it was given life. This is, it breathed its last, the spirit being shut out by which the flesh lived. He perjured, he shut out the spirit by which the soul lived. He breathed his last, but you do not know it; he breathed his last, but you do not see it. For you see the flesh lying without the soul; the wretched soul without God you cannot see. Believe, then, apply the eyes of faith. No perjurer is unpunished; absolutely none; with him is his own punishment. If he had in his chamber a torturer of the flesh, he would be punished; he has in the secret of his heart the torturer of his conscience, and is he called unpunished? And yet what do you say? He lives, rejoices, lives luxuriously who swore me a lie; why do you send me to invisible things? Because God himself, by whom he swore, is invisible. He swore by the invisible, he is struck by an invisible punishment. But he lives, he says, and in a way teems and bubbles with luxuries. If this is so, that he teems with luxuries, that he bubbles with luxuries, they are the worms of a dead soul. Finally every prudent man, who attends to such luxuriating perjurers, by the sound smell of his heart turns himself away, does not wish to see, does not wish to hear. Whence does this soundness turn itself away, unless because it thinks the soul dead?
Sermons5.7.8
8. 9. Breviter ergo audite, fratres mei, concludam sermonem, figens in cordibus vestris curam salubrem: Ante omnia nolite iurare . Quare: Ante omnia? Si magnum est facinus peierare, nulla autem culpa est verum iurare, quare: Ante omnia nolite iurare? Debuit enim dicere: Ante omnia nolite peierare. Ante omnia, inquit, nolite iurare. Iurare enim peius est, quam furari? Iurare peius est, quam adulterare? Non dico falsum iurare; iurare dico: iurare peius est, quam hominem occidere? Absit. Hominem occidere, adulterare, furari, peccatum est; iurare non est peccatum; sed falsum iurare peccatum est. Quare ergo: Ante omnia? Isto verbo quod ait: Ante omnia, cautos nos fecit adversus linguam nostram. Ante omnia, ait, ut attendatis prae ceteris, ut vigiletis ne subrepat vobis consuetudo iurandi. Tamquam in speculo ita te posuit contra te: Ante omnia, levavit te super cetera, unde te attendas. Considerat enim te iurare: Per Deum, per Christum occido illum; et haec quoties per diem, quoties per horam? Non aperis os, nisi ad talem iurationem. Nolles ut diceret tibi: Ante omnia, ut te adversus consuetudinem intentissimum redderet, ut omnia tua inspiceres, omnes motus linguae tuae diligentissime custodires, esses custos malae consuetudinis tuae, ad eam constringendam? Audi: Ante omnia. Dormiebas, pungo, ante omnia, spinas admoveo. Quid est: Ante omnia? Ante omnia vigila, ante omnia intentus esto.
8. 9. Briefly, then, hear, my brothers, I will conclude the sermon, fixing in your hearts a wholesome care: Before all things do not swear (Jas 5:12). Why, Before all things? If it is a great crime to perjure, but there is no fault in swearing truly, why Before all things do not swear? For he ought to have said: Before all things do not perjure. Before all things, he says, do not swear. Is swearing, then, worse than stealing? Is swearing worse than committing adultery? I do not say swearing falsely; I say swearing: is swearing worse than killing a man? Far from it. To kill a man, to commit adultery, to steal, is a sin; to swear is not a sin; but to swear falsely is a sin. Why, then, Before all things? By this word which he said, Before all things, he made us cautious against our tongue. Before all things, he says, that you attend before the rest, that you keep watch lest the habit of swearing creep upon you. As in a mirror he so set you against yourself: Before all things, he lifted you above the rest, whence you may attend to yourself. For he considers you swearing: By God, by Christ, I kill him; and these, how often a day, how often an hour? You do not open your mouth except for such an oath. Would you not wish him to say to you: Before all things, that he might make you most attentive against the habit, that you might inspect all your doings, most diligently guard all the movements of your tongue, be a guard of your evil habit, to restrain it? Hear: Before all things. You were sleeping, I prick, before all things, I apply thorns. What is, Before all things? Before all things keep watch, before all things be attentive.
Sermons5.8.9
9. 10. Iuravimus et nos passim, habuimus istam teterrimam consuetudinem et mortiferam. Dico Caritati vestrae: ex quo Deo servire coepimus, et quantum malum sit in periurio vidimus, timuimus vehementer, et veternosissimam consuetudinem timore frenavimus. Frenata restringitur, restricta languescit, languescens emoritur, et malae consuetudini bona succedit. Denique non vobis dicimus, non nos iurare. Si enim hoc dicimus, mentimur. Quantum ad me pertinet, iuro; sed quantum mihi videtur, magna necessitate compulsus. Cum videro non mihi credi nisi faciam, et ei qui mihi non credit non expedire quod non credit, hac perpensa ratione et consideratione librata, cum magno timore dico: Coram Deo; aut: Testis est Deus; aut: Scit Christus sic esse in animo meo; et video quia plus est, id est, quia amplius est quam: Est, est; Non, non; sed quod amplius est, a malo est; et si non a malo iurantis, a malo est non credentis. Denique non ait: Si amplius facit, malus est; et: Sit in ore vestro: Est, est; Non, non; si quis amplius facit, malus est; sed: Sit in ore vestro: Est, est; Non, non; quod autem amplius est, a malo est . Sed quaere cuius. Sed tamen aliud habet humana pessima consuetudo. Et cum tibi creditur, iuras; et cum nemo exigit, iuras; et horrentibus hominibus iuras; non taces iurando, vix es sanus non periurando. Nisi forte putatis, fratres, quia si sciret apostolus Paulus credere sibi Galatas, adderet iurationem et diceret: Quae autem scribo vobis, ecce coram Deo, quia non mentior . Videbat ibi eos qui credebant; videbat et alios qui non credebant. Ergo noli dicere: Non iuro, si forte exigitur. A malo est enim quod facis; sed illius qui exigit. Nam tu quomodo te purges non habes, quomodo satisfacias negotio quod instat, non invenis. Sed aliud est, cum exigitur iuratio; aliud, cum offertur; et hoc ipsum quod offertur, aliud cum offertur non credenti; aliud cum ventilatur et credenti.
9. 10. We too swore here and there, we had that most foul and deadly habit. I tell your Charity: from the time we began to serve God, and saw how great an evil is in perjury, we feared vehemently, and reined in by fear that most inveterate habit. Reined in, it is restrained; restrained, it grows weak; growing weak, it dies, and a good habit succeeds the evil one. Finally we do not say to you that we do not swear. For if we say this, we lie. As far as concerns me, I swear; but, as it seems to me, compelled by great necessity. When I see that I am not believed unless I do it, and that it does not profit the one who does not believe me that he does not believe it, with this reason weighed and consideration balanced, with great fear I say: Before God; or: God is witness; or: Christ knows it is so in my mind; and I see that it is "more"—that is, that it is beyond Yes, yes; No, no; but what is more is from evil; and if not from the evil of the one swearing, it is from the evil of the one not believing. Finally he did not say: If one does more, he is evil; and: Let there be in your mouth: Yes, yes; No, no; if anyone does more, he is evil; but: Let there be in your mouth: Yes, yes; No, no; but what is more is from evil (Matt 5:37). But seek whose. Yet the worst human habit has another thing. Both when you are believed, you swear; and when no one demands it, you swear; and to people who shudder, you swear; you are not silent by swearing, you are scarcely sound by not perjuring. Unless perhaps you think, brothers, that if the apostle Paul knew that the Galatians believed him, he would add an oath and say: But what I write to you, behold, before God, that I do not lie (Gal 1:20). He saw there those who believed; he saw also others who did not believe. So do not say: I do not swear, if perhaps it is demanded. For what you do is from evil; but from the evil of the one who demands it. For you have no way to clear yourself, you find no way to satisfy the business at hand. But it is one thing when an oath is demanded; another when it is offered; and this very thing that is offered—it is one thing when it is offered to one who does not believe; another when it is bandied about even to one who believes.
Sermons5.9.10
10. 11. Tene ergo linguam et consuetudinem, quantum potes; non quomodo quidam, quando illis dicitur: Verum dicis? Non credo. Non fecisti? Non credo: Deus iudicet, iura mihi. Et ipse qui exigit iurationem, multum interest si nescit illum falsum iuraturum, an scit. Si enim nescit, et ideo dicit: Iura mihi, ut fides ei fiat; non audeo dicere non esse peccatum, tamen humana tentatio est. Si autem scit eum fecisse, novit fecisse, vidit fecisse, et cogit iurare, homicida est. Ille enim suo periurio se perimit; sed iste manum interficientis et expressit et pressit. Cum vero aliquis sceleratus fur audit: Iura si non tulisti, iura si non fecisti, ab eo qui nescit an fecit; ille tunc, Christiano non licet iurare; quando ab illo exigitur iusiurandum, non licet iurare; Christianus sum, non mihi licet. Capta talem, averte te ab illo, dissimula a negotio de quo loquebaris; misce alias fabulas, et invenies eum millies iurantem, qui semel iurare noluit. Istam ergo consuetudinem quotidianam, crebram, sine causa, nullo extorquente, nullo de tuis verbis dubitante iurandi, avertite a vobis, amputate a linguis vestris, circumcidite ab ore vestro.
10. 11. Hold your tongue and habit, then, as much as you can; not like certain ones, when it is said to them: Do you speak the truth? I do not believe it. You did not do it? I do not believe it: let God judge, swear to me. And he himself who demands the oath—it makes much difference whether he does not know the man is going to swear falsely, or knows it. For if he does not know it, and therefore says: Swear to me, that he may be assured; I dare not say it is no sin, yet it is a human temptation. But if he knows the man did it, knows he did it, saw he did it, and forces him to swear, he is a murderer. For that one slays himself by his perjury; but this one both forced out and pressed down the hand of the slayer. But when some wicked thief hears: Swear if you did not take it, swear if you did not do it, from one who does not know whether he did it; then that one—it is not lawful for a Christian to swear; when an oath is demanded of him, it is not lawful to swear; I am a Christian, it is not lawful for me. Catch such a one, turn yourself away from him, dissemble about the business of which you were speaking; mix in other tales, and you will find swearing a thousand times the one who was unwilling to swear once. This daily, frequent habit of swearing, then—without cause, with no one extorting it, no one doubting your words—turn away from yourselves, cut it off from your tongues, circumcise it from your mouth.
Sermons5.10.11
11. 12. Sed consuetudo est, solet dici. Solet dici, quando non dico. Hoc est: Ante omnia. Quid est: Ante omnia? Prae ceteris cautus esto, plus ad hoc intentus est, quam ad alia. Maior consuetudo maiorem intentionem flagitat, non rei levis consuetudo. Si de manu aliquid faceres, facilius manui tuae imperares ne faceret; si pedibus aliquo eumdum esset, pigritia retardante excitares te ut surgeres, et ires. Lingua facilitatem habet motus, in udo posita est, facile in lubrico labitur. Quanto illa citius et facilius movetur, tanto tu adversus illam fixus esto. Domabis, si vigilabis; vigilabis, si timebis; timebis, si christianum te esse cogitaveris. Nam tantum mali habet iuratio, ut qui lapides colunt, timeant falsum iurare per lapides; tu non times Deum praesentem, Deum viventem, Deum scientem, Deum manentem, Deum in contemptorem vindicantem? Claudit ille templum super lapidem, et it ad domum suam; ipse super deum suum clausit, et tamen quando illi dicitur: Iura per Iovem, praesentis oculos timet.
11. 12. But it is a habit, it is wont to be said. It is wont to be said, when I do not say it. This is: Before all things. What is, Before all things? Be cautious before the rest, be more attentive to this than to other things. A greater habit demands a greater attention, not the habit of a light matter. If you were doing something with your hand, you would more easily command your hand not to do it; if you had to go somewhere with your feet, with laziness slowing you, you would rouse yourself to rise and go. The tongue has an ease of movement, it is set in a moist place, it easily slips on the slippery. The more quickly and easily it moves, the more you be fixed against it. You will tame it, if you keep watch; you will keep watch, if you fear; you will fear, if you consider that you are a Christian. For swearing has so much evil in it that those who worship stones fear to swear falsely by stones; do you not fear God present, God living, God knowing, God remaining, God taking vengeance on the despiser? That man shuts the temple over the stone, and goes to his house; he himself shut it over his god, and yet, when it is said to him: Swear by Jupiter, he fears the eyes of the present one.
Sermons5.11.12
12. 13. Et ecce dico Caritati vestrae, et qui per lapidem falsum iurat, periurus est. Unde hoc dico? Quia multi et in hoc falluntur, et putant, quia nihil est per quod iurant, non se crimine teneri periurii. Prorsus periurus es, quia per id quod sanctum putas, falsum iuras. Sed ego illud sanctum non puto. Sanctum putat cui iuras. Non enim quando iuras, tibi iuras, aut lapidi iuras; sed proximo iuras. Homini iuras ante lapidem; sed numquid non ante Deum? Non te audit lapis loquentem; sed punit te Deus fallentem.
12. 13. And behold, I say to your Charity, that even he who swears falsely by a stone is a perjurer. Whence do I say this? Because many are deceived even in this, and think, because there is nothing by which they swear, that they are not held by the crime of perjury. You are plainly a perjurer, because you swear a lie by what you think holy. But I do not think that holy. The one to whom you swear thinks it holy. For when you swear, you do not swear to yourself, or swear to the stone; but you swear to your neighbor. You swear to a man before the stone; but is it not before God? The stone does not hear you speaking; but God punishes you deceiving.
Sermons5.12.13
12. 14. Ante omnia ergo, fratres mei, obsecro vos, ne sine causa me Deus haec loqui compulerit. Dico enim ante ipsum quod dixi, saepe me istam quaestionem devitasse; timui ne monendo et praecipiendo plus reos facerem non audituros; hodie autem plus timui ne loqui recusarem, quod loqui iuberer. Quasi vero parvus sit fructus sudoris huius mei, si omnes qui mihi acclamaverunt, clament et contra se, ne falsum iurent adversum se; si tot homines qui me attentissime audierunt, attenti sint adversus consuetudinem suam, et admoneant se hodie, cum ad domos suas venerint, cum consuetudinem suam lapsu linguae repetiverint; admoneat proximus proximum: Hoc est quod hodie audivimus, hoc est quod obstricti sumus. Non fiat hodie, certe cum recens sermo est: Expertus loquor; non fiat hodie, pigrius fit cras. Si et cras factum non fuerit, minus laborat qui custodit; adiuvatur enim consuetudine superioris diei. Triduo moritur pestis de qua laboramus; et gaudebimus de fructu vestro; quia magno bono abundabitis, si tam magno malo carebitis. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
12. 14. Before all things, then, my brothers, I beseech you, let God not have compelled me to speak these things without cause. For I say before him what I said, that I often avoided this question; I feared lest, by admonishing and commanding, I make more guilty those who would not hear; but today I feared more lest I refuse to speak what I was commanded to speak. As if indeed the fruit of this sweat of mine were small, if all who acclaimed me cry out also against themselves, lest they swear falsely against themselves; if so many men who heard me most attentively be attentive against their own habit, and admonish themselves today, when they come to their houses, when they have resumed their habit by a slip of the tongue; let neighbor admonish neighbor: This is what we heard today, this is what we are bound to. Let it not be done today, surely while the sermon is fresh: I speak from experience; if it is not done today, it is done more sluggishly tomorrow. If it is not done tomorrow either, the one who guards labors less; for he is helped by the habit of the previous day. In three days the plague dies of which we labor; and we will rejoice over your fruit; because you will abound in a great good, if you lack so great an evil. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.12.14
SERMO 181
Sermon 181
Sermons5.12.14
1. 1. Beatissimus Ioannes apostolus salubriter et veraciter scribens, inter cetera ait: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est. Si autem confessi fuerimus peccata nostra, fidelis est et iustus, qui dimittat nobis peccata, et mundet nos ab omni iniquitate . His verbis docuit beatus Ioannes, immo ipse Dominus Iesus non se tacens per Ioannem, neminem in ista carne, in isto corruptibili corpore, in ista terra, in isto maligno saeculo, in ista vita tentationibus plena, neminem hic vivere sine peccato. Absoluta sententia est, nec expositore indiget: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus. Quis est enim qui non habet peccatum? Sicut Scriptura dicit: Nec infans cuius est vita diei unius super terram . Talis parvulus peccatum non fecit, sed de parentibus traxit. Ergo nullo modo quisquam potest dicere, non se habuisse peccatum. Sed accessit per fidem ad lavacrum regenerationis homo fidelis, et omnia dimissa sunt ei; iam sub gratia vivit, in fide vivit, membrum Christi factus est, templum Dei factus est; et tamen sic quomodo membrum Christi et templum Dei factus est, si dixerit se non habere peccatum, seipsum seducit, et veritas in eo non est; prorsus mentitur, si dicat: Iustus sum.
1. 1. The most blessed apostle John, writing wholesomely and truly, says among other things, If we say that we have no sin, we lead ourselves astray, and the truth is not in us. But if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, to forgive us our sins, and cleanse us from all iniquity (1 John 1:8-9). By these words the blessed John taught—rather, the Lord Jesus himself, not silent through John—that no one in this flesh, in this corruptible body, on this earth, in this evil age, in this life full of temptations, no one lives here without sin. The sentence is absolute, nor does it need an expositor: If we say that we have no sin. For who is there who has no sin? As Scripture says, Not even the infant whose life is of one day on the earth (See Job 14:4-5 LXX). Such a little one committed no sin, but drew it from his parents. Therefore no one can in any way say that he had no sin. But the faithful man came through faith to the washing of regeneration, and all was forgiven him; he now lives under grace, lives in faith, has been made a member of Christ, has been made a temple of God; and yet, even as he has been made a member of Christ and a temple of God, if he says that he has no sin, he leads himself astray, and the truth is not in him; he plainly lies, if he says: I am righteous.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Sunt autem quidam inflati utres, spiritu elationis pleni, non magnitudine ingentes, sed superbiae morbo tumentes, ut dicere audeant, inveniri homines absque peccato. Dicunt ergo, iustos prorsus in hac vita nullum habere peccatum. Haeretici autem sunt pelagiani, iidemque paelestiani, qui hoc dicunt. Et cum responsum illis fuerit: Quid est quod dicitis? Ergo vivit hic homo sine peccato, et non habet omnino ullum peccatum, nec facto, nec verbo, nec cogitatione? Respondent de illo superbiae vento, quo pleni sunt; quem ventum utinam finirent, reflarentur et tacerent, id est, humiles fierent, non elati; respondent, inquam: Prorsus isti homines sancti, fideles Dei, nec facto, nec verbo, nec cogitatione possunt ullum habere peccatum. Et cum eis dicitur: Qui sunt isti iusti, qui sine peccato sunt? respondent et dicunt: Tota Ecclesia. Mirari potuissem, si invenirem unum, duos, tres, decem, quot quaerebat Abraham. Abraham enim a quinquaginta usque ad decem descendit ; tu, haeretice, respondes, et dicis mihi totam Ecclesiam. Unde hoc probas? Probo, inquis. Proba, rogo te. Magnum enim mihi gaudium affers, si docere potueris, totam prorsus Ecclesiam in singulis quibusque fidelibus suis nullum habere peccatum. Probo, inquis. Dic unde? Apostolus loquitur. Quid loquitur Apostolus? Christus, inquit, dilexit Ecclesiam. Audio, et Apostoli verba esse cognosco. Mundans eam lavacro aquae in verbo, ut exhiberet sibi gloriosam Ecclesiam, non habentem maculam aut rugam, aut aliquid huiusmodi . Audivimus de nube magna tonitrua. Nubes enim Dei Apostolus. Verba ista sonuerunt, et tremere nos fecerunt.
2. 2. But there are certain inflated wineskins, full of the spirit of elation, not huge in greatness, but swollen with the disease of pride, who dare to say that men are found without sin. They say, then, that the righteous in this life have no sin at all. But the heretics, the Pelagians, the same as the Caelestians, are those who say this. And when it is answered them: What is it you say? Does this man, then, live here without sin, and have no sin at all, neither in deed, nor word, nor thought? They answer out of that wind of pride with which they are full; which wind would that they would end, would be deflated and silent—that is, would become humble, not exalted; they answer, I say: Plainly these holy men, faithful to God, can have no sin, neither in deed, nor word, nor thought. And when it is said to them: Who are these righteous, who are without sin? they answer and say: The whole Church. I could marvel, if I found one, two, three, ten, as many as Abraham sought. For Abraham descended from fifty even to ten (See Gen 18:24-32); but you, heretic, answer and tell me the whole Church. Whence do you prove this? I prove it, you say. Prove it, I beg you. For you bring me great joy, if you can teach that the whole Church plainly, in each of its faithful, has no sin. I prove it, you say. Tell me whence. The Apostle speaks. What does the Apostle say? Christ, he says, loved the Church. I hear, and I recognize the words to be the Apostle's. Cleansing it by the washing of water in the word, that he might present to himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing (Eph 5:25-27). We have heard great thunders from the great cloud. For the cloud of God is the Apostle. These words sounded, and made us tremble.
Sermons5.2.2
3. 3. Sed dicite nobis, antequam quaeramus quomodo ista verba Apostolus dixerit; dicite, inquam, nobis, utrum vos iusti estis, an non. Respondent: Iusti sumus. Ergo non habetis peccatum? Per omnes dies, per omnes noctes nihil mali facitis, nihil mali dicitis, nihil mali cogitatis? Non audent dicere: Nihil. Sed quid respondent? Nos quidem peccatores sumus; sed de sanctis loquimur, non de nobis. Hoc vos interrogo: Christiani estis? Non dico: Iusti estis? Christiani estis? Non audent negare: Christiani, inquiunt, sumus. Fideles ergo estis? Baptizati estis? Baptizati, inquiunt, sumus. Dimissa sunt vobis cuncta peccata? Dimissa, inquiunt. Quomodo ergo estis peccatores? Sufficit mihi unde vos repellam. Vos Christiani estis, baptizati estis, fideles estis, membra Ecclesiae estis, et habetis maculas et rugas? Quomodo ergo est Ecclesia isto tempore sine macula et ruga , cum vos sitis ruga eius et macula? Aut si non vultis esse Ecclesiam, nisi eam quae sine macula et ruga est, cum rugis vestris et maculis praecidite vos a membris eius, praecidite vos a corpore eius. Sed quid adhuc dicam ut se ab Ecclesia segregent, cum hoc iam fecerint? Haeretici enim sunt, iam foris sunt: cum tota munditia sua foris remanserunt. Redite, et audite; audite, et credite.
3. 3. But tell us, before we ask how the Apostle said these words; tell us, I say, whether you are righteous, or not. They answer: We are righteous. Then you have no sin? Through all days, through all nights you do nothing evil, you say nothing evil, you think nothing evil? They do not dare to say: Nothing. But what do they answer? We indeed are sinners; but we speak of the saints, not of ourselves. This I ask you: Are you Christians? I do not say: Are you righteous? Are you Christians? They do not dare to deny: We are Christians, they say. Are you, then, faithful? Are you baptized? We are baptized, they say. Have all your sins been forgiven you? They have been forgiven, they say. How, then, are you sinners? It is enough for me whence to refute you. You are Christians, you are baptized, you are faithful, you are members of the Church, and you have spots and wrinkles? How, then, is the Church at this time without spot and wrinkle, when you are its wrinkle and spot? Or, if you do not wish the Church to be any but the one without spot and wrinkle, with your wrinkles and spots cut yourselves off from its members, cut yourselves off from its body. But why should I still say that they separate themselves from the Church, when they have already done this? For they are heretics, they are already outside: with all their cleanness they have remained outside. Return, and hear; hear, and believe.
Sermons5.3.3
3. 4. Forte dicturi estis, in corde vestro tumido et inflato: Numquid potuimus dicere quia iusti sumus? Necesse utique erat propter humilitatem, ut diceremus nos peccatores esse. Propter humilitatem ergo mentiris? Iustus es, sine peccato es: sed propter humilitatem dicis te peccatorem. Quomodo te accipiam tamquam christianum in alterum testem, quem contra te ipsum teneo falsum testem? Iustus es, sine peccato es, et dicis te habere peccatum. Testis ergo falsus es contra te. Non accipit Deus mendacem humilitatem tuam. Inspice vitam tuam, vide conscientiam tuam. Ergo iustus es, sed non potes nisi dicere te peccatorem? Audi Ioannem; ipse tibi repetit quod etiam superius veraciter dixit: Si dixerimus, inquit, quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est . Tu non habes peccatum, et dicis te habere peccatum; veritas in te non est. Quia non dixit Ioannes: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, humilitas in nobis non est; sed dixit: nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est. Ergo mentimur, si dixerimus nos non habere peccatum. Si mendacium timuit Ioannes, tu mendacium non times, ut cum sis iustus, dicas te esse peccatorem? Quomodo ergo te accipiam ad alienam causam testem, qui in causa tua mentiris? Sanctos reos constituis, dum contra te falsum testimonium dicis. Quid facturus es alteri, qui te infamas? Quomodo alter tuam calumniam devitabit, quando te tuae linguae mendacio reum facis?
3. 4. Perhaps you are going to say, in your swollen and inflated heart: Could we possibly say that we are righteous? It was surely necessary, on account of humility, that we say we are sinners. On account of humility, then, you lie? You are righteous, you are without sin: but on account of humility you say you are a sinner. How shall I receive you as a Christian into a witness against another, whom against yourself I hold a false witness? You are righteous, you are without sin, and you say you have sin. You are, then, a false witness against yourself. God does not accept your lying humility. Inspect your life, see your conscience. Are you, then, righteous, but can only say that you are a sinner? Hear John; he himself repeats to you what he also truly said above: If we say, he says, that we have no sin, we lead ourselves astray, and the truth is not in us (1 John 1:8). You have no sin, and you say you have sin; the truth is not in you. Because John did not say: If we say that we have no sin, humility is not in us; but he said: we lead ourselves astray, and the truth is not in us. Therefore we lie, if we say we have no sin. If John feared a lie, do you not fear a lie, so that, being righteous, you say you are a sinner? How, then, shall I receive you as a witness in another's cause, who lie in your own? You make the saints guilty, while against yourself you say false testimony. What will you do to another, you who defame yourself? How will another avoid your slander, when you make yourself guilty by the lie of your tongue?
Sermons5.3.4
4. 5. Iterum te interrogo alio modo: Iustus es, aut peccator? Respondes: Peccator. Mentiris, quia non quod te esse corde credis, hoc ore dicis. Ergo et si non eras peccator, esse incipies dum mentiris. Dicis enim: Humilitatis causa nos dicimus peccatores esse; nam Deus videt quia iusti sumus. Cum ergo humilitatis causa mentiris, si non eras peccator antequam mentireris, mentiendo efficeris quod evitaveras. Veritas in te non est, nisi te ita dixeris peccatorem, ut etiam esse cognoscas. Veritas autem ipsa est, ut quod es dicas. Nam quomodo est humilitas, ubi regnat falsitas?
4. 5. Again I question you in another way: Are you righteous, or a sinner? You answer: A sinner. You lie, because what you do not believe in your heart that you are, this you say with your mouth. Therefore even if you were not a sinner, you will begin to be one while you lie. For you say: For the sake of humility we say we are sinners; for God sees that we are righteous. When, then, on account of humility you lie, if you were not a sinner before you lied, by lying you become what you had avoided. The truth is not in you, unless you so say you are a sinner that you also acknowledge that you are one. But truth itself is that you say what you are. For how is there humility, where falsehood reigns?
Sermons5.4.5
4. 6. Postremo omittamus Ioannis verba: ecce in corpore Ecclesiae, quam dicis non habere maculam aut rugam aut aliquid eiusmodi, et esse sine peccato, ecce veniet hora orationis, oratura est tota Ecclesia: et tu quidem foris es; veni ad orationem dominicam, veni ad trutinam, veni, dic: Pater noster, qui es in caelis. Sequere: Sanctificetur nomen tuum. Veniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo, et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie. Sequere, et dic: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. Responde, haeretice, quae sunt debita tua? An forte pecuniam mutuam a Deo accepisti? Non, inquit. Non te ego amplius interrogabo de hoc: ipse enim Dominus expositurus est, quae sint debita quae nobis petimus relaxari. Dicamus ergo sequentia: Sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Exponat hoc Dominus: Si enim dimiseritis hominibus peccata (ergo debita vestra peccata sunt), dimittet vobis et Pater vester peccata vestra. Redi ergo, haeretice, ad orationem, si obsurduisti contra veram fidei rationem. Dimitte nobis debita nostra, dicis, an non dicis? Si non dicis, etsi praesens fueris corpore, foris tamen es ab Ecclesia. Ecclesiae enim oratio est, vox est de magisterio Domini veniens. Ipse dixit: Sic orate ; discipulis dixit: Sic orate; discipulis dixit, Apostolis dixit, et nobis qualescumque agniculi sumus dixit; arietibus gregis dixit: Sic orate. Videte quis dixerit, et quibus dixerit. Veritas discipulis, Pastor pastorum arietibus: Sic orate: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Rex militibus, Dominus servis, Christus Apostolis, veritas hominibus loquebatur, sublimitas humilibus loquebatur. Scio quid in vobis agatur: ego vos appendo, ego de trutina mea renuntio, prorsus dico quid in vobis agitur. Hoc enim ego plus quam vos scio. Dicite: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris.
4. 6. Finally let us omit John's words: behold, in the body of the Church, which you say has no spot or wrinkle or any such thing, and is without sin, behold the hour of prayer will come, the whole Church is going to pray: and you indeed are outside; come to the Lord's prayer, come to the balance, come, say: Our Father, who are in heaven. Follow: Hallowed be your name. Your kingdom come. Your will be done, as in heaven, so on earth. Give us this day our daily bread. Follow, and say: Forgive us our debts. Answer, heretic, what are your debts? Did you perhaps receive money on loan from God? No, he says. I will not question you further about this: for the Lord himself is going to expound what the debts are that we ask to be released for us. Let us, then, say what follows: As we too forgive our debtors. Let the Lord expound this: For if you forgive men their sins (therefore your debts are your sins), your Father too will forgive you your sins (Matt 6:9-12.14). Return, then, heretic, to prayer, if you have grown deaf against the true reason of faith. Forgive us our debts, do you say, or not? If you do not say it, even if you are present in body, you are yet outside the Church. For it is the prayer of the Church, it is a voice coming from the teaching of the Lord. He himself said: So pray; to the disciples he said: So pray; to the disciples he said it, to the Apostles he said it, and to us, whatever kind of little lambs we are, he said it; to the rams of the flock he said: So pray. See who said it, and to whom he said it. The Truth to the disciples, the Shepherd of shepherds to the rams: So pray: Forgive us our debts, as we too forgive our debtors. The King to the soldiers, the Lord to the servants, Christ to the Apostles, the Truth to men spoke, the Sublimity to the humble spoke. I know what goes on in you: I weigh you, I report from my balance, I plainly say what goes on in you. For this I know more than you. Say: Forgive us our debts, as we too forgive our debtors.
Sermons5.4.6
5. 7. Interrogo te, homo iuste, sancte, homo sine macula et ruga; interrogo te, inquam: Oratio ista Ecclesiae est, fidelium est, an catechumenorum? Certe utique regeneratorum est, id est, baptizatorum; postremo, quod totum superat, filiorum est. Nam si non est filiorum, qua fronte dicitur: Pater noster, qui es in caelis ? Ubi ergo estis, o iusti et sancti? In membris Ecclesiae huius estis, an non estis? Ibi eratis, sed iam non estis ibi. Et utinam iam praecisi accepta ratione audiant et credant. Ergo si tota Ecclesia dicit: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, reprobus est qui hoc non dicit. Et nos quidem cum dicimus: debita nostra, quousque id quod petimus accipiamus, reprobi sumus, quia peccatores sumus; sed quod vos non facitis, nos faciendo, id est peccata nostra confitendo, mundamur; si tamen faciamus quod dicimus: Sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris . Ubi es ergo, haeretice pelagiane vel caelestiane? Ecce tota Ecclesia dicit: Dimitte nobis debita nostra. Habet ergo maculas et rugas. Sed confessione ruga extenditur, confessione macula abluitur. Stat Ecclesia in oratione, ut mundetur confessione; et quamdiu hic vivitur, sic stat. Et cum de corpore exierit unusquisque, dimittuntur ei omnia, quae talia habebat ut dimitterentur debita; quia et quotidianis precibus dimittuntur: et tunc exit mundatus, et thesaurizatur Ecclesia in thesauros Domini aurum purum; ac per hoc in thesauros Domini Ecclesia est sine macula et ruga . Et si ibi sine macula et ruga est, hic quid orandum est? Ut venia percipiatur. Qui dat veniam, maculam extergit; qui ignoscit, rugam extendit. Et ubi extenditur ruga nostra? Tamquam in tendicula magni fullonis, in cruce Christi. In ipsa enim cruce, id est, in ipsa tendicula pro nobis sanguinem fudit. Et nostis fideles quale testimonium perhibeatis sanguini quem accepistis. Certe enim dicitis: Amen. Nostis qui sit sanguis qui pro multis effusus est in remissionem peccatorum. Ecce quomodo fit Ecclesia sine macula et ruga, tamquam bene mundata in tendicula crucis extenditur: sed hic omnino potest id agi. Exhibet sibi Ecclesiam gloriosam Dominus, non habentem maculam aut rugam. Agit hoc et hic, exhibet ibi. Hoc enim agit, ut non habeamus maculam aut rugam. Magnus est qui agit, bene curat, doctissimus artifex est. Extendit in ligno, et facit nos sine ruga, quos abluendo fecerat sine macula. Ipse qui venit sine macula et sine ruga, extensus est in tendicula; sed propter nos, non propter se, ut nos faceret sine macula et ruga. Rogemus ergo eum ut faciat, et postquam fecerit, ad horrea nos ducat, ibique nos reponat, ubi pressorium non erit.
5. 7. I question you, O righteous man, holy man, man without spot and wrinkle; I question you, I say: This prayer—is it of the Church, of the faithful, or of the catechumens? Surely it is of the regenerate—that is, the baptized; finally, what surpasses all, it is of sons. For if it is not of sons, with what face is it said: Our Father, who are in heaven? Where, then, are you, O righteous and holy ones? Are you in the members of this Church, or are you not? You were there, but now you are not there. And would that, already cut off, having received the reason, they would hear and believe. Therefore if the whole Church says: Forgive us our debts, the one who does not say it is reprobate. And we indeed, when we say: our debts, until we receive what we ask, are reprobate, because we are sinners; but what you do not do, we do—that is, by confessing our sins we are cleansed; provided we do what we say: As we too forgive our debtors. Where are you, then, heretic, Pelagian or Caelestian? Behold, the whole Church says: Forgive us our debts. It has, then, spots and wrinkles. But by confession the wrinkle is stretched out, by confession the spot is washed away. The Church stands in prayer, that it may be cleansed by confession; and as long as one lives here, so it stands. And when each one goes out of the body, all is forgiven him, which he had such as to be forgiven, as debts; because by daily prayers too they are forgiven: and then he goes out cleansed, and the Church treasures up pure gold into the treasures of the Lord; and through this, in the treasures of the Lord the Church is without spot and wrinkle. And if there it is without spot and wrinkle, what is to be prayed for here? That pardon be received. He who gives pardon wipes off the spot; he who forgives stretches out the wrinkle. And where is our wrinkle stretched out? As it were on the stretching-frame of the great fuller, on the cross of Christ. For on that very cross—that is, on that very stretching-frame—he poured out his blood for us. And you faithful know what testimony you bear to the blood you have received. For you surely say: Amen. You know what the blood is that was shed for many unto the remission of sins. Behold how the Church is made without spot and wrinkle, well cleansed, stretched out as it were on the stretching-frame of the cross: but this can be wholly done here. The Lord presents to himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle. He does this here, he presents it there. For he does this, that we may not have spot or wrinkle. Great is he who does it, he cures well, he is a most learned craftsman. He stretches us out on the wood, and makes us without wrinkle, whom by washing he had made without spot. He himself who came without spot and without wrinkle was stretched out on the stretching-frame; but for our sake, not for his own, that he might make us without spot and wrinkle. Let us ask him, then, to do it, and after he has done it, to lead us to the granaries, and there store us, where there will be no press.
Sermons5.5.7
6. 8. Tu ergo qui loquebaris, sine macula et ruga es? Quid hic facis in Ecclesia, quae dicit: Dimitte nobis debita nostra ? Debita se habere confitetur, quae relaxentur. Qui non confitentur, non ideo non habent; sed ideo eis non relaxabuntur. Confessio nos sanat, et vita cauta, vita humilis, oratio cum fide, contritio cordis, lacrimae non fictae de vena cordis profluentes, ut dimittantur nobis peccata, sine quibus esse non possumus. Confessio, inquam, nos sanat, dicente apostolo Ioanne: Si confiteamur peccata nostra, fidelis est et iustus, ut dimittat nobis peccata, et mundet nos ab omni iniquitate . Non autem, quia dico quod non possumus hic esse sine peccato, homicidia facere debemus, aut adulteria, vel cetera mortifera peccata, quae uno ictu perimunt. Talia non facit bonae fidei et bonae spei Christianus; sed illa sola, quae quotidiano orationis penicillo tergantur. Humiles et devoti dicamus quotidie: Dimitte nobis debita nostra; sed si faciamus quod sequitur: Sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris . Sponsio haec cum Deo, vera sponsio et fixa conditio est. Tu homo es, et habes debitorem, et debitor etiam tu es. Accedis ad Deum, qui habet debitores, et debitor non est, ut postules tibi debita relaxari. Sed hoc tibi dicit: Ego debita non habeo, tu habes debita; debes enim mihi: sed etiam frater tuus debet tibi. Debitor meus es, habes et tu debitorem. Debitor meus es, quia peccasti in me: habes debitorem fratrem, quia peccavit in te. Quod feceris cum debitore tuo, facio et ego cum meo; id est, si dimittis, dimitto; si tenes, teneo. Tu contra te tenes, qui alteri non dimittis. Nemo ergo dicat se esse sine peccato: sed non tamen ideo debemus amare peccatum. Oderimus ea, fratres; etsi non sumus sine peccatis, oderimus tamen ea: et maxime a criminibus nos abstineamus; abstineamus, quantum possumus, a levibus peccatis. Ego, ait, nescio quis, non habeo peccata. Se ipsum decipit, et veritas in eo non est. Prorsus oremus, ut Deus dimittat; sed faciamus quod dicitur, dimittamus et nos debitoribus nostris. Cum dimittimus, et dimittitur nobis. Quotidie dicimus hoc, et quotidie facimus, et quotidie fit in nobis. Non hic sumus sine peccato, sed exibimus hinc sine peccato.
6. 8. You, then, who were speaking, are you without spot and wrinkle? What do you do here in the Church, which says: Forgive us our debts? It confesses that it has debts to be released. Those who do not confess do not for that reason not have them; but for that reason they will not be released to them. Confession heals us, and a cautious life, a humble life, prayer with faith, contrition of heart, tears not feigned, flowing from the vein of the heart, that our sins be forgiven us, without which we cannot be. Confession, I say, heals us, the apostle John saying: If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, to forgive us our sins, and cleanse us from all iniquity (1 John 1:9). But not because I say that we cannot be here without sin ought we to commit murders, or adulteries, or the other deadly sins, which slay at one stroke. Such things the Christian of good faith and good hope does not do; but only those which are wiped off by the daily brush of prayer. Humble and devout, let us say daily: Forgive us our debts; but only if we do what follows: As we too forgive our debtors (Matt 6:12). This compact with God, this is a true compact and a fixed condition. You are a man, and you have a debtor, and you too are a debtor. You come to God, who has debtors and is not a debtor, that you may ask your debts to be released to you. But he says this to you: I have no debts, you have debts; for you owe me: but your brother too owes you. You are my debtor, you have a debtor too. You are my debtor, because you sinned against me; you have your brother as a debtor, because he sinned against you. What you do with your debtor, I too do with mine; that is, if you forgive, I forgive; if you hold, I hold. You hold against yourself, who do not forgive another. Let no one, then, say that he is without sin: but yet we ought not for that reason to love sin. Let us hate them, brothers; even if we are not without sins, yet let us hate them: and most of all let us abstain from crimes; let us abstain, as much as we can, from light sins. I, says someone, have no sins. He deceives himself, and the truth is not in him. Let us plainly pray that God forgive; but let us do what is said, let us too forgive our debtors. When we forgive, it is forgiven us too. We say this daily, and daily we do it, and daily it is done in us. We are not here without sin, but we shall go out from here without sin.
Sermons5.6.8
SERMO 182
Sermon 182
Sermons5.6.8
1. 1. Quando Ioannes apostolus legebatur, audivimus loquentem per eum Spiritum Sanctum, et dicentem: Carissimi, nolite omni spiritui credere; sed probate spiritus, si ex Deo sunt. Repeto, quia necessarium est ut repetam, et hoc mentibus vestris, quantum Dominus adiuvat, vehementer inculcem. Carissimi, nolite omni spiritui credere; sed probate spiritus, si ex Deo sunt. Quoniam multi pseudoprophetae prodierunt in hunc mundum . Praecepit Spiritus Sanctus, ne omni spiritui credamus: et causam cur hoc praeceperit, dixit. Quae illa causa est? Quoniam multi, inquit, pseudoprophetae prodierunt in hunc mundum. Quisquis ergo ista praecepta contempserit, et omni spiritui credendum putaverit, necesse est incurrat in pseudoprophetas, et quod peius est, blasphemet veros Prophetas.
1. 1. When the apostle John was being read, we heard the Holy Spirit speaking through him and saying, Beloved, do not believe every spirit; but test the spirits, whether they are from God. I repeat, because it is necessary that I repeat, and that I vehemently impress this upon your minds, as far as the Lord helps. Beloved, do not believe every spirit; but test the spirits, whether they are from God. For many false prophets have gone out into this world (1 John 4:1). The Holy Spirit commanded that we not believe every spirit: and he stated the cause why he commanded this. What is that cause? Because many, he says, false prophets have gone out into this world. Whoever, then, despises these precepts, and thinks that every spirit should be believed, must necessarily run into false prophets, and, what is worse, blaspheme the true Prophets.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Hic iam ex isto praecepto homo cautus effectus dicturus est mihi: Audivi, teneo, obtemperare desidero, quia et ego in pseudoprophetas nolo incurrere. Quis enim hoc velit, a mendacibus decipi? Siquidem pseudopropheta est mendax propheta. Da mihi hominem religiosum, non vult fallere; da mihi hominem impium, sacrilegum, fallere vult, falli non vult. Cum ergo nolint fallere boni, falli autem nec boni velint nec mali, quis est qui in pseudoprophetam velit incurrere? Verba dico consulentis me: sed utique in pseudoprophetam nemo nisi invitus incurrit. Audivi praeceptum Ioannis, immo Domini per Ioannem: Nolite omni spiritui credere. Ecce accipio, ita volo. Addit, et dicit: Sed probate spiritus, si ex Deo sunt . Unde probo? Probare vellem, si errare non possem. Certe nisi probavero spiritus qui ex Deo sunt, incurram necesse est in spiritus qui ex Deo non sunt, et ex hoc seducar a pseudoprophetis. Quid agam? Quomodo observem? O si sanctus Ioannes, quomodo nobis dixit: Nolite omni spiritui credere, sed probate spiritus, si ex Deo sunt; dicere dignaretur, quomodo probentur spiritus qui ex Deo sunt! Noli esse sollicitus, et hoc audi. Hinc cognoscitur spiritus Dei: hoc certe exspectabas audire, ut probares spiritus qui ex Deo sunt. Hinc cognoscitur spiritus Dei: Ioannes dixit, non ego; hoc sequitur in lectione quam tracto. Cum enim nos propterea faceret sollicitos et cautos, ne omni spiritui credamus, sed probemus spiritus qui ex Deo sunt, quia multi pseudoprophetae prodierunt in hunc mundum; continuo vidit quid desideraremus, occurrit exspectationi, iniecit oculum tacitae cogitationi. Gratias Deo, quia et hoc per illum loqui dignatus est. Hinc cognoscitur spiritus Dei. Eia audite; audite, intellegite, discernite; inhaerete veritati, resistite falsitati. Hinc cognoscitur spiritus Dei. Unde, rogo te? Hoc est quod audire cupiebam. Omnis spiritus qui confitetur Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo est: et omnis spiritus qui non confitetur Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo non est . Interim ergo, carissimi, repellite ab auribus vestris omnem disputatorem, praedicatorem, scriptorem, susurratorem, qui negat Iesum Christum in carne venisse. Ergo repellite Manichaeos a domibus, ab auribus, a cordibus vestris. Manichaei enim Christum in carne venisse apertissime negant. Spiritus ergo illorum non sunt ex Deo.
2. 2. Here now a man made cautious by this precept is going to say to me: I have heard, I hold it, I desire to obey, because I too do not wish to run into false prophets. For who would wish this, to be deceived by liars? For a false prophet is a lying prophet. Give me a religious man, he does not wish to deceive; give me an ungodly, sacrilegious man, he wishes to deceive, he does not wish to be deceived. Since, then, the good do not wish to deceive, and neither the good nor the evil wish to be deceived, who is there who would wish to run into a false prophet? I say the words of one consulting me: but surely no one runs into a false prophet but unwillingly. I have heard the precept of John—rather, of the Lord through John: Do not believe every spirit. Behold, I accept it, so I wish. He adds and says: But test the spirits, whether they are from God. Whence do I test them? I would wish to test, if I could not err. Surely, unless I test the spirits that are from God, I will necessarily run into spirits that are not from God, and from this I will be seduced by false prophets. What shall I do? How shall I observe it? Oh, if holy John, just as he said to us: Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are from God, would deign to say how the spirits that are from God are to be tested! Do not be anxious, and hear this. Hence is the Spirit of God known: this surely you were waiting to hear, that you might test the spirits that are from God. Hence is the Spirit of God known: John said it, not I; this follows in the reading I treat. For when he made us anxious and cautious for this, that we not believe every spirit, but test the spirits that are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into this world; at once he saw what we desired, he met our expectation, he cast an eye on our silent thought. Thanks be to God, that he deigned to say this too through him. Hence is the Spirit of God known. Come, hear; hear, understand, distinguish; cleave to the truth, resist falsehood. Hence is the Spirit of God known. Whence, I ask you? This is what I desired to hear. Every spirit that confesses Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is from God: and every spirit that does not confess Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is not from God (1 John 4:2-3). Meanwhile, then, beloved, repel from your ears every disputant, preacher, writer, whisperer, who denies that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. Therefore repel the Manicheans from your homes, from your ears, from your hearts. For the Manicheans most openly deny that Christ came in the flesh. Their spirit, then, is not from God.
Sermons5.2.2
2. 3. Hic video unde velit lupus obrepere; agnosco, et quantum valeo, devitandum esse demonstro. Hinc, in eo quod dixi, vel potius ab Apostolo dictum commemoravi; quia omnis spiritus qui negat Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo non est ; insidiatur Manichaeus in hoc verbo, et dicit mihi: Ecce spiritus qui negat Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo non est; unde est ergo? Si ex Deo non est, inquit, unde est? Numquid enim potest esse, nisi aliunde? Si ergo, inquit, ex Deo non est, et aliunde est, vides esse duas naturas. Invenimus lupum: retia salubria tendamus, venemur, capiamus, captum trucidemus. Trucidemus plane; moriatur error, vivat homo. Ecce in eo quod dixi: Capiamus, trucidemus; moriatur error, vivat homo; ibi solvitur quaestio. Sed recolite quod proposui, ne obliti quaestionem, non intellegatis solutionem. Omnis spiritus qui non confitetur Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo non est.
2. 3. Here I see whence the wolf wishes to creep in; I recognize it, and, as far as I am able, I show that it must be avoided. Hence, in what I said, or rather mentioned as said by the Apostle—that every spirit that denies Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is not from God—the Manichean lies in wait in this word, and says to me: Behold, the spirit that denies Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is not from God; whence, then, is it? If it is not from God, he says, whence is it? For can it be, except from elsewhere? If, then, he says, it is not from God, and is from elsewhere, you see there are two natures. We have found the wolf: let us stretch the wholesome nets, let us hunt, let us capture, let us slay the captured. Let us plainly slay it; let the error die, let the man live. Behold, in what I said: Let us capture, let us slay; let the error die, let the man live; there the question is resolved. But recall what I proposed, lest, having forgotten the question, you do not understand the resolution. Every spirit that does not confess Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is not from God.
Sermons5.2.3
3. 3. Et Manichaeus continuo: Et unde est? Si ex Deo non est, aliunde est. Si aliunde est, docui duas esse naturas. Hanc quaestionem tenete, et mentes ad illa mea verba revocate, ubi dixi: Capiamus, trucidemus; moriatur error, vivat homo. Error non est ex Deo, homo ex Deo est. Redite ad quaestionem: Omnis spiritus qui non confitetur Iesum in carne venisse, ex Deo non est . Dico et ego: Omnia per ipsum facta sunt . Omnis spiritus laudet Dominum . Sed si non omnis spiritus ex Deo est, quomodo spiritus qui ex Deo non est laudat Dominum? Prorsus omnis spiritus laudet Dominum. Utrumque video, languidum intellego; vitium sanetur, natura liberetur. Vitium natura non est, sed naturae inimicum est. Sana unde langues, remanet unde laudes. Medicina vitia persequitur, non naturam. Omnis spiritus qui non confitetur Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo non est. In quantum non confitetur Christum in carne venisse, in tantum ex Deo non est; quia iste error qui non confitetur Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo non est. Fratres, quid est quod renascimur? Si bene nati sumus, quid est quod renascimur? Natura quae corrupta fuerat, reparatur; natura quae lapsa fuerat, erigitur; natura quae deformis iacebat, gratia reformatur. Solus enim Creator, Pater, Filius et Spiritus Sanctus; trina unitas, una trinitas; sola illa natura immutabilis, incommutabilis, nec defectui, nec profectui obnoxia, nec cadit, ut minus sit; nec transcendit, ut plus sit; perfecta, sempiterna, omnimodo immutabilis, sola illa natura. Creatura vero bona, sed Creatori impar valde. Vis adhaerere diabolo desertori, si aequare contendis condita Conditori.
3. 3. And the Manichean at once: And whence is it? If it is not from God, it is from elsewhere. If it is from elsewhere, I have taught that there are two natures. Hold this question, and recall your minds to those words of mine, where I said: Let us capture, let us slay; let the error die, let the man live. The error is not from God, the man is from God. Return to the question: Every spirit that does not confess Jesus to have come in the flesh is not from God. I too say: All things were made through him (John 1:3). Let every spirit praise the Lord (Ps 150:6). But if not every spirit is from God, how does a spirit that is not from God praise the Lord? Surely let every spirit praise the Lord. I see both, I understand the languishing one; let the vice be healed, let the nature be freed. The vice is not the nature, but is hostile to the nature. Heal whence you languish, there remains whence you praise. Medicine pursues the vices, not the nature. Every spirit that does not confess Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is not from God. In so far as he does not confess Christ to have come in the flesh, in so far he is not from God; because that error which does not confess Christ to have come in the flesh is not from God. Brothers, what is it that we are reborn? If we were born well, what is it that we are reborn? The nature which had been corrupted is repaired; the nature which had fallen is raised up; the nature which lay deformed is reformed by grace. For only the Creator—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; a threefold unity, one trinity; that nature alone is unchangeable, immutable, subject neither to defect nor to progress, neither falls so as to be less, nor transcends so as to be more; perfect, eternal, in every way unchangeable, that nature alone. But the creation is good, yet very unequal to the Creator. You wish to cleave to the devil the deserter, if you strive to equate the founded to the Founder.
Sermons5.3.3
4. 4. Agnoscat anima conditionem suam: non est Deus. Cum se anima putat Deum, offendit Deum: non invenit salvatorem, sed invenit damnatorem. Quoniam Deus quando animas malas damnat, non se damnat: si autem anima hoc est quod Deus, se damnat. Demus honorem Deo nostro, fratres, cui clamamus: Libera nos a malo . Et si susurret tibi, ut in oratione invenias tentationem, et dicat tibi: Quid est quod clamasti: Libera nos a malo? Certe non est malum? Responde illi: Ego sum malus; et si liberaverit me a malo, ero de malo bonus: liberet me a me, ne incurram in te. Hoc dic Manichaeo: Si Deus liberaverit me a me, non incurram in te; quia si Deus liberaverit me a me malo, ero bonus; si bonus ero, sapiens ero; si sapiens ero, non errabo; si non errabo, a te decipi non potero. Liberet ergo Deus me a me, et non incurro in te. Meum est enim vitium, ut errem et credam tibi: quoniam anima mea impleta est illusionibus . Non sum mihi ipse lumen: nam si essem, numquam errassem. Ideo pars Dei non sum, quia substantia Dei, natura Dei, errare non potest: ego autem erro; nam et tu ipse confiteris, sapientem te dicis, ab errore me liberare conaris. Unde ergo erro, si natura Dei sum? Erubesce, da honorem Deo. Ego dico quia multum adhuc erras: sed sicut tu ipse confiteris, erraveras. Erraverat ergo natura Dei? Ierat in immunditiam natura Dei? Adulteria committebat natura Dei? Stupra illicita faciebat natura Dei? Caeca nesciebat qua iret natura Dei? Facinoribus et flagitiis obruebatur natura Dei? Erubesce, da honorem Deo.
4. 4. Let the soul recognize its condition: it is not God. When the soul thinks itself God, it offends God: it does not find a savior, but finds a condemner. For God, when he condemns evil souls, does not condemn himself: but if the soul is what God is, it condemns itself. Let us give honor to our God, brothers, to whom we cry, Free us from evil. And if it whisper to you, that in prayer you may find a temptation, and say to you: What is it that you cried, Free us from evil? Surely it is not evil? Answer it: I am evil; and if he frees me from evil, I shall be from evil good: let him free me from myself, that I not run into you. Say this to the Manichean: If God frees me from myself, I shall not run into you; because if God frees me from my evil self, I shall be good; if I am good, I shall be wise; if I am wise, I shall not err; if I do not err, I cannot be deceived by you. Let God, then, free me from myself, and I do not run into you. For it is my vice, that I err and believe you: since my soul has been filled with illusions (See Ps 88:3 (87:4)). I am not light to myself: for if I were, I would never have erred. Therefore I am not a part of God, because the substance of God, the nature of God, cannot err: but I err; for you yourself too confess it, you call yourself wise, you try to free me from error. Whence, then, do I err, if I am the nature of God? Blush, give honor to God. I say that you still greatly err: but, as you yourself confess, you had erred. Had the nature of God, then, erred? Had the nature of God gone into uncleanness? Did the nature of God commit adulteries? Did the nature of God do unlawful debaucheries? Did the nature of God, blind, not know where it was going? Was the nature of God overwhelmed with misdeeds and shameful acts? Blush, give honor to God.
Sermons5.4.4
5. 5. Lumen tibi esse non potes; non potes, non potes. Erat lumen verum. In comparatione Ioannis dictum est: Erat lumen verum. Numquid non et Ioannes lucerna? Ille erat lucerna ardens et lucens , Dominus dixit. Numquid lucerna lumen non est? Sed erat lumen verum. Lucerna et accendi potest, et exstingui potest: lumen verum accendere potest, exstingui non potest. Erat ergo lumen verum, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum . Illuminandi sumus, non lumen sumus. Expergiscere, clama mecum: Dominus illuminatio mea . Quid est ergo quod dicis? Ergo non sunt mala? Sunt mala, sed mutantur; et ipsa erunt bona: quia ipsa mala, vitio sunt mala, non natura. Quid est: Libera nos a malo ? Nonne possemus et possumus haec verba dicere: Libera nos a tenebris? A quibus tenebris? A nobis ipsis, si quae in nobis sunt reliquiae tenebrarum, donec in totum lux efficiamur, nihil habentes in nobis quod resistat caritati, quod repugnet veritati, quod subiaceat infirmitati, quod conditione mortalitatis deficiat. Tunc totum videte quid erit, quando erit: Corruptibile hoc induetur incorruptione, et mortale hoc induetur immortalitate. Tunc fiet sermo qui scriptus est: Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum . Ubi malum?
5. 5. You cannot be light to yourself; you cannot, you cannot. It was the true light. In comparison with John it was said: It was the true light. Was not John too a lamp? He was a lamp burning and shining (John 5:35), the Lord said. Is a lamp not light? But it was the true light. A lamp can both be kindled and be extinguished: the true light can kindle, it cannot be extinguished. It was, then, the true light, which enlightens every man coming into this world (John 1:9). We are to be enlightened, we are not the light. Wake up, cry out with me: The Lord is my illumination (Ps 27:1 (26:1)). What is it, then, that you say? Are there, then, no evils? There are evils, but they are changed; and they themselves will be goods: because those very evils are evils by vice, not by nature. What is, Free us from evil? Could we not, and can we not say these words: Free us from darkness? From what darkness? From ourselves, if there are in us any remnants of darkness, until we become wholly light, having nothing in us that resists love, that fights against truth, that lies under infirmity, that fails by the condition of mortality. Then see what the whole will be, when it will be: This corruptible will be clothed with incorruption, and this mortal will be clothed with immortality. Then shall come to pass the saying that is written: Death is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your struggle? Where, O death, is your sting? But the sting of death is sin (1 Cor 15:54-56). Where is the evil?
Sermons5.5.5
6. 6. Modo mala hominum quae? Error et infirmitas. Aut nescis quid agas, et errando laberis; aut scis quid agi debeat, et infirmitate superaris. Ergo omne malum hominis error et infirmitas. Contra errorem clama: Dominus illuminatio mea. Contra infirmitatem adde: Et salus mea . Crede, bonus esto; tu es malus, tu eris bonus. Noli dividere. Natura in te sananda est, non separanda. Vis nosse quid es? Tenebrae. Quare tenebrae? Homo qui dicis: Corrumpitur Deus, aliquid his tenebris potest esse profundius? Crede, agnosce Christum in carne venisse, accepisse quod non erat, non amisisse quod erat; hominem in se mutasse, non in hominem fuisse mutatum. Agnosce, et tu ipse ex malo eris bonus, ex tenebris eris lux. An mentior, et non est unde convincam? Apostolum accipis, si te non fingis accipere; Apostolum legis, et deciperis, et decipis. Unde deciperis? Errando malo tuo te ipso. Si autem credideris, erroremque discusseris, audies ab Apostolo: Fuistis enim aliquando tenebrae; nunc autem lux. Sed addidit: lux; sed ubi? In Domino . Ergo tenebrae in te, lux in Domino. Quia non tibi potes lucere, accedendo illuminaris, recedendo tenebraris; quia non tibi lumen tu ipse es, aliunde illuminaris. Accedite ad eum, et illuminamini .
6. 6. Now the evils of men, what are they? Error and infirmity. Either you do not know what you do, and by erring you fall; or you know what ought to be done, and you are overcome by infirmity. Therefore every evil of man is error and infirmity. Against error cry out: The Lord is my illumination. Against infirmity add: And my salvation (Ps 27:1 (26:1)). Believe, be good; you are evil, you will be good. Do not divide. The nature in you is to be healed, not separated. Do you wish to know what you are? Darkness. Why darkness? O man who say: God is corrupted, can anything be deeper than these darknesses? Believe, acknowledge that Christ came in the flesh, that he received what he was not, did not lose what he was; that he changed man into himself, was not changed into man. Acknowledge, and you yourself too from evil will be good, from darkness will be light. Or do I lie, and have nothing whence to prove it? You accept the Apostle, if you do not pretend to accept him; you read the Apostle, and you are deceived, and you deceive. Whence are you deceived? By erring to your harm by your very self. But if you believe, and shake off the error, you will hear from the Apostle: For you were once darkness; but now you are light. But he added: light; but where? In the Lord (Eph 5:8). Therefore darkness in you, light in the Lord. Because you cannot shine to yourself, by approaching you are enlightened, by withdrawing you are darkened; because you yourself are not light to yourself, you are enlightened from elsewhere. Approach him, and be enlightened (Ps 34:5 (33:6)).
Sermons5.6.6
7. 7. Scio, carissimi, de ista lectione sancti Ioannis in re una multum me fuisse immoratum, nec vos esse fatigandos ultra video, vel ultra capacitatem replendos; et nostra infirmitas cogitanda est. Nam haec verba sancti Ioannis habent adhuc magnas latebras suas. Interim eos qui negant Christum in carne venisse, repellite. Constat enim eos non esse ex Deo. In quantum errant, in quantum peccant, in quantum blasphemant, non sunt ex Deo: sanentur, et ex Deo erunt; quia et natura ex Deo erant. Hinc quantumcumque disputavi, attendite Scripturas. Nolite credere eis qui negant Christum in carne venisse. Sed certe dicturus es mihi: Ergo qui dicit Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo est? Audiamus Donatistas, quia confitentur Christum in carne venisse; audiamus Arianos, quia confitentur Christum in carne venisse; audiamus Eunomianos, quia confitentur Christum in carne venisse; audiamus Photinianos, quia confitentur Christum in carne venisse. Si enim omnes spiritus qui confitentur Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo sunt, quam multae sunt haereses mendaces, deceptrices, insanae, confitentur tamen Christum in carne venisse. Quid ergo dicturi sumus? Quomodo istam quaestionem soluturi? Quomodocumque solvenda sit, hodie solvi non potest. Tenete me debitorem: sed Deum pro me et pro vobis orate adiutorem. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
7. 7. I know, dearly beloved, that I have lingered much on one matter in this reading of holy John, and I see that you are not to be wearied further, nor to be filled beyond your capacity; and our infirmity too must be considered. For these words of holy John still have their great hidden places. Meanwhile, repel those who deny that Christ came in the flesh. For it is agreed that they are not from God. In so far as they err, in so far as they sin, in so far as they blaspheme, they are not from God: let them be healed, and they will be from God; for by nature too they were from God. As much as I have disputed about this, attend to the Scriptures. Do not believe those who deny that Christ came in the flesh. But surely you will say to me: Then he who says that Christ came in the flesh is from God? Let us hear the Donatists, because they confess that Christ came in the flesh; let us hear the Arians, because they confess that Christ came in the flesh; let us hear the Eunomians, because they confess that Christ came in the flesh; let us hear the Photinians, because they confess that Christ came in the flesh. For if all spirits that confess Christ to have come in the flesh are from God, how many lying, deceitful, mad heresies there are, which yet confess that Christ came in the flesh. What, then, shall we say? How shall we resolve this question? However it is to be resolved, it cannot be resolved today. Hold me a debtor: but pray to God for me and for you, as helper. Let us turn to the Lord, etc.
Sermons5.7.7
SERMO 183
Sermon 183
Sermons5.7.7
1. 1. Vestrae Caritatis exspectatio, mei debiti exactio est. Non dubito meminisse vos, quid in adiutorio Domini de sancti Ioannis lectione promiserim. Cum ergo audistis lectorem, credo vos cogitasse me debere esse debiti redditorem. Magnam quippe quaestionem sermone in longum procedente distulimus, quomodo recte possit intellegi quod ait in Epistola sua beatus Ioannes, non Baptista, sed Evangelista: Omnis spiritus qui confitetur Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo est . Videmus enim multas haereses confiteri Christum in carne venisse, et tamen non eas possumus dicere ex Deo esse. Negat Christum in carne venisse Manichaeus. Non est laborandum, neque vobis diutius suadendum, quod iste error non sit ex Deo. Sed Arianus confitetur Christum in carne venisse, Eunomianus, Sabellianus, Photinianus. Quid istis convincendis querimus testes? Quis tot numerat pestes? Sed interim quae sunt notiora tractemus. Multi quippe haereses illae, quas nominavi, ignotae sunt, et est ista ignorantia tutior. Certe quod novimus, Donatista confitetur Christum in carne venisse: et tamen absit ut sit hic error ex Deo. Ut de recentioribus haereticis loquar, Pelagianista confitetur Christum in carne venisse: tamen omnino non est hic error ex Deo.
1. 1. Your Charity's expectation is the demanding of my debt. I do not doubt that you remember what I promised, with the Lord's help, concerning the reading of holy John. So when you heard the reader, I believe you thought that I ought to be the payer of the debt. For we deferred a great question, the sermon proceeding to length, how it can rightly be understood what blessed John—not the Baptist, but the Evangelist—says in his Epistle: Every spirit that confesses Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is from God (1 John 4:2). For we see that many heresies confess Christ to have come in the flesh, and yet we cannot say that they are from God. The Manichean denies that Christ came in the flesh. There is no need to labor, nor to persuade you longer, that this error is not from God. But the Arian confesses that Christ came in the flesh, the Eunomian, the Sabellian, the Photinian. Why do we seek witnesses to convict these? Who counts so many plagues? But meanwhile let us treat of those that are better known. For many of those heresies which I named are unknown, and this ignorance is safer. Surely, what we know, the Donatist confesses that Christ came in the flesh: and yet far be it that this error be from God. To speak of more recent heretics, the Pelagian confesses that Christ came in the flesh: yet this error is by no means from God.
Sermons5.1.1
2. 2. Proinde, carissimi, diligenter consideremus, quoniam non dubitamus veram esse sententiam: Omnis spiritus qui confitetur Iesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo est ; convincendi sunt isti quod non confiteantur Christum in carne venisse. Nam si eis istam concesserimus confessionem, ex Deo illos esse fatebimur. Quomodo vos ab eorum erroribus vel prohibemus, vel deterremus, vel adversus eos scuto veritatis defendimus? Adiuvet nos Dominus, quia et vestra exspectatio pro nobis oratio est, ut convincantur isti quia non confitentur Christum in carne venisse.
2. 2. Accordingly, dearly beloved, let us consider diligently, since we do not doubt that the sentence is true—Every spirit that confesses Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh is from God—these men are to be convicted of not confessing that Christ came in the flesh. For if we grant them this confession, we shall confess that they are from God. How do we either forbid you their errors, or deter you, or defend you against them with the shield of truth? Let the Lord help us, because your expectation too is a prayer for us, that these men be convicted of not confessing that Christ came in the flesh.
Sermons5.2.2
2. 3. Arianus audit, et praedicat partum virginis Mariae. Confitetur ergo Christum in carne venisse? Non. Quomodo probamus? Si adiuvet Dominus intellegentias vestras, facillime. Quid est quod exigimus? Utrum confiteatur Iesum Christum in carne venisse. Quomodo confiteri potest, in carne venisse Iesum Christum, qui negat ipsum Christum? Quis enim est Christus? Beatum Petrum interrogemus. Modo cum Evangelium legeretur, audistis, cum quaesisset Dominus ipse Iesus Christus, quem illum dicerent homines Filium hominis; responderunt discipuli opiniones alienas, et dixerunt: Alii Ioannem Baptistam, alii Eliam, alii Ieremiam, aut unum ex Prophetis . Qui haec confitebantur vel confitentur, Iesum Christum plus quam hominem non noverunt. Si autem Iesum Christum plus quam hominem non noverunt, Iesum Christum utique non noverunt. Si enim tantummodo homo est, et nihil amplius, non est ipse Iesus Christus. Vos ergo, inquit, quem me esse dicitis? Respondit Petrus, unus pro omnibus, quia unitas in omnibus: Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi .
2. 3. The Arian hears, and preaches the birth of the virgin Mary. Does he, then, confess that Christ came in the flesh? No. How do we prove it? If the Lord help your understanding, most easily. What is it that we require? Whether he confesses that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. How can he confess that Jesus Christ came in the flesh, who denies Christ himself? For who is Christ? Let us question blessed Peter. Just now, when the Gospel was read, you heard, when the Lord Jesus Christ himself had asked whom men said that he, the Son of man, was; the disciples answered the opinions of others, and said: Some John the Baptist, others Elijah, others Jeremiah, or one of the Prophets. Those who confessed or confess these things did not know Jesus Christ as more than a man. But if they did not know Jesus Christ as more than a man, they surely did not know Jesus Christ. For if he is only a man, and nothing more, he himself is not Jesus Christ. But you, he says, who do you say that I am? Peter answered, one for all, because there is unity in all: You are the Christ, the Son of the living God (Matt 16:13-16).
Sermons5.2.3
3. 4. Ecce habes confessionem veram, confessionem plenam. Iungere enim debes utrumque, quod de se Christus, et quod de Christo Petrus. Quid de se Christus? Quem me dicunt homines esse Filium hominis? Quid de Christo Petrus? Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi . Utrumque coniunge, et venit Christus in carne. Hoc de se Christus quod minus est, hoc de Christo Petrus quod maius est. Respondit de veritate humilitas, et de humilitate veritas: hoc est de veritate Dei humilitas, et de humilitate hominis veritas. Quem me dicunt homines esse, inquit, Filium hominis? Dico ego quod factus sum propter vos: dic tu, Petre, quis est qui fecit vos. Qui ergo confitetur Iesum Christum in carne venisse, profecto confitetur Filium Dei in carne venisse. Dicat nunc Arianus, utrum confiteatur Christum in carne venisse. Si Filium Dei confitetur in carne venisse, Christum confitetur in carne venisse. Si Filium Dei negat Christum, nescit Christum; alium pro alio dicit, non ipsum dicit. Quid est enim Filius Dei? Quomodo querebamus, quid est Christus; et audiebamus, quod sit Filius Dei; quaeramus, quid est Filius Dei. Ecce Filius Dei: In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum; hoc erat in principio apud Deum . In principio erat Verbum. Quid dicis, Ariane? In principio, sicut dicit Genesis, fecit Deus caelum et terram ; tu autem dicis: In principio fecit Deus Verbum. Factum enim dicis Verbum, creaturam dicis Verbum. Tu ergo dicis: In principio fecit Deus Verbum; sed Evangelista dicit: In principio erat Verbum. Et ideo in principio fecit Deus caelum et terram, quia erat Verbum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt . Factum dicis. Si factum dicis, Filium negas.
3. 4. Behold, you have a true confession, a full confession. For you ought to join both: what Christ said of himself, and what Peter said of Christ. What did Christ say of himself? Whom do men say that I am, the Son of man? What did Peter say of Christ? You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Join both, and Christ came in the flesh. This of himself Christ said, which is less; this of Christ Peter said, which is greater. Humility answered from the truth, and truth from the humility: that is, humility from the truth of God, and truth from the humility of the man. Whom do men say that I am, he says, the Son of man? I say what I was made for your sake: do you say, Peter, who it is that made you. He who, then, confesses Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh, surely confesses the Son of God to have come in the flesh. Let the Arian now say whether he confesses that Christ came in the flesh. If he confesses the Son of God to have come in the flesh, he confesses Christ to have come in the flesh. If he denies the Son of God to be Christ, he does not know Christ; he says one for another, he does not say him himself. For what is the Son of God? As we were asking what Christ is, and were hearing that he is the Son of God; let us ask what the Son of God is. Behold the Son of God: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; this was in the beginning with God (John 1:1-2). In the beginning was the Word. What do you say, Arian? In the beginning, as Genesis says, God made heaven and earth (Gen 1:1); but you say: In the beginning God made the Word. For you say the Word was made, you call the Word a creature. You, then, say: In the beginning God made the Word; but the Evangelist says: In the beginning was the Word. And therefore in the beginning God made heaven and earth, because the Word was. All things were made through him (John 1:3). You say he was made. If you say he was made, you deny the Son.
Sermons5.3.4
4. 5. Filium enim quaerimus natura, non gratia; Filium unicum, unigenitum, non adoptatum. Talem Filium quaerimus, tam verum Filium quaerimus, qui cum in forma Dei esset, Apostoli verba sunt, propter rudes commemoro, ne mea verba putentur: illum Filium quaerimus, qui cum in forma Dei esset, sicut dicit Apostolus, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo . Non rapina, quia natura. Natura erat, rapina non erat. Non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Non erat ei rapina, natura erat; sic erat ex aeternitate, sic erat coaeternus gignenti, sic erat aequalis Patri, sic erat. Semetipsum exinanivit: ut confiteamur Iesum Christum in carne venisse. Semetipsum exinanivit. Quomodo? Amittendo quod erat, an assumendo quod non erat? Sequatur Apostolus; audiamus: Semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens . Sic se exinanivit, formam servi accipiens, non formam Dei amittens. Forma servi accessit, non forma Dei discessit. Hoc est confiteri Christum in carne venisse. Arianus autem qui non confitetur aequalem, non confitetur Filium. Si non confitetur Filium, non confitetur Christum. Qui non confitetur Christum, quomodo confitetur Christum in carne venisse?
4. 5. For we seek a Son by nature, not by grace; an only Son, only-begotten, not adopted. Such a Son we seek, so true a Son we seek, who, when he was in the form of God—they are the Apostle's words; I mention it for the sake of the unlearned, lest they be thought my words: that Son we seek, who, when he was in the form of God, as the Apostle says, did not consider it robbery to be equal to God (Phil 2:6). Not robbery, because by nature. It was nature, it was not robbery. He did not consider it robbery to be equal to God. It was not robbery to him, it was nature; so he was from eternity, so he was coeternal with the one begetting, so he was equal to the Father, so he was. He emptied himself: that we may confess Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh. He emptied himself. How? By losing what he was, or by assuming what he was not? Let the Apostle follow; let us hear: He emptied himself, taking the form of a servant (Phil 2:7). So he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, not losing the form of God. The form of a servant came, the form of God did not depart. This is to confess Christ to have come in the flesh. But the Arian, who does not confess him equal, does not confess the Son. If he does not confess the Son, he does not confess Christ. He who does not confess Christ, how does he confess Christ to have come in the flesh?
Sermons5.4.5
5. 6. Sic et Eunomianus par eius, socius eius, non multum diversus. Etenim dicuntur Ariani confessi fuisse quia vel similis est Patri Filius; et si non aequalis dixerunt, sed similis. Ille, nec similis. Et iste ergo negat Christum. Si enim Christus verus Patri aequalis est et similis, profecto qui negat aequalem, negat Christum; qui negat similem, negat Christum. Qui ergo negat aequalem et similem, negat in carne venisse Christum. Quaero enim: Venit in carne Christus? Respondet: Venit. Et putamus quia confitetur. Interrogo: Quis Christus venit in carne? Aequalis Patri, an inaequalis? Respondet: Inaequalis. Inaequalem ergo Patri dicis venisse in carne: negas Christum in carne venisse, quia Christus aequalis est Patri.
5. 6. So too the Eunomian, his equal, his associate, not much different. For the Arians are said to have confessed that the Son is at least like the Father; and if they did not say equal, yet like. That one, not even like. So this one too denies Christ. For if the true Christ is equal and like the Father, surely he who denies him equal denies Christ; he who denies him like denies Christ. He, then, who denies him equal and like, denies that Christ came in the flesh. For I ask: Did Christ come in the flesh? He answers: He came. And we think that he confesses it. I question: Which Christ came in the flesh? Equal to the Father, or unequal? He answers: Unequal. You say, then, that one unequal to the Father came in the flesh: you deny that Christ came in the flesh, because Christ is equal to the Father.
Sermons5.5.6
5. 7. Sabellianum audi. Ipse est Filius, qui est et Pater. Hoc dicit, hinc pungit, hinc venena diffundit. Ipse est, inquit, Pater. Quando vult, Filius est: quando vult, Pater est. Non est ipse Christus. Et tu erras, si hunc Christum dicis in carne venisse; quia iste Christus non est, negas Christum in carne venisse.
5. 7. Hear the Sabellian. He himself is the Son, who is also the Father. This he says, with this he stings, from this he spreads poisons. He himself, he says, is the Father. When he wishes, he is the Son: when he wishes, he is the Father. He himself is not Christ. And you err, if you say this one came in the flesh; because this is not Christ, you deny that Christ came in the flesh.
Sermons5.5.7
5. 8. Quid dicis, Photine? Ait Photinus: Christus solum homo est, Deus non est. Formam servi confiteris, formam Dei negas. Et Christus in forma Dei aequalis est Patri, in forma servi consors est nobis. Et tu negas Christum in carne venisse.
5. 8. What do you say, Photinus? Photinus says: Christ is only man, he is not God. You confess the form of a servant, you deny the form of God. And Christ in the form of God is equal to the Father, in the form of a servant is a consort with us. And you deny that Christ came in the flesh.
Sermons5.5.8
5. 9. Donatista quid? Donatistae plurimi hoc confitentur de Filio quod nos, quod aequalis sit Patri Filius, eiusdemque substantiae: alii vero eorum, eiusdem quidem substantiae confitentur, sed aequalem negant. Quid opus est disputare de his qui negant aequalem? Si enim negant aequalem, negant Filium. Si negant Filium, negant Christum. Si negant Christum, quomodo confitentur in carne venisse Christum?
5. 9. What of the Donatist? Most of the Donatists confess of the Son what we do, that the Son is equal to the Father, and of the same substance: but others of them confess him indeed of the same substance, but deny him equal. What need is there to dispute about those who deny him equal? For if they deny him equal, they deny the Son. If they deny the Son, they deny Christ. If they deny Christ, how do they confess that Christ came in the flesh?
Sermons5.5.9
6. 10. De illis subtilior disputatio est, qui hoc confitentur quod nos, unigenitum Filium aequalem Patri, eiusdem substantiae, aeterno coaeternum; et tamen Donatistae sunt. Dicamus eis: Verbis confitemini, factis negatis. Aliquis enim negat factis. Non omnis qui negat, verbo negat. Plane sunt homines qui factis negant. Interrogemus Apostolum: Omnia, inquit, munda mundis; immundis autem et infidelibus nihil est mundum, sed pollutae sunt eorum et mens et conscientia. Confitentur enim Deum se nosse, factis autem negant . Quid est: Negare factis? Superbire, et schismata facere; non in Deo, sed in homine gloriari. Ita factis negatur Christus: unitatem quippe amat Christus. Postremo ecce quomodo et ipsi Christum negant, ut apertius loquamur. Nos eum dicimus Christum, de quo ait Ioannes Baptista: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est . Bonum coniugium, sanctae nuptiae. Sponsus Christus, sponsa Ecclesia. Ab sponso cognoscimus sponsam. Dicat nobis ipse sponsus, quam habet sponsam; dicat, ne fortassis erremus, et invitati ad nuptias sancta vota turbemus; dicat, ostendat primo se ipsum sponsum.
6. 10. About those there is a subtler discussion, who confess what we do—the only-begotten Son equal to the Father, of the same substance, coeternal with the eternal one; and yet are Donatists. Let us say to them: With words you confess, with deeds you deny. For someone denies by deeds. Not everyone who denies, denies by word. Plainly there are men who deny by deeds. Let us question the Apostle: All things, he says, are clean to the clean; but to the unclean and unbelieving nothing is clean, but both their mind and their conscience are polluted. For they confess that they know God, but by deeds they deny him (Titus 1:15-16). What is it, to deny by deeds? To be proud, and to make schisms; to glory not in God, but in man. So Christ is denied by deeds: for Christ loves unity. Finally, behold how these too deny Christ, to speak more openly. We say he is the Christ of whom John the Baptist says: He who has the bride is the bridegroom (John 3:29). A good marriage, a holy wedding. The bridegroom Christ, the bride the Church. From the bridegroom we know the bride. Let the bridegroom himself tell us what bride he has; let him tell us, lest perhaps we err, and, invited to the wedding, disturb the holy vows; let him tell us, let him first show himself the bridegroom.
Sermons5.6.10
7. 11. Post resurrectionem ait discipulis suis: Non sciebatis quia oportebat impleri omnia quae scripta sunt in Lege Moysis et Prophetis, et Psalmis de me? Tunc, Evangelista sequitur et dicit: Tunc aperuit illis sensum, ut intellegerent Scripturas, et dixit eis: Quia sic oportebat Christum pati, et resurgere a mortuis tertio die . Ecce sponsus, quem confessus est Petrus, hoc est Filium Dei vivi, oportebat ut pateretur, et tertio die resurgeret. Et factum erat: impletum videbant, caput tenebant, corpus quaerebant. Quod est caput? Ipse Christus: passus est, tertio die resurrexit: caput est Ecclesiae. Corpus quod est? Ipsa Ecclesia. Videbant ergo discipuli caput, corpus non videbant. Ergo eos corpus non videntes, doceat caput. Dic, Domine Iesu; dic, sancte sponse, instrue nos de corpore tuo, de sponsa tua, de dilecta tua, de columba tua, quam dotasti sanguine tuo, dic: Oportebat Christum pati, et resurgere a mortuis tertio die. Ecce sponsus: dic de sponsa, imple tabulas matrimoniales. Audite sponsam: Et praedicari, inquit. Hoc enim sequitur. Oportebat Christum pati, et resurgere a mortuis tertio die, et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum per omnes gentes. Ubi te abscondis? Per omnes gentes, incipientibus ab Ierusalem . Sic est factum. Legimus promissum, videmus impletum. Ecce lux mea; ubi est obscuritas tua? Ergo Christus sponsus est huius Ecclesiae, quae praedicatur in omnes gentes, et pullulat et crescit usque ad fines terrae, incipientibus ab Ierusalem: huius sponsus est Christus. Tu quid dicis? Cuius sponsus est Christus? Partis Donati? Non est ipse, non est ipse. Homo bone, non est ipse: immo homo male, non est ipse. Ad nuptias venimus, tabulas legamus, et non litigemus. Ergo si tu dicis, Christus est sponsus partis Donati; ego tabulas lego, et invenio esse Christum sponsum Ecclesiae diffusae toto orbe terrarum. Si dicis: Ipse est, et non est ipse, negas Christum in carne venisse.
7. 11. After the resurrection he said to his disciples: Did you not know that all things must be fulfilled that are written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms about me? Then, the Evangelist follows and says: Then he opened their understanding, that they might understand the Scriptures, and said to them: Because so it behooved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead on the third day (Luke 24:44-46). Behold the bridegroom, whom Peter confessed—that is, the Son of the living God—it behooved that he suffer, and rise on the third day. And it had happened: they saw it fulfilled, they held the head, they sought the body. What is the head? Christ himself: he suffered, he rose on the third day: he is the head of the Church. What is the body? The Church itself. The disciples, then, saw the head, they did not see the body. Therefore, since they did not see the body, let the head teach them. Tell us, Lord Jesus; tell us, holy bridegroom, instruct us about your body, about your bride, about your beloved, about your dove, whom you endowed with your blood; tell us: It behooved that Christ suffer, and rise from the dead on the third day. Behold the bridegroom: tell us of the bride, fill in the marriage tablets. Hear of the bride: And that it be preached, he says. For this follows. It behooved that Christ suffer, and rise from the dead on the third day, and that repentance and the remission of sins be preached in his name through all nations. Where do you hide yourself? Through all nations, beginning from Jerusalem (Luke 24:46-47). So it was done. We read the promise, we see it fulfilled. Behold my light; where is your darkness? Therefore Christ is the bridegroom of this Church, which is preached through all nations, and sprouts and grows even to the ends of the earth, beginning from Jerusalem: of this one the bridegroom is Christ. What do you say? Of whom is Christ the bridegroom? Of the party of Donatus? He is not the one, he is not the one. Good man, he is not the one; rather, bad man, he is not the one. We come to the wedding, let us read the tablets, and let us not litigate. Therefore if you say, Christ is the bridegroom of the party of Donatus; I read the tablets, and I find that Christ is the bridegroom of the Church spread throughout the whole world. If you say: He is the one, and he is not the one, you deny that Christ came in the flesh.
Sermons5.7.11
8. 12. Pelagianista restat, non ex haeresibus omnibus, sed eis quas pro parvo tempore commemoravi. Iam enim dixi: Quis numerat tot pestes? Quid dicis, Pelagianista? Audite quid dicit. Videtur confiteri Christum in carne venisse: sed discussus invenitur negare. Christus enim in carne venit, quae similitudo esset carnis peccati, non esset caro peccati. Apostoli verba sunt: Misit Deus Filium suum in similitudinem carnis peccati . Non in similitudinem carnis, quasi caro non esset caro; sed in similitudinem carnis peccati, quia caro erat, sed peccati caro non erat. Iste autem Pelagius et ceteram carnem omnis infantis carni Christi conatur aequare. Non est, carissimi. Non pro magno commendaretur in Christo similitudo carnis peccati, nisi omnis cetera caro esset caro peccati. Quid ergo prodest, quia dicis Christum in carne venisse, et omnium infantium carni eum conaris aequare? Et tibi hoc dico quod Donatistae: Non est ipse. Ecce video Ecclesiam matrem testimonium reddentem ipsis uberibus suis. Accurrunt matres cum parvulis filiis, ingerunt Salvatori salvandos, non Pelagio damnandos. Mater quaelibet mulier pietate currens cum parvulo filio dicit: Baptizetur, ut salvetur. Pelagius contra: Quid salvetur? Non est quod in eo salvetur; nihil habet vitii, nihil ex traduce damnationis attraxit. Si aequalis est Christo, quare quaerit Christum? Ecce dico tibi: Sponsus Filius Dei qui venit in carne, salvator est et maiorum et minorum, salvator est et grandium et infantium, et ipse est Christus; tu autem dicis salvatorem Christum maiorum, non minorum: non est ipse. Si non est ipse, negas et tu Christum in carne venisse.
8. 12. The Pelagian remains—not out of all the heresies, but those which I have mentioned for the short time. For I have already said: Who counts so many plagues? What do you say, Pelagian? Hear what he says. He seems to confess that Christ came in the flesh: but, examined, he is found to deny it. For Christ came in the flesh which would be the likeness of sinful flesh, but would not be sinful flesh. They are the Apostle's words: God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh. Not in the likeness of flesh, as though the flesh were not flesh; but in the likeness of sinful flesh, because it was flesh, but it was not sinful flesh. But this Pelagius tries to equate the rest of the flesh, the flesh of every infant, to the flesh of Christ. It is not so, dearly beloved. The likeness of sinful flesh would not be commended in Christ as a great thing, unless all the rest of the flesh were sinful flesh. What does it profit, then, that you say Christ came in the flesh, and try to equate him to the flesh of all infants? And to you I say this too which I said to the Donatists: He is not the one. Behold, I see mother Church bearing testimony by her very breasts. Mothers run with their little sons, they thrust the ones to be saved upon the Savior, not upon Pelagius the condemner. Every woman, a mother running by devotion with her little son says: Let him be baptized, that he may be saved. Pelagius, on the contrary: What is he to be saved from? There is nothing in him to be saved; he has no vice, he drew nothing of damnation from his descent. If he is equal to Christ, why does he seek Christ? Behold, I say to you: The bridegroom, the Son of God, who came in the flesh, is the savior both of the great and the small, is the savior both of the grown and of infants, and he is Christ; but you say that Christ is the savior of the great, not of the small: he is not the one. If he is not the one, you too deny that Christ came in the flesh.
Sermons5.8.12
9. 13. Et si discutiamus omnes haereses, invenimus eas negare Christum in carne venisse. Omnes haeretici negant Christum in carne venisse. Quid miramini, si pagani negant Christum in carne venisse? Quid miramini, si Iudaei negant Christum in carne venisse? Quid miramini, si Manichaei apertissime negant Christum in carne venisse? Sed dico Caritati vestrae, etiam omnes mali catholici verbis confitentur Christum in carne venisse; factis autem negant. Nolite ergo esse tamquam de fide securi. Adiungite fidei rectae vitam rectam, ut Christum confiteamini in carne venisse, et verbis vera dicendo, et factis bene vivendo. Nam si confiteamini verbis, et factis negetis; fides talium malorum prope est fides daemoniorum. Audite me, carissimi, audite me, ne sit vobis testis sudor hic meus; audite me. Iacobus apostolus cum de fide et operibus loqueretur adversus eos, qui sibi putabant fidem sufficere, et opera bona habere nolebant, ait: Tu credis quia unus est Deus; bene facis: et daemones credunt, et contremiscunt . Numquid ideo daemones ab aeterno igne liberabuntur, quia credunt, et contremiscunt? Ecce modo quod audistis in Evangelio, quod ait Petrus: Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi ; legite, et invenietis dixisse daemones: Scimus qui sis, Filius Dei . Petrus tamen laudatur, daemon compescitur. Una vox, facta diversa. Unde separantur istae duae confessiones? Laudatur amor, damnatur timor. Non enim amore dicebant hoc daemones: Tu es Filius Dei. Timore hoc dicebant, non amore. Denique illi in confessione dicebant: Quid nobis et tibi? Petrus autem: Tecum sum usque ad mortem .
9. 13. And if we examine all the heresies, we find that they deny that Christ came in the flesh. All heretics deny that Christ came in the flesh. Why do you wonder if pagans deny that Christ came in the flesh? Why do you wonder if Jews deny that Christ came in the flesh? Why do you wonder if the Manicheans most openly deny that Christ came in the flesh? But I tell your Charity, even all evil Catholics confess with words that Christ came in the flesh; but by deeds they deny it. Do not, then, be as it were secure about faith. Add to right faith a right life, that you may confess Christ to have come in the flesh, both by speaking true things with words, and by living well in deeds. For if you confess with words, and deny by deeds, the faith of such evil men is near the faith of demons. Hear me, dearly beloved, hear me, lest this sweat of mine be a witness against you; hear me. The apostle James, when he spoke of faith and works against those who thought faith sufficed for them, and were unwilling to have good works, says: You believe that God is one; you do well: the demons too believe, and tremble (Jas 2:19). Will the demons, then, be freed from the eternal fire because they believe and tremble? Behold, what you just now heard in the Gospel, what Peter said: You are the Christ, the Son of the living God (Matt 16:16); read, and you will find that the demons said: We know who you are, the Son of God (Mark 1:24; Luke 4:34). Yet Peter is praised, the demon is restrained. One voice, different deeds. Whence are these two confessions separated? Love is praised, fear is condemned. For the demons did not say this out of love: You are the Son of God. They said this out of fear, not out of love. Finally in their confession they said: What have we to do with you (Matt 8:29)? But Peter: I am with you even to death (See Matt 26:35; Luke 22:33).
Sermons5.9.13
10. 14. Sed et ipse Petrus unde, fratres mei, unde illi dicere ex amore: Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi? Unde illi? Itane de suo? Absit. Bene, quod ipsum Evangelii capitulum utrumque demonstrat, quid Petrus de Dei, quid de suo. Utrumque ibi habes: lege, non est quod a me exspectes audire. Commemoro Evangelium: Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi. Et Dominus ad eum: Beatus es, Simon Bar-Iona. Quare? De tuo beatus? Non. Quia caro et sanguis non revelavit tibi: hoc enim es tu. Non tibi revelavit caro et sanguis; sed Pater meus qui in caelis est . Et sequitur, et dicit cetera quae commemorare longum est. Paulo post Dominus ibi, post haec verba sua, quibus approbavit fidem Petri, eamque petram esse monstravit, coepit ostendere discipulis suis, quia oportebat eum venire Ierosolymam, et multa pati, et reprobari a senioribus et scribis et sacerdotibus, et occidi, et tertio die resurgere. Ibi Petrus de suo expavit, et horruit mortem Christi, expavit aeger medicinam suam. Absit a te, Domine, inquit: propitius tibi esto, non fiat hoc. Et ubi est: Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam ? Oblitus es, Petre? Oblitus es: Maiorem caritatem nemo habet, quam ut animam suam ponat quis pro amicis suis ? Oblitus es. Oblivio illa de ipsius; trepidatio, horror et timor mortis, totum de Petri: immo de Simonis, non de Petri. Et Dominus: Vade retro, satanas. Beatus es, Simon Bar-Iona: Vade retro, satanas. Beatus es, Simon Bar-Iona; sed de Dei. Vade retro, satanas; unde? Recolite unde beatus. Iam dixi: Quia non tibi revelavit caro et sanguis; sed Pater meus qui in caelis est. Unde satanas? Dicat Dominus: Neque enim sapis quae Dei sunt, sed quae sunt hominum .
10. 14. But Peter himself—from where, my brothers, from where did he have it to say out of love, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God (Matt 16:16)? From where did he have it? Was it from himself? By no means. It is good that this very chapter of the Gospel shows both things: what Peter had from God and what from himself. You have both there: read it, there is no reason for you to wait to hear it from me. I recall the Gospel: You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. And the Lord to him: Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona (Matt 16:17). Why? Blessed from yourself? No. For flesh and blood has not revealed it to you: for this is what you are. Flesh and blood has not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in heaven (Matt 16:17). And it goes on, and says the rest, which would take long to recall. A little later the Lord, after these words of his by which he approved Peter's faith and showed it to be the rock, began to show his disciples that he had to go to Jerusalem and suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and scribes and priests, and be killed, and rise again on the third day. There Peter, out of himself, took fright and shrank in horror from the death of Christ; the sick man took fright at his own medicine. Far be it from you, Lord, he said: be merciful to yourself, let this not happen (Matt 16:22). And where is this: I have power to lay down my soul, and I have power to take it up again (John 10:18)? Have you forgotten, Peter? You have forgotten: Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his soul for his friends (John 15:13)? You have forgotten. That forgetfulness comes from himself; the trembling, the horror, and the fear of death, all of it comes from Peter—rather, from Simon, not from Peter. And the Lord: Get behind me, Satan. Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona: Get behind me, Satan. Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona; but from God. Get behind me, Satan; from where? Recall from where he was blessed. I have already said it: For flesh and blood has not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in heaven. From where, Satan? Let the Lord say it: For you do not savor the things that are of God, but the things that are of men (Matt 16:23).
Sermons5.10.14
10. 15. Sperate in Dominum, et verae fidei bona facta coniungite. Confitemini Christum in carne venisse, et credendo, et bene vivendo, et utrumque ab illo acceptum tenete, ab illo augendum et perficiendum sperate. Maledictus enim omnis qui spem suam ponit in homine . Et bonum est homini ut qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur .
Conversi ad Dominum Deum Patrem omnipotentem, puro corde ei, quantum potest parvitas nostra, maximas atque veras gratias agamus; precantes toto animo singularem mansuetudinem eius, ut preces nostras in beneplacito suo exaudire dignetur; inimicum quoque a nostris actibus et cogitationibus sua virtute expellat, nobis multiplicet fidem, mentem gubernet, spiritales cogitationes concedat, et ad beatitudinem suam perducat; per Iesum Christum Filium eius. Amen.
10. 15. Hope in the Lord, and join good deeds to your true faith. Confess that Christ has come in the flesh, both by believing and by living well, and hold both as received from him; hope that both will be increased and perfected by him. For cursed is everyone who places his hope in man (Jer 17:5). And it is good for a person that he who glories should glory in the Lord (1 Cor 1:31).
Turning to the Lord God, the Father almighty, let us with a pure heart give him our greatest and truest thanks, as far as our littleness can; praying with our whole soul for his singular kindness, that he may deign to hear our prayers according to his good pleasure, that by his power he may also drive the enemy from our deeds and thoughts, multiply our faith, govern our mind, grant us spiritual thoughts, and bring us to his blessedness; through Jesus Christ his Son. Amen.
Sermons5.10.15

Notebook

Full View